The New York Herald Newspaper, July 13, 1851, Page 2

NEW YORK HERALD. UJAMES GORDON BENNETT, PRCPRIESOR AND EDITOR, SFTICE N. W. CORNER OF FULCON AND NASSAU STS. THE WEEKLY HERALD, Satu its per cove. or 83 per ang uropean F my part of ‘Great Britain, avd f beth to inciwde the postage. | PONDENCE, ‘containing | pnd tarde Aulicited from any guarter of the world 4, witt ratty paid for, Qua Pour | Te ARE PARTICULARLY REQUESTED TO SEAL ALL remitted. ADVE. wenewed every morning. JOR P. executed with neatness, fend despatch. AYUSEMENTE TO-MORROW EVENING. | of the State. of the people have a clear right a! aay time to make a change. The Catholics of this ceuntry, with very few exceptions, are utterly opposed to the Pope being ® temporal ruler; and there is one feet that speaks volumes—Catholicity in the United States, and in Great Britain and Ireland, where it has no connexion with the State, is confessedly those countries where it is the established religion It is very evident that Archbishop Hughes has become reactionary since he backed up the Irish revolutionists in 1848, when he contributed $500 to establieh a young republic in the Green Isle. It is clear that he has retrograded since he lauded Pio Nono to the skies for making a step in advance of the age. The sovereign pontiff became alarmed at his own progress; he first hesitated, then re- treated, and fivally lost himself forever a; a public CASTLE GARDEN-La Favonita. NIBLO'S GARDEN, Broadway.—Le Diasie 4 Qvaree —Opaen Moveren. WRTIONAL THEATRE, Chatham strect—Sr. Ciana’s Bve—A Day i Panis -Toree Wives or Baspav. { ate ! PROVE MAME LYCEUM, Broatway—Dow Casan De | Barax—iscrane Er CuARLENAGNE. GERISTY'S MINSTRELS, Mechanics’ Hall, 472 Broadway | Brworias Buxsrresy. FELLOWS MINSTRELS, Fellows’ Musionl Hall, No. 444 | Sroedway—Ernierian MinsTRELsy. | AMERICEN MUSEUM—Amusive Pearonmances Ay- | PERS0ON any Ev Este. New York, Sunday, July 13, 1851. News from Europe. | ‘The American steamship Franklin, Capt. Wot ton, is due to-night from Southampton, with four day.” later news from Europe. | Summary of the Latest Intelligence, | man. | ‘The sanguinary character of the French revolu- tion has been urged by the apologist of the Arch | bishop in the Tribune, or the Archbishop him! , ag a ground for the reactionary movement. not sanguinary, in the worst sense of tie term. It is true, some blood was shed; but it was rather an accident than a necessary resu't of the revolution. The loss of life attending the dethronement of Louis Philippe, and the establishment of a republic, was perhaps as small as ever accompanied so great a political change; and it is not for one moment to be weighed in the balance against the advantages flowing from a system of self-government, by which the people make their own laws, and carry them into execution. It might as well be turned as an inst republicanism in this country, the penalty of their crimes, under a democratic form of government. Republicanism does not pro- fess to heal all the diseases of society, or to eradi- ‘The New Yor instivution fer the Educe- eation of the Blind. On Thursday the annual examination of the pupils at- tending the above institution, commenced at § o'clock, A.M. The exercises during the forenoon were confined to the erdinary course of education, mamely:—re writing, arithmetic, English grammar, the elements composition, chemistry, natural amd moral philosophy, | branches ef useful science, in several of which depart- ments many of the pupils sustained « highly creditable character during the examination. At 2o’clock, P.M, the examination was again re- sumed, efter an intermission of shams ee betes, he i exercises rte ‘ing chiefly of a masical character. he following e programme afternoon exerc’ all performed by the students, both male end female:— ART FIRST. First. F, MeMeeban. ‘Second.—Prayer, by the Rev. Mr. Hat. Third. —Chorus: “Salvation, 0, the joyful sound.” Fourth —Eseay on the Mind, Gould. ‘The manner in which Mr. Gould handled his subject displayed considerable crane and segues strength of mind, and « bigh degree of mente! and moral culture. th-Band, by pine of the students. This the exercises was also ereditably exe- cuted out. Siath.—Bong, “ My happy home.” by Julia Spring. voi Eighth —Band. Ninth Song, “On the banks of Guadelquiver,”” Miss . Bnifiin. ‘This beautiful song was sung in a style thet called forth applause from the hundreds that thronged the where the examination was conducted. ;h.—Graud March, piano, by BE. Hail and C. Van Houton. Eleventh.—¥seay on Moral Courage, by C. Hazlet. No young mau who had gone through # full coileziate courses cf elucation, and pomening the wee of all hist culties, could have handled his subject in a more lucid and argumentative style than did Mr, Hazlet. He rea- soned foreibly on the difference between moral and nata- ral courage. "Iie quoted largely from the Scriptures and other historical writings of antiquity, to illustrate what moral courage bad achieved, where the natural or meu- | that we have State prisons, and convicts suffering | tal had failed, or which, if depended upon, would have been the ruin of many eminent individuals whom he | named. These and many other striking illustration were pointed out, and the actions of individuals com. mented upon in & graphic and fcreible manner. edfth —Gondolier's Serenade—selveted and arranged - ws ur readers will find under our telegraphic head, | cate all the vices of man; but it professes to be the | by A. Van Alstine. one of the senior students, Chorus ® very interesting despatch from Albany, which | best system of human government yet discovered; | | and its practical working in the United States, has giver an insight into proceedings that occurred at the State Capitol, after the adjournment. It ap- | pears that a terrible rush was made for the spoils | the moment after the adjournment; and that those | who benefitted by the legislation of the extra ses- | sion, were extremely eager to clutch the money voted away by the majority. We venture to say that a more corrupt sessien never was held in Al- | reacticn among the timid, and the supporters of | bany, than that which has been just brought to a | lose. The Seward dynasty seemed, from the out- | set, determined to make as much <3 possible for | their purty and their friends whilst they retained power, and acted as if they were as hungry as bears | They will be | im the spring, after a long winter. ‘ealled upon hereafter for an account of their stew- ‘dship; and if the people do not have proof posi- tive, and in abundance, that the Seward abolition whig party of this State are incapable of diresting | cans of the United States are responsible for the | the government of this State, for the benefit of the whole people, by the time of the next election, we will be much mistaken. At the caucus wh ch was held by the abolition | the national wealth, to which they have contributed | whigs after the adjournment, resolutions endorsing the compromise measures of the last Cozgress were | introduced, but indignantly rejected. Nothing Yess could