The New York Herald Newspaper, October 10, 1877, Page 6

— rowedy that defect, and it was then that Mr. Tweed | Mr, Tweed’s office in Di geve him such directions, The fact caa be proved if Nested again. Mr. Hughes can be obtained asa wit- nessa ‘WILLIAM SELSON VS THB PROPLE—SEWER ITB COR. ‘Ract, Mr, Tweed never saw Nelson to his knowledge, Upon the part of Mr. Tweed. who was then Commissionor of Public Works, his friend the Deputy Commisioner, Mr. King, made the arrangement with the person who represented Mr, Nelson, The understanding with Mr. Nelson, through Mr. King, was that Jarge quantities of pipe should ve calied fer. in the Specificatiqgs in the contract which would not be required to be delivered, and that email quantities of other sized pipes of greater value, as get forth in the specifications, should bo called for srom the contractor, thus alluwing the bid to be for the large quantities in the speciticatious much less tha the pipe could be purchased for aud on the aver- ae of the balance of pipe called tor, allowing great proat, the bid being computed as to quantity, as @alied for in the specifications The meaning was that mo one would bid for the contract in fall as set forth in the specifications, and the person who did bid was satisfied, because he knew what wi to be called for. The arrangement through Mr, King with Mr, Tweed was that Mr, Tweed was to receive ten per cent from each payment made by the Comp- tfoller atter approval by Mr. Tweed as Commussioner of Public Works, The corroboration ig this matter depends upon se- ouring the evidence of Mr, King, unless Mr. Tweed’s evidence can be supporied by the stat at of the kind of pipe called tor by the department, ‘RL JONRS & CO, AND ROGERS, STATIONERY AND PRINTING, Mr, Tweed is not informed at this moment what the bills now against the city are, but from his knowledge of articles which a furnisbed by these people Jones and Rogers) be thinks that upon examisation he can satisfy any jury of their falsity, Hoalsothinks that be can furnish, if at liberty, direct proofs of their falsity by the testimony of a person he cannot now reach or control. Mr, Tweed ‘Was personally acquainted with both Rogers and Jone, and had conversations with each of them {re- quently in regard to the bills which they made up against the city, and which Mr. Tweed pre- @ames is the one now in suit, from the fact that it is the only outstanding one not paid for by the city. The bilis made up by these men, as stated by themselves to Mr. Tweed, were made op regardiess of whether the items contained iu them were furnished to the city or not, Mr, Jones, to Mr. Tweed’s personal knowledge, and the same is susceptinie of other proof, spent one of two winters in Albany during the ses- sions of the Legislature, and used every exertion to have provision made for the payment of this bill inserted in the tax levy, as was the usual course in shose days, to provide for the payment of such bills by Telieving city officers from responsibility of the pay- ment. On all bills paidto EB. Jones & Co. or William C. Rogers & Co, large amounts were paid to different firms for the certification and payment of them, “O’BRIRN’S CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY. Doring the entire time O'Brien was Sheriff, Jamos Hayes, who was then a member of the Board of Su- pervisors of the city of New York, took obarge of | and for a percentage consideration bad passed by said Boaré of Supervisors bills of large amount, which were paid to said O’Brien. Thore were, however, Dilla to about the amount. of $300,000 re. maining unpaid when the Board of Supervis- ors was abolished. These bills were for sup- plies to County Jail, carrying prisoners to State Prigon and other daties devolving on tho Sheriff. These bilis were fraudulent in amount, and Rave not been paid up to tho present time, In the fall of 1871, alter the Ring disclosures, Mr. William KE King, who was then Deputy Commissioner of Public Works and Mr. Tweed’s confidential and right band man, told Mr. Tweed that Me. Bixby, new Senator, desired to have an inter- view with him (Mr. Tweed) for th irpese of having Mr, Tweed buy the whole or part of eaid claim of U’Brien against the city. The interview took place at the Metropolitan Hotel, in a room occupied by & son