The New York Herald Newspaper, November 12, 1844, Page 2

~NEW YORK* HERALD. New York, Tuesday, November 12, 1844. Beginning of the Great Movement of the Age in Religion—Politics—Civilization and Everything—Dr. Pise’s Lecture. We give ‘to our readers to-day a very full and accurate report of the lecture delivered in St. Pe- ter’e Church, in this city, by Dr. Pise. It presents in a somewhat interesting light, one of the aspects of that great movement which has just commenced a movement which is destined to exert an influ- ence on politics, religion, civilization, and every other element of human progress and human mind. A great revolution is, indeed, in progress every where around us. The spirit of tree inquiry—rest- jess and uncontrollable—is busy on all hands. Prejudices, errors, the antiquated dogmas of darker ages are dragged into the light of day, and subjected to searching scrutio Sec- tarian intolerance—the rivalry of opposing creeds— the dogged obstinacy of ignorance—the sober strength of philosophy—the reeling extravagance of fanaticism—the wild vagary of speculation—all these elements of agitation are encountering each other, and in every direction you hear the din and shock of conflicting opinion. This lecture of Dr. Pise, delivered:tuse Suoday.eyening in the elegant church dedicated to St. Peter, is one OF the «signe of the times,” and as such let us glance at it and see what it is worth, and what it indicates. After perusing this lecture, our first thought is, that it was rather ill-timed and rather injudicious altogether. For the motives, which, no doubt impelled Dr. Pise, we have the highest regard.— ‘The Doctor is an exceedingly amiable man, He has always discovered himself to be a man of peace and christian charity. But he has, unhappi- ly, in the present instance, followed a bad exam- ple. He is travelling in the footsteps of Bishop Hughes. [tis not exactly a Carroll Hall step, but it isa step sufficiently out of the line of prudence— and duty, and good sense, to be deplored and to be censured. {t really cannot do good. It must do harm. {twill excite new and strengthen old pre- judices. “Many of those whose intolerance it was intended to rebuke, will glean from it additional weapons of attack, and misrepresentation, and abuse. Inthe minds of those whose rights, and privileges, and creed, it was meant to defend and vindicate, it is not likely, in the judgment of chare ity, that it will produce a desirable impression.— We have always set our face, and we ever shall set our face, against the introduction of polemical controversy, and sectarian appeals into pulpit min- istrations. It is this abuse of the pulpit by the cler- gy of all denominations which has torn and dis- tracted Christendom—keeping in continual blaze the angry passions of opposing sects—and leading the minds and hearts of men far away fromthe hal- lowed influences of the peace and love which are the great principls of true religion. Men should go to the house of god to pray and not to fight; and there is assuredly a woe upon him who takes occasion of their as- sembling there, to inflame their hearts with unholy animosities against their brethren; for is not this sinning in some sort as they of old did, on whom “strange fire from heaven” descended, and consumed them utterly with the altar they had pro- taned ? in handling his subject, Dr. Pise is as unfortu- nate as he was in its selection. He is an eloquent preacher; but he is not a good logician. In appeals to the hearts and consciences of his hearers—in declamation on the simple truths of Christianity—or in the regions of poesy and imagination, the Doctor is quite at home; but in the thorny paths of ecclesiastical controversy, he does not appear to be so happy. Huadreds of laymen, tolerably well-versed in their half-a-dozen vo- lumes of controversial theology could be picked up any day in a Scottish Presbyterian church, any one of whom would demolish the Doctor in an hour. Just look for instance at his quibbling about the Reformation. In the first place, the Doctor asks, “Did the Reformation indeed give light and kberty to England?” This he an swersgvery satisfactory—(to himself)—in the nega- tive. He then goes on to answer his second query: “Did the Catholic Church extinguish, or attempt to extinguish, the light given by the Reformation?” This he also very poorly goes on to answer in the negative, surely a very unnecessary labor, for how could that be extinguished which he had just shown had never any existence? And then how silly his attempt to cast discredit on the Reforma- tion, by retailing stories about the frailty and folly and intolerance of Luther and Calvin! As well might he deciaim against the art of printing, or the mariner’s compase, on the ground that their first discoverers had been guilty of some flagrant im- morality. The truth is, the Reformation was not strictly a religious movement. It wasthe result of a great, comprehensive, and universal revolution in the hu- man mind. It was the dawning of a new day on mankind, at first visiting with all its glorious infla- ences of light, and hope, and energy, the minds of such men as Luther, and Calvin, and Huss, and Kaox—just as the rays of the morning sun first gild the summits of the mountains, and as they quickly diffuse themselves over all the plain, dispersing the clouds of the night, so did the light of the Refor- mation rapidly spread itself over the face of Chris- tendom, dispelling the icy mists of monastic insti- tutions, and leading men from the gloomy and fog- gy atmosphere of ecclesiastical domination, into the warmth and sunshine of the open day. It 1s vain for Dr. Pise or for any church to strug- gle againstthe movement which originated with the Reformation. All the churches must finally yield to it. Allneed purifying—all need new life and energy. Dr. Pise must give up his antiquated dogmas—dogmas which no intelligent Catholic be- Jieves. Let the ‘‘mysteries,” which are in reality no mysteries at all, but merely the relics of a dark- er age, not unworthy of respect indeed, not to be treated with contempt, let them be regarded in their proper ligh!, aa traditionary remembrances of the faithfulness and piety of past generations, bu! not as articles in the creeds of eflightened men.— And Jet all sects—Protestant and Catholic—cast tar from them that heathenish intolerance which still lurks in their midst, and poisons the atmes- phere of the christian world. The age of proscrip- tion and persecution has passed away. No church —no sect—no party—no politician—no popular leader—in this day can long dare to breathe forth the spirit of intolerance. That demon may, indeed, exmnbit for a time its odious face, stained with the blood of patriots and martyrs, but it will only be to be driven back to its den amid the hootings of out- raged humanity. Ovgan Staeers.—The contract for cleaning the Streets commenced this day, which has been put out at the large amount of $45,000. This sum ought to give us clean streets; and the tax-payers will ree ceive much satisfaction, as well ay our citizens at large, by having our public streets and thorough- fares kept in proper order during the winter. We need many reforms; and now that the election ex- citement is over, it is to be hoped thatthe Common Couneil will seriously apply themselves to a reform of the many crying abuses which we have repeat- edly pointed out during the last six months. Ovarke’s Gartery or Parntines.