The New York Herald Newspaper, May 18, 1850, Page 6

rused by any who have not already examined | been presented for the settlement of this ques- | tion of the final I wall then the sum | of in the State of New Hampshire, om the | States increased. {t must be bore in mind that SEE SPRBON | Fe"T wit! Tevely eestor thet aapeediaataa Chateaese: | fiom." One hee enmateoten ites sony Might ek teens Pevie eemameeet Tee felef invalid ‘pensioners, snd pay hist'a, pension ot | the rule of law isthe reverse’ in the two classes of or THE ments of that memorial—a portion of which are | thority, recommending, as I understand it, the ad- | The committee recommend the union of these sual-sota pew your on le. i ‘son or Rees States. In the slaveholding States it is the rule conjectural, and a part official—the tion of | mission of California, are doing nothing more, | three measures. Ii the honorable from | disability of an assistant surgeon in the navy of that color slavery, and the onus LAY i United Staten, to commence om the first day of July, p HON. HENR yc | California, from the Ist of January, , was | leaving the question unsettled of the boundary be- | Missouri [Mr. Benton] will allow me the benefit | 4}: 1848, and continue during bis pany &, "| of freedom is t upon the person who is claim- on 107,069, exceeding the number r alse to entitle | tween New Mexico and Texas, and leaving the | of two of those cannons which he has poi ‘Bee. 2. And be it furthor enacted, Thas there be, and | Cd. Every person of color in the slaveholding to seovteautia Gil os | Be State 3 two sepcasentaiyes <5 me, that brings ert pins inhabit Utah and en eee unpro- Wiaciee: of a beens, snd which I Tien a hereby are, appropriated, out of any, money in the States is regarded prima Ts Sg gelave. Onthe | Hifor: the Territor! vernments, | it down only to Janua! . Since that time we | vided for vernment. I will take the oceasion desk, I shou! very much o! to | treasury not otherwise aj 6d, tho following m1 | on ute ond | are authorized to aud to the number, by that of | tosay, that came to Wee on we @ most ee : (io bi ) Th aap sums for the goverument “ot territory of Minne- | plies freedom—not slavery—and every man of color | e ‘ a » oamal ion | the arrivals by sea at the port of San Francisco, | anxious desire—a desire which I still entertain—to . Benton, (in his seat. ey are in tl e- | sota:— ’ } The Senate . then prvorstied toithe: capnideteiion as shown by the oftietal"seport of “the harbor co-operate, ia say legislative position, in all cases | cretary’s office and the page will bring them. For salaries of the soreness: three judges, and | and when a stranger from Kentucky or Virginia | of the specie’ pg ts cl Thirteen) Sa ft | master, from the Ist_ of January, 1850, to | inwhich I can judiciously co-operate, withthe ex- | Bir. Czay, (resuming.) ‘The union of these three cnaretary, sine thonsiad d S eekatocslierss ashe’ Wich: 8 to a remote part of Pennsylvania and seizes a com anne Gate lute the Chane entabliat the 27th of March, 1850. Without going into | ecutive branch of the government. I need not add, | measures in one bill has been objected to, and | g.04% ‘ond aft di spe 0 eck person, who perhaps has been living there | peter soverumenta for Utah amd How: Mexi Ny | the classification, ‘there are of Americans | however, sir, that I came here, also, with asettled | has been already very much discussed in the Sen- | “por ee a mileage of members of the | for years, and claims him as his slave, the sympa- | : + gem fp % to ‘fauna ake aan blishe | $697; of Californians, 13,454; and of foreign- | purpose to follow the deliberate dictation of my | ate; but, out of respect to the Senator from Mis- | jegislative assembl: ‘of the officers and attendants, | thies of the neighborhood are naturally and neces- | bo Ay heen, i y ee t + he Hah | er, 5,503—making a total of The number | own judgment, wherever that judgment might | souri (Mr. Benton] and to the Senate, I feel my- fuel, and other incidental ex- | sarily excited in favor of the colored person; and ihe. bill being Under coumderation grin Come | of Fdeserters from ships, us stated in the memorial | carry'me. It is with great pleasure, sir, that I | self called upon to give some answer to the argu- we ure to respect those feelings where they are Hee ce the Whole wt Counmeration, as in Coin | before alluded to, is put at 3,000, in round numbers. | state that we do co-operate with the President, to | ment which he addressed to the Senate some days | Approved March 3, 184 ? honestly entertained. Well, sir, what are you to ae ner epee Peay ie ison, Mr. Pree | Lhe official statement of the harbor master, made | the extent which he recommends. | He recom- | ago, to show that it was improper to connect them ‘ow, Mr. President, when all these things are | do ina case of this kind? "You are to give Jeni foe the narene st ithe risems Mir. Efe | on the Ist of March last to the Legislature, states | mends the edmission of California. The commit- | together. I must begin by stating what is consid- | taken into view, I think it quite clear that there is | satisfaction that can be given that the person aaa tree and ee ea ning some Turther eX | the number of officers and seamen that left their | tee pr There the Preaident’s recommen. | our perliamentary law inthis country. It consists, | no want of power on our part to do what is pro- | have arrested as your property is a fugitive p anane, a an ad dition x xposition th Con- | vessels from various causes, to be 14,240. The ag. dation stops. There we take up the subject, and | in the first place, of the constitution of the Unitad | posed, und no want of conformity to the principle— | service or labor. ‘This is one of the measures pro- oo , he ba me < ithe went? e of aoe |, gregate of all these stotements will give the fol- | proceed to act upon the other parts of the territory | States, the rules adopted by the two houses of Con- | which I admit to be sound—not to combine incon- | posed in the bill. Now, what is the inconve- omega reer cig rage a ae jowing results, viz:—Ist January, 1849, 26,000— | acquired from Mexico. Now, sir, which course of | gress, and, if you please, Mr. Jeflerson’s Manual, | giuous and discordant measures in the same bill. | nience of that measure ? It provides that when an poate get BR ing a 194. ge et Mik See | 8.000 “Americans, 13,000 Califordians, ‘and’ 5,000 | the two recommends itself best to the judgment of which has been a respected authority, and, believe | We have here three measures, all of the same cha- | owner of a clave shall arrest his rty in a non- report of the committee was pr : ‘i * e Ist of J ry, 1850, the popula- | those who are to act in the case? used in mostof the deliberative ies in this | racter. They have all in different forms, the same | slaveholding State, he shall take him before the nae, lst weal, warious metubere of the eames fan eee or Oe emakiog total number on the | In the frst place, sir, if we do not provide govern- | country. general object in view. I will not detain the Se- | proper functionary to obtain a certificate author- ose la their places, and et tel that certain parts of | 91h, oF March, 1850, of 124,026; to which add the | ments for the other portions of the country acquired | Now, sir, cither the honorable Senator | nate upon this point longer. 