The New York Herald Newspaper, January 26, 1875, Page 4

THE BROOKLYY SCANDAL | Openi The Champ Witness Con- tin ;Cooland Calm. 6 Ned Boecher a “I May Have C Sneak, as He ONG COUNSEL MORE SPARRING Ah Tilton to Appear as a Witness To-Morrow., The Court was delaved ten minutes, one twenty- fourth of the whoie do session, before Lawyer Bhearman began to read (rom Woodnall and Clas Jin’s paper. This was read im acquiescence with a Tuling baif digested last Priday, that this outré mewspaper might be used to a small extent, There were no icwales in Court, although the wrcather was very good and the sky and the waik- ing good, All the sensations had departed, like t ‘baseless fabric of @ vision. The bouquets, the plaintit’s wile, su rounded by her maids of bono: ‘the defendant's wile, sturdiiy holding up bis cause upon her resolute presence; the wives of some of @he Plymouth people and the /iymouth lawyers, ali were gone. | What is life without women? Whatisascan- — dai tria! without them? Though lost to sigat to Meinory dear, we remembered them all yesterday and grieved that percuance inhospitable critictem had driven them away. If so, return, Ob, snow | birds! and if any crumbs of encouragement can tempt ye back they shall not be stinted, Keturn, coy matron, woo has already learned to face the beasts of the arena. Let us Jook into thy face, oh thou whose name was worn by the stormy Virgin Queen, and see ip it the grand drama of ‘the mind, surpassing evidence, the crater whose existence attests the volcano, Come back im thy Sadness and thy sternness, thy suffering» and tay purpose, thy power to listen aud to be! So also, ye radiant spirits who attend on Elima- eth, rejoin us who must needs write and who hate lawyers and their wrangies. We wanta litte wolor in the vista, some brightness jor tue luck of roaring camp. There sat Tilton, however, the type of the mod- ern Roger Chillingworth, except that his wie had g@bandoned him for an old man, so charged, ana mot jor a younger one. Sie had retreated into antiquily like obla, Tilton took it all like a be- ‘pg injured past remedy. The golden bow! was broken and the pitcher at the fountain, and ootu ang was leit fur Theodore but the law's delay. He sat, a8 usual, & patient listener to the teru- mony, hardly opening hie mouth, seldom smiling, mot often looking very sad. There is in him, how- ever, the air of one oppressed, not so much with pain as with a public sorrow, “and something vacant, expected, unending, unsatisfying, remote and yet near by, abides ‘or ever tn lls slowiy mel Jowing, wrinkling iace. Yesterday, as it seemed to some, he was perhaps lonesome because his wife wis abseat, What a wonderful reality it might be, to our inconsistent and infirm natures, af this man and this woman bad crawed to court to see each other suffer, out of thei mutual and ‘wayward love; to take the only opportunity law, association and society allowed, to look a each Other, and m that lovk derive compensation for interminable enmity. All einics and precedents are Wasted on the wild, yearning heart of love. Yesterday the counse! for the plaintiff were very quict. Three of the defendant's lawyers—Tracy, Evarts and Shearman—examined Moulton, with the usual luck—tiat is, the witness kept his cool imperturbability, except three or tour times, when he retortea and expressed himself with a sort of giadiatorial spirit, once saying of Mr. Beecher, “1 probably said he was a libertine and a sneak, as he is.’ He also set upon Lawyer Tracy, and | by repeated answers exposed the act that Tracy Was acting as joint mutual friend to Beecher as @M associate of himself. This is one of the singu- larities of the trial, the adhesion of a part of tae counsel to the res gest@ of the case. It ‘requentiy happens that the name and acts of the interlocu- tor are mvolved in the answer. One result of all this is recrimination and bad temper, to which Ube foreign couns and Fullerton, are not exposed. Evarts and Fal. lerton hobnob every day 4% the end of the session. Evarts aiso laughs and jests with Moulton. PRANK MOULYON. As Moulton ts to disappear from the scene it may be well to make a last note of kim. Aman under forty, but appearing by bis buoyancy and variable temperament to be nearer tuirt red hair; a forehead broad put not high; eyes of blae, smaliand plercing; a weil defined, expres- sive nose, inclined vo be aquiline; a very large red ; Justify the other side in odering vo read wy » like Evarts, Porter, Beach | bright | mustache, in which there is a great deal of | character—it is an added feature; the chin ia cleanly cut, the throat and chaps nearly fat with | good living; altogether, a slrewd, good, alert head on a pair of lair shoulders; the body ts of the best specimens Of medium height; the hands and | feet are neither large nor delicate, and the ¢loth- ing 18 Of the best, Without disclosing its newness, He has confidence, spontaneity, resources, reflec- tion, aud has come to the witness box with a dis- position agreed upon, an infexivie determination Not tobe enraged by anything, Wut to irritate by courtesy. THE EARL OF ROSEBERKY Was on the vench yesterday, a Scottish earl of an old and respectable family, in politics a liberal, and, as it is presumed, the afanced of a New York judy. He was well dressed in the English | style, with @ brown overcoat and very littie jew- elry for one of bis character, with good color, | ruady brown hair and an open, inquiring aud in- genuous expression of countenan Rosedery watchea &s the ladies and the defencan relapsed, and only the Beecher's son had absconded or ostie Tilton and one of d the spective. Rose- bery was addressed at the recess, who referred to bis extremely radival speech be- jore the sriu e¢ Association, of Which be is president, saying, “My Lord, | was surprised that a gentiewan of your station should utter sentiments 60 apparentiy opposed to your interests.’ Koscbery replied, ‘rhe intere: are a very poor guide to the judgment.’ The Earl of Caithness, fellow liberal with Rose- Dery, has aiso atvended this tria! jor a part of a aay. adorne nh Soca: Sc Tue Hari of | triai onw very poor day, | Sts, sit, | One son of Ham, the first of the triai season, | appeared in court to-day, clean asa pin, radians im white linen ana demure as a church mouse. THE JURY look statuesque and have become derelict in their attire. Carpenter, the foreman, is as attentive as ever, but he looks pale. Halstead, the next in re: spectability of any age, as something of the look of a Generali Sherman who has siept out ana caught acold. The young grain droker on the back seat preserves his well shaven, alert fac but his eyes, bright and Vigilant as they are, wear @ little of the naze of weariness. The old and sorry juryman, popularly aAnowD a8 Newman Noggs, looks out pale and worn, like one who ad no living relations, The two boys in the front seat, who answer to Napoleon’s description of she Bourbons that never jearned anytning nor forgot anything, t of sleep as if it were & perpetually buzzing mosqui‘o, palpable, but threatening. The curiy-headed furor with the black side whiskers mauilestly says, NEW YORK HERALD, TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1875.-TRIPLE SHEET. “pring OB another witness orl shall perspire.” Toe bg Dlack-bearded man Biceps like Preciosa— ™ The two Heights cr “Judge Fullerton’s remarks are said to be briil- | is plain he has no right to tt, We have no right te | Moulton’simpertarbability and styness increased. | The Judge—The second in order? fant. Taon-t sec any wit in that put it 1b evidence on thie OceRs.on, | He bacgere’ Tracy, declined under any ciroam | Mr. Tracy—Phe first in order. . Mr. Puserton— have @ 1 on the to vd SI “Sorry ior your stupidity,” said Fullerton. call the atteatvon of tue, tutes to the ieee | stances to be @nvaged, took reoukes with a smile | writing of “Thoodore “iuton. Ho read it as fate AN EXPLANATION, a Kvare— wit bave the (0 see | and another re: rasied in to | = Mr, Fullerton desired t) state that Mr. Mone | it then. serbia ‘ eed / ee ereree reek oath ton's connection wits this woman Woodnuil, rom | hit Fullerton—t have a right to see it on the re- | “MAVe surken out,” aud yet at intervals there REUFOM: AMD. SEN OOMMETERR, Plemish-bearded, who wear | begining ty eud was to save Mr. Beeoner, 'Arver eX mination oO the Wituess aud t claun! have a WA* 4 frankuess and obliging disposition shown in When Shearman undertook to read the report @ some further argument Mr. Mou!ton took tue | right to see tt no: him w very nearly disarmed tn o-mgceoun- | the committee which Tilton wrote for their ace brews COfMae OF ® Worn Bae Bod appear to be | g:cad ana his cross eXaminaito | The Judgzo— righ * now, on | e opposing, | cemore se@ commonplace working citizens, lis- | Ar. Tracy ation was resumed Dy | iM wer of the Witness that be bas Lorsece re | Se BY tempera@ient and combivation Moulton | CePtance—a paper very adroit and now-com wened | ke people already old, growing older very fast, tral abe (oe }ig-o@aded young man with ears ike oot Wurrets, who sit modestly, avoiding , Mud and Tracy turned pare and became jerky and | js we have no right co put it in ev.dence now. Of the evidence as possibie, felt obliged | tem OWL Of sheer weariness. On the whole, ive men pursuing knowledge MOULTON TEASING COUNSEL. betore. Me | Secbamples witness, Mine dave on she stand, | Miisl—Mr. Shearman was obliged to refer ta,himy ‘se acca ax hie Seake aroae’ ences Mr, Evarts—When we put it inevidence we will be is fresh as @ buck and the audience nas got Sei! asa marplot. He did it though without wink+ y + Moulton made him | yo gia. ior everybody to see It; but the JRCUIty Inco general sympathy with him, as witn acome- | g- Some people in court thought the paper net appy. Moulton wiped his face, tweaked nis | Mr. Fullertou—t wil chew Your Honor beiore | #0, aud taagu even when he is only aly aud | V¢Fy Modest for ‘Iliton to write. mastache, Went through the attitude ot deep | %¢ Ke! through that T have a right to see itnow. | serious, He wot mad at the recess yesteMay and { THE PROPOSED REPORT, he Judge— 5b ‘The undersigned, constitutin, study and did not recollect; when he did recol- wou pe ett gt Awad material t probably cur some wivtnes, bas in one moment he laughs fino ‘whom Were’ relerred certain iegeme Leonard con and Mr, 4) bs an ureanen lect, he said perhaps he did; when he explained A QUESTION OF COURTESY. ogain, Roger A. Pryor has been his mentor&s to sont their unan linous report. At olewen @'elock the proceedings were begun | this he said: “It seems to me, Mr. Tracy, that you An issue of etiquette,among counse! arose before Maoner. Pryor i @ valuable man in the case as | enue commie > sought and obi ned @ personal inter hy Fk of toe Court aiiiog tie oli of jurors, | were present at that event and went to sicep.” | recess. Mr. Tracy showed Moulton @ paper, eaia | CUNT CoWMselOr. He, Mt ts said, will make the | (Yi. Mr Tiion, Mrs, Filton and the taton eRe © ) © Woom answered to their names, Alver the witoos®, Frames D. Mouiton, Wok bis usaal place | M Byard rose and said that therr as-ociate, | fOXiness, and alter awhile, peevish, he got upto | Beecher to the Woodhull publication, Moulton SATURDAY NIGHT STUDIEG, ant papers pertaining to th Jas accoumt ef Uneas, Mr. Shearman read the follow Mrs. Wooun Beecact raie ge to a more Comvement season. | tou—Tlus 448 far as you eau read © Pores, would HOt be Ib court that day OM | movg that one of Moulton’s sotco voce remarks be | gaid he nevor had seen it belore. Judge Fullerton | first on the seth oF fKeame to be gen= imiormed of the tacts i Was deferring the uearaan—We propose to read the follow- | of good nature, edged with a malice only hall pro- | that this article was employed to force the $5,000 | tion, sir; l ww jog is flopor-—Read that separately under tue ru ing. Mr. Pullerton—So far as read. fe ag hy Ag ‘ tougue of public gossip; next, that the apology was de- oun ieee ee me By atontanas haggard, less self-concetted, Moulton isa great | At vis pertud the cross-examination was very | Wa4 substaniinily thatcara; I did mot dictate the | sisied to cover a complicated transaction. ts detalii | Bead ti. separarely. Mr. Suearman (reading) — e , and and elsew heightenet by the conviction that te of many friends. when they looked at his remarkable proceed- jnas, at bus brill T advooace adVoe sey of the main Cheor: t red G'm immediately commlued ove uy vom of the most radical of all radtoals, NO OBJECTION, Mr. Fullerton said be bad no objection to admit | M'ter part of Argument followed on the. ques- tion of admitting the remainder 0 the artic Mir. Shearman iuelsted that