The New York Herald Newspaper, November 1, 1872, Page 5

‘ NEW YORK HERALD, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1872—TRIPLE SHEET. 5 --——— able, earnest and clear appeal on the part of counselior | one of these accounts had not even the | crime i TH E C 0 U A T § theddetendant That argument was eminently creditable | signature of Mr. Tweei.. Mr. Tremain ‘showed the bille iatter, ay Reyser, Davidson an Garvey were, shoulave | Ldonoekuow wont Caniaceantt howe orders; of course | process from the State Court on the complaint of 1 counsel. | {g.ihe jury On one of them, he said, it was signed | received on the subject ot the detendanvs euilty know!- lent he acted contray to—not wife for abandonment. fo the head and heart of the distinguished how; the enactments - — Breryining that could be presented, elther byway of ar- ed, Chairman'of Comniitiee.” Now, it | edge and corrupt conduct with great caution, “The jury | did not think it was nese gee ass E forget them ; 1 sap te tna ake nae | Heneghan cpa a phe | hein Sra mee aaa ado | nd bs ema wit ele aac | THE PTT AY NTA COURT OF OVX ND TeXER e a, Jat element ie Case rel ‘onversations, places; ave ie book in my hand; I read the book the accused everything that could be done by Bon This was alto slened “BA Woodward, Cleve. 10 | must also be sald, though regarded a a dangerous species | at the time of the registration ; it was the first or second | Judge Brady Discharges the Petit Jury— of evidence, even when honest | day of the registration ; I of oe" y day gistration; I cannottell you if I nrich whether any other person lived on ed Mr: | The October Term of the Court Closes. appeal our om 8 could be ‘accomplished exci your | yer to suppose that an order to Count: ugh to be scrutinized. and received Boor i I it; he Auditor Watson to Prejudices against the witnesses for the people, or the | xuther together all the vceeante uk Wann ror the nit ith rthe! nisid t Seventh and Closing Day of the cage as presented on the, part of the fovernment was | and county and put them, before & committee was a | ctheritete Stal Ubicemelamene ey FOr oy They Bi ne (hea aha Ag hy al agg wathleicees Tmmediately after the opening of the Court yew ably. ly and ey. rort 3 ene, member | audit that was contemplated by the statute. There was | are to be not only viewed with reference to their (anger. . Did you use this language to lim, or in substance | tetday Judge Brady directed Mr. Sparks, the Clerk, Tr of the Bar. If, after acareful review testimony, | certainly no audit by the rd. Mr. Tremain then | ous character, but, if accepted, are to be taken t er | such, “1 ¢ arightto ask you those questions—reter- | to a of Mayor Hall. ‘ou shall be constrained to come to the conclusion that | showed other accounts which were signed only “William | Sna‘tharaicol in a re rigt xe r. announce that all petit jurors were discharge le yea mirained Yoo he on if and the wholé estimated in determining thelr impor- | ring to what you had asked before—"and it you do Mot | fy 3 evidence on the part of the people je established, that | M.. Tweed. “Chairman.™” He was Qrmiy convineod that | tance and value, firing to the defendant what makes in | answer I wilt go after an officer?” Did you use thatian- | ow. any further attendance. Upon this announce 3 the case is clear and #0 inst the defendant, and | not a single dollar of these accounts had been auditea, his favor and to the people what assists their proof of the | guage? A. I cannot recollect very definitely ; everything | Ment there was a smal! stampede of gentlemen who that as honest men, acting upon iy Fesponstility ot your By a Juror—What is the amount of that warrant | charge made. The proof to establish the charge of cor- | was upside down, had stood anxiously with their hats in their hands oat i at DO Cs ‘vee + rendered except the not ed by Mr. Tweed? ruptlon should not vague and indefinite, uncertain, Q. What was upside down? A. He spoke a good deal; | around the fringe of the Court. It was understood verdi hull ty ve) en An very certain that Mr. bane and hat it nt fc but such in quality, character and strength as leads to no | he threatened to throw me out, or kick me c hat is | that the present term wa: irtually closed, as far SUMMING UP FOR THE PROSECUTION. there will ne'a uiiversal accord that the defence failed an 2 am said that it was @ warrant fF | other honest conviction but that the wicked purpose ex- | what Tmean by everyening being upside dow! aa the Jurymer Aol rt to ariet iccount of its internal weakness, and not from any want | $50,000, and for @ bill the date of which com- | {sted and was carried out, he would throw me out; he said I should cl jurymen were concerned, and that some ar- of oratorical skill. Wnile it gives me pleasure to pay this | menced in 1860, Have you heard evidence to satisfy you of the truth of | that it T did not i 1 th Tangement would be made by Judge Brady as to fribute of respect to the learned counsel. 1 deem it my | Mr, Tremain said that it was in evidence that | the charge? It is for you to-decide—that is your | then he auld he Epi aay outmy'bralus: | ‘he holding of the General Terin next monty A Thorough Review of the Statutes Defining tome imperfections ot that argument, and witch scem tg | these frauds had been made public in July, 1871, | Province and yours only, and 1. leave it with | Feaid that before on the last examination, le EY Te rol eview of the Statutes me defects and blemishes, and to impair the force and | aNd then read an extract from the message of the tly. ; 5 you say a on the former examination SUPERIOR coURT—: ng! mar the Beauty of ‘what would be otherwise a model fo- | Mayor to the Board of Supervisors on the 29d of a able only fer bis owe berdecds end tot he ye RO pe ee a Pe ae " rensic address. To illustrate some of the defects, and to | August, 1871, and also commented at length upon | others, unless connected teith tens fda rtkaseee ee ant een ig oe A Decisions, the Duty of City Officials and Punish Thich I have the right to allude. ‘The learned gentleman | the resolution passed by the Board of Audit and | ion thissublect youentertain rational doubt, the vy now taek Be bald Be eel eke ab eed Bea Poet By Te aoa Offi Haughter of the adeesed. Wheer pad, been sent to the | drafted by the Mayor conferring the power of | cused Isentitied to the benefit, Certainty is a grand ele- | your brains? A. He said he would beat out my brains; | Georgede Met: Louis Dagon. ment for Malfeasance in Office. He tnight ave stated this om cath fe eieteor or Matt | examination of claims toa commitree, lent of cpiminal, law, alshcugh it may de established | Ot courye he would use a club and not a coal shovel Gabrlel Lc Bucdy var Deletes Cardy ean it in some way, and then it would have been ‘The Court took a recess at half paet one o'clock. | yeview, you feel this certainty and, declare that the de. | prains?A. He'said so many things atonce wnat caunot | FANAUM on papers. ‘ ‘ofcomment: It fe ie Sich cel ‘SUBJECT After Recess. fendant knew the claims, or any of them, to be false, and | remember; he used more expressions tha: Tcannot Frederick Ackerle vs, Robert Cummington et al.