The Daily Worker Newspaper, January 30, 1929, Page 3

CAPITALIST STABILIZATION, CLASS STRUGGLES __DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 1929 Page Three THE PROLETARIAT, AND THE C. P. OF GERMANY Speech of Comrade Stalin at Meeti Comrades, in view of the fact that ymrade Molotov has already ex- ained the point of view of the legation of the Communist Party the Soviet Union, I have only a) w remarks to make. I want to ach lightly upon three points that me out in the course of the debate. ese points are—the problem of pitalist stabilization; the problem the proletarian class struggles at arise in connection with the ecariousness of stabilization; and e problem of the Communist Party Germany. It is with regret that I have to Party of Germany was discussed. I think that very speech represents the ideological foundation of the po- sition the minority of the Presidium of the E. C. C. I. took up at that meeting. I think therefore, that the speech on the question of principles that Comrade Humbert-Droz deliv- ered at the meeting of the Politsec- retariat of the E. C. C. I. must not be ignored. I said that Comrades Humbert- Droz and Serra have fallen into the mire of pusillanimous opportunism What does that mean? It means that in addition to avowed opportun- the struggle of the working class, its spontaneous clashes with the capitalists, are in the main of a de-| |fensive character, that the leader- ship of the Communist Party in this struggle must be exercized merely within the limits of the existing reformist unions. Is that conclu- sion right? No, it is not. To maintain this means to drag at the tail of events. Comrade Humbert-Droz forgets that the struggle of the workling class is now proceeding on the basis of a precarious stabilization, that the tionary movement. It often hap-| pened in Russia that the masses were more revolutionary than some of their Communist leaders. Every Russian Bolshevik knows this per- fectly well. This is exactly why Lenin said that it was not only neces- sary to teach the masses, but also to learn from them. These facts must not surprise us. We should) rather be surprised at the fact that Comrade Humbert-Droz does not un- derstand these simple things that occur in the sphere of Bolshevik re- The “state of affairs” in which the Rights poison the atmosphere with social democratic ideological rubbish and systematically violate the ele- mentary principles of Party discip- line, while the conciliators carry grist to the mill of the Rights must no longer be tolerated, for to do so would mean to turn against the Co- mintern and to violate the ele- mentary demands of Leninism. <A | situation has arisen similar to that which.we had in the C. P. S. U. (if not worse) in the last phase of the ng of E. C. CI. Presi |the history of the Russian revolu-jhas reached the limit of toleration.} Droz and Serra forget this thesis in the resolution of the VI. Congress of the Comintern. It is very strange that all conciliators, those who re- gard themselves as conciliators as well as those who shun that name, tematically forget this important thesis in their reference to the reso- lution of the VI. Congress of the Communist International. a general tightening up of iron dis- cipline in the German Party, we get facts of deliberate violation ipline, by the Rights and pa: dium Dec. What are we to do if, instead of + a9 the|tors. And this is called a “logical conclusi I hope Comrade Serra will excuse me if I say that his arguments remind me of a provin- cial lawyer trying to prove that black is white. His line of argu- ment is prec y what we call a lawyer’s de: of opportunist ele- ments. Comrade Serra proposes to reo! ganize the Politbureau of the C of the C. P. G., e. g. to remove some members and to replace them by others... Why does not Comrade Serra say clearly and frankly who these stitutes should be? | shevi which struggles took form of direct civil war against the Mensheviks whien lasted for al vee Do not forget that vember, 1917, we Bolsheviks over- threw the Mensheviks and S. R.’s as the Left wing of the counter-revolu- | tionary imperialist bourgeoisie, That, hy the way, explains the strong tra- ditions of hostility to avowed oppor- } nism in the C. P. U., traditions at are not found in any other Com- ist Party in the world. It is icient to recall the fact that the Party workers in Moscow in a period of not more than two months, nc velfalleninto the mire at pisil: {features That Je Niaratly the