The New York Herald Newspaper, March 9, 1844, Page 1

Vol. X,, No. 69—Whole No. 3639, mix Ww SUBSCRIBER hereby infor days, aud ae now ready for delivery. has contracted with the eons im, and Beth Israel, 10 supply Perrone belonging even to ether snaj tity of the membe ends and the Before Judge Vanderpoel. Before’ Jndge Kent. wer Bread for} Marcu 8.— De fa Hay vs. Verven.—After the jurors had | (Fut Day—Mancn 8—Crim. Con—Vun Cott vs. bers Of ‘the ‘Elm stwret | MECessary to provethat it was written by him, or that he | taken in the re their orders. the # mid be staiiariy citanied fa yoenre b ho shoul nF ever was bronght into acourt of justice, and fi t to muke his way te oper to.thevr own cousrogation, who an act as thy ples without | now" nn an, fetta act Trnoticading; Wemes c aeat We | there was a rush for places so aa aa the prineipel t fant Brivain and ireland a confident that this 1 followed by others, who shot 1 nek, master, will 7 1 under any restraint. it icipated TERMS—IN1N19 of BOYD & HINC ___ corner Wall aud Water street”. FOR SALE—Posi iv sail perior quality, six to the pound |, deserves the severest animadvemion, not only of the| —‘THEJUFy Jury, but uf every well regulated mind in the community. 1 kinds of Cakes for the approaching 4 y, 43 Dey street, or 69 Duane stieste vely to close aC —The hip LOUISVILLE: 3i7 tons THE NEW YORK HERALD. NEW YORK, SATURDAY MORNING, MARCH 9, 1844. ee Price Two Cents. Superior Court. Cireult Court. witness was not an interested witness. He also put seve- ral questions in relation to matter that had been extracted from the witness in his cross-examuiation, so as to recon- cile the lestionvny with his direct evidence, 19} answered to their ames, Judge Vand A dhe jg | Sharp—The anxiety manifested by the pablic in throng- regs: | charge. His Honor said thi ty an toe eeceoen hod ing the Court to palmont papacky. peat day since tl This examination was Cop explanatory as to how, four | 2nd publishing a libel, Before a party can belixed, it f | (Fal has commenced, shows tue intense interest which is | and for what purpose he had received Mrs. Van Cott’s | i . Long before ten o'clock a vaat crowd | Jewelry, to which he replied, “for the purpose of mending Court room door and blocked up | them,” “Tho bracelet and & gold Wa were shown to the age, fi Court, and the witness valued them at $20. ag be Sato Mikes wert nder ‘it ditioult or the door kueper | St Joun Sure examined by Mr. Joapan—I went down danost to ‘endanger life to the South Farry, in company with Mrs. Van Cott, in party, whoever he i mb, wy i " . | July, 1643; | observed a man watching her; his name ix th de he sora eae composed andl publlstied | A>, vroe.e nich the benches were quickly Alled up.) F17ver lisight, whothas been exumined on this trial, he Tux Devence crossed the ferry, and returned again after us; 1 saw him Gentlemen, in this care the defendant dues not plead a jus- |, Mrs. J. Sanrn’s cross-examination was resumed by Mr. | d@ this more than once; Mrs. Van Cott was then going to tification, he pleads that he is not guilty—that is,he neither ; D& Wirt. J heard Ven Cott call his wife a lazy litle | her sister's. uyseriber | published it. Asto the matter of thi had collected al ‘willbe | ho doubt. itis the most gross und. dime git wt ee ty in the summer of 1831, of live oak, ted on the sticks; has s for thirty cabin passen- aa pelore Thursday, ak "3 finan & Co , at the Merchants? ‘hie age. For K. COLLINS & CO., 56 South st. AND WALKS, VIA r FI NIBLO*S VATORY AND SEED ESTABLISHMENT, | not guilty—that is, that h he "ARRIVALS OF FRESH SEEDS, cond, ina plea of jastilicen particula 5 apgly PASSAGE F! BAND spring f | comes in aud spreads the libel on the files of the court, and Last winter wu | wives it greater currency. ‘This, as 1 said before is agreat vals of the se- | uggravation of his offence, for'be a party ever so inn in jnremi'ted attention, and without ap} ‘rom Loudon aud Havre. "The siock will be f>und to ia well to apply at N HERDMAN, 61 South at 1ow leave Liverpool every five jiahed for any amount. pay: ovate superb varieties of uew | ‘his is not the case here. The defendant pleads net Old eatablished packet office of Perle dee temtcl | quilty—that is, that he neither composed or )ablished imported, of those | that he is the publisher of it, for it is not denied that it is have also been i rable tbe obtained at a foreign ma kinds ouly which are desir: r kets, othicr sorts, for which the American productions are mor DUBLIN, CORK qolebraiad yrs boon grows by pase of «: ; RY, COLERAINE, or Orie seteniisnmne V: perience and an be atricely relies. | (tis outrageo Persons wishing to fact, are warrante ‘beg to cal Pablie attention to the | that the libel is in the defendant's handwriting. ‘This wit. me'ican Packet Ships, on : genuine character h- caused all tera and without the exper r by his ince partaer, Mr. Dau without any reserve, by Mi Broad street, ou the 27th assert there is not a worthless see 4 (pro ) g et i pspiAc ance fy | Strong testimony and ought to put the defendant on his de- id ab Wri fi ithe Charemepmadence | once a mouth ; now this was enough to make the defen: ilg’any unnecessary d PParscott, our ot the frm, will be on, the i By the subsersbers he to the passengers engage here, and persOus may rely those whose passage may be | fm { A ‘ 4 we and proper attention. For |» Double Dahlivs—An extensive collection of vese teantital | plaintill's evidence. But, gentlemen, this is altoetl iso been imperted from the most emi- | question for your consideration, and it is my intenti most choice Pi Flower: J y intention to Mie he horney cow" | Larow the burden of the verdict on you, and upon the evi- Kade dence the verdict must be based. ‘The’ legal propositions = sms Crnloguay con which think propor to submit to you, Ihave reduced to flowering Koois have al; ip. cor. Snvth street, large or amail sui: or -ny other charge, of Ireland, or any o! their fe22 ro ‘nner propagation. and gow to-name will be ready fr sal each varie, tevether with in: will be published at anearly | ject, you must not take that opinion into your considera. lection of fine health: whieh will be foun PACKETS #OR LIVER- ist March—''be aplendid HOLTINGUER, (1009 tor ants in F'lower,are in the Geckrabie oraainents, for | tue k of vorite vacket ship dra Bursley, will sail on Thurs’ay, March 2ist,hor 100 tous, and upwards, yo. Bld eouutry will no sce Advantages to ba derived from select ug thie dive ia gacat fortable and convenieut and their accommedati f Flowers, can be Trees, Shrubs, nard ing Roots. viz : Gh Jacobean Lily, ‘Luberose, ‘on the shortest notice, put wo 7 Fruitand Omamen: Roses, ke, in | | now lay it down av law, that the mere writing