The New York Herald Newspaper, September 2, 1857, Page 2

9 “ J by ory on land mark, in order shes tae pean! row eee thet were not eschewing # sirgle foatar dintinetive idenstiy por seeking to affisieto with the vid sch ol church. He had « peculiar sdmiraion for the name, and he trusted It would be retained. Dr. Leacw said he very mash admired the zea! of Dr. Rows for the maintenance of the honored mage «New Robool,”’ because i: was an aopeliation given to those who ‘were deemed heretics sixty years ago. But we sre not of that beoy crago Weare acting for oureelves and for the burch tp our has bithero been and eborch of the Uw tne “New School” Presbyterian oburch. It ings and motives to bing otiam nes €¢, conrider himself at home. Rey. Mr. Manstialt, of Teamewee, theagh: the Conven- don wes wasting too much time on a maitor of sach litte {mpertance. by not compromise the difficalty oy say- fog ‘‘ The General Asse mbiy (ne# school 90 called)” — aXudivg to the general a) ven us— ve not as evuming t\ eureelyes. The old ech ol Preabsterians do pot claim that desigaation as part of their regular name. the people bave given it to them. They may assune it ‘as & mark of identity in regard to their peculiar orthodoxy, bal itis no part of their mame. He hoped this matier would be decided without any farth:r discussion. Rev J McDaaaman objected to such a designation. He regarded it ae « perfect misnomer It was given to them ‘te 8 spirit of odis those who differed f-om them, and for that reason b: tm favor of striking it oat. Rev. G. W. Leynuns, of Va., hoped that the mntion‘of Mr. Grattan wouls prevail What objection coald there be to the designation which he proposed? Tt was the oe which they recognized for twenty years, Without a single exception, within thai period, the Assembly 0’ the Presbyterian church of the United States was the desicas tion applied, and there was no difficulty in knowing whs ‘was meant. In regard to the old association of the name tm Tennessee, reforred to by Dr. Ross, it may be sald tha: i was rot the same in other parts of the cvun- try. He was persuaded if they recognized that term here there would be & most improper use made of it agatast them. It will be considsred as @ very important conces- aon by our enemies. Mr. Furrcuex, of Va., was in favor of adopting the de- sigvation, “Geners! Assembly of the Presbyterian Courch Of the United States of amerioa.’” kev. H H. Sumuuscrorp, of Philadelphia, said he was ent as OFC OF the floaticg members of the church of the ord Jesus, put in that position by the action of the General Assembly, You propose {0 give « designation to the charch that would represent {tas “ibe General Assembly of the Presbyterian Oawroh of the Unived Siates of America.’’ The section of the Church to which he belonged ts cast off from the General Assembly, as it was recognized at Cleve land, ani he was prepared to acqaiasce in any dosig ation which {i ¥ as the will of the Convention to adopt He was there to represent men of in{izenoe, men of talent and men of wealth, an» he would ask the Convention, in every act, im every Cconzideration upon every resolatiou of this report to clothe him th as much power as they could, so that when he returned to the city of Philadelobia he mich‘ be Abie to present arguments in su; of their aotion which Could not be ocntreverted. Lei tl be no avtion bere which would afford other members an opportanity to dodge tbe question Let there be no difficulty as to designation or anything else here. If the desire is that we shall be recegaized by the apvetlation “Genera) Assembly of thesUnited Sates of Amertos,”” be ‘would ae& the Convention so todetermine without farther discuss en. Do nothing that our enemies migot take ai vantage of He was @ ‘‘ne# school” man, and he gioriod in being called s»; but if {t was deemed expedient to change thai designation, be would cheerfully acqaiewe. Waoen ‘were scting fo our officia) capacity, clothe us with as much power ar you can, that no sdvaniage may be taken of us. Give not the Noribern Presby tories the power to say, when your action bere comes up for di cussion, “these recommendauons we cannot se."” Rev Mr Dickinson, of Ky., offered as ac amendment to the amendment of Mr. Fletoaer the folowing:— That we recommend to the Presbyteries reoresen'! (n this Copvention, and sympaihzing with tts objects, | draw from said body Mr, TuokER aid he did not desire to intrude upon the ‘ime of ibe Convention. He wished this discussion could come to anend. The objest which he believed all bad ta ‘Viow was to derignate the Preeyteries to whom w fend our recommendations. Now, who ave ti School General Assembly of the Unsted States of There is no body in the United States claiming that name. Wuo are to receive the recommesdations? Your P tories will say, ** Why, hese recommendation Gressed to us.” The gentleman from acky (Mr. Dickinaon) provosed, as ao amendment, that the Presoy- tories be recommended to withdraw from the General Assembly, and terminate their ecclesiasical reiations with them What was intended by that modification? Nothing, !t would seem, and he could therefore see 00 pro riety in urgiig tt He thought the whole difficulty would met by the snguage of resolution as it etood, with the emendment offered by Mr. Grattan. As to slang ferms or techricalitics be was opposed to thom, particularly in the prevent Convention, He would de favorable to te \ai- Calities at otber times and under other circums ances; bat Gt this Ume be was opposed to them. Mr. Dickixsos withcrew his amendment, and Mr. Grat- tap baving acrepted the amenimeant ofered by Mr. Fieteber, the question on the original was put, and decided in the affirmative. ‘The scoond resoluiion next came up for consideration. It ts given above. Rev. Mr. Mcumam, of Alabat mored to amend it by " the words ‘and im- Adding to the word “sj pliediy."” Dr. Born ea\d that he remembered when he mot the Committee In the city of Philadelphia appointed by the General Arrembiy, some time ago, a arose at to the cons'\tuiontl power of the Assembly. He Barnes added the words ‘“impilediy, implication’’ which were intended to ral Assembly a greater latliude of power in deciding the extent of criminality upon soy charge than they had pre. ‘vioun'y porserred Dr. Adams took the position thet ine crime of epprsseion as it referred to slavery, would be cognizable oy that body under the constitution. He (Dr. B) believing the principle to be one of vital !mportance Lo Uhetr bret interests, opposed soch « construction of the constitution, and be would vow say, that if they departed from the rules laid down ip that document, and opeaed the door to & latimudinous construction of It, it would be use- Jem for them to my that the abolitionists were acting wrong when they brovght slavery onder the general charge of oppreation. They may set {t down as im plied im the term “o He thought the wisest course woutd be to adopt the resolution as tt stood. Rev. Daum RoGas, of Tepneasee, said there were many tbinge bat m gti properly be made sudjecs