Evening Star Newspaper, January 29, 1933, Page 4

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

- which has most privileged nation agree- | + sistence to have all the nations treated . France. + general financial and economic settle- _ ecations that the President-elect has changed , tude. He has let it be known in various . equitable manner. ! each nation individually, the post-war DPLOMACY OLTED BYLINDSAY PARLEY. Who Futilely Sought-En- lightenment Here. BY CONSTANTINE BROWN. ‘The approach of the State Departmend ' acting on_behalf of the President-elect to Great Britain, for tha Te-opening of the debt question has created an extraordinary situation in the diplomatic world. For. the first time in the history of the United States, a foreijgn ambassa- dor, Sir Ronald Lindsay, - the Brit- 4sh Ambessador at Washington, was 80 completely lost “in the maze of American politics that unable to answer the pertinent questions asked him by his government, he went to high officials of the State Department and asked their permission to enter into direct and of- ficial conversation with the members of the Senate. He based his request on the fact that the department was not able to give him the necessary sat- isfaction in replying to certain questions put to him by his government in con- nection with the debt negotiation. The State Department, as much at a loss to undesstand what the President-elect might have in his mind in regard to the future negotiations, hastened to give Sir Ronald its blessing, and since last Monday “he British representative has been in direct contact with the prom- inent members of the Senate. Pays Borah Courtesy Call. In order not to offend the suscepti- bilities of the present chairman of the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, Benator Borah, the British Ambassador made a courtesy call on him, but the Benator apparently could not enlighten the British Ambassador more than Mr. Stimson and his collaborators. From Senator Borah, Sir Ronald went to see Senator Robinson, Senator Har- rison and other prominent lights of the Democratic party. He did his job as well as any good newspaper reporter would do it, asking questions and an- swering none. He ended by obtaining an invitation to see the President-elect through the medium of some of the Democratic Senators. It is true that the actwal invitation was transmitted to the British Ambassador through the State Department, but when the Presi- dent-elect telephoned the State De< partment apparently on other matters than Sir Ronald’s departure to Great Britain, the official to whom he spoke mentioned casually that Lindsay was leaving the United States on Tuesday and in the same casual way, the Presi- dent-elect suggested that unleSs the State Department had any objection, he ‘would like to see the British Ambassa- dor at Warm Springs before he left this country. Mr. Roosevelt had been informed by his friends in Washington that Sir Ron- ald was hungry for news and that no- body here, not even those who are clos- est to the President-elect, could give the Ambassador a correct answer to the many questions he was asking on the instruction of his government. So Mr. Roosevelt decided to satisfy, to the best of his ability, the British' Ambassador. Roosevelt May Clarify Plan. Those close to the President-elect say that he will be able to give Sir Ronald a complete outline of his plan regarding the settlement of the debt question. They say that Mr. Roosevelt has such & plan although neither he nor his ad- Visers who are working with the State Department, on the debt question have given that department the slightest idea 28 to what it is. And the officials of the present administration are asking no questions, since they consider them- selves as mere tools in the hands of the President-elect and are not curious to know how Mr. Roocevelt will solve this | problem. ‘The economists of both parties who have been at work on the debt question recognize, however, that while there may be a number of satisfactory sclu- tions, it will not be easy to harmonize tvtlxe American and the Britich points of ew. The British maintain that the only decision which can result from the Washington negotiations must be a de- cisicn dealing with the reduction of the debt only. That is to say, that .the British government thinks there must be only a bargain in dollars and cents, based, if necessary, on Britain's capac- ity to pay. ‘The President-elect considers the situation from a different angle and says that any reduction of the debts must be based on a counter part which must be offered by the beneficiaries of the reduction. ‘The present British attitude is due to the fact that the invitation ex- tended to them mentioned the fact that the debt question will be taken up in- dividually with each debtor nation. ‘The British government is of the opin- don that if the American government | actually desires to go into the question | of tariffs and stabilization of curren-| cies, it will be necessary to bring in all the other debtor nations, defaulters