does not ican Ti fee. ke., Tor ‘sons about to embark: well known are su Dignan early 18 8 to ih -uld net fail to "APSCO It, Gen Ke "General sce, 43 Pe‘kal'p, comer South street. Fish, Fish Globes, &e. 4 an item that fe ic i ult ro Fish Globes, on ae ac at gone far to show publication. Gentlemen, are no off-red for sale at LOW PRICKS, that it does not injure his neighbor, and he ought to take nady «ntageous tering BLACK BALL, OR OLD LINK OF LIVER- ‘OR LIVERPOOL —Regu- -The new magnificent ship, MONTEZUMA ber, will positively sai ‘of publication, | sf a man writes a libel, and that it was stolen from m the ensuing | him, or otherwise surreptiously or fraudulently ob- romptacss, an thankfully received. if he sits down, composes and writ . Sole Proprietor 576 Brondway. | inerwanly shows, It te any’ 0 0 for de'tvery (gratis, we ke Ori rs attended to wi WILLIAM NIB! No conve. tion with any other establishavent. and culebrat ‘burthen 1,50 tons, Capt: s . “iti exami his composed or published the libel. Gentk b—-h, and heard him abuse her thus in the presence of| This witness was cross-examined chiefly as to his two species otdelence to a libel, ‘The first s the plea of | Mz. Polhemus; he also called her a hatelul little devils he | Whereabout for the Inst two or three and exhi- is mposed or published | Abused myself also in his own house some six years ago, | bited « degree of sang fr oid, in giving his answers, which ‘hesecond, isu plea of justification, by which he jus | When | was in a delicate situation; 1 was then gone in tne | frequently caused much laughter. He stated that on ons the lil hich he id. bera’ | tillew himself, and insists he done it for good and justifiuble | {amily way some six months; he invited me to go to a| occasion, when Haight was watching, he got on the top i i h ofa lamp post. ‘This caused much laughter. if pare Jf he is not successful in this last species of de- | ball and made use of an expression which | could not with pr mr aes ined by Mr. Eeiwerds—I aud own aggravates the wuilt ofa defendant, propriety, mention; I never stated to him or any one else Dennake $e tinge the last trial, that | would look like an Alderman if went. Counsel here pressed the answer to his question as to the precise words made use of by Van Cott to witness ow the occasion referred to, when the witness objected to an- ewer, ‘ount—There can be no use in pressing an answer— ‘The witness states the conversation was #0 indelicate not to admit of explanation. I think you ought to be sa- tiafied with that. Mr. De Wirt—I have an ulterior object in view; and it is on this account I urge an answer, Tell me, Mrs. Smith, to what ball had you been invited by Mr. Van Cott? Wrrxxss—I believe to Palmo’s. ‘The liberties | have spoken of were taken in Van Cott’s house; I often saw ‘an Cott expose the person of his wife to gentlemen; I had a conversation on the subject of these liberties with Mary Kiddle; { saw misconduct exhibited by Van Cott tuwands his wife frequently at Williamsburgh; I saw him take up his wife’s clothes in the presence of Mr. Pardy, when { boarded there; this was before Sharp boarded there; I saw Van Cott do this in presence of my husband, Mr. Polhemus, Mrs. Betsey Dixon, and several others; i saw these litierties taken at his house in Liberty street; | know of ablack girl that lived at Liberty street, named j there was another black girl, | dont know if her name was Cris; they lived in Liberty street about five or six yoars ago; 1aaw these liberties taken frequently by Van Cott; he generally used to unpin_ her dress and ex so her bosom; he generally used to lift her clothes above r kuees—(sensation;) I heard a conversation about a letter in 1842, before they finally thia letter was written in Van Cott’s wife's name, aad contained something about a coat; have frequently seen Mrs, Cott have these fits; Van Cott was generally out ot humor on these occasions, and used sometimes to grow! at heron somé occasions he wouid say“ Well, Moll,come wake up,” (laughter;) I never saw him on these occasions go for any thing to relieve his wite; I, have seen Sharp kiss Mrs. Van Cott at a Christmas dinner party ; he also kissed Mary Riddle, Mary Waldron and all the ladies present ; Mra. Dr, Bailey ‘was also kissed; I was brought upat Poughkeepsie ; 1 worked in a manufactory ; I was not presentwhen Mrs. Van Cott wrote a letter to Mr. Sharp and put it in his coat ; I saw two letters taken up from the 4 ex brother to Mrs. Van Cott; | heard Van Cott frequently call Mra. Van Cott opproprious names; and conduct him- self in an unbecoming way. This witness corroborated the testimony of the former witnesses in relation to Van Cott’s frequent improper treatment of his wife, in exhi- biting her person, and lifting up her clothes, exposing her breasts, and his general conduct, as detailed in the former part of the trial; Van Cott called him a perjured villain, after the 1st trial, and said he would fix me for wh reply, telling hit nothing but the cent, they leave court with @ taint on their chi ractes this libel, and it therefore lies on the plaintit to prove in his handwriting. ‘The only question then for you to determine if, has this defendunt been guilty of publishing ibel on this inoftending lady. Mr. Cothiet atroduced for the purpose of proving ; 1 made him a avy, and that I told not to be uneasy, for he could not scare me. (Langhter,) Isaw him act improperly towards qa Mias Horton) and a Miss Terry; he jumped on their backs, and tumbled them on the flo’ (Laughter ) e capers in the p sence of his expressed her dislike on those occasions; she used sometimes to get angry, and at other times bear it in good temper; I recollect, on one occasion, hearing Van Cott state that he had caused a letter to ‘be written to Sharp, in order to entrap him into some remark that would enable him to take hold of him. (Sensation.) is the witne should | ness states that he was in the vestryof de(endant’s church, ured | that he #aw the defendant write ones @ month. This is fence. ‘Lhe witness swears he saw him write as much as dant produce some testimony to rebut or explain away the er a AFTERNOON sE8810%. The Court took a recess, and returned at 4 o'clock. Mr, A. J. Satutu (in continuation) to Mr. Jordan—| had heard Van Cott often declare, that he did not believe any- thing Mary Riddle said ; | also heard him say Mary Wal- dron’was not worthy of credit on her oath. Cross-examined by De Wirt—Have you got any chil- dren ? AWMy wife has. (Immense laughter.) Q—What do you mean by saying your wife has? Do you mear. to say they are not yours 7 A—I do not, Q—How many children have you got ? A—L have got three, Q—When were you married? A—In 183: writing, aud although | may