of disciplise ‘that were pot specifically mentioned (n our book of govern ment and cisct line, euch as selling ardeat spirits, which procucts drunkenpess and leads to so many crimos Bealug irpecificaly mentioned, and so is gambling ‘The © are many things that oar chorch session may re gard os metiers of discipline, though not mentioned, a be urderstood, specifically inthe book of discipline He ‘wae, therefore, in favor of the adoption of some terms tha) might more fully express the objects of the Conven- ton Mr. Firrcirme did not accept Dr. Boyd’s construction as to what shovid be matter for cognizance by the Goneral Asembly of the church. He could not agree with bim ‘bat there was no ruch thing ss trying upon @ clear jm plication. He believed there wassuch « thing as the cburch tr) ing cpon cloar implication. wr, Quss Bo Wruams, of Richmond, said it seemed to bim thai it would be just ag incoogracu® wo connect light ‘and Garknose, truth and error, as to connect epesticatious ard implications. We ought to abut out that Jsageroas doctrine of implication. If our cogatitation does not sult us, why, all we have lo de Is to go & work and sot It right. He believed tbat all discusions of this were pot cotristeut with the purposes which brought ihe Coaveation togeiber Dr Convnien, of Philadelphia, said he did not intend, as corres; opéing member, to vote upon the question before tbe Convention. Ho ssw ite difficulties They wore pro conte d ten years agoin discossions ori by egitation on (be eubject tbat bad rent the church anuoder. Every- thing 1 dootrine {¢ 8 herery which fe tp diroct antagonism with the dostrines ef the Biblio, AS we interpret ibat book fn our Uonfessicn of faith, every action and babit ts acrime which i# in direct auiagoulem with the character and spirit and purpose inseparable from those do> trines. Be felt the danger of inserting (he words muggerted _ his friend from Mobile, Mr. Mclsam. In 1846, * & forinight’s discustion pon this and collateral questions, the General Assembly laid down the doctrine «lich your commiuee have reported ia tae eeoond reroluven; aed although It does toi seem to cover (he prerent and whole subject, yet it presents a innd mark from i bas pe OY tha} ae pace to depart. Even if we cannot discipline « man for telling arcont epirtte that creates drumkenpess—i\t may be righi to sell it © some for proper aes—even if we caupot Wuch a man, or even fod @ man guilty of intemperance who ér them—I think we had not pat in thas ‘word “\mpliediy.” It may lead us into some diffculiy Bot foresees in cur femvereices Oe mere. ‘ aug matter in reat importance to Mr. Incraweom, of Ky, said he volved in that resolowon wae them. If we go back to the orgenization * & Christian cburch, that the subemnce of that resolution ie lef. To de- trom it waa exoeedingiy dangerous. It was the right Of every individual to go to the word of Ged, and there find the doctrines of religion and the principles of charch order. But then Wo reach the advan 00-operalive Action we must compare the results thai we have reached, and when we bave compared our resulta we will be likely to act harmoniously and piace our action upon a foot- Ing. We bave gone to the Scriptures, an we bave embodieo tn the constitation ‘the 4 ‘we conocive the Scriptures teach. Now, all experience shows thai the greatest danger 'n the action of reproseats tive bodies is the danger of trenching upon the principles we bave adopted. He wae utteriy opposed, for these reasons, to the in roduetion of the word “im sliediy.”” It would give & dangerous latitude to the General Ausembiy ‘and be therefore tramed the amendment would be re Mr. Fisronsa said—Huppose & Charge is broaght in ® chureh judicatory for oppremion: can It be entertained fas & specific charge before the session of Presbytery ‘The difficulty in hie mind was this: if the charge of o prosmion was brought a individua—be did no peak particularly in reference to tlavery—the charcb jo dientory would go to work and decide as to whether it i) entertain this charge. Mast the Preebyvery, in church eee Bion, before |t cotoriatns this, reqaire the aocaser to deng ate. under (be word “‘oppreasion,”’ the particular crime’ OF does {t allow cf some construction that may amonat to fn implication? In making these remarks wee Bn tious to obtain information upon thie subject. ae desirous to know whether, the charge of ‘‘oppreasion’’ be img proved by the accuser, in whatever form, be war bound in ac dition to the nature aad character a the “op ’ of would the church judicatory re Oelve that charge, and act without receiving # specifica ton of i wature and character other than is given in the (erm “oppression? He would ask whether the book ‘Gpeciiee every thing that comes under that head’ Mr. Guerras eaid, that {t seemed to him that it was not Deoewwary lo eperify the mere charge under the term oppression '' TrueMhere were various forme of oppres ion bul whenever “op oresion” was proved betpre the adiontory without regard to \ character, they were a bee ee oni jt Mcl.aaw Haid, he underes: twine and the rule a dere.xed that the eyetem Lh Gherob discipline we taken from the Bible If the i¢ so— Ad be of ovnrse belieypd it wae \\ waa to be presumed NEW YORK HERALD, that the cbarger ebould be made mpecifioully. It would be difficolt, tm ble optpinn, to ciscipline @ cese waioss it was Specified in sowe partic vlar and Compreheustro fora, Dr A Nawrom, of Mivsixsipp! aed the Dretorea who bad diffiou tice tn thelr minds in relation to thin quest on, Would wey, covid sbey sustain a charge of aft against s doy for stealing appleat tne Con’carion of Faith speaks of crimes geouetrlcally, if I may be Permitted to ure the term. Theft is @ term which may be wed in reference yaltng and surely im this coapec jon vould form & proper sudjec for the jadicatory to take cogatzan‘e of The absurdity o entertaining and scing opon cherges presented under » genera) beat is fully demon-traied by the relative guili of tb Verm “theft”? ip these twr oonnection. Hs was altogtber 1n favor of the re olution as reported by the com nitiwe And opposed to the amen We are constit tioua) [reziriey and as such oblig be atric, con stro We should have no hesitation, th rsfore ip voting npainet tbe introdaction of this tarm ‘“imptiaciy ” Mr. Ssriuun@rorD, of Philadelphia, said he was bore oar tictpating 1m the deliberations of the Conveation, not kno ¥ ing when be should retara to his ch rch. but that charse may be brought against bim of oooupy! g @ revolutionary poridon—that ts, by implication, E tertaising the views teat he took when he juned this churon of Cari to stady its peace and iw prosperity, he was ati!’ nes to act with reference to those end), snd In aiming to do go took the porition which now held, as «hat beet calculated estimation to affect there purposes, He shorld mot abrink from mestiog any- thing in regard to this question; still be wanted tx a> vention to be very gasrded in all its langvege, that it may Rot tke away from tim or those wh» : mpathised with them tn the