The New York Herald Newspaper, February 17, 1875, Page 4

4 NEW YORK HERALD, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1875-TRIPLE SHEET. —_—_ : ‘ * main and she strack me pretences while Bench was speaking and Beach | counsel on the question of Mr. Pailerton, “What this right, when the exclusion of a paper is inde- | three weeks; then I left and went into service at | Turner; J broke ber ci ‘ tC you reierred to giving that indent of its conten tw— Mrs. Brower’s, in Second avenue, as washer and | with a/Ratrbresh. FOR Seen se ee er en ene eee auswer?™ is, seamen ed «and Par. Beach—It te me that the couns froner, (or tour months i108 you Bo trouble abeut nursing the oniid t }, 1 = gat aan Spi is, io es By pigee to Mr. Bvarte objected. eed aA sponte Bet to argue this question ed Save 2 poe desis os a sir. mit an tm the line of v nich r, Fullerton—alter reading estion w! Hon ruled. bron ; reco! will eee tasue oe wat t to the witness belore the Sumistes, and Neilson—It may be beneficial to ‘Tilton »; ‘4 gentleman (Witness gave the name, PARLOR FLOOR OF MB. TILTON'S HOUSE. . his answer, he then put this tnterrogatory, “Did | | Mr. ty asking you to review tue deci- | bus ‘was Inaeuible at the reporters’ table) ; Mrs. MR, BERCHER’S COUNSEL ou say that im answer to the ge that Li bay ke made paoes one. soe ceeeet eek me was j i were und en read here?” and he answered that he di Q t8—Ni ‘ e' Thirty-first Day of they ver cra ee re eee tne anak? | Now the counsel on the other aide expecta ‘nere- | MF. Beach—Tuere is no question before Your | aay T got there; Twas not at the house before the eu & propriety In Tillon's €X- | aiter to hold Mr. Tilton responsible for what he | Honor. child was bora; the child Great Scandal Case. plaining the motives and intentions of his suppos- | said there in answer to that question, and he | Mr. Evarts—Well, 1 don't know that this is 1 weat isto Mrs. Tilton’s ‘g | means to argue that the wife of the plainti® had | within the control and perhaps not covered by of Tecellection tt was the titious Barrative. His evidence was important | means Lid D ‘ \d four when he came to Dr. Storrs and showed tnat he | 29 deem guilty of adaltery, and that she had com- | any rale of law, but when tke procedure of the | fa consisted of Mr. and Mrs. Tilton an e mitted no crime; that she’ had not violated ker | learned counsel comes to the reading of a paper children; there were six servants im the house, EEE £3 vrrec, | Bad read bim the manuscript of the “True | marriage vow. Well, sir, tn order to get at the tull that bas been exctuaed, I thon submit that It is | including Bessie Turner. AN UNEXPECTED WITNESS. |} story among otners, ana had told bim meaning of tis question and properly to n:er- ae Fale waioa exc she and Nething made more buzz among tho auditors ar the time that tt was only part of | Prov te JAneuMe cnet iace theretolore with |. TLIs brought on smotuer fong an@ tedious legal | than the announcement that the Tiltom family | the truth, Storrs had then advised Tilton | regard O ne SORE We sees are Reg proms ry is ended in Mr. Beach making the kept more servants than there re people im i | the extent and scope o! confession, om the house to be waited upon. The extravagance vant S in the! to publish novbing unless he published ail. Another | Bature ani Me etteatthe mmeaping of 1. A What @ Serv ant vee, tH | important fact whisn Tilson got in was ,tnat be these ’wordst The gentieman certainly cannot | abodia'Mrs Kilsabsth Rerbton iets an inesrvicw wits | of the establishment seemed to be Rot the least Tilton Mansion. had read tne “True Story” to Mr. Beecher, Mr. | eliminate from along examination @ single ques- | she ey. Sere Uae Beec! at his residence, she feature of Its want of method, and tuis feature | Evarts tried to have this struck out of che reeord, | ton and a single answer and hold us to the yer | Reena ers RS, go ye eg will probably cause @ rood deal of overhauling of BRE al but itwas ruledin. It therefore appears that Rana Ne laying detore this jury tue’ context | intention an act PCOra pppecee foot pace ber | acconnts is consemporney Similiee’, TERere!® . 7 . | among the persons io whom Tilton rsad | to show what preceded it, Why, Your Honor will | her part being. as nereinberore stated, uot regardea by BUSDandry in heaven,” says Snakespeare, “How Do You Feel, Eliza- | tne “True Story,” tn order to get their ad- | perceive that this question breaks right into | her at the time criminal or wrong: which act was Witness—I did not know Mr. Beecher before; 7 | vice a8 to how it would alfect pubic | medias res, that something has gone beiore it lowed by a similar Sct of oriminality between pever saw him beiore; it was Lessie Burke, one 0 beth ?” | opines im extenuation of his wile’s gulit, were | which we do not understand, apa winch we can- parties at Mr. rkoe’a tomvence A the servants up sta’ who told me bis ; ‘ | Mr. Beecher himseit, nis pulpit neighbor, Dr. | not understand unless I am permitted to imterro- ‘ilowe oy (cher similar | When Mrs, Tilton was Im the bedroom I, with the | Storrs; bis lawyer, General Tracy; Moulton’s | gute this witness, Tne word confession here is trom. $i ite by ‘of 1863 to the | Child, occupied a room adjoining, which commu- partner, Woodruf;’ Titon’s associate editor, | introduced and wey have tutroduced it ip this ot i twe residences afore- nicated with the bedroom by told! Uivrary. “DEAR FATHER, | FEEL SO-SO.” | ® ‘00k! — and the present District Attorney of The spectators who have been compelled to hear way. The Judge ruled out the question, on the assump- tion that it called ior the terms and contents or other places to winch her pastor ir at which he would ‘ing doors; | sel- dom went into Mra, Tilton’s room; the {¢ doors were opened every day to air the rooms; they were snut in ¢! ing times; sometimes he even! Lod or con- this, with other long debates, are very MucD 1D | gyogrance of tae conession. ariekes through a blinding of her | they were closed; Ttadinot say what was the rea- daoubt send. LR, Another rgument between ponanael eee a oe urcen tions, occasioned by Pata Renpnce | Orbedre 6 ng there; aoe Ee tae claaee Tilton’s Redirect Examination | forms ts impression irom such a class of expiana- | 246d, ME Evatts opeclng fo She mola eleiee | Henry Ward decchor as ner trusted religious preceptor | the folding doors when she went to bedi I coused tions. In the length of debate the point i8 Ov | took place at the time tais question and answer ee to occupy the feiding door room and got smother c. Continued. and when the connsei for the plaintiff have | were put ito you before the committee!” Alter Judge Netlson—It is rured out. room when it was vacant, about three weeds Bs fe (py (aden { weved their purpose the fagged and dejected | considerable d'scussion Judge Neitsou allowed the | ir. Beach—We except, Your Honor. after I went there. NPR Jury look up as i the modicum of tes- | que: nd Mr. Evarts noted an exception. A NBW WITMESS—A SENSATION. How lo ir you went to service did yonsee | ,AA.