have an opinion on the sub- tion, nor let it into the scale on either side; ‘you must take law as I now read it to you, And now, gentlemen, did thedefendant publish this libel, for this is the material rocared | point in the cause? Gentlemen, I will now lay down the yh Jaw—the law for you, as I have found it in the books ; and amount to a libel, nor does the finding it in the posses: of'@ party amount toa libel ; but in such cases the ques- tion lor the a, to decide ia, whether there was a publica- and Pots, | tion or not! Te mere writing is not a publication, bat it wn aud writesa libel, he ought to take care care also how it gets into circulation. Again, gentlemen, ‘as your oldest child born ? Q—Have = of your children jdied ? ‘Yes, in [836. Q—Is Miss Houghton a relative of Mrs. Van Cott’s ’ jot as | know. tained from him, js not a publi tion of at; but ites a libel, and it amounts toa ‘publi- PHENIX HORSE BAZAAR, . r NO. 189 Ee TtRe Tee NEXT TO | came into the possession of De Bouillon by fraudulent or The next regular PUBLIC AUCTION SALE | if he c: will take place at gthis estab March (2th, commencing roperty to dispzse cf, | person Who may have composed thut libel,and showed it to cher Orders fatehtnlly | a th fal te Sale—25 fice young country horses, kind and f | sound, just iu from the western part of | irs of Bay Horses, a five pair of Bay Carriage Hi of tt call an this splendid specimen of naval arch:tecture before engagr gin any other seul. For passage in cabin, second cabin and rage, apply on board, fx b- hment, on Turs- tom street, next door to the Fulton Bank. TEZUMA, sails from Liverpool on, the Yersons sending fart mut in her, orin any of the 35 F P.8 The MON Ist May. be ate axle, will have . ind | with those legal rules for your guidance, you muat uppl: tne Sears; tra paverior | them to the evidence adduced and come to satisfactory ’ sucreed the above packet for Liverpool on the ist of April, her regular day 5 ight Sere “ ida very fast trotter. ledged libel, first made its appearance in the Courtof 5 Horses. Also, te nands Kock: We ; i B36 Peivate zeke pe per ee pg Pe may ho id howd man; in their defence this libel was first promulgated to The New Line lew sat ERS SE as Fain ee CTL EN Aneta a) Bouillon wrote these lette: description taken ou storage in | them. The defendant's counsel stronely argues that it is vent mora Sel cleat heb vie: manifest that De Bouillon must have beenthe author of nt selling property at, this establishment may rely | Burtisin Brooklyn, long before the frial in the Seasions & true account of sale readered, and the fuil | Court, and Burtis weds will, inall cases, be paid promptly sa enr- | eudstance as the oneshown to him in Court, aad that it tablishment, is built onan eatirely | Gonillon alone is accountable for the publi : ; ication of t! detatched from the main | 1ipel, because plaintiff saw the letter eent to Madame Br ic in on the day of shone splendid eck ENA of this oa ins, of 1000" tone, new aud iost convenient ilding and stable, thereby not sale hers Board, at Orleu whar, foot of K COLLINS & CO. ‘Atall other times tue Arena 13 kept, entirely clear, an} 1e- Otis Mddons Capt. FB. Cobb ot ule tone D lopez Wren, entomna ah jiddons . Cobb. of 1000 tons, mucceed the’ Roscius, and sail the@ith April, her regula? served for che accommod sale, »ffording every facility for ex rei D bibs. libel, because he ou ever jump on Miss Houghton’s back ? cation in the eye of the law. gentlemen, if he w: carpet by Mrs, Van Cott ; I never said to Mary Waldron, it, he wrote it, and that it was found by De Bouillon, oi Mary Riddle or others that Mrs. Van Cott was much to blame; I never auidto any person that Mra, Van Cott was to blame ; I never saw Sharp present a dress to Mrs. Van Cott; Iwas presented by Sharp with a dress some two years ay boarded at Vam Cott’s and paid my board b; my Inever saw Van Cott weep, when his wife had fits; I nevertold Mrs. Dr. Bailey that Van Cott was the best of husbands; I had a conversation with Mrs. Dr. Bailey. Counsei—We don’t want to hear that. Mr. Joxvan—The witness is fully entitled to give un ex- planation of this conversation. ‘LCovrt—If it arises out of her direct testimony; but a conversation such as the one referred to here cannot be allowed in evidence. Witness to Mr. De Witt—My houre wa furnished. Count. What does this tend to? What has the well or ill-furnished condition of the house to do with this trial ? Mr. Jonpax.—If the object be to show that the people are poor, | am willing to admit it; but that is not a reason why this witness cannot tell the truth. I really think this course of examination takes up a great deal of time un- necessarily. Mr. DeWitr.—I suppose the learned counsel knows nothing of saving time, except as to what he gets from the dictionary , but practically, he knows nothing ubout it. Teak you, do you know of any member of the family whose house was as weil furnished an Van Cott’s? Wirvess.—I know Mr. Bell’s house to have been well furnished. Mr. Jonpax.—I think this has nothing to do with the case. Ihave. been told about my slight knowledge of saving time, except through the dictionary, 1 am willing any other untair m #, it would not charge theldefendant how that it was stolen or otherwise surreptious- jy obtained from him, and published without his concur- rence or consent. And lastily, if De Bouillon or any other n you took no jumpson any ofthe ladies’ back ? didnot. (Loud laughter.) Mantis Wruts examined by Mr. Edwards—I am ister to Mrs. Van Cott ; 1 remember living ut Van Cott’s in Orchard street, in the Spring of 184 was there; [was in the basement at that time ; I Van Cott and Mary Waldron there ; at this time she near the bureau aud Van Cott was with her. (This wit ness testified to having witnessed improprieties between Van Cott and Mary Waldron which docs not admit of publication.