op. quently are in the nature of coun- The same may be said of Com- the Party and the Comintern were Can such a situation be tolerated any Con Gece ryan aehioicat ie resell? Bat the VI. ia side eae niinous® epporcaninnit vt te te ei 1S Drecisely the oP- | ter-attacks; a counter-offensive to Tade Serra. He does not approve of /compelled to drive the Trotskyists longer? p : ticle Percents Seite See ere a ea ree ism. ‘ue portunism of conciliation with the the German Communists acting out-|out of their ranks, Everyone rea-| What are we to do if, instead of *'S to be able to underst pose that the conciliators be re- at, so far Comrade Humbert Droz Right deviation. Conciliation is pusil- the capitalist offensive and a direct offensive against the capitalists ide the existing unions and of their lizes this now. But Comrades absolute subordination of the minor y to- | hak trong the traditions of ted. On the contra it in- that, m as we the Presidium of the E. C. C, I. on es eee only, on totes pesca saucer Soeur re ones | Comrade Humbert-Droz sees nothing having broken down those limits in| Humbert-Droz and Serra do not see/ organizations, the trade union frac- peel Es Gh) a ee Os Gace b aincton GMO ne cel EEE hee conadeahave #nic new, 1H themreren’ atrtggles’ of: the | Me, rugele on orgamize the locks |G op pretend they. do not ses it. So| tions) and the Party (press to the/ (ti. German Party? oS | peeciely, Aecauee ERLE Snel Inte beat HTM Leet A He MeL’ tea eae ta eaisecce wustii a nagen | MOTemee class GEE: ignbres\Sxyahi) Cur Matalaworken | HO megese8) SNe) much: the. worad) for them. This) Central) Committee, we get in the)” a tably you will agres with me failed Co. ¢airy: out-thie: anerarine Li Secreta oor Ge Beh Ged S| facts as the general strike in Lodz; | #8 @ Violation of the resolution of | means that they are ready to sup-| Communist Party of Germany cry- ach so sie A me ee 8 INSLrUCUOR, which the question of the Rights d conciliators in the Communist opportunism. Permit me to demonstrate this by la few facts. 1. The Problem of Capitalist Stabilization. The Comintern proceeds from the; into the opportunist conception of| ers’ lockout in Germany, etc, ete. sumption that present day capital- stabilization is a temporary, ansient, precarious decaying sort stabilization that will break up ore and more as the capitalist isis develops. This does not in @ least contradict the generally 1own fact about the growth of pitalist technique and rationaliza- | stabilization. | That is how the matter stands in | regard to the formal side of the | question. Let us now examine the material aspect of the question. If present-day stabilization cannot be described as precarious, decaying or transient, what kind of a stabiliza- tion is it then? The only thing that the strikes for an improvement in conditions of labor in France, Czechoslovakia and Germany, the powerful mobilization of the proleta- rian forces during the metal work- What do these and similar facts signify? They signify that in capi- | talist countries, the conditions pre- | cedent to a fresh revival of the la-| bor movement are maturing. This is the new element that Comrades Humbert-Droz and Serra fail to see, and which, of course, comrades who are in the habit of looking behind} | instructed the Communists to work the IV. Congress of the R, I. L. U. He maintains that the R. I. L. U. only within the unions. This is non-| sense, comrades! The R, I. L. U.! has not suggested anything of the sort. (Lozovsky: Hear, hear!) To say this means to doom the Communist Party to the role of a mere passive spectator in the class struggles of the proletariat. To maintain this means to bury the / cision of the VI. Congress does not} idea of the leading role of the Com-| munist Party in the labor | port both the Rights and the con- ciliators even at the risk of utterly \ disintegrating the Communist Party of Germany. In arguing against the expulsion of the Rights, Comrades Humbert- Droz and Serra refer to the deci- sion of the VI. Congress about com- bating the Right tendencies by ideo- logical means. Yes, the VI. Con- gress did pass such a decision. But these comrades forget that the de- say that the struggle of the Com- move-|munist Parties against the Right} ing facts of the gross violation of this demand of the VI. Congress of the Comintern by the Rights and partly also by some of the concili- ators? Can such a situation be tol- erated any longer? | You know the conditions of ac- ceptance to the