The New York Herald Newspaper, February 12, 1876, Page 8

~-_——. THE COURTS. Another Attempt to Solve the Myste- : ries of Pacific Mail. BTOCKWELL'S BROKER AMAIN OV THE STAND, Bome Questions He Answers and Some He Will Not. Further testimony in the suit of the Pacifie Mail Steamship Company against William 8. King and John B. Schumaker was taken yesterday before Commis- dioner Edwin M, Wright, Counsellors Bennett and Goodwin appearing respectively for plaintiffs and de- Yendant FURTHER PROM STOCKWENL'S BROKER. Mr. Samuel I. Harriot, broker for A. B. Stockwell, tontinued bis testimony. Counsel for the plaintitt | asked it the firm of Harriot & Noyes received a check on February 7, 1872, from the Pacific Mail Steainship Company for $300,000, He answered wnat they had feceived such a cheek, but that without his foan book he could not state positively to whose | Account it was credited. In answer to further questions he stated that the firm of Harriot & Noyes Yeceived a check on March 9, 1872, for $515,000 from the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. Counrel—What did you receive this check for? Mr, Harriot—We del 300 shares of Pacific Q. To whom was the check ¢ €redited to Mr. Stockwel! and the 5,300 #1 fivered and charged to account of Mr. Q. Who else was intere: 1 decline to answer. Q@ Do you decliné to answer on tbe gronnd that it would impleate your firm in Mr, Stockwell’s travsac- tions? A. Ido nec ockwell. ed in this transaction ¥ A Q Did you have an understanding with Mr, Stock- well in re to tho other directors, or why do you | wish to concealthem! A, Because Ido not wish to dis- | te business of 0 well’s broker in ev office; I merely acted ything 1 did in those close tho as Mr, Stoc transaetions. ft * THE NDOKRR'S COCNSET, Mr. L. E. Chittenden, who was presont ag counsel | for Mr, Harriot, here arose to m: we remarks and | Was finmediately interrupted by Mr. Bennett, who pro- | tested against his appearing at ali in the case except as | a spectator. . | | Mr, Harriot then resumed and answered a number ‘of questions putro him: by the counsel for the plaintill Mo said:—On the 7th of February, 18 $200,000 from the Pacific Mail Steamship it was charged to “loan account;” the m tained on the application of Harriot & No; lanecus stocks were, I suppose, given as collateral secu- rity for the loan. @ Have you any record on your books of what na- ture these stocks were ? A POSITIVE DECLINATION, A. Ihave, but I decline to produce the books. Q Did you receive a check from the, Pacific Mail Company on the 13th of February, 18’ A. We re ceiveda check for $34,425 from them on that day; tho money was paid for 600 shares of Pacific Muil stock, | which were delivered to A. B, Stockwell. Q. What is the heading of the account in your books 4n reference to there t T delivered the tock to Mr. Stockwell, ns: and ®t that is ali I know about it. ie. Q. Did no conversation occur between you and Mr. Stockwell regarding his right to use the money of the | sel, upon appeal from the decision of the Cémmis NEW YORK HERALD, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1876—WITH SUPPLEMENT, Term of the Common Pleas, for an order thatihe de- fendant furnish a bill of particulars, The answer to the suit is that the artrele is true, In his decision, given yesterday, Judge Van_ Brunt say; "The only authority which the plaintiff! has been able to cite in support of his novel application is the case of Tilton vs. r, It seems to have=been assumed that the Court of Aj is, in the decision of that cage, has put forth some new and hitherto unfamiliar “doctrines with reference to — the granting of applications for bills of particulars. Bot an examination of this case will show that the de- cision was strietly in accordance with the practice be- fore the code and in entire harmony with section 158 of the code, and does hot support the position of the plaintiff on this motion.” He then goes on to show that under the gection quoted the power of the Court to or- der a bill of particulars is limited to the case of a claim bees made upon one party or the other, and it is the Particulars of this cluim which can be ordered. The word “claim,” he says, is equivalent to a “demand,” and cannot apply toa mere defence. 1t would, there- fore, appear that this motion should be denied; bow- ever, he is constramed by the decision of Jadge J, F. Daly granting a bill of particulars to the’ same plainti® in his hbel suit against the Times. n that decision Judge Daly held that the Court had power to order a bill of particulars, and until this de- cision is reversed by the General Term he (Judge Van Brunt) sliould follow He therefore orders delendant to furnish a bill of particulars, showing who the per- sons were who suspected the plaintiff's honesty and in- stituted inquiries and learned that his record was not good; in what Toroato paper he advertised for clerks ; tue kind of leiness transacted by him in Chicago par- taking of the nature of swindies; from whom he re- ceived consigninents while in this ejty and to whom he failed to account, and the Bames of the persons whom plaintiff swindled by means of notes indorsed by Read, MANUFACTURERS AND BUILDERS’ BANK. In the assets of the Manufacturers and Builders’ Bank aro two promissory notes given by Hugh Young and James Young for $4,000 and $6,000, The receiver of the bank bas made an application for an extension of four years to pay these notes, as there is no pros pect of realizing on them short of that time. The re- ceiver also made application to sell $180,000 worth of Southern State and county bonds, They lave no mar- Kot value, and it is now asked to diepose of them at auction. ‘A referee has been appointed by the Supreme Court to take testimony as to what disposition should be made of these matte SUMMARY OF LAW CASES. The jury in the caso of Leon Rheims against Collector. Arthur, in the United States Circuit Court, to recover | alleged excessive duties paid upon 1mportations of arti- | ficial Sowers, returned a verdict yesterday for the y intifl’ for the full amount claimed. The jury were unable to agree in the suit brought by Phitip A, Maden against Dodd’s Express Company, | He | 4 75, tho alleged value of the contents of a | tried betore Judge Curtis, of the Superior Court. sued for lost trunk, The company defended on the ground that | its labihty did not-exceed $100, this being the sum limited for damages in the receipt. in the matter of Thomas Stewart, steward of the | British ship Neptune's Car, held by United states Commissioner Osborn for extradition to England m, mate of the vessel, copies of all the pape! yesterday sent to the Secretary upon application of A. H. Pardy, defen Us coun sioner, and also that of Judge Blatchford, who dis- | missed the writ of certiorari taken out, At ameeting of the judges of the Marine Court, held yesterday, Officer Gleason was removed, and Josey Norris appointed an officer of the Court in his | ad. Mr, Morris was for many years one of the | most attentive and efficient officers of the Superior | Court, but, having received bis appointment there at | | is judgment in favor of the defendants 1 do not see Bess pointed out that it was too high tm the collar, tog Jong in she ekirt on ove side, and not enough on the shoulders. Plaintiff's claim was the coat was 4 good fit, and the only complaint which defendant could make was that he did not quite as attractive in it as he expected he would. The jury found tu favor of plaintiff for prineipal and interest— in all, $82. DECISIONS. SUPREME By Judge Lawrence. Weber vs, Weber and another. —Granted. Bage vs. Astor Fire Insurance Company.