The New York Herald Newspaper, February 27, 1851, Page 6

Leeture on Italy On Monday, the 17: inst, Col. Forbes delivered the first of his Couree of lectures om the receny events in Italy, at Society Library, corner of Leo- nard street and Broadway The attendance was good, and the lecture was listened to with marked attention and manifest interest. Colonel Forbes commenced by stating that the subject of his first lect«re will be confined to the position Italy oceupwd previous to the revolution. The cauees, he said, ot the ancient greatness of Ttaly, and principally of Rome, were its geographi- cal position, the fertility of its soil, and the energy and intelligence of ia people. Having deseribed ite position, and the teriil- condition of ite soil, he observed, in connection th (he latter cause, that the mental cultivatien, which had beem imperted from Greece into | «), nas never entirely left that country. The 4 © oo now naturally arises, how could a natwu -¢ such circumstances, and with such nm advantages, ever al- low itself to be © and trodden down? The answer is! power of priestcraft. But the people are « ermined not to tolerate 4 priestly dominion » + r They are resolved to free themee! vest). eotly and princely des- potiem. The tack : ult one; but the cause of justice will eve ciumph. The first and atnots of Italy have to ‘e for freedom, is the sron rule under which ing, grew by little and » of Christianity the ne religious customs 8 Thus the statues tne siatues of saints. greatest enemy wii encounter in their power of the priest the people of Ltaiy litle. In the i priests retained + and ceremonies of of the ancient go The beautiful stat + was replaced by the statue of St. Pei 1ests Rave also given the various trade tron saints. For in- stance, St. Mari: patron saiat of sol- diers, Ke. Die also their special saints. Thus, > resides over diseases of the eyes; St ¢ breast. The nume- rous pictures «p ot che madona have taken place of idesses. We havea madona of the u / 1, valley, fountain, snow, &ec. Ben- eur protecting saints. ‘Thus, St. Antou! rses, cows, pigs, &e. ‘Cities, vil uthes, have their pa: tron saints. Th mioke a fine harvest tS. Apolonia is said by selling relies Fane t teeth, which work to contain seve! miracles. The , kiwg of popery is in direct oppognor vire of freedom. Its aim is the entha hircts The people are told that nor “ interpret certain , s00n became price eripture. The masses tte Pope acquired @ power which vor: voszessed. Various | a(tempts were uw «trom this degrading bondage ; but thy wo avail. Upto that time the power wae great. When apy danger thr the agsistence or that the priests » people to his nav means that the | pears almost un, The moet pow: priests is aurieu means of break jamily ties, ape « the power of the penitent knows, with the nature ¢ Jation. It is, ib anything, on ace: also manage to « requires a hos deed. In retere ence botwbh-: ave their house! by two nieces; himself tied fron ‘The order of the J: is supported by informed ano jaw but the ruier and without fer. is alzo an impor ~ immediately seeks ¥ 0,10 return, expect, 't wtluence over the nh we consider the brs disposal, it ap- aly to free herself. ty toe hands of the . Which is used as a ~ suciety, dissolving ery individual under ezing out all the eceme acquainted ‘» of the entire popu- impossible to do rssion The priests enold affairs. Th a # host there 13 in- y, he said that the | an easy life, and aeraily attended to tnateven the Pope 4» company of a lady. owvecfal society, and s members are well “They have no r They are cold, von, ip their hands, r rhe security of the government. Tt » the management of public educe : edge, they know, is power. When ith of good abilities, every artifice is; vo draw him to them. When any oue > of independence, a horvible (persecu * on egainet him They have thes ws ot the world. They k up 4 svondence. Jesuits ang to be pew © immensely nich. ‘hey have bers vantohed; bat the Jesuit laughs & @ new gerd, fil portant enemy +! ner indepenaeu power ol the ar of the various ‘ unportauon, under y. The next im- ve achievemeat of gle egainst, is the cave a description ether with their geographive wat of population. italy ci aud west by the Mediterranean ah by the Alps. The populeans vouty-four, and by others twenty Tne population un- der Austrian y« millions aad a half, and thot of the Church three millions pvite more guests to a house tha: » +r, and if ap enter- tainment ie to 1 must be given to the police. it i thatcan leave the city, and thoer w ld receive a pass. he piaces where erred to the odious spy system, to ut ticles which cir « the power of thr utes levied on ne couotry, aad to ug chirtly io armed police, end nor s The liberty of the public press) weumacribed, and nothing can he .+ t has beea ap- proved by the ex. oa should present a book to the « «ving previous!y weighed every ex) > the author shoald happen to fina pb ‘ The two emull newspapers tha rament organs. A greet persecuner “orast the patriots, who maroyge \ & There his bern police to discover, are secreted | the Pope iseurd printer, thatesery ~45 speciti cas of wil where it «ne re thea mentioned me publications + flort mate by the woere these presses of che last year, ring that every new service, that “hoy. and the plac -s 1 oe regutered He tea that existed to tt Bol wiihs - Lc woe and circam- epection ef h~ + wt pohee. The first was sour mart, which was broken up by the «4 *oprnces. Young Italy wee the sec he causes which acetlereted the | t was the death of »s taly had come to a At he weve ~ Newth to the Pax ene y pauuse io the 1 (co ee what polie This conduct « ded by a love t triotism. The heen imstances Which 1 am y, and he pohey of Lerd wh ise 10 the revoe tution in lua!y. | 10 ive, and who, ulumetely . ema ite p re He cc ea h a that the in the intron w regulations, w guided ty pro id a epitit of re- form Law ee. Scraexn Core siates, Pen. 2 No 81.4.8 O14 e+ William Uf Marrictt—tn err vt of the | alted States tor Maryivr opinion ef thi « aid Ciroult Warne wilvered the ndgment of the Jeremiah Van n Watts execu courindel United ar 4 Lo if tor the appel sment for the appellee » 7h non eteor, ve H.T. Reid thie ted 9 the court, o@ @troctd ane y rohe platetif ta No tw 4 T to error. va J a et wl — tht 1 to the court on the recere @ t tor the plaintiti« No *l. » rir we RD Wal was commenced for “votes, Feb 19 Z & Patoe eto red the eit Oeurt Justion Neiec eMrmins tb urt in thie case, With corre ane o» oin per centam per an ow . p vent Im error, va.J3 De You « root thie onase was con! nur d tor vor, tor the defend ein erter B eres Couns ' 82. We © Revie This eppes! treme the Calted States od @ith costs fot Tenwerree ene No 25.8 etn ty epoport of, aad Weatherhead lvtal "he ae » for the piatntift oonante in error rates, Feb, t= AP Merrilt ovluded for thea: sot fle error ve. Borremn, Cor 86 A Fowler « vy cw Rattroad Company, + Maryland = This delphia Wilainaten 3 hail ot the pleiati® in error jaintit ip errer ¢ be waa eubmitred ip bel on s printed argument lewspeper Literature. Revve ves verve Mownes.