or | not, and in order to bring home forci- | bly this point of view, it has adopted | its present adamant attitude. British Attitude Clear. ‘The point of view of the British| fomnment is easily understandable. f the American Government wants them to give certain American products | a privileged treatment under their pres- | ent tariffs, if the American Government wants to “horn in" on the Ottawa 'ment, the British government, | ments with many of the debtor nations, | would be placed in a difficult position if it acceded to the American request. It will be necessary, the British say, to have a general agreement between all | the nations and such an agreement | must be based on a global debt settle- ment. The British. like all the rest of the debtor nations, don't want individual agreements. They expect to have to pay_something like $2,000,000,000 2s a final settlement and want the 11 debtor nations to form a pool out of which the amount agreed upon should be paid. In this manner it would be easy Yo finance the payment on the New York, London and Paris money markets b}r issuing bopds payable over a period of years and bearing a rate of interest of 3 or 4 per cent. The real reason for the British in- equally by the incoming American ad- ministration is their agreement with The British are worried that even if the American Congress agreed to give Great Britain a fair deal. France would have a hard time to obtain a set- tlement acceptable to her. The British are not only bound by the gentlemen's agreement to the French, but have a number of political and economic questions in common and could not accept to make an agreement with the United States and leave France out. For this reason they are putting forth requests which cannot be accept- able to the Pr t-elect, in the hope that he will relent ultimately and agree to have all the debtor nations present in Washington in March to discuss a ment. - For the time being there are no indi- in any wag his original atti- ers in Washington that he is hos- | e to no country and that. he wishes ! to treat them all in a friendly and| But he still insists | that the debts have been contracted by settlements have been made again with each nation individually and that it will be difficult to convince the next Congress that the final settlement must be made by treating all nations in the same manner. ‘Whether a point of contact betw: thewiews expressed so far byshe-Bri Mrs. Roosevelt leaving the White- Mrs. Hoover. She was accompanied to where she hailed a passing taxicab to return to the White House limousine. MRS. GARNER URGED BY MRS. ROOSEVELT TO CONTINUE HER WORK (Continued From First Page.) White House and its furnishings. She had declined a White House automo- bile bearing the presidential seal, which waited outside for her. “Mrs. Garner told me,” Mrs. Roose- velt said later, “that she had been her husband’s secretary for 30 years. She said she loved the job and couldn’t bear to give it up. She asked me what I thought, and I told her I saw no rea- son why she should. Nor do I" Later Mrs. Garner said: “We were of one opinion—that we couldn't cease to lead busy lives after March 4. She was charming—just as natural as a human being could be. Of course, she was beseiged by people wait- ing, but we had 15 very lovely minutes together.” One of the first things Mrs. Roosevelt did after her arrival in Washington early yesterday morning was to call up Mrs. Garner, whom she had never met. “I expect to be through at the White House shortly after noon,” she said, “and I thought that, if you are going to be at home, I might stop in and | see you.” Mrs. Garner suggested that, Instead, she stop in and see Mrs. Roosevelt, and she did before Mrs. Roosevelt left | for the White House. “It was €0 kind of her to offer to call on me that T wanted to be kind, too, and insistes I'd go there” said Mrs. Garner. “1 just wore the things I work in. I had on my old pet black hat that has seen many Summers and Winters, but I don't think she knew what I had on.” Mrs. Hoover had offered to send s White House car and an escort to the Mayflower for Mrs. Roosevelt, but Mrs. Roosevelt declined. She wanted to_walk, she said. ‘Warren Delano Robbins. her hus- band’s cousin, who, as Chief of the Protocol Division of the State Depart- ment, is master of ceremonies on state occasions, arrived at the Mayflower shortly before Mrs. Roosevelt left. He and Mrs. Robbins also offered to give her a lift to the White House in their car but again Mrs. Roosevelt declined. Accompanied by her son, Elliott, Louis Howe, the President-elect's per- sonal secretary, and Gene Vidal, a friend of Elllot, Mrs. Roosevelt left for Atlanta by airplane early in the after- noon. An automobile was to be waiting there to drive them to Warm Springs, where Mrs. Roosevelt will celebrate with here husband, his birthday anniversary on_Monday. Later in the day, Mrs. Garner picked up some of the social duties of her station by attending a reception in her honor at the Women's National Demo- cratic Club. One of the largest