The New York Herald Newspaper, November 13, 1866, Page 5

santiiel _.. NEWYORK HERALD, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1866—TRIPLE | SHEET. 5 — oer De ow i : d ori In ‘ Fisth—1 eaid compisint mon- cmcyiy : the playntit several times, cut bis face, and pushed oy inthe will? wosing ok somaetning and talk beet Fay that is all, Me panee bores o ae » ame tioned, aad Premera 9 of July, ios, void as UNITED STATES Om count him into the «treet. The case of the defendant . that oe kr. Jumel, and ee. ; she was a lady of Q. There were three provided for and six not? ‘A. @ Did you hear the testimony of*My. Holland read on } alleged in any of the answers in this action ? ° Before Judge Smalley. Plaintit! was drunk; Shut be created great nowe and con- , t 2, Asi did..4 fusion in the saloon, and that he used towards the plain- Have you stated all ‘the inferviews you had with sonal vanities aventions mon in vel ‘h societ the a m1 “tt a deal of vanity, and would tell’ mer stories of per- great ity bed was sub- Me 0 4 Hide Parnas fas Chatged the dary b Chas. H. Lockwood vs. the New Yark Central Haitroat | \\t'ny myre casos than Wom neccoauey ts eine na ‘the subject of the execution. Ww “ Jury aa follows: — Q Was that substantially correct? harged ry 88 fo) «plies. The Jury found a Vordict for the plain geataly ee a slight 7 6 it 3 led a mist yal a Ne Lp manner of ae tritertag ‘ite yobod: ¥ 0 a Grsriees ov Tux Jony—lt ‘would seem, from the | Company:—Judge Smalley, in gharging the jury to this | frou ot Mi e Jumel. from. the time sho sent for you in the " fr the : Rape which this action hes taken thal perhaps all the | case, aad that this was ay, action, In whieh the plalntit ¥e 01 mer of 1862 down to the \aso'you tat the rab at the gato when she did pot wish fe 0 fon Was (hat the cause of your being #0 long delayed A, Lhave. which these parttes might have produced on |". S es one = ance? ‘A. Yes; I never staid there less than four or five | stated all that occurred to cy although ic. you enter sti ground that day #1A. We. | either. site has wot neem od; We bayo to deters } $ltined $2,500 damage against the New York Central unl $ DISTRICT COURT—BROOKLYN hours. " ” I know there were twor contbrest other visits, from my | went into the oa Bey agate which opens into them maige ‘Our action.on the evidence that is here. There are | Railroad Company for injuries as deciared by him be had tie 8 ‘Tie witness wag not cross-examined, remembering slight th herp. further dows ‘the RingsbHave ‘road thin’ the main ‘ew='| iflvd questions to bo decided by you. eo of them | Feceived op their road arising out of carclesspegs and inbility of Shipowners for Losses by ‘The court here took a recoss for Ave minutes, and «pon @. Do you recollect” i lon trance; this gate was open that. day, as somo) there seems to be no dispute upon... (The Judze bere | peotigence on thoir part or that of thelr servants. ‘The Collision and Fire. its reasse sibling Mr, Augustus F, Suifth stated the these ‘other yiaiat A. Nothing mater) bey: men were wheeling mi rough ft; T su ft | recapitulated the issues.) There seems to have been an gende on their part or a dune Bofore Judge Benedict, ‘CASS FOR THE DI , | single fact, thi 01 conversations I told ber | was the néari wo! tho-hanse, and thet tbe other oh o inthe pleadings that the deed of July 29, | plaintil, the first piace, testifies that he loaded two The cane Fat iio rr Mr. Smith said—If_ the Court, gentlemen of the | I conceived it to! to.settle her earthly’ntfairs; | gato might see to Chase from the beirs of the deceased sister, | cars of the company at Bofalo with cattle, to be trans- Petoypbiong us the City of Nor: Jory, it is not may intention to oper case formatty, or {| that was the pf the. fags of & sion jm our |) .Q. Was ‘es whieh wotld namita wagon? | Al)}Mrs.’Jonex, was void for some reason; but there is uo } ported to West Albany, having paid $70'a car for such ser | Wich, i/o. fom) the 6Ub instant, came up again To say anything nidre to than one'or two sdntences, Book of Cotton” 3 point tto me by] Yos, air.) hooW obeauiel F en eRe on that issue, ond conseqneniy the issue is made | Vice, and hintwelf recewing what te called a drav page | yerterday, They n before the court was on the You havé caiready: neds: frome Si copme the case e Rev.) Mr, Tyna dt theoddeycof ministord taf. @) Had you exer dean pbrough that gate Before? "A. P Dy the production of the deed, £6 that you will an- | Plaintiff ¢lasms that the cars started from Buffalo and ar. petition ty the cous ‘i has taken, hat we do, not, int to'urge this case op | advise persons to wake wills while in. health. No, sire | OuaIOO ON a : *\foswérte the fitth ‘inquiry, No.) That leaves you to } rived near Cans , and’ hero that in astending & steep Neel for the defence to give them the the of tho “defence. "Tt “is, however,'|' " @. Hosides what-you have stated ‘tothe jury did'vétt' |" G How did. you.gotinto the house? A, By, the from | determine shaply. tho fuurth, inquiry , Wap the de | grade, ttieedts stopped the ongine not having suiflctent | beneBk of the a6. oi Coupross pasted ou the Sd of desirabie, Ne he ant aw community » quageat Aanythipg im reference to the contents of a will? ad ro "| consed lady, Madame ee of apo pee tree FS pb dee papi drei. While here am. @ ploys of Mareb, 191 titled “An act Himit the Hability of in which Liive ia Whe rr lela 1 de- |) A, | fad you a key to the front door? 3 mind at the ume ef exqeut OF Abin wu 0g PD ‘ormed the dro that some of thé cal fer , sirable al ¥ry Nude Herat fa ‘one of thc actos ‘Promi Septemibor 3, 1862, how long a period elapsed M3 evera key to it? A. pi ainet: fn April, 1503" The proof on that po is not obtained | tle had grounded, and require nv after fmmédiately, "| “bipgwmefa and voows,’! which provides sate in thi it he should, berore this fury, pam Maceme Jume! again’, A. 1 never saw 3 any person take hold of Madame Jumel’s hand | from many witness@a ‘You have Mio evidence the | Viatnti was leaving the ear to took atter bix cattle, an theta rider together with ber engi i | statemenvor the mabnerin’ which this will was mide. ber agaip untfl , 1863, ort’ ¢ pen io order’to-apake her siguatare ty No | mespbers Of the family of the. lady ad their evidence | for this purpose took a ight which, before he Jeftthe | and ber (reight pend tnic'ot ihe ome Hision and fire, by MadameJumel. 