The New York Herald Newspaper, March 11, 1850, Page 2

ze S —— - " sae: . its — jage. And article 9th decla: to the marrige itself, and that she has constantly’ Our Chagres Correspo | Our V otuarelen Correspondence, The Decision ia the, Goons, Hypernsd Case at bo berm 68 shat it marriage, to wit: Nao Gath, ones of Laser Papeating (A sate envi fame bre dt rg Tau unce she weat there, until yd ’ eb. 28, 1950. | ALPaxaiso, January 30, 1850. [From the N. O. Delta, Feb. 27.1 Gen. L Whitney, of the State of New York. 1'| sumption eaiste, with respect to the Ghild born 300'| returned within the fewdays previous'to giving Arrival of Passengers—The Empwe City—Im- | Very Late from Valparaiso—Hints to Califorman | yyna cuank GAINES, COMPLAINANT, VS CHEW AND | was present at her birth, aad know that Mr. Clark | days after the dissolut ion of the marriage, OF after | her evidence. How fc have the ‘ovement of the Place~Marine Affairs—Accom- | Adventurere—The Resources of South Ameri- RELY, AND OTHEKS—IN EQUITY. imed end acknowledged her to be his child; | eentence of weparation.” Now, we have record | declarations or statements slluded to from Clark, pre M C . iy in Ye ge § When | consider the decision of the Su the was born in 1805; | neither knew, nor had any ‘oof that De Grange was here in New Orleans as . Oe to way. «8 she does not pretend that modations— Death of Senor Ramos—Captain N. | . wd Count of the United States, in the case of Gaines | yexson to believe thut any other child besides Myra Inte asthe 6th of December, 1805, and we have ever met him in Europe. The solicitor for the K. Taylor—Panama Railrond, &¢. §e. When | embarked st New York, on the 13th of | and ‘Wife vs. Patterson, (6 Howard) I feel the | was born of that marriage. The circumstances of evidence of the sume character that the judgment | complainant has explained this part of her evi- This notable place in the history of California | November, I promised you a series of letters from | utmest diffidence im assuming, es | feel at my | her marriage with Daniel Clark were these: ~(By | againet him, which has been called a judgment of | dence, by saying that she referred to her husband, i ting auspicesof the | Valparaiso. So, here goes the first. As you are | duty to do, the responsibility of ew her, it, 18 of course presumed that the witness | divorce, though the record does noi show the | who left for France aiter the preliminaries were pre oe ah ao pete: “ itis i rn : novo the ments of tig controversy. 1 disclaiin | means Zulime; though up. to this point in her tes: | grounds upon which it was given, was not readered | arranged. The plain grammatical coastruction of Amcricans, is almost daily altermg its dingy and | awere, | came out to Chagres, in the beautiful avy wont of respect for that decision, oF 10t | timony she does not mention het name).—Several | until July 24th, 1806. What can be the object of | the sentence does not suasity shag opie 3and gloomy appearance. The miserable bamboo hats | steamer Crescent City, commanded by the veteran | the high wibars Rom Wicd is canine Bat years after her marriage with De Grange, me open legal peemumecions, if ie party wae See tenet hee a eeeeee ane prekic i ig i eel most selemply convinced, that the merits toa setiies : ‘ “ ntract of marriage, ; ereelt, 5 5 are decreasing in number, while good frame houses, navigator and polite Captain Stoddard. We had Lice saad po ‘a Derg seed folly and tavly pee that Meade lietaa wie; our family checged Tent eee 8 o nes oe a ng : slave | complained tte her ientanade ied ae me brought from the United States, are taking their | on board 313 passengers, most of them bound for settied by that decision. Apart from the new | Zulime; he at first denied it, but edt ad- | within the space of eleven months? If time be sly taken down. Other corrections were made, places, and the old habits of intolerance and bi- | the * El Dorado” of the world, whose enjoyment | tects ani femematnnged, deyeloned nay a er matted 1, and fled from the country. These lps important is Pop iroretey of this poy oe the oy PRG 1s mu, io sptemengp to this manifest idly givi i | romufol y o bE c a ess of the trial, which present the rights of | ¢, . Clark mi uments show it to be important, then the com- | und calpable cou 4 4 E fe petal. See ee | ot sot rece’ . ; fe ae pet pp the parties in a different hight, the testimony of rerio of trees ats with fyi re Papaat should be bound to fix definitely the date | ** That which renders the testimony of a witness iberal democratic principles introduced among | tain and his gentlemanly officers generally. I take Patterson himself, who has been examined as a ioe of allourtamily. It was considered essen- | of the marriage, by virtue of whieh all her rights | dcubitul,” saye Gilbert, in his werk on evidence, great pleasure in speeking thus of Captain Stod- | wirmess, diecloses enough to lead my mind irresise tual, firet to obtain record proof of De Grange hav- | have accrued. This was in the contemplation of | (p. 150.) “is the attestation of the sev cite Curd und bis officers, as itis but an act of sheer | i,bjy to the conclusion, that there Was mo serious ing # living wite at the time he married my sister; | the Spanish law, whose whole policy was opposed | cumstances, and yet no proof of any one of these Justice. Lo those of my countrymen bound for | contest before the court. It was a proceeding 1 obtain Which, from the records of the Catholic | to clandestine marriages, and required a registry | circumstances. to fall im with what he attests. Calitorma, via the Isthmus, I would commend this | jp which itis perfectly apparent, that, whatever | Church in New York, (where Mr. De Grange’s | of marrmges to be kept. If at be beyond the power | This may render such a witness (standing alone, Sleenicr, (HOt, however, to the disparagement of | night be the result, the defendant was to suffer no phior Marriage wes celebrated,) we sailed for that | of the complainant to fix definitety the date of the | without ony assistant proof,) to be very much sus- otbers,) as oue worthy alike of their confidence | jocs, His own Statement shows that he is now in city. Ov our arrival there, we found that the re- | marriege in this instance, it 18a misfortune, for | pected, and there must be great con an the is now a thriving little American town, where the | S&¢ cemtort In my judgment, a finer ship never | poseersion of the very property which was the | pity of musriages had been destroyed. Mr. Clark | which the authors of her being, and net the de- | integrity and veracity of the man, to believe many reater portion of trade is carried on, and which | D@¥td the cea. Her power and sea-worthivess | subject of controversy. tu consideration of his | Ersived efier use We heard that « Mr. Gardette, | fendenie, were responsible The rule which has | circumstances in one zuaa’s tOnOR when, if it Oe cais heceane na te ee al dof | Were well tested off Cape Hatteras, on the tourth | ithngnees to uid the complainants in obtaining 4} then living in Philadelphia, was one of the wit: | been followed in this case, 1s one which, in my | were true, there mght be a mulutade of coneur- time Mie ietact al mart on the cy pia of | and filth day out, mn a gale, through which she rode | ju¢gment of the court settling important’principles | jerres to Mr. De Grange’s prior marriage. We | judgment, is calculated to lead to dangerous con- | rent provfs to strengthen and confirm the evi- N reds an | im guilaut style. i, ot law in their favor, be has been rewarded by a | proceeded to that city and found Mr. Gardette.