—Among the Keviews published in Europe, the most prominent is 20 doubt the Revue des deux Mondes, ® work pub- iehed under the direction of M. F. Baloz,s gentle- man of high merite and rare intellect, who stands im Paris at the bead of the talented men of the press, The publication of Mr. Balos is very impor- tant of ite Rimd, and it contains, every year, about twelve hundred pages, divided into four volumes, We thimk it useless to add that all the articles of the Re- view are signed by some of the best writers of France and Burope, and accordingly its price of subscription: jf compared with that of the English, German and American reviews, is less than that or any other work, for it amounts to only ten dollars a year. Desirous to please his readere, the editor of the Beview has thought proper to add a new publication to the ty: four numbers which he issues each year. This publication, will be entitled Historical, Statistical and Literary Annuaire , will be @ recouir, nearly unique in the world, of contemporaneous history, of literary and political items, and, at the same time, a compendi- ‘um of diplomatic,commereial and statistical documents in which the U. States will find a particular chapter, well as all the Northern and Southerm countries of America. Numerous engraved portraits will be pub- lished in this new book, which is destined to become @ monumental specimen of human science. The history of 1850 will appear st the end of February, 1861, and will consist of # sort of summary uld understand and | of the United | fo motion for s | of all the events which have taken place since 1848; o |seketch, or rather s picture, of the crisis which Burope has just experienced; and # tableaux of the insti. pane wh hen been formed masieg te three last ers, The history of the year 1850 will begin with an of the intervational intercourse of the great al the diplomatic questions which ttention of the cabinets of Europe. ‘There debates of the governments between themselves have been always the most important part of national life, and they are still the most animated part of politics, cflering the greatest imterest to those who are observers, These questions will be treated in the “Annuaire,” with many tacts, and great accuracy, d often will be found in tne history of international questions the verbatim report of notes exchanged | between the cabinets of all the powers of Europe, the treatics and diplomatic decuments relative to the rights of nations and geographical truths with reapeot to countries. The ./nnue s+ of the Review will also be consecrated to the description of private lie in all countrie this description will contain the politica! institutions, the progress ard changes introduced into laws the establishment of churches, universities, | schools; the pames of the members of familte: om of power in that of the chiets verpment and also the stute of all the polittsal, re- Ligious, adwipistrativ 1 of every country; thi badget of expenditures and receipts. the induatry, the commercial move ment ys of communication, either om jand or ees; the institutions ot all kinds, | eitber of utility or benevolence; penitentiary and Judiciary statietics— in ehort. the ensenlie of questions ot publie economy; the political events of the | year; the acte of the government; the acts of parties, the struggles which are theie con- sequences, and 8]! the poittici the movements ot science, belles-leitrese. ona «i the direct or indirect influence which they buve every year on the general march of eoci-ty; the statistics of ine periodi cal press; the moral history. condition and objects of all the pripeipal publications. either daily or periodi cal, im all the countries ot the world Tn short, all important tacts commercial reports, | scientific or literary events. will nd a place in th innuaive of the * the fwo Worlds,’ for or money. to render it as complet sible; and this task ts remaered & he found siresdy in authors who Literature in various nations. We doubt not that the gent of the Revue des dewr Mondes, Mr Batllic re, 169 Fulton street. pear Broadway will secure the trans- mission of the work to subscribers in New York or in the United States A Umon TOR at THE Bort Petits an Cen aay. —There bave been many p cal marchiogs and countermarchings at Nashville, Tennesses. which have stirred the peopie of that district to inquice inte the best means of preserving, in future, the beat degree of national democratic usetulpess The Nasbyille Union has beaded the great Union movement, and baa perse- vered, under the patriotic determinatioa of its pro prietor, to allay any excitement either too hasty or prejudicial to the general interests ef the country. It bas now, we perceive taken another importmet step, for the proprietor announces that he has secured, as Joint proprietor and editor Uherles Eame q lately Commissiener to the Saudeich [+l en adle writer, in the best sense of the tera: and ® gentlemaa whose talents will bave @ Geld for future usefulness, such as few editors enjoy We belivve Mr Whose politice will meet with the favor of every sound democt atic republican 1p the Soathers & astietant journeliat of the Washington d the respect and admiration of pclitictane RN througbeut the country. and a= be is well acquainted the true state of public teeling here at the North. anticipate that the Nashville |» cer his spices. will become a relinble expooent of # itis the most central journal of the Bo The Fugitive Siave Riot In Goston—OMictal Correspondence The following ietters fiew the War and Navy Departments have brew tran mutt d to the proper oflicers of Boston, giving the neces-ary directicns what course to pursue, should here be nua tempted -enectment of the laie rescue of @ fugitive slave ip shat city — Wan Devantaes Wasnincros, feb 17, 1861 Sir:—Information ha» just been communicated to the Presient thet © number ot prreoas prince Prople of color in the city of Boeton did a f y tines, combine to preveut the exec of thelae providing for the a:rert of fugitive slew who had ber marreste possidle Char th find it necessary t the execution of the and the marshal or any of his deputic ate ol the ciroui? shail echibitto district \udge ot obuvets, emeing itary tora cerenry to ineure the aue ex-eutron of the laws and shall require your aid and cb t the trow your con inand ass part of tee» aus piace under the direction aud rontrol of thi yourrelf and such portion of your com be deemed adequate to the purporr [ft metiber toe cireuit oor the aistrict judge «hould be in the city of Boston when the exigrucy above reterred to ebali oo cur, the written certificate of the marshal sions will be ined sufficient for you to afford the requi-ite aid Very respectiuiiy your ome dient serveat C M OONKAD Svoretary of War Brevet Major Groven A Tiuma mmanding oMiecr, Port Ladependence, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts arious letters have passed beiween the Navy partment and the federal and city authoritiee at on, during the past year he following w t despatch which Was communicated to the Navy Devan Feb. 17. 