The Nonpartisan Leader Newspaper, October 19, 1916, Page 15

i i Braner Block MINOT’S PIONEER CHIROPRACTORS ; « Drugless Healers Minot, N. D: : You will always get'a square deal if : you trade with: Ghmgo Cash Store Co., Inc. . K. Edelman, Pres. and Mgr. { Egeland and Rock Lake, N. Dak. ' The E.dmore Mercantiie Store ight treatment should D. bo'f:. We:try to be i U always find Satisfaction Yohum«uflu Pmpcfi.: Trading Co. HANSBORO, - : Onr utablishd motio is “MORE FOR YOUR MONBY"! Mlchlgan Mercantile Co. MICHIGAN - FARMERS— When in Hampden ‘make your : headguarters at { Canenburg’s Sanitary Shaving Parlors Good Work Courteous ‘Treatment MM Hhm(flnflmrlm:nrhm -v(:o-.mywfl or wire i the act of the people? . REVERSING mmn OPlNION NO.D4K. . ot tF nulflly TO HIT POPULAR RULE This blow at popuhr !'ichts this inmlt to direct’legislation, was struck by the supreme court South Dakota ‘in its: decision - in ‘the ¢case of: Rxehlldsrs. in the:bill by the legislal it not subject: to referend ulent, contrary to: the made the legislature’s he “alleged’ that only the ' peoy repeal an act passed by the pe - The court m "its. opinion first nverses : the old opinion of 1901, A% that time' the court, as will be remembered,. declined to interfere when the: leg:slaim'e had attached an: fllegul emergency clause | to ®u bill to prevent a referendum by. the —~ people. - It declared then that the legis- iature was the only judge of what an emergency ‘was and that the courts could - not go back of the legxslntures act. In" the mnew opinion, 15 Vyears .later, it~ declared that the courts could and would' interfere when a’fraudulent emergency. clause was sttached by the legislaturs . and said that a fraudulent emergency. clause could not prevent a referendam. ,». The: court said in the new opinion; “The attachment of an. unwa.rranted and void emergency clause to an enact- ment can in no manner prevent the filing of a proper referendum petition.” But the court refused: to declare the repeal of the Richards’ ‘act void on this account. IT DECIDED THAT BE- | . CAUSE THE .FRIENDS OF THE . RICHARDS ~ACT AND DIRECT LEGISLATION HAD FAILED TO START A REFERENDUM AGAINST: THE LEGISLATURE'S REPEAL OF ' " THAT MEASURE THE COURT! oom.n ' NOT. DECLARE ' THE LEGIS TURE’S ACT VOID: In other wo!ds, the court held that My. Richards and his ~ friends should have done something that thk court previously ~had . forbidden.: = This in itgelf was a remarkable posflnon for the judges to take, % -The court then goes on. throngh 14 pages of closely: typewntten matter to prove that the legxshture has the right to repeal acts of -the ‘people as'fast as the people enact them. Tt takes dde— ~ pages to read undreamed of thm (Contmue;L on’ page 18) " [For Milady! Mn-m.wmnmm lnzflutmhanmplyotlhfim 2 Inweoxdwlthtb.lumtawle. . Our Epeclal designs from sbeel dle plates. —intwomdflmneom—mmbmu .ol axd handsomely M and lnu!mlo.‘ ‘PLAGE CARDS, CALLING CARDS' | INDIVIDUALLY. COLORED i smqm{ly. ETC. "'Am-mnasmmtuzs.m - Edison’s ¥nesrion Pay Less | lntérést‘ } e_n! G..@.t 0..!! 9.f Debt ousnd 1818.'1 and when nobes : p:do’, the debt and” mg;;:!m paid , infull. Kg!\.xbotmw $1000 and pay Cwenty ‘years you m cipal, ‘makin $22(gd 8386313 p or. 3 more the nmortized ylan.« Wme