of Mr. Tweed, aod Mr, Bixby then said that for $160,000 he and O’Brien would sell Mr. Tweed one- bait of O'Brien's ciaim, and would, by ther infuence wth Mr. William 0. Bur- rets and George ©. Barrett, protect Mr. Tweed {rom prosecution arising {rom Ring disclosures, and also that Mr, O’Brien, by his influence with Mr, Sam- uel J. Tilden, would have him co-operate in the same, and sot make public tho oxamination which was then taking place in reference to Mr. Tweed in the beoks of the Broadway Bauk. Mr. Tweod then agreed to these terms, and subsequently and on the 20th day of Oviober, 1871, ap assignment of bis claim against the cily was mado ui sealin Diank by James O'Bries, which wae witnessed by Jo- soph A. Momhetmer, which assignment was delivored to Mr. SF. Dewey as agent for Mr. Tweed, and then by bis son Williom, Mr. 3. F. Dewey, ¥, Kaho, Joba C. Halligan and W, Edeleton, all of whom were con- nected with Mr, Tweed, in bis employ and pay. ‘The comperstively {ow papers which wero nod thes in the office and not immediately accessible are the énly data ftom which Mr, Tweed has been enabled to make up the schedule Reféto andéted, ' WILLIAM & INO. Ut William EB. King, who was Deputy Commissioner of Public Works under Mr, Tweed, and who was My, ‘Tweed’s right band man, and throegh whem most of the illegitimate business im the Department ef Pablic Works was transacted, could be promwed immunity he would be ablo and willing to corroborate Mr. Tweed ia most of such transactions He i in Frauce at the present time, and Mr. Tweed can fied means of communicating with bim, In the cases of Nelson against tho city, Jones and Rogers against the olty, the Navarre whter moter (if more is required) end the O’Brien claim, Mr. King would be of great value, ag alse im many onses where individuals have been illegitimasely paid money by Mr. Tweed, through My, Kieg, by otecks payable to bearer or cash, and ‘whtob checks are in Mr. Tweed's possession, but which he can furnish no etber corroborattve evidence at ent. (Nowm.- The following sentence was erased im the original manuseript : “While be was in confinoment on Blackwell's Island Mr. Tweed’s friends destroyed the stabs of his check books and nis nank books, but copies of his bank ac, count can, of course, ve procered from the bank, which Mr, Tweed is willing to (ernisb.’’) CORNELIUS CORSOS, Cornelius Corson, who is cow under indictment, was clerk to Mr, Tweed when Mr, Tweed was Chairman of the Commitioe on Musicipal Affairs at Albany, aod was one ef the managing dircotors im the New York Printing Company. Corson is not now possessed of apy mogey, but in fact, is very poor. If promised Immuaotty, be would be of immense service by in- dividualiziag members of the Senate and Assembly with whom Mr, Tweed hed Guancial relations, aud ulso be able probably to state specifically the bills, for the passage of whic money was paid by Mr. weed, and particularly in regard to members paid (or passage of what was kaowa as the Tweed Charter end the Jegisiation of 1870 and 1871, NEW YORK PRINTING COMPANY, The New York Printiag Company was an offshoot from the Transcript Association, and was formed by the stockholders of that association, who were W. M. Tweed, Peter B Sweeny, Hugh Smith, James B, Taylor (now deceased), Cernelius Corson and Charles E. Wilbour, Corson and Wilvour were the mi ing membors of the company. It was formed for the purpose of having control of the Printing for the city governmeft ana its de- partments. Mr. Tweed thought that each of the members held about an equal amount of the stock ‘The bills were made up by Corson and Wilbour, were fraudulent in ameunt and well understood by every member of the company to be so, upon which very large amounts of money were received by the com- pany out of the city treasury, for which little or no consideration was given. Alter the bills were made up they were submitted to Mr. Peter B, Sweeny, who made the arrangements with Richard bk. Connolly for their payment, for which it was understood by all that Mr, Connolly received consider- ation. After the payment of such bills ehecks were generally given in payment to the stockholder above- mentioned as dividends upon the stock they held, aod wero signed by Wilbour ag president, o> meeting of the directors being