The New York Herald Newspaper, February 17, 1851, Page 7

‘The OMecors of the Late Texas Navy. TO THE EDITOR OF THE HERALD. Wasutnaton, D. C., Feb. 9, 1851. Your paper of yesterday contains an article in relation to “the officers of the Texas Navy,” which requires @ reply from me, because state- ments are made in it not justified by the circum- stances of the case, and entirely misrepresenting Several important facts of a controversy in which 1 was involved many years since, with certain pro- minent officials mm the then republic of Texas, arising out of personal considerations, which I would have preferred to let remain in Texas, where they more properly belong, had they not been re- vived by the three commanders named in the article to which I am now replying, by their pub- lashing the pamphlet that has been seat to you. I obtained possession of it a few days since, on my return from Texas, and have now in press a reply, which I will send you in a day or two. By its pe- rusal you will see that those three commanders have given anything but a fair view of the case. I will now reply, as briefly as possible, to the points stated in the article signed M. First, It is | not true, in point of fact, that the officers or men of the Texas navy were disbanded by the act re~ ferred to as dated 16th of January, 1843. Nosuch act is to be found in the published laws of Texas. Laws of Texas, Fifth Congress, page 106, sec- tion 9, will show that there was a permanent naval establishment. The law is in these words :— “ Be it enacted, &o.—That the naval establishment of this republic shall be composed of one captain, one master commander, eight lieutenants, ten midship- men, with such other warrant and petty officers ae may be necessary for the establish ment, upen the scale provided tor by thisaet, with sixty aon and ma- Fines, one lieutenant of marines, one surgeon, one jurgeo" wary 18th, 184 the above law was in full force and effect at the ae of the annexation of Texas to the United ates. Secondly and thirdly. It is asserted that I * dis- obeyed repeated orders to surrender the vessels,” | &c. To sustain this, reference is made to that ex- traordinary document, the proclamation of Presi- dent Houston, Viren when I was off the coast of Yucatan, in 1843, under the orders and sanction ef the government, through one of the commis- tioners who were sent to New Orleans to control my action and movements, and who brought ordera from the proper department to me, “ to act under, be governed by, his instructions until [ receiv- ed further orders from the department.” The com- missioner was with me all the while. It appears by his evidence, and the orders, that I never re- ceived orders to eurrender the vessels, as is agsert- ed. The letter of Secretary Hill is also referred to; it is only a repetition of the anomalous pre- clamation of the President of Texas, which need enly be read to convince any one of the abzurdity e allegatious it contains. aled to the Texas Congress for, and ob- tain rial, by means of an act ed establish. ing an especial tribunal to investigate the charges alleged against me, in those two high-handed and oppressive documents, in which the lawa of the land were disregarded. The court acquitted me of all the charges, six in number, with 22 specifications, except four specifi- cations under the cooge of disobedience of orders; the letters or orders'referred to in which, were all conditional, and begond my ability to carry out. Of these the court found me “ guilty, in manner andform as set forth in the same.” It was not pretended by me, on the trial, that they were exe- cuted. My letters to the department, written on the receipt of each one of them, report my inability to carry them out. They are not correctly stated | in the document that is re-published by those three commanders. As proof that I was not found guilty, I will here ineert the action of the President of Texas on the finding of the Court:— The President disapproves the proceedings of the Court im toto, as he is assured, by undoubted evidence, of the guilt of the accused, in the ease of E. W. Moore, Commander of the Navy. (Signed) SAM HOUSTON. Dre, 7,1 The government had entire control of the pro- | seemion and mes selection of the Court. Comment on such proceedings is unnecessary. Fourthly. The veto of President Jones (June 27,1845) was simply of a joint resolution re-appro- priating a part of my pay, which had beer with- Id in accordance with the relentless pereecution that had been carried out CT pers me. It had no other object or interest. To carry out that perse- cution, some of the charges were thus revived against me, of which I had been honorably and unanimously acquitted by the Court; the proceed- ings of which having been