—As there why the receiver should pay $1,000 and release a judg- ment for over $1,600, Hursted ys. Cohen,—Mr. Hursted’s affidavit should state that there are no infants. It states through a clerical error that there are no defendants. Reuton vs, Durant.—Motion denied. Huestermendia vs, Mayorga and another.—Motion denied, with costs, Memorandum. By Judge Barrett, Langdon vs. Gray and another—Nos. 1 and 2—Let ©x parte orders be prepared in each suit, with notice of settlement, for Monday next at eleven A. M. Ruckee vs. Mead; Heatherton vse. Heatherton.— Orders granted. Gardiner vs, The Mayor, &c.—Order gcttled. Matter of Gilinan.—Report confirmed, except as to the recommendation at the close of the opinion; as to that Iam not, as at present advised, prepared to make the order which the petitioner seeks, but I will reserve the point until I have seen and conferred with Mr. C, M. Whitnoy. Matter of the Atlantic Giant Powder Company and anotber.—Motion denied, with $10 costs. Memoran- dum, SUPERIOR COURT—SPECIAL TERM. Ry Judge Sedgwick, Willking vs. Witiking.—Motion denied for want of proof that defendant has means and without prejudice to a renewal of application, Harmans ve. Wilson,—Motion denied, with $10 coats to abide event Martens et al. va. Martens et al.—Bond for guardian ad Titem approved. Stewart et al. ve, Lindman et al.; Hall vs. Cowdrey ot al, ; Henoquin ¥% Butterfield, —Order granted, COMMON PLEAS—SPECIAL TERM, By Judge Van Brunk Orvis vs. Doane.—opinion, —_4— COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS. Before Recorder Hackett. THE STORY OF A FLUTE. Frederick H. C. Crake, a musician, living at No. 32 | Spring streot, attended a ball at Tammany Hall on the | 18th of last month, and while on his way home about | midnight with a flute and a piccolo under his arm he | was stopped in the Bowery, near Houston street, by | two young men, who knocked him down and robbed | him of bis instruments, valued at $100. A week later | Officer James Little, of the Seventeenth precinct, was in, | A pawnbroker’s shop In First avenue when a young man entered, and, taking a flute out of a basket which | he carried, oflered the imstrument in pledge for a loan | of $5, The proprietor of the store declined to receive the “noisy stick,” whereupon the young man replaced ault with intent to kill Richard | to the latter. of State, | He stated | officer | Deen brought to the house by his eon James and not it in the basket and left the store. The suspicions of { the officer were aroused by the careful manner in i which the instrament was covered, and he followed | the youth and asked him if he were ainusician. He replied that his fathor was, and that the flute belonged This story ‘proved untrue, and the oM- | cer took the youth to the station, where he gave the | name of Terence McKenna, of No. 069 First avenue that ho had received the flute. from john Grant, aged twenty, of No, 622 East hirteonth street. On going to that place the found the father of Grant, from whom | he obtained a piccolo, which the old man stated had | John, The latter gon, however, was taken into cus- | tody on the strength of the statement made by j MeKenna. The instraments were identified by Mr, | Crake as those which had been stolen from him, and { the youths were indicted for highway robbery, the | musician positively identifying McKenna as one of his | the sale had been made by its officers, condrmed it | against a federal power exercised by law, a bit in the act of picking a pocket, Marks washold ie “ee A boy named William Davis was also arrested and held for picking pockets in the same —— Al the Tombs Police Court yesterday Diedrich Lamp- ‘kin was held in $1,000 to answer on a charge of keep- ing @ gambling saloon at No, 12 South street. COURT OF APPEALS. Aupany, Feb. 11, 1876. » No. 167. Hull vs. Mitcheson.—Arguwent resumed apd concluded, No. 191. Henry Faucet, respondent, vs. Frederick 8, Nicholls, appellant,—Argued by George B. Bradiey, of popanet jor appellant, and "by W. B. Ruggles, for respondent. a 169. James Walstenbolme, ot al., appellants, vs, The Walstenholme Manufacturing Company, respond- eut.—Argued by Benjamin H. Austin, of counsel for bapa) and by E. C, Sprague, for reepondent, Case still on. © Adjourned, CALENDAR. The following is the day calendar for Monday, Feb- Zuary 14, 1870:—Nos, 196, 190, 19914, 200, 202, 208, 170, ES UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. Wasnixcrox, Feb. 10, 187 In the United States Supreme Court to-day the fol- lowing cases wore heard :— No. 142, Stone vs. Towne et al—Appeal from the Circuit Court for the District of Mississippl,—The sole question in this case is whether a certain judgment confessed by ome Woodman in favor of the appellant was an honest and valid judgment or was void for fraud and collusion. The Court below found it to be Trandulent and void, It 13 here contended that the Court was brought to this erroneous conclusion by ad- mitting improper-evidence and by the exclusion of legal evidence, and particularly in rejecting oral testi- mony in respect of a matter which was also contained in written , but not necessarily #0, and roling that the books contained the only legal evidence wh'le they were in existence, This ruling is said to be unex- ampled. Wright & Lowe for appellants; Joseph Casey for appellees. No. 143. Lofenstein va. United States—Frror to the Court of Claims. —The claimant sought to recover dam- ages for not getting certain hides which he bad con- tracted for with the proper oficer. The contraet was that he should have ail the hides of beef cattle slaugh- wored for the Indians at Fort Sill, Indian Territory, for acertain period, which the Superintendent of Indian A(airs at that place should not decide were required for the comfort ol the Indians. The Court below de- clded for the government, holding that in the first p the Officer making the contract was not author- ized to make it, and that in any case there could be no recovery because the cattle were ultimately turned over to the Indians on foot, and the United States did no slaughtering. It is contended here that as bidesare not’subsistence supplies they are not within tle regu- Jations requiring sale under advertisement for bids; and that to say that because the cattle were turne over to the Indians alive the contract was avoided would be to allow an entire departure from the under. Standing between the partics when the contra made, and that the Court will, not permit such version of its terms, C.F, Peck for claimant; k. B. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for government, No, 146. Raymond vs. Thomas—Error to the Su- reme Court of South Carolina.