The New York Herald Newspaper, June 30, 1854, Page 3

» Morril, of Mr. Cary, of Mr. Parris—Peeu- ties of the Three Factions—Courage of the and Cowardice of the Regulars— Motives Nomination of Mr. Parris—Congressional- Whig Convention—Free Soil Con ion, he. low that the several conventions of our demo- tic party have at last been held, and have nomi- their several candidates for Governor, I e concluded to give you some account of the ition of Maine politics, which have been get- into s worse and worse state ever since the liquor-selling law was passed, though it is more probable that some other cause of offence or bling-block would have been found if Provi- ée and the fates had not bountifully provided h a brandy cask and a rum pancheon. There difficulties in the democratic party of Maine so ly ge the year 1843, but they were cleverly got wr ot under, without breeding any great troubles were visible. The leaders,to do them justice, carefal to keep these troubles to themselves, as they did the offices. However, the time when nothing could prevent an outbreak, and ows how deep-seated was the evil, that the open movement, for almost ten years, was in 1852, just onthe eve of # Presidential on, when there was every possible mo- for men to smother their wrath. To gure, there were those who said at the } that the Presidential election had mors to with the bolting movement at that time than other cause. It was, they said, to get a party should have a claim on the Presiden “ the spoils that ‘the Chandler men drew off from old associates—but the: ch by the operation, whi certainly did not do turned out to be any- g but a peving business. The moderates, or » got quite as much as the intractables, or ds. Some cf the latter were well provided for, as they considered themselves robbed to the amount as was given to their rivals, they fy naturally took deep offence at such ingratitude ithe part of the powers at Washington. Some that the President thought it a Peculiar claim fi offices—literally good “offices”—that ae pers See that might have led to feat. ‘he intermediate facta are acquainted with: “that the softa bolted in 1863, in imitation of hards of 1852; how that the whigs triumphed onsequence, and that Mr. Fessenden was chosen pator last winter, because of the renewal of the flition discussions growing out of the Nebraska ation. Since hoy were entertained by the derate portion of democratic party that, the hatorship been disposed of, a new union ht be formed, and victory once more be restored their banners. These hopes proved to be mere usions. The party is now split into three pieces, A there is no saying how much more of it will be en from the portion in consequence of feeling created by the repeal of the Missouri first of these parties, them in the er of time in which their conventions have been 'd, is the Morrill section, formerly known as ram- from their stiff temperance principles, or oly heads, from their sympathizing with aboli- mtiee, eee ences 0 e E had a meet iter, and called a convention, which met here on ‘7th of June, ang no id Mr. Morrill for Gover- ‘. cence ns sa Sonenor a’ ne strack ol ers O! as being more a temperance and free oil body than one of the fashioned democratic character. The resolves ted were decided in their views on temperance ebraska, and Mr. Morrill, who had been unan- usly nominated, was very emphatic, when ac- tig the honor conferred upon him, in stating his H-slavery views. He considered the Nebrask: ition as the great question of the day, and as ount to all others. He was enthusiastically a; 1d when he thus spoke, which shows how t! is setting in this quarter. This section of the ocracy is, personally speaking, the most respect- 1 of all, and numbers the best informed men of ty. Such democrats, or most of them, as ® “got religion” belong to it; and few of ita abers ever crook their elbows. It may be com fed as slightly Puritanical. The more sanguine 8 leaders reckon their followers at twenty thou- 1 voters, and I suppose that they really number farfrom fifteen thousand. However, it will, most ly, never be possible to say what will be the pre- p number of democrats who shall support ir 3 for it is expected, and not without rea- that the bulk of the free soilers, the more litionized whigs, and all the uttras on every sub- will vote for him, and under such circumstances ould be found a difficult task indeed to separate faction into various parts. Political analysis, hese days, is the most difficult task which aman undertake. » he second democratic convention met here on 1éth of June. It was composed of the repre- ives of the democratic opponents of the Maine ._ This party contains all the ‘‘go ahead” men, bbehold in the Maine law a flagrant attempt to are and their ram apart. They areas angry t account as were their great-grandfathera ut the tea tax. The invasion of the right of m to get drunk involved in the existing law is to m intolerable. They are resolved upon opposing parties that do not oppose the rum law ; and how cessfal they have been, thus far, in weakening W, best appears from the fact that that statute ice as bad and twice as strong as when it was passed. The nomination of this ram conven- —the so called wild cat convention—was con- upon Shepard Carey, and the regular con- fon was not hich case his original friends would not forsake led that it too might nominate him, | . This was verykind. The convention sald nothing | ut Nebraska, ps, Mexico, Cel of tne globe te payatory to becoming an American star; and in evra eg showed their sense. They con- their action to local affairs—to the worm (that ansas, Cuba, Japan, the hilip- tral America, or any mes dies y stick to their liquor like foundering sailors to pirit room. Their motto evidently is— 5 being reasonable, must get drunk Tho best of life is but intoxication.” third or regular Democratic Convention, as- bed here on the 21st of June. It was very nu- ously attended, and I should be inclined to call mass convention, for I think that almost one- the supporters of the administration in Maine present. It was a regular officeholders’ affair ; p aexmany of the national offices have been Herred on the most contemptible of mankind, ‘ean judge what its character must have been. tion of this convention was cowardly in the The desperate condition of the adminis- r well known; yet not one word of en- em pat Gia this packed body of oftloebolders and lents—the fed creatures of the national gov- atter for the support of their principals, or Cero gm The grave itself could not have been e silent than were these unheroical ple. n their proceedings no one could be led to iter the country is now in a most excited atate on a mational question, in the Pp rt of which ident and Cabinet, and the majority of "4, are completely identified. Not a syllable to show our unhapp President that his Maine are mindful im in the midst of vraska agony. Equally silent waa the con- on State affairs. ey were passed over @ coolness that was ane charming, as evi- the contempt which the delegates feel for intelligence. The whiga say that the de- were silent, because they had nothing to but it is maaye, jest to say they were 80 gh cowardice. ancient democratic spirit hed from amongst the regulars, whom de- officeholding have converted into so many eunu be regular nomination for Governor is not a bad but