the aruele, whuie 1 | Preselt in my Louse—you went to sleep, and was | charged Mr. Beecher with Mr. Thiten wi ivance at that adaitery, The | coausel for the plaintid would have it that be- cause Mr. Beccber did Dot deny the charge lor six Months after tis publteation he Was presumptively guilty, and the other party was presumpuvely Insocent because (here Was bo demial at ail from thea, Mr. Morris satd this was a spectous statement, Bevery inan Bees he & r, Shear uit At was Umposaib by Mrs. Woe connected respectively, 1 he commanity ae Was and the sule man called hat. ¥ GWadersvood that Mr. roceeding to read further, said separate the charg to (hie* specie, distunet, un awalust these taree gentiemen CanRol ve Jone; tb 4a single charee—a Charge Lwat Mr. Beconer bed commitied adultery with the wile of Mr. Ti tou, ana that Mr, ‘Triton, came. eoucied, bus the charge thal Mr. b wha beid @ at the head of Mr. Boecher 'o extort 41m the case, 1 reed abe appr his paper Decuuse 11 Lhe eVidenoe ucle—a mingle clease. It ther toe pa 8 mul ine witge- is maue tw the lore ougat 10 be ac wou Ab Orst tadignant about that, not voly bee wGuence of Mra. Woodaull, r proved Of ty abd rejoiwed La tt on Weal With @ pistol 4 afterward stood us drst, tess reference >, am Chal kame evideu Teicreuce 8 made wo the Woodhull swury, AN BEPLISIOD She tt smal! Mas ehbly setsied off th atehing beth Moulton aod Titon, and mis faiure, quick, smarp, gIrlisl voice, English WwoRos, « series of insinua accent 204 AWeTicaa® BeTVOUSLERS OF UlLeTance, put a new featere inte the itiak Me exploded like a pack Of freersekera, Frank Moulton, stroxing bis long, red mustache, sinved With about bait ing, as i saying “fe couldn’s let me stop Witacut gabbung in some- where.’ Moulton bed rapped Shearman hard ia the © called arse of his evidence, suring that Beeouer ischiel maker and ovnerwise ve- littied nim, Shearman bas very great capacity for multum in parvo, He can rattle of like a tete- sr po lostrument, and be i Lie only counselor Qt the trial Who has struck per omsliiies from the Outset, He spoke of Moutton’s pisiol act as a vile me; of Tilton as welcommy adu. family, &0.; Whereas the only so ery into hte ok under di cussion Was Wneiber & ueWspaper should ve read wtoud, Pulierton stopped ing spee Shearman and rapped him smartly. Morris said he Was falsifying bis open- uations, The litte mat and appeared (o like lus ¢ MK. PUL seach said be was geting im tmain- rettied on umdie\ urse aplewity. 7 eRro Could not see the spplication oF the art.cle as con- 1 cerning Messr not called todo thw ex tnand & deny it. ept to Me Misery loves company. Mr. Shearman satd Mr. Moulton consuited Mr. Beecher as to the best Way to meet tac story. Mr. Beach said the charges im that paviie arainst Mr. Ticon apd Mr. Moult to insinuave presu D. ‘to UdMit SUCH aF eVIdeuce Would purpose vir Ted to it hav witon. They were There is Bo vecasion usirate tue adage tuat her ee aMAINSL bese ot Lave ped would KO nr not been the first to tue other side have n said if they had the right to bring jogue and & ad the commandment “Thon sbalt not commit aduitery,” it does not Of Ananias and sapplira Judge Neilson decided to execinae the paper as @ Whole. ory INTERVIEW WITH WOODHULL. hearman procecoe: ofa reporter wity Mra. Mrs, Woodbull (to the re Made subsequently to (his se« “1 frequent couversation w Tremember dur vu Reporter— they nade ‘this thing Mrs. Woodhui: knew this tuing musi co willing it 5 attempts at bla Money enongn silence in this Just as re mis fred 1o read the interview voodha orte s relations were ond t Joriug montis of wything of the sort. 1 ¢ te, and that f ween Sharged with sir, there is pot fo purchase m smy duty ond my snd ieatouy uve Woe oiher When tue hilis are ry mo p 4 Highted up. ‘his cxposition will send dismay to Waal is calied conser ve socieiy The Judge—Same ruling and same exception, Mr. Shearmau—Tve next following Words put into tue mow if Your rlonor will pardon me—I will not reac d have to put in a great deal which We are ail eadeavoring not vo 4 erally. because | wo paragraph | over is the tn of Mr, Tiiton— We want to pus im as littie of tus taing as porstole. | aow put Mrs, Woodhull tuto the mouth of Mr, Miton)— I have one friend who is ike a brovhe } ton. [went to him and siat both members of llymout Pistol and went to Mr. Beecher and | Of airs. Tilton under peuaity of tus rank Mow iuily. We were church. My friend wok a nded Whe ewer death d the oi The Judge—That wili remain in. Ail of that, i aprears, Mr. Moulton demics. Mr. Fullercon—And that he did not take @ pistol. The Judge—fhat may invoive 4 quesuon, Mr. Fullerton—They buve proved themselves it was untrue. Mr. Shearman—The next paragraph. Mr. Beach—We except to it. Mr. Shearian—I propose so read a short para. graph, and though no hame Wat mentior Lam doing ‘his becw al Of this goUg 1D. objeota, and if they onject to my Jers to Mr. Tito; ovject to a grew ‘re. reat your Honor ng this 1 have to read the whoie paragraph. Tne Judge—I hope you will get on with as tue of that master as you possibly can. Mr. Suearman—Weli, Your Honor, | offer, if the ge jemen on the other side don’t object, to have it understood that the paragraph which I sow read refers to Mr. Tilton. Tead tue Wuole paragraph. NOT A MEMERR. When the Judge ruled that he wouldendmit a , Piece of Woodhuiv’s article, “although,” be said, | itt8 already proved that he is not a memver of Piymoath church, and that writer says be is.” “IT thank Your Honor,” sald Moulton, withs twinkle, His idca wasto put an imputation on « brow, the church, This he does m i wey object | shaun fa to do, and we member-bip, twenty or more, in the vody of tae house, lave got to look shy of him, Mr. Shearman alter reading few ovher para. graphs said:—We now reuew our offer to read the Views o: Mrs, Woodhull om the marriage meu totion. The Judge—Exciuded under the former ruling. COMPLIMENTS ALI. BOUND. The Jndge’s bephew, &# son Of state Senator was on the bench—a well Gressed, forid, attentive young man. While Shoar- man was reading from Woodnuil’s paper that the Honry ©, Murphy, injured Tilton “was Dot & vesiai Virgin bimee, the Judge addressed to this young man, sero voce: — “7 am sorry your Visit here has been #0 inoppor- tune, to hear the remarks read Of a wild, crazy | woman," i Shearmap algo attempted to