—Folding Doors, B.—The chair In which Mr. cae was a very indifferent compensa- WwW. continued—I had stated to the commit- Soon after kalf-paat three Judge Fullert: 2: house? A. About two wee! | raed Mrs. Tilton on bis kne jl lows. Yesterday's proceedings in the scandal case | ton for so much waiting. However, these | tee im writing the suostapce of the cenfession Di ee Judge Fullerton 80- | thar was the time he went tuto her dedroom; 1 | P—Poors =. parimeg, Would have been very dull but for the introduc- | points possess an importance in that when tuey | made by Mrs. Milton to me in July, 1870, ade | Bounced @ mew and sickly female witness. The | was in the folding door room and saw him go tn. 2 Are put im they stand as parts of the speecues tO | by Mr, Beecher to me in December or January | counsel for the defence seemed destrous to object, | Who showed him up stairs? A. He went | At half-past three, alter about forty minutes om tion of a new witness, Kate Carey, lormerly @ | be delivered at the close of the evidence, When | fouowing, and made to Mr. Moulton and other | put nag very littl ‘1 fe ; Bimself; he knew the way; Mr. Beecher called; | the stand, the witness Catharine Carey was let ge @omestic in the Tilton household. each side will do its best to revive the wemory O! | persons, it was @ confession — i ‘ery little opportunity before the witness | ‘Tessie Burke came up to know if Mrs. Tilton Was | », Mr. Evarts, and sbe walked aly ont of This woman belongs to the peripatetic class of | the jury and array all that serves its purpose and Mr, Evarts then objected, and after further | marched intocourt, She was a thickset, middle- | dressed to see Mr, Beecher; Mrs. Tilton said, “In 4 bpd | nothing else tn the argument. argument on the admission of the consession the | aged Irish woman, about ferty years eld, wearing ‘¢W minutes,” and in a few minutes Mr. Beecher | court, escorted by Mr. Pearsall, Nothing that she wet nurses, who are always in want of a new All sorts Of opinions continue to prevail as to the Judge Morris Judge overruled the objection, and tne witness & gray woollen dress, a reddwh, figured shawiand which fd Went up; he did not frst come into the room im related was offset by the defendant, altiough Mr. lace, and are kept by one mistress only | conclusi nd result Of the trial. ntinued—As I understand the question, it is | a8. ¥ & period of od mpaecenied Secs continues to hold that nis prospects for a veraice | CMuBued— AKT Underslond teen made to the | & Diack bomnet, with a bunch of pink roses init. | 'Q, Who closed the folding doors A. Mrs, Tilton | Sbe@rman had passed notes and memoranda up per © je e ye for the plaintuf are growing better week alter | commiitee which led to their asking Me that ques | she carried a white handkerchief in ber thin, | was in bed when the message came up; ake got up | to Evarts all the while, The only questions tend- ing to her testimony, Mrs. Carey had | week. General Tracy has repeatedly satd that be | ony aunt hands and heid it againet her chin whilo and closed the folding doors; | dia not see Mr. | ing to destroy her veracity which Evarts had put been takem to Mrs, Tilton’s six years | ¢Xpects the plaintid’s side to brevk down and his | “Q. Yes; what had taken place before that com- | & eechor there agaim While 1 was occupyiNg this | referred to ner frequent change of employers— ago to nurse the child Raph or Frank-—the same | about whose legitimacy there was an alleged sin- gular consultation bevween Mr. anda Mrs, Tilton and Mr. Beeener. Mrs. Carey was naturally led to | the house by oue of the friends of the family. She related that while there she was a personal Wm. ness of some impropricties not hitherto given in any o/ the capacious documents or hearsay pubil- cations which have marked the scandal. She saw, according to her oath, Mrs, Tillon receiving Mr. Beecher ia HER PEDROOM and close the door atter them both, She also saw | om one occasion tat lady sitting on ber pastor's | lawyers to retire irom the contest belore the case goes to the jury. THR EVIDENCE. The proceedings began at eleven o'clock, Mr. ob resuming the cross-examination of Mr. iton, Mr, Fullerton—You_ were asked yesterday about your reiigious iaith. I pass now to the pubdiication Of the letters in tie Cnicago Tribune, You stated in your cross+examination that your counsel thougot justice required that those letters ougnt to be published. In what respect had you been misrepresented, and in what respect did you con- sider the publication of tuem or any part o! them | necessary ¢ Witness—Well, sir, during the early summer, When this case first began to be taiked oif in the newspapers, Charges were brought against mein | various Ways to tne effect that I had been a very mittee whicn led to tue question on that occasion? A. | bad made a sworn statement before the com- mittée in whica I had charged Heary Wara Beecher with relations ef sexual tntimacy with | Mrs. Elizabeth R, Tilton from the Jail of 1868 to the | spring of 1870. | Mr. Fallerton—Sworm to it? A. lt was in the form of a sworm statement; I have it here in my bands ; these are the exact words. . This paper whica you now furnish had been laid belore the committee prior to this examuna- | tion? A, Yes, sir. Mr. Fuilerton—Now, sir, I propose to read it. | Mr. Evarts—They propose to prove the enure in- | | quiry before the church committee upon the single question which | asked, The Judge—I think this has gone far enough. Mr. Fullerton—I propose to read tuis. monplace, overworked, keen-featured house- keeper or under servant, witha smal, sharp nose, cheek bones and a reddism complexion. Sho ex- plained very soon that she had “brown keeters”” on her lungs, Tute she satd very jauntiiy. Her testimony was ween, quick and circumstan- tial, With ber arm on the elbow of the witness chatr, her face attentive aad all her facui\ies con- centred, she answered both Fullerton aad Evarts without evasion in a very distinct voice, and generally with that grammatical clearness which | inatcated a geod natural head and good associa- testifying. Her appearamee was thatof a cym- | fo! | have d dmg door room. Q. Can you fix the time of this visit tnat you scribed aa the first time an saw him, in relerence to the leagth of time it was alter you black eyes, rather darting im their character, high went into Mrs, Tilton’s service? A. Two