quashed by the prede- cessor of President Jones, six months previously, as I have already shown he had no right or autho- rity to, and would not have thus revived them against me, but for the reasons already stated ‘The Congress of Texas declared that ‘the action of the Court was final and conclusive;” and I have yong, since drawn the money from the Treasury of exes. lregret the necessity that has compelled me to make these matters thus public. It has become necessary, in my defence against the mis-state- ments made public by those three commanders, and the article wet pod paper signed ‘‘ M.” They should have informed themselves better before they made these pezsonal attacks. i Fifth. As to “ * version of the opinion of the Supreme Court, in the case of Brashear vs. Mason (not Broadhead), by reference to the case, it will be seen that that part of the opinions cited in the unfair view to which reference is made, is purel incidenta), and is not the legal grounds on whic! the decision of the lower court was made. The opinion sa: The intift plication to the lower court for s ny us mE ie pavers 4 ot = Navy, es .. i the ment of arrearages , wi ie Blatmed'te be due him from the government as 8 com- mander in the navy of the United Btates. After citing the constitution and laws of Congress prescribing the forms under which money is to be drawn out of the Treasury, the opinion of the Court and two pursers, Approved Jan- m jer ui: 0 District to the Be- to pay to the plain- of the Navy, tocom; im of money claimed to be due her ass pension jer a resolution of Congress ‘There was no question as to the amount due, if the plaintiff was a, entitled tothe pension; and it ‘was made to appear, in that case, affirmatively on the application that the on fund was ample to satisfy e claim. The fund, alsq, was under the control of | Sees, and them payable on his own war- rant. Still, the court refused to inquire into the merits of the claim of Mrs D. to the sion, or to determine whotber it was rightfully withheld or not by the Secre- tary. on the gro t the Ccurt below hed no jurie- @iction over the case. and, therefore, the question not Properly before this Court on the writ of error. The pri le of the case of Mrs. D. is decisive of the Present one. The facts here are much et: , to illus tate the inconvenience and unfitness of reme4, Commender Brashear, of the late Texas navy, was indvced to bring the suit with the double oi ject of obtaining his pay from the date of annexa- | nd deciding the question legally; being also ware that before he could obtain a commis- the navy of the United States, the existing | ting the number of officers, would have to | be mouified or repealed.* Oa this point the opin- jon of the Court eaye:— It will not do to ray, that the result of the proceed. id show the title of the relator for th of as . sen! e ra coest martial. Captain Moore has never apy such claim, either for rank or back as is alleged b; 0 his seventh set of assertion. Tt has Deen made “by some generous nt of the Texas navy.” Firat, as to “old e in the navy,” which he resigned. twelve years since, prom| a8 is freely admitted, by a spirit of potting honorable ambition which never supposed would have been attempted to be used to his prejudice; from the moment of the aceeptance of his tion he had no more claim to ‘* his old place in the navy,” than you have, Mr. Editor. Suppose he had never been in the United States navy, as is the case with all the other surviving officers of the late Texas navy, what would then be said of his commission as captain in the navy of a republic, which, during its political existence was equal to any other inde- pendent sovereignty, particularly those that had recognized its independence ? that the officers of the Texas navy have claimed from the beginning, is, that, coming from Texas, they should be incorporated into the navy ofthe United States, in the commissions they re- apectively held in Texas, to date the day that re- public merged her separate nationality into that of these United Srates. The President, having the right, untrammelled, to make the nominations to the Senate, when Con- gress authori: him to do so, by modifying the existing law limiting the officers in the navy, it rests entirely with him, when he submits the nominations tothe Senate, to say whether the officers of the Texas navy shall take rank from the date of annexation or from the passage of the law proposed by the Naval Committee, or, ia fact, whether he nominates them or does not. Eighthly. It is contended by M, “thatthe regula- tions of Texas ought to have nothing to say in the premises, &c.”’ It appears to me that Texas, being one of the parties to the compact of annexatioa, some weight should be given to her repeatedly and unanimously expressed opinion of what she believed she was doing, when she accepted the terms of annexation Bs bsp to her. It will be seen by the following joint resolutions of her Legislature, that she relies solely on the sence of justice, liberality and good faith, of the government of a ‘States, for the accom- plishment of her well-founded wishes and expecta- tions in this matter. Whereas the: with the great mea- acy of which we are ber, various resiprocal rights tions, prescribed by the terms thereof, as we clearly implied and fairly deducible from the sam: of which Texas has On her part fully and completely \d whereas, it is the opinion of this Le- gislature, that the offi of our late navy, by a libe- raland just, if not by a strictly legal construction of tl nexation, should be incorporated into y United States in their several ranks, and that they are justly entitled to the same, as well from the construction here claimed as from their ersonal and professional and the ew jotiem, and valor with which they sustained the cause of their country while its navy was in existence. Therefore, Bec. 1 Bo it resolved by the Legielature of the State of Texas. That our Senators are hereby instructed. and our Representatives in Congress requested to use their influence to procure the passage of a law by the Congress of the United States, incorporating the offi- cere of the late navy of Texas into the navy of the United States, in the rank which they severally held in the late navy of Texas, See 2. Be it further resolved, That the Governor be requested to cause copies of this joint resolution to be immediately forwarded to each of our Senators and Representatives in Congress. ote —The above joint resolution passed unani- py and was approved by the Governor, February Great weight is given by M., to the names attach- ed tothe pamphlet which he has sent you, and of which he says, he “merely analyzes the con- tents.” Iregret that he, like those three com- manders, has made statements of my own acts as commanding officer of the Texas navy, and the condition of that branch of the service of thi! re- join which are entirely Aha agi and which I ope they would not have , had they not per- mitted their judgment to be biassed by their feel- ings, in what they are pleased to denominate “ en act of injustice to themselves and other officers of the navy; viz: the admission or incorporation of the officers of the late Texas won the navy of the United States; to which we believe we are clearly entitled, under a just and liberal construction of the terms of annex on, as is 8o plainly set forth in the Teport of the naval committee of the House of Re- presentatives, which | herewith enclose. I have not seenthe gentleman whe voluntarily wrote the article that appeared in your paper some days since, and which called forth the reply signed M. He will doubtless vindicate his own positions. I would not tax your kindness to publish this, did I not feel that I was called on to vindicate myself against reckless statements, that | tear have made to create an undue prejudice against me and the other surviving officers of the Texas navy— now only thirteen inall I have no fondness for newspaper controversies, and only hope that before these gentlemen make any more publications on this eubject, they will better inform themselves of the facts in the case. Very Om agra your obedient servant, E. W. Moors, Captain Commanding, Late Texas Navy. Gov. Barry, a the Compro- The message ef Gov. Barry was transmitted to the Legislature of Mi on the 6th instant. Speaking of the Compromise measures he 8a} The States of the North may look upon slave- Ty, permitted in the South, as a great mischief ora great sin, or both; but sovereign themselves, they muat respect the sove! ity of their sister States, and refrain from interfering with the institution de- precated. It cannot be regulated or abolished by the free States, nor by the central government; be- cause, being a m regulation, each State ——— entire and exclusive jurisdiction in legis- ating upon the subject. Aay interference by one State with another, or by the central government with any State, upon this or other like subject, would be a violation of the federal compact. The principles recently avowed by the executive au- thority, that a State, in which slavery is not now recognized, has no authority to establish that insti- tuion, 18 unsound and inadmissable. The particu- Jar question raised can have no practical applica- tion ; but the principle involved denies to the State the entire control of their domestic relations. The ‘neral and uniform obligations of public laws, is a | prcey me of government definitively settled ; and all attempts to substitute opposite theories should be met by our