— Pa aeimenis tet grits Professional to comment Te c 1 nevertheless certified them, he is guilty. tell all the expressions he used; when Tcame Dack with | Motion for further injunction denied. Motives of Political Ambition the | jeyrred counsel ld you thatthe econo ad eecintas | ang court having reassembled, Garvey'a testi | ,, The case was then given to the jury, and that | Hic oMlcer the latter remained in, tront of Heinrichs Oe r. Green ag Comptroller, and said this without stating | mony showed that the bills he pit in were not siinply for body retired to their room to deliberate upon their | 1°" 4nd F went up to the door of the room after COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—SPECIAL TERM, Actuating Principle. anything of the circumstances that Preceded that ap. | work already done, but ior work to be dove. “These bills, | verdict, tio occtg tp'tal he Boca means ehcne Gb anneal Has ave chown eircuunptencen te veg aa svidence we mil ps | SRarOOEs, Bad Usver Led, before wie Foard of Bupervi. PUBLIC FERLING AS TO THE RESULT. Not notice if my brother came up with mes he did not have Decision. i the slightest examination must have disclosed a 7 A would have given a very different Impression. Then hie and led to the discovery of the rest of the irauds, | g With the retirement of the jury there was | anything todo with the affair; at least he was not ox- By Judce Robinson. that A read to you, gentlemen, what some newspaper corre- | He analyzed Garvey’s accounts, showing that a claim of | 8¢@tcely any diminution in the crowd of anxious bar Dis van Ni 7 Jaldwe y m + . ‘you see Mr, Heinrich in hi then you an Name vs. Caldwell.—Motion for refereg Judge Brady’s Charge to spondent bad said about an dress aelvered by, eh about two hundred and sixty-six thousand dollars wax | Spectators, Whispered comments went round a8 | wone pack with the officer! “A, He had Iie dour locked | granted, the basis of payments amounting to about a million and | to the force and effect upon the jury the speeches lomeiie s “ the 3 poues of political aspersion, and probably with the desire | & halt: farhiait “million “nearly “ot these | Of commel for the defence and tie prosecution, | Alitaatopen it forcibly I kufocked ‘at the door to see It e Jury. ta arouse, Rood-humored as tt was, the political prejudices | w cas for the Plastering or the Court | and last, though not least, the charge of thé | | Q- You knocked at the door ot the room in-which you TOMBS POLICE COURT. for me t that it ia MS chat ee pe de dulimitted | shrewd: | learned Judge, would have upon the jury. For an | knew Heintich was? A. Yes, did not open the door; 1 me to say that it was impertinent and irregul ness and ability of the defendant, would they * jt: | A Long and Paticnt Search Partially (Mr, fremain here read an imaginary letter of a news- | pretend that this Was not a proot of the fact that no | hour longer the people kept their seats, and it was | ¢anvot say if it was polted or locked; I tried to open ONNOLLY | Sussccstarteny mutiage atacseenern anak; | Rua restate of hse cat eau ac ney | Only when i wan Known that Judge. Heady woul | Wau neat he Kacy twa giMife ont trast | Mewarded=—Kendricks, the «Bond ¢ at the Cincini nad 1 o e indictments under the statute, | remain in his chamber till eleven o'clock that the | not come out; 1 hh tt th ‘Te: hd ° TWEED AND C Genventinn, the renal ror the letter caused gansider- Now asi torte common law count he laid down, first, that | people began slowly to disperse. out; Teangot aay what tine In the day thinwass whee | masher,” Again Arraigned Tnain, as jurors in this cage, With ail Whe surroundings | common law. bMeers< duticss: ang: pabiic. officer was THE MAYOR SIGNING WARRANTS. Twont to knock at the door to sce if he would beat ont | | Om the night of December 16, 1871, the omce of of this Court, is a sublime ang ex resalve exhibition ofa | liable for misbehavior in ofiice us well for acts of ister the feelings of the pelnciesl gotor By beatng with a giup Haid nok ay Pap hss wanted the Town Clerk of Middleborough, Mass., was en- rama in real life, ‘trial, wit! c Mr of : e legal drama being enacted, Mr. ~ “*: pe ksar, el iw * R {ts surroundings, taken in connection ati hese ‘stup ead San evidence of what the law Pomaciterett ¢ omapiicly, hibited 10. tw at 2 algns nor aI pre! Y inll OX | side; Thad not been in the room; it was a parlor. tered by burglars, the safe blown up and securities wo Vi suits g inst e Ex- gErOD ts in 60 hy 1 no outward signs of apprehension, A Q. How do you know it wasa parlor? A. By looking cannot fai T ane purest ieaprene DOR the mings Staal |: sua ine ae Ceeree a eee eRe ae aS bundle of warrants was brought to him for his through the Keyhole, of various kinds stolen, to the amount of some concerned in the admini: Ofjustice, upon the mind | talsely testify against the Mayor. G signature, and these he signed, ashe had signed . When you'looked through the keyhole did you see if | twenty thousand dollars. Notices were imme- Boss and the Ex-Comptroller. of the learned Judge, the: counsel, the defendant and the the stand Mihai did aot belteve na 3 thority he over eae ere ud under the same au- | french Wasin the room! A. Xo, air, 1did not see him | qiately scattered broadcast throughout the coun- s OW 01 ese frauds, but atter the matter was ull 5) Clse Mayor, > tw A SENSE OF THE GRAVITY abroad he said to Mayor Hall he did not suppose he knew After waiting a considerable time, conferring | jo% ‘\ hes reo was he. in-vou say. po. Yeas, In the par: | try, specifying the nature and amount of the bonds, and importance of the issues by which, by your verdict, | of the exaction of seventy-five ent. But later in 181 | with his counsel and chatting with his friends, the | {fit wasn sagen © aparlor; Teould not tell | cortinicates, &c., stolen, and detectives put on the those issues will be determined, You see the Chief Magis- | they found the Mayor not pursuing this great ming Lape Mayor and his counsel lett, and with them the spec- Q. Did he invite you to come into the parlort A. Tdo | scent. Judge Barrett Decides that Both Actions | trate orthe principal city inthe ‘Western Continont brought | terér, but combiniig with him to bring a suit tators, leaving the court room altogether to the | not know; he threatened deal; naterns¢ f r y ge part. 0 - "] + he da good deal; I would not have e May Be Sustained—By the Atto: Criminal laws of the countey. "all the formalues of the | iraudulent, ers: Never mind, the tanker’ the bever aud | Members of the press, busily engaged in writing | Altacked him umes. he “sruck’ ‘mes Lo wo Detective Sydney Tucker traced the United States ‘y i—By the TNEY | aw have been observed, We live in-a land of equality. | finally they setile on $100.00, Counsel then closed an | UP the proceedings of ‘the day for their respective | Have lone nothing uniesy I was’ attacked: | ponds, amounting to about se ven thousand dollars * ‘There is no jury of his peers; we are all here. When | able sumuiing up by appealing to the jury to do their | papers, Fer te tt way , on the second attempt to ps General in One and the Corpora- wecenter this Updre we are requaaed to take the sandal | Whole duty to theiselves and tO their deli ciizensin | SP" ab Se club Tovent tothestadon' house on Fin aveaue' aad | ras of dae Gosks Ace wel eon Yee. ‘ on holy and saere ender. aiting for the Verdict=The J asec i on First avenue and F @ & CO, Se 0. - tion Counsel in the Other. ground. Mr, ‘tremain then alluded to the character of the | Mr, Tremain was listened to with great atten- s ie he, any, Pee.