suppress Fulierton, saying — argumedt for Tiio 6 right to testify. whom responded to the searching questions com- wig ly. niittee with freedom and candors ‘Documents, letters Je case were careiully con- ered, A multiplicity of details, needing to be duly on the Sunday night | weighed, occusioned a somewhat protracted investigae | stricken out, Moulton had gaid, as Tracy tried to | asked to look at it, but both Tracy ana Evarta &">tmitied to Mr. Beecher & card, the substance of | tion. The committe hope that the apparent tardi Sse ‘a : j : ‘5 ietheir report wil be compensated t get the length of the “iru statement,” tilustrat- | argued chat they need not show it, as the wituess | was prota vam agve the Bogle; the cara nat | pcriving al erroneous pubtig entment, tn er whic, } | Wir, Evarts eat silently laughing at Moulton’s | 10 have been an unpublished response of Mr. Witness—i he tripartite agreement was publisned | L cod upou in my study on | ; vs lng his thickness with ms hands, “You know, Mr. | had notggentified 1% ‘The Judge appeared to pre- the saturiay night: he never paylsood te card | Pey,have stl autered wierenrosentation, Tt | Tracy, a8 you heard it read.” Mr, Evares wanted | fer that Bounse! should settle the question among | be itendes ty on the satusda: iwarned on the | aboth { Tilton. whose tesumony was given with amod- i . Monday Coat he dit not intend to pubiisi that uy and tomoning sincerity that deeply moved th | this stricken out, themselves. The deience would wot deliver up card; that was a.ler Mr, Bese! p+ to resign, ho lirtened to it Her straightforward narrative was Moulton ail this while, perfectly polite in his | che letter and Fullerton sat down dumpy. Q Aud alter you had conim ed (hal threat | 4 anconscivgs vindication of her innocence hdd wk HeWes; You aih? Lwilt tent | Sf cauracter and confirmed by evidences an the dogw. She repeiled with warm feeling the idoa that her = es you about the cara, My. Tracy, you Want me to. | fucband w was sitting nearly on the small of is back, with | publication of the Golden age articie in a Brooklyn | 7°O. "ti you wii auawer promptiy che question Tf | R&pand, was the author of calumnious statoments 2 wt her, or had ever treated her wit his hips and knees far forward, his pands | Sunday paper, which the defence claimed to have | ask you, Mr. Aluultou—— A, 4 didn’t uaderstand chivalrous consideration. and. eae Sh ie | aitormately in bis pooket and along the frame of | been furnished by Tilton,tg Joan W. Harmon for h tribute to his character and also to the fordtude: the chair, abd tn bis eye @ Rip Van Winkiish look | pubiteation. It is tebe the theory of tue defence Sentences, was in a provoking state of case. He | New evidence was brought forward os tothe | t resin At | you— hi | 7 : with which he had borne prolonged injustice. ye ee nae aie ty ques: | ii. The commitice furuier fud that Mr. Tilton, im nis eo Oat relations with the pastor, had a just cause of offence, ied tosay 1 Would tell you aii 400UE | and had received a voluntary apology. Mr. Tilton de- founa. ont of Beecher to support the Golden age. as it ts | Tie dues won you was asking angus; the Qriginal | clined to characterize the offence tor the following ts | Mc. Tracy, it may be satd, is looking very much | claimed to Lave been published April 20, and the | ton;the drat Mr. Tilton prepared t ‘snvmitiea to | should accompany any statement would include the Worse than when the trial began—paier, more | $5,600 was paid by Beecher May 2. Beecher, and he made one or two biwsell; 1¢ | D4MCs of persons who had happily escaped thus iar the card to Carpeater ater the Bacon letter {1 an cl o ry killer of abst ystagpta a earnest. Tracy walked forward nearer the wit- ) Writta, ‘uieratsd it at Delmonico’s, on Ohare Dosniole good sould aries thoes aration thernahts ring The witness Was asked if he ever read the paper | RO And declaimod his questions, his whole arm | DOrh sits de them I pursuance ofan ape | sesumovy, respectully called ths attendee st ie Gore | witch Mr, diiton prepared, called his “true story. | extended and bis fst doubled. The Judge | potutmont, bur arrived ite tor diuuet; 1 did noe | Wiitee to the ict. thatthe clerk of. the churoh A. 1 don't know tut Lbeurd the whole oi it, read | shrewdly relicved the witness when he tried to | propose to’ publish the card, but that’ he should | SiPKencalmpniously of Mrs: 1ilton during the iate coum 1" bid you hear the most of it read? A. Per. | “tue stenographer may read tt.” the publication of the Bacon letter. and this cara I | thatapology. inasing honorable: record of the wsoes te & & hapsIdd. 1 don't know. DUBIOUS SUNSHINE. dictated; 1 think about a week elapsed vetweem | Meir report, which is hereby cheortully done. Q. When Was trat story, that statement, pre- | | Moulton—1 do not recollect tue publication of a | tho writing ol the card aud the publication of the | whi fe ce a eenlbin earln dod in Tie ared t pa acer is, sir, It was im the | letter dated January 1, in Which charges are Bacon iettcr; | think tie Bacon letter Was pud- | of Mr, and Mrs. Tilton. He also said that the charch ecember, if you wili allow | iterated against Mr. Beechtr in the Sunday Sui | shed on a Friday; 1 do not remember the day the | a: 1 | me to State, Mr, Tracy, when L think I heard most | | believe | saw the lotcer you have just handed me | Golden Age goes to press; 1 GO HOt recoliect | Eispired te eke pane Lcuer ers Hakane fade: | of tread, It was one evening when you were | iD the Hagle; Ido notrecolicct having seca allot | whether Is came out im tue moraing papers on | pendently if the church; tiat the popular impression U5 mpresston is that | Was told that it was in | the Wedaesday morumg; 1 do not know that the | that Mr. Titon had been in the habit of speaking not quite interested, the Lagle; it strikes me I was out of town when tt | Golden Age went to press On Wedaesday, Sgainst lim wes uniast to Mr, 7. and wee owing malay, (Was that story prepared and read as Mr. Til- | appeared, and then Iwas told of the pubileation | "Q. Aud was distributed on Wedneruay night? | 1,088, wiwelcome introduction into the church of | tons answer ro the Woodhull publication? A. {| 01 the letior of Mr. Tilton to Mr. Bowen in the | A. ‘No. who. in #0 doing, had rocetved no countonanoe from | think that was