Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, October 11, 1875, Page 1

VOLUMI 20, FINANOUAL: TI—:EW‘T“' Tierchants’, Farmers', & Mechanics Savings Bank, wp OLARK-ST.,, CHICAGO. INVESTHMENT CERTIFICATES, Perfeot Seoirity—Lileral leresl, TABLE of lucrease of * Investnens Certlfie cutes,” secured an lmproved renl estuted bears {ng Interesty payable in nunrterly lustalle penta, nt tho rato of 7310 per cent per nne puwne Bhowing the accmmnulation of aiu lue vested for tho benefit of Children or othernt ot T Acchimaiba. wonre BYOATMcirvns sens 8 142,01 430,07 42,1 10 18 ycorn, 1,740.85 e 1 yeurs.. 2,10 3 1,$20.10 01,70 Teifsted upon tho hasla that fateres, when duo, s gradited on vAVIINE BEOuURY, 8nd fovested in INVEST- JENT CERTIFIOATES whenovar $100 Is tus accumu- “:’:; holder of a Certiflcate has tha pristioge of oxamln. {og tho condition of tha trust at Any time on calling at tbeollca uf tho Trusten, Gertificator forwarded, asd Intorost, whan duo, refn. vouated, 11 dosirad, or remdited by diuft or espross to suy sartof the Unltod Siatos. Addenny BYDNEY MYERS. Managor, e gl 0D Offes: 121 Dearbora-st, Chicage, I, Morigngo Loand on Yiex) Eetato, improvod and un- soyrevcy Joctted i the ity and oubuicbe of Chicag and In 11 Btate of Iilinols, exclusiceiy negotiated, ‘Gecurity mieticed ta capital eonking nvestments of bl eharacter by tho adaption of a system pecullar to titution, mh‘::n apecdily execnted at the lowrest ratea of inter- ot Espenses modernts. HERBERT & MORSE, Stock Brokers, 04 LaSnlic-at.y CHICAGO. , DERDERT, : 9F, it ' Momber X, ¥, Stock Exchinge, Stocks, onds, and Gold bought and sold on ecumieeicn. Wo offer wpecial f)ltlllllgl for tranesc— fions in Becurities dealt fn at New Yoric Stuclk Exchange, ciiher for cash or oo mergins, Befer to Untdn Natioual Bank, Chicago. E, KIMBALL & CU., MO, kers and Drokers, 18 Nows New York, I.J.Monse. R.J, Kiupary, A, B. Loux<seny, B C WILLIAMS & (O, BANKERRS, WALI~BT., NEW YORK, buty and sslt Ghicago Bor Mmouie, 5, Pavl, whd orbor good munied beade, Investment acourities constantly on hnd, Waaled—Burlington, Cedar It, aad aliun, Orst, Wintal—Ohlcago, Dunvilln & Vincennes first, Wanted—Norihern Facific 7 8-10 frat, Theeo and othor Inflway securitics,not teguinrly quoted made a npeclalty, Orders for atacks atd otlier Securiien pecolve personal attentlon at o New York Buock Exobiange. Good deposit accunints received, $100 INVEST NOW 1,000 ACCUORDING TO YOUR MEANS, 40, $.5, $100, $,000 IN STOCK PRIVILECGES, Thay offen pay s profit fram 10 tn I8 Hioa the sum fovested every Y0 dass, without riak boyond tho fuvest. mestesexplained in our bock and Weekly Financlul Japort sent froe, contofulng tlie daily pricce aud faciuations {hat occur at the Naw York Stock Lx~ cungs, Also, tho general condition of the New York money market, ety ALEX, FROTHINGHAM & CO., Dankers und lirokers, 13 Wall-st,, New Yorx, " STOVES AwD FURNAGES. [USHING'S TUBULAR §lqye, Grale, and Furnace. heat from & given amount of fuel, i open gratos and Frankiin_stoven, than close stoves, Wo have thirtesn sizc8 of furniaces, Cal warm e largeat slinrchs or smatlest cottage, Wo especiall mecmiend therm fog ofy con 4 Gill and wos, or send for clrentss, CUSOING, \VABI; FOR SALE! %2000 ACRES VALUABLE LANDS IN EARBAR Imxun af the Honurablo Rocrotary of tho Intauor, e sikuod will racoivo soalod bids to, the purchase ta7 oz ali of the nnsuld lands west of tha Noowo Kvu southoru )i s of th Statoof Kanwas embreced Fuals whst ts gunarally kuowa as iho " CE e Tiiselsads aro offarod for salo In_compliance with S0 wa 8ot of Gungres oy "a:r:";:fy‘fl. e 46N for such jands aa rlver, n\;; lists, desorsblug the Iaids horuby dffered for eir propor legsl subdivistae, aud Indiea- 12y tho i it price at which oach tiact is hold, wlil basont E:-'"hmu tosa f any porson m:klnrllmllullm Snlorto the Commismonicr of 1ha Geaoral Land Ustico, Fidie Saristor and Recaivar of " local oiticos at ispendenr, Kauas. "erxics ofring to purchaso inay bid for as many trats wufter may deniro, but each bld mosi bo srparately made o B , 300 Tuust Lo fur ot mnre tian «no hundtd = facres {and”euntorm Lo logul suldivbaious most Yo acgompenled by ten por cent of tho ABant bid b s ganraute gf a3 | Tahb of {o6 Liddor, Yulehum, (o casotho land by awardsd and tha balancs Dald, will b forfelled, bhonld auy Did bo teivc:od, Yamm Bopositad will bo returnad to tho proper party. bids aro neocutod will bo nofitiod uf sl i oning nf he Lids as practi. Gl et ainps afir aact, matice has e of Thd Henorat L (s of i amsaet phL A 5 ".l"?‘l which such Lid wes madu will ba again subjoct T\nlflhleunl de; ot requirad 1o sccompany bids Burb recuted e LU TS 0rdo o cortingates of dor .Eflnl ed ahocks o0 semo Govarament dopovitory m‘ll Jothe onter if tho Commissioner of tlig Goaural to, or In curroncy, T8, Hgni 0 rojsat ahu‘““i"’,"fi" A hdrner o d O giand Indorsad ¥ 1A (57 Cerukey Sitth Lo 4, Tl e recelvad as abve invited ntil 13 a‘clock fl'-ui‘t.'.‘a ‘:gx:u:n dey ot Novenibar, 1ots, afiar which > N, BURDETT, e Commtsy he ( at Land Ottios, Rismvarox, B onorof e (2o s e oo EDUCATIONAL: Mlmuz 0, DA BILVA o MRS, ALEX, LHADFORD'S fi u'.’:'!,.,‘,"\i;,fifl“"“ Hoftuan's) sk, Fronch, ug and Day Beboo) for Yousy. L ad Ouidren, with eslfsthenice, No, 17 West adabtt-at, New York, Seopeus ot Ap- sy bo 1 1ue by letier or Versonal bova, E&g_;um SEMINARY, nt KALAMAZO00, hh‘;luuluu bore offered_for thorouyh invtric- extended cou Qltan Uooie, “Exponse 04 jidrunuages for 1 7, mm‘r-lnu Laugusivs, Lovation bealthy aud e Bt Soma vacaucica yul rematn. Appiy fur cata- i furtlier fuformulin to to Frincipal, M15S NETTE FI NLeh, Fatamooo, Bich, ¢ Arvig MISS LATIMBR, Y icturued from Furope, will sail again’Navem. o ous wishing (o avall thomaclve i an sddzeas hes at 151 Ru) o8 V. 0. BRYANS TONRDIKC-SCHODL . o8, Hatavis, N, Y. For references, in. S0t et ey Glarias . s ’Bzflflla{’l 2 (N, ¥.) MITLITARY