North one tote of needed They wanted to oco right oomtion; ‘hey dia not want any act of the Conve! to weaken their post Vion or any wording of conttitution to be used agent them. It seemed to him that by insertin; ord “ tmpliediy '’ they were opening the way to laaumeradic latitude to the Geaerai ebures, and giving @ dangerous AssemDd! He woald ask the Convention to weigh and consiner well what they were abeut, for any false step on tbeir part would ly weakea the position of their ‘riends at the North under the pecaliar relations which they ocoupied te the church at the South. Dr. Haapy said, that ali agreed that chis was a subject of ‘very serious importan:e, and the question involved was one that would tell upoa the interests of oar church for fature generations. He would regret exoceding!; @ vote in auy direction that woald tend to ws & fase pecalisr position as regards tas u cerned, he would be g ad to occupy the position there ds Gned, and like wo vote for resolution just as it te, and if it could be plainly made kaown to bis wiad taa' ‘the constitasion of our church does specify al! classes of immoralities Iebould cordially vote for this resoluion He was pot prepared to say that the constitation does «pe. cify all classes of immoratities, {here are many cases of crime that are pot specified, and which he presamed may pot be inferred from Cage said in the constitatiun, He woulc regret exocedingly ¢> take any position which woul! not stand the feet of exam nation of the ages afver us; bat be was in ag muck ditlic ilty as regards the matter of4he substitute. He would egret to vote for that amendmeht, for It would open the door $ all the ills and con'aso> imaginavle under euch a latitudinous or privilege os sbe amendment would give. It seemed to him tna: the ‘wisest and best woald be i let the whole subjecs aloue, If wedo - hat the committee recommends, wisely and croperly, and in such a maaner thai it would bear in veetigation, be would caeerfully stand on such « platform and would rejoice 10 do that thing fo far as it regards the subject of aroliioulsm The whole case was covered anc they could gain nothing, ‘or the arguments advanced have com pictely closed tue dor ageiast them, and they can present no views to justify them im the course tney pursued in having vroughs up the subj ct of slavery. Bat be was afraid they might be placed in difficulties arising out of the fact that acase may come up that we shall be required to prove, and whi hb is not «pesilied tn the coa- stitution. In view of these reflections he would prefer ‘\bat potbing should be said upon this subeci whatever, whilst be woula most cordia ly and with Lis whole heart, ‘vote in favor of it, if it was proved .o his mind tha: tne Constitution of the charch does really spocify all classes of crime of wbich the jud catory was to take due notice. Dr. Ross of Alabama, said he would like to kaow if there was an elder or minister who would have aay aiili- onlty tm briniogg upa man before the judioatory to try him for cock fighuing, under the constitution, (Laughter.) ‘A Voice Under what rale? Dr, Ross—Why, under the rule of cruelty. The subjsct u eee ret forth in the caiech'sm Is {t speciticaily set fo th that we could be ried for watpping s siare? Aad vet san’t we do that? With all duo respect to his braihrea would say that be was astonished the book was go litile Mr. Furrcner desired to know if he might ask « question of Dr, Rows. Dr. Rogs anid he dif not want to answer any questions. He said that taough he was a new schoo! man he honored bis old school brethren, beceuse they had so perfectly drilied thsir peoole. Fe was again and again astonisned ‘tbat the book was so little read. ae) Dr Hanpy said be bad no doubt the matter of cock Ogbting was referred to morely as & specification, and not 9 @ matter alluded to in the book of ¢ iact pling. ar. aesured the Convenion tbat he would not was that sometbing po © in this convection. The whole question seemed to him © be exceedingly complicated; and so far as he was con —s* was anxious t0 be better instrusted regard. Dg it. v. J D. Miroum, of Virginia, said he would call the attention of the chair to an | mportant breach of the rules of orcer during this discussion. Cader the rules no dele- Fate is permitied to speak upon the same question more than twico. This rule, he would say, was violaied in many instances, The Pam= nvr here read the rule appertaining to this ques ion, and expressed & hope that gonlemen would not infringe upon {t, and thes {m ose upon him the novessily of keeping tally of the number of epeoches that may be made by each momber, Rev. J. D Mircuans, of Virginia, aald the difculty with him was whether we ought to enter into a discustion of this character or Oar book is before ue, containing the constitetion of the church in the United stater, and this is nos the boty, and certainly not the tine, to modify it. He concet ved the tenor of t2¢ argumenuis as they have deen presented to have reference to an ameudment of tat Constituvion, and not to our privileges or dut.et under it. H» considered tha: the crimes in reference to which the Judi bd were empowered tw act were specifically Sated. Oppression is mentioned, and among other: ftoaiing, man stealing, fraudulent dealing, &e., wore all specitically set forth. if bro her wished to change tho book in & form inconsistent with the princtp ee proposed in this resolution, they could do i, and make it to corer op Preasion in ali ite forma. The constitation provides, after S change \s made, in what manner {t call be laid bof re the Judicatory. When a mas brings @ obarge (i roqzires that the accuser should enter into spertfcatioas, bat +! the specifications are come to be looked into aud found pot to sustain the charge of course, dismisse: ‘The sccuser mest bring the charge ae ts to tte ter of the book; but when it comes before the Coart, sper’ cations must be entered into. We might stand here ‘Until doomeday to legisiate for those of the church north of Maron and Diton’s iS Te fall to satisfy them. We do not recogniee the right of the General Assembly of ‘1818, or any other “wen,” to throw suspicions upon the moral standing of any slaveholder. They have de clared that slavery if blo; upon oar holy relig Diot that mast be effsced. declaro that it ts ‘S preat evil; that itis & crime, ‘that ft isthe solema doty, not only of us, but of all men, to seek for ite adolien- ment throughout the world. We deny thelr right to pare any euch teav mon: ‘The General Assembly har not the ‘Upon questions of thie sort. It is ibe Aga net that whieh has Dot been spectically decided as evil, ether tn the book iteelf or by regu ar process of jadictal decision. They can woar ‘no other testimonies, therefore, than such as a ypertain to crime or heresy, or whatever else you may ca | thom, ant only with these whes epecifically mentione!. In thie state of things we would be on eafe ground, bat o herwise we ss on dangerous ground. Moxmsox, of Missouri, exld—Rxpunge from law the principle em>odfed im that