| 1° recollect an occasion in 1342, when Van Cott offered to give his wile ten dollars a week, if she would go and live with Sharp; she indignantly refused, and stated that he hal tried her destruction before, but he could not effect it, and that thet was her home, and she had no place to go to; and did not wish to leave it; 1 asked him what wax his particular reason for making such a proposition, and he aaid it was in consequence of what he had heard from Dr. Bailey; | saw Mary Waldron often arrange Van Cott’s hair; I have seen Sharp in Orchard street with Van Cott, and they appeared to be onthe best terms; Van Cott tapped him on the back, and called him ‘“Billy.”” (Laughter. I have seen Mrs. Van Cott in fits; Mrs. Van nthe front room up stairs; it was always used as a sitting room, and persons, on visiting the family, were always introduced into this room; Mrs. Van Cott did sewing for persons in the family; | have seen Van Cott treat Mrs. Van Cott indelicately. | [Witness corrobo- efendant, and that he consulted or was a party to its pub- lication, he is guilty of publishing such libel. Gentlemen, conclusion in this cause, ‘The letter containing the al- sions, on the trial of De Bouillon, Barthelemy and another show the character of the defendant, whe was the prose. cutor in that suit. Gentlemen, the defence 1s that De nd that the defendant copied them, and that De Bouillon afterwards stole and published partly, well those letters, because in the first place he showed it to ys it was the same in language and also reflected on Madame De La Haye. Next, that De ¢ | nell before it was published, and said it was in the hand- writing of De Bouillon, and that it came from him; and thirdly, gentlemen, he ‘contends that De Bouillon was tbe original contriver, writer and publisher of this that it is impossible the defendant one On may rely upon the skips of this line anili sscmgere may rely UO ups ing pane ‘OR LIVERPOOL. h—The superi apt. Allen, will sail ‘accommodations are equal to any vessel tn embark by this ouvevange in the cabiay BOOTS AND SHOES. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. LL WHO WEAR th icles and he p VIRGINIAN, ‘above, her regular day. fas “4 ape es ‘wen | he could have no moti phe tel be tapacelee at gentlemen, the plaintiff's counsel made a long and inge- fon to McMURRAY, jue st. corner South t of the 10h of UEBEC, Capt jar day. eabin and steerage a to apprise it ienl meni who covsider a well fitting boo article to the tout ensemble of all with 16096 or 16) Greeawicn al ied. Be Ladies and Mrew + 16036 and 161 Greenwich street. 21) ton, and it was one of the ingredients upon which their ‘OR LONDON—R arch 'he spleadid will as at her necominodations for eabin, sec ond are. tunst y any ve embark shoald make ear! jaiden lane, or to JO: ly plaors mn New Gaiters, Shoes, &., always on | ments of counsel, that the defendant had a motive in wri- would write three letters on one Dearing a Pret | ital. Hie Honor then weut cu witha cn eee ment of defendant's counsel, and said the inference might —_ie be drawn that De Bouillon was made a tool of by de- , fondant ; but he said, there is no evidence of any misun- derstanding at that’ time between the plaintit!’ and de- fendant, and it was strongly argued by his counsel, that for writing such a libel. ' But, tv wtmit this to counsel if ke likes; bat i think, in the course of this trial, I stained’ from any indication of a disposition to unnecessarily consume time. Mr, De Witr.—The opposite counsel is very touchy, Mr. Jonpan-—I appeal to the court if this is to be toler- ated? I think I have conducted this case temper and forbearance which do not justify these re- mars, and I must now, once for all, protest against any such allusion from the opposite side. Covnt.—I wish the examination to proceed. Gentlemen, there ia nothing before the court. Mr. DeWirrt.—I am not desirous, your honor, to enter into competition with a gentleman so proverbial as Mr. Jordan. 1shall let him have it all his own way without a competitor. he Court again interfered; and the witness was asked a few further questions, to which she replied in rated in detail the statements of the forme; witnesses, in relation to Van Cott’s treatment of his wife.) T often heard Van Cott say he would not believe Mary Riddle on her oath; I remember Van Cott coming to my hous Smithtown, in August, 1812; Mary Waldron was there. (Witness here detailed some improper familiarities which she had again witnessed at her house in Smith- town, between Van Cott and Mary Riddle, which does not admit of publication } Cross-examined by Mr. Dx Witr—What was your mother's occupation when Van Cott was married to your sister ? Mr. Epwarp: submit your Honor that this the w ness is not bound to answer. Mr. De Wrtr—!I shall insist on an ans Covrt—I do not see of what benefit this ‘The question was pressea on the last tri ith a degree of tious argument on the letter written by the plaintifl to the defendant on the 20th December, 1689, to show that the defendant tried every motive to rnin the plalntif’s that character. His Honor then told the jury, that if they ‘ork | were satisfied from the evidence, and not irom, the argu. ting this libel, they should take it into their considera an be to you, and objected verdict should be founded. He was not, however, to be ‘low prices of BOOT ling off at the New and Fashi corer of Greenwich c Mildridses will cent os aboteser tester aay, F Japt. O. , will railas above, regular day. ‘or iat ing handsouy= accommodations, apjly oa ethot ot Wall ater i,k COLLINS & ( hip wall vlease be on ‘ eeton Monary tnoraing, (lth inst) at aod single soles, single soles ‘assortment I and itp Shoes, ofthe Pr by tl Bea 10 o'clock, at which | Pesitively no treig! Shinpers by this line may rely upon having their geods cor New Orleans, Hallin & Woodruff, who will ress, t. stunt, will succeed the . her regular day. mec sloop THOMAS COLYER, ing at the foot of Spring street, boys and youths, and at prices | nary, that a minister of the gospel would s: vw York and its vicwit will find it to the ea ment and see th ; iter Boota, Buskins, Siippers and Ties, ef | Yet, if you can gather from the evidence, thathe only sat all the different colors and most fashionable style: evening, the 9th a did rssortment of DR SALE.—The corroburation of her direct evidence. {Counsel for defence here tendered, through this wit. ness, to show, that plaintiff, Van Cott, had a bastard child the wi rmer partner in trade, which wax ruled out protractel argument. ‘The Court re- marking me within the rule laid down to ex- clude any new matter which had not been introduced the direct, as such a course would open a line ofexamina- ion that would consume time to an unlimited extent.— Honor alo observes that he was determined to strict- ly confine the line of examination on either aide to rigid rule Tivatinea ties understood as saying as some others have done, that ju- rors never received any light from the arguments of counsel. On the contrary he held that both courts and juries did receive great assistance from the arguments of ‘counsel; and he would fay, that in this case, he received the greatest benefit from the light thrown on the subject bythe able arguments of the learned counsel on both peg: | sides. Gentlemen, said His Honor, it ittle extraordi down to write such a libel—a man clothed in the sacred character of the ministry, should recoil from such a disgusting work. ‘The objection was overruled. Court—The iady is a good Reporter; it appears you are entitled to put the question. Mr. De Wixt—What was your mother’s occupation at the time of your sister’s marriage ? Wirsnss—she used to do sewing. Mr. Josxen B. Panpes examined by Mr. Eowanps—I am @ carpenter, and reside in Orange county; I saw Van Cott treat Mrs. Van Cott improper! 