The San Francisco Call. Newspaper, January 27, 1900, Page 3

HE SAN FRANCISCO CALL, SATURDAY, JANUARY 27, 1900. 3 POLITICIAN ~ AND EXTRA SESSION SWEEPS THE STATE [riend of kn d kely pport Burns. Dan Burns. It he State to elect sonally. It is a iia if we can’t elect cretary Republican ittee—There is no 1, if it is not a : Burns. If for that, & stake. Burns is not wanted as want two Senators. The people st him. t—If it is to elect ss. If to elect a Smith, hurrah for rder—I don’t want t the session is for, m in favor of elect- 1 don’t think there t; we can get along with all right to repeal the wide expense is useless, Burns deration can’t see w ugh wit h along well eno met were will g to venture 3 Most seemed ction of Burns. - | - +* or George Burns or t seems to e shaped st Legis- say whether time will Bu rraled enougtk Governor Gage d man can be It's all an S. P.- 4 dried befor b expe: ; Surprised when OAKLAND. Arthur W. Feld- y Treasurer hest Repub- Valley—I do Governor people of id be politics political 1id have b 10 represent this ild say select we can't possibly get & Alameda County As I can say frank- United ving favor- st heartily n of the Leg- or. 1 can- holding of y. This e Repub- who forced = g @ Hearts are as numerous as weak stoma chs There scarcely do not read paper some of cumbed to heart dis- ease. 1f your heart flut- ters, palpt- tates, gives dence of wing weakness, begin treatment at once. DYAN will cure, HUDYAN strengthens e heart's n. "HUDYAN rebuiids the rt structure with irregular fluttering of Choking sensation (Fig. 3)? Fiushing of face upon shight exertion (Fig. 3)? cars and throbbing pain in head Weakness in limbs (Fig. 5)? Cold nd feet (Fig. 67 Pain In left side These symptoms all tell you of heart Again, you may notice an irregular poressed feeling in chest, dizey spells, & 1 tendency to faint HUDYAN corrects all the foregoing symp- toms. Bince the @iscovery of this valuable remedy fatalities as & result of heart failure bave been lese frequent. HUDYAN is for men and women, snd cures permanently. HUDYAN is for sale by druggists—i0c a package, or six packages for $2 50. 1t your druggist does not keep HUDYAN, send direct to the HUDYAN REMEDY CO., Cor. Stockion, Fllis and Market Streets, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL. in our daily | | hence. Grant at the last session, and it | has the votes. | extra session will help the Republican am opposed | part —Down | | a Democrat to | | W bs ki is | a day that we | Major John L. Bromley—I am opposed to the extra session. It was called for the purpose of making Burns Senator, and that I do not favor. Henry Evers—I fear that this extra ses- sion will injure the Republican party. I do mot think that it was necessar: the people will charge all of its ai to the party. Sol Kahn—The extra session was called for the purpose of making Dan Burns Senator, and I do not think that the peo- ple want Dan Burns for Senator. Under those ances, 1 do not think that the extr: jon will be of any use to any one except Dan Burns, and the Re- publican party will get the credit of the whole move. + + f CHICO. ; ‘ (:'Ht'(\v an. 26.—Republicans here will | not be quoted. None are for Burns or the extra session. They say it iIs a political schem pens - - s 3 | MARYSVILLE. | + 34 ARYSVILLE, Jan. 16.—H. B. P.| Carden—In convening the Legis- | M lature Governor Gage did nothing | more than bow to the will of the people, and his action should meet with the approval of every loyal Republican. I am of the opinion that much good will come from the extra session. It certainly was the only thing to be done from a | Republican standpoint. | W.-H. Parks—We elected our legislators | in the belief that they are competent to R e R R R 2 S0 SO PRSPy attend to the duties of their position and | 1« do the best for their constituents. The | ority favored the convening of the ex- “session, and for that reason I do not fault with the ac 1f the Legislature Works the people have a fauit to find. ,ard Belcher—If the extra session about_no other re of a United States mpensate for the outlay it ental tes for United 1o express | of the candida or and do not car tor F. H. Greely—I think a Re-. wuld be elected, and will accomplish that | e a good thing. a Republican, with the take, 1 am glad exira session 11 have d: Hall—As believe the whole af- and any suggestion figure. isdom of call- work of the meeting is conclud- think the Republicans Califor- n realize that it was a good e to convene it. ‘ | w ed. 1 nia will th T. J. Sherwood—Fallure to elect a Sena- tor last winter was sufficient