ACADEAIY, Lo daife Mdars, siGIT & BONALD. foon FORBALE, 0t Fouring Harhine, O Sididg Sow, 006 Sir- fer; also wo Good Lumoer Teans, il ‘Lbun:l?w besoldat a bargaln, Addrossd 84, bor ser- at. Hefer- The Largest and Best-Furnished Houso in the World} ROOIIS, WITH BOARD, From $3 to $5, ACCORDING TO LOCATION. ENTIRELY FIRE-PROOF! o the Proprivtors of stels tn Chicago, particularly the * Pacllic, " whu are falvely advertising thelr Ho- tein ar practioaily fire-praof, und yet paylug 2 per cent for Insuratics : Having ercited a Fire-Proaf Totol, at an sdditionat cortof cunntedstlou of over balf s nilllion of dolinra, sud being unwilliog sny Hotel In Clicigo ahould <l im excrption from fire, and not be eutitled to it, I Direby ehallengs any of you 40 tho followlng tris) atler tho closfug cf tho Lapositions The Chiel Fropioter of uny botel tuy brlug on his ack all the kindiag ko ean earry to any chamber (b the Fulmer Houao proper (not IneTunding ibo Wabaah svenun sxtension), in which chamber thu fuiuiture, e2rpets, cartsing, aud mirrors 670 10 rem du_on they NOW are. A frs may then be Lulltin 1Le sriddls of tho o, after which the door *hull Lo Le: t elored for oue lu , If, at the esplra- tion of tiuit too, the e han not spread Leyond the room, the progrister of the apposing Hotel in to puy for the datiaze by fro snd smoko to thie fuinihire, cte.: but, if 1he firo extendu beyond the imits of the room, (here will not Le any churge for the dimago, Lut 1'will pay the proprietor fivo thoueaud dollars, oy conditlon, Lo thaz 1 have o like | Fivilege aftar. wrrd, on tho same day, and, if T do not reduce it to axbes in one hour, I will iy the Propreturs of the Hotel all dimagn' to the furnlturo snd room, aud twents fnousand doliars bealdes. Deponita of the money to be tade in ony Dank that may bo agreed upon, This chialiengo may bo sccepted entiro. or simply as 10 thy fire-pruof quality of the Palmer loune, LOTTER PALMER, NHOUSE CELICAGO. Prices Reduocd to 83, $2.60 and $4.60 per Dav, The most Eiegent Hotel in tho eity, 3% Suporb Boams, maguificently furuipaed end provided witl buth ¢ entirely Nreproof, Lecation one block from Army Headquariers BISSELL & HULLERT, EXPOSITION THE ART HALL will open to the public on MONDAY, TUESDAY, and WEDNESDAY next, from 9 a. m. to 10 p. m., at tho earncst solici- tation and for the benofit of those who wirh to purchase somo of tho Pointings in this unsurpassed col- loction. Admission, 25 cents. Mr, Stafford will bo progont to give information and to make salos. Lot all who can do so avail thom- selves of this opportunity to buy high-grado art at the LOWEST 8TUDIO PRICES, UNDE i WEAR, Underwear Tho Larg-~t Ztoclk and the Largost Number et Liines cvor offered in this oity, cousisting of Flannols, Meri- nos, Cashnioros, Scotch Wools, Bilks, &e., fromn medium to finear qualities 1the world producos, at unusually low prices. WILSON BROS., 67 and 690 Washington-st., Chicago. Pike’s Opera Housg, Fourth- 8t., Cincinnati, Completoe lir o of English and Amor- ican 811k Umbrellas ot low prices. GENERAL NOTIC .5, Tax Redemptions, Tha condition of tho City Finances ro. quirea that o moro stringont rulo for the ro- demption of Tax Cortificatos hela by the oity shall bo ontorcod. Public Notico {s horoby given that on the 1st of Novembar next, the premium on the salo of 1874 will be raisod to 35 per cent, and on all certificatos ssuod at tho prosont eclo 5 por cont per month will bo gharged until furthor notico. 8. 8, HTAYES, Corptroller, Chicago, Oct, 8, 1875, Notice to Railroad Contractors, Baaled proposala will L recelvod by the undersigned, st Waveriy, Ohio, until 12 o'ciockt nodn of TUUNsDAY, Dctobier 41, 1979, for the construction of the Hpring- Ald, Jackion & Poweroy Ratlroad, from Springdeld, {u Clurke Cuunty, to Jackeou, (o Jeckeou Cauuty, o, Dids will be recolved on the eatire construction of the rond, a8 embraced fo the following divixions, viz, : Gradu Gop_snd Masonry, Bridge Bupersiruction, Crows-tics, Iroi, Trak-laylig, sud Salissting, Profies, speciiications, Sc., An ba scen tud general Information given at the Culef Englacer's Oftics, in Wavesly, blks County, Oufo. The Company reacryos tha right to roject any o all Ahio Lida, oF auy portious thereats JAMES EMMITT, Prostdent, W. C. AGNEW, Chief Engineer, TO CONTRACTORS! 0 of Pustponement—Notice (s herlbh giventhat he date of recetviug Uiy aud awaraing the contract for the lhinots Arylum for Feeblo.Minded Cluldren at Liucaln, ls postponed until Taursday, Oct, 8, af which timo the bids will be opeued. The speciica- Hous aro ready, aud cad be oblained from H, B. Tur- ftect, at Room 41 Portland Block, Chleagn, 4 can bo 3ech 81 a0y bour betw o 8's, i, anid 4 p, m. In the room adjoring, or ot Lincoln, IlL., at thie oitics of COL, B, B, LAIHAM, St James Episcnal Chame ‘Tue firat aaryice in the uew 8L Jatues Church (cor- ner Cans snd Uurop ste,) will bobeld ou Baturday oveulujs, the Uth fusr., at ), aid witl be of @ memove ud thaubegiviag uaturs, The Pews will ba otfef- ¥ #ulo und rnt ou Mopday ovenlng, the X1tk inst,, W49, Dy order of tlo Vestry, TOWNER, Treasirer, ____BUSINESS GaRDS, JOHN G. ASHLEMAN, WIIOLESALEJEWELER, 136 STATE-S8T., Chidago. IIIL VINEGAR, FUSSING'S WHITE VINEGAR VIV, ATHENGE ne, e Narranied lreavs » Chicaga. CHICAGO, MONDAY. OCTOBER 11, 1875. BOOKS, STANDARD WORKS Targ and Frilfifl Eflllmn_s Jansen, McClurg & Co. SHARSPRARE-Knfelt's lustreted. 8 vol a0 Cal on. SHAK ‘ A "l' ik SUARSPIANe ondoa. o Tiiisied Wik it 13vols., 12ma. Hail BHAKAPES| slmo, TuEes caa BHARNErbE i cai 100, Lickons ediiica. . . Jondon. DICRENS WOLKS - Gloto st i2mo, Halt oalf.. prcreas” WOltkE Lo, vuls, 12mo 1iail ealf, WAVERLEY DUVELN trated. "4 vola, I INVING IRVING eall, _Laudor I8AAC BISRALLL . 8 vuls., Bro. u 6. FIBLDIRG'S WORKA Do ¥ ey, sl oalt. Loud .00 STERNKSS WURK: e Yola X STERNE'S WORTR 5 % CINALLES READ Y 1 om0 [y T ot & RIS B AT st MACA UL A ; i 0 aaoaliAvE wo w' oo, 3 $ LAt COMTLRE ol i e jan, Londua, § vols.. 8vo. 5. aRoES, A’JI-{I‘UA‘LV.