very respectable, if we consider the matter iors § pee ae of yids The eae oe regulars—it. is not a vei mass— oapd that Mr. Pillsbury ban'f to be put up again, ere satisfied that he should be nominated. was no reason for superceding him. He e @ very good ran last year, and was not 0 ly unpopular. He had given as little offence two branches of the party as any man hithe State. You can, therefore, form an idea of astonishment thet was felt by the rank and file n Mr. Pillsbury was disp of by the conven- 0 it Nate inlined: 3 him. ter was arranged here before the con- n met by the officeholders, who were deter- Hned to have a new candidate. The convention erely ratified the action of the officeholders, in cing Mr. Parris before people as a candidate for overnor, who, in one may be oonsi- ed a8 worthy of the e favor of officehold- ; he has himself held office almost his entire life- e. Not to mention minor places, he haa been overnot} United States Senator, His very Court, and Ma: me is significant of fat things in the official line. goa err eres yor of Portland. other that is now in that nebular state | of the still, and tothe barrooms. | » and the free soilera will hold theirs at & week later, July 5. I had intended to say somethin; about the condition of the whigs, and conce! the probabilities of a new party being formed in Maine, but the length of oh letter admonishes me to atop for the present. I write as soon after the other conventions have been eld as possible. Sepaco, Our New Hampshire Correspondcnee. Concorp, N. H., June 24, 1854. A Lullin the Senatorial Contest— Political ntrigues —Fault Finding—Opintons on the Senatorial Elections—The Whig State Convention—Remi- niscences—The Country Ministers. The suspension of action on the Senatorial ques- tion by our Legislatare—it will not be taken up un- til the 29th—has afforded an amount of time for the action of political intriguers to operate in, that such men, on both sides, are far from disposed to neglect. This place has been a perfect hothouse for forcing the growth of slow politicians since the meeting of the Legislature, and some of the workers on the ad- Ministration side complain, with no little bitterness, that they were not summoned to the field at suffi. ciently early day to render their exertions certainly useful. Relying upon the Concord Patriot’s cla- morous assertion that there was a democratic majo- rity of twenty in the House—which, it was thought, would be found numerous enough to effect every thing, after allowing for a3 much bolting as it was thought New Hampshire men were capable of— nothing of an effective character was dqne until after the Legislature had organized, when the elec- tion of Mr. Chase to the Speakership, by pre- cisely the number necessary to choose him, began to wake up the drowsy wirepullers, All that bad been done was the President's fending Nebraska speeches to gentlemen on whom he had turned his back ever since the 2d of Novem- ber, 1852, and assuring them, under his own frank, that he was their “ most affectionate friend ”—an assurance which they thought it took a good deal of assurance on his part to e, and the correctness of which they were so reditious as to doubt. This sort of rubbing down the back did not pay, for it caused men to despise the who to it, and was taken as an evidence of the weakness to which folly and arrogance had reduced him. At any rate, no one was converted by the President’s sign manual—not even his “‘ affectionate friends” caning to his pathetic call. mebody mi be blamed whenever there is trouble in a party, and accordingly the edi- tor of the New Hampshire Patriot is censured for having so overrated the democratic strength as to have warranted no interference on the part of the national administration. Had he not done so, efforts would have been made at an early day to bring over the recusants, by a lavish use of those means which are at the com- mand of the President, while the ‘cham- pogne and chicken” argument would have en brought foscibly to bear upon men at the very moment of their arrival in this agreeable town. As it is, the offices have either been promised in other directions, or there are none even to promise; and the champagne has been expended in getting up a ood nature as evanescent as itsown spray and bub- Bice.Thus far, nothing but has awaited the democrats on every test question, in spite of their twenty majority; but still I think the censure of Mr. Butterfield is unjust. His errors consisted in under- rating the extent of the opposition to the Nebraska bill; in underrating the number of disaffected demo- crate nek t bene genre pe = oe me overrating power of party pline. He ja of that power by a standard that belonged to an- other age in politics, and forgot, too, that some of the most accomplished martinets of the party—Mr. Burke and Mr. Barton, for examples—were chiefs of & very important sec:ion of the cted—a section small in numbers, perhaps, but of great skill and courage, and of iron energy in the conduct of affairs. Any man might have made the same mistake, for it takes a long time to convince the drill sergeants of party that their day, if not exactly over, is fora time suspended. The opinion that prevails here on the Senatorial elections is, that no one will be this session chosen. ‘The dissenters from this view are democrats, who fear that if the elections should go over until June, 1855, there will be such abundant means—such a supply of political cement—as to render a coalition of the various anti-administration parties of formation and certain of success. No efforts will be omitted to get matters straight by the 29th, when the House is to decide on the question of the choice of Senators. Should the attempt to elect them fail, the business will be over for this year, and the | democrats will go before the Page toe next March was selected with exprene reference to the busi- | ya of ‘scatching” or keeping voters in various a wo: He a mop of the administra- yy and therefore acceptable to such demoaarats ag interest in the fortunes of President, Pierce. knaywn to be a Nebraskaite, and there- Pesitively offensive to those de- ook wil aversion ou ade. Doug Noal Dow in a great Hy | ie Meluewond pare YE & Community like ours. with a very Lag? Gx] on th ready well bur- thened backs. whigs expect their to win @ great many victories before that time, and so them a sort of moral aid in New Hampshire, position, of all sorts, hues, shades, and stripes, lesfre nothing better a Me Pt of the elections, and the of m a distinct issue the next contest. success of their ideas would leave us with but one Senator, as soon as the Legislature shall rise, Mr. Norris’s term not expir- img until next March. Perhaps we should not have any Senator, Mr. Norris being Laraene considered abont as near to nobody as a solid gentleman well can be. The resolves jgemel at the Whig State Convention were of adecidedly abolition cast. The eleventh resolve is sup} to intimate their Ly oy, to support Mr. Morrison and Mr. Kittredge for Con- x at the election of 1855. It is quite certain that the coalition should carry the next Le; " nether of these gentlemen would have much chance for one of the Senatorahi Mr. Morrison might be elected now, were it 8 concur- rence with such action on the part of to be obtained; for his election would be ag ta blow