The New York Herald Newspaper, March 10, 1844, Page 4

brought here the ganve hare edo boing shout 2 le bless! 0 my countrymen. r that the Honea of the Ueica would Velieverall the distriss and wi y tem misery which we behold, and in the performance of my sacred duty to the Irish people | will place their-ease triumphantly before ou. Lhave said that it wasmy duty—I am bound y gratitude also. Once I have represented the county of Clare, with a papayas of 250,000 inhabitants. Once I had the honor of representing the county of Waterford, with its 300,000 iahabi- tants. Once sagin | ave been returned for my. native count containing a population of two hundred and sixty thonsand inhabitants. Oace for Meath, whose people amount to 300,000; and I now stand the representative for the County of Cork, with a population ef 750,000 inhabitants. Besides this, !have twice had the’ honor of being member of the city of Dublin, und once for Kilkenny It is, therefore, my bounden duty—and from motives of gratitude to those who have showa me such mirks of favor to do all T can to promote their comforts and prosperity. { am their hired servant. {admitit. I am their paid servant, and though it may take away irom the chivalry of my station, avow that I receive their wages, and[ am ready now to earn it, I begin by showing you the system of misgovernment purswed by England at all times towards this country, aad I shall quote tor ‘ou the views put forward by an eminent French Ristori an—one of the faterati of his day. Mr. O°Con- nel! here read an extract from the work of M. Thiers, in which it was stated that the English government had for five centuries governed Ireland in @ spirit of jealousy of sap rity—-and describing the fertility of the soil—the blessings poured on it by nature, bat the wretehedness of its people. was & meiaucholy picture of the manner in which img country was governed for five hundred years, and of the banetul influence of English govern- meat. Have I tne authority of Theirs alone ? No. Thave also the authority of Mr. Pitt for the advan- tages possessed by Ireland; and I find him, in dis- cussing the coinmercial propositions of 1785, ad mitting t it. was the uniforin policy of England to depres; Irish interests, in order to advance their | people, Lord Clare. His lordship, in a speech made ow That is not my language, it is the language of Mr. Pitt, avowing openly the policy pursued by Eagland towards Ireland. I aow come to another authority, which, in this Court, at all events, will carry great weight. I mean that of the late Chief Justice Busche. Listen, I beseech you, to the words of that gifted man:— Yon ure called upon to give up your inde- pendence,and to whom are you called upon to give i up? Toa nation which for «ix hund ed years has treated you with naiforin oppression and injustice The Treasury Bench startles at the asser ion-non meus hic _sermo et. Ifthe Treasury Bench scold | me, Mr. Pitt will scold them; it is his assertion in so many words in his speech. Ireland, says he,has | been always treated with injustice and iliberality. | Treland, says Janins, has been uniformly plundered and oppressed. This is not the slander of Junius, nor the candor of Mr Pitt—it is history. For ce: turies have the British Parliament and nation kept you down, shackled your commerce, and paralyzed your exertions—despised har culed your pretensions to any privileges, commer- cil or unconstitutional. She has never concededa point to you which she could avoid,or granted favor which wasnot reluctantly distilled. They have been all wrang from her like drops of her blood.‘‘Gentle men, have I ever used longuage half so strong, half 80 powe. ful, or ha f30 eloqu-ut, 4s the passuge | hav read? There was this cardid admission made by Mr. Sreretary Cooke, the author of the pamphlet— namely, that the intention of the British goverc- meat wasonly to prevent Ireland from growing too Great aad Na ertil There was another passage io at to the effet thac England was extorting,1a the mo- ment of her streagth, those rights which she wou'd likely concede in a moment of her weakness—that it was the denial of the rightafrom one great nation to another, from an intolerance of its p*osperity When in neginning to address you (resumed Mr O’Gonnel ) Lsaid that £ would be able to chow you that it was an in‘oleragce ot Irish prosp-rity that had created the Union; und if the antnor of this sentiment were here in court, he ehoud have avowed every word of what he had said, for he spoke it in the sinc rity of his heart I think Ineed not go muchturther to prove to you that it was the imtelerance of the British govern- ment fox the Irish prosperity which had influenced the measure of the Union. Gentlemen ofthe Jury, mark the words, for you h: this avowal from an authority you cannot doubt. These are topics which cannot ever be forgotten; and I feel much obliged to the learned Attorney General for giving me the opportunity of reviving them. I must refer you next, gentlemen of the nie to a letter from Primate Boulter, at the sa period, referring to the same subject, in which the learned iretate ebarged the British Government with pursuing an infanous policy towards Ireland, in making the most odious distinctions between the ditlerent sects and religiows in Ireland, and setting one in actual hostility towards the other, for the purpose of com- sir Own wnjnst intentions, and that such ust be deprecated asa very great cali ly 1 not proved what Tha sid, (continued Mr. OC.) from the evidence of such men as Pitt, Bushe,Pamate Boniter,and others. I shall now,gen" nen, invite you to consider with me transacuons of 1732, and L will detain you but a very short time a this point, because every thing connected with thet period must be familiar to the Irish mind. That was a solitary bright spot in the history of Treiand, a green island, asit were, amid the sterili- ty of the world—an oasis of prosperity amid the mass of misrale and tyranny which had surroand- edus, The transactions of 1782 cannot be forgot- ten, and the prosperity of Irelund at the time, agit appeared, was of the most consummate advantage to England, who assailed America and was defeat- ed. endeavored to crush the forces of Ame- rica, but America resisted, and Anerica from re- bellion obtained arevolution, England then want- ed the assistance of Ireland. She had not then suth tient troops to support her demands and to m untain, if she were opposed, her connection with this eonntry. Did Treland thea think of separating herself from England? Oh no, that was always a thoagnt whie! sforeignto the Trish mind ‘hey eougat not for separation, but they sought for the i i rights. Toe Irish obtained free y demaaded legist tive independence. It was not thea safe for Eagland to refuse her just demands ; it wasnot prateat to treat [reland wi disregard. England williagly conceded those de- mands. Ta a letter written about that time from the lea he goverameat were contained those words ill nobody stop that madman Grat- tan?’ Nobody did attempt to stop the dem ands of Crary and the revolution of 1732 obtained for rel Gentlemen of the Jury, it is partof history that the | monarch: of that day, from Miccthiden desnred this | to final adjustment, and that there was no | quesuon left open for further discussion. Itis a fact | in history, that the English House of Lords, and the English fouse of Commons, had respectively deciared that this was a final adjustment. The Lord Lieutenant from the throne, in the Irish House of Parliament, had declared the same. Both houses declared it to be final. But how was thia got rid of ? [ will come to that presently I will show you, gentlemen, what the opinions of certain statesmen were with respect to this, sub- ject Caarles James Fox, in April, 1782, said :— “30 far was he from thinking that Great Britain had a right to govern Ireland if she did not choose to be governed by us, that he maintained that no conatry that everhad existed or did exist, had a right to hold the sovereignty of another against the will and consent of that other.” And in another paasige, in May, 1732, he says—‘He desired gen-" tlemen to look forward to that happy period when Treland should experience the blessings that attend freedom of trade and constitution; when, by the richness and fertility of her soil, the industry of her manufactures, and the increase of her pulution, she should become a power- jul country then might England look for powertul assistance to seamen to man her fleets, and soldiers to fight her battles. England renoun- cing all right to legislate for Ireland, the latter would most cevdially support the former asa friend whom she loved. If this country, on the other haad, was to assume the power of making for Ireland, she must oaly make an enemy ins of a friend, fe a r where there was of interests, there the party who: sosacrificed became an enemy. Such was the principle upon wh ment was broughtabout. I would ask you, gentle- mon ef the jury, did you ever in your lives know a single individual volunteer of 1782, last moment of his life, did not boast of having participated ia the change that then took place.— Jt was clear that up to this time Ireland had pre- served her allegiance and had gained tranquility in connexion with it—that she, in fact, clung ta community interests were with firner hold to her connexion with Eng- land while she obtained those salutary results. I | may bw asked, gentlemen, whether I have any proof thatthe prophecy of Mr. Fox was realized, that the prosperity promued to Ireland had been actuall gained by the legisiauve indepeadence. I will tell fou upon whatevidence { will demonstrate these facts. The first authority I shall refer you to is, Pitt ia 1799, when proposing the measure of the Union. He should quote the following from the anti-Union Evening P. Pit’s case at the Union would be strong if he could have shown tha Trejaad was declining and impoverished under her own Paliament. But the facts were too powerful for nim to wrestle with, and he wasunable to meet them (1 that way. And whiat, therefore, was his reasoning. ‘AsIreland,’ he said, ‘was so prospé: ous under her own Parliament, we can calculate that the amount of that prosperity will be trebled usder the British legislature.’ He first quoted a eech of Mr. Foster's, in 1785, in these words— ‘he exportation of [rish produce to England amounts to two millions anda half annually, wad the expor- tation of British produce to Ireland amounte to on Lon. He gives another quotation from Foster, which itis snid~ "Britain imports annually @2,- rf those rights which sie laid claim to. | your character, and ridi- | siderable, but certainly not so great as that hi trade at thi to ee ay lew ad Thold in my hand, asfaras relates to the mere in- terchange of manufactures, that the manufactures exported to Ireland trom Great Britain in 1797 very litle exceeded one million sterling (the articles of produce ameuat to nearly the same sum); whilst Great Britain on the other hand imported is Tre- land to the amount of more than three millions in the manufacture of linen an‘ linen yarn, and be- tween two and three milliona.in provisions and cat- tle, besides corn and otherarticles of produce.” You have heard proot of the prosperity of Ireland from authority which cannot be questioned. We atthat time exported three million’s worth of linen and linen yarn, besides our exports in provision, which amounted to.a million aud a half. What were our imports of English manufactured goods at that time? At half the amount of what we exported. How does the case stana at present? You all know too well indeed; I may say that some of you has had sad experience of the fact; that almost every thing we use now is imported from England, and all our manufactures are gone, and our people whe lived upon the wages which are always derived from that source, are famishing. When we exported three millions and a half of manufactured goods, you are aware that a very large proportion of that amount consisted of wages paid to the laborers and artizans employed; and that money was again expended with the farmer and the shop-keep- er; thus went on increasing comfort and prosperity throughout the land. But, alas! what isthe case now? Wretchedness and misery prevail where wealth and happiness once had their abode. And should the man be punished who has no other ob- ject under Heaven but fo restore his country to her former state—independ *nce end prosperity. | have given you the authority of Foster and Pitt, and I will now come to give you the authority of another man who never was very favorable to the Irish by him in_ 1793, made use of those remarkable words; and I beg to call your particular attention to them .**There is not,” said his lordship, ‘‘a nation on the habitable globe which has advanced in culti vation, civilization, agrienlture, and manufacture with the same rapidity,in the same period, asirelan had,trom 1772 to 1793.” I will call your attention te Lord Grey’s 3,eech on the Scottish Union,in 1799 “Tn truth,” said the nobleman, ‘ for a period of more than et ae after the Scotch Union, Scotland exhibites yo ee of increased industry and rising wealth.” Lord (Gey, in continuation, stated that—* Till after 1748 there was no sensiblr advance of the commerce of Scotland. Several ot her manufactures were not established till sixty years after the Union, and her principal branch ot manufacture was not set up, I believe, till 1731.— The abolition of the heritable jurisdictions was the first great measure that gave ‘an impulse to the spirit of improvement in Scotland. Since that ume the prosperity of Scotland has been con- of Ireland has been within the same period ”’. I will now refer you to Lord Plunket, who, in in giving a description of Ireland in a speech in Parliament in 1799; in one of his happiest efforts of oratory, speaks of her as of ‘a little island with a population of four or five millions of people,hardy, gallant and enthusiastic—possessed of all the means of civilization,lagriculture, and commerce, well pur- sued and understood ;#a constitution fully recog- nised and established ; her revenues, her trade, her manufactures thriviag beyond the hope or the ex- ample of any etier country of her extent—within these few years advancing with a rapidity astonish- ing even to herself; not complaining of deficiency in these respects, but enjoying and acknowledging her prosperity (hear, hear.) She is called on to surrender them all to the control of—whom’ Is it to a greatand powerful Continent, to whom nature intended her as «n appendage—to a mighty people, totally exceeding her in all calculation of territor’ orpopulation ? No! but to another happy little island, placed beside her in the bosom of the Atlantie, of lit- te more than double her sernitorvyene papuledeayahd possessing resources not nearly so superior to her wants.” | | Twill now