The New York Herald Newspaper, June 24, 1875, Page 8

NEW YORK HERALD, THURSDAY, JUNE 24, 1875.—TRIPLE SHEET. TAMMANY’S TROUBLES. The Anti-Tammany Democrats Work- ing in the Dark. HE LABORERS FOR WAR. Jhe Reason Why the General Committee Did Not Deuounce the Reduction of Workingmen’s Wages, JODGE CLANCY’S VIEWS. ‘The democrats, prominent aud otherwise, in the ‘various Assembly districts, Who have been quietly perfecting \Rcir plans ior weeks past for we overthrow of Tammany Hall seem determined to Keep up their work uatil every election disirict ts represented in the opposition ranks, The Tam- many men contend that the opposition will mun! (to nothing; that itis motmimg more nor Jess than a sorebead Movements, sud that the few wellknown democrats who baye allowed their mames to De mentioned 1m connection With it have Gone so simply to secure, if Dot for tnemseives, a@t jeast for some istimate friend, @ cov- @tea piace of profit aua power under Tam- many. “The day has gone by when any set of men,” said a well known Tammany eMcial yester- Gay, “van bana toether to extort irom tae regu- Jar party in power @ political recognition or | profitanie piace, on condition taat they will for- ever thereuiter keep the peace. Im the days of ‘she ‘Ring’ 1s Was a common custom for a few men 3 organize themselves into @ close corporation and threaten opposition at the polls to the regular icket. They kuew what tuey were about, and ‘were always bought of im the nick of time—at east the ‘enginvers’ of the movement were al- “ways certain of being comPoRTABLY caPrtReD.” Notwithstanding tais view of the case there can eno duns: about the fact that there Is a great @eai of rea! aissatisfaction in the Tammany Gen- era) Committee, and that i! the opposition within @ week or two is able to give good proof of strength and vigor, there may ‘De a serious disaffection in the ranks of the faith- ful. reduction of the wages of the laborers ven the puolic works; the quarreis that are being anduiged in py the Mayor and the Comptroller ever tne signing of warrants, which result in Bardsbyp and suffering to hundreds of men em- Ployed by the city; the refusal of the democratic Governor to remove repnblicans 1n oMee whose wemoval would give employment to cemocratic | workingmen who have been idle all the winter, nd the squabbies that the various “leaders” | have been thrown into by the determination of each to have his own way regardiess of the wisnes of bis fellows or ef the public good— tm is pervading the political atmosphere th ay him ended ten engell ms ai My interview with and there.”” “You are doubtless aware that there 1s consider. able talk about tae formation of a new party composed o/ democrats wuose object It ts to de- feat Taw wany at the next election, and that they are determiged to make most of their Capital out Of Mis reduction of the laborers’ wages. hat do you think about the prospects of such a party ?”” “That there are strong and adie mea outside of | Tamaeay Hail, who are democrats, I pave ne | Gono! but I have great hopes that Tammany will ress hersel! suificieatly strong against the on in wages and against any one inside or ou. Who will attempt vo approve O/ it, that an out- side orgenization will have no capita: to make upon toat issue. The rank and file are against the reduction.”! “What ao yon think of the trouble between Morrissey and Keliy, and tne talk that is being in- | culged in by some ple to the effeot that Mr. Key Les Mismanaged tuings as 4 PARTY LEADER?” “The trouble between Mr. Morrissey and Mr, Kelly wtll, I think, on calm reflection amount to nothing, That mistakes have been made ne one can | den, ut our remedy is with the committee it- self, where, I think, everything in the end will turo out satisfactorily if @ ree, open expression of opinion is permitied and ood suggestions are followed by departments in the control of persons holding odice under the auspices of Tammany,” “im your opinion Judge Qoinn’s want of good judgment, and not the General Committee. is to biame for the peculiar way your resolution against labor reduction Was disposed of 1" “Decidedly so, It is rather surprising to me that our Waole committee ts biamed fer not de: ounc- ing tue reduction, when 10 polut of fact, by the | ruling of the cuair, they were not allowed an op- | portuaity to piace themselves properly upon record, which would have been against the reduc- tion by @ vote of an overwhelming majority o/ the committee.” “vo you suppose Judge Quinn ruled as he did Without lastructions ?” “ft think he ruled without fustructions from any- body, :8 nO Man O! intelligence would have been | 80,foolish as to have even suggested the course he took. You see the resoiution was introduced and | relerread by Jud: Quinn to the Commit- tee on Organization. In order to bave it considered at once £ moved that the commit- | tee be directed to convene immediately, This Motion Was DOE entertaiwed, aud & motion made right on the heels of 1¢ to adjourn Was declared carried by Judge Quinn, although it Was evident Uhat tt Was lost by a vote of uineieem-twentieths | o of those present.” “Do you thimk the resolntion will come up before | the Genera] Vommittee again?’ “Most assurediy | siail bring it ap if tne Commit. tee on Organization fail to do What J believe.te be their duty, ama thatis to reportitfavourably. I believe that every family shoud chastise its own cluldren withip itsown doors, and I am thereiore prevented by my judgment [rom saying to you what I think would be very proper for me to say in the committee.” MUNICIPAL NOTES. Mayor Wickham was away from his office yester- day, and Alderman Lewis occupied tue executive chair. it would have been an excellent opportu- nity for Mr. Lewis to affix his signature to the Bremen’s warrants, and thus allow those deserv- img men tosecure their salaries jor May, but no action was taken, The gentleman evidently does not feel at liberty to interfere in this matter auring the abseuce of Mayor Wickham. ‘tne Clerk of the Common Council yesterday re- ceived a petition from residents in the upper part Of the city objecting tothe establishment of @ dog abbatoirin their section. The subject will Probably receive tue attention of the Board of Aldermen, Mr. Coarles Swan has not yet received an; ther instructions from Comptrolier Green re! to fis new duties as “Register of Licenses.” 