The New York Herald Newspaper, January 26, 1845, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. Vol, XI., No. 35—Whole No, 3967 WHO WAS CURED OF GANGRENE BY THE USE OF BRISTOL’S SARSAPARILLA. AMONG {ir host of medical triumphs which the AGGREGATE CIRCULATION THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND. hist of id Ly, THE GREATEST IN THE WORLD. Parl ores omen staat W cis the ound to . ‘To the Public. Ing above, ss afirmed ned by the followiug cercifense i ean THE NEW YOK HERALD—Daiy Ni whose spirited painting from the life las been copied by the ene lished every day of the year except New Year's Day and Fourth | "8h: Wi siegulartruth andfidelity. | | Of Juby. Price 2 cents per copy—or $7 26 per annum—postages | _I certify that the above i 3 painti Pid~euh in trece sind spetiel on HE e hee Heb, THE WEEKLY HERALD—published every Saturday o1 hands of Me. C, C, Bi ole C. CARPE! trait Painter. morning—price 6% cents per copy, or $3 12 per annum—post- sgt shactratan caepiid, gee tn hipenens a he voluntary starement of Dr Lee, the attending physician, . 1 e f the Daily C ial Advertise at EERO BtEE tah Baebes ot te | Heer cua oP Net 8 igre fast Ut has the torent circulation of any paper in this city, | ”*" Tes tae indeed that fatien humanity i¢ made to experience, Tenteas giver arm ma modu x lve | Cte hu of Preximue, og ek ace nd aac ; : 3 A. ‘ng CEHINTING ofall kinds exscuted atthe moet moderae hus fallen to the lotof James Wyekoff, a Ind fifteen years of Nap, now living in the town of Clarence, his Countr JAMES GORDON BENNETT, Jaines is the son of a farmer, the offspring of healthy and Prornieror oF THE HeRap Esra LisHMenr, Febucable parents, who haye a numerous family of robust chil- +. | den. able cause, he Northwest corer of Fulton and Nassau streets. Iiived ofthe a se of hearing, some tea, ears’ es hich was soon follow wi was attac! - DALLY’S TOBACCO MANUFACTORY, | SnecThig_mapialy demsroyed rere sal the, bone (THE Subscriber avails himself of this method of communi- | guittian'ta well axjuteguments’ ie wont te ditket oe ie fine Cut and srediie ig she fact that he is now manufacturing | gine in what way a more unsightly deformity could be im: aud smoking Tobacco and Sunff, at 28) River street, | pressed upon the “human face divine,” ‘This frignttat diese iY; Hext door to the Fulton market, ‘The following may be | Eensed its ravages on the face after’ several mouthee ny ee Wonaccon Te ‘celebrated Faney Virgiuin. This Tebacco | eaten cues Parte of he system, with greta and more took the premium, at the late Fair. xtra Uhewing Tobacc Lome two Years ag0 « “black spot'-en' the. {ntelligent mo- preety, Ames bing Tobacco, "minufaetused ther ft this mort unfore hid told the writer of tist—was gm the leaf; Spanil ith do. observed under the nail of each big toc. his oruinous ap mairrig Mose scented, No. 1; Maceaboy, American Gentle: | Gret'was tue seen attack of gangrene, ‘which He abore catehenct Hapee, and lish Biackguard. Bradually extended over each foot and leg to withts four inenes ah ene even! to e Ae owned the ‘A separatiy place, and in due course of time qualities leaf tobacco, and by the most experiens rere th limbs ry fingers of the right mene subscriber would also warrant his tobacco to Veet: | neu . indy, which extended to ter wvanufactared than any other in the tate of New York or | with sttagked bY this ¢ length the right arm ‘Orders directed as above will meet with prompt attention, ME yell ye AS ae oS guatomem may ray 0 on having the sme pelos kee anit thee ish Cpa eit aim don E. Savage, 234 Fulton street, and A. A. Samanos, at fa Ses Broadway, Anenyg furthe city of New York. maid ct Tompthe Sete ‘rov, Jon. 18, TWAS. j22 Im#ec “On comeing the boy, who, notwithstanding he is deaf Gun TLEMEN 3 SUFERFLUOUSULULHING | td mute, ie realy intlligéntand sprightly, the greatest marvel GENTLEMEN ORF. nd filelegs, that the syatem was falling rapidly: to piece from eal nar eqperdingty or emt the of its parts, could, when reduced mere ff of humanity, hold out and prolong for years a miseiahis exiee tence. eas i¢ may seem, we found this piece of a child Sitting a dianer table withthe eat ofthe family, feeding. Hime self with meat, potatoes, bread ‘and the like, with an evident Telish of the hearty meal: His stumps. of limba, which lately, ass of eating ulcers, dndly, and nothing but the scarsare left'to tell the Injen doge mee franienet saa Mn os sari ania ean ctr ren geet Tare, Chen He the Fost Office, ‘or pia A i peasy eecetaon the left shoul wre je ulder and the parts that surround the right eye, the jaw, and the fragments of ear still growi ead BRUN LA ROSIERE & COURT, 18 Willan thaapvestcnce of which shall uovanemprtedsscnbes ee treet, we lose tece:ved by the Louis Phili a ¥ certain check given to this terrible, spreading and essortment of Wreaths, Folka, Rachel, Tagfianta, A\- | hopeless malady the removal of the intense rotasted pal igerion Herd Dresses; Glove Trimmings and Hair Pins | ever excited by irritable fungous flesh counected with dead ax a is Fo in % Hiner a lee epbingee ot Haney mal toattor—t qui sleep, increased s1 nth aud stable con- Howe ! jeseeuce, so manifest. ia of James we eurpassid bo hen ta tos Valet hee: Houbifess fanty, ayibuted by te mother tothe dean, ix . richness jld tm*re TEETH! TEETH!! TEETH!!! GREAT feed a IN DENTISTRY. for the last, 4 C,. Bristol's ila ‘Phose who have witneas fly auspiciows, and eaoet Oa expected effects of this medicine in this very extraordinary case, are unanimous in the opinion that had it been adini Be, ministered id the Cees Post ect Rec OPER IN Tietatsaulyt | courtitution sonal snd vigorous, dccould wot hava Fiat ine J erent one 0 ‘greatest celamicies that can befall ie N. TAYLO, Surgeon Dentist, etenkivod eae Deel Peper fel aor ds ee Hee Browdwres | oe ee ctune” dak venbeliot sont be itetie’ be raking UAN EUS EA KEE Neg tat door pole ble witness. hen we Reomrjathas phd thatinenant NE UENIY D. BLACKWOOD. Worthen | ofr, Lees supported by the tollowing ertfcate of General Dot of the above, advertioes the following cheap | Manefeld,.wha ipratensivaly and favorably known as one of county. ble joi Bex t doul ble Jointed Sold Pesctagien, Best double jointed Silver Brectacles.. single jointed Bilver Spec 3 ‘nest double jointed elastic blue ta ‘mest single join sate clue Steel Spectack Filer doobe ‘ortuise ser, are correct. Finest single jointed Tortoi ‘the concurrent testimon’ "i STILL CHEAYER. might be supposed to sa elastic blue steel Spectacles, set with the best glasses, and | evidence by no means rests even every care and a:tention to them in the manufacture, | the boy, who has been the subject for one dellar. | : 0 wonderfu ul a care, the following Good elastic blue Bteel 8 been receiv: elastic ._,CLARENCE, Dec. 13, 1841. elastic blue Stee] Spectacles. Mr. C. @. Bristor—Dear Sir—I understand there are persons German Silver in Buffalo‘ who dispu'e the publicacion of the case of my son Best Tortoise-shell Eye Glasses 6a. James, which is suostantially true, and he can be at my Best blue Sterl Eiye Glasses im Clarence atany time. “There ine pece of a boy yet + Best Eye GI jeoee living, ling as fast as possible, and {n health so as to Best Horn les. . 