of itself to warrant convening the members of the _egislature in extraordinary session. Be- | cause the members of the Legislature ailed to perform their duty in 1589 is not | ,d reason for the Governor to fail to do his duty in an effort to secure for Call fornia full representation in Cong . at chosen at once and ad- quickiy as possible. le' to_the people has as good * > - + - + ANFORD, Jan. 26—1 am not a H Burns man and deprecate any scheme to elect him. I would pre- fer to see some one who w not prominently before the last Legislature I believe M. H. de Young would make a good Senator and one who would work early and late for the interests of Cali- fornia, and that is what thi —B. L. Barney, ex-Supervi | n extra session of the Legislature if we can elect some good Re- n United States Senator. I am 1 favor of it if the same scenes of Legislature are re-enacted, as it disgrace to the State of Call- I am in favor of fornia.—J. H. Dopkins. I am not in favor of an extra session of the Legislature and am not in favor of Dan M. Burns for United States Senator. 1 think we can get along with one Senator until a ular session of the Legislature. | The calling of an extra session iIs very un- | wise.—Dr. N. P. Duncan. | | I think the scheme of calling an extra | session is for the purpose of _eclecting | Burns United States Senator. I hope this | is not so, but those in the scheme prob- | ably know what they were doing when the e Dept + - +| + KIAH, Jan. 2%.—Your correspond- emt interviewed a large number of prominent Republicans to-day re- garding their Senatorial prefer- s. While the almost universal senti- nt seems against D. M. Burns‘for the , the gentlemen interviewed make statements for publica- tion over their own signatures. This reti- ence may be accounted for on the ground tate institution is located near and the patronage therefrom is more or less extens m the outlying districts the sentiment against Mr. Burns is practically if not altogether unani- mous. : 4 | ERKELEY, Jan. 26. — George Schmidt—Personally speaking, I have nothing to say either for or against Mr. Burns. I would even go further and say that I have no doubt that he would be able to represent this State in the Benate, if elected. Politically speaking, I believe that Gage is doing only what he ought to do. Burns brought him out of the brush and made him and he is bound to carry out his pledge in re- But, politically speaking again, it ican party elects Burns all hell the Democrats two years - e people of the State, rightly or wrongly, will not tolerate it. His elec- tion, in other words, would be a disas- trous political blunder. P. R. Boone—Of course, every one knows how Berkeley rflf:nrds the candidacy of Mr. Burns, and, like other Berkeley Re- | ublicans, 1 am opposed to his election. | his seems to be the attitude of the better class of Feuple throughout the State. Per-| sonally 1 am in favor of Irving M. Scott. | He is a man used to succeed. He is fa- | miliar with affairs in Washington and is 2 man of unblemished reputation. I am satisfied that his election would please Berkeley. W. R. Little—As the extra session is evi- dently but the means used by Gage to fill his obligations to Burns I do not see why the State should stand the immense ex- pense of an extra session. The election of Burns would cause a scandal through- out the State. 2 BERKELEY. SACRAMENTO. + g ACRAMENTO, Jan. 2.—John N. Larkin, the veteran Republican editor of the Sunday Leader—I think this extra session is a farce and a fraud, got up for the purpose of put- ting in Burns, and for nothing else. D. Lindley, of the wholesale grocery firm of Lindley & Co.—I am opposed to extra sessions generally and to this one | cation A Burns. Mexico will disrupt the party moral grounds. Burns would be suicidal. . principles of the Republican party. REV. W. L. GASTO} D. H. BRYANT, San Jose—The methods of Burns are not in keeping with the His defalcation as Secretary of State and his record in and bring disgrace to the State. GEORGE LYON, Lakeport— The conduct of Burns while Secretary of State should forever debar him from favorable indorsement by the people of California. A. H. DEPUTY, Lakeport— Burns’ name is man is his record, and he would follow his bent toward the people of California if elected. WILLIAM APPLETON, Lakeport—To elect such a man United States Sena- tor would be an outrage on the decent-minded people of California. , pastor of the First Baptist Church, Santa Rosa—I am free to admit that the only reason I can see for this special session is a background in which Burns looms up an