4 large and infuenual delegation of eitizens Waited upon acting Mavor Lewis yesterday, im the abseace of Mayor Wickham. to urge the ciaims of Mr. Jerome J, Collins for the position of Chief En- fur- tive all these things have made the Tammany men enything bata unit. Notafew would gladly join ands with a new organization that could bold | some inducements for the future, waich would put | an to the embarrassments of the present sit- | wation, But it is because all Tammany oppositions | am the past have found their only strength in | @aking common cause with the republicans that | the regulars who are not any too closely bound to | tne Wigwam policy of the day, now Resitate te | @how their Bands. The present oppositionis! sensible of this fact, have already deciared t they will only | PUT DEMOCRATS IN NOMINATION, @né wil! not listen to any approaches ‘rom the re- padiicans And yet even tue oppositionists are Botofene mind on this point, as many of the ‘Mtrongest men who are known to be secretly at ‘work doing their best to make the opposition | s @ thing of ngtm, are devermined, — that the republican and the opposi- mm ticket shail be one and the same. “The republicans,” said one of the opposition Jesders to 4 HERALD reporter yesterday, now SBat it is useless for them to try to elect tueir | didates at the next election without the aid of jooratic votes. The republicans will do any- | in whom they had Implicit confidence. A few days ago their suspicions were aroused that al] was not Tight, and the assistance of Messrs, Tilley, Heidel- berg and Prior, Agency, was called in. It is alleged that sufficient | | evidence of embezziement and forgery was ob tained to justify the arrest of Lingard, which took between | place on Tuesday evening. TI thing to keep contre! of the District Attorney's @Mce, and ip excaange for an indorsement of | Phelps tuey will, | know, readily indorse ail the @pposition democratic nominees for jucges, coro- | Bers, aldermen, ‘¢., provided the nominees are | Mot old party hacks or men whose past career | Ws not above suspicion.” «It Will be seen, therefore, that Tammany will | ave & word road to travel if ely segs net mow and election time take a measures to | Fetrieve what the opposition cali her “many # ® Yousg married = m rare ae bi and forem Ae | classes | business capacity and intelligence, was | fe watching her closely, and ii she does mot de | taken to the Tombs yesteraay morning by ‘clare lierseif nat the reduction of wages there " " be rronv iohin store for tne lea. . Ta tis con- | Officer Casbmaa, of Captain Caffrey’s command, ‘Bection it may be stated that there is co aideranie wh should be remanded vo the station house, which Was accordingly done. searched at the Leonard street station house ‘there was found upon Lingard acheck drawn in favor of tne firm by J. Kiopstock for $147 62, whieh | the prisoner expiained was Kept about Ris person | | owing to an error having beem mace in tae dis- | ¢o Is is believed that tne | bad jecling among toe members of the General Committee on account of ine way Jadge Clancy’s Raper resolution denunciatory of the retuction | "Was disposed of ny dodge Qaism, who presided at ‘She Meeting Of the committee two weeksa.o. A WAgERsLp reporter cailed upor Mr. Clancy veser- @ay iD reiation to this suvject, when the following Conversation ensued :— JUDGE CLANCY'S VIEWS. “What was your object im preseuting that reso- Yation relative to ime wages of laborers at the Meeting of the General Committee Tharsday week?” “My only objec to reach it Ithoneht am Important issue io relation to the conduct of pub- hie works by the diffe ent departments, as atfect- iog the jaboring man. 1 represent entirely a laboring coustituency, and believe that @ @action in pay upon tue ablic works Would seriously affect my whoie district; consequentiy I Grew the resolution myself, and resented it in Tammany Mail General Committee b they Might take immediate action to cus ‘What | deemed A GREAT INJUSTICE TO THE POOR MAN, as the wage ) geen Woked upon as a % doing pullic Work to guide tuem: Our city is beim gradually foode! by . @ass who will work jor anything—bdoa @oihes even—wotle cur tried citizens are almost %m @ State of starvation in consequence of tse Severity of the winter } past.”’ “Belore yOu presented the reseintion dia you con- Ser with any other members of the Genera! Cou- Bitter as te the policy’ of ts introduction | “| conferred with many prominent ocr! Some of whom were iiemvers of the General Com ittee and some Of Whom were not members, and their assistance te prevent ibe reauction. Pin: that futile, I fell back upom my oaly a the Generai Commi tee.’ “You bad an idea, 20 doubt, when yon introduced the resolution that it would be passed minout @ny trouble; did yon not?” “Undoudiediy. There iss standing rute of tne General Committee that al! resolutions smould Ue Feferred to the Commitee oO Organization wiih. our devat: believed tnat such a@ reference of My resolution Would jeopardize by déiay the ver ad in view, Wilch Was to relieve the Committee trom ali respomsieility a yr to re-estabi THE OLD RATE OF WAGES. Quinn, in my opinion, nad exercised the ordinary judgment of a man uncerstanding t nave ruled in sack an action om (nat evening itiee im a disagreeable | ION ag to their desire to mect the eimergeney. ie Committee Was out<poken and almost anant- | Movs OF the immediate adoption of tue reseiu- on.” “Wao @o you think } ‘s really to blame for the Pednction ia the laborers’ wages ”” “I wil place the respoustbility on no one in par- Mewiar, but say thal ti eads of de men's have been badly advised Wf ctaey sougat vice, yy themseives are responsibie. | have no | ready to test the matter in the tiee, that the organization was the reauction. and it is very diame upon the whole commit- See while they had no opportunity te prevemt it.’ “I. s8 claimed by some that the Mayor ¢ould have vented the heads of departmeats from lower- the standaro of the laeorers’ wages. Do you now whether this is ® fact or have you heard any story to that effect’ 1 waited myself upon the Mayor two days before the introduction of the resolution and requested Rim, 1D vebalf of my constituency, te prevent if a the proposed rednotion, but was in- riaca alter a prot was sed conversation tuat ne COMMITTED TO THE PRIXctrLE @f tne reduction, I told tim im my judg mt the was bi i suicidal to the purty. His ary Was that thirty-three and one- Shird per cont more men coud be empio: the reduced rate, 40d thereby thors | sougnt provect J begged tim (6 ase bis intuence in tae Of APportionmeat and increase tne Amount Ansist Would be themscives beno- jor public work, and that wovid che day. urpose as Well a4 starving men on hywing that, in inclemeut weather work, they get no pr hat the reduction haa it was @ great inistak become recone! ‘That the people w , and Jad | for the position, | will take place to-day. Some interest 1s mant- gineer of the Dock Department. Air, Ooilins was represented as @ yentieman in