Comintern adopted at the II, Congress. I have in mind the 21 conditio Point 1 in those conditions lays it down that: | “the periodical and non-periodical press and all Party publishing of- fices must be completely subor- dinated to the Central Committee y regret it, Oct. 6, 1928, i. e., after the VI. Con- gres passed the well known decision on the Rights and the conciliators. Comrade Serra wants to pose as the sole interpreter of the decisions of the VI. Congress. He has not by yy means proved his claim to this. ne interpreter of the decisions of the VI. Congress is the Executive Committee of the Comintern and its Presidium. I observe that Comrade Serra does not agree with the de- cision of the Presidium of the E. C. C. I. of Oct. 6, although he has not stated So much the we cannot say i More than that, we cannot deny t the Cc Party of Germany has not ye a long way freed itself from it cial dem ie traditions which fos- ter the Right danger in the C P. G. Or you will say perhaps that the stipulations of the II. Congress of | 1 the Cominterh are not binding on | the hts? s Humbert-Droz and Ser- against alleged violation isions of the Communist International. In the Rights we have real (and not alleged) violators : | : ° : ; ‘ ; : ; so frankly, m. Indeed, it is on the basis of| can be said about it then is that it| instead of ahe: : ae ment. It is the merit of the German | danger must be confined to measures| of the Party, irrespective as to i : 10 y- f 7 nets a : s ad, can never see. * | : 5 zi : 2 of the fundamental principles of worse for him. is very growth of capitalist tech- is durable, or at all events, that it What does looking behind instead oe | oe by Pi ceneate Buon ocanel se Harahan aaa ela PHA cen aot whole at | the Communist International. Why| What is the conclusion? There que and rationalization that the is becoming more durable. But if| ahead mean? It means dragging at eee EA ee Naga aes hey do they remain silent? Is it not is but one conclusion—the attitude ternal unsoundness and decay of | capitalist stabilization is becoming | the tail of events; it means failing union limits”, that they broke thru | measures for combating deviations You know that the Right faction because they, while ostensibly de-| of Comrades Humbert-Droz and abilization is developing. more durable, what is the use of ki yee | those limits and organized the strug-| from the Leninist line by ideological! has two newspapers. You know). 7. i Ria brnadlay er piap sce aol ret S s bs 3 speech at the Politsecretariat of | C@Pitalism becoming more acute and jyoans that the Communis' Parties | Jy. 9h Pe ere Gee cane punter in its resolution on Com-| to submit to the Central Committee |) hye these decisions revised? jnvver'a ‘defence. of Lis Riek e E. C. C. 1.? He flatly denied that abilization was precarious and ansient. He bluntly stated in his eech that “the VI. World Congress fact condemned the loose and neral description of stabilization :—decaying, shaky, etc., stabiliza- on.” He bluntly declared that the weieht etalk he : as - - . at all. He di s the extremely! agains 2 Rig! r, esis of the VI. Congress regarding |i8 @ two-sided process— 1) the of 1923, must stimulate the thoughts does not at all follow that because | minor organizations, as well as all prevail.” You know that the Rights ae etic p acai pay agate pie eda tho At e Third Period does not say a word | towth of capitalism in some coun- i iE ‘ Contra and ou upon we must work in the reformist| the other Party organizations | in the German Party refuse to recog-| beau of the C. C. of the German’ mentary ie fe ian ine ae M adie Period z " i she advance; they mus s A : % : 5 - : seere ce ne i ea 2 C. C. 2 Germa entary understanding Marxis rout stabilization being precarious. tries, and 2) the decay of capital- em to advance: 'y prepare | unions if they are really mass or-| (parliamentary fractions, trade | nize any kind of discipline, iron or «must pe ereoreenieeal an Comrade Humbert-Droz conten- mm be regarded as correct? No it nnot; because the VI. Congress the Comintern said the very op- »site to what Comrade Humbert- roz said in his speech. In the para- ‘aph on the Third Period, the VI. ongress of the Comintern stated: “This period (i. e., the third eriod. J. S.) will inevitably lead —through the further develop- rent of the contradictions of cap- talist stabilization—to capitalist tabilization becoming still more orecarious and to the ‘severe ntensification of the general crisis of capitalism.” Did you hear that?