The Daily Worker Newspaper, March 14, 1934, Page 5

ner oh on REET Steel, Transportation Coal Workers Battle Co DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 1934 Page Five Hackmen’s Fight on: Co. Union Needs All Workers’ Support. Stifle Militant Voice | Of Drivers | By HARRY RAYMOND NEW YORK.—The Parmelee Sys-| tem’s company union, led by Mr.| James I, Cuff, recent candidate for) New York City Controller on the Recovery Party ticket, if saddled) upon the taxi drivers, would indeed place them in a*helpless condition of utter impoverishment. The aim of this organization, against which the drivers are fighting so militant-| ly, is to bind every hackman, every worker of the company, hand andj foot to the wage-cutting program of | the powerful General Motors Com-| pany. Once the drivers are herded into this so-called Drivers Brother- hood their militant voice will be stified; any protest against discrimi- nation or the blacklist or the jim- crow tactics of the company will be met with the iron fist of police rule. 4 have already voted with their feet Parmelee Bosses Aim to) against the so-called Brotherhood. |. A driver, writing to the Daily Worker, gives a good picture of how the company union is “improving personal relations and group wel- fare” around the Parmelee garages: | “On March 12, the 38th Street pickets reported that only eight cars left the garage between 4 and 8 a. m. Monday morning. A few company union rats were driving around the block to encourage other drivers to take cars out. The | hackmen were not fooled and are solid behind the fight against the company union and the $12 a week, blacklist offer of Mrs. Her- | rick and the bosses. “At 38th St., the oil man was made by company union officials te drive around the block to de- moralize the pickets.” re rir 'HE Parmelee System has always ways discriminated against Ne- groes. It is the policy of the com- pany union leaders to segregate the Negro drivers so as to keep them | | | | | | | James Egan, National Organizer of the Steel and Metal Workers’ Industrial Union, which is head- ing the battle against Morgan’s company unions. | Nominate 7 Workers for | 'Gallup City Elections at! United Front Meeting —— } GALLUP, N. M.—At the recent | united front election conference the | | following workers have been chosen | The bosses agents who have or-| from uniting with the white drivers|as candidates for the coming city) ganized this company union tell the) in the struggle for higher wages and elections: | men thet the aim of the “Brother- hood” is to improve personal rela- shorter hours. | ‘The cars on which the Negro driv- | | John Tomac, representative of the | tions and group welfare activities. | ers work are painted in distinctive | International Labor Defense; Bill | They sey that the company is in- terested in the welfare of the driv- ers. But the company’s action dur- ing the period of the strike and be- fore the strike has proven. other- wise. Union men who were fighting for fhe welfare of the drivers have been fired by the company union lead- ers. The blacklist system is more extensively used in Parmelee garages than any other garages in the city. Company union men, working with the police, have brutally assulted and caused the arrest of - union drivers who were picketing the garages, who were fighting for bread for their wives and children. Negro drivers working for Parmelee have been jim-crowed, segregated and discriminated against by exponents| and leaders of the company union. And hobnobbing with these lead- ers, assisting them to perpetuate the vicious company union, is Mrs. Eli- nore Herrick, chairman of the Re- gional Labor Board. She suggests that the 4,500 Parmelee hackmen call off their strike against the com- pany union and vote on the ques- tion. This is an obvious strike- breaking proposal aimed at smash- ing the militant Taxi Drivers Union of Greater New York. It would throw the drivers at the mercy of the company- union. The drivers colors. The Parmelee System does not allow a Negro to drive out of any of the 22 garages owned by the company throughout the city, except the one located at Fifth Ave. and | 140th Street. This vicious system must be stopped. And only by defeating the company union can it be stopped. The Taxi Drivers Union of Greater New York has taken the proper ac- tion to stop it. | The strike must be spread and ex- |tended to other systems—to the Terminal System, where Gerald E. Kamm is active building a company union, to the Knickerbocker Fleet, where the blacklist system is used |to terrorize the drivers and beat | them into submission, to all the ga- | rages in the city. By spreading the strike the drivers can defeat the which Mr. Allen, Deputy N. R. A. Administrator, is attempting to put over on all taxi men. They can |halt with one mighty blow the fur- | ther development of company unions in the New York taxi garages. Ev- ery worker, every trade union, every | workers’ organization should give | the utmost support to the struggle of the taxi