The New York Herald Newspaper, April 30, 1857, Page 3

96,962,401 944,000 <8 i z ze i f xt §, PEER 2 / = ii i Hi se 8 ‘ i 5 i i | Bg at tee Soar ico Who were arrewied at Long at ferry. asa ‘Browght to that city on .the Bist ult., from whence they ‘were sent the next day to Bangor, have been exeouted by place. The circumstances, as near as rained, wera as follows :—it will be re- were accused of shooting and rob! i Li g a They had been examined and im oharge of the Con- sent for. On Thursday the hours of two and four the four, succeeded in with- bandcvifs, after which he themselves of yhe jearp—and Uae i ! i ! = = t | g & Z| j : 3 i j if 3 g E rE id = t 8 Ls : il Marriages, Births and Deaths. Jn Oregon City, Feb 23, Me aries, Albright to Mrs. Cymahie Albright Peps Bwsurmsorr—Mooxy.—At Mokelumne Hill, March 24, Me. A. C. Beritzhoff to Miss Martha Moony, of San Fran” —In March 22, Mr. Frank . Sere he Phase Josoes Expoo to Mi Margaret Kinsey, of Boston ocanty, ‘Canaria —Coxrxn.—At Wi Terr tary, March 2, Mr, Willem Campbell Yo Mrs, Phobe MW. ‘Ciaue—Hiury.—At San Francisco, March 20, by Rav. & lacy, Mr. Seymour B. Clark © Mics Julla G. Healy, fem the steamer John L. y Torre —In Shhsta, March 16, by Judge ‘MBekley, Mr. Samuel J. Chittenden, of New York, to Misi ‘There a Tuite, daughter of the late Francis Tuite, Req., of vec K-—At Red Diu, March 16, Mr. M. ©. Davis . Burk. Dxsayve—W Mot.—At Red Bluff, Mr. Ovo Deising to Mra. Garoline Wilmot. ‘Drxox—Maxwet1.—In San Franckoo, March 23, by Boswell Max- Rev. B. Brierly, Mr. Clement Dixon to Miss ‘well, all of that city. Mavk.—-At Voleano, March 18, Mr. Wm. H. Bowning, of Jackson, to Miss Frances A. Mauk, Froaan—Biicx.—At Cache Creek, Yolo county, Mr. ee, W. Freeman to Mies Mary E. Black. » Feb. 18, Mr. George BovEn—Parrick. MiseAwabella A, Bs a ede omg se 0. T. . J. W. P. Huntington to Miss Al ‘1vkY.—In San Jose, Fons 19, Lg, i” oa vee Be we, a sar x Charles Bro "29 yoars,.a native cf Maryland” aa |, 0. T., Feb. 26, Branchs Buli- Csi to tam Franciooo, March 2?, ef consumption, Sarah Coben, ee ema e sere of f ‘Cunay.—At Bap Luis Rey, March’?, Jabo Curry, of Now about 25 years. (oma Make 21, of consumption, Wiliam Dowe, aged 26 pears ana & ‘months. Faepenice —Iv: Polk Jan, 20, . or coumy, Oregon, Jan, 20, James M. pm San Franciece, Mareb 31, of sore thi Teenk Reon, a native S Angus, Me., aged 6 years ‘Gmanom—In San Fronciece, March 22, to the Sist year of his age, Arnaud Etienne Girardin, ef Bayonne, France. Jvuan.—In Marysville, March 2, Philip 8. Jutian, for- ears. merly of Lancaster, Obio, aged 28 Kime.—In San devo, March 16, of “connmptian, Mr. Roland King, @ native ef Allen ooumty, Ky., agod 40 years, Mackay.—In Horretown, Shasta eonaty, March 18, Mr. Hugh Mackay, a native of Hainburg, ‘Bootland, in the 33d year age. * Daniel MoMlillon aged 16 tomcat? Shh, v8 re n ; Moxrox.—In Bacramento, March 26, Stafford P, Mortan, aged 26 years. PRNDLETON.—At Baker’s Prairie, Marien county, Jan, 23, Champrey Pendleton, aged 44 yoars. In Ban Feandisco, April 1, of consumption, Geo. A. Pirrie, aged 84 years. Rickerm.—At Kerne River, March 4, of pneumonia and dropsy, Ekier J. T. Ricketts, tn-the 64th year of his age, Rowxk1s.—in Ran Francisco, Marc By of wore Auwlene Eliza Foungest child of Cape. R, ‘and Mary E. Roberts, aged 1 year, @ and 3 days, In 1 Z eee ia? of Cant 8. it, a nMyive of New York, 5 4 Rowsxts.—Jn San ed 4 years, i. Frances) March of pore prey Lilian Gray Roberts, daughter of Gapt. MR. and Mary dD yd brain, Mr. Ab: Mloeg,'a mative of Germany, aged 45 years. ‘TorrEy.—At Redwood Sap Matioo county, Wm. G. Torrey, a, native of gua, New York, aged 46 7 Saucy.—In San Franeieeo, March 25, Graco Fmolia Trn- oungest daughter of Frederick P, and Emily Tracy, ba 18 years, "Van..—In Sa Frapeiseo, on Sunday morning, March 29, Ida, only child of Charles "H. and Abida A Vail, aged I year, 7 months and 4 days. Van Pxur.—Lo San Francisco, March 81, 2 Wash- ington, infant son of Captam Bavid and Rachael Van Pelt, aged 1’ month and 9 days. Warrna= In San Francisco, April}, Alfred H. Waters, son of E. D. and E, A, Waters, aged 17 years. Warkrvs.—In San Francisco, on Thurday, April 2, of consumption, Wm. Watkins, @ native of Dubiin, lrekand, aged 85 years. Warraan.—In San Francisoo, on Friday evening, April 3, after a protracted illness, which she bore with great fortitude, Helen Amanda, wife of 8. P. Whitman and daughter of Jonathan Ballou, of R. I. ‘Yount.—In Big Canyon, EI Dorado county, March 20, Crawford W., youngest son of John B. and’ Livenia E Yount, aged 6 years, Review of the Market, {From the'San Francisco Prices Current, April 4.) ‘The past fortnight has been by po means ap active one in business in this city, and the amount of goods sent to the interior bas been mush smalier than was generally ap- ticipated at the sailing of the last steamer. There bas also been a pause in the speculative movements which charac. terized the ht, and the market altogether bas been quiet. At the same time rates generally are weil sustained, and the impression prevails that the ruling duil- pess ie but te » and will ere long give way to a season of considerable activity when the stocks in the in- terior become reduced so far as to force the country mer- chante into the market. It is pot difficult to account for the present state of affairs. ‘The purchases made during the month of March, on specu- lative account, were unusually heavy, and absorbed a large amount of money, ata time when the market was much tighter than usual, Although the then operators are well able to hold on, the stringency which at present pre. vails prevents others from pur lasing from whem a current rates except for 1 requirements, and thus the speculative move mon moment brought to a stand still, The ntry mm with fair stocks on hand, are not disposed to crease their supplies at current rates, thinking probably that the chances of the market are in the’ fuvor, and that delay will prove pro- fitable in the lon: ron. ‘The jobbers, under these cir- cumstances, bol -f'aleo, that the #pecula- tors should carry (0) market, and meet the drain of inte- Test—the more fo as i dhey sold largely 10 tho codutry they would have to give ong, eredits on high cost goo. Thus operations of all are stopped, and although rates aro well maintained but fow sale cotaparatively are effected In our last tseue we ventured the opinion that this condition of aifairs would enste, and stated that the activity we then noticed was mostly’ anticipatory in its character, The result has justified our expectations, aud ‘we may have to wait some weeks before the country’ con sumes the «upplies now in the interior, When this takes place, particularly should the advices from abroad couti- favorable, a period of considerable activity may bo Jooked for, aud’ perhaps a #tul further enhancement of the vaiue of staple goods, Frou amp dvan.wo ae Riana, April, 1807 xD MrAL.