—? Volaee Bror ‘5‘“’ o anoril o EGR '1': QURTIN'S Ge. KU Vi) :m} n GIRDOAT 10 X GIBHUN'S RUM. . Londos . awncys HoM 340 Halt eale. Londun. o8 Ui FOKY OF AND-13 wols., Bvo. Lalf eall. Toa. Bnt OTLEY'S L u NETHEILANDS, J\tl NOF BAlt. NEVELUT-9 v el ealt, 1180 ROLLIN® ANUIRNT R¥Y—4 Tol Halt cau. Loudon, PLUTARGIUS LAVED-§ ¥ PLUFAKGH'S MUitALy -5 ANULENT CLASSICS ¥OR ERS=ii v, MISY BLuLW Malt cal SOUIALBUIE! aLlfa DIVIES GF rig Lol UuLLUNSY OF ENGLAND =10 vola,, 1im Half ealf, Loudon 8, OAMPHLLLS LIV, O % g I3 S KNULA Porsl{vm‘fi:’sq" lml“'“"l !k&.“ A it K Yuly,y lano. BOLDSMIFH'S WuRKs—y morucov, 1Oudop...... .00 PUEMo-~1cat Lbrary edition, bvo. 1l 1, Londor .00 TUKME— vals, 1.0 AILTON 5188 vol o, with the- Nmn:’)( Hiod ! W, Turuor, buaioa.... X BLIZAGETH BAKRETE BTG K wis—Tho bost editiun, 8 vol calf. Londot..... 20.00 ROORIN TTALY ~ilibuir Bar, 1 vol., 8o, H fuce. 5.0 MILMAN'S HORAT {US— Jgnisn. osres 20.00 8e0. Hall caif. 13w 1—iliustrate don, 800 ONEART WORS §vols., bvu. “Fuil eall, . AIRS. JAMEBUNS ARE WU it Ao 04 . CUNNINGH LIVES GF TR PRINTER =6 vuls., bvo. Polbed celf, Luadon..., PARKKI'S GLUSSARY UF¥ ARCINTRCIURK —3 vola. wvn, 3{ali Morceen. Veryacircs BOSWELL'® JUHNSON-1 wol, §vo. Halt calf, n EOURIIN S N doa, .- .00 BECRE S LR Erwte DL S D yo ~3 vule., Bvo, Malf wiorocoo. Lon. o Lmvn‘(n().\ A i Laby ARG i =11l don, vais., Bva. Full ol RS Sl b erv, it call: Lodog 1.0 Half 3.0 ‘l‘;\mlfix:'x.i?u,l:h{fl LiTnH OHAMUERL ENCYULOI i RS LIS g Tl 0 St R The above examples selected from our immenso atock only serve to show 1ts completeness in all the highest branches of litorature. We have named only fine bindings, but have all standard works in oloth as weoll, and all noew books as woll as tho old standards. ‘Wo invite_ visita or oorrespond- ence from all persona making addi- tions to their librarios. Jansen, McClurg & Co., Booksellers and Stationers, 117 and 119 Statest,Chicago, THE CRURCH. The Storm that Judge Booth's Lecture Has Raised, He Is Reviewed by the Rev. Dr, Fallows, of St Paul's Church, Ilis Arguments Are Also Con- troverted by the Rev, Dr. Sullivan, Defense of the Bible in the Schools by the Rev. Arthur Mitchell, The Truo Method of Revival Work Described by the Rev. Mrs. Lathrop. Laying tho Corner-Stone of &t James' Catholic Church by Bishop Foley, Heoly and Sackey's Work to Begin in Brooklyn—ithy They Closo That Cily. JUDGE BOOTH'S. LECTURE REVIEWED. ADDUESS DY THE KEV. DR. FALLOWS, $ Thoe Rov, Samuel Fallows, D. D., Rector of 5t. Paui's Reformed Episcopal Churcl, deliversd tho folloswing address last evenwg in suswer to aud roview of Judge Booth's lectuso before the Philosoplhical Socioty : 1 wish to roview 04 briofly as poesible tho promineut po-it.ons and atatemants of Judeo Looty, in hus locturo latoly deliverad boforo tho Philosoplicat Sovicty of thinoity. I cannot, in the hmits of a singlo disconrse, do justico to the subject. It would roquire volumes to do that. IHe has justy alluded to tae gravity of the theme. TlLo Churci of Jeaus Coret rosts 1pon tho resurtection of s Lord and Savior ficin the dead as on & ohiof cornar- utone, Remove that nod the wholo editico fum- blea to the ground. It ts due to Judge Booth to eay that be tiss prescntod the arguments agsinst the resorrection of Christ as strongly es thoy cau bo put. Ilo has gone over pretty much tho whole field socarofully covered by Sirauss, Bagor, and others, 1leavo it to this Iuteligent andi- enco to Judgo whother the foucdations of our faith nro 10 dauvger or pot, Withs tho collsteral matter lutroduced by Judge Dooth I cannot desl, I sitaply plast myselt on the aecumptivi s, assersioas, and priceiples made by him 5 governing him In nis diseuss'on of tho question. Judge Hooth admits or asuumes the fotlowing facts and rivclple: First—That the four Gospels al! belcng to the Apaatolic age, all belug wnitton withinsixty yoars aftor tho death of Christ : the Guepel of John being composed about that t.me, and tho Gospel of Maik probably ni.lun twenty years from that groat oveat. Thoy wuse thorefors written maoy years after tho sayings and duings occurred which they profesa to rolato. Second—Tuat thess Goapels were written by tho mea whose uames thoy bear, Third—Tunt Jesun Christ wes a veritablo etson, a great sud most extrsordinary presenco,; that He Impressed Himself and 1 {a words ma remnrkablo nunner upun Lis Disciples ; that Ho was in the Linbit of repeatiog His most sn- {)onum. teachings agaly ond acuiy, these tench- ogs Leing doub.esu corroctly saminarized w the Barmon on the Monnt, Fourth—It would be duing violenco to the probalilities of the caso to snpposo that the rec.rds of tho uayinga and dolugs of tho Marter aro fieo trom misconception, misrecollec.don, or oxacgeration on Lhie part of the nasrators, Fifth—Wo tind d.scror:ancies i the nurretives of thepo writern; for oxam, lo, the different 1n- Hediptions on the cro=s ; therefors wo tmust con- clude that they wero not juraihblu writers. Sixth ~Tunt’thoss four biogrephical skotchen or momoirs areall of au exceedingly tragmentary oud nnmatisfuctory cosracter,—none of thew posserainyg mach mont tor methodical arrango- ment, sequence of ovents, chrunological order, or treatment of aubject For the piesont I wiil ‘oave out of tho qnestion the lnlsliility or jus)iration of tuo writers of theso Goapels, and eudeavor o prove the fact of the resurroction of Chtlsy from tho princip les Iaud down by Judge Booth bimsolf, The Judge adiits that the Sermon on tho Mouut wus dehivered by Chrise, or that tho teachings alloged to havo been giveu on s mountaiu wera 80 often uttered that they were indelibly stawped on the momorics of Bis disciples, Who aro tho narratois of this eublimo d.scourse ¢ Matlbow and Luke only. Neither Mark nor John have & word to say about it, Think