1851 Bre —The Department hae received information that a prisoner. arrested as & fugitive clare in Bos ton, was forcibly rercued from the deputy of the Marehal of that Gietrict, on » y tes tae evens tion of the iaw ia thie ead all ang whtirt it i* bop-d that the civil tin cred or no military @ om the forces of the United & ates, you are io woted that if the tacebal.«r wey of bis deputies charged with the service of process be competent aurbority, shall procuce to you the certificate of the uation of district jatge of the United Bat n hie opinion coms f the ia promptly or your ecmmand or oy ocher accompany sod aid alin mekiog arr iu preven’ ing e-seue or in recapturing any permn who her vevaped of been resoued. by virtue of any proeses in nie hate If, however orither the justin nor district judge shall be pretemt im the city of Horton at the tion when @ call for ruck ce rhall be meade you will them act upon t cortincate from the Mar. shel or deputy. sod det th» wit required To evotd auy +x t anrberity, you eill te ail such cases, direc’ the oMfver in commend of the forces herein deroribed to reerive @rile om this mt rice the orders ofthe Marshal of deputy, and ast only in striot obedience therete — Lam vary respenctuily yout obedient errvant WILL A G@aHaAw Commodore Job» Downes commandant | waited Sates navy yard, Mass Anonition Ovrmaer ty Kawett We leare fon lust night, that J Hamittoa, of Nene as county, WhO Was puresiog 4 free negro, wHo hed stolen from him a horse aed sum of moury, overtook him «at Ripley, ond had hin arrested While the conecable (who bit Me H oherwe ci the thief) was searching tor the horse, tne ne ero, aesiered by ome ebolivenivte, managed to cut the cords with which wie tied, and knock ed Me. H. down. A eeuffle ensued for the of Mr Hin which the chivalrous free veut! took no part until the whie maa bid the vantage, When they resisted the ney re, nad allow Brooklyn City Court. TRIAL OF GEORGE WILKES, FOR LIBEL. THIRD Day. Fre, 24—On the sitting of the urym: mot engaged in the above cause Say Be le gr} Wed: y Mr. (who was absent in consequence of il - ness on Batui . resumed his place as counsel for the irday. yw defendent, and Mr. Gracies’ examiuation was conti- nued. He thought it was prior to the let May he first saw or spoke to Mr Sheldon snd Mr. Freeland. Cross-examined by General Mather—Mr. saxiden refused to talk to him; he considered that that retu sal was talking; Mr. Freeland also refused, ne could not im to tal ; a4 before the convessation he hed with either retort May, 1846; the interview already ek of at Mr. Coits office was not before the lst witness had been married, and supposed he was so till. General Mather—Do you keep house ? The Conrt arked how it was material to pur:ue such an enquiry ’ it might be unpleasant, and ti.) would avoid it unless it were necessary, General Mather— It is necessary. The Court would allow counsel’s discretion and feel- him. 1G social Mather IT will waive the question for the Are you a: be ar ya To th ware pte New York and Brooklyn have pumbers of parses a be dee! op your apd property ! Me Bichice objected: What it they had? or if the had reason to suppose 80, After some discus- ‘al Mather said—BSince they had forced h mto ould explaip that his object was, to «hi mess Was crazy—as crazy as @ loon—and paved vont frauds exieted ail around him, that he could scarcely pass a pump without suspect ing {tof some design upon him. A commission had been issaed by bis relations, but an arrangem<us ru tered into bad raved the peoessity of procvediog with it. They bad tried to show that this witness bad no. tified Mr Sheldon of the frauds; they did not inteod to go into thore, and he would have spared all th: pain it he cculd bave dene so. bnt now tell them from the etand, that he lost Prince, the son ot Jaroes II; and to show ro the ratietaction of ell, that when he attempted to intrude bir opinion on “Mr Sheldon and Mr. f’recland those gentlemen were quite justifies in refusing to talk with Bim: If he were allowed to go withoat thin sort o cross examination he would «tend in the porivion and ‘as pow the jury would see what his opinion was worth and that he was unlike any other witaess that was over placed on any stand. An argument followed upon this point which the Court ultimately put an end to, by ruling that it was competent to the counsel to show that # witness, pro~ duced by the other tide. is irrational undor any de lusion, that he bas ® bad memory. or is mi to the existeuce ot fa They might show chi any receonable range Que repeated know that within there three years there h any conepiracy against your lite and property’ witnees objected to the question, and appealed to the Court, but Judge Greenwood, raid he wus there as a witness, end they beds right to croes- exsmine hia. Mr. Gracie atill objrcted The Court hoped he would wot refuse to answer, and the question was waived for a moment. but couarel would return toit. He would now ask him whether he hoew # Mrs Kecwell, sometimes called Mrs. Ked- well? Antwer—Yes Examination coptinued — Witness knew her in New York; could vot say whether she was a married wo man, hed eeew her et Albany, and many places, be owned a mill in Portlaud county, borderiag on Tamp- kad seen ber there - pot in the mill, but in # public hous Question— Did you ever give her any money! Odjected to. and waived for the present. (Questiou—Did you ever reside with William M An dros? Auswer—(Aiter e@ome besitation)—V-s fe firet called at his house to see bis wife, who, he under. stood & celebrated clairvoyante ; there he met Mr William 8 Pierson. who was, he thought. couduct- ing ecme mesmeric inquiry with Mrs. Audros with re- ference to the Kidd ship; Mr. A. Thompson and others Do you were there; her acquainfence with th gentlemen was the passport to Mro. Andros’ respectability in his mind; he subsequently bired & room ta Andros’ house, eu lived there for some months, but at last discover- ed (bat be was an agent for the sala of some stock, end then be left; when Le met Picrson there. he (Me, Picrson) wes there first; Mr Thompson was not; wit. nets went alone, as he always did when he went ts those places; he bad often before been ed in mes- meric experiments, but had not been « ly; he was not inthe habit of mesmerising a lady at Dunning's Hotel; be might have done so some eix or eight months ago. eS uention— Was Judge Uleboeffer one of the parties ia the conspiracy against yor Witness objected, as he might, be prejudicing his own righte. ‘The Court ssid the fear ot any civil consequences was no excute for