said. | Bagies; Ido not remember whether was told it Q Well? A. Isaw you immediately alter, Mr. cat mass of the congregation or trom the Q, Was not the statement presented to you by | was taken iroma Sunday newspaper; I think I) Tracy. id that the apology had been invested by ‘Tiltou as lis proposed answer to that publicauon? learned (hat subseqaenuy; | believe that was the Mr. Tracy—I don’t want to know avout that. press with an undue mystery | thar atter having A. L con't ree san | first publication; Ido uot recuieey of any otaer; | (Laughter.) Pe aC rE ella Per ge answer to that pt | Tdo not know how they got hold of that letter; 1 | “Mr. Mouiton—I wanted to ax tne date more ac- | (aricurmg munity of behavior in a Christian mam q. Do you reniemvoer what were the subjects of | had nothin all to do with it; i ‘do not know eurately. (enewed langnter.) | hy had always preiched this doctrine te others apa whies th tory treated? A. There is oniy one | that the oldva Age article, as Urst published in |” Witness (contiouing)—I did not mean to make , would aot shrink trom applying it to himseit. art ofit that I distinctly read; that I described | Brookiyn, was published {vom a copy that came | any fun then, Mr. brac, Wil teil you the thougnt | ‘he coumitiee, nuier hearing the three witnesses ere; dou't remember Wiat Was distinctly treated | from Tilton aad was given him by John W. Har- | which was in my min | already rererrea to, ieit unauimousiy that any regrets on | mon; If ihink JI asked him how it came | Mr, Tracy—We aon’: want that, | Previously en‘ertained rning ‘the pubiicauon of Q. Answer my question; do you remember the | to ‘be published and he told me he! Mr, Everts—'There certainly cannot be any mis- | tniackuow! oni . bacon shoul give Way to grate. the providential opportunity suojects «I Which that story treated? A, Not ull | did not know; 1 think 1 asked him understanding about this; tile Witness Can’t go on | which Uns pabitcation bas unexpectedly afforded te Of them, str, | how anybody got the siips struck Of in the | in chis way. draw forth the testimoay which the committee have What subjects do you remember that it ; Golden Age office; I do no! rec lect his account. Mr. Moulton—If Your Honor wilt allow me I will | {8s reported in brie! butin sificient ialuess, as they treated of? | ing for it; ‘another emergency’’ was talked aboat try to State the thougnt which Was to my mind. I beevey paaplatn and put at nt forever a vexatious Mr. Puilerton onjected. | afer that publicatton; | think 16 created a good | noticed the audience laughing. Ib was Rot men- | Oy 'ihe testimony ceruntied tor thet thas a a ease Judge Neiison—Was che toning published ? deal of exciten aw Mr. Beecheror — tioned tor tat purpose. diced court of inquiry could uave reviewed the case ws Witaess—No, sir; it Was not published. he came to he letter of Mr. | ‘The Juag 3 We assame tt to be proper, | thus presented in per-ou by its princiy res Withous Jucge Nelisom (to counsel lor deience)—Do you | Tiiton to Mr. res of adultery Mir. Moutton—Yes, sir: thank you. I will state | being feakingsy impressed with the moral integrity and al! jor the paper? M that L was endeavoring to Ax the date, u Vetinn Gh ats for of the parties: and accordingly Mr. Trucy—We do, hat they fail to produce it. T recollect re ‘ the Judge—It was an endeavor upon your part | Ycury Ward secenen Mr Toendare Tien eat Meee Julwe Notison—ti they ail to produce 1 you can | 1 don’t recollect the date that le agroed to give | to ix Lhe date in taat particular way. ton tks {a eh osaeeiki Wanner tieclarcdy sintine aaa show the contcats, me the $4,000; I don’t recollect thar my first talk Moulton—Precisaly. should recoive the mereased sympathy and respectet and congregation, eee » Court then tok its Usual recess unl two | Plymouth chu Weat eubecta do you recollect of which it | With Beecher avout the money was atter the pub- | te Witness continued:—At the interview of which od, A. The relations bebween Mrs. Tiiton on of the ae : ea ee nabioattin — Mr. Beecher. { G -occurr hefore its public ; my ZI ° I have spoken at my house, between if, Mr. Q Did Li aiso treat of Mr. Tilton’s relation with | ConVersstion on ihe subject Was just belore Lob. | | ee, | Tilton aud yourself (sire ‘Yracy) I think | seceue Mr. Bowen, and the causes which led to his dis- money; when onthe road down to tue | The inquiry of Tracy as to a portrait of Reecher | panea Mr. Filton to the door; standing on the ? A. Ldon’t recoitec Whether it did M | in Moulton’s house was a portion of the knowl- steps [did not exactly tell him that night logo I have a distinct ecollection Oo: tue inci Shearman then read the following letter:— edge of the witness’ interior household derived by , home to lus wife and ve reconciled to her, that the een I hav narra ed belore trom this stanu and MOULTON TO BEECHER. cay . ‘Moul: | time had not vet come jor him to fight her; i that is all; | do Bor recollect whether I reserred | Dran Pre statement, out of which Cleveland | Mr. Tracy in happier days. loulton, however, | gon't cuimk J said tt in that way; he haaseparated to the public omen ol Leg Woodhall ticle; it Was 3 tried to tke ett s t A Re, he €- did not get euraged, and used such little bandiage | from ver, 0 I understood, and | told him some- a long p do ot recollect wow long. K at our table that you we 1 be editor of of atest r | thing about being reconciled to bis wife; r @ How tuck Was iithear A. Idom't think it in tnion when it condesconded to persunal at | that the coulisel, who was mortally afraid of his | FIG a, ene a ta te ee tail Min we Was 10) pages; you heard it read; f£ don't know rele | sallics, let him make some points for himself. | that time that the time iad not come (or ‘him to how large ib was | When asked if the Beecher and ‘iiton pictures | figut nis wile. Q tre D nig i Cte ver beonght | Were not the loadiug portraits in his house be TRACY'S EQUIVOCAL POSITION. mai stl i ori | x triendiy said, “My portrait is the leading portrait in my Moulton followed Tracy very closely, and espe. : . 