crowds that ever eddied in and out of the fine old New Hampshire avenue residence came to greet the Speaker's wife. Movement about the tea table was often stopped. so dense was the jem. There wasn't even room for the guests to get their elbows up to eat the cris) cookies shaped like donkeys for whicl the club is famous. Ia the receiving line of six hand- somely gowned women, Mrs. Garner was outstanding in a brimmed hat which becomingly framed her youthful face and gown of blue crepe with neck and sleeves outlined in open-work scallops of white worsted. She bowed smiled and chatted and shook hands as thought she were thoroughly en- Joying every minute of it. A few men, including Senator Rob- inson of Arkansas, minority leader, mingled in the throng. HELD AS COUNTERFEITORS NORFOLK, Va, January 28 (#)— Secrct Service agents, busy for the past several months in a search for the source of the counterfeit quarters that had been flooding Norfolk, struck light last night, arresting two men and seiz- ing a quantity of alleged counterfeiting equipment. H. W. Craddock of Princess Anne County and C. R. Robinson of Hanover street, Glen Rock, the two alleged coun- terfeiters, are being given a hearing to- day before United States commlufoncr Percy S. Stephenson. ish government and the views of the President-elect can be found is for the time being unknown. Mr. Roosevelt will certainly inform the British Am- bassador of all the pitfalls he will have to encounter when the settlement of the war debts is brought before the next Congress and will ask Sir Ronald to explain the difficulties to his govern- ment so that the coming negotiations should procced with a better under- standing between the two countries. Broadcasting Easy For Mrs. Roosevelt, Now “a Regular” By the Associated Press. NEW YORK, January 28.— Mrs. Pranklin D. Rocsevelt takes radio almost as a matter of Each Priday night she N. B. C. with advice on some current problem, but she never bats an eye before the microphone, so fearsome to some. She always arrives at the stu- dlo a few minutes before the broadcast for a brief voice test, then takes her place at a table to await her turn. Meanwhile she studies her script. Phen, getting her signal, she delivers her talk as if she were. reading to a fire- side group at home. and | THE SUNDAY STAR House yesterday after ghe had called on the gates by Irwin Hoover, chief usher, her hotel, declining with thanks 4 . Photo. LEAGUE TROUBLED BY FRENCH-GERMAN CABINET COLLAPSE (Continued From Firs ) of the League hoped for further re- actions to warning messages from the,| League and from the United States. A committee charged with handling the dispute between Bolivia and Para- guay over the Gran Chaco remained discreetly silent. Indications are that they proposed to Bolivia and Paraguay the dispatch of a neutral commission to the Chaco in an effort to end the fighting. Replies from the two gov- ernments are expected Monday. HERRIOT MAY BE CALLED. Former Premier Mentioned to Form New Government. PARIS, January 28 (#).—President Albert Lebrun is looking for a strong man to handle the delicate parliamen- tary situation resulting from the over- throw early today of Premier Joseph Paul-Boncour. The powerful figure of former Pre- mier Edouard Herriot looms as potential head of the government, although his strong attitude on the war debt mo- mentarily appears to eliminate him. A certain amount of receptivity, how- ever, was indicated in his statement to the Associated Press relative to the possibility of his forming a cabinet. “It is too early,” he said. “The lines are not clearly drawn.” It was M. Herriot who was overthrown because he in- sisted that France make the debt pay- ment to the United States December 15. Not only is the Chamber of Deputies upset because of & split in the Left ma- jority, resulting in a Socialist defection, but there have been numerous disorder- ly demonstrations against heavier finan- cial burdens. The latest was a mani- festation of tax the boulevards: M. Paul-Boncour, who had ruled only 40 days, was defeated, 390 to 193, early this morning on the taxation issue. The combination of Radical Socialists and Socialists, which bad supported him, broke over proposals for 2 5 per cent increase in income and other general taxes. Friends of Edouard Daladier, war minister in the Paul-Boncour govern- ment, are presenting him as the ideal strong man, favoring the decree method to balance the budget. Others prom- inently mentioned are Camille Chau- temps, minister of interior under M. Paul-Boncour, and Senator Jules Jean- neney, with former President Gastcn Doumergue as a possible neutral com- manding figure. Taxpayers from various regions of France, carrying placards as though at national convention, made a manifesta- tion in streets of the American quarter, causing nervous merchants to pull down their iron shutters. Many temporary arrests were made, but charges by plumed and helmeted Republican guards dispersed the mani- festants who previously had adopted resolutions oppesing higher taxes. President Lebrun will continue his consultations with political tomorrow. TUNCERTAINTY IN BERLIN. Von Papen Expected to Play Important Role in New Cabinet, BERLIN, January- 28 (f).