Grand Rapids Herald-Review Newspaper, May 8, 1912, Page 6

Pneenereertes PAGE 81x OFFICIAL OF THE BOARD County Commissioners oF Itasca County, Minnesota. Grand Rapids, Minn., April 30th, 1912. Pursuant to adjournment the board ‘of County Commissioners of Itasca scounty/ Minn., met at the court house in the village of Grand Rapids this 30th day of April, 1912, at 10 o'clock a. m. Members present: Commissioners Shellman, Mullirs and Nelson. The following applications for cor- pare plans and specifications for the construction of county road No. 93, See igh eae ee ee e ps ship 143, range 25, and that auditor be instructed to plans and specifications missioner Nelson and carried by un- animous vote. It being the time set for hearing upon the petition for the establish- ment of a county road, designated as county road No. 111, the same was then taken under consideration. There being no objections filed or offered against the granting of the petition and the laying out of said road Commissioner Nelson moved that the following order be adopted. Final Order On County Road. STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY of Itasca—ss. ' Whereas, a petition signed by | rection of assessment and abatement |tWenty-four freeholders of said coun- ‘of taxes were approved and recom-|t¥: praying for the establishment of mended to the Minnesota Tax Com-)certain highway in said county, run- mission: ning into more than one town, and Thor Thorsen 1; Elien Dufficy 1; |20t within the limits of any incorpor- Mrs. M. A. Wright 1; F. H. Welcome) 1; Enar Hoilund 1; John A. Redfern 2; The Allen Dry Goods Co. 1; A. Barron 1; T. R. Dodson 1; Manne Hedquist 1; August Magnuson 1. The following applications for cor- ection of assessment and abatement of taxes were rejected. Mrs. John Sinnett 1; Susan Woods 1; Coolidge-Schussler Co. 1; Great} Northern Railway company 2; S. E. Grinda}i 1. It being the time set for the hear- ing upon the petition of Kathrine E. Doran to detach certain agricul- ated city, as hereinafter described, ‘was presented to this board at its session on the 29th day of February, 1912, and this board having deter- jmined by the judgment of a majority of its members that said petition is reasonable on its face, and having by its order made at said session, a:~, Pointed Tuesday, the 30th day of April, 1912, at 11 o’clock a. m., at the county court house, in the vil- lage of Grand Rapids, in said county, at the time and place for a hearing upon said petition, and having by | said order appointed a committee of tural land from the village of Grand | its members to examine said propos- Rapids it was then taken under con- | sideration. ing upon said petition was continu- ed route of said road and designated Upon motion” the hear-| Thursday the 8th day of April, 1912, at 9 o'clock a. m., at the point of be- ed until the afternoon session of the! ginning of said route in said county, ‘board. The following communications were read and filed; M. McAlpine in al purposes, of a certain tract of land on Pokegama lake. Boiler Inspector regarding the con- dition of heating boilers in court house and jail. L. B- Ohlinger, superintendent of state sanitarium regarding the ad- mission of Henry Kantola. as the time and place for said com- mittee to meet on the route of said re-|proposed road for the examination gard to sale, to the county for hospit-'of the same, and having caused notices of said hearing and said meet ing of said committee embodying a copy of said petition, to be posted in three most public places of each |town through which said proposed route of said road runs, or effected thereby, at least thirty days before the day of said hearing upon said Dr. Homer Collins, Dr. W. H. Mc- | petition, and being satisfied that said Gee and Sisters of St. Mary’s hospit- al in regard to bills for care and| treatment of Joe Lindahl. State Public Examiner regarding | per diem and mileage of county com- aissioners in certain cases. Commissioner Nelson moved the adoption of the following resolution: Resolved that the superintendent of the state sanitarium be requested to receive and care for, at said institu-| tion, Henry’ Kantola, and that the expense for the care and treatment of said Henry Kantola be paid by the county of Itasca. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mul- lins and carried by unanimous vote. A report of the Grand Jury for the March term of court, also the report of Miss Anna Wang, visiting nurse, were read and filed. Upon motion of Commissioner Mul- lins, seconded by Commissioner Nel- son, the plat of the survey of Sec- tion 4, Township 150, Range 28 was approved by unanimous vote. Upon motion the petitions for the survey of section 3, township 53, Tange 23; section 24, township 55, range 27 and sections 7 and 8, town- ship 150, range 28, were continued to the next meeting. The county auditor was instructed to furnish circular letters to the var- ious town boards and others interest- ed, giving full information as to the steps taken and necessary proceed- imgs in connection