1big my design Jengeik Bum, pad ale Whiere did-you shen Bee her? A. At ber house. | sir. 1) | is Wholly undontradfeted. Tt seam that this lady, who] car, was taken from bim by the brakeman, who went On | may be app! tb bin 4 by the court to call one witness Who Was present at the execution. o} _Q@ Did you make any attempt to see ner from Septem- is this (exhibiting the will) the paper which was | was very old, oxbitnted in 1859 a marked:change in ber the track, plainti? following tim. Tp looking for tie 4 Ww. | Leveridge, ' ten: the will. ber, 1863 / A, Pnever attempted to co" antididen gare A. -Thatint 3 | mental ohargcien—a decided change, Ske bad some. | cars containing his cattic hefell into a pit and wceivad | qrgived that’ utider this statute (he vo ‘ TRETIMONY OF JOU M, HOLLAND te th 7 <i » Q Have you stated everything ant ie ‘ever eald to | thing kp a toralytte or apoplectic oat Baratogn. | the injurios, for which he now sought compensaton, | the tine of the cvllision, and b John M. Holland, a witness on. she’ part.of the defence, Ww Induced you to go? A. When I was at the | M 6 Jumat which looked ike urging her to makes | She was takes home by ver frlends and -relasives, ex- Plawud claims that the company was guilty of culpable | praised, and that the company ¢ was examined by dir, Smith, and testified that -ho, re-. | village one dayel heard he was: extremely iti—eick unto } will’ _ Yos, «ir. pibitigg a the way some excitement, After she got io | nerlgongr, from the fact that at this point they had | give a bopd for the wpoupt, apd by wided at W; ton Heights ; was one witness to a pa- | dei Ba ooe ar I wont there. Q. Did you in any other manner thait'as you have stat- |}! her ¢ she became the subject f those delusions, of | the arossing of the canal uncovered, and that i way a | hos been repaired munce Qie acc dent, per 10 be Madam eJamel’s will; went to Ea- 3 ‘see her? A. Not that day; Itaw ber the |! ed t/to.her the contents of her will?) a. Never. which evidence has been given before you, These de- } place that heavy traime stopped at during the hours of | eustady of the court. Fope in ind course of the pastsummer; before he-went pment day. '-. @ was your opinion of Madame Juryel’s capacity | Insfons are par to you as the strongest evidences of tho |’ the night; and wlso that the company wero liable, in |” fuehard A. Huntley, for the Libotiants, veld that the Was examined a @ wilnors, and a copy of bis deparition: ' e ‘ag stie ill?) A. She was ill. at the time she executed that will, and Gowntothat:} insanity of thie lady, and'of the uterdanceriof a jury | Consequence of not supplying in engine with snftic ent | respondegteeoild datavar thémectves of tin wat was taken; the statements made in those depositia: ‘as the will spoketof? A. No, sir. time? A. Lhad never h @ suggestion as to her, upholding a will as the will of a sane woman... If you | steam power to make the ascent; it was also contended | inumuch as i 8 not applieable to vessels nay gang ine were (0! 4 ‘Q@ When did you next gee hen? A, Some days. Lan a boy ; I never had a thought of her incom ; Pehould yeliéve these things to be trae, and if whe | that the gorvant of the company should have given uo | iond waters He ulatutatned that the City of Norwierny Counzeb-réad the depositions df Mr; Holland relating®:| ‘that; °I cannot answer precisely; it may have beon Pit haa I ldyhayB scorned to have bad anything a will based upon this belief on her part, | tice so the plaintif of the dapgers. of the was plying on inland waters. from the fact tbat a portion the circumswnces gonneced me | his Witeasr! the | ox two daye; ashert tine, however, , “ @o with guch a trdngaction; I was so thoroughly eee hat her rejatives—her grand nephew and grand niece— | particular place, the plaintiff at the time being in die | or wae, 1p was Upon the Thames river, in the of execution of ihe will in question; he went me ‘hat occurred then’. A. thet interview 1 | ed y pes competency, eal Am 60 \to this’ day/that P| were lying in walt to “take °tipr’ life, edt te | charge of adaty he contracted for: with the company— | Connect out, and upon the East river, n the State of Jumel’s at'thé reqhest of the Kev. J. He and} ‘spoke to lor of making her will, asked her if she fake imply boallower. tp sep that the respo! iby of manifest that she was, pot im such @, state of | to look after his cabth The defendapie resist \ie cl New Yu This being the ease, no eruates could be ap. in company With Mr. South and Mr. Butlers, MrButler } did:not intend to do so, referring tg the interviews ol . ‘mind as is required tn apersom making ® will, which | on three grounds rst, That plaintill was riding © poli and the vesvel could not be bonded as iho ony Sottlement of this case is not upou me. POLL Baers here imterropted by the examining: Q How was ‘her memory? A, ‘Her! mémory ‘war’ somewhat capricions; sometimes shp would forget, ab”) Other times she would be extremely tenacious, Q._Do you recollect any acts of memory: on her part? ovvted. Heakdes thay they did not want the for the Hbellants had ne objection to a to the extent of the etatutory lability otto the teepondents going {feo from «!) nity. ould be prowmunced ag the aét o a sound apd 1g} Poss by which he contracted to ride avhia own Pek Mind’ Paerohoatan toe aeons aa to the extence | matter whethor bo sustained Amgury. the neglige ‘Of these delnsiins, for tho witnesses on ‘the other side | the company or not. Second, That there was bo Aestify to them, and the clorgyman, the Rey, Mr. Smith, | of negligence in the raction Of the road, in the testifies that he heatd the tame thing, bestdes the addi: | Manner of the loading of the cars, norin the power of tie tional charge i relation to hima. In addition to the | engine to draw up the load; that the embankment at nod binseih were pho subscfil Wi the will; , they were ros ihete more iy Trae tid stati the conviction «hich arose on bis wind when he left the house wacthut Madume Jumiel was nota serious:as he | ‘had hopod and desired; that is, she was notserions tn. reference) 40 . ber Stee eternal interests; rites 0 wi had passed. r bid ste reply ?' A. No, sir, ‘she didnot; or, if she tysnen 4 reply, It was not to the point, } Q' Was anything else said on that occasion about the will? A. Noy tir. , Q, When did you next geo her? A. Within a short sponded intelligent): | ume. A. Yes, sir; she-had committed to mem: and-made | testimony of the facts you have what is also powerful | the piace where the accident occurred and the bridy spondent#, argzed that within and he not perceive ay ener in regard to Wer |’ Q. On thar occasion was the will spoken of? A. lt | very slight mistakes in repeating it, the arn of prayer testimony agalist the anity of this lady. You have | were necessary, The defendants also claim that although | ea tbarthe Clty of Norwich inderstanding what was said to her; : it’ didnot occurto | was. for morning and evening tn the prayer book. the testimony of accomplished physier who visited | there wight have been negligence and a want of care on |; i iniand. navigation. It fis at the tie that. she was not of soand mind, memo- Q Who firet spoke of it? A. She did herself. Q How about the hymns? A, She would repeat | her as physicians and examined her mental character. | thelr part, or that of their servants at the time and | ’ Notson, in 24 Howard, that * ry and understanding, and he did not know that she was Q What did she say? A, She gaid she had been | hymns with very slight mistakes, Jatics and pecu farities, who are accustomed tb do such | Diace, ot there was also negligence and want of usual | ol spoken Of tt means sole! Dine Oovigation.. Kast river wauld ew or the river Thames. under any restraint, coercion or infigence, wishitig to make her will, but that the lawyer whom she ‘The withess was not cross-oxamined. things, both of whom’ tell you that at the time of the | care on the part of the plaintit, who had thas contributed had seen in the meantime wished) to make such a dispo- . What was your opini 4 the o. Tea pinion st the time. the will wee.) Caditlon of this "Will he could noe have exestted | to hisown injuries., .Thedattor poms, ase rule of law, executed, as to whether Mr. Chase and Mrs, Perry were THBTIMONY OF KEY, J, HOWAKD SMUH. sition of her property as was not agreeable to herself, | interested-in the residut clanse? A. Ibelieved them | @ paper as the act of @ sound gna. disposing | Was properly presented, and isa sound rule of law, and | javier ia bus fteon mile -Rev. J. Howard Smith, the incipal defendant, was | and ihe could nat arrange it with him; I asked her then, | both to be Interested, in she residuary clause, mind. It is ‘for you to decide upon all the facts | if sustained by the facts the plaintiff could not recover. | the Sound, Which could not be examined by Mr. A. F. Smith, and testified as fol- | ‘Have you nota will in existence ?” and she said, ‘None Q. State when it was that you Were disabused astothe | Of the ense If you say that this will is the | If they should find, however, on the other hand, that | more than the which had been decided bot to he dows :— e at all;’” I then said, ‘Certainly, Mactame, Ihave neither | imterest of Mr, Chase in the residuary clause? A. Never, | Will of a sane person, the effect of it will be to transfer | the injuries resulted from negligence on the part of the | intand, i» about one hundred and twenty miles in length, Q Are you defendant in this case? A. Jam. the right nor the wish to dictate so you fn any manner | until after Madame Jumel’s death, tho property as the will directs, If you find that the | defendants, plainti’ not contributing to them hitnse!f by | if the vere! could be bonded apd released it would save @ You are the Rev. J. Howard Smith, to whom al- | or form what you should do with your estate, but so Cross-examined by Mr. 0'Conor.—Q. You have spoken | Will ts not the will of asound, sane, natural disporing | Legligence on his part, the verdict would be in favor of | the company from umjort eroburraement and secure to Tosion has been made? A. Tam. large nn estate as that should not bo left to go tothe | of Madame Jumol’s competency or incompetency, in| mind, this proprrty goes to the heirs at law, the same as | plaintuf.: The question of damages was altogether fn | the }yboiiants a just proportion of thelr respective claims, Q. When did you first go to Carmansville to live? A. | four winds w! You die; it is certainly your duty to | your opinion; did you mean to be understood that that | ff no will had ever been executed by this Indy. You | their own bande. No other claims could be put m or any further aetion In the spring of 1854. make a will such as will sult yourself, and thus dispose | state of incompetency you spoke of continued to the end | Will therefore take these quostions and answer them. The jury retired, and will return a sealed verdict thin | taken after tho vossel should be released. aw all Ppervons Q@ In wis capacity? A. As rector of the Chorch of | of Abe question. y of her life? A. [spoke of her at the time the will was | The jury retired to their