held for such purpose in fact, no meoting of the directors (who consisted of the above named members) was ever held for the purpose of determining the amount of dividend to be paid, but such dividends wore paid directly from the surplus moneys in the bands of ‘Wilbour & Uarson, who performed all the financial duties, Mr, Tweed thinks that the greater part of these bills, if not all, were never audited, but were paid by the Comptrolier upon the application of Mr. Sweeny, and the amounts were paid by the Comptroller directly to Cerson or Wilbour. Mr, Twoed thinks that tho books and bank account of the New York Printing Company and the Manufacturing Stationery Company—which was another offshoot of the Transcript Association, and formed of the same parties, will show the truth of part of the above statement, The accounts were kept in the Ocean Bank, the National Broadway Bank, the Tenth National Bank and Guardian Savings [nstitu- tion, All ot the above facts can be corroborated by Mr, Cornelius Carson, who, Mr, Tweed thinxs, if tmmounity promised bim, would be willing soto do, Sir. Twoed bas not seen Mr, Car- son or bad direct communication with bim for some years, but knows of his circumstances through others, Mr. Tweed says tbat such stocknolder received a very jarge amount of dividends during their brief exist- ence—not icss,' be thinks, than from $60,000 to $100,000 por annum during the three years, SCHEDULE OF MR. TWERD'S REAL ESTATE PURCHASED since 186S—oincLk PROPERTY, were dolivered to Mr. Tweee, The dlank was filled aftor itcame into Mr, Tweed’s possession with the name of Mr. Dewey, which was doue uy xavico of counsel after Me. O'Briep had bad passed a jaw roferring said claim to arbitration or refercnco, Subsequently Mr Dewey assigned saia claim to Mr, Tweed, and such assigameni is also in bis possession, The amount of $150,000 promised by Mr. Tweed was paid, through Mr, Dewey, to Mr. Bixby ia the following way:— Cash $29,000, aod tne beiance by assiguments of good mortgages (which mortgages were paid ‘= full) upom property early opposite the residence of Fernando Wood, and which Mr. Tweed bed formeriy parchesed trom Mr. W. Tilden Blodgett for the sam of $146,000, the mortgages being given Dy parties to whom Mr. Tweed had afterward sold the property as part of. the purchase monoy. The whote opening of the Ring deveropments ariscs from the fect that R. B. Connolly, then Compiroticr, refased to pay thre rome claim of O' Bren, Corrovorative evidence of the above facts are the as- siguments and testimony of Mr. Dewey. BXPLAwATION WRARING EPOX Lack OF ConnonoRaTIVE Trenimosy. After the indietment for miedemennor, commonly Eoown 48 the omoibus intictment, lad been tried the gegond time net Mr, Tweed aay én +n granted belore sentence was provounced. Dering tmet interret Mr Tweed by fsotgo = Fatlerton, = one . ‘pat there was a orized ine appormiment who wonkt have power 40 take possension of his proporty acd exercie al! the rights which be bed bad, Tule slarmed Me. Tweed, und by the advice of Judge Fullerton be tnausterred varices picess of bis property to parties, among hom were several of bis counse!. He aiso at inate time, in eccordance with advice given by bie counsel, destroyed woarly all bis bf seevents, bank books, Hock evidenons of bie previous wemmeuens wie mem. pore of the Ring and others, ‘These wore buracd ia memoranda aud omnor wee convicted, a few | x 19 ™ Se 343 FIPTY-MINTH STREET. oo waxwaY minOrd \e | | i} oor MAVTT-RIGHTH STREET. Bought from Rovert Ackenburgh in September, 1868, Consiteration $200,000, conveyed by Wilham M Tweea to RM, Tweed; deed dated August 16, 1871; mort, | gaged (00, @ Franckiyo, for $125,000, Realized, ator taxes, extra commissions, allowances, &o., about $90,000, mortgage being foreclosed againat Willlam Af. Tweea, KR. M, Tweed and others; suit now pending, FIFTH AVENCR, CORNER FORTY-THIND STRERT. Forty-third street, REMC (9 TITTIES | 123, aul a Ste av \ Z | le Known as No. 511 Fifth avenue, bought in Jay, 1870, by two deeds, one (rom Washington M, Hall, ot oor Jot. and one trom Mra. Trask of the remainder; | eonsideration, $275,000; convédyed by W, M. Tweed to | KM. Lweed, deed dated August 16, 1871. in 1871 Ste, street by bimself, assisted ! Mr. Langdon or Mr, Hatton, or both, for $150,000. Mr, | Mortgaged