—No auies of either reported’ to- The market ts very dail. mad Grim.—No sales of wheat. The market for barley it down; 6,000 bage old at 2e.; 150 bags owls at igo; and 100 bage Mexican corn at private terms. Prov ions. —No sake reported. Grocenms.—Eales of 400 daze Corte Rica coffe; 1,000 mats China rice; and 100 boxes Thain’s adamantine can- dies, all on private terms, Tagvond—100 one eighth carks New York brandy sold EE Jefferson, of Weston county, Mass, w Mise Aun Eliza- Beth Quivey, of San Jose. ‘Kmixy—Mooxs.—In Wassan Valley, Utah Territory, Myareh 3, by Samuel Moore, Eaq., Mr. Rivwell Kelley to Mins joore. McApaw—Focaxty.—Near Benicm, Mr. Peter McAdam — te Mies Ellon Fogarty, both of Susco!. | Moxxis—Biaxirrsax.—In San Francisco, by Rev.8. Levy, ‘Mr. A Morris to Miss Fanny Blanketein. Mvrco—ALack. 14, Mr. Alexander —In Sonora, March Margo to Miss Mary Slack. Moncay—Opex.—In Oregon City, Feb. 5, Mr. Edwin ‘Bergan to Miss Lacretia Oden. Monns—Buavkeverkiy.—At San Francisco, March 18, ‘Mr. C. Morris to Mies F. Blankenstein. ‘Moxw—Levy.—At San Franeisoo, March 22, Mr. Henry ‘Motwe to Mrs. Sarah pay McBrinp—Rarx.—At Volcano, Amador county, March tour. Francis McBride to Miss Mary R. Barr, eNEIn—CLARK.—In San Francico, March 22, by Rov. B. Brierly, Capt, Jobo T. McKenzie, of that city, to Mise Dorinda, nidest daughter of the late Hamuel Ht Clark, Lis—Marerrt.—In San Francisco, Aprit 1, at the re. , of New York city. idence of Hon. G. W. Wrightggy the Ri. Rev. Hiahop Kip, Mr. J. 8. Nichole, of San Fri 0, Mrs. EM. iu, tate of New York. Powwock—Brerow.—In Ban Francisco, on March 18, Rev. 5. H. Willey, Mr. James Polopk, of Benicia, to Mary Anp Frances Brastow, of San Francisco. Proscort— Meu. Francisco, March 2, by Rev. K.P. Cutler, Mr. Edward Prescott, of Charlie: ‘Mam, to Mice MM. Jennie Merrill, #f North Cooway, N. i. ‘Ponuxk—Auan.— At * February ds, Mr. Robert Porler to Mise Emily Agar. W 1.008. Grace church, @orly county, New York, to Miss Frances ‘Wien Wilcox. Rowanr—Mrmom.—At Wood's Ferry, March 92, Mr. Mreakiin Harriet —In San sown, Portiand, Oregun, —In Han Francisco, at 11, by the Rev. Wim. H. Hill, Mr. L. F. Reed, for’ of detlereon to Misa Meoker a "gon —At Newtown, Ed Dorado county, March gle. Adam Rigney Anno " —At San March 29, by Rev. Mahala Fieh, all | = 26, by Rev. ydia A. Wing, w March B. Brierly, Mr. Edward A. Wolcott to Mrs. 1 ah of that city. ‘Wrapox—Dovrow,—10 Buel @eary 7, Mr. James Weidon to Mu Humboldt county, Feb- Ailzabeth Dolton. BIRTH. Amuwa—In Jackzon, Amasor county, March 19, the qife of Mr. Abrams, of a daughter. Cannwrit.—In Los Angeles, Fob. 17, the wife of H. ©. ardwell, of a son. ‘Davm.—In San Francisco, March 16, tho wife of Mr. Max ayy, of a daughter ‘Baay.—In Martinez, March 20, the wife of Michael M. i gan, of a son Gearon —te Humboldt county, Feb. 16, the wife of W. Flisworth, of a daughter be os won beard the ey Alexander, on her paasago from China, the wife of ne y, ofa ried Ainsa.—At Mondocino, sh 18, the wife «f J. F. Hilt, fa y a Me mays , Yolo county, March 23, the ‘wife of Capt. Hodgdon, of & 800. 2, the Hi of a eee deaen ements Dave, Suntel’ tien. 16, tho ee hirer te, Mare iy ee wie Joma Nests “in Dewnierttio, March 8, the wife of Senor sere Vo, bh 6, the wifo of Mr, Boboo eee een re 10, the wife of Mr. ere nn in cammi, Mar she wi Tr r. * ty Er, Shar, Marc 8, wi oy , March 17, the wife of Mr. Is ‘can Winn, of gree ey een valley, ee Francinco, March 16, the wife of Mr e at 660. Wives. —50 baskets ‘ Gloria” ehampazne «old on private terme. ‘OrL.— 100 casse Plagnio! olive sold at $4 60; 500 cases do. “pala tusmemnsan ten, oF ble. sok! at 723K0., 30 days, tand'1,000 gallons on terme not made public. . Conn. |. Senorted sizes Scotch sold on terms ARRIVAL OF THE QUAKER CITY—QUICK PASSAGH FROM MOBILE HON. MR. MORSE AT HAVANA—HUS DEPARTURE FOR NEW ORLEANS—DESERTERS FROM WALKHR'S ARMY—THR SUGAR AND MONEY MAR- KETS—S8LAVE LANDING, ETO, The stoammhip Quaker City, Capt, Shufidt, from Mobile the 221, at 7 P. M., and Havana at 12.90 P.M. on the 25 inst., arrived here yesterday afternoon. ‘The Granada, MoGowan, from Aspitwall, arrived at Ha- vana on the evening of the 24h, Of Cape Hatteras, 28th, 8 A. M., the Quaker City passed & United States eloop-of-war beating tv iue northward. ‘The Quaker City mado the passage from Mobile to Hava na in 4334 hours, apd remained in that port 22 hours. Nothing of tmportance was transplring at Havana. The weather was quite ooul, and the health of the city and country perfect. Mr. Morse, the Commissioner from the United States to New Granada, arrived at Havans from Aspinwall by the steoamahip Granada on the Meh inst, and procested the next morning in the Empire (ity to New Orleans. ‘The Granada had also on board a number of deverters from Walker's army on their way to New Orleans Aclaver was captared near Trinidad. Negroes from the ecast and Coolies from the Bact were arriving on the Island in numbers. The Spanish armada for tho invasion of Mexico had not yet arrived at Havana. Business had been more activethan urual, Sngare havo again advanced, but prices are nominal. Molamwer tho same. Stock of eugar on band, 180,000 boxes. Exchanges improved. London sterling, 60 days right, ‘TM W 8 per cent preminm; New York, 6 por cant discount; New Orleans 1}: to 2 per cent discount. PASSENGERS BY THR QUAKER CITY. Prom Mobliy—Mirs J L Al three children and two ser vante, C Janbert, H Jwood, lady and servant, F J Humpheldt Onab, 8 Gf J: W Coleman, Baler e'F Willams, MA Lite, EA GL ae Pn le ‘A Girard, Mew A tend ot i . and two soma, Mra A Kafford, child wad NA Cally, David Townsend, Meet de Ai wa DD Bergeson—an, Ut MR. MAMURL NICHOLSON, Wo regret to hear of the death of famucl Nicholson, Maq., whidh oceurred in this city, we understand, yestarday,, from ‘an attack of gout in the stomach. Tie war, we learn, ana ive of the North of Ireland, from whance he came t4 this country when young. He wae jong and favorably known a8 @ member Of the house of Brown Brothers & Co., bank tid ba Wane Weenies irm in New Orleans, where ho fo , of friends, who held him’ in the soroen for hls many