room and after an absence of | morning. The court then adjourned. having a right to be im court were presumed to be there, the Invercesston at that place. @ What did she say * A. She said it was her | executed a few minutes returned. and the matter would be acted opon the same as if they Q Was Madume Jumel at that time connected with | dutyand she would do he then asked me if I would Q I know you did, and did not know what you The clerk. addressing the foreman, ‘Have you agreed PRIZE COURT. were there, thatchurch? A. 1 found her mame upon the ehurch | request her, old lawyer, Mr, Wetmore, to come and see | meant; did her incompetency continue to the end of her | to your verdict?” em The Judge reserved his decision. record as a communicant of the church. her on the subject. hfe? A, Ido not suppose it did. ‘he foreman, “We have, We find for the plaintiffs | The United States Stare Ship Sapply and the atl Q Did you after that visit her? A. I visited her soon | Q. Was anything else of importance eaid atthattime? | @ When do you suppose she became incompetent? | and that Madame Jumel was of unsound mind.” Blockade Prize Stephen Hart. earner’: efter zoing to the place, and about twoor three times'a | A. Not that I remember. A. Ido not know that I can answer that question pre- ‘Tho issues were thon handed to the clerk, the answer » * COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—PART 2. & pe you maké an appointment with Mr. Wetmore? A 5 Q Did he gothere? A. He did. Q. Did you at any time ing to Mr. Wetmore of the sum which Madame Ju Proposed to leave to buildachurch? A. I cannot say positively as to that; T may have done so, but I do not recollect dist'nctly. Q When was it that Mr, Mold, the architect, went up there’ A. A short time before Mr. Wetmore came up. Q. Was it in the month of March, 1868, that Mr. Mold Q Did you see her to speak to her from 1859 to the | was there? A. It may have been. summer of 1862? A. No. Q How came Mr. Mold to goupthere? A. Madamo In thesummer off1862 did you visit ber? A. I did. { Jumel was talking to Mrs, Perry and self about the Did you go voluntarily, or at her request? A. A | plans fer the church, provision to build which she was man ,whom I afterwards ‘Larned to know as David | to make. She spoke of severat that she had seen in the Wilkie, came to me and said that Madame Jumel wished | city, but none were satisfactory, I asked her why not » year alter that, down to the year 1859. 4 @ Did you visit her oftencr than that? A, Not that I | geeollect; there may have been some occasions when a@he was not well, and when my visits may have been more frequent, but I have no recollection of them. Q In the year 1859 what bappsnedt A. In the year 1859 I found her pew occupied by another family, and I enced to visit her. @ When did you visit ber again? A. Not until the summer of 1862. to the first throo questions being im the affirmative and Refore Judge Botts, the two last in the negat ve, A final decree of condemnation was yesterday issued SUPPLEMENTARY IS8U7R. by Jndge Botts against the blockade runner Stephen 0" ' i 1 " Mew i pot object, but Would consent to your finding, ad a sup- | by the United Statey vessel Supply on the 20th of Janu. | #°t!0u for assault and battery, the plaintiff aking $5,000 Jermentary statement, that there was no coercion, fraud | gry, 1862, off the southern coast of Florida, and taken to | “ ®#Uage his injured feolngs. Plajntit ix a manufac. fluen K bj I Smith ¥ 4 c . Ty reterence 10, this sae Weise Ser coorkan the port of New York for adjudication. A Iibet was fled | ‘TF Sr pte and had a dinpate with defendant about motive, and if the jury are willing to find that I have no | against her on the 18th of February following, and on | wm Dill, Daring the controversy, oom sane ed iw eo i citem with Overbeck slap ‘After a brief consultation in the Jury box the foreman Te ceater pe ls sen a coins A Mec OMe pe te acy because, an «lnimed, plaintitl call stated that there wad a disagreement among the jury | (wher: alco by Sasnuel. Tnaac, nnd, lane con See oes Assault wax admitted, but provo- upon that point; that thoy did not know that they had | ono Harris, an English subject, as sole owner, wan put cation claimed, Verdict for $25 in favor of plains. anything to do with it, aa they had already rendered | jn, soon after the arrival of the prize at this he |g, ener Cet venice was unloaded at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, whea her | CO"rt of Common Ploas Calondar—This Day. cisely; for about a month perhaps before her death she was sinking from a fall she had, Q Then it was not more than a month? A. For what? Q That she was incompetent? A. I cannot fix the time of hor incompetency. Q Do vou mean to say that she was incompetent six months before her death? A. I mean to say that she ‘was competent at the time this will was execated, and for more than a year afterwards. Q. That is, from Apri!, 1863, to April, '1864; then, from April, 1864, until her death,’ in July, 1865, you will not say that she was competent? A. T do pot wish to settle that question; I cannot answer it directly; she might bave been or she may not have been; I do not know that she was not competent to transact her own business Judge Cardozo. to have a visit from me that morning as eoon ag] could | have an architect, and fix upon a plan which he might | and to know her own purpose, and to execute her own ‘Thus ended this in nt case, Part 1 Now. 1627 1641, 1543, 1237, 1640, 20 op. show her, She ‘aid at once that that was what sbe | purpose up to within a very short time of herdonth: T | | For the plaintits, Charlos "Conor, ex-Judgo Pierre. | forded thalke with perowainn ponies pom ce, Heet | atte. 1713, 1184, 1100, 178, tbo. test Fare a Not Q@ Andon that you wentto her? A On thatI went | would wish Dreciaety. T then went down and saw