to estate of Thomas W. Thot Bold to W. A. Childe—net to Mr. Tweed STABLE (RAST FORTIRTH STRERT). Fortioth ‘Tweed netted from this about $130,000, About sbe fall of 1874 Mr, Tweea gave decd to mortgngecs and re ceived in ensh over the mortgages $12,000. In conmection with the above some question arose ae to title at the time of purchase by ls tet ie a le hs Signy Sal Bios ‘which De hefd until the question fm dispute was set. Hod, and then returned :t te Mra, Trask, He never had any interest othor than this im said property of Mrs Trask, Convaréd bp W. Tweed to BM. Tweed by door, dated + Usdslderea about $40,000 (sic.) OUVESTY-POCRTM STREET PROPERTT. a Conveyed by R. st Tweed to A. 8. Stockwoll, with Beventy-ioarth strect. Mr, Tweed’s steam yacht W. M. Tweed. Mr, Tweed E 30 thinks togevber they netted $40,000. 5 ; et SRE SIS Be 3 - x OWS Hundred and Twenticth stroek : E i ee Ca Fy Fd ° E Ps 1 sl 23s | Bought from the Orphan Asylum im April, 1860; consideration, 622,900; conveyod by R. M. Tweed so Bi M. Tw Elia A.D, Twoed by deed. dated Novonber Ai, 1678; potest fl Ll cera RM. Tweed by deed conveyed by Elizs a. D, Tweed 4 Rotied to Mr. Tweed | aotoq march 20, 167% aiour cn . Subject to mortgage of $150,000, fanrt-soom 7 pscsaniabtbeescnicri Conveyed by R, at, Tweed to Willtam Fallerton No- Eighty-foarth street. vember 21, 1873, a a a a 7 Reonveyed early it 1674 by Pulletton to R, Mf. z Tweed. . & Foreclosure proceedings’ were commenced, ana in he 3 z 2 3 | 187510 was sold under foreclosure and was bought in z i 5 | by the mortgagee, Suft is now pending tor deficiency & against the Tweeds. Li 3 nos. 16 TO 86 DUASE STRERT. 100 | 50 Bought from William Pitt fm October, 1869; con- Sideration for the six lots, $25,000; frst four lots - Dearest to Ninth avenue, conveyed by R. M. Tweea to > Eliba Root, by deed dated November 21, 1878; other Bla two were sold to Thomas W. Smith. Theproperty was a of vory !tttie value over taxes, ‘ £ NINTH STREET PROPERTY. rd agi 125 | 2 | Known as Nos. 75, 77, 70, 81, 83 and 85 Duane 376 2 street, purchased from Thomas Palmer in s Docomber, 1866; consideration... ....0-+.« $200,000 H ‘ 12 | Conveyed by W. M. Tweed to BR. M. Tweed In ig : & 8 | 1871. Now, 75, 77, 79 and 81 were wold by R. : 3 4 100 M. Tweed to Mr, Thorpe about Jaty, 1873; : Lane, DN Retted to Mr, TWEOd........0-.ceeyeorerere $80,000 Ninth street. Nos, 83 and 85 were sold by RK. M. Tweed to William Edelson, November 21, 2873, for... $40,000 HIRD AVBXOR PROFEETT, Sixty-third treet, Known as No. 109 East Ninth street. Bought of B, ¥, Fatrcntid 1n Decomber, 1869, consideration $15,000; conveyed vy R. M. Tweedto EB. A. D, Tweed, decd @atod November 21, 1873; conveyed by H. A. D.| (> 105 eT iOrERT aR! eg Tweed about March, 1875, to E. H. Balok, Netted to ny Mr. Tweed about $6,000. 3 8 188 OLIVER STRERT PROPRATY. « abe peemeteees cannons ‘eR ERarH : é le & 38 $ aces as road = 3 aes South street. . Koown es Nos, 100 and 102 Olivor street, Bought 3 from A. B. Ditmars, referee, by B. F. Fairchild for a William M. Tweed; deed taken from B, P. Fairchild in April, 1870; consideration, $12,000. Conveyed vy R. | d M. Tweed to E. A. D, Tweed by deed dated November 05 i 21, 1873; conveyed by FE. A.D. Tweed to M. W. Don- evan, January 81, 1874; net oash received by Mr. Known as Nos. 1,065, 1,067 and 1,069 Third avenue, and Nos, 202 and 204 East Sixty-second street, Lots Tweod, about $5,000. bought tn March, 1864, from Charles G. Corne!l and FIFTRENTE STRERT PROPERTY. Terence Farley, and bouses ince erected. fil rr or ae Aggrogate cost of land and buildings about. Sold toc, Moyers for about,... eeeres SIXTY-THIRD STREET LOTS, Ps | é 3 5 ¥ ; : Z if i % iE § be FI z ele 300 20 | Fitveenth street. | Known as No, 137 West Fifteenth airect. Bought cect thaaraeens from A. J. Smith, refereo, in June, 1870, considera- | Five lots bought from Joseph Smith in 1868, tion, $14,200; conveyed by R. M. Tweed to John C. ++ $60,000 Halligan for services as clerk. Sold to Jacob rpoel for a mortgage of BIGHTH AVENUE PROPERTY. $30,000, and « release on a claim te oad against William M, Tweed before his failare in 118th stroet FIFTY-SHVENTM AND FIVTY-RIGHTH STRERT LOTS. fi Fitty-oightn street, = 60 w5 $ S| 5 3 3 % Z1.3 r = 3 3 3 Fa foe FA : 100 3 100 3 2 | Roa 3 : a f pS 2 . Pa 100 ¥ __ | __100 215 eee i Finy-+ venth aureet. Two lots bought trom Ed. Koarney in August, 1870, for $10,000; mortgage $2,000 to estate of Charles King; 8014 under foreclosure. No particulars, but as faras Mr. Twoed bas escertained no attention was paid to it, it being considered of no value beyond Six lows bought from Charles (, and Honry M. Taver in February, 186% Lots average about $5,000 each—$30,000, Mortgeged to anknown party and the mortgage sold, realizing about $10,000 net for both + 5,610 | Total amount of cost of foregoing real estate. $2,473,600 Real estate realized by Mr, Tweed from sale RRAL RSTATE. Phe webeoule of real ostate hereto anuéned Mr. Whey fo aL tw pr x; Tweed states eeutains ai! the information that be can ‘ROW individually give in reference (0 amy réai estate that be bas beea possessed of since 1870, and is fur- nished from memoranda given to him by parties who had charge of Bis real estate matters. From the time of its purchase np to December, 1873, Mr. George ¥. Domorest, conveyancer and real estate agent, now im New York, was bis agent and bad entire cherge of the same. In December, 1872, it was ail transferred and deeded to Mr, Tweed’s son, Richard M. Tweed, for the purpose of enabling him to qualify as bat! for Mr. Tweed. Since that tine {+ has boon mainly under oharge of Mr. 3 F, Dewey and Mr. W. Edeleton, the letter having beem one of Mr. Tyeed's counsel, Much of the property hes been sold by these gentlemen and the schedulo referred to 1@ made dy memoranda {urmished them at this time and one fury ished by Mr, Demorest at the time of the transfer to Mr. BR. M. Tweed. In consequence of the proceedings tm law ageines Mr, Tweed but » comparatively small amount of the value of this property has ever beem received by Mr. Tweed, the same having been eaten up by various transfers, commissions, back taxes and assessments. Mr. Tweed bas owned nO real estate whatever since 1870, or had any tnterest im any way, legal or equit , Outside of what is set forth in the schedate hereto annexed and above re- ferred to, except 112 lots in Long Island City, in the Queens county, the present value of which he cas furnish estimate of, and two pleces of property in fPusnam county, with val wadle water rights, which to the city of New York must be of great.vaiue, Mrs. Tweed Owns at Greenwich, in Connecticut, a farm of seventy- five acres, with bouse and outbaildiogs, which, with farnitare, &c., 18 worth not more than $60,000, but which, uoder favorable circumstances, would not realize, if wold, $25,000, The groater part of this proverty, about thirty ucres, aud upon which all the buildings are now located, was purchased long prior to 1870, and, as Mr, Tweed thinks, a6 early as 1865, in the name of Mra Tweed, for the sum of $18,000, and che title’ was never beld by him, The balance ot about forty-five acres is farm isod, and bas never been used for any other purpose, sod was bought in 1869 or 1870, aud would probably bring, if sold, aboat $260 per acro in good times, Mr, Twoed’s wilo and four childres now reside on the place. Since 1869 Mr. Tweed has not transiorred to any member of his family or to any other person, either absolutely or tn trust, any Feal estate which Is pot detailed in the schedale bereto annexed, excepting thy lots in Long Island City, which were transferrod to bis nephew, Alired Tweed, three or four years since, without consideration, but which ‘Will be restored at any timo apon application. 4 REMARKS IM CONNECTION OF RBAL ESTATE. Mr. Tweed says that it shoald be remembered that, after bis arrest, the value of his real estate in the eyes of buyers depreciated to a very great extent. To meet the very large domends made upon him tbo ame necessary for him to realize upos this property at no matter whas sacrifice, Nobedy would consent to derive title through him, and freqaent transiers bo- ame necessary before any one could be feand who was willing (© accept, and then atgprices which seomed like giving it away. For the purpose of enabling bis som Richard to become one of the bonds. MeN OF sue vars ve on,cemitvy exacted from him, all the real estate Mr, Twoed was possessed of was deeded tovhim, excepting the Putnam county property and the lets in Queens county, and with all the effort which was thon made to attam tho vatuation of tho property at the bighest ngure it could only ve esti- mated at about $1,000,000, and that was the amount only im which he could justify. PERSONAL PROPERTY. | Mr. Tweed says that bis personal property at no me bas ever exceeded his floating obligations, and of the amoant realized from the sales of personal and real property the following amounts were lost and ex- pended: — Loat in Metropolitan Hotel. Paid his counsel for legal services... Sundry expenses tn trials outside of counsel... 