The New York Herald Newspaper, February 4, 1850, Page 1

W YORK HERALD. MORNING EDI TION- MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1850. jeans. [¥rom the 8 U, Delta, Jen, $4.) Court, that tribunal rendered ‘This long delayed and much contested case came up — oa ‘the Circuit Court, Judges MoKinly jer aled. After some discussion {i to th ting of the record, the case was “peed by i Lagi Bey bill ey oy which. ears phen = plead- ipge, we e condensed, 80 a8 preeen' point disentangled of legal technicalities and verbosity. ge’ THE PLEADINGS. ‘The first bill in chancery was filed by Mrs. Whitney, between Daniel Clark and heir of her father, and is enti one legally give to others; On the appeal from this Iudgment foll wing “ We shall direct the decree of the court below to be wi ia 1 « mun: reverted, and adjudge that a deoree shall be made case of ‘against H.R. ‘hich Dinner to Hincks— Municipal Elections—Increasing Dis | g,/B,meey of the municipal or the sald’ court, in this sult. deolar! 2| = pg AD eee Timed “ syowed anneantt marriage was contracted in Philadelphia, Pe: Zulime Carriere, Mare Cesk, now Myra Gaines, is the lawful a: estate, after the excessive devation in the will of 1811 is reduced to the disposable quantum which the father tbat the desoribed to the Supreme | the will of 1813 could not be found where Clark had Our Canadian Correspondence: minding bim of the smaller salaries under a cee onl decision :— pisces’ it—that of 1811 Lan been substituted for it ; Tononro, January 25. 1850 government loniste have been that @ lawful | was declared to be offepring of an adulterous bed. satisfaction with the Government —The Judgeship Settled | mevting was held in Dundas (near Hi the other mapery « knowing te was a a columay on theneme and — Boulton “ Chiselled,”’ will be a Great Law Reformer— dey, to consider this subject, and but two or: bends memory deceased and a cruel and wicked Mh Relish’ 4 i were beld up inst anne: only ‘and name of his wrote a letter | The Ministry in extremis— University Commission | meets ‘bes fuss Coe held ii aateraie set owen ; that tee ald Myre ie the forced stating thatit was am untruth, and DeGrange, the | Offensive to the Dissenters—Trial of Rioters—Jury | at which resvlutions ware par od cundematng the min- of Myra’s mother, bad beencondemned | Pecking—Judge Draper on Annexation—Annecation in | Sstry for opposing annexation. . - A regular annexation association has at | deem the Country—Asseciation in Toronto— Quebec Election | 4, e justice had net beem dene the cha. os Ripon coer e, ng by he, , and a manifesto is ex; ins on July 28, 1836, ip the United States Circuit Court, the answer of the defendant, Mr. Wve dared to utter such ‘Rolf of oar mest tetelligens ond infuse eer ge Samuel K Harper. This bill was prepare of the estate of Deulel Clark at the time of his death, contrarg§ and was the lest man from whom | **#reed—Corporation Recommended (0 take Stock. On totes en es ae 2S James W. White, sclicitor. |The orator and oratrix that it was legally sold ‘by those who had no right oF have das he owed eve thing be I observe that you reocive telegraphie reports of the | oouragement to the would-be republicans, The cen, are pager fag Be fd and Myra Clark Whit- eutbority to make a sale Hy ee ge titles given by Generosity of Daniel Clark ; | think | events passing here,as they occur. The bare facts, | tainty that reciprocity will be retused by your govern- ney, his wife. ¢ bill proceeds to enumerate certain m tothe purchaser, and by the purchaser tothe | it my duty to declare what | know to bea fect, that however, donot convey much information to American | ™*ot, notwithstanding the promises of ministers, is Properties of which Daniel Clark died possessed, to defendant, Mr. Patterson, including those given by the | DeGrange was condemned for bigamy in m: og * movement. Inspector General wit :— r et ‘nl the buyer from the frst purchaser to Mr. Patterson, are | Miss Carriere; this condemnation took place in New | Feeders. They require introduction, comment, and has admitted that if we can't get reolprocity, w oes 3. One plantation. five | es from the city, on the | that Careline Barnes claimed a ie of the | null and void, and that the same is liabl part of the ans about the Spanish domination justration. will therefor prehe: m Soft bank of the Missiasippl, fucluding all the buildings, Property of the late Danfel Cary, Ly Re pe gi i re a venek Devas beatles | a Phage Hee oe | Shee ip cooetrined eae oe ere cee Sas Ke. purchased by Clark cf Stephon Henderson 611. They further aver that the Probate Court re- | and that the defendant, Charles Patterson, shell sur: | wes bern im in 1760; !oontinued in Louiat. | °B¢ my information, even should you fiud that ity? To be oopelstent, they should dan fee be call yi aa fosed to probate « will unless it could be prodused in | render, the same: aa aball be directed among other | axe under the American an government, held various | °f It, In « condensed state, bas been antiolpated by the thea be am cunexstionist. 