prompt disay val and unqualified condemnation. If individuals be permitted to de- clare legislative enactments nugatory by reason of their alleged immorality, or for other cause, the whole statute book would soon be repealed or de- prived of its general application 4 whimsical fan- cies and tender consciences. Should States be conceded a like permission to judge of, and over- rule, acts of the central government, the uniform and h jous operation of its laws would be destroyed, and the most frightful and dire calami- ties ensue. measures of compromise, adopted atthe last session of Congress, and designed to quiet the unhappy agitations of the country on the ubject of slavery, have been misrepresented and denounced. Fanatics of creeds have avowed the intention of resisting their enforce- ment, and, in some instances, have made domon- stration of executing their threats. The compromises of the cometituti artake not joker of the nature of a treaty between sovereiga ‘ers; and their violation is not less criminal han the violation of treaties. They bpd of law, and the superadd: ti ssese all the obligation of ighted faith of States, to give them effect. 'y | Without concessions the Union could never have money in the Treasury apelicable to the demand. Commander Brashear, ag well as the other sur- | viving officers of the late Texas navy, were not entitled to their pay as officers of the United States | navy, because they had not been commissioned by the President aod Senate. President Polk avowed | repeatedly his anxiety to do 80, but he was pre- vented by “the act of Congress of August 1842, limiting the number of officers in the navy ” He suggested the resolution now before Congress, pro- | posmg to “authorize the President to increase | the number of officersin the navy, by adding | thereto a number of each grade, equal to the num- ber of surviving officers of the Texas navy, who were duly commissioned and ia the service of said republic at the time of its annexation to the United States ” Todefeat this plain act of justice all sorts of falae issues are made. If the officers of the Texas navy were incorporated into the navy of the United E£t.tee, asis proposed by the bill reported to the Nouse, by the N aval Committee, no officer at this time in it, would be deprived of his promotion for ope moment—or of any other right or emolumeat he now enjoys. It ia orgued by M. that ‘ Texas sold her navy.” ‘There was no purchase in the matter of annex thon the power end resources of two sister republi who were in all’respects equals. The oflicers in one navy ¢quals of the officers in the other, holding ilar comm i siathly—tt is tended that “ Captain Moore was dischereed # another aopointed in his place” If this were true, it would not affect the measure proposed by the maval committee. The cr rifieate referred wy by M. proves the illegality of the appointment of Joo. G. T 4 by me for that purpose it f st, that Captsin Moore was di-mi dent of Texas, who had no more authority, ander the laws of Texas, to dismise Captain Moore, lt was clesriy intended to be “a union of then he had to diemise the President of Texas. | This prevended act was a mere null The law of the Texas Congress oa that subject 4 by the Senate and House of Repro. 2 of the republic of Texas, ja Congress cffiver died in the fall of 1849. been formed; and it is the duty of the national le- gi lature, by appropriate enactments, to give eflect w all the stipulations contained in the articles of compact. In return for he advantages secured by the Union, each of its members must perform its share of duties enjoined; and bear its portion of burdens imposed; and a refusal, in either case, is a palpable violation of faith, in. its repetition, can omy lead to disastrous results. Regarding with ee oe and censure all unlawful mani- festations of opposition, come trom what source they may, it is the plain and undoubted daty of all | to obey and enforce the laws in question. They | were the resuit of the deliberations of wisdom and experience; and, in the spirit of the constitution, | designed to secure the rights of the North and the | South. Though we may not approve every pro- vision in dete, we are not therefore relieved from the obligation of giving them effect. The right to resist, ifindeed sucha right could be named, is futile, and destitute of all foundation but the lucu- ion of adisordered mind. Obedience to the laws is inculeated alike by human and divine pre- cept, and will alone give security to life, liberty ond property It will alone save us from the ap- | palling evils of anarchy; and who ever counsels re- sistance clearly disregards the best interests of | himeelf and bis fellow men, and incurs the guilt of conspiring ageinst his country. Michigan, itis