—In this case foreclo Sure and sale were ordered by the Stato Court of cer- tain property held by the plaintiff in error; but before the gale océurred, military orders forbid Such a pro- ceeding in respect 'to any property mortgaged between 1860 and 1845, and commanded a stay of proceedings. This order was sanctioned by the Legislatare of the State, but the Courtdisregarded the orders, and, when The questions here are, first, was this such a decision right of appeal to this Court, and stcond, w: mado in violation of the military orders valid and binding. The plaintiff 1 error contenus that there was no violation of the military order, because it was made subsequent to the order of the Court. tended that the order of General pare staying pro- ceedings fell with his fall from power, and hence there was no violation, because the sale was made aftor his authority ceased, upon the representation of the State | On reaching the stand the interpreter inquired as to | prisoner gave bis answers with that indifference which | | has marked his deportment, but throughout this sudden | and vital interrogatory seemed to arouse him from his It is also con- | lethargy, and, fixing his eyes on the counsel, he re RUBENSTEIN. The Prisoner on the Wit- ness Stand. THE TESTIMONY CLOSED. Mr. Beach Summing Up for the Defence, The trial of Pesach N. Rubenstein for the murder of Sara Alexander, which was resumed in the Kings County Court of Oyer and Terminer yesterday, is draw- ing rapidly to anend, All tho evidence on both sides closed shortly after twelve o’clock, and in anticipation of hearing the summing up the court room became densely crowded after the recess, The prisoner seemed to be somewhat more animated than at any previous time during the trial. His appearance on tho witness stand was of short duration, the main object of his testimony being to deny any connection web the crime with which ne is charged. Messrs, Beach and Mott, counsel for the prisoner, and the District Attorney were early in court, and the case proceeded at twenty minutes past ten o'elock. : Herman Popolinsky, of No. 60 Mulberry street, cor roborated the testimony of his wife in regard to Ruben- stein’s calling for the payment of a debt on Sunday night, Decembor 12. Mrs. Rosa Rothstein testified that she went to the wedding in Hester strect at half-past four o'clock in company with Anna Finkelstein. Abraham Quint was examined as to the character of J.P, Alexander, which he said was not good, where- upon Alexander became somewhat excited, Jacob Seligman was the next witness, Ho stated | that he knew nothing againat Rubenstein, | Barnard Semanski, whose wife was going for medi- cine when she met the prisoner, was called to cor- roborate her testimony. THE PRISONER ON THE STAND, At this stage Pesach Nisan Rubonstein, the prisonor charged with the murder, was called to the witness | stand by the defence. He rose slowly from his seat and dragged himself, as it were, to the chair designated. the manner in which he wished to be sworn, where- | upon he took from his pocket a black skull cap and — placed it on his head. The oath having been admin_ | istered Mr. Beach asked the following questions in his usual impressive manner:— Q. Are you suffering from illness? A. Yes. Q (Through the interpreter). Does he feel weak? A. Yes. Q Did he faint during the proceedings yesterday? + A. Yes. Q Did he kill Sara Alexander? To all the foregoing questions except the last the | plied, with a sickly smile and apparent innocence, “Oh | of the blood had not been suiiiciently no, no. ° The District Altorney asked a few questions as to the | that the defendant, unless he was the father ot must be regarded lished, Nor was that a light other motto, not less pmo — ~ pe gn tag where the evidence was of an uusatisfactor, the accused must receive the benefit of a doubt. The prosecution was bound toestablish a clear case in order to secure conviction. Couusel read several authorities on this point, and added thatthe evidence in this case was indirect and circumstantial. Nor did he undervalue the force of that evidence. He nized its necessity. He knew that guilt travels in darkness; he knew its ways were stealthy and gen- erally unseen, except by that oye which watches the sparrow in its flight. Although there was much in the evidence to make the jury strongly oy guilt, that would not justify them in bringing in a verdtet of guilty, He wished to impress upon the jury, while he coneeded the necessity and the force of circumstantial evidence, the rule which the law established for its consideration and application, and that they should ‘see, a8 nO doubt they did see and feel, the danger arisi; from its perversion. Counsel alluded tothe skill ant ability which had marked the efforts of the ution: pre- paredas this had boen upon both sides, aid hi fad as this had been upon sides, i3 learned associate, so far as that remark was applicable to the defence, deserved the entire credit of the preparation, His forecast in anticipating the modes and character of the attack, his ity and an unweaned industry im the preperation of the means of resistance had unequalled, But he (counsel) made no complaint of the activity on the of the prosecution, It was commendable, It was for that such officers were em- ployed, and it was upon their vigilance and trastiness that we are able to travel our ways in peace and in secu- file rest ri dpe in our homes, ungel further submit- ted that the evidence of the detective, Zandt, should be received with great care, as well as that of the girl. who identified the knife, and who aud been under his control Now as to the locality of the murder; nobody saw the prisoner there, The evi-' dence of Kraemer was entirely out of the case, Ihe wanted to kill the girl, why travel to that desolate and Jonely place? There were recesses enough, occasions and vimes and places enough within the range of his acquaintance with New York where he could secretly and effectually have disposed of his victim. Then the prisoner had no motive to perpetrate the crime, The murderer of Sara Alexander was her seducer, and there was nothing in the evidence affording the stight- est suspicion that the prisoner had any motive; there was no proof of any intimacy, no tokens of affection, no secret, stealthy association. The prisoner was waiting tor his wife to come from the olden land and had no motive to murder the girl. Thero was no | link between him and her which demanded the bloody nife, It would not do te convict under such cireum- Pine quickened child, was the marderer of Sara Alexander, and all the evidence repudiates such an idea, While Levy swore he never met the girl in the kitchen there was abundant proof that he did, There gould be no mistakjng the testimony of the inmates of that house- hold that he did visit her. The testinfony of Levy in reference to the cutting of his beard was contradicted by three or four witnesses. Counsel then described the terrible struggle that must have occurred between the murdered girl and her slayer, and contended that the prisoner was physically incapable of killing the girl. His appearance on the night in question did not show any indications of dis- turbance when at home, nor upon his shirt or clothes were there any spots which would mark his partici- pation in one of the most inhuman massacres ‘of the age. Counsel proceeded to review the evidence, and contended that the fact that one of the prisoner's boots had a spot of blood on the heel, or that it was eworn to that they fitted the imprints ot the footsteps in the cornfield were inconsistent with all the sure roundings of the case, and also that the analy: minute to the stances. It was monstrqus and unnatural to su to establish any comparison, Then as urchase of the knife; he submitted that it ad never been purchased by the prisoner. The p | physical condition of the prisoner, who then resumed | man who bought that knife committed the murder, his former seat. but the whole evidence was inconsistent with the Bs theory that the prisoner had any connection with it Moses Rubenstein and Benjamin Koiscinsky testified | The persons in the car