| ao ~_ iain Tint NEW YORK HERALD, FRIDAY, MAY 8, 1867.~TRIPLR SHEET. ——— that this was an adjourned court~ | eah other? A. | ead before that ] did not think ar % ; , on 8 hen wo | himself bo callnl upon % epesk 0 any % tho on, 9 A, Y looked at ber alesely, Dut did not ob- ‘ai contended Sera fen. . Mey were hoor yes, sane sev-Hinainer, rae i thin: The And Joh seathemes, WA gp aly db aay & - a+ jedgmant 0 .@ Toews ot you say, came from the parson ‘adhered to tte dediston, and 9 recess was | Q. Weru they not bowtie? A. Ab times they wore, and a ae ont al a erin anon dt en Ses be awigned to the dofendam, ip write oo oe te coat 3 you do ak Wey come taken enti! twe ocock. ' ha oc oye eer, babe just read 10 you {‘oumsol oad cinchision of ex. 4 and wiib bie own wiInesoos—whes dei he ony in your bear, | might yrorecate HK for hime, ab as ma Or At, i rom Dr. Burdol? A. Tdo OW Wom they came fram Dr. | wpopnmony oF SENSAMIN Y, MAGUIAE. acne Beene ool tadgment 0° PPward Prarpont | ivack}) ero, gentlemen, there. wo a many whe conad | ing? He obipcied to the Watimany ami ran, “This 8 | Doe nos Bee te nary taal i prefer & ee dais ali pepeng: >. 1. ‘ager te rocees tho District Attorney called Bonjomin | Think | heard Mr. Plerpomt speak of tives 9°? oe ee ee ee rah | part of tho Tacos of the defen to Dut ce ‘do We our | ob fabe charge @talart tik defen wi ay 90 for, the whesbor bo waked aibeed thers eter bia wounds yon ¥, Maguire, who tertifed an followe-— Wels ton tes eee cee Wo, sir. | evidence of the defence, if] am oh ¥ ‘There | chiens i be bok by H; and yot when wo at | purpore of ridof ber. Bhe, ut once fee enc knew? A. No, sir; the spots appeared to be of the @. You are ® dentist by profession, i boticve, sir) A. aiean Swern Harvey pang was coreen, J. Sie howe Some reer, Twill not ag he gl tg says “tei, . me ode pied women SO ee ile * ame charactor. c w Harvey? A. Maver the partionlare, vo tha’ to the e'¢kdence ta riadlose, delence, p proba! ‘on = hesasion, ‘ser @ In reference to these woinds having been iniiiclod | Yea, sir. glance whatever; I nover bad an bour’a gonvorsation With | sConnsol again reverred vo tho same tictuu,) Now, goa | +00 rexpect ar contideration. » fe told you th 4h intocont woman do oes? id, amma pad Q. Did you know Dr, Bardell? A. Vos, cir. my Hemen, I ave quoted thosa ret of la +, oot thas {wap | preparations wore malo for that morder by my, elenky thet have outatacion, Dr. Binds Demived to wade HA ‘ax bis intended wife; \t was known smoug their ma- i | f uw i E i 7) f E dispected tho wound? Doctor did nob have blow was etruck a3 ¥ : ts F re ' wo blow. 8 @ And that when he put out bis band: he could nos havo berm erping ay obec ‘A, Toanpot say that to could mat havo grarping apy object. @ It would not Dag papa 4 ed sweali have been near? A. As 1 aald before, it war Bay when bo held hia band np, judging frou the cirou- _ The Gourt—Tho general appearance? A. Yes, sir, * _@ You think that there must have been a atruggin with | @e who did this murder, and that the murderor ‘ hale raceived personal violence y would depend rem ee eee, the Decaer's bolas a? A. Fos, Yi that a man of his physical strength weit as ae rseaoet A. {think 80. @ BW he did takto hold of aperson? A. Ho woukt havo Given violence. By a Juror—With regard’ to those scattering drops of ‘hood, you saki there was one on the teaf of tho table? A. ‘There was several Hite drops of bleod. f .cedegetelyoeeaghd ‘A Saror—Did mregzic ‘Tho Court—There Gall your next Tho District swhech I will Br. Burdell, Say de sumer ber di teas har amity —to ry : ©, and to Feat ‘Ge house No. 31 Bond etreet at $400 a year rent. ‘The Court—What is the date of tt? Mr. Ea}—Thero is no date