confidently believed, will require no prompting in the fulhiment of duties pertaining to her federal relations. The laws of Congresa will be executed in her borders with promptness and fidelity. If the misjudge for the moment, she will not fail soon to retrace a mistaken step Though comparative- ly young in the sisterhood of States, she will be found second to none in attachment to the ti ne- honored principles of our Union; and for their per- petuation, she will strive by earneetly supporting the campromises of the constitution and tae eu- premacy of the laws, United States Marshal's OMice, Supesior Court. GENERAL TERM. Present, Justices Oakley, Sandterd and Paine. RRR, ty 0 \d thet motics on the groun of the oogtioation to settle the same ehould have been given to defendant’s attorney. Albert L. Comstock, defendant in error, ads. Leonard Brown, plaintyf im error.— Motion denied without costs. George W. Soule vs. William H. Burroughs.— mede at the special term affirmed, without costs to either party. Eugene Lentilhon vs. the Mayor, etc., of New York.— Motion of the plaintiff, to strike the cause from the calendar of the general term, granted without costs. jarah Ann Post vs. Isaac Adriance.—Order at special term. striking out part of the reply, modified so tar «s to provide that no costs be given to either party on the motion below No costs to sites party, on the Edward Roberts vs. Jesse F. Randall.—Ord on the 26th of January last modified 0 that the order be- low is reaffirmed without costs. Samuel Huffman ads. John Leslie.—Metion fer new trial granted on pazmens. of costs, unless plaintiff sti. pulate within ten days to enter verdict and Le rage for $72 60, with interest from Ist Se ber, 1845, in which case motion for mew trial denied. Eugene Keteltas and others, appellants, vs. Lucius RE. Bulkeley, respondent.—This cause was tried before Judge Vanderpool, in the Superior Qourt. It was an action for malicious prosecution, in charging Mr. Bulkeley with having committed perjury as an attorney in an action brought by s man named Bradley, against Mr. Keteltas, for an assault. The alleged perjury consisted im Bulkeley having sworn that he had no interest in the result of that trial, for which the appellants enter- eda criminal Fs apelopng against bim, which resulted in bis favor. je cause was argued before this Court on @ bill of exceptions. Chief Justice Oakley, in giv- ing the decision of the Court, eaid that they could net see any error committed by the Court below to induce them to interfere in the matter, and they must, there- fore, leave ‘t as they found it. The appellants must tuke such steps in relation to it as they may be ad- vised. The motion for new trial denied. Robert L. Crooke and others vs. Wm, P. Furniss.—Mo- tion for new trial denied. John Chester, appellant, vs. Levi Mills, respondent.— Judgment at special term reversed, and new trial or- dered to abide the event. 1ST OF LETTERS REMAINING IN THE NEW YORK Post Office, February 15, 1851 LLY PUBLISHED IN THK PAPER HAVING THE LARGEST TION, Picase mention the date of the list im which they are advertise @ LADIES’ List, Armm Mrs Eliza = Anthon Abraham Mre,Divi- Adams 2 ndrews Mre Ma} MroMartina nderson Miss I. bella MreS W AldrichMissSarahG ise Julia Anthony Emily Armstrong Mise Max ry Bates Miss Ann Bowen Miss Mary Bell MreJohn Elizabeth Ann Bennere Miss Julia Barber Mrs, Cham- Boyle Mary »rower Mrs .S, &th be t Buckley Miss, N a ry Mary B ‘num MirsEliza- th th Brannan Miss Ann Butter): Branpon Miss Mar- Burns Cath: rown Julia Ann Emma eae Wm Mw le re BootbMier Margaret line A Brown Blizabeth Caffrey Mrs c Collins Mrs Mary Crawford Mrs Kose~ Callahan Sarah Lan Coling Amanda bell Susan Connor Gatharine-2C E'Widow, Lew-SonnorMrsTimothy _ rine i Ri Cristic Mrs Eleanor inet 080 t Mre BH Conhlin Mrs J W Clifford Mre Martha Carrots Bridget Cook Mre 5, Hud- CodwiseMreMarthaJ 20) Carlon Margaret Curti Maria C Caffrey Miss Catha- Coles Miss Matilda 'y nie rine olby Miss on Mrs Bliza~ Cameron Miss Har-Collter Mrs,Brid, beth riet Collins Mrs Louies M Clark Mrs, 8; Chi er Madam Carr Brs, Gri Clitord Miss Blize- pose! re, 12th ry Miss Catha- be arroll Mise Corde-' ChilashamMargaret lia Cogblam Catbarine Carlon Margaret, oughton Mary Coleman Mrs Ra- Cl he Cc iss Alice catvert Job pong bo Cor Mise Maria olbert Johanna Casey Banors 5 se Coulter Margaret Cunningham Miss Courtes Mre Bliza- Courtain beth © ry ky Bridget Cowen Miss Mary Sezer, Bzicees, ureh Miss Susan one Miss yo jon Mise Ca- lary ‘uilmane thariae ChatletteA Cunningham Widow, Cullen Mary 5th at ve Mrs 15th 9 Cummings Miss Ca- Clough Miss Chris- Cunroff Mre M,Pearl e tina a ry Cusack Bridget Daky Ana, Ches- Miss Louisa Hannah Bemey Mary Demme Dow Mrs Mary A Doyle Miss Ann M