eminl» and ocial qualines. ? J 3 i ES 4 HERALD, THURSDAY, . ' eT. d BPOY THE POLICE QUESTION. PLE SHERT. the not interfere to. we rely * “GAYEEDRAL, OFF CAFS aoe wenger Governor from making ans but [From tho Panama n could prevent a potice officer from. ap att under an un- ‘Te mie crannies an ative wwe-ef ibe amor | The Decision ef Judge Davies Dissolving law. cap chip tomierars, Enoch Traim & Uo. his Injunction. ir. Evarts doubted Whether the Qoarts had any power ot Born, op br way from the United States to Sap 4 (te interfere with a constable in the mxorcine of bie duties, in ag furnished by Mr. A. R: Gare, inte Mr. Sedgwiek would sathfy him before be ¢°% throuch chief officer of the Ml faied vewel. wha, together wih the with bis yemarks, Coaneel referred to caso: Wo sbow that es ee Ae eee seh as amemeie THE QUO WABRANTO PROCEEDINGS, | the quo wurranto was not a criminal but a civil prooosding. thin chly, frem whenes they will be passed home hy the Bat be would vay here that h wan ls fallacious to 9 Consul government :— ' orn in reference to fa in gamrens # Be Argument en the Applica tom to Diwolve Judge | what was claimed to be the constitutional law of thia coun. i E a 5 : EE <5 I 28s ae E i g = i § Hi = z = a H $5. z i 4: Hs means in my power toright the vessel, and not to jay the mests except asa last resource, I found, , that no other means woukl avail, and ty geve the order © out away the mizen which was done, but without any good mainmast was next cut away, and, a6 the side, it carriod away wxh it tho which wero Iehed the 1 in’s gig anda whale boat. Ast did not pay off, but lay d . setting more and as the: d water. into the "tween the ward 8) ected the nd aitioer forward clear b ch was {uformed the Captain of whatT had gape, I told him. iD. my y pri the vessel would’ go favmind cone apat time, ahd requested him td allow me to have him carried out and and placed on beard the beat: Thies however, he refused, declaring that he would never Wave the ship, and that the boat coukt not live five minutes in sucha sea, then went again on deck, when the third officer informed me that the topsides were open, coal falling out and the water rushing "in, I again went below to the captain, to inform him thet the ship was rapidly settling, and to beg him to go with me, but he re- fused, and as I was endeavoring to prevail upon him tho ship fellover full wpon ber side, and the water immoedi- ately half filled the cabin. The captain then cried out to me, “For God’s sake save yourself,” and a6 I perceived thal the vessel must go down ina very few minutes, and that no time was to be lost, I broke the window out on the weather side of the cabin, and first pushing the doctor (who had remained by the captain til) then) through the window, | followed him myself, and ran ajong on the bilg» of the vessel, outekle her ols, and kaped down upon the side of the forward house, breaking it throngh, and falling in up to my shoukiers. I’ immediately got out, and Jeaping into the water, was picked up and placed in the Doat, which had been floated off the house by the sea, £0 had the vessel gone down in ibe water. Having picked up all whom wo coukl, although, owing to our havi no oars, we were obliged to leave the doctor one man on the wreck, as they wouki not jamp overbeard, and we could not get pear them, we ishoved off,! and had hardly got fifteen yards from the vessel when a tremendous sea struck her, lifted us up, swept us round her stern and covered her at once from our sight. We saw nothing of her aflerward~, except a few pieoes of board and one spar. It was just forty minutes from the time the ship was thrown upon her beam ends until abe disappeared for ever from our sight. When the mainmast carried the four after boats over tho side, all the oars which were oni deck, being lashed inside them, of course went also, and the spare oars were below and of course inaccessible Wo us. ‘Woe therefore found ourselves, thirty six in number, on Doard an open boat with neither oars nor sails. One-half our bumber—the watch which was below at the time of the accidemt—being in the clothes they left their berthe in, and with nothing bat three or four picoes of bation, & pices of the Joom of an oar and a small bit of board w! we Saeko Seanehnneniuntiins <t danibenete Nanya Sees: to wind. During the whole time of the disaster a bark and ship were in sight of us tothe leeward, the bark at the time the E did, and that our only chance would be to put the boat be~ fore the wind and rum down w her. This, after much trouble, we succeeded in doing by making some of the men stand up inthe bows of the boat and upread out their oi! jackets, and after several bours of hard labor in baiting ‘and keeping the boat before the Wind, we rounded to under. Maryport Hayland, Captain Notort “Glastor, Garp, ptain ort ter " bagk ol wpder Brovideuce, fe due our lives, He had hove Yo on seeing our’ diene, ned w wait till daylight and then run over the spot to wee if any one could be picked up, as neither he nor his oiticers ex- Proted tor a moment that any boat could live in such « sem, and owing to the squalls which wero constantly pass. ing, it was impossible for him to see us #o far to wind. ward, though he had a look out at the main topmast, . This, gentlemen, is the full and circumstantial account | of the most lamentable and unforeseen catastrophe which it | has ever been my misfortune to be concerned iu—lamen- | table on account of the low of life which occured, espe. | cially that of the Captain, and unforseen, as no one could | have foreseen or fancied an accident of this description | happening toa vessel so strongly buit abd 40 weil bulk- headed as the Cathedral, 1 send below a fall list of the names of all | those lost and saved, and will forward you on she first op- | portunity a detailed’ account of the ca rtain’s last illness, and other Httle matters here untouched, and have the honor to remain, gentiomen, with the very highest respect, your very obedient servant, ‘ANDREW RICHARD CLARK, Late chief officer of tbe abip Cathed-al. | PS —Woe left at about 3:20 P. M., and arrived on board | the bark at 11:35 P.M, | "We certify that the foregoing account i# trae and exact | im every paticnlar, and bear our testimony to the un. davnted courage and skill of the chief officer ip all his ex. | ertions for the aafety of the shia, both during the captain's {liner and at the time of the wreck. D. J. Cox, 34 officer Recwe R. Heuer, ‘ith officer, Dami. DRAiw®, earpenter, LIST OF LOBT AND