7 ult 6° 00, Sat he % ‘aul ie ', #000) court, api cor jon corns a ary, soben - open jai e tiene on, rd — a ear inthe | civil and military posts, removed to Cubs in 1814, | telegraph. oe ie vontane necomany vy the clpality, such a will, the complainants despaired of success, decree and mandate of ate ttteeta, together with ali’ the’ tenements, So, | resrou of the entoe pretecion of the or etd | im Loulslana,” |. Lots 6. Three lots, each 60 feet front by 120 deep, at the | der the will of 1811. They, therefore, di eouthern corner, formed by the interseotion of Toulouse bate proceedings. They further all and Burgundy stree: ines ie 6. A tract of 185 a1 its on the Bayou St. John, ad- | virtue of roperty of Evariste having been ae frem the city of Ni St. John titled to one-half in ri 10. A equare in Faubourg St. John, 800 feet front on | To this bill, Chew, Relf and Ferriere demur, on the | case was St. Jobn street, 200 on Washington the ‘This plantation, the bill rs, was bought Wade Ham: for Daniel Clar| by nd after Clark's death dents im this suit, Richa: Barthelemy Lafor: June, 1612, situate in Ascension Parish on left bank ef | all the allegati the bill. that Clark ever Missiseippi, 1834 arpents front om Mississippi, and 40 in | the propert bp pier ty he ever married Z. ‘A Jot im Second Municipality of New Orleans, bounded Apr street, Tivoli Place, 88. Charies, St. equare is worth at least $50,000 } court, and by reason of the direct i ‘of two ofthe | _ By virtue of this decision, complainant 3. A tract of land in Gentilly Road, 22 arpents front. | judges of the Supreme Court, (Martin and Matthews.) | she is recognized and decreed to be the 4. Li (0. 184 and 186 on Royal si New Orleans. | who had jased at the sales of Clark's: un- | end forced heir of Daniel Clark, as other) marriage with Clark, is not showm as te | Patterscn, should be left in = toone of the der @ cr place, or that the is entitled to the benefit of | claim«d from him by complainants. and should Relf, as executor of Clark, who subsequently sold to | the community. Finally, they set up the law of mite. | appegpfrom raid decree, withoutany security whatever; | hinge of licland. and always cherished bis cont of arma, | to Hincks, whore speech and explanations at the dioner | rent Parliament e. ‘ tion or prescription. that, Jb tact. the complainants bave alwayabitherto | though republican, | wrote to Myra in 1882 of her failed entirely to satisfy the mass of the people who | Legare be returi 12. A tract purchased by Clark of Wm. Sampson, in Then follow the pleas of the defendants, They deny | sllowed. snd still doallow, the said Patterson to enjoy the | rightr; she did pot receive the letters; but | met herin | had elected Bim. Hincks is the great polittet Bam f said property as owner, and solittle respect have raid | Metapras,and there developed her whole history. | | cabinet. He has been a newspaper editor, ai laipants to sald decree, that they ha: terson defendant to their amended ip, ler the con. | to; all of which facts and many c Patterson, titled to one moiety of Clark’s estate py Defendants respond to this new issve, that they conveyance from her mother, said estate | not bound by a judgment against Patterson in a trial joining the pr ty quired during the covertare of sald in which they took no part; that the whole 7. A lot the Faubourg St. John, half « league | Clark and wife. The claim of complainant is to the | in the case of Patterson were false and fraudulent, (8 Elght lots, from Nev to'No. 8inelustve, in suburb | Litied tot as Sirat thereby ao wile Ie cei i fart eearente to sy aid aol and supp the ited Siar prea rally art to | tendance of the right sort, and a few devoted servants | Quebec snd 9. A lot in Washington street, in Faubourg St. John | as forced heir of her father. many ways, and among others, by the fact that sald | also to preven et 5 seme grounde as in the former demurrer, all; that | on the Riecieeenatay. Beene pho aes thes | Sars sett mee perernen.el she-clty; | wee aS Scenes Deoddasentine, nope a ony rt tee shahiocat conan’ thet the meee Ploinenta. vis K, M, Chto, i ofa which, as a part | wasthe bead of the political party to which | belonged; | retived in favor of his friend, Miseieaippi river and 2 on Bayou Lafourche. en in the amended bill were not proper matters | of the decree of the court, it was ry the Saeed | pee @ parcel of ground in raid deoree referred | other obild but My: other so's of fraud | and in her infancy was called Myra Clark. 1! per agreed between mdment Second, that M. Z. Gardette’s (Mra, | complainants &nd eaid Patterson, that he, the said | to Miss Carriere, His pride was probably the motive | ner, and bas since been defeated at the municipal elec- | ment nor will t of the Property for the concealment of the marriage, for he was proud tions of his own township—five others being preferred | doubt be telegraph ean ‘cuit Court | and have ever since lived on Plantation, and am movements (concern! shall Livutenant Colonel in the Spawish service; my inti, | _7%® Political movements ( fing which} poe ae ge loon ages regarded with reo that | macy with Clark commenced about the end of the last | *P¢#k chiefly, as heretotore,) of the last two or three | intense interest. Should this election go against the ‘i ad lasted til hia death; we had relations of | weeks have developed several features of much signl- | government, it would be & mortal blow. Sopreng Clark, thea United States Consul at New Orleans, tag. | S°NC®- Since the dinner, or “ radical feed,” referred | Coe enpezation cendidate, had « majerity at the nomt- the offer of the Fyench Colonial Prefect, Laseal, to | ‘© in my last, which your printers have, perhaps, im- | 4 poil ‘The government ee a ped’ thin fast, cmmand of the militis ot Louisiana, ‘when ihe | proved, by calling it “radical feud,” has been fol- | and that there was great danger of Mr.ghabot's defeat? timate friends whom Clarkin 1506; anserivieg | ,°%C4 bY & dinuer to Mr. Hincks from his supporters | et the versclous organ, the Clete eazie out with the ia | in bis house, aud inferming them of the intentions of | ‘= Oxford. Great pains were taken to insure anat-| jnjormation. When it 1s knows that the @istrict of ighteen members to Paritement, that growing resti ind threatened to join Mr. °f the government displayed great activity om the oc. | they wer J cation, for which, of course, they expect a suitable | bumnment” cf “Chabee ae dn Bey