drivers against the men- |ace of company unionism. Company unionism is spreading in all industries under N. R. A. author- ity. Stop it by strike action. Experiences in Struggle Against Bosses’ “Unions” By BELL GEBERT An outstanding result of the Roosevelt “New Deal,” N.R.A., etc.. is the growth of company unions throughout the country. Nearly 5,000,000 workers and primarily in the basic industries, steel, metal, |. auto, packing house, ralroads, are forced to belong to company owned and controlled unions, or sometimes called “employees representative plan.” This places before our Party. the trade union of the T.U.U.L. and opposition movement inside of the A. F. of L. the tremendous task of winning the workers who are forced into the company union and to defeat and destroy the company unions, which are embryos of fas- cist. organizations in the shops and built on the model of the corpora- ive state and syndicates in Italy and Germany. In the Chicago District we obtain- ed some experiences in the work against the company unions. In the Tilinois Steel in Gary, in the Party shop paper. “The Gary Steel Worker,” for February, an editorial appears, written by a member of the District Committee, which declares that workers in the mill must “stick together and keep at the heels of the company union representatives who are now de- fending the company interests, but who must be forced to act in our behalf.” That is, he demands that the representatives of the company unions are to become the spokes- men for the workers in the shops. This question was raised at the shop nucleus meeting of the Illinois Steel in Gary and the unit unani- mously rejected this position and reiterated its previous position on this question, that in the struggle against the company unions it is necessary to build committees in every department, consisting of workers who are members of the §.M.W.LU., members of the A. F. of . and unorganized workers to set up this committee of the united front from below in every depart- ment, and they are to act in behalf of the workers of the given depart- ment and not the company union representatives and that demands of the workers can be placed be- fore “reps” as they are placed be- fore a boss. We cite this example to point out that the Communists cannot and under no conditions should create even slightest illusions that the so-called workers’ represen-~ tatives can act in behalf of workers, That in all cases, the called workers’ representatives the company union are the tools of examples. In the Tiltnois Steel mill in Gary, be- cause of the growing discontent of ‘he workers, the workers’ represen- tatives in the company union placed a demand of 331-3 per cent in- crease in wages before the company, not for the purpose of fighting for it, but for the purpose of showing (Continued on Page 6) starvation code} that the company union is taking | |Quoton, colored, militant labor | leader, at present employed in the | |C. W. A.; George Burrola, miner and | member of the subdistrict board of |X. M. U.; Harry Mavrogenis, mili- tant N. M. U. elader; Rodrigo Oriiz, | | Pete Sanchez and Oliver Leone com- | plete the list of workers who have been nominated on the basis of their undisputed militancy and devotion | By MARGUERITE YOUNG (Daily Worker Washington Bureau) Article I. WASHINGTON, March 13.—They are going to deck company-union- ism out in a nice, respectable dress —New Deal legality. They are go- ing to sprinkle several hundred representatives of “labor,” “consum- ers,” and “government,” including many U. 8S. Army officers, among the thousands of big business men who make up the N.R.A. Code Authorities, and turn oVer to this group a virtual dictatorship in American industrial life. These are among the most im- minent results of the “Congress of Industry” held this week under the auspices of the N.R.A. These and a new barrage of ballyhoo that will make the first seem like a Com- munity Chest campaign. As N.R.A. Administrator General | Hugh 8. Johnson put it to the 4,000 or so employers of 90 per cent of those slaving under N.R.A. codes, the meeting this week was just the| “first step.” The other steps now| | to the working class. I linois Steel C : Pa a i Steel Trust Says the N.R.A. Makes Company Union Permanent or ‘ 3 Supsidi wy To the taployser of Bowth Yorks, eS Y'the Pian of Ruployee Rapress ccs Saga a Goring & Tpre been propot Dy the Employees’ Rey up. embodying the suse aT hevines Plan hae been draw ing serations of tbe Bstional sith nage nen a eh a m-cottrolled U.S. Steel fon has deen in operation at this everal changes in the Plan fe result that angen, together Sitinois Steel Company $00 cHicase, nt, fo the Baployees of South Werks, TLiinost Steel Company: 1a L plante. Operation has been gener Fedeuary 26, 1934. Above are letters sent to Illinois Chicago telling them to meet the requirements of the N. R. A., to make the company union permanent, some changes will be made in the “em- Against this the Steel and Metal Workers | workers’ right to join genuine trade | ployee representation plan.” Union led the fight, demanding the unions. 