The Daily Worker Newspaper, June 13, 1931, Page 5

DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, SATURDAY, JUNE 13, 1931 _ THE FIVE YEAR PLAN--BUILDING A SOCIALIST WORLD Districts! “Save Daily” Tag Days June 26, 27, 28! Make Preparations Now! The yesterday's article showed that the Sov- iets use their power to build Socialism and to elim- inate capitalism in Russia. Capitalist economy pro- duces for profits and therefore causes unemployment and Starvation. Socialism produces for need and therefore will do away with unemployment and starvation, The Five-Year Plan is a tremendous step toward Socialism. It was preceeded by the NEP. The NEP followed war Communism. The article shows the respective roles of War Communism, the EP, and the Five Year Plan in ine construction of Socialism. = By MAX BEDACHT. IV. The Five Year Plan. The Five Year Plan is a sectional plan of minimum accomplishments ,in the building Sf socialism. Within five years it provides forza fixed minimum advance in the de- velopment of industry, in the development of electric power and of means of transpor- tation; it demands a fixed minimum of ad- Vance in socialization of all production in- eluding agricultural, a minimum of advance of the living and cultural standards of the toiling Russian masses, and last but not least, a minimum accomplishment in the dissolution of the capitalist class. *:The hysteric ravings of the American capitalists about the Five Year Plan and the echoes of these ravings in the New York Evening Post and other capitalist papers cam-be understood only in the light of these collective aims of the Plan. Mere industrial development of Russia could never result in such universal capitalist antagonism. The *erime supreme” of the Soviets is that they éarry through this industrial development without and even against the capitalist glass. The. capitalists of the world desire nothing more than the development of Russian in- dustries—for their private profits; but they abhor, denounce, condemn and anathemize industrial development of Russia in the in- terests of the Russian masses. However, Hoover and Wolll, Fish and Hillquit, the New York Evening Post and Chicago Tribune notwithstanding, the Soviets pro- ceed successfully with the building of so- sdaliam on the basis of the Five Year Plan. Capitalism Cannot Plan Its Economy. Although the Five Year Plan is primar- ; ily a@ series of economic measures, yet its major import is political. Its very starting point is planned economy. Planned eco- nomy is impossible under capitalism. Planned economy bases itself on an accurate and detailed analysis of the co-relative facts 4nd factors of public needs and the means to supply these needs. Planned economy systematically develops public needs as well #8 the méans to supply them. ea Cannot fulfill any of the two provisions of | planned economy. It cannot ascertain ste lic needs. Capitalist commodity production isnot based orf needs; it is only concerned with the ability to buy. Capitalist com- inddity production planned on the basis of Public needs would lead to hopeless over- woduction; those that have the greatest xééds usually have the least ability to buy; and. capitalism floes not care for the needs of anyone who is unable to pay. But capitalism is also unable to distribute production systematically. Systematic or- ‘ganization of production means the assign- ment of definite production quotas to every factory, workshop or mine; it means the @imination of small and inefficient and the Be ng of the big, modern and efficient establishments. Such a distribution of pro- duction by a capitalist government would violate the inviolable rule of American capi- {ali8m that business must go into the goy- érninent, but that under no conditions must government go into business. It would also wielate the blessed capitalist individualism ‘and-would kill the doubly blessed capitalist tive; it would result in a cat-and-dog fight between the capitalists themselves. 