Mr. | can give you a {not in reference to this; not three weeks | pont; James C. Curtor and Charles K, Whitebead. some 600,000 ball cartridges, or fixed ammunition | 1022, 1774, 1776, 1117, TM4, 1201, 086, 1763, 1754, 1786, to her. Mold, having been directed to him 78 friend, and he | before her death Mr. Chase asked me to assist him in For the defendants, E. F. Smith, Mr. Stoughton, A. | for smail arms. Thero wan benider « quantity | 1756, 177 1758, 1780, 1700. vi Q state the conversation you had with her? A. | came up according to appointment, bringing with him a | getting her to alter that will, and I consented, if ahe was | W. Bradford and Michael W. Divine. of rebel buttons manufactured in Great Deteaia, etamped Sielibeumnpemmenspammned After a few moments genera! conversation I her | number of [oped ngs 5 protege willing to do s0, to be the instrument of having. it done. with @ ‘rebel device; Enfield rifles with lar OE nS IN SI for what purpose had sent for me, She she had Q Did any person at Madame Jumel’s look over those @ it indicated that you considered her com) a Dayoneta and sabre bayonets, British rifed wuskets, cra m Supreme couay. been sick the night before, being s0 cold that she feared | plans, if eo, who? A. Madame Jumel, Mrs. Perry and 0 | did you hear aoyt of this charge wi she UNITED STATES COMMISSWONER'S OFFICE. amooth bore muskets, Brunswick rifles, cavalry sabres, By Justice Potter. Piya und"puck md ter tahoe | "Ob Mr wold stow any parce pas tor the | emmet SER EAPPE'G cm, hao bv Counterfrting. Rages enema Seay cement | Cu tin ie se par, cme t 1 i 5 i, bir. 4 and cavalry e arm Av erpoo! udgroent for pla'atiff on the demurrer, with might not 42 tong: | thas, oe Sie ae a gpurch ? a Yoo; after show averal Sebich ware Bot she make any charge against you of dishon- Before Commissioner Osborn. marked ©.'5. A, and a large leave to the defendant to anawer within twénty days on tit 4 John Diubrow and Jomph Bradley were charged with | menta. The appraieement ‘or the cargo wha 9208 048 oF dealing in counterfeit money. Ex-Judge Stuart appeared | The war was delivered to the United States Payment of eomta The People of the State of New York va. Bernard of i had come to the conclusion ‘that I her one which bad a beautiful le, at least on Y A. As far as T recollect, it was two or W death. i paper; she was very much st! with, months before her | wished to leave money to much it would cost to build thet courts ie bald be was @ Will you say it was not eight months before her | for Disbrow; Mr.’Waite for Bradley, and Mr. Joseph Oty pix Payer ares F ttt ln ic lg heer gr pode Forgas oF oe in thas bo = mors then game apie Yen rey re a ‘As far as = oo hecs g me it could | Bell for the government. $66,000. After considorabie litigation in the courts the twenty daye A. payment ot eae , tat sho. wished to & Who tame up with kit 66 tneb cocanon?’ Aan’ | "Q°wan'enat ala abe ehetie geet” A. sho anid’ that |” B4Mtm 8. Brace examined. aman tbe Soeret Service | Pita bee igs Oe bes commmpades, oMaene ane svoee | Ul om toraeriee,cetecdueate seamen he footy eae said she, had not to old gentleman whose name Ido not recollect, if 1 heard | her bank book was not Department; I know the prisoncra; first saw them on | atthe tine of tb capture, lu slowe entited ts share in | feviant to amend biv answer within tweaty days on to the at ha ele at Did she charge you with robbing ber of money in | the 1st of June last; went to their place, of business in | sad the Bet sumoent for distribution ‘Wetng | pavinent of conta. Mie wished ne o ndvie har ete ee nen [ne cee my You bad inkae hermaney?, a. Not | 2étt Hoasto tres, on the morsing ofthe th ot June; | $841 28 Py totian Meare a personal Lancy t0 zoel @ Who went with im? A. This cid fentteman, who "to me. a A-NObY went again about clever delock; T tel’ ® note mating ae el Wet wey ail he te oune subjent of ‘making ber will ¥ "e ‘How lon; Erp itg rye uensis re- oe nee Fe ganatrrspatog seg eerte: 2 lea - eae - eee d aren “ if je amg mg : that until I had taken the subject. mealn'ay aureh’ A. Wires ee tone Deed my Boal wey wrote on 6? A, be onic shat her st thas hour and saw Dishrow; had » conversation with | Important Opinion im Kegard to the Inepec- || Wm Falen, Hecely PA en ty ga al don; I said thet it was a. & ora myeno,yen.daring: the, waple af period? | Q: You had charge of her bank book at that time? |. bim; Bradley was in the room, but I don’t think he tion of Books in Taking Testimony. | ’ . was new to me, never ha' a ep mitog with Mrs. Perry hg soatirarterg Yes, 1 charge of it io this sense, that! drew her | could hear; gave Disbrow a letter of introduc By Judge Barnard. Fy MR TINTS ORY = a cree on a room, whic’ was ordinarily occupied by Madame Jum: a Tt pene mi tion; be took ft and read it, and said 1] Amida Bigechivs. John ¥. Mehepeler ctal—The plain | DECISIONS IN COURT OF COMMON PLEASGENERAL TERM. | sa© 72 Passel sce speak on Q, Did you, during the whole time that Mr. Wetmore | from her bank account ? eho said hor ‘account | Could not come better recommended; he them asked me Hefore Judges Daly. Hrady and Oardoro. | maw ber again? I conversed ‘was there, see Madame Jumel? A..No, sir. ‘Was wrong. what I wanted; | told bim $6 and $10 national currency ; Benry i, Dawson ve Jay.