uncanny aspirant for the Senatorship. The people do not want him on Brigham Roberts is to be preferred. F. W. GEORGESON, cashier Humboldt County Bank, Eureka — The selection of McKinley is as popular as any living man, but the State would go against him if Dan Burns is sent to the Senate. E. M. PYLE, chairman County Committee, Santa Barbara—The election of Burns to the United States Senate would be a disgrace to civilization and the defeat of the Repub- lican party in this State for years. J. J. SQUIRE, Deputy District Attorney, Santa Barbara—Dan Burns is not a proper person for the position of United States Senator. GEORGE A. BLACK, Santa Barbara—Dan Burns is not the man we want to send to Washington as a specimen of Californians. D. GOCHENAUER, San Diego—It would be better for the party to leave the seat va- cant for a year than to fill it with Burns. L. A. WRIGHT, San Diego—Unless Burns and Gage have overestimated their in- bad. No one could be a worse man. The party cannot carry Burns. L4 b4 + Always to beat his fellow- ’ fluence at the extra session, the next Republican campaign in California, so far as State is- ¢+ sues are concerned, will be one of penitent apology for a faithless Governor and an unwor- ¢+ thy Senator. T FRANK EGAN, County Committeeman, Angels Camp—I am unalterably opposed to ¢+ the election of Burns and do not believe that Gage should be allowed to pay his political ob- ¢ ligations in this manner. ‘4 JOHN DAVEY, proprietor White House, Angels Camp—If Gage and Burns were in ¢ hades the people would be better off. The extra session is a scheme and a disgrace. 3 ALPHONSO BARRY, attorney, Angels Camp—If Gage’s scheme carries and Dan ¢ ¢ Burns is elected to the Senate of the United States it will be a standing and burning dis- ! grace to the State. This State needs a Senator badly, but it would be better off without one ! than to send a man like Burns to represent it. $ W. J. DOHERTY, Bakersfield—Down any scheme to elect Burns. It is a sorry day 2 for California if we can’t elect a fit man for Senator. E ARTHUR W. FEIDLER, Alameda County Treasurer, Oakland—If it can be proved + that the scheme is to secure the election of Dan Burns it would be one of the most gigantic 4 conspiracies in the history of California. outrage on the people of this State. F. S. COOK, ex-Town Marshal, Ventura—Burns should not force himself upon the D. S. BLACKBURN, capitalist, Ventura—The election of Burns would be a great Gage has made a monstrous ass of himself. he is not their choice. A. J. PILLSBURY, Tulare—If the head of the San Francisco push is chosen Sena- tor the result will constitute a disaster to the Republican party and a humiliation to Cali- R. T. McMILLAN, Tulare—I think it is an ou'trage to put Burns in the Senate. A. W. GARRETT, Healdsburg—Burns’ election would be a disgrace to not only the J. H. BROWN, Petaluma—A scandalous job from beginning to end to further the 0. R. CROSS, Visalia—Burns isn’t fit to represent respectable people anywhere. He should not be elected. GEORGE SCHMIDT, Berkeley — Burns’ election would be a disastrous political b ¢ + people when he surely knows . @ fornia. + % Republican party but the State. * ? ends of a very objectionable candidate. . ;0) JUDGE H. C. LITTLE, Visalia—Burns is a rascal. 4 $ blunder. - in particular, for I do not consider that the situation demands any such convo- . A. Van Voorhies, head of the whole- sale saddlery and harness house of Van Voorhies & Co.—What do I think of the fon? That it is a very unwise sive move and not required by the taxpayers. L. Lewis, senior partner in the large stove and crockery house of L. L. Lewis | & Co.—1 am emphatically opposed to the extra session. I consider the calling of it a shame. Ed .1. McKee, former City Auditor—I | believe we should have a Senator to fill the vacant chair at Washington, and therefore 1 favor the extra session. Per- sgonally, I may add, I am for Burns. John C. Ing Jr., Prumem of the Board of City Trustees—I believe that the Re- pubiican party has a duty to perform in sending a Senator to Washington, and on that score is justified In the extra session. As for myself, I can mention no _favorite for the place. E. Leitch—I belleve we should be represented with another Senator in Washington, and if the Legislature will select a good man, and stop at that, 1 s‘h.;u not be opposed to the extM. ses- + | HEALDSBURG. + + EALDSBURG, Jan. 26.—T think it H detrimental to the best interests of the Republican party to call a spe- cial session of the Legislature for the purpose of electing Burns Senator.