—This choice collection of paintings, together with some very va- luable specimens of marble statuary, are to be dis- posed of to-morrow, by auction, in the mew granite building, Broadway, opposite to the Washington Hotel. An opportunity is now offered to connois" seurs to obtain some of the most valuable pictures oi the old masters that is not likely to oceur again for some time to come. Iranian Oprra.—It is now certain thatthe opera troupe will n at Palmo’s on Monday next, with . :adi Rowmberg. See advertisement, The “Natives” and the “Irish.” CATHOLICITY AND PROTEST ANTISM. ST. PAUL ON ROMAN CITIZENSHIP, AND DR. PISE ON AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP. A Lecture delivered at St. Peter’s Church, New York, on Sunday evening last, by the Rev. C. Pisg, D.D. And when they had bound him with thongs, Paul saith to the Centurion that stood by him: In it lawfe you to scourge a man that is a Roman and uncondemned ? Which the Centurion hearing, went to the tribune and told him, saying : What art thou about to do? For this man isa Roman citizen. And the tribune coming said to him: Tell me art thou a Roman? But he said, yea sind the tribune answered : I obtained the being free of this city with @ great sum. And Paul said, But Iwas born s0.—Acts of the Apostles, xxii. 26, 6, 7, 8 It was indeed the greatest of privileges in the time of St. Paul to be numbered amongst Roman citizens; and I believe that I can with justice re- mark that it is an equal privilege at the present day to be acitizen of thisrepublic. Andesthe tribune earned his citizenship with a great sum of money, se there are those who have earned the rights and privileges of citizenship in this great country by the sweaeef-their brow and the labor of their hands— many who are willing and ready to Mytrt the datos necessary of that land of which they have become citizens, and to die in the cause which is so glori- ous. But I, in the language of St. Paul, have been “born eo,” and yet is it not astomshing that c: zens, whether they have earned the right of citi- zenship with “a great sum,” according te the ex- pression of the author of the Acts of the Apostles, or whether they have been “born so,” find it ne- cessary to stand forth in vindication of that reli- gious creed which they conscientiously profess, and thus to claim for themselves the right which citi- zenship confers upon all—the right of worshipping God according to the dictates of their consciences? But such is the spirit of the present time, and such are the prejudices of the present generation, even in thisrepublic; that it becomes my duty, as it was the duty in Pagan times—in the dawn of Christian- ity—of Augustine, of Attanagoras, of Tertullian, to expound the doctrines of Christianity, and to vindicate the claims of Christianity, or 1 will say, Catholicity, to the attributes of truth. In taking this great subject into consieration, I find myself obliged to contend with these strong obstacles in the way of our religious belief : First, we have to contend against sectarian influ- ence; secondly, against popwar prejudice; and, thirdly, against whatI may style dogmatic misre- presentation. EG. Under the head of sectarian intolerance I would signify that we have to contend with the intoler- auce which has been exercised and enforced from the pulpits and through the press of those secta- rians who have presumed to make the assertion, and who have attempted to prove it, that our reli- gion is is.compatible with free institutions, and, that, therefore, our religion should not be tolerated in this our own republic, of which we are citizens, either having purchased our citizenship with a grea’ suni, or having been ‘* born so,” as St. Paul. Under the head of popular prejudice, 1 will take briefly into consideration that strong and universal prejudice propogated egainst us with regard to the reading and use of the scriptures. Wnder the head of dogmatic misrepresentation, I will cast my eye, cursorily, in this introductory lecture, upon the ex- traordinary misrepresentations of the doctrines of our creed—misrepresentations which have gone abroad not merely from vulgar sources, but have recently been confirmed and settled, as far as it could be, by the authority of no less an assemblage of individuals than those who composed the Epis- copal Convention in the city of Philadelphia.— Those who know me are fully aware of the man- ner in which I conduct these lectures—without any disposition whatever to injure the feelings of any individual—without any intention to attack any other creed—with the most perfect respect for the convictions of those who may differ from me, but at the same time with a candid purpose, and manfy determination to vindicate my doctrme,and prove it to this community as far as my abilities will allow me,and my privileges asacitizen,having been “‘born £0,” will warrant me. Now, the question is, on what grounds has been founded that extraordinary prejudice against our church, under what it i ted and believed by many, that eur church is in- compatible with free institutions? There are here two things to be taken into consideration. First, did the Reformation give liberty ; and secondly, did the Catholic Church, since the days of the Re- formation, attempt to destroy it? It is generally believed by those who have taken but asuperficial view of history, and much more so by those who derive their views from the declamation which they hear trom the Leer of those opposed to us, that at the dawn of the Reformation, liberty ot conscience, liberty of speech, eed of the press —nay, universal liberty, beamed with its radiance upon a benighted earth ; and that the Catholic re- ligion stood always opposed to that light, and that wherever the Catholic religion had means and influ- ence, itattempted to extinguish, or if it could not totally extinguishit, to diminish that light, With regard to the question, did the Reformation give and authorise this universal liberty of conscience, I will not have recourse, in furnishing a reply, to any Catholic author. I will have recourse to an author universally known—to an author whose au- thority isevery where respected, not merely on ac- count of his general accuracy as an historian, on account of his philosophy asa critic, of hiscandor as a narrator of events, but likewise on account of his popularity as a man of extraordinary talents and of beautiful and correct taste. Mr. Roscoe, whose pea has glowingly apeito the bright age of Leo the Tenth. In his “ Life and Pontificate of Leo X.” 4 vols. octavo, he censures—these are his words—** the severity with which Luther treat- ed those who unfortunately happened to believe too much on the one hand, or too little on the other, and could not walk steadily on the hair- breadth line which he had presented.” Again, “whilst Luther was engaged in his opposition to the Church of Rome, he asserted the right of pri- vate judgment with the confidence and courage of a martyr, but no sooner had he freed his fol- lowers from the chains of papal delusion than he forged tor them others, in many respects equally intolerable.” Thus we have the confession of Roscoe, that Luther, who is generally considered the great patriarch of liberty, because he was the first of the Reformers, was as intolerant towards those who differed from him, as the Church of Rome is accused to