ee works, em- | Teward. Some of them have already received it from these eighteen inem- tht into | ber of the State Convention of Louisious that assembled | the people. A Mr. Carrol, man of greet Joowl popu- bere, * Pitti cas ts S @ coin- | in 1812 and fremed the constitution of that State; Clark | Jerity, who was bimeelf candidate for parliament, but | of public : Hineks, at the last | the impo: 1 do not kuow, but | believe that Clark was married | election, was exceedingly busy in getting up thir din- Every intluen: venta meeting of the Legislature in. of his pecigreé, which he carried back to the ancient | before him—in consequence, | am told, of his toadyism It ie now ascertained that sizteen members of the pre- fe in favor of ani ition. Should ul for Quebeo, their ber will pro- ian of = bal be Fsdags 5 No bapa vote, pore sets im be ° reat | expected from the present larliament, should the an- jain made | subsequentiy wrote her fully on the subject. She has | stickler for demecratic reforms; but when g! on the Sovipleniona avon - @ majority. A general election claim. | my permission to exbibit these letters. Clark had no | power to carry out these reforms, he holds back, trims, | must first be held, and the question be brought fairly Sbe lived with Colon dcdges, and, im fact, gives his vete and assistance to | before the country, staip extravagance and corruption, and to foree upon A great meeting, the largest and most respectable [ at S E. corner of sald of the Probate Court of New which this defendant claims the right to adduce onthe | 1613 was fraudulently suppressed Clark k e country measures of toryiem and reti i in Torento, jd this afte: atthe intersection of Camp and Delord—60 | leans. declare that Z. N. Carriere, before the | trial of this ease, be declares make the decree mention- | well, He submitted that will to Judge Pitot, who tully | Meny of hi constituents thoug he would beable to cy Hall. to connider whether the Corporation should vetord. birth of Myra. was married to Jerome De Grange, and | ¢d by seid compleinante as Lege been rendered | approved it (lark, from hi: fidence in my honor, some of the char; be recomm 1d to invest $400,000 im the purchase of ‘of a tractof Mi sald i} and void as to | declined receiv: of the fifty lots he but bis dinner explavation tickets im the lottery, or rather the T: Rail land at Manchas, marriage Missleeippi, evld by Danl Clark to | After these pleas come the answers of defe First. the avewer of Chew and Relf. In their anewer, | forth as gro bad not been dissolved at D Cberles Patterson, «bolly nu! ws Myra’s birth. —— d ly this defendant now puts | bad arrignedto rescinded by Disuict of Lomein ey aver that Daniel Clark died in August, 1813—that | bad set ame out more fully and B rtagnc nny by e ne; OD iyra. He made other atirfactory. Indeed. they have only con- | scheme, which was sanctioned by Parliament last ses ner asifhe | assignments. His object was to place bie property be- | fimed the distrust of the genuine reformers, and itis | sion. The question was pretty warmly debated for ch ct Chew sad Reif, doubting their in- | pearly impcesible that be should be again elected for | two ot three hours, the Mayor being im the chair, A 0 bie will, in due form cf law, on 20th May, 1511; | Way of rpecial plea or othe © prays that triot, and anen- | Oxford. The fate of bis triend Carrol at the towuship | vote was taken on the point, and those who were in fa- fi ‘of Baton Kouge, bought by Clack from | eed ill was duly probated in 1813, and Ki This court may investigate this case upon ite own ine- He. relured to beoom election i reat fact,” aud must give the Inepostor vor of 7 Charles Ferrin, containing 500 arpents. Chew qualified as executors. All the charges and alle. | Tite, disregarding raid decrees so rendered against ited States sequi General bt uneasiness. The voters of his county | city funds. or, in ot 16. A treot of 14046 arpents oa the river Comite, 9 | gations im plaintiff's bill are expressly, and, in general Charles Patterson, firet, a8 res inter alias acta, ws to this citizen of that republfo, though | ate, meny openly. but more secretly, in favor of aunex- | promote this cbjeot, carried the day, by at least a two- miles from the Amite. : terme. denied. Mary Clark is averred to have defendant; rnd secondly, because they are collusive | ecntinuing to ri New New Orleans. fle took an | ation. ‘Tbeir disappointment in the rn | thirds majority. The chief objectors were moraliste, 17. A treet of 1.248 arpents in East Baton Rouge, 61{ | the only proper heir to whom Relf and Chew could ae- | ud were fraudulently procured, active part in esiling the attentionof the United States | ment Crives them, with thousands ot of | who read long extracts from old parliamentary re) i A H sis-tppl, 10 miles from Baten Kouge. | count; she was the universal heir, and she bad given 18. act of 4364 arpents in Baton Rouge, 19 miles | them as power of attorney to sell and administer the THE TESTIMONY FOR MES. GAINES. south of the Ine of demarkation, property eevieed to her Dy Clark. Their acts, as execus 19. A tract of 3.864 arpeut» on west side of the Co- | tors. were fully approved by Mary Clark, whilat she mite, 23; miles above [edwood Ureck. lived. She died im Philadelphia, in 1823. leaving « wil 20. A tract of 2,600 arpents om Junes’s Creek, in Ba- | appointing Joseph Reed her executor, Reed contiou mows from tamily report thet Mrs Smith ton Rouge. Chew ana elf ee the agent for the estate of Mrs. Clark, ” w Orleans in 18v6; knows Mre 21. A treet of 2,000 arpents, 9X miles from fort of | whore will was duly recorded bere The answer further | Betber of Mra Gaines, and her eon. Dr Baton . ere that Daniel Clark. previous to the year 1801, had | @J8*-Cardette,for complainant — Knew 22 A tract of 21000 on eat side of the Comite, 8 fed on business with Daniel W, Coxe, of Philadel. | Be?ederol. who formerly resided in Opel: miles from the Amite 4 said parties bed scoumul 23. Undivided half of « tract in Parish St. John the ame of Clark. On 19th wae born t jelphia im 1809, and § Baptist, 12 leagues from New Orleans, on the Missis- into partnership with the ep; bis parents were mar slppl Relt, who bad succeeded to oF 1808 and bad three cbildren; they lived in Philadel- |. Undivided half of « plantation in St. John Bap- | parther:bip of Clark and Co: 1 i 1829, whem they moved to Bordeaux, tet, 436 arpents front on the Missiseippt. @li his property equally with t one iY where his father resided till his death. in 1881; wy C pents front on the bayou pay m reed, aed the pro i wep dh dd the mother of the complainant, Mrs Gaines, 26. A of 6, titled to ove-third of Oailien Prevai, for complainant — Age 63 years; oo- 1 Clart’s property. Ph oF he. 13 cvypation gentleman; bee resioed 39 yeare in New Or- a oe pe Mest of the peoperty ue LJ anal Beows the parties in this oult; knew Daalel boundary line betweep (he Spauish and American pos- | whore debts were enormous Respon pessions: much embarrased by the large queutity of The bill then ev umerates the slaves of which Daniel | tive lei owned by them in connection ‘Clark died porsesred: they are two hundredand twenty- | ip coneequerce of theoe et bar: ents, th @izia number. Then follows am enumeration of ail | for e respite from their erediters, as well for t! property: cows, oxen, and other animals; fur- | of Clark's ertate as tor themselves. This ure, flowers, &c., of the value of $4044; and farming | The meetii implements. Ko., cf the value of $5084. Then comes | preceede of oreditors granted the respite, © dispose ef the property, most of whic: nt Chark's will; was particular debts due to \ lark, amounting to $28.00, | was beid in Clark's pame, Said rales were made to | ot!?Fered the package into the w Clark, but bis debts to general. amounting to $95 438; to | the best advantage, Th ole statement of complain. the petitioners also anvex the claim filed by | spt, abcut the will of 1613, ite destruction by Reif, | Sf Clas’ wae to cerry said trunk to avers that Daniel Clark intended to | that cf 1811, and the whole conduct of Jeave his property te Myra (iark Whitney. and didon | under that will, is averread to have been just aad legal. OF about July, 1813, duly make bis will, declaring Myra | ls is then alleged that Clark could not bave legally Clark Whitney his legitimate child, ‘devising ali his | married Z Nee Carriere, who intermarried, in property to her, naming as his executors Col Jose De with Jerome DeGrange, who was living ville, —— Beli born; that these parties bad not then Dusueu Croix ther , Of Daatel Clark, of the value of $223,188. | the ranction of am eath. The only wi The bill thos HS | 3 litet, De h acne, James Pitot, Chevaller Ve la Crotx to be tutor of {ated we = ities to Sie 7 clark, Dd atel Clark a olen beree! ae bas wits ain Tevet hued im for © minded map; he never thought of inquiring whether | ‘directed ull be edu. #0 election te any office whatever. by the people's | feelan interest in it. gnother, and $0 Careline De Geneon ah Gumena-ai: | dreasen elach dtvenes ‘ras granted subsequent to the | “iaf% as married or not. ented; about ti rs before his death, Clark evi voice. There fentlemen are, of course, disappointed; bra Fections as to the education of Myra. birth of 4 in 1806. said Mrs DeGrange mar- Peter K Wagner, for ne oy oer Bye tog strong feelings for Myra, avd directed his rervant, ed velng oe men Be baer ng es. suppor. Our Philadel ‘This will, it is alleged, was written by Deniel Clark, GasGatte, WA Whets obs Mved Nal Bis | D002 *shs0e in Niet Ce eR rearty vetoed Wins | ee a tece aha cats to, Do le Cosi: 26 ssom (00 Re | ete Of tne fHestel porte te ophdiy’ torening aed Pr, , February 3, 1860. at Daniel Clark lived five years after the mar. | hbew (he Partie, noe sal was read to Judge James Pitot, the late J ; to Gardecte. and never. a Ly (Notary Public) aud Mrs Harriet Smith, and its ¢: tents communicated to said Wol. Bellebasse. to D: ; that if o lo Boirfontaine; that Daniel ( rot 1 Clark, by Z ¥ @ ‘of August, 1813, without altering or timate and could net, therefore, inherit by revoking thie will, leaving Myra, bis only child or de- | It is alse averred that Madam Car- , the rame society with The bill then avers Myra Clark Whitney's right of Clark was paying Imberitance as the only lawful and legitimate child of the imputation — Clark, It further relates that shortly after her upon bie charecter involved in the charge of con- |, which took place in July, 1506, oy was placed peaion with adem Carriere, They deoy that Myra pb Sy in the family of Samuel b w she lived in New Orleans till 1812, and then but aver that in 1817, Colonel Davis, in whose family moved to Philadelphia. She continued with Davis dur- Myra was raised, brought suit agaioet them. as Clark's ing Clark's lite, and sometime after bis death. While | executors. for the support of Myra, styling her his na- be lived, Clark exercised over her the authority, care tural or illegitimate child She was 0 ized property ww Orleans; him im the 1804, until bis of Harper & Di (lari 7 Davis, with was ever recognized as the legitimate child of Clark, and tion of & parent. in the will of Mary Clark, the mother of Daniel. But In 2811, Clark, that Daniel W. Coxe, of Phi- | respondents deny even this, that she is a child, legiti. him, assigned property to mate or illegitimate, of Daniel Clark. They aver that eae of several hundred | | they bave never inte ort Myra went to Phiiadelphia the trost Denlel Clark