now of the transcendent impurianca of that sermon, embodsing all the graud, comprelousive princi- ples of Cliristian morality, and the glorious apir- itual truths of Wi Kingdom, univerzal and ever- Jastiug ; & sormwon whicl has won the admirae tiun, uie af.er age, of both the friouds aud foes of Chnstiauity, aud yot only tvo of the Lvaue g roourd it. Now, Judgs Booth sava that, uso Matthow afoue relutes the acconut of the mcoting of Chast sfter Il resurcoction with his Disciples in tho mountain in_Gail.oo, o ia dicredited by (be Teat of tho Lvaugolists. Where is bis coosistency ? Futher, the.o is en n|v£uoul discropancy between Matthewand Lulie ws tu the place whors this aarmon was delivered. Matthew saya it was given by Chriet sitting ou & miountajn ; Luce says Jesus was standing on a ptain. Tho apparout discieonucy s eamly recouciled, Judgs Booth by no dutiieulty 1u reca.ving the Serwon on the Mount fu spita of ths amcrasnxm'. but whon Luke enys *it was Mary Magdalens, and Josuna, ‘sod Blay, the Tmother of Jamea. and othor women tuat were with tbom, which told thow things unto the Apostlos,” and Matihow sayy, **Mary Magdalcuo aud the other Mury, mothier of James and Jusor, cams o see the sepulchre™ (e names of the othor ,women nut being montion. ed), then Judge Hooth sees a (atal conilict of tostumonv betwoan them as (o tho fact of (he rosurrechion, Further, Luke's account of tho Fermon un the Mouut s coutaned {u twenty. ing veress, while Maithias raquires 118 voiwus, Luke omita muny precopts which Matthew gives, a0 thet Mate tigw alons gvaes the wermon in tull. But wo discredit dog udge Buotl cast upon bid lestimony iu tbis case, \Why, then, shoald o discredit 1t when Matchew, fu his ac- count of the Hesurrection, mentions a fuct not guwen by the other Evangolista ¢ Judge Luotb, in dwelliug upon the differanae In the accounts of Luko und Mark yos| ectiug (he Jourucy to Ewinuus, says : * Luke here gives 8 parncular account of the two disciples wha went to Emusus. . ., Aark alludes to It iocidontally, me one would paturally mention 8 rumored pecurronca of which the par- ticulurs wore not known. Lid Mark koow the patticu ss nerested by Luke 7 If so, why did lie uot reluto thew 2 If ha did not koow, boa can we scoount for bia iguorance on the subjecs? Did Maithew kuow ¢ If be did, can W 1nagine & roason viby, wheu Lia sccount of what treuspired aller the Reaurrection is so e zim Lo should Lave owiited shls appear- auce 2" Now, let mo ask, Did Mark know the partica- 1ars of tho Nermon oo the Mount as narsated by ‘ Luke? (Mark, remembor, wente only abont | i -our hanas, fwenty yeard after the Savior's death, aud 14 put H wn'a4 the eurliest writor by mauy eminent ecLulars.) It Lo did not ko, how can wa ac- 0Dl for bis Ignorance on the subject? If b Wik cau wo imagine & resson why, when his sc- conut of what traupired beforo the line. nrrection ro pienger, he shluld bave “omitted this imporiant eermon ? jhuu nueaiions do ot Loncl the fact of tho non the ount, Wiy enould they, o die Buoth's owu admisslons, tho fact of tho Herurreciou ? Aeain, in roferonco to ths ap-earance of Clirwt 10 tue unniain o Gali ce. Jud,ce Both axke the quicticn, **Ilow does it hiaspen that Matthew Tals 03 mentio s the promise of salva- tou to the Laptized Lcueser, and tLe e of - dammation upon Lhe Why 12 he mient In re- Rard o 1he Lrounsed ripoe, easting ot devily, #peakiog wAl uew tougues, fmuunge from deadly poisona, heding tie mei ¢ relv, 1f thicke comfoit.ug worda ad beou spoken 1 tae presence of Mattnew, one af (Lo eleven, hn would have remetobered them.” Lot ne ark a question : How dees it bagpen that Jobn fatle tu montion tho Llcsrad basti- tudo: ** Biensad are yo when me: sbatl rasio you snd jemecuts you, aud sbal ray a1 mau. ner of gvil ggatoet you fuleely for "My sake, Rojvice aud e exceedingly giad, for gzreatts your reward in heaven.'” "Why v ho elient in 1egard to the othor beaiitudes, Buroly if thess comforung words bad oeen enolou it tha rrea- ecae of John. ous of the clevou. tae d sciple shum Jesus luved, Le would bave rememlered tbem. Dosti's Joln's eilence, the fact of tha Bormou un the Motnt rowmatus : why should nos the fuct of tha Resurrection remain, denp to the euonca ¢f Mutthew on ons of Cbust'’s appear- ances, Judge Booth himee.f beiny the juige? Aud 1t thisSermon on tae Mount in sl Iy a BUDIDLTY uf tle kavings of Jenus. and repouto] Beain and span to bus dircipies at difforent tlmes, In duferent plices, 1o diffe.out cireum- tuncon. then the questions I have ssked prepaut grenter difticultiv fur Jujge Boroth's solunion. After q otiug the accouut piven by Sfutthow of Chrim's last wo dy ofior His resmirection, Judgo Booth aske the queston: *la this all hat was kuown tu tegatd to the reappearance of Jesus up to the time when Matthew wrote bis £ospel, tuent s 5ours or ujwaras after the cruci- flsioa? Peerine iuto the daritnesu of those tirst deeades fol'oniug the deatt of Jesus, when the facta coneern g 11is recurrec:ion were sascepil- bla, if over. of being ascortsined with certaiucy, o ek, ie this [ositively all that was tueu known. or renorted, or rumore] amouz tue dis- cples in rr‘finrcl to the woudrous eveut # " Let me nsk a quostion : Wheu Mattbaw finishe ed Lus Gogpel vy to th death of Curiwt, did 1% conzain positivoly ali that waa then known, or reported, or rumored among che dieciples in regard to tho woudrous Ife aod teachiugs of Chmst? Let ©H Bes, Maithiow, 3a:k, and Joby, make no mention of the woes deuuuced aga'nst tue I'hauscos anc ot 18, por of tno robuke to 1he youug mav who wishied Christ to inte:fero in the dividing of the intieritance, nor of the rich fool, nor of tha jarable of tho barren fig-tree, nor of the ime rortant teschiug respectinz tho siaughtor of the Gal lceaas, and thoso erghiteon u ou whom the tower 1u 8/loam tell, not to mention otaer par- ticularn, Luke only givos an account