1 do not think it can | izing his return to the State from which the fagi- the report did not meet wiih their concurrence. It | leserting seamen, 14,240, makes a total | from Mexico, we fail to fulfil the obligation, the | from Missouri, [Mr. Benton] or myself, to- | be necessary. I shall dismiss the subject with | tive has fled. And if he declares to that function- rfeet truth that po | vcurred in all that might have been steted wit one member of the c was done, or omi ‘There was of Add _to this the population arrived | sacred o ion in the treaty with Mexico. | tally misunderstand what is meant by Hatsell, | a single observation upon an amendment to | ary, at that time, that he is a freeman, and not a from the United States and other places since that } It is a thet they will have govern- | and in the English parliamentary sense, by tacking. | both the territorial bills, which was introduced | slave, what is the officer required to do?’ Why, to time, and altogether I have no earthly doubt—I am | ment of their own—a local government; that they |] We have no such thing. as tacking, in the | by the committee, to which I was myself | take a bond from the agent or owner, that he will is . perfectly satisfied in my own mind that, putting all | have such @ one now ; but they have not such @ | English sense of the term. Jefferson has no chap- | opposed, but which was carried by a majority of | carry the black person back to the county of the i the subj felt ‘ ~ these statements together, there is at this moment | one now as they had when they were part of | ter in his manual on the subject of tacking—Hat- the committee. It isan amendment to the 10th see- | State from which he fled; and at the first court ber, perhaps, if left to himself separately, would h he a} opulation in California that would entitle her to | Mexico. When they were part of the republic of | sell has. Tacking in England is this:—By the | tion, I think, of one of the bills, and I do not recol- | which may sit after his return, he shall be carried yeesonie d the various Inwtters Which Were re partes two representatives, even supposing there had been | Mexico, with the common government of Mexico | constitution of England ‘or, in other words, the | lect precisely where it falls in the other bill, It is | there, and of he again asserts his right to freedom, tot tan aps wd nee somewhat Geerent from 4” no provision for a fraction exceeding the moiety of | stretching over all the parts consttinhags that re- | practice of England, which makes her constitu- | to the etfoot, that no law shall be passed by the | the court shall afford him all the facilities which inw bi h they were presented in the report. twas d by Congress. public, they had all the benefit resulting from their | tion, money bills, supply bills, bills of subsidy, | territorial Teer interfering with African | are requisite to the establishment of the fact as- ee ae errs oo the: minority 9 te question of population I do not wish to | own local laws, and the additional benefit and | and aid of all kinds, are passed’ by the House of | slavery. I did not then, and I do not now, attach | serted. No surety even is required. The com- committees yet I have hot been disconrs din ; ae ate unnecessarily. They | and security resulting from the laws of the su- | Commons, and are sent to the House of Lords; | much importance to this amendment. It was pro- | mittee thought—and in that I believe all the com- 0 lest degree by the ditierences which at gr jn nd flesh of our flesh, for the | preme government, covering all parts of the | and the Lords are obliged to take them, word for | posed by an honorable Senator now in my eye, and | mittee concur—that, it would be wrong to demand the committee, or which wer ananifestec in the ve lost nothing of intelli- | republic. We have the place of that supreme | word, without. making any amendment whatever. | carried through by the concurrence of a majority | of a stranger, hundreds of miles from his home, Senate last week. Gentlemen who did not agree | ¢ elf-government by passing | government. They were transferred from that | They are sent in that state to the crown, and the | of the committee. The effect of it will at once be murety to take back his slave to the State from exaetly to what was dene, will, in the progress of | fro, to California. By the | sovereignty to this sovereignty, and we stipulated | crown is obliged to take them without amending | understood by the Senate. It {speaks of African | which he fled. A tral by jury is what is demand- the ratio fi Upen thi take up the time of the'S m the the measure, endeavor to mike it conformable to Coy i e | e- | wii ei: Y % i ing in E vord ‘ African” was introduced, so | ed in the non-slaveholding ‘States. Well, we put A ’ . treaty of Hidalgo, the fornians w ain b with that former sovereignty we would ex- | them at all. The practice of tacking in England | slavery. The word “ / = ig , put swe wees. If it should Glas modified, | | come citizens of the United States, ey do not | tend to them proteation to their pe sone, i is this Knowing that a money bill is obliged to | #8 to leave the territorial governments free to act | the party under bond to take the slave to the indulge with great confidence the hope that ne one adopt the alternative of remaining Mexicans within | their property, and the benefit of pre be passed without any amendment or alteration | a3 they might sce fit in relation to another species | State from which the fugitive is alleged to have of them is so irrevocably a against the | one year after the treaty of Hidalgo was signed. | own religion according to the dictates in the House of rds, the Commons in | of slavery—the Indian or peon slavery, which hi d, and to give him a trial by jury. Now, zencwnre, as to induce hin, upon the question of its | ‘Tye Constitution of the United States does not any- | consciences. Now, sir, if you admit California and | England frequently, when they have a popu- | existed a long time in those territories under the | ought we not to make this concession? I wil final pas Vote wguiuel it. Tam not author- | where fix any term of residence sufficient to c do nothing for Utah and New Mexico—nothing in | lar object or measure to be carried, tack that | Spanish régime. In leaving those goveraments free | tell you what will be the practical operation ized to say, and do not ime stitute an individual one of the permanent port relation to the settlement of the boundary quest measure to the money bill to be sent to the House | to act as they may think proper im relation to that | of it. It will be this:—When a slave has es be an a of the people of the United States. In the eousti- | with Texas—I ask you, in What condition, im what | of Lords, knowing that the overruling necessity of | description of slavery, their object was to impose | cz, 4 from his master, and has taken refage in nate in favor of the of the bill; but I need not » ‘ hope, whether all mod:licstions which were de- sired by various members of the committee, may or may not be made, that fiaally there will be not tution, with ard to the subject of taxation and | state, will you leave these countries? ‘There are | the aristocracy and the crown is such, that they | upon them a restriction as to the passage of any law | a fr. State, and that master comes to recover Fepresentation, the term is people and aumber. 1] the Mormons—2 community of which I do not | must, for the sake ofthe money granted in the bill, | either to admit or exelude African slavery, or any | him and take him back to the State froun which he have very little doubt that there is a sufficient num- | wish to say a word in distespect. 1 know very | agree to the clause, favorable, perhaps, to liberty, | law respecting African slavery, in any way what- | fled, the slave will ery out, “1 do not know the ber of citizens of the United States there to entitle | little about them. I have beard very often things | or something else, which is tacked on to it. The | soever. The effectof that amendment wil! at once man; 1 have never seen him in my life; Iam a free- California to two representatives. Well, as they inst them: and 1 believe during this session my | process of tucking, therefore, in England, is ob- | be obvious. If the territorial legislatures can man;” and he will say anything and do anything only a unanimous coucurience of the committee | Wii] not be represented in the United States, they league, Who sits before me, {Mr. Underwood,] | jected to by the crown always, and by the aris- | no laws, either in favor of or against the introdue- | to preserve to himself the freedom which at the orga in the a nded, but 1 ConA ought to be represented somewhi Having goue | has had oceasion to present some petition or docu | tocracy, but never objected to by the Commons. | tion of slaves, the laws on the subject will remain | moment he is in possession of. He will assert most that it W il leave this brauch of Congress with a ia, it is said that they have gone there | inent, showing some very harsh, oppressive, and | According as the prevalence of the authority of the | just as they exist now in the territories of Utah and | confidently that he isa freeman ; but take him darge maj iy in itsfaver. I repeat that Iam not rary purposes, ‘They have gone there | tyrannical treatment extended by these Mormons | crown and the aristocracy, or of the popular branch | New Mexico ; and they will continue so to exist un- | back to the State from which he ran away, where discouraged by anytning that has transpired in the , and how many will return, | to citizens of the Un ates, Who did not com- | of the Legislature, takes place, is the practice of | til they form constitutions for themselves, in which | hisold comrades reside, who know and can prove committee, or in the Senite, or in the country, | how many will remain there, it is impossible at the | pose a portion of their community, and who were ing resorted to or dispensed with. The§crown | they can setile the question of slavery as they | what he is, and he will relinquish and renounce all upon the subject of tux meusure. I have be- | ‘resent tiie to tell. We have all a right to move merely passing through. Of that people, of their complains of it. Hence the quotation made | please. The territorial governments will not be | pretension to freedom. The practical operation of lieved from the fi nd I yet firmly | be- | trom place to place. “) capacity to govern, of the treatment they would | by the honorable Senator the other day from Lord | allowed to admit it, nor to exclude it. They are | the amendment in the bill, therefore, will not be Teves iit jy these wnbavpy subjects whieh |” “Wink regard 10 Louisiana—I am sure I state a | giyeto the other eitizens of ‘the United States who | Chancellor Finch: he complains of it most amaz- | restrained from any action whatsoever on the sub- | tinged with the least earthly inconvenience to the by an amicable adjust ity i must be doneupon ct that will be bore out and eflirmed by the | might eettle among them, or who might wish to | ingly. ‘The Lords always complain of it. Hatsell, | ject. I will not go into any detail of repetition in | party who claims the, fugitive. | 1He gives his bond by an amicable adjustment, f Keres be done upon | Senator in my eye from that State (Mr. Downs)— pass through, not belonging, there—of all these | in this very loose and unsatisfactory work of his— | stating the opinion which J have held all along on | without a surety, and that bond is transimitted by seed 7 And kate te cc thousands and thousands went to New Orleans and | matters I shall not speak. ‘The members from | to which I have often had occasion to resort—as a | this sujbect, and which | have, on a previous occa- | the officer taking it to the district attorney of the Weee Phe ctisee ne the enced Poubt upon this sub+ | other parts of Louisiana, shortly after the acquisi- | Missouri and Ilinois are much more competent to | great courtier, complains of it. But the fact is, | sion, sufficiently stated. pip district from which the slave comes. That officer a fy [isco s repeat, bas arrived tion of that territory py the treaty of Louisiana— | afiord information to the Sew te upon them, thaa | that the process of tacking in England is favor- | | My opinion is, that the laws of Mexico, in all the | sees that the bond shall be enforced. ‘The slave ueures which have beenrepor | and even up tothe present time they go there for | lem. able in England to liberty, and favorable to the | forms inwhich legislation can take place—by the | is taken before the court, or perhaps, the moment . _ jnaiy humide judgment deter. nding to make a fortune, if | But Teare not whether they areas bad as they | Commons of England.” It is never objected | edict of a dictator, by the constitution of the people | he reaches his own home, he acknowledges that mines the fat i 1 traction of this country. Entertains 1 cannot but nies, oras good as| to by them, but objected to always by the | of Mexico, and by the act of the legislature of | he belongs to the claimant; and though he was i hen return home. But, so delight- , : pega shi ag 0 ee, et on , or What they | crown and aristocracy. Her Majesty would | Mexico—by all these means that slavery has been | free by his escape, yet now, since he has got home limate, so happy do they find themselves | they are represented by their {rien hope that n teste ; i i i am Se he relinquishes all i freedom, and th 1g : H + when they get there, the number’ of those who go | gre; they are a portion of the people whom we are | be glad to get the money, without being obliged | abolished there. Iam aware that some Senators | he relinquishes all pretensions to fre Sonat in aring of the repert, might have there for such purposes, who ultimately return to | bound by treaty, as well as other high obligations, | to make eny concessions’ to her subjects, ‘Tho | entertain a different opinion ; but while I will not | is an end to the trouble. to which the owaer was seen some matters in it objectionable, « their wishes or judgment, will see fit to 0; sir, is it right to say | Ilouse of Lords are equally indisposed, ‘and feel it | go mto a discussion of that subject, which I think | subjected. Is this not reasonable ? Is it not a pro- cerehendilig the Mor- Lier f wrong to be compelled to swallow the whole, | Unnecessary at the presént time, I fee! authorized | per and a rational concession to the prejudice—if q their individual hom scarcely one ina hundred. So it is and will be of | of the people of Utah, I do not believe amounts to | to govern: and I put it t final pa: 3 but thatthe entire Senate ’, ‘ " *, 6 : cbr, iori 7 Jease—which exists in th laveholdi 1 . " ; Californ » say. Vast numbers have gone | mons, and to the people of New Mexico, deprived | and, taking the money, to take along with it the | to say that the o m of the vast majority of the | you please ich exists in the non-sla ng fencer mitlinge Hh geen! pe oc spel there w urning; but after } as they are of the bencfit of the government which | clause which has been tacked to it in favor of per- people of the United States, and of vast majority er "3 Sit) our rights are to be asserted. Our er uacer ail Citar oration they he arriage, they once had, the supreme authority of which re- | sonal liberty, or some other right. of the juristeof the United States, is in scoordan ; Spsjenranllinpen Berth Song at which [entertain myself. In point of | ed and maintained In point of fact, | cessarily the sensi! it is possible that | ing such a bond as this amendment States, passing | act from the owner, there is not the le plans of adj the question—whatever exp: ctat have been announeed elsewh will concur in this m sides at Mexico—is it right in us to leave them to Lhad intended to go into detail upon this sub- | with t v reumstances that tend to fix to a permanent | themselves, and to say, they will take care of | ject, by way of answer to the honorable Senator; | law, there is no slavery ther | location the re: ce of this animal man, they | themselves, I dare say; and When they get ripe— | but really itis hardly necessary, for other reasons | there is no slavery there, un will relingvish their purpose of returning to the | ay, when will they be ripe fora state government?— | | will state presently. You find in Hatsell’s, in the | Some gentleman from the slay ns or hopes may hy » by the acquisition of Wealth, and ut of this body, es lities of others. And in record- e310 eX- jightest incon- ping tenho acpag rennin phmemame dt > ear | United State » no doubt, and become per- | when they get ripe, after the lapse of many yeat third volume, he has a chapter upon the subject, | through those States, may have taken along Mises imposed upon him of which he ought to houses of C SB. “| manent fixed residents of California, On the | let them come forwari, aud we will receive themt | * Dilla tacked to bills of supply.” repeat it, we | a slave asa body servant. In point both of law | complain. question of | tion, therefore, I think there is | Is that discharging our duty? have no such thing as that (ackin; ess in this | and of fact, therefore, there is no slavery there. |. There is one opinion, Mr. President, prevail- nd of rational objection to the number | Twillgo further is reference to the message, Which | country. And why? Because, althongh supply | 1 entertained that opinion, and I expressedit ut an | ing—I hope not _ extensively—in some of the which has been proposed by the committee, | lam sorry that] think it my duty to contrast with | bills, tax bills, and other money bills, originate | early period of this session. Since then we have non-slaveholding § cy which nothing that we can and which is precisely the number in the case of | theplan of the committee which is now under con- | in the Hoase’ of Representatives, and require | had pre-eminent authority, entitled to our highest | do willconciliate. [allude to that opinion which 5e 3 sideration; and I will say that 1 have no doubt | to be originated there by the constitution of | respect—none less than that of the delegate from | asserts that there is a higher law—a divine law—a | Now, sir, with regard to the limits of California. | that there were strong, at least plausible reasons, | the United States, the Senate has a right to amend | New Mexico himeelf, who says that labor in New | natural law, which entitles the man under whose Upon that subject, a proposition was oflered in the | for the adoption of that recommendation in the | those bills, to strike out any clause, to reduce the | Mexico can be obtained at the rate of three or four | roof the runaway has come, to give him assist- commi: e { a line through California, | message of the President, at the time it wassent | tax, to make eny change they please. The Senate is | dollars a month; and when labor can be got at that | ance, succor, and hospitelity. A divine law! a first by A member of the com- | into Congress, at the beginning of the session. 1 | under no restraint. The Senate is not as the House | rate, no one will take slaves. I ‘believe that upon | law of Nature! Who are they that veature to téll mittes, however, was not satisfied with that,and | have nodoubs it was apprehended at that time that | of Lords in England: hence we have no snch thing | this part of the subject, I have said all thatit is ne- | vs what is divine and what is natural law!— But | have sen, as I announced, more particu- larly for the pu ering into some further explanation of the course of the committee 4 throwing out some few observations in suj ¢ Which they have recommende of the Senate The first measur that of the true exposi the United States and no g » Which th n of the Xox, upon t a e occasion of the admission of that State into the Union. Upon 1 i : 4 tog . i ‘i Whe hy dential q 3 propos deg. 0 min. I believe that a majority | it was iny iT é re 3 fe tack! English parliamentary sense of | cessary for me to say to the Senate, in relation to re ure their credentials of prophecy? Why, ul jer annou ed e repo . possible to create an: overnmient lor | as ing, in the I-nglish parliamentary ens , ” 1 rs pager my ——— sa was ot ie A pmly of th mittee was in favor of that ameudment; | those territories, witheut oe seenes in Con- | the (eet ut the Po, ag found in England is only | what is contained in the report. There remain two sir, we were told the other day that, ata meet- ne of whom is now ab- —while they declared ‘Two honorable Senate sent, and the other pr but when the question of any line eame up, it was | gress of the most painful and unpleasant character. | what they choose to consider as incongruous mea- | or three other subjects upon which L wish to say a | ing of sotne of these people in New York, Moses rejected by a majority of the committe. Is itnota | | have no doubt it was believed, as indeed it was | sures. question now remains, is there any in- | fewywords before ¥ conclude. id all the prophets were rejected, the little remarkable that this prop these measures !—a bill for the ad- he next subject upon which the committee act- | name even of our blessed Saviour treat ith sa- —this attempt | stated in the message, that distraction would be | congruity ir concurrence in thut as the true exposition, de- | 44 Onibatain tee} . 3 ! ng - A 4 iti ile id by the of a 2 penta, Sen. aliforni« »y the line 56 deg. 30 min., | eggravated—diflerences of opinion, perhaps, car- | mission of California, and a bill to establish a ter- | ed, was that of the recapture of fugitive slaves.