Evening Star Newspaper, November 2, 1925, Page 4

B THE EVE R, WASHI D. €, MONDAY, NOVEMBER DAVIS AND WILBUR HEAD 73 Gt Qlee Rt SR hrope IMASS OF CONFIDENTIAL NAVY r e el sattere] Eokther Teomtiome 1o that Army by/| Onie eloa 1 oo toaints and tha. do. n COOLO Val ~ ~, ganda, people awakening, Hawaii cap- | 2. Height of the Shenandoah dur-| means of reducing or eliminating |fen usked that he produce certified ¥ tured, one reelly happened, Hawailan | ing each run past the guns. fiying. coples of all correspondence exchanged WITNESSES ON MITCHELL LIST | one veciiy happenca Hawation | DATA ASKED IN MITCHELL CASE jing cuch ron past the guns © 7 Jsiog e ceport, copies o all Cortespomicncs exchunged ing boat, entire publicity stunt, graphic | 4. Actual height of tow target on| Statement from the official records | of the United States relative to se- X . 4 picture,” Department of Commerce | each run past the guns. of the War Department showing the | curing the President, or a represents Subpoenas Asked for Sanders and Mrs. Lansdowne, | crossed out and Department of Agri-| Virtually Complete Record of Aviation Service| b Greatest lensth of tow target. | number of fatalities and casualties in | tive of the President. lo hefore iq-uu”m substituted, false conclusions 6. Diameter of tow target. Army aviation in the United States | the annual meeting of | Among Others—Calls May Be Denied IOt baee o s Wb cader e ‘\ ( y Representative Reid; Controver- O e e e T S e T | Aevonautival Association. | r . Germans know ho 1Iu\lknl|| il 1 T s o w‘fllhflleme:l showing number of fa- | held in Dayton, Ohio. in connectior e fcraft tests, page 11 copy changec volume, in cubic feet of tow target. es and casualties in all militars | with the air races in the Fall of 1924. By Military Judges. I words In It cromed out and ‘as’ at sial Reporls Particularly Sought. 9. Number of guns used In irlng. | aviation In 1925, id ulso a certifled copy of written 2 = T | substitute sanization crossed out e e 10. Location of these guns on hip.| Official copy of the chart showing |statesment of Col. Mitchell, Air Serv and organized substituted, cost enor- | 11. Number of rounds fired. percentage of Air Service officers kill. | ice. U. &. A., speaking as the repre- (Coutinued from B Page. machinery to do it. In or out, our) MOUS. only one carrier, Navy asks, [very onc in the Government serv-, Lieut. Lelgh Wade, Bolling Field; 12. Number of rounds fired on each | ed in recent years, which was attach- | sentative of the P'resident, which was N hand is to the plow.” mn:w_}', 1-«:_.».‘“} ”.mf:_m._l-:n-()a . and some outside, who at any| Maj. Batcroft Walsh, Afr Service, ;‘BW'}\S‘H"‘"& . et ranalen —l-g loA:hr annual report of the chief of | broadcast through the National Aero Beitain's air force in 1k, -andely 0418 Statements Jontetanalig: | |0%6 It tankintheste elimole [ s oo nedlanyIAE D do it i Comdr. Kenneth Whiting, ['18, Nummber of run rast & e o moniltisd isvputiner. UG ASieisoon) (on Iavion: + copy of a Brilish “nerial yeax book | ; * L bombe Tt e oresting | example; laviation, seemed to be on the list of | U. this city; Lieut A. J. Wil- : jaten s ze 0 LIRS Wi el 1@ Who's who' for 1920, said to he| “Those are some of the outstanding | PN Bl (avket, puge 14 the word |73 witnesses presented by Representa- | Anacostia = Naval Station; Speed of Dirigible Sought. Statement showing number of air |in the Fall of 1924 i file at the War Deartiie statements to which the court’s at- AN surrounded: cut down pays | iive Reid, counsel for Col. Mitchell, to | James T. Williams, Jr., Boston, Masn.. | 14 Intormation received from Shen- of jgach tyne on hand in the|, Everc t Sanders. secretary to Prex he circumstances le. tention_is directed,” said Col. More. | 1¥ES T -+ 5 |the courtmartial & few minutes after |and Capt. B. S. Wright, Kelly Fleld, | andoah regarding ner speed and alti- fi41 Senvleol onliSeptamtiensn, | 14enC Coolidee; 5 (exneted 0 1 s he formation o Us Alr|land. “The Government doesn’t Hmit| PV Aie peerq | IS oDENing today, with a request that | San Antonlo, Tex. - i his statement to show number | Copies of all correspondence exchang Bt moila b thot st camer tato [ite tatament B EhAE, however” i he context.” continued Mr. Reid. | hey be subpoenaed or before time of 8. of de Haviland planes that have not|ed between the President and all per v...a‘xy.m\?p:,im he "’:\l',‘.':.:‘ O e Aot ot evaptediand | LN the same words as handed | \While President Coolidge is not on Lansdowne Orders. "154 Directions to bhemrd?;h rela- been rebullt. | sons relative to the necessity und poroval White House covrespond- | asked the courf why Col. Moreland | " ol — the list, his secretary Everett San-| rpe papers which the court is asked V&'llag&e%dh;ga?&fl;l%n;;mmin an |ty oBies [OF sl (correspondans rela. | Tsksons foF the formation of the bres ce concerning the Mr Board would | should limit hik opening stutements (o, o U)Nllunkfl\‘en:u‘(', i ders, 1 ‘:smuls‘n‘flu;:"l:'::;;t-lfl:.l\: ,‘(.’:'».\.; to have Secretary Wilbur bring With | near as possible a constant speed or | known as “the meion, Of the board | (S0 nt Mot e on A i tne <elidence by Secre- | n few extracts when the regulations| Col. Winship asked Col. Moreland if | f the . » Sec b e tai ced or E = Morros ard. | Dwight Morrow, as contained in th ¢ Sanders and ”_-K\In Morrow | Yequire that the #18t of the offense|he was offering only the typewritten | Wilbur of the Navy Department, Sec: mg‘u}:l':s of correspondence between | 17 “}‘).’d".“rfl"fléffiafi‘\' 'c:;:,:;fi Av‘;:fig'! woficlal coples of the proceedingsiand | Hles of the White House execntive) o Ihe trial today made but little head- | Must be given at that tme {part as evidence, und on receiving an | retary Jurdine of the Department of | (he late Comdr. Zachary Lansdowne, [ 1y What wes woority of wind on | meommendations —of * the — Crowell | fices. : By durine the % session. The | = He said under the a ccment ihe | atfiinative unswer overruled the ob- | Agticulture “and Dwight, Morrow. | iho commanding officer at Lakehurst | eqch duy” of tast duriig time fring | wncies of all reports made since | HUtlec advovato opted he | jection of defense ¢ ol tha chairman of the President’s Alrcraft | Ny S : g Trosecution put on its first witness, | trial judge advocate had adopted he {jection of defen ounsel that the | E Newal Al Statton Iekehurst, NX. | S . H o ot S for the San | would have to defend the entire state ;m-. ument should not be received in ' Hoard. The list also includes heads | ynq each and every officer in the Navy “‘?;.f?)lf)ler:!l len:: Derastmenihbave T:me:"‘réer!. 1925, by the command. | i questioned | ment, instead of parts here and the:w | evidence, but added that all subheads | of bureaus of the Navy and War De- | Department and the department 1tseif | hombing plane. which can maintain | or aomemper of fis CrnANdIng officer | e he stutements | on Which Col. Moreland hases his{and ma ould e disregarded | partments. and also” Mrs. Zachary | regarding the fatal Might of the Shen- | prmnoi e Plans (Fhch, con AT | or a member of his command, of each PAID ON bkt e Hnded o him | prosecution. The chief civillan coun | absolutely by (he court as not belng | Lansdowne, widow of the commander | yndoah to the Middle Weet. e e aad o Do S aaduehy | oo cecly corpaarealon district fnth by Col. Mitchel forts of the sel then moved for a dismissal of the [ DAt of §U" The court upheld the [of the illfated Shenandoah, and Ad-|“"Copy of order of Navy Department | (P§oarRet was towed by Shanandbalit) United States and foreign possessions, ot e eton (i 1% | Cuse on the ground that the opening | oPinion of its law member. miral William S. Sims relative to the carrying by and use of | ine ‘target by anecploded profectlles | sinte at wooy ountries, showing the SAVINGS ecord doctmer e Contended | statement of the trial judge advocate iening 1o the witness in the ch Accompanying some of the names | parachutes on dirigibles. the target by unexploded projectilesstate of g0od order and military dis nata 1 Stitements led | “was ot sufficient and according 10} M. Yeager, Col. Moreland began ques. | is u long list of papers which the | ' Copy of interoffice order, op. Arr| MG ans ™ A 3 R e S Contband DEPOSITS ol "hetiveen counel | provedure.” toning on the September 9 Statement | court fs asked o have the witnesses | 084307, dated August 1, 1919, and sub- | 07 0 o tiles Jardine (o Give Data. e i TR g et o i | SO PR P, e S A0 | o, nd n czamialion, of (e et iconintance of Divson of uu o 180 (G D BN e et . auriciare ox e el et 2% °1 Lattempt to zec a bill of particulars. | When the judge advocate asked the | tary of the Navy makes it appear that [ * Chart showing organization of sec- | ™ad® on the target? = = | pected to pre D s of weather | MORRIS PLAN BANK G tatarients! BReies B he Government bases fts case on|Witness to identify it, Mr. Reld ob- Mitcheil's counsel is going quite |tion of the offics of the Navy Depart. | g 25 Flow many land wmiles flown on | teports showing wes it S TS Ty Sperien L statements, N bE e these two statements, and 1 propose | jected on the ground that it was not|thoroughly into an investigation of | ment which, among other things, han. | SIENLS Xos. 45, 49 uny s 2 T Q7 IRONCER H ST. N. W. reland for the prosecutfon insist the inal ath e - - ndoal in towing targets for anti-| Washington, D. « ton, Ohio 1408 . N. W, o e T St |10 prove he issuane and publication | the oviginal stutemont, adding, “you | the Navy Department. For instance |dles press relations e o Sebt b e Tt aaG n, e e don't mean thut Col. Mitchell Tianded | he asks for copies of all letters sent | Coples of all leiters sent by the bacdtlo At ensEor] e Ay andE bl enciien oty - be ocepted by | Col. Blanton Winship. the law mem. | that newspaper to that man {by the Navy Department or any of | Navy Department or by each and | e ¢ B LA gulmu biaiene At I(vhl"l"l AELE he court., explaining that the nota-|ber of t ourt, politely but firmly | The question of the whereabouts of | its