6d, receive his regular meals with a good relish ; his Jeft arm is Best Conver set ows 3 almoss healed up, the other piece of the arm is healed up, 20 Best Concave Glasses set into your own frames, 3s. ‘tnxt we think it uo trouble, as there is but one small spotabout Best Convex Pebbles set into your own frames. . 103. as big an a sixjence ; hus lege are healing finely, aud he feels ‘Best Concave set into y ra frames, 124, perfectly ted. ” id Reyaiss executed at the same rate of cheapness. 1 will in as 'ew words as possible, give you the life of my son ies and Gentlemen attended at their own residences. James. He was born April 221, ‘smart, active child, and jal6 im*ec Femaiued so, until Apa 3d) 1 yhen he ‘was d with, measles and took cold, ‘the physician sent hima potion of SOMETHING NEW. ranted Wy, the Opited Sennen as Teeonea Rietinn Masel . nari seo BURN WITHOUT BRIMSTONE. oh mercury, which struck him almost lifeless, and from that time he grew deaf and blind. In September his ‘right arm became a runuing sore. lo the winter of 1838 his eyesigbt was restored, in the spring following a number of ulcers broke in the Eta Ne ‘very reason,ble lands of his eck and rcof of tl th, and otuer places, TWENTY THOUSAND GLOSS Sraich coutinued cating wntil the fall of 1835; “We then gave uy} 4p in tin, wood and paper, in any sized packages, and | all hopes of relief; aud the disease stood still apparently until * Durch gk MATCHES athe foig ta toc mentee he 00 wets are highly soproved ‘and recomroeaded for family use b re of phyniel sta, in co and! ence of the absence of sul- ‘heir wanufacture, the {ames of which are so disagree- able and deleterious to all, and particularly injurious to persous reak |i or deli on eae ‘They are pyrtienlaniy, recommended to the attention of ship- pers, as they have frequently been on long voyages and ex- Posed to the action of all oli je withoge the shighest injury. ay LZ RW YC F. For sale by the principal a om Grocers in the city. From Jacob Carr, Minister of the German Evangelical order : Orde's left at Shepard’s Bookstore, 191 Broadway, or at their z “s Burrato, May 15, 183. office, 161 Bleeeker street. Ihave been acquainted with James Wyckoff since he was a jali im*m SPALDING & CO. cnild, and have seen him in every stage of his sickness. The statement as ret forth above, I know to be true, and the repre- CIGARS! CIGARS! CIGARS! sentation of his present appearance in the above engraving 18 N. EZEKI 92 Ni street, opporite the E jd Build J correct. Signed, JACOB CARI + ings, respectfully invites the attention of his friends and i fat nro ‘Barsaparilla has been in use for tea years, that y ing Cures. that i ver ‘once % tf producing the wished for effect, that it has triumphed fail ve and ans the publ ice Ci ity ica to the following choice Cigars, just Te- various Drands,"Peseas of various brand, the severest tests, that it hes ai jas ‘over the worst cases, and ¢ ul rincipes, steadily and continually increased in reputatation, that it has ngrauided, da, secured the commendations Press, the approval and en- 28, japoleones, dorsement of the medical faculty, and the good upinion of the India, _ Noriegas, ‘Lord Byrons. most intelligent and estimable wen of our ti vantages: ‘The above Segara are TMepeneincand imported, and | which no ciler med.cal preparation has, aud which none ean the trade are invited to fall anc ee thes. Mave une its value ss unquestiguable and established upon t 'N. B.—Orders from ‘will be strictly attended to. just experience of yearssare facts affording security for its siiates Wie ceahioten: whi ine bese ebcrsementcice cae tron ol o ine, WI 3 on an ofits LEECHES! LEECHES! merits and efficacy will be aiforded by its own operation. JUST RECEIVED—Per , from Hamburg, a | patient can have no better evidence than this—the proprietor de- very supply of Swedi: hes; for sale wholesale J sires no other. and reall ¢ the moa aod PHETDINAND & CO following ia’ litatal cong OF & ouae reeelved by Me in meee Tenporter of Leaches No. es Nasasa sireet Bristol by re course, of aneil. i, shows cleat. hae the ATCHES WATCHES AND JEWELRY —Those eee acicore of a geapencton of Denetesiitn, cok who wish to. purchase or Silver Watches, Gok fstol’s preparation was in such good repute that 1¢ was Gold Pencils, Keys, te, will find ig greatly to their | an object to procure the lace at the fetter and ‘ita to call on the subscriber, who is selting all descrip- will hambugyery of their long-winded the above at retail mach lower than say cabot house in ivertisements ‘to the world,” &c., aud expose the shameful the city. Gold Watches as low as $20 and ‘Watches } imposition of their false and ritical statements. welry exc or ‘war: J could uot procure the ageney of Bristol's Harsaparilia, and ranted to keep goed i the money ‘Warehes, } combined motives of spite and avarice were ind ad Jeweir in the best mauner and warranted, | Corrit the prevaration. - prices. jes,” ‘im GC. Abort of Fiasches nd Jewelry, cag viet a me | Catiied apeiane the imyosition of & spurious aad. valeelen zt a st im ition of @ spurious and valueless BALLS, PAR EW EARS FESTIVI- | Sreparacions si ast Gat Cea atace HOSE gentlemen who intend enjoying ities of the |, Mr. C. C, Briss} Dens Six_We have in ielliog” duriog ment of fablonsble Reagee, Cugvatp, Di rarauasey {the Fis® Zot'iulcr trons the bocowats we hear of feo vittwes fore received by late arrivals from Paris and fe Present | those whohave used it thatthe sal inthis city may bs much assortmeut of the have been with great | inci by paying more pitengon in Cog Our ar- ‘stention, and are well to give satist to geatle- | rangements are such with the dit it papers, that we can have mea of taste and fashion. theatten- | advertisements on much beter terme haa most others tion of their patrons and visiting this city to thei pay, and more conspicuously. If you would like to make an And well selected tof the following goods; Li Errengement with us for selliog it ‘more extensively, we think Maslin Shirts, (out. ‘appro |, to it could be made of much edventage to us both. We have now nef SWearer,) Silk, Mea be Wool, ur different stores, three of fn the best locations in th irts and Drawers; city for retailing, and one Lor wholesaleing, and our facilities are such a W ius to dispose of more of it, than i | Sty ‘other house. We shall be muuch , -F to hear from you Saree Survepeten Whim cge th oF 80, ‘Yours very respectfully, ‘A.B. & D- BANDS. REMARKABLE CU OF SCROFULA. Mesten, Ct, June, 1844. GINEEK. | Me. C. C. Bristrol— Sir—A delicacy in appearing before the 7a has hitherto ed me from giving to the w ing statement ‘on an extensive scale for many years | Of my severe and afflicting disease, (Scrof: |a,) and the means by eo. Inventors, patentees hich it was effectually removed and. | my and others ‘ and Feeling it is an obligation | owe as one of the vast family of man may consult him to like my peing}ples of prast ‘as I have been, Falidity aad usefa world what hes cal, wo logger retard sion to the ports gasaiven falas canard eae - pur ur agents, Dickinson & Goodwin, of perimee ng Processes, 4 r i descril rigid ‘ 1o 31 Spruce street, New \ ote suffered at af i from this coy plaint, si the ‘hist being, lost byt Tivalons apie. pplicaats will bo ex: | Seni, Rmemuneet, Ch be es pected to pay a $10 before consultation. plane became very, kit n22 Smre many Diysicians who s \d high in the pro eae lai WYKOFF’S DINING SA: iN faa wort hic “2 Corner of Pine and Nassau streets, in the Basement. | "ad aicrotulons swell ite fa of Y0AtT went co the pride TT'HILB ia ove of the est, places in the city at which to obtain Roping to find relied but: was dispoiuted, aa nay” health was ameal, es & Dinner, at once cheap snd Iezuriqus, | worse than before, January, 144, 1 had another swelliny The articles of food, are alwaye fresh , well cooked | come on the top of my foot, ‘and ove on my forehead, whic tnd well served, aud the prices as lo ag those of any establish | were very: distressing. ‘They continued wo grow wore and ment inthe city. Geutl who are disgusted with the filth, | worse until May, w! ‘was confined to my bed. I remained t order 40,60 mon ‘among the eating houses, will | in this hapeleae tate through the swimmer, with nothing but the ings and Apple » Dumplings served by Who depth boa rhe sacceeding winter I felt a little more comfortable, Hor, as di raged . Various Mmeaue were used (o afford reltet, but too pate, "All aeemed to 4 eds Vs aye m vad R be powerless in my and every effort to arrest my ME PROPRIETORS of’ Brite eon hate, ax | complaint pre cessful, “I gave up all hopes of bein "T HEP mmense expenses completed toe mane Slogans anal coun, | cured oz my alliction in the vetat mitigavg, uni time with modious BALL OR CONCERT ROOM the dsc, and {hed given Up the wat of rndiein 8 ah ogo eae Rete pamio tt | wh hone ro Sant bpe aa Bintly adapts ete the syenn ia l (7 stim others, aggeated a eral SEH Hy wee eared, been ade ag rome te ain day ot day i. Bat Seomlor and convene of the at w.cbh ose os eae Ying tn - he dy Sl 3 shove tat i Piece % cover, after the use of two or three bottles, a a spaciou ipper uO Beenie — ine: manele ¢ hy Tothing ea ve meme ene ny an oth preva aa ae tras able to ait ub alt day, “After | hed taken eighteen bowes | wvaaa linere themselves. Teomme gthe ‘Sarsaparilie {hid it, HENRY Pai hg Pa ES te waiklag.e ue reso tad may pay a megs tears Be rien and wastes CSRs TELz a Se | Meee r aa at {SPORE | Geen ieee neecieage PUR Fa nied | iat yar esa os Tea StS a, EE tion in my power; and were I capable I would proclaim to all ‘world’ what Bristol’s Sarsaparilla has done for me. for to it ‘owe the preservation of my life, under the direction of a wise Providence. ‘ours respectially, ‘ALMIRA STOUGHTON. .) Mancuuaten, Ct, April 20, 1814, J have bern, tequained with ire Almira Sioweheon for the mon en ted ay tw that her health appears to be very goed. She had m very much previously from Scrofula, as her nw us sears abundantly shew. and from her aceount’'l have the fullest Foason to believe that the recovered under the use of Bristol's continued for afew mont Ww. C. WI . D. AGGRAVATED CASE OF SCRORULAY With nive large ulcers on the leg ; enti ren ap as acurable by" Pupsisians ) by" Basis Bama j Avotnen Paooy of tHe Vintuxs or Buistou’s Sa Panitta.—The followiux in one of the many huvdced r° pa I yA ra! into tf oti ity— whereas Bristol's Sarsaparilla performs all {t purports to.do, aod wad gress faction to those who hinve had the ‘art rs sled given ea fairerals 9) ew Yorx, : Mx, C.C. Baistow—Sir, there’ have been but faw tients any life ore ple'sua tp me, than the Of the statement lam about fo make, relative to dhe nate, cure performed by your Ssrsaparilia. ou my son, Charles, uy years. Charles aoe il 1¢ licted with Serof ae neck and various parts of ‘ regal ey Somer io vege he Sprin; 1812, when the i pearan Ber ig of wi mache Perotuls made its api ce about es lich go af cat is inflamaion, seriously affecting bi ae oor incase next appeared ou his lett leg, assuming a very dangerous and fearful form, ‘Spreading rapidly from hts kenes ( hisancles, And there was but little hope ot hi belt prithoas the loss of the leg by amputation or the dreadful and Horrid fate of being eaten up alive by bs distressing malady, the Serofula. in vain was the skill aud talent of the medics? ‘bros fesston brought into requisition in, order to arreat this: feavfal and wasting disease. “All the various Temedies presctil Dhysiciansyas well as the numerous nos! ‘were resorted to without avy benefit wi ‘was fast wasting away to a mere skeleton. in this dreadfal condition, with niue tanning. and ,eatiog ul cers on the leg, the most of them resembling eng foe In'subduing thts Patdincase, the atrofula, ‘At th r recommended Bristol ferred to rescril ims vended as curealls, itever to my son, who t that distreasing and ‘and pain a. At thi is, a fr ae fol is cu a friend providentially ons, whu dat the same time re- la in its worst possible furm. in cured Dy it, were afflict i with ser af of aint hope that my son might yet be saves f the great Dispenser of every blessing to mankind, 1 cone meneed administering to my son Bristol’s Sarsaparilla, in July, teat : After using it fora short time, we discovered a change for the better, and ina few months his leg was wearly well, leeviug only the sears to tell where the ulcerations had been. He had various other afflictions, all of w! am happy to say, wil filled with joy and gratitude, are now removed, and ‘Charles perfectly cu yy, Bristol's lla, 1 should fail im the rempt to speak of your Sarsaparilla as it deserves, Languave po faint, and my abilities too feeble to ex rene the his eats mation in which | hold yourinvaluable preparation of Sursapa. villa. It will be a pleasureto me to satisfy any one who may desire toe my son, at No. 86 Heat tet g, Cedar Cooper, ‘Another remarkable feature about Bristol's ‘Sarseyariila at no one is heard to speak m the contra: body, exeepe the tmitato ise, Th i becomes sour li ithe hentia hater eat e piest feature of it all ts, medicine, stay cured. ‘A IMPORTANT AxD NECESSARY CaUTION.—Bristol’s Sars- aparilla has a red stamp across the cork of the bottle, on, wit is the written signature of C-C. Bristol, ‘None other is reaa, ine, (> Bristrol’s Sarsa issold by WILLIAM BURGER reneral Agent, No. 5 landt street, New York, and at re- tail atthe followin places:—Milhan's' PhYmaey, 188 Bron way; James Syme, M. D., Bowery and Walker’ street; N. iu, 260 Bowery; Rushton & Co., 110 Broadway and 10 Astor Buildings; Jas. 8. Aspinwall &'Co. 80 William street; John Syme, Fulton and Water stncets Dr. Miluer, comer of Broadway and John street; Robert Legget, ttreet? Altied Hlth, air “Greenwich nce 1 ae Soeeay es J ill, wich street; J. & J. Codding- ing and Hudson streets; 1). H. Burtnell, Third Avene rl treet; Daniel B. ion street; Moss, Gran Henry Buel, 30 6tlaw*ec i 4 3; oe Be is i me THERE 18 HOPE for the Consummptive, for those wot, 8, aflited “with Asthma, Bruch an ered, for, those who sre laboring. under loog continued and tedious, Coughs, Shertness Ps Bineuty of , Breathing, Pain sn the Breast or side, Bleeding of the Lange tind ther precarrs of Fatal iseases.