'Gen. Johnson, 4,000 Bosses Discuss Co. Union Strategy conflicts were entirely among them-| selves, however, for as speaker af-| jter speaker declared publicly, the| used but not enough. Some of the| f the company union by the plac-| workers are wondering yet how they| are being worked out in the free- carpeted office here—worked out by Johnson and exactly twenty-four business men. It will not be such a difficult task, either, for they know right now just about what they're going to do, at least on the two vital points mentioned above. The central figure among them is Gerard Swope, president of J. P. Morgan's anti-union General Elec- tric Company —the ruthless little gray man who told reporters last night that they were discussing “something” to take the place of NRA. but that: “We are trying not to crystalize the plan now [at least not for public consumption.— M. Y.] because if we do we merely will have to upset it again.” I shall deal later with the pro- found threat this business Congress’ deeds hold out to all the opponents of war, of fascism and of mass pov- erty and with the contradictions and conflicts among themselves which the participants clearly evi- denced in their discussions. The dom and privacy of Johnson's deep- | of Rnployos Tepresentation fae) sure that it (ours very Steel Co. workers in Gary and South only basic opposition to them is the and the Communist Party, par- ticularly the Communist his final Hall. speech Criticism,” last week, made com- but at errors and omissions in what has been done under the codes.” “With minor exceptions of a po- | litical nature, there was practically |no criticism of the Recovery Act, |nor of the basic principles of the codes themselves’—and then John- son found it necessary to refer to, and distort the position of, the one exception—“except for the Commu- | nist, who invited me to join a move- | ment for the overthrow of (Continued on Page 6) dual force of militant labor unions | | Party. Johnson, the bombastic drillmaster of the N.R.A., made this clear in in Constitution He boasted that the critics who came to his “Field Day for plaints “not directed at the codes WILLIAM Z. FOSTER Leader of 1919 Steel against the trusts, now Seretary of Trade Union Unity League. Gary W whet ig Tells of Co. Union Stools a Worker Correspondent GARY, Ind.—Concerning the steel | workers, especially the transporta- by tion department of the Gary Steel! Co., and how last Thursday, March | Ist affected them. The bosses have | placed a couple of stools there, tell- | ing the workers how to vote on the company union. And not only that, but one of these stools gives out the ballot slips and the other one is hanging on the workers’ shoulders know what it means to them. how to vote and where to place their crosses. Mostly on the “yes” | question, But on top of all that, | the workers in general did not know | what they were voting for. Every | worker was given letters with in- | structions that the vote was to be | in changing the by-laws of the | company union. | Well, as a matter of fact, we, the | workers, lost out because the work- ers weren't aroused enough on that. Workers, we have issued special leaflet and quite a few were were defeated. Well, we, the mem- bers of the S. M. W. I. U. have | been agitating before election, dur- | ing election, and we will continue and file united fighting front. | thrown out. pany union. The 8. M. W. I. U. made a special appeal to the rest of the organizations to come with | us and form a united front. And | s all of you workers know, the A. |¥. of L. and the Amalgamated As- sociation which the same as the A. F. of L. is fighting against the workers’ rights of forming a united | front. We all know that the A. F. jof L. is the bosses’ right hand. | That’s why the S. M. W. I. U. is appealing to the workers of the A. the B0V-F. of L. to come with us and form) a united front through the form of rank and file. Strike | | interested to vote, for the majority! As for the representative, they| were working for weeks in advance, | | pursuing the men (and telling them) a| With a sticker to the workers call- | to agitate until we form a real rank| ‘his leaflet and took them into Now, in counting the votes 4,379|°f this leaflet, the company for yes and 3,469 no’s with 600) foreed to do away with all, And that shows the| ‘nse of a secret ballot and’ car-| bosses knew beforehand that work-| Tied through the voting in the 11-| ers weren't satisfied with the com-| NRA Fertilized Growth of Co. Unions with Aid of AFL Officials mpany Unions Morgan Steel Plant Vote in Gary Shows Rise of Bitter F ight iling” to come t the shop due to the fact that the balloting took Place on their day off Of the votes cast, 4,279 were cast for the “new” plan and 3,372 against it, which means for the old plan The 3.372 workers voting against the “De atized” plan were attempt- Stickers Demand Right To Join Genuine GARY, Ind., M s from