officers to newspaper editors or |every officer thereof to newspaper ed- | ureetios icnassedithe guns? (fussidcne & Alios (6 Brargiinexpectel m— s T e nit: | veproved defense counsel for its many | the original statement developed the | publishers invilmg them to attend publishers, owners and emploves | | s el e i ot i B Rt i DR. HUTCHI2 ttors and primees taring mroora’of [objections ontechnical grounds. | fact that after Mr. Yeager turned it!the recent Hawalian maneuvers with ting them to visit and attend ‘|,x-[,'("1““' e L D O e et Sty o the Amber Oil Liniment e R e hia | “Technicalities in law in' courts-mar- | into his city editor, it presumably was| the flect, and a list of the names of | 1925 Hawalian maneuvers. Coms ifsh “xerial Yearbooki| Airerafe Hoard: Bwisht Motros. ohow | §Ees JUELNMEIIN SOOIDE, SEIATS0A ourt. The matter finally was sottled | Ual cannot be carried out to the ex.|destroyed all newspaper editors, publishers. | List of names of all newspaper ed-| L ORY, of Tritish “Aerinl Feathock | SIwerset Bonrd, Diighy Morrow: show At Any Drug Store. 750 v the court when it agreed to accept |1ent they are in civil cases,” he said. | The witness added that he made no! owners und employes who accepted |itors, publishers, owners and employes o B e s L formadania A e S R e e Gocuments with (he tnderstandime | “If the charges and specifications | effort. 1o find it and he did not know | the invitation and took the flight recefved on_board naval v s or i e e Dt atavities gy that the additions would be disre. | WeTe not as stated. it would have been ther or not it was in existence. Dirigible’s Papers. ng the 1 waiian maneuvers Strenzih of Forces | Frea Patterson, president of the Na £arded. unfair to the accused to have one or ’ e % i »apers affecting | Stitement showing the name, nui ¢ ary Intelligence De The second witness called by the |TW0 Statements pointed out and stand | Witness Is Excused. e T e ih: e | ber and position of the station or res d giving the commis prosecution made u statement which #lone. The whole articles glve i When the prosecution finished its!pars on the MacMillan expedition | i€ Ships taking part in the 1925 | stre the Royal Air LQYRTaXE/pragNi oYt iaYiTeViaNie \ppeared to be somewhat favorable to | €4TiNE and context (o the extracted | examination. the defense announced | relative to the carrying of radio equip: | Hawailan flight. , | Force of tain on January | = Mitchell, rather than incriminatory. | Statements hat there would be no ¢ rossexamina: | ment into the Arctic; a statement of the {‘L"(‘r'fi}u“r'{flfl'x’.‘f“ir““,"” e M Intell D 2 In response to cross-questioning by S ttion and Yeager was excused. Afterithe upkeep and depreciation of navy |!he Navy De . or some office v of Military Intelligence De : - he defense Col. George L. Hicks of Motion Is Overruled. he left the room an orderly was sent|yards, 1919, 1920 and 1921, and figures | hereof, previous to the 1925 Hawalian | partment reports from Great Britain | 5 ave our Fart ‘Sam Hoisten. Tor. told thel. -t my opinion, therefore, Mr.|after him. and on being returned toon aviation target practice. But this | 11Eht stating the purpose and reasons | numbered 17258, 17118, 16090 and o7 - o court with some hesitation that he |President, that the articles in the|the chair. the president of the court!is only a partial list, the remainder of | {OF the flight . I* ul‘nltul‘ Jid not think that the isswance by Col, | Sbecifications stand as they are and|asked for questions from the court.|iwhich will be given later Schedule {ssued to the press about | "Report of the British national and Mitchell of the San Antonio state- | that the judge advocate be not called | Hearing none, the witness again was| This is only the beginning of the|Ausust 17, 1925, showing the State!imperial defense committee, composed nents affected the discipline of his|upon for turther information. T rec-|excused list and gives some idea that the trial | f2ir8 to be visited by the She foah | of Lord Balfour, former first lord of % ommand. The admission came after | ommend the motior defense coun Luis Felipe Recimos of La Prensa, {is to be a long drawn out one, for the | ©% her fatal flight to the Middle West. | the admiraity. Lord Peel, and Lord! 3 S 10 Qtel‘e ol Moreland had endeavored to inter- | el be overruled, N a Spanish publication of San Antonio, | list is marked “partial list” of wit.| CODY of orders issued to the cor ! Weir, formerly minister of Great R = pose an objection to the question. The "H;.- court sustained Col. Winship's | was the second witness called by |nesses. The list i ies Benedict | mander :“f 'hem hv":fl;'h]-fl‘v) 1]~ the | Brituin, submitted in 1923 and 1924 . court then recessed until 2 o’clock. pinion the prosecution. He identified Col. | Crowell, former Assistant Secretary of | Commanding officer of the kehurst. | entitled The Navy and the Alr Z (E NEW " Yeager identitied himself as a re.