have been with regard to him- self and his associates. Again, passing to the do- mination which Calvin exercised—going {rom one Reformer to another—we find that more than one thousand Lutheran ministers were proscribed with their wives and children, and reduced to beg the bread of charity. Thus we fiad Luther waging war against those who differed from him, and Calvin pro- scribing on the authority of an almost cotemporane- ous writer, thousands of Lutheran ministers with their wivesand children! Now, as it is not my inten- tion to enter at length into this all-important subject, but merely to give a cursory view of it, let briefly examine what has been the chai Catholics with regard to toleration, and a disposi- tion to extend freedom of conscience and liberty every where. We find that in Belgium, which is essentially a Catholic country, the people have sub- mitted to be governed by a Protestant King, and there has been no attempt to rebel against his au- thority. We find that Poland was persecuted, and yet there the Catholic religion was principally dom- inant. We find that no Catholic government ever united the King and the Church, making the King head of both Church and State. No. This was the effect of the liberty, as it is so termed, of the Reformation ; for we find that after that event, Prussia, Sweden, Denmark, Holland and Englan established this connection, and made the temporal sovereign ut the same time their spiritual ruler ; the King in these countries, or the Queen as it may be, being the Head of government both tem- poral and spiritual. Rome has opened her gates even to the Jews. Rome has given pro- tection to the unfortunate captives of Judea.— Since the days when they were brought captive to Rome after the siege and destruction of the venerable city of Vespasian—from that period down to the present they have been lected —mo-e than tolerated by all the sovereign pontiffs, and so sen they of the privileges which the Roman pontiffs have ever extended to their race in Ro is customary for them to present a1 and reapect to the sovereign Het Great res] remark, that w! orator, in his private Character amiable and social, was treating, on a recent occasion, of the restoration of his people tothe Holy Land, it surprised me much, that whi st he spoke of the light of the Reformation beaming over Christianity, he ed heen _ ee Ha pein in bed little . for their rights and privileges and protection, to that church, whiot he, it seemay with others, i not wil ling to acknowledge as worthy ‘even of a passing tribute of respect and veneration. Now, what shall I say of othe ge my native State? What shall I say of thet bar or of Catholic pilgrims, who, when they planted the for the fire! time on she barren shoporof the Bt, Mary’s River, unfurted at the sume time the banner of universal liberty, proclaimmg freedom of conscience to their persecutors who had driven them acriss Atlantic? Be it everremembered that Maryland—a tholic colony—was the first in thi a land to proclaim uni- versal freadom and liberty of conscience, Does thir ok like carrying ott principles of intolerance?— Does this present justifiable grounds for the minds of the with the fie and free Maryland, not. ft to were liberties of citizens of the nai much for the first part—sectarian intoleran I say of the second—popular prejudice—; dice which bases itself in a measure on the fulse- hood that the Roman Cat ple are prohibited the use of the sacred ares?’ Now how olten in the course of the winter, in lecturing upeP these subjects, did I not insist upon the - lacy of this assertion? Over and over again do the ministers of the Catholic contend and that the use of the saered scriptures never was forbidden—that the abuse of the sacred scriptures was and is forbidden. And here is the distinction. ft you use the sacred scriptures , then are you eniitled to an indiscriminate of them. If you abuse them, then it is evideut to any man of common sense that tha Bible should be closed against your abuse. A. thawte thes teens system Sf the tholic religion \ which as brought upon us so muc! use; and in the languege of the author of the Acts of the Apostles has “caused to throw dust into the eye.” But it is said—‘ you not allow the Bible to go into the hands of the peo- ple without note and comment.” Well, we do not allow the Bible to go into the hands of the people without note and comment, because we believe that they cannot un- derstand it unless they have an explanation. Recollect that there is no book more difficult to be understood than the sacred toe ra Now, if I place in the hands of a outh the works of an ancient classic writer, he may per lectly understand the words—he Leg 4 comprehend the substance—therefore, I would argue it is utterly unne for any classic critic to annex note and com- such a work. We have notes and comments to red scriptures on the very same principle. And if you take the trouble to enter ona amination of the necessity of such notes and (believe that you will ell, whether Catholics or other perusal of the Bible goes, it would be that people should be guided by landmarks, & resi sae = and comments. ang cre yous we in nooding post ou find in the xxii. chap and ‘i0th ¥- this, passage." And they that were with me saw, indeed, the light, but heard not the voice of him that spoke with me.’ ‘hen, pass on to the ix. chap and 7th v. of the same book, and you read—‘ And the Lord unto him, arise, and go into the city, and there it will be told thou what thou must do :-—now the men stood amazed, hearing,indeed, a voice but seeing no man.” Now, there is apparently flat contradiction, which would puzzle an: reater of the Bible. What, then, does th do? The Chure! ys, publish th language of the people, but the young mind may not be perplex: parent contradictions, so ‘hee they may not give up Christianity altogether, on the ground of contradictions in the sacred scriptures. We have, then, in our Bible a note on the passage just quoted, and we recur to ites we would to the explanatory comment appended to the text ofa ic writer, and we find this lanation—'' They heard not the voice, that is, they dist ished not the words, though they heard the voice.” This at once re- conciles the apparent contradiction. In another place— the 5th chapter of Romans, 20th v. —a young man reading the chapter falls upon this text, which to him must a) pear very contradictory—‘Now t! jaw entered in that might abound.” When the young mind pauses on tl ext, it will naturally become bewildered. What! was the law given in order that we might commit more sin? He would present it to his neighber and find him equally bewi!dered, but the chu:ch has foreseen and provided for this difficulty. The reader finds an explanatory note, ap- pended to the text—‘' not as if the law were given on purpose that sin might abound, but that it so happened, through man’s perversity, taking occasion to sin more from the prohibition of sin.” I merely adduce these texts, with the nooo pany comment, to show you the character of the notes, to show you at the same time the propriety, as we conceive, of having these notes and comments for the explanation, and understanding of those otherwise difficult and obscure passages. But is it true that it has been the Catholic Church. which has pro- scribed the general use of the Bible? Wasnot the Bible permitted to be read by the pat bs after the Reformation? Was