— | sequences. Upon the testimony of Madam Despau | dence.” a ‘Ainead! there are thirteen or fourteen hotels, and |; A!(¢t stepping at Port Royal, (in the Island of donation of the whole property, Even the costs He answered, that he was present at the said prior | clone, the Supreme Court of the United States ** Another thing that may render & wu sus- ” more. pubhg’ banses Telail stores end | J2weiea,) # few hours, for mail purposes, we | sng expensesimeurred mu the litigation have been | marrage of De Grange, and that he atterwards | have solmenty decided 1m the case of Patterson, | pected,” continues this author, ‘is in the person Tas, whan aoe Roeenie ote ire por ! achor and cut across the Carribean Sea, | aid by the victorious party. Knew Do Grange and ins wite by this marriage; | that Daniel Clask wes tarried in Philadelphia, in | hunseli; as if he who were # party to the crime, be cbintncd sheen kee amaerete dell arey cad velocity, reaching Chagres at10 P. |" ‘The counsel who argued the cause and the | inar thas wife had sailed for rence. Mr Glork | 1808. ‘The atteution of the defence in this case | swears for bis own safety or indemnity; or be & enisepelen ketene Beate Pin Goccreens on the Sih day from New York. | Yousee lam |. counp which desided it, were ignorant of the Dr’! then seid, you bare no tease IMgar to refues. | was paturally dinented towards tie pantinuiar date, elution or friend to the party.” (Madame Cailla- art } forward on this litle point, “yy social as'| you a cursory account ef my journey. Ido | vate, anueable understanding that existed bewween being married to me; it will, however, be necessary | and they bave shown most conclusively that the | vet, hie Mademe Despau, 13 an aunt of the eom- soune ce political point of ¥ As to g. aiune of | £0.fer the beuefit of those who have never takem | the parues; but this fact does not, 1n my opinion, to keep our mamiage secret ull] have obtained | marrage never could have taken place at the time | plainant.) Sete the ab aaa oe hg d yer by dthiags, | Wis travel, since persons! observation demon- | relieve the case from 4 tuint of collusion, whicd | yudieral poof of the wullity ot your aud De Grange’s | aud place thus definitely fixed by the testimony of | — Tis necessary, says Domat, (b. 3, lit. VL. 553, No: constantly By igee, Yara aa irressonele 7 rig | frstes to me thet mtuny Americans leave their | renders the judgmentitselt of no binding force as warnage. They, the said Clark aud the said | the only witness who pretends to any personal | 15.) to add to ull ‘here rules, in relation to proofs by | | the inhabitants by the constant and increasing communication with the people of the United States. A point of land on the opposite shore, at the mouth of the Chagres river, embracimg many acres, ble magnet to | country w Rese owe of getting t 0 1 f . A if natives | Foe eee ee eee Tine AO | resadjudicata — 1 is impossible not to dweern ata | Zulime were then marmed. Soon afterwards, our | kuowledge upon the subject. Witherses, (hat we uny ht to considertheir condition, Se ramen ne nasives, webo = pans | Galeria. L wish to render a service, by ten- | yiunce the udvantages so willingly surrendered by | cister, Me deme Caillavet, wrote to us trom New | ‘The evidence in the record shows moat aatfofac- them estate, their conduct, their. reputations if their honor Te- observing the bury movements of the Yankee. ng them a little gratuitous aes ay the defendant by bis sefusul to joa with the other | Oyjeens, that De Grapge’s wife, whomhe had mar- | torily thet the complainant was born while De ty reached he r i s about crossing this much t Of | defendants in the resolute resisiance they have unt- | red prior to murtying the suid Zulimne, had arrived | Grange wus in New Orleane, and before any judg- y & coudemnation in a court oc ye ereaiag of and much travelled Isthmus. : pear formly made to the claim aseer by the com: | jy phe Onteu Hale A hastened our return to New | me foc diverce was given pgainst him; and we ; they ere in a condition to tell the h, with the greater | CCL 1M maxim 88 fan Ob truth ae is ie fe | Pisinant. And itis apparent {rom his own testi- | Gyleans. He was prosecuted tor bigamy, father | Supreme of this State, in the case of Tate v. truth without regard io the persons interested, or 1f j ioughr down.| }¢2"%) At te smaneh.oF tae phe hegre bic mony that wething short of a sutisiactory assur | Antoine, of the Caiholie church, taking part in the | Peune, (7 N.S 554), have said that the law con- | 11 is to be feareo that they ure under some engaze- ipsa ‘and the | oe penne strikes the sight 18 see 2 [ae (2. | ance thathe would become the gamer instead of dirgs vgemet DeGrange. Mr. DeGrange | siders the husband of the mother, as the father of | ment, or hve some inclination to favor one of the gia, fom e at Limon ba "| Sameera ni 6 Sale Oe eee ‘Sone af the | the forex, by the part he has acted, would ever ndemmed for bigemy in marrying the said | all the eniloren conceived during the marriage. | parties, as 1 they are friends or enemies to one or thers oe y- Lon, erceted by the early Spaniards. Some of the | pave operated a6 an inducement to place humsel ime, and Was cest into pri from which he | Jn cere of voluntary separation, access is always | «ther of them; it their poverty or wants expose The news brought by ‘the California, you will | \ f : Mf C: ‘ill! d . A ; «i The plea: Denman & alitornia, y guns (splendid specimens of Castilian skill!) have | iy a jaise position before the high uibunal whose teeretly ereaped by conniva and was tuken | presvsed unless the contrary be proved: the pre- | them to the temptation of giving such testimony av he Empire course. , 1 | . rolled down fron thetr lofty position, and now he | coniuble rel : Ked. * " , : tbh of th tier, sccording ’ ate- . qmiable relet be but nomimaliy invoked, cown the Miseissippi river by Mr. Le Bretou b’Or- | sumption of paternity is at end, when the remote- | moy be ugreenble to one of the parties, ac f ; orks with mater | neyiected, at the bare of the huge rock oa which | “The comploinuut in this case sues as the only | vegois, where he at into 4 vessel, escaped trom nece of the husband from the wife hes been guoh | ae they have anything to fear or hope for from him they were originally planted, in the palimier days of | Jeginmate chuid of the late Daniel Clark, who died country, and, according to the best of my | Wat cohabstation has been physically impos#ole. | if their teeumovy appears to be sincere withou: Syanteh conquest. “Instead of exhibiting the ght- | nus city onthe 13th of August, 1813. She al- terand torbich, as in days of yore, to deter the | jeges in tier bill that thes ine from that bold and abrupt shore, they nOW | a Will ip Is in whieh b covsuture ibe chiei resting places ot the weary | eit his esta e, ren! av ers id wiedge and belief, never afterwards re- | —Coce ot 1808, p. 45, art.7, 10& LL.