resola be you at onoe, in his hambie jaigmoent lay the von, Churoh, aa far as your inf sence gore, open 19 wi tho mis: extra bey chief of exocarive legislation, i enpaconnen 4 to all we evils and all the envy and evepicions post ble tolls us to guard against. It reemod to him that that was the very last thing of all which the com alte bw reported which you ough} to relingaish Rev. Mr, Martin of Tennesree, agreed with the gontio- man in the views which be had just otpromed. He hoped the Convention would adopt the resolution as roportod. Al thie stage of the discussion, the Rev Mr. Rean, from the committee appointed Jo cond act the religious exorcisos, reported the names of ministers, the time aod the charchos ‘n the city, where services would take place to morrow, (Sunday. ) The :jaeet'on then recurred on the motion of Mr. Rogan, © Postpone ‘odedinitely, and it was rejeoved. ne qatetion then was pos the amendment offered by Mr. Mclean, te introduce after the word ‘“wpecifoally,’” ia ‘the vecond resolution, the words oo Mr. Molean wihorew the a. Mr. Fiaronm moved to amend it by striking sat (ho worls sapecitenty Feferred to,"’ and insorting the worl Op motion of Mr. Ona® B. Wortiame, the amend Ia'd upon the table Set eee es The original resolution was then adoptet win third resolution, Which rewis a# follows, was also Resolved, That the General Assembly of the Prashypterian ehnreh bar bo power tn pronounce ® wentenon of solomon ton 01 & lower judiestor® or individoale for aay oxy ~~, uo Jone they have been Droueht before the Assembly in the way prescribed by the conati tum. "The foursh resolution was next takon ap. thos Ts reads Recolved, That the Convention recommend t ail the Pree Dy téries im the Presbyterian clmrck Which are opp 2ed to tke aetintion of in the highest jucioatory of the churoh, to sprornt deley Jp tae proportion prassrthed by our form of re As verpment for the apprinimant of Commissioners gy pate Knaaville Sean . on ibe third Ly ee OE ae: or (bh purpose anizing s General oyna ice hename g! “Tue Uriwed. is ee Mynod of the Prosbyte- jan Choreh of the United States of America’ Dr. Laacu moved to strike oat all after 1853," and insert + for tne pergran of orgautsing the General Assembly of the Presbyterien couroh Suth.’’ L, sald he made the motion with bis vier, We act 46 coustituvional Presbyto:taus, taking the book as it stands ‘or our constivotion, and if we name the suprem coastita- twa! juticatory, “toe Uatted Staes Synod of 4 * eriap Cburch of the Uvited states of A sertea,’”” ec ntempt upon all our pretences to tee claim of constita- icpal Presbyterians, at loass tp tae pining of the vast ma- jority ofthe other churches. We look to the Goneral As sembly of the Presbyterien church in this country as the \rue representative of Preebyteriansm, and o¢ was, there: fore, ip favor of preserving tt in all its invegrity. Hi 1d 10 2Omplioating It, even to the exwat o/ its title, by Northern affilation (t was by avoidieg all such things hat ite bizh oousitiutomal charaoser could be preserved, Bud {ta action bo free from any doubts or suspicions. Dr. Boyp sala f he upderswod the poerd to strike on} all after 1687, for be words ‘‘for the purpose of organizing the Gsnersl A-eembly of the Presbyteriaa “burc1 South’? He would b-erve, as might very well be anticipated, there war coosiderable diversity of opinion as to the name tat ehould be applied to thie new organtsatien. Ho was Wo say that there was almost a+ muva diversity of 0 jniou B thls polntss ibere were members in the commitiea, sud, as might be said, this was oct at all surprising ia the proviiar circumstances in which we are plac.d some proposed to cail ths body “the Presbyterian assembly ’” not the Genera) A-sembly of the Bresbyterian Charch in be United States. And then i$ was proposed to oall it ‘the Gepersl Assembiy of the Presbyterian Chirch South’’—the amendment just offered. Tho commiites, afior duly deliveraung upon thie maiter, came to the conolarion u ly,as far as be could revoliect, to adort we obrase contained in the resolution. There were objsotiony the other aucndments, which, in the estimativa of the membe a0’ the comm ties, were valid. As to the name “General Assembly of the Presoyterian Cauroh,’”’ whish was propesea for adoption by the commitice, It wes a t that while the name would be apygropriate, yo: in _semeoh as there were two other bedies which were called “‘the General Assombly of the Preebyterian chursh,’” is wae important that a di should be kopt up in order that we may be correctly designated, ani tai the commoanity might know who we were. Then, as to tne ether amendment proposing to call this body ‘the Gan eral Assembly of the Vresbytorian Charo Soath,” to ‘same Dow proposed, there were unanswerable objections ‘o that tn the minds of the bi on the committee. ee ee be een ee to any such do- sigeation as that. He uid deeply regret the rgarization of a Sou'hern charch now, at least, Thes was the last resort. If there was ony ab- solute nese tity for it—I¢ tt was impossible for us to or. gantze regularly a body which might not bs national {n its oh sracter, there might be some propriety in the organizs- ton of a }urely Southern church. But we do not desire to O-ganize a seciional cherch in any shapeorform. He Ould well ucderstand thst we might be placed ta cirsam- @an oe whica would render gucd @ caurse absolutely ne- but unser existing olrcamstences there was not test peccesity for any such organization as ths. hw beloved that the name — the ce cures thougtt proper to give to this boly, overlooking eatirel the idea that !tisto be purely @ sectional orgeaization, ould \eli powerfally on the country at large. Ashe understood, @ vast number of this Convention and those whom thoy represented are traly nations! in character aud feeling. It ta not thoir desire to have anything bd artog the designation of a sectional orgavization. He beleved if thev wre to organise # seciional churc with- out apy nevessi'y for doing #0, there would be serious 0b- jections advanced against {t, cn the ground that tne ten dency of auch ap organization would be to rent the Union to pieces. Bat when we as a Convention, and the Geaoral 8) nod to mert at Knoxville, if so agread upon, 628.1 adoot ‘the platiorm which we bere lay do odlal@ to the worid that we propose to organise ¥ to be com: posed of eldert ministers from ali parts of the Ucior we can rtand on bast platform and no oher. Tnen, o if there should not be a single man from the North, ora single P. eeby’ery from the North in our midst, we wout neverthel and befwe the country and the world as na'ional assembly, 80 far as our priccipies are 002 erned, and you are to jadge of a body from thom and not from {ts actual practical resulis. If it should none of our brethren from the North w mid jin this body, the responribility will rest upon thom and not apon the Convention, He would it to the world that we desire all who to come and stand with us upon this pla\fora. '@ go bo- fore the world not as sectional mea, but as true national