this not the canse of liberty in land? Was not this the cause of the discovery of the ‘errors, su] ti tions, and abominations of Popery”? Was it not in con- sequence of this universal indulgence, that all the here- cies which preceded that event were demolished? Itis indeed generally believed by those who have not inves- tigated this matter, that as soon as Henry VIII. declared himself head of thechurch, the Bible was opened to the perusal of every body indiscriminately. But this is by no means the case. I quote from the History of England by Dr. Lingard, 4th chap.6 vol. ‘ Some years had pass- since Willian Tyndall, a tutor in a family in Glouces tershire, but of suspicious orthodoxy, fied into the Netherlands, and there printed a transl mof the Holy Scriptures, which speedily attracted the attention of the Archbishop of pepo who ordered all copies of it to be seized and burned, on the ground that it wasa false translation, interpolated with all sorts of heresies. This only increased the sale. The King interposed, having previously consulted the Bishops and a deputa- tion ot divines from each university, and issued @ pro- clamation advising all persons to give up their Bibles, de- claring that in respect of the malignity of the times, it was better that the scriptures should be explained by the learned, than be ex) to the misapprehension of the vulgar, promising that after the false and corrupt transla- tion had been destroyed, there would be one produced by the joint labors of several Catholic and learned persons.” ‘Thus we find that on the ground of error in the transl tion, England, immediately after the Reformation pro- hibited the general and indiscriminate use of that Bible. And it was in the same spirit that the Catholic church the Council ot Trent assembled, finding that the Christian world was torn into pices by the Bible, that is to say by the abuse of it, declared that it was necessary that there should be some restriction upon the reading of it, and Henry VIII issued o similar decree with regard to the translation of Tyndall. ‘The promise of another trans- Jation was not forgotten. It was urged by Cranmer, and finally on a petition of the convocation, a trans- lation composed partly of that by Tyndall and others was iswued under the fictitious name of ‘ Thomas Matthew,” as printer, by the royal license. An in- junction’ was issued ‘ordering a copy to be placed in every church, and allowing permission to all to con- sult it provided they did not disturb the preacher during service. This was after the permission was extended to rivate houses. ‘ But again,” says Dr. Lingard, “ he d formerly sanctioned the’ publication of an Engli version, and;gave pe: mission to all his subjects to read it; ‘but on its being represented to him tit even this autho rized version was filled with corrupt readings calcu- lated to mislead the unwary, and had thus not only gene- raved false teachers, but led to angry discuse‘ens amongrt the vulgar in ale-houses, and other places of resort, which had often ended in blows and breaches of the peace To remedy the first of these evils, it was recommended that the version of Tyndall he condemned altogether as crafty, false and untrue, and that there should be an authorized translation, without uote or comment ;—to stop the re- cond, a permission to read to others was recommended to be conferred on lords and gentlemen, but only in secret to their households, and to females of noble and gentle birth. (And row bear the next sentence in your minds !) Any other women, or any artificer, apprentice or jour- neyman, or laborer, if found guilty of opening the Bible was liable to.one month’s imprisonment.” This was the eer ~ eg fhe oi erdineed ay pe — !—I pass fe to the great and important part, tha is, dogmatic misrepre- sentitions of our creed. "It hes alweys teen to me g ter of astonishment, that men, erudite, eloquent, amiable, adorned with social virtues, lights and ornaments uf the country, if you choose, could, nevertheless, persist in these misrepresentations of our holy religion. Now, em I making too harsh an assertion—om I forgetting my or- dinary gentle character of lecturer ?—by no meaus. For instances, over and over again it his been repeated, and published, and it is believed by mi that we attribute infallibility to the Pope—to the rch—that even if the church tells us to believe that which isfalse,that we are to obey. This is but an article of our faith which is Bi misrepresented. For we believe in the infallibility of the church in this respect, that, according to our convic- tion, the church was established by Jesus Christ with the promise that the faith committed to it would be trans- mitt:d to all generations. We believe that the church is infallible only in testifying to the truth of that deposite— ‘as handing down unimpaired and unchanged that deposite from generation to generation, and that the ehurch of the 19th century testifies to the infallibility ofthe doc trines of the first century, during the time of the Apostles themselves. But that ifasaint for instance, be canonized, the church is not infalibly right. The church may have upon the calendar the name of some Frat HPS per: sonage, who may have been thought fit to be presented as amodel; but the church does not infallibly decide that he is in heaven—merely that he may be presented tothe ad- miration and veneration of the faithful, on account of the virtues which we believe he displayed whilst on earth — I merely allude, just now, to one article of our faith ; shall have ample opportunity of noticing many durin the course ofthese lectures. But there is one denun tion, which I fe 1--as one ‘: born so,” in the long" St. Paul—bound to deprecate and cast back. in charity, whence it came. For, as long as I have a voice and a mind, so long shall nd before this com teh and declare that 1 am no idolator—that my church is mpd Po of idolatry, no matter what may be the decision of a Convention in Philadelphia or else. where. The anthors of the famous ‘Pastoral Letter,” say in allusion to the Jews :—'The Jews for this sin were rejeoted ‘of God, and ever since have become outcasts from the divine favor. They leaned on that false princi- ple, that broken reed, that dangerous supposition, in be jieving that their sacrifices ond ritual observances atoned for sin; and, in consequence ot this, they rejected their true Messiah, and were, and are still rejected of Him. In this condition of excitement they will remain until they repent and believe the Rosrel, unto Abraham their Ya ther—viz : that by the blood of the ‘Lamb of God, slai trom the foundation of the world, and once tor out upon the cross, is the atonement made and sin! justified.” Till they believe in this true found: true era remain in their eit ‘The some may be said of those who believe in the false atonement set forth by the Romish mass in the decrees ef the Council of Trent. By these decrees that whole communion was thrown into a condition similar to that of the Jews; both the one and the other held and still hold that the sacrifice itself and the ritual solemnity do atone for sin. The arti cles of our Church afford us stable ground on which to stand in fae on from these errors of the Church of Rome. Take these articles in the sense of their framers, and as set forth and investigated by the most distin, ed divines, and therecan be no misteke. Now we are requested by uthors, the Right Rev. authors of this pastoral letter, to take the meaning of the thirty-nine articles accordin, them by the ablest and most dist! ished divines of the Church of England. 