“ The eve | aflectauon; it the depositions be coatormable toone- Daniel Clark executed | ‘uined to Lousiana. This happened in 1803, not | dence,” agan ‘remarks Judge Porter, who de- | enother, and net concerted; at the number of the rd wnd bequeathed | » yieat while before the close of the Spanish | livered the opinion of the Court, “creates a pre- | witnesses, the couformity of their depositions. 1 1 i eb gy maces Se 1 fo her, the com | vevernment in Louisiana. Mr. Clark told us, that | eemption of absence and non-acerss; but that | common fame, and the probability of the cirey, seek they would unfold a tale rich with increge | plamunt, ond *did also there and thereby de- | betore he could promugute his marriage with my | will cot do in cases like this, ‘The legal presump- | stances confirm thetr evidence; if their variatiohs, : speek, they would wafold'a telerich with ey bn Clave her to be his legitimate daughter, and did | sister, it wowld be necessury that there should be | tion of the hu-band being the father, and of access | their disagreement, their contradictions render Ul be gised as heretofore, waiting | ** L circled around i 1 saw a mule bed 6 rows | muke ord order therein other dispositions and be- | povght by her an action ugainet the name of De- | being peeuined in caees of voluntary separation, | them suspected; it the consequence of the facta be Hast ing immediately uni ‘h va ge waar tes quests ;” that the will of 1813 operated a fail and | Grange. The anticipated change of government | cun ehly be destroyed by. evidence bringing the | such as may require a more exact consideration of impe h has occurred | cera tg hag ears ete ane Te” | peslect revocation of the former will allezed to | created delay, but at length, m_ 1806, Mr Jumes parties within the exception the law has created to | what muy render the witnesses suspected, as in. for mony years to the natives of this place, is the | but eu _ io me contd no dit a aan pba ave been made by the said Daniel Clark in 1811; } Brown end Eligius Fromentin, as the counsel of | the rule, namely, the physical impossibility of | crummal provecutens; or if the facia be so shgnt death of Linor Julian Ramos, a Spaniard by | me se ia geen ins vid of that’ tinge, | that the sara wail of 1811 ought to be set aside, and | my sister, brought suit against the name of De- | c nLection—moral will wot do. Now, that phy- | thatstis not necessary to be so exact in the in- birth, who, for a long period, through the influence | 28! ge 4 sm td lage ge ae - th eh ei the said will of 18ldestublished and confirmed; | Grenge, in the City Court, | think, of New Or. | sical my ossibility cen only be shown by proving | quiry, as if the matter were only a bare action of of his immense, wealth, held abectate sway over | ort PF New Grenade MSuint “Lawrence On | aud the real and personal estate ct said Clark de- | jeans, The grounds of said suit were, that D-- | the residence of the husband and wife t¢ be so | slander or detamatiog, in a sper between per- the cestwies of every inhabitant of Chagres. He | poe dae casey nay (A aia <4 clured to be descended to her, the complainant. | Grange had imposed himselt upon her at the tims | remote from exch other that access was im. | cons of @ mean condition. Thus the right judg~ was known to every American as the King or Re. | 2¢#°h0g eg mouth of ¢ weed a Son soe, red | X¢h” contunues the bill, “your oratrix, by the | when he hada living, lawful wife. Judgment in | possible.” x 4 ment that 1s to be made of the regard which ought gent of the town, and the greatest obstacle to | @f Nyeabe " ey bal ae te a heoeral advice of her counsel, hereby deciares that, for the | said suit was rendered against said DeGrange. Mr. | ‘These principles of law, thus clearly recognised, | to be had to the depositions of witnesses under all American influence or improvement, while to the ; Min S variety Of wild fowl, of rare thean to the | Purposes Of thig suit, she will not insist upon | Clark still continued to defer promulgating his | repel the presumption of’ the legitimacy of com- | these views, depends on the rules which have been. docile Rative, a perfect demi-god. He 1s succeed. | eee eee ii ann a ee ee ten ic. | the said will of the said Daniel Clark, made e with my sister, Which very much fretted | plaiuent, sought to be established by the testimony | explained, and on the prudence of the judges te- ed in business by his son, educated in New York. | Nevilern latitudes’ ‘Being seldor, Inolested: by | 22813) except for the purpose of availing herself | and irritated ner feelings. Mr. Clark became a | of Medeme Despaus and they will apply with great- | make a right application of them, according to the Our Consul, Mr. Gleason, is recoveriog from his | thet - = hoa then re ora t a we of the devise therein contained in her favor, but | member of the United States Congress in 1306. | er force to the merits of this controversy, whea we | quality of the fact aged the circumstances. — jndisposition.. Among the acquisitions we have | fou Fete iv a4 LM =p Mage Ph t Wien 1 the for the purpose of availing herself as far as in law | Whilst he was im Congress, my sister heard that he | hereefter exemine the question iavolving the legal | The testimony llechasse, so much relied on, had to the number of permanent residents here, is | _ o hia pdms th ti ee lars, itis competent to do, us a declaration of her fa- | was courting Miss Caton, of Balumore. She was validy of the marriage with Clark, ia singularly avconsistent with the friendly re1a- Coptain M. K. Taylor, son of General Taylor. re- | Mack ond ‘the first. part of April,)the water ye | Wet» the said Daniel Clark, of the legitimacy ot | much distressed, though she could not believe the | tore an action ef nullity bad been instituted, to set | tions which existed between himself and the cently our Consul at Santa Martha. Young Tay- | yeusily low ‘dit is dan a pl gopeal end ihe your orainx, end for establishing her pretensions, | report, knowing hereelf to be his wife. Suil, his | aside the marnege with DeGrange. j Jendant, Reit, tor many yeura atter the death of Jor has established himself permanently in the fore | DS88)Y JOW> an peng oe eeacd to | 12 this bill set forth, as the forced heiress of the | stronge conduct in deferring to promugate his mar- | | Let us now proceed to test the credibility of | Clark. | As Inte as 1522, he writes the moat friendly i rege with her, had alarmed her. Sne and t sailed | Medame Deepau, by other facts and cireums' ketters to Relt, in which we find not the remotes: for Philadelphia, to get proof of his marriage wih eat by the record. She states that she ‘h, in his deposition taker. warding and importun, | Fiver. Atall other seasons, you are exposed 10 | said Daniel Clark, and as such forced heiress, her a 7 my sister. We could find no record, and were told | her sister Zulime went to New York, to obtain the | in 1884, he alleges was committed by the latter, in 1, have all left for Pana- board. 