who said they saw the prisoner that they would not believe J, P. Alexander, the | differed in ee description of bim, while a lady gee brother of the murdered girl, under oath, bat that all | aealyo.g™ Ay? Gar tnt AC ne arued, tad. boom they ever heard about him was that he would not pay | firmly est lished, for it was proved beyond all is debts, loubt tl the prisoner was in his father’s house bi d that thi his father’s it the time of the alleged occurrence, Counsel cot mented on the fact that the evidence of Kraemer had been withdrawn, and warned the jury to be careful in passing upon the other evidence adduced. He con- cluded by asking the jury to acquit the prisoner im view of all the facts and circuinstances. ‘The District Attorney will reply on the part of the | in Congress. P. Phillips, for plaintiff’ in error: W. W. Boyco, for defendant. THE BOSTON BELFRY MURDER CASE, Referring to the verdict in the Boston belfry murder | case, the Advertiser of that city says:— ‘Yhe conviction of Piper for the murder of Mabel Young was perhaps not felly expected even by those the instance of Judge Freedman, he was, when that | i - 4 x at, 6 wa, | assailants, The case was disposed of yesterday before Pee darn, expired, compelled to give place toa | Rocorder Hackett. Tho entire Grant firnily went upon renebmin of Gne of the incoming Judges. He re- | the stand and testifed that the instraments were ceives his present appointment on the recommenda- | prought tothe house by James Grant, whereupon As- eet prey Pueereams who was funihar with his | gistant District Attorney Bell entered ‘a nolle prosequi ra . : | in his case. McKenna was found guilty of receiving wo Abt the mnididle of Aunanry last complaints were re- | stolen goods and sentenced to two years’ confnement pen geil dtd dee © of the nou-delivery of two | in the State Prison, James Grant hag not been seem registered letters sent for delivery from Station E, As | since the arrest of his brother, | fe usual m such cases the matter was placed in the | r 7 hands of Mr. Sharretts, special A STARTING VISITOR, he depart. | ment, and yesterday was fu! Tewasascer- |) Join Kirwan,.of 241 Monroe street, was lying in bed vod that he was really th ot ¢ th tained that the letters were | m1 $i 5 . lying io who believed that he was really e perpe rator of that Teuther, a letter carrict of Station Ly lor delivers wei | at midnight of Monday last when be heard a suspicious | dastardiy crime. ‘There are not a few who have deter- | rE a noiso, and called out “Who's there? Scarcely had | Mined iA their own minds not only that tho govern- : | ‘company in this way, and Wes the subject never eug- ted between you? A. No, I merely acted as his roker; on tho 14th of February, 1872, we received a check for $295,407 58 and delivered to A, B. Stockwell $,000 shares of Pacific Mail; ou the 19th of February, Is7Z, we received a check for $100,000; it was chargod loan account” and we subsequently gave collateral for it in miscellaneous stock. Q@ Have you not got records of these loans and traveactions? A. I have, but 1 will not produce them ; Harriot & Noyes were the only parties interested in the moncy borrowed from the Pacitic Mail Compan Tn answer to further questions Mr. Harr.ot states in Fobroary 23, 1872, we received a check for $400,000 from the Pacific Mail Company, which was REBUTTING TRSTIMOVY. The defence having rested, Barnard Edleman, Israel Renzansky, Solomon Nicolson, Joseph Rubino and Isidor Goldstein were called and gave evidence as to the good character of Alexander. Charles 0’Rourke, an officer in the District Attorney’s ! shortly afterward and before the complaints were re- ceived he obtained a short leave of absence. He re- | | ment did not make out its caso, but also that the pris- ‘cused for carrying stock for the company; I could not Yell for whose special account the money was used; we borrowed money whenever we required 1t for carry” ing stock, and the only account it was charged to was “oan movey ;"’ Jt was for the benctit of different deal- ers with Harriot & Noyes as brokers; Mr. Stockwell ‘was one of them, aud the others I don’t remember, Q. You were carrying stock for the benefit of Mr. Stockwell and other directors of the Pacific Mail Com’ y and using the money of the company for that pose, and yet you refuse to tell who the other | rectors were? A. I did not know anybody in these transactions but Mr. Stockwell. turned to this city upon Thursd. | being brought before Mr. Sharretts, adroitted that he had appropriated the contents of the missing letters— one of Which contained $3 and the other $11, | detection by signing the receipts to both. | Shields for examination to-day | stockholders of the United State morning, and, upon He said the letters had been destroyed and that he had delayed The accused was held in $2,500 bail by Cuited States Commissioner ther has been a carrier in the departinent since Jane, 1875, Judge Barrett has denied the motion to set aside the | order “of publication in the suit brought by various Blasting (nl Com- the words escaped his lips when he was sprang upon | oner was innocent; but, 8o far as we can judge, theso | by a man who pointed a pistol at his head, seized a | | pair of trousers and a shirt, worth altogether $7, and made off with them, Thirteenth procinct, saw the robber leaving the prem ises and took him In custody, when the prisoner gave | the name of Morris Moriarty, of Scamme! street. wi | pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree. His Honor, Oficer Christopher Dixon, of the | | He and | brought before Recorder Hackett yesterda Jn a few pointed remarks, exprosed the repngnance he felt to xending young men to State Prigon for lon; periods, but stated that the public welfare demand that such a crime as the accused had pleaded to should persons constituted but a small minority of all who | have interested themselves in the case, Yet Piper has | has manifested itself against him. Nor, we think, was | the terrible suspicion that the belfry murder was not his first crime of the fame kind allowed to prejudice | bis case in the trial just concluded, There can be no | harm now in saying eomed to many a failure of justice, and of course the ‘sal jo-will. now believe that the verdict of yoa- torday is a righteous one. THE SECURITY SAVINGS BANK. | office, testified that he had endeavored to subpana Mr. Wyman, one of the witnesses for the defence, but that | had «fair trial, and no pressure of ptflic sentiment bo had left his houso and could not be found. store after Mrs. Semanski's prescription was made up, and that she arrived at home at four o'clock. that the result of the former trial | husband of the foregoing witness, corroborated her Mrs, Hannah Brooks said she was in Mangan’s drog Jane Herman and Solomon Brooks, the sistsr and the statoment. Lective Znndtwas examined and stated membered a paper, purporting to be of the witness Kracmer, ' Witness directed Lizzie Cook to sit ro! Petgiven to tho jury in the afvoraoon. Calcutta linseed, Linseed oil, 24s. per ewt, secution this morning, and the case will probably EUROPEAN MARKET. Lonpox Propuck MARKeS—LonDoN, Feb. 11—Evening.