mep, as true constitutinal men—he meant as to the con- cast any imputation upon our Methodist who Dave organised ® distinct church, cumstances were different. He believed there cortataly pposed, whi body mi be called, to placieg it upon any platform the covniry will regard as ly Southern, and not of a character t> embrace within it brethren from every sec- tion of this country, Rey. E. Mt. RICHARDSON, Of Mississippl, said he agrood fully witn Dr. Boyd. if an has us i te oar adberence to the coostitation, and we have this day fully eatablished ourselves upon a constitutional He moved to amend Or. Leach’s amendment, by adding the word “‘constitutional,’’ so as to make the ameodment read ‘the Courtitutional General Assembly of the Preaby- terian Church gouth ' Mr. Cuas B Wiissawe, of Richmond, moved that jhe ‘vote be Orst iaken on striking out the part of the reso lu tion referred to in the motion made by Dr Loesch. Jonx Raspotra Tooxmr, Eeq., Attorney General fer the State of Virginia. seid if sme motion of Mr. Williams was to be regarded as the test vote upon this question, ne did net know that @ better opportunity would be allorded him upon the subject than was now offered, When the resolutions proposed by the committee were first read, his cars caught the aigrifcance which might be given to the terms of this particular rosolation, to which ¢ confessed bimecif utterly opposed. He was a young and inexperienced member and no wiood there for the first time in his Ii re\bren of the charch in conventional body. He attended a charch judicatory, which was tne largest judicatory be ever at tended, but for the first time he was now participsing ia the proceedings of Convention of this characer. Taero were gentiomen prosent whove age showed thai they had belonged in former days to that branch of the Pretbyte riap charch kr own as the (id Sooo! Presbyterian oburch. He could not ray that he was united wth thet body; his fret conpection was with the ww School branch of that church. Ai! the Chris jas sympathies whics be had ever expended, all the Ubristian la xors which he hed ever ron- dered—and they were very littie—had been rendered in (hat denominaiion. In the providence of Gol we bare reached ® critical state of thiags, both in chursh aad Mate. The times are rife with com motion and distarba toes; the Union groats beneath the tread of this slavery agita- ton, He was reminded more and more of toe simost sepolcbral toes of the dying stalesman of South Carolina, ia a private conversstion with bim about two weeks before nie dewth—‘'the cords that are binding us to the Union are snap ving asunder.” Whether we sbai) take any partin this great movement, which must be favorable to @ onatinaance of the political ae weil at to the eccvsiattical union of there sales, ise question wh ch he regarde1 at involved in the resolatira Bow proposed. de wished that this duty, whicd devolved upon bim, bad passed to somebody cise. He should, however, ditchargo it with all the zos) and ability st his commend, ani | order to do #) he should bospesk from the Conventioe @ carefo! consideration of the riows which be —_ present. The interpretation put apon the reso- jution by bie friend Dr. Boyd bad not diepelied the dowdte which erisen in his m) ‘What ie that rosolation? It is that commissioners are to moot at Kaoxvilie, Tennessee, on the third Thursday in May, 1868. For what parpose? For the purposo, distinctly avowed and advocated, of organising a new, fixed, qaolc rity be “tae General 4ynod of the permanent or- Pres yverian chareh in the United Sates.’ He had no jealousy about the word “South,” although be should vote to strike it out of the amendment of bis friend Dr Leash. He hed no jeelousy about the South. If Northern men wil! Gnd that he Southern platform {s rigb\ and proper, let nem come ‘and stand upon it, He should say nothing in rogard to the constitutional righta which belong to bim in tois coaniry Or t© bim a8 @ member of the Presbyterian coarch. Bat & purpose fas indicated, was intisted upon, «x! a purpree with a name. His friend, Dr. Boyd, ead he did not care Jy A the name. fis did noteither, but be od at the name in this oon section as indicating the ob ject. He would speak what be knew when he stated that ‘here were many in this body who, if there could be an honorable, cordial union between the id gohool charch of the country aod the New Sonrol, would hoarily respond to it; and he would 7, “Amen, anon |" fi he bottom of hit soul, He would ask if they were going to give w name tos thing that might perish in six months? Dr. Boyb (interra —The quesiion before this body ls not whether we or a distinct body, That ‘eto Come up afterwards. His remarks wore intended to be — exclustvety to the name. As to the other point, he shcold have something to say rogarding it. Mr, Tocxmm said—He understood the gentioman per. ’ res wet ty fogged not hare design mitter, and he renen tod fr m the remarka of hia friend ((r, Boyd) a walt aot de a ea ed a Of the committes wo upon this United of the Pree. byterian church to the United States of America, being § body as eternal a the Convention of which we are mom vera. What, then, is the purpose of the committee? [s it the purpese of the committee to got this Convention to commit ftself to enlarging and deepening the calf be. ‘tween us and the members of the 01d echo! Presbyterian church #0 as to render itimpareabie? If that oe the pose—and be could not condsive any o'her—he would tell lemen that he was utterly opposed ty the pr: from Ube begianing to ube end would mak th of \hat honorable body to the views wien prem themecl res open ind with reference to this matter. Is \t right to maintain a permanont disanion with tho other branch of the church’ [a it right, om the other hand, and asa re verse ition, to bring about an honorable union with the 0 branch of the cburch? the speaker was here invited to take hie #tand opon the platform in order that the gadience may have « of hearing him. It was ® vory unfa rorable ge for the reporter, the back of the speaker being now almost constantly towards him, leaving him at a decided disadvantage, #0 far as hearing was covcerned. Gentlemen should consider that their speeches cannot be roportes unless they are beard; and they should therefore bave some consideration for the roportor in selecting their PUD 5 Mr. TrOKER, resuming—He. was proceeding 10 consifer the rightness of this thing, and he supposed that tn all thinge evclortartion! tho fret thing to know {s that wo are right. He hold that the ultimate end of the church war- fere t* the onity of the church He apoke of Onrisi\anity as rrity; be spoke of the devil ax schism. If this was the case, let us look at tt im another potet of view. Accordiug to the tre language of the Divine Had of the Church, the unity of the church is the argument for tbe conversion «f tho world. He would say that the sin st icken world waits in {a- credulit; for the anity of the Covietian chareh. He woull lose bis arm before he would strike a blow at the apity of the church