1840 and 1541. The testified to the same sort of improper fami- liarity ag detailed by the former witnesses, on the part of VangCott towards his wife and other females, Mrs. Many Satu, examined by Mr, Enwaros—1 am nid met There is | down and co) this libel from a motive to shield himself put in the bill of divorce, filed in gentle- | (rom an attack from De Bouillon, or from any other qu which he said was stricken off the be 3 is Jter, and without any malicious intent to defame or selene Heber th 220th Ap ny ection Dranata steely olain and figured; misses and chil- | (1\) if, i it Mr. De Wirt—We admit the fact astothe dismissal of | him on the +Pr a She . . injure the. plaintiff, then, you should give him the | ap bil Wwe hal conversation on matters abontt ourselves; we then corser of | benefit of it; but it is extraordinary, that this |e Dill. i adverted to the matters between Van Cott and my daug! &CO. ‘ a Mr. Kowakns—And the omer for alimony ? ter; told him ighe waste be called on this trial he would IGHT, CAL H * is ceatre-bowrd it 120 Yorthe freighting or lumber teulars apply to OS*PH AGATE, i¢ to his larg an Boot Hie will sell at the | argument all the consideration it deserves. iniatrator of the estate of Fran callakia,, warranted No‘ Yankes about them, ss a single tn of all deseripti sale, which he is euabled to do of $i 8 poe SALE a pny lee) Doab'e How to order. on the | why they did not produce him. His reply is that he was 1 cases, orno | not bound to go into the enemies camp to make out his vd fed Io case, and even if they produced him he could not becom- $6 00 to 7 00 refuse to answer. Our if yy taxing a drawiy Keepiag expressly a pair tly on wero woke Boots, Tro 1 by Double sole Boots, igh state of caltivation. The situation is aesirable for eit public house, being situsted midway, jariem One half ths bailding hos been ree years. Possession can i fire of F. BLANCARD, 66 Prospect Hall, Yorkville. a TO LET « Nhe Herid Bek di of 07 lerse, part good well of soit water. Bronawey, oF ir. NO! cea 5 114 Fulton street, iver tween Nasanand Dutch strats. | lence have been made and ruled out, but whether such 297, feouting on Nase We. Ke.. newly put furnished ale> with ica‘ion to be made at Birmad handuomely pin cog the Counter of tre Hern taining from 20 to ‘aterson Turnpike ‘& extensive view in all directior beat evideuce of the geae- | is to enquire whether the defendant published this libel ; ara. fs and let me caution you against briaging your minds £25 mee _ | isfied from the FARM FOR SALE—The ¥ 1m, | and deliberately and penned this libi owned and occupied by Jonatha in the upper part of the ta Vounty. 20 miles from th eity anda quarter of a mile from the Harlem site fora tleman’s r.sidenc ers. Inquire of WM, or of the owner J. Q. OVER, 2 Aenst. m8 im re ie, FURNTU SP CLASS Hot Ur yearsasa Lodgi il the fast atures mage te with oe Noses Fe HULLS nt Becaucn Ward, Esq., | blast the character of plaintiff, with a‘view to screen of Nee vers himself from the coi ‘arm contains about two hundred seres of Land, | outrazed laws ofthe country. Neither should you allow @ high state of cultivation, well watered te j dea tua state of cultivation, well watered and your feelings or your judgment to be swayed in favor of 2 1d bal fi'ted the Union. Ail required. "The al js not expected that an’ itwill be proved to the sat i, whe may wish to purchase. lav net ; or a Darter w ‘he Jat'er condit! ina Fates consi it $8.00, and gol qualifi be let for the ulton at for a milk dairy. Mr. Dx Witr—Yes. Enwanps—She filed a petition, and the bill was d ‘The Vice Chancellor gave an or- Mra, Van Cott then filed a petition, stating she was entirely destitute, and left without sup. port, ipon which an order was made allowing her $100 towards defraying the expenses, which, though poor, she did not receive, and the court also made an order for ali- mony. M? De Wirr—In relation to the order for alimony, it was not peremptory. We admitthe peremptory order for the $100—we admit the dismissal of the bill as perempto- ry—but the order for alimony was referred to a master. Sowans—Yes, in the usual way—but we shall read of divorce and Mrs. Van Cott's answer. After a few further remarks from Mr. Edwards, in sup- port of his position, the reading was dispensed with, and Tis points were admitted. Joun Pounxaus was here sworn and examined by Mr. Jonpax.—E nce went, chiefly in corroboration f the testimony of Mrs. Smith, in relation to the bad Van Cott had received from her husband ; instances of improper treatment the part of Van Cott towards his wife, when he (witness) had been present ; he stated that he has seen numerous instances of improper familiarity exhibited by Van Cott in relstion to other women, and thet he (Van Cott) boast- ed to him (witness) of having had « bastard child, with the wife of his former partner, which bore a strong re- semblance to him (Van Cott) (The court was convulsed with laughter at this part of (he testimony.) Wrrwess in continuation to Mr. Jonoay.—I often heard Van Cott call his wife a w—e, also atrollop and ad—d everal were present when Van Cott boasted about his child ; persona have often been obliged t the room in consequence of the smutty expressions made ae of by Van Cott in his own house ; I am married over Mra, Van Cott visits my wile; i never prevent. divine should sit down and compose tli libel. Gentlemen, the defendant's couns it is impossible that the defendant could have and composed three distinct ani separate libels at the same time and on one sheet of paper. You will give this On the other in the | hand, the counsel for the plaintif argues strongly from Wil | the non-production of De Bouillon, that the tmust be the author ofthe libel, and asks defendant’s counsel tell the truth; Mh yaid he had nothing to eny against liza (Mrs, Van Cott), but that he should keep the right side of those he had to look to; Mr. Plain came up, and the con- versation dropped; my daughter was fifteen ‘years of age when she married Van Cott; Lwent to Orchard street‘in the fall of 1849, and found Mary Riddle and Mary Waldron there; I then waited until the packet came, and saw Mary Riddfe there alone; Van Cott and Mary Waldron had been bsent; they returned at ten o'clock, and I eccused him of having made up this plan, and asked him if he was not ashamed ot himself. ‘This witness’ testimony implicated Van Cott and Mary Waldron, and similar in its general character (in relation to Van Cott’sconduct) to that of the former witness Inher cross-examination nothing was élicited to shake her direct testimony. The court adjourned over to 10 o'clock this pelled to answer. ‘This, gentleme the fact; he might w will m compel a witnesa to 00 =| criminate himself; but, gentlemen, it was one of thoue 00 | cases where it could hardly be expected that either parti 2 ould resort to this witness ; and I think his non.pro- ction ought not to prejudice either parties. Gentlemen, of extraneous matter have been pressed upon ideration in thix case—offers to produce evi- th U. 8. Circuit Court. Before Judge Betts. Marcu 8.