4 presentation, mMisappre- | - Fea aera you bo rene AP accordthgiz} then no} LOU. Acie iin, cially damaged him when he said that the report “Excuse we, sir. it was ong enough | Mit cut Me don. ioh mmeodore and eso yourself, | Francis D-Mouiton recalled and tis cross-ex. | Pefore Mentioned, which’ Tilton prepared for the my Unpre-sion is that the letter M ene Hava tele npLapiesion UDITLOaIS oor On | rs sumed by Nr. trac; | Plymouth committee to use, “tad been shown te Tuvoa wrote to Dr. Storrs ts ia the statement: I Ltt eat lela i MA | oA ORDEE eae DE BOELTO LAS Madd you (Tracy) and me jointly.’* tuk it contatned, “Prompted by my tn: all is right, and I pray God that it may re- | eB bat eel 7 5 Wind endl pastor, Bad soleited ms to be a wie mie aang sorien ye“? #8” | tne latter part ui December, 1872, | Known personally to himseif before he was coum to him, tom rw ali tis Ampites Witnese—I pelieve “C." aud “1.” refer to Mr, | , Q. Was it before or uiter the publication of the | sei, has greatly irritated the counsel for the plaim sitteatent uf her relasions to Rt beeches, | Cleveland and Mr. Tilton; 1 think ‘the conversa. | letter of the complaining friend? A. Alter; I think | tu and rendered it probable that before the trial ecoliec? Whether the pape nejthe tol Freserred to was on tne evening Mr. Titton leit with me by hima. a » | 4s over there will ve another outburst in court P 1 mace his speech tn the Academy of Music in favor | oi conten or any per ve ~ A cher’a aY ‘The letter was oncred tn evidence. | It bas appearea from Moulton’s assertions that im Jail reevilect; io mot recoliect any charge 0! Mr. Greeley; T think that Beecher’s conversa | 0 "Yon aye spoken ol & conversation between | duivery between Mr. Peecher and Mrs Jiljon Wow Cccurred at that Une; tue dibwer seemed to | y SLU MING OG! Me teaes, in whic ar, | 2/! the preliminary attempts to keep the peace im thet paver; Ldo not recolect (nat aiter quoting be quie a friendly cue, | racy advised you m regard vo the Woodhull scan- | @Bd promote concord, Tracy assisted and advised the charge Mes. Tidon agatast Mr. beecker WHAT WAS THE SECRET? | dal that you told Mr, Beecher that Mr. ‘tracy ad- | Moulton. shat Me. a proce ea A, ae wlogise Bis wife jor The foregoing lettcr was the first adduced by | vised you to deny that part of the Woodhall story | be deucgte mann whieh she resisted the ads vauces of ber pestort | don’t remember whether | MY. Beecoer which THE WRECK OF THE FAMILY. 7" ae " that related to yoursell, se far as it represented wi ey s Nae hacatirea aaa ou $0 Deantive, OF present at Any ecient” £1 old nas that agtaie coat hies hag sepacared thoes a ani guyfuing aveutit; | eve go recolection | lished, Mr. Beecher said, when he was examined , Go not recoilect whether I told him that or not. p HhAT subject; Ihave NO rec n abOUL Its L . y rw) ea pests 5 i i ve you & portrait of Mr. Beecher ba his wiie the day beiore in consequence of her go- did not know hae Mr. Hilton Was unwiling to make | PY the Church Committee, that “everybody had; | @ Beye te ier k: No. OgINE | ing berore the committee. ! ‘that she had come that night and told him | She had been before the committee? A. Yes, air, I 8 Gao e oc hc ‘our wo as the letters ont himself.” In this cage he had udduced | 1B FOU Males MOTT ake It down? A. Some time it was some time ater] | understood that he went back to bis wife that fr ols Wile, one, a friendly epistle from Moulton, accusing Mr. | ago—I sorget how long : he think he was W 'Mr. Beecner Me t ry a t ‘trait. i ‘ Cleveland of prying inso secrets, and sullreferring | got Mr. Paige’s pox | might; Laomt recollect whether it wan the next ome on OF v solicited | e te } H wie hus West Anew that tala ctite: | to a mysterious overwhelming secret somewhere | Sane About how long ago? A. It may be within a | day ‘of the next day but one that he presented me ay we ” a « le opts 7 .. a ‘. G vou 7 ‘oar BEECHIER'S RESIGNATION. = was; I do not reco!iect how long he ana his wite Hope dow rememocrs A. T think if you Will che company understood at the dinner that ; Tam asking you when you took itdowat A. | Wasihdo non recollect iy eae ee ad cute ° ouns ns . Beecher was lor Grant and Pilton jor Greeiey. Lhe | I cannot fx a date. yon Saturday, al Wn Loknsel Answered my anes: | tecier was written shortly atterward, ; A DISPLACED PICTURE. ATR LETTER. OP CONTRITION, : east, “PE Wet you said as a2 | Q, Now was that the only tusiauce, Mr, Moulton, | Witness went on tosay that he took the por- | 9, pia Mr. Beecher at any ime ask you for the _jy the witness desires to make a core Where You bad iollowed up reports. that ud , trnit of Mr. Beecher out o! the frame and put an- seigrn of the paper which you have designated r » be has @ right to de 40, - somsar Mr. penratg REL etn Oe tie shane Lo ret pi Pals. The portrait oFMr. Beecher | gq tne lever of contrition? A. No; he never bave iec . | remavks, and assured Mr. Beech 8 infor- | Was painter ee ) asked me for it;I Lever at any time told him ir Mouituu—I have @ recvilection of an inter: joicion was entirely mistaken, and Tilton was en- Q. When did you take dovn the portratt of Mr. ! had burned tne aper; I Naver id; the state- urely iniendly ? | Beecher, when was tt? A. | don’t recollect, } ment known as Boecher’s statement before vr. Tracy I have asked im a simple question “sy. Fulierton—I object to the form of the ques- , Dont you KnOW Lt was since Auguste? A. No. | tne cmamictes abd bis croge-oxatemetion bea Whether (hal stlelment Was prepared by My. Tle Don't you Know that it was since your state- " mu Vv D publicatic , ‘say: on. aA been published beiore 1 made either of my state- r ody a hy l 4 ee ee me S058 TS eee ‘The Judge—Read the question to the witness ment before the committee on August5? A. Ido | iments; my statement of July 13 was publisned ve , Sane eigg r ch—That assumes that reports had Ret know, guy 1 re | _Q. Don't you know that that portrait nung in 45 eit! ‘our long sta’ nts? A. —Certaily, if there is apything in the | your house—in your svont parlor—ior a year be- " ane NPRSE OFZ) sath hemlet: ; fore you made your first stacement? A, lcan't q. Both of these were published alter Mr. Mr, Gracy—Will you answer ? | Say. ' Beecher’s statements * A. Yes; the first state- Beach—No. | . Howlong bad it hung there? A. It wes in ment of mine—the first long statement—was pre- acy—i understood the Court to say he | that parior since 1371, | pared not altogether, 1 betleve, before Mr. Beech- as W | Q And continded to hatg there from that time erty statement was publisued; 1 think the state- tee Witness bas made 4 