— 50s, & 503, 6d, Sperm eil, £99 per tum, ~ HAVANA MARKET. ye Havana, Feb. 11, 1876." : * ; ce checks were | PALY Against the Giant Powder Company and the Atlan- | down and take Ktaemor’s statement, and it wi never exered ou the Woks oF the Pacific lial Com | Ue Powder Conipany of California. He holds that tho | meot with condign punishment. Ho. therefore wan: | delivored to the Distnet Atiornoy, rahe Spanish gold, 21234 8 219. Exchange’ trmer:! Valted pany? A. donot property which was the subject of the action was per- | tenced him to confinement in State Prison at hard wi u: Deak iver of the Sccurity | , Nathan Levy recalled—Lives at No. 69 Bayard strect, | 71. n 6% discount: 60 duys™ gold Da ais premiuiss short Here Mr, Bennett produced a number of checks, and, | Seal, and that the order should not be set aside | labor for fifteen years, Mr. William M. Banks, receiver of the Security | and formerly resided at No. 83 in the same street; he | sight di Ais a5 ' premium.” Bugar weaky No. 12 ‘Duteh exhibiving the indorsements only to the witness, | merely because the Court has not the power to enforce COLLECTING OTHER PEOPLE'S BILLS. Savings Bank, yesterday filed tn the County Clerk’s | was asked if he had aver shaved and replied inthe | standard, 19% 'a 1471 reals per arrobe. asked him to identity those bearing the indorsement ot | the ignments of these foreign corporations, inas- ee a office a statement of the assets and liabilities of thas | Uegative, and added that he never had a beard; ho — Harriot & Noyes. The witnose retused to do so unless | MUCH as tt can nullify the conveyance and reinstate | Joseph G. Conklin, coal dealer, of No, 104 West Thirty- | I that Tint " ; | knew Sara Alexander, but was never intimate with DOMESTIC MARKETS. ho was permitted 16 examine the tace of the checks ag | the plaintids to (he Med Sagoo athe lee fran- ' ninth street, appeared as complainant against Jamos | institution, It appears that by realizing on the securi- | her; he never visited her in Rubenstein’s kitchen; en a | exeiusive enjoyment of such proporty within tiie | Cullam, a boatman of Rondout, N: ¥., whom he accused | ties held ineagaecingess see mies, woot | never lighted the gas for her; nover called her ‘his Gauvesto Feb, 11, 1876. Mr. Bennett refysed to jet him take the checks in bis | Jurisdiction. 5 i of obtaining money by false pretences. It appeared that | 10 $329,504 08. | The Habitilies rier 4 . | | Mir. Beach cross-examined the witness as to whethor | oniimary, Wise: "Net. revelpta, i002 baies, Bxnotta chgete naan’ {| ypSuit bas been brougbt by the Germania Bank against | tho accused called upon Mr. Conklin on November 20, | The accrued interest on rent and deposits does not ap- no had ever cut his beard, and he replied that when | wise, S23. ales, 1.202, Stock,’ 73,300. Weekly Net, ree Mr. Harriot resumed—I dont know that any mom. | William Killien to recover $1,420 20, amount of checks — represented himself to be captain of the canal boat | pear in the figares. The following are the principal | there was nothing there Was no use in shaving. ceipts, 12.421; gross, 12,510. Exporty—to Great Britain, bor of our firm made application for these checks irom | deposited by bim and. having the indorsement of the | General Doubleday, and collected some $50 due the | figures of the statement: — At the suggestion of the District Attorney the wit- | 9.344) te the Continent, 4.730; to the Channel, 1,409; comat- the Pacific Mail Company; they came to our office Ina | New York Mercantile Journal Company. Killen re- | owner of that boat for coal transported for Mr, Conklin, nes went into the jury box to show his downy cheeks | Wite, 1,008. Sales, 10,349. New Ontxans, Feb. 11, 1 lar business way; Thad frequcut interviews with | ceived the checks from one Schotie, who was an em- | Cullam was convicted of the offence yesterday and sent | —ngecsent i | and convince the jurors that he had never submitted to . a: Maida 2tce.: ME Stockwell and was frequently in the Taciie Mat | pioys of said company. The latter ‘disavow their in- | to'Stato Prison for three years Bonds and mortgag 202,615 09 | any tonsorial operation, The sixth juror stroked his | aug, tie.; good ordina ead, migdling, Lae ti se. ‘office; the subject of these checks was rarely brought | d0#sement, and so the bank sues Killion, The case | H Town bonds (cost). ++ 41,188 87 | chin and smiled, and Mr. Beach remarked that it was | . Exports—To' Groat Britain, 4.564; to France, up between us; I was buying and selling stock for Mr, | CE up for trial yesterday before Judge Curtis, of the ONE MORE JAIL BIRD. | Gall loans on United States five-twonties... 1,500 09 | evident the witness was not an Esau. ior the Cuannel, 8,708, es, 14.09). Stock, Stockwell, and that was my business; I don’t remem- Superior Court, Tho defence is that both the bank | Joseph Doyle, aged twenty, who stole a gold wateh Banking Louse and lot. Other real estate | 3b The father and mother of the preceding witness poris—To Great Britain. a ‘eekly—Net receipts, 56, 3 ross, 58,945, Ex- France, he nob to the ode 7 4 and the Mercantile Company were guilty of neglect for | 5 | were noxt called and the | 3, bor taking with Mr. Bellows, Mr; Bagitor or Mr, John Dot finding out. for move than a year that the inderce, | from the person of George Rawlings, of Brooklyn, on | Gash’ on dey Boras 93°} Were couttranee hy aeeeene ol eee | Continent, 14,451; to the Chante, 3.798; eoasiwine, 9,268, interestod with Mr. Stockwell in any loan account. + ment was not genuine. | the 6th of this month, pleaded guilty and was sent to | All otber assets, consisting ‘This closed the case for the prosecution. |:Goesd aicenta te Scante atcectae core Pesmnt a income Q Were they interested in any account? A, That I | jarch, 1870; Bloomer & Co., agents for the barge | the Penitentiary for three years. terest, estimated value of town bonds MR. BEACH'S ADDRESS, coastwise, 1 instead of 1,424 February 10, exports Gethin anode ’ k,'made'a contract with ‘the Lorillard Steam. | enistie A baci ‘over ‘cost, &¢ 7.881 02 | Mr, Beach, when the court had reassembled, ad- | constwise, 1,583, instead of 1,370, Q Did Mr, Stockwell deliver to you several thousand then being formed, to furnish the j . Deficiv....... 27,175 69 | dressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner. He said:— + anteall Ptah Mopitx, Feb. 11, 1876. shares of Panama Railroad stock ‘about this period ? ear at piers Nos. 33 and 34 East River, | James Ryan, a porter, was arrested on December Fro ca ga | Te One Renerally unfamiliar with the habits and modes | ordimury, “Ohad ‘moe Noe secciotan aor bale” eee <. Leer kate . to be used in joading Vessels, the company aggeeing tO | 15, while carrying off 8 trunk from an cxpross wagon | Tobal.......... steeness eases sscesseeres «+ $405,849 42 | of civilization and of law a scene like this would be | Zizi, Bxperte- To Groat Britain Ad7d? te Pe Fe: @ Do you not remember anything about 9,500 | take proper care of her. | The owner of the bafge, Her- | tonaing in Hudson street. The trunk was the prop- 4p WABILITIND. full of wonder—twelve men gathered to pass upon | to the Continent, #40; coastwise, 1,418. Sales, uiinot Pcauia Bantrout woe T don't revoliect, | man F, Bauer, has sued the company for $1,220 78 dam- wl # Amount due depositors , | the question of tho hie and death, of a | Sock 71Ga8" Weekly-—Ner reesipis, i0ee0 balers croc What time do you refer to? In I don’t recollect 8ge8 for the loss of his barge, which was damaged at | erty of Notman G, Kellogg, and contained $200 wgrth | Depreciation on real estate | fellow man. All this machinery of ji 10,858, Exports—To Grent Britain, 15,465; to France, anything without referring to my books, ; the picr through the neglect of defendants, ag alleged, | of