of tbeso, ond Luke wro'e years aftor Matthew. Judge Dootu will not answer ves to mv question. Why thould I auswer ves to bis question? Ho would not sk my quostion, why then should he proponnd hia? Judge Booth quotea tho difforent verslons of the {uecription ou the crcus, I{e claims that a lawycr addresaiog a Jnry would argne with much force that on inscription was thoro, and Lo would have his theory as to which was the cor- rect vesron, Ho with cho Lord's Prayer. Tso verslons aro given us; bnt no one could there- fore deny the Lord's Dliayer tu bave beon tanght by Chriet. In the roudering of those versiund wo should know sust the discinles wels repurtiug the samao discowrse, and the discroparicioa ao should ascribo to limitations of tho hunan wind and momory, Tho Gospeld, in tho.r account of the life and t2aclings ot Christ, aro fragmountary, Oue writer Zives us biuts, au: eayings, and yarables, and uariutives, and deeds, mot given by noother. No particolsr method or arangement or koquence of time is observed. Tho later writei® eption most impoitant matiers which the enrlier narrators omit, ond vico versa, ©ou account of the fragmentary characres of those recorde, and the wau$ of tho thread of the con- tinious_acta of our ditjue Lord, discraj-ancies arise, Whoo we come to tho acconnt of tho tesirrection of Christ, and Il brief Lifo thora- afier npou the earth, the recorde avo etill fras- montary ; tho thread of oven'sis not placad in Wo oxpect discropancies. Were Bno discrepaveies to be wecn, tha reo- orda would bot Lo conefesent wi.b thameelvor, Wo sbould koow 1nfalably that collusion and importure bad taken place. 'Lho vory priuciplea Judgo Booth has lald down, wih iiresi-tible logic must jead lum to adinit what be 1s cndeav- oriag ta coniue, the fuct of the resurrectin of our Lord Jesus Cliist fiom tie doad, for tho very witnesses he bas snmm.ned to prove tue exnistence of thig wouderfut Savior of wen and to roprodues kllsimwor, sl toackibgn aro the very wit- 1368rC8 We TO ¥ U on to prove tho restirroction of Clirist and he teachiugy of bis riren hfe. Nog one singlo argument bas Judzo Booth sdduc d aguinet that resurroetion, #ave what mav ho ternied a1t argument from discrepancy, aud, pree Aumctively, that argument 1s in favorof tho rosurirction, Mo cubtradictions in the tentimo- uy are given, We have the many-rided versiun of tho sameatory. All testilvtotho rupreme fact. Five timos did tho Savior predict Hin resarico- tion tu His disciples nod to the Apce’les. Mat- thew, Mark, end Luke mentioa the tirst of theso l:rophcmcn, which was made in the presoncs of o dusciples, donbtless tho sevenly dieciplos bemng mosnt. ‘Lhe socond was mada 10 Pecer, Jamoe, and John, according to Matthew and Maci, ‘Lho third to Hia disciples, acourding to tue pamo uvaupelista, The fourth and fifth wero to tho twelve Aposties, accordiog fo Mnat- thew, Marz, and Lave, Ln also declates that b d to His disciples, A litlte while aud ve 8lLall bt 800 me; oud spain’ & little winle and yo shall 800 me,* words platnly refuitivg to Ilia denth and resurroction. As to timo : the thros Evangellers agree that it wan carly iu tho mocning. Matihow sayu, ** A4 it bogan todawn.” BMattuow xxvui, 1, Mark sas, **Very early in tho wmoruing, at ths risiag of tho sun,” Mark xvi, 1. Luke's words are, * Very early in the morping.” Luke xuiv., 1. Jobu enya, " When 1t was yet dark.” Jobn xx., 1. You will observe that Mark states i harmony with all tbo other Evaugelista, that it wos very early in the moruing, and then aods, * Ai tho risisg of the emn." It oo baimonitlog of the lau: phrase with the reat conld be tmade, would any ono, whoibier se- customed to welgh evidenca or not, question tho factof tha accurrenco of the ovens from thin trivisl discropuney 7 1f four mon testidod L1at 80 event Wuk plice very earty in the morn- ing, onv of them sbould kuy, very esiiy, at the sisiug of the sun, would ‘that dizerediv tho tortimony of all the rost? Yet tluais s poinc Judge Bootn attempts to make against the fact of tho rosurroction. Iiut wo buve an expinbatiun of Mark's langunge. **The rising of the sun,” 18 & synonvin for ** very early in ths motmng, or & pounar purase for tne rising of the day, Iu Yealms, ov., 22, 13 s suid respecting youug hons: “'I'ho enn priseth, thoy gathor thewnolven together. an i lay them down in then dons.” Yol it is a woll-enown fuct that wild bouasts do sot nait for tuo 1ising of the sun ; at thio breuk of day thoy retreat to their lairs. As to number of witnesscs, Ma thew mentions Mary Magdalens and Mary tho mother of_James ard Juees. Mark adde to thiese two Saloue, Mark xvi, 1. Luke, omntting Salome, adids Johauns sud other women. Lule xuiv.. 19, Judge Dooth uska the qnestion: **J¢ there oot 12 the naraives au ) parsot pgrowth and 8 trausfonmaiion sccowpandiug (o growth?* 1t Mark wrota befuro Mat- thow, thiero cartainly could have boen no growth. But I will propound & quustions 1f lour wie newses, who contesaedly are fo give oy frag- montary testimony as tua tomb being empty, como un the stand befure Judge Booth 10 s tify, and tno drst says, Aary Mazdsloue uay present ; and the second ssys, Al agdalon aud dary the mother of Jumes, aud Salowo were prosout: and the thitd maye. Mary Magdal e, Mary the motuer of James, Joauua, sud oiber "mi'x' \nrfi dn:nlnut: aud "mla last an; 8! alous was greasut, would h{.'uy m:{ nm:g witnessen cootradictsd each wther, or would he discrodic tho tostimoay of the firut aud last bocauss thoy did Lot sueu- tion the uames given by the othar two, aod os- pocialty when thay did 1ot teatity that niua ath- ers were presest? Of courw be would not, vor would suv other Judge woithy tu wit oo the benol, All the wituessos a'so iestify that the ¢t mb was emply: vo conlradiction among thews a4 10 that hct Would Judge Booth, iu the face of ther evidonce, say that tle towb was not empty 2 Anto spgelical testimovy, Matthow narrates atlp Tribamne Lbe account of a great earthquake, tho descont of the Angel uf tha Lard qlml of hin rolhug mway the atone and mitting upon it, and of the Alnght of the kospers. No othore maotion It. 1t Luke had meutioned tha fact, wriesd of Mate thow, wonld not Judge Bouta Lave esid: vle thero not in lhess age falivay an apparent gromth and » Itanstormation Accumpannng the Browth ' Mark rayw thero was 8 young § “an the ®eyulchie, sitting at tihe fight u -~ white rajoent.