weeks, | sir; about four weeks alter the confinement of Mrs, Tilton; She was confined two weeks beiore 1 went there, and two weeks after that Mr. Beecner | Came there the first time, as 1 have stated. Q. When was it that you went to Monticello; about what monte? A. It was about the latter part of June or early in July. Q. Who went there at that time? A. Well, there was Mrs. Tilton, myse}f and the baby, Raipn; Mt+s biog Tilvon, that is the oldest daughter, and cee Q. Where did! you stop while at Monticello; was itatahotei? A. No, sir,-we did not stop at tie being a wet nurse—and her quarrel, if any, with Mrs, Tilton, Endeavoring to answer the last question to the prejudice of Bessie Turner, Mr. Evarts stopped her. Tne importance of her testimony lay ip this. Prior evidence had all been of a document- ary and inferential character. For the first time @ witness had sworn of her own eyes and knowledge, to famiitar, 1f not immodest, relations between the defendant and the plaintif’s wile. The appearance of the witness was neither pre- possessing nor forbidding, and she had to be judged by her relations to the parties she informed , i knee, and heard @ nondescript remark between | brutal man to my family, that I had abused my | AW ee eter Y referred to's state- | toms. She was generally cailea a clear, good he at Dr. McKay’s, @ private | upon. These, she said, were those of ch eed them while im that confiding position, | Wile, tnat | was given to drunken orgies aud that ment made by tais witness before the committee, Witness. Was Mr. ‘Tilton there at the time? A. No, sir, domestic employment and the origin of her ap- The reason this testimony had not been hinted at by the ambétious partisans in the case was that the woman kad said nothing about it until last week, having been very sick for more than a year, | aod an inmate of Beiievue Hospital A deep cold in ber lungs and throat had quite disabled her from doing housework, and the occa- | sion of breaking the sileace had been an invita- Uon from @ late visitor 10 assume employment againin Brooklyn. This invitation bad led Mrs, Carey to reply that she had once belore lived in Brookiyn, amd when asked where gave Mr. Theo- dore Tilton’s name. Her betriender bad thereupon questioned Mrs. Carey as to whether Mr. Beecher ever came to the house, and what was ois conduct | when he did so, Then, like ALL EVIL NEWS, the attorneys for the piainti? became possessed of this information, and they forthwith nunted ap | many years between my wile and myself, 1 was in every respect a savage; my then counsel, | dudge Morris, said that the popular impression | was working me great injurv, aud, after reading the correspondence which passed during those suggested my publishing them, or extracts jrom | tnem, in order to correct tae popular impression; | anything was omitted in | ary 3, 1868, in Which appears the expression, “io the letter of Fevru- Jove is praiseworthy, but lo abuse tue giitis sin,” | At Was by mere accident. Mr. Fullerton—I now offer tn evidence section 6 Of the statement, in which that extract appears. Mr. Evarts objected on the ground tial part of the paper had been read. AN INTRENCHED WOMANHOOD. The Judge intimated that the plaintif’s side | couid read it. Mr. Fullerton (reading) :— That previous to the atoresaid criminal intimacy. one of the reasons which Mrs. Lilton aileged tor her en- couragement of sueb exceptional attentions trem the Rev. Henry Ward Beecher was the tact that she had been macti distressed with rumors avainst bis moral purity and wished to convince him that she coud re- ceive his kinduess and yet resist nis solicitations, und that she could iaspire in him, by yt dy he | urity and fidelity, | and they have put a question based upon that fact, | Now Is it not proper for us to know What was be- | lore the committee at che time ? | The Judge—It waa a sworn statement. | Messrs. Beach and Evarts then went into a long argument on the question, Mr. Beach holding that “uney give in evidence a portion of the testimony oi Mr. Tilton before tae Investigating Committee. What is eur position? Not that we may give the | whole indictment or the whole evidence which | may relate to matters not essentially and inti- mately connected with the particular part given | by the defence; not Decessary to qualify or to ex- | plain the very subject matier which they have | given in evidence, but simply that part of the pro- | Ceedimgs betore the committee on the part of Mr. ‘Tilton which reflects light upon the portion which they have proven. Our ovject is to get the whole | trath, to get ali that Mr. Tilton said upon the par- tucular point as to which they have extracted a | single guestion and answer of that examina- tiou, And who will dispute the propriety of that? Wno will atirivute to the law aay principle which shall prevent Mr. Tiiton {rom giving all that he sald before that committee upon the subject which they have introduced and but @ part of bis decta- | am from the hospital at Bellevue, New York; have Mr. Beecher and wife were not present when this testimony was given. Mrs. Field, the large | Quaker lady, sitting by Mrs. Tilton, heard this | 1 didn’t see Mr. Tilton there at ail. Now, Cathertae, how long were you living at Mr, Tilton’s alter you returned frem Moaticelio; how long did you remain in his service? A. I re- rather startling and unexpected testimony given | mained with them for about four months after re- with a look of pain and nervous interest. sitting | © ‘urning from Monttceilo to Brooklyn. Q. Did you leave Mrs. Tulton’s before your month under Mrs, Field, Mrs. Tiltom could not be seen by | was up, ordid you leave whem it wasup! A. 1 any great number of people. A mote was passed | think my month was up; [ was with them from to a gentleman who sat just beside her te ask how she took the testimony, and hereplied On paper :— | “Prushe@; eyes Mashing: writing notes to Tracy; | uneasy; breathing like a racehorse; eyeing the woman closely.” The audience was extraordinarily attentive | during ali thts testimony. By Mr. Fullerton—Where do you reside? AT! been there a number of weeks—eleven weeks, | With a severe coid. Q. Do you recoilect the time you went there, the | Gay of the montii? A. I don’t, In what ward were you? A. Twenty-first. the end of June to about Uctober of the same year. o Now, you have said that you saw Mr. Beecher and Mrs. Tilton in the room down stairs. When was that—be/ore or alter your return irom monti- cello? A. That was after returning irom Monti- cello, sir. Q. How long after returning wasit? A. Well, 41 Was about ihree or four weeks alter. Q Where were you when Mr. Beecher called at the house? A. I was up stairs im the nursery woen Mr, Beecher catied; the girl Burke came up stairs and told Mrs. Tilton that Mr. Beecher was in the parlor ; Mra, Tilton then went down stairs, . ad you occasion then to go down statrs? A. Lad occasion to zo down stairs when I wanted to get a drink of ice water; I was nursing the baby at the time. pearance in court was an accidental narration of hers to @ hospital visitor. 