clothing. The prisoner, on being arraigned yes- tice presents its proofs and ‘its powers Continent, 8,648; constwise, 3,451. Sales Q. During all the time that you wore receiving those #4 Was sunk in consequence. The casé came to trial | torday, stated, with tears in his eyes, that be had Total.... to the human mind and conscience to lead SavANNan, Feb. 11, 1876, cheeks Was not Mr, Stockwell heavily interested, with yesterday before Judge Van Brunt, The defence sets | been hired by a stranger, whom he supposed tobe The state it to produce the irrevocable judgment which may con- i and steady; middling, 123,«,; others, in your operations ¢ ot ali the time. up that the barge was not in a fit condition nor such | jts owner, to carry the tropk toan express office on | signa human soul to death, Intelligent men acting | t ‘edinary, diye. Net reeclois, 11404. bales Q Did it result in profit or loss? A, I decline to an- | # one as the contract contemplated, and that in sinking | Broadway. The jury did not believe his story, and { RECHIPTE. under a responsibility hike this are naturally led to in- | Exports coastwise, ‘1,087. Sales, 754. Si He 79,391, ower, she took with her $4,000 worth of cargo, to defend- | the Recorder sent him to State Prison for three ; Cash on hand January 1, 1876 +++++ $90,143 98 | quire into their qualities by what right and power they | Weekly —Net ETS, te te Dee bore. Q Was Mr. Masterson interested in these transnc- | S¥ts’ loss, and the want of care is denied. The jury | years. From depositors. + _ 989 60 | gitin such solemn judgment, the issues of whne are | Suatteh esos cameus, iat gules S008. 850; to:the tions? A. I'deeline to anewer. | Will give a sealed verdict this norning, — From call loans. y ++ 2,000 00 | peyond their copirol’ or ‘Imagination, When we | nel, 2,650; snat il @ Did you not confer with bim trequently and were | ,. THe suit of Jobu Patten, proprietor of the Pacific | TOMBS POLICE COURT. From bonds and mortgages, 26,800 00 | think of the wonderful mystery which surrounds our sages shaded ail 1igarlow wildling des aes not some of these checks placed to his credit jointly , Hotel m Greenwich street, against his neighbor Will- From town bonds... 8,000 00 | fives, of its origin, yits destinies; what wonderful | grdinnry, loners lhe Ree fecvigns, Dor. Barrie te with Mr. Stockwell? A. I dectine to answer. { Jam J. Stit, was tried in the Common, Pleas yesterday | Before Judge Flammer. Profit-and toss, capacities with which the human soul is endowed; how | the Gout 4,802. Sules, 1.500. Stock, 9.558 Weekly @ Did not a jarge portion of the money received | Vefore Juage Van Hoesen. The complaint was for tres- | PASSING A WORTHLESS CHECK, Interest. it revels and rejoices in the trath and in the exercise of | Net receip 387 bales. “Exports—To ‘France, 1.870; te from the Pacific Mail Company goto W m Bush's | 8s by inserting Abovm from defendant's premises | Urian ©. All ainnsd hk as-L Bt Rent. its wonderful capacities lifted np to the kinship of God— | the Continer t, 4,82 ; coastwise, 1,800. Sales, 6,100 » firm for losses incurred? A. No, sir; what we received 1Nt0 the rear wall of the hotel, and it charges that the rian C. Allen, Edward Myers and JL. Harrison ‘ —— when we think of these things and what may become | ToLeno, 1, 1876. from the Pacific Mail Company was ‘either asa loan or | Aeieudant, who isa coffee grinder, causes some of tho | were yesterday held to answer on acharge of being | Total........see..+. savage: 7777777 $701 42) of the spirit within us, will lead wa to pause be. | q Flow steady, with e mogerate demand. Wheat dalet but , - | Fooms to be almost uninhabitable from the constant | jointly concerned in passing a fraudulent cbeck for | DISUURSEMENTS. | foro we tamper with its existence, We must panish | firm: No.3 white Wabasl., $1 35: No. 1 whi itis noise of the ie fine duat of the coffee and | $439 yn Honry Nichals, of No. 75 Gold strece | To depositors.................- + $48,741 07 | crime. ad enough it is that in this beautiful ; 1,9 {mh Q About the time you were drawing th the 7 ‘a and that people were driven 2 i ‘ | Real estate account, insurance. 17 50) and winning world of ours, amid the enjoyments aud | Bi 27%: the subsidy question before Congress, anc froin the hotel tb consequence, for all of which damages STEALING A HORSE AND WAGON, Expense account. oo 170 16 | attractions of society; that all the motives and induce- | mixed, 4 ount? think the enbsidy question was before Congress, avd the stock did fluctuate, Q Did not Mr. Stockwell ana other directors with stock fluctuate conside: thai a rably on bim lose heavily about this time? A. 1 decline to were claimed. The defenc but ¢ imitted a nominal tres- imed that coffee grinding was a lawfal | nees carried on in a lawful mauner, and was no nuisance. he Court instructed the jury to give sub- Aantial damages only in case they found the complaint of Wilham Williams, of No. 24 Spring street, was com- mitted for trial at the General Sessions on a charge of | stealing a wagon and team of horses, valued at oad the property of Frank Copeman, of No, 400 West Thir- Total Balance BUSINESS EMBARRASSMENTS. February 1, 1876.11.) 14/861 29 + $48,929 63 © ments which lead us to abigher life and lift.up our | vere ready e1 nit . | 47,000 do. corn, 5,000 do. oats. aspirations, sad enough it is that societ are debased with the crimes of man; fairest and the most beautiful scenes society should be scarred and marred by the vices of those ‘hose and the earth | that amid the | mand ‘at — 15, vip Curcagy, Feb, 11, yeonts—3,000 bushels: wheat, 4,000 do, oats. . answer, a. te at peli gles awarded plaintiff $1,600 | teenth street. The property was recovered, enjoyment they were created. To protect them, top 1 we Market firm, thon, by wore, Platecs maeeae 7 " and al ‘ance. ees SSPREY eryped 7 / xtras at + 5U, to fanc do You reimcinber Mr Stockwell dolivering youd check |, MAtY Barbara, an Ttaliao, aged Ofy-seven, married | WASHINGTON PLACE POLICE COURT, | _*0eedings in bankrupley have been commenced | poctety’ te protect ae ih an hoe eT | nonnext 025, medium t6 choice winter extrag to square up his losses? A. I don’t rewember any- | 2% having six children, was found sitting on Barelay | °' °°" ada * | against John McCafferty, Daniel McCafferty and Menry | itis casentlal thot wo should punish those guilty of , 8{$t75 8&7 5°. at unsettled, active and lower; No, thiog about it. 5 a ae PANY’ | sureet soliciting alzus from passers-by, and was arressod | Melore Judge Morgan. MeDonald, shoes, No, 290 Bowery aud No, 804 Third crime, and he was the last man who would consciously | Murclt closed at 1 UK “Marc St Oris May? No. Bde Q Dia you testity before the Congressional Com. | 20d taken before Judge Bixby, where’ she said, “Jam | ALRBORD HOTSL THLY. perageistierts sc Coy 7 $ and willingly stand between the penalty of the law and | Ase; rejected. 