every way qualified Such am appointment woud reflect credit upon the department. Mr. Joun Mo rissey Was im the vicinity of the Olty Hall yesterday, amd continued his discassion ou the Tammauy troubles. Groups of politicians gathered ar a Morrissey in the new Court House, and eageriy canght up aay expressions Which dropped from the late Tammany chief, The geotieman ts by no means mild in denunciation of the present Keily-Wickbam administration, ‘The regular weeting O/ the Board of Aldermen fested in the proceedings in consequence of the positien of contempt occupied by the repubilcan members, If those gentlemen propose to stay away and thus continue to block the business of tee Board they will matertally injure themselves apa their party. A BAD BOOKKEEPER. A CONFIDENTIAL CLERK OF A LARGE HOvsE An. | RESTED FOR EMBEZZLEMENT. | For some time the firm of Weil Bros, & Dreyfus, | of Nos. 39 and 41 Walker street, have Dad in their | employ as pookkeeper and cashier George Lin- | gard, of No. 161 East Fortietn etreet, a young man of tne Merchants’ Detective who | No proof of the payment. The receipt is not THE Benry Tine, cook on board the stesmer City of Hartiord, was charged yesterday, before Commis- sioner Shields, with assaulting Thomas Eaden, a messboy un the same vessel, by striking nim with | &@ hatchet and biting bis nose, ears and thumbs, | The accused was heid in $1,000 bail for examina Mon. | Yesterday, in the United States Cireutt Court, no criminal case being ready for trial, tae Gourt was agjourced til this morning. Ia the Court of Oyer and Terminer, yesterday, before Judge Brady, the trial) of Hdward McLaugh- charged with murder through causing the death of James Stewart by beating nim on the head with a c'ub, was resumea and occupied the whule day, The beating 1s claimed to have been done im self-defence. It is probable the trial will be finished to-day. THE NEW YORK, BOSTON AND MON- TREAL RAILWAY COMPANY. A bill in equity n been fled in the Umted States Circuit Court by the bark Frauco-Kygyp- tienne, of Paris; Edward Weutsch, Aulust Heutscn and Andre Lutchsen & Co., of Paris; | Abravam de Camondo and Nissine de Camondo, composing the firm of J. Camondo & Co., of Paris; the Société Générale de Crédit Industriel et Com- mercial, of Paris; Joseph E. Gunzourg and Horace | Gunzburg, composing the firm of J. E. Gunzburg; Leon Gay ana Alvert Rosland, composing the firm of Gay, Rosiand & ©o., of Paris; Levy, Cremien Freres & Co,, of Paris, and B, Allegri & Co, of Paris, in benalf of themselves and ali other per+ sons similarly situated who hold any of tne | $5,000,000 of the so-called first mortgege bonds of the New York, Boston and Montreai Railway Com- Pany, and who shali be entitled to avail wnem- selves Of the beoefit Of tus suit against Jona Crosley Browne, William Watts Sher- man, Jesse Seligman, Wiiliam Butier Dun- can, James Brown and George H. Brown, ew York; Treuor W. Park, of Vermont; The New York, Uoston and Montreal Ratiway Com- pany; Herman H. Balizer and Wilham G, Tanks, Frederick Adams, of New Jersey, mmers’ Loap and trast Company. been commenced by Evarts, South- Mayd and Choate, acting as counse: and solicitors | om beuals of the plaintiffs, A SLANDER SUIT. In November, 1372, the St. James Hotel at Far Rockaway, L, L, belonging to Edward A. Darrell, was burned, After the fre Joseph McKim, an ad- joming neighbor, stated that Mr, Darrell set fre to tne place jor the purpose of getting the in- surance. This allegation Mr, Darrell regarded as sianderons and he accordingly brought suit against Mr. McKim for $20,000 damages. The suit came to trial yeslerday beiore Judye Freedman, of the Superior Court, It 1s set up in mitigation of @amages that the statement was uttered in moment of exXchtement, that tt was based on @ curreut rumor, and turther, that i Mr. Darrell did @ Ne was at the least unior- tubate tn the matter of fire out four times at Far Rockaway and once in this city. The trial will probavly occupy a day or two longer. SUPREME COURT—CHAMBERS, Before Judge Lawrence, | CHARGE OF EMBEZZLEMENT AGAINST AN EX- PRESIDENT OF A MANUFACTURING COM- PANY. A civil suit has been commenced in the su- preme Court against Oscar S. Thayer, formerly | President and Treasurer of the Tnaye: anulac- | turiag Jewelry Company, for the recovery of | some $11,000 in cash and jewelry valued at | $10,914 26. An order of arrest was also granted | im the case on the adidavit of Leonard 8. Beales, who swore that he bad examined the nooks of company and discovered deficiencies to the above amount, It appearea from the papers in the case that the company was organized in February, | 1874, with Oscar 5. Thayer as President and Treas- | urer. Early in 1875 L, 5. Beales, a member or the firm, suspected that the accounts of Mr. Thayer, Who had sole mavagement of the finances of the firm, were not correct, and repeatea.y asked jor a statement, which was refused, On the 26th of April Mr. Theyer resigned, and Mr. Beales was elected President ano freasurer. He employed an expert, Who examined tre accomuts o: the late Treasurer and found a deficit of $11,410 07 in cal and 529 cases oO! jewelry Vaiued ut $10,904 26. Or the affidavits of the expert and Mr. Beales Jadge Lawrence grauted an order of arrest, and Thayer was takea into custody by Depaly sneriM Erb, in default of $25,000 bail. DECISIONS. | SUPREME COURT—CHAMBELS. By Judge Donooue. Selden vs. Dole.—Baily ought to have notice of mocioa for the order. | Ju the matter of Hargrave.—Onght to be @ ref | erence to ascertain faci». | In the matter of Masterson.—Order granted. By Judge Davis, | In the matter of the petition of Stewart, et al.— | showa to be genuine. Tne Court canavt take no- | tice that the signature Is genuine. | In the master of Kelily. &¢.—Order granted. ‘ Cuskley vs. Cuskiey.—Grauted. | Saeely va. Keuy.