SAVED. Wm. H. Howard, Boston, Mast; Dr. 0. W Kirkendal ton, N. J.; stewardess, ‘Ann K. Flaherty, &. Jon, NB; seamen, Danie! Sullivan, Ireland; Benja min Davis, Bristol, England; ordinary seamen, John Gra ham, Gorman Town; boys, Phillip Kooh, Philadelphia, Pa. , Jost in the boat); Samaol’B, Hall, Philadelphia, Pa. ; Jon elany, New York, Total lovt, 9. RAvED-—A. R. Clark, Chiof Officer, Boston, Mase ; Iraao Beet, 24 do., Philadolphia, Pa.; D. J. Cox, at do., do.; Reuben R, Heriot, Boston, Mase. ; Daniel Draine, carpenter, | Philadelphia, Pa.; Wm. Standish, steward, Boeton, Maas. ; | Jacob Williams, cook, Philadelpbia, seamen, Wm. Reed, Alexander Savage, William Rei/ Joseph Hard- ing, Edward Whitney, George Price, Jamon Walker, Jemes Packer, Richard Jackson, James Henne, Thomas Allen, Chas. Dupre, Archibald Campbell, Thor. Remeris, Peter Enfield, Win. Winslow Jar. Brown, J. Pender. Jas impeey, ordinary seamen, lee Jytiue, Philadelphia, x Gonige Benniit, do. Si dain oven, do. é0.; James Rossiter, do. do,; Alfred Ronita, do. do; ‘Peter Boyd, do. do.; Reeven Fitzximon, do. do; second onck, Wm. H. Godou; passenger, Freck Gavel. Jems leer—Cy News From The Guano Islinds, ONK HUNDRED TONS IN FORT £f HONOLULU, (From the Honolulu Advertiser, March 12.} + | The arrival of the fine schooner Liboliho, Captain Joba | Paty, on Rauturday, with about a hundred tons of guano, from Jervis and ‘New Nantucket Islands, caused vo litte excitement sn our town. When the expediuon sailed, on the 26th of December, no one appeared to take much in- terest in it further than W expross @ yencral denunciation of all bumbuge. The appearance of the specimens of guano which we have seen is that of fine powder, very much rovembling snuff, without the strong smell of ammonia which the = dalance is being abi on the clipper ship Aspasia to New York dire-t, oad wi reach that port about July 26. We are informed by Mr. Charles H. Judd, who was om ployed by the American @uano Company to procure the cargo, that, after encow bad weather and variour causes of detention about Uwee isian ty. ov dee wight of Hawaii on the 6th of Jannary, and with e wade wind reached Jervis ten Inland in ten days. (n the of the 16th of January, the native ts Dorers takes by Mr. Judd from Honolulu ware landed, and commenced preparations for loading the schoooer. ‘The firet anchor dropped by the Liboliho failing to hold, she dragged off into deep water, and inuch time wae ioet in getung it on board. In this’ manquvre the windlass wae Unfortunately broken, 60 thet thay were unable to anchor the vessel afterwarda, lading was effected while the sebooner lay off and on, by means of whale boate, without any necitent. The bagging and lading occupied ten days. On the 2h of J they satled for Howland’ island, thoy arrived on of February, landed, erect: hut, brought off a sample of the deposit and Sot sail day a next They maw New Nantucket on the Oth of February, a low faland, which a th y approathet gave faint signs of vere: tation in the of ay ram nied deed Dynbes on the water's edge. They landed on the 20th and wore agree- ably surprinnd to fibd the entire surfies of the island not only destitute of vegetation, bat affording a vast deposit of guano of the very The Liholiho being al ready weil down in the water and somewhat leaky, onlj Reosevek’s Injumetion. [The decision ef Judge Davies, divotying the temporary injunction whieh he bad granted against the mew Police Commicsioners will be found ou tho second page of this morning's Hunan.) SUPREME COURT—HEBOIAL TERM. Before Jucige Peabody. Arn 20,--Anether phase of the injmetion proceedings Against tbe new Commissioners of Metropolitan Potice was devoloped in an argument to dissolve the absolute injunc- ton heretofore granted by Judge Roosevelt, om the writ of quo warranio sued out by the Attorney General, An ap- plication to set % askle had been made on Wodnesday, and &0 informal argument had arwen thereap; and subse- ‘quently the hour of 8 o'clock P.M. this day was tixed for ® more regular argument, There was a large umber af penton present, manifest: ing much interest {n the provesdings. Mr. Noyes opened for the new Conimissunéra, He aakd that the case, as be viewed, it presentod a.ingle aga) pro Position which be proposed tediscuss with-very, lithe ut- tention to extrinsic circumstangos. ‘The quextion invotyed" f* was a great one, for & would devermine whotber by the Judicial power, the jegislative anda large portion of the executive power ehoukl be paralyzed. It was a conitict between the different. branches of te goverument, those strictly subordinate assuming authority over those supe. thor, AN act bad been passed by the Stato Legislature organizing @ metropulitan pokice, aud the power of tho Judiciary had been invoked to prevent the execution of that jaw: and now they were to sea whether the jodiewal inter position was to remain on the record of the Court. It was hecessary for him to refer to the compiaint of the Attorney General, It was in substanes what was originally known fovmation under a quo warranta, to wst the right n Of aD office. In was a proceeding unier Code being a substituted for the Rivised Revised Statutes being a substitute for *, regulating the proceedings of 2 quo warrant, avd that statute being a simplification of the okt common law proceedings. This information demanded that tho de its be ousted from the office of Commiksionors of ind that the relator (Mr. Wood) be declared enti ki that ottice, It siinply related to the tide ty au ited by the defendants and claimed by the re In other Words, it was a proceeding by a party out of office by an act passed by the Legislature, and to pico violation of the act. The complaint admits ndante are in office. Counsel referrnd to some ® complaint showing that ‘uct, to show “a8 & proceeding by a party out of office as re- against persons in office, under ap act of the Legis and it must be tbat the defendants were in office, be. cause no quo warranto Would lie except the parties were in Poeession of the office from which it was sought to oust them, On that proceeding the injunction was granted which the defrndants now arked to have dissolved. Coun. sel read the affidavit of the Mayor on which the quo war- vanto Wa isened, That attidavit shows that the relator i+ Sustained in his effort to oust ‘hese Commi-sioners by the Common Council of the city; aud thus they had a local legislature striving to break down an act of the State La- gislature; and the question was, not only whether they