refer you tothe report of the Secret d pitch, and that the Government’s fastening it, wae who, to the | Soverument, and transmitted to them _ At this stage of the proceedings, the Chief Jus- tice said that the court was becoming so intolera- bly hot that one of the windows shoutd be opened. Mr O’Coxnett—Very well, my Lord, and [ shall ake advantage of this opportunity to go out for a moment. The Court then adjourned for a few minutes. When the Court resumed, Mr. O'Connell said —Gentleimen, when the adjournment took place | was in the act of reading for you several authori- tes, showing how much Ireland progressed under sn independent parliament, I have a few more, | think, to corroborate and bear out znd, if possible, to extend the proof of that prosperity. You heare how in the year 1810, a meeting was held in Dub in to petition for the Repeal of the Union, which. at that time, was discussed also in the corporation ind other places. I will now read for you the speech of Mr. Hatton made at the corpor- ation—who then belonged to a respectable house that holds a high character in the city. “Some of us,” said he, ‘remember the country as she war velore we recovered and brought ovek our coustitn ‘on ia the year 1782. We are reminded of it at the oresent period’ ‘Loen, as now, our merchants were without trade —our shopter pers wehout customer —our workmen withsut employ meat—then, as aow, t became the universal feelinz, that nothing but thy recovery of our righ's would eave us Our right: were recovered, ard how soon tf.erward:, indsed, is if by magic, p'enty smiled on_us, and we soon beeame prosperous and happy ” Gn lemen, in the vear 1798, when the Union wastel<ed of, ‘he, Bink- ers o} Duolin had a meeviog, and in the chair war the head of the Firm ot Uatoucne. That was or the 18:4 of Decem er, 1798, wren the following r - + lunons were passed —** Resolved —That since thy renunciation of Great Britain, in 1732, to legisla’ forthe com nerce and p osp-risy of treiand haveem: sently increased = gResolved—Uhit we attribuie hes» blessings, under Provid -nee, to the wisdom o tne Irish Parliament. LT have, im addition to these, from a most unquestionable «u tority (an aurherity incannble of duceiving or uf b-ing deerived). the re ative increase in E gland aod Ireland of she con sumprio sof tea, tobaceo, wine, ugar, and coffer rom 1785 tothe Union, which is as follow Tea. . 84 por cent. 49 per cent, +++ «Increase in Ireland Increase in Englar From 1786 to the Union Tobaceo. . . Increase in Ireland . 100 per cent. Increase in England. 64 per cent. From 1787 to the Union: Wine... .. Increase in Ireland.....,. 74 percent. Increase in England . 22 per cent. From 1785 to the Union: Sugar... . Increase in Ireland. + 87 per cent. Tncreuse in England 53 per cent. Coffee. . .. .Increase in Irelanit. . 600 per cent. Increase in England... ... 75 percent. { hops to demonstrate, gentlemen, that there is no country can ever surpass in prosperity the ad- vancement made by Ireland from the period of 1782 to the union. ‘There is a cant word often used by many people, “ dismemberment of the empire,” which Iwill prove to be an absurdity. Ireland with her own parliament, increased in prosperity, during her connexion with England; and why should she require « dismemberment? I cannot understand the term dismberment, unless from a state that is in the depths of poverty, not with one in which she increased in prosperity, as lreland did with England, when she Rad her own Parlia- ment, and as! fervently believe will again experi- ence under her own domestic legislature. We lost our own Parliament by means of corruption: the means were certainly those best suited to the na- ture of so deleteriousan object,and everything that the worst passions could effect were arraigned to accomplish it. How was it carried? The Attor- ney General has referred to the report of a Secret Commuttee of the House Commons, in ’96 and ‘97. Committee of the House of Lord, in 1791, wherein it is stated that it was accomplished by the foment of the Rebellion to such a the first ingredient of that vile and nefarious, plan. A person named M’Guane, attorney, gave informa- tonto the government: he was a Colonel in the United Irishmen, as well as a county deputy. He attended allthe meetings of the county deputies; and,on the 4th of May, 1797, he got into the pay o! i rose! a Mr. Clelland, agent to Lord Londonderry) the names of all persons who attended,the returns made and the time and place forthe next meeting. So that the government was in full possession of th entire proceedings, knew the names of the colonels and county deputies, and where they were to be found at a particular time; so that if they had been so disposed they could have had them all arrested, and thereby crushed the rebellion at once, but instead of doing so, they let itgo on for the pur- pose of carrying the Union. 1 will now refer you to another authority, which you will find in the life of Grattan, 2d volume, page 145, itis as follows:— The entire country rose against the ineasure; but they were controlled and ‘hy ecked by the mihtary, aa well as the dissentions that existed amongst themselves. Mr, Plunket made use of these words: Plunket accuse the government of foment- ing the embers of a lingering rebellion; of halloo- ing the Protestant against the Catholic, and the | Catholic against the Protestant; of artlully keeping alive domestic dissensions for the purposes of sub- | jagation.” It is manifest, therefore, that the Usion was carried against the will of thelrish people; and it would have been much more manifest if the people had an opportunity of expressing their sentiments What were the words of Burke? ‘The basest cor- ruption and artifice were exerted to promote the Union. All the worst passione of the human heart | were enlisted in the services and all the fost depraved ingenuity of the human ‘intellect tor: Castlereagh Union; I_ will now read @ passage froin a speech made by Land Grey in the year 1800, on the repug- nance of the Irish nationto the Union:—*: Twenty seven counties,” said his lordship, ** have petition- ed against the measure. The petition trom the county of Down is signed by upwards of 17,000 re- spectable independent men, and all the others are in a similar propantion, Dublin petinoned under the great seal of the city, and each of the corpora- ns init followed the example. Drogheda peti- tioned against the Union; and ulmost every other town in the bigs, jom in like manner testified its disapprobation. Those in tavor of the measure professing great influence in the country, obtaines a few counter petitions. Yet, jtheugh the petition from the county Down was signed by 17,000, the counter petition was signed only by 415—though there were 707,000 who signed petitions against the measure, the total number of those who declared in favor of it did not exceed 3,000, and many of these only prayed that the measure might be dis- cussed. If the facts I state are true (and I chal- lenge any man to falsify them), could 4 natiow in more direct terms express its disapprobation of a litical measure than Ireland has done of a legis- lative Union with Great Britain? In fact, the na- tion is nearly unanimous, and this great mmasority is composed, not of bigot, fanutics, or jacobins, but of the most respectable of every class in the com: ity.” Let, me now request your attention to tion given by Lord Plunket, of the mode in which the Union