to it, sir; we will dx the date wy Another subject. Ie Mr. MoGuire in Court?” [No ‘enewer. a witness by whom I havo but thres or testimony will be very short. exception of Mr. MoGuire wo iH gF xfale i Hi ef lf if " i g i g Ee f Hi in FE lf in eR ia : { 2 8 Fe ‘Who opens the case on the part of the de- . Cui Af the Court please, we wi ws that this prosesution bo Tf the Court please, before argument 16 made tobeheard. aA ‘The Court—It is a most onosual ding. Mr. will state, before my feat, the law Figen he where two defendants are indicted togothor, présecntion having concluded, a motion may be made, ‘md the Conrt may instruct the jury then and there, st tho termination of tho direct evidence for the prosecution, that ‘tm the judgment of the Court no care has been out Freooeent, tho pany euay be put upon tho y'tnces sland, it upon the witness 4 ena mado a wiunecs of. "But where. UT rest—the jury must pass upon it. Tho lo- testimony, or they may go to motion of ; it E 5 E F Hi sir, under the fms ig okber a @ Did you ever #00 Dr. Burdel) write? A. Very onan, } yt, sro7U,m gol terms with Wadham? A. T always | jose thore was say Tent Doparmity for it, bus because the J HRI no’ mordor was ever moro defiberately pl al dim. ~m a iho fare Deen, and since the death of e Awe @ You are then acquainted with hie handwriting? A. ‘ iarvty ave enshen ® |, Coarinet Ravied the power, 9a Teey secu Ree cae a ily your thal the defendana re. | waa sequatotance, nb she waa loncod . the cago as they havo ip similar cases, it had »| Yoo, stv. Q. What other relattves did Op, Burdel have in this leave thea. q owt red Hannah to go to bad early tho night in questi. | Mrs. Harvey Burdetl. beup wb hed ye E! Fin'yon dove tho gontoen 10 ak at shone papers | i? ,A. 140% Kuow” bat Yay had any adore oxoept | pyyet ih but we prefor that ot sours should Boake, | ABO Here the yet met wehin tho sraridwrearad | thc fer we omierae sm amd en th mentioned abd ¥ g- My . : nto evidence inthe chain of damaing qui would | was ’ , and vee if any of them are iw bis handwriting; and ifso, | floor of his woo Ryda assas | me in fis connection chow out @ sagest wl the ‘as there any mark om tha dy which yom | eemven fnew i? A, No, nothing exeops on pen pt i whl ‘war’ it. { Ch Q. Did you notiee et the: time what kind “of a look ef Visit'to 31 Bond sarcet, dud paid great attention to this sin; that Dowdy “Wress Hot f DaPNon h | not the District Attorney examine the py of partios Sts ? A. 1 donot remember, J eare? A. Lwax thava nearty every day during the Oore | py. Tell, Tak cant eke Dashoem in witch | tho fad tho keys to that house? Why wai not thoeo om hy eh gc ae. 0. Did you notiee who the wiaker wast/ A. did no, P Bor’ ins ortigation, from #lYah ho dedued an inforonca of gH against my | Premises oxamicedyand why was not ecrutiny directed to | heart Wiha, ents it was natural for atthe pereon who sokt hima the pital toid him it waa . Before that you hol Kept away from your dousin? | cient, AWrai in bisproof upon that poms? fia witnessea, | them. ‘There were other partion who had keys to that view on ae Mg apt ecin ion bn ages ove of tho best. / A. "Ves, Fir, Dre. Mawrand Ubi, isl yon that this body remained there | hoaso. Tdon’t wish to tast annessseary wuspicion he co een Fr ae ho woukl invoke th paticietion, which bo subse “Q. For how many momiha prior to that time have your | ag it habdealways, ‘hers was no evidenoe, #9 show that it | sxyboly; but there sera ocher parties. He has Ca "fect beep in tho Bouse sf Dr, Budell? A. Ym April was the | had been disturbed at all. Amether elvenmetance which | even to call them as witnesses upon tho otand. The ry Q. You dons snow whether it was O89 