—Chancel- lor Kurt von Schleicher, for almost a decade considered to be Germany's most clever player of political chess, to- day was checkmated by the opposition which he a few days ago described as political manipulators and resigned. Former Chancellor Franz von Papen, Nationalist Leader Alfred Hugenberg and National Socialist Leader Adolf Hitler, plus the East Prussian Junkers and also certain big industrialists, per- suaded President von Hindenburg that Gen. von Schieicher was unable to | master Germany’s economic crisis and insisted that a stronger man must be placed at the helm. With the dismissal of Gen. von Schleicher, President von Hindenburg's conception of the constitution has be- come a pivotal question. On one hand those who scorn parlia- mentarism try to convince him the country is in such a state of emergency that-the fate of the people is more im- portant than the letter of the constitu- tion. On the other hand organized labor of all political shades solemnly adjures the President to “energetical- ly oppose all underground efforts aim- ing at a coup d'etat and to insist upon a constitutional solution of the crisis.” The de; n_premier, Otto Braun, even issued a public warning that a declaration of a stat of national emergency would be tantamount to high treason. Former Chancellor von Papen, as the confidant of President von Hinden- burg, immediately started contacting Herr Hitler, Dr. Hugenberg and the Centrists, but Wilhelmstrasse expects :: definite developments before Mon- y. Gen. von Schleicher, head of twentieth cabinet since ihe birth of the German Republic, resigned after gov- erning the nation only 56 days. This was a shorter administration than any previous chancellor’s with the exception of that of Prince Max von Baden, head of the Jast imperial cabinet, who was swept away by the revolution after 30 days in the chancellorthip. Gen. von Schleicher resigned be- cause the President refused to vest him with power to dissolve thé Reichstag. He interpreted this refusal as meaning that he no longer enjoyed the Presi- dent's _confidence, without {would be impossible for hinr to rule in the face of a hostile Reichstag. et 865 5 SR, leaders the woolen industry, is being used to keep steel surfaces bright and prevent Tests have shown it to be su- Crude_lanoline, a waste product of | Nevada. WASH ROOSEVELT T0 GET RECOGNITION PLEA Col. Landes Heads Drive for Trade Pact With Soviet Russia. BY FREDERIC WILLIAM WILE. President-elect Roosevelt, as a result of plans formulated in Washington yes- terday, is to be urged to recommend American recognition of Soviet Russia in his inaugural address on March 4. The movement to that end has been unched by Col. Lewis Landes, World War veteran and now senior colonel of the Reserve Corps of the United States Army. Col. Landes is a prac- ticing lawyer in New York City and the recent organizer of the “National Committee for the Recognition ofgSoviet Russia,” of which. he is chairman and general counsel. Declaring himself and primary grounds—the substantial bene- fits which he alleges would accrue to American industry, with consequent un- employment relief, and the urgent de- sirability of a friendly Russia in the Far East, with a view to the possible danger of a conflict between the United States and Japan. Mr. Roosevelt has had submitted to him a communication addressed to the Recognition Committee at New York by Senater Joe T. Robinson of Arkansas, who will be the majority leader of the new United States Senate.’ Senator Robinson declined on principle to per- mit the use of his name as a member of the committee, but said: “During the last session of the Congress my unqualified indorsement was announced of the diplomatic recognition of the Russian state by the United States with a view to establishing closer trade relations between the two countries. The opinion then expressed has not been altered.” Col. Landes is unmistakably of the opinion that the Democratic Senate leader's support of the recogni- tion cause insures it at least sym- meflc consideration at President-elect sevelt's hands. Believed Favorable. Although no public utterances of his justifies it, the beliel persists in Wash- ington that Gov. Roosevelt is strongly inclined in favor of establishing official relations with Soviet Russia. One pur- pose attributed to him is the early appointment of & United States trade commissioner to Moscow, who would prepare the ground for later and even- tual diplomatic intercourse between the two governments. During the 1932 campaign, Gov. Rosevelt had protracted talks at Albany with Walter Duranty, famous New York Times correspondent in Russia. Mr. Duranty ranks as an ad- vocate of American recognition of the Soviet. e Col. Landes, who was one of the or- ganizers of the American Legion and whose final war service was as a mem- ber of the staff of Gen. Dickman, commanding the