— | crilege and contempt by these prom gators a di- Gif not intend tobe roparded ws hetding themerlvest | Or 5 deas. 30 min., or by any other line—does not | ried to extreme lengths, ifany attempts shoald bs | torial government for Utah, and a bill to estab- | ‘Lhe committee have proposed two amendments to | Vine or a natural law, which they had discovered, Jed as holding themselves, in every postible state of things, and in every con- tingency, to vote for the admusion of States that might hereafter be carved out of Texas; but that they reserved to themselves, ae | understood th the right to determine this question whenever new S formed out of ‘Texas should present them * for admission. Whether, under al circumstances of th cumstances under whie went 1 | come fiom the north at all, from whence it might | made to extend gov t over those territories. territorial gov ent for New Mexico, and, | be appended to the bill introduced by the hoaor- | above all human laws and constitutions. If Moses be supposed it would come? For, with reopect | to Tut 4 prod oe Werte ike cs vecanmies int ‘al oy Ee tetemeseetie dt seeaiee her a govern: able senator from Virginia, [Mr. Mason,] when- | and the prophets, and even our Saviour, are to be the orth, sthere can be no earthly, doubt bat if | have seen, that, since the commencement of the | ment, a provision declaring. what shall be ‘her ter | ever that bill is, taken Ca Ee She, are iaes rylected So Re i eee ae epee to there were if PS J it i ifvi i i i i that the owner ol ve fugitive siave, en leave “Teed erent oF ate | aewion ‘he moet grtitag cheng, Ruths Ul | Ray, towided Rexam soll acer the Uiberal pro | th ¢ fornia, they would ail be free States. “ wmgthimey I} j own State. and whenever it is tiea- pogating this new law of nature—this divine the Heek “1088 oct nak Sek ave: North, has come to the rescue of this Union of ours. | ask, incongruous in these measures? What is it? tie ey ate jor sometimes It may happen that in | law of which they speak? The lawvof nature ! liom. the South that the proposition to divide the | She has displayed a disposition to ybate in her de- | Whe is the incongruity # What is the indignity t | the hot pureuit of a runaway it may not be in his | Look at it, as i is promulgated and even attemted -~ Phe cate | Existing limits of California comes, ‘Phe towth | mende. The Souih, the glorious South—not less | —for Ihave heerd, without defiaition or explana- | power to procure such authority—shall provide | or threatened to be enforced in some quarters of the COUNTY Gnd eile city | Wants Some other States, or another State there. | glorious than the other section of the Union—bhas | tion, from time to time, that undignified, or | himself with, and carry with him to the State to | world. Why, sir, there is a large class that say— ‘ . et hen, State might” Some gentlemen from the South, it is true, propose | also come to the rescue. The minds of men have mo- | that'it is ill-treating California, to attach her to'the | Which the fugitive has fled, « certificate from the | and I think it'a very plausible law of nature—if a P , it si honld or should not be ad- | that there should be an express tecognition of the | derated. Passion has given place to reason. Evry: two of the territory acquired from Mexico, | court, which shall contain the adjudication of two | man, no matter by what industry—either by his mitted, they made this reservation; and yet | ruht to carry slaves south of the psed line.— | where—everywhere, in all of the Union, there | included in Utah and New Mexico. What is the | facts: first, the fact of slavery, and, second, the fact | own industry or by inheritance—has acquired a vast they united most heartily in the true expo- | bur | believe that the major pert of those who ask | is a demand—the force and effect of which, | trust | indignity? Mr. President, 1 admit that, in general, | of elopement ; and in the third place, such agenera! | estate, much more than is necessary for the sab- sition of the compact between Texas and the | for this line, do not even ask for this recognition, | will be felt in both branches ef Congress—for an | for the sake uf simplicity, it is better not to make | description of the slave as it may be possible to | sistence of himself and femily—that 1, who am nited States, according to which, as we all know, | or for this enactment, toearry slaves south of this | amicable adjustment of these questions, for the re- | any one bill complex, or to embrace a great variety | establish before the court. ‘This record, taken from | standing by and starving, am entitled, by the law of a number of States, not exceeding four, with oF | Jine; and I ask everybody who is acquainted with | linquishment of extreme opinions entertained, whe- | of subjects of incongruous natures; but it rests | @ court of record in the slaveholding State, and car- | nature, to take a portion of these accumulated without slavery, having the requisite resiation, | the country, who has taken the pains to look over | ther on the one side of the question or upon the | in the judgment of the Senate, in the discretion of 10 the free State, shall then be competent and soem, to save me from the death with which | am with the consent of Texus, w to be admaitte the map, ithe has not come to the conclusion that her, and coming together once more as friends | Corgress. It has been said that California has set | sufficient evidence of the fact. Now, sir, I have | t tened. There really would appear to be some into the Union, from tme to time, as nes might | 4 friend of mine (J believe now within my hearing) | end brethren, living under the common country, | us a very good example: she has provided in her | heard it said that this is throwing an obstacle in the | plausible show of reason for this, Here are you, stg go pe rons themmelv hat part of the | om the south and a large planter, came tot Tle | and enjoying the benefits and happiness which have | constitution that no two subjects shall be united in | Way of the slaveholder, If #0, it is a very tri with your barns and your warehouses full tucede ee eT ney well longer wpon ihat part of (ie | said to me, the other day: * Mr. Clay, if Congress | flowed from @ common government. I think that | the same bill. Louisiana has done the same thing | one, I think ; and J think that it will be of great ad- | collected from all quarters of the globe—fall of that subject. Iwill now spproach that which in th to offer me $500 for every slave I might own, | ifat this time the President had to make ® recom- | in her constitution; and 1 ask the Senator from | ventage to him. The expense will be very little— | which conduces to the subsistence of myself and “<= committee, and perhaps ia the two houses, has ke them to one of these new Ter- | mendation to Congress, all the lights which | Louisiana, and ask the honorable member of that | indeed, not more than two or three dollars—which | my farnily—while I am standing, like Lazarus 1 oganen pp pe coho : me bog pono » them there for ten years, L would | have been shed upon the subject since the com- | legislature, just arrived here from Baton Rouge, | Will cover the seal of the court, the certificate, and | the guts of the sick man, perishing with hunger. > * ensures Upor ch the com= Reg ; “agg ie me teh posion.”” : mencement of the session, now that nearly five | what vast inconvenience the legislative action is | attestation of the clerk. We ail know the just re- | Does not the law of nature allow me to take Peete Rave reperved— Nar ee ae ou were to take