1 will take tl et their word. | will take the explanation of some of the most learned divines of the Church of England, and these will stand in direct opposition to their false assertions, and at once res cue our church from the charge of idolatry thundered out against ua in their anathemas But before I quote these extracts, I cannot but make one remark with regard to the charge of idolatry. They say, not in a very Chris- tian manner, for I must use that expression, that we Ro- man Catholics are no better than Hottentots or Manome dans, ifwenre idolators Now, ifso, I contend that the great object which Jesus Christ had in view has not been effected on the earth. How #0? Ifthe Roman Catholics are idolators because they believe Christ in the real pre- sence, and adore him in the Kucharist, then, at least, ac: cording to thei the third to the sixteenth, and all others- Chareh of Rome, the whole world w: nged into idole- ty, end where was the efficacy of the cross, when we were taught to believe that Christ came to destrey idolatry and countless multitudes, the and at idelators, and professors of the pure Christian religion are reduced to the convention in Philadel id Unitarian cally out to adoriny to wh 4 Sasietinet man! they > yet they allow us the most ‘* distin, Bellomi "The Kin wl J cry aetantand truly edarable in the Eucharist” Therefore, the King was an Idolator, and Bi joie ity. Again, Bishop io tl cou! city. ne ooo treatin an the Euchsslst’” Book ii, ch ii, Erker cage lly olics are idolators, op Forbes, one o! the Rplnopalcherch, i an idolator also! 1 take the “explanation of another of those “disti divines”— thatof Thorndyke 896, wi ys, pegeas the may be adored wherever they are, a which he communicates so requires sacrament of the Eucharist a that inward honor which we his Bishops—more modern, howe’ latter times, “ex divines” of the Church of England. tory, they elso say in their “Pastoral Letter,” a practice leading to idolatry, accordi: tei explanation of the most distin, jere —Let net the ovations for the church of Christ, almost from the very time of the apos- tles, to any more rejected by Protestants as unlawful and vain. Let them renounce the judgment of the primitive church, and admit a rupted profession o! well as in private, attend to last @ peace so earnestly desired by all saintly and pious men may be Church, in fie ,Bishop we Chie! mnalatees cf prayer; but that in |, and for all in general, they inter with God by their supplications and mediate by their | in be ” Thus, then, Dr. Montague explains the article in question, in direct opposition to the Philadelphia convention. | A, treatis “ Tt ie no impiety to they of th Church do— ray for us! Holy Peter! bishops, assembled in council, Rey Or us!” And yet hi ec! that it is any examination of the doctrines just alluded absurdity of sccusing us of idolat: Christ in the Euch: admit that Christ sug we can commit ide! he may mani Boswell asked Dr. Johnson—“ Pray Doctor, what do you think of the idolatry ofthe mass?” ‘‘Call it not idolatry,” seidthe Doctor, ‘ for the Catholics believ: Christ is present and they adore him.” These are the re- mene which I propose ure. on the vindication of the doctrines of the mass—purgato- ry—transubstantiation- of this election; the State has gone for Polk and Dallas by a majority of six thousand according to the democrats, and three thousand according to the whigs. whig gain. The State is for Clay, of course. cratic gain is 583. This is too small; the State ie, therefore, for Clay. 360 in 49 counties. Anotheraccount 872. Neither account will secure the State to Clay. fore, set down for Polk. of 977. The democratic majority in 1843 was 2,000, and 1,700 at the lastelection. Clay’s chances are the best. Through the polite attention of a gentleman, who has just arrived from Gambia, we have obtained several items of information, which probably may be interesting to many of our readers. friends and patrons in this country could wish for ; the coast generally from Siera Leon down to the Bite of Benin, has been very unhealthy for the past twelve months; this cause alone has been sufficient to paralize the efforts of the colonists to a great ex- tent; many among them who have survived the disastrous effects of the climate, areyet much re- duced, their constitutions so utterly prostrated, that they are capable of doing but little to sustain life. In connection with the inhospitable clim: colonists find in the native tribes in their vicinity but little if any dispos their views; the negroes generally on that section of the coast, are averse to conforming to civiliza tion in any shape, unless it is perfectly apparent to them that they are to gain some immediate advan tage; they are treacherous and much addicted to thieving, whenever a chance offers. denominations have the same obstacles to contend with as the colonists; indeed, in some cases their situation is more unpleasant, especially those sta- tions which exist among the least civilized tribes; several of such stations are also distinguished for their insalubrity. friends of the colony, as well as those of the mis- sions; however, it is to be hoped, that the descrip- tion of affairs on that portion of the coast may be somewhat coloured; such possibly may be the case in this instance, as the gentleman from whom we obtained our information, probably has been a se- vere sufferer, and if he has drawn a gloomy pic- ture, it is quite natural ter of Mayor Harper to Mr. Le Clerc, on recciving the painting of Henry Hudson, presented to the Corporation :— the abandonment of Henry Hudson b; cheerfully add my opinion to that o other, gentlemen to the exposition given of millions still attached, re ! And let them beware, for the m, * You are idolators, ‘a man whom you call aGod.” Thus we see ity is reduced by the essumption of he tte nar on it the ex; 8 settitsaea er eas coat ledges Jesus Chiat trtly Andrews explains iether ore that enzo be. re 9, . * We adore with St. Ambrose, the flesh of + Chtint in . stories » Therefore, if the Cath- eure of ” book vii, ch. 30, p. and blood of Christ and must be adored christian, where the custom of the church wi And, is not the roper occasion to exprers we ist his “ Epiloy he sa; mn” given of it , of course, divines. in the same learned Bishop Forbes rises up before nd thus in his “ Discourse on Purgatory,” proclaims cient practice of prayer and makin; , Tecaived throughout the univers rectice sanctioned by the uninter- so many ges, and in public as js duty, not es es- jially recemmended by the divine law, but as - le and always approved by the church that at restored to the Christain Church.” Here, himself and all his school in the Episcopal rect opposition to the assertion that we ators, the Bishop explains the article in question. exclaim against us for an invocation of the they say, look at this article in con of the mest distin- then, letusdoso, Dr. Monta- ler and Norwich, in his “Anti. hed divines.” Wel in his en the ‘ Invocation of Saints,” page i it is wrong—that it is the grossest impiety— idolatry. I do not now go into or at all enter upoi jo. The ry, because we worship is, however, very manifest. If we hi to be adored, it is impossible that in worshipping him whenever jifest himself, Therefore, it was that when e that Jesus offer in this introductory lec Tn the ceeding lectures I shall enter at length id the invocation of ta. Election Returns. Micuican.