returned from Philadelphia, and finding them which was wT ‘Chew and Relf, administrators, of the debts due aud | is pronounced by the latter unfounded and falee, under | {00d witness that Olark sala his Judge Pitot is the rame Jud, ot the will of Daniel Cla quently attended Clark's soiré went to see Clark to collect & hind of man, and said, “ Wagner, | have no change draft on Uhew and Relf; be replied, tiwaye understood Clark design ; when he fought duel with Governor Bis interents not seriously joopardized by Coxe. reovived | brought by Iveif against Whitey. former husband of | to settle bis po erg oy ob vie # ~ the had given testimony im this cece, ~ Lye oer ledged as bis own. before avdafter her birth andaslong | country is fast making up its eldent Ie eats Coes, d further told Pitot, th : ; wet with « lady recognized an Mre Clark; Daniel | Zveptiy stated bat raid Zulime, after Myra’s birth, to | Crk e veputation was thet of an hovorable. high- | foslede ere till 1835; she is Court of Probate; he imately; attended bis parties: ith Judge Pitot; the Judge t i) was ine curt Government to tbe iusportance of soquising Louiciaue, | Canada to the profession of this new doctrine. ‘The. | showing the evil effects of lotteries om the patito morale ard constantly corresponded with the officers of go- | beltef is becoming general that whetber we have story | ope hundred and fifty years ago, when there was no or complairant.—Says he is26) vernment. ‘the United States owe the acquisition of | geverbment or # reform government, it is all one tothe | law to regulate them, and when people were rather ver- t aod resident Of New Or- | Louisiana to Daniel Clark. His influence reconciled | people. High salaries, pensions, tuerease of offices and | cant in financial matters. These remarks were an- arriet Smith formerly Mrs | the people to. the ¢ ge of government, and gave | ofice holders, continuance of bad Jaws, and a yearly | severed, by arserting that this waa not a lottery; thet It them the most fevorabie impressions of the justice and | addition te the list, public improvement and enterprise | lacked that element of fraud which is # constant in- Wirdem of the United States 4 still, nnd ail the innumerable evilsof such @ | gredient im all mere lotteries; that there was no more Boietontaine, for the plaintiffe— Witness | ty stem. seem to be the of Canada. A ing in purchasing a ticket in this scheme, hopi: te with Daniel Clark, Mr. Clark left, at | 6f the per 1ize, and. at allevents, sure of gutting @ vaughter named Myra. whom he acknow. | change the ind to seek a thorough | obj rpoke of the necessary | change, to wit, « change trom mock monareby to real | pri = 8.01 presence asked my in i ried tu 1807 i eben judgeship, which | mentioned some time | pe’ 0, &e giving the ministry # great deal of trouble, bas | the moral th bern filled. H J. Boulton, from his standing | former care, bar, being also @ professed eupporter of the party | e¢; in the latter. object was purely selfeh and the and tiem certain promises made him about | enhencement of the price of food to the star ef the tory riot and burning at Montreal. was | weegloated over by the speculator as @ god. to 5 be communicated to me he was i who had the best claim to be the newly | him. The moralists. who aro more sensitive than the wekieg bis last will, be told me be should acknow. | created prize of $4,000 perappum. But his antecedents | /arliament or the Queen's Ministers, (the bill havi ledge ber in itas bis legitimate daughter; the day be- Wire regent Lim. The popular party could not for- | been rererved for the royal sanction, which it recetved) fore be died. be spoke to me about her with great | get old tricks; end although they were willing to accept | | am sorry to ray were not appreciated by this pious atection, aud as being left his eetate in his last will; | bm and ute him ar & logiriator, they would not take mering- The cits who were determined to have a the day be died be spoke of her with the interest of a Lim ara judge, The ministry knew this. and were | railroad, bonestly if they could, but at all events te iy brother-in law.Mr uld take the care of ber aft dying parent, or Beir of bis estate in bis last will; was Streid to encounter the opposition and disgust that the | bavee raiiroed, outnumbered their long-faced brethren, papg ony & Juph's bouse Ofcom days before Bis deat: saw have Sppoiniment wowid engender, Mr Baldwin, the Attor- | The corperation, if they consent to engage in the un- l be obliged to apply to parliament for ealed packet to De ie | reix. statin, ney General and to whese department the office be- | dertahki P19 last will, before thir he had often tol | lorged, etood out for Boulten. In the midst of the | the legal powerto do so. If the tickets can be disposed t ‘he patience of the public was pearly | ef (the priee is $20.) and the woney put under safe eabeusted Mr devin fell sick, and daring his ad- | keepipg— thie isibe great poiot — the road will be built, sree the other ministers gave Boulton the go by, and be little doubt but it will pay shoved im K. E. Burns,atory. This ‘are two prises of $100 000. six of it very reriously, but not, p much | $40.000, and the remainder of the capital, ($2.000,000) iotment ef Houlton would bi veral allotments of $20,000, $10,000, three lawyers in the tou $600f and #0 on. The faithful epplicstion of the ho were eligible to (tem | money to the object. is the point ou which most doubt the bar is required.) and in thetrown btertained; avd before the Corporation will invest wd that of thelr fri ) as well qualified as room for euch dowbt must be re- ay lawyer ted, who was never in Parlia- De lg ment, and who could not boast of popular approval by and asked if he oroix) had