120,000 In regard to loss in Metropolitan Hotel the account of the parties farnishing it will corroborate the above estimate, together with the receipted bills now in Mr, Tweed’s possession (a ment of a part of which is herewith annexed), and also cheeks paid therefor, many of them now in Mr. Tweed’s possession, All the rent was paid by Mr, Tweed outside of auy re- ceipts from the hotel, being $96,000 one year and $116,000 the next. Mr. Tweea says that his outside speculations, such as in Wall stroet, have been about even as to loss and prod. The payments to couusel can be corroborated by checks and notes of payment, and the testimony of Mr, 8, Foster Dewey, who made to counsel, on bebulf mortgage, taxes, interest, &c. Ploces. basa bila Aiabaces: FOURTH AVENUR PROPERTY, tr ob 105th street. Bleecker street, 360 S| | $$ — $ $< — $ $$ Fa F Too . 350 f= 3lz 16 ———— S|e a & e 3! & Fe 85 Fourteen lots from Patrick Daffy in October, 1870, for $28,000; mortgaged to Charlotte A. Marries tor ‘ $16,000; after paying taxes, back imterest, expenses, Aa, netted about $3,500. Mr. Tweed thinks it was wold to Mr, Trask. RIGNTA AVENCH PROPERTY. Koown as Nos, 172, 174, 17436 and 176 Mercer strect, bought from Au § Pottier and William P. Stymus in 1870, for $120,000. i to Isaac and John J, Phelps for $62,000, Cot ed by Wm. M. Tweed to R. M. Tweed by deed November 21, 1871; conveyed by by R. M. Tweed to Wm. Kdetwon by deod, dated November 21, 1873, ~Roventy-firat wtrect 1 subject to Phelps’ mortgage, which was then under Sas = - Joreclosare. Sold under foreclosure during December 8 or January following for about $82,000, Equity from i} referes ander foreciosure about $8,000. “Too BROADWAY PROFRRTY. Lot bought from Gustavas A. Sacebi in March, mi 1809, Carr ae a Consideration, $16,000, Conveyed by R. M. Tweed to FE. A. D. Tweed on No- vember 21, 1 We Conveyed by K A. D, Tweed, Sold, net, about » A 8 $8,000, te | In 1871 Mr, Tweed was offered for this $25,000, on | THIRD Mt ‘FWenty thied Atrect, i) caning inne Known as Non. 922, 924, 926, 926 and 930 Broadway, bought of Henry Nicoll, referee, in February, 1871. “ $000,000 Wo Cram estate 360,000 er by Willian M. Tweed by deed dated No- | yomber 21, 1871, subject to above Morigages. Mort. gages toreclosed and property sold andor forvciosuro 1873. peered foreclosure it netted about..........$50,000 ° WESTCURSTER VALLEY FARM, : Being one-half inverost fn said property, bought from I. W. Jerome od owned jointly with nim. Paid about. ... $300,000 seid tor about 300,000 to M. P, Bush & Co, BuMalo, N. Y. Not over mortgages on sale about. ..+.seseeee4 130,000 Sold early im 1873, bought 1871. Above property deeded to KR. M, Tweed and by bim to M. P Bust & Co. PROPERTY, WASTINGTON HEIGHTS, « $275,000 + 150,000 To A. 7. Stewart for the account of the Pouicr & Styfnug Manofacturing Company, in blank, and by them sold to A. T. Stewort; proceeds credited to WV. M. Known as No, 120 East Twenty-third street, Bought (rom estate of Joseph Mecks in March, 1869... or . Mortgaged to estate of JosopnM oeks Net realized to Mr, Tweed, about... Known as No, 306 Wost Forty-second street, Stockwell and others offered for this prop- [ony 1m 267R mortgaged property te etter ‘Tweed in pats payment of their account in furnishing the Mesropottian Hotel, Bought in March, 1869, from B, P, Patrenild $12,000 of Mr, Tweed, a large amount of above estimate, cnycKs. Thomas Coman—Oct, 30, 1867, $860; indorsed by Thomas Coman. Oct. 29, 1868, $175; imdorsed by Thomas Coman aod G, B. Wilson, ji Oct, 26, 1869, $350; tndorsed by Thomas Coman. Nov, 6, 1871, $660, Jan, 10, 1871, $1,000; ivdorsed by Thomas Coman. James Hayes—Oct. 14, 1857, $367; check drawn to cash, Dee. 7, 1867, $250; cheok drawn to cash. Nov, 26, 1887, $260; indorsed by James Hayes