would be able to break down that act, but whether they would be able to delay the execution of it until it could be decided in the Court of Appeals. Judge Peabody—Is that (Mayor Wood's affidavit) strong evidence in the ease ? Mr. Nayes—That is strong evidence. body——-What dees he allege? . Noyes—Nothing but that he i: apprehensive the peace of the city may be endangered. The simple legal question to be determined by his honor was whether this injunction on such @ proceeding a* this could be sus- tained i aid of a quowarranio? This injunction restrained through the executive officers of the government, duly ap- ited by the Governor, under the direction of the Leis- ture, the exereiso of the sovereiguty. of the Stato, If these Police Commissioners coukd be restrained, the Gav- ernor could have been restrained from making these uppointnienis. one Peabody—Can the Judiciary restrain the execu ver Mr. Noyes—Why not, if this precedent is supported? If the Commissioners ‘can be restrained, the Governor from whom. they derive their appointment can also be restrained. Mf the judiciary coukt restrain the agents of the executive, it could also restrain the execntive This injunction restrained the Commissioners from quell. ing @ riot and from proverving the public peace. It was a general principle the courts take no cognizance of © case in whieh the sovereign power of a foreign county, or the sovereign power of the home county was a party, Counsel referred to the case of the Duke of Branewick against the King of Hanover. In that ase tho aid of the English equity was invoked agalnet the King of England, and they refused to enterwin juriediction over the subject on the principle which he bad stated, Suppose that during the last war, some tmaloontent in the Council of Revision bad sued for an injunction to prevent the levying of a tax for the purpose of carryiug on the war,on the ground that the law was unconstitational, would the courts have entertained it? Certainly not, Counsel referred to the caee of Thompson against the Canal Commissioners—24 Abbott's reports. He contended that on general principles this was a violation of fundamental principles, and bad a tendency to bring the judiciary into a direct conflict, not only with the Legivlaiure but with | the Execvtive of the State, and it_ was not doubtful who would fall in such @ case. He proposed to show | by the code, that the power to sue injunctions was not | | enlarged by the code, andalo that no injunction war ever issued in such case as this. He roferred to sections of the code from 428 wo 441, commenting on them as he pro- ceeded. This, he said, was a criminal proce g- He referred w $d Blackstone, 363, and tw 21 Joluson's Chancery reports, 377, to ‘show that a warranto was a xtrictly criminal —_ proceeding, aitbough it partook in part of the nature of a civil pro- ceeding Fo far as it gave a remedy to the relator for the fees of office. Would it, be asked, be contended that in aid of a criminal suit an injunetion had ever been issued, vither before or afer the ood He referred to sections ‘215 anc 219 of that instrument, showing that to obtain an injunetion it must appear by the complaint that the plain tif in entiled to reef, oF would be injurod by the do- fen ants continuing in the oftice. If it were shown that the plaintif in thie case, who are the people of the state of New York, would be injured, then there might be an injuncth pn imaned, but not otherwire. To show Uhat the code Lad not eularged the powers of the Judiciary in refe. rence to injunctions, counsel referred to Howard vs. Ellis, 4 Sanford’s Superior Court Reports, 374; Lindon against Fritz, 44 Court Reports, 376; same against Hepburn, 3 | Ranford’s Buperior Court Reporta, 608; te Troy Iron and Nail Company's case, 6 Howard, &e. hie action produced anarchy here at ones. It prevented the Commissioners from keeping the peace; and if Mayor Wood was not in Commie ioner, as counsel lnsistod he wwe not, ne Be power to preserve tim pence of the ‘i u fi i tin quew he claimed to be entirely Matter, because it placed the partion that helther could exercise the office P osh—tonkow rceoding, OF UR proceeding quae was Dober known on the information under the Ttwas never known under the #atate. He cape of Moutagueagt. Lord Dudley, 2 Veacy ded in 1751, showing Ui: the Court had no injunction on a mandamus, or on informa warranto, He also referred to the case of anders, C. Modern, 16, 3 Daniels’ Chan- Perkins, page 1,858, to show that injane- in aid of oF tn opperition to eriminal pro- 02 Johnwot’? Chancery Reporte, 370, 6 er} 370, {7 Watson Bergoant, 104; 8 Bawarde! the case of entirely Conclusive that by the law ‘York no such remedy as this could be of Equity? If no, this was an ond of ‘experiment should be exposed to and contempt it merited. He wouk! not question of the constitutionality of tin affirm that tho Court had no ™ @rant an injunction in this case would close his argument by citing, toe worde of jurist as applicahie to this eae-—When a public functionary abum bit power by any ect which Beara ca the community, his conduct excites attenuon, provokes Popular resentment and seldom fails to receive the puniah ment * merits, Bhould an individual be chosen for the litde sympathy i created for bie eufferings, if Ue med to be promoted by the ruin of ‘weal for the public is therefore alway» of rasion, and the people are some jer that’ ss @ brilliant exertion of i 3 i ii $ 33 ist ; i ‘| il Ps § 2 Mr. of the io seventy four tags of this guano were taken on board. CON fp ht ling, and referred to The to Honolalu was made in twenty three days, the ¢dhh section Stine tate abolishing tho write of sire pen Lag wed a ape! February until the Th March. | faciar and guo warranio, and stating Wat the remedies bi Absence from Houdtale seventy one days. ‘these Might be obtained by civil quit, He ret , ‘The wanal course of the wind was trom the north eae on the came point, to the case of the People vs. Cook, of southeast; and although tho voyage wae mado in| ¢ to dhow that this was a civil action; and be Midwinter the weather wae mild, excepting the great ‘fll the brilliant generalities of bis’ loarned pi me ey Sty Ialghit be shown to be ws devoil of aocuracy change with cirnge of ‘moon, from the weetward | as this effdayit which this fi of eastward, and from one to one and a half miles an hour. Sbtained, ‘made by ho head of the The landing might portage be considered tition ty tex: | ent of Row Fork un was early oat mre op oe it appears wo