| Brnsieat fom, Cuiet erate Mortons milye & Co., the books of which houses showed treasury, was disttiouted among ihicres plimderegsang | tou by all in the crowded court room until he had $9. Aas: iusirions ean the Mayoralty them to have been negotiated by Kendricks & Co., Pale Teas tae arated among hleves, plunderers and | concluded. The jury remained locked wp last night until ‘bout Heinrich; O'Bri¢n come of them Within seven and others within only. Hevvaehe wo anened dis rensury, and from whichis | Judge Brady proceeded amid deep silence to | twenty minutes past nine, when This Honor sudge | MMs thwyiy Chel Dep, Marshal whom he naw | four days after the robbery. °° °° S| 5 < to at- | cl e jury. , peace : 4 could not tell whethe: etectives had now go! 3 Ke HEINRICH--DAVEN PORT. tach his signature, 10.4 be warrant, and betore * ‘Botine rge idl i afc Bal Brady reopened Court. There were present a are publican, a cempcratis Reaaquarters; te & Co.'s, but this latter firm proved dificult to Dieaieiauinet laarieusneninniocesaiie misinnn Genruewen ov THe JuRY—THs is a very interesting | !arge Number of spectators, including counsel on ood Went off, telling Witness toremain | lcate, its representative being of the peripatetio he came back, which he did in the course of | School. However, his face and history were well ‘As yet there has beets Wo Ntomenment Bor those wrongs; case, for it is a proceeding sg0}ne # person holding & | both sides, Mr. Tremain alone excepted. Great e cl¥ th and honorable position, in which he 10. about an hou d then told wiine: ki to the de Bi he Central vt et there has been no satisfaction. either in, th Bigs Aid BODO AL ~ : and then told wiiness to come up to the nown to the detectives of the Central Onice, and . rar peer rye f t ed offence axainst the law of the State | &aNnXiety was expressed as to the verdict, and much OFPICE OF COMMISSIONER DAVEN 4 2 e 8 pherge' ¢ Bpicy Examination in the Onse of Heinrich— | tay irom wo record gine ig'and aie | SAR LSP hsm ce ig aah avers: nonce | GimappoIntient was feit| wien Hw Honor Judge | that wag alvutwelve wsock iy he day. Witne then | Philip Fafley ‘and ‘ward, Detective Jou Doyle a . * ., . cas ady announced that the jury, having failed to 4 03 win to the house of Heinrichs w 1 e 2 3 Davenport Oarries Things with a High | mat nas dono. ao, mel to ‘bring. dishonor and re- | Sytld i, prevented fo this Courtior your consiteration, | agree, the Court was adjourned wii! eleven ovloek | Havrainer, with the Deputy Marshal who hadine war: | Me Flat precinct, the tong-sought-for Kendricks Hand—The Qase Adjourned. Hestenions’ votk'ss home Sad area." we eur | tHe, and that'is corumon to all persons, hichund fow. | Hs (Friday) anoruing. Which they rode; when they got to Heinrich’ He was arraigned ygsterday morning, before Jus- gentlemen of the jury, to dismiss from your minds every: | jie Accused of citizens are, lo be ante with in preci ely noe re were people assembled in the neighborhood; wit- | tice Dowling, at the Yombs, on the charge of Detec- thing in the way of sympathy of a partisan and politi. the seme mayner 3] pan ished ht ite ee aid and THE “RING” FRAUDS pes and the ofleer who had the warrant went up to | tive Farley, Kendricks is & man between fifty and : calchatacter, Het no political prejudice, or, animesity | she courts. in “tis ‘State the provinces “Ol, the a neither dit Mee Lackwoad. Wittes sawen fey Sher | Sixty Years of age; was attired in a suit of deep ORP TISING fad day wheh politieal conslderptions exrelse the align | Judge are distinct and separa pro. wa and requested her to All ap the book f ptito me's) OUrEIDES IW ATtIe Over the medidm: Nelgite, oe Cc ORATION ADVERTISING, | 222983. TRS wethealight: | vince ot the jury is, and theirs eaclusvely | ihe Board of Supervisors’ Suits Against | Helntichs: Teannot say thatls | stout build and @ face encircled with gray whis- sf aerate * le chee: Aas wens bos ea Ries] sot eaeeanis is, to pass upon all questions of fact as to whether ine up u Be chal who had the warrant asked the lady who she kers, and has large, round and rubicund r 2 r eae sceordluk te the evidence and the law applicable proof was sufficient, and the province of the Judge, and his Tweed and Connolly—Judge Barrett’s | ant I think she said she was the daughter of Mr. Hein: | features. His - gencral appearance indicates thereto, Mr. Tremain then went on to say thathe did | {xcluslvely, ts to utter the rules of law by which thede- | Deeision=The Suits to be Pashed to | {ils l went to the room where the lady wasut the table; | the bon vivant, while — is betokens : N hot understind the counsel to have charged on him that | Wperstions ot the Jury should be governed and.their ver. | eres lo , ARTE OO as oer shrewdness and a temper, hy having The Proprietress of a Weekly Newspaper | he was infuenced by noiitieal animosity. fils yresent | {et con? Terare called upon ty exerciaetheus power rial—The Fraudulent Items of Charge |. yeinrichs wasnotthere Ue dtateha ekeiiwhere Mr, | already passed through the turnace of many cares Sues for Advertising—The Bill De- Oe ae ad aan ae awashtah asieen an of | you should approach the consideration of the main | for which Recovery is Sought. Heinrichs was; he made. a request to the ladies to op n | and aMictions, is not easily ruiled, A short sketch Professions and one with whom though they had been features of it without any’ prejudice for, or ay gainsl the nc, After the breaking up of the “Ring” civil suits, it the doon to ace It Mr, Holnxich wag dp thatec j thee ote rocker, Coit yaaa by Detective Farley, may clared To Be Greatly in Excess—Ap- Pleetaat. rebwas nok pleasant Lo haveto gence atneat | Hnouttavor, without any favor execpt that which the | Will De remembered, were brought against Witham | they said they had not the Kiy; When the Hanhal asked | "Tt seems that some twelve years ago he was lication for Mandamus Denied. such @ map, but he had long ago accepted the charge | He doubts of iis guilt; and you must uiterly disenrd | Me TWeed and Richard B, Connolly by the Attorney | jot’ Tnalign coon weed the door of that room was | cashier of an Albany bank, which position he filled P id sles PUSS we your mings the thing Galled public clamor and | General of the State. At about the same time Mr. | there when Mr. Hémelens was arrested; the ladies, Me praale yinereae cone Lec rapw dale his 4 public indignation, ether aris! rom indi- ; . hink, said “Mr. Heinrichs was not _ there ployers. PCI ve prope! ; ever, of pursaing the frauds, and that duty he must ful), ‘The | Viduai expresion of opinion or’ the expres: | O'Gorman, Counsel tothe Corporation, broughtsiml- | a-ked' ‘the ladies the ago. ‘ot’ Me tettichs; | involved him int nancial ‘embarrassment «ani 4 sion of public opinion in the egereg te OF lar suits based on the same substautial cause of | ce#nnottell what words I used; there were two ladies | forced him to sacrifice his position. Since that $ contained four counts on each of filty-five different acts, | from the public press. ‘The case 18 to be dispose there, and I did not put the jon to one part v5 % “4 The Petit Jury in the Court of taking 2adin all, ‘The three first counte were under thé | tingn dhe idw and {he evidence. and you sre nut to G80 | action, these suits being brought on behalf of the | they winded not ontething, Dut not the questions Bape Hee Dect IG te ROWE ae 1 Gotta ce Oye Ty ; ing. vast amount of surplusage, but eubstantatly tora | we, statements of counsel un'e-s these statements are | Board of Supervisors. The question as to which | &kedi they Hea Nn ind Nest badY | quired the reputation of being, in, police pariance r an erminer. Hint neglect of a duty imposed on him as s putlie anted and the conclusions they are warrante f tell the words they used; 1 | 4 PI He 8; in p p , y' Bas eee ceiSs-Sne Ditka wane mintantoe cet roper view and a just consideration of the evidence | of these parties—that is to say, the Attorney Gene- | did not show my o them; I had iton iny lappel; | “bond smasher,” in which peculiar branch of his by hie ”, to which you have just listened. Now, gentlemen of the wae a did not then “t n ‘asa Deputy United States rofession his extraordinary success and dexterit; Hine ot ai, or both tt might be imprisonment, ora | Siry tqanrtintend in presenting ihe sews shart enter, | Ta or the Hoard of Supervisors—had the right to | jaenaity en, | Mr. Lockwood's business; do | Rave wor Mim high renown, ‘4 new bape cory crcy ts tee ery ene areery ncn ofthe | tain'with regard to this case to comment upon the evi- | bring the suit, was argued at great length in | Not knowif he is president of a republican club, Two years ago a similar robbery took place at There were | dence. You have listened to it patiently, as it was your TI here fifty-five different offences, all, however, blended | Gute to do. : By Albany. The defendants demurred to the latter This concluded the cross-examination, when the | Poughkeepsie and many of the ‘securities ab- The Jury Discharged and the October Term of | here fry tre itera eect antl bie Mee crate, | Auty to Mey coe hava cate rac ene eee 4 - attey, | Withess rose trom his ‘seat and, polnting outa per. | stracted megotiated by film, Av large number of 1, and you have a right to receive and believe such it, claiming th i 4 konan together. 20 thet bat oi Fepelled “any” idea of | fauructicns du the comments ce vou think they proreag | Suit claiming that two suits for the same cause of | Son in court, informed the Comuuleslonee char okie |: ; n : : . y s Rahway bonds, also the the Court Virtually Closed, Vindietiveness on the part of the prosecution. Now | Contain. And in the application of them you must re | action could not bo brought against them | person liad insulted and threatened him outside.» | were seon atter oud inhine pospouctea Mh ad defen ant wily nogloct to auait anyone ot these alae Svat ues. prevail ainong"sentdemen” ‘eaiied | &€ the same time. ‘There was a recent hearing | , Commissioner Davenport—If that, gentleman, or | the Woodbury (Conn.) Bank was plundered Ken. ve claims, What was neccssary in order to establis : aillieatearialt st gentleman, res With or molests | d ciple : this fact? Well, it was not necessary to establish that together, as you are, to consider the mghts and | before Judge Barrett upon this demurrer. The | you while you are a Deputy ricks was again the recipient of a large share of 0 4 - 2 : p Hf arshal of the U 3 sare ¢ Business in the Other Courts—The Jury Calendar | there had pen ‘any loss whatever. When show that | aiewdank snc anic case fe ouhaed Mi Tee ing Ho | Judge yesterday rendered his decision, over | States, or while going to oF {ron this room, care with att these actus aud as late as, last Augest he these accounts were bogus, fraudulent and fictitious, itis | audit. Thatis the first charge; and, secondly, for aper- | TWiing the demurrer. ‘The following Is | 1 PROPOSE TO DEAL WITH HIM OR ANY OTHER May. | fi in th as de’ ny rol 3 y 5 alle e. efore his elev. ale | ci h i » Cargo of Sugar—A Charge of False Yo cin'ta me course of & long argument, then pes eles, on4 the Quy gyaich pe ene callea.nppn eioeah dor ampioned te couteel evan paihegieneisl, | _ Mr. Hirsch—While it is the duty of the Court to | knowledge, a number of stolen Westchester count; % © said :—Without reference to any knowledge of or com- | do was created by the statute of 1870, which imposed | he was engaged in suits between other parties of som rotect the witness and officers of the United States | bonds, Nevertheless it has hitherto proven dini- Registration Dismissed—Decisions. Hiclty in the frauds on the part of the defendant, the | upon him and the Comptrolier and the President er the | waat red | ‘and, therefore, axa matter of | 10 the discharge of thelr di he liberty of | cult to secure his conviction, and he has invariably fact t at these accounts were fraudulent was an essential | Hoard of Supervisors the duty to audit claims and pro- | taste, would have preferred the consideration of these Suggesting that these persons are citizens of the | found means to extricate mmself from the meshes element, and t A lage: RO vide for all the claims then existing against the city of comune saotiee ’ nde, and had Only consented to | State of New York, and ifany assault is committed | of the law. Yesterday, when asked by His Honor Yesterday was the seventn ana closing day of Had heen tald that ¢ wefe Was no proof that the Board of | shoud be provided for ty the face of revenue bonds: aud | fnd to exbedite carrying the matter tothe General Teri | on the winnegs when he i not actually in the dis- | Justice Dowling what’ he had to, say, he almpl ‘i ud not meet. The of the character of these | fh ‘tute under which the defendant is intlict he plunges into the subject, in medias res, He begins wit 4 e ty Marshal I respect- | answered, “My counsel is Judge Barrett. I wis! Mayor Hall’s trial, the case having been submitted | Claims put the defendant in rhe er aes me thpe cresegiet deg nine Sede eee CITATIONS OF OTHER JUDGE OPINIONS, SN | iully submit that Your Honor has as much author. | to consult him. AT ity over it as I have, Judge—Judge Barrett cannot be your counsel. Commissioner Davenport—And I respectfully | He is a Judge of the Supreme Court. submit that you should read the statutes of the Kendricks—Oh! I don’t mean him. I mean his United uncle, W. C. Barrett. General Davies—This man is a witness attending Juage—When do you wish an examination? Next on behalf of the United States, and if he is assailed | Saturday? oe or threatened the person assailing or threatening Kendricks (with nonchalance)—That's a little him can be punished by the laws of the United | too soon, I have to examine my