with tbe. survey “of section and property lines, and the assessment the amount of the expenses of said survey. It béing the time set for the cor- rection and confirmation of the as- sessments for the survey of section 19, township 56, range 25 and section 35, township 55, range 25, said mat- ter was then taken under considera- tion. There being no objections fil- ed or offered to the apportionment and assessment as made by the coun-| ty board and duly published, Com- missioner Mullins moved that said as- sessments be confirmed. The mo- tion was seconded by Commissioner ‘Nelson and carried by unanimous vote. It being the time set for the hear- img upon the petition for the sur- vey of section 36, township 55, range 25, the same was then taken under consideration. Commissioner Nelson moved that said petition be granted and that Bert Conklin be appointed to make the survey of said section. The work of making said survey to commence Monday the 27th day of May, 1912. The motion was second- ed by Commissioner Mullins and carried by unanimous vote. Upon motion the petition for the formation of a new school district to be composed of the territory includ- ed in the organized town of Nore was continued to the next meeting. Commissioner Mullins moved the adoption of the following resolution: Resolved that temporary relief in @ sum not to exceed $75 be allowed for each of the following persons for the wear 1912: Mrs. G. W. Sherburne, Mrs. Mike Munter, Mrs. Thaddius O’- Reily, Elsie Skoglie, Mary Caduto. An adjournment was then taken to 1 o'clock p. m. Pursuant to adjournment the board again met at 1 o'clock p. m. Members present: Commissioners Shellman, Nelson, Mulling and O’- Brien. Commissioner Mullins left the meeting to attend a joint meeting with the board of supervisors of the town of Grand Rapids in the matter of the consideration of bids for the construction of a bridge across the Mississippi river in said town of Grand Rapids. Commissioner O’Brien moved that the assistant state engineer be in- structed to prepare plans and speci- notices were so posted and proof of said posting duly made, and the said committee having met at the time and place designated in said order and said notices: and examined the same and made its report in writing to the board, and recommended that said petition be granted, and said board having met at the time and county vertise for bids for the construction | and of said roads in accordance with the|report of said committee thereon, prepared. | and a majority of said voard having The motion was seconded by Com-|agreed that said petition should be Owners of Lands Description Shevelin Carpenter Co. Ssw% W. A. Watson SE% Ole Pollestad SW% |Ole Pollestad S% Cc. H. Marr 8% Cc. H. Marr NW% Chas. Hartshorn NE% Bovey & DeLaittre NW% Bovey & DeLaittre N% F. J. Mackey % Jas. James on % N% Itasca Lumber Co. NE% J. H- Towley NW% Given under our hand this 30th day Attest: The motion was seconded by Com- missioner O’Brien and cé@rried by ‘unanimous vote. , It being the time set for hearing upon the petition for the establish- ment of County Road No. 112 the same was then taken under consid- eration. There being no objections filed or offered against the granting to the lands of|0f said petition and the establish- emnt of said road Commissioner Nel- son moved that the following order be adopted. Final Order On County Road. STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNY of Itasca—ss. Whereas, A petition signed by twenty-four freeholders of said coun- ty, praying for the establishemnt of certain highway in said county, run- ning into more than one town, and not within the limits of any incorpor- ated city, as hereinafter described, was presented to this board at its session on the 29th day of Febru- ary, 1912, and this board having de- termined by the judgment of a ma- jority of its members that said peti- tion is reasonable on its face, and having py its order made at said scs- sion, appointed Tuesday the 30th day of April, 1912, at 11 o'clock a. m., at the county court house. in the village of Grand Rapids, in said county, as the time and place for a hearing upon said petition, and hav- ing by said order appointed a com- mittee of its members to examine designated Thursday the 18th day of April, 1912, at 2 o’clock p. m., at the point of beginning of said route in said county, as the time and place for said committee to meet on the route of said proposed road for the egamination of the same, and hav- ing caused notices of said hearing and said meeting of said committee embodying a copy of said petition, to be posted in the three most pub- lic places in each town through which said proposed route of said road runs, or effected thereby, at least thirty days before the day of said hearing upon said petition and being satisfied that said notices ing duly made and the said committe having met at the time and place designated in said order and said notices, and examined the same and made its report in writing to the board, and recommended that said petition