— Motion granted, ' Mr. Wet, of the firm, requested that he When arrested and counts usually allowed, accused intended to appropriate this check to bis | own use. The exact modus operandt of the alleged embezziements Goes mot clearly appear, | but the detectives and poice explain that when a | bill of goods was sold and the mouey received | Lingard was in te b of appropriating a | centage of it, and entering the a bis cash book, and trausferring these entries | to bis iedger. it is charged that the embezzie- | macats thus discovered are between $2,500 aad | $5,000. It is furtner alleged that tne frm have dis- | covered tbat he bas forged their names to at least twe checks, received in the course of business | from their customers. One of these is saia to be for $190, and another for $154 22. Tae latter, the oMcers report, was dated tm 1874, was made pay: oie to tae order of the firm. indorsed by nim of the drm, pay 40 himseli, and 0: im reindorsed to Mls Wie, it is jurtaer al- lewea, depovited it to her credit im one of Danks. A rumor waving gained currency that t prosecutors INTENDED TO “LET UP”? } on the accused, Lingard was questioned by HERALD reporter on the subject. He a that | be did hot wish to say anything Uaril be had con- ferred with hig counsei and he knew | Bot What the frm would do is the way ef pressing wae charge. Mr. Weil was called upon aud he | s tuat the Orm did not intend to silow the press to pugisn any Of the facts until to-morrow ; that toey had placed the matter in the ofa yer and Would give the reporters no informa- Wren asked ii taey intended to prosecute, aid that tue accused belleved ke could mak restitution @f the amount embegzied, “and,” Mr. Weil joes We Will NOt be likely to pros- ecu My bi r has gone to see the Jud 1 ase Comes Up at two o'clock, to gett remanded (ot om house, 80 48 to give Rim time to make restitotion if he cam doso. | wish you Would say Guiuing s0oUt Is UBT) We give you tue facta.” | At two o'clock Mr. Martin J. Weil appeared | before Judge Duty at the Tombs and made tue | following aflidavis — tate of New York, City and County of New York, #2. Martin J. Weil, ef No. East Seventy-fouris str being duly sworn, deposes and says that on th ——, 1875, at the city and county of K employ George ard (now bere) rt 4 9& spprenuice nor within ie age of eighteen years, dil feioniously emvezale and con- | Yert tw bis own use, without the conseut of we said Marin J. Wes of mouey at different times, commencing February 17, I-74, on which date said Lingard converted to his own use $12 89, om the 23d of Fepraary $19 on 13th ot Jui 92, om the 13th | of aey day of July $3 ou the day ‘of $52 61. on the ‘th day of December, 1, on iin aay of May. 1875, $36 18 the ist day of J | $31 9—in ali to the am , the property of Wer Brothers & Ureyfus, 4 ens at No. sl Waiker street, Which had come into the possession of said Lin- gard by virtue of bis appointment as aepon D> ponent a et na Linw may Grail win as W directs in sUCh Cases. ia MARTIN J. WET. | Sworn to before me this 23d dey of June, 1875.— Dorry, Police Juste’ The prisoner, on being arraigned, gave his Dame as George Lingard, @ native of Bnglan thirty-three years o/ age, resiaing at No. 151 be Forvieth street, a bookKeeper by occupation, entered @ plea oi NOt guily. He Was comulst u A MYSTERIOUS SUICIDE. Yesterday morning # lad, while passing rnrough | Rhodes’ woods, sbout dale Station, on Stewarts Central Ratlread, Long isiand, in pursuit of some strayed cattle, discov ered the body of aman hanging fo the limb of a tree some fiteen feet from the ground. ihe mau Was appareatiy avout filly years of age, and was huneomely dressed with Diack breddcioth suis, Diack #1K RAT wad Dinck kid gloves. The vody was | badiy 6 ard\y more than the skeleton remain ntly been hanging tor a umber of Weeks or perhaps months. here toe Scovery Was made Was in the Gensest part of the ired that his body pods, a8 though the man a Ourouer Reimer, of ould remain undiscovered, 4 (hat p Slee Drinciue Of economy | Fiusuing, Wii bold ae maUest to-day, | the attorneys ol tne estate. It Of $1,000 bail to answer, j helt a mile north of Hins- | | is one which freouently Worgs great injustice ai Benjamin vs. Ruthertord.—Motion granted. Th demarrer 18 frivolous, aud, as it seeds, was inter. posed ior delay. Plaintiff saoald have judgment, ‘With $10 cos‘s Of motion. Mar kwatl va. The Company.—Leave to fii answer granted, ai five | date. jarsnail.—Mowuon denied, without st | Plerce va. Pierce.—Referees report confirmed and decree of divorce gran:ed to plaintim, Thurber vs Fiiggeraid.—Motion graated unless Plainti® make and se,ve on the deiendant’s at- | Torney the wri ipajation im two days, and | on giving such jatien—Motion denivd, win | $10 cosis, to abide the eVemé O! suit, LO be allow: j Wo the successful part | Miller, &c., vs. Brasigan.—Thi | ease ought not to be tried on th: taat is virtually to deprive the p of review of the questions avectiug tae merits. | The deiault was regalariy taken. it can only oe Opened on terms Om payment of Costs of trial } And of preparing thereier, and $1) costs of oppos- ing this motion aod on stipulating tuat the case } May be put on the calendar of present tei ana forthwita tried def. ned. ‘ne motion to reier is devie ‘adice to any order the Court av special gee fit to make on that subject, Soico vs, Worstell dv not think a stay should be granted upoo appeals of this Kind except in | rare caves, ‘Ibe order of reicrence must pe pre- sumed to be right, and, a8 10 is a mode of trying the issues Opon their merits, there ought to be no stay without a-curity for the revovery. A stay May be had in this case on giving sucu security, but orherwise tt snouid be demied, The Mutual Life insurance Company vs. Whelp- | ley.—Graated; allowance of $60 to guardian ad btem. Fagot ve. Pagot.—Referee’s report and order | ation | lemental days, issue to De Woli ve. M | eranted confirming report and granting decree of divoree to pisintifl. Hays vs. McMaion.—The referee in this case, on @ reference to ascertain sen sarpius, hus Undertakea to a pay ofits own commission legal services of The report cannot ve approved, There is uo compliance with wae new rive touching the disbursements of Surpius of she | mortgagee. The motion is denied. By Judge brady. Henry vs. Boston Needle Company; Eagteson vs. Or granted, | aud the compensation for —The undertaking Ow .—Motion denied, with | to rewew oa payment of $10 costs, (See 01 in No, 1. Feris vs, Forau.—I am not satisfied tha Geiendant has been as prompt as he should hi been, aud thereiore an order to prevent tae dey | whic might oceur by restoriag the cause to the | calendar. Ordered thatit be referred io N. Jarvis, | Jdr., and a8 @ condition require the defendant to accept five days’ notice of reterence. oooruf va Caidweil (No, 1).—Motion denied, witn leave to renew Of payment of $10 coxts. Was onder the impression Wheu tue motion wi made in this the cause bad been or trial. frwat can be m: denied, with liberty, however, to t | m in paymentof $10 © . The wing i# given, for the reason that tits having received tue , are upon information may require more con- priviie the allegations of p Rote With keowiedge, made, it would seem to be sulicient on the authorities, bul (he Matter may de suemitted or prevented on that question at champers to the jastice there presiding, if tne plaintif deems it | Harris and another.