to the administration now, as would be that of a whig in 1855. The President would feel it more. Mr. Bell was re-nominated for Governor, and, al- Seoage wreak seem, to be, impomibie: shat, he id & majority of the pop yotes, it does not follow that he will not be our executive chief magistrate. Gov. Bakér’s popularity is great, and alone saved the State for his party; but the exer- tions of the opposition at the next contest, even should Senators be chosen now, will be prodi- gious, and may lead to his defeat, when Mr. Bell may be chosen by the ture. The Keeping open of the Senatorial ion would greatly factli- tate the ends of the ition, by leaving them more capital upon which to trade; but still it can be formed, in spite of the Senatorships being filled, should fortune cease to favor the opposition at the present session. The Statesman of this morning publishes an ac- count of the action of the New ipshire House of Representatives on the Missouri question in 1820. It seems that there had been transmitted here certain resolves passed by the Legislature of Virgiuia on the subject; whereupon our Legislature three resolves on slavery and the ad: m of slave States into our Union, that would now satisfy the most ultra of free soilers. The House then contained 197 members, 194 of whom were present’ and voted on these resolves, all in the ive. Among the members thus voting was He: Hubbard, then & federalist, but since 80 distinguished as a demo- cratic leader, and who presided over the Democratio Convention last week, at which resolves in favor of the Nebraska bill were passed. The ministers bave done the democrats consider- able damage in this State. Here the clerical order Spercath nearer to the primitive apostelical condi- tion of the founders of the faith than in any other part of New England: but what they lack in silver and — is made up in influence, which is ten times greater than that wielded by the pampered preach- ers of cities and great towns, The manner in which their order has been assailed by leading dem- ocrats and the democratic press, has set ther against the party now dominout in the nation. Shonld o rats fail, it will be in no small do- gree owing he hostile feelings created by their unwise treatment ef the country clerey, a poor but Moxapwocg, | | porary structure on the roof,) gave way while he i PEN ire g = BE so eee F i i E g i : s i Ly aa g a i ceeding was the voluntary the creditors. And haf rbeag ch: CP te ek against one joi btors, circumstances, Secharaee the other, and that the other, if afterwards W \dgment associate, as an absolute bar ? it no reply to such a plea to say that the creditor did not elect, but was compelled, to take judgment, as he did the one alone, because the other had absconded? The doctrine of wergee is founded e Court and upon convenience—convenience: to convenience to feel, eet pa the consideration that two suits not be permitted where ove was sufficient, Does'this reason apply in favor of a int of law, thata man who had rendered a joint, , suit im) # consequence a ae ible?” What right has he, or rather what right could he have, to complain of dou- ble vexation? Is it possible in such a case for the creditor to obtain a full remedy except by two suits’ Even with the aid of a ,special statute, the Court, having no jurisdiction over an absent party, can ren- der no bat apie jadgment against him; s that, although in four against two, the recovery in ef- fect, if pursued in that mode, would be only against one. Wherein, asa remedial prozeeding, then, would such a judgment, in the State court, have been more advantageous than the judgment which was reco- vered in the federal court? In either case the record would have shown that the course of action was a joint demand, and that if an effectual recovery was not had against both, it was no fault of the plain- tiffs. They sued both, but both were not found. Besides, a federal judgment in some respects may be preferable toa State judgment. Stay lawa and appraisement laws are Aire over it; and the Supreme Court of the United States had decided a decision, which in subsequent cases brought within their jreticte they were likely to follow, that a ae judgment one partner, even where taken without pice pe no bar to a subsequent. suit against the other. It may be that that adjadi- cation has since been partially Champ yet the reasoning on which it rests, in all cases of necessi- ty, still remains. At all events, there cannot be a doubt, I think, that a court of equity in such a case would enjoin the defendant from availing himself of such @ technical bar—in analogy to the practice which allows a bill in equity apelake the represen- tatives of a deceased partner after an unsatis- fied judgment against the survivor, notwith- standing that it involves the difficulty of merger and donble litigation. Double litigation — is an evil; but like other evils, if necessary to the at- tainment of justice, it must be submitted to, es) cially by those whose acts or omissions have created the necessity. I assume, therefore, that whether the judgment in Michigan were in form against two, it in fact against one, or both in form and in fact the parties of en eflcient remedy subeoquontly, tn e 8 of an efficien subsequently, some form, a; it the other. t all ante tha euit brought in the federal court, being a bona fide exercise of a sound discretion, and especially as no actual logs from that election is either proved om pretended, there is no ground for oe the cre- ditors with awant of “due and legal diligence.” The effort made by them to recover of the principal debtors was a legal effort, anda Proper effort, and the only one, as it appears tome, which they were bourd to make. Its fruitlesspess is no answer to the argument. That fruitlessness, anticipated as wh feats by all the parties, was the reason for ten- dering the guarantee and the motive for requiring it. It seems to be assumed—and some judicial dicta have at times given countenance to the idea—that in actions against guarantors all sorts of technicali- ties, whether equitable or inequitable, rational or iirational, are to be invoked by counsel and encour- aged by the Court, to prevent a recovery. For my- self I do not believe that the common law, which in its genera! scope professes to he founded on common sense and common ipo is 80 inconsistent a3 to lose sight of these attributes the moment it ap- proaches the beundaries of suretyship. What difer- ence is there in principle between soliciting credit for one’s self or soliciting it for one’s brother? The cousideration is the creditor’s parting with his ars on the faith of the engagement, and the bene- it the surety receives, or expects to receive, from obliging his friend. It is not only a good, buta valuable consideration—as much 80, in every just sense, as if the surety had himself become the pur- chaser. Judgment for plaintiff. oo Court—Special Term, fore Hon, Judge Hoffman. DECISION. JUNE 28—The People of the Stateof New York against the Alliance Mulual Insurance Company and,Thos A. Emmet, receiver—The defendants, the Alliance Company, were incorporated on the 10th of April, 1843, by a special act sed that day. It continued to business as a Fire, Marine end Insurance Company until about the 15th of July, 1847, and is stated.to bave accumulated a bs sum of money, which was