be granted, and said board having met at the time and place designated in said order and notices, to-wit: at the county court house in the village of Grand Rapids, in said epunty, on Tuesday the 30th day of April, 1912, at 11 o’clock a. m., and duly heard all that anyone had to were posted and proof of said post-| ag. considered said petition and the granted. ‘It Is Hereby Ordered, That the prayer of said petition be and the same is hereby granted; and said highway is hereby established so as vo run according to said committee's report, by courses and distances as follows, to-wit: Begining at the intersection of the Sucker Brook road with the line be- tween the towns of Iron Range and Balsam, near the center of the line between section 34, town 57, range 24 and section 3, town 56, range 24; thence runnirg west along the line between said towns one and one-half miles to the intersection of the east 1-16 line of section 32, town 57, range 24 with the town line between the towns of Iron Range and Balsam thence north along the east 1-16 line of section 32, town 57, range 24 to its intersection with the Prairie river; total distance about 2 1-8 miles. Said road to be designated as coun ty road No, 111- It Is Further Ordered That the county auditor notify the town sup- ervisors of each town through which said road is established that they cause to be opened so much of said highway as lie in their repective towns. And, Whereas, At the said hearing upon eaid petition and said report of | said committee said board has de- termined from said report and the’ evidence before them, the amounts of the damages sustained by said per- sons and that said proposed estab- lishment of said road is of suff cient advantage to said county to warrant the paying of the damages assessed by this board, the said board pro- ceeded to assess said damages at what is deemed just and right to each land owner, taking into account the advantages and benefits of said establishment of said highway as well as the disadvantages and dam- ages. It Is Ordered, That said damages be and they are hereby assessed to be paid to each person by said coun- ty, to-wit: And in case of the following lands it is estimated and determined that the advantages and benefits said roid will confer on them are equal to all damages sustained by them by rea- son of the establishment of said roa”, to-wit: of Land Sec. Town Rge. of SW% 34 57 24 of SE% 33 57 24 of SE% 33 57 24 of SW% 33 57 24 of SE% 32 57 24 of SE% 32 57 24 of SB% 32 57 24 of NW% 3 56 24 of NE% 4 56 2 of NW% 4 56 24 of NE% 5 56 24 of NE% 5 56 24 of April, 1912. JOHN L. SHELLMAN, Chairman Board of County Commissioners. M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. say in favor, or against, the grant- ing of said petition, and considered said petition and the report of said committee thereon, and 2 majority of said board having agreed that said petition should be granted. It Is Hereby Ordered, That the Prayer of said petition be and the same is hereby granted, and said highway is hereby established so as to run according to said commit- tee’s report, by courses and dis- tances as follows: to-wit: Beginning at the intersection of the Lawrence lake road with the south line of section 16, in town 57, range 24, and running from thence west along the south line of sections 16, 17 and 18 to the southwest cor- ner of section 18 in town 57, range 24; thence west about one half mile along the south line of section 13 in township 57, range 25, and terminat- ing at a point where the road along the north and south quarter line in section 13, town 57, range 25 intersects with the south line of said section 13, town 57, range 25 near the center of said south line. Total distance about 3% miles. * missioner Nelson moved Given under our hands this 30th Attest: The motion was secondea by Com- missioner O’Brien and carried by un- animous vote. Commissioner Nelson moved that | the agsistant state engineer be in- structed to prepare plans and speci- ‘fications for the coasiruction of {county road’ No. 89, kuown as the Alice road, and that the county audi- \tor be instructed to advertise for bid for the construction of said road, in accordanec with said plans and ‘specifications. The motion was sec- onded by Commissioner O’Brien and |carried by unanimous vote- Commissioner O'brien moved the adoption of the following resolution: |Resolved that the sum of $100 be |and the same is hereby appropriated from the county road and bridge fun |to the town of Bas j Lake to be ex- pended in the improvement of coun- ty road No. 12 in said township. |The motion was seco.ded by Com- missioner Nelson and carried by | unanimous vote. | Commissioner O’Brien moved that the assistant state engineer be in- structed to prepare plans and speci- |fications for the construction of a {portion of a road) known as the |Van Patter road, in township 55, range 27, beginning at the quarter post between sections 22 and 27, ; township 55, range 27, running east |1% miles, and that the county audi- tor be instructed to advertise for \jbids for the construction of said road in accordance with said plans {and specifications. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nelson and carried by unanimous vote. , The petition was presented for the ‘establishment of a highway in the ‘towns of Arpo and Iron Range. Com- that the |following order be adopted: |Order of Hearing and Apjointment \ of Committee for County Roa. {STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY | of Itasca—ss. f | Whereas, On the 30th day of | April, 1912, a petition signed by |twenty-four freeholders of said couu- |ty was presented to us, praying for ‘the establishemnt of a highway run- |ming into more than one town of said county, and ‘not within the limits ,of any incorporated city, and descrilb- led as follows: Eeginning at the in- tersection of the east line of lot 2 in section 3, township 56, range 25 j'west of the 4th P. M., with what is known as the Prairie river road as now established, thence south a- long said line, same being what is known as the “Eight” line, through said section 3, thence con- |tinuing south along said line through (section, 10 in said township to the south line of said section 10, thence east on the south line of said sec- tion 10 to the east line of said sec- tion 10; thence south on section line |between sectiors 14 and 15 in said township to the center of the west line of said section 14, thence due east on the center line of said sec- tion 14 to the center of said section 14, thence south 80 rods to the “eight” line; thence east on said “eight” line 240 rods to the “eight” line, north and south on the south west quarter of section 13, thence south on said “eight” line through sections 13, 24 and 25 in said towu- ship and into section 36 im said township, along said “eight” line a distance of 160 feet, thence east through the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter to a point on the center line of said section 36, 775 feet south of the North line of said section 36, thence southeast from said point through the south- west portion of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter and through Said road to be designated as coun-,thie northeast portion of the south- ty road No. 112. It Is Further ordered, That the county auditor notify the town sup- ervisors of each town through which said road is established that they cause to be opened so much of said highway as lies in their respective said proposed route of said road and |towns. And Whereas, At the said hearing, upon eaid petition and said report of said committee, said board has de- termined from said report and the evidence before them, the amounis of the damages’ sustained by said per sons and that said proposed establish ment of said road is of sufficient ad vantage to said county te warrant the paying of the damages assessed by this board, the said board proce- eded to assess said damages at what it deemed just and right to each land owner, taking into account the advantages and benefits of said establighment of said highway as well as the disadvantages and dam- es. It Is Ordered, That said damages be and they are hereby assessed to be paid to each person by said coun- ty ,to-wit: And in case of the following lands it is estiamted and determined that the advantages and benefits said road will confer on them are equal to all damages sustained by them by reason of the establishment of said road, to-wit: Owners of Land Description State of Minnesota SW% of SE id William Quackenbush an, ‘ west quarter of the northeast quart- er to @ point on the “eight” line 350 feet south of the northeast cor- ner of said southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, thence south east through the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said sec- tion thirty-six to the center of the east line of sai@ section 36 on the own line between towns of Arbo and Iron Range in said county, thence southeasterly through the mortheast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 31 township 56, range 24 west of the 4th P. M., to af point 300 feet south of the center of the north line of the southwest quarter of said section 31, thence southeast through the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter to the point of its intersection with the Bovey, Coleraine, Grand Rapids road as now laid out and established. And the board of county commissioners of said county having determined that in the judgment of a majority of its members said petition is reas- onable on its face. It Is Hereby Ordered, That a hearing be had on said petition at the county court house in the viir lage of Grand Rapids, in said coun- ty, on Wednesday the 12th day of Jung, 1912, at 10 o’clock a, m., at which time and place said board will hear all that may be said in favor of and against the granting of said peti- tion. It Is Further Ordered, That John L. Shellman, Andy Nelson and M. A. H. Powers swe Alexander W. Lownsberry SE¥% | Oscar Oscar L. Mather , SW%|Oscar L. Mather NE% Oscar L. Mather NW% | Alexander W. Lownsberry