was carried—‘‘l will be bold to say that licemtious and anes Franee, in all the unrestrained excesses to which anarchy and athe- ism have given birth to, has not committed a more insidious act ugainst her enemy than is now attempted by. tne profeased chimpion of the cause of civilised Bprape against a friend aod ally in the hour of her calamity and distress—at a moment when our country is filled with British troops, when the loyal men of Ireland are fatigued and exhausted by their efforts to subdue the re- bellion—eftorts to which they had succeed before those troops arrived—whilst the habeas corpus act was suspended —whilst trials by court martial are currying on in many parts of the kingdom—whilst the people are taught to think they have no r ght to meet or to deliberate—and whilst the great body of them are so palsied by their fears, or worn down by their exertions, that even the vital ques- tion is scarcely able to rouse them from their le- thargy, ata moment when we are distracted by Jomestic dissensions, dissensions artfully kep tlive ag the pretext ef our present subjugation, and the instrament of our future thraldom.”—Tha! is Lord Blunket's description of the means by which the Union was carried, and yet is only a partial account. One million two hundred and seventy-five thousand pounds were spent in pur- chasing rotten boroughs. Three millions be- sides in hard cash were paid in direct and actual bribery to persons who voted or their connexions. “Chere was no office, even from the highest in the church, to the lowest in the constabulary—-no,that force did not then exist—but here was no situation, from the highest to the low- e cred or profane, which was not in the mar- ket. There was nothing of contract—nothing of ar- gument in the carryiag of the Union, all was shame- less fraud and undisguised corruption, involving more of moral iniquity than ever accompanied any public transaction. Gentlemen of the Jury, you can easily imag:ne what were the result of such a measure, so carried; you feel them in your daily avocations of business ; you see them inthe state of your epete) a8 know them from the position o your tradeund commerce. I have shown what has wen the general gspint of the English govern- ment, whenever it had power, from date of the final settlement in 1782. I have established that there was an extraordinary advance in pro perty under the Irish Parliament. I have short- ly described the means by which the Union was carried, and I shall now; roceed, with as much brevi- ty, a3 I can; but I fear at greater length that I could wish to lay before you evidence of the evil result: of the Union as affecting Ireland. 1n 1794 thr Irish debt was only seven millions, the debi of England at the same time 350 millions. At the time of the Union the Irish debt was twenty-one millions. _I know it has been since stated that i was 23 millions; but that was by a resolution of the House of Commons of England, passed in 1811, by which it was resolved that the seperate debt of land should be charged with all the expense of ying the Union. Well, the Irish debt was 21 millions, the English, 446 millions. Ot the 17 mil- lions of annual interest upon this sum, it wasagreed that Ireland should not be charged any thing, for the principal. Were those terms complied with ? No. lreland is charged with every penny of thar 446 millions, principal and interest, in spite of the promises of Lord Castlereagh; and the lends, the industry, the labor of the nation — are mortgaged for its payment. As a proof of the total mismanagement of our finances, detri- mental to Ireland, and to show the progressive ac- cumulation of our debt, I will read an extract “Ulalf a million or more were expended some years since to breakan opposition—the same, or greater sum, may be necessary now,” and Grattan added, “that Lord Castlereagh had said so in the most ex- tensive sense of bribery and corruption. The threat was proceeded on—the peerage sold—the caitifls of corruption were everywhere—in the lobby, in the streets, on the steps, and at the door of every parli- amentary leader, offerin; 3 to some, office to others, corruption to all.” This is the way in which our affairs have been managed. The Irish Parliament had an interest in keeping the Irish nation outof debt. The best proof of U 3, that Ireland owed but 14 millions when England owed 350 millions, and only 21 millious when England owed 446 millions The Irish Parliament has been often assailed; but I fearlessly ask, could apt have been more protective than to keep the people out of debt? Whilst the Eug- lish was squandering profusely, the Irish were thnit ty ; bat from the moment were placed under Eug land the proportion of increase went on in such a nanner that whilst it was for England as 16 to 10, it was for Ireland as 43 to 10. Hear now the lun guage af Sir John Newport in 1822 :—‘* Ever since the Union the Imperial Parfiament had labored to raise the scale of taxation in Ireland as high as i was in England, and only relinquished the attemp! when they found it was wholly unproductive. Foi twelve years he had remoustrated against th: scheme ; and had foreseen the evils resulting from it, of a beggarly gentry and a ruined peasantry — {reland had four mithons of nominally increas: ed taxes, while the whole failed as a system of revenue, and the people were burdened with mt any relief to the treasury. (Lear, hear.)— It would be found, as it was ia some ovher nntries, that the iron grasp of poverty had para- lysed the arm of the tax-gatherer, and limuted in thig instance the omnipotence of Parliament. They had taxed the people; bat not augmented the sup plies; they had drawn on capital—not income ; and they, in consequence, reaped the harvest ot discontent, and failed to reap the harvest of reve- nue.” It was objected to Lord Lansdowne that the efleet of his proposition would be to make Treland the rival in trade and manufactures of Kagland and Scotland. He was accused of this. He disclaimed any such intention, and now Lask you, could this eccur in an Irish Parliament ? What musthave been the spirit of the assembly where it became neceasary to disclaim, as some- thing cura, atrocious, aud abominable. the idea of making Ireland the rival in trade and man- ufacture of England and Scotland? Do you not, gentlemen, perceive the fatuity, the folly of leaving your affairs to the management of those amongst whom itis considered a reproach to seek a rivalry with othercountries. Oh, this declaration speaks trumpet tongued. I hope it will thunder in yourears and excite in your minds a spirit of just indigna- tion that any attempt should be made, through the medium of a court of law, to prevent the uprising of that peaceful power of public opinion which will procure for our country a Parliament to legislate for her interests. I shall now read an extract in reference to the proportion of the English and Irish debts. You have seen how the Irish debt was kept down by the Irish Parliament; but in sixteen years after the Union the Irish debt had increased 230 per cent, whilst the British in the same time only increased @ percent, These factsare so little known, and so much intervenes to prevent a knowledge of them that I feel delighted at the opportunity of again cir- culating them. (Laughter.) “The enormous excess of British over Irish debt at the Union Jett the British minister no excuse for their consolidation, and accordingly it was arranged