be expected from such an unprin- sipled faction. There is no doubt of the conviction of General Talcott, at Washington. We publish, under our telegraphic head, the sentence—the President's ap- proval of it—and the censure passed on Colonel Huger. This bas been a most extraordinary pro- ceeding, from the commencement. We have received nothing further concerning Mr. Webster's resignation. If he has not resigned, we think it very probable he will do so at an early day, in order to fortify himself for the Presidential election. Jenny Lind, we learn, was very much frightened | @uring ber last concert in Albany, and fainted on | the stage, under the apprehension that there would | be ariot. Nothing of the kind, however, occurred, and she has gone to Utica, to give converts in that city. Archbishop Hughes on Republicanism in Europe. The sermon of Archbishop Hughes, on his return ‘to this country, has led to much discussion in the mewrpapers and in private circles. The wholesale adhesion of His Grace to the cause of European monarchies and despotisms, and his denunciation of republicanism struggling for existeace in various countries in the old world, have aroused the atten- tion of the inhabitants of the new, and particularly the Irish and Catholic portion of our population. ‘The pressure has become so great that it has been thought necessary to put forward an indirect and a@novymous denial of the accuracy of the reports of the sermon in the newspapers ‘This ingenious device wil! uot do. There has been mo attempt to show a single instance of a misre- port. In fact, it would be impossible. The whole fabric of the discourse—the warp and woof alike— as the scope and tenor assigned to it, and uo ingo- muity can give it any other meaning. The seati- ments expressed by His Grace before leaving this | sity for Rome—his sermon in London—and hie speeck in Liverpool, are all of the same anti-ro- publican stripe. There can be no mistake in the | Butwe are told that the press has no right to report the sermons of Archbishop:, or tocomment | mponthem. The press lias precively the same right iticise the pulpit that che pulpit has to ani- madvert upon the press. ‘Che newspapers, there- | fore—even if those discourses did not assume a po- | litical complexion—have a right to report thea, and to offer fair-strictures upon the priaciples and | em. In this ropublicaa country the press is free. ‘There is no Intex Ex- purgatorius—Do laquizition—no church power, to control the pewspap ape+k one. wag, or to be silent. There is no bed of | Procrustes, to whore dimensions the stature of the | human intellect is tobe reduced by rack and tor ture. Thought is free, and its expression is free, | and wit! continue so to be, as long as the Declara- | p of independence and the constitution of the | United States shail endure } The whole argument of Acchbishop Hag’ is | founded upon a gratuitous ant false assumption. | He holds that the Pope has an inhereat Di sight to the sovereigety of Rome. But the Pope | is ouly.the heed of the Catholic charch, and has no | snore right, human or Dirine, to be a political sove- | reign, (han any other mae. [fis rigkt does not last one hoor beyond the will of the people; nor do the intervention of a foreign power, forcing him @pon ups iling lie add aught to bis cight in the | sight of God or man. The doctrine of th» Divine | Fight of kings has been leng since exploded, and the people are now regarded, by all but depots and their minigns, a the true souree of legicimate power St. Peter, seid to be the first Pope of ome, and from whom ail hie sueceseors profess to derive the! Suthority, was not a political sovereign. So far from that, when asked for alms he aid, “silver | and gold Lave | none,” and he was actually cruci- Ged by the reigning power at Rome. The govern- | ment of Church and State was not combined in one | Person til the eighth ccn'ury of the Christian ora. | ‘The right of the Pope to the temporal sovereigaty | @f Rome was never claimed till the time of Charle- | magne, when, fur the firet time, a locument was abundantly established the soundness of its theory. In France, too, republicanism would have realized the expectations of its rational friends, but for the | mad and headlong course of the socialists, the anar- | chists, and red republicans, who attempted a second | revolution, and, failing in the attempt, produced a existing law and order, which almost brought the republic back to monarchy. They did not under- stand the spirit of the revolutionary movement, | and by their imprudent conduct they not only retarded the chariot wheels of progress, but actu- | ally drove it in the opposite direction. It was here | that human blood was shed like rain, aad shed to | no good purpose. The true republicans of France | Were no more responsible for this than the republi- | vagaries of Horace Greeley, socialism, Fourierism, | and all the isms whose followers prefer public | plunder to bard work, and a utopian division of little or nothing the mselves, to the honest industry | their brow. ‘The socialist reform party expected hat a revolution would make them all rich, like m egic; and being disappointed in so vain and absurd an expectation, they attempted the overthrow of a constitutional republic, and all law and order, and the substitution of a red republic, or a reign of ter- ror, in tsstead They were put dowa, as they de served to be; but unfortunately, liberty was re pulsed by the same blow, and has not yet recovered from the shock. The Archbishop, therefore, ought to make rome distinction between monarchy and despotism on the one hand, and red republicanism and anarchy onthe other. Between these extremes lie constitutional :epublicanism and rational free- dom. This was all that che Roman patriotssought and all that the great mass of European repubii cans desired. lu opposing them, and making com- mon cause with their tyrants and oppressors, Arch- bishop Hughes appears to us to be an ineonsi citizen of the United States; and it is not to be wondered that plain unsophisticated republicans ent | such political doctrines from the pulpit, by the highest digpitary of the Catholic church in this country. New Freak tx Fasuionaste Lire.—The peeu- liar form and diagnosis of this new efuption in fashionable society has been liberally discussed, and it will be known to posterity and the mankind, as the “ Home Book of Beauty.’’ Its rise, progre: ud specific character will constitute a standing topic of discussion during the summer, at allthe watering places; and we do not see how | our proverbial philanthropy can be more beacfi | cially exercised than by anticipating and gratify- ing curiosity on this point. It is known that for several years past an an- | nual has been published in England entitled the ** Book of Beauty,” containing portraits of such of | England's haughty and titled beauties as would consent to lend their features and their names to the public. Of course, everything in New York society must be an imitation of something in fashionable society in Europe. Of its own inde” pendent self, society in New York has not vitality enough to hang together a week. Consequently, the women of Now York must have a “ Book of Beauty,” as well as their prototypes across the | water. A publisher, an artist, and an editor were accordingly selected, and after @ great deal of sublime flutteration, the ii the list of favored “beauti having been made out entirely from a certain small and particularly vulgar coterie of our would be fashionables—to the complete exclusion of the ninety nine other coteries, each as high born, as eminent for taleat and genius asthis. The list itself, too, upon examination, compelling them all to | turned out to be a strangely compounded affair, con- | the bl sisting mostly of respectable elderly ladies, pretty high up in the forties—while the really fresh, piquant, and rory beauties, which even the coterie If could have furnished, also got the go-by Here is a “ Book of Beauty” indeed '—which ought rather to be called a “Book of Female Antiquities” —and which will probably be a work of mo rest to the amateurs in entomol and taxydermi thanto the gay # . However, the “‘Home Book of Beauty,” euch as it is, we are to have ofa certainty, with the name of cient divinity engraved at full length beneath her D The most recondite portion, however, of this work, must necessarily be the biographical hotie * accompanying each portrait, and which are te bewritten by a lady of some celebrity in the blue stocking world. We confess that, as 4 staunch eup porter of our new fledged aristocracy, we await the appearame of these biographical «ketche trepidation. Cruelly debarred, a# are our aristocra- cy from allvéles ond dignities, by our miserable and plebcion constitution, there i# as yet, melancholy to relate, no suck: work in existence aan American itee te specimens each | Peerage; and we fear that our fair biographer will, nd to know exactly what In regard to some of to print aed what to orn these distinguished fax riltes, their origin, we fear, | is lovt in the remote ana’ fabulous periods of auti- quity; while the modesty of ali is so well known, | that ore never, by any eh fee, hears them mea. tion a word, even about thea” grandfathers. Now, the ig to be done de this: to eupply the put forth, purporting to be decree of Constantine | learned biographese of the “Hoye Book of Beauty the Groat, granting temporal cov aenty to the Pope, from the period that that emperor, in the fourth century, removed the seat of empire fron the west to the enst—from Rome to onstautinsple, the city which he founded for the purpose. That dooument was pronounced to be a forgery by tho best and wisest men of the time. Charlemagne, Bowever, was called upon to make good the real or Pretended donation of (onstantine. Ile did so; and from that comparatively modern period, dates the origin of the temporal power of the Po ‘There is no pretence of Divine proscription abc fa; apd if i be morely human, thge the majority with the materials she mey lack, Ving to the mo. deety and reserve of ber ilustriowt subjects, 0 that | her sketches may poesese all the fide. t¥ of history, as well as the grace ef biography. Any one having ist of the beauties who are to No the forth. — oe can a = a it authentic pedigrees, relations, jon, and other iotercoting particulars, ep apgey it be like»—to the editrese of this dainty work. ; Supreme Court. Sos ‘edmond Refore Ghirt Fury Whe the master ning ond widening Wall —A rehearing wag order: Fevt from Nassau to Liven a ft Sater bere and independence to be realized by the s veat of | should feel dissatisfied with the promulgation of t of | inform,'tion of | +t and piano accompaniment. At this stage of the exercives, Mr, J. F, Chamberlain, | the Superintendent, announced that one of the female | portis would read « psalm from the writings practiced in | the school, and asked any of the gentlemen preseut to bame one, when the Rev. Mr. Hart called for the first Psalm, Mies Buthera Bullock was then called up and a | large book handed to het, In les than half a minute she bad opened the page on which the Psalm com- menced, and Tead the whole piece through without the | Aightest hesitation, flowing the lines, from end to end, with her fingers, as if to distinguish the peew iar forma: ion of each letter, or word, by the touch. Hor style of | reading war clear, and emphasis, cadence, pauses, &c., | were as strictly attended to. at their proper points. as if the faculty of teeing had sided in acquiring her course of instruction. PART TWO. purer than in France, and Spain, and Italy, and | aigedra, elementary and practical geometry, and other | low! Vat it was | _ Seventh.—Chorus,* The ‘multitude of angels,” several | yeainst the plaintiff, until the case of Uaplin ; | First—Glee—* Hail, Smiling Morn,” performed by se- | veral voices. accompanied by the piano. | Second —Eseay on Friendship, by F. Haskel. | ‘The address was short, but in the delivery the lan- | guage was elcquent and grammatical. | Third —Band exercise. | Fourth —Sclo on the piano, by Miss H. Barnett. Fifth. Aria, “In native North” —Chas, Hazte Sreth—Semi-echorus, They that sow in tears,” Performed by thirteen voice Seventh-—song, by A. Bal | ‘Vhree or four other songs and musical pieces were exe- | cuted, all doing credit to tbe performers. we song, | which wes the composition and musical arrangement of Mr. A. Van Alstine. one of the graduating student cited applause, goed. A valedictory address, by Mr. L. Hall, another of the ginduating students, concluded the exercises. We give anextrset. In addressing the spectators, Mr, Mall said :— ntlemen, if Lmay judge by myself, owing ue day and the length of time you have that you must all be anxious to retire; but ot detain you long. I aim about to leave you all, institution in which I have been enabled to de- that the God of nature gave me he worthy superintendent, and must ever enter- t sentiments of never-dying gratitude. ¢ among the class of students with whom ke been here. If I shall | twin th | There is ; Lhave badt years but bas bevetitted by the institution, and I am they all justly appreciate the lasting advantages whieb they have received in an educatimal point of | View, as well ae the ever watchful care snd more than parental solicitude evinced by the tutors aud all connceted with the welfare of the institation Fr. Hall then continued his address on tie cultiva. tien cf memory. His arguments were namerous, strong, | and conclusive; and his language throughout was correct | and eloquent. Short addresses were delivered by 8. 