sw% Thoams H. Simmors NE¥ | Alexander W. Lownsberry NW% Thomas H. Simmons NE of NW%|of Land Sec. Town Rge. M. P. Larabbe & % & S% of SW% 16 57 24) .W. W. Potter NW% of SE% 17 57 24 of NW% 20 57 24 of SE% 17 57 24 of NW% 20 57 24! of SW% 17 57 24 of NEY 20 57 24 of SE% 18 57 24 of NW% 21 57 24 of SB% 18 57 24 of NW% 21 57 24) of SW% 18 57 24 of NE% 21 57 24) of SW% 18 57 24 of SE% 13 57 25 of NW% 19 57 24 of NE% 24 57 25 of NE% 19 57 24 of SEX 13 57 25 & NW% of NE% 19 57 24 of SE% 24 57 25 Chairman Board of County Commis sioners. day of April, 1912. JOHN L. SHELLMAN, M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. O’Brien, members of this board, be, and they hereby are appointed a committee to examine said p1 route of said road, and that said committee meet upon the route of said road at the point of begin-| ming of said road in said county, on Tuesday, the 4th day of June, 1912, at 10 o'clock A. a. for the purpose of examination of} said proposed route of said road, and make report thereof at said meeting of said board hereinbefore specified, and that notices hereof be given and posted as provided by law. The Board of County Commission with two inch tamarack or pine plank ing, and in accordance with a plan furnished, for the sum of $491.50, or to construct a boat of the same plan put with three inch planking for $688.50. Commissioner Mullins and Commis- sioner King returned at this time. Commissioner Mullins moved that the bid of Angus Gleisford to con- struct a Ferryboat, in accordance with plan furnished, with three inch planking for the sum of $688.50 be accepted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner O’Brien and upon roll call the vote was as follows: Yea: Commissiovers Mullins and O’Brien. Nay: Commissioners King, Nelson, and Shellman. The Chairman thereupon declared the motion lost. Commissioner O’Brien moved that all bids for the construction of a Guard Railing or Fence on the Bovey road be rejected. The motion was seconded by Commissioner King. Upom roll call the vote was as fol- lows: Yea: Commissioners King, lins, O’Brien and Shellman. Nay: Commisioner Nelson. The Chairman thereupon declar- ed the motion carried and the bids rejected. Upon motion of Commissioner Mul- Mul- ers of Itasca County, Minnesota. | King, the bids for the construction of By JNO. L. SHELLMAN, Chairman. Attest: M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. The motion was seconded by Commissioner O’Brien and carried by | unanimous vote. Commissioner Nelson moved that the Bridge across the Bigfork River, upon Road No- 28, were continued to the next meeting for further con- | sideration. Commissioner King moved that the sum of $125 be appropriated from the County Road and Bridge fund, to be expended under the direction of the Assistant State Engineer be in-| Commissioner Nelson, in the improve- structed to prepare plans and speci- fications for the construction of County Roads No. 111 and 112, the same to be presented to the Board for approval at the meeting to be held on May 22. The motion was seconded by Commissioner O’Brien and carried by unanimous vote. im the matter of a petition for the establishment of a highway in Town- ships 145 and 146, Range 26; Com- ment of the Grand Rapids-Bovey road in the Town of Arbo. The motion was seconded by Commissioner O’Brien, and upon roll call was car- ried by unanimous vote. ; The matter of the petition of | Katherine F. Doran to detach certain ‘territory from the Village of Grand Rapids was again taken up. Com- missioner King moved that the peti- \tion be granted, and the following missioner O’Brien moved the adopti. qgorder be adopted: of the following order: Orger of Hearing and Appointment Of Committee For County Road, STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY of Itasca, ss. Whereas, On April 1912, twenty-four free holders of said coun- ty was presented to us praying for the establishment of a highway run- ning into more than one town of said county, and not within the limits of any incorporated city, and described as follows: Beginning at @ point where the section line pe- tween 10 and 11, Town 145, Range 26, intersects the state road No. 4 thence north on section line between sections 10, 11, 2 and 8 to the NE corner of Section No. 3, thence West On town line to the NW corner of Section No. 3, Township 145, Range 26, thence N. on section line between sections No. 33 and 34, Township 146 Range 26 to the NE corner of Sectio No. 33, thence west on section line between sections 28 and 33 to the NW corner of section No. 33, thence north on section line between sec- tions No. 28 and 29 to the NE corner of Section 29. Also latteral road commencing at the SE corner of section No. 34, Township 146, Range 26, thence North on section line to the % sec- tion corner between sections 34 and 35, Town No. 146, Range No, 26, and the Board of County Commis- sioners of said county having de- termined that in the judgment of a majority of its members said _peti- tion is reasonable on its face. It Is Hereby Ordered, That