The mo’e yon divide, as a mere matter of COMMON BEPHE, the leex concentrated is your power, aud conrequently the feehler you besome. Aad this applice pertinentiy to divisions in tne church. If there be ene bead in the cb sreb, lei us all be one through that head. Ho knew that tho answer was important. He kocw the anawer that wonld be suggested by bia freind, Dr. Boyd — that, {pn the providence of Got, mu xb good has grown out of civisions He did not mean to sey that good would cone out of unity in the churen under ll circumstances. He did not kaw that #» much good would coms-—if be would bo rermitted to ure « vulgar phrase—from hite ing together an ox aud s0ree. Now, the ground thas he assumed was this:—In ope of tho resolutions, which we bave not yol reached. out witch I sball repeat, it is recommended “tha: the members of this Touvention adhore to and abide by the Sooferaton of Faith of the Presbyterian cha ch, as coniaining the system of docirine taught in the Holy Sor!piures, and toat we atbere to the form of government and book f digolpiine of maid oharch.’’ Is not this a common platform upon which the Old School body and we may stand? His frien to the teft Dr. Boyd, who shook nis head) negatives bis question fthat be the basis upon which tne Old School and we stand, he wanted to know, if the unity of the charch was in Iteeif costrabie, why, {nm the name of common senve— why, in the name of }—should we not come to 1% agreed upon certain uated resolutions which were passed in the year 1837 apd which uced the origiva) convulsion ip the Presbyterian . Now he desired te be dis tinotly understood upon the record. He agreed with the gentleman who sat before him, (Dr. Newton, of Miss ,) {Sat we aoghtto berstrish consraososist, "ered he bose which adosted there resolutions in 1857. he would mest certainly bare o»posed them to the last ex trenaiiy and were he to adjudicate upon them he would heve declared them unc nstiutiona!. Is tne quarrel never to crase? Is the sore neve: to ir 6 breach: never to be mended? Is there to bs n0 abatement of the strife? When two sets of mon agree upon fundemental principles of ,overoment are they to be kept asunder for togs of ow ohure! me, ens le the shoe They did ore to Virginia, Bot she said we are all friends here together —we will take the part of an inoffensive and perse- cuted neighbor—we will join bands with Msssachusetts— ard she did take the part of Massachusetts—and in the struggle that now stands out in bold relief before this coustry what hes she got? Precisely what bis New Schooi brethren got fom those whose cause they advocated. We it our fingers into the fire for the Western Synod andthe 3ynod of New York. And now we have acted in this way upon & mere abstraction, so far an we are concerned, but from symostbizing with our brethren im the Western Synod of New York we are to bo iold, according to the language of cur own resolutions, here reported by your committee, that we are keeping up the quarrelar¢ irend fo continue it He believed that the only: itication that we have ever insisted upon or tes. could have been urged in favor of our Old School breth- in 1837, was that the action of that period was revolationary, That is the worst that can be said for an unconstivational act Now, let as look at our pre- sent position. His friend from Philadelphia (Mr. Shilling- ford) and his venerable friend (Ir. Conver i¢) seom to be afraid that they may be classed with the revolatioulsts He would teil that they were engaged in the best of revolutions to-day, Rignteous revolution is @ glory to res not ‘upon success to give it today? Recommending tion.”” We aro doing to-day whai the Old School cburch aid to 1881. the very persons thatthe recsss at this stage until four or P M., the hour of two, previously determine’ upon aa thé hour of adjournment for dinner, haring arrived. EVENING SEBSION. ‘The Convention re-assembied ai the appoinied hour. AB apppre| hymn was sing, when Mr. Tvckxn, who was entitled to the floor, resumed his tace on tne platform CB ys with bis address ie eld, when tbe Com adjouned be had urged that the meeting of a permanent organizauon on the part of the Southern Preabyteries was not only against the es ential principles of cliristianity, but was not right. Ho aticmpted to show—with what success he could no! de cide—that the great objection urged to a union between the two churches arteing from a aiiferenos between thom upon the acta of 1837, had ceased to oxist—that |) bad conned to be & practical question, bocagro the acts of that Con rention, who\he’ by revolniionary action or I tive action, are perfectly m ved as far aa tl of the difficulty is concerned; that this Convention dope what the General Assembly of 1437 lad done, an- constitutionally as you belleve; that we therefore agree, se far nw the practical effect of the resolutions are concerned, the same point. Now, he ‘would assert, In connection withjthat, that whore there is no difference of doctrine, or in form of government, aa | be ineited upon the basis of the resolutions ado xed this morning, there is not—be ¢idn’t know—there may be some gentleman present who coald sce further \ato a mill. tone {han be on the outside sould. He would repeat that, a2 there was po ‘iflerense upon these pointe betwoon the fo churches, there could be no objection to the proposed Gentlemen may differ abect shades of doctrine, bat we all Calvaniets, and therefore there can be no mato: jal differences between the to denominations at the i SS 1 » Ho not mean to discourage ren. If wo ostabliah this organization we m means. Yon all know, as a mattor of common that the missionary fand derivable from the South is portionstely & smal! one when compared with that de rived from the Nort. Now, you must have moans to establish your s*minaries to each your preachers who are to upply your poipita; you must either do this, or you mast send your young men to those whom you have to- exscinded to be educated—be meant to the new tol seminarics at the North—to learn @ little ematter of abolitioniam; or you must depend upon the old fominaries, with whom you refuse to coalesce, He would eay, you must either depend apon the old ecnool peminaries oF uj the new, whom you have repudiated today, or you must establish seminaries of your own. Now, he wanted to know whether thie dificuity will be intreased or diminished by roason of the consideration that there will boa large body of men in the fouth who may be disposed to come into our organization if It stood upon rer ae far an woalih and powor are con- corned, but who will not be tempted to come under a con state of affairs. Why, the very iret I that te fo to them is an appeal to the pocket nerve. This was by no means tempting to the outside world. And if a great many that have feeble organizationy'are get up, it requires: ‘a large amount of mears to uphold them in compsution with a wealthy organization, Hofthought, thereforo, that it would be obviour to every member of the Osnvention that the fact of eetabliehing ® permanent