8. Randall, Eeq., Superinter. dent of Common Schools for this State; by | Pref. Pheips, of the State Normal School; by Dr. King. | Superintendent of Schools in New Jersey; and by Mr Mekeon Ip: peetor of Schools in this city. Each speaker spc ke ix the bichest terme of praise of the progress nade by the different classes since the last souuabexamina tien. Dr. King made an affetiog appeal fo the si udents to bear in mind the important benefits that had been | ¢CMferred upon them during their course of study; and | admonished thore who were about to take final leave of } | | their alma mater. still to persevere in developing the re- sc urees of their minds. by constant stady and applica tion Similarapjeals were also made by Mr. Chamber- | sin, the superintendent; Prof, Phelps and Mr. Randall. fhe effect upor the students was visible; aud all, both mole and female, seemed to appreciate, in a sensible de- gree, the sslutary and kind advice of their friends Durkog the last year, 147 pupils have received instrus- ticy im the arylum; und the whole course of yesterday's ¢xawinstion showed the great attention, care, and zeal | of the instructors in the faithful diccharge of their ardu | ous duties. | . The ywing is the list of students presented with | diptoamas yesterday. and who bave served a term of seven Jears in the institution:—Abel Lyse. L. Hale, A. Van Aletive, Franklin Haskin, Matthew Davis, Chas. Hazlett, Gecrge Gvilot, Ezra Hall, Joseph Rosell. Elizabeth Pex- ton. Luey A. Kingebury. ‘The summer vacation commences to-day, when the | sludents, accompanied by friends, will proceed to their | respe bomes, Several hundred visitert were pre- | vent yesterday. and all were highly éelighted with the | musical performances, and the general prodeleacy dis- ployed by the students in the various branches of edu- eation, The Christian Brothers. The anvual exhibition and examination of the pupils on Friday, at two o'clock, in the Apollo Rooms, in | Broedwey, the Right Rey, Archbishop Hughes presiding & ni friends of the children. were prevent ‘The examina. were of various kinds, and highly interesting throughout. Brookiyn City Court. Before Hou. Judge Greenwood. BUCKMAN AGAISST LEXOW— ACTION FOR LIBEL AGAINST THE REPORTER OF THE NATIONAL POLICE GazettE. skCOND. Pay. ‘This case was resumed on | Vine of examimation. which was interrupted ae ie jourpme: t op Thursdsy. waa coutinued as to the geue- a characterof the plaintiff, Upon this point the Ly persens were called :—James English, William Hartyhorn, Williem Beylap, Samuel C. Mott, Cornelius ‘Addivon, Oliver W. Sturtevant, James P Decker. Robert L. Crook, 8. &. Coleman, John Patten, Charles Fletcher, Abrabam Van Winkle. and Jacob Houghwout. ‘They all testified as the preceding ones had done, and were ely croséexamined by Mr. Schaffer, but nothing was cliclted On Mott belag questioned as to whether be had not heard that the plaintiff was what is termed in New York a sporting man, the question was objected to, as coming within Judge's ruling of the dey before, by which questions of character as to particular circumstances were excluded. The court taintained the former ruling as far as the prineipal issue was ccheerned. and would ouly allow general character tobe inquired into; but where a witness uadertook to ray that he had heard nothing, he might be asked whether be had not heard any particular charge, be- couse it went to shake the testimony, or test the accu- racy of the witness, Upon this principle the examina- tion was thenceforth conducted, but with the same result, Mrz. Fletcber stated he had never heard anything ‘Was pre- sent at the trial of that case. Cross examined by Mr, Schaffer—Had heard that case; did not recollect whether he was in attendence asa juryman or not; but heard the case; it did not excite ‘any indignation. because his impression was that the girl. young as she was, had been very well t F ‘The examination of these witnesses occupied a consi- derable time, and before it had concluded the Court in- terfered, saying, that having established a primd faci« case, there was no necessity to accumulate evidence. Mr. Clark bad no wish to do so, but if saything. brought cut on the other side, he should be at Lil to call others. Judge Greenwood—Certainly. Mr. Clark would then stop there, Defendant's counsel desired they might exhaust that part of the case. ‘The Court would no further interfere. Mr. Clark would leave this in the discretion of the Court. and would not be controlled by the other side. ‘After bearing Mr. Jacob Houghwout, the Court ordered the evidence on this point to stop here, wasting the time of the Court and jury. Mr. Clark here proposed to read the libel in evidenc Defendant's counsel objected that there was not pri ie case of publication made out,to enable then to acl it. ‘the Court thought there was. The pleadings ad:nit- was erty fa re | ted that the defendant wrote «nd composed it; there was enough *o fo to the jury, as to whether he did not it ication aod whether i¢ was not pub- ‘The defendant's counsel ndmitted all that part of the alleged libel ecmmencing with the affidavit, but not te introductory part. ‘The proof is that he wrote and published the artic Mr. Schaffer—They would take it that he dil write it. Mr. Wilkes was responsible for the publication, it was for him to say what should be published, ‘The Court ultimately ruled there was sufficient evi- dence to admit the in evidence. Mr. Clark then proposed to read other articles from the | eame paper to chow the malice. i ‘The sentiment and poetry were hoth | pleasure to associate for the last seven | f | tion lasted till helf-past five o'clock; and the exercises a 3 Au cpening address to the Most Teverend Avehbishop, | distinguished Limeelf in almost the exemination, and who, at the close, w: parded 1 prizes for his excelleoce in the higher rim: heduention. ‘The «ystem of mathe- matical Jecutionery instruction imparted by the of & puperior order, as was fully ey of manner in which geome- demonstrations were performed on 4 and wumercus pieers of ancient and ceution recited. We were highly pleased at @ to the Iveid, quick. and commanding style ia which even some cf the ger pupils solved a variety of abetrare and complicated propositions in Algebraic verde apd equations. In giving the different transpo- sitions and (ther formulas. owed clearly that they dern bad teen well diseiptined in all the fundamental princi- plee of tbat intricate science Owing to the length of the various exercises. and the beot of the erowded oon ing std gremmer was om the examination in book-Kee pe whieh had it teken plac We bave no doubt would have Leen ali a: Was every other part of xhibition mt cut in wl was a true copy, upon that he f following are some of [he principal subjects which ® ¥attart reainst Wilkes: at that time h imbioced the exercises of the 2.“Hymn al'Eter. Court at Centre street, the Halle of Jay n praise to Ged for bic wonderful works: catechiem | ‘I#h+frred to Kesex merket hort ord seered history, in Feencl: snd Foglieh ; cantiqne on the m took place; Mr W wadeon, aeeompa by a chorus of severe eomnd demanded a he metic ta. in French and Rng. Te now appented ot Rerce mathet: witne 4 Lildiren bey, exch in " in whiek seversi emall bers nately on the map cf ¢ denev of their sirens and subdiy tions «f countries. & a6. rive ordre et deve «©. with masie sot simging: ge artronemy, an interesting dialogue oa euriesit of the United States. entitled © The Ameriena Historical Disiogue.” (Thix last vara piece in which peverel of the tars took part some of the elder nares! in elcquent and grephic Inoguage. the principal inter. ees and evemts in Amerizan history during Wirhe with hy ton small ® piece 4 pleewe were recited. and ces Jabot in singing. wecompanie | by performance ou the orgam ; after which the pupil« Fietwetions in the Sne arte—eal'grwphy. linear, architec turel and expamentel drawing—were exhibited for in- +pection. all of whick were a credit to themselves and thetreutors Af | Most Reverend I y the French languege. by Master H Ellen. nuothee | who was crowned with the second highest m | prises The Ki at intervals eever pil. rot d Avchhiehop then addressed ghe | tehool In pathetic, gious and admonit: rebcol numbers, #t prevent, sevemty et > | three clasres, namely: boarders bait boarders, and | ina et urt before. tromeieut or quarterly scholars, who reride with their \ Mr Clark bere reer, aod seid he would not ewfer any | parents. Yesterday's exhibition was the second annual » one to insult his client. and that bis opinion was that the exemination of the from | m ¢gintrate's conduct wat quite as reprehonettle as that their papile made fro of Mr. Ruekm he vatied exercises thee int “ycdge Mountfort retorted, and an diseursion | « u ice tot only of their | Feet, Which was with difficulty silenced by the court capacity pt the most approved witoe ed—He Fad determined te trrwestigate ryrtem. bat aleo of theit fidelit; ied the ena wely; Mr. Ruckman repeatediy i stilling into the youthful mii the terrey d insisted on an adjournment; principles of secular, moral and relly United States Commissioner's Court. Before J. W Nelson, iq. Tere 12 —Lorzere Ginons Ri was bronght befors He Commircioner, charged with deserting from the Facdinian berk Joan of Ate. The ease vee adjourned over till Mondey. to give the Fardinian Conenl, whe claims the aecured. thine to prezere trenslotione Of the tbip's papers. every branch of | tii to Judge Greenwood—You must show they were written by the defendant, ‘Mr. Clark—We heve shown enough to make him liable He felt it was | libel, which was accordingly read | pec! at the beginning and early wand just oo long as the Witners sustained his Fore FO bd bey: instance in which he had allowed er than @ professional man, accused, and catechise a libel an’ atrocious one, him to justice; had when the witness did % ruled out as questions of law.) He never defendant to go on without counsel; hud witners to answer by mitred ® complaint — a compelled @ committing him; had never dis- use & witness did not answer, thet he remembered; but might bave done so; kaew Lexow at that time asa reporter for the Police and knew that paper had contained libels on him, as he hed issued warrant for one; Lexow used to report the police news, &e., at the Tombs; Wilkes had been ar- Tested and released on his own reeognizances; had seen scares in which he thought there was more need of coun- sel than ip that one; was not excited, but felt just in- dignation, ax any niagistrate would; did not Know of any other complaint having been mude against Wilkes for libel of his own knowledge; had read the report of the proceedings (the alleged litel ) Direct resumed—Kuew a reporter by the name of Moore; believed he was at the time connected with the d seen him attend the police offices. ‘The Court then adjourned till 10 o'clock next morning. THIRD DAY. Jury 12.—George Caplin called and sworn, said :—He resides at 1:6 West street, and carries om business at 141 Fulton street, New York; was the father of Elizabeth Caplin; knew Mr Ruckman for about seven years; had Dusinets transactions with him; had collected bills for him, and was agent to collect rents for an estate of which he was trustee; at the time of the alledged assault upon his daughter, witness was out of town; he was present at the cros+-examination of Mr. Ruckman before Justice | Mountfort; dia not remember the time of day; it was about noon: it had not commenced when he got there; he remained until it was dismissed; the weather was very warm, To Mr. Clark.—It was the 16th of June, 1850; the | Plaintiff (Mr. Ruckman) appeared very warm and per- spiring: believed be bad bis coat on; would have observ- ed it if he had not; to the best of his recollection, he was witness on the part of Wilkes; had read he alleged libel at the time it came out, Mr. Schaffer—I wish to examine the witness as to the of it. Shall we purtue the same course as with Mr, Russell objected. He wished to have the wit- nesses Own account of the matter, and not tohave the words put into his mouth as they were yesterday. He objected to it as illegal. ‘The Judge said the more correct course would certain- ly be to take the witneskes own statement, and call his attention tothe subject matter of anything particular | Justice Mountfort yesterday ? | or that the witness omitted. for ail purporting to be reports of criminal trials. And — ' he had thought at first that he was only the reporter ; but there was evidence to show that he was an editor; and | the editor of any paper is always lable for all that ap- peared in the paper. from that of the most respectable to the most obscene. Where men were engaged in nefarious trades, it was difficult to discover who was really the per- eon liabl would probably be prepared to show he had nothing to do with it. They were ‘all liable; and he proposed orend other reports, aud to anticipate the argument that might be set up that there was no malice, by show- ing that long after the plaintiff had proceeded, libel upon libel had been heaped upon him, The Court did not think the case at present warranted reading the other articles, and Lexow might not be the reporter. ‘They had shown that one Stanley was also a Te porter. r Clark contended that Wilkes, Stanley and Lexow were all concerned, and were jointly and severally liabie, The Court said be was shown to be a reporter ; but re- Porters were not editors, Mr Clark said it was in evidence that he wrote, re- ported. condensed, and translated for the paper, and he thought that cousti‘uted an editor—oue who had control of the columps—and he now offered to read the articles published during the period testified to. (The articles alluded to were ruled out and an exception noted. ) be ph it would then show that Lexow had sued Mr. Ruckmun, and recovered a verdict for $1,450 for an assiult. ‘The proof was relavent, as showing the means of the defendant. It was then conceded by both sides that a verdict hod been obtained, but that aease had been made for « new trial, and the matter remained unsettled. ‘The case for the plafatif! here rested, and the counsel for the defendant epened the defence, after which the court Look @ recess. TERNOON BEESION William ©. Barrett, culled examined for the de- fence :—Was a lawyer; knew the plaintiff’ and George Caplin; also his davghter Elizabeth; recolected trial ia nd if Wilkes had been sued for this libel, he | On that ¢xamination, the witness continued—Ie had no recollection of seeing the affidavit made against Wilkes (Certain portions of the report was then ad- mitted tobe true, and the witness directed to give his own account.) Mr. Lexow was there, Justice Mouatfort, Mr. Kuckman, and « person accompanying him; Mr. Ruchman was asked some questions, which he refused to answer, and the Judge sustained him in some of the objections; he then wanted the case adjourned, and wished to have counsel; the Judge said he was counsel eneugh, and would not adjourn the ease; Ruckman | asked for adjournment two or three times, and refused toanswer, and raid the Justice might commit him; he still refused: and the Judge dismissed the case. Mr. Schaffer then offered to show that Ruckman had vsed profane language toshow, quo animo, the report was made, by proving they had suppressed that. (Objected to and ruled out,on the ground that it was not within the | justification. | Exception noted } Special Sessions, which was had before Recorder Tal- | madge and two Aldermen. The papern roduced were in his handwriting: could not recollect whether they were used on the trial, did not know where Mr. Caplin was at the time. (Objected to.) Counsel for defendant offered to show that the charge contained in their opening, viz—that Mr. Caplin was a defwulter to Mr Ruckman, and got up this prosecution in conrequence, war false, By the Court—There is no such question before Ccart—aze you going to dleprove counsel's opening out ‘ boa Sires employed by Mr, Caplin, the father of the girl. to prosecute Mr. Ruckman; the trial took glace about 11 o'clock; hud no record or minutes of it. Counsel for defeudant then asked the witness whether he had not made the offer, as set out in the alleged libel. Mr. Clark said he would not object to the question, though it bad teem ruled out. ‘The Judge thought it was quite irrelevant; they had nothing to do in this action with the truth or falsehood of that aftidavit—but if objection was waived, they might put it by conrent Question put—Witness—I did not make that offer; I bad to much respect for the Court and myself Compre! for defendant —Did you make any other offer, or to that effect Mr. Clark objected to his crossexamining his own witness, or to his giving anything but the direct answer he might have made to any other offer. act Suse sald, Ms view was that they had nothing to jo with it i Ccunsel for defendant said he thought 0 too, but he under the tutelage of the Christian Brotbers,commenced fad justified it in his answer for safety; avd as that was the opinion of the Court, he would ask to strike such part out, ‘The Court rald there was no necessity; it might be al clergymen, and a large concoarse of the parents | taken ws cuperfvous, Mr. Clar id—No, it could not; it was certainly an ravation be wet frcopee. and witness continued :—Ile wax with Mr Ruckaan’s gen about « year and no tion. xamined by Mr. Clark—Never knew Mr. Lexow iy; Mr. Caplin was sgent for Mr kman in ecileeting rent Mr. Ruckman being trustee estate; Mr Jems Brady was Mr Ruckman’s lawyer at that ie; he wes not present; Mr Ruseell tried the cause, examincd—Believed Mr Brady waa now in Europe; na letter written by him, end mailed from Lon- a Mr. Brady not preseut at the trial in the Special Brssions? (Ohjected to.) Counrel for defendant wished to chow that Mr, Brady had thrown up theeau Papers bended up) Witness attend amination before the Justice ¥ popers used ? Clark chjceted to evidence of proceeding before kk, in August hie office wi could net find th hould think the &; war a police justice hoew platnt hy sigh! tuade by him in May, 18f to do so, a+ it war only a misdem tucew to writing oft he deemed material rue A dene: he had acter bed thove im! orig'nal effidavit, and last saw ther on th emto Mr. Rowell neeell had re. ioatien, whem he wt be. at dis impression was that M we. and they were tiled with papers dixp eed ed looked om; Me Oo Sean got there that haf op hour efter Lex w wae worn by wite aumined hy Me. Lexew, The witness then hed with Mr. Russell's copy of bi: own mi- & fur es his reeollection erred him, stated | right | witness | offend en, from t Examination continued—Something was said on the subject of Mr, Ruckman’s transactions with regard to the real estate before mentioned. Mr. Schaffer offered to show the libel to the witness, but the Court refured to allow him. (Exception noted ) Witness—There were some remarks made about witness having acted wrongfully as an agent, but he could not re- member what; Justice Mountfort had said if the ques- tions were not answered, he would cither dismiss the ease, or commit the complainant. (A somewhat tedi. ous examination followed. in which the witness gave bis eccount of the proceedings going through all the éetails comprised in the alleged libel.) Witness was acquainted with the general character of the plaiu- tiff, from hear say; his trading character was good; bis moral character he did not consider good. (The latter part of answer objected to.) To the Court—In his dealings with men, he would act honerably, but he is an immoral man; that is his general reputation Cress-exemined—Became acquainted with him about 1844; had known him by right before; had been agent for the property before Mr. Ruckman took postession; had becn Mr Ruckman’s agent about four years; bad a difficulty with Mr. Ruckman about his daughter, but never had about money; had no recollection of promis- ing Mr. Chas, Judson to render him an account; it war rds left to be settled, between Mr. Judson and Mr. ; did not promise to render an account; they bad thew all, (Accounts handed up.) ‘The Court interpored and ruled out that portion of the evidence Mr. Clark said he offered it to show the state of mind of the witness, aud Mr. Schaffer would not object to go into it. but the Court still ruled it out. Witness— He ceased to be Mr. Ruckmman’s agent, after he bad commenced criminal prosecution against him; he was present at examination before Justice Mount: fort; did not know how it was, he was so late; he was either subpenied or called upon by some one; he was instructed to go to Kasex market; it was Mr. who hed called upon him the same day witness; had known Mr. Lexow before; knew him as 4 re: nter for the Police Gazette; bad seen him at the office; d been there about advertisements, and nothing else, unless to get a paper; Mr. Ruckman, on the e: jon, had refured to say that his answers to the questions put by Lexow would tend to eriminate or degrade him; said be thought the magistrate did not sufficiently protect bis te; he did not refuse to answer uny questions rela- tive to the libel, or any others, except us to the realestate, Direct resumed—Knew the general character of the plaintitt; had always heard his moral character was bad. Cross-¢xamined—Mr. Clark asked if he could nate single person; aud the witness having appealed to the Court. and been assured be could not endanger himself by spexking the treth, named Ann Maria Blakeman; but could not say whether it was before or afver the ap- ‘arapce Of there publications; could not nawe partiea- time; she fived at 74 Essex street; witness pre- +umed there bad been no difficulty between her and the Jaiptift, as he wae her trustee; could not say her say ng Ohad made any impression ou him did not think be bau troubled himself much about It; had neard him, Ruckmon. spoken of as “a gay mau;” had never ine vited him to his house; he had been there to call upon on business; he bad never spoken of him; bud never done so to his own counsel; hal never ap- plied to, or demanded of hit a hundred and fifty dollars; never hed written in the Police Guzr'te, of Was anything isbed to bit knowledge, upon information given did not see Lexow at the Petty Sersions; did not iikes at all; only knew the man who collected advertivements; did not know the editor's room; (lett, dup); did not know the writing of the address. printer, called Worked on the National Tth of January, 148; the week there sno work done there, and he din other places; re tion of 2d of June, 1800, as printed, well; Knew Mr to show that the «o-called libel uscripts produced. that pe by Mr. etory perse ted that they could not be permitted mtrary to the defendant « owu sworn Justice Smith, where be said he had article. thevght that was not conclusive. and over. hjection. (Exception noted ) cripts handed to witness.) The first two pages » net in Mr. L writing: had no clear re handed them to him, but he hem; it was customary to preserve dents. and s© on; common pol usually thrown away; tec up, Mr. Wilkes looked at the were principal! made in the first part. of the laiter part was in alterations were made by Mr. Wiikes Direct resumed—Did not recollect whether they nad other reports there then; when he first worked there Mr. Mccre reported at the Sessions altogether, aud afte | words reported some weeks, avd some weeks he did not; © account of the examination, a* stated ia the alleged libel wae fm substance trae, counsel for defendant cadting it -eriatin, He did not recollect anything being | swirl ebout an indecent meewult; there war a great deal of excite ment Mr. Clark objected to the mode of examination, as un- One and geading The Court enid they might polnt his attention to the dM rent parte of the libel. and sk him what be had to ray to the subject matter of it. Witness remewbered that Mr Lexow insisted on an anewer to his questions, but be could we gute whetber the larguage wre preeierly as etated in the re- port: ae tocther preanges, be merely recollected indin- tiretiy; there waa eomethiog of the kind sald; there ocd deal sold that woe mot there at all; Mr. vieted om having counerl there, and refared to anewer certain questions and at length said ¢ he would be d—d if he would. end that he (witness) might commit him” Me. Clark <f'e*. thet ie what you ought to have done. Ye jie; it wae eworn at the ary part (ook notes of the proceedings. ‘ sttine be remembered Moore's reporting was on rury’s trial, at Brooklyn, when he was seqyuitted inet: Mr. Wilkes had ‘hat not; written Mr befere Judge Greenwood, in Ma the control of what was to go in, and uot huew snything of Stanicy having a any thin: it the or; One eye ompsom inight " ane items, whieh be have furnished rome item: wet up. The Court. interryy net knew whbieb of | article, end they meant to find out if they could. Witness continued—Mr. Smith had charge of the edi. — torial department, but did pot write them all; had set uprcme emallones by Mr. Lexow, calling attention to his translations of eriminal news; did not when, cr ty whem he wae directed to save that manuscript; he hed hended it to Mr, Lexow about a week after its pub- articles retlectiog | Heation: did not recollect about other or Mr Ruckmen (reveral shown); could vot say from whore manu they hate at Las articles Bnew any one bat #mit ikea to write enc! as the nes ehown (answers to correspondents); Mr. Lexow was the principal reporter; he reported all the mest d'fiicyit. important, of long trinls; witness was em- picyed by Mr. Sak m id by bim; Mr. Whiting received hie he publication office; Mr. Whit B. Whiting at that time, and was reved. Dircet reeomed—If the part at the top of the third pege had bern stricken cut when given to him (witness) if qould have been ret up; the figures 1, 2, and 4, correspond ed with the leading ; he had reserved mnere manurer, Ute (ban (hoes for Mr. Lexow. Mr. fehaffer . en cffered to put in the manweript fn ' evideper, except Qhe paat strigken out, und Mr, Clark en rome very like it; could not recollect where or | im the latter | from Mr. | Pt fendant was not held in prison; the examination gene- Tally takes within & week, but is often postponed. » ® long time; there New York; had known the plaintiff nineteen or tweni; driven his oyster carte; had not inqui in eneral ! before the publications; he hi e papers; never heard eu against the laintif; he did not move in the cirele of the people who- ‘new him; did not know #hat publications he had seem theee accounts in; it might be the Police Gazette, or some~ Bunday paper; had raid to Mr. Lexow. that he had reen | ae that were disrespectful of him, but had par- Seulasa caid he knew nothing of him, of his own per- nowledge. M. tomuel f Cogswell called —Was present when the examination of Mr. Lexow was taken befure Justice Smith; Mr. Russell put a question to Mr. Lexow about —_ i some setae. and veeny Mr. Lexow refused. nswer; somet was said akout reporting proceed- ings at Ersex Market Prison; Lexow pe whether he and Mr. Mcore, the assistant District Attorney, objected; could uot recolleet the grouads; re- collected Mr. Lexow saying be wrote the report that ap- peared; did not recollect whether the word “report” or» proceedings” was used; his impression was that Mr. Russell sa:d no use should Le made of that admission: there were half a dozen articles in the Police Gazette pro- duced and shown; he could not say to which re- ferred; his impression was that Mr. Lexow made the ad- mission after what he had before said, he thought Mr. Russell bad said. Crote-examined.—Some article was put in his (Lexow’s) hand, and he was asked whether he wrote it, and he sai. yes; others were shown, and he thought he refused to newer; his recollection was indistinct; he bad not heard Mr. Moore's testimony. Mr. —— Symonson called—Resides in New York; isan oyster dealer; knew Mr. Ruckman 12 or 14 years; been in partnership with him; his general character and. reputation was, up to the time of these publications, gocd. Mr. Schaffer—That’s all. We were mistaken. Mr. Clark bad no questions to ask. Mr. Schaffer wished to call rome further and important witnesses who had been subpenaed, but were not pre- | sent—Judge Bleakiey and others | Mr. Clark wished them to call all the witnesses they could as tocharacter. | ‘The Judge was resolved to close the testimony to-day, | and wonld take a sufficient recess to enable them. Mr, Schaffer, after some little discussion, rested his case. Mr. Clark called Mr. Judson to show relations between Mr. Ruckman and Mr Caplin—(Counsel proposed to show that the witness bad sued him for Mr. Ruckman, and he hed promised to render an account of the rents collected; all as to accounts was ruled out.) —Witness was a counsellor at law; had seen Mr. Caplin a few months ago; could not make any specific statement as to what he had said Mr. Schaffer objected to evidence in toto, ip the ab- sence of Mr. Caplin, ‘The Judge said he might show, if possible, any hostile feelings. The witness said there was @ hostile feeling; he had beard him say s0. Cross-examined—Had heard him complain of Mr. Rackman’s conduct to bis child Mr. Rusrell was then recailed—(Objected to. Mr. Clark only called him as to new matter, and to rebut.)