als ii Davany Bridge: Mite Julia Drewey Misa’ Mar- pftsefora Mrs Ro- BanoraDunne Miss Mary © Doherty Margaret Doves Mrs Sufelk Dunbar Mise Hine Booty hs or Ni Drom Isic aah P Daley Mrs Ann, Dilley ar Monroert D , ‘ond Mrs Dooly Bridest Dechan . Doody WiseBilon Desmond Mis, Ca- Dunne Mise i ee Duncen Mrs Bact Mrs'War- DetritebMrsSarabS Duncen Mrs Harriet Dunton Mrs Anna z Egan Mary. Marit Elliott Mrs, 9th st EBay Mice Sarah” Elniends Mise Jue Ewing Mary Flood Mrs, mother Frith Mrs, Thomp- of Betsy gud Wan | 400 cron Mie Elite P Finnegan Natey of te Name re, thet _ James . gna Gardiner Mres Gaynor ison Gready Miss A Gi ‘Mre Chas A Graham Mrs reese Mrs Bliss © Mar- i] 2 Wm Lati- ite et Hogan Mise Mary tien” garnane Catharine Molden Mise Busan Z Ingersoll Miss Lovlen —,_—=—_—Trentrum Mrs Rabocon Jackson Mrs Jones Mrs Senking Mrs Rliza~ Sarah Jobneton Mrs Mar- beth bag seen = Miss Rebsooa garet omas yy! it Mise C Senis, nytt Ca- Fohaeves ire kW Tone re Jane A thar: Jevkine Miss Emma Josephine Miss, Jordan Catharine a Froaklin st KameWiseCatharine Kilroy M: Kent Miss Mary Kecsnghise,Bewery ‘Rar "are Wari Kenny Miss Catha- Keenon Miss Jane K Mise Ly} rine Kelly Miss A: se 8 Maria Kennedy Miss, Leo- Kelly Mss B Kavanagh Miss Ma-_ nard st Kelly Margaret tise Kerney Mise Almira Keni ise, Jamosst Keohan oy) Kilaon Redecoa ey, Res o Miss Cathe ie] i ery ad ne ~~ a Kelly: Julianna Kyle Mrs Joba Keough Ann Cc L Lacken Bilen Ledge Miss Catha- Lewis Mre Abbey Mies. Clarket rij Lewi, Mre Lovina Leahy Catharias. LombardMes,James Lewis Mis Phabe re Linehan Garrie' Keonard Bienauot ‘Lyndesey ire mM Morgan Kuen Morrie Mre Julia n Mooney Mary = ire Biizabeth fey me aan Mawhioney Mrs, Howard street ry MeAlvara Alis Met be Miss, Henry ale Rlinabeth Mise + ° MoDevitt Mrs Mar- Mac! waret je Cot MCGarrill Miss Bo molk at Bridget Quade Rosey Meintyre Elizabeth Naylor Miew Newman Lydia Nelron Mise Marya Nowlsn Bridget Reylon Bridges Nigh Neally Blien Opcen O'Donnell Margaret er ann O.erton Miss Je~ rushe H P ish Mrs Mary HL orter Mrs Mary S hes Powers Mies Anna ross Ann Pow sre Bil Phill ps Se Ola~ triode Phillips Mra Rachel Quist ns Mice, Ca- Quinn Mise Jobanns Quinkek Carhe pales @ juayle Aame Mre German bola Mies T Ji Eun: estan ays "Bsns oe faarcnest ™ Rotuhardt Gertrude Rush Onthe ‘Miss Julia Re: Miss eee lise Rachel Rich Mise E Ryan Mrs Alio® : el edges Me Bi Mise + 4 ry Caue Ba. Se th Miss Ellen K Sefton Mrs Catha- oe 34 ‘rine M y Senith Mre Mary © Shearman Anne Braniey Mrs Smaith Mca burs” Sergeant Mise 1H oe ie one ee Epes rine Sandford Mrs Phi-Stone Mrs T eh Mise een ist Mie Trrphe-Aeith Amelis Det Mrs Delia 3 ten Mis? Beith Stratton ey Aa ira tae 4 gral Bis 5 jargaretSmart Mrs Susan F Smith Mro Seaman Anna Sampeon Miss Janc Ld Mre irs, Washing-Staniey Anne jimons Mrs H Bkanlin Aaa es Louie sievin Mien Baarplens Mrw Har-Saydor ‘Mts Delisht Smith hae P, Mald- Siew Misa Frances monet Safa Bhelton Miss Virgi-fconlan Mre Ieabel-Stoves herr Falnota aia is Sullivan ken ADB ‘Tracy Miss Hanor: Travers ie . ‘Tree Miss Annie ‘Treacy Treachle Mr ‘m Taylor Mrs Robert Tuehy. Tomphine. Miss W Tint Mee Be fous. Fees wae BEC Ly ims Mre lous- we tonst Trowtal Mey Chole Thompson Bridget Toley Mrs, Canal st Turner irs HannabThompson Mise Eli re Mary Voris Mies Meril P Voorhees Mrs A vi wi Miss Van Nouten Mrs Van Norden Mrs A’ Christiana” w Ward Miss Caroline Wilson Mrs C Ward Brid, Wham a MAO litle Many Ana Wheipley Mise Pry velo Mary Ann Walker Miss AnnaMWilliams MreGG —lotte i Waters Catherine Williams Miss Hen-West Mrs Sarah Water: ireSarahJ rietta Wilber Miss Harriet Whipple Margaret JWadl L Where iss Mary Wale rand MreWillismeen Miss Whelton Mise Welson rs WG Wilsen Miss Aun Walhins MissMaryS Whittaker Mrs G W Wood Mrs Melon Willie Mrs Wheeler Mise SarabWalters Mise Ann Young Mrs Wm GanTLAgWs LIST. Abbot Jon C Addoms Chas Achert Acker Thomas a Addair John Abbott Martin a Ackley Capeifenry® Adams Jas D A Allen William H Adams Bobert ry I Enrico 1 4 ‘andria 4 Alber Samu A Alberton Milton B All a well Ablmark ¢ J Amende Frederick Ai; Fey Joun Moore a Mr bla Dr Be P bere n James A Thomas G Absley Samuel ge John Anbiga John John Armstrong Dr Wm Atwater TC Armstrong Lambert AndersonAlexander Ash Parry Athony Philip a * Ayres John J Bacon Thomas H Black Mr Babbitt Adwin D jades John Bradey Patrick Lewis Bisokall W js Braskett Harris L Bradbury Thos Bailie George aldwin David Ballard Charles Blake Alexander ird John Alonzo Baldwin James Elias Bald wit WmP Bi Banet Mr Brandamore Napo- Branwood Joha leon Blank Leonhard Barrett Thomas Biward Barber W Barlow J Holmes Barnes Myron Bartlette Dr Alon- Barbier Mousiour 0 inell Stepnen Barnes Heary W Barnett William Barker John Bassett Z D Jr Bates Samuel Jr Bearse Samuel I oakley. Boot Ge jearse