and James M, Sweon: " Doc. 19, 1867, $260; indorsed by James Hayes. Maren 2, 1868, $10,000; indorsed by James Hayes, March 8, 1868, $6,000; check drawn to cash. May 16, 168, $234; chock drawn to oush. June 12, 1868, $1,000; check drawn to cash, Jaly 16, 1868, $1,712; check drawn to cash, August 3, 1868, $720; check drawn to cash, Sept. 10, 1868, $79; cheek drawn to cx Oct. 20, 1868, $3,762; eberk vrawn to cay, Oot. 17, 1808, $777; check drawn to eash. Oct, 29, 1868, $275; indorsed by James Hayes, Doe. 15, 1868, $1,000; check drawn to cash, Doe. 29, 1808, $400; cheek drawn to cawh. March 15, 1869, $3,805; check drawn to cash, April 5, 1869, $300; check drawn to cash, June 24, 1869, $9,061; check drawn to cash. August 12, 1869, $5,000; check drawn to cash, Oct, 4, 1869, $4,800; check drawn to cash, Oct. 22, 1869, $2,000; indoraed by James Hayos, Oct. 26, 1969, $500 (as treasurer); indorsed by James Hayes, Doc, 22, 1869, $4,400; indorsed by James Hayes, Dec, 80, 1869, $4,200; cheok drawn to oxsh, M. M, Pomeroy—Oct. 14, 1868, $5,000; indorsed by W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. 1868, $7,000; 1udorsed by W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. Nov. 3, 1868, $8,000; indoreead by W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. Nov. 17, 1868, $6,000; iadorsea vy W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. Dec. 4, 1868, $2,000; indorsed by W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. Dec. 112, 1868, $1,400; indorsed by W. M. T., paid to Pomeroy. Juno 4, 1869, $3,000; indorsed by W, M, T., patd to Pomeroy duly 8, 1860, $1,000; indorsed by U. P. Sykes, his agent, end M, MP, Aug. 6, $1,000; indorsed by M. M, Pomeroy, Ang. 12, $2,000; indorsea by & P. Bykes and M, M Pom i Bey. 15, 31,800; mdorsed by M, W. Pomeroy. Pomeroy. indorsed by M. G, and Wiliam Clark. ae! 20, 1869, $50; indorsed by M. G. and William lark, one 5 eres ‘Nov. 2% 1869, $10,000; indorsed by Oct. 29, 1960, $025; drawn in favor of W. M. T., really for ©. £. L.. | . A. J, Garvey, June 28, 1867. $1,671 16; indorsed by As J. Garvey. Aug. 18,1867, $1,260 87; indorsed by A. J. Garvoys ‘Sept 6, 186% $187 15; iudeérsed by A. J. Garvey. Nov. 7, 1861, $997 20; indorsed by A. J. Garvey. Noy, 11, 1867, $2,000; indorsed by A. J. Garvey. Dec. 10, 1867, $2,200; indorsed by A. J. Garvey, Jun, 11, 1863, $118; a by a. J. @arvoy, Jan. 18, 1868, $2,030; tadorsed by A. J, Gatvey, Jued4, 1868, $8,173 20; maoreed by A, J. Garvey, June 30, 1868, $6,000; indorsed by A. J. Garvey. Ang. 10, 1868, $5.700; mdorsed by A. J. Garve: Sopt 23, 1868, $6,000; indorsed by a. J. Garvey. Sept, 29, 1858, $100; iedorsed by A J. G., cashed for Douglas Taylor. Nov, 16, 1968, $11,330; indorsed by A. J. Garvey, Aug, 25, 1870, $13,521 ; indorhed by A. J. Garvey, May 3, 1871, $2,800; indorsea by A. J. Garvoy. Ang 31, 1871, $10,000; iudormed A.J. Garvey. Sept. 29, 1871, $1,000; indorsed by A. J. Garvey, Oct 9, 1871, $5,000; tudorsed by John Garvey, Heary Smith—July 2, 1867, $1,730 50; check drawa to enon. 4 July 5, 1867, $750; check drawn to cash, July 8, 1867, $582; check drawn to cash. Ady. 14, 1867, $456 10, check drawn to cash; tm Gorsed Henry smith. |, Aug. 14, 186% $1,169, check drawn to cash; in dorsed Hoary Smith. Sopt. 26, 1867, $915; check drawn to cash. Oct. 10, 1878, $880, check drawn to cash; indorsed by B.S, bi Jan. 9, 1868, $3,180; indorsed by Henry Smith, Jan. 11, 1368 §750;iadersea by Henry Smith. Jan. 11, 1868, $91; indorsed by Henry Smith, Jan. 21, 1808, $896; cheok érawn 16 cash. June 26, 1868, $5,212; check drawn to cash. June 26, 1968, $1,586; indorsed by H. Sailtd. July 17, 1868, $1,712; check drawn to cash. July 28, 1888, $1,025; check drawn to cash. Aug 11, 1868, $300; indorsed by Henry Smith. Deo, 26, 1868, $8,420; cbeok drawn to gash, Jan. 9, 1869, $500 $8; indorsed by Henry Smith, Jap. 30, 1869, $3,000; check drawn to cash, im dorsed by B.S. ; ~ Feb. 19, 1869, $3,667; check drawn to cash, Ine dorsed by HL 8, . June 24, 1869, $4,861; check drawn to cash, im dorsed by H. 8. Aug % 1869, $3,800; check drawn to cash, ine dorsed by B. 3. Aug 4, 1869, $4,762; check drawn to cash, In- dorsed by H, 8. Over, & 1809, $8,300; check drawn tocasb; ine dorsed by 1.8, Det. 31, 1889, $3,500; check drawn to cash, im dorsed by H. S. May 9, 