— John Young, ex-Mayor of Healdsburg. 1 am opposed to the election of Burns as Senator and am in favor of Congressman Barham for that position—H. M. Keyes. 1 think it is an outrage on the people of California, this calling of the Legislature together for the purpose of electing Dan Burns, or any other man, Senator.—Ed 8. Gray, ex-chairman Board of Supervisors. I think the election of D. M. Burns as Senator would be a disgrace to not only the Republican party but the State of Cal- ifornia and a sure way of losing the State at the next election.—A. W. Garrett. —_—— I | > S 1 think the call is a disastrous thing for the party, and the elec- tion of Burns will be worse. Though I personally do not believe that Burns is as black as he is sometimes painted, his very many political enemies in the ie- publiean party will disrupt that har- mony which s necessary to success. D. Gochenauer—I am a bellever in the jdea that there should be at Washing- ton all the representation that this State is entitled to, and that, therefore, the call s a wise move that gives us the representation, That the Senator shouid be Burns I do not say. As a Californian, I say that Burns is better than no Sena- + SAN DIEGO. AN DIEGO, Jan. 26.—D. C. Collier— tor, but as a Republican 1 believe that it would be better for the party to leave the seat vacant than to fill it with Burns. The State needs a Senator, but with the present feeling of the people, the party cannot carry Burns. L. A. Wright—Governor Gage's sixteen reasons for calling an extra sesslon are all contained in one proposition—he is paying Burns the political debt he owes for his nomination and election. All other reasons are mere subterfuges. Unless Burns and Gage have overestimated their influence at the ex sion, the next Republican campaign in California, so far as State issues are concerned, will be one of penitent apology for a faithless Governor and an unworthy Senator. W. W. Stewart—Tne extra session is a wise move, and should have been called before. California needs two Senators at Washington as much as any State In the Union, for there are large interests to be looked after. I am not one who be- lieves that the Republican party will be disrupted by the election of Burns. . Levi—My belief is that the State should have two representatives at ‘Washington, and I think that the Repuo- lican party would be called more severely to account if the seat were left vacant than it will be if Burns Is elected. — e & LOS ANGELES. OS ANGELES, Jan. 26.—Interviews with prominent Republicans in this city show that there is an under- current antagonistic to Daniel M. Burns as United States Senator. Mayor Fred Eaton—Well, 1 don't know what to say. Regarding the call, I favor it, but as far as Colonel Burns is con- cerned he may or may not have a cinch. At this time I can’t say regarding the wisdom shown by the Governor in calling the extra session. If a good man is elected it will be all right, and if, on the contrary, a man is sent to the Senate who is not the people’s cholce it will be a decidedly bad thing for the party and the State. I have my own troubles as Mayor and am not dabbling in State politics. Ex-Congressman James McLachlan—I am building up my law practice and am not in politics. If the Jamalca treaty passes, however, we will be sorry that we Were not fully represented in Congress. Outslde of this I have nothing to say. Judge Robert A. Ling, Police Commis- sioner—If an extra session of the Legis- lature could have been called to elect some one of the prominent Republicans of the State to the United States Senate I think it would be all right. But to call one and elect such a man as Dan Burns I not only consider the worst thing that could happen to the Republican party, but think that it will disrupt it In the State and allow our opponents to wipe us from off the earth at the next election. You can't put it too strong for me. Judge E. J. Ensign—I approve of an ex- tra session and think Burns is going to be elected. Furthermore, I think he ought to Cornelius Pendleton, ex-Assemblyman— Oh, don't ask me! Of course I favor an extra session; but whether Burns is the t fellow or not to be seen. If elected we will have to take our medi- cine. James Rives, District Attorney—Gage is Pede Ved et eds [ @40400003409004040404400400040450000094645400340004 0000040000000 000000 000009 friend and I n};pro\'o of the extra ses- sion. As far as less said the better. Frank Dominguez, Judge J. W. McKin- ley, Bradner W. Lee and Edwin Meserve refused to commit themselves one way or the other. T + - + TOCKTON, Jan. 26. — Republican: expressed themselves as follows on the Senatorial situation to-day: Dr. George S. Harkness, chairman of the County Central Committee—If Daniel Burns can secure the caucus nom- ination I am In favor of his election by the Republican members, who stand charged with the duty of fllling the va- cancy now existing in the United States Senate. Why this opposition to a cau- cus? Party nominees are always elected in caucus. E. C. Dickinson, Councilman—I favor Scott and would under existing condi- tions oppose a caucus. George W. Langridge, chalrman coun- ty executive committee—I favor a cau- cus. I favor the unit rule when a nom- Ination is made. If it be Burns, all right. W. C. White—I favor Scott and am un- alterably opposed to Burns. Captain W. B. Hardacre—Anybody but Burns, and the friends of the other can- didate should not go into caucus. Theodore Brown—Burns first, last and all the time. Judge C. P. Rendon—Burns has been good enough to make other people’s fights —has put up time and money for Republi- can success. I am free to say he is my favorite. E. C. Wright, Superintendent of Schools —Scott is my man, although I have no prejudices against any other candidate. Julius Cohn—I favor a caucus and I fa- vor Burns. The above regresent all elements in the party and is a fair consensus. > i SANTA CRUZ | 5 SANTA CRUZ, Jan. 2.—Nearly every prominent Republican who was in- terviewed was non-committal, but the prevailing sentiment of leaders of the party is against the holding of the extra session and think it unnecessary. The refusal to commit themselves in- (tllcale- they are against the whole af- air. From what ‘was gleaned from leaders it is an assured fact that neither Assembly- man Radcliffe nor Senator Trout will ever cast thelr vote In favor of Dan Burns for United States Senator. W. H. Lamb, Mayor of the city of San- ta Cruz—I think the calling of the extra session is all right and is a very wise move. We should select a United States Benator—one who h—and send him on his R S R e S R S R TSRS SP RS O B e R R e O e R S S RS | necessity of it. Don | the man for Senator. | ———— think Dan Burns + APA, Jan. 26.—The extra session has created a good deal of talk here during the past two days among the Republican leaders. A can- vass among them has brought out tae fact that the Republican party in this county is_opposed_to the election of | Burns as Benator. They think that he | is an unfit man for the place. The sentl- | ment is that if Burns s chosen it means | defeat for the party In this State next November. Barham or Scott would be | acceptable to the Republican voters here. + £ | i WATSONVILLE. | |+ - + ATSONVILLE, Jan. %.—H. C. \/’\/‘ ‘White, wholesale liquor mer- | chant and a stanch Republii- | can—I think that Governor | Gage has no reason to call an extra ses- |ston. It is a big scheme to elect Burns Senator and squander public funds. J. F. Cox, one of our leading merchants and a resident of this place for over | twenty-five years—It is uncalled for and { 1t_will be a bill of expense for nothing. L. Holbrook, a leading Republican and a prominent attorney—I think it is an unnecessary expense and a scheme to glect Burns, but they will get decidedly eft. G. G. Radcliff, Assemblyman for this district, would not state his oplnions and will reserve them until he arrives at Sac- | ramento. [l FRESN You'll quote me verbatim, will you? b ‘Well, its the — —— imposition I | ever heard of. I don't see any ex- cuse for saddling the expense of an extra ession upon the people of the State at this time. | bear without spending thousands of dol- lars for the luxury of electing a Senator, especially when the Senator may not be such a luxury after all. I think the ac- tion of Governor Gage was very unwise. 8. C. St. John—I think Governor Gage tra session of the Legislature. he is concerned, it will injure him more than any other of his indiscreet acts, and what _is more, It will cripple the party in this State. An extra session never bene- fited the Governor who called it nor his arty, and this one will not benefit Gage. So far as the question of a Sepator Is con- cerned, 1 will say that if I were a member | of the Legislature Burns would never get | my vote. The Legislature that elects him | will disgrace itself and the State. I don't | think Burns will be elected. |+ + | | BENICIA. | + + ENICIA, Jan. 26.