not ans "ering @ question. Mather ed that one tor the present, piracy existing. The witness etill refused to vice of some legul geutleman wer not there. ait Brady savised bim to answer, as he did not see how it could injare hia ‘The Court directed him to ge om; but as hy remain- ed silent— Jucge Greenwood raid. I am tolerably patient, but 70a must do It, or emy you will net; and if you retuse, we must take the course we feel called upon to do, to Viadieate the dignity of the Court Mr. Urecic euid, the mattor was of vitel importance be did not know where it or, that he might comenit with rome be erked 7 His cbaracter, everything, might depoad on ounsel. withed; but he must uot leave the court Mr. Brady had already given his advice. Mr. Uracie, after pacing the court for afew minutes excited state, aod havivg had a short odand arising contivued—The against bis live, lidercy, piracy was, he property; Evan! believed bis het; bad bad these impressions as loug as the rea- eons for them bad ex iste¢--@ good many years; there bad been a great deal ot mystery about them ; be hed reason to believe there were persous on the other side of the water, who have « poxitton ta conurction with <reoma in the government of eingiand. Q. WasJudge Isboeffer oue of the meo concerned jo the cons; ‘A. (After come further hesitation) The con duet of Judge Ulenorfrr, and towards Lim, aod his belief that he w " he hed no children. Jadge UlshoeSer's wite aud her children were bis bers at-iaw, Q Are Gabrei Fur metber, Mrs Midden, aad Caleb First, 5 never charged bim with belong’ A.—Never, @ wite's mother, Mra. Midden. Witness—Thet's none of your business. ‘The Court imterpored aod said they could not p mit such language or ecnduct. They #ould cer commit in not auewering, saying they proereded to put ineie th and directed the commit iment te be made oat intercession © Mather, however, wh 24 te withdraw the quesion. i was count mended and the exemivalion rerumed. Witness went ber of times to Andros’ house witness, and as that g ptieman persisted 48 HOt prepared, inte execucion, On tne there a tines end Pierwon the woquatet ance was formed by merting @t Avdros’ house; wit. pees thought he bad paid Mire K-deell money, if #0, ic examinations; soumtiner ons dol- et be bed not given did not Know ing bees got with child in uy of there mermeric experiments j This witness was thea directed to stand aside, but remain in attendances Williem Sineleir called and eramiced.— Wa: a clerk eras office New York, predased mt in the nutes of troutt Court, in nick Jarpen- ter ens pl Bheidom Freeiana ant oth Geterdante teoord in the 6 Carpenter age! he Dommon Views, the Dili of exceptions therein, and the proceeaiags in error in the Supreme Conrt Mr brenty In the deciara ion ef th Sap-wme Coart, Carpenter charges the detemdante with cnnaptriag to edbim to escape = Mr. A followed him and «hot the negro twice, the darkness preventiog his cap ture. A warrant was taken out he arreet of Mr. Hemilten, bot not served — wvrlle (Hy ) | Postboy, 17th Invention 1x Twe Artor Pristina — Burdick, of Uviea, has succerded ia 1 new cylinder printiog press. whieh ts certs ahead of asything nowinnee This | both sides of the paper by one revo! print twice as fast as the Hue’s press, work as weil or better then the Adama press, aod it requires but half the labor to reeding it, while the cost of the machine, it 1 br lieved, will be leew than thet of any power press There ia one of these preseennowat workin Utica Pr nod all concerned in the business, will de well to call and eee for themacives ~Auburn (N V.) Advm mt him and canting him to be wrested on ga- inju:z founded ebe.gee The «uit See cowimen sed ta Use. 1810. eed be proposed te snow, by the mivator woo were t ed @hat war the verdict Toe judg ynat Bbeldon odu the tented 10 Tedwow course which he Aveust, 18:6 th iste. The verdict the Obroult Court was ovcained May 12. 1848. and war for 66 (8, Mr Joramn had commenced @ pult m malicious prosecution and oo dicte were Obvained fm ® maoner hut aecesary to rete pew. and they were borh unger review. Tho libel charged them with having robbed arpenter of de of Golinte and tFat De bed resovered heavy deepite of Jorden The plaio tuport was need erat ngatnst thos who hat daveratet that ix ater and im To prove this, his own coun-+l | ight lead to; | t 2 ‘The Court would allow him to comeult counsel if he | we bad | beem fired at more then once—ouee it went througa | | | csme acquainted Sinclair was directed to attend ers in the matter. ir. Jordam.—The defendants in Court peesees oe Cornes. Freelan ‘owles, | neh, Cole, Norris, Loumsbary, shin ros 1 frem the record, also witnesses who were examined on both sides, to the number of nearly a hundred) He was the trial except to take in some je affidavits used wished him to not in court dur; papers. He did no! he bis en were which was a err Je affais proceedings of le ale, Carpenter m Matsell, the Chief, to the Mayor. and back again, t azine, and consequently stat: te were re- but the simple charge was, that the deteudants id caused him to be arrested, on charges of forgery, aseault with a deadly weapon (a revolver) on Piersoa, and with attempting to rescue Andros, Clarissa B. Lemoine, (examined by Mr. Sickl: lived at 751 Washi: ¥ 2 know whether Jordan ork; ii June and July inet fived at 206 Broome str quainted with Mr, Sheldon and Mr Frerlacd; Caldwell’s in the month ot June, 1846; did not to see shout the Kidd ship; went with went twice with Theodore Cowles; believed he was connected with the Kidd Company; went to the house of Mr. Samuel Bard; no one was with her except Cowles; went there ence, about two years before, with her mater and her sister's husband; was not there at any time between May and September, 1846, except on the two occasions she had mentioned; had m+. Mr. He Sheldon at Caldwell’s twice in June, 1846; was etopping at Mr. Bard's House; believed Mr. Sheldon waa there, but did not enquire; she did net remain there, but returned by the uext boat; did not se» Mr, Sheldon at table; took her meals at the public table; that was the first time she bad reen Mr. Sheldon; did not see him there afterwards at all; mever saw hia but onee—between May and Beptember, 1846; kaw Mr Freeland; did not recollect seeing his, Jal well’s; L Mr. r. Quer. penter were in the boat [ was told, but [ was not in company with them; that, I think, was in June; had known Sheldon some time th Mr. Theo. Cowles weut with her; he had brought a request for her to go to lady there, 8 Mrs. Elisa Ann Wakeman, and she went ap to sve her and nothing else; her ais- ter wus not with her at that time: ber services were never required by Mr Cowles or Mr. Sheldon; she re. turmed by the first boat that came along; Mr. Cow! came back with her—Mr. Sheldon faw ofirers at al]; going up did not aee them; our said te be Bumateac; ehe thought be epoke to Sueldon; a few daye atterwards, the