—Order overruling de AF. Ce eed x wieres Bosse, in the room while the draft wil Q@ Did sho not name the sum of $6,000 as havi said ba had not of kind om hand; I tn: murrer afirtined, and defendant muat answer the Sed feirciye a tangata peer carte Wd ae descaal M+ H Biuta‘uken for the tant Ubauo of the Biiy cont fractional ortica, pigeon as Did Mr, Wetmore come down staizsatali? A. He | state it was. hp ey “| r Haflere bm had nothing of ‘on hand; I Yh nn ve Mohaster ve Inase Sommers —Judgment next day. book + a 7 . “4 red. © State very briefly what q hor apaual Tentsia and thet se hed data oot’ So, mn ean Fhe he at De maid bathing Pet ozs ia the Kiigaboth A Mead ve, David Stevens —Judgment re- to her and told ‘that come’ Reet. it, ae, ps ertce she Dot keepitig rather a di ‘ebanty; be eaid’ they bad just. versed, and report of referee pet amide, wife I still proposed to decline personal | me to it, whi did fm the presence ‘sept off two men that day—one South and the other to Kiehard Halloran va. Daniel Low, —Judgurent affirmed, Cees Cone sites satertios 1het, eyes the con- | a of Mr. 52.) ‘ Pennsylvania; be sald be had given them Wright Gillies va, Maria Lent —Order appealed from sternal ee cee |g S aieaqapemmuapeaina | Pt og erg M2 peeumnenicmenppenseteyr tn not after y ireue | we ‘at least Do direct I T thought a De 79m recobors abe Tekin 9 the | plainedit? A. Neg the ba, sas hy oa iprecneaee is ae eo Ama, Martin Frank va Richard Gomprecht —Jadgmeat Bela she ee Se at Wouters ei tt alabisala tte?” om ; pert ‘tat Rie Sen James A Dorman. —Judgment 4 Meliride va ” ones an Ofnament to the source of |} @ Jou Om sine day kaow the contents of tbat If yoo go RE a Meee d verted and now ftisl haere’, ber that gon ts her any advice 1 pol | spe OOF hel WO come takes: 1 then skeea’ aes vr ia to otner proper objects for her bounty j whe ‘then saked Ng. Bi you se the paper on that day? A. Tid not. |’ had + Mg Wy Fn Charles Jobpeow, kay ve. William Florence, Jr,, he. — me if I w mg oy te to Gram a will; Isaid aid Rext see Madame Jumel’ 4. The futimatea at kind, ana aid Jeagmen' reversed. immed ately, no, me ip the | first visit shat | armen after that was wil two ould let me bave The Mayor, &e., Ya Isaae Wortendyhe —Judgment Rap day. . rites in ity T left, |) weeks, although I may have been there and seen in have sixty pieces of Cotton—Alican. | Teversed. % When did you nia cobtuer a) 1 'seer ter’ byw nan he $15; 1 told bim 1 | thon of Fraud Against a United Ktates Trease ‘ ee oR y ener ‘whhin Be oem within that two weeks when eit UM next | wry OMmicial—Motion to Vacate an Order of | DECISIONS IN COURT OF COMMON PLEAD—SPECIAL TERM. two weeks afterwards; it was more than one week, and 5 of conversation! A. Eee, P counterfeit money with — J shink, perhaps, less than two ee @ What 7s je ques- it was man: re Before Jndge G. G. Barnard. By Brady, Justice. Q Stare what occurred thent A. Mga yd omoeartens | tion her will. ‘and bo never went there in the daytime; he - “ Frederick W. Bird et al. wn Michaes Allison, —Hee decided to modify my purpose; I do that Q Whatdid she any? A. She made a very slight 16 meet him next there af cloven o'clock. and Jeremiah Beall, W. A. Beall and Thomas & Metcalfe | opinion with Clerk. po sage se which 10 Ber Id have the stuff; pointed | es ZL. B, Brashear.—In the year 1*65, about the close of oy Place et al.—See opinion it Cort Py mind; Lsaid that] would wi Piles of out Mr. Bradiey to me, aid if | the war, pinintiffr allege that they were owners of about hie Peere Jeum Stock Bx ding Com Sever whom abe mth Lyk for the pargons of aa ae ePiradiey tor i, be. said any Une | Metbownand balew of cotton, stowed In various places at | M'ikish Keyser ve The Mark. tor, Soe font among wovera A ‘ Gueiga wil ORT OF 20H. FOOTER. Seer Sate tara 2 nc goal ees came ines (Lad gleed ve oes son of '¥. 0. Bart of Aivecy, | swimeme to the Gepeiea od Ne TROTIM Mr. Jobo P. Butler was cross ex: mined by Mr 0° pln TK lA Bele os! Koods ax there wi en left: went in again at eleven o'clock went day; Bred'oy and Disbrow were both in at the time: Diabrow asked me |f 1 had come in for the sta, I #aid | some ‘partie claim! By Daly, Justion. tn Kohler ve Brenck —Motion granted to be United Bates Trensuty | Koehler ve Frenck Wotion for commimion granted, told ber that | as & witness to re? 4. Lam. he aeked me to take a seat, that he had to go down -! Y | bot stay of proceedings denied T'would Sndee ne eaten To ore Zen vaeaaas a4 the ime of, the | ewes, bnd would sent Arediey beck with i in Afters | todyof items the cotton belosgiee te tne’ proiauite “tm —~-----— — pmaed te] Ap lyty ted Dig o -riprgel Dut her name to this paper? | ininutep: Disbrow went ovt; Bradley went out while T | the 23d of February Jeremiah Henll went (o Albany, COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS. erent wactieti amt bom toe waa to Dinbrow; half aa hour after | and found the defendant engaged in the seizure an — will do immediately rose, | Q. many were present at that me! Dinbrow out Bradley came in, and banded | moval of the cotton. Plaintif was then taformed Hefore Judge Russel Srenstt ie, on praed the || 4 Pogre ur: Saab tie Hetend, “Metiwe sad myt, | Sy package; | evked bins what it wan; he said | defendant was a United States offic'r, and that he, in WAT ROWRERA RENT 10 THE OTATR Piso ey; wali T sad'Woo Wil abe Niassioeh We elveiee eter RO et were there was that will read | ig ways 0-of counterfat money thet Disbrow seot | wosing and confiscating this cotton, was fulfiling his vb Pa Las of toe eouth walothed’ Suits’ Pasaiibae urea endatenses pe pnteee oat e Mas eny iotas meen to herd: A. 006, ite Baiscd wae, thes Unere wes 6 worth ; Ke onld Level} Mer ace na ecreearz of the Treanary, ot Washing: | Mallady, who were convicted om Priday of moving when she eee es! eee te, ord“ will”! uttered while YOu) gap into the otber fom and cquntit it L chow: 1 did 8, | ants, amounted i» the whole to something hike 140 bales, eo brougbt up for sentence, Tt will be pe. . who Tw ‘@. Bow até aie | @ How long were you there altogether? A, Lehonld tai found erty tare pieces be difeence whether i | sitaytas ut Mt the, rae at which, comme Tee ‘E" | membered that they rubbed Thomas Coiline of a aver What occurred? A. Finding: that Mr. Cutting Ay Spar {ieidy Sheet es boar anda belt; pet I cxnnot Fay post: | paid bie or Dishrow. aa they were in company , he told the