—The majority of Republicans in the city are strong- even if it takes a special session to elect one. There are differences of opinion regarding Burns' candidacy, as the following will show: Godfrey Rueger, County Committee member—I am entirely opposed to the election of Mr. Burns as nator, but | destre very much that one be elected. Simon Johnston, mérchant—I favor the extra session, because we must have a Senator, and ‘any one that is elected by the Legislature will suit me. Stdney Frame—I am totally opposed to | the extra session and to Mr. Burns. | e + + ; VALLEJO. | + ALLEJO, Jan. %.—Many of the | \/ leaders in local Republican circles are averse to being quoted on the Senatorial question, but from the general expressions the prevailing | i{dea seems to be anything to beat Dan Burns. Opinion as to the calling of an extra session is divided. Senator Luchsinger—I think the extra session is all right. It is highly importa=nt that the State should have a full rep sentation in the upper house, and I believe the choice should be made by the present Legislature, which would insure a Repub- lican Senator and would remove this issue from the next election. matter were left in statu quo_ that the urns is concerned, the | candidacy of Dan Burns may jeopardize | @#+44+ 4+ 4444444444 444444 g + | RESNO, Jan. 26.—Fuiton G. Berry— | We have expense enough to | made a serious mistake in calling the ex- | So far as | | ly in favor of another Senmator, | I believe if the | I do not think that the | @4 9664940600840 040404000400 0404000900900 040 404040004 840404040 420000000900+ @ | exira sesslon unnecessary. Don't see the | the party's success at the next electior. T SCATHING DENUNCIATION OF BURNS COMES FROM ALL PARTS OF THE STATE f. R O R e R R S R R R R S S a2 ] UDGE J. R. LEWIS, San Jose—At the coming election the Republican party of this county will make no mistake, and will not re-elect any of those who voted for have agreed to go into caucus on ths con- litlon that forty-three shall be necessary o a choice. I am willing to stand by anv 1 who shall receive that number of . and I believe that a caucus will in a satisfactory compromise. I am and always have been for Barnes for Senator. _G. G. Holllday, County Clerk—I am for General Barnes 'for Senmator. but I don't believe the expense of an extra session Is warranted. : D. Pennycook, Vallejo Chronicle— The people won a victory at the last elec- with the election of a Benator an and I belleve the frults should be i ';any;d. F. R. Devlin, District Atto y—1 | for M. M. Estes for Senator. o [+ - | [ PETALUMA. | - + ETALUMA, Jan. 2.—Dozens of P prominent Republicans interviewed to-night echo the sentiments of the following ten: H. P. Brainerd, Mayor—I think the special session very unwise at this time for any purpose. There was no need of it. F. H. Atwater—I don’t think that the | exigencies of the case required a special | session. Burns will probably now be elected Senator, or if he is not the man | whom he names will be. | Supervisor T. C. Putnam—I think that | the spectal sesston is against the interest of the State. It may not be, but I fear it on account of the Burns proposition. | Lyman Green, City Recorder—There is no occasion for the special session, which will cause the State unnecessary great ex- pense. If it would resuit in the election | of Barnes instead of Burns the evil would be mitigated. M. D. Hopkins, Assessor—The special ston will be useless and expensive and | In the end detrimental to the welfare of | the State. George M. Brush—I do not think that it | will” prove ‘productive of any benefit to this State. A. Kahn—I think the whole thing un- recessasry. Some of the reasons assigned | are ridiculous. Thomas McGuire—I think there nigger in the fence, who will a big denly POD up to the detriment of the State and arty. The whole thing is a scheme from fn my opinion. do not think the occa- big expense incident to the special session. For the only apparent necessary sons megtioned in the call action might well have been postponed until the next regular sesston. J. H. Brown—I think the whole thing a | scandalous_job from beginning to end. put up to further the ends of a very ob- jectionable candidate. It is infamous that the cost of this extravagant farce should be saddled on the public in this manner, and it will be a severe blow to the Repub- | lican party and of no benefit to the State. . [+ | JACKSON. | g * | JACKSON, Jan. 26.—Republicans here | generally feel that the calling of the | extra session was unwise from a par- ty standpoint, that all of the matters | mentioned by the Governor might and | should have been deait with at the regu- | lar session, and no one interviewed out of | elghteen is willing to be put on record as | favoring Dan Burns. | Wil A. Newcum, late publisher of the Ledger, says the party will have to shoulder the responsibility for the ex- pense, but he thinks Burns shouid ani will withdraw in favor of some one less objectionable. | 3. W. Caldwell, lawyer, says that it | looks as if the sole purpose of the call was to elect Burns, and if that is s t | would be a godsend if something would | happen to prevent the meeting. | 'N. L. Keagle says that it was not wise | to_issue the call. Postmaster George Folger did not wish to express an opinion as to the call, but said he was first, last and all the time for | Scott for Senator. | “Richard Webb, capitalist, says he was | decidedly opposed to the call; that the publican members when in regular ses: | should have gone into caucus and bi | the result like men, Senator John F. Davi Scott in the regular session, has all along | been opposed to the extra session. He contends that if there is any extras dinary emergency requiring the calling the Legislature in extra session such | emergency was created by Governor | Gage: that the Legislature In regular ses- sion passed all needed legislation, but many good bills, for the passage of which there is now a demand, were by him tossed into the waste basket. —_—e————— G4+ 4444444044440 Uncle Sam has his eye on the immigrantand smuggler— see next Sunday’s Call. who supportcd AR + - + + - | B 3 Mrs. May Hawkins has brought joy to many homes once cursed by drunkenness, and her name is held sacred by hundreds of grateful women throughout this broad land. Any true woman might well be proud to have saved one poor soul from the shackles of drink, but Mrs. Hawkins has redeemed thousands by her noble and practical work among those who have been victims of intemperance. Mrs. Haw- kins for years suffered the grief and an- ish shared by so many true and faith- 'ul women in erica to-day, who have drink-afficted fathers, husbands or sons; and, seeing nothing but a lifetime of mis- ery for herself if something was not done, she determined to overcome this fearful Her search for a harm- home cure was at led when an old came to her and gave her a remedy which had never been known to fail. rs. Hawkins ADVERTISEMENTS. DRINK HABIT CURED. Mrs. May Hawkins Will Help Every Woman Save a Drunkard. A Trial Package of Her Marvelous Home Treatment Free for the Asking. | gave the remedy secretly, and in a few | weeks, to her great joy, he was entirely | cured ‘of his appetite for drink and was again restored to health and manhood and ;lt& enjoy many happy and useful years of e. After seeing this wonderful result Mrs. | Hawkins decided to devote her life to the work of helping her sisters everywhere, whom she found suffering as she had suf- fered from the effects of alcohol upon a | husband, father or son. With the assist- | ance of others she perfected the original | treatment, and now offers to send this | treatment free to any distressed wife, | mother or sister who will write for ft. | Mrs. Hawkins has means of her own and no charge whatever is made for the treat- ‘ment, because her great desire is that every woman who needs this medicine will write at once to her and get it. Mrs. Hawkins treasures hundreds of tes- timonials received from thankful friends. She holds each grateful letter sacred, but the following is published (by the request of the writer) in the hope that it may be the means of hastening others to write and get the treatment: Mrs. May Hawkins, Grand Rapids, Mich.—My | Dear Friend: You have been the means of bringing sunshine into my home. August I got your remedy and began giving it to my husband, and from that time until the present he has not taken a drop of any kind of aicoholic drinks. I cannot say too much for what your remedy has done for me, and I urge it as a helper to any mother, sister or wife who shall need it. I sent your address to a lady friend in Boston, who wrote me about three weeks ago that she necded it for a husband and wife, both drunk- ards. She wrote me that they were in an awful condition, with six small children. Oh, what a home that must be! May God speed your rem- edy to them. Please use my testimonial if you wish. Yours sincerely, RS. H. A. LA East Hamoton, Me., Feb. 14, 189 | Many other letters similar to the above might be given, but one will suffice. Thou- sands have saved their homes and loved ones by this remedy, and you can be among the number if you only wish ft. Mrs. Hawkins treats every letter she re- ceives sacredly confidential and you need have no hesitancy whatever in w her for assistance. Do not delay; write her to-day. Address MRS. MAY HA' Box 56, Grand Rapids,