1a the har- tahe views of . on the river artered by these gea- % business—a dashing, per- | jrrepular shower, and the consequences of wet i if ’ ; | to the ki f four-tifths of the st severing youn ae who distinguished himself clothe s. Having but four days, to cross in time cA Ocho tk he held edna ” » and has already ingra- to take the Briuish steamer at Panama, down the tisted himself into the good graces of the n: alinvion to the fraud, a ava ¢ i @ preceding part of the bill itis alleged that the , eo C se natives. | coust, (which sails regularly on the 27th of every | wil of 1: led to, was “fraudulently con- wv e have sine Conaln Ackerman, of Ne ork, month, at 3 P.M.) Lat once busied myself in se- ph § pede or Neca ba the defendant, ong & merchant there, Fi some standing; he 18 | enring'a canoe, to goto Cruces. By the aid of an | JGehard Hell, ond the reveked will of 1811 pro- = e | a omy mone jouse for the reception | oid Jamaica negro, who keeps a eort of a hotel, | guced and. procured to be admitted to probate, ua + Froreoanciae tee the Eneion Scent, in | nd who is quite & personage there, 1 got one im- | the last will of the eaid Daniel Clark. The will of ie passengers by the Burk Whiting, seventy in mediately, manned with three men, for $40. Tis | 4s)1 is im the following words :-— nuniber irom can y aperecs, are here, waiting for | was xbout7 A. M. I was told I should’ be off in “In the name ot God, Amen! I, Daniel Clark, . two hours, and was eredulous enough 60 to be- | , bed cnmeperent argos age | ryder od cn nd rene xe | eaten nen? hw * & commenc at Sorgoua, and, | sives, in the shape of additional dumes, | could not _ 2 Commenced uergetcaly the mukeetied aga | weve, them before At e'elock. ‘by the ndvice of | 23" eave and bequest une py anne, Mary which its expected will be so far completed, as the American Consul there, I paid them in ud- Claik, now of Germantown, in the State of Pean- : comes S| vance. Jt is bed policy. Pay them half at starting, | .\ivania, all the estate, whether real or personal, =x mg re aay ton with the Pacriie compa- | and hall at arriving. learned, to my chagnn, | jvc, l may die possessed of. nection will be made between | that neither money nor any other dowceur oa this 3 i the road, terminatlug, for the present, at Gergona, — earth od. I hereby nominate and appoint my friends, and « new steamer now nearly ready for operation. | reugy The word « hueeges hee ae ey eet | Richard Reif and Beverly Chew, my executors, ne mails by the California have been lying | yo . They will bambooale yor with power to settle everything relating tom) Fes sit am exposed condition, since the 18h inst, fete afer pete tna ge, apes} Wide ree cutate. | New Orleans, 26th May, 1811, signed, a ne Georgia's mail le auama, thirty-si rom hut to hut, in search of provisions (they say, hours after her arrival, and would probably reach | ynuil the spirit moves them. Be the nececaty a seis La 0 ea, and ee the Pacific vide five days after. The mail agent, your early departure ever so imperative, you have | named. By virtue of these letters testamentary, end who is en ctiicer of the Grenadian government, | to wwait, with folded arms and clinched teeth, | also by virtue of n full power f attorney from Mary authorized, ccording to contract, to supply the their will and pleasure. At 1 o'clock, we set Cussh. the este Boledan and legate Skeeatined a American ofiicers wiih boats for the mails, failed out, in a long-built, thatched covered canoe, with | the will, it is contended, on behalf of the defen. w this, os well we in many other instances, to sup- seuicely room to sit erect im, They cover the middle dants, that the property 1m controversy was sold and ply the United Stotes agent, who was oroed, on of the canoe with palm leat, to, proteet the travel | vurchused. us owo responeibility, to obtain the facilities from jer from rain aad the tropical sun. For several Without noticing minutely the various allega- Cuptaw M K. Taylor. Mr. Collamer is certainly miles we got on sw immingly, but were seon over- | ions in the bill, and denials in the answer, I shall et teult in allowing the New Granadian contract- | taken by some fellow passengers, who had the proceed to examine some ot the most important crs to vifle with the interests of the people of the gacity to get emailer canoes. They passed issues Which bave been distinctly presented by the United States, in the manner they have done, |“ jike a thing ot live,” reaching Cruces nearly ad y | pleadings, und argued with great cbility at the bar, since the ecoption of the treaty. There are Ame- | before me. When about eleven miles up the river, | The firsuand meet important of these issues, in- heous here, with every means at hand, and willing | we stopped at a squalid little “ kraal” (« collection | volves the legiumacy of the complainaat. it has to receive their mails, and forward them with de- | of shanties), called Kitioon, to give our boatmen @ been raised by the positive denial in the answers tbat the priest who married her und Mr. Clark had | record evidence of the former marriage of De- | suppressing the Jost will and testament gone to Ireland. My sister then sent for Damel W, | Grange; but that, on their arrival, they found that | The solicitor of the complainant, who last address~ Coxe, mentioned to him the rumor ; he answered | the records had been destroyed; and yet, there has | ed the court, endeavored to pre ig this manifest that he knew it to be true, that he, (Clark,) was | been offered in evidence, on the part of the com- | mconsistency, by saying, that immediately after engeged to her, (Miss Caton.) My sister replied, | plamant, a certificate of the ma e jacob De- | the death of Clark, Bellechasse could not have that itcould not be so. He then told her that she | grange, with one Barbara Orci, signed by O’Brien, | known of the commission of any fraud by Relf, would not be able toestablish her marriage with | the very priest who solemnized the marriage, and | end that the witness, ia speaking of the suppression Clark, it he were disposed to contest it. He ad- | dated on the 1th of September, 1806; and, trom | of the will, gave not bis own, but the language ot vieed her to take counsel, and said he | this certificate, 11 appears that the orginal record | Pitot. A short extract from the testimony wilt would send one. A Mr. Smyth came and told | was to be found atpege 45 of the register. Surely, | show, et a vlunee, the error into which the solici- my sister that she could not legally establish her | if this be genuine, the