sor someberty 8. aaportant to bo | Obes, A. It sas not Colt’, ' Q. How did you come to de wita Wim whon he beughs! } Fat time I was there provinus to tho murder, ‘ the ey clothed ¥ timony waa before the Geroner, and if it is ms : thet pictol? A. He invited mo to ge wth bin, YQ. How fur wad you roviled trom it? A. Thad resided | rhevepte was talsz dle nard. that Yar duneneane Ge | proven here it will ba, thet goo two or Uareo persons hat | point Warwo or throe altercaitons ip the | ours nf» Year oF ou were with him in bust seseas thes time? A, Noy ta Union equare, vorrior of Fourteenth sutet. pears the next day with a Yer cape on, by | aeys w that houne. Ydon't choose to tention their names | two. Mary Donoho — rh ayn thas. thaso "| Q, When bare insyeen Demis Hubbardcr Nemia Voors? | Whioh ha cought to hilo lew neck’ but’ that | ki present. Why was it chat no sttontion was directed to | cho trad been there about » week | le Tie’ ie, “pip, Wore you amocisted with ttm in any way? @. No A. lsaw hor here yesterday, in Oours; when she went} shecrld riot eo hido it aste prowert a boing dis. | s2y one cle? Was it becawee tho official, whose namo } patties Ol ean ery onl toid bor that t waa ip rela- out of the dvr, | row her pass. covered ugion it corresponting with the mark upon the 8 become a byo-werd of reproach, know mot how to con dell caino out of the room and tol that te cay barga the ig own ¢ man} w ‘ami } Althis time they were aucried, . on to iicybard, Now if thas be true Q Issheheronow? A. I don't know, newt of Uae decensed—a mark whie& Phe Di«wict Attorney an inquest? Wa it Deo sn the wane eer ee we) ‘An to the character of Aro you 8 blood relative wrpr. Bardell? A. Fos, sir, ; fl ha J Q She ia-reviding in the city, isshometi A. Tthinksbeis. | sna! had Been given in the deatta gripe. “Yon recoliget, | time or attention, ho thwght a Jort state what relat @ . His mothor andmy mo- thor were sisters, Q How troqueky have you eam "hor during tho lust | fyatememscho rhetorks wht w ro een ae aie Ge” wees Ie tetore ee , 1 boon sincoyou-wers | three mow?” A. {may have seen Mer threo ines; per- | Fa a Udet, gentlemen whas letee prentenar incre | cease further inquiry in. any her di Doral Hubbard, perhape you have beard euough arady. in hie honse? 2 Poem Iesench April test, haps net more them twice. fo ached his Witvers, Pr, Maia, Dit saa observ: . | Let tho presecntion answor. Another aociasatie pst You have heard that she was ay 9 Proves pa Q. East A. Yor, wir, Q. Where have you soon her? A,“T saw bor once 909 | ding bert her neck,” gointing’¥e this particular cir Tho District Attorwey says nt stolo the key of Yr, | mistress of her own bie meet oy ee Q. On business? A. Tc ddoththara on bisinens. or 910 Wreatwoy , at Mra, Beulen’s, #mpce, “Wy. Main eald, “No, there was tothing.” ur. | Bi seal y atid upon that bio socks } let ue prove it, but if allowed wa coubl prove We, Q. Wero you on frien: ty or unfaiendly terms withihim? | Q You wentthero? A. 1 did, ther Uw that, gentiomen, bo 'tdlis:-yeu that it was aosid | to prodica With roference to this, 1} from tho papers of Tir. Burdell, coat ne poms Le A Wo wordnm on frie aity worm e Vaid om ace bite eeen | a, When bed you laet been there before? A. Idon't | gay-caiet a.fur cane was a wry dowabio artiche of cloth | &aY, Keath nis ower cuored by mortal | divorce frean her iwwfo) busbamd, paid ube 4 Yeallod; 1 thonght aft wares that Tbad beter havo the | tink hatbeen thero befura; Uttwmic not, iogesViatday. Trero wasmefhing woonual in the iwiy's | maa more ‘abe in fect Woon that, T do not insinuate that | ond afterwards kept ber a8 bie, oam Resets Oo Q That-ya since the homickie? “A. Sine tho