1t was remarked In court that Mr. Beecher, a8 @ spititual adviser, might readily have entered @ sick woman’s bedroom to pray with her. The jury listened to all this with intense in- terest. Pryor heard Mrs, Carey testliy with @ satisfied smile. Tilton listened without any change of expression, sallow and oldish. The gal- leries had all the while been in great joy and curtosity. In a few seconds Tilton was again in the witness box, the subject of a tedious argumentation whica lasted till adjournment, TILTON RESUMES THE CHAIR. Mr. Fullerton—There is, Mr. Tilton, somethiny in your answer before the committee which | wan! to ask you about; with reference to your wile you said, “She main! ed in my presence to her mether that he had not done anything wrong;” what did you mean to convey by that answer ? the poor woman and brought her across the Jerry | #0 increased respect for the chaste nity of woman- | pasiom? The examination was conducted by query Q. In whose immediate care? A. Dr. Schaffer Ne Mr. Evarts arose and objected to the question as |. Previt 8 she maint Ty _ . a Q. Now you went down stairs. How were the 4 * on one of the celdest days 0! the year. ee ‘Chassiea tajuasen ooorard bs a thie p aetby and afswer. ‘Tue examining counse! had a and Dr. Luske, a rooms arranged? A, The parlors are divided by ireieven eat the Judge said, “We won’t take Had it been to the interest of either side, Mrs, Carey might have presented the jury and public | with @ detailed account of tne menage at Mr. | of resistance, always refusing lis were strong and oft-repeated; and band, dates February 3, 158. she wr Jove is praiseworthy; Dut to abuse the gift is sin. am strong. So demonstrations or tascinations could Here! | | perfect right to change tue suoject at any time @nd at any point in tue examination.” Mr. Evarts, in reply, staced, “it 1s pot an inquiry atalio! what Mr. fMitun thought of tis wtie’s in- nocence or of his wile’s purity. What theory he Q. Where uid you reside before you went there? | A. Irving place, the city of New York. | . With Whom? A, The name | cannot remem- ber; it was at No. 55. Q. How tong did you live there? A. One month. 1oiding doors, into @ front and back parlor; there are two back rooms, one ef which, @ continuation of the hallway, is used a8 a dining room and is connected wi back parior by folding doors; there is also a small room in tue front hall; the Mr. Fullerton said tt was charged that the wit ness had made use of this expression before the committee and tue counsel had aright to show imhesner he said that or not. If he baa said any- Tilton’s. Mr, Evarts just penetrated the shell of | cause me w yield my womanhood.” had of aduiter: " 7 hy ualifyin these statements then that “ ‘'y, thet heid the adulteress pure, Dia A ali is o th Th ng qi ying the question when be asked if Mrs. Carey | _ Witness was askea if he was understood to say | rire question hua'boviing to do with any theory of | yoy, D| YOU Feside with Theodore Tilton? | ee ee aac AcaEs earween ine ani Was Angier MALICT. ase otner ale had he did not purposely misquote that letter, to scheme Oi reasoning of Mrs. Tilton, if she Rad any Q. When? A. I was the first wet nurse Mrs. Til- room and the back parlor were generaily open. bad ever had any trouble or rupture witn her | wnicn he answered im the ne; : z j gative; the next nevertheless pu PY brought ous im their examination thas couversa- mistress, She apswered she had once qnarreiled | question Was i he took down in phonographic tom abe ‘holy charsoter Of the aduiverer. Pine “00, De yom replibes tes. yes: A. Ido not. onthe! ieosacer inom of tho wiaevoara’ a T \u and the Court remarked that that did not with Bessie Turner, who struck her over the head | nutes an account of Moulton’s imierview With | question is ms, @ plain and simple one, | Q How many years ago? A. Six years ago. was inthe dining reom standing by the table justify them in going back to that M eerepeere hie with a hairbrush, and that Mrs. Tilton sided witn | ?Witaeas—Yea, on the spot; Dbave all. thatis tort | Shc pte tes eo iuatter si ince, ifaw iinpored | of wast Semon oC the year waait? A. Summer. | hick sided nest ihe window. toank the witness sow Mrs: Teton, in the presence the girl; but that otherwise she had never ex- 6 ghee ‘y npute . How long did you remain with Mrs, ‘Filton? | _Q. There is where you went and got @ rink of | of her movher, vindicated herself from wrong. He changed a harsh word with the wife of the plain- | of it; some pages are gone; | could not certiy that this I bold in my band is a correct copy, burl could read the notes themselves, coniession on we part of this husband alleged the wile had not insisted on purity ? No, but on the simple and straigutierward qaestion :—“Yeu* A. Four months, as wet nurse. Q. During that tame aid Mrs. Tilton go away water? A. Yes, sir. Q This el bee think you were about three or four weeks bs irom win w! manner she did it. Evartg said he had asked the wit tif. Mr. Evarts cut sort these familiar details | THE TRUE STORY AGAIN. . from home, to Mouticello? A. Yes, jonticello? fA. Yes, sir; | * le 4 ¥ iter you 8! y made certain statements or no! Gia te very soon dropped the witness, | Q. With what object did you snow to persons Lo deg Bir tr ae new Sie pl herd mg Boma peg, 6 eet aed te ag lel a ass 6 | SbOUE shree oF four WeOks. 