thatthe two debts should continue to be sepa- rately provided for. The active expenditure of the empire (1. ¢. the expenditure clear of charge of debts) was to be provided for in the proportion of two party from Ireland to fifleen for Great Britain. These proportions were to ceuse, the debts were to be con- solidated, and the two countries to contribute indiscrimi netaly by equal taxes, 80 soon shoul be brought to bear to each ot! the contributious—viz: as 2 to 15; pro’ fiscal ability of [reland should be found to have increased. Now, the 2 to 16 rate of contribution was denounced at the time by Irishmen as too high for Ireland, and afterwards so admitted by the British ministers themselves. [ts con- nence was, to exhaust and impoverish her to such a de- gree that her debt in sixteen years increased 230 per cent. while the British only increased 6 per cent. "This digpro- portionate and unjust increase of the Irish debt brought the 2 to 15 proportion between it and the British debt. Advantage was taken of that single branch of the contingency contemplated in the Union aet, although the other branch of the contingency —viz: the increase of Ireland's ability had not only eccurred, but, by the confession of the Eng- lish ministers themselves in 1816, the very contrary bad vcourred--namely, Ireland had become poorer thun hefore Advantage, we say, waw taken of that single branch of the contingency to consolidate the debts, to do away with awure of proportionate contribution, and place the purse of Ireland, withont resriction or limit, in the hands of the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, thenceforwerd to take from it, and apply as he liked, every it did apis ~ +} 7, ny re time contain, aad rol relant chance me of rev ie thennoforward and aeves™ i “ey Lord ruption which might become necessary to carry the | Excise, TT , grounds sagt os Seen Brat justifies her overwhelming nume- 4677 179,408 ‘in the House of Commons If Wales ‘280: 69.678 Hearth. representation dirproportioned to her wealth, 473,001 ‘ork ought to return 43 members to Parliament 301,796 71,086 The honorable and learned gentleman having closed Uta. 71,04 the Court adjourned to ten ‘othocks t0- ose 085,202 £1,684,211 ‘The taxes repealed or remitted in Ireland twenty-sixth part of ‘hose repealed in Great Bi These figures, gentlemen, will tell you that England in- creased taxation of Ireland by four millions, and what was the result 7—why, oa was to be expected, the actual revenue fell upwards of 500 0001, so that t! tempt to tax us four millions actually cost England one half @ mil- lion, They increased onr debt 235 per cent., while they increased their own only 60 per cent New, geatlemen, allow me to ask you what prosperity can we expect, what prosperity can we have while we ullow the management of our monetary affairs to be invested in the hants of strangers? Can we be prosperous while the management | ol our revenue is In the hands of the English government? Would any of you Jeavs the management of your aftalra inthe hands of a stranger?—or would you not expect that any man doing so would soon find himself a begger? As it is with individuals, so it is with nations. 1 be told that there has been a diminution of taxation. , gen tlemen, there has been a diminution of taxation since the peas but, in what way has it been done? England has n relioved to the amount of 41,852,0001., while Ireland has obtained a diminution of her taxes to the amount of | We wun iidey. he only 1,684,0001,, or in the proportion of one one-half'to 41 | jYy" iy che p--( thet { That, tlemen, is the justice with which we have been | q, herea: dtw treated But, gentlemen, this {a not all, for by the change which was made in 1626 in the curréncy of the country, ded at least one fifteenth to the debts of Ireland Yo much, gentlemen, for the justice with which we buve been treated. Let ma ask yon, gentlemen, how can we prosper while we allow the hands of others to rummage in our pockets? An Irish Parliament, while it would pay hilling that is honestly due, it would at the same ve us from the folly of puying tha which is aue by England alone, Now, gentlemen, 1 mean to leave this part of the case, trusting that | have shown you the evil mercantile effects which the Union had on our common country. I will now, gentlemen, call your attention to the protest of the lords against the Union. J will net by reading all the decument. [ will content ‘citing the 10th reason of the noble lords, ic have los om of our favn-ite authors, red an ether what ene canni join and give nan) boo Ht Li ol t ape, ber te1 and bouad 1 rit ing. You will trast our ta te to elec. the bwcks, New ilintowy aia. iaa peso what ek ow of ih puch mist what w Sand fy our toubl> in pro fe ding, publ ‘forwarding. we wall Dee our elves ont cf tha sed “aun fee Ww. I. arrived at ¢ weplag gen bad tu year, to fad « publisher who would w~ «anew edition «four Ggne— hie gh they were com outs fprint.aude ovgh (it seemed to wrt there. was Ly hy ro Aga det ih tel Femad advic- w to read “by pu price that wor ing. To oor no sinall astonish dly whiet ey were in edition, whieh is suill se an 80 vai very |. which says, ‘‘ Because when we consider the weakness of this kingdom at the tims that the measure was brought forward, and her inability to withstand the destructive exmct dfamb « = ju'yes as to wa Caht as ancasy one, Cou'd not, ont o ter judgment anc smoller enpectations as top as Faudsone a dc eipedt ous fother auth te vere nut, now, easily Come at? “Let us try |’ said Enter Prive. Before arr-ving at this idea of the Minnor Lianany, how we bad mace arrangemevts to republish ia the same cheap form, other work: of our own that were as mach culid for as the Poems—in short all the Paos: W. your bumble servant of this present Our cear ally, Gener ad and Batta! ty as the oth "ay Mill be ready in a day or (wot a sy TH Way are in prepara’ion und will be in ortwo. The advertisements will duly announce all these. We would Passant,, of “Pensi\ hed i r been re-publi edition (the fifv riuted from a broken set nd the author bei designs of the minister, and coupled with the act itself, the means that have been employed to accomplish it, such as the abuse of the place bill, for the purpose of corrupt- ing parliament, the appointment of sheriffs to prevent county meetings, the dismissal of the old ste:!fast triends of constitutional government, for their adherence to the constitution, and the return of who had neither connexion nor were therefore aelected to decide upon her fat consider the armed force of the minister, added to power and praetices of corruption—when we couple thi thin, ether, we are wurran‘ed to means have been used to accomplish this great innova- tion, and that the measure of Union tends to dishonor the ancient per for ever—to dismember both houses of parliament, and subjugate the people of Ireland for ever Such circumstances, we apprehend, will be recollected with abhorrence, and will create jealonay between the two nations, instead of that harmouy which for so many centuries has been the cement of their unien.” This pro- test, gentlemen, was signed, Leinster, Meath, Charlemont, &e., and by the Bishops of Dewn and Lismore. This is the’ authentic declaration of the peers of that day ; and | feel certain that their descendants of the present day must be proud of the deed of their ancestors, and that they will yet assist in carrying out the intentions of their