—In the case of William Johnson, Joseph Wallace, William Collier, Joseph Lindberg, and Fred’k. Lander, indicted for a revolt and endeaver to cre mutiny on board the barque Lagrange, on the high seas, was given to the jury this morning, Hie Honor, Judge Betts, in his charge took occasion to say that although the conduct of the ship’s crewa maysometimes be discreditable and reprehensible, as no doubt they were, yet a jury onght always to see whether such condnet wes not the improper conduct of the officers themselve watchhulness on the pert of Jurors come needful; for Ihave, said his Honor, lately observed with pain, that there is nothing #0 common us for officers to make com- plaints ogainst their crews, and when those complaints are lodged, it becomes the duty of the District Attorney to pong them; but when they come to be investigated, it turns out in most instances, to be the fault of the offi- cers themselves, arising from a want of knowledge of their duties—from a want of good temper—but especially from a want of promptitude and decision in repressing disorder, Lander was found guilty of confining the captain, and the rest wrre acquitted. ‘The Grand Jury Vills against Jacob Gi offers could have been realized or not, if they were ad- mitted, we do not know,but you have to try this cauxe by the evidence adduced, and not by the evidence ruled out; and if you try it on anyother evidence than that produced, you forswear yourselves, and outrage the laws of your country. This is an important cause, ay it regards the Sots’ | morals of the country,and'it is to be hoped you will give it esta: | all the considerstion it deserv Your simple duty then, rashly to the consideration of this subject. If you are #1 idence that the defendant sat down cooll 1, to defame an sequences of his own conduct, you ought not to let the sacredness of his office nor the feel- ings of his wife and children step}in between him and the Cross-examined by Mr. De Witt.—Were you ever part- plaintiff. If she has net made out her case, however much ness with Van Cott? there may be to excite our symputhy and feelings in her favor—she is a stranger in a strange land—a desolate wo- man, and the victim of one of the most atrocious libels ever uttered against a female, and well calculated to blast ‘and forever prevent her from varning her A—Yes. Q—When you heard Van Cott speak of having this child with the wife of his first partner, did he mention the e into Court and handed up true and Abraham Sutton for amug- the pre- name? A in other be dp eavire the major part of bis time, Address cr. 4 mi im*r INS fs FOR SALEY NSTRUCTION. FRENCH LADY thi bread. His Honor continued to make sume further elo.| A—Yes- gling, and the Court adjourned : Dx Wirr—Tell it to us. vent remarks on the sitnetion of the plaintif-and the| De Wrrz—Tellittons | Seumeicatieeras delicacy of hesitation, and conclnded by submitting | ,.1T do not veo the use oF Dovessity of fntroducing the | Couwon Pusan Monieyo New 19:79, 76, 77, 78, 2, 00, can tench the French and German | ‘The foreman of the Jury then stood up and asked if the | "™™*- 82,83, 44, 85, 118, 17, 20, 42, 47, 60, 68, A FARM in the Townsh, om Newark and two from North Orance—1 thirds meadow and arable, lialance thrifty wood—| 1, garret and cella 0 Forte, aud any ‘kind of work, desires to find a situat’ fiaon Jury, as in criminal cases, were judgos of the law as well ¢ the best recommentatious, “She hes brant Spanish Ambaseadors, acd ‘eaves GOLD LEAF REMOVAL. nny spate bar REMOVAL. his Gold Leaf Factory ta’ 928 READE STREET, ; : Oa Riends will follow. sc Jb. W. Practical Gold fa, has, (in eons» if bei der- | on their minds, was the party entitled to the benefit of BALE—Qp Staten In 4'sgentiemen® Gold Bester): | the do Ee ina e. a small Farm of fit Young wood. the balance ‘ix. is two. he is confident his v Ls anh avere Rien e not agree, They were discharged at 7 o'clock yesterday Neat A rer hee Gold Foil Covnr.—Do you think this essen Mr. De Wirt.—I do, your honor. name of the former partner? Were you not Mr. Van Cott’s first partner ? A= was not Q—Then tell us the name of the partner ? A—His name was Price, a tailor. Q—Had you any difficulties with Van Cott, when you broke up partnership ? A—No. Q—How did Mr. Van Cott and Mrs. Van Cott usually sit at table? —Generally near eaeh other. Q_You left the room in disgust at Van Cott’s conduct? A—I did 81,7 28, 32, Soreniorn Coun. 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 28, 24, 25, 26, 27, 40, 4,4, 6,14, 18, , 34, 35, 36, Hen et, | as the fact? house on | Mr, Weirivc—The law on that point is not decisive; but the better opinion is, that they are. Surrn—The faw is undecided. ‘The Covnr, however, ruled that the jury were to judge of the law, as'well as the fact. Another of the Jurors then asked if there was any doubt Trinvres or Resrect,—As soon as information of the calamitous occurrence on board the U. 3, steamer Princeton reach Richmond, Gov. MeDowell caused orders to be issued by the ed officers directing appropriate honors on Saturday, the day of the funeral at Washington. In obedience to these orders 00 minute guns were. fired betweon 11 and 12 o'¢lwck—the National Ti was displayed at half-mast rom the top of the Capitol— the State bell was tolled during the day, Weatner at tue Sourm.—The weather for the t? The Count decided in the affirmative. The Jury remained in deliberation all day, but could evening. No. OF Becade street. pihamas Masuenger and Henry Masvenger vs. Mogmouth ENGLISH BONNE ii D. ., | The tents of the soeanre-ce follows? tha pbunclaes JUaT RECEIVED AT ETS, MILLINERY, &c. | ‘rhe facts of the case nro as follows : The plainti Terie ae Braid, ke. Se, Alno, ‘ Milliners end theabore. he Boghoh above ~ Quarntine, Staten TO COUNTRY MERC! 8. hoor: Y MERCHANS. <o to John Husching) hav SLs GN in July follow: ved from 129t0 to gall and | effect he § m Jadies’ common Slipp~ J. LYON, | chine remained on the premises until the 14th of Septem. 2 rene don 1000, YON. ‘and ¢0 ort, ses of gentlemen's canes kins do, 25 case, boys eat Domuibly be hestere opened will 10. tre Sacphnac opportunity to purchase When not N. B.