officers called on her at her house; rhe remembered tbat, because she thought it was very insolent, General Mather objected Mr Sickles hoped he would be allowed a little in dulpence, asbe bad got # witness from the enemy's camp. aud hostile tothem. He proposed to show that trom May, 1848, this woman had been enga in con ith Sheldon and Freeland in cai ou in partly ivat Carpenter. and partly uguinst otherr, but wil yued to deceive the public The Comt must confine him to strict rules, thouzh dirpored to allow & more leadisg examination, in suck # case, than usual ever pretended to any pretensions @my account of th Kidd hip; never assisted to write one or oopy‘one written by ber; had heard of « printed statement, but never Faw it; never undertoo: to tell anybody ® for- tune; Mr. 6Beldon had called at her house, frequently betweew May and the fall of 1816. to see ber; he came as apy other fidividual would do, but not to get any information from ber; sometimes she was alone, some times bed company; they talked upon religion y other sudjeot: Ghe did not ses him be foreshe met bim when they went to Cauldwell a, but she knew bim before; thought it «as Mr. Pierson ia- troduced her to him, but it might be les. she would net he positive; was not introduced tor any purpose; they never ret rred to businers. To the Court— She went to Oaldwell's bacat bad rent for ber; that ledy bad got into some tr upd the ves a friend of ber Examination resumed. Thero was ne appointweat; she did not know Mr, Sheldon was going there till abe saw him on board the boat; ehe never gave auy infor. mation to the cficers upon eny eubject, or never was sent for to go to the office of the Chief of Police; never met Bumet-ad with Sheldon. ‘The ceferdant's counsel then presented this quos- tion to tbe witpera in writing, the Court baviug ticst passed upon and approved it. on the uvderrtandin Ubat they would conuect her answer with Sheldon an Freeisnd. “Did you. at any time efter you beceme acg tainted with Mr. Sbeidon. offer or pretend to ties eny iotormation or advice in re; ebip oF any Operations cownsoted with it?” Witners would answer ia Me Bickle's owu langnaga, she pever did at any time, Ko; no relative +f here ever resided with berin Sroowe street. er avy person of the same nume; there was st that time (in 1846) & Mits Selina Lemoine living at No 40 Urobard et asister of her's Witness's houce was in Broome rt: between Orsbard and Ailer Crow-examiaed ty Mr. Jordan.—Witaess first be- th Mre Wakeman in the fall of 1544, it wan in October 1844, [ went with my sister Mra Bophia L. Davie, who bad beeu etaying there be fore and boerdipg at Mr. Bard's how Wate man war a daughter of Mr Bards; there was a visit ing acquaintance between them, and Mra, W. bid been Visiting at witness's houre in New York Mr Brady at this stage of the proceedings Tegretted he pelled to leave. aad h explain to the court aud jury that h Shere was indispensable; be ves o to go to Rhodelelend. The court then tock @ recess, it being past two o'clock AFTERNOON af.98t0N alady ‘oudie On their + Jonas BR PNillips, te Assistant Attorney of New lork and against each cf whom attach arnt resented thew The tormer wing expired ell judicial enquiry. led toe well grounded | witness would aleo state, that aa | before be tock the room there, and remained, be theught, fe Months after; he esw Pierton a ateat number of times, he left. he thought in 1845. | —When you fret called. did Pierson find you or you tod bt led. Mr An dros wi Mr. simply tor aa ertest epo (ar Jordan) aid wot ree tn prow thet The one in the Vommon Pires showed that ‘arp rotor eved Bheldon for calling bim ® couvterteiter Chey | vule pot nee whet that hed to do sith his having led of reversl thourand dollars, or with @ bard cf ewindiers Mr Brady proceeded to prove the procaedings by the documnte produ The trial im the Virsnit Court commenced 40th April. 1845. nod the verdict | dered 13th May, 184" Witne-s next proaused » proseeaioge in ihe chancery soit instituted by Te appeareo bill bed been fied 14th May Bheldon’s and Freeiand's if putio aed Mr, Veit being their attorney ined by Mr conte, bia produce the the bill. dated Lat July “Siesees prover Coote dimissing the biti defendant Plerere wbtcb Pr ied 29a Rept Mr. Jordan wanted the a WL oF ff they could met Gnd It would counrel admit that it was dietiveed on t aod the conte texed at £700 oF $500. Mr Brady not on the merits On she ground of ho jur: dtetion thought, o¢ plalot ff bad his remedy atie The papers were the a 1M6. ard December, 1840- ‘Cross ean) ato eat rearched, bat the decree wa: | fer twenty y not produce any ofthe papers requtred. wud be ing eent word 60, comsidered bie attendance unneen- tary, He was then worn td examined by “ir Sickles —Waa Assistant District Attorney when (adit ment was ‘ound against Carpenter and Andros, in 1848, the eMidavit produced (which was Aodros’s affidavit, mentioned end proved by the witness Grit) was eu dorred by bim, with the names of the witoerses; it was nd sent to the Dutrict Attorney, to be ent b e ordinary course of busine 4; ous and Corbeer endorsed oa nd eupposed they were personeto whom the ao bet pareed counterfeit money; did not recollect about AmeliaAndros but got hia name ashehad maie the oMficavit of the cause of comp eiut; wilaess served subj cones on all the witnevees, Insluding Snaros: was nCt aware oOfany counrel bring e rovlared oF counected rorecution befure the trial, it that he could not y General thought. w with th he bad «) lictle | be thought the Jorden was; Mr Jorian tion with the ease. either to wou in the Sessions. befo mitted to the court of Oyerend Terminer Knew anytbing at ali of the Kidd Compe py but by rumor witness hae been ia offer from 1843 to 1661 Mr Bickies-Do you ever remember any cass in which the Attorney Genera! appeared with tue Dis- tiict Attormey on motions of that sort Mr Jerdan objected, bee: id not think they ought to try him th though it he were called of to Getend himeelt be thought uid Mr Sickles argeed iu support of his right to pat th tion a.nd the court would not rule ft 6 they thought it allowable to rhow whet uenal Witness bad no recollection of any aush cases, but one on «B Indictment agatost Berte lium tor libel. and there be thought Mr. Brady, them Attorney Gen Mr. Cid, im thet care appecr on motions; could o say when Mr. Jordan Grst came into the ease Carpenter, or how underrtood he wae fficin ly d—Remembered Me Grab tthe Attorney. General ; uent of the 47 or examin ing im bebelf come in at the ermer. or Gev- in the Drarty cases, subsequent to this one, Mr Graham lived in New York. and always appeared on mov! thore cures; 6nd there was no motion ete in which the District Attormey did not give him Witness knew Jertook it bime-! Ditice before be wi that Mr. Jordan resided or Rept of and he knew of hie © & edu th: time whem that ease or any other. In tative, appeared, w ' nt te him by