American Army of Occupation on the Rhine, c the National Committee for the Recog- nition of Soviet Russia is already forth- coming although the movemegt is bare- ly a month old. Among those who have assured the committee of their approval are Gov. Gifford Pinchot of Pennsylvania; Gen. Willlam S. Graves, U. 8. A, retired, who commanded the American Expeditionary Forces in Rus- sia; Representative Hepry T. Rainey of Illinois, Democratic leader in the House of Representatives, and a host of American manufacturing and exporting concerns, anxious for expansion of the United States’ trade with Russia. Gen. Graves wrote the Recognition Commit- tee: “My convictions are strong that the United States should recognize Soviet Russia. It is my conviction that such recognition would have a stabiliz- ing effect in the Far East. But possibly we have waited too long.” Representa- tive Rainey wrote: “I have always been in favor of trading with Russia. The sentiment in that direction is increas- ing now, I assure you.” The National Association of Manufacturers, as a body, has cxprcssed to Col. Landes its interest in the\recognlmn plan. Objections Recalled. ‘This writer explained to Col. Landes that the consistent policy of the State Department, beginning with the Wilson administration and continuing through the Harding, Coolidge and Hoover ad- ministrations, has been that the United States cannot shake hands diplomati- cally with Soviet Russia s long as the Moscow’ government refuses two things: (1) to acknowlgdge the validity of the pre-Bolshevist government’s debts to the American Treasury, and (2) to pledge itself irrevocably to abstain from Com- munist propaganda in this country, directly or indirectly. “I cannot state too emphatically,” sald Col. Landes, “that the Committee for the Recognition of Soviet Russia has no connection with, and is in no wise inspired by, the Russian authorities at Moscow. No American alive abhors the Communist system of government more than I do, nor is there any American who would more violently oppose its introduction into this country, or any attempt to introduce it. But I am in position to state that Russia is ready, when the time comes, to give our country binding assurances on every score that we have a right to demand. These scores are, first and foremost, & cast-iron commitment in the name of the Soviet government that it will not foster or foment subversive propaganda against American institutions; secondly, satisfactory commitments with respect to the money that the previous Russian government owes to the American tax- payers; and, thirdly, reliable guarantees that goods purchased by Russia in the United States will be paid for on credit terms agreeable to the sellers. “American trade sorely needs the rich Russian market. Our business with the Soviet fell from about $118,000,000 in 1929 to about $32,000,000 in 1931, and to approximately $6,000,000 in the first nine months of 1932. The business we lost was gained by our European busi- ness competitors, mainly Great Britain and Germany. Points te Far East. “If our e needs in themselves were not _sufficient to justify early diplomatic relations with Russia on agreeable conditions, the increasingly menacing situation in the Far East seems to me to make desirable in the highest degree, and as soon as feasible, the establishment of a cordial under- standing between the great Russidn people and ourselves. very one from this country who has been in Russia in recént times knows how that people craves comradeship with - our own progressive Nation. As-a soldier, it is | not difficult for me to envision the im- measurable , would l undesirable emer- 1 gency of war with Japan—Ifrom friend- ship with Russia.” (Copyrisht. 1933.) STATE REPEALS DAM ACT Kills Act Giving U. 8. Jurisdiction Over Site in Nevada. CARSON CITY, Nev., January 28 (). —Gov. Fred B. Balsar late yesterday signed a bill the 1921 statute under which the Federal Government gained jurisdiction over the Hoover Dam reservation area in Southern laims” that | widespread and influential support for | HOUSE KILLS FUND} FORDRY INFORMERS Prohibition Dealt Blow as Enforcement Appropriation Is Cut $680,000. _— (Continued From Pirst Page.) Judiciary Committee and in charge of the real amendment, earnestly de- sires—the 1 resolution come before the ate for eration during this week. Clash Expected. A clash between the two Senators from Wisconsin, Blaine and La Follette, may develop, however, for Senator La Follette demands that the Federal re- lief bill for the destitute be taken up at the earliest og::nunlty. ‘The relief bill recently has been reported from the Committee on Manufactures of which Senator La Follette is chairman, and would provide haif a billion dollars 1 be to aid the destitute. Of thi sum_$200,000,000 would be allotted to the States, the District of Columbia and the Terrjtories, according to population, and the remainder would be used where local funds and the allotment from the $200,000,000 fund was not sufficient to care for the unemployed. ‘Tomorrow morning