books, memo- THE DILEMMA y vi cr] y e i to the jury. The attendance of the public was that the only theory consistent with. the personal in, ita tr omtcer: shall wilfully neglect any duty’ imposed upon ie. Cigrned Spinto larger than on any previous day. Even at the | texrity ofthe defenddnt was that he did not examine and | {uitby Jaw he shall be gullty of a mixtemeanor. rope tment, audit them. He should show in another part of the argu- “ mi seule. qpeertain ov2:| Te earn ti onsidered Wi opening of the Court, a time when there is generally ent that if, by any neglect of a public officer, the public pings at Bey OS ane a is what fe xtme i beg yy Bartle ret ey ath ee a smaller attendance than at any other hour of the | suffered jossit was misieameanor, Suppose the cas of an Memloee Hon Restle Tote one Ob cena oe case Le | iadtwtnnoe tccidod tates Hatecit secioes eat ee agent of one of the jurymen authorized to pay bills for the | settle and to pass upon, involving the exercise oi mit and, second, whether the solution of that question was day, standing room was not obtainable, and three | building of a house on certificates of the arctiltect, and on i personal Attention. upon the thine to he pecémary t¢ its judgment, Each of these uuestions must ladies who arrived just before Judge Brady took | his return found that the agent had paid without such | considered in ‘audit, And 1am. not without What sre. éred in the negativ correct the neglect would \. He case of a 3 his seat had dimiculty, even with the assistance of | be merely technical and to be condoned, but not it | 474,48 authority on that definition, ie tine duty of the | States, We have now spent so much time over this | randa, &¢., for evidence in the matter. the Court officers, in finding seats. Yesterday saw | are ile polly, rons had been paid. | auditor is to audit, which means to hear, to examine, to ane ce Py, says | *easeeXamination, which is lengthy, that Imust | Judge—Well, Tuesday next? remal said, unnecessary that | 9 to vass upon, to settle; and it ynatters not whether ° * whethor “the | eight pages. In thé wkin.extend ‘to seven gt Kendricks—That is election day, Your Honor. w close trial day was occu th L dja “ ‘ 4 onsequenc K é aoe et ee een see eer ry Satan teaeat ey ie eet for Te eerictiNG | tue duty fe dinicult or easy l¢ requires, the excrelte of {o'sud Wf that right exists in | any witnesses he can go on and examine them | i WedliesuMyame his head)—So it 1s. Well, make the speech of Mr, Tremain for the prosecution . Ithad been sald by the counsel on the | x "Cy omit intentionallyeor designediy.. The offence, | the people. It is quite enough that the action can be | now. Kendricks (pursing up bis tir, » and the charge of the Judge. At a quarter to | other side that the prosecution had abandoned the charge | therefore, consists in’ ® wilful refusal or omis: | maintained in the present form in the name of the people Mr, Hirsch—I have witnesses, but I decline toex- | be kept in 80 long—(sententiously j=y* wim to 5 laint.” Potter, J.. in_his opinion, - four o'clock the case was given to the jury. See ae cere coeiine tn tha Tatts eee. || S100 t0 perform the duty required | by law. and Senet tit mall turn out that the State Is authorived to | amine them until the cave for the prosecution is | vote. y 1 Was ¢ indictment charging | whether it not. depends upon i 4 4 le " n against the wrongdoers alone, then | Closed, when I will make a motion to dismiss the Judge Dowling (smilingly)—Well, if I thought Mr. Tremain’s specch was considered to be a | SA¥ed It and that he has secured stmmunite from pening, | Whether it was intentionally of, designedly neglected | Bring, i014, Acton the Hoard of Supervisors had been | complaint, you would vote fightl might let you out that day. very forcible presentation of the case for the peo- | ment by turning evidence for the people. Was there no ferences ‘in this case between omit to do anact and | omitted—“is immaterial. Ifthe Attorney General is not | Commissioner Davenport—The case is adjourned Kendricks thereupon graciously saluted Judge je. Great expectations had been raised on the | form Of law that would reach @ man who had been a | SUR jt Un. cive Weiviat nelest does nox necessarily | authorized to bring the action ¢hen thie ohection also | until Friday of next Wok. and detectives and was escorted below. pK party to the stealing of millions of dollars? And yet | involve the element of corruption and requires no proof | becomes immaterial, and the action must fail upon that Mr. Langbein, of counsel for defendant, saia that previous day by the gossip in the Court that Mr. | when a man stole $2 it was grand larceny! Now, | thereof, Itis enough to show neglect to prove itto have | ground. This brings the examination really to . 4 i y : | the District Attorney was present at the whole of “ ONLY QUESTION IN THE Ca! | ! —NOTICE TI 5 Prema moni Sutnguin mae he eo, | Sher aon Ming eet AY iste | hee ene et merece og att | heh of Ceo i ar csi, oe | he, Come IS a see a isnt sarees ety are wan only fair to say that those or om iow the questi je knowledge of veer, @ 1 Ti Teason the rema "0 8 0 3 h ke 8 0 the Bar of this city are inv! 0 pdf Mead “i riage aed Se etaitn tore facts ahd cirenmmatancen to-have thown | Parker in favor of the rieht of the Bonml ot Super. | the evidence, .as he migat have done, and evea ‘The matbers cf te sd these frauds was not the point he was discussing. I Were fot disappointed. Fierce indignation lit up | some of ihe counts in the Indictment it was alleged, but | Placiaim fram iacts and ereunstanees, fo here chen | visors to maintain the present action were motessenual | {Nucl he Wid hot do so the eridenee wasireck ie | assemble in the court room, Part 2, of the Supreme the eloquence of some of his sentences, and though | 10 some it was not, Mayor Hall did this: he certifed, | Oered by the Mayor indicated or stated that hisdutyin | to sustain the people's complaint, and upon thisauestion, | Hi memory, for he had heard it all. Iwas an un. | Court, on Saturday next, at, twelve o'clock, togive bevever and anon paid a graceful tribute to the | due, wien the Board of Agdit, of which he was «men, | rererence to audit was ministerial, The resolution Isag | therefore, the Ontnion ON ide Miller seis our with the | heard-of proceeding, and he (counsel) hoped that | expression of thelr sense of the loss sustained by the shi ber, had never passed upon them, Then wa: f ql 4 aig Comprrotier’s Orricr, May 5, 1870. same general view as Judge Potter, but closes by quoting | the defendant's side of the case would be heard be- rofession in the death of their late associate, high reputation of t 4 meres? . * peli . ae code that the Mayor bad no guilty knowled he The undersigned meet as a comulssion, under and by | an See ee earl dieru ening ln toon leaes fore election day. Ifthe redirect, exammation of | Marshall S. Bidwell. ‘official, a citizen and a frien ie nevertheless dd | no guilty motive ere Wi erations, other \f hay of the Laws of 1870. De hl gp h i the witness were Woncluded now he could go ER ounced with a withering scorn the authors of | ‘42 revca opt ARta oP Be TREASURY WOnmotion ot te Nayar i fs reapived that the County. | that “tBere Ay eA or action on with the examination of two ladies for the de. COURT CALENDARS—THIS DAY. approached by a claliiant of great political influence, yar are notinconsistent.” Thus it is evident that the | Segoe s \ peace Te .. the fraude upon the city and county, He charged | Shprieehel of tn inat ha wasinougneed bs alton nee: pee ait al SE ee ait ne | eh aor bound by any actual determination of the Uotimissioner Davenport—This examination is | SUPREME sta eS El that the Mayor was used as an instrument by | tives—that claimant being a member of a political ring, ue thereon, and that the evidence of the same be the | present question, nor even bya concurrent or over- | adjourned to Friday of next week, and I will not | gtaham.