4 middie of August or | !ne sala anything qralitying teem that wi ee ee eee | thie, Bveete Well Tdontelinow what wolmvets Tete snes ate cheatan et nat wien Coan = In the summer season? A, Yes. ” the ond of tuas month; would tt aot? A. i don't gp reg ag teeny filch ai sem alee manner of testifying, considering her | qo witn thats " { an, Cee iP ane ap Co pf ing mr Q Did you go wita her? A. Yes. knew; 1 suppose 80; i cannot fix tne date very | £0 4Piny mother, whica has nothing to do with invalid character, was very frank, prompt and | positive. This is the first witness who has given any ocular demonstration. All the others nave testified to documentary matter and points of inierence. Mrs. Carey's brief, but unqualified story was heard with intense anxiety by all the friends of the defence, the plainni’s wile included, who appeared to recognize the witaess when she came into court amd "seemed jor the first time dis- | The Juage—Well, it is like asking him how he came to show it. I taink it 18 proper. Mr. Evarts—Pcopie are to be judged by their actions—— Mr. Fujierton—And by their words, Mr. Evarts—i suppose the object in showing it was that the people to wiom he showed it might gee it. (Lauguter). ‘Tue Judge—Tneve are very few acts tuat cannot be expiained. Mr. Evarts—Yes, sir, but there are many that the Jaw does nos permit to be expiained. tuat ue did say so; that he did say that, that sne cid say #he bad pot violated her marriage vow, and that is @ contradiction of tue assertion that | she did. The Jadge—I still think I cannot allow you to read that paper. It Was not a part of the conver- Sation respecting the inquiry. It was a presenta- tion on witich the inquiry was to be made? Mr. Beacu—Nor any portion ot tt? The Jud; Beside this discrepancy has been cleariy expiained. You have a rigit \o read spe- | cifle parts in order to make your exceptions, } Q, Did you remain with ber as long ag she stayed | W there? A, Yes. Qs Thep did you return with her to Brooklyn? es. Q. How long did you rematn there alter she re- turned? A. Until the coid weatner. Q. Catherine, during the ume you lived with Mrs. Tilton did you see Henry Ward Beecher? A. ell, Q. How soon after your return from Monticelio ‘Was tnis visit, to which you reier, of Mr. Beecuer ? A. It was about three weeks, I think, Q. And that was the first time Mr. Beecher haa Visited at the house alter the return of Mrs. Tiiton trom Monticelio: A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, you are jamiliar with the parlors and 1 aid, sir. the arrangement ef the iurniture, are you not? Q Where did you see him? A.I saw him go | A. Yes, sir; 1 was often in the parlors. into Mrs, Tilton’s room several Dim, bat | did net near any times belore wo | went into tne country; she shut tae door after | sitting in? A. I Q What ‘chair was it that you saw Mr. Beecher saw Mr. Beecher sitting in @ | large armchair, cloth bottom, which stood im the the question of whether he did answer the ques- tion, ‘sue maintained to her mother that sne had not done wrong.” The answer was plain, and “how sne maintained that position” was not competent for the witness to prove. The Court said the question is, ‘How she main- tained ner innocence #)? Mr. Evarts remarked that the witness did not state the terms of these expressions to the com. mittee, and the license to state them here did not appear. What be had spoken of before that com. mittee was alone competent for inguiry at this turbed. The Juage—i thiuk the witness may show why tals. ) stage of the evidence. THE RELIGIOUS VIFWS he showed the paper. At (his point tie Court took a recess unt two What room wasit? A. in ber bedroom. | corner of the room, near the window, and Mr. Beach, replyim, they simply wanted to * | P.M. Where was it? A. Right over her’s; there | facing to the dining room. prove that sue mado a confession. The effect of of this witness were not the subject of tnquiry. She kissed the bible when she took the stand, and it was the general impression that she was either a Presbyterian or a Catholic. The only language that she adduced as passing between the defend- ant and the plaintii’s wile, when the latter was on Mr. Beccher’s knee, was thought to be as fol- lows:— “How do you feel, EMzabeth ?” “Dear father,” answered Elizabeth, with her band on Mr. Beecher’s shoulder, “I frel ” It 1s uncertain whether the witness meant 80” or “social.” ‘30- Everybody supposed at first that Several other objections were interposed but the | Judge ruled tue auswer Was admissidie. Witness—My object 10 shuwing that paper to a select number Of intelligent peoosle Was in order that I might get from them a judgment as to how it Would nave adected the groat puvlic if it had been publisned; 1 did not know bow it woulda al- | fect the public, andl thouguc if I showed it to perhaps a cozen intelligeut persons, their united Judgment would be to me like the judgment of a jury or the judgment of the public. Mr. Fulierton was proceedia: ask what object witness expecved to accomplish If it Was puolished, whea Mr. Evarts interposed and said tiat matier had been iutroauced by tuem on their direct ex- amination, aud the witness Stated thas it was written and proposed as@iorm of puoitcation, and that it Was read to Mr. Beecher, and toat AFTER RECESS. Notwithstanding tne dulness of the morning se-s10n the Court was crowded in the afternoon, and the counsel for the plaintiff were unusuaily alert. Three of them were standing abreast on tue floor at one time—Beach, Fullerton and Mor- ris—while Pryor, sitting back on @ ciair half- tilted, swung bimseil, pinched nis lips and listened nervously. The counsel for Tilton had made up their minds fat the recess to produce before the jury, as an offer of evidence, an alleged and now extinct con- fession of Mrs, Tiiton, This metnod of procedure are four rooms on one floor. Q Isita double nouse? A. frame house. . Where were you? A. there were folding doors between. Q You saw him go in? A, Yes, sir, and the doors were shut. Who shut the door? A. Mer own self. ) Where was this 1ovum with reierence to theirs? A. My rovum was bext to Mrs, Tiltou’s; I had a lounge to sleep ou. Q. Was this which you now speak of before going to Monticello, or after your return? A. Be- | 1o1 Jamily weut to Monticello? A. No, sir, | did not, @ Now, did you see anything aiter toeir return? No, sir; it’s a small | kn In the next room; | re. Q. Did you see anything else there before the | Q Was not this chair usually there? A. [don’t iow whether toe Cuair Was usually in that cor- | mer or not, room? A, There are-two windows in the back parior and one in the dining roon This chair was next (othe room? A. It was not near the window, but was in the corner lacing the window; the cuair was near the wall, close Lo the diing room door. Q. Where did you stand in the dining room when you say you saw Mrs. Tilton sitting on Mr. Beecner's knee? A. I was taking @ drink of water | @t the table in the dining room when I saw Mr. Beecher sitting to the large chair aud Mrs, Tilton sitting on bis knee. Q. Now, did you see this without making any effort on your part? Q. How many windows are there in the back | this declaration, which the other side had arawno from the witness, was to prove tuat his wife always maintained her inuocence. Tney pro’ that Mr, Tilton declared that Mrs. Tilton main- tained her innocence, We hold tnat was simply an opinion of the wituess, formed from the cun- versatiun, 1s it not proper then to ask this wit- hess by what form of expression Mrs. Tilton Maintained ver purity ? We want the witness to explain what he means by the word “maintained.” ls it not proper todo this? Mr. Tilton says M Beecher was guilty of improper intercourse with bis wife. They say no; Mrs. Tilton has said that Mr. Tilton pas testified that his wife has always Maintained her innocence. It was but just that they shoud show bow she maintained that posi- tiou. a she said “s ” afterard, when Mr. E: view took place concermng u A. 1 did, sir. : Were tue Joiding doors open 2 : ane eed caer d ceart When Rr. Bvarts | tat Thave asked no questions, ©” 14884 as been a part of the tactics of counsel on doth | |g, Wiiat did vou see then? A. Isaw her inthe | Wide! A. Yes, sit. for u wiiness he sauus upon the rules Of evideuee a oocatarnn “ "| The Judge tvougnt he might answer, as the sides to adduce papers and documents ruled out | back parlor sitting on Mr. Beecher's knee. | ,& Catherine, are you a married woman? 