the Senate Finance Committee begins hearings on the beer and wine bill, recently favor- ably reported to the Senate by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senator Smoot of Utah, the chairman of the committee, has declared that he pro- poses to hear the wets and the drys on the merits of the bill as well as witnesses dealing with the revenue features of the bill. Some of his col- leagues on the committee, among them Senator Harrison of Mississippi, say they intend to override the chair- man on this matter and confine the | hearings to the revenue features of | the bill alone. The bill levies a tax of $5 a barrel on the liquors author- ized. Senator Smoot is an opponent of the beer and wine bill. It is not expectéd that he will undertake to ex- pedite the measure. He postponed hearings on the bill for a week after the Judiciary Committee had re- ported it. Handicapped by State Action. ‘The cut in the appropriation for| prohibition enforcement is more par- ticulerly severe in view -of the fact that more than a dozen States have repealed their own enforcement laws, leaving the burden in those States on the Federal Government, very largely. This is the situation in some of the | most populous States in the Union. The provision in the bill prohibiting the use of any of the enforcement money for the purchase of liquor in making a case is regarded as a big handicap, for without the actual pur- chase of liquor thousands of cases will | be thrown out or impossible to prose- | cute in many of the States and in the Federal courts. The temper of the House appeared to be so strongly against prohibition that if repeal cannot be had in any | other way, the route of denial of funds | to enforce the dry laws would b~ taken. | An amendment cflered by Representa- tive Griffin of New York, a Democrat, proposing to cut the enforcement item by 20 per cent was defeated in com- mittee of the whole only by a vote of | 128 to 113. It was Representative Britten of Illinois who offered the amendment to reduce the appropria- tion which finally was successful. Further Reductions Forecast. If the present Congress, containing as it does many drys who were defeated for renomination or re-election, makes | such a showing on prohibition enforce- ment legislation, the expectation is that in the next Congress, regarded as far “wetter” in sentiment, the reduction of funds for enforcement may be much more drastic. The roll call vote in the House on the amendment to prohibit the use of informers and money to purchase liquor showed the drys 51 bad shape nu- merically. On this vote 110 Democrats, | 1 Farmer-Laborer and 63 Republicans suported the amendment and 62 Demo- crats and 103 Republicans voted against | it. Many of the Republicans voting on | the dry side are “lamo ducks” and will not be members of the next Congress. | Representative Oliver of Alabama, in charge of the appropriation bill, sup- ported strongly the proposals for en- forcement. But it was clear after the first record vote that the wets were in command of the situation and no fur- ther record vote was taken. When the bill reaches i.e Senate, undoubtedly ef- forts will be made to restore the en- forcement item to its original size. Fear Adverse Sentiment. While the wets rejoice in the strength which they have been able to show in the House at this session, some of them are fearful that a sudden lowering of the enforcement bars, before the repeal of the eighteenth amendment and the legalization of the liquor traffic, would cause a scandalous situation in the country and arouse dry sentiment again. Until the present session of Congress the wets have found it impossible to put through provisions cutting the funds for enforcement or to prohibit wire tapping and the use of informers and the use of money for the putchase of liquor to bring about: convictions. Again and again similar gmendments to those now.adopted in the House have been offered to appropriation bills in the past, but they have invariably failed by substantial votes. The results of the last election, !.E]m the platform declarations of both the Democrats and the Republicans, have been responsible for the change in the,present Congress. LOSES 2 OF 3 JOBS OKLAHOMA CITY, January 28 (#). —Deputy Sheriff O. C. Jones apparent- ly #s going to be just one-third as busy as formerly. Jones, who Itves in the corner of Greer County where Beck- ham and Harmon Counties cenverge, has been serving as a_ deputy sheriff in all three counties. Attorney General J. Berry King ruled today that Jones can hold a commission only in the Vote on Dry Informers Tarver Amendment to Prohibition Enforcement Fund Denying Money Passes House b By the Assoclated Press. HE vote by States in the House on' the Tarver amendment to for Liquor Evidence y 174 to 165. (D). Ruth Pratt (R.), Kennedy (D.), Bloom (D.), La Guardia (R.), Gavagan (D.), Griffin (D.), restrict the use of prohibition | Millard pairs listed funds with listed unrecorded and those on the vote: Alabama. For: McDuffie (D.). Against: Hil Jefters (B.), Steagall (D.), (D.), Oliver (D.), Aligood (D.), Almon (D.), Hud- i dleston (D.), Bankhead (D.). Arisona. Douglas (D.). Paired for. (D), (D.), California. For: lebright (R.), Curry Kahn (gn)’, Welch (R.), Carter inst: Barbour (R.), Evans (R.), Swing (R.). Colorado. Against: Eaton (R), Timberlake (R.), Hardy (R.), Taylor (D). Connecticut. For: Lonergan (D.), Goss (R.). Delaware. Against: Houston (R.). Florida. | For: Drane (D), Yon (D.), Green (D.) paired against. ‘\ Georgia. | For: Parker (D.), Cox (D.), Mobley | (D.), Tarver (D.), Wood (D.), Vinson (R), (R.). (R.), (D. “Against: Castellow (D.), Wright (D.), | | Ramspeck (D.), Lankford (D.). ¢ Idaho. Against: French (R.), Smith (R). Tllinois. For: De Priest (R.), M. D. Hull (R), Kelly (D.), Sabath (D.), Schutz (D.), | Kunz (D.). Britten (R.). Chindblom | (R.), W. E. Hull (R.), Rainey (D), Major (D.), Arnold (D.), Parsons (D.). Against: Johnson (R.), Allen (R.),| Hall (R.), Holaday (R.), Adkins (R.). Keller (D.). Indiana. For: Bohne (D). Crowe (D). len (D.), Larrabee (D.), Griswold Against: Canfield (D.), Ludlow Purnell (R, Greenwood Hogg (R.). | | Gil- (D). (D.), (D), Towa, For: Jacobsen (D.). Against: Kopp (R.). Robinson (R..| ™ Haugen (R.), Ramseyer (R.), Dowell (R.), Thurston (R.). Swanson (R.), Gilchrist (R.), Campbell (R.). ‘ Kansas. i Against: Lambertson (R.), Guyer | (R.), McGugin (R.), Hoch (R.), Strong | (R)), Hope (R.), Ayres (D. | Kentucky. | For: Cary (D.), Cerden (D.), Spence | (D.), Chapman (D.), May (D.) Against: Gregory (D.), Moore (D.), Thatcher (R.), Vinson (D.), Finley (R.). Louisiana. For: Fernandez (D.), Maloney (D.), Montet (D.), Kemp (D.), Dedouen (D.), Overton (D.) Against: Sandlin (D.), Wilson(D.). Maine. Against: Partridge (R.), Nelson (R.), Snow (R.). Maryland. i For: Cole (D), Palmisano (D.), Gambrill (D.), Lewis (D.). Massachusetts. For: Treadway (R), Foss (R),| Holmes (R.). Rogers (R.), Andrew (R.), Connery (D), Douglass (D.), Tinkham (R.), McCormack (D.), Wigglesworth (R.). Martin (R.), Gifford (R.). Granfleld (D.), (paired for). Against: Underhill (R.), Luce (R.). Michigan. For: Bohn (R.), Clancy (R.), Person | (R.), Wolcott (R.), Hart (D.). Against: Hooper (R.), Ketcham (R.), | Mapes (R.), Michener (R.P.), Wood- ruff (R). Minnesota. For: Maas (R.), Knutson (R.), Kvale (F.-L.), Pittenger (R.). | Against: Christgau (R.), Clague (R.), | Andresen (R.), Nolan (R.), Selvig (R.), | Goodwin (R.), paired against. | Mississippi. For: Whittington (D.). Against: Rankin (D.), Busby (D.), Ccllins (D.), Ellzey-(D.). Missouri. For: Lozier (D.). Dickinson (D.), Johnson ringhaus (R.) Williams (D.). ]5 )vakms (R.), Cannon (D.), (D). Milligan (D.), Nied- Montana. For: Evans (D.). Against: Leavitt (R.) Nebraska. For: Baldridge (R.), Howard (D.). Against: Morehead (D.), Norton (D.), | Shallenberger (D.), Simmons (R.). | Nevada. Arentz (R.). New Hampshire. rs (D. For: Roge! Against: Wason Against: ). (R.). New Jersey. For: Sutphin (D.)," Perkins (R.), | Auf der Heide (D.), Norton (D.). { Against: Wolverton (R.), Eaton (R.), | Stewart (D®, Seger (R.), Cavicchia New Mexico, For: Chavez (D.). New York. For: Brunner (D), Lindsay (D)), Black (D.), Somers (D. Delaney (D.), Celler (D.), Prall (D. | county in which he votes. ! The Morris Plan Bank offers the INDIVIDUAL the facilities of a SAVINGS BANK with the added feature of offering a plan to make loans on a practical basis, which enables the borrower to liquidate his ob- ligation by means of weekly, semi- monthly or monthlydeposits, It is not neces- The INDIVIDUAL Under Supervision U. S. Treasury Dickstein (D). Boyland (D), O'Connor | | BANK for the Loans are pass- ed within a day or two after filing application— with few excepn tions. MORRIS PLAN notes are usually made for 1 year; 1408 H Street N. W.; Washington, D. C. #Chardcter and Earning Power Ave the Basis of Credie” | (R). o), | | hran (D.), Dyer (R.), || D.). Cook (R.), Corning (D.), red for. pal E : Pish (R), H. J. Pratt (R.), Parker (R.), Crowther (R.), Snell (R.), Davenport (R.), Clarke (R.), Hancock (R.), Taber (R.), Sanders (R.), Reed (R.) Stalkin (R.), paired North Carolina. For: Warren (D.), Pou (D.). Against: Clark (D.), Lambeth Doughton (D.), Bulwinkle (D.). North Dakota. Hall (R.), Burtness D), Against: (R), Sinclair (R.) Ohio. For: Hess (R., Kniffin (D), (D), Lamneck (D.), Fiesinger (D.), West (D.), Crosser (D), Bolton (R.). Against: Hollister- (R.), Cable (R.), Brand (R.), Mouser (R.), Seiberling (R.), Moore (R.), McClintock (R.), Murphy (R.), Cooper (R.). Jenkins (R.), paired against. Oklahoma. For: Disney (D.). Hastings (D.), McKeown (D.), McClintic (D.) Against: Cartwright (D.), Swank (D.), Johnson (D.), Garber (R.). Oregon. For: Martin (D). Against: Hawley (R.). Pennsylvania. For: Beck (R.), Stokes (R), Rans- ley (R.), Boland (D.), Brumm (R.), Campbell (R.), Darrow (R.), Davis R.). Erk (R., Estep (R.), Lichten- walder (D.), Turpin (R.), Watson (R.). Connolly (R.) and Wolienden (R.) were paired for the amendment. Against: Biddle (R.), Coyle (R.), Kelly (R.), Kinzer (R.). McFadden (R), Magrady (R.), Shreve (R.), Strong (R.), Swick (R.), Temple (R.). Rich (R.), Kurtz (R), Stull (R.) and cochran (R.), paired against, Rhode Island. For: Burdick (R.), Condon (D.). Against: Aldrich (R.). South Carclina. For: McMillan (D.), Gasque Fulmer (D.), Johnson (D.). DAgunst: McSwain (D.), Stevenson (D.). Polk (D), South Dakota, . Christopherson (R.), Wil- Tennessee. For: Lovette (R.), Davis (D.), Byrns (D.), Crump (D.). Against: Taylor (R.), McReynolds (D.), Mitchell (D.), Eslick (D.), Brown- ings (D.), Cooper (D.). Texas, For: Dies (D.), Mansfield (D.), Bu- chanan (D.), Cross (D.), Kleberg (D.), Thomason (D.). Against: Patman (D.), Sanders (D.), Rayburn (D.). Sumners (D.), Johnson (D.), Briggs (D.), Lanham (D.), Blan- ten (D.), Jones (D.). Utah. Against: Colten (R.), Vermont. Against: Weeks (R.), Gibson (R.). Virginia. For: Burch (D.), Montague Smith (D.), Woodrum (D.). ‘Washington. For: Horr (R.), Hadley (R). Against: Summers (R.), Hill (D.). West Virginia, For: Bachmann (R.). Against: Bowman (R.), Hogg Shott (R). (D.), (R, Loofbourow | GESTURE DENED NTONOWARGAME |Osumi Implies Fleet Will Ma- neuver as Far as Man- dated Islands. BY the Associated Press. ‘TOKIO, January 28—Admiral Mineo Osumi, the naval minister, told the Ase soclated Press today that the mavy 1933 maneuvers beginning late in A gust will cover a large area of the seas “southward of the islands composing the territory of the Japanese Empire,” but he declined to confirm or deny whether they will extend to the mandated ise lands in the Equatorial Pacific. = The navy minister's comments, how= ever, strongly implied that the zone of operations would include at least a por= tion c” *he mandates—the Mariannes, Caro! 5 and Marshalls. “If the fleet should maneuver as far south as the mandated islands,” Ad miral Osumi said. “it would be nothing new as our warships often have beem there.” Entire Navy to Mass. The navy minister explained that the 1933 war games would be the “grand maneuvers” held every third year with the entire navy participating “Such a big event cannot be staged glr-n st;::t&-hof Jagnn o;_?)ng to the lack " he said. “There Ml;;flcant in it.” i Reminded that the maneuvers in neighborhood of the mandated !Sh!?d‘: would place the Japanese Navy between. the United States and Guam and the Philippines, Admiral Osumi laughed. “The southern islands, such as the Bonins and even the mandated groups are our home coests,” he said. “If we maneuver off them we are only doing what the American Navy does when it maneuvers off California, Panama or Hawail. Certainly no gesture of any kind is intended thereby.” Cruise to Be Brief. The fleet's southward cruise, the na | minister asserted, would necessarily | brief because of the cost and the f that the southern islands lack harl suitable for protecting battleships, pecially in the September typhoon set son. He said there were “no particular| grave reasons” for the time chosen-| two months earlier than usual—excej| a desire to provide “experience und different clim: conditions.” That ii | under subtropical Midsummer cond: tions. | Admiral Osumi declared that reper: | —which figured in recent inquiries the Mandates Commission of t League of Nations—that the navy w: | building submarines and airfields o the mandated islands, were “withol | foundation.” | For “Commercial Purposes.” “I know ports are being built on the islands for purely commercial pure poses,” he continued. The admiral asserted that it Would be technically impossible to use these ports for the purposes ascribed to them in the reports from Geneva. The co- lonial ministry is building the ports, not the navy, he said. The naval minister declined to state | whether Japan would retain the man- dates in the event of withdrawal from the League of Nations, asserting that the question was hypothetical. He also declined to comment on the proposal that America retain a naval base in the Philippines after independence has | been granted those islands, and he would say nothing concerning the American Navy's concentration in the Pacific during the last year. ‘Wiseonsin. For: Amlie (R.), Kading (R.), Scha- fer (R.), Stafford (R.). Rellly (D), Withrow (D.), Boileau (R.), Schneider (R.), Peavey (R.). Against: Nelson (R.), Frear (R.). Wyoming. C arter (R.) not voting. SALTZ BROTHERS e 1341 F ST. N.W. Tailored Clothes . (Including the $1 Wool Hose $1.50-82 Neckwear Undershirts Silk Mufflers. $15 Trench Coats Tab Collar Shirts.. Fine Silk Neckwear. Reduced to two low ' SALTZ BROTHERS parel for F STREET, ine q 134 S CLEARANCEE Our Entire Stock of Langrock Custom- * Windsor Oxford Shirts... 85 Dickey Bosom Shirts... 55¢: $2.50 Broadcloth Pajamas... -$1.65, $1.95, $3.95 All-Wool Sweaters.... All-Wool Golf Hose.........$1.95, $2.95 * French, Shriner & Urner Shoes . « Our Own Stocks of Finest Quality Furnishings and Hats I and French, Shriner & Urner Shoes. (R.), and Lehlbach (R.), (not voting). | $45 Langrock Suits $60 Langrock Suits New Drape Suits) 55¢ -$1.95 -$1.15 65¢ -$1.69 Shorts. -$9.95 8169 $1.95, $3.95 prices—8$7.95-88.95 geatlcmen

Other pages from this issue: