ian, wa _ THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: SUNDAY, JUNE 27, 1880—SIXTEEN PAGES. idee Test diameter of the ring being about one- ‘of the greatest diameter. queries will south Thursday at 3:01 p.m. Its ane difficult to distinguish him from o por Npar, as be is along way off, tnd well down the west by the end of evening twilight. ‘Neptune will south Thursday at 8:07 2. m. _———————— New York Sun of theday before Han- g nomination had a double-leaded leaderon wquden, the Candidate; or, the Great Issue Sur- dered,” a5 follows: oir ‘q@ilden wasiegally elected President. All ur brats and most Republicaus believe this. oer ‘Tilden was cheated out of his office. Mr Tiayes, by an woconstitutional tribunal, qcipinced in the office to which Mr. Tilden was me rlayes lng held the offico only by an illegal aoa fraudulent title. cei ‘of the people, as expressed through he ‘ablished legal channels, was thwarted. oGasa monstrous fraud, which ought never doned. one rr Tilden is not renom{nated, then this jgantic fraud is condoned. S'Eisd the astute and Yenerable Thurlow Weed ram reporter yesterday: 105 Tree Democrats must gloe up the fraud or pep must nominate TAden, ‘This ig the simple truth of the situation. If yamiiden isnominated, a wronged and in- Mr a party, containing & grout majority of tho sulsof the United States, is afforded an op- nity to vindicate the cause af popular Porerament. If the fraud by which Hayes was Hijeed in power De not rebuked by the renom- jaation a0 reelection of Tliden, then the fact jeemtablished that the Democratic party is tno ting and uncertain to be depended upon forthe defense and preservation of the rights of le. noperereill probably decide. Tt would be as ta mistake to abandon Tilden uow as it get have been to abaudon ‘Washington in the Sine of the American Revolution. pis article was telegraphed to the Cincinnati pers and published before the nominutfon was made. The Convention concluded to surrender the “great fraud issue,” and abandon it and its embodiment as “ dead.” ——<—=—__— {ue Prince of Santa Severina, who was the oocaston of many of tho late duels in Pans, jean Italian gentleman. He carns his Mving by firing his name to a brand of champagne. He ad a duel tho other day with somebody un- to fame. Nobody could discover the pause of bis quarrel or the occupation of hisad- versary. The bright journalists of Paris poked fonat the Prince. Ono of them wrote: Tne Prince, finding bimseit in this Capital, and bet anxious to conform to its customs, gent for bis valet and told him to prepare to Sart the next morning for tho Belgian fronticr. “Imust fight a duel wit! somebody,” added his Highness. “*'1 have been here over ten days “With whom is bis Highness going to “to scour the swords. i re- Pirwed bis muster, flercely. “With me!” cried the astonished man. “Parbleu!” roared the proudnoble. “Icannot get up even the show Pra quarrel with anybody else.” ‘The Prince sent a challenge to the writer. The jatter responded. On the field of honor, evi- dence was required of the journalist's standing. isseconds took offense, and challenged the Prince's seconds; so there were three ducls in- meadof one. The affair was taken up and dis- cussed; more ducls arose, and the fruitful theme isstill multiplying “gentlemen of honor.” As aPerisian guel is only a pin scratch, more or Jess, there doesn't seem to be much reason why the Prince of Santa Severina shouldn't be an oc- casion of grave dispute until the end of time. ———— AFeEw days ago we had some observations upon the general character of a large body of men who make themselyes offensive because of the prominence they assume in all public demonstrations of the Democratic party. In fllustration of that fact, we copied a list of names published by the Chicago Times purport jngtobe alist of self-constituted representa- tives of the Democracy of Chicago who had gone tothe Cincinnati Convention. The Times dis- tinguished the persons named in this list from the number of reputable persons who had also goneonthesame mission. Finding this list in ‘the Democratic organ, and assuming that it was posted as to the persons and their character, we used the listin zood faith. It seems, however, thave been largely false and malicious. In the ‘first plnce many of the persons named did not gotoCincinnat! at all, and among those whom ‘the Times ptously prayed might never be al- Jowed to come back to Chicago alive were sev- erat respectable and estimable citizens whom that paper thus sought to insult and degrade. “Among those whose names were thus wantonly used were Messrs. C. J. White, Louis Spicgel, gud John J. Corcoran, and, douptless, several otaers. So far as THe Trrsuxe did these or any otuers injustice it has only to express a regret that it was deceived by accepting the Times as an authority concerning their character per- soually or as Democrats. os Tue existence of the Cincinnati Times as an independent newspaper ended yesterday. It will be transferred to-morrow to its youngerand more vigorous rival, the Star, which, selling at a lower rate, has been able to cut the ground from under it. The Times was founded about 1838 or 189 by Calvin W. Starbuck on a capital of a few hundred dollars. By great self-denial and un- tiring industry he managed to build up a large property. His paper had one of the best weekly cirenlations in the country, years ago. He was offered $200,000 for the Times just after the Civil War, but demanded $225,000, and would not sell forless. The Intending purchasers established a rival newspaper called the Chronicle, and spent, it is said, nearly $350,000 in striving to supplant the Times. About 1871, Starbuck died, and the two papers were consolidated under one _ management, $175,000 having been paid for the ‘Times to the Starbuck heirs. Meanwhile, the Star came into being, and, while it made little or no money for itself, it prevented the Chronicle- ‘Nimes from making any. Ithas been an open secret. fora year.or more that the Times has been losing money at the rate of $15,000 to $2,002 year; and, of course, its winding up. under the circumstances, was @ mere question of time, ‘ ——————__—_. Ax active controversy is now roing on among the membersof the Jewish Order of B'nai Brith in this city. During lute years, a large number of Polish-Russian Jews have taken up their residence in Chicago. These, having pros- vered, have asked permission tu form lodges of that Order amoung themselves, to which there is opposition. The Polish Jews have herc- tofore been largely exciuded from civilization, andsocially have not been held in high esteem by other Israelites, and the objection is founded on social prejudices,—such, perhaps, as exist among Gentiles in certain localities against Israelites generally. The question is whether the Order of B'nai B'rith shall recognize this Prejudice, and perpetuate it by denying the Poles a charter of their own, or whether they Will seek to elovate them by according to them inthe Order that equality which is consistent With the broad and liberal principles which are common to all Americans. This question is Sharply discussed in several articles in the Yavish Messenger of Chicago of yesterday. It shows that social prejudices are not confined Wwany race, and it will be interesting to sce if the Jews of Cnicago can rise above them.

Chicago Daily Tribune dated June 27, 1880

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16