4A. | which govern every Witness. Ihe subject matter which would mean “colera or “passing com- | counsel bad put the contents tu his recoliection. gs real evidence in the form of offers of evidence. Q, Wuere were you theny A. lwemt into the | Yes, sir. co | Of tis (Mr. Evarts’) inquiry was vot what Look fortabie.”” The word “soc might indicate | — Mr. Evarts—isut that adds nothing to the au:bor |” yy “ 1 8 ae ag Sogn ap lass of water. ban me here is your busband, is he living? A. No, | piace between Mrs, Tiiton and ker mother, but the odegiseiioaatlal or The brevity | Of the story that uad composed 11, and to tell way ', Evarts, who 15 doing nearly the wnole oral | Q,. Where were you coming irom? A. From my | sir, he is = 4 1 question was Wether he made answer, and not alt t . r be composed 1t, aud ior what purpose, avd con- work of the deience, was promptly up and | Dursery room. « You have said all you have seen. A. Yes, | gs to tue truth or falsity of tue reply. and novelty of this testimony wiil proba- | cerning whicl I nave asked Lo single question. launched intoaspecch, le had fought all da Q. What part of the parior were they sitting in? | sir. ‘Tne book contawing the question to which the bly make @ larger ripple in outside com-| Tne Judge admitied t swer and the witness “ 4 y | A. in the corner ford parlor and dining room. Q. After you saw that where did you go? arguinent had reierence was shown Judge Neilson all thank th tue ‘verdict. is a mere | aid—My object in tae preparation of that narra- with a perseverauce and general good nature Q. What ume of day was this? A. lt was coming | a, | went up stairs, sir, to my nursery, at his request, and iter perusing tv the Judge Dit of bo-peep tm the course of a very long, live was this:—airs, Wooduli's tale, blasting my which indicated the importance of nis objections to | Gusk. Q. Did you say tiat at Luis time when yousaw | said:—“You extorted from the Witness the ad- Soom er ora very long, serious | jamily, had veeu six weeks beiore tue public; the the cause of his client, Q. Intneeventng? A. Yes, sir. Mrs, ‘Tilton seated on the kaee of Mr. Beecher tust | mission that sue had not done wrong. And now epic, ana belongs with Bessie Turner's testimony policy of silence, Witu Whico We originally agreed Q. Where were you? A. | was going around the she had her hand on his shoulder? A. Yes, sir. tne question is, How did she 60 maintain that in relation to seemg Theodore sitting in the jap | to Meet it, Wus proving every day more and more He was at once reminded that on three occa- dining room to the table to get a glass of ive water, | Q. And was it then that you heard the conversa- | position to her mother? Iwill allow the witness bi nn 8 ” M disastrous, carrying my family down to ruin; | sions he had put in offers of evidence atter the q What kind Of doors were there between? A. | tom you have given? A. Yes, : Theara whis- | to avswer the question.” of the venerabie Susan 3. Anthony. Mr. Beecher | undertook the prepara'ioo Oo. & barrative which papers on which they were based had been ruled | Folding doors. | pering and Mr. Beecher said, “How do you feel, Mr. Evaris—l then take an exception, Your was not present with bis wile co hear this at- | Would, on being published, create im the public r Q Were ‘hey opened? a. Yes, sir, avery lUttie | Elizaveth’”’ ‘Dear father, | feel so 80,” Honor. testation, but as soon Mrs. Carey was dis- missed the assigtant pastor, [uiliday, slipped out as Mind ah impression iike (his—namely, “We never believed toe Woodhul story was true, because it is too extravagant; but we always believed there out. Mr. Beach began to read Jilton’s statement beiore the church committee, when Mr. Evarts apart, so that you could see. Q. Did you see anything else? hand ou his shoulder, and he said, A. “How do you I saw_her Q. Did you bear tuls conversation without an effort on your part’ A. Yes, sir; when I went imto the dining room 1 did not open the door, it Judge Nellson—Yes, of course, Mr. Fulierton—in what way did she maintain her innocence to her mother in your presence ? ‘ ain interrupted with a speech. ‘tne Juage 1 court to report the new icature iu the cause. | Was some foundation for i, bat now we have the ag . Elizabeth?’ She said, “Dear ta! | Was always open. Witness—She said she did not believe that God te REST OF THE DAY — story, ait - Lyd Poe as she had re- | showed @ remarkably clear memory of past epl- | ena en 5. ae Q You webbed of Mr. Beecher’s calling at the | would nee wig thes Baid ane, loved Gag a | ported and it exonerates Mrs. Tilton; my object jes of the trial, and corre . Ey house otber times than tn that si id not believe that God would nave le! was spent fn legal wrangling, being as to the right | was to planta story less deleverious and wines ote” . cred Mr. Evarts, He | waen this remark, charged by Mrs. Carey upon | Yea sir, ose you speak oF A. | Tort yelatious continue if they. were of ® Siuful of the plaintiff to explain his reletion to what was would not incriminate my wile. Anoiher Uriel controversy jo\lowed here on the sided with the plaintif’s counsel, but still per- mitted Mr, Evarts, to the great amusement of the Mrs. Tilton, while sitting in Mr. Beecher’s lap, wat made, the self-enjoying, semi sensual laugh around Q. Can you state how many times he called | there? A, He came there three or tour times be- character; sne said neither her mother nor myself Were competent to advise her, as it was not our called the “True Story” of bis case, Tiis “True | a . . question as to what the Witness said to tue gentie- gudience, to make @ third speech. | fore going into the country, and sent ker @ basket | business; Mr. Beecher, who was her minister, and Story’ has beem one of the singularities of the suit, | men to whom be told his story. Mr. Kvarts ob Mr. Evarts was Saleh by nis associate, Mr. ssf 4 iglesia eget i alDherd of ‘elegant floWers on a large q@ish; ke Wanted | had made it nis business to study what’ was as the document in question, aitiough the compo. | jected to tie introduction ot third persons. Tae “ , MT. | scandal to @ portion of the audiemce, 11 was plain them to be kept around her bed. right and what was wrong, bad repeatedly sition of the plaintiff, seems to have passed Judge allowed the question, Abbott, the celebrated law reporter, a round- | that a newcatcn word nad been invented by this Q, And they were placed there, were they not? | assured her that it was not sinful; he had told WHAL STORRS SAID. headed man, with @ ravher sickly complexion, a8 ocedure, the first since “the ragged edge,” | 4 Yes, sir. | her that love was justified in all things; out of mis mands aud unexepectediy made | Witness—Aa soon as I had read the paper there 1 too much closet work. pr Ad age ime, ‘Q. And every person who came there sawthem, | that there were Various expressions | its appearance in the possession of the | ae ee ere ements Dr. Storrs bite Judge Porter, still looking 11), watzhed Mr. Ev. “troe inwardness” and ‘nest hiding’? had been scat irom whom they came, did they not? | ale , heseipoy et ee the j hands, by | said, “A , before | cau consult . |, Wate! . Eve | A. Yes, sir. the kissing of the lips an sexual intercourse; defence. That portion which the plaintiff had re- | witn you on this subject or give you any advice ee ee eee ener ri ii the love, was right the Cxptessious ‘were also tained partly dovetailed with the portion whica the defence had captured. ihe struggle yesterday was to keep Tliton from modifying the evidence | he bad given under cros*examination as to the truth ofthis “frae Story.” [! we could be shut oar from expiaining Its inconsistency with the line of charges he makes against the defendant it would worth anything you must answer me one ques- tion;”? 1 said, “What ts ity’ he then said, “{ want you to tell me waetner this nurrative we have Tread 18 the plain and honest truth—what is caued in court toe trusi, the whole trath and notning but the tratn?” said, “Well, sir, 1 will answer that question if you will promise not vo ask me any jurtuer questions on the sudject;” Well,” says be, “1 will not catechize you against your arcs attentively from behing his spectacles. Gene- ral Tracy, with bis bands clasped benind his head, 80 looked up with his intense, clouded tace, He Oks to be always about gotug into baitie. The Court assembied at two o'clock, when the phat examinauon of Theodore 1ilton was re- suined. | Mr. Foilerton—Your Honor having denied the People of grave feelings at once nezan to reason whether the phrase was in keeping with Mrs. Tile ton’s temperament, Q Now, where was she when she made use of tar language ? A. Sitting in his lap, sir. (Laugo- er.) in hear distinctly the words did, 1 Q, And did father?” A. A ing else? A. No, sir, 1 did “dear | Q. Was Mr. Tilton there? A. No, sir, not w! Mr. Beecher was tuere, Q. No, | mean was he not there when the flowers were there, and did he not know that they came from Mr. Beecher? A. Yes, sir; Mrs. Tilton told him they had been given by Mr, Beecher; | never saw him looking at the flowers, but he was olten in hia wile’s bedroom during her confinement, Q. When dia you first mention to anybody that | you had a knowledge 0: tue matter to which you justinea and right, and were pleasing before God; ir. Beecher’s love for her and her love was right, 80 far the expressions w sinful; she rested her faitu on Mr. Beech thority for that. Mr. Evarte—I will now ask the Court to strike out that answer. ‘Tue Court—You can do So in the morning. ‘Tue Court was then adjourned, it being eleven ” rst third and fourth paragraphs of the sworn state- Did you see anytn: } afford an opportunity for Mr. Beecher’s counsel to | Wish OF will:!) I then sald, tt is noc the waole | ment of ar. Tiitou. wiih reference to tue ques pot; | went wit my gisas of water Up staira to | Se ery ine fiat ome Anema cae. STLCUEER RRO SOUE OAOREs neal Wea ma ene show that Tilton ha@ never dreamed of accusing | statement; but itis all | am wilting to give to the | Pomsed pote dose ee eee oder. (air. | the bursery and sald notning to novody, | bie aay, who ts Ta'the habit of visiting tie ar wares and hatred ied bim on to mcrease the imputation | 1t}" 10 not recoliect now the hames of tuoss to | te question, and it is not necessary (0 permit | about three weeks | Bick she would get me an clegant piace in a iamily whom | showed the “frue Story,” as mentioned | 1m Brooklyn; I said I had been at service in Brook- Yesterday afternoon Detectives Williamson and of bis jealousy to an indictment of guilt, Mr. EvV- | jn my cross-examination. | this to be read, 1 must object to his reading, Q How often, 11 at all, beyond the time you | ivy and she asked me wuo by arts seemed to feel the importance of Qkir, Devitt Me, Whitney, Mr. Clark, Mr. | , Mf. Heach—Your Honor ias ruled, and tue coun | speak of, did Mr. Beecher cail at the house while | ner’ I" bad lived with Hira, Nad lived with; 1 told | peiny arrested Charles Collins and Tomas Hamil HUPPRESSING THE PLAINTIF? | raey, Me. Woodrum, Mr. Harman aud Mr. Dunk | (cing alter Your nek ee hs Ors ae ans iden” fragt gt gets enum. | Bursed the bavy; I then commenced to tell of | ton, on @ Sixta avenue car, while engaged in an in his disclosures on tois score, and he made | ocherss” there were ounersl showed It to: a large | ,,MT- EVArt#—The paper is passed upon, and there | ber of times be called? A. He calle’, 1 tnink, Rhode ity it was throug tae ay tne dame | attempt to pick the pocket of one of tie passen- num ber of gallant efforts to have bim ruled ont, | circle of persons, perhaps twenty or twenty-live, | 8 Bo pee pyese y id int be read. Jt 18 | jour or Sve ume beiere she went to Monticelio, here. ers. The prisoners madyu LY aoa jrenatence, nbting exception aiter exception to the Judge's re. | 10 Met Irom chem @ judgment, such as 1 supposed | ap ded peel ac gti . aquiry. Q. And after her return’ A. 1 can’t say; the nen 6 a put were finally overpowere: had Beoden to it | gal argument and ® great | noves and letters came to her, and she would 3 AST FRIDAY. Headquarters. Nameroas comp! ate peated decisions, that under cer!ain limitations Tul- ton might explain, It was an entertaiming stuay for one Who had not been sa‘nrated with the te. dio usness of the trial to see the-e O14 connseliors | Piymouta church, the pubic would render if was published; my object iu rezard to the Conversaton with Mr. Halliday concerning the Woodnull scandal was to biet out irom by 1, a8 the second officer of idea That there could ve any waste of jegai verviage, the Judge said to Mr. Beach, “I shail allow you to make the offer in such terms as you see fit.” Mr. Beach