—The Basement of 36 Maiden Lane to yen immediately. m3 imere” | On'the 19th of September, 1 Chatham Vt ~ Rss ‘a, | Sent was Fil ie ic manufacturing o| foods nthe ma BOOTS AND SHOES AT REDUCK ‘he sabseribers in lap io ek mot aale Deena “including the |. For the plaintifiy, Jamos T. Brady and Joseph Hussen ; t the lowest en jad . 299 if S.—The fixtures and furniture of the store for sale, 4 1m? ma lwre | 100 per cent in this business. last two weeks has been truly delightful—cold, clear and bracing. The planters are gathering in their cotton rapidly and preparing for the new crop. Our turnpike iferowden every day with cotton going’ to market. I'he Vv naraly 4 very inferior, caused by the long apell of weather in No ary.—Huntaille Advecate. _ Destautive Fing.—At about 2 o'clock, this morn- ing, a most destructive fire broke out in a tallow chandler’s shop, in George street, near Shippen, Not only was that building burned to the ground, but also four or five small dwelltnge, und as many stables. Six horses, which it was found im et out of their st were burned to death: any horses, how were saved.— Phil. Gaz Novet. Divorce Pert Q—Do you recollect having admitted about the time of the last trial, in presence of a third party, that you had comm: ited perjury? och ve you done any work for Mrs, Van Cott since her seperation from her husband? A-I have. Q— What kind of work? A—I have repaired a gold watch for her; I also repaired another watch, which belonged to her mother. Q—Did you ever tell Mrs. Guion, in Division street, that Van Cott had treated his wife well? AI did not. . Q—Had you ever a gold bracelet belonging to Mrs. Van Cott in your store 7 A—I had some jewelry belonging to her. Q—Did you swear, at the last trial, ¢ jewelry belonging to her? A—Idid Q—Do you believe in the trath ofthe Bible? A~I do sir, I believe in God and in Jesus christ. $150, 1842, recovered a judgment against one Joseph Au caused anf:xecution on said judgment te Rite | 1 issued to the Sheriff, under which he madea levy upon fe inary Austen's property, and on the 27th July, old part ofthe lovember, December and Janu- ad,seized ; amongst the effects left behind was a id best | tobacco cutting machine, which the plaintiffs insist or re | onght to have set up and sold upon the first va! 6 ber, 1842, at which time a quarters rent, 5, had adcrued 2, the Sherif called an auc. tion and set up the machine for sale, which was bid in by plaintiff at $150; the Sheriff refused to deliver it until the aid; this, the plaintiffs, refused, and the Sheriff rosold it for $90. ‘The question now is, whether the Sheriff imcrwased | was bound tosell on the 27th of July, the day of the firat Tely-pn | sale? ‘The case is still in progress, hut will be conciuded HEED | this day TIoN.—A novel divorce case was brought before the council to-day. Peter G. Obert, of Now Brunswick, represents by petition, that having once petitioned the Legislature for @ divorce from his wile, being informed that a bill was passed, he married you had no for defendant, N. B. Blunt and Joseph C. Hart. ep hoa Q—Did you not beast of being an Athiest? another women, and he now learns to his surprise that he §G- The Bostonians furnished Rochester with | A—I never did, sir. ‘was misinformed, and begs that the Legislature will re- the ateck will | 'y Goods to the amount of rising $200,000 the ear, | “Mr-jonpaw here examined the witness, in relation to | lieve him by nulilfying his first marriage, end thus save manufactured | being an increase of trade between the two cities of over | some business transactions which he had hed with Van | him from the penalty of the law. The case was referred Cott, the tendency of which went to show the Court, that | to a special committee.—Newark, (N, J.) sdvertiver General Sessions, and Aldermen Scoles and Joxas B, Prittirs, Esq., Acting District Attorney. jay.—In the case of Jobu Jones fempt \o procure Before Recorder T: March 5.—SenTEnce the button maker, abortion from the person of Catherine C ordered that he should appear on Tuesday 1n application was made to the Court for stay o 4, in order to allow defence to obtain a bill of ‘0 the trial, on the ground that the Coust re- fused to admit evidence to prove that the girt was of lewd character previous to the transaction. refused by the Judges of the Sessions, and application hax been made to Judge Bronson, who is in the city, to assent to a billof exceptions In the case of Edward F. Burke, convicted of obtaining goods by false pretences, the sentence was also until Tuesday, to allow his counsel time to prepare a bill onvicted of an A new trial was In the case of James Gulick, the militia fine collector, convicted of an assault and battery on the wifeol E. M. q., the court stated that a bill of exceptions had been granted to obtain the opinion ofa higher court on points of law relative to his power to act us collector while resident of another State. wf Fight on Parade.—In the case of Edward Mills, Lieu- tenant Colonel of the Second Regiment of Light Infantry indicted fog an assault and battery on Si during a parade on the 22d of October, 1840, i was entered, because the complainant had ate, Getting a Suit of Clothes.—Char man, was tried on a charge of gran on the 10th of February last, @ suit of clothes valued at $41, from Edmond H. Weyman, 29 Maiden lan cused onlered the clothes, which were sent to his cellar, and for which he was to pay the cash A boy was sent with the ¢ instructions not to Gibbons, a colored larceny in stealing deliver them unless the money paid. On arriving at the cellar, Gibbons took the clothing intoa back room and went out the front way, tellin, oing to get the money. He left a colored man in the cellar with the boy, and after half an hour's delay, the boy sent Lloyd to look for Gibbons, Not ped into the hack room, when he been removed. returning, the boy step) found the clothes had ascertained that Gibbons had pawned the clo The ticket for which wae returned to Mr. V the clothes restored to his possession. ‘Th case of frand, the jury the court sentenced him to on for two years, —Two young men, named Abraham RyersonZand William Spiwood alias “Shoemaker Bill,” Were tried on a charge of grand larceny, in stealing $137 a, on the night of the ‘The complainant met the accused at the corner of Anthony and Centre streets, in company with two other men, one of whom was named Thomas Lowerre,and another named Kinche. liquor, treated a number who were present, got a little purse exhibited the money He left the porter house soon ‘and was proceeding down Anthony street, when he vas accosted by four men, two of whom he thought were the persons accused, who asked him