758, Conn onened. ‘Hem ‘a mittee that charges were made on the books of the | ROOF and can get uo work." She was committed to | ws | avenue, by 8 Munson &Co., of Albany, who havea the guilty, He was in court not to protect | lower, No. 2 mixed, 41\e., spots 41ie, bid March Pacific Mail Company for loans which you never ro- | Se Workhouse for sixty days as a vagrant Somehow | About two years ago a lady, occupying room No. 568 | claim of $1,860 against the firm, Their liathhtics or advocate guilt; his office was to aid | May; rejected, 320. Oars’ quiet but sendy; No. 2 ceived? A. 1 could not mnake apy such statement, | Fhe was able to procure a habeas corpus and she was | at tho Grand Central Hotel, was aroused from hor re- | amount to $36,418; nominal assets, $20,067; actual the Jury, he’ could, im. clear aud , tit; Slikc alfec. March. Barley quiet ahd weak Q What checks did you receive on April 16, 17 and | t#kea before Judge Lawrence, in Supreme Court, by I her door cl s | . | comprehensive ard judicious determination of the | {) Fork Iregalot’ bigher BIN HG te Tate hen nee aS; ay aad | Chambers, yesterday afternoon, where Mr. W. ¥, Leary, | Pot by hearing her door close She jumped up from | ggsets, $12,072 The property of the firm ia uow in the | Suestion whether thore war gon an ane partot the | sues eat sig ee but in ke. m ceived On April 16 one for $185,600; on the 17th one for | Of the District Attorney's offico, put in as answer tho her bed and saw a man rapidly walking up the corridor, | hands of the assignees, Messrs. James Chambers and | client he r uted. When the qnestion is presented once aR the ‘main higher at $85,000 and ono for $19,000, an on the 19th one for facts above stated, Judge Lawrence beld the proot in- She then raised an alarm, and found that $200 worth Robert Irwin, | to twelve intelligent men whether they shall consign a | 12 75 March ; $12 87), 0 $1: 887 . 4 | suiticiont and discharged the prisoner, saying he of jeweiry had been stolen from her room, “Tue thief i rm, aud holders are asking higher baa Wanehee chet Wore eee. chose niaced? A, | thought the Logisiature nover intended that every poor . could noi then be foand, but yesterday a middle-aged | leven creditors of Otto Huster, dealer in furs, No, shea ia to bad simon, sabi & seerh sitegious Band: | whorl, rb, middies, Ter ‘a They were given for mocks delivered to Mr Stockwell, | Taare soliciting a gratuity suould be sent to tho | zn, named William Curtis, ound at the hotel, was | gg Maiden inne, have petitioned to throw him into | upon the ecurces of hatuan life, then the punishment | YW iskey steady. with fair demand at and the checks were received in payment by order of | Workbouse for sixty days, He considered the law on | arrested for the crime and committed, bankruptcy, and the order is returnable to-day, His | OF the quality of the iseues upon which that life is to | Go.! ate, 31,000 dors barley, 17, ON de. rca y | sanmary convictions unsettled and suggested an ap. | BURGLARY. abilities “Amount to $58,618 61; nominal segote, ‘lepend assuimes a gravity and a consequence which | Shipmente—Hionr, 6.00) bbie.: ‘wheat, Wmto PRIVATE Cov: peal to Gene: pis cal " f be: i . ress 7 b corn, 67, .; date, 16, 3 A Mere ae, chien rae SEE acempet wo | Mansnereting wil cout ce up resterday before | AB OMcer Fitzpatrick, ofthe Tweets peeclae was | #24HT1 30; Fen sta Stet iK pho anime ofthe OPhrmcvary scorn ae eloua drama wih wees | Siu at, sa ade dy speak to the witness, Lis client, and Mr, Beonert arose | SurTogate Van Schaick—that of the late Walter Pear. | patrolling his post on Ninth avenue on Thursday night | PQutgn'ns ‘Wright, wholesale, Hquor dealer, No, 6g. Tesponsibility of the jury was divided; he thought that 824 Sisheeecds thes, Waa saat 40 Mares ad strenuously objected to nny {nterterezce on the poo eas hw fi pains 3 vy 0 aaa’ Pip Pgh: | he found the door of Nathan Levy's butcher store, No, | New street, is iu negotiation with his creditors for a Le Rare gt bat Lae Gok anite | April. “Lard firmer, but uncha isea Exclude Mr. Cbitteadcn from the room altogether or he | Wiis have been offered for probate, ene dated Cetober | 239 Ninth avenue, open, and on entering found a young | COmPFOMIEE, and sevorul meetings have becn beld.. His . fPemsey wih Me lury. | But Thojary bea been s©- | _ Receipts—Fiou 200 Ube: wheal, 3000 busta’ Would Dot go on with the examination, Cerumiselenee | 2 1857, and the other Juve 10, 1875. By the former , man behind the counter, In court yesterday ho gave voninally $60,000, Dut there’ real wniue ns catinnaved ce. ; lected upon both sides, certainly upon the aide of the | sTOsode’; cen sate det baslaye 17,000 08.” sone Wight interfered and restored peace and tie mveetiga | the Property is left to his wife Ann Blige nnd other | his name as Charles Block. | He eniered the store by | $2 Qo“ aie ‘hrst proposition Was, te ectile at forty defendant, with a view to eecure the best Intelligence . Fivur, 2,000 Ubls; when, 30,000 bash Glen proceeded, Feiatives, and by the other to a daughter, Eliza Jane | means of a skeleton key, and when arresiod a londed | $89,000. His frst | propositi - 3p and 80 far as thoy could judge the highest conscien- ; oats, ‘20,000 do.; barley, 13,000 4 dutt . MORE HEAVY CHECKS. Pearsall, residing at Elizabeth, N. J. In August, 1862, pistol was found ou his person, He was held tm $2,000 | Coulson the doilar unsecured, but the committee Of Toustee to be drawn from she panel, because they | chauged. Wheat duit and firly held: Mr. Bennett then called the attention of Mr. Harriot | 3s. Pearsal! obtained a divorce from her husband, and | 10 answer. j Would be almost impossible for hinrto pay thaanounk, | Mew that Upon the wounduess ot the jadgment of the | £6074 At 61 87, Cory antes, new scarce; sales of seven ache b 2, for $300,000, and asked — P.! , one of two months betore his doorase, wagging and he subsequently made another proposition to com: JUF¥ depented tho life of a follow being. They kuew | tui! lots. Rye inactive; Milwaukee offered im if he bed any record of it on his books Witness replied that he had not op that date. Pearsall executed the other will, 4eaving all bis : | property to his daughter and appointing her sole ex- Coutrsx. The deceased hat oo children by his wife Eugene Hoss was held in $100 to anewer for cruelly | torturing a dog in the rear of No. 492 promise at thirty cents on the dollar, which has been accepted by a number of his creditors, { that distorted and unfavorable acodunts of this transac- tiou had been sent broadcast through the community. They knew that nese men had seen the frail and feeble according to qaality. Pork quiet at 13\¢. Highwines nominally re . quiet but firm; sales 20,000 busbels Canada at Sv, a $1 firm ; Rin ted $20 75, Te wag subsequently discovered that this check, as Tepih avenue, | ed a well as anotber for $318,000, wee deposited, according liga, and the lexatecs under the first will clan , whore the dog was found lying in agony, with his | gAmarmot, Je bankrupley has been issued against | Voa7 ine mombors of a desplaed face, persecuted fOF ‘ Osweo, Feb. 11, 1876, to Mr.sHurriot’s statcrvent,'on March 9. that Eliza Jane, the legute unuer the last will, iam | throat cat and a fearful giash by a knife across hie | im, of the late firm of Bowers, Beekman & Co., | S¢0®% and yet amid all degradation and persecution . Frowt cmchanesd; sales 1.000 bole. Wheat steady : axira, @ Did you pot, atter receiving the chock for , MeKitimate ehi'd, and, beyond this, that undue infla- | bowels, so that tho intestines protraded The animal's dry goois merchants, No. 42 Worth street, wno failed clinging to thoir faith with a tenacity that showed the || Weeds ee Nomina tere en 22 18,000 ob the 9h of March, send to Mr. H. V. Smith thoy mes Costted when the deceased was imcapable of | agonies were ended by @ shot from an officer's | soyeral years ago, ad the matter bas beon referred to Holimess of their nature He knew, because the Jory | quick: salcs one ear Nog Cane at $l. OT” ‘Che meal r auother