—It seems useless to give the details Kentucxy.—All the returns received show a Nortn Caroxina.—In thirty counties the demo- Groraia.—One account gives a whig gain of It is, there- InpIana.—Seventeen counties give a whig gain From Monrovia anp Care Patmas, Arrica.— The colonial system does not work so well as its he n to favour them and The missions established by the several religious These things certainly are quite discouraging to the Le Crerc’s Paintine.—The following is the let- Mayor's Orrice, New Yorx, Nov. 7, 1844. Ma. J.B. LeCurrc: Dean Sin—I hod the pleasure, es you know, of attend ing the exhibition of your beautiful Painting Feprespating crew; and who accompanied me, and the public gener hat itis a work which evinces very great genius an . Fam informed that you have generously presented the painting to the city; you will please socept hy sincere thanks, as you will probably receive the thavi Council officially, for the splendid offeri I sincerely trust that the citizens generally, will appre- ciate your Utd ‘and generosity sufficiently to call and see Sabah on Ks tata tully yours, (Signed) f the Common JAMES HARPER. Mistake Corrected. di o Bennett, Esq.— 1k i— I ame constant reader of the Herald, and think, on the whole, that its report of ‘matters and things” is about as near “‘ the thing” as any in the city; but the account your reporter gave of the services in Mr. Shimeall’s Church on Sunday (yes. terday), was enough to make a saint—almost lose his patience! He lugged in Dr. Potts and Duane street Church with the Episcopal (St. Jude’s) Church ; and the reason was owing to a contused idea on the part of him bi Fo ga to give a true story. "he last named Rev. is preaching in the same building—St. Jude’s Church 16 to be. in 6th Avenue, Dr. P.’s in the 5th, as you have before stated. Farr Pray. Answer.—We admit the soft impeachment. Our reporter did mistake Mr. Shimeall for Dr. Potts. Not knowing either, personally, he went to the building where Dr. Potts preaches to report him. He supposed the first parson he caught was the real bird; but it seems Dr. Shimeall and Dr: Potts preaches in the same building—one up stairs, the other down stairs. That's the truth. Qo “Rice,” the original and only correct deli- neator of the negro character, has returned to this city, after playing two successiul engagements at the Cheenut Theatre, Philedelphia. His opera of “Utello™ was a great hit, and ran ten mghts. He was greeted on Saturday night at the Chatham Theatre, in the opera” of “ Bone Squash,” by one of the most crowded houses of the season. ed a series of three lectures on the above subject, last evening, in Palmo’s Opera House. The at- tendance was but limited, considering the vast amount of valuable information promised, and the circumstances under which the learned lecturer now appealed to the public. The following ex- tract from the’Dr.’s address to the public on the occasion, will fully explain the circumstances:— live ited States. are that time, has exceeded 300,000 date the lectures, and render them rere single bight by fire. pope ofthese 8t think the lectures beneficial, will, aid in accom this ce attending @ single course like that now offered. that at the beginning of the last century, it was en- tirely owing to the enquiries and study of a black- smith and a glazier, that the discoveiy of an at- mospherie engine, the original of the present steam engine, The atmospheric too expensive laid aside. land wi business of a mathematical instrument maker, to be repaired. This person being of a very ingenious turn of mind, d 1 D . article betore him, and directed his attention to re- medy them, and the reault was the introduction of the condensing engine at present in use, about the year 1784. Theprinciples of this e . known; its power was caused by the swelling of water when heated into steam; for instance, one ft high. Very few of the great inventions and disco- veries of the last century were made by educated or scientific persons. was that made by a turer took a review o! lin on electricity. attention a England, and Lavosier rected to the nature and that both foxygen and hydrogen gas could be dissolved into water, and water coul produce hydrogen gas. could not fail of being clearly understood by all present, and clearly demonstrated the too generally understood composed of the same elements; by these researches the decomposition was full e lecturer then proceeded to take notice. of the far- ther inquiries of Cavendish in his ascertaining the weight.of the globe, this was ascertained, pher and Dr. Maskalon, about the same period. He then proceeded to take a review of the great disco- veries made in astronomy during the last century, dwelling at considerable length on those of Hers- schell, minutely describing the apparatus he used, and the vast amount of astronomic: gained thereby ; and, in the course of his remarks, alluded to the astronomical apparatus and recent discoveries of Lord Rosse, in Ireland. ed Doctor then proceeded to take a review of the discoveries made in centi an Areata of all was that made by Lavosier, who had discovered ;a chemical language, which now become so.very general as not to be noticed. He then proceeded to netice the discovery of gal- vanism, which was quite the effect of accident, ari i ‘ severe cold or catarrh. This led to the discovery of the Voltaic pile by Voltaire, who was indeed the true discoverer of what is at the present day un- justly termed galvanism, or at that time “animal electricity.” At this observed, that heshould now conclude, otherwire his ing wherewith to vary the lecture in the way. of- illustration, but should resume the subject on Wed- nesday evening. lars of these discoveries more fully, whiel ely ep at the same time very amusing ; inde iectures affords will be found much greater than that produced by six months reading of the most talented works on the various subjects treated on ; at the same time delivered in such forcible, elo- vent, tHes, that those of the most limited education cat. not fail to understand the lecturer fully. Science and Art in the Present Age. This learned and scientific gentleman commenc- these lectures will be applied am extensive illustrative appara- continue the fir of public ition of in ev ‘he aggregate number of the persons. ‘The profits derived were invested in apparatus to eluci- ‘The whole of this apparatus has destroyed in a nature and ¢! an; ; that benefit pices suspended. he apparatus may be soon reconstructed, become who hing The gentleman commenced hislecture by stating known to this country — : cane was Fae to be for ordinary purposes, and it was Some time after this that a small _mo- ngine in one of the universities of Scot- gent to Watt, who then carried on the was made jiscovered the imperfections in the ine were well int of water would produce eighteen times its ulk in steam; and every cubic inch of water in hig state was capable of raising a ton weight a foot One of the most remarkable preter's. boy. Here the lec- the discoveries of Frank- In_ the same epoch, the avendish and Priestley, in in France, was di- composition of gases, of be made to The gentleman proceeded o show how these facts were ascertained, which reat antagonists, water and fire, were ascertained. The and showed by what means both by that great philoso- information The learn- chemistry during the last enumerated several; but said |the had from the fact of a lady laboring under a int the learned gentleman address would become tedious, as he had noth- (Applause ) ‘Want of space prevents our giving the ‘icu- were the amount of information one of these and plain language, so free from technicali- Grgen Room anp Litgrary News.