records were not destroyed, | tor bas fallen. ‘ Pitot,” says he, “as well ae marnege with Mr. Clark, and pretended to read to | when the witness and her sister sought for the | others, always spoke with the utmost indignation her letter in English, a language then unknown | desired record proof, in 1811—according to the po- | of the fraudulent suppression or destruction of the to my sister, from Mr. Clark to Mr. Coxe, stating | sion now sssumed by the solicitors of the come | said last will of 1813, and the fraudulent - he was about to marry Miss Caton. In conse- | plaiuent—-or, im 1603, uccording to the testimony of | tion, an its place, of ood gray en of 1811, quence of this information, my sister Zulime came | the witoces herself. The complainant, therefore, | ell of which we attributed to interested villany.”” to the resolution of having no further connection | hae proved too much. — ‘ And yet we fing this aevoted and confidential or iptercouse with Mr. Clark, and soon afterwards jut Jetus turn to the acta and declarations both | friend of Clark, who thus sympathized in the in- married Mr. Gardette, of Philadeiphia. The wit- | of Clark and Zulime ; and first, we will examine ioepetion: expressed at the Gienprearence of the ness further states, that she became acquainted | those of Zulime. While proceedings were pend- | will, remaining on terms of cord oy eee with with DeGrapge in 1793. He was a nobleman by | ing in the Ecclesiastical Court in this city, against | he author of the *villany” ot which he complains, birth, and married Zutime when she was thirteen | DeGrange, for bigamy, she appeared, and took an | and reeorting to no means, either by word or deed, years old Zulime had two children by him—a boy | uflidavit as the wife of DeGrange; and, in this af- | to expose it, and thus vindicate the rights of the end a girl; the boy died, the girl is still living, | fidavit, deciares that she did not believe that her | child of his deceased fnend. He remains 4 (889); her name is Caroline, and married to Dr. | husband was a bigamist. Strong objections have | upon the subject until he 1s called upon to give evi- barnes. Witness was precent at the birth of these | been urged aguinst the record of these cedings dence on behaif of the complainant, in 1834. children. The marriage of Zulime was a private | before the Ecclesiastical Court, as events. 7 Equally inconstste nt with nis conduct is the tes- ides the witness, Mr. Dorsier, of New | own opinion clearly is, that it is evidence to prove | timony of Samuel B. Davis. It is difficult to be- Irish gentleman, a friend of Clark, | rem 4; \—that such proceedings took pla heve that the witness bas disclosed all he knew w York, were present at the marriage. | aud that Zulime, under whom inant | in reference to whether the complainant wae A Catholic priest performed the ceremony. Betore | also claims, appeared in Court, and took an affida- | the legitimate or illegitimate ehild of Daniel the detection of the bigumy of DeGrange, Zulime | vit os the wite of DeGrange, and that DeGrange | Clark. From his S ype position, as the imme- hed con who died, and a daughter called Caro- | himeelt was present in New Orleans. This is im- te protector of the cltld, during the lifetime of tine, which bore his name. Caroline was born in | portant ae incoatestble record evidence, showing | the father, it is reasouable to presume 180]; witnees was present at her birth, as well aw | song grounds for ihe presumption that Zulime posseseed advantages for acquiring informatior ich, for one-half the sum it now costs. | breathi il. They detained us an hour or two. thet of her brother. The natural language of wit- | had not been previously martied m Philadelphia to | not enjoyed by the other witnesses in this tecord. h language, and when in need of a | clesastical tribunal took place several months af- | from his evidence that his own belief was, that she lator, shy lies to him.” ter (us the complainant's solicitor contends) the | was the legitimate child of Clark; and yet we find ave, in justice to this witness, stated all the | mwrriege was celebrated. Madame Despau swears | him keeping her in utter rance of the circum materiel facte detailed in her testimony taken im | that DeGiarge had fled from the conatry, when | ctances of ber birth w true parentage, anc 1839, before I proceed to compare it with that sub- | Clark made proposals of marriage to Zulime; and | mak ng no eflort to ossert her rights to the larg: eequently taken in 1845 and 1849. Her testimony | yet we find lim here in New Orleans, appearing as | estute, which, sceording to a statement he re taken in 1845, 1s, for the most , & repetition of | defendant iu these proceedings,’ in the montn of | ceived from Clark bumeelf, was estimated a what the stated in with Galsedo September, 1802. He was also here whea | $600,000 On the 24h of June, 1817, as curato fects which may be t in weighing her | Clark was on his way toNew York, on the 27th | wd (vem of Myra, then thirteen years ot age, he credibility. For instance, she states that the first | of June, 1802, as appears by a letter addressed by | instituted, iv the’ Furst Judicial District Court o tume she saw Mr. Clark was in the latter part of | the latter to Chew & Kelf, from Piaquemines. | this city, & suit for 1802 She was shortly afterwards introduced to | In poi aa toa debt due him from De Grange, | executors of Danie! d him by Colonel Bellechasse. Zulume was married | he says-—‘'1 wish you not to push Mr. D. for pay- | en his behalt, by Mess: to Mr. Clark a8 Miss Zulime de Carrere. The | ment, but wait, consistent with safety, such time | attorueys, a ee is expressly mentioned as * th: lust ume she saw DeGrange was in 1808, In 1349, | as he may find necessary. Should he be inclined | natural cuughter of Daniel Jlark, ackaew! the says che was well acquainted with Daniel | 10 #0 away before the sum is paid, you must insist | by him such.” la hia testimony, he Clark; that her acquaintance with him commenced | on tecurity.” By a letter addressed by De G ne clares that these words were aoe made use of about, or not long after, 1797. His marriage with | to Clark, from Bordeaux, on the 24th of July, 1301, h his knowledge or consent. Itis difficult t Zulime, to the best of her recollection, took place | it is evident that the former was in Franee about eve that the ator who the su) i ch an allegation in th ably warm. | mises, we ©, ° in dipped our our, and travelied un | jather, Daniel Clark, was married to Zulime nee Our Guatemaia Correspondence. tl welve, when we hauled up, and slept ull dawa. | Camére, m the city of Philadelphia, im the year Guatemata, Dec. 20, 1849, | At this lack-a-darey gait, after being out 56 hours | jug, und that she i8 the legiumute and the only qTheP ce secret trom Chagree, we finally reached long-looked for icgitimate oflepring of that marrage. The deten- ¢ Polry of England in regard to Central Ame- | Cruces. This is a remarkable place—t1.e., tor raw- dants deny that Daniel Clark was married