a hear ing be had on said petition at the County Court House in the Village of Grand Rapids in said County on Wed- nesday, the 12th day of June 1912, at 10 o’clock A. M., at which time and place said poard will hear all may be said in favor of, and against, the granting of said petition. i It Is Further Ordered, That Andy Nelson, C. M. King and M. O’Brien, members of this board be, and they hereby are, appointed a committee to examine said proposed route of said road, and that said committee meet upon the route of said road at the point of beginning of said road in said county, on Saturday, the 8th day of June 1912, at 10 o’clock A- M., for the purpose of examination of said proposed route of said road, and make report thereof at said meeting of said board hereinbefore specified, and that notices hereof be given and posted as provided by law. The Board of County Commiss‘on- ers of Itasca County, Minnesota. By JNO. L. SHELLMAN, Chairman. Attest: M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. The motion was seconded by Com- missioner Nelson and carried by un- nimous vote. Upon motion the hearing upon the petition for the establishment of a highway in Township 55, Range 26 and Township 55, Range 27, to be designated as county Road No. 113, was continued to the next meeting. The bids for the construction of a Bridge across the Bigfork River on County Road No. 28, also for the construction of a Guard Railing on the Bovey Road, also for the con- struction of a new Ferryboat at Po- kegama Lake were then opened. Bids were received as follows: For Bigfork Bridge: Lander Larson for the sum of the 30th day of $1875. Wm. Smith $1700. H. J. Copper for the sum of $3165. J. O. Larson for the sum of $13 per running foot. L. E. Hunter for the sum of $1700, For Guard Railing or Fence: a petition signed by | that | Order Detaching Certain Lands From the Village of Grand Rapids. Whereas, A petition signed by | Katherine E. Doran, as the owner of the land hereinafter described, asking that an order be made detaching said land from the Village of Grand Rap- ids, was presented to the County Board of this County, at the session of said Board held on the 28th day }of March, 1912, fcr the action of said Board thereon. Whereas, It was then ordered py said Board that a hearing be had on ‘said petition at a session of said Board commencing on the 30th day of April, 1912, at the County Court ee in the Vilage of Grand Rap- ids. Whereas, Due notice of the time and place of said hearing has been given as provided by law. | Whereas, The said petition has mow been publicly read and consider- ed and argumeuts of all persous in- terested therein have been duly considered. it 18 Hereby Ordered, that said ‘petition be granted and the follow- img described territory to-wit: The NW% of Section 28, Township 55, Range 25, be and the same is here- by detached from the Village of ‘Grand Rapids. Dated th-s 30th day of April, 1912. JNO. L. SHELLMAN, Chairman of the Board. M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. The motion was seconded by Com- missioner O’Brien and upon roll call was carried by the following vote: Attest: Yea: Commissioncrs King, Mul- lins, O'Brien and Shellman. Nay: Comm ssioner Nelson. The committee representing the Auto club came before the Board |and requested the Board to appoint |@ committee to examine certain roads in Towns of Grand Rapids, . Iron Range, Greenway, Nashwauk, Arbo, Balsam and Trout Lake. The said committee agreed to take a com- mittee of the members of the Board Over said roads for the purpose of examining the same and ascertain- ing the necessary repairs to be made \thereon. Commissioner King moved that the members of the Board as a Whole be a committee to examine said roads. The motion was sec- onded by Commissioner Nelson and carried by unanimous vote. Commissioner King moved that | the sum of $500 be appropriated from County Road amd Bridge fund for the |improvement of County Road No. 63 ‘in Commissioner Shellman’s district. The motion was seconded by Com- missioner Mullins and carried py un- animous vote. Commissioner King moved that Anton Payment be recommended to |the Minnesota State Highway Com- mission for appointment as section- }man on State Road No. 1, between the Villages of Gramd Rapids and Cohasset. The motion was seconded | by Commissioner O’Brien and carried ‘by unanimous vote. Commissioner Mullins moved that |Dave Montcalm be appointed as , Section-man on the Bovey road, be- | tween the Village of Grand Rapids and Prairie River Bridge, until the 7th day of May next, and that his compensation be fixed at the rate of $55 per month. The motion was seconded by Commissioner O’Brien ‘and carried by unanimous vote. Commissioner King moved that the Chairman appoint a committee of three to examine the work done by H. F. Schutt on County Road No. 90, jthe Committee to report at the inet meeting. The motion was sec- onded by Comm'ssioner Mullins and carried by unanimous vote. Com- missioner Shellman then appointed lins and seconded by Commigsioner © —