have » | states that be, as "a hy Ne wea | stacle 3 houses, telegraphic apparatus an! other potion The agent of the company, Mr. Arthur Penson, erocind | tranter’ or ernie property is sought ie acts ina 8 ga wp whi Gow fa i and it also states that there was danger Amertoan fing, and vada’! ‘on ita etal! house for | of the city to permit these commissioners the protection of the of the company ax wall ns ® | euthe the ‘Komrol’ er tho poles. This, then, Papin intruders, One great drawback | cry ing ord h these guano inthe want of fresh water, nota drop | had ouerio that no portion of of which i anywhere to be found. Rain seldom falls, as the Plate conid he interfered with by the judiciary. But he appears by the very dry condition in which found the ieee ee sewer American woul gano a ae foor oF five feet below the su . Birds | he that his righte were in safe k (Ogre and deh are in euch abundanw as alrwet to were exercise no avthority over the Our faith in human testimony. At times the birds were so | power of the Judiciary to restrain the ‘thick aa to cloud the atmosphere, and it was | of legislative recklee: partican Almost imporsible to step without treading om the nesta. | held and and when the judiciary failed to ex. Altogether, it seem, theag isianda are, by all accyunte, @ | erotze that power, ail that they talked of an to eafeguards Wonderful piace. life, Uberty and property, Worg pvt worth a bugon, To | passed during the session. by Mr. Noyes, be umderstood Mr. fiy referred to eforence 1» injunctions, of the oower of Lip pep ed onder the Governor, up to the time of the pa-#age of that act. As to the process of injunetion, it was dontended that there Was no power on the part of the judiclary to interfere wih the Legislature. If the judiciary, be wxked, had a clear recogniaed authority to arrest the action of execa- tive authority at the ond of a judicial proceeding, what great objection wus there to ju: interfering at an earlier stage by injunction? He «houkt be glad to know some reason ip reason, and im a book ew than fve bundrod pont why the courts should pot igteriere at an ear. T step of the B? If the opparite counsel gave au oral instead of a Rilent edgnovit to the uncousti totionatity of the law, why shoald pot the Court have from office? An injunetion jan wae oth vexlinyes: why pony gone te igs A ‘power, wnerei rt that iso f. which. wan-- all they eked in this care? Thik question was a question betweourthe prin ciple of electad and the iple of central power. Tt was urelss' to: endeavor to dwarf the question, No one could doubt that it was. better for the harmony of this city tokeep the matter in suspense until the constitation- ality of the act sheokt be determined. Couneel referred to Judge Pavier’ decieinp, and reurarked that t was,not desi rable for either skle to resort co. these little technicalities on which Judge Davies dissolved the injunction, It was on the point of the omission of a few words in the complaint that (be decision was made, It was a more clerical error, and the counsel submitted that instead of turning the ques” tion on that mere clerical error, Judge Davies shoukd have overlooked that and yone behind it lo the constitutional yuitted that hie Honor in this suit tte look ut the smail eehnicalitis of law, but at great consthutional question at ius here, He con- tended that the writ of quo warranto wii a civil avtic governed by the Code, and that they were entiled to an injunction. It was very plilo—he admit! that in England, an injunetion would not & quo warrano, Unless Whare property was involved. But here it was distindtly averred that pr stake aud the to know why they were not entities the broad aid wholesome language of the court having ful jurisdiction over the wh Dill was a bill Of peace, ¢ The only possible mod rs of the naw Board coukt be ae by a series of vexations and harassing titigation, and be eubinitied that it was within the province of this Court to prevent these Htigations by entertaining sueb a bil ondel referred to tet Clark and Fepneliy, of Lords cases, 1-8. This cose came strictly Ww the principles proceeding of a Dill of peace. Here wer @ powers at ieaue, The power of this State and the po of this city were openly at issue, and both were aaxious wo have the point at issue deckied by the Court of Appeals. t litigation, maintained? Ina mauer of discretion and of peace, bh wsked, was t not desirable for the Court Wo retain the until the issue of the constitutionality of « deciled? Ax w the coustitutionality of the law, be as attention in the first place to the political anatomy of State covoreignty of the Slate of New York. Its politica! subdivisions were counties, towns, villages, Cout vel read the clauses of the constitution to the effect that a cout city, town and village officers Bhoukl be electe! by the peeple, or appointed by the local authorities. The argument, held, was conclusive and irresistible thy the Legislature supposed it had fixed unaiterably, the village districts, and — the districts and had given tho power. of eh or ap ntment to the loreal electors and He supposed that if there was anything of which the Ju¢ lary of the State was bound to take notice, it was that th hered to more tenaciously, It was well known, this Dill was drawn originally ax a Metropolitan b ‘oligg bil ‘Ul they ran fonl of the snag of the Auorney General’: tacked certain rural districts to the city, 60 as lo make Dew subdivision of the Bate, and to pice the appointiny power ip the hands of the Exeoulive power of Albany. T by political partisans, he thought it better for it to bt tate | not the same this | lumber counties, for the lake counties? The Legisiat which framed the constitution bad said “you ehall not ca up a county ;”’ but what difference was there between cnt ting up a county and fusing several coanties into oue dis triet? Mr. Field—The Legieiature can do both. Mr. Sedgwick—lIf it can be done for police, why can it pot be dope for supervisors? Make two counties into one district, and what is to prevent the goverum mt assuming the appointment of supervisors, under tho naine of over seers, Commistioner®, or something elmer Look at the lows There an act in reference to building the City Hall, whieh only aifects the city, « Har- bor bill which affect #evera! counties of the State and doos not affect others, and a Port Warden's bill which affec# the commerce of the world, He was not going to criticise Uiewe lawe how, Mr. Field—Do you call these Commi city officers ? Mr. O'Conor—Neitber, It ean oti ed by the constitution, There are there but Staie efticers, city town and vil'nge otfice Mr. Field—T inean the old Commissioners Mr. O'Conor—They are city athioore Mr. Freki—My friend was arguing they wre county officers, Mr, Rodgwick—It is totally (mmaterial whewWer they are city vilicers or county oitorry ir, O'Conor—The constituted Ly the sane. Tht ase to be elected by the people. ‘Mr. Evarte—The Mayor is a city officer. Mr. Sedgwick—These aré neither city oflicers nor county officers. Mr. O’Conor—They are an unbeard of monster, not sanctioned by the law Mr. Evarté—Exeopt the law passed by this Logi-lature. Mr. O'Coner—Whieb ts no law at all Mr, Sedgwick—Which will not be a law long. Judi boty—Ix there anything in the way of the police reguistions themselves which make them county, Tegulations, district regulations or State regulations—any- Wing in the nature of things? a Bedgwick—Nat at all. However if Uut appears te important—— ouers county or totally wnwarrant- afieers recogniged . county eficers, and plttge Peabody (interrupting ate understand » course of your argument, Mr. as to the ne» cemeity of there mature adbering to aby cofdition: whet ‘ther to the county or any sumber of counties, or whether to the Bate; whether the legislation a to any particular measures of thie kind may not be applied to any territory ire than a county or more than @ ;and if that be #0, whether there is any redistricting. You say the Har. vor Commissioners’ bill applies to several courtier and not to the roet of the State. Iseo nothing in the uature of the bull itself which would render it that there particular «pecitic application, applied to one or more counties. Uns being @ viKion of the e have t court for t— somebody who the sane. There # nothing in the conatitation to to morrew—any More than there i@ about thie tan patoe tae erevace. of Eve new Citrine fee eo mini ton lay pane tour core of pase court ight Jadiotal diages, O'Conor—That * for the Supreme Court. But there We not a word about the inferior courta of it says about counties, towns and aod thas te merely in the affirmative, that they tu counties , towns and villages erect courte. Ned cae ain there in the izle word ta begative. There i# nota syllable, not a breath, nota word, not a letter ‘negAli of prohibition of th tii ooo trae the Htate of New York into five or—if my learned pre. fore it—into eight districts. they are bound to have Indiciad district Nereos. Theo there is not one word in the constitution about the manner 4p which the courts shall bo crested, of the judges created appointed in any of theeo districts; and the Tegisiature hat but to abotint: the 1 Without abolishing them, they courte—aud they have an un- ‘en ee Sr Posor rT ww to these newly created Judicial ow nothing in the there is i tie na iho orb ‘and all appointed by the Governor, (tment; but we dissent from In the name of heaven why not let that decision be assembly districts, the county districts, the city districts, iptention of the Legislature which framed the constitution ‘war to decentralize aud break up the power of the central authority at Albany; and there was mo change which was | The power of selecting alt county, city, town or village of received by the people more favorably or would de ra too, that . for the eity and county of New York alone: and it was not opinion that they backed out, and W meet that objecuou this he was wholly opposed. If the city was to be governed governed by political partisans who knew the wants of the city, than by political partisans from all over the It was @ bill devised t evade the constitution. If ite provirions were constitutional why could net the old | central power of the State be brought ‘back? Why could be done for the river oounties, for tie | tion, forbids the Leyixluture to ereet for any permanent ure 3 Mr. Field—I did pet. 1 did, and he other skle were ime asepine 27, associate, who has the floor. Mr. Field—And yours was by way of counterpiot. Lt maaan aes by Ve of counterplottiog your iona. Mtr. Sedgwick hie argument, He held that tha State was nota vara to be cut up and gerry mander- ed into as many pieces as the Legislature 2 Wo divide it. If it was competent for the Legislature to override tha jocal interests in regard’to the of New York, what linw could be drawn to prevent the divtricting of jadichat courts? The proposition seemed mathematically trao ther the Jecal principle of goversment coukl only be carried out by keeping to the local supervisions faced ip the courts, If this operation of the Legislature could be tolerated for the purpose of police, for what other parpose of executive autborty could it net be rami carried out? The principle of Armorican vitality wae the principle of «cal power—local energy. That was the Je which the constitution of the “State was intended to promote. Ho hoped the Court would not look upon this cae with eyes of & mere tocbnical Jawyer ; but chat if tis Honor supposed the law to be uncomstitutional he woukd lay hiv hand on it and eay that it *houla go no further, He asked the court in the same beneficent spirit in which: the Code was devised, that this writ of quo warrante should be treated asa civil wit, and that they suoukd nog be governed by the opinions of Crav.g lawyers in the daya of the Stuarte and Tudors, He asked that the court would declare Unat this law was not only a systematic evasion of the constitution, but a violation of -he principle on which the government of the country rest Mr. O'Conor, on the part of the plo.ntitia, eabmitted the following points im First EN The Metropolitan Poflea bill, in its whole scope and désigny-and in every one of ite provisione, tim cluding the repeating clauses, is manifestly repugnant to the letter and spirlt 6f the constitution, and {+ consequent void, (Warner v#. the Peowlesgenio, 270; Time va, tha Alabama R., 186, 1 rous and ogrefuily worded provieiona of the constitwtion and the unanimons address of it framers to the people, show that a cardinal object of that instrument Was “to id decentratize the patronage of the exe- entive gevermment.”—(Convention Journal, 1547.) IL. Accordingly, as will appear by the ease proofs, “the Mort important State. officers ares made elecuve by the people of the State, and moet of the afficers of cities, towns und counties are made electtyo by the voters of the locality: they serve.”