| Col Moreland then gatinfthe filn! Mitchell and said he was sent to his f War: MaJ. Gen. Robert . Davis, ad- | 1 eJ:‘l?:"fii"h;""r Sin Jao ke O P | LIKE NEW AGAIN porter for the San Antonlo Light,|Witness for the p ution, office at Fort Sam Houston shortly | jutant general of the Army: Brig. Gen. | the fa ght of the Shenandouh 10! Copies of correspondence between S His testimony was drawn out by cor x 4 newspaper man, to whom | before noon of September 5 “'to get a | A- S. Fries, chief of the chemical war. | the Middle West the War Department, or its repre- for ThankSg"""g stant questioning on the part of the | Col. Mitchell gave his statement for | gtatement.” Col. Mitchell said noth- |fare service of the Army: Representa- | Coples of all requests received for | sentatives Col. Wil . .. irial judge advocate. He was called | Publication. ~Representative Reid at|ing to him. he told Col. Moreland in |tiVe E. R. Anthony, jr. of Kansas;|the Shenandoah to visit state fairs Sutwicer o e ree - Piece Lw“‘g Room ipon to point out Col. Mitchell in|this polnt said: “If the court please.|reply to questioning. At the request [ ¢@PL. Anton Heinen, who piloted the | oD its fatal flight to the Middle West X he was testify the courtroom as the person who, on |1 Withhold my opening argument un-! 5¢"(he prosecution. he produced the | LO8 Angeles on her trans-Atlantic Paness: on: Flight t committee of in & . September 5 last, handed to him the | tl the prosecution has finished its| {tarement swhich he said (‘ol. Mitchell | fiBht to the United States; Admiral| peEs on Mgy vy into « ¢ f the United Smtes U holstered for now famous statement assailing the | CaS€ gave him. Tt was examined by the|C: F. Hughes, former chief of fleet| Statement showing the purpose of | States Alr Ser ¢ the House of p e War #nd Nevy Depactments . Representative Reid replied that he | defense and the court and admitted | (F&ining in the Navy Department;|each flight made by renandoah. | Representatives. The witness testified that he had|insisted on his objection on the | SO0 SR the eoure And aftelited | Admiral Hilary P. Jones, president of | Copy of decision ad | Copy of chart show i THIS LOW PRICE I FOR 1ABOR ONLY known Col. Mitchell ever since the|Stounds that the document in ques-| oo g O NP FerBERER o e, the Navy General Board: Donald Mac- | vocate general of g he of the military ligen Seusationally low prices on Tapestries and Veloi latter had become air officer of the Sth | L10n was not physically nor word for saw him on the 9th of Septem. | Millan ‘of the Arctic expedition:|effect that the fat Nigh! the al staff, dated it 7 m to choose from Corps Area, and said that he appeared | Word the same as that contained in | [ $4%v Bifg On the Bt Of Septem:| Admiral W. A. Moffett. chief of the |Shenandoah to the Mid us v of press report issued by Wi e e e i+ Mitchell's office on the date specy. | the specifications against Mitchell, ber, st Fort Sam Houston.” | a» | Burean of ‘Naval Aeronautics; Capt. | legal. Depirinient. Octabe: SLIP COVEES MADE TO ORDER fied to obtain “a statement for which | ThE ':‘,:‘)T;,Z‘, i by | “Tasked him for news and he gave | X, oses WholNan o coargeofithe e L encwlon, g udate. On iNeided el o M R 1o obrain " Siten, e dslon et The it Shi it el stargs ctbla| | Suttement showing the auie o , ERICA R Do o Stontiana auizzea | Co SoreahdTnnfing that b 'wan | e another, siatement the, wiiness | ight tormer. epresentaiive P | received e ot it cximimuton | | Seeks oars Kepor . he Wt raing. hip o aquizzed | within his rights in offering the papers | Fepliec s statement also O'Sullfvan of Connecitcut, Representa- | previous to her fatal fight to the ort of Joint Army Board on th Phone, Write or : the witness regarding his connections| und Reid just as strongly defending | roduced and Mr. Reld asked only |tives Randolph Perkins of New Jer.| Middle West 1921 Lombing tesis 627 F St. N.W. (i il Phone Main 8139 el Seiloe Weager il ihatin his objections to them. The law of-|one question, as follows: ““What lan- | and A. S. Prall of New York: Copy of the report the effect of Chronological rd showin o e e et hme | ficer broke in to explain to the judge | 8uage is your paper printed In?" . E. V. Rickenbacker, the Ameri- | non-freezing solution the girders |date and action taken on the Lassiter 1yas not personally representing elther | Jqvocate that the defense apparently | “My_papers is published in Span-|can ace: Capt. Lowell Smith of the |of the Shenandoih and Lo Angeles |hoard Brocesdings, which siso s Service when he appeared for the objected to the additions as possibly | ish.” replied the witness. The court |[Army world flight squadron, Rear| Copy of the statement of the Secre. |the date the chief of the Alr p 4 bearing on the judgment of the case | then took a 10-minute recess. | Admiral Joseph Strauss of the Navy|tary of the N# avy made on or about !made recommendations that \litchell statement, and explained that | . “the court. Col. Moreland then| Lieut. Col. George L. Hicks of Fort | General Board: Licut. O. A. Anderson, | September 3 o e that {board be convened. (It is he had merely turned the document|;qeq the witness to erase all pencil | Sam Houston, Tex.. was the next!Kelly Field. San Antonio, Tex.. Maj. the a sasters in the |this inf tion can be obta over to Eis own paper. which was|marks, but Representative Reid re.