cotton was seized. but only w portion of it) watch The Judge (nformed them that if they would notevmiag the ited upon) Bimwens | Secred ce bis oom ‘What Ime I could seud to him for money, and be would wend it 0d it in 1B reference Lo the later that this walt | one that the watch was reatored \t would make a dif OM Seles ietoon Seimeosyt os a Fabjects were conversed about? A I would 145° me by wail or expren, I paid him $15; t went oat | ieinsttuied, The cotton was confiacsted Vy Hrasheat on - se you see ‘epon the subject? down at jr T meas oh to tell what old Madame and myrelf lunar yosdway, and mat Dishrow 1 | the ground thal the. pro‘iucer ‘of thie cation hed during | ferente in the sentence The proverty wae found and ‘were aboot ~ ’ Collins ener that wich a@ Dit you make an appointment with:-bim? A. 1 athe net v @ Sate it ly. A. About har first burtand ang | Pel Brealey ; t ralc ven, tho rome ee ecneenatan, Gutite to Goabeee io baaeeed i Lin world hawe seat thea to the mate Did he thas ee oD about Aaron her second Husband, and about car | gre ike the nineteen pieces | 19882 He was informed by one of the plainuff that the | twenty years He sentenced them each to the § bia youre wit Samet, afer Supe loneoan cement Tee ee ee tian a. Yeo; a good | «ctemecmamined by Mr Waite—t marked the money | cottan in qnestion was of the crop of 1461. aad had ten Frisom for the period of 66 yeunm i ’ ; ‘days after | got it; TF cannot tell whetner » f pue | — 6G whet cocarred, tent a the, ned i Tat deal of fooltah talk ene ey materia, tioney or wot, woe te tues | Burenened, from se producers previous to he reer 1863: | win Clark was ined end cowvicied of greed lareoay m. % Bg She made en appoiat- dips Was she talking # greet deal? A, Yes, or— package; Lhave born n ploy of the Secret Ser | tite had purchased cotton bad ever subscribed to | ® oan two pont Cas, ahead ck BAS, he ae with house. mediate! or the cs , o rty oan, 0 mn bere wtreet. agit FoR mucceed in seeng him at hie Bouse? A. 1 | Ssball 1 write itso 7” Was ber ateption called to thie paper by anybaayr | Tee Department since the oth of Februsry , 1 wae sasiel. | oe a eet ne aes eee ie Titan, Makin. | porter of the ectabiiehment jurvued the bey, and 4, Be ee a es eS Sak tetera, ee sti on that Wras she called upon to sign it Uy anybody’ A. Yer, | Bemnet ot ae, kee) vaurum, Revel | ping it via Wink River to Apalagh Re | ten ete eee ee pee re ae ' ne newer | ao Drape were ( a } fag Sg Py f Hommnip, “Stet i oe mask amy Lp oy Be on nem Lge tg Armen 4. | Sa Dinbrow have 40 Counterlelt moves. te bie poses: Saw: Yormptunaths ba cseveatan evanrconnmnt "rhe | with the ede on oo meee 0" uring the time you were tere ent when any One else delivered .! - fone near the Park, sod when canght held of sipped Miahed mio to draw up a Ht of woh benevolent Bent of Charles O'Con Two of three Te cousterielt money 1 don't know where he waa | gaces by the Sunicens Coon of Rocyheday conc tin, | 901 of bia coat, but waa aflerwards arrested. The Jedge Plan ute aay beet op iaatpelag Ap yeaa to of be a mt ee eee ee eae Siam other, euitaest th Grae Deadioy deliver d the money to me, pe sonnsthlag Spestons tenet any Sine Urban, | Mt hitn to the Penitentiary for two years « or fo parpose es, eit, While . Nettleahip (exuded—f am an operator of + Mma “ r LAO ALT OPO a OFrCmE nck Pi 70 draw op puch s paper? 4. 1 aid; 1 told pemin. afer she was talking to me In diferent pari of thescom. | «a'Lacrus Service Depaiment; L know Disbrow, 1 have | sufgea byr une vignroos others) ud tas the Pod Joseph Riley who war charged with # felonione om ooek ay te nog vertain bour that a Q What would he say to ber? A. “Well, Madame, | nag a conversation * th him in reference to his trenrac | heen threatened with military force in the event of bie | Q enrbedy some fort? A The same messen- | prot oan beg tte oy called Hone with & man named Bruce ip the month of Jupe St | endeavoring to etforee the order It was alieged sito | ger, David Wilkie, came for it, 7 on an written there, 1 theret be nt he ea fe Rpon bert | Newark; Dwurow to. me thes man named Broce hed | that in tenmsit « portion of thin cotton, vabved at about | ©. Hawi M, whel M4 you domibny a was $60,000, as thick es nS, A. She remarked, Oh, yor,” and then she would get | teen to him to get counterfet money, he raid be Ges.00B, had heed miripped of lin wrappers ead marke ‘Bsvi tt, 1 gave Mt to bir. ged oN nA ie taarianes sy ~ from ume Wanted och a ema! cimcunt that he did not koow what | pag repacked and remarked, by (he persute having it im | 0 Bis yoo go tw Uetame Semel Pi cnt a fem vd, ie $ FER io ne ution te de, | We think about it, he va hot let bite have it) | charge for the government ‘These bales were forwarded tA go a ‘a next da? A 1) to feet C¥y- feet in dey and ut What was it at Inst that brought the buriness to an though be wre ed anziowr to pete little that be fed ib from Kufsls. Georgia, to Liverpool, Bngland, and - wm farcdid you get? AL 2 got'te the rome: ¢ ina | ei reenenees gpa oo pacha chngen 4 rt + alee BP carlin Miia [want | 30 that somebody @ Y nim for ame We ood ster t | ImeERee te. 2 brather of Galt ; | , \ * a to ™ e ; of re “i sl ara Wwe tate ete Pap ues he |v ay an ih soca 44am hat i$ tiny Settee ee | rare Sey Seay a's Nae nat Panel 010, | SO Raion torvared can nga tay al have next morning at a gate et tt tre | non cot down tere Morty? she outa thet she mun 20 60, hat the a of Mas Sabor foc | got ne tombe, Bruce wae 1 | Acourding to the law regarding the contention of gete next morning did wot wieh t | gs it was too much; tbat Mra. was vein and {rive | place? A. Yes, vir. nied: Mr. Wook, id me | Brrr mmagenes f2 th 2 ort eR aay wc | St PERRIN te ech ee |" Brchce ty eneD Ra AVA Ee wie Moc i | Rt foment ned ye pei mt ia oP & ga lea thd Jamel about Wirty yeers, itimaccly shout on the part of Disbrow, moved (0 dis | rates, © ibe oat” sasvn. oon ame (Be chegeteen | e paper ‘ ‘8 fol. | have it at ? AL vrged that, and, ‘ter variows | tweive or fourteen. { This ware charge of felony, and fu) Conversion sre made against Jews: eqsnces cn tmammamn soaggen, obtections o@ 1 sep ra a @ Atthat time when the will war execdted what wan been offered to show that Disbrow time mace Brishear web whee’ 1. Chureh, Rectory and Sebool.