ances- tors and yet take their seats in their places in College- green. Amongst the other evils to which the Union gave rise, none was so oppressive as the total inadequacy of the representation of Ireland in the Imperial Legislature; and the great deficiency of voters created by the state oi the registry. Iam the more anxious to point out this de- fect, because I find that there is now a disposition to concede upon the point. They are now willing to do something in respect to the franchise; but let me ask how long has the injustice heen allowed to exist? Let me call your attention to the following document, and it speake trumpettoagued of England’s injustice: — “ FIRST REPORT ON THE FRANCHISE IN COUNTIES. “ The reault of the injustice done to the people of Ire- land by the restriction of ‘the elective franchise, is made manifest by a contrast between the population of the seve- ral counties in England, and tne number of registered voters therein, with the population and number of regis tered voters in the different ish counties. We take our statement of numbers from the parliamentary papers, and by comparing the least populous counties in England with the most populous in leland—Westmoreland and Cork, for instance—we find the following result:—*he rural population of Westmoreland is 43,404, and ita num- ber ‘of registered voters after the reform act, amounted to 4,392, Nearly one out of every ten inhabitants. Where- as, in the county of Cork the population is 703.716, and the number of eleators registered after the Irish reform act, was ouly 3,835, being scarcely one out of every two hundred of the inhubitants his to be endured ? ih the sam Fkom UNDER a id PeNGiLuincs RIDGE: ig xbawit in France, even br the proof-readers. Fie a literal copy edition (lerg go ou of priut) complete English one, nnd now, fur by the Way” will be priaied in a not intend yr sumption P t the begianing ‘a ‘Librery of Favorite Ai 1 But we shall so arrange it, by Kiving you an extra titlepage, that you can bind up if leave out, us or « thers, at yo ich author willl be separately paged, arrange it hat whatever yor I bind ino me the Sacred Poem: v Wivwis, 22 Poems of Passion be RP, Wits 32" The Tatty Jane, and other Poems,” LL i “mes, johns on, the Ballads of Bai r . 3 Water Lol by GP. Mor-¥ American 12 nay Cor 11i!— onta COATE. PINENEY ketch be the tare Wit id Original Not by The Irish Metod Si Mook. Lowole sus b works are weerly ready for ubiicat on, vaz: No. JiL?~ containing? 1 ye Ani Cro! if of the Kum ni *by a et Ww prepordtort ised ten, 19—* The Songs and, Batiad pix, (the tard. of roor dack,) with nent, cont ining (and viving to the ris tyors)atew Nau ical Sones, which, from their Lopalet cheracter, and their inevitable tu Iness, Veen art Memoir and Ne on ath a a can edi 4 1—"* The Nationa! Airs, Legendery Ballads and ‘Miscellaneous Poems” of ‘i noxas Moone, With Netes and « riticiem Dowoie number.=95 Inadditivsto the above, * the P ems’ rf the Hoa. Mrs. Non- oN, and s-yerel utter ch'rming works are in press, aud will form putef the Winnor Linkany. : We have tour or five gems t fallow these, v hich we are will equally delight aud suepr nerslly, We will not name ther are books we almost made a scret_ of possess mg—ihey were #0 i and 59 impoasible ta replace. We can ven- that, urown works aside ) no seres iver, or better shilling _ rs © Wis y that we shall publis! res nothing which will again appear in the New Mirra ve New OF tterlt, We are Confident wil’ be 4 saruanle portion «f the Liv-ary—of ‘the same s.ze an’ sha e, dud con‘aining, of evmrse, the best fi T te) ture that w cam choose ¢r prot he New is our pride. shall eno abor and it shel worth * of the con- the leader—if we kuow how to make it sw. dear vender, let us commeud to your parcha e and presenting the Mirior Liprary—f y shillings thas expended without anv feeling of sacrifice, you will g-acua ly couate a Potad uy teaivg into which you ean re- Teat When you would be rid of cars or weariness. The above works ‘eve ‘ust bren issued as Ea ras of the New Mirror ane can be bound ei: her with or without it ‘They are beau ie ly printed. of a uniform size, and pliestion t» the pablishers, They r+rent by mail vv all quar ter of ‘he counte. ,at the usual u-w: paper sustage Single co ties /2M cents—ton cupies for one dolla. For sale, wholesale ame MORRIS, WILLIS & CO. No. 4 Abn street, New York. of the population of Cork, and yet it has an absolute majo rity of 657 registered voters! “Is this to be called reform ? © Again, take the county of Bediord, with a rural popu- hal its registered votera under the reform act were 3,960. whilst Antrim, with a population of 316,909, had only 8,487 istered voters—that ford had’ en absolute mm 'y of near O00 voters over Autrim, notwithstanding the enormous disproportion in the number of its inhabitants, * Hertford, with a population of 95,977 inhabitants, had 5013 istered voters: while Galway, with 381,564 inha- bitants, had only 3 061 el “ Rutlandshire, the 8: “ Again, Huntingdon, with a pop’ bitants, had 2,647 voters; while Donegal,with » population of 259,149, had only 1 449 voters; an erick, one of he wealthies counties in Ireland, with an opulent agri- ultural population of 248,901 inhabitants, had only 2,565 electors v, even the Isle of Wight, with only 23,731 inhabi ad 1,167 voters, while Mayo, with 356 328 inhabi- tants had only 1.240 voters, and Protestant Tyrone, with + population of 310,000 inhabitan’s. had only 1.151 electors, Urolutel 16 voters Jess than the Isle of Wight. “ The islan Anglesen also, w fh a population ofoniy 33,503 inhah had 1,187 voters; while Killere with 108 428 inhabitants, had’ only 1,112 voters; and Kerry with 269,126 inhabitants, had only 1161 voters, just 26 voters lees than the Anglesea, and six less than the Isle of Wight. « Sey ‘en if we compare the largest counties in both coun- tries, Yorkshire, with au agricultural populetion of 913,736 inhabitants. and Cork, with a population of 703,716, we will find that the English county had 83,154 electors, while the Irish one had only 3,366. “We find, therefore, that England, in her rural popula- tion of 8336 000 inhabitants. had 344,64 county voters, while {reland, in a similar proportion ot 7,027,509 inhabi- ants, had only 60 607 registered electors ‘ECOND REPORT ON THE FRANCHISE IN CITIES AND TOWNS. “ The consequence of all these defects in the Irish re- form act is, that the disproportion between the number felectors in English and Irish cities and boroughs, when sompared to the relative population. is as great as in the sounties, For we find from the same returns that, after he reform act, Exeter, with a population of 27.932 inhabi. ‘ants, had 8,426 voters— Hull, with 36,746 inhabitanty, had * The " Letters from Under the Bridge” were written in u se- ley of the Suquenanna”. she suthor, nce ad travel abroad, made th re, as i for h hol» w lint chat od 5 revitable v= active mete p dita life, ond the ating ne VL of te soue ams rural seems to tim now Like tte bi a dream. Ay nig ws y the covour of his own mind and the satural f. uring a brief enj yment of the kind of life alon ee depnattion as well ts his better natare, the isteresting to hin ge Card wo thee who | ve him As ng foithe vi charm ef nett e and sec'uson after ars Of Inte xreated lif- in the xayest circies of the ga, eat cities, of the world it may be curivus tthe reader. Since published—-ce priv ted list a! ove. 2% 2waca ltw- re mai 0 1,975 