the District Attorpey This wasdone in the case of Mr Jorden sod Mr Grebem beth, He belien ariven tn bis experience. but it ned convict at a witness, and they were Knew of one ones only before ta which od @ convict to prodoce bia restore bis competency pitrener convicted Mr Jorden pot in the ball bonds in Andros's eare The vitners could swear to identity of the documenta, which be bad placed on the Gie in the County Ol-tk's Ofier of New York as partot hit duty Theaigneture and Ollitg up iain the Recorder's writing The bail m Bartiett and Jone Porte 4 words or proot ‘The writs of exeeu'ion lrurd were putin The witmers proved Ded been retur bo goods oF real estate cm There were, eiso, received as origin ente not reeorda f entered ment gaint Warner by a torpedo, nd another agi tempting to bribe Jodge Kdmonde. all about the time Deon Alonso Cushman celied in Ware merchant cf New York, oud bad knows Mr Bheidon he wae a member of the Grand Jury that fond the bill against Carpenter, in 1848 Objected to by Mr derdan. that It was incompetent sianylhing that took place before the Ar Here wan Re OTH OF warn provision in page 8)! of the jnat edition of the vived Btaruter, but that did net alter the com noo law. exeept for statutory purpose Witness o ight theretore state whet wit ereaworn but eothing for ber (hat transpired Frsmiration cont tore thet ed Andros war examined ase od Jury, against Jarpoat witner Examination continued:—Witness had never been | +reeged in mesmerto experiments; never was subjected to uesmeric «xperiments; never pretended to bave greet eBill in telling fortu had +piritual visio never before heard of avy statement eaid to bave been | on bo particular subject; generally called ia ths after. | neon; he talked on the subject of the Kidd Company | and he thought there were one or two others; he knew Mr Freeland well. also; one or both of them (3helion | and Freeland) called his attention to the case, but it was Dow 90 remote he bad no reoollection of what they wai pe sheughs they referred to the case ot Andros; ted; he thought it was induced Ry hought. that other persons were as end ought to be looked after by the ber where it was—in the abreet 4 ig thi the Gra: Jury | reom; only one spoke to him. he thought, and he could not tell which; did not remember receiving @ note trom them. Mr. Jordan had no questions to ask this witness, and it being very nearly six o'clock, the Court sdjourned till next morning. FOURTH DAY Fes 26.—Mr, Smith appeared this morning, with Mr. Bickles. tor the defendant. The firet witaess called was Mi Bowman, of New York, attorney 21m. koew Mr. James Freeland and Mr, Bhel ion; employed, at various times, by both of them; attorney for them. and others, in the suit brought by Carpenter in the Circuit Court To the Court —He believed he was attorney in that case for all the defendants, ren in all, Mr Sickles— When was the suit commenced? Mr Jordan wanted to raire the quertion, whether it hed anytbing te do here? [t was wn action. as appeared to the Court ding one count in the declaration, er for false imprisonment, and if t. they (the prosecution) had a © whole, which would beto let this jury over agein. r Sickles did not propose totry that over in; he bad not arked @ single question that tended to it. AL amtcmihiate vi is to show the truth of the article 5 Mr. Jordan—How, does it show that these parties were swipdlers, o: that they swindled or robbed Cai. No; it does not sho’ Boonenuess urticle, and it gor t at _ Mr. Biekles--Was that suit pendivg in January, 1848? Anewer--Yes Do you bnow that affidavit ? (The affidavit of Andros already produced and referred to, handed to witness ) Judge Greens ood--What do you propore to show * Mr. Sickles ‘That Andros was employed by his clients t Carpenter, would ask ths court whetber an it made and aworn before a public ministerial of justice, could be said to be impuguing the | character of the perrou charged ‘The Court thought, under all circumstances, it was ible. The theory of the defence was, that Andros wus a man totally unworthy of credit Examivation centinued—The affidavit was sworn | on the 6th January, 1848; the suit in the Circuit Court bed not been tried then Mr. Jordan would then take an objection, and eub- | mit itin this point of view: The tibel charged that | i ter recovered heavy dam: | they employed. They hed not re | hat, but the whole is to show the truth of | wore than asy otber man. and ought to be contiaed fo the strict proof and prove that the party was | guilty ofthe particular thing charged, and sothiug | different can be admitted at all Mr. Sickles thought thatic might bea very factory way to the prosecutor to ask the wi whether it was tra» or false, or whether Mr. Carpenter had recovered beavy damages @nd so ‘orth, but that would be to mehe the witness the judge He wes obliged to get our the facts ae he could; and he pro- ported to go bark to the earliest time, whem be fouad, or had reason to believe. that Andros was in the sei vies of Sheldon and Freeland; and the first act he caw wae his making the efMiuavit He would theo show a continuous series of acts, down to aud subse. quent to the objaining of those verdicts did. or did not, sbow enough war jury; but it was very str met by such frequent obj open handed and chivalrous conduct wiich they wi led to expect trom the opening of tne case He thought it wae a throwing down of the gauntlet by the Kidd Salvage Company. and invitiag inquiry The Court thought the objection was well iounded They had aliowed this testimony heretotore, oa the ground that it was to show the truth of the article out of which the libel was extracted. Mr Bickies contended that even if there was a mis- take iu point of time, it was immaterial if they em yed a man to impugn Carpenter whether it was ber it was to prevent bis getting & verdict, or to punish bim for bi gotit) The mo- tive weethe moet material thing to show endif they thowed that the article was eubstautially true, aud that was fer the jury to pass upon they proved great part. The Court eaid they could not allow the sphere to be enlarged, but must confine them strictly to the articl+ A peTron could pot be supposed to be prepared to meat avy jw tification ; but as it appears inthe article ex netly and not under any chang show they were jastigated by U1 ered @ verdict. Bat if you show (bat they employed & coupterfeiver without way such motives, it is comuging the tace of the watter, and charging them with « new Cflence not contained inthe article, They eould not do thet Mr. Bickles- The a Midavit is in evidem Generel Matber—No ; it has beon pri not in evidence ‘The Court—We have sllowed you to show th» cha: acter of Androx and Young. and will now allow you to ebew the employment, but coufiue yourelf to the time you state. We will let you give inevidence ev gthing ruberquentto the verdict in the Oireuit our. or Vom- non Fir ase, relative to the