if he hi some money. He replied that he had not, but they insist- and advised him to step towards a window that was near at hand, and examine sented, when it was immediatel; hi 'y named Kinche, and a valuable Spa- from his back b t one way and the cloak another, neither Ryerson, Spiwood and Lowerre were arrested the next day by ofticer McGrath, but Kinche escaped. ‘The defence, conducted by Messrs. ‘Terhune and Voor hies amounted to but little, except that C. W. ‘Terhune in summing up to the jury stated that he had formed a posi tive determination not to appear in this Court in defence of any person charged with crime unless he believed him entirely innocent of the offence, and he concluded by avowing the innocence of his client before the Court. ‘The Jury was ably charged by Alderman Sc they returned a verdict of c ‘The prisoners were then remanded fur sentence on from Hugh Luck 2st of February of North Caroli He called for some groggy, and in taking out that Was afterwards stolen. aft ed that he had, another ofthe been recovered, ity without leav: Breaking into a Sto A boy named John Moore was tried for burglary in breaking into the store of John © of Market and Water streets, ou 7th ult. The boy wax found in the when the watchmen entered he ot- ne Jury found him guilty, o# he wax P, Stevens & Co. cor tempted to eseap 0 Knock Down Case.—Peter Cusick was tried for an as ttery on John Powers, on the 2d of January him with a’club over the head, Tha jury returned a verdict o/ recommended him to mercy. Forfeited Buil—The names of the following persons being called, and not answering, were forfeited, and ordered to be prosecuted :— James M. ombecalomnent and also cut his face. their recognizances a end. grend larceny, oks valued at $44, from David Felt & as aclerk—bailed by he was employe James F, Beers, in the sum of $300, Samuel Johnson, for embezzlement and grand larceny, chooner load cf charcoal, the pro vey—bailed by Elias H. Maine in the sum priel Hatfield, for assault and battery on A. N. pin, by throwing sand in his eyes, on the 2d of Janu: last. Court then adjourned until Monday next. '® BLoopy Scene on Boanp Tue Princeton.— ‘The annexed letter to a gentleman of this city, is from Mr. Phelps of the U. 8. Senate, who was an eye witness of the awful carnage on board the Princeton, and who escaped the explosion, by a species of providential interference. Wasnincrox, March 3d, 1844. Your kind letter of yesterday came to hand this evening. My escape from death by the tremendous occurs board the Princeton, was murrower than you or th I stood at the breech of the gun, and pose nearer to it than any man, except thoec empley discharging it. I bad with me’a young lady from M. land, (Miss Somerville) whom I had just introduce: Col.’ Benton, and who was the only posed. The Colonel and | were both prostrated, and he is at disappeared, and [have made young lady’s bonnet went with it My surtout was torn open, and my jer face was scorched, und the lady on boanl e on his back still. no enquiry for it. -her dress was torn. pantaloons demolished. poor girl stood like astatue, unconscious, my consciousness for a moment. scene, caught her round the waist,and curried her below | witnessed a acene there which 1 shall not attempt to de- one ofagony, frenzy. The shrieks of a hun- sisters—the beauty, I took a glance at the dred females—wives, the loveliness of the land ‘The imploring appeals to know the fate of the nearest and dearest objects of their affection, cannot be forgotten will not tell me about my husband. know her not, but she was at that moment a widow. husband was blown to atoms. Another, ina state of frenzy, was caught in the arms of her bus his ardent embrace and fervent kis hut the agonized being who had, at that moment that trying eppeal to me, auge would feel that embra nature will encounter p: the agony of woman's the truth, yet fea friend, you will hardly *Sir,"sad one, ‘thi nd, and aswured, tiy that he was sale ; he sternness of man’s in—nay, meet death boldly, but eart in doubt and uncertainty of the worst, surpasses all. clieve me, when [tell you, | was It was no time for trepidation. into the presence of my Maker, ‘The scene y selfish feeling vaniahed—even my 1 was taken to th eportaly of surveying not the paltry inter- is eternal destiny. eye, fell upon the few lines my beloved’ and devoted wife—the aesurance that she was not awidew, nor her children which conveye The friends who, but a moment before thefatal accident, were seated with me at the festive board, blest with health, aud clothed with honor—the se- lect and distinguished few, a nations pride and a nation’s ornament, are now in the presence of their God, whither My worthless life has been'spored may it mot have been for the purpose of a better Lg 8. | must soon follow. Later rrom Mexico.—The arrival of the Tippe- canoe, from Vera Cruz, put us in possession of our lar files of Mexican pa he official despatches re ra to the 18th ult. Jing the adjustment of the ain, were received by the British Minister in Mexico, on the 19k Jannary, and government on the eve- communicated to th ning of the same d “The Charge d xico, Jan. 20th 1844. ilaires of H. B. M. has the honor to Excellency Senor de Bocanegra, that this morning he has received despatches from Government, ordering the renewal of diplomatic with the Government of Mexico, In consequence of ex planations given by the Mexican Minister in London, re- garding the occurrence whieh took given atthe Natienal Palace, on the 1th of September I ly is ns follows ‘The undersigned onor to receive the note which Mr. W. Doyle was pleased to address him, informing him of the despatches which he had just received from his government, ordering the renewal of diplomatic relations vernment of the republic. dersigned has received the said note with the greatest sa and is particularly gratified that the Mexican cabinet never broke those reli 8 which it is the inter- est and the wish of the republic so much to cherish, undersigned will also feel the ing any communication with which Mr. Doyle may p) inta Anna was still at his plantation near Vera Cry, ted to leave for Mexico previous to the Gen. Canalizo was elected President of the Senate during his absence.—New Orleans Bulletin Feb. 07, Be jer, ko. had the with the supreme sateat pleasute in receiv Fire is Broominapare.—On Wednesday eve- ning a fire made its appearance in # room over the carriage house belonging to the Abbey Hotel, ut Bloomingdale, which, before being su’ stroyed it, and all the stables The mansion escaped hree er four fire companies were early on the ground, but were unable to arrest the progress ot Lows about 800 or 1000 dollars and sheds on the without injury.—-