—Nos. 56, 64, 69, 72, 3, 74, 75, 76, 77, 14, thi and plundere: ‘and that he had been | moving in the State Senate Chamber, and chairman ofthe | authorization of the same by the said Board or its | whelming expression of opinion. This question, then, | change that order. 142, 156, 157, 208, 211, 233, 240, 251. Call—No, 252. leves Pl re, Board of Supervi ; that chairman getting passed | appropriate committees, on certifieate of Clerk or Presi- | being an open one, itonly remains to be said that 1 have Mr. Hirsch—The Commissioner should give some Supreme Court—Circuit—Part 2—Held by sudgs blinded to the enormity of the crime by motives of | through the Legislature a law by which the f | dent, and that thereupon the said Ooaaty Auditor annex | attentively examined the elaborate briefs which have ground for this adjournment, have introduced | Van Brunt.—Nos. 2702, 2052, 3988, 3434, 3476, 3658, o y is entirely con- re 4 4 ogg Q political ambition. Thronghout the speech the | witch the high maruate of tne Senate mould be nee the | The Voucher and the, appropriate blanks for Deen, Presented, aid ty Uxhaustve: argument ofthe | no itrelevant testimony. Isimply cross-examined | S714, 3738, 3776, 118634, 2090, 2004, 038%, ‘our signa: 1d action, as directed by the section atoresald,and | vince a : . akan’ ah Mayor maintained 3 Mayor another and the Comptroller of the city another. | hivmen d . ; learned counsel for the plaintiffs that the Board of Super. | the witness in reference to the matters that hap- | 3549, 3678, 3668, br} oe eer araee, Tien In’e charter that was atlerwards git payment. A. OAKEY 1 HA! i visors hese right to bring the present actions, and that | pened in the discharge of his duty as Deputy Mar- face to the jury throughout the entire address, he | power was conferred on members of that ring, and Wal dae ne Hai © ood their fac a Present President of the Board of Supervisors. the present complaints are gvod upon their face. and | snalin connection with this case. peanned qui wilt bet al - ‘ag sent to Albany to influence legislation. Migh vy pt id be sustained upon devaurver. ‘The demurrer must, % 1 aulefly, without any betrayal of nervous. | Herbs political ambition. that put under control the HICHAND'S" CONNOLLY, Comptroller {heretore, be overruled with costs and_with the usual | Commissioner Davenport—The order adjourning Tf the design of that movement was to gather the bills | joaye to answer upon the payment of such costs. the case 1s made. ness, the countenance of each juryman, as though a he ele ulating on the pet vA Mr, ein white this! help to ys ambition waa gratified, for. the. puxpose of actiomby the Boars then. 1s woudte TUR CHARGES AGAINST TWKED AND CONNOLLY. General Davies—I have no notes of the witness’ peculating . Mr. Stoughton—' 3 don't impute to the Mayor any of ene Se fest Melee Teak ti These were published in full at the (ime, but it is re- | evidence, but I must take the responsibility of that, (enchant atteranoes. Oa OTe ate hae Ne Bi cae Was cine iinperiat | presumption’ that the Auditors did thelr duty, aed fey iavery bred told in. tie. following recapitulation | Ltd not ask for an adjournment of the case for a Alleged Assault at Sea, At the recess It was known to a few that Judge | powerswere riventathe Mayor by Which te mae | burden i consequently upon the prosecution to thow that | Ste amoiate paid from the «ty treasury in connecuon | Week I ean go on with It to-morrow or Katurday, Baiote, Comimanisnansocen Brady intended to the jury immediately | patronage of nino of the public departments under his | they did not The people must forge {he chain org, | withthe new County Court House and for repairs and | an¢ . i 3 y Charge ta control. There, therefore, might be other motives be- | dence link ty y tink until it is complete. | The presump- | supplies of city armories, and on account of which pay. | nesses now I will give him until one o’clock, as I The case of Captain Washlager, of the bark Nica- after the conclusion of we Trenenin po meee oy sides pecunk Masbpend Corot way ee fp joer wpa. ag angry ‘gain and "accepted he Hegiat and c) pee hopes ose. oon of the money back, eae ae reer ewe iutaed to make a motion to | T&¥% Who was charged with assault on the high thy 799 whiaperes, sxouud prerey freely, 8 Lanaidestr aims > “yee Neer be tema vie TaMiSE OM sntate agli ‘THE ITEMS OF ALLEGED FRAUDULENT CLAIMS FoR | dismiss the cage; but we cannot do so until the | Sea by drawing a loaded pistol on Thomas Harrison ? 1 ot be. con’ consequence was that the approaches to the Court BARDELL AND PIORWICK. canne neglect, What, ‘therefore, was the design WHICH RECOVERY IS SOUGH' were blocked, and many friends of the Mayor who | Rin" Wolier's flluge to aos Ris ther. "Was there ng | Wasita/deitemination i, aniiespation and without We: | carpenter work wud timbers: were desirous of being present were unable to ob- | possibility, of avoiding to see what one desired not | HEME contemplated and without anything more fhan a | Capote siavien aid Gurtains ‘tain admission. the plunder. The law distinctly said thats wilful omission | Mere ministerial act, such as signing the papers} it yea, | Plastering work oe hig | should be puni ‘a6 a misdemeanor. What was the | then there was no audit, such asis required by laws no | Painting and decorating Judge Barrett, Of the Supreme Court;, gave duty imposed b: Taw passed by the Legistature on | hearing no examination, if the resumpen, mem ouier, | Plumbing and gas work.. for & adit “i this » tt tis, that the collection should be made for the | Tron worl decision yesterday upon the demurrers brought by She ae ot ape a ed py me county ‘ow ork passed advisement of the board, then, have the people Sofas : 3 re-direct evidence of the witness is closed. Why | and others of the crew at Savano Key, in the Carib. not get through this matter before tne election? ean Sea, was heard yesterday. The allegations of Commnissioner Davenport—I have more important | the complaining witnesses have been fully pub- matters to attend to than this examination, in | lished. ‘The evidence for the defence owas which the defendant is out on bail, and where the | showed there was no such occurrence as char; 5 examination is a matter of courtesy. and that there was not @ pistol aboard the