organization upon the basis proposed by the comm ties would 90 to prosant the new schol body of the South aa a amsll body, with Hittle power to attract, In com, to a large body with great posers of attraction. If there was @ material dif rence be'ween these two charshes a1 regarded the form of government you Might appeal to 8 man tpon the basis | Of difference to joln your organization. Bat he. witl my, | “When I jotn this organization | will have to contrivate largely to ite rapport; and thie I onm avold by joining ano- | the? holding the same doctrines and buted apon the #amne | priscipies of government with the additional advantage | of wealth and power, which will obviate the seorearey of taxing me for Its support’ He know there was anothor | objection which would be raised at once as botwoen the two churches. Fils friend Dr, Boyd, thie morning, with ‘that ty which i@ pooullar to him, and which would adapt him moet admiracly 0 the profession he (Mr. Tucker) belonged to, hed ineisted that the orgenize- tion which he propoeet here is not a sectional organize. | tion; that he would not it showld be @ socsional ‘orgeuiaation, tbat the piakform whion ia laid dows ws auit- | tre Ag? | men, Thay eny honeetly, it ie 8 sin to hol ‘WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1857. ed for Northorn as weil as Souttern wen. That might, tought to beso. What is true bere is trac in the North, and ali men in the Norh ° from where tt may. When our ministry that attended the les: Clevelanc Gon rembly be was dispoved to thiak it #ns a xeot! anal orgeniza Won. He would to say that this organization, {t was ob rious, was @ sectional organization, Atboagh bis friend, Dr. Leach, proposed to dub itso, it was bardly necessary’, for it was substenilally seciiona), for the reason already mou- tlozed. Why, who are you™ Ie theron Prebytory {ron North of davon and Dixon’s Nuc? Isthare a caarch rep resented “orth of Mason and Dixon’s jine, except a cburch in Delaware?—and sho is but nominally a slave holding state, Hie venerable frient, Dr. Converse, is here, reprosenting no po ver in the North whatever, #0 thet bere js an organization, the whole representative power of which will bein tho bands of the Southern por- tion ofthe church. Now, he would say that, as between ‘an organization that is sectional {a {ts essen'ial » ‘and one which Ie, according to ‘be plraso of the day, a us tional organization, there {s «0 strong @ teaiency om the t of the latter to do all that way be done to preserve this Loy under which we have lived for 60 lo g a time, ‘aud from which we derived so much power~ ‘as between the two, he would be pre-eminently in favor of the natioral orgepizeucn. He knew that there would be gentlemen whe would suswer this objection, by tp look at the North and reo her trossouable actions. ‘bad no besite- e'membera ogo in the jurch, t> Convert the world; ws ; e never know that its power woul’ be diminished by vin more Chrisians in it By diaunion you iE i power tego a - itd strongth ou sccomp mt 7 here Forerred to the state of tho churio in would say—unquestionab:’ how he cyphered it out, say he did not know what scheme would be em! order to acoompHeh this. He knew this, that if the ohurca- men think rigbt about # question of to their differences, each in honor preferring its diatinetive , bus yielding, for the sake of religion, ES and barmony, @ union mast follow without’ difficulty. The subiimity of ths elevation ofthat bumility that caa in honor prefer to remain dis tinct, and yet submit for the saxe of religion, is grand, indeed, Can gentlemen stand upon of honor in walters sppertain'ng purely to the welfare of a Christian church? He would sa», that to advance ths cause of Christ we st bew our heads and yield in hamility. Why, gentleman are ge'ting as pucc! ioas in matters of honor a Haman (ihe reporter thinks } Now, what is {t tbat divides these two churches? If you come down to the cavse which divides them you will find that it is tn- tolerance of difference cf opinion. He was reminded here of aremark of Jr. Franklin on the last day of the great federal convention of 1877. There were some of tue doie- from the Siate of Virginis who were refusing 0 tign the copstitution because it did pot suit them ia all respects. Dr. Franklin, 80 colebrated for bis wis- dom avd good humor, got up and sald, that it reminded bim of an old Freach lady, who remarked to her slawr, “Sister, I don’t know how itis, but I never met with anybody who was right, except’’—| "po balance of tho sentence was inandiole to the ter} You must get rid of that—you must give tolerance to oiiference of op:nion. {He bere qu. ted some ecriptural passages bearing upon this argu went of toleration of opinion. j Have you ever poticed it,as an cemen| in human ns- tare, that when a man does ap ipjury to another he seeks wo — bie, spd be misrepresents him, of n, in order to Bud s jostificaiion for the wrong. this is the ‘pride of the human heart. Now let thero be no Pharisoes in this matter. Let there be noue of this standing apart aud fcld ing of atme, and raying, ‘I am the stronger and larger body, and you must come over to me; I cannot go over to pi Wel, gentlemen, if you cannot come er In way, meet in the middie, as be (Mr 3 ha jueet- ly teen tried on the Coort green end eleew! A have all seen it tried when wewere boys. Mr. Tucker closed with « few other forcible remarks \o reference to this plan of union be wees the churches. Dr. H. A. Ros, of Tennessee, after a fow prelimi re- marks, said bad been bul one argument of any great weight advanced, showiog why we should now unite, ‘and that bas been chat of the strength and wealth of the 5 5 é 4 B e H eo any more rigbt over bis siave. He the Bible proof (hat Got regards the relation tru ? Here it ts, 8i Cleveland, and which we engrafted paper’, altbongb not upon this, £0 clear rerolutions), He would ould vow ti. : g : 3 zis iin e z H 4 EE =F FS was (bere and not afraid to talk, and to defy the world bid the eame detlanoe iu Cleveland, aud z E a ee i 3 i Ege idk 1» aye, addresses you, when be oonsen ed to advocate ern side of the question agalust any one they mi to put forward. What was bis position? It ihe ronnie, to the slave and" tho commas % slave 1 comm #0 he chooses’ to continu {t. It may bave evils, cy lowg as God chooses to continue it, it is aerest benett, He regarded the maswr as the ro) ve of Godin « Brest © ork of benevelence—te represent degrased aed lift him up as be can be give bim all the revelations of Christianity that E i ack E ul Now, wbloh of these opinions can Peace to the th, the Nortn, the Union, she world? Dr. R. concluded with @ few othor remarks, aad them a pereces adjourned until 9 o’ciock A. M. ADYEBTISEMENTS RENEWED BYKRY BAR. REEDOM.—JULIBT — - MY PARTY INTEND us evening, if plearant Onn we have the picasare Hous 'o wi aadrese af Harald oflos ta Talure ; ~ same for Inet. i ‘who can ecrn by applying at 622 Greeawich room J, ME. JOHN B QUIRK, JR., HAPPENS TO SEE advertisement, be will confr af vor by sendi dreae io ‘amea G Reld, Jr., Herald ofice, New Wort FAMERS. 