2‘[he Five Year Plan therefore presupposes ‘the political fact of a workers’ government. ‘All the ink spilled by “liberal” capitalist economists about the advisability of adopt- a five year or any other plan for capi- t economy in America to overcome the ‘present crisis, is therefore just so much -waste of ink. . Five Year Plan Builds Socialism. Starting from the political premise of a workers’ government, the Five Year Plan proceeds to its aim: Sociaism. To achieve this aim it must not only overcome the phy- sical resistance of the remnants of capitalist .. ‘elements in Russia, the NEP-men and the *Kulaks, but it must also overcome the men- tal resistance of large masses of poor peas- entry. These poor peasants are individual- ists—according to the capitalists the. peas-_ ants are “natural” and therefore incurable Ahdividualists. However, their individualism fs only the reflection of the primitive in- dividual tools with which they till their tiny parcels of land. It is not the “natural in- dividualism” of the peasant that erected the fence around his small holding. It is the primitive individual farm implement; it is this, implement which can only be used on emalll parcels of land, together with the fence around his small parcel of land, that maintained the individualism of the peas- ant. The tractor, the gang-plow, the culti- vator and the combine will break down the’ fence. _ In America too the “individualism” of the farmers is cited by the capitalists as the un- conquerable barrier to socialism. But de- , eslenmenta in Shean too, disprove the eternal character of this individuaiism. Though it is .3 a rule incomparably larger than the holding of the European peasant, the farm of the poor American farmer is still too small to make profitable individual use, for instance of a combine, even if the farmer had the money to buy one. Yet this combine by its very existence and use else- where lowers the cost of productief of grain and thereby reduces the poor farmers’ in- come. Therefore even the poor American farmer wil have to look toward collectiviza- tion of small farms to make possible the use of the most modern farm machinery. This is the only possible method to lower the cost of production for the poor farmers. The need for such collectivization in America grows daily. Its growth undermines the “natural individualism” even of the Amer- ican farmer. Tractor Breaks Down Peasants Ferce and Individualism. With the fence around his holdings will also gradually break down the mental capi- talist fence around the ideas of the Russian peasant. As the primitive implements which can only be used individually on small hold- ings are exchanged for modern implements which demand the breaking down of the fences between the small holdings, and also demand collective efforts of the peasants, there will also take place a change of the narrow individualist peasant of the capital- ist days into the collective agriculturist of socialism. The economic fact of the tractor causes the political fact of death to the peasants’ individualism. Therefore the Five Year Plan tackles the problem of socializa- tion of agricultural production and of the agricultural producer with an extensive pro- gram of collectivization of the small peasant economies throughout the cougtry by means of the tractor. Of the present population of the Soviet Union of avout 161 millions, approximately 125 million are rural (agricultural) popula- tion. This rural population is distributed over about 26 million individual farms. Less than a million of these farms are kulak holdings. The rest are poor and middle peasants. The present qttota for collectiv- ization of agriculture of the Five Year Plan demands that 50 per cent, or about 60 mil- lion of the agricultural population must be gathered in collectives by the end of 1931. At this moment in May, 1931, this quota is already fulfilled. At the beginning of the Five Year Plan, in October, 1928, 2.3 per cent of the Soviet peasant holdings were collectivized. On April 20, 1981, 47.1 per cent had been collectivized. | This collectivization also undermines the | existence of the kufak. The kulak is the village usurer. According to an apt Amer- ican expression, the kulak farms the farm- ers.. The collectivization of the small peas- ant holdings is'making the poor peasant economically independent of the kulak. At the same time it rapidly increases the pro- ductivity of farming. These facts make the kulak an entirely unnecessary public nuis- him accordingly. The kulak is told categori- cally to stop living on the labor of others and to work himself for a living. This is one of those terrible “crimes” of the Soviets which neither Hamilton Fish nor Morris Hillquit, neither Hoover nor Woll, neither the A. F. L. nor