the line 35 deg. | months of the session have gone, he would not | exposed to from that restriction t ‘To distinguish | Verence and respect in which records are every- | enough of your superabundance to save me a little ae into be 4 io t ‘th measure (hele 30 tin, or whatever line was proposed,what would | have limited himself simply toa recommendation | between two subjects is not always absolutely cer- | Where held. The slaveholder will feel, when while from that death which is inevitable unless I ere various objections. One of these be the consequence t There would be an open sea | to admit California, or to leave the Territories to | tain. Ifyou happen to think they are not incon- | comes to Pennsylvania or Ohio with this certifieate, | do it? ‘Trace out this pretended law of nature. was with respect $0 its popalation, 1: be on the one side for the escape of slaves— California | shift for themselves, as they coul i judi j ity which he i t ' " - mages Borde , bs y could or might. uous, you send them to the judici and the ju- | that he has a security which he never possessed be- | about which scarcely any of the pretended philoso- Ter lh ith eee roar ecient daimig | Teduced as I have suggested, on. another ; and | He tells us in one of those messages—I forget diciary’ decide ‘otherwise, and declare’ the ‘whole | fore for the recovery of his property; and wien the | phets themselves ‘aufee take it In reference to one . ; . Mexico, with her -onndless mountains, on another. | whether it is the message of December or January, | law to be unconstitutional, because the opinion of | attestation of the clerk, under the seal of the court, | of the most interesting and solemn ceremonies of with two represe . it would be a Vio i Who would think—who believes—that, if you es- | that he had reason to believe th the 8 is cont! to that of the legislators, be- | is exhibited to a citizen of Ohio, that citizen will bs | life. Goto a Mahometan ¢ United State hat one of those | the j con a j ¢ hio, Country, and the follow- tha cenmsieeien of she \ - age tablish the line proposed, slavery would ever be | ‘Territories atleast (New Mexico) would sibly | cause t ph mre not c ous; and I have | dirposed to admit its authority, and to co-operate | er of the Prophet will tell you he is entitled to as Soudan tad eo atictur eed sate carried there, or would be maintained there '— | forma State government for herseif, and might | been told—the Senator from Louisiana can state | “ith the slaveholder in securing his property. The | many wives as he can get; come to a Christian one representative. I suppose that no one Will cone | Moreover, | think I have understood that the del come here, even during the progress of this debate, | Whether I have been correctly informed or not— | inconvenience will be very slight, very inconsidera- | land, nnd the follower of the Saviour will tell you ¥ pr ation in the convention, south of the line of Atall events, if there had been such a state of cir- | thet in two or three instances, the of bills | ble, and the additional resin very great, that you are entitled to but one; go to our frieads, tend—California and the other acquisitions from | yin, or north of it, voted unanimously against the has bee " ‘i so tha OF . , ve ‘n impeded in the Legislature of Louisiana, Mr. Botirn, (interposing.)—-As that bill was | the Mormons, and they will tell you t shouts ual tae Porgy mbt tte Bi, racy introduction of slavery here, lteannot, therefore, Pry oe By a gg We oben in Consequence of this constitutional restriction up- | fomewhnt under my care, now the honorable | entitled to none, (lavghter.) Ys a thing cot py ph om bdo ag gt > Loaaty ot Hidalgo and | suppose it is not designed with any hope that | tut believe that the gentleman who now presides at | 0n the legislative action. The courts have declared | Senator will give me a little information on the su progress, of civilization, of enlightenment, “ihere ~dint Ghat baal of ovidanes. t0 entitle har to po yc there would be slavery carried there upon the li- the head or our political affairs if he had had the be- | the laws to be unconstitutional, and would not en- | ject of thie amendment. Is it proposed that are persons who will rise up ia public assemblages two representatives, which 1s farnished by the de- | its of the Pacific at all. The making of a new | f+ of our lights, would have made a recommenda. | force them. certificate ehall issue from a court in open session, | and denounce "the church, and all that is regard- ceil anamenaen ate ema! hited | Stite or States out of the present limits of Califor- | tion much more comprehensive, much more gene- I think I have stated what I think ought to satisfy from the judge of the court? I perceive that | ed as sacred that belongs to it—denounce even Witten woeke bo seston f , pry tbe h | Ma is, therefore adding to the objection which | pal and healing in its character, than the simple re- | €Vetybody, without dwelling upon it further. Ww, contemplated that it should have the attesta- | the founder of our religion, whom we all profess to moon Hey mF dat pr ee aA fy. ms ater has been made by the South to the preponderance tion of the admission of California, leav- sir; 1 will show you what has been done by tion of the clerk. What I want toknow is, wheth- | revere, and ‘ell you, notwithstanding the solema be furnio ahs Lavtare penta caamaenen J influences, und the apprehensions entertained of | ing all the other questions untouched and unsettled. from time to time in the annexation of dif- | era judge can issue the certificate in chambers oath which they Rave taken, by kissing the sacred only for the short time I have mentic the preponderance and influence, of Northern pow- ith to the abandoned condition of Utah Ferent subjects in the same bill. Here, sir, is | | Mr. Ciay—Mr. President, the understanding | volume,to carry out into full effect all the let me ask, What was done in the instit er. If the North is satisfied, if the thing iy notun- | ond New lexico, to which | have alluded, lei | Yelume second, page 396, chapter five, of “the | Was, I confess, the county court, or the courts of | of the constitution of their country, that there is a fiset apportionment of the reasonable, it seems tome that there should be without any authority of this government, acting United States Statutes at Large,” in which I find bate which prevail throughout the United States. | law of God, a law of nature, which they have States of the Union? Th: on the part of our Southern friends no hesitation locally to protect the citizen who there to set- | “Anact to regulate and fix compensation to cler! If that is not thought best, however, the proposi- | found, and which nobody else has been able to dis- meration of the people of the U in accepting these limits. Bui they are said to be tle, and to protect the citizen who is in transitw | 8nd to authorize the laying ouf of public roads, aad | tion can be modified in any way to meet the views | Cover, paramouat and superior to this law of the which that ‘aoportionment was made. So many | wereasonable. California is some 600 or 700 miles | between these countrice, without any thority | for ether purpores.”