mistake t i ge Nelison)—I will what | we Phe port 1s Dux wered th Do right W go over th Bations. & could ' 1 . fe . i. ee . a ilcridn—it is a misconstruction of the | WNtl! it was remover, as you have stated? A. Yes. mont was prepared beiore alr, Beecter published ounbler: Cone SS Sere te corre 1 yes, Was. Si. Tuiton’s vertrais algo bansing 10 | his; Mr. Beecuer’s was publisied on the 14th of Mr. bv: That is a matter question was admitted. ; Your beck parlor during the seme time? A. Yes, August, aud my statement was Pade co tue com- a 4 whe iracy—We ave walting for an answer. | 20 the diane room. | mittee August 5, Mr. @ wired to ¢ er ne de. : banity er's and Mr. Tilton’s portra(ts ALLEGED HOSTILITY TO BEECHER. hands on the — the two !eac our house? A. ihey . Have you recently expressed hostility—vtoe y Bl, 1873; L re- rac ait Gene (Leuboeeny leading por- fant hoatihiy—to Mr. Beecher? A. 1 do uot ra put in evidence, ‘alts, except 2 hepa! coliect that J dia; I think it very likely [ have done dated dune L, 1575, on tae following day; I believe sitomrioe room is your own portrait im? A. In So wichin three months, 7 Fitow Was in Ue House thal das, Somewhere from , the parlor. i A discussion here eusned between counsel as to twelve to three P.M: i recetved Mr. Beecher’s | Q. In the same roomin which you had Beecher’s whether a general question o| this character conld Wituess—! don’e recoile ir; [think I saw the Q. Were sine ug po letter belore | Was Us? Lthink about nine A, M.;1 portrait’ A. ves. be pui wiluout stating time, piace and circum uswered (ne letter in bed; 1 remember my wile Q. You said tn a previots part of your examina. seance " x bringing me te paper. tion that your wile nad uct uctendéd the commu- "tr teacy—It he saya he nas violent hostility to r, byarts =f don’t matter what your wife did, } Hion at Piymouth courch recentiy, ‘The comma- Bearer, We Will ask lim When and where, pardon; your questions to Mton service is held imurediavely after a The Judge—Let lim answer the question. teat | bay " t — atl beg pardon try! service? A. Ido not know. ; - ’ ae, Won Stee bs Mt. i haven’: calied 4, . + tee eter son panded bee rey Q. Did you not at one tine state thatgyou were ¢ eum questions ee white lad ppeagee a, oy ong a he Was w te aod answer to Mr. Beecher. * amember of Piymout caurcn? A, 1 may bave The Judge—Answer as you understand the word, 1 . 4 ‘ , done so. : 4 eee ae When should @X- UNEASY COUNSBI.. 1 "G Did you not atter augnst 31, the next day Bare Den cteaea Cor net clade wile cower im Lec attr Mr. Evarts, weary oO! doimg notaing for any song = alier that, publish a card ting forth that you Have you expressed violent hostility? AE Pa period, came forward to rebuke Moulton for as- Were a member of the ¢o ration of Plymonutn | nave expressed hostility violently. refer to any shuren, 2 — teeth fe churen, and as such statmy that yo: hada rigat | sed determination te We al take The fisting Mis memory by recollectmg something to he rhere; That your wie was a member of tyat e great duuaaloon' Higtees a ay 0 a0 r greas paruicuer buswer and stie.t ‘| ey. ; through @ domestic incident.s Moulon was as po- chureny A. V likely: I tbink tdid; ldon’s Ne Mr. if it priwin o * > he e violence’ A. Not that J rememver, sir. ser my q eee RARE lite as a lawyer to a jauge, He couid not disom- know that my Mave Owing late on Sunday | “q, Do yon know Mr. Caldwell? A. Yes. Mr. Tilton Was © ” morning and having company @t midday dinneron | @) Charles E. Caldwell’ A. Yes, sir; know er howid do | pose aris, Whois on good terms with kimsel’ sunday prevented my Vile from attending tne » haveu< Caled of aay such ‘wing. Ny question f w bé gonars sw him. bao! of simply asks @Rat statement Mi. lige was Wis babitualy, but he generally threw bim back into morning serv him. at Plymouth chareh: 1 doa’s | th | think sue has very frequntiy attended morning | adits aecroure house, hoscuat te. pwr ere nds ing * ae. feesent oF siience, , think | as Very | a the vate ay service sive 1870; she sas not attended evening ere, if perso The Jodgs— You got the auawer — | OU CAN STAND."? nervice more frequently Han the morning; reiere , Wverume, and T own here, ti per ervliowning Mr. Moviton—Mr. Tiiten had prepare state Witness—I am satisficd that itis my handwrit- | 7 to the letter [wr a |} meni edie the “True story,” i hous ” Witu the exception of the words that are eatios 6; tg reply. to Mn (eteonmaroeealae tae | minute? A, No, sir, } therevor willing that Mr. eecber shoula Hined; 4 don’t Kuow tat thar makes much yestorauon of papers th my possession, [ A LITTLE PERSONALITY. Z , eera— diderenee; i} G0 not Uniuk that uuderscoring ts | wrote immediaicly \ Mr. Tilton on the “I thought Mr. Caldwell was a sneak when Re came to my house.’" a NIMBLE DOUELA , Smbject; [ don’t reclect whether or not ‘ Mr, Evarts—(s that erasing yours. fir? A. 1) sir. siiton was present it the time I wrote him , Frank Moulton, Joss alter noon, appesied wo qun't see that: yes, | tbiuk tia: was the begin. | Mi, ton was proses it the tim Beecher, and | _Witness—1 never sad such words to Mr. Calde the Judge agaieét one of Mr. Tracy's strict con. ning of the .etter. ny letter to Mr. Beecher vas written vo him fignt | We!l or anything like them; | thought Mr. Quid- | stractions Of & question, Mr. Tracy would not @ You yourseh crossed tt and wrote the rest? off; my impression 1s linn drew the letter in my | weil was a sneak when he came to my house, nim explain, but wanted “yee or ao." mp. | 4"yh&h Sf | study} I think J drafted ny letter to Mr. Beecher; | (Great sensation and some munours to Key ’ . o . Mr evaris—I give the letter, then, as you wrote | [tnink I have got the japer; 2 will try to get it, | amidst which she Court ordered ihe ast part Moulton tpseted Gpoe looking at tue Jodge. Mr. i It ts thu | and if Lhiave tt} wiil procuce it, tue answer to be stricken out, and told the Wit Fvarte rushed wm, Mr, Moulton contnued to ad- e never been in|, Tito prepare your fetter, and | ness he should answer questions only.) ft wh ¢ sane room before you sepa- | KOUGH LANGUAGE, h yor lave”) make his dress the Judge. The Piypmou'e socery wore ap t i the whole case was Jomnpa " je whole cas aid nd drait the letter; {| 9, Did you express—. outraged look, Then Mr. Moulton, by sheer per- Simy epiien shows aself Gyo rced it, * | Witness—i thoagit Mr. Caid Mit, FULLERTON MUKGS A STATEMENT. when he came bo the house. (Laughte t 7 oo © @rutwensing wor ond 8 Mr. fracy—There the record stops, | Mr, Fullerton informed:he Court that he wanted Mr. Evarts—Lhat should be sti ° adrowly (hat te this Mr. Shea rtial—As Culs letier Was originally pub to make a correction of ®mething he had said be- | Judge Neilson—(to the stenographer) —Strite seer be wae merely | Meved it Was pudlished correctly. | fore rec He had uow ascertamed that the that out. 1t18 not an answer to the question. Mr, bvaris then continued: | whole ot tne pape a “The True story.’ was Q. Did you express @ similar senument te yer, Ube day's ¢xamimsues bad bo life or 4 FRIENDLY ADVICR. ‘not destroyed. Par it had been preserved, ;,ANgustus Storrs at your house within three r. vay a aoe be ve oi Suxpay, June t, 1873, Some of the iragments hid been retaiued, | mouths ? . Kemi, hh @ mere worry —he «fort to heaps r letter makes this first rab: ‘The Witness then wenton with bis evidence | Mr. Beach—That ts very indefinite. cold ‘ike a oat. You have | Jmaue the Lirst commulcation tothe committee | Q. Did you make an expression toward Beecher coufane OF hope and 1 t bad | 3 chink on the 131i of the second i think | to Augustus Storrs im the presence of his rosher ups recore agaiBel the Wi ibess jor ature reat 1 y eonteenen, yeu alone my hands wonla have dropped | Wont son nee now Ouaries? A. Now , You don't begin wo be in te daner ; Was gost: Lkmow yuo drattea tue original ‘i OF uid you, to Charles, in the presence of ti A Wrenese--§ semember she mcaron of Mr. Ti. wany tines before. Ir you | GOcuMent; f did it mysel. | tons etter to Se “Om PT a ee Wie cyes to will cower and shrink q. Who Was present wien you did it? A. Idic- | brother Augustus? A, No. pred ye yecenfirg hd od ba Thave never been in sym- | tated tt to Theodore ‘Ni! dictated {fin uis | Q. Didn't you say In their presence at your reaeas ‘aan hpouiedaes Tae Go uumaniy presence; 1 do not remenver who else Was pres- , house, smce the termination of tue itvel suit of pee fy Bg y RR Pe came ont; don’t rememper rhetner Titon Wrote ior’! Miss Proctor against you—dida't you say to (hem senotber em my opin. BOO; TL copied it, I thtok, trom his writing; 1 dic. | 1m your house that Beecher was au sneak and & is. Keecher ous Whiting | tated It him, add Le tod tt down tn shortnaud; lar, and if they said so, you would daa bun— you’ would shoot nim? Witness—Wuac! moment | is hoLapperens w Televing Nis CONseHBCE OF CheCeMaing the low 0 with a trath that are wot | I think Mr, Carpenter a Mr. Redpath were pres- | courage vip and swith im God, to | ent at that time, one olother ot them. 1" Q. It they said so? A. | Would shoot nim. * 7 wy inbivennes sh. You know that Tove vou, and Because |” G, Mr, Moulton, you dave spoken of.& conver: | ¢ Did you say anything In substance like thal Gl) CORMASTATON OF ERE NETO Ee Oe eee ey oe oy that “Lheodore charges you | SAUO0 Which took plae at your house berween | A. No, sit. i Did you express any Willingness to commit s dock parties }ad¥ined spemce, 140 Bot reMeMOET with waning hind appear as Che graciously pardoned b yourself, Mr. Tilwon avi myseli, im which you say | riviog a pote Irom Mr. Heecher comisining & M Tie said that toe rors in whieh it was pablished | that Mr. Titon’s ange Was melting, aud reier to | vielence on Mr, Beecher in their presenve? A. Noy © the Woodeul stundal; Mr, Beecher of the papers made i eo appear, and it was the conversation forthe purpose Of fixing the «sir. red Obes £40 Got [rem thle that he wiehed reler fF de aot think tt un- | date. Did you, after pat, see in Mr. Tilton’s hand | Q. Did you say he was a sneak and a liar in their Femow.ver his p r ¢o pot think sible to frame a letter which will cdver the case. | @ proposed report tethe teer A. Yes, [| presence? A. No, sir. ever tid me Ue bad prep whee dio MAY God bese you, T kaow He will deower you | tnluk Tad, Tadonot know whether Mt, Triton |g. Did you express any disposition or wiliing- ROL Pecullect ev Coy 2 eer you Bave / TILTON AMUSED. “| went to members ofthe committee and urged | ness to commit violence? A, No, sit. beuded ‘om hever saw it. ° tt prot ' them to accept that eport; a short report has | Q. Did you express any hostile sentiments ’ Les that ‘The secognition of these jetters by Moutton Was peen introduced in vidence; it isin tue hand- | toward Mr. Beecher in their preseave ¢ A. i think O (WiLhROlding Mj) —I (* Bet iN ew «associated With a sceptical Inauiry of Shearman | i yee Mee t ay, a omic es | u TR Fvtee aeuie hike ine Said as Cleary as Ah f or. | Mb iroma drait mage sy Mr. Triton or mysell, ‘ecollect, . Wer have a right to see it, a8 Whether there bad Dot been words ander. | Hye etch? AL Mr. Tiitod, Lthink; | Mr, Tracy—That will be proper when { wat ane Ww see the paper. seoread by the lawyers to make (hem more vivid | J peneve, asa Matte Of iach, that the short re- | you to. Wheo it ix in CVidCuCe and do more duty for the detence, These new let- port was prepared ater whe long one, of which T Q. Have,yon in conversation with A. W. Teony, n=! beg Your Honors pardon. We ters of Moniton agitated the audience with aise | @M Now speaking; Llo no. know at whose sug. | United States pistrict Atvorney, Oxpressed your- Dave « right to see how, It hae been piaced ip el + Bo “ Gestion either reyok was prepared; i velteve it | sell yn violent terms of hatred for Mr. Leecuer? the Wiites’ hands, and the Witness nas ocen C®S#OM In Gudertone as to wheter they affected | Was ay Mr, Titon’s, | A, Not in Violent terms of love. asked & question aboat Moalton’s theory of Mr. Beecber’s rulit. “You can | Apuper wos handd to witness. Referring to tt | r. Tracy—-That ts not my question; you ander. Te Judye (+) defendaut’s conse) : Né saHid—! Cink tha ts the rr tode is called | stand my question, | would like you to answer th | objection to that ? ere SAY stand ii the iruLs Was known to-morrow.” St, | Tr Tne on: gibi Judge Netison—Now, the question is as to what Mr, Kvaris—As & matter of privete courtesy, 'h¢ Teference to “whiting into teaven” made Mr. Ira aid (8 wag ‘Tilton’s proposed re+ | ne sald to Mr. Touny, | PerWane Yos, UUs ae 4 coeuarieK vi ©: oceodinas 5 ‘Tukan sme apo most auatbiy lauc> {| pOKt to ths commuce "air. TragyHave vou tm aur conversation with