|witness. He identified himself as the |H. H. Arnold. Air Service, this ¢ity. | Upited s i hee. laitis 2 ey «fMliated with the press oclations. | fysed to be satisfied, and the con.|officer who made the preliminary in-{ apt. Basil N. Bass, Air Service, ' byt one i S 3 lle said that two other reporters and| troversy ended for the time being|vestigation of the Mitchell case fol-!this city; Lieut. V. B. Bertrandias. | United States is « S o la a ket an assistant to Col. Mitchell were in| when Col. Winship suggested that the | lowing publication of the statement.| McCook Field, Dayton. Ohio: Maj. the Atlantic and - Otenns stina . DS W Dena- the room when the statement Was|matter be left to the judge advocate, | After the report was put in the rec-| Willlam R. Blair, Fo NenWortle L alit as the' Atonsest wallalecatt il 3 g P ziven out, copies of being also|ang that if he cared to have the|ord the witness was turned over to| Kans. Col. *. Brant. general | fense of the nation i handed to the other reporters crasures made and resubmit the |the defense for cross-examination,|staff: Maj. L. H. Brearton. Lans i contes of ail In response to questions by the as the Serviee the fiscal vear rega papers the court could then formally | when Counsel Reid asked him: Field, Hampton, Va.: Lieut R. J.|including radiograms amd relegrame b L rosecution, Yeager sald that the|pabe upon Reid's objection S o i suing | Brown. Boston Airport. Boston. Mass.: axehs tement was given to hm for pur.| > po s objection. Would vou say that the issuing ; ton Airpor t fasa: | gxchanged bet poses of publication. ive to the bom % D = avy Depart- |ing of surfa aft the Army Air o 5 of that statement caused any lack| Col. J. E. Cassidy, S1 o i an expedition | Servic o SecondjSestsmentiiiven of discipline in your area?” street, this city; Reed ative to ca Sehipe il e as s SRanas cse bion |, The judge advocate then questioned | (5] Moreland, trial judge advocate, | Memphis, Tenn.; Capt. es Cl At Rta ihe A il ¥ Dene 1 ot N Produces Original. [the witness regarding Col. Mitchells | jmmediately jumped to his feet und | Lansley Field, Tampton, Va - ) A e 1w naneuvers. ¢ umber One 5 | subsequent statement, issued for pub- osed objection, following which | H. A. Dargue, Air Service, this ci ted destrovers to deliver rad ey e g Seri Col. Moreland requested the Wit|lication on September 9, when the re o S rintion et il 1ts irer: | Tieut. B T Fabani: Moot daReias R g iealiHavptisn g of Series oyt e o e o [""""‘”‘i”““ made by his earlier verbal | evancy. “Col. Moreland contended ! rm_nm\ Ohio; Admiral W. F. Fullan 1 it s e vians 1 | | itors who ha ment. Yeager handed to the judge |pon'h 2 e Foi 7 2 > - Hdvocate a thick bunch of papers |bomP Sl \‘}f(ffhs‘l‘;"g‘p’;’:fln;,f‘f"hgm,f; that it was far afleld of the case | U. S. N., retired, this city: Lieut H e of fitors o)y ] romprising typed sheets of paper on | (o him and o two other reporters a|3nd that nothing was produced on | ( eorge Air Service, this clty: Lieu Dt « hetw awaiian 5 =N ODAY collars are worn which vellow paper had been pasted |{ypavri TS & direct examination on which such a!Col. W. E. Gllmore, Air Service, this ata on Costs, il 5 § f o y a y | typewritten statement and said he did 2 e e S . s e Tt . . § i or appearance; an nnd which was replete with penciled | g pecall what Mitehell said at the | auestion could be based | city; Frank B. Corin, Mills Buildin uent showing number of day ? e 3 notations. Representative Reid im-|¢iya’ The statement, he added, was| The report itself formed the basis | this city; Lieut A. F. Hagenberser y were engaged on above i S & Tolmanized collars are mediately objected to the admission | published ” 7 and the court asked also if it did not | }.'ulu' Elein, Hanolulu: /Capt. Willls om and returning to B oonaince 3 comfortable, too. Tolman- of such evidence, because of the in- | P PharC ensued another long perfod of | Telate to matter in the report | Hale, Langiey Field. Hampton. Va and the average main _ 3 Fre ondence il 2 : < terlineations and its “pasted-up” | hickerings between m,um,,"“”hen‘]‘hfi After some hesitation Col. Moreland | Col. ‘C. C."Hall. Naval Alr Station, aan, T ) cost ol these : ‘m‘”;\;‘\\‘jl I‘Mi” t = ized starched collars are condition. The judge advocate ad-| jujee advocate sought to have intro. | Auin rose to his fect to address the | Luko}u:]m. N. 3 Col. John Hamble festrovers per day A ! a s PR freely flexible, softly mitted that there were ‘“marks in|gyced as evidence & ge fro e | court, and replied that it woulc ton, Baltimore, Md.; Maj. Hubert R of uffict ort_on the anti % & the N I s 20! S i i Pemcll” on the document, nmd ex-| ooy At Tl ‘A;"‘;gp,‘fi‘""?,fl'hg»rxm to answer the question. Pressed | Harmon, Air