liable to taxation either as capital or as personal property. On the 16th of July, 1847, by a decree of the Chancellor, the company was declared dissolved, and the de- fendant, Emmet, appointed receiver. The super- visors of the city of New York taxed the property of the company in the year 1845, at a sum which, with interest, amounted to $2,839 05, on the Ist of July, 1861. The company refased to pay the tax, and it was, according to law, retarned b’ the Chamberlain of the city to the Comptroller of the Sate, and was credited on the books of taxes in the office of the Comptroller to the city and county of New York, whereby an action accrued to the plaintiff for such amount of taxes, The com- ee then states a demand and refusal to bay e amount, prays judgment for it, and that suc! part of the propert; the com} be seques- trated as shall be nécessary to eharne the pred with interest and costs. * * * The injunc- tion granted, but not so as to prevent the receiver from collecting the funds of the company, and mai to prevent his parting with any moneyson hau until the jadgment in this action. Distriet Court. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Before Judge Green. June 28—Aaron Close vs. Stephen Kelly—This action is brought to recover for a bill of Wyner 4 amount to $19 62, sold and delivered by D. Lock & Co., toone Everett, and which the defendant agreed to pay for, if the said Everett did not; and also for sale and delivery of the same goods to defendant, the claim thereof having been assigned by Lockwood to the plaintiff, his partner. The plaintiff proved Daniel Lockwood he was one of the firmof D. Lockwood & Oo.; that a man by the name of Everett called at their store and wanted to purchase some clothing, stating that he bad not money th to pay for the same, but that the defendant would become his surety. Wit- ness then sold Everett clothing to the amount of $19 62; that he put the game up ina bundle, and they then went to the defendant’s place of busi- ness, Witness asked defendant if he was willin ; to go Everett’s security forthe bill. Defendant an- swered by saying he was. Everett then took the ls away with him. Everett has never paid for . He also moved the assignment of his in- terest in the claim to plaintiff, so that he might be- come a witness. The defendant swore that he had no recollection of seeing the witness until he called tocollect the bill. The Judge decided that the plaintiff could not recover. His own testim was not enough to make defendant liable. That a! the defendant did was to become security for the peat ofthe claim, in case Everett made de- fault. That the agreement not being in writing, Neher the consideration, was void by the statute of frauds; and therefore gave judgment for the defendant, with costs, Distrresixa Accrpext.—A bene man, named Andrew McGuire, was instantly killed yes terday morning, about 10 o’clock, by falling from the roof of the five story building, occupied as a wholesale store by Messrs. Wadsworth, Turner & Co., on Pearl street, between Main and Cary streets. Workmen were enga; in Putting &@ new compo- sition roof on the building, and the deceased, at the time he fell, was standing near the edge of the roof, in the rear, receiving buckets of tar, as they were drawn up by means of arope and a derrick. The cause of his falling isnot, we believe, recisely known, but itis supposed that the derrick (a tem- was standing by it, perhaps holding on to the rope. He fella distance of about sixty feet, on a brick | averbent, striking, ae he came dowa, a few feet | rom the ground, the cdge of a slate roof of a ware- house about five feet from the building on which he pa hal calle " horribly CH ines | in + We underrtand he no for wily—Richmond Enquirer, June 28. ‘The Walker Dtverce Case. OOMMON PLEAS—PART Il. GATHERINS F. F. WALKER, BY HGR NEIT FRIEND, CHRISTIAN 8. SLOANE, V8. WILDERS P. WALKER. Before Hon. Judge Ingraham. TENTH DAY. Jun 20.—The cross-examination of Ruth Ann Eaton, witness for the defence, was resumed this morning by Mr. Sandford. Witness deposed—I think Mrs. Walker returned to Bath the same day that she came with Mrs. Waldron; it ‘wap previous to her return to Bath that I saw her walk- ing with Heartwell with his arm round her waist; it was about the time of the arrival of the party of fifteen that I saw her standing in the doorway with Heartwell; I can- not tell whether I saw them standing in the doorway be- fore or after I saw them walking as I have stated; I ob- Loh gto aris in the door bearers bel-geet 38 § o ; we clearing ising tatte then; Traw them standing st the front door @ining room door; can’t say where the other guests were at that time;I wasin the number of domestics were with me; Harriet not there; Sophy Johnson was there, but she is was door, and and a moment at Dr. Heartwell Harpswell is a watering place ofthe wooden house, persons where bg scant the brick perallel § former receding a litt! sure between either of the house: guests, when going from the wooden passed the door wi Mra. Walker brick houses face the east; the crock I saw Mrs. Walker and Dr. Heartwell adjoins the diniug room; the is about a mile from our a half a mile to the commencement grove; between the and our house there was then a house about half way; Mr. Isaac Douglass oc- cupied that house; he had a fanily; we had a view from the Mansion House to the grove; there was nothing to intercept the view of the road from our house to the ‘ove; when I raw Mra. Walker and Dr. Heartwell walk- & from the grove, as I have stated, I was in the family dining room; Harriet Baron was there; don’t know what part of the room she was in; don’t know how long she remained in the room; don’tknow what she did; i know she did not Jook out at the window. Q. How do you know that she did rot look out of the poeag when you say you do not know what she was doin, A. * have no answer to make. Witnese—I did not look out of the window all the time I was there; Harriet Baron did not remain there a‘ter I left; she went into the cook room; Mrs. W. and Dr. Heartwell were coming up the road when I first saw them; they passed near the house, right by the dining room, which is nearly on a level with the road; the room in which I was was next the crockery room in the wooden house; the crockery room was between the two dining rooms; the road is on the west front of the house; when T first saw these parties they were nearly opposite the house; they were not two rods from the house; the road ran close by the house; I was sitting at the window of the family dining room nearest the cook room when I saw them; I was resting my arm on the window; 1 saw no ebange in their position when, they were me; the windows in the ee dining room, I think, are higher than the one at which I was sitting; there was one win- dow in the public dining room at the end; Mrs. Walker and Dr. Heartwe!l passed that window; did not notice Mra. Walker’s dress then; she had a bonnet on; it wasa clear and a warm day; I only saw her face; aid not no- tice whether she had a sun shade or a parasol; he had not an umbrella; I don’t know that I seen Dr. Heart- well’s sister at all at this time; don’t know whether Mr. Fuller was there at that time; don’t recollect of his being there more than once; I ‘don’t recollect stating to apy one that I knew anything against Mrs. Walker's character; I