—Chevalier Wikoff, of Fanny Elssler memory, has, it is said, sold out the Republic newspaper—not stopped it— exclusive of the editors, to Morris, Willis & Co., of the Evening Mirror. What he got wehave not heard, but his lesses on the Republic reached $16,000 or $18,000. The Chevalier has now gone back to the theatrical business again, and is said to be the agent of one or more of the theatres in London and Paris. Heretofore John Povey has been busy in that line—but honest little John must give way to the Chevalier. It is said that Miss-Taylor, of the Olympic, has been engaged for the Princess Theatre, London, by Chevalier Wikoff, for a term of three years, at $50 per week. Forrest, Miss Cliften, Hackett, and several other American players, are, according to rumor, en- gaged for the London theatres, perchance the French—whether by the general agent Chevalier Wikoff, we don’t know. This kind of business, of engaging actors, and actresses particularly, must be much more congenial to the Chevalier than throwing away $17,000 on a ricketty newspaper, merely to gratify a little bad temper, by which he is made the dupe of others. Park Benjamin, the great peet, has published his last satirical work in Boston—it is not sold to the Democratic Review. Park, who is the Lord By- ron in little of the present age, has returned to the editorship ot the New World—and not sooner than it wanted him. Epes Sargent, and his brother John, who con- ducted the late Republic newspaper after it turned to Clay, have returned to their literary and legal occupations. Epes is engaged om a new gem of literature, which will make a greater noise when it comes out than did his recent editorial writings. John sticks to the law. James N. Reyaolds has abandoned politics, and goes strong for law practice. George P. Morris, the Burns of America, is busy waiting the movements of his muse, who will strike out in six months a new batch of songs, or a new opera, that will create a sensation. Mr. Hawkins, whois now in New York, expects to leave the city for Quebec in a few days, with his newly engraved plate of the City of Quebec, which he is now publishing under the special sanc- tion of the Mayor and Corportion of that city, Theatricals, &c. Nimvo’s.—Mr. John Dunn takes a benefit; to-night, this house. He is a comedian of high merit, and has created hosts of friends and edmirers during his engage- ment here, The bill for to-night is unusually attractive. Mr Barton, the eminent flutist, has left this city, and taken up his permanent residence in Philadelphia. He is an artist of the highest ofder, and a very estimable man. The Augusta Theatre open this evening with a very good company. The Eagle Street Theatre, Buffalo, closed for the season on Saturday evening last. Mr. Lewellen’s farewell benefit took place on the previous evening. Personal Movements. Governor Porter has sppointed Luther Kidder, Esq. late Senator from the Luzerne District, Judge of that District. Mr. John Vorse has been appointed Post Master at Pal- myra Post Office, vice Dr. DD. Hoyt, removed. Prateie on Fire.—Frem Captain Lamothe, of the steamboat Luella, which arrived to-day trom Alton, we learn thet on yesterd a fire broke out in the Monticello k of Alton, and raged with great Hi ry. by the fire, and the fences, rod ad dgstroyed.' The farm of Mr. Corey, the Superintendsnt of the Monticello Female Semi much injured, and all the buildings on itconsu: egonpi thew lings. There came in. qrprenene, fens the.country h amd mony of the citizens of Alton went out ‘o render assist i the of the fire and savin; race ay Tehe fight, won visile from this city lat evening, @ distance of more than twenty miles. — St. Louis » Now. 1. om rounded as we are by the unnumbered blessings and political During the ra of her increase; 2 the Dainese ‘ela ae end nenenetweere bes been gradu surely extending its benign influente. Actuated by ite diffusive benevolence, Christian Mission- aries have not only labored among the waste and desolate places at home, but have gone forth to proclaim “Christ and him cfu the earth :—Education, in all its Le open is rf an increase of knowledge awong all c! nity :—Temperance, the handmaid of Religion, is making deeper and wider im; fort into many desolate households; w! Let us, then, as one on the day desi |» day asidataa cores ont ne veeie. aa Walkens-at lite, and ‘ame thanks unto God. And with our thanksgivings let us im New York. PROCLAMATION. By WM. C. BOUOCK, Governor of the State of New York. Another year has nearly drawn to and sur y ly drawn poles. wt orouldencocnd grece, nothing ona be mess heenesing 0d Lo oot ooo Ke all secular en , and de- vote at least one our own, to devout Thanksgiving and praise tothe Au- thor of the Cor ord ‘unmerited mercies we, as a peo- , are permitted to enjoy. 1 do therefore most condially recommend that Tuurspay ree TweLrTH pay or Decrmssn next, be observed atthe State, as a da: wagements { y of the many ive me aliewed to call of Prayer, Praise, and in Heaven, our gra- | Thanksgivi to our F oy Bis meroitul pe “ idence we hay mitted t y v we have been 10 enjey the comforts of life, and our us, social, Privileges have been continued to us— | past year, we have been Somerton, the maligna:t disease, and the earth ielded wins has been felt in all ified” to the dark and benighted regions of lasses of the commu- ssions, and sending joy and com- peace and ity are dwelling in our midat. See mi our prayers for a continuance of the numerous blessings we enjoy, and especially that there may be an ; or of the Spirit of God, to revive pure and unde- fus ; the best security of our civil and institutions. In witness whereof, 1 have hereunto affixed my name. and the privy seal of the State, this eighth day of (L. $] November, in the year of our Lord,one thousand | eight hundred and forty-four. ‘WM. C. BOUCK. Grngrat Montcomery.—On Thursday last a Tablet was placed on the rock of Cape Diamond, near the spot where General Montgomery fell, with his two Aides de Camp, Majors McPherson and Cheeseman, at Pres-de-Ville, in the attack uron Quebee by the American Forces, in the winter of 1775—6. The Tablet is raised about fifty feet from the road and bears the following inscription : HERE MAJOR GENERAL MONTGOMERY FELL, DeceMpeR 3let, 1776. \ It has long been a matter of surprise to our neighbours of the United States, who, during the summer months, pour in acontinual stream of visitors to our celebrated city, that no clue could be found by them to indicate the spot where Mon! ery fell. The event must ever’ remain memorable in our Colonial history as terminating’ the last hostile struggle before the City of Quebec. Quebec is much indebted to Mr. Hawkins for the labor he has bestowed in bringing before the public the Le 4 histori‘al reminiscences connected with the city ; and| this tablet, erected by him, is a fresh proof of the interest! he takes in juating the recollection of every inei dent connected with the many warlike and memorabl events illumming the annals of our American Gibralter. Quebec Paper. A Posgr.