the recent ballot te down the company t had the illusion that the does not “recognize” an and will therefore de- sf legal, The A. A. cultivated such dea among the workers, but after the leaflet issued by the Steel and Metal Workers Industrial Union were forced to take a more stand upon the question, even though they refused the proposal of the Steel and Metal Workers In- dustrial Uinon for a united front fight against th i The desire for 1 f the membership forced the A. A. lead- ILLINCIS STEEL WORKERS Vote Against Company Unionism! FOR REAL TRADE UNIONISM ‘The Emphoyde Representation Plan of Illinois Steel Company has been in exie- tence 9 months. In all this time, the COMPANY “Union” has done nothing for the workers. It hag been proven to remendou ti ers to the company union. The voting was to be w) ion of a “new” or * pa: union plan with the ballot: to be only “yes” and “no.” The |new features of the plan were de- ised by the company in order to workers have been ruggles for their im- | A vote cast for sey form of the com- | Pany union will be twisted to mean op- | Position to @ real union of workers. | | That is why Gleason, in hie letter of February 26th, states that this vote “will make # permanent and meet legal wirements.” The cor which 1 VOTE AGAINST All Forms of COMPANY UNIONISM I Stand for the Right of Workers to Join Genuing Leaflet and stickers distributed Trade Unions #8, while to steel workers by the Steel and — as Metal Workers Union in Gary piaiifte, exe com- 1) which aroused the workers in the | fight against the company union of the Morgan-controlied steei trust, ‘The company “union” is the begining ft Fasc 0 attempet to destroy all mili- mediate demands—going over the heads of the “representatives” | whom they have been rapidly losing all faith in. | The Steel and Metal Workers In- dustrial Union issued a leaflet along | ers to later take a stamd ef ab- Staining from voting. In the American Sheet & Tin Plate plant in Gary the company posted signs warning the workers against placing stickers upon the ballots. Workers in this plant were told by the company that they would be laid off if they “voted radical.” Although Illinois Steel claims a victory for the company union, even their own figures of 3,372 No’s; 1,700 abstemptions; 580 = sides gives a total of 6,652 votes all) clearly direc ait - corners of the shops. As a result | pany ‘ini fet cote tiace op ‘Gar Was) for the “democratized” pian. The pre~| Steel and Metal Workers Industrial Union plans an intensive campaign to follow up this fight against the company union. The A. F. of L. is petitioning the National Labor | Board for new elections, but the | Steel _and Metal Workers Indus- | trial Union is organizing the work- ers to organize their strength in | every department and by struggle for their demands win the recogni- tion of their own committees and Smash the company union, BETWEEN THE LINES OF A COMPANY UNION TALK | ing for the voting down of all forms | ing of a sticker upon the ballot) | which stated that the worker votes | |for the right to join a gennine| | trade union. | The workers responded well |linois Steel plant at open tables| ; With the election clerks watching | Qn, to frighten the workers from| | placing the stickers upon the bal- ot. | In spite of this the company is |forced to admit that 580 ballots | were voided,” “by improper mark- ing.” Another 1,7) workers re- |fused to vote—1,000 of them by | | By a Steel Worker Correspondent , But Langrebe did tell you he was | BIRMINGHAM, Ala—I watched! afraid of the rank and file, He jWwith much interest a group of 2,000 | called the rank and file Reds. He |Negro and white workers on Jan,|said their number was small, but Wagner Advises Bosses How Best to Use Co. Unions in Strikes ing new ones on the workers. This happened in Weirton Steel, in Budd, in Fords, in the U. 8. Steel subsidiaries, and in hundreds of By HARRY GANNES | The National Recovery Act stim- ulated 8 monstrous growth of com- pany unions, in the most powerful trusts, in steel, aluminum, auto, chemical, metal mining, the work- ers see before their very eyes that N.R.A. promises of “the right to organize” have become a shame- less travesty, The NR.A,, that is, the action of the Roosevelt regime, is mainly responsible for the tre- mendous poisonous spread of com- pany unions, Having achieved the objective of greater trustification, increased profits, higher prices, and lower wage levels, the biggest corporations The company unions were shackled on the workers to keep them from resisting the “benefits” of the N.R.A, According to the National In- dustrial Conference Board, company unions under the N.R.A. increased 169 per cent. A survey made by this bosses’ organization shows the N.R.A. scored heavily against the workers in the matter of organi- zation. Every strike broken by the Na- tional Labor Board, thanks to the help of Bill Green, John L. Lewis, Sidney Hillman and George Berry, either resulted in strengthening wanted to insure these advantages. | other