Service, this city: Lieut. aircraft atiack the U s eIthivtheSarg SHmAE e smooth,immaculately white plained that the copy had been used | containing a story about the subse-|bY the court as to whether he with-|Col. H. E. Hartney, 3616 Davis place Texas again t *t towed by the 3 u ; and neat. A man's busi- hy editors, printers and other news- | guent Mitchell statement and quoting | 4rew his objection, he d{fi :_mgx a mo-| northwest; Maj. W. N. He r., Shenandoah x A Sought. e e 4 ness position demands the paper employes in putting it Into|therefrom. Representative Reid said | ment's thinking withdraw, and the Mitchel Field. Long Tsland of port of the . S wbat shoula Tar com. e for puuie o e bt et e o e answered | Maj. ¥. M. Kennedy. McCook Ii ster general » Navy for : structive hits in the A" tooks distinction of Tolmanized Tie witness idertified most of the |copy of a statement. holding that the | ‘“No. Dayton, Ohio: Col F. R. Kennev 10 fiscal vear 1920, i tests during the Sum- o collars. You will appre- marks, saying that some of the nota- | originals would be the best evidence.| Col. Hicks then identified a copy of | tired, Ponca City, Okla.; Maj. V Statement : nd de- ., 1 Rt drsnite’ TOL iate thei fort I tions were those of the managing | ol Winship apparently sided with |the clpping containing the Mitchell | Kiiner, Alr Service, this city: Liex ecintion of navy vards and their| “gopy ot the report an the ‘experi- P e Somtmcama. S edifor requestinz the composing | the defense in this contention, ex-|Statement which was in the official|co). Frank Knox, Manchester, ) records for the fist #19. 1920 11 ant conductesl at arsenal, Aberdeen, | ool days s Tolmanize a week's wear- room to return the copy to him after | plaining to Col. Moreland that the |files, and also the letters of indorse-| Njaj A. N. Krogstad, Luke field, And 1921. as showr officlal records. | \ig "y 1025, Showing the danger of | ; ing for you, he linotype operators had finished | newspaper article, in view of the con.|ment as it passed through milltary | jonolulu: Reed G. Lan care of - Statem of th esent cost of | oyl ireraft shells to the surrounding o e with it, and explaining that other | text, might affect the case of the |channels to Col. Mitchell and back. | judge Landis, Chicago: Grover Loen. bullding each type of modern naval | An"-alreraft shells 1o o | marks and words were ‘“subheads” |client before the court At this juncture the court took a|ing, Loening Alrcraft Co., New York Vessel. including appendages —ana | “CEIIE S0 T8 GO0 wnd printers’ notations Gen. Howze then proposed that the | recess until 2 o'clock this afternoon. | ci¢y: Maf. G. E. Lovell, jr., Air Depot, ?Verhead. as shown by official recor Hale, Army Air Service, and the | OLMANIZE! Counsel for the accused continued |witness read the statement as given L Honolulu; Capt. Robert Oldys, this 'his to include 1 resrmored | officer in_charge of the anti-aircraft to object in vigorous language to the | to him by Col. Mitchell and thus Sy ML BE © Eini bl Dol |oheiters, wEhi cralsam, 'Giesyers, | COICC 1N CHASER OF [he il sieral admission of anything but the orls- | have it incorporated in the record NEGRO IS INDICTED this city: H. S. Rawdon. Hureas submarines” mine planters.” tenders constrictive hit area of inal s el and o © by | Representative Reid jumped to his Standards; Lieut Col w Ui unurdit carTicns w target i Mitchell. Col. Winship, court | feet and caustically ° attacked this| Schauffler, 2940 Newark street: Licut. | Stitel from the official records | “"& W8N i toard ceedinzs 1€ TO[M LAUWRY officer, then asked the judge |suggestion, saying Ythat is a most FOR MANSLAUGHTER L. A. Sheridan, Kelly Field, San An. | Of the department showing the number | o/, ort of the result the advocate if it would not be possible | remarkablé statement to come from | | tonio, Tex.; Maj. Sumpter Smith, °f fat o L DA af ts at F y elie il Gt S 1o erase all of the penciled notations, | the president of this court” Rel abame. National Guard; Maj. Cari|2Viation in the United States since the {y ', 1 j| oth and C -"‘- W Franklin and inquired of Representative |.~~m‘ irgued that the mere reading of Spatz, Air Service, this city; Maj. W, A7Iistice AT it Official copy of the re L = = ir he would have any objections to!what constituted the second Mitchell | Alleged to Have Caused Death of | D. Tipton, Baltimore, Md.: Licut e e aiowne . nunibens Ok shifdeie r he statement thus treated | statement would not serve in place of | Frank Tyndall, Luke Field, Honolulu: | 7{alities and casualties in naval Monroe, Vi, in 182 the actual statement, and defended W. F. Carter With Knife — == oD o anuaey 1Ll Official copy of the reports of Moreland Opens Case. his numerous objections on the KOLAR”( INSTALLED T nti-aircraft tests conducted at Cam | gro re desired only = i i Copy of all orders issued in 1925 | JIu ae - COIE at Camp tinmedintely on the_convening ot | ETeUid, (At he desired bnly o pro- e rolative “to" atiation "iruining | for | DN Joon Sy 2102 L court Col. Moreland rose to present| « . . - e . | cad at the Naval Academy. hiag Sk S ste i3 Tia bpening statement for the DEoSecu: | papir poris (e Sot the, original Officers of Indian War Veterans'| ' Copy of uil proceedings of the spe.