then read the following offer :— go down into the parior and retail him. at Did you ever carry any notes for Mrs, Tilton? No, sir. ‘@. What time did yon leave her employ, as near There was another buzzin the auaience when the witness related how sue was unexpectedly made a feature of thia trial. been made to Superintendent Walling by parties who have been relieved of their pocketbooks and small change while riding oo this line of cars. It is hoped that the arrest of Vollins ana Hamiiton, sed to be Members of the gang whe possible truch ia the Woodhuli story agaist my | JIL. That about nine ye: go the Kev, Henry Ward | @8 you cau recollect? A. Impossibie to recall. At the last court day of last week she was in | Who are suppo! and their senior judge wrangling to unlock or seat | wile; 1 suid to Mr. Hauiday what 1 cad in sub. | Beecher be nd tngreaiter continued, a ‘iriendanip | Q, Mave you anything by whic you can deter- | poievae Hospital, unconscious of her relation to , Rave been “Working” the cars. Wil Hive the eect stance to other persons denying It. | with Mrs ik th R. Tilton, for whose nauve delicacy | mine the time you left her employ? A. I can’t . | Of stopping to some extent the ving practice. the lips of the ptainufm. It appearedto be in the line of the defence to suppress an explanation of the “True Story’ in order that vheir theory of | THE VIOLATION OF THE MAMRIAGE VOW. ullertlou—On your Cross-examination did ur? Mr. this and extreme religious sensibiiiiy he orien expressed to | her husband a high admirauon; visiting her from time | tw tame for years unth the year 1870, when, for reasons | herermarter stated, he ceased such visits; daring which od, VY many tokens and attentions, he won the recollect the ume [ieft; the dimculty 1 had with Jeaving her was through Bessie Turner; I bad a few words with her, Q. You do not recollect the season of the year? | the great scandal. A hospita) visitor, Mrs. Lyons | or Lyman, had offered her employment in Brook- jyp, and she had said, ‘Il lived there witn Theo- STABBING AFFRAY. u on the oecasion of yo “ | th 1 Mr. Beecher’s conduct migit appear to be | |.Q. Mr. Tilwn. upon the oncasion of yonr attendancn, | auuttingie love of Mra. fiiton, whereby, after long | A, it was cold Weather, the fires were being ouilt | dore Ticton.” Then the lady had extracted these | A desperate stabbing afray occurred last even- substantiated even by Tiiton.. On the 6: the church, pi nay if this occurred, did vou upon f a Gop meg ay ber see oe ae eeeeenaas oe in the house, two points—the bedroom entries and the lap | ing, about hali-past seven o’ciock, at Mulroy’ other hand Mr. Beach and Mr. Fullerton were re- asked this question say, “Mr. ill comncen eines ae de Q. bo you recollect whether it was before or young | liquor store, corner of Whitehall and Bridge rafter what you state as Mr afver election? A. 1do not recollect, sir, about solved to explain their clionv’s intentions in com- | that she insisted to you that ste had not wicked ane | With ner thenceforward, during the period hereinatver | S{tOr Catharine Carey had no combativensss, rather | streets, betweem Francis J. Kane, keeper of @ posing this story as designed to deceive au impa. | {"rriane Did you Not wnswer to that, ton bs hg raed by rine daring het perl wa Crose-examined by Mr. Evarts—Aiter I left Mrs. | » jauntiness rigs i jlor’s boarding house at No. 34 Monroe street, tient curiosity, and to ® great extent clouds wie was between Mane’ ond dxekenae oes | 9 + ct had beet Titon 1 Went into service in another family as | */*0Dtinews and eprightiiness of testifying. Still, nael Gingle, at owner at tne Battery. , Gould not see thatitywas Wrong; she maintained to her e ‘gyman to satisty her religious | washer and ironer. (Witne: ve the name, | She seemed quite willing. wounded man, was down town, ACQUIT HIS WIFR mother, in my ¢ had no. done wrong; | *FUpics against such violation of virtde and honor. which was inaudjoie at the reporters’ table) Q@ You remember the first time that Mrs, Tilton | paying a few visits to ni , and that on en« of the extreme charge of adultery. Time and she sould phy ar aving done Mr. Bvart Now, if Your donor please, | object |*ufter that 1 went to New York to board; I | went out ol the house to church after her contines | tering Muiroy’s store he was met by Gingley, who again the counse) drew their blades and renewed | her own peace Y eeks for | to the evidence that Is offered as ruled out already | boarded at No. 415 Thirteenth street, with a Mrs. | ment? A. 1 don't remember the time exactly, | 1mmediately pr d to indulge in 6 Rent, Kane Mave had’ those relations If, ate had cupposed they ware | OY Your Honor, aud thereiore needing bo argu- | Doyle; Llived there four weeks; then I came back | but J know it was before going into tne country. " | told him that he did not care to Hight, but If com. the affray, neither side taking “No” as final from peiled he would aeiend himeelf. Giugiey responded Wrong; lizaveth never does anything thatattie time Ot Upon its werits; and I object tu any farther | to Brooklyn again god 1 think J went | Q And do you remember wieter she continued the Judge. The straggie did not terminate with fee yrrong, for such & ae moral nature qhere iH a apprapvinte c paper as anecessary means or | into the employment of Mr, Hunter, of | in eh 4 heaith before going out of town? A, | that be could ‘yen na ay Age) ns ~ id eouipoise; ai J no! propria’ ri | A be partly renewed to-day, out Beach and Ful- | atany ome that which dove not have the stainp of ber cerping which you ruled, ployment of & fanilly named Duryea, in Cunton | Q Had you apy quarre: with aay member of | Kane, inficting two terrible wounds in the region Jerton in general prevaiied, relieving each otner ¥~ I eald t tke th + | JBdwe Neilson—t so rule, street, near Second piace; subsequently | was | Mrs. Tilton’s iamily walle you were jn her employ. | of the heart. The latter now lies in @ striking n the debate yesteraay, as they are in the one a Something ke that, but idon’t | Mr. seach—And 1 except, employed in tne amily of Mr. Moore, a grocer; I | ment? A. I had no quarrel nor trouble of any | condition at the Park Hosp tended by Dra, u * 7 Enow how accurately It was reporvea. | Mr. kvaris—if the paper needs to be identified | remained ti four monvhs; siter that went 'to | description with eitner Mr. or Mrs. Tilton while tn | Hull, Getman snd Smith. Gingley Das not aa wad of doing. Fullerton devising new suggestions and Here followed an extended argument between | by Your Honor, it may be so marked; out as for | New York agi yoarded with Mrs. McCadrey for | her service; 1 bad @ little trouble with Besse | been arrested,