6.0868, W O LATELY BEXIDED IN Broadway, wil vend ber present address 'o Mr. Feater, 15 Sucel. she will hear of something advantage. NFORMATION WANTED OF PETER BROWN, Anat F} yno'ds, ’ ot suler (Hoonsarty, Ireiand: gay in ormation Dim will be tasnkfully received by brother. « dreas a note io him at 188 hast Twenty icond street, be tween First and se-on: avi pu’ @. St. Loule prper pl-ase copy. OOKKEEPING, ARITHMETIC AND WRITING ARB very favorable terme by W.3 R@NVIULE, 362 Broadway. The ‘na'ruction ta separaly imparted, tho- rough, and readily available op practice. His rooms are opem day and evening. OUDERT LYCBUM, NO. 96 AT. MaARK'S Lp} aw York.— ‘Koriiad Erasich, ‘commercial and clacal- cal boarding and day ecnool tor ou Moncey 4a Bepember, Sirens can e chiaiwed Siow sour and ai \ne office of Mesars Brothers, sum at law, Nos. 89 and 41 Ana str F B. MAUBION, Principal. ¥ and term opens September '3 Gentlemen tm music, pi and jon Blo rooms, The . A. FLACK, a. “ Principal NETRUOTION.—MO¥S LEOPULD DE GRAND-V 3178 French Poardiag sc 001, Hudeon terrace, Hoboken, N. J. &olassicsl ané commercial In-tiutien t# now open for the rerep'ion of pupi's. « trculars at Ao. 6 Broad street, Rxoslser Ipsurinee \ ompasy's office. DMR MAKERWS BOARDING AND Vax re On Mon’ ay, - seventh street ‘between Fitts and fixts Sveanee. Wo RS. MACAU" AY'S FRENCH AND RBXGLISH BOARD. f ) XK 4) —) al eeepebeimemedteetatales : : ae im the world. Money! What 7, nothing as ‘with those great principles o which that chursh bas Toaintained® lieelf’ and waich If Ml tricm against iw adversaries it must hold inviolate. Whatis money com- ed with the holding of these iples in thetr full ta- ity? Weare not weak, and we are not wo unite with the Ola School. Before we do #0 mut a 't for the execind ng act of 1837; but for himeeif how be satisied with a Umited—a very | repentance. (Lavgbter ) why? Because he that act was Lynch law, and be sometimes in faror of Lynch law. (Lang! pposed he him, (iacgbter,) that is, that they bad been ty be don’t apologise. oa so thick for rethren repent or Bot, we ought to be satisfied. (Lacghier,) He would treat them a:they themselves treated # certain man in North Carolina, named McQueen. He married his wife's He thoug! twenty years, whether oor Ole S2bo \! decivion. "They jed tho man if he would not repent; that he to do, and he keld on to bis wife. After they thrasbed him and Uhrasbed bim for four years, 3! roatored him. (Loud langhter ould pay that if he bad nothing | from ais o ool brethren than the thrashing which we adminis ed to tl ‘ing the last twenty years, he would ro- ho waited with the od soboo!, pret his own confession of 1 not be very hard with them Stonement, why, ia the oldew \s instance, the examination question. This great barrier to him. What was that rule? Why, tien Thats the whole of NThoy said we wan to Pon 5 whole 4, We want to for them ss much as we can. feet pl hon win tore and trey wont |t with « perfect rosh, and they succeoded admirably In catching the unwary among our brethren. I! there wae any need for that rale at frst, there is none Bow, and be wocld say, with Kindness and respeci, and wiih all proper affection for his old echeo! breth: is is now wnworthy of that groat aad noble church to have thatrole, Whatiel? Why, toe ey ite e of ciple expreasiy ided for in the book. Somes trotted cores the door, who, with the soul of ap charge. wonid call a rule and not bave them mpracti Sul the uae reason Sie a8 Sew guteg Site We Gne Cunees church—and the reagon to his mind worth ali the balanco— ‘8 this:—That our Old School brethren are not ready lo take as yot, on acoonnt of our position in regard to siave ry. That is worth ali the balance. And it is especially #9 in view of the fact that Most adopt our views of nie . He bad nothing to eay offensive towards our Old Echoo! brethren; but Would be bound to adopt our views on Seve? Why? Beoanto it is the only position which will or can give peace to the South— to the North-to the Union—to the world, He wae no! osing at all insulting, He never retracted what raid in debate, for he food arore from his excitement. They murt our view on slavery, because it is the only question can fire peace to Une South, te the North, to the Union snd the world; for the wholo world {s' intovestod in tate qnention. We mast no longor banish this mbject from our thoughts by looking up to the statue of liberty, singin “Tail Columbia’ and ‘Yankee Doodle.” (Laughior Ho would take ooension to thank Mr Fitzbagh, of Virginia, for writing an article in tho Inst numbor of De Bow's Re’ view, which is worth all tho numbers of that work that might be lanued for five yours. He snows that it was the Bible alone that gave us the trae idea of human reaton, and the Bibie sustains the great views of the worll upon the slavery question—thofsin jtheory of slavery, whien is the theory of the abolition men in the North, and one which im all probability they honestly entertain. Ite would were far more honest than your conservative ala 10 into the relations at once. They hold that cernal righ bide & man to own thoory is based upon th Bible does not reeoguise this princt ple of “ eternal right ' At all, but declares that all right ts {n with the will of God, and all wro non conformity with hie will. The second theory is, thet the relation of master and slave Is not rin im itecif, but It ie a najural evil, never spproved of God, aed only toleraled of God. That is led the conservative theary, which prevails (n ali the South, and which now te the theory of the Philadephia conservative mon, It is not held in the North among this Claes to be a pin In Mteoif, Dot that it Isa pataral evil, never approved of God, and that wo should, if ® proper time should offer, relieve ourselves of (t consistently with oar DAME MARTINETS FRBNCH AND ENG! boar ‘and day school for ladioa, No, 82 ‘wenty fret # betwees Fifth and avenues, will re- open om Tueeday, Feptember 15 BASRS. LBSPINASSE & DK LASALL| Ty Ee Ee pear ven a two Brgiiehmen Po extra "for. modern, SfeePenaahieal n't Opeaes Sete York. ROKEN BANK MONBY.—WARREN COUNTY, PRM hoy Mi fae 1a Royalton, ar all other biuis of broken, closed or fal Danks bought br At highest oagh rates; Slate and — foney at the youn! ieee. JOON his “o3 Broadway, a tow doors shove Orne 4 sireat, VWEVELAND AND ) RalLROAD OOM [fe ‘The interest warrants on the Ist of ber, will be paid at ibe cotton of pe omens in Ulevelan New Yorn, Anguat $i, 1867. oes oe Compsy, corner seats, Now York, Sept 1. 10s? —Divideod. Direeicra of this compasy have thia day declared Anpaal cividend of ten peoms fevay ogee INTER A) TIPROV EERE BORDA lerest soupons on inierne ens) dye heplember ihe Fiare of Lie pelt at the Bank of ey yablne, im thie c.g. 2 BR. MORTOR, CALVIN W. THOMAS, J. J. BR. MORTON & »). Backing, exchenge an collection Ie erent Putra Haying corre: the Weet favored’ street. Olncinrat!, OMe, in ‘be principal sities and towne of led to mane colleclons om the ntor advice at eux jersey Money, ROPORALS LJ