| The very title shows the in- | of Senators. I am not—and I know that all the | constitution, and thet they do not mean to obey yapeeeetatives were abowedte ome Stnte, ana e¢ | i cate on the Pacific coast; it is too large. | It | connected with the supreme authority of the go- | Congruity of the subjects trented of. You will find | committee were actuated by the same spirit—we | this human law, but this divine law, which, by many te another, and s0 is stated in the report that with respect to.all that | vernment here—when they are. communicating | im Volume four, page 126, chapter &3, “An act to | are not attached to any particular form in anything. | some inspiration ‘unknown, by some. means undis- ber provided for by the © portion of California south of the line 36 deg. 30 | from time to time this state of things existing in | ¢Xtend the time for the settlement of private land | Show us a better plan, and we will adopt it. We | closed, they ha obtained a knowledge of. We States; but in that instance, the convention that Nit» shortly after you have left the coast. you | rose countries, I submit that toabandon thems in | Claims in the Territory of Florida, to provide for | bad in view, I confess, the county courts which | are noi so v to imagine that any concession allotted these representatives to the Various States, | (™COUnter deserts of sand, which never can be in- face of our obligation contained in the treaty of | the preservetion of t blic archives in said | prevail everywhere except in Louisia where | that we can make will conciliate such minds as based it upon all the information which they pos: | habited, and after you pass these deserts of sand, | Guadalupe Hidalgo, and other hich obligations, is | Tettitety, and for the relief of John Johnson."— | they have parish courts, and perhaps aleo, in Soutis | these. geesed, Whether it was perfectly authentic or not. | 7* approach mountains, and are involved in sue- | hoe conformable to that duty which we are called | [Laughter] Here the name of the individaal came | Carolina, in both of which cates they have pro- This committee, in its report, has allowed a trial Iti known by those who are atall acquainted with | CCssive chains of mountains until you reach ® pe- | uoon to 4 ; but I have a case before me in. which the indi- | bate courts, One of these courte was what wee in | by jury in the place where they nnd ‘ought to take the adjustment of the question of representation | PUldtion that has no intercourse with the Pacilic, | Nay 0° tone ie the bound: bon oh vidual came first. It is to be found in the Statutes | the mind of the committee, as itis the custom of | place, if it takes place anywhere—in the place among the several Staten, that in several of them, | ypesyncee intercourse iscarried on exclusively with | , TES there Oe re ent we iene hoe ks at Large. private acts, volume sit, page S13, chapter | these courte to give written evidence about pro- | which, ty a proper interpretation of the consti ay Mention particularly the case of Georgia,) |}; 4 , ee 1 ji en “An act for the relief of Chastelain . t the United States, wi speci- Ai Twas ‘pretty. well ‘kuown at the time tats | (He Atlantic ocean. When you come tothenorth. | papers that Texns hae sent ber civil Fhe maron’ fe | Ponvert, and for other purposes." And what do , with regard to the other amendment, I re- | fied. What is its langusyge? It in that &« person larger number of representatives were allotted band thus saver boar eee irning them under her poe oN og if mf You suppose those other purposes to have beent— i to hear the honorable Senator | held to service or labor under the laws of the State than the exact state ef the population would au- | was known to be passed, extending from the country | leave the Texas boundary question, ‘and establish ate jon ep come oA ge aay and ve eataneny te Re) m donna 1 Any Sores et the uate from thorize. But it was said in that case, “Georgia is 2, the Mormons oceupy down to the Pacific | RO government for New Mexico or Utah, I venture whic ot q a new State, rapidly filling up; a strong current 7 “ ermment as ours. Will my friend read the extract | to question his right to do so, nor the right of any | of the amendment which the committee of emigration is Howing into her limita, and she | SCce®,<rnere ecenne, to, te, then, to be no ade- | to SAY etaria December’ pest, te seo brent | for we ; giver Senator; but I am sure, that the honorable | posed, in order to do away with both difficulties eptesentatives take their seate—the requisite popa- | | i vant of ti fae i rom th i oe esliticn cathe Marmallet Knowledge whieh we psseas at present S| Set othe boandary. er, nr, withontfening | 4 4° P08 tux mero chara aorowany ase | Halthe Sate which suf most rome acape | lick he as Bed retly tree, that the preeioet obtained wader fe t authofity, on infor: i ror 7 § i 19 could be procured, and which was of a nature cal- the previous authority of Congress, ‘The honora- | the people of Santa Fe expecially are as much ‘by authoriged to deduct from the = the{greatest for their suc- | in the slaveholding States, who chooses to sue for culated to satisfy the judgment of the convention, j,t¢ gentleman from Alabama (Mr, Clemens) stat- | poved to the government of Texas, and are as muc ented In the schooner | Serirunrcats ctor that State into Canada) and the | his freedom. || have never known an instance of a Jas the apportionment of the representation made | ed that in all the other instances of States aclinitted | convinced that they do not belong toTexas, and that eavtten, tn | Seete wine het one sea fct and an At ae the | failuye on. the part of jodgment in hie lovee there ed in - - ms | neral Jackson, Hawes, master, from Neuvitas, in | State presents i freedom, te sesever by the framers of the constitution. So of a more into the Union, they had served an apprenticeship they constiute no ion of the territory of Texas, | the island ‘of Cubs, such duties as may pny wii be re te i concerned, I doubt hy Tecent acquisition of annexation—that of Texas. | Of so man ki ha ‘ ; very much whether Arkansas ever loses a slave by | Were even sli : of sey y years. But the statement in the aa we know that Texas was the earliest in assert- | charged on that pertion of said merchandise which y 1 hed population suerent to enulé her vovwme | ame uncontadiced. Michigan, Arkanens, Flo | tg the trsuary be here, and maining her te Lada, but T think very trey indeed tons | of ‘Bowsting but 1 never appeure” apees'a vo A of the ates, came into t ‘nion without | Ty lon e mou! u io + sah ¢% represratajves, As in the cuse of same of the old vosactof Congress, areording te the usage | Grande to its uppermost sources. “ist right, then fas dc. shove may onseaionclly heeees hgreey | son: Uhasoceptased tr Gime iraney tha ‘ » ie case » it wa " . President, to leave ided 7 i . knowa that she was rapidly filling up—as I have Ste eee nag ote Bae | Sy Lemeiee fe a tame te lore et ee th on shipboard; but this, too, is very rare. Now, | ing i solitaty cent. Such is the course, T believe, ry FE 2 us 42f 3 no doubt will turn out to be the fact when the next Constituth But it id that th ier | t ; te my own Stato perfect the liberal and eminent portion of the bar fs ons\ " 3 : r | tant question of the boundary between New Mexi- , 4 Lea the whole southe: h the cammppation of the next ovases wes telpe, the Sener fre t