Samuel ey 0 Bukman W Beenhe Daniel Bleecker James B Bellemoat P Bre joseph = =—- Bellard Joseph sre! ds Benton JB Benoit Pierre Bender Jacob Bi Beekwith Beary W Bennett B Brennan Thomas Bennett Peter EE mm Ber olet Mic Brewster John Rad Brewster @ 8 ard Brewster Joseph Berney John BosmsaB . # George Wm Berlin © Samuel Brigs & Brother a Bissel Wm D Bristoll Henry Blogan Joh: wn Bordick James le) ir Brooks Thomas 8 Bro: Pe ‘The Spencer Bs om! je Ave rooks Leonard pe demos Btocxstecuard Bo Brown Samuel Blood George A Brown Sylvester F Brown Monscur Bri & Loring = Brown William o Be Edward le 3 oe le James Boyle James Bray Fred Bayle Ge Bor Thi Boynton Capt Wm Browni ¥ Bowman kley J if Ni on e jo junt, Na Buen ley Eow y Rv Hi Buchanaa Simpson perpees Somes Brof J Buckle Jobn bert ‘ohn Clark Bornard Carleton Charles Boma Carry Robert Cashman Timothy Caseytowen or Ja's Cassidy Fraacis pny pe Cy nt Ley, ‘eracoy ‘eavian: ten: DR Cures Captain y Byron ‘ord Connors Gs Thomas s Connell; ol ie eSaml Soni y Franklin ward Au- Ceok Day Jae Daz Chas bg to Augus- Verael Decotom Carpen * Dell & rothe fe a am Derrick Kent Demarcst Wm R }, Miller & Co. adrew Depuy Jacob De Debiitert av olphe D Det Robert ho Donneilan Samt Drooghart Dodson John w Dobson Edward Donlevy Joh Dowd Wm Dror Mone Q Dormon Richa Doran Dow RR Dowgsng Geo W ow os Bert ifs Dougherty Thos etnias M2 onan Dowd Joba Dour Jos Dooly Michi Douglass, Spruce et Doyle John Duncan Win Duke Donne Jas Dunhor Wim Du Dunn Donn & * D Dutly Pas bs john Doon d fi Papay Goiliannne Durand Chas Dooly Martin Dyeert James E James Bitae E @ » BenryR Kvere Erelebart GW ‘Abbott Elwood John Enover Robt Edwards W er haapold hd Gaston Pisnagan Pat tr ofa a 6 a r vd Fem ngs Jas R rie J Ww 4 Precerie G Fer Forris Fagum Robert Path Tinnel Troa Jas Pechren a Pie’ Seth Dick Samuel Pata To Feby Poth a? John » lyn Dennis Foret MP & Baxter Fin dobe. Tftyottsan Reve- Pulte Te a Furmaa Jonathar Futvoye Mr Gabriel Michael = Gadas Joi Grady Timothy Grace Alivea it Pier ee Gall Daniel A Grilor F Gall BL Graham NB Grace A Gallitar Jone Gi x Mt Gallivan Joha rb i Gansonvort Leonard re Gossee Pet Green J & 8 wo b cd Jonathan ap Green Russel @ Gerhardt John ree! 2 Gleeson Wm Geo Washington Gilbert Aaron ifford Jos Gri John Gibbs Wm Gibbons John B Gib! aT Grit ng Griffin Michael Griggs Aaron 1 Gibbs Emanuel riscom John H ifford Samuel jindle Leop lin John jiven John Gilehres Geo W Gillesby Wm Giron Mons, Beek- Gilbert John J it Gilobrist Thos les GW Goggin John Goodwin Jacob Godfrey, CaptAdams Gregen Goodkin Warren D Gurley Geo H Goodall Ps Golden Mich! Geodrich John Goldamit! Gordon J M Gorman Th: Gi Ginbeat Mr Gui ‘dwin Glynn Thos Gu Gilt Pat Gunrell A Geo Geléemith & CoH Gouldings & Co Gould Gee WoR Goodman Stephen K Hagen Geo: kmann George i! panies ‘ Holey ee it lardy Charles dora Wm Halsey W miice K tt Haines Ss Hallub 5 Hallids: James all HP Hal wc Hussree Wa A Hanstone Joba Hansell W 8 & Son Hand Orville Handy Capt Elihu Hammond Daal Baemelinosx iy Hampson Jose Heesah Michacl | Hartoba Hart Jehiel Hyde James Hegarty J Head Charles Heith Stillman Menkel Chas F Henry William or woes yn Cant Herndon Dr 0 P erdman John Hill Capt Joseph Hilton Corns 1s Bil James ope Hogan Thomas Dooper R Hosiksss P Hopps Martin H = Horan Jehn Houser Wm A Hopkins Rich'd R Hovey Ble Hogan Patrick Hovard Tough Joseph Hovey 5A Hoag Wm Hazen Edward = Howrison James Horrbr Wiliam Howard W Howard John = Houck Wm I John S Hubbard D Hughes Hogh D Fmann 1 Hu! Mar'n D HuntingtonRobtGH ele 8 Hunter J Hamphrey hrey€ W = Humphrey Johan Harspett Wn jussey Thomes Hutchings Capt DH Henry John ee Jobn Hayward E Irvine Jos M I Ingersall & Jewott Ingraham Jao B Ingersall Simon a Irwin Hy irving HJ Iacobson Hy imme, de ache Jaquith Jas M Jackson Wm L Jack Geo A Jamison Jno P James Nathanicl E Jenkins Spooner Johnson Wm fed Jegeph a ye Patk C 3 ones Joshua F Jovee Jno F Jones Capt Tucho Wm Jerioo WA. Joyce Austin Jimkins PP James Thos Jeyne D «K Janson Capt Kavanagh Wm © Kobluley Josey‘ Keloey Hy Kraken Mr Klim Jakob ho: aparsim © Keeler Solomon iy te Mortimer y Wm aG Kiri %, Wo iy JamesM = Kernick Waa Kerr Levi Kerr Alex @ Ketcham Smith Kerr Hy Keati Kenedy Patk er Ke Kiten i, King J 2, naley Thos ing Baw Drv Koran Jno Kyley Thos L Kerpeles Mr Lambert Robt H Laken Henry F jey Joba Loralard Peter Laboyteaur J N James Low & Co Lauren Lawr Le: Leeland Marti fas Leaby P: Lewis, rr-2 en CaptTheodore Maddock Walter D Madin Dominico Madison Joo R Beanter Mr Mackenzie Jus Madnin Wm & Depen nege Salone- aper s Mille J Doreusves er Jans ( * Miller Thos ler Weeding Iford Joho B Minier Theo S Moore Brainard 2 Chas Mori Morea Morelii Morri Chae a John M tepben Wo Morneon Wm furry & Haig! fanger Samt array Thos he Mea lister John MoAuley