| II°5 0 the Coast Artillery, for the There are two things you'll tion. I want to point out to ”"‘h ol. Winship at this junctare. It | Shavus Browna blind colored man, Centers of Ceremonies. al board appointed by the Secretary | 1Sgi Sears 105 and 1034 - 9s Yy court,” he sald. “a few of the out-| i unynraneiy S6GINE JNRGUTe Tt 30 vears old, was indicted today by = of the Navy in 1925 to Investigate ! pombing sets on hand awith . the ke ab A standing statements in the articles| . objec = > Charles Kolarik of Philadelphia, | aviation. i S a i 1Re about these t tat in ] cleslous objections to anything but the |the grand jury on a charge of man- 5 e, St 5 " . .| bombardment group on September which the accused is alleged to have | orisinar on the aroany hey 1 iine 4 7" who served with the 1st Cavalry in | Statement showing the number of | e FGIC BB SIS S made as contained in the charges and | contain additional matter, and we |Sieughter. He was in a fight Sep-|(he Indian wars, was Installed as cadets of the Naval Academy who were ' (08 SICTEL BY 0T ‘;‘.pp“ in the specifications as read.” |are only “taking the time of the |tember 2 last at the home of Walter | commander of the Eastern division |¥rtually glven instruction to quality.| \w,r Department relative to study o e it itk Ths | court by delaylng introduction of the | F. Carter, colored, 1280 Ward: court, | of the National Indian War Veterans | LA 25 Biows; <he, the number who aceidents to the Shenandoah and the | “iro: when it is sald Carter struck him | QEF a8 Fonees e Indi } ; il : h 2 > oL actually handled the controls of air- e acciden : We inslst on standing on the law,” diers' Home yesterday. Indian war y handl : RS e PN-9 No. 1. which declared they were | broke in Representativ id. over the head and Brown used a|veterans from Virginia, Pennsylvania | CTaft during 1923 O College ves Examined la Ona the “direct result of incompetenc oo e o e ; e z i Graduate Qi9 Mditecc xelul Nr icohineiei Well, T am v willing to|knife inflicting an injury resulting in |and the District of Columbla were Wants Copy of Order. s a-snd Jonistie ce I have|the death of Carter. Brown fled to | Dresent. Copy of the order re o the sonable administration of the national | sought to introduce it here except for < Other officers Installed were Joseph | 00 ©Of (he order relative to th Dr. CLAUDE S. SEMONES defense by the War and Navy depart | (ja other printed matter not divectly | DS home. where he was arrested. e o prers Jonerh | nandling of contfols in aireraft' by = SRts nents.” “The statement which Col. | connected with 1t, and T maintain hat | , mbezement of postal funds 0| je ho' day; Henry R. Boynton, Sol. | vaa'iy of the Naval Academy during Eyesight Specialist S Moreland read from, charged that air- | {Pele i3 nothing in this evidence he. | taling $1,165.07 is charged in an in-| 8 "5 roC * g g 00" chaplain: Paul | s, r2ining period in the Summer of | Thone Maln 721 E men ‘‘were merely pawns” in the | poti o TE RIS T AR quicence be | dictment against Harry W. Ransdall, | 3O ARG SOl S SRS, T | 1920 B 3 400410 Sicl.achlen Bidz. lands of the Army and Navy and|jhe e - C€ | for eight years superintendent of the |- BEANEIGCT 4 g Copies of all correspondence relative | and G Sts. N s | the court one way or the other,” an-| ‘" SI&N! : '® | adjutant; Willam Hoffman, FPhila- | (o the formation of the board k | further declared that Congress i e oE e o West End station of the local post = - : , fc : board known nounced the judge advocate with some delphia, ~ division _adjutant, and |as the “Morrow Board.” treated by these two departments as | neid'®®C MG 88 RORERIES VUG EOMe f office and an employe of the Post Of-| (LG & "Gigunivan, Hampton | * Statements shosarthe fol ininstitution created for their own | . el Al fice Department 26 years. Ransdell i g " | Statements showing the following: | el counsel who had said that he didwt | i€ N3G “cover up. the shortage | R0as, Va-, divislon vice commander. | 1.” Number of days target towed by | e vant ake iefense ] 4 R P e — Col. Moreland picked out. extracts | WEIG 10 e ANV Qefense hould | |- haking two bundles of stamps out > = = heye and there and the DoXt SuHiecht e pepradentative Reldirepllediihat the(0f 2 #inEle bundis anajthusiappearing ROSS INQUEST HELD. client Overcoats he took up concerned the PN-9 flight | oigence which Col. Moreland sought | (¢ have twice the amount of stamps P A I N T I N G One is the new Cur- which the accused had be-littled .nr;xd a R 3o of Balleview: | Should I had declared would have meant noth- | an Coeurt of the . F || station and sent a letter to his wife| James W. Ross, 19, of Belleview, Fa st ne : vette Shoulders—the new ing even if successfully A ore e Jand, and he said he | aying he was golng to ‘commit