—Dr Folger OLOSAONTAN, OR ALEHEALING BALSAM, 1st AS BELA Uas AERA vexpens Tthas been submitted to the faculty, and has experience. [omg jed by them—and it th the pean, cate ekdsece to all who tmay be efficted, and who necd its, healing. properti ‘Davip tHewoe 60 Laight street was reduced very low i id raising of Blood. He had tried vari jief. chou a tic fever and night Sweats one bottle of this Great Remedy restored him entirely to (tealth« W., Havs was relieved by two bottles of the Olos- nian, aithousi s0 venkat the ime he commenced using it that v he coal co culty of breathing was such that he contd walk only a few ste ata time, and his night sweats were a from the commencement of his, using. the medi Aoi ee Goria en the offiea, and ia ck weeks be'wus 00 fared stored at to be able to attend to his busisess again. ee ate le aie gem a sid. down iu bed fo He bas. weve Tecurrence of the disease—now a montl je has never had a Ua gy ee? ree ‘Wert street, was cured of Asthma, of ding, by half a bottie, and declares it to bethe qhe world, She had ‘used various other reme least dreds of cases might be given to its efficacy, ee Ge a ieee int, LL-HEALING” in its properti ‘ou will not sed it, amd it may entirely pat to flight the dis- street, one door re FEstacipel Ofkce® 100 Ni one u TO THOSE WITHOUT CHILDREN A EROCREATIVE ELIXIR CORD ZORDIAL ry in medical science M Sieg Corda, is every u se ries ‘gate oF Semis: ations train se te ae is evidence of its ria Pe Nl led PELE ea ceed jies calling for the “Elixir” che in attendance. Orricy on sapzamon uney ; a By Tong D., de = Jona ©. Merits sssroway W. SHO dant Aen. T. Hore, Seoretary nin ¥KENCH OHINA. MO. 66 LI STREET, Ae i stpocri sad ent, ei = entd Chocalte Wars, Orok: Mah and Aimarioon inet cred sansa + wane PINE’S HO ’ No, 19 NASSAU, BETWEEN C AND PINE BILL OF FARE, New Y. di fy P RTC BS RED TG D. Lied ie giledsalf dos 1 ‘Stewr: Pick! Pork and Beans 1 VEGETABLES, Green Peas 6 6 i Hd Piso fw oyster sauce Calves Head, hh DD. ‘MEN OR LADIES Ree Narmtureto duapgse of oa en Rect cash prices forthe nae sondage ‘ubseril Duane street, No. 6, in agement, the Post Office, or ‘cere elk P.8.—A line promptly NEW YORK, SUNDAY MORNING, JANUARY 26, 1845. THE NEW YORK HERALD. | *®1ancasue case ov sawes wroxorr, | Transubstantiation. A Lecture delivered in St. Patrick’s Cathe- dral, Thursday Evening, January 23, 1845, by the Right Reverend Bishop Hughes. I shall commence, beloved brethren, by reading for you several portions of holy scripture, having reference to the subject I am about to treat. The first portion is that in which our Saviour introdu- ced the subject of his intention to establish a life- giving sacrament—that of his own body and blood under the appearances of bread and wine. The second will be those portions of scripture in which are fully accomplished the design he had previous- ly expressed ; and the third will be the reference, subsequently, to this institution, by St. Paul the Apostle. (Bishop Hughes here read that well known passage found ia 6th chapter of St. John’s Gospel, commencing with the 5lst verse; also, that trom St. Matthew, 26th chapter, 26th, 27th, 28th versea; as wellas the relative texta from St. Mark and St. Luke; and St. Paul’s reference to the subject as found in 11th chapter of Ist Corinthi- ans. As these texts are too long to insert we omit them ; they are, however, texts with which most readers are familiar.) tis not my intention, be- loved brethren, to enter upon any discussion of the force and purpose and application of these inspired words. Yet I have pronounced them aloud on en- tering upon this great and awful question in order that the memory of them shall remain with you, while I shall have to speak of many things appa- rently separate from these texts, yet not uncon- nected with this doctrine. For,unhappily at the pre- sent day, the plain, simple, direct, but well grounded meaning the church always attaches to these words is questioned and denied by many who profess to take the divine volume, from which I have read these words as their only guide. Thisquestion divides them from us, and the point at issue is simply this:—Did Chriet in these words, ordained to be a memorial of his almighty power, realize what the Catholic Church believes reepecting the mystery of the eu. charist ; ordid he utter these words, with all their solemnity, to express that which would scarcely be p muster atall? In brief, did he mean to give to his apostles at that moment, and to the recipients of his mystical body at all times, his bedy and blood, under the appearances of bread and wine,or not? The Catholic Church has always taught, on this subject, the affirmative; and, unhappily, against that teaching of the Catholic Church, since the unhappy separation that has divided so many Chris- tians rom her communion, every species of argu- ment that isgenuity could suggest—every specier of evidence that could be brought forward from the obscurity of languege, the ambiguity of gram- matical construction, and the progress of science, and the resources of reason,that man could muster, have been used for the purpose of overthrowing what we regard as the most exalted of God’s mys. teries. Now, beloved brethren, the reason I do not enter upon the discussion of the force of the scrip tural language in esippar of this dogma is, that while we Catholics understand our faith, and know to what point an argument of scripture should be applied—those in this audience who have been brought up under another training have an imagi- “ee Catholic Church in their minds, and would be liable to be led away by this phantom of their minds from the truth. It is necessary, then, to pro- ceed to an understanding of what it is that the Ca- tholic Church. teaches on this subject; and I need not add hefe that, for every member of her own communion, reason and argument are altogether superfluous; because they believe that God has anneinted her as His minister and representative in His cwn place—guiding and guarcing the faithtu! in the ways ofeternal lite, and the mysteries which cause’ others to retire have no difficulties to their minds. For them it is sufficient that the Church teaches this, and this, and this; but, before confid- ing, they have satisfied their minds that God has made Church for that teaching, and take, in- stead of God himself, the Churchhe has substituted in hisplace. Not so with our separated brethren They claim the dangerous piers of examining every thing. They bring all to the test of scrip- ture, and then bring the scriptures to the test of their own