Jamon MeBryan Benry Meclasky Florence Mel. lew Wm OC MeGu i ph Je Gi jam A Med: Melntire Joseph MoD: Dei McKeown Thomas Me Dot MeKary Hagh | WoDermott Thomas Mek iterie George MoDonourhT: 8 MeLaughlinChartos 1d Patrick MeLean Capt Wil- Mr linen A Inekey George BeNary Alexander be MoNorke John bh — MeRoberts Barney blin damee Mot ‘Ibomee Moavenehy gor Jo n Edward Mecarrick Jehm = MeGren John Mecue Zobn n RoCafirey Hugh he Son MoNickel John eek MeNewa ar Dens MoVania Mehl - o mothy O'Connell Des O'Connell Pate hoe O'Brien Martin P Parsons HonryL Parsons Rev Benj Palmer Wan Parsons Hen! Page &Brother ‘al m ry Plant Palmer JJ ns Win Parray John Pain Kobi W Parish Chauncy Parker Geo S Palmer C8 imer Henry atman Geo Parisant Alfred = Packard Mr, Bist Pratts Anthony Pratt Jobn F venue Pratt Jas Paxson Alfred H Pratt Sam'1B Pratt Judal tJ Pateenden Noah Fault Wilscim Paul Ephraim W Paxton Pratt RT pe GF Pearson David 28 Phelan Jas nger Raw 80) ins J ac ro Fred Percival Wm R Perrastu Chas Prucett AG Bdwa Thos Pi Masker Pierce John A —-Plerson Judson, Philbroke Chas Pisnbie Isase Philps Mir Pringle Robt DrJobn Puirent J Picker P P a Ld : ro G Ren x) = fomeroy ezarG Port Laws Co Port Capt Ohas Pollock Wm A Post Israel Fetter John A Proctor Jos Pugh Richd PlumeJohbn N—2 Pund Haaais Pye John E Prodbome Eémund Purvis Wm a uinn Mich! uinn Mr juinn John M juin Robert uinn Durbey uinn Martin uigg Edward uain Alexander juin Dr J M Quick Ba a Raprom RH & Co Rashje Capt Raisbeek Sam! M pagiseens Joseph Ranrohenbosh A Rameay Cel AC Rubill Thomas Kaguct Ph Raek Reiter Jacob Recardson Joreh nF ye Patriok R Job Reid James id APs ‘Ra a8 ‘Semi A Ripley 8 C Ri ds Riley Fitegerald Rice Aaley.. ‘lard aie, Frederick Rice John der Geo T Riker Wy Richardeon Gee W Reilly Thome Riddle BR Riley Bdward Riley Timothy —iley Michael Richards Jobn OB Richard T Rich David & Reck arthur Robert Dr Robert Robinson Frederick Robb Thomas R IM 3 Robineon BR Joho Roehe Patrick RobbinsLewis8 Roach Edward © Robbins Isase D Robinson Joht Robert Alexis Roberts J W Robnete J George Robert Michi Layee Robinsen John. Rodrigues Babtists Roche James D = Robbins Oapt J N-2 Rodgers Richard Rogers J B Rogers Captain An Rodick Andrew Roger ambrose | drew Roache Patrick ‘ing Aw Rogers Robert | Rhodes Emerson Ross Capt Edwin Ross Lionel Romeau Julien © Romane y Romsey Rua: Rust ussell Capt Ryan Pi Ratledgo Paul == Ryan Val Ryan Joseph Ryan Russell Ji Ryen John Ryan J Rynolds Thomas [Russell Wm Rusoell Francis T us21l & Co Mess T Stebl Martin Smith Sml 8 Bmich Cape Sair Jd 2mith Jas M Smith A ry oford Capt G Shackelten W B—2 jo Branton George P Bhamatt Jose Btanton Joho Stanton T Scanlin Timothy. Sparrow Phillip B Sawyer Luke Stark Jas Shacer Lewis Skawitshi MT | Sharkey Hoary annem Stauber TT i Searing RB ‘Ker (7 Bpell Chas Spencer CS Bpencer # P Selman Sohunck Mr, Water Spencer Frederick Scheme Joha erect Stevenson Jastin R Btewart Ch: Sewell, Andrews & Shepherd W A Co i Stewart John M Stevenson David Stewart John W Sexton 8 W Sterling alex F * Bierly 5 Bhiclde Hoary Schielber Adrian Bhimmige Chas — Smithise Chae Spindla Frederic Slinger Thos Stiokler Esekiel Brith Jas Smith Smith Brothers & Bmith Chee h Jas Bmith GS mith Henry A mith Chae wden Win skins Jos W er Geo ephen rite i 08 man J Sandiond Wm = Squires John M Bmith PatriohKevil Symes John Busheriand David Sarder Lewis Schummers Ww Sully Geo—2 ‘Teasy Thos T™: Tappan Whitti- more Thatober Hy Talbot Wm H Talleyrand AB Taylor WB Taylor Chas B Thompson DR Thomas 8 Utley Morrie 1 oud @ Faxon : D Vonuta Lugi Virney Patt Valiens Peter Vandoren J Yan Dyke Geo Vanderhoven Oran 8 Varness John B Von Bane Joset Foigh Whearley Michael Woodwart G Weoeto Ab water rt Woodward Wan fi oR Wooloott A Homer Woedwara lJ 0 Wot West Lake Wiloox Chas, Bon- ny castle AT Wilson Stucrt fn Wilkinensw Thos rier&Co Wilkins N Penton We t Geo tt WiterES William I White Danie White Mie W bitney C! Whitten David & Colewis Whiney Willard Whipple DR John G@ WhitmereG W hittlen Wilken J Sen Yewde!l Joba Young Thor & Young John & coe W Young David Younyman Mr Your et De “iat O De Temily Visiter Jeveniic Weekly ote Vormoug re u Journal of Mine iation Aliami Apnalist tory Weekly Ree American Meganine MechaniceMegarine Youths Dayspring Army. eworton Lt Good Rese Br Lt an Thomas oat WR Kameoy a Davy dhera ‘alver Brt Lt Gol haw Byt Maj J Paiseoun Capt Ed W « “ ward 8 Wilon Lt Johreon William Gorgas Lt J-2 Hawes bi Jae M Morris hej W Navy, Burtt DrJooL = Mivebe WT 0 Thed Belyn Jew R on Mt ney Joba D Rwh kt Maden Mi * im Tilton Lt BG MaCorole toed Mid TurnorCapePeter 2 DP Betes John omens Wt 1 Mid Johnd StuartPasd HdTohm ome Wil am Whipple Jona vb e.My Ferqubareen Dr Kebt Fyffe Mid Joseph Ens Baed Mia te ne r + Para kia Fr 9 pa] Gideon Josep)