—in this 38 mouon to adjourn mace belore Judge mue if conclusive. Tue defanit cannot pe | Opened, thereiore, The deiendant shoula witu- draw his application to postpoce by permission of | the Court, aad then his application coula pave | been entertamen. Wright vs. Howes.—I am not entirely satisfied thas the debt asrerted to have been due to the defendant's brother Was in iact due. | desire, if it can be procured, to see Lis sworn starement thereto, It should be served, if maue, oy copy on the piainvifl’s attormey and another submitted to me. This must be done within five cays. Forseh va, Frede pers and proofs wiul vo justly That process COURTS. | | in South street, Kearn | more vigorously. otner | } 794, | 1486, 898, 1284, 1304, 1128, 846, Mg) 992, 2994, 554, 2618, it shoul? not be sustained save when the rivht to Ib exists Devond ali reasonable doubt; such 16 NOS Vols Case and it must be discharged. SUPREME CouRT—crRCUIT—PaRT 2. By Judge Van Vorst. Oberman ys, Worid Mutual Lie losurance Com- pany.—Case and amendments settied. COMMON PLEAS—SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Loew. Hartt vs, Merz,—Motion gr nied. In the matter of the application of Benjamin Hickscocs.—Application vor leave to Change Dam granted, Mackeliar vs, Green et al.—Application granted, COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS Before Recorder Hackett, SENTENCES, ‘The first case tried in this Court yesterday was that of Kichard Butter, who was coarged with | stealing from George Brimmar, with force and | violence, on the 6th of this month, a stlver waten, Valued at $10. He pleaded guilty to petit larceny trom the person. Lewis Miller, indicted for felony, comprising the crimes 0| burglary in the frst degree, grand lar- ceny and receiving stolen goods, pseaded guilty to larceny. He was charged with entering the dwell- ing honse of Onaries J. Wiley on the morning of he J 7ta of this month and stealing $325 worth of Tuese prisoners were each sent to the State Prison ior five years. Henry Opermeyer pleased guilty to toan at. tempt at robbery in the fist degree. On the 11th of tis month be stole with force and vioience & silver watch, Worth $16, from*Paul Richter, whi he Was wa king through Chrystie street, As the prool Was Clear (Rat he Knocked the complainant down, the Kecorder imposed a severe penaity by sending tac prisoner to the State Prison for seven years. | Jeweiry. SENTENCED TO TWENTY YEARS, Meory Fenrich, alias Charies Williams, who was jomtly indicted with James Brown, was tried and convicted of robbery in the first degree. The tes- timony was so clear and conelusive that the jury rendered @ verdict of guilty witnout leaving their seats, Christian Schreiber swore that on the night ofthe 17th of December be went Into a lager weer on tn Greene sireet, and after taking drink we proceeded to the street, followed vy the prisoners, who Knocked him down, stamped oo bun, tore the cloties off nis person und stole $30 in ironey, leaving him 1 an Unconscious state, A girl of the town, Who Witnessed the crime, also Jully identified Wiluams as one of the robbers. His Honor said thar as Williams bad already served @ term inthe State Prisou he would sen- tence him (0 the State Prisoa for twenty years, Joseph Ford was tried aud convicted of grand jarceny irom the person in tne niglt time. On tre 16th of the preweat month he stole a pocketbook containing $30 irom James McCarty, He was went to the State Prison for six years. TOMBS POLICE COURT. Before Judge Duffy, & CONTEMPTIBLE FELLOW. Yesterday afternoon, just before the closing of the court, 5, M. Kearnan, @ bartender in the First ward, tall of gure, and with a faring red mus- tache, was arraigned for indecent behaviour and using insulting Janguage towards Mrs. James Betts, wife of the proprietor o1 the Eastern Hotel favorite loafing place is said to be in the chair of tue starter of the Twenty-third street line of stages, opposite the Eastern Hotel, where, it is alleged, bis insults usucliy took place. Several witnesses corrobo- rated tue testimony Of ira, Betts and her bus- bund as to the lacts charged. Justice Duffy said toe conduct of the prisoner was reprevensibie in the last degree, aud should he be brougat pefore him again he would deai with him severely, Om tue present com) lant ne would hola him im $300 for his future good bebaviour, ASSAULT UPON THE BIGH SEAS. Henry Tyne, a colored steward of the steamer Ony of Hartiord, plying between New York and Hartford, was charged with feloniously assauiting Toomas Edden, @ cook on that vessel. It ap- peared that about nalf-past seven P. M, on Tués- day, on a trip down to the city, a difference arose between them in regard to their relative duties when Tyne, as alleged, struck Edden with a batcnet on tae head, Inficting & severe woun ‘he steward explained that he was provoked to the act by the couduct of Eaden, who was ver: quarrelvome. Justice Dudy said as alleged of- jeuce occurred Upon the nigh seas he had nojuris- dicion, and Weuld, therelore, reier the matter to the Unitea States Commissioner. ESSEX MARKET POLICE COURT. Before Judge Morgan, RIVER PIQATES CAUGHT. About two o'clock yesterday morning Ufcer Braisted, of the Seventh precinct, while patroling s beat along the East River, saw two men pull- ing rapidly in @ smal) boat irom the schoo! Nel- son, Suspecting they were about no good he hatied them and called npon them to stop, They paid no attention, but continued to pull only the He rapped for assistance, and, in company with another, procured a boat and followed them. The chase was @ lively one, and the policemen soon cam thin ae Officer Braisted pea fired five shots, the | 9 the head ef one o: the thi hors. They tuen dropped their 0 dered. On examining the boat the oMcers found $40 wortn of clothing stolen from the schooner. Toe boar liseli was stoleu (rom Amos Cook, oi No. TiO Wastington street. On deing arraigned yes- terday, Captain Roe. of the sloop Marietta, also cvarged the prisoners with the theft of a quantiy of clothing from the cabin o! his boat. They gave thelr name: John Connors, of No. 60 Gouver- neur street, and James Mahoney, of No. 341 Mi n street, and were held for tial by Judge Mor. a 1B $3,009 each. BAILORS IN COLLUSION. Officer Moylan, of the Seventh precinct, yester- to open default , @ay morning saw three men busily engaged in | lowering bags from the side of the bark Verona, Captain Collins master, lying at pler 45 ast River, He boarded the vessel and discovered that 200 worth of pe, per was missing from her cargo. ie immediately arrested Cnmaries Andersoa, George Coyle and Waiter Rasnieigh, three saliors, ‘Woo were te vply men be found aboard. It is supposed that they were tn collusion with th river thieves arrested by Oficer Braiste uw jatter wer justly engiwed throwing packag jd sacks Overpoard during the chase which ended in their capture. FIFTY-SEVENTH STREET COURT. Beiore Jadge Kasmire. 