minds. Let us meet them on this ground, and if it be possible, even by adopting their own principles of reasoning, let us examine the question between the two communions—the Catholic and Protestant—and understand on what side the force of scriptural evidence, historical authority,andeven the force of reason itseif, is found to reside. Now, beloved brethren, the view which the Catholic church entertains of this doctrine is one in itseli the most exalted, which it is possible for the mind of a Christian to conceive. For the teaching of our church is this—that the mere dying on the cross was not yet enough to satisfy the infinite goodness ot our God in becoming incarnate and assuming the work of our redemption; but that even by the iniracle which none but God could perform or con- ceive, by the same infinite means by which he be- nd gave his life for our redemption, to give himself for us, and, in a mysti cal form, under the appearances and accidents of bread and wine, he continues to redeem us. And in that mystery which the church has from the be- ginning, day by day for 364 days of every year, through the power delivered to her ministers, ot fered up to God that sacrifice first offered on the cross; not a new or distiacteacrifice, but what the ane expressed it, ‘‘to show forth the death of hrist till he come,” and that Christ,being the vic- tim of the high priest, presents himself to the fa ther as a propitistion for our sins. The church teaches that when Christ died on the cross, he died for all mankind in general ; out that he renews that death in a miraculous and mystical manner in fa- vor of particularpersons or communities, and gives that flesh, once so much areas, as a pledge and winciple of eternal life. I know we are far from him, at the es hand of the Eternal Father where he is—but I know at the same time that his love sees a great way, and hence, when we raise our eyes he seems togive usrenewed powers of adora- tion, and humility and gratitude, which we never realize when we think of the Saviour’s distance from us at the right hand of God. If it be ark. ed, then, by whom is this rite performed—ie it the priest accomplishes this mystery? Yes, in one sense; no, in another. The priest, in an out- ward manner, and in the same sense as he is in- strumental in converting sinners, speaks to them in God’s name; but Christ does all, and is the au. thor ofany good that is accomplished in his church, by the outward means appointed. It is, therefore, 8@ far, simply an evidence of God’s goodness and power. ‘e believe in that mystery, he continues, —as the fathers expressed it. it were an exten- sion and continuation of the redemption of the world; and that we, assembled round hie altar, are exalted to his presence, because having something in that mystic rite worthy to raise to God in his name; and that in no particular place, but all over the globe wherever there is an altar raised by his Church. It is not the priest, according to this, who accomplishes the mystery; but Christ himself—he being the high priest aiter the order of Melchesi- dec. This, my brethren,is what makes the Catho lie Church so sacred ia our estimation; thisis what influences us when we sacrifice our wealth to raise splendid temples, and if the altar be spangled with the gems of eastern wealth, it is not for the sake of the altar, but because ‘of him who gives himself for us, and is still the mediator between God and man. If 1 were then to divine the subject I pro- pose to treat of, I should say it will naturally come under three distinct heads. One willbe the scripture I have just read. Another will be the history of this dogma, and another will be the ob- jections taken from what is called philosophy that have been urged against it. It will be impos sible to dispose of all these at one time. But I will say, in regard to this dogma of the Church at the present day, that it is the same taught bi the Church in all ages it; that, of all the dogmas revealed by the authorityof chr this was the last to be directly attacked or a upon its own merits. For whilst we see various sectsand heretics assailing the several tenets of Christianity, the divinity ot Christ not accepted, we at least have the best and most triumphant histori- cal and scriptural evidence of the real presence ot Christ in the Eucharist. I find that the first that ever questioned that dogma were the Gnostics in the age of the Apostles themselves. These were men that blenden philosophy with Christianity,and some do at the present time. They believed that Christ became man, but atthe same time they imagined themeelv ayeble,by tiple ‘ilosophy,ot elevating Christianity from the lowlness of the true faith, and found it impossible to conceive how God incarnate should have suffered the indignities offered to humanity. Their system was one of elevating aud rationalizing the Christian faith ; and accordingly they believed that Christ had a figu rative body when undergoing these sufferings and indignities, and that his real bod: and so St. Ignatius, a martyr and apostolic father, when epeaking of the Eucharist, referring inci dentally to their gnostics as being conscious of was not there; Price Two Cents: all perceive that it was so—all these qualities you could tell from its appearance— but as to what is under that ap pearance, you cannot tell it It may be woud—it may be marble; are your senses obliged to tell you the substance? No such thing; habits and experience have regulated our belief, and by thie testimony, when we see things we judge of their character, but it isnot the province cf the pees. to tell their i aha nv eyo ts to pr nrg according to the C e ? We believe that, by the universal estimony of the Cathelic Church that under the ee and appearance of bread and wine the body ~ and blood of Christ is veiled. Where is the absurdity of this? What can philosophy bring sgainst it, with ail its proud aspirations’ It belongs to @ aphere to which it can never wiog its way. {t bel to a supervutural order ef subjects, a3 10 philosophy io at- tack it. But it is impossible for us to understand as God, yet we can hat notious. Tske an Indian, and, ringing him how him some object he never saw betore—b nce, two large mirrore placed at certain angles ot » and bring 4 man ata certain point, and the result will be that the Indian will see three men, and these men all moving in exactly the same order —and be assured he will see them so as never to suspect there are less than three men. This 1s the evidence of his senses; if you tell him there sre but one, he wili tell you he saw distance and motion, and taat you cannot re- Present distance and motion, and that you are imposin, onhim. Would you think that man reasonable? Wou! you consider thai blind man reasonable who would con- tend about colors, upon which he had no o her evidence but that cf thoze aronnd him? God has given us reason for another purpose, and when we take upon us impious): to set up its false deductions against God’s express words, and