1870, $4,000; indorsed by R. B. Connoliy. Jane 11, 1670, $11,000; imdorsed by R. B. Cone nolly. Nov, 16, 1870, /$12,500; tndorsed by R. B. Con- nolly, Jan, 19, 1871, $4,000; indorsed by R B, Connolly. March 26, 1871, $6,204; indorsed by R. B. Con- nolly. William Walsh—Dec. 2,.1868, $241; indorsed by W. W. March 2, 1868, $291 66; indorsed by W. W. Mareh 80, 1868, $201; indorsed by W. W. May 8, 1868, $291; indorsea by W. W. June 1, 1868, $291; indorsed by W. W. Jaty 2, 1868, $301 ; Indorsea by W. FW. August 8, 1868, $201; imdorsea by W. drawn to cash, Sept. 4, 1868, $201; drawn vo cash. ( Oot, by 1868, $2015 drawn to cash, Oct. 25, 1869, $5,000; indorsed by Smith Weed. Oct. 31, 1868, $291; indorsed by W. W.; check drewe ta cash. Doo, 29, 1868, $201; indorsed by W. W.; checks drawn to cash, Fob. 1, 1869, $201; tndorsed by W. W. March 1, 1869, $201; indorsod by W. W. April 3; 1809, $391; indorsed by W. W. June 2, 1809, $201; indorsed by W. W. July 1, 1860, $201; tadorsed by W. W. July 19, 1969, $500; indorsed by W. W, Ang. 4, 1869, $201; indorsed by W. W. Sept. 1, 1869, $201; indorsed by W. SV. Nov. 1, 1869, $291; indorsed by W. Ww. E, A. Woodward—June 14, 1867, $334 95; check payae ble to bearer. June 16, 1967, $108 105 check payable to bearer, Dec. 18, 1868, $6,904; indorsed by E. A. W. Dec. 24, 1868; $2,850; indorsed by E. A. W. Jan, 16, 1860, $2,043; indorsed by E. A. W. Feb, 9, 1869, $1,983; indorsed by EK. A. W. Feb. 15,'1869, $2,965; indorsed by E. a. W. March 5, 1869, $275 90; indorsod by E. A. W. March 5, 1869, $12,500; indorsed by E. A. W. June 8,1869, $1,728; indorsed by E. A. W. Muy 17, 1869, $8,967; indorsed by EB. A. W. July 28, 1869, $51 50; indorsed by E, A. W. July 28, 1869, $634 78; indorsed by KE. A. W. John Cox—Dee. 6, 1869, $500; indorsed by John Cox, Rarry Howard—March 4, 1867, $71 16; indorsed by A. H. March 14, 1867, $28; indorsed by H. H. “April 26, 1867, $66 66; indorsed by H. H. July 25, 1867, $50; check drawn \o cash, Nov. 14, 1867, $250; mndorsed by H. Howard, Dec. 28, 1867, $83 32; indorsed by H. Howard, Jan. 26, 1868, $100; indorsed by H. Howard, August 17, 1868, $333 34; indorsed by H. Howard, Nov. 24, 1868, $50; indorsed by H. Howard. Oct. 48, 1869, $166 66; indorsed by H. Howard, Dec, 22, 1869, $100; indorsed by H. Howard. ©. B, Woodrufl—Oct. 1, 1868, $100; indorsed by G BW. Douglas Taylor—Dec. 7, 1867, $600; indorsed, by D. T, George H. Purser—May 1, 1867, $1,000; cheek drawn to cash. Feb, 18, 1867, $200; indorsed by G. H. P. Anthony Miller—Jan. 25, 1863, $200; (as treasurer) ins dorsed by A. M. Och 29, 1868, $360; indorsed by A. M. * Nov. 18, 1868, $500; indorsed by A. M. Oct, 26, 1869, $450; indorsed by A. M. Walter Boche—May 14, 1867, $1,000; indorsed vy W. Re June 17, 1867, $1,209; check drawn to check. Oct. 30, 1867, $500 (assistant troasurer); indorscé by W. Oct. 49, 1868, $275; indorsed by W. R. Inne 21, 1960, $15,000; indorsed by W. R.¢ Jay 2, 1860, $26,000; tadorsed by W. Oct, 26, 1869, $550 (assistant treasurer); indorsed vy W. R. Richard Shay—Dec, 31, 1867, $200; indorsed by R. S, 8, Shook—July 26, 1867, $2,188; indorsed by S. Shook, J, MoB, Davidson—July 6, 1868, $1,901; check drawe to cash. Oct. 19, 1869, $2,000, May 9, 1870, $19,000. ©, Campbotl—Oct, 80, 186T, $400; indorsed by &. C. ‘A. Wilmour—Aug. 7, 1867, $1,500; indorsed vy a, W. Kugeno Durnin—May 15, 1869, §400; indorsed by W.; check indorsed by W. W.; check fadorsed by W. W.; obecis KE. D. J. B. Vaientine—Noy. 27, 1867, ,$159; indorsed by J. FV. Nov. 30, 1867, $90 37; indorsed by J. F. V. Oct. 88, 1869, $1,100; check payable to vearer, Nov. 6, 1871, $500. i, C. Murpby—Oct, 30, 1867, $400; indorsed by M, co. M. Oct, 21, 1868, $750; indorsed by M. ©, M, Oct, 20, 1868, $200; indorsed by M. C, M. and T, Kk. Sind. Oct, 26, 1869, $400; Indorsed-by M. C, M. (treng- urer) and T. %. Smith. John U. Jacobs—March 7, 1868, $500; indorsed by J. oJ, s 969, $1,000; indorsed by J.C. J. John F, Pierce—June 2, 1869, $500; indorsed by J, F. 1% Nov, 10, 1869, $1,000; indorsed by J. F. P. Sowell & Pierce—Dev, 2%, 1888, $1,000; indorsed by Sewell and Pierce, W. Hichardson—Oot, 29, 1867, $100; indorsed by We Ry Det. 7, 1868, $1,000; tndorsed by W. R. Nov. 10, 1968, $1,000; indorseu by WW. R, Nov, 27. 1868, $1,000; indorsed by W. Dec, 80, 1868, $1,000; indorsed by W.