employment of Andros or Young. and that either of them did impuga Uarpen ter's character. or anything douc by Bheldon or Fre land relative to it General Mather thought the ceurt had he would o ® Wendold alladed to. The Court—With regard tothe Kidd Compauy, we adhere to our devision to exclude all matters excep’ thore which can Le connected with eftker Bbeldon or Freeland Examipvation continued -Wiiness continued to be atiorpey to don und Ere fter the trials in the Ctreuit ¢ spa Common Pleas; he member fer (bem and the otber defend other suits; did not remember meet: wards, but once casually going up the river in raw beat jand be thought be hed once stepped in at bie (witness # office efter bie discharge frou prison; it bout the period of Carpentar’s trial in the Oourt ofOyerand Torminer supposed An‘roe got out of prieon by means ot his b employed in net Carpenter, thought there was som: made to the trisl when be met Andros oo board th s atter it had taken pl aboutrhe trial why his office, it waa principally «bout bis in! f try. ing to get into some businens up at Troy, aod endenver- ing to puppert hie family; could not remember Partioular conversation with any one with reference to Andros’ tertimony: might have had rome with Mr Bhel- tis ed, but it is wed on it; their attention to a case om the point in tu case it should be again referred or 0: wherever he ure be never hed aay contereuce #1 converration with Aadgros on the subject atter that Gate; the first time be knew anything about the Kidd Balvege Company was inJuly 1840; had his iutorme tion trom Mr Piersow. aud from the depositions ip the fruits, be understood that Mr. Sheldon ana Me Free. land were the principal parti+s—he did not remember it wasinteres.ed a that time or beto y other partios i public notice tion of the cld or peny; be mever yed in bevelt ct any pony be wan requested to go to Keckiaad county to investigate some ebarges ‘The Court What do you propose to show now? Mr Bicklea—At that time procordiogs ware on foot under ome pretence. of arresting Andros, but the on- ly man thet was arrested was U nught » im and ounrel and caused bim to be ha rds brought bim to New York. Court—Thaet is all too general Mr Bickles The proceeciogs were all general Mr Bmith proceeded to argue that these procer dings might dave been fo order to extort mo would be @ phase of swindling, th: rr Lbed. might mean that be was deprived of bis perty by being obliged to exbanet bh Himsrl!; that @ robsery did & bat whether it What they meant by night be. wi competent to them to ¢ belrg robbed wna, that for two gears ho ranted and his property dwindied; it the competency and the effeot be pot mized ap, the question would be « proper one Mr Jorden replied. end instanced some ai ‘The moce of testing it tion bad ariarn on dem > joying Andros or Young t five evidence ot It; but not if it me Penter being strested. and being obliged to employ ccuprel. That ear mot enough The Vourt did not think that thir term robbed was to be jerstood in a technical sense but in the seore io which » man To swindle. wae a term wukmown in le waa erll understowd to menu to cheat. It was not fair import to ettribate to the term to ray that it em. @ embarractiny aaerrting. or subjecting him to expense. from whieh they derived no benefit, They thought theretore, they mvt exclude it They (cone defence) might ehow anything In r * to om pio: ing Anorce Neither partis having any tu eps to put te Bim, the witmers was permitted to wi! iam Binclait (exemined yertertay) was then re. ition te hit former evidence te cer Rupreme Court of o fait ti he jat Mr Gracke Dad obteined an Injunrton bh eae diemisned bros wd by Mr. Sordan.~ (Indgment record ip the Common Pleas re produced | There was « re mitt itur eodoreed om the record, redacing the dems. ere to $8.000, the order te eeduce the dam on bet in ore The final decree In Gracte’s Uhenoery ‘The bill wan diaminned as againet the Bheidon, and Davis, and costs hem { Teoogniv ances entered inte by Andree’ ball Wil lem Bartiett Jokn Porter (proanosd yesterday), were reproduced, and proved as the deputy clerk, wh A ho recelved them frou ral charge of the offi le okies, hi they in the Clerk's room, and in comm ties connected with the prosecution. the ds ne Red — ateceee, whi ration wit © required merely that she should ewain in view of the Court, and hold no og vation with any ons, General Mather only requested there should be no communication at wll; it seemed it was the other sid who were talking to her. The Vourt however, did mot make any order or direction, but merely requested ehe would remain in that room. Dr. William McKinuey was thon called —He resided io York. (Che defence wished to show Andros in agent of Bheldon’s, and the connection whit ndros had called existed). Ai on witners. The quertion was ted to, and Mr. Sickles un- dertook to show the otber witness, oy bi Genera] Mather aneaed they might be compelled to rhow agency first. Two items bad been admitted on these conditions. but the prosecution in this case war quite sure they never could prove yi; aud aiter some discussion. the question put was ruled ger, hee the Doctor's further attendance dispensed with, Mr Henry Vandervoort, Clerk of th ions and of Oyer and Terwiver in New York, produced the records int of the People against Carpenter, and the reugh minutes. The trial commen 8th October, 1849, and continued till the 1st November, when Car- penter was acquitted. The charge was belog acces- rory before the fact in forgery ir the second degree. ‘The affidavit was filed 13th January. 1848. ia the Goart of Sessions, Mr, McKeon (the District Attorn»y) aad Mr Jordan appenned for the people. The witness also Produced four indictments against Aadros (the partic- Ulars of which have been betore given). Taey wer all fled 2ist J. y 1846. Supreme Court—Speoial Term, before lon. Judge Kdwards THE FAILURE OF SUYDAM, SAGE AND CO. Fru Q4.