—This bequest Bem Sak Sor me’ e Ser a va whore wee was et "Hm committed, the “defendast | ang’ commitied 10 Ja om tbe <harge” Meare ie nee rr ate onder arent © Se ccer an Tuas of ae tecrentnns Was Serdar hyo ond ey eceaire es Malas | he Geen gs teapot aed comand | (rs ago te ec a pp he = ey ‘le}, Mow ork etty,”” aa that Jomel wea . weet we Salant Counnel agreed Wo revine thelr papers god sebmit them To Cre OED vetem. & The imitation for tos Dea rsd Da ort Ween. Mr. 0'Conor announced. thal thay were now through | 74 Omtint Stats ws. Wiikam Craft The defendant the cane, and, addrexsing coansel on the other wide, asked | Was charged with roing bur cena am a lotery ond pricy Coove Caleod The Day to the @ mun: 2 \ t equired they Mentitcetion of the serased, eome of te ALF, Stnithe We do ot think [t neceemary So ApE in thie city widdous paying the Specie! tax req @ Covmt—Cractiy—Psmy |New. 3603, 3071, | whom sow too youhe tee ‘but ‘whe were Mr, O'Conor-And 1 €0.not. Lewill call the by law. 4 371, LTKG, 1461, 1404, 2201, B01. T77, T8T, Fy depirBoad 00 oct bring othey Sasbony of of big Howor to the principles laid down in the Ht Mr. Adame appenred an cov nnel for the defendant Be | 188, 1406, 7141, vega, Bat), o, 1en7 The Jedge wl charge the Jory morn wit gaan that where a prmon in own tobe wubjon te | Memiiueanhe fact, Yr coutenden Mas the uw wan um | jo ZMH lee Jae? 4. 1B, 482, | Jog Ha oy without shadow tren to the dia. | COhetitqnoma vy virte of 8 4e0prog rendered by Judge | jaan ( aleadar fer To-Day. ment of perrona who would naturally be the ot» | Field, New Jerey a copy of which Mr, Adame banded | Gevmeat Tama —Non 9, 4,6, 30 to 34 8 to 60, 42, Gert femom —A D. Monnet, oom bie boanty, that ¢ one of the most distinctive to ccbettiototer porn for bie Geratron Connnel | @9, 44 ting b Bettor®, ty for the people. ton on of incapacity sino aid Was Chin jaw wee uncommitntians) by viriee of | | Mretsh Tram —Demurrer Ne TL levee of Law and Novemter 3, 1606 The People va Wen I. it Waa too mach, Court intimated that the wat fami) iar, 20d Niele luster Neon ndvciment tjed | Peet — Noe 16%, 100 to 27 oghes, Thewdere Kae Wm Oiieepie, taee pre Mr, O'Conoe whether be intended to pur ap in the wtrit omilar The opts. | One Mee TH 66, 1, 9, 00, 107, 199, 117, 199, | temeew tame ve Jobe folenious amenlt and 4 dollars? A. ft wae, ‘Mr, O'Conor--No, ‘vir: | believe wot We are die | ion he rai) bad wit wiih bim, but be had writes to | 146 Generml call at 126, tery same ve fimo even, grevd ier ry Will madet A. Anew copy to submast it, under your Honors direction, We the doth of ite jorbers Citriet for scopy of A, aed —— Coty, ame ve Jeremiah murder; same ve Of the will was ve agreed to the \ewuer On which the jury ie 10 paam | oe Aa he received it he would ptewent i (0 the Comm wine cour Wie. . denne Tighe, cana, a} ‘@ Was that new copy executed? A. That new copy | They are a follows: wat ver, hom he eked Ww Consider the mation apd Sate. frow 7 7 Sr weee teres FOR, THR ICRY, hagye the deteadert Alleged Acenalt and Battery & Tho anagented the namenot the executors in itt ‘Did Phen BR, Jemet, in the complaint in (hie ees Comm minaonet Unbom tad D6 Would give Lhe cane bie ° <aperior Court Calenéar-Thie Dey A + amed, Ain at the time and seieed and posnenmed pe | beet attention Betore Judge Alnor aad 6 Jory Pert 1 Kom 1h, ota?, @ A nbewe 7 A. At et reason. sad eamplaint alleged? reise Bétore Commiomonen Bouin | duh ws. Jacks —This wae avanti io rewrer dammages | gan, 306), Lo at Ee bs 3), 5867, jae, J a wer charged with eel iy cont " . 5 4 e c not A yy Up town, are they on os pacha Pom F Pe a Pp At for sileged semeoll ned tanery. The case of the pian Roe ae a 9001, 1714, Bowe, BEAM, @ What material cecurred ip reference to the wil! Mabdon, the’ next of kon sod etre mt | on he ‘Wariked Up by deiretives of the Bearer Kervice Depart. | Si ae tbat op the Sin of Augurt lan he went into the , from tbat RSA Be Ie, | ee Kise B. Jumet, docenoed, eo lldged 10 she Wed |, moct aod tie Commionerer baring heard the evidence, | waloon of the defendant in Twelfth street snd ented for « ton? AL e i, and on the a ee \thed whe defeniant for (ial He wee rélemmed om | plane Of beer, sorts * men. « 86 bel, het he ie at maeas. motning of that day I fo wre if abo was ready to the four piaintiffr in (hie action lam ramen anh 92,000 Gefentant spoke Wo him yéry roughly en’ mid be bad = ween ber gy convey © pisiauss, Neieon (tare, me in the maid com. Before Commumcner Rtilwe! pe change, ehereopen pint! remarked be would Haass MR, Rew 8 x a peyond the | pint all Clotan) Tennate war charpet with déaling I COenter: | go core the fire! tf ameter mien sed 4 Gre Om Materday wight destroged ibe mithary bowpt fact that ebe 414 Prerthla the paper wnting mentioned and referred | fort dollar alia lity goat, tempn whee ome By" Chan defendant very roiely sold Wit | ta) ad Geurty Gil he contents The patente were My @ Di she withioe apother day | t i maid com bearing date the Lith day of ‘net yreiner were ay O64 chet of the | to get Oot ae fant we be could to whieh We rep ited eee 0 that it should be Apr, 180, or Part therect the wil) OF alamems of sore Deperiment Mr Neweors oad ky. May Mab ite & remarh thet war tot polis, ao teh imme | MOTO Feveges firemen were injeres Wy enue Add M thes das Aid yon a0 hers) A) did, Wee said bine B. Jama Pecennes | Ly pote nae Bit Monn pe? 6 say | heis pier Aline hehe he hae eel | CmUT ey