know Mr. Lawson; I have stated to him that I knew nothing personally to criminate Mrs. Walker; can’t tell the time of day when my hueband refused to board Mrs. Walker; her children came with her then; Iam under the impression that she staid all night on that occasion; can’t name any one who faeviaying there then; don’t recollect Mrs. Stone com- ing with Mrs. Walker on that occasion; I think, however, that she was there. Q. Did you not feel unkindly towards Mrs. Walker? A. After the first occasion of my acquaintance with ber I never had any reason to feel kindly towards her; I don’t recollect saying to Mr. Frederick Sewell or to James F. Patten that we did not take Mrs. Walker because the houre was too full; Itoli Mr. Sewell that we did not want to take recollect Mrs. Walker coming into the kitchen to order a chowder made her own way; it was not done. To Mr. Busteed—There were no shade trees about the house; Mr. Adama, Mr. Faton and my daughter were pre- sent when I told Mfr. Lawson that I knew nothing person- ally to criminate Mrs. Walker; 1 am sure that the person whom I saw walking with Dr. Heartwell from the grove, was Mrs. Walker; it could not have beeu Dr. Heartwell’s sister; it was customary to return both ways from the e; I saw the face of the lady who walked up with im; I have no recollection when this happened; I think it was before Mrs. Walker rode to Bath with Dr. Heart- well. Ann Maria Eaton—I reside at Dixéeld, Maino; I was twenty-three last March; am daughter of Mr. Eaton, wit: ness exemined in this cause; know Mr. and Mrs. Walker, and Dr. Heartwell, end first’ know them at Harpswell, at my father’s house; 1 have seen Mrs. Walker and Dr. Heartwell riding, walking, and sitting together at table; Dr. Heartwell wis here more than one season; 1 know that Mra, Walker’s wants were made known through hita at table, and at other times; [have scen Dr. Heartwell stancing in the door with bie arm around her waist; I know that at the time Mrs. Walker was refuvod board there was room for her in the house; I Srst communi- cated these facts to Mr. Walker last May. Cross examined by Mr. Blunt—I never spoke of thea: facta toany one before last May, tomy rezollection; don’t reecllect in what year it waa that i saw Dr. Heartwell with his arm round Mrs. Walker’s waist; can’t say whether it was the first year she was there; don’t know whether Mrs. Walker came there two seasons rupping; remember the fact of a revenue cutter party coming, but cannot say whether it was before or after this party came that Mra. Walker and Dr. Heartwetl stood together in the position I have mentioned; they stood in the front door of the wooden house; don’t recollect whether it was im the morning or evening; I cannot i 8 3 g F ¢ use 5 nothing differing from ‘tis as one fancies sbout that. me, , had there been anything materially different from What you knew, aan hee wee T have kept you by ‘Once more, dear Guss, do attempt to scribble a few words—a parenthesis, by @ whist ) pre- day comelo me. “Guns if you love ms, comme mo Elis hat eote ia till ringing ia By ere, eventor Ona music of the spheres—' sweetly, Ing smi lives in my memory fresb,and as holy as—ob, heaven!—as the decp feeling breathed forth from the a hoy pen ups to give it utterance. How shall I write? Not as Z wis! Icould—] not. Foal ill vou of they ht star, star that still sheds i of upon my pat ‘the oot “A it aeds down to my inmost would be oe ee ennee asthe future, « dark yy e msea. Awa; cold caution; "tis too ee bids , brilliant, talented—why enume- care to analyse the Tfancied. I could not. As soon as reason was called to give his all werful decisiun—so soon it became not love, but pru- tial, cold preference. I know not if I make myself intelligible; in either sense of the word, I want the spirit of Guss Waldron here to answer to the feelings of my own soul. Shall I not have it? Say, dearest Gusa, how soon may I look for the light of your countenance to shine upon me? Boauly ritually sick, I cannot write ee eet ree i truth nee (Maptaalty of better had I only at the not Pp of the world. I must stop this pen of mine, which moves on, on, on, giving you, if nothing more, some idea of eternity—neither beginning nor end. Sunday morving.—Again am I before thee, dear Guss, aaahare attemp'ed to reac what I wrote last evening need I say that the effort was unsuccessful, and Ihope you may be equally puzzled, for ’tis ever thus with me, a creature of impulse—my feelings seem to get the better of my reason. It rains in torrents, so that I cannot attend church to day or walk from Hannah’s at five o'clock this afternoon ! a sad disappointment to me, as you may imagine when— When shall I see you? ‘There are very many things which I am anxious to talk with you about—questions of morality, religion, and other themes, which, if you can answer, will quiet my conscience; that ia, answer to suit my way of reasoning—such as how near may one ap- proach to guilt without being guilty, &e. Tam sick, Guss, in mind an , but I blush to say that Iam infinitely less solicitous about my moral than my physical state. Let me have dear Guas with me once more, to Haten to the tones of that voice which has so often whispered words of peace and comfort to my wea- ried spirit. What can I offeras an inducement? Bos- ton is gay now—concerts, theatres, and lectures are in abundance. Come and go with me, for I am Gay this win- ter; but with you here, could be more so opasty. Now to breathe the very air that —— is happiness enough; but to be near, read in the clear depths of those eyes truth, is what must wait, your arrival for before I dare venture to geze upon thelr brightness. What a fool! Aye, think so, Guss. 11 not deny it; but for Heaven’s sake, if not for mine, give this letter to the ‘ devouri element.”’ I would not care to let the goggled eye: world light upon such a document. Guess they would have more ‘food for talk or thought”’ than ever they received on a similar occasion. I shall now Jook for you daily, and believe me honest and true when I say that it will give me hearty pleasure to have you pass as many days with me as you can make it agreeable to yourself. should you prefer going to Chelsea first, do not forget make me an carly call; and if you find me “‘out,”’ re- main until lam “in.” This I ask, and shall hope to see you ere ay te at the corner of Beach and Oxford, when we will talk over the past and present, do‘h alike of no little interest to vs. Be sure that you come over as soon as you arrive. I heard through —— —— that you were in town; peoordinely called at Mount Vernon street, but found that your mother only left that day. Andnow good bye, cearest. I must see you soon. I long for some one else to 8) my thoughta to. What other ono dearer than you In haste, aff., KATE. Mr. Blunt then said that he desired the jury to look at toon pastas) and see that the parts italicised were in differ- ent ink. Elias D. Pierce, examined how Busteed, deposed—I live in New York, and shall have lived here two years next December; Tkeep ® restaurant; am a cousin of Mr. Walker; was formerly acquainted with Mrs. Walker and a visiter of her house; she lived at the corner of Oxford and Beach streets, Boston; I know the Hon. George Evans,who has been Senator from Maine; I have travelled in a steamboat from Bath to Boston with Mr, Evans and Mrs. Walker; it