to said rwca— The Deplorable State of Affarrs in Guate. | boved mules and hait clad women. At eight the | Zulume atthe time and place alleged, or at. any mala—Kevolutions— French Interference. neat morning We mounted mules for Panama, at | oper time or place, and they aver, that at the um 7 f ‘ thefate of sixteen dollars a head, reaching the lat- Whatever may be the ultimate intention of the | ter city at7 P.M. To describe to you the rough- = ate Reid cl ansToneeiecaties Bnitish government in regard to Central America, | ness 61 this mountain road, 1s beyond the power of | They also deny that the complainant was the chet the pol'cy pursued by ite representative, Mr. Chat- pr An te here Se tntles. long, and, I pre- | of Daniel Clar and aver that if she be, she is an field, has been most disastrous to the general wel- | jt in male ature, riding like the lords of creation ene et ante oy incapable of inheriting the fare, as it has also ever been to the commerce of | You are obliged to tread hen way through devi- ‘he Fret question to be determined is, does the England with the Central American States. The | 0U8 recesses and narrow chasms ot rock, scarcely | evidence on this record estublish the marriage of untiring interference, by intrigues, claims, and | Wide enough for one to pass through, caused, | Duniel Clark and Zulime Carriere? It hes been , , gues, J Coubtless, by earthquakes, und frequently encoun: | my own desire to be relieved from the reaponsi« blockades upon the Stater, has kept one part of the | ter traine of mules a quarter of a mile long, laden bility of deciding this question, by directing un community constently at War with the other, until | with bars of silver and boxes of gold dust. You | jecue out of chancery, to be determined b the vem the Stues of Hondurae, San Saivador and Nica | then are compelled to retrace your steps some- | diet of a jury. f have regarded this pr ache eo Fagua are alniost reduced to a state of barbarism; | umes for miles, which retards, of course, your ar- ove peculiarly proper to be etetalead'’ ey and from the recent specimens we have had of Mr. | rival at the poit of destinaion. As you approach | [1 is wpparent to any one, who will look 1, mt 44 Chaifield’s conduct in Costa Rica and Guatemala, | Panama, the road improves. Here let me advise cord, that the evidence of the witnesses is of the it 1s ceriaia that they will shortly be reduced to the | the traveller to take mules, y all means, in prefer- | most coniredicior charactet, and | have roy seme degrading condition, unless the United States | ence io horses, which, however, are scarce. that in a case where a conflict of ne ‘he of America should impose a timely interference, | fagmer are re-footed, and rarely fall; the latter ; and check the juitous poliey to which Cent frequently. oe Leyton Pon: caller pentyl i Ameticn has been +0 long a prey. The great inte- | | Cn the following day, I took the New G Sesndagunet tesouiee Or penian Pow Be beth. rest, Which manifests s more and more every | for Valparaiso, where we arrived on th: tnesse med day, the United States have in the welfare of this December, Col Poter, the United States beley of Rew i who have been exam Jonsul, country, ie ae only hope of saving us trom falling | beng one of the passengers. I find that 1 aun | MAyCeette ee oe to he decided,” Paap r ireley, in 1803, although there are some associations in | the time his wife was in Philadelphia, not, as | would have intredue her memory which make her think it not impos- | solemnly believe from the evidence, tor the pur- petition, without authority. The testimony sible that the marriage may have taken place in | pose of procuring evidence of the former marriage | HorstivDavis, ove ot the attorneys, repels any suc Her impression is that it took place in 1803. | of De Grange. ot giving birth to Caroline, the | preeumpuon ih tis testimony and that llicit counection with Daniel Clark. | Sw B. Davis, show clearly that the actio k's ceparture urope. When we wider this letter of De Grange— ted afier a consultation with Edwar Let us first consider this evidence with reference ched is in the most fnendly je, and | Livingston ; and it is quite unreasonable, if not at to itseif wlone. It was taken at three different | containing a warm recommendation of his wife to | seiutriy ebsurd, 10 suppose that that disth periods, and, we must presume, was not giv the kind consideration of Clark—in connection | juriet would have counse iled the mstitution asui without much reflection. In the year 1345, she | with the testum Coxe, bose fea ciream- | tor alimeny merely, ov behalf of a legitimate chil s, that the fist time she saw Daniel Clark | stences of Z '¢ introduction to in Phila- The testimony of Dowtontane, Be! an in the latter part of 1802, and even then, { delyhia, end the birth of Caroline, which shortly | Mrs Horyer, in relation to the last will, are 7 ahe remembers, a short time previous to | fruit of her ay savages (ihe ites) @ buta farce. England | cemmercial character. {wich toe the pete PO Equity. (p 522,) comueh, from their aature, dee echasse. In 1849, she says, her acquaintance | by various wituesses on this recerd, on the charac- | Fiom the vain, beustiul character of the man, as bed no more right to the Noth American. to the wealth of South -Ame- mend publicity tor their tral, as a question whether with him commenced ubout, of novlong after, 1797. | ter of Clark, a8 an honorable, higa-minded man. | is clearly portrayed in this record, I entertain r wages than she bas tt , ates ries, and the fields of fortune that are unkaowe to | & Party i® the heir at law of an utestate estate, or | jn 1899, she states, Without any qualification what- But there is another fact which conclusively | doubt that be ofen made such declarations to where some person interested has a peculi to the fullest inve on, (ae an heir who is questioning a bill; eu the Jucge reaily feels « aitheulty too great to be removed by the mere substitution of the master’s opinion for his own; or where he thinks it betier that the responsibility ot deciwipg should be throwa trom himeelt upou that evanescent ee Jury)—in these, and 0 meoke treaties with the In Buadle Joba and | our people in these distant countries. I will com all bos minions out of the Mosquito country. He | municate with you monthly. vot quarrel with you. Todo so, would be to ‘The man who sails for California, if he wish, in querre) with bis bread and butter. the firet place, to consult economy, should convert land, through its representative, has ereren- a bundied or two of his money into dimes. Eight to meanege the interna: affairs ot Central pass tor a dollar from Chagres to Panama. In the r which great number of claims are | second place,he should not neglect to get suitable » to be uged when disobedi- gum elastic garments, for the rains, and the wear ever, that Clark was married in 1803. In 1815, she | thows that the tesumony of Madame Despan, in | few friends Bat we have the most conclusis eguin states this fact, oa