ofthe aie sia” So uch Seonege secrbeee E hevs reterea ey 7 tenes tocall the atfeation ofthe Senate’ | | Thimade an xception. It was in the case of a very - a -- sel tter for then ; they had a @ 3 | quences to wi ve refe: may be \- ‘ . population entitling her | 4 “territorial government. But Tow wae tt with ed 1 On this question, I believwe—1 de net certain- Mr, President, in all casee of thie kind we must | perticular iriead, and I said to him, ** Sir, Veil representativ: Celifersia 1 ‘he had overiment. "You shan | ty feeotlect the Way ietood before th ~ deal fairly and honestly by all parties. We must | 20t appear against your negroes, unless I am per- rexisting, as it seemed Goned and deserted her—-volaics, the engagement | —1 believe that there. was no. serious diversity of reco hat hr are fecha itr ta fey sue, tha thy ae not ented to ee of the treaty of Hidaigo—left her to shift for herself, | opinion. We all thought we should establish gov- " should become = as well na she could. To this state of abandonment’ | eruments for them, if we could; at any tate wo Weacd entoran comment coal te ever put his mind seriously to the consideration of _ <pnvinced that they are entitled to Ht to , n \ ic freedom, I shall abandon the case.” U to two representatives. she has formed a constitution and come here. should, make the attempt. If we failed, after mak- rtermaster, for transportati Seven gus to ee ae Lew po Ad these con n there \ sr cisennposer, double the jtio which was Sak again, as I hae occasion tn ask some three | ingthe attempt, we should siand irreproachable for | forers, and ether things, for the use. of the fopedtd with grost Silkcalgn ne Senne | Ube poet ty chow ther ep mice eee ee fined 01 70, it was expressly provided in | months ago, if she does not present stronger claims | @hy voluntary abandonment of them. Fort Smith, Arpantee, in the year 1858, $1 On one hand, if the owner of the slave could freetom Yes, sir, 1 venture pt Ay 2 the law establishing it, that ang Stare Which hat | UPC, Cur consideration than any of those States | ‘The next which arose before the com- | Rayment ince due for supplies furnished to the | into the non-elaveholding State, and, see i relates to the ‘attainment an excessbeyond x mciety of the ratio esta! lished, | nigh hnd territorial governments, but which, not meter hain concurred in the proposala to Hien tndian, and mca er or rterna te thoee | negro, could pat his hands upon hizn, and the whole {ministration of justice, nothing in the slaveholding Arcwiag he one aes esata |Sucortonnnond came be staat | 1 ime hha Mew Wes nee | eT as Sas Take Tee aay | Renae eRe meal asec ee! | ait eats nemo oe California to two teprecentatitens she would mtg | inte the Union? Think, then, Mr. President, that | don ef the union of these three incusures in’ one | which sccounte were incurred under the direction of | from the taster, there. would. be ko dithculty, | | Nowe Me Preeitent he een sare remain be required to have h population Of 106001 ned ty | with respect to the population’ of Californin—with | Lill; and upon that subject the same diversity of | the Proper oMecrs ot agents of the government, | presume, even in’ those States where prejadice cx. | vpon which I should ‘say ¢eteun as Was supposed, 140 odd thousand. Naw. thy | Fespect to the limits of California, and with respect opinion which had developed itself in the Senate, | $7741 4. For Payment of the expenses of & | iste in the highest degree againet the recovery of atoli: on of the lave trede inthe Dae question is leaving out of view altogether tke repid to the cireurnetances under which she presents het. | dieplayed iteelf in the committee. * | dleviston, of the lends of ibe ibrothertown Indians | his property. But bogens 8 State which does | lumbie. | chink that the firet man T ever heard in augmentation which is daily taking place fell to Congress for admission as & State into the tT have sa , not admit slavery. |, by let it be recol- | my life porulation of California, whether eke, Wygh@ | Union—all are fevoruble to the grant of what she pi. po pee I nothing upon the | (he act of Congress of the 3rd. of March, 1890, ent, pee ie TR in ASL new hem | foun eslenownce thar trade was s southern man— : d to be given to Texas act the relief of the Ad thea population at this time—at the time when two, | Pli¢is. ond that we can find neither in the one nor | fi, the relingvishment to the United State what it was in 1793. In 1798—noarly sixty years | been no tine in’ the last forty t had members come to be admitted—which would en. | {he ¢''c" » suflicient motive to reject or to throw | tive south of the proposed line. "The compntoe== persons of color were to be foun in | been “sine teed open gran there wo tide her to two representatives. Upon this sab. "°F by: ne rey lawless oe and | | hope it will meet the approbation of the Senate— | Mr. CLay—There are a great many others, States, ho ng to the numbers existing | rot have been a ——S melody ton ject, T have that which appears satisfactory to my | /S{"")" (tor v hich she has emecged. . | thought it best pot to fill up that blank, exeept at fr. Bewrox—What is the date of that act ? ey ag Process of emanci- | tw, Southern States—in favor of it. bill mivd, and I trust to the minds of other Senators. | .,\) \l!,W* coumutiee, I say upon this occasion, | the jaat mement, on the final reading of the bill. If Ir. Chav—It was approved July Ist, 1840; but | Pation in, the slaveholding Stites and by malti- | which the committee has and reported i¢ __In the first place, I offer to the Senate an extract | ))\ °ll the considerations which devo! Meee hag | iwere inserted in the bill, and were to go out to | I have one of a later dare, ir the honorable Senator plication by natural ge vast numbers of them | founded upon the acts of as the Inws of peg VF ag Et, senators and representatives done, ond give het myo py + the country, it might lead to an improper apeenla- | will prefer it. Here is one in 1849, entitled ** An wy Tad view York ontite oe, a ee een et Py nt fre hme A) 7 wee soars hd of the State of California to the Congress of the | [°N*s i ‘ | tion im t Merket, an: wi Norrie, now, i ventura ni a 4 Bins i this memorial, oF to mate ¢ | *iTHNHM ecusl force to the two territories of Utah | thought best to reserve the amount proposed. tobe | nehfekeatss nee of James oer ae 2 To norknow, f . to: Jhave not looked at the eansu what their er, Ido and New Mexico, to be | purposes. chant 8, SOFIE G is, not Presid offered to Texas, for the relinquishment enacted, by the Senate jouse of Represen- or tcp to one, in proportion to what there | I have heard we and as that memorial has been before | oinerstiicns Mabie "peer tee shinee ce | claims 10 the Binal paneer of the tal When we tative othe Une sini ol Ameria, tm Coomrene | ett 17M But in proportion as the five blacks | seven, and ore, and t red i . rese rriv i most happy | aetem That the Secretary free States, far te two. Some years can at any time be re Oo an: he Sena © contrast the plans which have te pee gts ite ins short tmmessée that aoe is hereby directed, to place the name Biden] Norrie, recovery of the fugitives from the mereholding it would have Peeufhougts's great concession in substance in detail, would take up a considerable iv 3 i z g Es sist