was in the year 1848 or 1849; eannot teil which year; think that the Charter Oak was the name of the bost; I saw George Evans and Mra. Walker in compa- ny together on board the boat on that occasion; | saw ir. Evans attentive to her, and in conversation with her on the deck; I saw them enter the stateroom together; I did not see either of them come out; they entered the stateroom together between 9 and 11 o’clock at night; I saw them on the whart in Boston the next morniog, at about balf-past 4 o'clock; he handed her to a car- ricge; be entered the seme carriage; I first com- municated these facts to Walker this year, since the suit commenced; I did not tell them before, because ke and I were not on good terms; even now we are hardly so; I would not vouch for his love for ms; after Isaw Mr. Evans and Mrs. Walker enter the stato- room J walked up and down, smoking a segar, for about an hour; I did not pass the stateroom, but could see it from where I was; I did mot see Senator Evans come out of the stateroom while I was there, but he might have ccme out; the weather that night was mild and cicar. ‘To a Juror—I was confident that the woman wh en- tered the stateroom with Senator Evans was Mrs. Walker; I did not speak to her. Cross-cxamined by Mr. Blun'—My restaurant is $4 Nassau strect; I have been there with the man Iam with now between seven or eight months; I am a laborer there; Ido the buying and attend to the bar; before I went there I was out of business; I was sick with fever and ague; prior to the seven months I was in 84 Nassau street Iattended a clothing store at 18944 Sixth avenue; I was also at the corner of Canal and Varick streets, keeping a bar, for three months; I was then out of busi- ness, end stayed in New York; I was at work last night state how Jong Mrs. Walker remained at our house in 1845; recollect her being there with her husband; Dr. Heartwell was not there then ; I never saw Dr. Heartwell or Mrs. Walker before that ; know Mrs. Walkor by ight, and remember seeiv there once; can’t say ‘whether it was before or . ‘a. Waldron came there that I saw Mrs. Walker ana . rrtwell standing toge- ther; Mrs. Walker has been insu. of our house between the 8th of August, 1845, and 1848; cannot name the dates or times When. A juror here rose and said that he had noticed a lady in the crowd making signs to the witness, and felt it his bests to inform the Court of the fact. The Court said that any communications with the wit- nesses while on the stand, were highly improper and must be stopped. Witness—I certainly think that I saw Mrs. Walker in- side of our house in the years 1846 and 1847; she was there in 1848 with her children; I cannot say how long she remained; don’t know that Dr. Heartwell was there in 1848; I have seen Mrs, Walker ride with Dr. Heartwell frequently; I don’t know that I ever saw him ride with her more than twice; I don’t know whether I havo seen him walk with her more than twice; I have seen them onee walk from the point of the gro: them pope ce front of the house; when I saw them; don’t know what time of day it was when I saw them standing in the door; I was are | down staire at the time; neither of thom, I think, ha: any covering on their heads; we have spoken of Mrs. Walker at home; I never expressed any feeling about Mrs. Walker, except as to her ropeoper conduet. Q. Did you not state to Frederick B. Sewell that you al. Mag disliked Mrs. W.?—that Mra. W. did not treat you well, was not kind to you, and had not thanked you for all you had done for her? A. I presume I may have said so. Q. Did you not state to Mr. Sewell that you were pre- judiced against Mrs. Walker, because Mra. Walker bad said things affecting the character of your father’s house? ‘A. Ldon’t remember saying so; I always heard that she eaid things against the house when was in the habit of coming there. To Mr. Busteed—1 know Mr. Lawson; was present at the converration between him and my mother, my mo- ther raid she knew the circumstances perfectly well, ahd was willing to tell them, but she knew nothing to crimi- te ‘alker; I believe Mr. Sewell isa lawyer; he wes employed by the Pattens; Sewell showed me a writ. ten statement which was brought there by him and Mr. James Patten; there iss copy of the writing at home now; I s'gned no writing for him; I told Mr. Patten then , that I considered Mrs. Walker’s conduct with Dr. Heart- | well very improper. Q. Did you or did you not state to Mr. Sewell that all you said was for the purpose of making peace, but that nevertheless you believed Mra. Walker guilty? A. I don’t know; I think this conversation took place in Moy last; I don't know whether the paper Mr. Patten showed me was drawn up by a justice of the peace in my presence; my conversation with Mr. Sewelt took place after I had seen Walker. William 8. Post examined by Mr. Churchill—My busi- ness is teaching. preaching occasionally, and missionary work in general; 1 knew a Miss Liman; she resided at the Five Points Missiot my own personal knowledge where Miss Liman is now; but she married Mr. Rice, a dentist, and they went to | Great Barrington, Mass., 4 I understood. Cross-examined by Mr. Blunt—I have resided in Broome | street nearly @ year; Liman came there about a | year ago; I was connected with the mission before; there | mod one and females, women and children, in that | sion. Caroline Tebbetts examined by Mr. Busteed—I am mar- ried, and reside at Boston; Tam the sister of Walker, the defendant; 1 know the plaintiff and have been intimate with her since her ; have been at Harpswell; fobs witness here asked permission to speak to Mr. Bus- eed, which was granted by the Court;) I have seen Mrs. Walker write; 1 know her handwriting, and have re- cetved letters from her; I have seen her write very often; me hag now shown to me isin Mrs. Walker's hand- | ting. To Mr. Blunt.—I don’t think that the sy pti on the letter is in the handwriting of the defendant; I don’t think it is in Mrs. Walker’s handwriting. | Mr. Blunt said that th on no rule of law could | this letter be received in evidence, in accordance | with the wishes of Mra. Walker, he withdrew his objec- | tion to having it a a ry Q. by Mr. Blunt.—When you spoke to the counsel for the ‘tere nee during your eapratoctio n, after he bad put a | certoin question to you, did you not say tliat you wore not called upon the stand for that purpose’ A. 1 did, Mir. Busteed then vead the following lotter:—+ l TLGb diese WALKM TO bithe WALDEON. , dear Cure, 00 voolding—I bave deinyed writing th ee, not from negligence, but that al! im, it ar- ticks ‘ing bap hept my pom quiet, and inasmuch as J goat till a quarter past eleven at 84 N street; I did not see Walker last night; I saw Mr. Walker either the even- ing before last or the evening before that at my house; I was subpomaei for this triai more¢han five days ago; never was here before to-day; Iwasa clerk to Wm. B. Dye just before I left Boston; I am married and am liv- ing with my wife; I have been married three times. Q ae two of your wives sued for and obtained di- vorces Obje:ted to by Mr. Busteed, and objection sustained by the Court, Witners—I raw Mr. Evans and Mrs. Walker on board the boat early in the summer; cannot name the month; I told Mr. Walker of this within a month; I am sure of this; I never atated it before to any fg a I think I mate the