4 MIDWIFE’ CRIMP. Clara GiebDhardt, a midwife, doing business at No, 102 avenue B, was charged with abandoning an infant three days old in front of the Catholic Orphan Asylum, in East Sixty-ninth strees, in the hope that the Sisters would take tt in and care for 1% She was arrested by Officer McArthur, who saw her walking away from the child, and at once admitted that the infant was not bers, but t a youug Englishwoman named Elizavetn, who had been confined in ber piace @ lew days ago and was still under ber care. She undertook to aispose of the chia, by request of tue mother, in the manoer already stated. She was held fomtrial and th fant Was sent to the Foundling Asyium. id mo (her of tue babe, Ruizabeth Hunt, was removed | examinatio: and batrery; Same ys. Morris Brack, felonious as- sault and battery; Same vs. James Hogan, felon- Jous assault and battery; Same va. Patrick H. Spell- Man, ielonious assault and battery; Same vs, Mary Bossuet, grand larceny; Same vs. George Hi forgery; Same vs. John Rieily, cruelty Same vs. Ferdinand Goeve, assault and YER AND TERMINER.—Held by Judge Brady.— The People vs, Kuward McLoughim (continued), bomiciae, anunals: batter: BROOKLYN COURTS. | COURT OF OYER AND TERMINER—MRS. MERRIE GAN’S TRIAL POSTPONED UNTIL OCTOBER Before Judges Pratt, Wolfert and Voorhies. Assistant District Attorney Moore appeared in the Kings County Court of Oyer and Terminer, before Judge Prats and associates, yesterday, and moved the third trial of Mrs, Sarah ©, Merrigan, under Indictment for the murder of Margaret Hammill. General Tracy, of counsel for the de- fence, opposed the motion, He thought it was singular and unprecedented to attempt the trial of @ prisoner twice in th me term of the court, before jurors who bad heard and were familiar with thé case. Tho defence could not consent to the trial of Mra. Merrigan in the present term. If Was unusual to try cases of that description more tuan twice, and there were few if any precedents to be tound where two efforts to convict had failed by the disagreem*nt of the jury, and especi- ay, yoare thee Was suiicient doubt in the case ry the release of tue defendant, He expected thas morning to move that the defendant be adwittod to bail. Of conrse the matter was at the discretion of the District Attorney, A‘ter some discussion, Judge Pratt sot the case down for trial at the Octover term of tne Court. General Tracy then moved that the prisoner be admitted to vail. Judge Pratt thought this should be done, but reserved his de- cision till to-day. An adjournment was then had Ul to-day at ten o'clock, COURT OF APPEALS. ALBANY, June 23, 1875, No. 54, Merrick Ogden, appellant, vs. Rulus H. Jennings etal., respondenis.—Argaed vy Jawes E. Dewey, of counsel! for appelant, aud by M. Good- rich for respondents, No, 88. Joun Fowler, responde: vs. Irvine H. Palmer, appellant.—Argued by 4. lard, of coun- sei for appellant, and by &, H. Duell for respondent. 8 a G. Wicks, appellant va Waiter respondents.—Argued by Samuel i of counsel lor appellant, aud by 3. P. Nach tor respondents, No. 84, Peter 0, Provost, appellant, vs, Willlam H, Congor et al, respondents.—Argued by Joan Townsend, of counsel for appellant, and by P. V, R, Stanton lor respondents. Proclamation made and Court adjourned tin Tuursday, June 24. DAY CALENDAR. ‘The day calendar of the Court of Appeals for Thursday, Juno 24, is a8 follows -=Nos. 59, 92, 94, 16, 72, 94, 96, 96, POLICE TRIALS. ARRAIGNMENT OF THE YIVE ALLEGED PERJURED POLICEMEN-—TRIAL OF SERGEANT BUCKLEY. The court room at Police Headquarters was crowded yesterday alternoon, the attraction to it being the trial of Patrolmen Henry J. Mctone- gal, Erastus R. Townsend, William Ellard, Edward | Malonoy and Louis Hirsch, of the Tw Precinct, on the following charge In this, to witr>—On tne 26th di fendants, then being witnesses ‘against Roundsmi anu tried at the ‘Wichin the city of N Police, in pursuance of law of tue Board of Police, knowingly an Tuptly, upon their corporal oaths, falsely swore, fied and stated upon a point and in reapect to a inatter Of fact material to the issue then and tuere beine heard &nd tried, that on the morwing of the 7th of May, 1875, at about hali-past three o'cloox, the said defendanis saw the said Reaben Rynders at divers pinces on Washing- ty-sevegth ton and Vesey streets, w in truth and fact id not see the said Kynders at the time and lant aioresaid, as they, the said deiendants, very well knew, and when, in trath and in fact, the said Keuben Rynderk ‘Was at the time last afors | barber enop at No. Greeuwich street. At the triel of Rynders Inspector McDermott swore, as previously published, that on the morn- ing of tne 7th of May, shortly before three o’clock, while watching in the neighbornood, he noticea Roundsmao Rynders and Ouiver Flynn, of the ‘Twenty-seventa precinct, then supposed to be doing patrol duty, eater @ barber snop at No. 36 Greenwich street, He (McDermott) waited at the Gour two hours for them to come out, but as they did not come out he rapped and demanded admit- ai Hearing bo response he forced the door partially open, Wuen it was pusbed against him irom, the inaide. After a struggle MolDer- | mott’ succeeded im entering, and there fvand Roundsman Rynders The Inspect- ors testimony was fully corroborated by Sergeant Smink and OmMicer Fiynn. The defendant brougut to the stand tue five patruimen apuve Ramed, who, ju contradiction to the previons t timony gi swore to having met Kynders as dierent attue time mentiomea, duly per- forming patrol duty. Alter @ hearing of all the evidence the Board became satisfied that the five policemen had com- mitted perjary, and ders was dismissed irom tue force and Officer Fiynu fined tnirty days’ pay. ‘mie specifications of ‘jury above set forte were taen ordered by the d, aud the trial set down for the 16th inst, At the request of the it was adjourned unt yestercay, C ‘The interest manifested by those present at the trial yesterday was very great. suns the spec tatora were lmspectors Speight and McDermott, Caotains Hedden, Willems, St Clineby and Sanders, whom were Assembly a1 ‘The proscoutien was conduct the Board, Mr, MeLain, amd the defence by Coun- seior Willlam F. Howe. Commissioner Mateell satasjadge, When the case was called Mr. ilo spon sas objected to further proceedings, as the joard (CR MAD NO JURISDICTION to trr of ieiony. ‘The Commissione: argued the counsel, ‘cannot take cognizance this matter untH afser the case has been dis ofin acriminaicourt, Uf the Board thought that the witnesses had committed perjury t ould