homieke. || Grew,@nd a0 tho wext mam Ciremmeaten cea ‘ct | the District JAttorney dit not boliewe wh @ Were zsa precont when ehy-waa oxamined ata wR | Qrgmae hip eiensant Again, the Deetice Aueacy saya, | fact wever weal so, He says it wae found Near poss befors tho Coroner? A. Twas. ‘ OPhie wooman—this fend—tes weman tlend-—told tho do’ | TLat key wos found in an upper atte, among a b was Ler maklep name, Her married seme was Vourst, Q. I with you wor@ea mtodo, vir, the reletives: that Dr. Q. You favo attonded here during this entire Uisl, | masttes imthe hover to liston to tha uRoreations between bor | pets, Where it had been thrown probably by Br. # b 7 sho bocame divorced # er ye A. Burdel) had “in thisserty-at tha time of his death ? @, Se | Dave pornos? A. I was subpetand. and Bectos Harvey Burdoll.” They Aidli-toa, fle told you, | himeelf, hohaving het it, Ataltevents, thore ky not one | namo. Gentlemen, cannes you understand why a oma vera}. @ Wimi was the cause of Mh ditfioulty betwoen yom | nydwne words of loathing-were moh that tboy shrank back | particle of provf, not any well Gunde olen showing | tight feel indignant et the \lee of having » Blow) cous Q. Just name team? A, Ho bad e ‘half sistor—-Mrs, Se A. Weil, he spoke rathor ‘owas | abated; a bosutiful semtence—beautiful: language. it | uF pretending to show ons the prisoner at the bar over | © ome back to ber ‘busband’e ows, hve Ngee ep a friend of mine, Mi eh . . \ . had possession of that key. . Burdoll lott his key; | Foo! nav0c! daughtare, @ Tero was ® 1 focting —that ie all T want toqgot | G2, One Se eee Dut | whether te lost up there or whers be lost it dan: not so” | ine bis Kopt miatres? ¢ ould you blaine » woman if be fap hn you or yay aonb A. Yos, sit. |. yom raat no such facta existed. Away goos, then, this | pear, andthe District ARorney youl inalanete that with ramen Fag orp tiphonsnp tryed oh oH ovd-exatmined by Mr. Hat. ‘mw canstancc. 4 sir, | bis Kost key the safe of Dr. Burde!] wo. oponod and ransack 1 ere to live come » aleboug Obs quertion—she day en'whieb you purchased that | Sip’ eamstanon. Another, endone Of Ae a foniant war, | ed bytiis defendant;and yet, gentlemcn, ws though tuero | she came often there to visit Dr. Burdell, (an you bamne Kitiehcees Os day oF aay, ime, 089 7a use it at Dr. Bor- | tied ‘eho abernded ‘wervel’ upon Dr. Thompson, rawts | were & Providence In al thes things, it eypears by tho | her that abo ished thie woman But» to come there afer Nae A. V did. 1 is r ‘enli tectisnony of the prorocution hat even time, when | cho discovered a IR lade a lie aah catia! So Tuer cto up hor bantes against De. Burdeil | isallegod tho particular paper abovt which you lave | Burdell Teey proved. yo ot tne Sontecesan aa yer-tied myself. 3 on hered Dr. Thomxwen testify t, and so | Heard so much was missing, anotber key bad Deen got. | evide bard. K F ee hog ° of Ju ie ; Dr. | Demis Hubbard did ot come back—that the defendant c comes mark? A) Shooting at a candle. far Trova that, he 1@i5 you that exactly the omtrary was | it was obtained upon tho 28th of Juno, which key Dr. far tareen ate mg Prost = lerparatyzod. Burde® always thoreafter bat in his poosession down to Nov hei to take The District Attorney here announved that his direct te might prove the character of thie Demin Hubbard, That business done by an r @erpey ated went out, Q. Did yon ap Jewrons htypation about "that tine? A, You, about that timo, owen, igen Wat i the manve of her husbaad? A. George D. Q. Where did thoy re ide at the taref hin demh ? They resided in "Thireys.ixth street. re Boyett oth © retatves had he? A. A brother, Lawia Q. Whero 4 he redo? A. In Brondway. ¢ In what yumber? A. Ido