the Daughters of the Amer- ican Revolution are ever willing to forgive. The whole capitalist world complacently watched the iron heel of czarist oppression and exploitation on the necks of 125 mil- lions of Russian peasants. But now when the masses of toilérs of Russia tell the hand- ful of kulaks: “Work if you want to eat and work yourself, not others,” then the capi- talist world gets indignant and the spokes- men of the American government solemnly declare that they could not recognize the Soviet Union because it violates every prin- ciple America stands for. And it seems that the Soviet Union is guilty too. But at any rate—capitalist noise or no noise—the class of ‘kulaks is dissolved in the process of col- lectivization of agriculture and thus an anti- social substance is removed out of the way of the socialist advance. Industrialization Is Necessary for Collectivization. Without tractors and gang-plows and combines there can be no collectivization of agriculture. Therefore this collectivization is a problem of industrialization. To be able to supply the tractors and combines, factories must be provided to produce them. These factories need motive power and necessitate the erection of electrical. power stations. They also need steel, iron, tin, copper, etc. These things cannot be supplied without the development of metal mining and the estab- lishment of smelters, rolling mills, ete. Industrialization of the whole machinery of production is not only necessary for the collectivization and socialization of agricul- tural production. It is in itself an -indis- pensable step in the building of socialism. The whole industrialization program pre- supposes the development of the means of transportation. Railroads must be built. This takes more steel and more machinery. Autos must be manufactured. More raw material and'still more machinery are need- ~ed to accomplish this. And roads must be built. Roads cannot be built without cement, asphalt and tar. Consequently the manu- facture of these necessities must be taken in hand. There can be no running motor vehicles without fuel. Therefore the oil production must be increased and oil refin- eries must be built and equipped. Steam- ships must be built. Rivers must be made navigable and canals must be dug. Chemi- cals are needed for fertilizer to increase the productivity of agriculture and to fit into the mechanization of agricultural produc- tion. agriculture in turn must free additional jabor for the further development of in- dustry. The Five-Year Plan is designed to supply thése needs. It is an intricate scheme of in- dustrial construction and industrialization of The increase of the productivity of | ance, —> The workers’ government deals with agriculture which is to solve all of these prob- Force Withdrawal of Bar to Hunger March in Illunois| (CUNTINUED FROM PAGE ONE) contingent will leave. Each section will ride to city and town limits where the trucks and automobiles will be temporarily aban- doned and the delegates, each wear- ing a band reading “Illinois Hunger March,” will parade ‘through the town. Then the automobiles will be resumed, with additional cars joni- ing from each town along the way. Courthouse Square, Joliet, will be the scene of the first meetnig the Chicago section will hold. The Chi- cago section will stop over night in Bloomington. Fifteen hundred miners in Spring | Valley elected five delégates to the Hunger March yesterday. The miners here are mobilizing for a meeting in the Public Square for the marchers when they pass through on their way to pringfield. Prior to the meet~- ing in Spring Valley, a Peru-La Salle mass meeting will be held in the largest park in Peru. Washington Park. Here the section from the ‘Tri-Cities will meet another section starting from Rockford. The next big meeting along this route will be held in the State House Square Sun- day morning at 9 a. m. Airy, Large Meeting Rooms and Hall Suitable tes Vai Kees and Dances in the Czechoslovak Workers House, Inc. 347 KE. 72nd St. New York Telephone: Rhinelander 6097 STRIKE SPREADS TO WEST VA. SOME OPERATORS OFFER TERMS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE ONE) bomb barrage was laid down by 50 to 75 deputies and Legionnaires. They charged the crowd and arrested 14 miners and organizers. Many women and children were entirely overcome by gas. The Sheriff's