electors—while Waterford, with a population of 28 - 321_ inhabitants, had only 1,278 electors, being in the ratio af Sto l. “Again, comparing the largest cities and boroughs in {reland, with the smaller ones in England, we find the following results:— “Worcester, with a population of 27,313 inhabitants, has 9,603 voters, while Limerick, with a population of 66,554 inhabitants, has only 2,850 electors. “ Chester, with only 21,363 inbabitents, has no less than 2931 voters, while Belfast, the wealthiest and most com mercial city in Ireland, with 68,000 inhabitants, had only 1,926 etectors. “ The city of Cork, with 110,000 inhabitants, had onl: 3.650 electors, including the non-resident freemen, while Neweastle-npon-Tyne, with a popnlution of 42,260 inha- ad 4,952 voters. Preston, with a population of MAGNIN’S LUCINA CORDIAL, OR, ELIXIR OF LOVE. : dd certain cure of female irregularities, im hitants vi 9 had 4,204 electors—both of them more | hae rt ued their health by t iY it city has more than treble the num- | ound in this cordial the means of restoration, efte al i other itants ot either of the other two; and Bristol, | medic sl aid used ju vain, The hitherto childless fires side hes olten brea rendered happy, end the ianrm, the impotent the debilt ated have again exulted in the elasiicity and vigor an f'pyrone days. eye peut of one of the interior villages ef New York states with 104,338 inhabitants, not equal to the population of Cork, has 10,847 voters, being three times the constituency of the Irish city. “If, too, we compare the smaller boroughs in both coun- tries ‘together, we find that those which barely escaped schedule A, with populations varying from 2 to’ 3,000 in habitants, have more electors than the boroughs in Irelan retained by the Act of Union, with from 10 to 12,000 in- habitants. ace, in which by the ue of two bottles of Li couple ofier four years of to rejoice over the realiz ie ter dienppei_ ment “tion of the fondest hopes of a murried he sgeat forthe city of A., New York, sold.a bottle to a femau who hid heen offlicted with a disease of the urethra Ina few days ne ret said hehod de. “For example, Wallingford, Launceston, Wareham, | rived {ar more benefit from the one fom medical Arundel, have all under 3,000 inhabitants, while the elec. | treatment fi He iermediste'y bought six bo tles torul constituences in all exceed 300 veters. However in | ™ 7°. sto name the man caves tu whieh ert. The universal s tistiction which Athlone and Bandon, with over 10,000 inhabitants in each, ee a as od the voters do not exceed 250, and in many others, such as Kinsale, Coleraine, and New Ross, the available constitn- ency fails far short of 200 voters. “If also we compare the metropolitan constituencies of both countries, where an equality in household value may he expected, we will find that Dublin, with a population of 210,000 inhabitants, had only 9,08) voters, including a! the bad freemen lately manufactured by the Corporation, while the city of London, with a population of only 123,- 000 inhabitants, had 18,514 electors, and only 17,315 houses above 101, value. Nothing can more clearly illastrate the disadvantages under which the Irish cities labor, with respect to the 101, household franchise, than the comparison ofthe num- ber of houses of 101. a year clear value in London, and the number of electors upon that qualification, with the number of timilar houses in Dublin, and ‘of similar electors. “Those facts appears from parliamentary returns, The number of 101 honaes in the city of London are 17,315, and the number of electors appear to be 18,584; whilet in Dublin, the number of houses of 101. value, according to Sherrard’ valuation, amounted to 14,105, while the num ber of electors only amount to 9,081. Thus in the city of London, there are more electors ‘than 101. heusehold«rs, whereas in the city of Dublin the aggregate of electors does not amount to within one-third of the number of 101. householders.” N st, New York;90 North Sixth street, Philae 3 Smicn & Fowle, 138 Washingion sticet, Bost fe2? Im*®ee haye ‘These medicines consist of four ki (OR ALLEBASI’S) SALVE. ALLEBASI’S HEALTH PILLS, ALLEBASI’S POOR MAN’SPLASTER, ALLEBASV’S TOOTH ACHE DROPS. * warrented to cur? if axed faithfully nceord- w cowplaii.ts (the Pi is somes ‘by the airectvons) imnant kind, f lors, uloers, jdlows, burs ard punctures buros und sealds, thew: fory or chronic sore thr y = 33 avd mu THE PE c if used faithfully necording to cireetion Salve, ‘nome cases the Poor Man's nection in, sich other FS COMPARED WITIL IRELAND. “ Wales has a population of 800,000. In Cork the rnral population is 718,715. How are they respectively repre- sented! Wales has twenty-eight members ; Cork, with nearly the same population, has hut wo. m, co ghy, cold:, asthina, fever ‘ACHE DROPS—Ace ‘warranted to “Here isa parliamentary paper; it wes published in| TO ; 1632, and the see nal number it 266 It oneten he rela | 4 Toothashe in from three ote, lage OF tive ‘amounts of the English, Scotch, Welsh, and Irish | frols, |i Whe tokh ot oat, Andere of tye ary revenue in that year, and there is no similar paper of @ Hy ew ed by an application of the Bh later date that | am aware of — ye face aillicted. os A ‘The Irish revenue was £4,392,000 icines are warranted fe or the be tulahed Hs ss The Welsh revenue was 348 000 il be bert, Proprietor, 214 Fulum ac,N. York, This is the exhibition which the return makes of what the hi om the coun! ied on literal try gpl Dy Le Wt be t, a4 4,99 Catherine street 5 ‘Malb-rry streets, and fell Imeod ee ie by hon, mamber considers the superior wealth of the princi- palit of Wales, That principality, in pointof fact, falls low freland in any of those pretensions to representa tion founded upon wealth, J have looked into the amounts of the revenue collected In the single portof Cork, and they excerd thatof the prigelpallty of Wales, There ate no annual records to he referred t@ in stich « caso, but I LAx0-* Bole No 1 Lard, Tonding anion whe 4 South strwet, nt co an mete is belived, 7, and frequeutly ‘8 Very erroneous ces with regard to sScidieays ating to ober torneo are i in pesticular by thi ary m stricture; Pat jing may exist cat Se ‘eat, ud 2 i cua i perfect darkness ese i erase enaaot fist 60100 eb teapedimeat,o the How of urine ix obeerved» Bu th . A stricture aye Sar owe yen ed and older cases, icture is ost on the part it- lowness of spirits ‘want of stricture is seeraingly wn- Boag ants it ts far from bemug really v0. (tis ‘these not acquaiuted with miyute apa the delicate and peculiar structure chedeat of hin darapada i i it Paton the mud, causing ail *Jd—Gut although a mild or eat fal Ute ak Sayed t ‘away biicy, an jrresble Winder sad other Like divences, fd aod strictare. therefore, cau be more useirable thin to have Rely qnea eof detctong stricture tice mild fortuaatel:, there are e ‘ieular a a aathor ne foun tg a at a ey” are une following. The fiat slat: wo. Manwen ov Uainaring.—it has been said alread; Oe eens ast be tuch dimashes oF innpoce. an that ss true; bat obacrve wh t happus after this is huished, and the clothes are re-adjusted, aud if 14 should be ound tuat a drop or gwo will afterward steal ray so as ty Weta little, this, oie log as it may seem, Willafford a grouud of stroug suspicion, he next regarcs ae Viste a yoRMen GonORMMata MAY HAVE REMAINED Uscuany.—it is not so much huw long ago it may have oc- ‘ured, as how lung the gueety stage may have coutinued.