Evening Star Newspaper, May 7, 1933, Page 76

L m wmwmwm m m mw § mmwm mmm: 4 m ot ly but i a bad thing necessar onism is n i find that this trait of exhibit mm Populatx'on Limit Seen Bdgo gds m Em m M P %m »%mm mxw 8 mmMmmumma m a 884 .Mm, s »mmw mmmm 1 mmmmm muum .mmMu WMMWW& , mm m mwmmm mmm mm M m J M . produces good results just about as often as it does the less desirable ones Scienti: mmwwmmm mm mmmmwmm mmmm I mmMm”“m il mm Wmfi%mmmm mm_mmmmm I i umm mmmmmm .mmw memmmm,_ i mm«m ewmmm mmmw~m mmmmw fl.— m mman_ w”wm Wmmwa TN mm@m mmeMu mmm,um says she was, but rather the greatest as legend doubt that she secretly enjoyed the opportunity to in showed « « There is no g J a > m z 5 : Science now believes that Lady Godiva was no such Yet the fact of science is that Cleo beyond doubt was only a mediocre-minded show-off of all women in history. . 1 University Laboratory. OW very often do we hear Psychologi the fact tendency thing, bul and English & bad B. proved beyond a doubt that save and some ome roundly con- difference M'emm demned as a “show-off”? Usually, the human thus hmdhlfellmvwho w-off” Likewise, numerous experiments conducted by L. E. Travis. Farnsworth and perhaps, is w achieve more when we ex- ‘W‘pectothers-regoIn(Mlee w 284y Bl But phat is even more sur- BY DONALD A. LAIRD, & Ph. D., Director Col, us and the loud style fancier is the way in which our par- ticular show-offishness, so to speak, finds an outlet. for a very few exceptions all of us work better—that is, take more trouble and peins to produce as ‘when- we have an audience than when we have not. few exceptions we “attention of any number of “psychologists in various uni- .such noted sclentists as Drs. -Floyd H. Allport, Paul R. near perfect results as possible— what we do than when we“think nobody but ourselves and perhaps & few friends and familiars whose good opinion we think we can hold whatever we do are going to get & peek at our handiwork. Typical of these highly inter- esting and informative research- “show-offs,” wersities.