not remember. } No. 910 ,is it nor? A. T think ao, Q. Was th g brother deranged? a. He Q. What @ you mean by that? A. caro of bir olf. Q Don’t bo govent sometimes? A. Re~ies out, but not often. Q. Did] somistinbbard or Mrs. Veewset. scrthere? A. Ibdelieve’ be dit'toard with Miss Granent; tho siter-in- law of Le wig Burdoll, Q Int pesamo sourr? A. You, Wh e@ was Pemis Hubbard or Voorst? ~ A. 1 think her crim—that Dr, Baréell applied'to hiro in the matter—that n = ye trdefl cali: 4 tho timo of hir-death, ‘Tho papors were lovtin Beptomber, | mast havo been satisfied in regard wo tbat point, 60 far a@ Simemy was through. va andl umid thet he hint nothing to do in | tho ene OF Ie vow Kee eiel suppiiod the ck a: % | Demis Hubbard coming tw ive under ber roof.” Again, & the mvotter, that ‘facre was no reason why ho should bo y: . . pants bl Gragg ed aot. Boctor Thempsan thon waid he had no- | Was a8 enrly as tho 2th of Juno. Mr. Horring told yoa | conversation at the fant table ia trumped up. iia THE CASK FOR THE DEFENCE. thine “to'do shh il, end eo next day wroto a noto | that that lost key, after tho 2&b of June, would not open | said that Eokel—as innocent and harmless mab a to {pat eect, AncAher circumstance put by. the | the safeatall. ‘Then what becomes of this circumstance? | ever appeared in buman form—made the remari, “ enaeen rar tec be Disti bot Attorney with dramatic power, was thi. | “But,” says tho gentleman, “we will prove to you that Jingo, T would like w be there when he waantrong up, if @pcning Speech of"Bir. Clinton on ohe Peat | 1 wi snot say of bim,eshorald of my'cliont, that he bad the | there wana mysterious smell of burnt garments in the | did not bave w pail too hard at the cord.” Now, of Mrs.“Cunningham. dra patie, ‘That eiroutaxtance was that Mr. Thompson | prewises there,” intending to insinuate, no doubt, that | the girls are mistaken. The facts aro than:—A few pighte hey .rd the defendant ask Pr. Burdeli upon tho Friday pre- | Wecever perpetrated that murder burnt up his bloody ae ty thie Dr. Buriell came home very late, Ho ‘Mr. Cinton then reso,erid profound silopee, and "Pre- | oo" Moy tho homicides ina very famniviar manner, “when | Clothes that night in the honso, HM iad his pars key but could not get in; wan, porbape, at Baise Wm fornieriy Hubbard. @ Ww aho Yolated to Dr. Berdel? Aho was his | eocded to address the jury in behalf of the defendant)ia | he would retun,” and thutthue sbe know the oxacbhour of | who eapzrienced an unpleasant se the time when the tock was no © open BO ono cousin. || bo following language»— DS g retwm, so that sho- might plan hia death, Ho tells you | Smeiiag burnt woollen op that evens could get in except with difficulty. Ho the hall with Q. Be ownrticod cousin, was sho not? - A; fhe was, t at she saki¢o-bimyin a very affectionato way, “Harvey, | Iwill not take up your time in reference to that. violence apd woke up Hannah. She axeked Mr. Yoodgrase @ ¥ fas shoe married of a single woman? A, Bho had | OXNTuanc ov Ta Jowr—Although not attageiber "NCC | y ihere arc you going?” of “when aro you going tore. | ebuugh to say that otbers who hat quile as good or Holter | te Ge ‘and let him in, Young rans did no Deen? parried. vexstomed to addressing a Jury in capital oases, Pave | { orn?” justinthe same manner that one would address | ohportun'ty rmelt nething of the k: Mr. Ullman, when | of Jandpess to Haavah and the Doctor, He want down Q. } do yourkenow, slr, whether or non divorce had beom «never riven to addres a jury undor circumstances’ tke | another dsavingtho house. There, gentlemen, are tho vo bo went into the house, smelt nothing of the vort,andthore | and let him in, and