—(Convention Journal, 1.547.) HL. An examination of the constitution in detail will show that this highly approved prineipie of decentratiza tion was extended to official power a MA LO patronage; and that even in the matter of election to office by the People, it was carried to the farthest practicable mit. One Fingle case for special reayons Was excepted (ror Une gene- ral Tule, expressio unius exelusto rat altertws 1. Tho Senatorial, judicial and Assembly districts ara created for elective purposes sand are not govern. mental departments in any sen°e; yet such of them as tie within the limits of a county, which | the largest recog. 4 governmental department, are withdrawn from !e~ gislative control and submitted to the government of the county authorities, t. ¢., the Boards of Supervieors. (Con. ms. 2,6.) id not allowed (o altar even those i. ¢., onthe return of each decennial ceneus. (As to rial districts, Constitution, art. %.,#ec. 4. As to Jas ‘rita, Constitation, art: 6, wee. 18.) Its intimated thatthe Legislature would conform to the stitution, by conferring upon the Boards of the several counties of the State further powers of loral legilation and administration,” (Constita. tion, art. 3, Hee, 17.) to the policy of decenteal ection by the peo mbly districts a small’ directed. And in respect to countir 8, towns and Villages, their elective officers are to de elected by the la- cality they ser Secon) Point —The proposition ap which the Me tan Police bill is sought to be supporied ix, that there are nO express negative words for may, for purposes of civil g ‘pment, w= ‘a new and anomalous divtrict unknown to tha 1 comstitution.” (2 Gray, 108.) The right thus w circum vent and overreach the provisions of the fun tamental law was ¢ ly denied by the Supreme Court of Mawac setts in an analogous case: if it existed & wonld render na~ gatory the most important featares of the constitution. connot be adunitted, J. The constitution bas recogniged all the civil governs mental districts of the State. thas giving them Perpetnity by constitutional sanction. aro counties, citiedy Kes, divisions of cities, owns or villages. (Ark 4 7 ) IT. the power of eeleeting most: of the principal State oficers was vested in the people at large, the power of selecting some of them was verted In the people of dia tricts created in the constituticn for this parpore alone. floors was vested, mediately or immediately, in the poo ple of sueb county, city, town oo iigee. 1. We tay mediately or it ly, becance when He officer is riot to be elected by the people he is to be Appointed hy some “authority” thereat, |. 0., some fune= onary or fenetionaries of such couty, city, town oF villags 2. Ir the Tegislature might lawfally give wo the contrat povernment the power of creating and appointing 4 local appeinung power, no change would have been wrought ag to loca! utfices by the constitution of 1846, II. Patrounge could be decentralized im no other way ‘9 a iz than hy treating the people of the rounties, eities, towne and villages a the original soures of power in respect 10 fall Joral offices vind.—The conetitution, Thirv by 4 necesary implies. ‘pone of etvil government WoW Wistric!« unknown to the ‘updainental law. 1. If that power existed in the [exgivlsture, our ettier, towns and villages with their recog ad divisions might be abelisbed, and all courte and offices therein aio abolishes. TI. The newly formed Circle, arréndieements, depart ments or cantons unknown to "he constitution, their tribupals of justice, ,oftices and officers being wholly upprovided for therein, al the provi-ions of the funda~ mental Ivw reeuiating the selec jon of local officers would be inapplicabi, and that great mare @f patronage which it Wad intendes to withdraw from the ceniral power would be placed in the hands of the Governor and bis revotu- tionary Legisiatore as the reward of their usurpation, TTL Under this view of the conatitavion the whote judi clary of the State (except the Judges of the Court of ap. penis and of the Supreme Court) could be legislated ont of office, aud a pew eet of Di trict Courts, with Judges, clerks and other officers, appointed by the @overnor and Renate, or in any other way the Legivlature thought ft, vewted with their powers and jurisdiction, IV. So all the functions of local government now exer. ceed by the local officers of counties, citiee, towns and Villages migbt be set off in paroois, eal) parcel having am. Anotaalous district for iwelf. 1, Poller th a district of far countier. 2. Lampe and gas in a district of two counties. &. Paving and regulating streets. So, in a tietriet of @ city and a half, and #o on to ihe end, he local oftteors for all theae purposes of local governs ment migh', of courve, be appointed by tbe Logiviatury the self, or by any one whom ite aw Gt to veet with the ape pointing power. V. There is not a negative word {n any of the proviviona of the constitution touching these subjécts. Hot unless « pro- Dilation «hall be impied pumerous prov sous of tbe oon- sUtubor are ioe deetan! and nugator, Jodee PAmools was about to follow on the part of the plaintut when, by an arrangement Between counee! and Court, it was agreed to defer farther argument pill Thurs. noon, wt 10 o'clock, at which taye Mr” Kumonts will proceed with bie arguth = POM, adjourned! ail to The Conrt thereupon, morrow (Thursday) at 10 A wal . The gloomy aspect of affairs @ China calling for a re Inforcement of our naval vee in the waters of the Colestial enupire, and the present slender dimensane of the marine corps, have compelled Uncle fam to stick the ribs bons to his cap, and to appeal to the military ardor of Young America, “ould Ireland’? and Deutsche culerland for recruits. A rendezvous is now ypen in Centre street, ‘ender the control of Mr. Swaaey, where person: wishing to hear © poetical eulogy on nautical soldiery woukl do well to call. The old frigate Savannah, which everybody expected to neo condemned, 8 ordered to be refitted and prepared for sea at the earliest convenience. The marine ruard for the sioop-of-war Decatur will leave for that ves- sel in the Mlinots, or the vessel sailing after ber. The 16un of May, it # expected, the razee Cumberland will leave for the Coast of Africa. The date of the ‘s partare for China has not been definitely Gxed, thorgh sha will evidently sail carly in May. Brooklyn Navy Yard is now ny tory t the new rave HL, ores house rounded i ery ‘t know A 1 t ni, who wo 4. Commander Soe, wae (, for Key Weet, where sbe arrived om was towun orders wo go North ov gf i Hf Hf Run Conn) Sut —A store a for Hong Kong, and voto, Conetetiaiog ofl feat 2