promised, ber ali my estate in my rill, an you, Pi edged Myra ae ‘Tirnge affair. as it is supposed many in your State Gied; about thie time, shortly before Clark’s death, blow An ultre liberel party is rapidly forming, nod ry im the spring of 1513 | witness raw Reif take a bundie of keys from Clark’s €Véry #ctot the ministry adds to its numbers [his | Mrs. Polly Bodine—Mr, Cameron and the Cotlectorship— Hine Mre. Harsiet Smith, for complairsnt—Kaew Clark in 813. usband wes of the Ty care and extravagance ui 4 that rhe ehould iuberit his splendid continued there attentions au 1813, wi with Color ; he was an off- PS d to wake Myra bis rhe J. to M: oO in, oo mes Sie the cole. an coccmms fl . eat ny ‘and sub. most arch and uprerupvlour politician, managed to get cruel rose fire, im consequence of this self same ot. will give it twoor three votes in the present The Art Unions— Our Importation ¢ Boulton, who is exceedingly cunving, aude ‘ P shée lawyer, Wal testes pepcler agene. aia | i= & of distinguished strangers, Philadelphia it be law reform abd, God Knows, the | just now 1s honored with the presence of Mrs. Poly retorm Court of Chanoery, of | Bodine. As she is dally engaged in vending stooks, fh wiust be abolished. | The whole country de- | chars, ke., at our prineipsl hotels, it is not unlikely Boulton | ¢ba may be prolonged for months, if not bey Foy | years. She dresses neatly, is quiet aud unobtrasive in | ber manners, and appeara to be driving « paying bust” | ners Mr. Edwin Forrest is also here, and shows his contempt and disgust for foreigners, by sporting an elegantly cultivated imperial. w mould stu Me ‘The razeeing in our Custom House, which com- dawn them toa ntente an UT pores will Place them bore du combet With thle Wheln pasty, oF rane napa Ae Geni terdtaes G ana Saree use, with the whole country | ™: Another recent act of the ministry bas giveu great | Lewis, for what is the use of office without the sccom- diatisiaction. Many years ago. large slice ot the | panying condiments of patronage and spoils’ Ex- it had been pUblic domain was ret sport for the support of a uni- | Senstor Cameron who left this city for bis home om fange, which ‘Yersity Bishop Strachan, then arch-deacon. and « | Saturdsy last, was exposed during his brief stay, to @ armoit. one of wbich witness believes opened the little Diack case he bi Clark open #0 often; Reif then Lubin rays, went into Clerk's efloe, and icoked himself up in the office; almost Clark's last & Words referred to Ms will in favor of Myra; my state: ment of the last will of C ‘i and substan- of ite contents; my taine; my ‘age about ane; | waa eight years in fer Mr. 4.1 live oppoeite New O: Britioh army; | wae several years agent married to ewis eeoused bi marriege of De Grange; when the time for ‘i+ charter #0 framed, as togive bimeelf and bis church leetorsbip ‘The friends of Mr back ® portion of the ty assigned te Davis. and compiainent for a libel. in char, ith destroy- ry ie provisions for Myra; alter his return i ccpalian, claiming to be established here.) the | seeret opposition, while the enemies of Mr. L. up Geolared that he should revoke the will in favor of his ing the wilicf lath, which was 4 1a Teepe tae Vhlincelpbia, he stated that the will of 1811 was andichet whole thing» When this charter appear: him for bolding back. The truth ts, Mr, mother, abd make ail his to Myra favor. They declare that Ci Property was | made with e view to his apprehended e wae adv: a, people of all classes were taken by sul either ured his influence for or against ‘that he rev: made one faithfully applied to | throvgh his connexion with Coxe ag commenerd, to get . 4 not ; to compromise himself oD plightert degree, in jebte, which wer jel Cox alone being $172 homologated their accounts in the Probate | {) Oriewps, they cannot be called on to ac- | tothis Court. They piead these probate pro- slieging thes they were not er- a by Clark— fm 1818. wbortiy before his death, leaving all his proper- to hie daughter Myra. In bis last moments he de- that be had mate this wiil, a: at it was con- tained in & certain drawer in . The will of 811 continued im the sion of Relf and Chew. affairs, and ia death, Clark tol « that De Ja Croix, Judge Pitot, « be his executors; that he Leda’ te, ee bis iegitl- | pate barrier to the publielty of her marriage with bim, the aforraid bishe ye Jewye? that the marriage was invalid, aud she rh married Mr. Gardette, Mpenge Se legntimate davgh' ‘ eu) family quarrel thet te bg and raging. The opposition may use his sake of ecquiting additional capital but v ner ther cowpromise Mr Cameron sor defeat Mr iark always spoke of rk was a fond pa conferred great poke ap upfortu- ‘ut in Operation, excerpt fo fer as paying $4,000 to $6,000 @ year for acting et and before the letters assumed control over per: le Croix, ope of the oortal! jes to bis oident of institution to be lished, it | for Mr of this city, who is comertic affairs, nod tok ponerssion of bis pa; alleged executors of the will of 1818, and before Judge aise i tee tee opene yy Lay ony ay Te 4 great sensibility presiden| institution to be eapabli Rn ye oe aug, whe —and that raid Reif obtained possession of the of Pitot, Judge of the Probate Court, another of the exe- | ourre of edveation to be pureued with Myre. | tiel triend of Clan bali to answer the charge of violstiog, with his 1818 and destroyed it, and substituted the revoked will cutors of this rame pretended will. of 1811—bed it probated and bimeeli and Beverly Chew in regard to the application of complainants, to pro- PY executors. The bill them avers that there bate the will of 1818 im the Probate Court of New Ur- of Daniel (lark in Louisiane, x bed no relations said jenna tespondents deny that the question of jurisdie- o's Chew and Kelf fraudulentiy took porsension of Clark's tion war raired. but aver that the care was nonruited, | effects, 204 administered the came. faleely representing to be ivsoivent end selling or approp: to their own uses. ke. with Davie till 1882, being always enlied Myra until (jark's death, when her name wee she waskeptinigao »¢ ance of ber tage and her rights ber mat. oath .