—Maik, xvi. 6. Loult wr myy ttiod 1o shining parmenta—Lul v, 4, Matthaw's account of the ange’ & 1 oti the #tne, and sil that portaina o ! $ S puake, i to be undeistous an rolens’ & whaslal takou plaze bojure tus wom ¥ cued tho soputclite, Julge Danth'n ¢ 'oment 1y tual e nccounts of N~ tave pot aiways method & 5° ur ehronolomeal urder. Wa &3S violencs to the probabilities of the case & & addrers of tho nowel, an ro * 5 “ad given to the woman . * fis wasin the *eiulchro. The wtatument o, cans would bo, hat all tho wiinossea testify that nue ungol wos preset, aud come of thom that twu were prose eut, Could any man frum such evideuc: con- clade thit no “ungel was present? A fair ex- Phaisiion would bo that ono of the Mg Apoxe for Loth., Nouo of tua wit- liceses may ihat ons angel unly was present. Yhe lauguage of the witnecses tesuiying to the (rusencs of one 4 uot thceefore exclinve, and in not coniradictory of the slate- fent that two were prosout. Tho lauguazo of the augela 10 the wowmon 18 diverse, Judga Tootl wsvs. Tr. Matibow, Maik, aad Luke &uve different vereinan, but sll tostify thet thoy end, "ileisuotlieie, iloim risen.”” Remamteriag Judgr o' adin veion that theso tecords aro frazivenlary, aud that each Lyacgolist does uot ( rofess to wivo uil Le part.culura, it ie rgut to Mfirm that thov do not coutradict excir otuer, An tu plices ol sppesrauca, Judga Biath dwelis u, on the fact thas the (laco - 1 uterview, Bceukaiig to Matibiow, wun w Galilee, au o otbier placo s mewtioued by biag Acurding to Luko it was azJerasalm. Audasou, on tis fact thar, upon tae eveniog of the dav of [La reau.rection, He ap, cared to il Dissplos 1 Jorusalew. He appeared in both places s in Jerusaem twice, once nhew Tiem.s s¥an sbsent, and ouco wheo he was proscat. e ] vl 15145 Lnko, xxiv., 85-£3: Joln, x., in, rewembening Judge Lootu's ade a of & want uf caronological videc fu the 1eco,d, sod the pattial acoount given ju creh oue. 1" auk, Doo- Matcbow con:taiics Mare, sad Luke, and Jolin, when they ay Curist appesre i io Jecusalew ¢ Certainly not. Tho au,ea.unce 1o Jerussicm was ta the eloven ouiy. The mi- peacancs in Galioe, forma.ly announced by the aoge!s and by the Sasior. was o bo mcde to tho Disciples iu goueral. Johu parrstos tha an- pearance uf Ch.isc by tho Sea of Liverius. Jebn, xxi., 1-2J. No_otbers tmoutivo 1t no others contradict it, The meoiiug in Gulil:o to which Mattuew refers took p ace. It was an ap)ointed meetiLg. lese provadly wore gathered the 50) bretisren montioned by Paul. Judgo Booth asks the question, “Why is it leit to Laul slona ~to relate this fact, sho tersedly way wot present:” I do know, exzept on the &imiesions, br Judso Both, of the fragmentary cusracter of tho rec- orde, Matthow ways: “Tho eleven weut awey into Gallee iuto & mouutan, whe.o Jesus had sppointed tuem. And whoa they san Ilim tuoy wurshiped, but somo doabied.”” Judgo Booth 8-ks: **Whoaud Luw many doubtea? \Wnat did they doubt? Why did tney doumit? If the chosen dieiples donbted what they saw with ther own eyes, 88 stated bLy this nriter, may bot we be paidon:d for doubt #' 1 canpot anawer the questions \Who? What 7 and Wiy? on s~count of tho rec.ran berny only fra- me:tarv. Itdyca not secm probabls tha: an. of tbe cleven daubie ), for tuoy bad recaived con- vineing proof of Chrisi's resurroction. Aud, of courae, when thev (the efeven)eas Him aud wor- suiped Him, thoy could not donut aad believo 1n Ui at tho s2me tima, The fais infereuca in thut & great multitude gathered wpetuer, and many of tbe Discipes o Gulileo sho had peon Jesus 1or the first tune were present. \vbut mote prodable thaa that thoy shouid queg- tiou nud doubt at Hrst? 1f this wero the case, Paolym, 1y supplies what the othara Lave omit~ tod, nud makos u statemont of 4 fucl o com- mouly kuown at tho thue that nobody ever con- trad.cted it Tha appearanco to Jawer mentioned by Paul does nur coutradiet tho statemeuts of tho Lvangelists. James wss probably tho biother of onr Lourd, and for speciil reasons tho inlorview may hava beon grauted. With referance to tle tiwo accoun.s given by Luke, I may ray that in the Acts of the Aposties Le makes sdoitional statementy, not ¢ mtradic- tory statomonts, Comparo Luke xiiv., 49-51, 1-1), What ho narrated in tho Gospel in brict bo has usreated wore fullv in the ctd. Lut does Judge oot supposo that soy or aid of tho Evavgelisls togabor bnva narrated sll tons the Suvior suid afier Lis resurrection ? ‘bt would bo to tly m the faze of his avsuwmp- t.ond t the outses of lns leciuie. Julge Booth nttewpts to throw discredit upon Paul vecausa the Apustle spesks of the appoar- auc0 to the tvelvo luswwad of to the eleveu. It wes o popolar way of spoaking, Luko save— X2, 20—~** 1ho cieven wore gatuered together," thougn thero nere unly ton troseut, \Woen Pail wroto, Maitbias having beow ewectod to round ous tho numb.r, tbo aposiles wora called tun twelve. Dues Judze Looth suppose the Core tutbiaus misuuderstood Psul? lo refervuce to tLo sleged discropancies be- twoen tho two accoants of L'tul's cuuvarsion, mentjored by Juize Bootb, If wo consdar that the men who jo.rueyod with Paul wero immo- diately sinitten to the groaud, betore tue voice s.ake to them, wiich Acis x2vi, 14, couvuys, aud thet tho narrative in Acts ix., 7, refers to what occurrod altersards, thoo is no didivulty, As to the subjuct matiar of two accuuuts, on the pruciplos