both occasions, she | Ielation to the marriage of Clark and Zulime, can- | evidence that he made declarations to other friend refers to other facts with which she couples this | not be relied on. I allude now to the suit for ali- | leading to « difl: reat conclusion, His declaration important event, 80 a8 to render it perfectly cer- | mony, Which was instituted by Zulime ast De | to his mtimate wed particalar friend De la Croi tom that the py did take place at the tune | Grange as her husband, on the 30th of November, | difler wildely irom thove w and place stated by her. For instance, in 1839, she | 160S—three years after it 19 er De marriage | lechasse, and M says that the proposals made by Clark to Zulime, | Wes eolemmzed. The solicitors for the complain- were made atier the detection of the bigamy of De | ent have strenuously resisted the introduction of married man, he w: ed to her will. The eecupation of 3 tees of weg ~ other cases, the Court o| Equity culis in aid the | Grange This she deciares, in unqualified terms, | the record of this suit, as evidence against the » form # matrimoni jui'o country, and, lastly, the Yela | jeane, if you wien ecto rv, pee eon saett Claas leer meee ee jnioa oa & | war in 1863, und not « greet while before the close | ccinplainant. I aim unable to appreciate the forve a, of Baltimore, & “country in etvil wary 10 more than vat | Sing enejeuan it wel, wich At jrast four oaremen. | been granted almoat ol coure, wenn ieue to if Seepage tet be Greate meres the courts tf Lieulons took tha terstentin at ce to every reflecting mind, that the | tfully tems, ‘It is an experiment of danger. Prov a dity of @ modus, or an esue of devisavit vel | bigamy in 1863 In 1849, im referring to the con- | #vch evidence, to show the capacity which a contracted « marriage with that lady, if the ccvniny ef Gvital ‘America. “The enertiow of | with?ine wate tniek vos ie SoReRnegS gem |" loesmuch ae it will ot be in my power to avail | inmate Soon the pare Bat Sars hate mt | fart hae chosen to place Mae! before a court o | was the aghst i af ve being xposed 0 the trderal government, with General Morazan at | from the river. When aduiterated with brandy, 11 myerlt of the assistance of @ jury in the presentcase, ned not a great while before the cessation of the | lish law vidence, that allegations in a bill of | Engiand, and tne cousulaten with Me Mazarea its head, wax coured by the same intriguing power, keeps off the * Chagres fever.” La conclusion, le. for the want of @ concurrence of a full court im the which may be repeated im every part of Central me advise the ellér to pursue the policy of tor pore Dhan fe tas sxuminntion fas ee Anietica, without fear of contradiction. bearance and conei! atioa towards those semi-civil- dence on the record, with that candor whieh th . * my leet, I — = a hy tt ized be A well-timed song will get you up | jy, portance of the case 20 Imperatively demande, ¢ insurgents on thes eny, t ic as kille C - 4 Seapoent inabiel, Guemen.s Gnas which, they — scone® an angry scowl or —- Aud | shall co #0, fully smpressed with the correet- eh oy in Lowmiana. In this chancery are not evidence against the complainant | epel ail presumption that he wae a maried man, of 1849, we find this witness, for the first | in the bill in another suit, rests, | apprehend, upon | hat the Complainnut was regarded by him ina eoing the slightest doubt about the mar- | the fect that the Courts of Chancery, 1a England, | other hight them a= his allegitimate child. T ving tken place in 1803. She | are not courts of record. Here, all our courts are | declaration of Zulime to Coxe, in Pailadelph _ courts of record, Would be, in my judg- | when he snformed her of the & meat of Cla dangerous ciple to introduce into | (0 Mies Caton, is conti : " sail TERR. of the remark ot Mr. Greole: his T y avacked Chiquinula, Senta Rosa, and Salama, — pees of the y, in his Treatise udence, 1 arty shall be per | subject, She replied that it could not be, bot baye met With 0’ sevete chmotsemeds at coat Our Montevidean Correspondence, juei => (. yout] that “the credit whieh the mitted, in a solemn judicial proceeding, to as. | Cinth hed promieed to marry her. ft is clear of the three places, having lost many in killed aad Mow rev: Dee, 27th, 1849, | COUF W bind nw ny of an individual fert a fact one day, ind on another day be at | \roved, and indeed wot disputed, that a few dx wounded. Leon Repmundo, whe committed se | Interesting Items Pemrnc egg: Toe -thyee- hee: + Pogue Rememner meorpe She liberty to deny it 1 am clearly of opinion that | :fterwards she marned Dr. Gardette. Now ie » much, that the advisability of examinug |__| ean arsure you that eventeare taking place at the | the topics of their examination ¢ | Camp of Oribe’s army, which has been besieging this by. the facts, experience, place for eight year. pr many atrocious crimes in the Antigua, was shot by order of Guamanend A. Perez, a short time the avtack on thie city. The latter has si n Salvador, to evcape a similar fate. aod the record in the euit tor alimony, is good eveonable, of reconcilable with counmoa deoen: ; thust be dictated | "Now, it is evident that the doubt was thus start- | dence to show that. on the d0un of N Svember, O suppore thet Mf this female was at that time m fs id common sense.” | ed tor the first tume in the mind of the witness, by | 1805, Zulime DeGrange applied to the late Count ted to Daniel Clark, she would, with so |iule ce he ditadvantege,” he continues, ‘under which the eflorte which the defendants were making to | Court of Orleans to award her a judgment for mony Or hesitation, heave formed a matrimon » chief in the field, A comedente, named Avil, has revolted, xitied » | the court must alw bor, with respect to them, | show that it was impossible thatthe marrage could | mory egainst Jereme DeGrange, as her husband, | ellience with soother tan, and that, too, ia vio = to carry the revola | Bumbep of persons, and (aken # party with him co Mere it , Ry , hoe egg in the Treause | have teken place im ge be Se mad Clark | and thet judgme at was ven . ‘her favor, on 2 | tron of the laws ot Penweylva 4, which’ punish: ; His char howev: 8 dis | Gog bee pescesston of the town, of Star Chamber, thus: ‘Now, con | wes not in the city Puladelsien during 24th of December, 1 It was only as the wife | with severity the crime of bigamy ? « the cerning the pe trons of Witnesses exemined in court, | whole of that year. The efforts of the defendants | of DeGronge that she had a it to for ali 1 might here i-pose ot the case on the facts a it gleat imputation eho Englieh Courts, that | on this point were completely successtul. Indeed, | mony at ie hends of the soa tad eons be cxreumptonges disc loved ithe record; bat itis d Pct G: aud how base or | the solicitors tor the cormplaint admit that the mar- | most absurd to say that the eminent counsel who | thatsoue of the questions of law p although they be testes ducb- | riage must have occurred about the last of 1801, or | fled