check for $300,000, which he refased to — Ort The petition of the daughter for the | revolver. | Register Henry W. Allon. had said 80, that they had formed some impressions in | Boea. S37 unbolted, Mill —Shorts, $16 « $17> give? A. I don’t recollect anything of that kind, dent by he hed alleges that the decedent left no ae ae sctietint oot ens pert McMullen, jeweller, of the corner of Water ; Tgard to this case of an unfortunate charactor, and | shipstuffs, $15 «$19; middlings, $20 a $22, Q. Don’t you remetber sxying that it was Mr. Stock- | NOON oa vosterday, miter eens othe last will were | ESSEX MARKET POLICE COURT. | and Fulton streets, hus made an assignment, | yet the defeuce,* studying the einciples ‘of Inw by — ant ee woll's order that you should get it; don’t you remem. | fXimumed yesterday, after which thp matter was ad- Bofore Judge Otterbourg | “Joshua Wood, dealer in coal aud wood, of Rutgers | Which the jury wero ‘to ve guided, and that when NEW YORK CATTLE MARKETS, der any difficulty with the Pacific Mail Company about | 4 In Part 1 of the Marine Court y nf | slip, bas tailed. | the human heart was appealed it was always that check A. Idon’t remember anything about any | ¢ 18 Part} of the Marine Court y lay, before Judge | STEALING A MUSKET. Paul Brothers & Co., manufacturers of lasts, of No, | TeAdy, the defence thought they coakl safely trust Pripay, Peb, 3 Aitculls; we delivered so many sharcs of stock—6,000 | GOCPP Hod a jary. was tr ae oe raliam F. Roe | overt Richardson, of No. 14 Lewts street, a private | 68 Warren strect, have assigned. | in their giving the evidence whieh should be addaced weceirts von two parn’ oe tt 187 Ghares at one time aud 6,300 at another—and received | Sgainst Francis Whe! P. Matter, Roo sues | Ro : v t » | @ Bbinghausen & Co., dealers in furniture, of No. | & fair and deliberate consideration, and they thought Sheep and these checks in retura, probably by Mr. Stockweli’s | ** & fu sy administrator the estate of Elien | of Company F, Sixty-ninth regiment, N.G.S.N.Y., | 499 seventh avenue, bavi sponded payment. | so still, And he would now rocur to the question as to Yords Beever, Cows. Calves. Lambe. orvers, i voted BT What ho ncants, 48 bonssinen to pay | wis held jn $800 bail on complaint of Captain Ceshing, |” Jonn Jamieson, Wooden ware, of No. 498 Washiagton | te Authority. The jury sat in the jury box to dispense | Sixticth street... 000 0 we De58 MG STOCKWELL'® ACCOUNT. over $78 Sales ruebeed & By Hiam Douglass, &® | of the sfme company, who charged bin with selling 8 ade wn asrigniuent. | the oltimate and supreine justice, which should return , ra neuen 2 i high - ‘eo7 How many pages dove the account of Mr. Stock- | former alunibiatrater. remove, had failed to bey over. | a masket which bad been delivered to bim whem he | Julius M. Dubois has aesigned to Albert Pelouést, | & human life to its just and natural associations of | Forel. sr 4 ans So eZ Nell gover with the ‘orm of Herriot & Noes A. Tt see ey ction Un the piée thas he cea ae otters Of | Joined the company. AL the first yoeeting of the ereditors of James 1. An- | featgrely‘to ls haw wad’ oh tocity ewan slope by | Totals ie a ae eae woul fe SIX months to anewer you that, (He sub. seent plat " 7 w eld yest wfBce of Reg- : », Obviously It wa fotals.. «. 1.769 7 q Bequently discovered that it woult tako opiy w few | deceased, but Roe, the present piainti, subsequently | ASSAULTING A PEDLER. | eg og col 4 at Mecodhonse was | the law, by the law which the Court administered, by | Bravns--Ga a Mabe run (rade wee slow’ oe avi minutes to answer, as (he account occupied but seven showed a better right to that relation before the Sur. Jacob Barrer, of No. 118 Ridge street, was fined $10 | appornted assignee, Tweuty two creditors proved their those rules and experience of the past gathered as the b., Woight Sewt, « 10 ewt herds to hand were nearly all sold at from Se. a y 10 The quality of cavth aged Prom 55 lbs. @ : laned ia the : : the ledger.) roe itor the couetendant, could ve nae teech | for assvulting Jacob Friedman, of No, $9 Stanton | claims, amounting in the aggregate to about $10,000, | clearest sabgaards of truth and justice, and the reepon- | J. Woleht Dewt, «10 cw. Th Mm answer to other questions Ling Mr. Stock. | poreon as Muller, found, and he " 1 | sibility which Is exercised upon that judgment can 5 hp ly common, well's transactions with the rm of lariat & Noyes, | Wat Me never ‘executed the bond on which suit wae street, a Jewish ahoo pedler. A umber of otters, | y The meoiing of creditors in the mattor of Lemanuel | Only ho airiy met und discharged, by-adkerence. to | Sym, Nts wen, allowed net ‘At 'Siatieth street yrds the witnege stated that he had furnished uo statewrent | Pfoucbe Judge Goopp directed » verdict in thvor of | who have ‘not yet been arrested, took part in the ae- | Morgan & Son, to show cause for discharge, which Wa8 > those "principles cetabliehed, cand. i, #0. Touch | hornet her ; Of thens to any one but Nr. Stockwell, paint for the full kum, including interest—in aj!, | Fault, their etjeet being to rob Friedman of the shocs, | 10 have bean held yesterday duniline , they fle the weight of ‘the. duty incumbent |W." Slegel ” So ‘Gis eligilide Wea bore cdjecrced. watit. eleven | #54! 2%. which he carried on bis back, Pra khy No + Beckman street, was adjourmed until the | uocy them in just so much would the detonce, | 10s. per. 1b. y o'clock this morning. Nicholas Doll, of Beekman s med one of hin | “evaheraey far ag Goi gave it strongth, strictly adhere to those | HG eRe wei aM, TM as the value of ov" POLICE COURT * NOTES. Counsel submitted that the question — a Mr, Ganse, to re . } pore. wetabs OF 4 y, 3AINS ; . The case came to trial in Part 3 of ihe FAILURE OF A TOBACCO GROWER, o prevented to the jury was as essential and as | Eomiuisson lt tale noes okgem ry LIBEL SUIT AGAIN = SUN. Tee Cask Betee DED MGAMEML thd a forge seb | Al tbe Weahinglon Piave Potles Court yesterday Otto SreixoriexD, Mash, Fob 11, 1876. | final us the decroes of Atniulny God, Abd In View O: Une | weight isch uh erg hte, nelle, aL Oem Mr. Charies B. Orvis, who has entered suit for | terday. The defence of MM .G sg part the , Schinedes, of Nu, 63 Hudson street, was held in $500 Flihu Belden, of Whately, tobacco grower and dealer, | 8Urvundings, of the hilarity whieh, at some stages, | terms not obtained. G, Vail sold nett 7 $20,000 againet tho Sun for an alleged livel published | *%8 an imperfoct ft, and nol such a first class Coat as | te was manifested indhis sole in’ mation, be almost | steers at 106. per ib. welcht Og ewt.; 45. Ilinois, {he 15th oblast November, receutly moved through | PMU agreed to make, and%od- tbia ground had been, | '° SD#WeF for the violation of the lottery lawa, | bas failod with Hiebitities to the amount of $80,000, of | (rer biod botore the modifiod. FespoMeibility Ne fel ng. | 20% Per lb, weighi Thy ews at ewt eeamby 10, Mle oo es Por te y Lonel rejected by defendant, Im ordor to test the fitting of | Detective Kennedy, of the Central Oiiee, af- | which $27,000 is secured by mortgages. His assets | ihe advocate of the prisonor, And what Bas the rat | sasaatel bis counsel, Beture Judge Van Bromt, ia dhe Special | the coat, tho defendant put it on in Court. and a wit. | rested Phiiip Marks at the corner of Broadway aud } over tho mortgaged proverty are only $1.000 | leenon us they; ‘ed apom the examination of thia (CONTINUED ON ® INTH PAGE.1