the faith of his Church ou this great mystery—then it is time to call reason to subserve the purposes of every day life on which those phi/osophers cunnot give ua un explanation. But if we are to believe that the Eucharist is the substance its accidents indicate, I say they are reparing the way for that universal infidelity that fol lowed it, and which has desolated and blasted the whole of Northern Europe. You say you see our bread and wine, and therefore they are bread and wine. I say, re- member you are a Christian, not an infidel; yet take care how you extend the argument. Have you not readin the holy scriptures, that the Holy Ghost assumed the form of adove, and descended upon our Saviour when vaptized in the river Jordan. Now here was the form, the oppear- ance, all the accidents of a dove. w was it, or was it not a dove? If your philosophy is right, then it wes; and yet if you say so, there wili be fifty uifterent views upon the subject, and innumerable authority to philosopbize and contradict you. Did not the same holy spirit, at the feast of Penticost, come unto his Apostles like tongues of of fire, and like the sound of a rushing mighty wind did he not fill the place where they sat ? But why enlarge these cases. I could bring numerous instances to show that, by bsurd way of ussailing this mysterious institution, they violate the word of God, and open the flood gates to infidelity. Yes, beloved brethren, wecallto mind with pleasure the fact,that you do not read, in all christendom, ofa single deist or atheist who did not begin his descent into the depth of infidelity with the nition of the very principle which is at the foundation of thst spurious. philosophy which would assail the evidence of our sense, this stupendous mystery of God. When this ar- gument was once applied to the encharist, it wes followed by the other mysteries in regular order, until their error, because they denied the flesh of Jesus Christ, whe suffered and died for us. The neat were the Manichaeans in the thirdcentury. They did not deny the dogma of the real presence, on account of any difficulty in that doctrine, but be- cause their system of belief made it necessary to do so. ney conceived, amoog other things in the struggle between man’s reason and the things which were seen, there were two distinct and in- dependent beings—one of whom is God, the creator of spirits, and all that appertains to the spiritual world. The other wasthe principle of evil, equally independent, to whom they ascribed the creation of this world, of all that is spoken of in the Old Testament, including the human body. And accordiagly, since they conceived that the hu- man body was the work of the evil supreme being, they denied that Christ, as such, received that body or dwelt in it, and consequently they rejected the dogma of the holy Eucharist, but not on ac- count of any difficulty iu itself. Another branch of this sect denied the docirine, but not upon the same grounds. And the first, in all the after histo- ry ot the Christian Church, who we find impeach- ing the doctrine, was the preceptor of Charles the Bold, in the 9th century, who wrote an obscure scholastic treatise on the subject, and wastully an- swered by a monks of that day. Io the 11th centu- ry Berengerius began to philosophise upen the real presence, and presently, as all do who thus mingle their philosophy with faith, he fell into this error, and called forth many bishops of France, !taly an: England against him, whilst he was summoned be- fore several councils, to whom he recanted his er- ror, but relapsed again; but at last, itis said, he confessed it, and died in the communion of the Church. From this time there was no dispute on this doctrine, except among the Albigenses ; and be it remembered that they were descended from the Manicheans. Then came,in the 16th century, the denial, for the first time, of a dogma received from the earliest ages, a denial that weighed with many, and which at present constitutes a part of the difference between the Catholic Church and those sects which have left her communion. Now there is one fact [ will assert most bold. ly; it is this: that the eucharist being notan ab- stract question for the scholar, ner a matter of pure mystery, but a practical rite connected with the worship of God inthe day service of the church, with which the people are as well acquainted,as to its practice end administration, as the fathers of the church themselves—that all the united testimo- ny of all christendom is in favor of this doctrine; that there never was a form of regular liturgicai worship before the 16th century that rejected it; and so true is this thatthe whole Eastern Church in all ages—the various schismatics,such as the Eu- tichans, the Nesterians, the Maromites, the Greck Separatiste—have it in their liturgies the same as in the mass of the Catholic Church. | what was once Protestantism in Germany is now nothing Here is a proof—but I don’t quote it as] more than practical infidelity. They do not deny the such—that if it be net the true doctrine— ecripture, but they 80 espn it away that there is nota remnant of the original force left. But, brethren, in the Catholic Church, this doctrine is not founded on human reason; and all I mean te sa: that J allude to it to show that it is not reason that pro’ We heve no proot by our senses; nor are we to regard our reason as adequate to comprebend the substance under these accidents. Now, the effect of the difficulty into which they fallwho reject this doctrine, is to show that their figurative ex- plonation of the scriptare is not less difficult thon the literal. The first who attempted this was Luth but he did not assail the doctrine of real presence clared, at the same time, that he wished, with heart, he could overcome that doctrine—that the 13 nothing he struggled for so hard as that; aud the on he alleged for his conduct was,that if he could it, it would be a great’ mortification to the Papis could not get over this text of scripture; and e weuld not agree with the church he had forsake: bead a taught that, although at the moment of p:o- the true doctrine did not survive its Divine founder one hundred years; that the whole Christian Church fell at once, and universally, inte idolatry as gross as that from which its Divine founder came to deliver and enlighten the world. We have these liturgies in every form; and al though these various sects are ready to use all means within reach to bring the Chureh into disre- pute, yet they have not reproached her, but all unite im establishing the primitive dogma of the teal presence; and with as much certainty as we believe Christ is the Son of God?do we believe the reality of his presence in the eucharist. But, bre- thren, when we speak upon this subject, we ure supposed to speak to Christians; for I would think it a waste of time to discuss the point with a man who did not believe in the divinity of Christ. With such a “person I would | nouncing the words of