her petition, presecuted the suit to final the court. ood © Sonne, Deine read | the firet of 1802. They admit that if itdid not take | \vdgment, would have acted without authority adherents og taken serous | d fortune, and deserted the | G roment haa been very active «,whieh have nearly allbeen | tek ot San Salvador. Under | = « 9, I think the revolution will | , Be ety i#, “Death to the Argentinos’ — : ‘ni trocpe in the besieging camp, esinst Rosas’ troops, ana are stander in cut Teer ve @ lewd and | place between the months of November, 1901, and | from the pl ii a ’ 1¢ plaintefl in the cause. Ax Hononxy Neoxnss—On Sanday, the 3d fed, 110, however, otill extremely nem. ns heh th : e and person | Avguet, 1802, there was no marriage at all. ‘This The testimony of Madame Despau derives no | Murch, there was ed ut Brunswick, Neivher can goods be forwarded | es te pane poe tne by vn phen phy ed | tely exumined, this | is» intituce of proof whieh, 1 apprehend, the laws, | strength or Srvation from that of her sister, | jack wemsn +1» tooarkable Guntin ent'd ry “ df not wo canon outs on Aig Oe jorce at we time this marnage is | Muceme al ourts, the witnessmast | glieged to have taken place, would never have witherses are, tor the most part, consistently with | were Govermor Kevbert Dunk » i sti ° soln, of t 1, Im presence of the proctor ot the ee ot . +4 ta legitimacy, the — be but bse arti sme f va those | came clare with Covet pp lm ld b q ime ef marriage was o' w Importance in | feets which are clearly ascertained, well estab- | , Prelessor Paoks t Ker otty, aud the seruit | These oa learned and ingenious aw | cuses he the one under consideration. With the ¢, end about whieb there can be no doubt on Seen Fan , t Dowdeia Oriisentee “ore the troope im ‘the eity are not ther, otien ores i ble solventors ot the | cor Aletivg evidence before us, we may ail ask, f a Chancellor. tis only necessary to | jriccipal inourners were Rev. President All aders. complarnent, Ne Necessity of great cure | when Zulime ceased 10 become the wife of De- jarne Caallivet, to | wish iw » of duagivers o ‘ 4 onnia.— The ship Cali- = ioe oe “te tad 7 4 wie Chancellor, in | grenge, end when she legally became the wife of | chow how impessible it stent with pnd pt ont conn av ependinter ewhog stincny iineeses who are | Clerk? Let na, for instance, suppore th © the | to give credit to her teaumony. She states that | wae buried by the « got uncer Wey um the ctreem, early | pever seen by the court, und who, as it happeas yh adem : “ “f' : aking, and Went to, bes With a’ cenart | Tavs ielenet ens eee vine etemeet ous muirage took place, as Medome Despan ho. de« he prelimmnartes of the coutemplated marriage (of | ond her daughter, Mw d without ao eseort of armed | Ayres, to cf General Carrera, nine of | “auere is great excite bere and it is believed hove suffered. im that wer wit) tak ing wided the ion—emong the f whem have emee been erated, after paying forced lavet. The statements of the two | was iighly honored at ner death. Her pall bear eu armed | Other tide eréily in the rev ex-Piesident © halt t By far the greater number of our wealthy mer- I BCLINED G chonts are subjects of Old Spain, who hace = | fornia Pook iered, from time | yesterday les. Ad ville Allen, She was be lime, great imyustice | hi y her depositions, “ , Zul government, such as forecd loupe, &e., &¢. About | 5: sé jad A young bandecme lady y seem | cn the reevid of the euse How under consideration, | the tine Span ah ye vermasent pony = Saicwa ds hte beeoe, es the year toad oc heoee . N ts ps Het ty k, wear Newark, N.J.— Bos @ yeat age, in the mde of a difticelty of this hied, | & oa aye oc ldusong F More. | jive beyond the process of the court, and speak & | Louisiena. This we know, historically, was | the preeence of witnees, who went to France some | “s Maret vey yt ned, #, the French Consul, 3 @ fore | foreign longuage. be eloee Gi bellape, soteluag his protection ro offend ee ie of whet ehe would have to endure on thelong | Me es 4 wnisese whose testimony ie rehed on by yet clr oe pechy, Which wes gronted. Many biter comma. | *'" i tleus voyage, resolutely insisted upon eo | to prove the fact of the marriage of Mr. Clark with | cf th nicetions pessed between him and the government, | MX? wehere wath tke pilot, who ia vain atiemped | Zulime Curtiere, 1s Medeme Derpan, the aunt of which resulted m bie retirement from the country, |‘ Ois*tede ber, telling her it was a8 much asher | the complement. She ie, at lenet, the ouly wite 3, rod not, as contended | time after the said arren ementa, but previous to at & oe Mom: © complainant, at the date | the entd marticge lluded to.” Wineve has con: Fine @ St. Levis, Mo—-About 7 0 treaty of St. Ldephouse, of 1800, which | stantly resided in France cine she went there, 1 treaty, ond never known in Louisiana | and she returned bere within the last fitteea time defore the delivery of the country | Ceys New, the information of this Witness, *k | i g Afire broke out in the atone bu Iding, t vee, owned and ovenpied by MeAlicter © ( whieh, t ter with its contents, was wet) ; : fe Wee worth to leave the ship in his little eanve, ho ew to the fact f A. & © . burl « emer been replaced a Consul Gene . de w ” * | nese Who swears to the fact from personal knows | | Spain to the Freneh authorities who in reference to important . ‘ Oo. were insured rel end Cherge d’Affairs, Mt Vomeete wre | and ho yous bode hing could alter her resolution, | je¢ge Her testimony has been taken at three | efmost itmediately turrendered’ 0 whe Unveed Clerk's Rintriege, serine to inte. tnereusee sass ity A nah oa fod egeacies it tins CUys F Bot without instructions (on the subject, Four of | ‘he came over the ingh <b S aieaiond aoun Citierent Uumee~ once in 1UGD, once in 1848, aad | Btates We bave, then, most conclusive erence | che Firt gare thle tectum, In her last depo- | 94.6 pak say wok nat pee a ee Roe wih five werke ppe ther forerd loan, at the point of “ a a ide, siippe egain ip 149. that the complainant was born i ie . verre teh, Ht te thow, ‘ the boyonet. o brought out Mr Fin defence = onlony by eso ple ves, and was conveyed Ip 1889 she reyes the old ¢ eale, p44 an pas sighs Fah Daag il Pony ~ i om 5 ee the very nearly, if not quite, cover theit luss — St. hey of the Bpan ards nen understanding * as come Y the gailent pilot to the pilot boat, im | the late Deniel € » uliene, aie yra | Intelligencer, Feb. 27 i oe | Stential'y the provicions of the Spanish law, de. + in 1803, by a Vatholie | elnies ibat the child who is born previous to the ! priest; I wee present at this mariage; one child | jeou Coy of marriege is not preeumed to be the And yet, in the evn - — - : hiv told that she went Horace ©. Allen bes betu arrested at tyan, M io France afier we airabgements for, bat previous | ‘or robbing the wai vet weon Manchester aud Bost to, to the eficet that they are pot to be agaim mo- | b Lawl y Feturbed to the eity.— Boston advertiser, | marricd in lested during the pending negotiations. <i