—Eibridge G. Merrick and Moses Merrick ve. Suydam, Sage § C Mr Jadah moved to postpone a motion made by the defendants to mitigate the bail in this case an order having been made by Vhinf Jus- tice Edmends holding them to bail in the eum of $167 £01, on affidavits of the plaintiffs charging that the defendants. as the factors of the pleintifts, had dis pored of or aesigned 17.000 barrele of flour, of $78 040 and Upwards. to the paym-nt of their debts to certaim creditors. in violation of their duty as fac- tore It sppeared that the defendants were arrested on the 18th of the present moath, end now in the nominal custody of the sheriff Mr Judah etated that he bed been served with some voluminous affidayite, amounting to aome hundreds of fclios on Saturday, for he motion to-day, the affidavits bringing up the whols care; for that reason. wlone it would be imponsible to have | ad (pipe Snswering sffidavits tor the motion this day; be elso rtuted that the plaintiffs resided in Je! fereon county. and that iz would be i. porsible to be pra- jared 10 oppor the motion of the defendwate under at wast 1( days. Mersrs NB Bluntand La Roque resisted the application for the poxtponement of the hearing of the motion, on thr ground of the enormsus amouat of bail and the inability of the defendants to procure it, the bail being in thir case for the delivery of the property and not for the torthcoming of the anu that, under the circumstances of such @ plaintiffs chould he pation of this motio: contended that the emount of ball in this case 6! not have more weight with the ‘ourt than one ef @ +maller amount. as the principle in both was the same, cd that no plaintiff could anticipate the trial of bis whole esse op & motion ot thisbind The Judge con- eidered that the notice was too short, but that ia all canes of arrest, the plaintiff ongbt to b- ready, that, undsr the circumstances of this case the pletatits were not im fault, and. as the detendants were nut actually locked up, the motion should lay over till next Buturday by which time the plafotiffs must exert due diligence to be ready to proceed. J ORNING sRag1ON THE INTUNCTION AGAINST THE MAYOR. Fe 26 —Jomes 7. Bertine and JH Ryerson v3.8. C King iand, Boyor of the city of New York. The court met at four anda halt o'clock. tor the express purpose of bearing thisargugent It was a motion on a order to show causes why the iajunction granted im this sotion by Chief Justice Ramonds. should not be dis evolved. “The injunction restrutus the Mayor and his € jents from int rtering with. or in any way ascumio to binder or obstruct the plaintiffs, or their license drivers trom running or coutinuing to ran the licensed stages or coachas mentionedin the complaint socord- ing to the tener and effect of the licenses granted to the plaintiffs except 1m cases of compiaiat viole- tion of (be orcinances of the Common Vounsll The complaint is dated on the 14th of *ebruary aad states thet platotiits compone the firm of Bertine and Kyer- Thaton the Sth of November 1860, permissio: wargiven by C. 6. Woodbull, then Mayor, to Kyersoa, torun @ teen stages aod on the 24 of Janusry, 1851, further permiesion was given to Bertine aad yersoa torun Ove adcitional stages. Plaintifl: entered tato arrangemen @ te carry out to's permission. Oa the dof January licenses were g: nted to ran ths stages op the route trom the Kudrow Railroad depot. corn ot Tenth avenue and Thirty first street, to through Fourteenth etreet to the Nintn @ through the Ninth avenue a ied street to wt mod Brosdway to Grupa street. aud throwgh Grand street to the Wil- Hemeburgh ferry. returning by the rem roate. Ene Noenres are numbered trom 680 to 599 tatlasive, Vioinritte paid $20 for each license #400 tn wil. @ud ta. curred expentes (othr aggregate @uoint of § The completot aleo etates that ou thy: Uith of #eb-uary, the date of the comulaint tour ataren bal com aenord running. Ou the Sthot January We. Kingalaw Installed into the Ma oraity. On the I8tn of Kebeasry he directed and cused four Hoenaed drivers to be ar- resed without ust cause end dveiared the It :eores revoked, whioh power the pliainttff« complain, was voreasonably and arbitrarily exeroied and «boat notice to them torkew cause or making aay com plaint of violation of ordiasnses. That oo ocher line Of stuges Cocupy the eutire route, Phat plaiotitfs eustals sd and will sustale great injury ny such oot ‘That uni be Mayor inrestrained piniutiffa will bo t turther ord: title $10 000 for thelr damage Mr J M. Martin om behelf of the Mevor to read the aMidevit of (he Clerk of the cil rhowing that a line of stages wae run oa the November. and r sl statiog that che liane ct Bertine & Ryersoe runs overs route o ted by other lines exerpt a very amali_ portio ther ofd thowing that the People's Line aad Grandetieetand the Bowery Line were eatablighnd long before the plaintiff’ route, and that they wer dremed eoffirient, ele ® remonsteanoe of over tw bundred resident, e in Grand atreet the plaintiffs’ ioe 4 * other mepvts. counts. oSered the injunction order of Jatge Eamenés Mr N B Blunt on behalf of the plaintiffs reed ouveral oM@davite in muppert of his motion; they «rat Pripelpaly to show that the necesstirnof the public gemanded the continurnce ot the line of ets: Berne & Ryerron Counsel also stated that h- het petivions containing upwards ef 6.000 aigna'ures in favor of the route ot the plaintiffs, trom ree teren the Hudson River Ralirond Ferry Mr O'Coner, for th tain corporation ordin Mr. Blunt objected an ereu@entemened. Mr DP contended that anne notion we: given bim of the fa- tention to read thore dooomenta they evald not do #9 The Judge decided that tte prieted ordinseces of te cor poration can be properly reterred to Mr Davies. on bebalt o: the Mayor. then prowedad to argue the case for the d rt that an action er uid not & Hin eMleer tor the pert Mecretion, mor od by . tiffed copy of the charter of the Jommon Jounsil page 4 eso 14 pote ft, page 18d mee 272 -Law of April? 1813 Mr Vavies contingrd and contended thet et the time the lloemees were greeted the yleta- tiffs knew the nature and couditions of the oun rest, and cutject torevocetion and farth«r that no jadi- cieloficer can be held amenable Nel He me nl apeatmnt, - to the Hts. berubjected to. ae tp all «alte, there ti y Cieaatifies and ® xuit would ab @ayebe the reeult “A judce or aa tteate if ha agte corruptly. oan be proce-ded agsinat for misdemeanor by Indictment, aud if proved. can be removed trom offce, However in this cage, en contend tron can be rurtained What ft to restrain the Mayor tor it to compel Lim to restore the lie tion can mare the Mayor the tnjnnotion to grant Nornre toteke the pines cf the mandeinae Mr NB. Biunt on the part of Hertine amd Rrersoa, lied occupying nearly two hotira. ine very able and loutred argumen’ te anid the quescion esa one of vert importance: that the coneti ution ot thy Uo Bratereanotioned mo ruch power Tt ftract question of power Mr Blant views. read several nutherities gov by the Mayor war acd that even t sor cranting tte voking at pleasure. The princi pie ts datentie: ower unccentitutionnl, and cannot be gartaned; and in thie progreaive age it becomes arbitrary preerive, At the conclasion of Me ft which waa ¥ cing the whe the court then morning, when Fen The by counnel for the plaintiffs. eho of rites In tavorof hie views, Mr. or follawed in reply, and the decision of the court ir reserved. t journed re be eqnnl ri until ten Court of Common Pleas, UW — Dee Jo pn Aden es sommon Ticohbe tion to strike out anewer granted in part Tare thing a+ s ret of of ai Am Hottie ment of one slander between the part pot a ovnnaril; volve & rattloment of others Conte Otte Tictyen —Motton granted conte PEitseeth Doe ‘rahets can reepondent we Joseph @ lick appet. lon — The retarn having been made since the waking of the motion the eame te denied. Corts of this motion, 910, to abide the svont