laid down by Jujge Luoth limself, wo ars not to supposo that & full atcount was givon either by Luke or by Paul bunaolf, or by botl. But chat thoio ts s cuntradiction, Jud e Booth caynot asaert. ‘I'ous rapidly I bave touclica tho saliont points of Judgs Booth's lecture, He has no: impescbed the honesty or ability of tho witnesges. Admitting Luke's to bo bassd upon oral commiui fiom others or from documents written soon alter tho deatns of Curist, acd further admittiug thar Murk wiois s gufl;ul largaly fron the rs- membianca of F'otor, the very bighest crodit 18 1o ba given to thewr testimony, for tney wroto wnilo tho actual witnosses were a ivu aud whilo shie whole cautitry wan astir respo.ting tho lifs, deain, snd roamtrection of ~Chnst. Nt tuo famntest ovidonco comes us Liom aati lnlty to didered.t their vtatemorts. "I'wo of the writers wore eve-wil- nesstd. Not A siugle statement of theirs is con= tralictod Ly tho uthor blstonand. if tha lite of Curist made such & stupsudous iy ression on tho wiuye of tuode rude Uaidiesu pessin a. 60 did tho death aud the yesurtociiou of tha sawo diviue bewg, The Resuriection way holr 10g_that the 1 Masthey, con- Lot to gieat thomu, tho burdouw of every vormon, Ihis glorious fact was hurlea fu tuo 1ace of Chriss's muiderers, Toey could oot dispro.u at. ‘Fno sitly story of the soldiors, that ** lis disciples camo ung stols Hun by wirhit, while wa elopt,” did not nv.ul.’ Tha feor- ful, doubting, we.k, dimurited discipies becama a0 10vino.blo buud of dauing borslds to aproad tho glsd news of a riecn Chilsk ‘Lucy sullered all waouer of tortures, Hut remained stesd- fast v tho fwtn, ’l'hog testified wot t0 un opinion, but to a fact, 0 rack can malu & Galilou's opinion or system true or falso, but ersecution siivsts the sncority of men v thoir alief. 'I'teso tornible hios, aud cruuching jawas of wild bewste. sud bloudy asatlis ou tho sauded arcus, prored that thess men wera uoi itapostore. Thoy were wot deceivieg tbe wai Wora they luou docoved? Lot Judge Booils Lning the proof, Tho witnesses, 1 repest. wo are Uut impeached, Tuov are good witnesscs for Judye Loulb se to the lite and teucuiugs of Christ, Thay aro equally good wite uussow for Sbo Chns {an Guurch a to tha death, resuiroction, sud asoousi n of Curist, Ho s udesa risou from the doad, sud bucono the Linst fruwta of tuow that slept, 1appeud a fow statsments of emineut men in 1he prolessiun Lo whica Judge Booth belouse, mfl‘mw what they thiok of the wuole wors of Franc'a Bacon said, ** I believe the word of God whoreby His will i rovoaled, and that the 3o iptures were Itom Mosew' tiwe to the time of tue Apoutles and Eun‘roh-m“ Hugo Grotius who frow his quiot study guve to ths world Lus troatise, ** L jure belil el pacis,” sod wita it the law 10 mankind o sli ture ages, which sball rulo them on lsud sod sca swd, “There is uo reasop for us Cluetiaug to doubt the cradioility of thess boow." Sir Mathew ilale sawg, "1t 1a & book fall of ligbe and wisdom, Lord Ervkino said. *'1 tiave ever boeu deeply devoted Lo the trutus of Ubris- tisnity, sod wy trm belicf 1 the Holy Uosnel ts by no meaus owiug to tue prejudices of educa~ on, but it arlses from the most ocabinged ro- NUMBER 43, fl2ctizns of my ripar yoars and . Tue HHou, Wil Wire perde o B g whu looks down unon ud, and & Savior who Ape P oves and mill sistain us by iutareasaign,” Jobn Quiney Adima saig Thin box haw bien tnroisaed man by the apecial providance af hi« Maker, to enabie hiun by fajch in iy Rodeom. or and by worls confarmnb.o to that taleh to as. oo sAlvation in a future world, and to promnte his woi-belng in tho prescut.” Chief wnstice Hotutlowor, uf Naw Jerssv, ward: o 4t the cilorcer of cuarter«—~the palladium of liberty— o etandard of ricuteousnos.” Chisf dustica MeLoau amid ¢ fLife ané immortality are brought to light by Senplures Amde from lovolationa dsrknoss rod B upon th woill and uson the fature,™ Tho tion. Simun Greenleat, who bas wriion & Losk en the Fentnnouy 'of the Evingelnts,” a8 nc\lu An 1haso mtandard tieatisns on evidanco, wald: = For myeelf 1 must say that, baving for Thany ¥0.ra wialn 1he ev.donces of Clirintiauiy tho ubject of .ono aud potient stuly, tho re- aale Mae heen o fhm and - incroms g coaviction of tho _ authicnticity ol plovary iusniratiun or "the Dible” Cofel Snstico Joseph Honcy Lumpkin, of Geurala, said: **Mowt choretully va o man aod § 118204 rate, whils hfe sod breath ondiro, aud Nt 1y voica I hushio L wid v pon parilzed In death, will bear iny nuracda taiimony ¢ the selue of tho Biole" Caancelar Walworth gaid *Thin boly boas, waich sxcacdsa | athors th the woight of ils au hority and the extent of fim utiney, fan - Fucceafully witlwtod the b aupliemong of & Pune and the moie ed wit of & Yol 1110, 08 wo.) as the attacks of a hoat of others, sny ol whu, trobatly, have saldom exiwmlned i sacied pazow™ 1t ls authsniiculy reported that Daviel Webator way no # rongly conviuced of tho trath of tho watecests mata oy the Lvaugelsin, sfier matarely examimng thoir claims, that he serion 1> con‘eruplated writing o Wark 0o the evilou:es ol Cuastsuity, bay was prevented by picwsing professichal duties, What a grand dafeuce of tha *Constitation " of tho Cliristiau 181tk that 40114 bave beeu! THE TRUTH OF THE EVANGELISTS. SERS(UN BY TUZ REV. DB BULLIVAN, Tho Itor. Dr. Bulisan, B.T.D., Rector o Trimty Episcopal Church, yesterday preached the fullowing serason in reply to Juugs Baotl's esratv on tho authenticity of the Evanzclists ; Lt 2iow 3 Chirint riten fzom the desd, and bocome b frufta of then that aleyt—/. Connthians, 1 properee, this morning and evening, to offer you a reply 1o Judgo Dootls's recent esvay on the Resurrecton, In order to imog shie reply within sich limits 2s wilt not unduly tax yous timo and vaticnce, whilo at the same time cosen iug ell tue esscntial points 1n his paper, [ will leave unnoticed veveral