sui- | D. C.. near Blue Plains, came to hid Lol he statement attacked the Navy for | 04 afhere fimly, © oblectlons | cige. " The shortage has been made |death Saturday night when his auto P. F. Q:)RDON broad effect —and the “smashing Lieut. Wade's plane in the Jurt would have disregarded | 890d: it 15 reported. mobile smashed into a gate post at St 57 Codue® firoct W, | North Atlant ol Moramam. Five indictments alleging violation | Elizabeth's Hospital as the result of S vinge ? That o cops of what we arelof the national prohibition law were |lack of due care on his own part. This hone: Adams 5483 G e . Disgust Charge Read. A g S O T among 28 returned by the grand jury | was the finding of a coroner's jury at | Quality—Service WE'VE WORKED WITH 't part 7 today. an inguest into his death today. i Another extract read by Col, More-| “The type-written part is a copy,” : A e e — THE WEAVE p land declared the airmen were “utterly | heatedly replied the judge advocate,| Those charged with violation of the| Testimony showed that Ross was at- i THE WEAVERS OF o v i s gt |liquor law include Jerome Peters, | tempting to avoid a collision with a i :doohi " ! S ir & e e o ot | sata apantain it is not falr and lesul,” | \finnie Boykin, Benjamin Nelson, | street car while attempting to pass | Bacillus Acidophilus Milk WOOLENS and DIAGO- : ouths for they 2 . S S Iver Hawkins and Willlam M. and |another automobile on the road when For intestinal disorders ! PR :ifi:-ier ‘;!:En'nm ‘:u'l"};:‘:bufe.‘l L.",T‘ 1::‘1 ‘u’.‘{.‘%fn:i“’“ e g nc::;m,;‘o‘:(el Mary Bielfleld. he swerved out and crashed into the Ask your physician about it NAL YELOURS is the re- e ¢ % d Grand larceny is alleged against |gate post. He died in a private auto- Prepared by the Bl hbse: lace. The state t 0! J! 4?;:I.Bd:nr-)l‘:;g;.|;:n"|‘nn-.=‘.u‘.-r..(»1p'_fr"\‘::s e e question from Col.|George King. John Young, Thomas |mobile en route to Casualty Hospital. [} NATIONAL VACCINE AND ! sult, The appearance and deluding the public and “wasting the | Winship, to state his objections, Mr, | C: Morely, Marie Rainsville, Gladys = ANTITOXIN INSTITUTE lives of its men.” Reid said the exhibit is not ad-|Dixon, allas Gladys Green: John 515 U St. N.W. warmth of ‘soft materials The prosecution then took up the[missable because it is not the state. |Henry Deal, Rachael McNeill and Fel’tl' 7 3 + 1 <tatement of September 9, in which |ment “we are called upon to defend | LOulse Howard, alais Louise Bradley. P : —BUT A FABRIC THAT C'ol. Mitchil declared, “What I've sald | in this case.” Housebreaking and larceny is the nppe = i WEARS Enterprise Serial i S. fo offer would not be admissible in |0 hand. He disappeared from the other is the fabric— about the national defense hurts the | crime charged against John Charles b s in Washington,” addin Points Out Additions. Perry, Richard Perry, James R. Wil- ‘nte eria :;'.';:fl'lfq?f;figm i g< “It does not have the same words, | llams and Fleming J. Bell. GO Sto them todav Bulldmg Association The next statement challenged the [phrases and sentences, as issued by | Other indictments and charges al-| Stop them qulckly—ul their dangers | war Department to take disciplinary | Col. Mitchell,” he said. leged include: Isadore Zeldin, carnal |and discomforts. End the fever and || 643 | ouisiana Ave. N.W. Droceeding in which the following | Col. Winship asked in what respect, | knowledge; James Allen, attempted | headache. Force the pofsons out. Hills s 0 D vds were used: “If the department |and Mr. Reld said it contained words |carnal knowledge; Harold T. Lewis, | break colds in 24 hours. They tone the S5th jeene obistock nowsepeh doesn’t like the statement I made let | other than Col. Mitchell's. __|torgery and uttering; Thomas H.|whole system. The prompt, reliable for subscription. 2 Chem take any disciplinary action they | Col. Winship than asked Mr. Reid |Bradley, receiving stolen property;results have led millions to employ Shases oF stock. $1i00%caeh Lot “according to their judgment— | to give specific illustrations of the |Frank Forbes, assault with a danger-|them. Don’t rely on lesser helps, e rmonthi A g Sourt-martial or no court-martial”|variance in the copy and taking a|ous weapon; Benjamin Brooks, dont delly payable y. ; & " ol Mitehell had added to this that | position before the President’s table, | Thomas Johnson, Ellis Vernon Lynch PRITEN Five per cent interest pai . 1328 F STREET < {here will be no defense on my part.” | defense counsel read the following [and John Willlam Stevens, non-sup- on stock withdrawn. t read declared “it|subheads and other notations placed | port. "IN'NE ide 3 An e X ey difference whether |in the statement by the newspaper | The grand jury ignored the charge James E. Connelly, President House of Kappenheimer Good Clothes doean’t, make Ammy or mot. 1f they |editors and composing room force: |of alleged grand larceny against Wik James F. Shea, Secretary ..m.fl throw me oul ihey bave thel “Congress flouted, airmen are 'liaw Norman. " . i Gdldl-