the Doctor immedi oly began to abuso Progu ged ny hor her husband, throng) tho instra- » Joading cironmstanees upon whicb the District Attorney | 1 D0 preof or anything to suspect Uaet b poor Snodgrass abd raid to bim, “Twill knodk your Yraias in, ent Bey wd ok ho expense of Dr. Burda? A. 1 do not, (Mw? Dow surroawding this case. I havo never before |” Lis ven to canvictithis woman: of the crime of murder. aro very deiicient.. You know very wall 1 Tw. cach your head in, God damn you. Why w thiadoor prosesnition « s i from fc on ed in t nse night, we Hod? od 4 rather qurprived at che ‘tieen to address a jery where the mn hed 80} His owm testimony taker se Bees dp ion all en burned in i ey, it for a tay | of Dr. Burdell; instead of thanking him for isting him 4 igcented the whole house not only *or a nigt nat ber. 1 ouly | or two afterwards. Xe! rmething of Uo kind) existed there, | Dr. Burdeil treated Snodgrass very rudely on this oocwe matee, who lived | elon, and yet Bnodxracy Dever rovemted it, so fur am I come Mickeriug | leard. Rothe remarks were probably ma‘io in regard % wod that | (hisattable, The language ved by Burdeli wo ‘oodgraw of guilt, |b age the very best criterion of tho faot fs reats Wero guiirely meaningless. You « go tat the Doctor intended to. kw at ee ee ‘or soparcte from hime - 1. believ woro both stopping- at’ Dr. Bardeli’s thew be in Bona etrset, g €) Io lastdeauary? A. J do netanow whet timo. « & Don’t you know tho fact thet hey-havo not tived to.” " er for more than a year? A. I never-knew abort the ¢ peer een Claw ees , Rurtell’s scrap book, since bis mth. Q, Wher dit you last see the husband cf Mrs, Demig Babbart? Mr. Hall, the Mstrict Attorney, sald -be-eould not see the 1 @levanoy of (his testimony. Jotge “e8-—-] suppose we cannot try this divorce qnee- Connsl for tho nocurad—T has been urged that a me- closed their evidence, end we ail felt mot only thet tho | Mo, ciroumstancee-whish he alle lot against ber Prosecution bad utterly failod to point even tho iogor of fowl bin hayes bore fae savage uack oe as But, gays tho gentleman, Boctor P. well grounded suspigicn towards tho prisoner at tho bar, |) Upon thir unprotected and defenesiess womyn? There ison- | acFass the way, discovered aboot that tito ‘but where the proseoudon bad proved not onty-that the \y one jrineipto upon which Toan uaderstand t You heard es bens ooh bot FB oy or Lage Bsa mney om % ire, tho of feels I. ent " lufere opening of the District Atorney was unjust end-ungouo- Tr rete teeween the diferent muembors of tee Bardell | KONE) as he supposes, 10 show thas coon wore rous, but where the progecution had proven'boyend perad- famiy. You heard-enough from bim to draw tho jafe- | burned in tho promisoa that night, Now it {3 @ | not venture that as dhe eese stood it was tho bounden duty of | rence thet Br. Bordoll was generally on bad terms with hix | Carou® colncitenco that two gantiemey, lust evening, | ib ress? Drains when he said #0, la bora guy the jury at onoe tomequit the defendant, Tho-District At family—quarrelied and made up with thom by turns, but | (sad I Lope my friend Mr. Oliver will not blame me for | parses you do rot bear parues aay, in reiere® 9 1) v4 “ At-| gat they peeresaone pocaliarity which is very apparent | meutiouing bis namo,) he was ono of the twe who were | enother, “I will knock his head inv? “I will KRY oq 4¢ torney, in opeaing this caze to you, gentlemen, fos thoug h | upon this triel. ‘The moment tho Lifeless remains of Har- ing, in Pond etreet, last might ebout oleren o'clock, | you do It!” or euch idle words as that? Not a Any he supposed that woman who, éinoo Use Gletof Janum wy | vey Rurdell arc consigned tothe cold and silent tomy, or | Dr. Parmalec’s window, and they ~ r al etolen a nets, manner we Giink proper. ‘Tho latitude of the eroec-exars!