extrancous topies fotro. duced by him which bave no direct bestlng ou s immediate theme, aid | r.ceed at onco to on analsais of h'a so-cailed srgument, with the pro- liminaty remark that 1t 1a ceenlyto be lsmented, that & document emanaring from such © koutee, on a tupic affectiug, e this docs, the very foune dation of our common Christisnity, lias beon yertted to go forty, exhibiting so littls of the impartislity becominy to & * candid loquirer " aftor truth, and o wueh Poth of the incon cluaiveuess of tho sophist and of the onesided nees o the partiean. So far a8 I am nble to classify the objections advanced In tbis paper against tha hislarical trutbfuluesa of our Lord's resurrection, thoy group thomeolves under threo besds, viz. First, alleged o iisaluns in tho narrative, the Evangolists beiuy wsileot whore, n this eritic’t judgmeut, they ought to bave 8poken ; srcond, ailegod contiadictions, 1n which, when tliey do speak, they como 1 collision, both with themnelves and with one suother : and, third, ulicgod antecedent tuprobsbilties in mauy of the eventa narrated. This clissilication will, I thiok, coverall the csuential points of the Judge's criticam. ‘fhe sdvantage of such an arrangement 1s, that it obviates tho neceseity of following bim through overy miuute dewail of his argument, hecaust rermitt og tho enunciation of cortain broad roneral muincijlos (wbich he has ignored or lost sightof), anud by which every dificulty he has rovived (for lie advancor nothing uew or origiual] mav be offectual's laid to rest, First—Uuder this gevein! Lead wo may place, fiist, tho omwsion by our Lord's blographers ot full par.iculsra of His youth mad child- hood ; secand, 5. Luke's omtesion of & portion of the Sermon ou the Monus, a8 rofotted by Bt Aatthew ; third, 8t. Luke's onvesion of & por- tion of tho Lord's Prayer, aa given by the same kvaugoliet; tourth, tho verbat variations in the ioacription placed over the Croes, os given by all to Bvaugelists ; and, fith, all the omiesions by oach of tho four of incidents conuected with tho ltesutrection. which aro rocorded by some cue ar mero of bis threo fellow-witnosacs— Aatthew, for examplo, saying nolliug about & eccond Mary, or of suy interview botween Chrixt and His D sciples snywhero bat in Galilen, orof be fact, timo, aud placo of tho sscensfon, nud othur incidents of which the other Evaugel- 1ets do speak. Bo Llark sgaiu la silont about the eurihquake, and the rolling away of the stone, and other incidonts variated by Matthow, while there aro multiplied otiseions by Laoke, Joun, and Paul in their respective records, Why, it1s 1ercatedly asked by our entic, do these omis- mons nad divergencios mar tuo perfection of tuo record, or how can thoy be reconciled with any theory of thewr iuspivation? Iaspiration tmplies iufallibllity, nud nfeldbility impliea » arfect knawledgo of all the facts af the case, aud with s perfect knowledge why not in each ot tuo fours cumplete and pertect recod? yat tha is tur from being whut we possess —orgo, tho Lvangelints wore oy fuspired. Too true ts it that Lo who lavs down fulso prowiscs muss svoucr or lator ariive at ta.se ¢onc.ustons. And tlis taroty of inspiration ta wholly fslse, Notlher Bortpture, uor even ono amoug tha vast airsy of writers on Beripture, Lviog or dead, lends it any warcant, * liocause sud in so far as insplued thereforo iufaiijvle,” Ho fac the logicia grod. Theso *holy men of old upake (wud wrote) a8 shey wero moaved Ly tha ioly Ghost,” wnd [is fospirations, tlowing o8 they do fiom the vory foune of truth, cau havo oo olomon: of error fu them~—but inspration carncd w.thit no gife of omuiscieuce. Luck wiiter was selectod 88 » cLauuel tor the couveysace of ouly a porios of tho truch, that patin of it, viz., which tha Holy Guoat suw b to be the itent to couvey, 1u converng it he avimlted bhunselr, Mist, of Ll owu direct knuwlsage, then uf wlatever he cuuld add that cawne to bLiw from teliable oral sud d.acuwentary testimony, 1ho supenutending iutluenco of “the lloly Ghust preseiv~ fug ban from error In uslog poth thcse suurcos of infurmation—it afior this thero was muro which e was meant to record, but wisich Lo had cihior forgotton or could nat obtain frum auy Luwan sourde, this the Ioly Gihost a.thor calfed 10 Mis rensembiance (Jobu, )or drecilyevealed 1o bum—then, the v tecord, ob.aiiod fiom these four sources, by Lue fuur wri erd, formed s complote and pere foct Goapel ; tlas I3, Dot complete in th nas of cuntaiuayg au absulutely tull, truo, and pars ticalar recoud of vvery incideut, bus oompiste enouyl for 1o actu il Ancasvitiss of the ceso, Now, what did this 0sse requuo ? A pre-Raph- aulito winictives Of datsil 7 Hurely net (such munteuesd Was vot morely uuneceassry ; it weuld have defuatad tho very end coutemylated), bt ya.lior aclear, bold outiine of wsliout fuots, cauveyiug to the roader a distiucs cuncaption of tue vuu perieoy Lfa,—a b.ograplical ol Cunist and tiw work, which, hke what wo call the general efect w psiut.wg or architeasurs, or tike the oxpression of tue humasu face, wuuld at ouce ¥irike the behioldur. aul impriut 1-01f on Lus mewory tu claractors ludelinte, Now, inshe production of such & biograply tho recorde must necessanily e vory fiagwoutary,—~a lutle {ocie dent hiore, aud another there, oue writer 1userts g this, und aunther that, according as the ooe Divine directiog ageut saw tha. the insertion of each little fiagment would coutribute to the pro- duction of she yisud geuers! result, Now, on siich & theory of inapirativn (ard nuthinxbfiyond this ad by suy vne for taese four Evau gouiets), ounesions and divergencics of state- meut bocome uit merely tegiimate, butsbeoluio- 1y uaceseary a8 evideuca of tus Independeuco and trutbfulue-a of tho teaumouy prosenied by eral witneuses. 1o object, s8 Judge Bool ¢ they do not sll tell verbally tns same that ove omits what the other recwsda,