forces were armed with machine guns, sawed-off shotguns. The workers stood massed on the opposite side of the jail for one hour and then left with organ- izers shouting instructions for mass meetings at every mine today. Belmont County authorities voted $25,000 for added deputies to break the strike. Thousands of unemployed here are starving as there is no re- lief. A conference of coal operators, the Goyernor, and the Attorney General will be held Thursday to discuss the strike situation, announced that troops. were kept ready to dispatch to the strike area. ‘The United Mine Workers of Amer- ict has a united front with the op- erators here the same as in Penn- sylvania. They tried to hold a meet- ing of 300 miners yesterday at Long Run, but’ the miners took over the meeting in the name of the National Miners Union. All five Hanna mines, the biggest company in the district, have struck. Five hundred miners in the Shinnston area, West Virginia, struck yesterday. ‘The attitude of the authorities was shown yesterday in a statement of the Belmont Sheriff: “No quarter will be shown radicals from outside The history of all hitherto ex- isting society is the history of class struggle—MARX,. Cut out and mail at once to the Daily Worker, 50 E, 13th St, New York SAVE THE DAILY _ $35,000 Save-The-Daily Worker Fund. We pledge to do all in our power to by July 1. Name Mollars 66... eee cents save our Daily by raising ara sees City the county who have come from out- side the county to freighten peace- ful working men into leaving mines.” As a matter of fact, every National Miners Union organizer here works in Belmont County mines. A statement issues here tod y by Bob Sivert, District Secretary of the National Miners Union, protests. the and children, and demands the with- armed assaults on miners, their wives drawal of the armed forces of county, and state and professional thugs of the coal operators from the strike area. An Ohio and West Virginia mine strike conference will be held at Roma Hall, Bellaire, Gate, Sunday at 10 a. m. Lewis Pleads Hoover Step in An Associated Press dispatch from Indianapolic, Indaina, dated June 11 tells of a letter sent by John L. Lewis, | president of the United Mine Workers of Amercia, in the name of the ex- exutive board, to President Hoover urging him to call a national con- ference of mine operators to work out national plans for breaking the mine strike under the leadership of the National Miners Union. Lewis offers the UMW as “an effective agency in meeting the exigencies that demand such action.” In short, Lewis proposes an extension of the strike- breaking activities of the NMU of- ficials in view of the spreading of the strike to Ohio and West Virginia. He is definitely out to help the op- erators cut wages. NITGED AIGET CAMP AND HOTEL PROLETARIAN VACATION PLACE OPEN TRE ENTIRE YEAR Beantifal Rooms Heated Modernly Equiped Sport and Cultural Activity Proletarian Atmosphere $17 A WEEK CAMP NITGEDAIGET, BEACON, ¥.¥ PHONE 731 ——— SWEDISH TRAVEL BUREAU Tours and Independent Tickets 116 Whalley Ave, New Haven, Conn. lems on the basis of a minimum plan of total/ accomplishments. The Five-Year Plan provides, for instance, for a five-fold increase in the capacity of elec-| tric power generation during the five years. | in the Soviet Union to not less than 25 billion} then be third in line of electric power pro-| | ducing countries, the United States being first jand Germany second. | The Five-Year Plan provides for the doubl- ing of the oil production. But this goal wa: reached within two and one-half years. In the tractor production, the Five-Year Plan | provided for 6,500 Soviet-made tractors in| 1930. The total amount of tractors in use in the U.S.S.R. was to be increased to 170,000 tractors in 1933 In fact, however, the Soviet | tractor production amounted to 13,400 in 193 0 | and the total number in use in 1983 will reach | 850,000. At this moment the Soviet Union| jhas already 106,000 tractors operating. Can- |ada has only 95,000 operating, Germany only | 30,000. Simlar aims were set by the Five-Year Plan| |for all industries and in all branches of pro- | | duction. Similarly, too, the real achievements | jin all industries and in all branches of produc- | tion outstripped the quotas of the Five- -Year | Plan. The accomplishment of the Five-Year Plan in four years will therefore be a reality. The