consecration by the Priest, the begin with another point, and it would be | real presence of Christ was in the eucherist, yet the a waste of time and breath to discuss this ques | bread and wine remained the same substance. Im: dately after there were others who wished to reform wells Luther. Zuingli i in which it was written, that tongue synonymous with the word, " to represent;” and, accordingly, that the phrase ‘ this is my body” nieaps “ this represents my body ;” end when pressedon this point, he gave another version, whieh said that Christ, after iret ing of the bread in his hand in the words, “take this and eat,” by a counter metion pointed to his body and said, “this is my boty.” You know what opposition and controversy existed between these two he shes of the reformation. Wheta mul- tiptication of boeks and expenditure of ink—and, alas, that was not the only thing poured out ; for the conflict- ing parties so increased their controversies, until it inter- tercd with life and property, and all the relations of sccial life. Again, Caivin, coming into the contest. contended ‘or something more than Zuinglius allowed. His ductrine was, that the consecration produced no change whatever in the sa thatChrist 18 as fur from the sacrament as heaven ; but that some persons who were tion with one who denied the truth upon this great funda- mental doctrine is founded. 1 suppose that all christians believe that Christ was the only begotten Son of God ; that he wi t into. the world ; that the Word was mad: flesh ; that it was God and man; that all power in heaven and on h_ was in his hands; and that his dc- ch ion was that cf God. Then there is at least oae com. mon ground where we can meet ; ond that must be pre served in the argument to which | am about to refer.— And, first of all, it is much to be deplored that while the infidel has become infidel, he has teken his arguments against the divinity of the Son ef God from the very principles of those who impugn this sacted mystery:- they have borrowed in their tura from the infidel some of his cavila and assaults, and made them a part of the weap- ons with which they deny the doctrine of the prea ence. Have you never heard of the absurdity, the im. propriety, imputed to the Catholic doctrine. Have yoo never heard it said that those who believe such a doc- trine as this were void of sense and totally unworthy to be reasoned with? But kt us recur to some oi the infide} modes of getting over the most stupendous of God’s mir acles’ Inthe first place, then, they pretend thet this dog ma is contrary tocommon sense. And you may easily imaginethat when they bring matters of revelation to this standard, they may prepare for what has followed their arguments. For whilst this dogma ‘wos brought to common sense test in Germany, and overthrown, these men did not see that the doctrines theywished to preserve, for instance, that of the trinity, or the incarnation— might be brought to a common sense standard and overthrown ‘oo; and the consequence is, that in those countries not a single follower of ' those men who first denied the real presence, on the ground of common sense, is found toraise his voice and proclaim the divinity of Christ. Every mystery of religion has been swept away in Germany, because the beiiei in these doctrines was brought to the standard of common sense We ask what has common sense to do with it? They say we are bound to believe, according to our doctrine, that a body can exist in two pla nd that we believe that a body can e: those propertics peculiar to it ; and that we must believe thi iy substance which appears to me as bread and not bread and wine, but that my senses deceive ave stated these t least, on God’s elect would, in participating, eat spiritually the body and blood of Christ against this, and said th: say in Luther wrote immediately the text was plain—Christ ‘ing, emphatically, y cody!” Calvin, in his answer to this said to Luther, “ If that be true, you , and the Catholics are right.” Now the Lu- therans believe in the real presence as firmly as we do, but that it is not accomplished in the ssme manner. We believe in the cessation oi the bread end the wine in sub- stance; they, believe in their conversion by the body and the blood of Christ becoming present with them at the moment of consccration. But when they proceeded to explain how that could be, Luther said, “do you that iron, when put into the fire and heated to redness, is iron asto the substance, and fire too—and thus 1 expiain the change of the bread and wine in the secrament—which change I call const jutien.” Now about the same time this question was agitatedin England, when, during the minority of Edward VI , the change in religion went on under the supervision of Somerset, who was appointed the protector of the young king In the work of reform, as it is called, his two principal advisers were men of the Geneva school, and it is for that reeson that so much nore of Calvin’s doctrine is embodied in the articles of the Church ef England than that of Luther. And though the language of the Liturgy ef the Church of England is expressive cnough betimes, yet there are contradictions im some instances, an incapacity, as it were, to edmit en- urely the sianderd of reason, so much £0 that the book of Common Prayer tells you that the body and blood of Christ is really and indeed token ; and the most pious and distinguished men in that Church have deplored the pre- sence of these Geneva men at the work of establishing the English Church. Now, brethren, | have gone over this evening those paris constituting the objections to our doctrine, ond this is always a teskto the degree pain- tul for a Christian. We shail have opportunity, on a fu- ture occasion, of quoting the lenguege of the early fa- rs on the dogma. You will hear St Chrysostom pro- claiming, that, when this mystic rite takes plece, the angels of heaven prostrate themselves before Christ ; you will find them speaki: of the doctrine as the most awful and tremendous of God’s mysteries. The sacred- ness and solemnity of the subject in the mind of the Catholic must mi i: painful to then to hear the ob Jections which are often muede sgainst it ; and lest it should escape me, at this moment, | remember one that was presented by'a high dignitary of the Protestant com- munion. A member of his flock was disposed to become a Catholic, and embrace that faith, and this minister attempted several times to convince him of his error, and seid, “how can you bring yourself to be lieve in such a great absurdity as transubstantiation!” ut, Sir,” replied the other—“ tho scriptures support joctrine.” “* But have you reflected on this?” he was asked. “You know the i Catholics say— trouble us not wita your little philosophy. Your minds are capable of a little light—very little—but on this matter, although we have the same light as you have, yet we are not guided by that, but by the declara tion of Gad ; ond we believe that if God has made this de clération, it