communication to Walker the stroet; may have been at my house; it was in the day tim can’t tell when I saw Mr. Walker before I made t) communication to him; saw Walker in the street, for the fret time after I came to New York, last October; since then and the time I communicated this alleged fac to him I cannot tell how often I saw him; have seen him at least a dozen times this year, and wien I have met him I Save wey oe to him; have seen Walker at my place at three times; there was a ide deck to the Charter Oak; the la- lercoms were on the upper deck; the le deck on the etern of the boat had no state- rooms; saw no doors dividing that part of the promenade deck where there were sta’ from the part where there were none; the stateroom into which I saw Mr. Evons and Mrs. Walker go was on the left hand side look- ing forward; this stateroom might have been the second or third from the end; don’t know how often I had travel- ed in the Charter Oak; cannot state‘how many staterooms there were on each side of the deck; think abont six; Mr. Evans and Mrs. Walker came from the stern; there was no awning at that time covering the stern; there were other persons on the deck then; don’t know who commanded the Charter Oak; don’t know whether there were any persons in the saloon; think there was no saloon on the upper deck; there might have been settees there; there was a space ‘between the state- rooms on either side; don’t know whether there were eny “aoe Bd that space might have been five or six feet wide, more or less; I don’t mean to say that I was smoking a regar there; I was pecking S segar about twenty odd feet from the opening ig to the atate- rooms; the staircase was about midships; that stair- case I think was aft of the stateroom into which I raw them go; I was about twenty feet from them when I caw them enter; I cannot say that I entered the passage with a segar in my mouth; I walked towards the stern and back to the passage; I cannot tell the distance from the to the stern of the boat; I stood still a little while; T was: then about twenty feet from the pas- bs. going in to the staterooms; the stateroom door was ot open when they reached it; I saw him open it; it it swung out I could see it; cannot tell whether it opened outwards or inwards; Mr. Evans opened the door; can’t tell whether the door was then unlocked; 1 was standing nearer the left than the right hand side of the boat; don’t know how far from the rail I was; there was nothing to obstruct my vision between where I stood and the door of the stateroom; only saw Mr. bie 3 and Mrs. Walker on ee 5 ee logether once; saw no one sea sick on that passage; boat left Bath about six o’clock; saw Mr. Evans first on ‘board when I was paying my fare; believe it ia twelve miles from Bath to the mouth of the river; think I paid my fare before we got out of the river; saw Mrs. Walker first talking with Mr. Evans before we left the river; do not know how long it was after we left the river that I saw Mr. Evans and Mrs. Walker enter the stateroom; I think wo then on the Atlantic; I think we were in Caeco Bay; we were then in sight of land; in good wea- ther Tihink that if the boat was properly steered we would not have been out of sight of land in the day time; there is a light called Pond Island Light at Seguin Island; the next light visible after leaving Soguin, is, [ think Cape Elizaberh Light; cannot aay if wo had passed tha Ny Ee, but think we were about there; cannot tell where Tlit my segar; cannot te)l how many ra 1 emoked then; there was no light at the stern of the boat where T could light a segar; the did not last an hour; the rest of the time I remained there I was alone; do not re- collect when | received the subpoena in this cause; found it in 84 Naseau street; | wasaclork for Walker in 1846, but I was not a clerk of his at the time when I saw the occurrence to whioh I have testified. To Mr. Busteed.—I am not positive that the steamboat was the Charter Oak. Jobn Orser, Sheriff uf New York, examined by Mr. | Busteed—Eldrige Sireet prison is under my charge; know Wildes P, Walker; be was in jail when i came into | having participated in the affray. office on Int of January, 1865; he rematued in ny cus: | tedy vntil the 1¢tn of Pevember, 183; he got out of my custody by an order of court. | Fronklin WH. Charebill, examined by Mr. T | pored—T pm a lawyer, one af the stterners for the de fenaent in this Action; I know when Walker was dla- charged from ; this suit for a divoreo was commeroed on the 8th of February, 1854, that is, I then received the teod, de was commenoed on the 8d or 5th of November, forme Goto secount of an informadityla next was commenced on the sami day that the tint Ay was discontinued; it aleo wae discon Cross-examined by Mr. B'unt. The aniwer to the pra sent suit was put in on the 10th of April, 1854. Br. Busteed here read the following notice:— New Yorx Common Praas.—Catharine FP. P. Walker ste agatns W tides Christian 8 Sleamc, her neal Walker.—Take notice that produce on the trial ¢f this ten by the defendant in this plaintiff and delivered to her by one bg ted on or about December 14, 1853, in wl ant informed the plaint® be was out was then ready to support her, and take Brunswick, New Jersey, and w! A are tion a 3 pe H rs proof will be given of its contents. Yours, &e., WOODBURY & Attorneys for To Martin Strong and A. k. Smith, Eage., Mr. Blunt said that he acknowledged this notice, but if any euch paper had possession he would object to its production. document in question. Geor side at Gardiner, in the State of Maine, for several years; I ain counsellor and Walker; I firet saw Mr. avd . Walker in time nebee, lying at the wharf in Boston, Mien caw ber beaband with hers 1 don’t thi nized her if ber husband to her, ‘I place you under Mr. Evans’ went ashore, and thé buat shortly converration with Mrv. Walker on board, versation with her; the promenade to not; Iremember that the lamp which was side of the stateroom was suddenly put out or some other cause; I re-lit it, and then enw Mre, Welker on board any” steamboat ; was any illicit intercourse, or any improper the most remoe, between me and Mrs. Cross examine by Mr. Busteed.—I General of Maine; [know Mr Patter fessioually by Patten; to my reco ‘deen once at Mra Walker's house, at Bath, cannot stave precisely when this was, but I an hour, observed her first, on thut ocoaio: taking a re cupied ti ‘Was a member of the Senate when Walker came to Was! tome by a messenger and when I raw him on the wharf; don’t with him then to his house; two or three times a year; between Mrs. Walker on board the steamboat more er wasin the habit of travelling in these on these trips from Boston to Bath. Here the Court adjourned. Superier Before Chief Justice Oakley, Campbell and Hoffman. . Uj t the the defendant’s name was for, the plaintiff offered to prove allowing him to fill them up. The defendant then offered to prove on The plaintiff objected; the objection wa: and an exception taken. admitted. It was found that the note in note. Evidence that the defendant had endorsements to his son, we dorsements. The impression of the witness was t! ant’s to a note shown to him. tion did not the case A 1 to the notes of 1. They were exhi ab to prove by tures. His evidence di ought to be clearly fendant admitted them to be genuine could admit them as contradicting We see no reason growing out of an objections why the verdict of the ju de! of of evidence. and judgment ordered upon the verdict. have been favored by a friend with the rua She occasionally spins miocklag quality, not exceiled by that of her bors, bhe is quite intelli her memory remarkably well and evinces ‘action and addrpesed to wished ber te and reside with him, or that in default thereof, geod and was formerly U 8S Senator forthe State Tknow Wildes P. Walker; | am not an intimate acquain- tance of his; i have some slight acquaintance city of Washington; I spoke to Mrs. Walker caly answered ene question then, which she rd to a relation of hers in Washington; saw Mra. Walxor was on board the steamer in 1847 and had not never employed professionally by any of his family Thave no professional connection with thia st EVIDENCE—WHAT ADMI88I6LE TO PROVE June 28.