vessel. Mr. Hirsch (with great earnestness)—No, sir; it | It appeared from Harrison's testimony that he had it is not a matter of courtesy. It is a matter of | brought activil suit for the recovery of his claims, Tweed and Connolly in the case of the civil suits | Serore the sth of April, 1810, How could these men then | Shown satisfactorily y did not meet again; | \wwn ; right and of stipulation with you. We owe you no | Commissioner Jones discharged Washlager and ex- instituted against them by the Board of Super. | wilfully neriect he duty of audit? The Inv was against | {hal toey diac is for youto determine on all the evi. | Articles (probably brooms, | thanks for it, It is. matter of right with us. pressed the opinion that the proper way for Harrl- a wilful neglect of duty imposed. The Board of Audit act | by law. This fact you Marble for work in progress. The parties then left the Oourt, en to proceed Was i wolvil voles visors. The claim was that the Attorney General | imposed the duty of auditing all previous claims against | dence to which you have listened. It you are satisfied | Pay roll of work in progress. Pi 01 Pp Of the State having begun suits against them for | the county, which, when found By them to be due, were | HHHt tere Mend pecause the intention forms an cewene | AUBCENTendence oF building. ae aa COURT—ZIRCUIT. the same cause of action, a second suit could not | He"elied in ilustadon the’ case” alreaay clit ore | tlowelement in vhs prosecution: not merely carelessness | Locks... CORPORATION ADVERTISING. SUPREME, COURT CIRCEAT. be brought against them based on the same com- an cathe Shen he wGourt tasegien? ia iss determined by a just and proper consideration of ali: the Repairson plaster wo bins Suit Against an Insurance Company. Plaint. Judge Barrett overruled the demurrer, or, | belief that he wert 22 poe fo, administer it Ae anion ag’ rertuuoe Syldgnne bear. Repairs on plumbing work.. : The Proprietress of a Newspaper Sues Before Judge Gilbert. in other words, decided that the Supervisors have | (eno *CUtesal ware wittul negiost and there weer | plated a proceeding wo audita Fererence to the Board of | faPattarcand repairs ow wood work of arino- S| the Corporation for Advertising—Ap- | Abner C. Keeney, as receiver of Keeney & Ctark, good legal grounds for their suit, irrespective of | necessity that i dy nd bmp Pnpetlenty 23 at adn fac ae BI a 14 should be consiiered. and | Repai ring plaster” Tork of atmotes wad ari MO plication for Mandamuses Refused= | bathtub manufacturers in New York, sued the the other suit. Hae cae ot to bimoctt audit these clatmis, notwithetatd: such value given to st a8 they inay deserve, if any, | pi : a 38515 | ‘Phe BI: Excessive. Home Fire Insurance Company, of Columbus, Ohio, A decision was rendered yesterday by Judge | ing he may ctwoy, and even it there were no cerrort | People ve. Brooks, Im the st ‘of Bento, an which | Painting armories and driit Foon: 25 38 | Lyala H. Brown is the proprietress of the New | to recover $15,000 insurarce on the property. ‘The hi I 45,223 87 | york Argus. This paper, with that liberal difuseness Gasana Tiessouen or tnt proenty witnont notes f me Leonard, of the Supreme Court which ought to Rowiege On aren it ‘was wilful negieet, and pub- | case & man was miicted for refusing’ to admin- | Carpets for armories and drill rooms bi as convicted, and the Court said that 4 ae Serve as 8 caution to proprietors of petty papers | jected him to punishment. To sanction the loose amd | WT AN Was waked to administer the oath he knew per- | ATHCES cio qarevepenincan viewances once exhibited by our municipal boards, was made | to and assent by defendants, whereby, according qho have had given them the Corporation aaver- | interposed would be to strike down all the defences of | fectly well what was required of him, and when te | Repairs om other county buildings. .. a Corporation paper. Mrs. Brown putinher bill for | to the provisions of the policy, their claim became tising not to put in unreasonable bilis, A Mra: | the to leave to all rior officers in fectly well. what he was doing. He knew | Grand total. old. Brown, proprietress of the New York Argus, put in , 27.37. ve very, city, the Hower eg? wReplect every, duty. | whad se. request amounted to, and he knew $27,374, This bill, tt appears, passed muster watil it | "thas the ‘proofs of loss served were defective, and @ bill for Corporation advertising amounting to | tainted evidence, hore showed ss gloat and certain @.| Janguage of th & pul ts ti “ oqnt om any | when he refused it what. refusal was. Now, the reached the Comptroller's hands, The latter | the plaintiff declined to make them complete as re- } ag Beg Bp HEINRICHS-DAVENPORT CASE 1 mot pay it and the Board | quired. eplect of duty imposed as it was monstrate, ‘as | CELE + | official woul pay joard | 4 $21,974. The Comptrotier refusing to pay it and the | Aifwhoondertake « public trust most Tenn that unay | TiA4Nls Oke tne amaavic ins’ duty he eslectod to of Audit would not give it their omeciat | ,, that the manufactory was Ingured as bathtub " - a » , precy of Tie eae bet afar ane the ee Important Proceedings in the Case Yess | sanction. She accordingly made application for sawing and planing mill for custom work, in addi- was such lect. The Justice knew what was terday—Lively Tilt Between Davenport | ‘Wo mandamuses—one against the Comptroller and | tion to the bathtul business. asked of him, There was nothing like in- the other against the Board of Audit—to compel ‘That the particular building containing the prop- Board of Audit refusing to allow it, she applied for | cannot find m thelr own negligence and supinenc @andamuses against both. This application the | landand this count wa biiile mee aud not Judge denied on the ground of the bill being eome | sometimes ecemed. to, Bethe then, bute f advertence. of misapprehension on his art, and Defe nt’s Counsel=Davenport’s | payment of the bill. Judge Leonard, of the Su- | erty insured was connected with another building, Sisk ica Gane Ho th hoe we vie oor mae 'G fen, tones one: hen, vad he Ingenta foe: Detectives Spying Thro Keyholes. | preme Court—before whom the applications were bein: part of the whole manufactory, by a wooden In the examination yesterday in the United to every i rj made—gave his decision yesterday, denying both ctor used for the purpose of carry- power of removal men, if, upon consideration of all the evidence in this Yesterday the case of Mr. Heinrichs, who is applications. His grounds were that the original foc ahest Sole: mach ine thee Te? greater tuum Het y neglected their ir trust. hth Seatle cours or Heinrich, charged with asssulting | Nese Tat meantby an fandit was a rational ‘invest | as" a2 omission to autit, that it wan unintentional, | charged with having Violated the Federal Election | qivut was Not conclusive; and, further, that the | that insured: aud the policy was rendered vold, ane of the United States election deputy marshals, ration and examination, heat witnesses and obtain- 4) al 1 nina! a not wilful, then the defendant is not ing to answer certain questidns put to | amount