most important achicrements of the Five-Year Plan, however, ,are not these in-| creases in industrial output and erection of | new industries. Capitalism too developed in- dustry although never with such rapidity. But} capitalism always paid for its achievements | with the sweat and the blood and the lives of | the workers. Its intensified exploitation drives the workers to premature old age. Its indus-| trial development worsens absolutely, but in| every case relatively, the standard of living of |the workers. It increases and multiplies the wealth and riches of the few capitalists, while} }it pushes down into the class of propertyless | | proletarians ever larger masses. | | On the other hand the immediate and pl |ned result of industrial construction of the So-| | iet Union is the rapid and systematic im- provement of the living standards of the Rus- sian masses. The standards inherited by the Revolution from czarism were at an unbeliev- \ably low level. During 1931 over one billion | | dollars are being spent by the Soviets for so- |cial insurance. Capitalist America does not {spend one cent. For the erection of workers’ dwellings, almost a billion and a half dollars | |have been appropriated by the Soviets for the ive-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan provides | or a 50 per cent increase of the income of the workers. This increase is exemplified in | the constantly climbing wages and reflects it-| self also in the fact of meat consumption per an- the increase in the Soviet Union. In the United States it is on the decrease. The Hoover re- port on “Recent Economic Changes” claims that this decrease comes from the adoption of a more scientific diet on the part of the work- ers. Any miner or steel-worker could have told the eminent engineer Hoover that if the work- er ate less meat now than he did some years ago, it is not because of a more scientific diet, but because he cannot buy as much meat any more as he used to, Egg consumption in the Soviet Union has | almost doubled since the inauguration of the | Five-Year Plan, all the reports of starvation | in Russia by the inventive capitalist, news liars notwithstanding. The much advertised short- age of necessities in the Soviet Union is a re- flection of the rapid growth of the standards of living. Industrial development cannot keep pace with this growth. Therefore it cannot satisfy completely the growing needs of the market. In this respect the Soviet Union ecdn- omy again distinguishes itself from capitalist economy. The productive capacity of .capital- ism grows faster than its markets. The in- ternal market of the Soviet Union grows faster than its productive capacity. This phenomena is a fact of socialist development. Profit was the incentive of rapid capitalist development in America. The needs and the well-being of the masses is the basis of the Five-Year Plan development of the productive forces in the Soviet Union. Every new factory opened un- der the Five-Year Plan increases the produc- tive capacity of the Soviet Union and conse- quently increase the share of the Soviet work- er. The increase of the share of the Soviet worker in turn increases his capacity to con- sume and consequently creates additional de- mands upon preduction, Every step forward in the Five-Year Plan liquidates remnants of capitalism and insures the Soviet worker against the recurrence of unemployment and against the possible down- ward revision of its constantly improving liv- ing standards. Every step forward in the Five- Year Plan is at the same time an invitation to the workef’s of the capitalist world to stop paying tribute to the capitalists, but instead to take over the organization and administra- tion of production themselves through a work- ers’ government. Only such a step could put a definite end to unemployment in America. Only such a step can basically change the po- sition of the masses in America. In capitalist America the masses of workers and poor farm- ers are forced to fight for a bare chance to live—which chance capitalism inf many in- stances cannot provide. In the Soviet Union the few remaining capitalists must fight for a chance to live—and can always get it if they head of the population which is constantly on} This will bring the production of electric power | 28 for “Daily” | with other work. The “Dai jin a very critical condition. }must