- | — n eivi) ennwe It lo wedBielept, If the aa br whol tt ‘ ‘ wiod i @ pol . nation doce not nt aii depond upon your Honar’s or the | pgrece wih and euppeesn the Sy> | ‘ " ¢ i 1 aa District Attorvey'* cow on the imp smtance of the testi. | to prove, but ie erimiass 9 fh mast orm withe shatow \c mony given by him on tuo direct examination. Polheais but thet of dhe gulls of the part had quarrets @ o ’ take & chmrge’ OF ie tind, ee Gent dwige Davieo—-You may (Cragin him on the point for | —n other wordegontiem: suv governing gor ania who we i wh rhy Prosonge tt at th jot Attorney has loft off the which bo han boon called, butk is vory difforent frou | tathie caro te sieaply shie~ ne the clroums'ances | trict Atorm +a comsiderable ti Bg Kowl a at LS one eaten belaie okt Gee Harvey Bar’ Suits wer fo of ao end bi reaher Willi tween thom. At thy rohan Rardelb Y called mot. for thie tur ied ho wad (and that f it frogs his «pooch ) yoothee|s than golag into a divoros wait. Proved in thir case exched ry Q. What were your rolations wb Dr. Burdell prior to | thet af guilt, it is your beunden duty to 9 his death, friendly or nnfriondiy? A. We wore noton | is beet eta od tn “Rest, on Prevomptions,”’ p visting terme Woke thostberty of reading fram that hook ‘apon this pein xt the whole Dou Before the Coroner Soodgrase wan evasatoen, this lady wore examined: ayo, and her and ten youre OF age, werd wade wit. Wore you on epraking terms whee you mot im the | “The evidonos agvinet tin aerured sho y ne to Bae 9 yey frou steely AT did B08 aponk to him exclude toe morn certainty, every hy puthects I hs fe eve Uke boys preet ot ake weer Q. Was thare a litigation between Wm. Ryrdol! and his | hie guilt of tho offence imputed to him ¥ | f- Why sted ty Late cone rr ordiner Harvey Bardoll, the deceased, in wesob you took | If ell tho ctreametences proved cout! be tres ant fot ths | came to pay him Wil s witnomes Were evar oulfeuted Op ee meniane part against Hisevey? party innocent, you uurt acquit. Ii tho cirvumetances aro | Mr. Porrepout sued him, and o mn. ee Ganguinrs were 4 + pdt eo pa vr} betwen. Harvey Burge | seyeite a with’ enilt or innosonce meantime cone raits hetirar ¢ not In accordance with the roles e ne laa bot Wat ware the rolations eon Harvey Burd Aoquit. Abd upon jhie point I w gone againot ¢ fot the vole purpowe of extracting frm them ovitesse at ments wht the asked Mr. Fs againet William; and uham | paved, Mr. Pier and bis brother Wiliam, friendly or anfriemily? A. I | ing yor attention, gentlemen should think they wore not very friendly, he wont 1@ see | fow illurtrations of th pri him about three times im the apace of four youre; Wilkitsn | prerently, if the prosecution lial prove't tonty fol! my. Hived In Colombne, Ohie, arkd Gecastonally came to the city, | than they bare, that it gould not avail thom wit Bir their mother’s guilt, T recellect weil, in reading that evi 1 a the peculiar nature of the questions pat te these artiees boys ="My little son, what timo wat i that us beard the noo Inet Friday night?’ What time when he called to eee him. thie rale of law. [ sow fond from Judges i eres & od owe a , Sve nee bnew, iat of the diatanca which wo- | Bimonde’ chargs ts the Jary in a capital ca | i’, = yy at Sr. te se ae ren Nae oe reer. wae Oe porated thom, what the rolaaions of these Drotharg were w ' roportet i the fowth yolome of the New Yor’ Lo | crime iP ay je come ia vy ) vee Ae 4 , WI und wate And ia

The New York Herald dated May 8, 1857

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12