is not sbsurd, but it is your minds and cepa- city that are too small to rise to it. What is a mystery would be no mystery at all to minds copable of compre- hending it. But, then, on the other hand there is more— and [ say to this man, take care how you apply this argu- ment : if you speak of bodies, such a8 we are acquainted with, eli experience would teach me that single bedy could be in two places sta time. But take care—if you are a Christian, you admit that book ef Revelation ; and ou there learn that Paul saw and co! ed with the avior, placed at the right hand of the Father. Was he then in two places ata time ? Here is gospel anthority. You must be consistent, and either give up the text o: find for it some other common sense meaning. Bat then is this all? There are other circumstances which you will be called upon to reconcile in acripture. It is there written that our Savior entered the room where his disci- ples sat,and that whilst the doors were all shut. Did he go through the wall orthe door? If he did, there were two bodies in one place at atime. But let us beware, for the greatest men, among the rest Grotios, and many of the inost pious and enlightened dignitaries of the English Church, have declared thut,upon the grounds some would call philosophical, there could be no difficulty in this Catholic doctrine. The subject is not one withm the range of philosophy. Our aly body might be, but we do not suppose that Chi y was, in ail respects, like ours, orin a perfectly natural condition, but a spirit bo y, endowed with such properties as we may Conceir« God ‘capable of endowing it. 1hus our divine Savior waa at all times an object of faith—when a child in the manger of Bethlehem—when a youth mild and gentle disputing with the Dcctors in the temple—when he was seen preaching to the people, and going = and down doing good—but, above all, when seen in his ignominy, dragged before an earthiy tribunal, and reduced to that state of distress not to be expressed: when seen in all these conditions, who, judging by whst men call philosophy, who could in this have recognizec the Eternal Son of theEternal Father? And if as Catholics or as Protestants we admit his divinity, we admit what presentathe same difficulty to the eye of, philosophy ar the mystery of the eucharist. Again, brethren, if they gr and analyse the component matter of ‘the elements in the sacrifice, what discovery do they make ? We are obliged to answer these objections, not because they are worth it, but because they are generally prevalent. Ifthey ex amine the substance what progress can they make? Are are philosophers ngreed about what they ter, oF the essence ¢ tier? There are no divisions and strifes among christians so bitter and steadfast as those of philo- sophers as to the nature of that substance upon which they rest all their learned speculations. If vou say the ly of Christ is material, it must be divisible accord. ing to those who believe in the divisibility of ma‘ter.— Some then will say it is divisible. Others contend that matter cannot de divided, but may be reduced to smal! atoms called monads, which are not 61 ptidle of s division, But what ht do these philosophers throw ‘upon this questior ‘hat discovery can they make in those substances with which they are familiar? None atall. They can teil you of certain results in certain circumstances ; they can tell you much of what they have acquired {rom the experience of their senscs, but not beyond that. How can they dare, then, to deny the body of Christ may be in the substance of the eucharist? | say that their senses were given forno such purpose and also [deny whet Tillotson proclaimed—that wher we receive the doctrine we must deny the competency o! tromple the sacrament in the dust, Christ would submit tothis? But pose some vile in- sect should craw! along end devour it— can you imegine it possible you could think so meanly ¢f the God as to suppose his body eto this!” Th ment for a moment prevailed—the feelings of the man were shocked, and he came to me and put the case. Overwhelmed with anxict, “Go back and tell hum it this objection be good a it will against him ; lor he admits the divinity of Christ, who died on the cross; and that, when he was nailed to the tree, did not a portion of his sacred blood issue from his wound, and fail down to the earth, where certainly the same creatures 98 vile, would have access to it, as those you suppose to devour the sacrament? He went hack and told him this, and the reply was, “It is unnecessary any further to reason with you—you may go.” 1 bring this forward, not for the purpose oi vindicé- ‘ing our doctrine, but with a shudder that such be heard, and with more of a desire to pray for those who so lightly toik of Chri These arguments when exemined, not indeed by what they call philosophy, nor the evidence of sense—nay, even by that evidence, they cannot discover ro besound. The evidence of sense cannot show eny ab- urdity in this great mystery. Then, beloved brethrcn, I shail enter on my argument, which will consist of iwo tivisions. One will be the simple, undeniable fact thet when those Protestents pre this error, «nd Jeparted from the Church of God, they tock away trom this mystery oll that makes it light and life; when they turped the ancient church into a mere house for re- \igious meetings, and deprived the altar of thet heavenly food—worthy mdeed of the master’s table—they forget that the doct: ine was established throughout the whole chris- tion world; that ithad been believed everywhere; that there was never a liturgy composed before’ the 16th cen- tury chat did not declore the doctrine as strovgly ss we declare it. Ali this will be matter for one argument re quiring careful examination. The second argument will be the sidera'ion of those pa: of scripture to which I have already ed yout an you suppore thet D&, DIXON avteads exelusi our senses they declare the cucharist is bread and the moring to that of wine ; that senses are stronger testimony eny | cure of on i pr ets, byhand o jon for Sq eas other, and that if they deceive us they cannot be dependeo nial e hy jog A. os y poy on {ot the support of those truths upon which Chris tianity depends. What then does the Catholic believe on this matter? That our wes deceive us? Not a permanently cared, 30 that the of rupture are, per x cared, 30 that reducible eaves . truss may be dispensed with. 5 Mercer street. all. We believe that if God changed the elemente of th: VALENTINES. | REE eucharist into his body and btood, he chenged the sab UPTID HOLDS HIS GRAND 1) VEE FURNE) & mon and let the neckents), ant Wey, do, 26 ie alent icon the most pled Valens fn he 1 to our senses to be able to see the body | Ne dienes Wa rsone Vain ie Fe ere care aye What do” they” tel | Re REG a kaceeer aR ed. alts cele ae us? Ifl have here at hand a cubstance of ‘ certain kind, Quarters his agents, TURNER & Wisitelt, in attenc anes, if it were gilt all round, er of a certain color, you could were