be no letting down in activity. |REMEMBER THE DATES! | ary paper—Negro and white work- agree to work themselves instead of working others ) | against the Soviet Union, miners’ | National Tag Days, June 26, 27 and | benefit should be kept | in mind. This does not mean that | kilowatt hours in 1933. The Soviet Union will| Jother campaign work, must stop. The|in the camp: rive is half over and yet only one- i | third of the $35,000 has been raised. | raised to date in the | Make preparations NOW for the| bove dates but don’t let it interfere | ” is still | There Solidarity of Negro and white | | workers in the campaign for $35,000 | will pull the Daily Worker out of its | financial rut and make it an even | greater fighting organ in behalf of | the working class. The importance of | a united front in defense of the! workers’ paper is made clear in the | following letter from a comrade in | New York: ».“Because I feel the solidarity of | Negro and white workers, I, white | worker, a few days ago, helped two | Negro workers to get jobs at the| same place that I was working. On | the next day one of these two Negro workers wanted to present me with | $2. I told him I was not a grafter | and spoke to him about the Commu- | nist movement which unites under | its banner of struggle Negro and | white workers. He was pleased with the idea and they both agreed to send the Daily Worker the $2 as sub- scription for this Negro worker. I am sure he will soon join our ranks.” | BUILD D. W. IN SOUTHERN STATES, The Scottsboro “Sacco-Vanzetti” | case, the Youngstown, 0., National Youth demonstration attacks, the Post Knickerbocker Crusade strikes in the Pennsylvania coal regions, strikes all over the coun- try against wage cuts, etc, makes the necessity of keeping the “Daily” alive — a responsibility which every class-conscious worker must keenly feel. Solidarity in de- fense of the “Daily” in its hour of distress will save your revolution- ers! Rush support funds at once! The Scottsboro case presents a splendid opportunity for organizing Negro workers into D. W. clubs. Al- abama workers should be made ac- quainted with the struggle of their brothers in Western Pennsylvania and in other sections. Why have * . | Drive, $7367 having | respondents, etc. | tution or dues. there been so fey ders from the opened? Ang w this district. Only $12.51 trict 17. The stand of the the Scottsboro case is weil every state in the South no reason why more fu [not be coming in. How to Build D. W. Seattle res ds with i esting points on D. W. Clubs district is still far behind in been sei date on a quota of $1,000, new D. W. Agent, P. M | fast action from now on. The D. W. Committee,” he writes, “should see that all subscribers are Cla! proi | visited for donations, renewals, and asked to come to readers’ meeting at which time a D. W. Club will be formed. All mass organizations must be visited; collections, pledg- es, subscriptions taken. Each Org. to elect their own committee, ar- range affairs and pian Drive on their own membership and con tacts for “Da' benefit. Must also send authorized delegate to readers’ me and as many members as possible.” WARN is given to keep track of every new contact made and re- ports sent in twice a w “the D. W. Agent should short talk on th: les of the Minutes to be recorded by Care to be exercised so a the club into Pa or trade un work. Its function to be funds, subscriptions, ‘deve No by. Plain common . “Point should be raised of i iduals getting small bundles for system: distribution among shop bors. Criticisms and suggestions for improving ‘Daily’ should be encour- aged,” concludes the etter. The second art Je by M. on the “Holy Capitalist Wa S. U.” appears today. T should be immediately. tied up ¥ campaign activity, Scottsboro c Pittsburgh coal strike. Order e> bundles for wide ibuti Strengthen campaign activity series as base. . Wednesday's totals went up $1,436.35, but only through an accident A friend of the Daily Worker in the New York district; whom the Daily had borrowed $500 from, cancelled this debt Wednesday and contributed the money. Otherwise the day’s totals would have been only $936. decline from the previous day. This a indicates that there has been a flagging of activity in the districts outside of New York, and a glance at the figures shows it. District 2 (New-York), with its raises its totals to