# Tement of interestin Judges Martan and te avo met by admission. as to the for- =p her history and ever since bas been engaged in conte before bir ¢eatD be brought bie will te wes an scknowledgment of Myra’s leg! it the cbarter of ber rights, and desired me to 1 read the will; it reecgpized Myre as bis to ether persema; he calied on me after this, rpoke ef the burden taken frem bis wind by bis ample | Orieans rovielons for Myra, and bis minute directions as to | leave (lark raid Vyre Ui tents cpemees nope Sse Wy tt ed | Eee Samra Saletan gece essa ng esis | Sonn toed im supprete bee } then,’ after Clark's retura to New Orleans from Phila .* hen she was made acquainted mer, eho wasinecmpetent to sot in the ease of com: | PM, ertruted jor it, Cark ease man of powerful i, a Oy Saye pen . Dut is utterly denied a to Judge Matthews ; | So schrewledged talenta, towering A ng rst Saiphite. till we left, im 1892, he frequently visi a ee ~-) ip, inatte place ‘® slightly modified char- | jogs, the lottery law. Whether he has or has not, ered that this great pro- © ‘bing i* certain, that while these Unions heve af- which was supported out of the forded fat pickings to certain parties in certain quar- public lauds, and was intended for the whole public, tere. they bave dene very little for the fine arts. Temarned im the bands of a greedy and would be domi- The ship Fiviend, f thie port, bas been sold to the pei rant sect. Theology was introduced, and a Puseyite sort, Howland and Arpinwail, of your city, to be em- fn my charge when she was piirst was imported trom Fngiand to Bil the chair Che pi ro im the Californie trade First our steamers, ‘ineined with ua, in New otber erets, by far the most numerous, ratved their pre- | end now our rhips. This ts, indeed, robbing to the hen we weregabout to teat, and s hot battle epeued At the clections, the re- | rkim, hetr, and speke of } WY = gave rae . a gover ot, LM agg Fagg Byes ek, Ti sales Pe, io last . . larization © university was a ques | eve i -eomai berm, ction, snd “prouniary ambi. pep Y, : tince. The shipping om our coast must ed copeiderabiy ene tate tab portations into weded hel enly inti toe babe a cc ming bie davgbter, who was hav A dill was accordingly | T! Sivaysspeke of ber with greet affection: the of her rights ' apd even if jt were true, there were three other | bide and dignity of character, strong feelings and sf | jae Ciask for the lest time, just ae about to Mending principles of whieh were gene | port 5 te heirs of Deniel, are Elsuncr A’ ‘beosst tad Jane Oreos, Geeioes aupe ooerpiate a they oak I A Wave, be gave direetions tat “ye should be educated | 4, seg aor | SS ry Cy- » narod pee . . + | #0 a8 tot . in eeciet to are Seigpana daughters cf ary Clarks ns ™? Civeuit Ceune sold helasen tothe jurledevion of thin Seat ee Se ce ef agus eeanen Tp be ela labo; never som aay will Clark, Tae Sate a ee ae ng | eee rivals ato ‘one Sere cee cn cnemeeion of the Ovune of tho | come teenns to blige defendants to go into the eat cates sak Jeayt the $e bones, Sian, speed st ene: Pabsadpaie; : ment. instead of dispersing them over two, may im upnecessary, ae the respondents will of 1818 created great excite. ery part sccount for thie remarkably beary ine ar are a0 follows :— bate Court, which fot! i and John Holliday invited ecmplainant to go into euch ecurt, and offered to waive all pleas to the juriadiction, In order to wo M. Marques, J ee ee Gate gets decirion of this vexatious matter. ly with Mr. Reif, and received from hime tit was naturally expected that @ liberal ry yene ot chet o fale rey roreutetten of ip fleur or grain there is not much doing The mar- bo Fines on the ctm- | bet is very quiet, and In fo nales are exceedingly bh ‘7. wld tok Coowes, J. Barobino, A. Peonios, New Orivans ‘This te rubdsantisily the avewer of Chew and Relf, € siaven; M: born im 1806; mede the Limited, even at the decline aiready noticed Kye ie — ‘eltrced Company, Widow Jaubert, Charles eworn to end filed January, 1845 ” | eee tee whether Clee maneted; ¥ iways ristened (the number of commis. | wavted 80 @8o, There ie very litle wheat offering. . and Charles Tude ‘The smended and rupplemental [bill of E. P Gaines | be was married to Myra’s mother; the sepa- ried; Clark pur- ie a brisk demand for o- pager and moa-ses, wier Martin, (late Chief Justice) and J. and Myra Clark. his wife Sled in 1848. contains oil the Detween Clark and Myre's mother was caused her cortly dresses et full rater, Cotton ts firm. at Inet quotations. rubstantiol alicgations of the original bill but renoun- Lemonier. cen all claims under the will of 1515 as, universal lege. Petitpain and Toledano ter and me four-ffthe of the perty ae forced ae produeed by letters written to (lark by im Congress, houre which my snd the Colliers To New York. $1 to Boston. $4 62% now no ec, atthe bar of the House, any interference with The ant feeling, alrendy moticed in the stock * t other rhe left eexelusive charter which be hed obtained by the market still continees During the coming week, aa ever acknowledged 4 they separated. and Aldermen ot New Orleans. The iil, however, ig aphed to be sed as | Rew Usicons: fecmmentonted te Myre ber tres bie- groveert fraud The other two ate persons of no public upward movement in Reading stock i# jas Pepie and —— Wright. of of the legitimacy of Myre, and ber