—Van Wyck agst. McIntosh —' an action brought against the defendant as endor- ser of a promissory note, and the defence was that think was ve. admitted, as it tevded to show that the endorsement in question might bave been one of such blank en- The evidence offered on the cross- examination of James Blake was properly e~aladed, nuine. And the Judge further instructed fa that they must be perfectly convinced this distarbed. Nor do we think it is The motion for a se ton is We the it, Pid. Att'y, hay reseirod on ton iin hie Mr. Busteed asked for permission to be allowed to duce & witness hereafter, to prove the contents g with f i F3 she 82F pat 5 g EE 5 if 5 I i é 7 care;? Walker after left; and it was the first time I had ever entered into any lengthened oon- “aeck was crowded with people, ro that I was often obliged to stang, unable ocure a seat; she became sea sick towards evening, and J offerea her my arm to take her to her stateroom; I don’t recollect whether I opened the door with a ee n- hai by # immediately wind there never familiarity, alker, ; I have been inti- mate with him since September or October, 1846; I have been at Patten’s house six or seven times since 1846; never staid there all night; I have beem emp! fessionally by the railroad company in which is @ director; the case is brought iu the name of Patten; except in this one suit, I have never been ens] yea pro- ir. Peten ed pro- on I was uit; I have in Haine; I think it was in 1850, 185) or 1852; 1 wasonce in the ears, for abeut with Mrs. Walker; Twas golng to Portland; I mn, ween Branswick and Portland; did not see her get out; don’t remember beside her; she avd her three children oc- eat; from 1844 to 1847 Iresided at Gordiner; from 1841 to 1847; in 1844, bis card was sent in ; don’t recollect Mr, or Mrs, Walker then asking me 1o call and see them; did not call and see him; met Walker two or three times between that time know whero Walker lived in Boston; was at his house once; went ve no recollection of see- ing Mra, Walker then; have been in the habit ef from Bath to Bosten in the steamer, between 44 41, 747 and °491 may have been twice a month; have no recollection of than once; i was the occasion of which I have spoken; I am very poai- Tive that I never saw her on board a, steamboat, on the occasion adverted to; don’t know that Mrs. Walk- ex08) boats from Path to Boston; my wife has been several times with me Court—General Term, and Hon. Ju iges Duer, ¥. was the trial jefendant had been accustomed to give his son blank checks, The defendant ob- jected to the introduction of this testimony; the objection was overruled, and an exception taken. the cross examination of one Blake, that the defendant’s son had committed other forgeries, but this testimony wasexciuded. The defendant thea offered to prove the defendant’s signature to checks drawn in the regular course of business about the time ot the suit. 2 sustained, Judgment was renderad for the plaintify, and the defendant appealed. Camrbei., J—Tue evidence that the defendant had given to his son blank endorsements,was properly nestion was filled up by the defendant’s son, and delivered, and the piaintiff’s name was written on the back of such given blank properly it defend- son had written the name of the witness The examination of the witness in relation to that note might | tend to show the skill of the son in imitating other people’s signatures, but we think would not be relevant to show the signature of the defendant to be forged on the note in suit. The testimony of- fered by the defendant in regard to his checks drawn on the Greenwich Bank was properly rejected, be- cause the object was to allow the jury to institute a comparison ef the handwriting of the defendant on the checks with the endorsement on the note suit. Such comparison is never allowed except in cases where the documents are necessarily before the jury. When they are necessary exhibits in the cause, and are produced, then the Court will enter with the jury upon the comparison. But it is done in such cases as matter of necessity, and wher from the course of the trial it becomes unavoldable— Perry vs. Newton, 5; A. L. Ellis, 519. This 5 my to the defendant’s witnesses on cross-examination to test their knowledge of defendant’s handwriting, and not for comparison by the jury. It was competent mnuineness of those not fally come point of satisfactory proof, and so the structed the jury. He also instructed them established that the: a Ju y | that. before lie AnotuER Survivor or THE Revo.veri0n—We that there resides in Pleasant Mount Borough, this county, a Mrs. Benjamin, at the advanced age of one hundred and ten years, wi! proaposts of living many years longer lly fair ber. yarn of the neigh- ent, and seems to retake 8 clearness of judgment of pore and a mind yet distinct- ly impressed with the scenes of the been married three times; her were killed in the Revolution, an named Benjamin, died about thirty the time she was employed at West een aia ak Point sooking for the army, and was present at one of the battles with Burgoyne, and nition to es disbanded at Ne and on which ceoauion the Cenerst was not afraid of the bullets, when she “Oh! the sword neverrobs the balter.”— County ( Pa.) Herald. Rrorovs Assavit.—Between on Saturday evening, while a Tuttle wae closing the store of on the corner of St. John and pak Mad ener Be men came parently in pursuit of some n. store, one of them cried cat, Yankee ?”’ to which another res} Yankee, at any rate.” “Yea.” am a Yankee,” whereupon they attacked after he had knocked down one or twe, ceeded in giving him a severe A several of his ribs, and otherwise Douglass assisted to defend his clerk, and was Others somewhat bruised in the rencontre. their assistance and the assailants were though not until after a +! which were evident about premises The police arrested Joseph Murray, James u assisted in distributing ammu- epee rg ageatiny weg: gen y ”, came driven battle, the marks yesterday. of Dennis Desmon and James mS em suspicion ones and other miesiles were found in their pockets, going to their culpability —Niw Haven Courier, June 2 The New York ex; Chidell, of the New aby the Ral 0 Sytacure to Rochester, a distanceof Fou ninety six minutes, op Friday. This is Fepers; One sult for a divorce Letween the paso partig §, ning on record, tor #0 great a distance, new erg'a, vee From milee, in tasteet Face wished her good night; that fs the only time when] ever .