within $500 of its quota of $10,000—a But not a single other district has even raised one-half of its though the drive is half over. Distri which spurted the day before, dropped off badly Wednesday. (Minnesota) has been pretty dead. contribution of more than $1,900, splendid showing. quota icts 6 (Cleveland) and 8 (Chicago), District 9 District 3 (Philadelphia and 7 (De- troit) improved slightly over the previous day, but they are still travelling at a snail’s pace. District 13 (Califo nia), after actually contributing $1 on Tuesday, found the effort too much for it and took a rest Wednesday. A special wire to District 13, telling of the critical situation and de- manding immediate action, has evidently been carefully filed away and forgotten. Workers of Districts 3 ,7 and 13, get on the job at once; rally to your Daily! . . . DISTRICT 1 | Martiniak 50 _berton, Ohio Comrad L = | Zinchuk 0 KE Steinbarth, Erie, rence, $10.00 | L.G.M., N. ¥. 500.00 | Units, Ts ror rn Mass. 16.35) Total i wrote | DISTRICT 7 T. B. Roxbury, |. DISTRICT 3 | i Mans. Sympathizer, W. wm Paimer Z HS, Boston, Mass, ‘80 |_ Hazelton, Pa. 43 Bhauten Comrade, Boston 1.75 | Lith, Women's 1. ny 0. 58, ‘Total $20.10| Wilkes-Barre, Pa, 5.00 hepesxis Denr- DisTRIOT3 Shenandoah, Pa.: | bors AK, New: 25 LDSA, Br. 62 10.00 | A, Moryeko Reade 2.00! A, Zernaitis 1.00 | Col. from Hun- Geo. Karbus 1.00 ger Marchers Comrades wis J. Petraltis “ | Auto. Tech School SHS, Eton, NY. 4 A. Konak Lincoin: Park HP, ‘5. M. Abraitis Unit Th. 4 EW, Astoria, 1 Matt Zobas Col. fem workers Worker, NYC 1 J. Jodzevicius J; Mecklavech 2. a. Motuza Detroit District 2. K, tune J. Jakubovich 100.00 | Agnes Naravax ‘Dentiarn 1.00. 20.00| John Bosle 00 | PD, Zittel, Saginaw 1.00 2.00 | | John Pacosky 50 | F Laufer, Saginaw 1.00 25 | P.G. Lorini, Wil- L Tewellit, Saginaw 1.90 Ballam, Bklyn :50 | ‘mington, Del 1.00 pistes Bronx Shule 10 2.00) A. S, Bernardini, ‘Total $69.85 T. Fuahlick, Bx 1,00 | “Wilmington. Del, |1.00 DISTRICT 8 5.00 | 'T Qltorek, Seran- J. S. Corem,. 1.00) ton, Pa. | Hammond, Ut 1.00 gen as preg M. Findling, ‘ota 25.43 | Hammond, End. 1,00 See. 5, Unit 12 1.00 DISTRICT 4 D. Frante: German Buro 4.50 | Ww. ©. Falk, Buf. 1.00 500) talo, N. Y. 10.00 | I. Guifel, 5.00 | Slovak Work. Soc., 1.00 Br. 49,/5) Galgory, EB Ww. Women’s Council No. 1, Newark 22,00 dicott fartin, N Tanawanda, NY 7.50 | a. dicott 2.50 | rem, Call met City, 1. 25 Elizabeth Unit 10.76 | Suezue, Chicago 00 14.75 | Total $22.00 | NA Fricoff, Gary 5.00 10.00 DISTRICTS ist,Wankegon 3.00 J.Goldwater, NY 1.00 | pn, Antulow. jw Chicago 5.00 See. 2, Unit 4 1.50 | “Shinnston, W. Va, 1.00 | Al G t, Chicago 1.00 TWO Shule 14Bx 5.00 | gona Lith. Lodge, | PiStenber, Chicago 5.00 Mapleton Work- ‘Wilmerding, Pa, 5.00) Latvian Work & ers Club, Bklyn 7.25 | p, Vinchov. | -Farm. Assn. of F Foreo, Harlem 1.00! ‘pittsburzh, Pa. 'T. Light, 2.00 | — P, Duchuk, NY 2.50] Totat A Comrade 50 | IMSTRICT 6 |.-cage Heights = 15.00 See. 1, Unit 14 8.75 | Croxall, Canton. 0. 4.50 | T Purvantechiv See, Unit 7 2.00 ‘Clevel: ior ChicagoHeights 1.08 Sec, 4 Unit 3 9.00 | Freiheit G Ver 6.00 Bee og | tas 3. Larkin Ferd Witte oni 5 | T. W. 0. Ruthen- s Coll, at concert berg Br. 124 17.00 wankhpentaiee by Williamsburg M Miller. col. piente 7.58 | — Sec., Minn 12,38 Shule 2 & E. Hanna Tykyra 5.00 4, Penualn, Pkwy Shule Matt Trojack ‘75 | “Phelps, Wine. 1.00 Sec. 1, Unit 8 Geo. Seminuk 3.00 | Eben, ¥CL Unit See. 7, Unit 10 a. Kaber 2.00 | "Reipas” A Bath Beach H. Kabert 50 | A, Sehiemme: Shule, WO S$. Menich 8.75 | cago, City, M 2.00 See, 2, Unit 5 Youngstown, 0. met See. 11 P Lubesky 1.00 28 J. Tender, NY Mary Fradin 1.60 |..-a) nustmicr jo G. Kyaulr, N.Y. Sanit. Retsaurant 2.00 | i © Carpenter. See. 12 GBilly, Baltimore 1.00 | yrancheater, lowart.10 See, 4, Unit & Massillon, Ohio: OF Oblitner, Sec. 4, Unit 3 Noet: Mo. Comrade, Bklyn ce eae: Total See. 1, eure mt DISTRICT 12 G, Sokulox, NY Brownsville Work, Youth Cen. Bkiyn Sec. 8, Unit 1 See. 7, Unit 1 See. 1, Unit 2 A Comrade Sec. 5, Unit 14 2.55 | Popular, Calif, See. 9, Unit 1 4.50 | Calquera_Cusa Sec. 7, Unit 9 11.75 | Ramon Peren Uk. Work, C, Bx Paul M. Martin Shalagan 2.00 | Baldomero Sunrex Sedilo 5.0 |, Gonzales rik 1.00) 4 potin 1 Kastle | 1 Myky ten us Pochorke of, Garmaty 1 Nayden f . Yermun, Bar- McKinley Rest, BH W Sandelin, ‘Tonashet, Wash. 5.00 Rose Johnso Portland, Ore.