rights to tm- | ¢.,y ¢) ortiy before her marriege with Mr. Whitney & Hams abd not likely 10 Dave @ay fofuence with theit | lccked for. ‘Tenes nutes and securities have further Wisi fifths of Clark's efiecte, The amended bill | to that time. she believed she was the daughter of Col. beget aid and if they are members of any church, | edvancea to Mi h certain interrogatories to defendants, | payjs, the mother of Myre wae Miss Carriere, whore dnerday morning not the mem whom their own “brethren” | — Anmexed are the salen at the #toc ben follows the names of Francois Dusuan dele ny ~ on Duss nh tee bor « ton in tow, going down eteeted— the Bi: the most ladecn. | ene me ths, penounver ot toe, Celestia | Then follow the ane | ge ee Golem Ome, ty —at the polla The Pr ‘possessor were of the defendants, which liver, came comtect w oo Ld ‘at. | tite Of great political influence ee Cae vert, F. FP. Laberre, Sonist Dupovat, grounds vet forth in the principal anewer of which was srcending The Diane. wi hon the te Mort BEMeFeUR the Lat , Uniterians H. Fortier, as the possessors of other slaves, ei oeh Uempted to exces the bowe of the steamebip, #! A many otbers, ate without any representation or infiu- Saieasiag te the etece of Clark cider than Myra, eniled Caroline; | thought Myra’s | Collistom took place ea teh coon on thit com misrion, and regard themreives mate TV ether rerpectable frcm tering ber intimare with Mrs | Of the latter were stopped and she bad commenced ‘old Through thelt remonstrance wad 7 at ife of Rie elf, now enebier of the he Diane and Stanton were co mac! nie | Aa ay there were romrra of @ private marriage 7 Beth sunk immediately. The Obie suet aa bo apd eT TY “ Clark and Myra's mother. arial Gemege. She remained with the wreshs | mest vit we) Lop f_, ky tt vay ee ELS ‘utin Bellechsere, for plaintif —1 etter daylight, and sucoceded. It iP uhen the there pretiferous Influence they hed made ‘ Zolime Nee Clark, mother of Myra © als of she ceo en Gesues tse atom ey rym oe =| Beth “wrecks bad drifted pearly down to the a OE Rg sald Zulime was the wife of Jerome De nt in this case fully explaine all ita | 1°87) Clark told me tbat be bad « da to them. Neither ie averted to be false, Vente! Clan owe — frequently took me to sey be veeeel ee Seder worer and mesh of tbe Cet. | Neo Carriere been Ine Teg come om for final hearing, by fect fin ISI Ciark co Bt cargo weuld be rave, Accurding to the sverred, thet if Zulime consent of the complainants, and the defendant Patter. +ut of the esterreman of the Diana, eho wae at Woe. 1,706 Pewn. 6 Grange, the marriage was iliegel, because said De | ron, upon the bill, answer. replication, exbibite. depo- the wheel at the time of the colfirion, the pilotand to ad de, OR Orange Was the lawful husband of another — eseiaps, ond dooumente on tHe, herein, 008 co the s¢ Ssptete ceppmee the Obie (0 be £0 the Went ride of Be | erty by ihe ever " pelo apis em i od et nes rrespondence. Wie ie further alleged that the executors, Reif and | thir cersexeerie in value the tum of {wo thousand ok within 40 or 80 yards, The Diane hed ber beim® bord. | Ic ayctemn whiol, enables een oe ) Jam, 12, 1860 Chew, did not act conforma Jars, ard the raid complainants and the defendant Pat- ae. tm Ono jar “Several of the parrengers and crew of | wes fully exemplified. The jury, — , tration of Clark qi i and diepenring with the pe- me tame tee betel Stanton came up in the Ohio —New Orleans | 5°) ‘ommoned from the city, many of fame mentioned, w to the bearing or deeirion the west ompies Creseent, Jan. 24. | thee: teten pert In the riot being om rv ae nae coenae, ‘capa ny Le contented bobs npn ip esta i} rw Beas © 2 on eau neiaaei wane | the bist. Number of eiuisane whe eamee XI 4 ‘Sane J ‘one Cowrom Howse Diasresaus — jowing cir. | and raw in the jury box the very const: ell = being now cuMicieatiy Sdvieed of and ose cvler bes been layucd te the Celiector cf the port of | the achrme wes hatebed sod the eiMies made, and who Comers Dee Se Sees premives. dees Gnaily decree aud order, the defendent fatterson mm oF before the first to © prospects are poor for freight, and the Buftele:— wat catght ringing (be Ore belt to cali oot the rioters, Trrasvey De nymeer. Jam 29. 1860 com at tbe solemn farce, and declared cou! o7 hat Dizra Clark Whitney be re- | day of the uext term of this court, convey and rurtem: | | Pee EPS ES, Bin — Ip addition to the © at and reduction they wewld ¥o neue Covee ov ena Usiren Staves, Feb 1< Ne, | der perserston to ¢ pl it," exciaiined ¢ lark, tohing my bend with affectionate from cus erable them ” Ho) P. Wilken complainant, vs. Daniel Barna, | $f shove lets o¢ parceto ot ta ne | reprebensicm. © Belitehare. that you have not been te # Decem | rien the secured. although the «flence (assaulting the | 11, ose was submitted to the court on printed arg@ 1S ye - sre me tetore? | told Reif to send for you” | repited perwnpaaey eanty proved, Geteel GuueED Gey 4 deterdant, No. 198 = | “ 804 to white Tar | bed received norneh message; thet | had been law of theee experser. to @ oe wterworth, Che motion te will of (1811) eighteen hundred and eleven. reyance rbail contein #1! of warranty | hi* phyrietan before, » iif i F i E H i | i i 4 would have beem mevt Daopy fo attend him ; be rquersed my band, | retired, tetling 06 ender Ly | helt | should call again to attend my old friend ; Reif Govndents pee that bie dector bad required ibed that be as nor very dangerous; | devtred, to be semt for: the next day | to barge to the grand jury, de inpenee your distriet. You will discussion of the ao. ree the beatmen, and jay | 4. No —T Mr. wing cntmtt a behalf of the plan aut ve Chertee Bip. be quiet smd 1 pited State ® ernment ot (his cause ©es copticaed for the appeiaat