charged was some $25,000 in excess of Jourt directed a verdict for plaintiff, the ex- Commisnoner Davenport took high ground, threat- fn Autti ia the Court The Mayor had power to etl | O2,,the cohtrary, Ht you find ‘i i Aa el i ‘ohariesa: Sean)» Obited: ethter Denil what it should have been. : ceptions tobe heard in the drsk. instunee at Gen br kd oe She rel lcs id pon athe de areca don the taspares hak ae ee This Gouri on thi question as" Po cue auty {0 pet: | Marshal, in reference to his age, &c., and using, ag items ab eral Term. Would molest one of his deputies. There was a | Board of andit clause the defendant war created a meme | fOrmathanto leave tte You. Ils fot You we ecise, an “ Ne hofety BUSINESS IN THE OTHER COURTS y ; 7 2 ; ds tie deputy, was resumed COURT OF SESSIONS. r Mame it. the nit Boned “whiae Raast ‘ou only. Itis only necessary to say, in addition to What | gjleged, threats. towar ss warm time between the Joint High Commissioner, | ber ofthe Board ty 4 he been said, that i every criminal before Commissioner Davenport. Ferry’s Prisoners theconnty. The meaning | the defendant's ult “must "he Made" out Another of Captati fm petto, and defendant's counsel on the question | Power toandit claims age Sees ji SA iibulaiiaias,. Ries ehtad <Chetag: Miata of the yorteatd gwerto audit from time Inmemoa,, | ¢vidence, , suflelently | conciustve to |, exclude | General Davies prosecuted on bebalf of the gov- UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT. : Acquitted. ate ir. Tremain cited the statu Breveri ing the duties of | With regard to the second charge-+viz., corruptly per- | ernment, and Mr. Samuel Hirsch and Mr. Langham sarap ¢ Moore and associates. should be proceeded with and concluded before 8 of snd thelr clerks as to auditing, | vorting or wickedly abusing the powers of his office or d 1 for the defendant, The Jury Calendar, Before Jadg . @lection day, the former, however, carrying his | Which made the audits open to the pu lic, and prescribed trust and certifying claims'which he knew to be salse— | Appeared as counsel for ‘The jury calendar of this Court will not be called | Edward J. MeMahon, alleged to be a member of point in adjourning the case, gounting of the claims. He tod thatthe Fe ere ae ie cote rye uly Rr peggumat erent whaler don cnaleeata untit Wednesday next, November 6, at eleven | the gang of thieves known as the “sliver gang, ° fot requires Lg 4 _— bf tat it pecon aa oF ‘auditing them will ‘The cross-examination of Charles J. Stab was | o-¢lock, who were arrested by Captain Ferry some time: MAYOR HALL. power o require tis as part of the evidenco, ‘were Lf ‘sisal on au amat fact toe the Jury, " Segaaes So Maas earner coPeR, Wabeee, Spe PtS, AS Sesnre, of, 0, Carge of since, was tried yesterday on the charge of, Dy er t Foppired “are 2S tee tatccde uiayzggonte of, ty muh the proposition that every officer is follows :— Yesterday Deputy Marshal Kehoe seized a cargo | tho House of Mr, Erastus Cooke,, No 35 Pros areas 3 | Te My brother went with me to Heinrich’s house; he is not | of sigar on the bark Cecilia to satisfy a judgment | place. The chief testimony for ence to nis duty tH the contrat BY lon the informer of the gq: Wiliam ins, who listeria! aha; 1 ‘oun 5 1 Siiimd forthe parposeof ssisting mes" ™. “OOF | of $89,000 obtained tn, the United States District | gre that the prisoner told him he had comileted. ae . Connolly. hi y Seventh and Last Day of the Trial=The pis Ray: is pase es a charge Samming Up for the Prosecution and | 1nd eye oe ee a Tmt eam tate , Have yowany power to ‘appoint a deputy marshai | Court against Harvey Barnes for non-payment of | Sword Wal the pubaior Take ni ee ene stolen: the Charge to the Jury. it was paid. | Hut if was claimed ‘that athey bud under you duties. property. "iiverware) in New York, and it was ‘The Court having assembied, the proceedings in | Ut shown that this Board did not meet. nif they General Davics—That ts 0 question of law. Charge of False Registration. produced in court, 0 P ngs ‘were only bound to show by slight a facie evidence, Commissioner Davenport—He has sworn that his Counsellor Gre: for the defence, examined the important case of the people against the chief | that there had been no meeting auce the evidence of Ra depot Before Commissioner Shields. a Greets, foe, he, Oe fn meeting was in the defendant's possession. But whey had brother 1s not a deputy, ‘The United States vs. Timothy Norton.—The | the prisoner, who produced his di from the scharge te commenced belore a larger audience | shown inore—they had shown ee ot Witness continues—The assistance T expected from m hag | SIMY, dated st Fort Tovten, Dakota, April 17, 181% than had yet crowded the court room, There was A PACKER TO AUDIT, ‘witnesses, aside from the record evidence Telnting to the brother wan. >, $e} ne, fe Seaees fel hungry J defendant, as already reported gd peared a4 aad awore tnae he srured, in aw Ba ry ae adverse party wo ™ La », Davi and Garvey— | ne 4 false register his | of a ing. e Tol 00! fo delay in resuming, and at a few minutes after | 18 Griminnl cate tne mine Bland. Tyrecd and Conmonise | peauce, tiem ea wit he Dehewse of plana some of | thon ar difierent things; it caunge remember i Re came | Deen charged with having falsely Fem -" Staton cal that be had eu- rty to the record on the stand. ane hed cheme of I ry 1} :, 4 tleven the summing up for the prosecution com. | fhe other members of the Board, were parties to the rec: them gartcinating in its fruits. The essence of an offence | into Heinrich’ With me; T made the aMdaviton | name at 31 James street and 48 New Bowery. The bor wb yr % Re in aie adeetous of 6 young ° ™, but Id accept the certificatio: th 4 Juay—We had ihe pleagure yesterday of ligiguing to ay | Of Mn William M. Tweed ib Yeu therev Now | Theevidence of mea who bave vasticioated in the | in my opine |, and id not be call jut Keyser, Garvey and Tul ‘without which jt | which the warrant was issued for Heinrichs’ arrest; I . menced. He ae vege they did not appear belore any Board to | cannct exit, ead eemkeald be established, Notconiy | swore {0 it; cannot give vou the date of anyenact | Certificate of the mspector showed that Norton Woman, and for that Higgins was ini MR, TREMAIN’S SPEECH, have an examination of their accounts, No honest jury- | by reliable testimony, but facts and ciréumatances ment of the Congress of the United States in reference | had corrected the registry at James street and | and had threatened to “send him ap. nota Mr. Tremain sald :— jen could doubt that the first and only meeting of the | when grouped together should ficiently conclusive | toclestions: Teannottcll iT gave the date of suchenact- | ‘nat he intended no fraud in the transaction. ‘The |The jury acquitted the prisoner and, & nol ay ay Prsiés exe OUR? skp Gayrienmn or rus bap 8 the one at which they resolved they wou to excinde any reasonable supposition o: Inwocence an, HEINRICHS ACTRD CONTRARY 10 Commissioner, therefere, ordered him to be di —” was entered ip other had nothing odo with the enactment; | charged, After his discharge he was arrested on a