plants, But the workers are going into battle against the company unions. This is shown in the rising strike wave particularly in the industries with the most powerful company unions. At this point, the N.R.A. and the National Labor Board steps in again. They want to drive a new) wedge between the workers and their fight against the company unions. General Johnson openly offers Green, Lewis & Co. to the bosses in place of their Franken- stein company unions. “Their in- terests are your interests,” he tells the bosses. Senator Wagner prepares a new bill for the National Labor Board. He waves it in front of the workers with new promises of “curtailing” company unions. President Roose- velt “revises” the National Labor Board by adding more corporation Officials that have the strongest company unions in their plants. Gerard Swope, president of the Morgan General Electric Co—com- pany union advocate—is put on the Board. Clay Williams, of the Reynolds Tobacco Co, with its company union, is added to the board to “fight com- pany unions.” manufacturer, standing advocates of the company unions, is chairman of the N.R.A. Advisory Board, Walter Teagle, another member of the National Labor Board, and ‘ACING the worst strike “epidemic” in the history of the country, as General Johnson puts it, the bosses discuss ways of smashing the strike wave. The U. S. Steel Corporation subsidiaries strengthen their com- pany unions. They do this by a fake referendum announced as “complying with the N-R.A.,” to the existing company union or foist- make the company unions “per- manent.” Senator Wagner and General Johnson, speaking for Pre- sident Roosevelt, are completely in harmony with the main objective of the bosses—that is, stopping the strike wave and keeping the work- ers tied down to the coolie wage standards. But they think some of the bosses are too mechanical and blunt and are heading for a head-! on collision of the workers against | the company unions, | Seator Wagner writes his views) for the New York Times (Sunday, March 11), He clearly outlines the tasks of stopping strikes. “As a matter of fact,” he says, “the company union cannot sus- tain even the claim that it tends to insure industrial peace. . . . It has been my observation that industrial strife is most violent when company unionism enters into the situation, and that the company union lune of organization is least likely to bring forth the restraint of irresponsible employes by others of their own group.” Here it is in a nutshell. Senator Wagner wants to revise the Na- tional Labor Board to help improve the company unions so that it can stop “industrial strife.” He tells the bosses that the new set up of the National Labor Board, with its phrases supposed to be di- rected against the company unions, Ag company unions, for their disciplining the saying: What he warns the bosses against is their tendency to rely solely on their company unions to keep back the workers’ struggles. In diplo- matic language he urges them to| make use of the A. F. of L. official- dom, who are more flexible in breaking strikes. General Johnson made no bones about the whole matter. He put it bluntly: 2 “I would rather deal with Bill Green, John Lewis, Ed McGrady, | Mike MacDonough, George Berry, | and a host of others I could name than with any Frankenstein that you may build up under the guise of a company union. In fact— take it from me and a wealth of experience — THEIR INTERESTS are YOUR INTERESTS... .” In short, the interests of Green & Co. are the interests of the com- pany union corporations who want to smash strikes and keep the work- ers from upsetting the N.R.A. apple- cart. One reason for this is that in| many plants where company unions exist the workers have already or- ganized into their own unions, and in many instances they are A. F. of L. unions. This is true of the Budd auto body workers, where 2,000 voted for the A. F, of L., though they got a company union instead. It is true in Weirton and in the U. S. Steel Corporation subsidiaries. Besides, there are locals of the Auto Workers’ Union and the Steel and Metal Workers’ Industrial Union that are leading the fight against the company union, with advancing strides. The bosses will not budge on their company unions. They are, how- ever, making them more flexible, fully complying with N. R. A. re- quirements. They are maneuvering with the A. F. of L. officialdom in view of impending struggles against the company unions, e eprpae isvie: AT its last Executive Council, the A. F. of L. already discussed its strategy on company unions, laying down a policy that is quite accept- able to the bosses. General John- son knew what he was talking about. Matthew Woll, fascist agent and Woll and Dubinsky Map| AFL Policy Favorable | (U. 8. Steel) officials, Gregg and| Langrebe, of the love, the faith and | esteem under which the company | held them. The purpose of to Company Union | the meeting was to force us to ac- | } | Workers, who made the report re- | garding