tter to the Knowledge of u body found sn tment d they were duly convicted then tre Gommissioners »b: ening them; o until such action had been taken, tae Board b ediction.”” reply, said that the Board of ous toa military court-marwal to point of jarisdiction, and was iully competent to disciplive members Oo: the foree om all charges. ‘The defendants were now before the Board a wita condact unbecoming officers—to wit, ” dante rand @eliverately and corrapsly commit perjury. ‘The counsel thougnt there could de ne doubt that the Board bad fail jurisdiction prior to any action | @/ the Grand Jury. “Presidcat Matsell decided that the Board had jurisdiction amd direct wi ne! 0 be calies, ta an exceptiol to all the fat pector McDermott took the stand, a ted in nis previ He was suujected by Mr. lowe to but did not contradict himself, Each of the defendants were in turu then sworn, and twey Corroborated all taey bad previously tes- tiled 6. A private Watchman named Curley, on | peing sworn for the Geience, testiMed to seeing the inspector at the time in question at the cor- ner Wasti jd Morris streets, the Inspector swore that he never ieft t or tl rber eawich street he had apprehe to Believue Hospital, Sue refuses to disclose tue | name Of the ataer oj the child, COURT CALENDARS—THIS DAY. 4 HaMoERe—Held by Judge Davis. —Nos, 47, 48, 50, 62, 68, 87, 83, 100, 102, 14, 129, 131, 146, 147, 163, 166, 178, 181, 186, 25, 228, 235, 93, 206, a SUPREME LOURT—SrectaL TenmM—held by Jadge Weaiprook.—Demurrers—Nos, 21, 25. Issues of Jaw end lact—Nos. 472, 596, 275, 338, 183, 481, 525, 431, 21, 271, 491, 464, 182, 948, 149, 362, 541, 478, 424, 417, 471, 507, 537, 15% 403, 99, 121, 266, S28 490, 545, 546, 158, 413, 487, 652. SUPREME CovRT—cincurr—Part 2—Held by Juage Lawrence.—Nos. 1000, 2802, 10005, 9028, 906%, 3154, 2228. 76814, 600)4, 1662, 1248, t 3—iHeld by Juage Vao 2508, 1463, 2062, 1454. Nos. 1261, 1356, 831, 2050, 1203, TY1 5g, 247, L151, 3195, 961, 680, 1359, 1822, 16, 1893, 1621, 1661, 963, 2429, 1775, 1777, 2519, ZBI, 214. ScPsRion Cocrt—Sprcrat. Terw—Heid by Jusge Sper. of. 8, 1,2 Law and fact— Nos. 48, 40, 6, 21, 25, 82, 60, 31, 61, 35, oy 56, SUPERIOR Judge Preeaman.—Same cate! Part 2—fleld by Cnief Justice Mo 1800, 734, 404, 1164, 762, 946, 1096, COMMON PLEaS—THiaL Team—Part 2—Held by Judge J. F. Daly.—Case on. day calenda: MAgINA COURT—lRiaL Tenm—Part i—Held dy Jadge Alker.— Nos, 4146, 2360, 2028, 4027, 8110, 966, BOLL, BiO1, 2255, 2164, 3113, 811%, 120, 3122, 3123, Part 2—Lleid by Judge Grows.—Nos. 2500, 4008, 2460, 786, 24, 1200, 2597, 2487, 2498, 4008, 2662, 1983, 2279, 4773, 4108, 4149, 4404, 4496, 17. 2982, 2034, 2899, Part 3— Heid vy Jud —Nos, 4016, 4482, 2620, | 4, eid by dadge McAuam™. hen, 44 4450 1143, 4, 4493, 2894, COURT O WRAL SRSSIONS—Hela by Recorder Hactett.—The People va. Patrick Vaughan (cons tinued), grand larceny; Same vs. Oba robbery; seme vs. Joln Downing, f boe ys. Jovin Lyon, ourgiary; Same va. Stephen Gera- elin, barglary; sauie vs. James Wilson, burglary: Same vs. dames Kieran, felomous asvauit and battery; Sume Vs, James Emsih. felowious assault After the exai testimony was tion, case to tke Supreme Court if the Board dismiss his clients, Alter the disposal of several minor charges the CASE OF SERGEANT JOUN F. BUCKLEY, | of the Seventeenth precinct, was called ap, The 188, 190, 191, bee 983, 785, 049, 69, 1183, | % | the morning of the 174) COURT—TRIAL TerM—Part 1—Held by | Li 73, 8806, BOL2, 2077, 4379, | complainams was Imspector Speight, who swore t morning of t h ie ing to tl is ec'or Speight, satishe Vat Ihe Mae Was inlexicated, went to the scation house and found by the vlotier toat Buckley was marked as being OM duty. Returoimg to the sta- Vom Nouse at AIX O'clock the same morning the inspector (ound Buckley asieep in ats room, wis breath smeling very «crongly of liquor. ce WAS Tepresented by Uolonel Spen- recincl, a Sergeant ekley of having been drinking. Sergeant Buckley, in taking the stand, denied the trate of the charges, He aimitted going to the saloon, but he claimed it was to queil & dis- ce there, He positively denied all kaowi- edge of Daving Walked away, as alleged by toe lo-pector, With a woman. witness for the proseention, Mr. Rrer, in wirose place th Was not present, been © “oer Mateeil adjourned t nbpenaed, case lor ATTE MPTED SUICIDE. Lawrence Miller, # German, aged fitty-aeven years, residing at the corner of Filty-second strestand Ten avenue, attempted saicide yes- terday in ® vacant lot, on Eleventh avenue, be- tweon Fty-fith and Fifty-sixea streeis, by stab- koife, He had shortiy before takon a dose of Parieereen with & like intent, The man was at- tended vy Dr. Hensett and removed to the Nine- ty minth street Receytion Moapital, Buckiey a joon on First street, comsideraviy fwence of liqnor and fighting. After- | aw the sergeant man with whom the serge W. yer. Mer speak- | Mr. Bartlett | will be very agreeanie to Tweed, for although | faved to avail ro-s-examine inspector Spelgi ery word the Inepector asses to show | mistak Hl phan lasting Sbout kulf an hour. pro aplen bing Dimseclt several times im the breast witha | wines bas been laid in by Tweed for his ig e | stl pending against Tweed, | cape # TWEED'S HOPES. His Release Till November Probable. THE PROGRAMME OF THE DEFENCE All the Cases, Criminal ana. Civil, To Be Dismissed. HOW TWEED SPENT THE DAY ‘The public is now greatly exercised by the ex« citing question which has so suddenly arisen since the decision of the Court of Appeals—‘‘Will Tweed be again a free man’? The general impression, however, which nas been created by the an Douncement of the fourteen old and new criminak Indictments still Ranging over Tweed’s head ts that he will again be convicted on one of these in~ dictments and consigned either to the Peniten~ tiary or State Prison. Yet, from present indicas tions, it is by’no means impossible that Wiliam Tweed will again “walk the stri of New York free man.’