— Witness had conversed several times with Mr. Caplin, who had expressed his f in pretty bitter termsand very hostilely towards r. Clark wauted to show, that before this girl had. proceeded against Mr. Kuckmau, Caplin bad demanded « $160, (Ruled out.) Mr. Russell resumed.—On the ¢xamination before {Mr. Justice Smith, when Mr. Moore bad raised the objec- tion to Mr. Lexow answering atter he (Mr. Russell) had shown him the first paper. he said he need not be afraid, for he did not intend to tuke any proceedings : against him upon auy of the other articles ; thet was all . that was said; Judge Mountfort had handed him the original notes taken on the examination, and the one roduced is a true copy (marked, and put in evidence); returned the original to the justice. The testimony here closed ou both sides, add it was arranged that the counsel should confine themselves tc two hours’ time, or one counsel on each side in the sum- ming, to be agreed among themeclves and the court. Adjourned till Monday morning, at 10 o’elock, Police Intetilgence. Charge of Forging a Deed —Uaaer this hend yesterday, in noting the arrest of the accused party, we inadver- tently omitted the name of the officer making the arrest. It should have been officer Kaipl Patterson, who is one of the valuable and efficient members attached to the de- partment. Arrest of a Colored Minister for Stealing. —Yesterday morning, officer Bray. of the ‘third ward police, arrested acolored man by the name of isaac Davis, otherwise —- himself John Harrison, ona charge of stealing six gold rings, of the value of $°, from the store of Jacob R. Schuyler, No. 4 Maiden lane. The accused, it seema. visited store and represented himself to be a mer- chant from Canada, and wi to purchase a bill of ~ goods. The proprietors, Pie good address and geu- tel ap; nee, had faith at first in his representations | and exhibited to him an assortiwent of watehes and jowel- ry,from which the negro selected out a ,uantity, amount- ing to between $600 and $700 worth. uckil; one of the firm began to mistrust. from some movement he cbserved, bis Bonesty: ‘and uiissing some gold rings, they stopped the negro ## he was about leaving the store. saying be would retarn in the afternoon, pay for the goods und take thei away, snd in his pooket was found tix gold rings, aa above stated. The rogue was conveyed before Justice Osborn, at the lolice Court, and bis per- ron searched, aod in his boot wus found several kets for gold chains, watches. Kc. property believed to have been stolen from the diferent stores at whieh he bas visited, under the pretence of making pureheses, for which owners are Wanted. In the pockets of the negro, when searched, were found several! documentsxbibiting his identity and correct name. uot withstand he gave the name of John Harrison when arrested. ‘Tite | go to show that he is a minister of the from | bis transactions we should thirk him to be somewhat of & black sheep inthe fleck. The ollowing are two of the documents f Winslow this 13th day of Ort, 160, at Ur- Ray. WM. PAT L QUINN, Bishop. tYeane Davis te a iuinister in good State of Ohio, ar Lend, 1S a Given under my ha this 4th day of Decew Si Ke were in | is poctession, a certificate of Odd Feliowshi», signed | TW Smith, the Grand Mester of tie Northern District viz.. New York,Rhode Irland and Conneetiout, dated Jul ‘Thin ministerial gevtlonan endeavored to preae | honesty to the mugirtrate, Lat the evidenes of his betug | dishonest, and the belief that property of a much greater | value was taken by him, the Justice committed him to pricon to await a further ¢xemiuation. In the swan . Il the sicre keepers who buve been defranded by gro, who Is tail in figure aud of very black com- Jexicn. will farther the ends of justice by calling on Me . Clerk of Potiee, Valle of Justice, and identify the rogue snd the property. A gold guard chain aud other property have already bee ed. ed tothe Chief's « last few daye, im ar. aries Davie. Charlies Shafer, and Charles Hinchman olarged with the perpe tration of burlaries on or about the 4th instant, 1d Davis ete held op a cher, «No. 18 Le Roy Llace, about the 4th ¢ duly; the exact day or night could not be set forth, as the fanily cooupying the « time, end the robbery was ne | Brice Smith, the cceupant cf the be = on the oth instant mw Pecurned to the Tha rogues stole from the pro- *, by forcing on entrance through the basement ‘4 quantity of ladie: sbawl, valued at $200. nq apparel, ® camel's A velvet mantillas, rog- bex, ond # lot of other 235. On the arrost of und Mr. Smith’ ard was alo identified by Mr breker, with whom he hed pawned the masial bo Shafer was recegnived by o witness who saw him | come from the houre of Mr, Smith about the time tt was suppored to have been robbed. The evidence against both the accused purties war <afflcient to authorize the Mayor in committing them both to the Tombs foe trial rles Hinchman stands charged with berglariously entering the office of Mr. Simecn Oreyfous, No, 129 Pul- | ton stre stairs, om the thot July, breaking | the iron rafe, and stealing therefrom four gold wate! | silver wateben, watch materisls, Ae . value iu all over $200 On the arrest of Hinchman, the officers found on bis per- son one of the gold watches belonging to Me, Deayfous, pyro d dwetch, tegether with four watch * | also identified as a portion of the robbery. The lal articles were found cn searching the premises of a Jew named Leopold Lehman, No. 12 Bayard stevet, who tx charged with purchasing the ame from the burglars knowing them to be stolen. On the premises of this mac | Wee found a quantity of jewriry; ales silver tea and table | #peons, with the names erased off the handles, with « vw, renty, of preventing ideatity. Geers ore wanted: can be teen ing to the | Clerk at the © late ce mw. Rene Buy glars Ariested —OMeer tt. of the Ninth ward arrested, on Fridsy night, two ine, called Ira Wiley and. George Low, on a charge of burzlariously the ee, Ftore of Peter Sbulte, situated corner of Wash- aton and Christopher streete. on the might of the 7th. le. ‘not contented with that, they elt ofthe ofl and melases cans, ay te? Pelosing to a : on a * to Mr. shi from ee oe night Ca2 Sar aary Te coma. were meget a Pe'feteon ov ert before givteate, and eomaitted srvest rty Owners OM "7 i aun to Sie y ‘ cete $ J. Smith and Fi Orborn’s valuable eee Seals 7 ie & misdemeanor —Joreph Mee har, owner of 00 Cross street; Patrick Collins, owner of* | No. 96 and 564, Orange street, also, No. 84 Cross street. William Hock, owner of 20 Orange strewt; Gorm lius ! A-bel 8, Duns. | and 33 street, ' hen bronght before Justice Osborn, } held to bail in the sum of $500 on each complaint.