company unions and on “industrial unions.” “Employers have taken full ad- vantage of this situation [Sec- tion 7-a of the N.R.A.].” declares Woll’s report, which is signed, among others by the Socialist, David Dubinsky, “in the organ- izing and maintaining of com- pany unions.” In this situation, the A. F. of L, | Executive Council adopted a flex- ible policy designed to mect the | wishes of General Johnson, Mellon. | du Pont, Swope, Morgan, Teagle or | any of their ilk. | _ They declared: “The A, F. of L. [read leadership] must take com mand... in whatever form the temporary situation may demand or require. look to the Executive Council of the A. F. of L. to serve in this capacity as never heretofore.” The workers face not only the danger of company unions and the new se‘-up of the strikebreaking National Labor Board with its | stronger company union directors, | but the greater treachery of the A. |P. of L. officialdom who are openly boosted as the best instruments for keeping the workers from striking Now that the workers are enter- ing into the sharpest battles against the company unions in auto, taxi, aluminum and steel the Communist Party must take the lead in the struvsles. Some fine work is being done in Gary and Sou‘h Chicazo. There every move of the comnany union {s being followed and ex- Posed, and a united front of all workers (A. F. of L., S. M. W. I, U. and unorganized) is being forged for a powerful fight against the company union. The workers are ready for the struggle. That acounts for the fran- tic efforts of General Johnson and |@ moment in becoming the real van- basis.” | bitterest enemy of the militant | guard in this figh® + .. After all we must | or wrecking the company unions. | |cept the company union. j The first speaker, Vice-President Langtebe, said he had worked emong the workers for 20 years, |favoring the men in every respect, and he must say the men should now return his many favors. The second speaker, President Gregg, after reading the draw up of the company union, said: “Men, jdo you see anything wrong with that? Your commi‘tees who hat signed this company make-up are in | many cases A. F. of L. mem Whenever your committee cannot | |handle your propositions satisfac- | torily, then you can enter my office | j With same, providing you go at it} in the correct way.” | He explained how well he loved jeach and every big, healthy, | working steel worker. How he wi the future come down through |the plant and even take up some | }of his valuable time to have some} |few seconds’ visit with each em- | | ploye. This sounds like velvet to some | workers, but what Grogg’s speech really means to any-rank and file worker is: “Men, the company of- ficials wrote this code. Many of the committee who represent you be- long to the A. F. of L. But ther |are not the rank and file kind.” Again, when he spoke of the | healthy steel workers he said noth- ing of the half-starved, ragged, Red Cross-fed youngsters of such | steel workers, who for the past five | years looked to the coming of the} Red Cross pity slips ten to cne more than they did to Gregg slips. | What They Did Not Say | Gregg and Langrebe did not say | to the workers: “We love you so} well that we will not stock any more | coal alongside the Ore Scales to use | | while we starve you and your kids when you strike.” They did not say: “Men, we think you not only healthy, strong steel | workers, but men capable of organ- Th was none other than Senator Wagner. We cannot waste | izing as we, the company, has, and |e. the company, will do all in our} power to help you.” ‘ |26 as they were told by the T. C. I.| he was afraid of them, Now just why is he so particular in talking about the rank and file and saying nothing about the A. F. of L. except where the committee is concerned. Langrebe knows what a rank and file worker is, and should have explained that he is afraid of any militant, straight- thinking, labor-studying and talk- ing man who is not afraid to come forward for love of his kids, his fellow-workers and country, to use free speech and struggle, in or out of his A. F. of L. union lodge, to kick out the high-paid parasites who have worked in harness with men like Langrebe. Workers, get into your respective labor organizations at once. Organ- ize to save the birthright of your kids. Make of yourselves leaders, Come forward—use your mouth. Struggle for your rights. DR. JULIUS LITTINSKY 107 BRISTOL STREET Bet. Pitkin and Sutter Aves,, Brooklyn PHONE: DICKENS 2-3012 Office Hours: 8-10 A.M., 1-2, 6-3 P.M 1378 ST.NICHOLAS AVE * 1690 LEXINGTON AVE. at.i79” 5 at 1064 ST.NY gl WORKERS COOPERATIVE COLONY 2700-2800 BRONX PARK EAST has reduced the rent, several good apartments available, Cultural Activities for Adults, Youth and Children. Telephone: Trains. Estabrook 8-1400—8-1401 Stop at Allerton Ave. station Office open daily from § a.m. to & p.m. Direction: “Lexington Ave. White Plains Friday and Saturday # a.m. to § p.m. Sunday 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.