? On next Tuesday morning Mr. David Dadiey Field will argue before Judge Brady the motion to quash all the fourteen indictments If this mo tion is granted—and the proverbial “ancertainty ofthe law” renders it by no means impossible Tweed will, for the present at all events, be sale from farther criminal prosecution unless new !n- Gictments should be found against him, That will, of course, depend upon the District Attorney, REDUCING THE BAIL. ‘ Mr, Dudley Fieid, son of David Dudley Fiel@y | when asked as to the grounds on which the mo tiom to quash the criminal indictments will bef based said they were manifold. The most impor tant, however, were that some of the indictmen' were included in ‘the omnibus indictment, 01 which Tweed was first tried, and that others were! supstantially, altiough not technically, repeud tions of parts ef the old indictment, He sali believed there were indictment! d oon ®& Single warrant, which was im direct. violation of the law, The motion to quase the crimimal indictments, which 1s to be heard on Tuesday, !s!0 be preceded by an argu~ ment on Monday on the order to snow cal 7 ‘Tweea’s bail in the $0,000,000 ctvil suit should not redueed, which has been grantea by Judge Donoy hue. The following is the order:— i Upon the compt to annexed, warrant of att pers upon wii the same Was issued, with the sh Teturn therew, the orier x arrest and the afidavi' And other papers upon which the same was ¢r With the Sheriffs return thereto, and Sees the pleadin; and proceedings in the suit heretoiore brought By same plaintuils against the said William M. 4 plicated with Androw J. Garvey, James H. inj and Richard B. Connolly, and thé annexed affidavit Robert K. Deyo, let the plaintiff ahow cause betore ‘at the Court House in the city of New York, on t day of June ius on o'clock A. M.,why the said or~ der of arrest sb i be vacated, or if that be refused, why the amount of wail should not be reduced, or suc! other and furibe: je! grauied as may be just, tor Tollowing reasous >— ‘That the defoudunt bas been already arrested and be) to Dail in $1,000,000 at the suit of the same plaintif to the same cause of action. Vhat the order of arrest was made while other ff tions for the same causes were penuing, in ope of hi bau ol the defendamt was sull under to the amount $1,000,000, ‘what. erson which the order was granted wer pot suite! or proverly veritied. That no cause mn action in tavor of the plaintiff te shown by the complaint, or the papers om which the or¢ der was granted. That the paj the same par ‘was oppressive and an abuse of the pro- art. tach all the defendant's property and at same trme hold him to bail in $3,000), or an; ouser large sum, is equivalent to perpetual imprisons ment and an act of oppression imtoierablc in ap; country, and rly atwarwith the spirl of our inst that the ball would be excessive, supposing a 1 a canse of action to be shown aad no Pe tory rh exist in respect to bail. j oun: of bail is excessive and prokiblied by the ‘iat or other reasons the order of the Court should Dé vacated, ef, if that be retused, the bail should be reai to a moderate sum and such as the detendaat pupposed able w give. Os ABLES DONOHUS, J. B ATTBMPT TO DISMISS THE CIVIL SUIT. Mr. Dudiey Field says thata motion will also ber made to dismiss the civil salt on the greuod that! the Legtsiature bad no right to giv authority $o sue in tne place of the “county,” an that the Jaw giving the clearly aaconstitutional, Tue le could not take away the right of the “c sue. Mr, Field, 0 asked Whether he pected to carry this important point, said, tainly 5 if not re theo before the Court of Ap- peals,”” and he added, with # significant smile, “Jc will Gepend @ good deal upon tae Judge before whom the motion will be arg If it 1s dented the civil case Will probabiy not be tried before Oc- tover, uniess the Governor should order 4 special session of the Supreme Court. Mr. Field feeia oo: t the motion te reduce the bau will pre- then be able to farnisn e motion to quaso tae. criminal indictments does pot prevail, meg rr, ‘Will try to postpone the frst trial unui No a as Mr. Davia D ley Field is desirous of spending the summer in Kurope.”? HOPEVUL VLEWS OF MR. BARTLETT. Mr. Willard Bartiet!, Junior counsel for Tweed, Says that of the fourteem criminal indictments re ly nO more than oue or two will be tried. if it Were the intention of ti hort to. ol fatlare, one after another! Ovtained a conviction, this would no! i trial might qui ne ¢ last, anu to carry out suc! plan would occupy the Court of Uyer ana Term: her (or years, As to the time Whem the crimii indictments Would probably be tried, he sad, a judge who was willing to depart from ail cus.om and propriety might order them to be tried at once, but otherwise they would, In the ordimar; aud proper course of things, not be reached November. “i think the next judge will be care~ ful im regard to what be does im this case,” Mr. Bartiett observed, with especial significauce, ‘fox Wwe decision of Court of Appewis leaves nq room vo dount that a judge imposing illegal pan isbment like imposed by Judge Davis upum aby client is justly lable to heavy damages jor false impris: nmeot.” ‘Does Mr. Tweed intend to take that course, Mr. Bartiett shook bis head, smiled, and that he cowid not say anything yet as to tum e seemed tobe quite nopeiul of freeing nis clieat irom the meshes of sue law and restore bim to lioerty. It wilh thas be hovelul and nurse aguin, before jon nal js Tweed may still ne Xpectation of being» man. Given ii the erime it very that the bail, to ap amount id mam” cae procare, and the: @ would at ali events Ue free til: November. | - quarters in Ladiow street Jail areeverythiag thas ease and comiort could desire, he would, ne aouDt, pieier TO SPEND THE SUMMER IN THR COUNTRY OF &t some pieasaut seasies fesort. Tais would rs bim so that he would be quite fresh Xt crim! triat in November. His unite im Saying that be feels perfeetiy rength o; bis case—er rather of never ior a moment @ that Deputy Sherif McGonigal, as a ‘rode round with wim ail might,” aiver bit bim from Lis peasant “island home,” and tua’ wimeelf of it, He evidentiy looks forward to the time when the law will have ex- oausted ail ite resources tm the attempt to punish him, ad waen le will be permaneatiy restured to HOW TWERO ENJOYS HIMSELF. ‘The day passed pleasantiy enough for rose quite early, pu: touk of a frugal breakfast, amused himself with reading the papers. jues the Beecher trial with copsiderab! At eleven o'clock Mr. 0. W. Bar of his Domerens array of counsel, arrived and maimed antil pall-past two. Mr avid Dudley Fieid jomed bim at two, and there was a consulta. . tion between the counsel in the presence of Field re- ‘weed ail the afternoon, so that tume vo periect their Tweed, tae prisoner's prother, jour four o'clock i@ the afternoon ded the conerence, Mr. Field hed palm upon Tweed’s wounded spiri for, after bis he seemed muck eneerial o'clock wi c 0 gue Burgundy and cna Lr ! y Tweed, whois quite snolsseur of old wines Tweed enjoyed his repast immensely. 'S SECEUSION. we rateer exclusive. Some forty or fifty jomve Of NeWSpaper reporters, called fespects tO Sim, but he deciined to In fact, it Would be ft a with id though smail stock of rare oid rary #tay. The periume of flowets pervad room, and, What witu good food, good wine and @ lUxXarieUs, cou! abode. “Mein Herz was wilst } noch mehr}! ci