—A would be brophet lately said in one of his sermons, that redeem the world and all things therein: ie for them. native pulled out two five ir and asked him to fork over the # Every stranger who comes to our cit: nent bY all means to Fo, and see the grand “Battle of Bunke STA Waghe at the Coliseum, ‘They ‘ought never too home till they have done so. It is worth a journey of 100 miles to see No exhibition can equal it. The New York Dissector—A Quarterly) Journal of Medicine, Su lagnetism, Mesmerism, and the Collateral Seiences, wit ‘Mysteries’ and Fallacies o: Faculty—edited by' Henry Hall Sherwood, M.D. Price ofthe Turik number of this work was published on the number of this work w: on the Ist the which comp! fetes the first volume. bers for the second volume ean be supplied wit! the numbers of the first, on application to: the editor, No. 10; hampers stree a fotive Power of Organic Life, and the Symptoms and Treat t of Chronic Di Second Editi by Henry | Hil Sherwood, MD. New York, isi; Wiley fe Pataarn, 10 | Broadway—Price is work gives a concise and interesting view of the nervouw: system, and its connection with the motive, spiritual netic power of organic life—illustrated with 30 engray othe buly. work from which a knowledge of this im subject can be ol . To the Editor of the Heraid— pbit—The “Courrier des Etats Unig,” of this, city, of the st instant, page 504, has republished, under the head of ‘Anecdote: historiques sur la Cour de Naples,” a nove from the French r "La Patrie,” relating to the causes of the den Christine, the first wife of the present King of th: 'wo Sicilies, stating in substance, ‘without fear of being con | tradicted,” that one evening, as the Quern was about to si down at’a gambling table, her royal husband removed he | in jests and caused her to fall in such an indeliente posi fs iincall ifeadien of he Goats ther. rcrent blushed tp e Whit of ire) 3 that Jueen indignant id to King—I thought od saarried potye but 1 find that. f have gt hand to a lazzarone; that the latter thereupon gave he ful slap on her Hight cheek (although he. is not lett funded); that the Queen was then enciente, and. gave birth « ven months after, tp a prinees and that affer & confinement 0 days, she died from he, pains, the consequences. of Falfeand Ret pcediog orety The trae facts are the following:— ade Sa One evening in May or June, 1! ‘Queen Marie Christine a Sard{nian princess, much beloved by her royal husband, the: 0049 24 years old, was seatedat ay pene in company with tw ladies. A chamberlain announced the approach of the King, w indies ‘and. the Queen herself arose. {vor , ‘King went affectionately to, her to sit down and continue her musi ‘and wishin | ight to her left side, casually removed wit small music chair of the Queen, just as sh. lown, and she fell to the floor before any on Her husband feelingly helped, her him, with some littleemetion, ‘this the at ofa Iaszarone rathér "han King.” vPhe ol i, Plat acc » apologt: ea and th gh enciente, it from eral yal ihe Queen, in the ease asa ‘ eX contigeraple time § ae ioe hak L sorters piers | tian with his brother, Dou Carla, in. the’ Queen's presence, a d sing outof his unwillingness to admit Don Carlo’s wife,’ dame Penelope Smith, at \d it is probable that | acea tany have suffered somewhat from her agitation and fer Fi Jogh of January, 1096, she save birth to th prince asin Leopold, Bake of Calabrin, who, noy enjoys perfect health: and on same died, not from the fall, nor. from the “slap,” #0. ealum: invented, for during the spven mouths pregealng ent, si ever heard to cemplain of any but Dains atten jetion; and indeed the Sard would not ‘over in'sileuce such an t have really been offered to. the Queen Marie Christ er cause of herdeath was the natural difficulty which accom, nied her accouchment, and up to the time that the above quote/| piece o1 malicious scandal was put in circulation, no one ha ever dreamed of any other. Deign, sir, to insert the refutation of ‘La Patrie,” and agcer | the assurance of my reap . Thave the honor to be your most ob’t, serv’t. DE ATTELLIS SANT’ ANGELO. |} New York, November 11, 1844. To old maids, bachelors and others —Di you want a first rate head of hair for three shillings? If 0, « a three jing bottle Jones’ Coral Hair Restorative. lt wi nee ky, and beautiful, and. keep it so a lop ime, fo) op its falting out, clear it of scurvy’ ‘Buy only at the sign of i dandruff. the American Engle, £ Chatham street; 323 Broadway; or 139 Fulton street, Brookly: power. of the Des ‘er.—Use the ‘ icine and you will be safe. Mr, Harnburger, whose chil neatly Killed by worms, heard of Dr. Sherman's Wor he used” one box. ‘The first dose the child too away tn fet of the taps wort, and two or the don Tiealth: He’ has since. then recon jes in Beaver Lo: brow restored the child to perfect mendedfthem to many fa sy ce of his realdence, and never otal “ing stan + effect. Man fended hit child, and could not benefit it, nor cou atten they te what ailed him. Go to Dr. Sherman’s, 106 Nassau street, wher You will get the genuine article, or te his agents, 227 Hiudso street; 188 Bowery; ast Broadway ger Bui Philadelphia; and 6 Sea race Medical Advice in Diseases.—Th members of the New York College of Medicine and Pharmec fablished for the ion of quackery, continue to dire their ictilar attention all diseases of a private pature, an can confidently promise to persons requirag medical treatmen and permanent cure, without injury to the it from, busi ‘iu itation ¢ mem! ' aneipel hospital in, E Sereol the gomlaits ramds for couedl tation dal » M. to .M. vrme--Advice aud Medici teed. MEORTANT TO COUNTY SINVALIDS.—Persar iving in the country, and finding it inconvenient to make pe doa, eca'have fgrwarded to them wchest contain ie to erform a radical eure, byatating the Seema feoieed slaves, hy uand ene oping 83, or paid, W. 8. RICHARDBON, M. D., Agent, Sfhes and Consulting Rooms of the College, 96 Nessau's iy from livi Ladies, why do the Bpanith Lan W alabaster life like you use common prepare: and complexion. Just try a box sicin a pure livin hi . Itwill give ke whiteness, and (8. warranted not to injure - Sold, price 25 cents a box, at 82 Chatham street; 323 Broadway and 199 alton street, Brooklyn. tue bee yes Mogae . tian an prep Medicine and yr naa ‘This refined and high rifying, qualiti od bs, is confidently recom finitel, to any extract of befc the public "and may be relied on as a certain remedy for a diner Mag froma an itnpure state of the blood, auch + porafalag salisenent: Zr sedan opmsconen weseipee,vlserta i ints, ne iy eor , a] bain in the bones @ diveass arising from the secondary effect syphilis eran we of mercury, fa sing . “im cases Coens forwerded oul parts of theUslon, KB BAe liberal discount to ‘wholesale purchasers. ae BNTICHARDSON, M. D., Agent. ® Parisian Alterative Mixture, fo enerev " t cure of primary or secondary syphil Peerceatial ae, i Psarat cin cicrsnah dsm aa mie teatien Grice Sa inane fully FStdicine gu all parts of «1 jon. ati — IB HICHARDSON, Mi. D., Agent. Vonstitutional Debit red.—The Tont ‘ edivine and Pharmacy ¢ ided for all ease ‘or excess of any kin terility, or barrennes: is } nek and ent x9 a pro the Uo, 5 Med 95 Ni foie of the College MIGHANDBON, M.D, Agent