— Neit ‘er is it possible in + very case t» state th, Jeng b of time a Gleet may ra. Sy'Giast peodne ng Stricture, fo ove ws oatural- some pain an aod ea'ly stage; aud circusmstauers whieh for mos ly mere victure than an 3 a le, however, ila Gonorrhea has been suffered fe cominas fuera period of froma six t+ eight weeks, this would st any other suspicious encumstaare. The third is ‘Tut Urvect 4 oTmcrTURE, Has UFON THE MiND.— Thue an the early 81 5 to det z ‘and to lessen mental energy. [is also ove uf its wost invariable effects, thi» ve seu in the sane degree in every individual common thas the wiiter scarcely sews a case of which he patient d ses not ecmplaia is active, and ‘ee capable ‘ot busiaess Unan formerly, Much inight be advane ed to show the vatural counection of the mala end. tive orders, but for this is bey bat “Phe Private frea- tue, wh le the tact iteelt is proved by che return of mental en cane af stricture it i ryan that tin is erin ve y A ittle time. So much. a thiny Ha? aot have thin, however coa'd at sucl we been i baal ere fa ly Of careful and experieiced peraone, the cure is wow accomplish ed in.as many days as formerly it demande! mou any, also, who cannot censult the writer pemonally, op account of gure them elves aud anc "Fo these are torwarded the yoost suitable and proper Means, together Wito the author's " Private Treatise,” andaach femurke 2s any particular case may call for. ‘The fee on yin ee tunity of saying that he mayba yr. Kalph also takes this opportuni athe con njted'oa’ thorewaclicate diseases, referred to fn his ‘Private ‘Treatise”—at his dwotling house, 68 Greeawi h stot York, at the : ea, will jicity aud little ‘and thove who’ ay ply, earls , will be surpri-ed at tue simpli a ice that actended their cure. re beieves, however. it from a certain class of 0 can properly appreci- scab services. Kalph further conmders it a duty, especially to those wh Ingere in this elty. and also to obtain the confidence of one, that he shoud make the followiug statement of him: Besides his rank gs Uradnate of Edinburgh, Sc, &e he bboen eugaged mn the cure of these diseases, both in Hospital ears, and has publi: ‘Also that he has jane 1 Earope to the most Zooper of Lon conv. is cmeny those who have suff ied. lon adverasing people and ocner causes, W! fas and city practise, for more than th three editions of'a work. expr letters trom fe most onanget Poeas } gla fs 5 % inost ever seas ye de pag fininence ia fx “hao mre LO NOT DESPAI dress Dr. Ralp LL who have been so anfortunate as to contract a certrin private disease, and have become weary with unceasing ef- forts tu restore tnemseives to health and happiness but hav met pith bitter disappointment io every medicine that promised desired effect,can uow iske courare and luvk forward with cone fidence to a perfect and ppeedy, restoration of all their energies. Dr.'Thomas’ fie Pilis have never yet failed to cure the most ited cases of gonorth eet, ox stricture, cure a receat case of a kind in nulls are effects, g mild ly beneficial for eit equal! fay picial del L NOTICE MEDIC, 2 UST PUBLISHED, (this day) by DR. FAWCETT. Ful on screet, a new aud original work on. Matrimony, im auatomically oad medically explained: position of the origi, na-ure and symptoms of gonor- keness, noctun secret, potener, and Sterility, Wich a’ comprehensive modern ¢ atmeut ol ») Thoea gieet striciu al weal munich sand all th: “consoquences siising from sttuctive habit of inconsiderate youth, &c., &e. ‘This work ¢ vatnica 180 page of new, matter, aud the great op hich the Anchor has had for the last (weaty veore country aud Kurove, ip inves Wgatils & 1} diseases of /aruaus, ill render this book iuvalauble both to a one physicians who sappese Mathobe marears, ener wil. pare Ba the ge inedieal re mentioued inew i its demons the absurdity of ater testment, and the enti success of Un eathors Blt i d id ‘those de still confines his practi those affeetions o| the generative organa which arezo tally disclosed and descr! Ty ed confident can on street, New York,where his treatise can be obtained for Buail, "y enclouing $1 ree of Postage. a inem TO THE LADIES. vy external application, super tly come ‘of perfect restora*on to under 5 failed of performing a cure, even agerer mstances upporter attained 9 very Sie ebaracter im Kurope ws well as Lat ot See. iis re pie ae Log he a or sa em ent Regaine London and 3 rag ‘aniversally ~ pommmended in urore bs, medical et ike highest a ust in members teenlties oft Cotlges ‘and Wocvitals, and by a) the emineat “THTbonls bave been “wrnished exciusivel for jadfes at No, 4 csey street, hev ine » separate entrance {rom et artment, warre aindy is im const, Vrassnsan “apparters tn (eraale patiosts READ WHAT SHERMAN’S LOZENGES HAVE DONE. M&. DAY, boot pales 6. 2 ‘Tillery ven ‘months. Ww Sports ian Fortwo mouths by the professors of the all to Dr. Sherman’s Book descriptive of the symptoms he Gyaaht they met his ease; 90 he pur: aber nan’s Worm Lozenges 4 away, as }, about two quarts of worms, and ectirely cured him, jimilar eases might where chil- suffered nil wut eth from worms, and no- {es had ey He Calta Asthann, Whoopie C atreet, Bro em oil yn, mn, de He had Ween attended! by raniowe pht University, au samption, are all ‘sooner cared ™h we CO thaa ay other knowa . Phey allay” oe few sceonta,' and" eusble thoes aft mot PATTI COUR OE orene, Hove De, Ravemond and hasdzeds thouswnids enn attest to happy Virtwes as others can vO palbindes 7 rom bodily ties of Sherr cents, and here ure a great, t and aeld by unprineipled drm; get Sherman Lozengenges and Plasters or you wil eye Sherman's Warehouse is 106 Nasona street. ou gt ent Suing 168 Bowery sor Stags 7 ise Brood 3 88 ppiiam ots He, a ‘and 601 Bros yn, Mra Hays ! , and Mountain? 33 Fulton. Simson cor ‘and Jackson nt; ET Rare eae teeth aur a Cons Leager Balla f ow Redding & Coad Beate et. “alvin “AGuthne, in Tay ton Tor BRON, A Gi rel ie above price, well screened “weighed ‘ON d delivered from the yard, eoruer a EACH ORCHA CI 4 large stor 3 al Ati Green wich sts WALES SAV SICIAN, wor @ have « = by one of thats yy ee CAURION To, t MA! AME RESTELL, # EMA! SW jcrorm Indios who, with a proper delicacy, vance Co the trentraent of their complaints except ‘own erx, Chat in all cases she attends (a = i yotiee art know! to do 50, ' She Sanso jt nopeneat y to state this, 0 doer not wish glaveed with tne IF, eontians| peating, advertising as * Nomele Physic Ain omelet themselves are obliged wideaca, 168 {Greenwich street, betyoen attendance from PORTUGUESE rd eTue. venti a A ea ee ee: SONI ave F yes g Ps a eedt 5 Scout coat, tee ie onder and adray are knows all over Europe to fncovered that ins proved. invariebl fy thay are ecrtain 4 Oat oa a ronad sai the stamped. Fae! ‘con See er RA eet continent of Amerien, 7 the Using ean and ae o import, et Teitere eh A eit b :. ever the mi if re i ron at No. 9 Fase fe 4, Ne Ge post paid, PUBLISHED DAILY BY JAMES GORDON BENNETT, NW. CORNER FULTON AND NASSAU STREETS Tue New Youx Hrrato—A daly paper, issu of the week—-price TWO CEMTS per Copy. ra faruinlved ac the same rate, for any ie “Connuy advenes, No paper sent a ret morn subseri oa a remittance it bai vagce Ti Wei ery Henatomisned every Saturdy ten o'clock—yrice 91% AND & QUA nished to coautry subscribers at, $3 25 per, am orate YY moming & a, in advance erate for auy spreited pertor, are - their laters t orrieworaee Rdixonsasdge