—‘capitalist | between two gigantic imperialisms, | about abilization becoming more precari-|the U. S. A. and Great Britain, each The unions ar It; of which is seeking to draw all other | cratic reformists who have com- 1s.” What does that mean? eans that stabilization is already ‘ecarious and transient, that it will seome still more precarious as a ‘sult of the conditions prevailing|and achievements in the spheres of | gan the Third Period. ‘And Comrade! construction, economics, in culture’ lutionary than the umbert-Droz has the effrontery to/ and politics. The very existence of it be otherw teer at everybody, including the erman Party, who says that stabili- \profound? Obviously, this leaves no room for the accentuation of the capitalist crisis. It is not clear, that | Comrade Humbert-Droz has got him-)| | self entangled in his own contradic- tions ? To proceed, Lenin said that capi- talist development under imperialism ism in other countries. Is this thesis correct? If it is correct, then ob- viously capitalist stabilization can be nothing else, but decaying stabili- | zation. Finally, I want to say a few words | about a number of facts that are} well-known to you all. For example, the desperate struggle the imperial-| ist groups are carrying on among |themselves for markets and for! |spheres for the export of capital. | There is the frantie growth of arma-} {ments in the capitalist countries; |the establishment of new military jalliances and obvious preparations | ‘for new imperialist wars. There is |the sharpening of the contradictions states into its respective orbit. | Finally, there is the very exis-| !tence of the Soviet Union; its growth | ;the Soviet Union, quite apart from |its growth, shatters and undermines must abandon the leadership in the labor movement. This is exactly the point on which the leaders of the German Party came to grief in the revolutionary period of 1923. Therefore, those who do not wish to repeat the mistakes the masses for the impending bat- tles, must take all measures to pre- vent the Communist Parties from dragging at the tail of events and the working class from being caught unawares. It is very strange that Comrades Humbert-Droz and Serra forget these things. During the Ruhr struggles, - the German Communists asserted that the unorganized workers were more revolutionary than the organized Humbert-Droz waxes indignant over | this, and declares that this is im- possible. That is queer! Why is it impossible? There are about 1,000,- 000 workers in the Ruhr. Only 200,000 of these are organized. mions are led by the bureau- pletely merged with the capitalist class. It is surprising that the umnor- zed workers proved more revo- organized? Could e? I could relate to you more “surprising” facts from) 3. The Problem of the Com ist leaders are merging with capital- Congress of the C. I. and the IV.) | Congress of the R. I, L. U.) and the munists that they sought and found new forms of struggle and of or- ganizing the unorganized workers. Perhaps, in doing so they made some minor mistakes. | But new things are never ac- complished without mistakes. It| ganizations, therefore we must con-| fine our mass work to work in the} reformist unions, that we must be-} come slaves to the rules and regula- | tions of those unions. If the reform- ism (see the resolutions of the VI. working class is waging a struggle’ against capitalism, how can it be} maintained that the working class struggle led by the Communist} Party can be carried on without, to| a certain extent, breaking through the limits of the existing reform- ist unions? Obviously, it cannot be maintained without dropping into opportunism. We can quite easily | conceive of a situation in which it} may be necessary to ercate parallel mass working class unions against the will of the trade union bureau- crats who have sold themselves to) the capitalists. We have such a situ-| ation in the United Stites. It is| quite possible for a similar situation | to arise in Germany. | munist Party of Germany. rade Bukharin’s report declared that: “This does not imply that dis- cipline is to be relaxed; on the contrary, it implies the general tightening up of iron internal dis- cipline, the absolute subordination of the minority to the majority, the absolute subordination of the union fractions, the press, ete) to the leading Party centres.” Strange that Comrades Humbert- of the Communist Party of Germany. | The question is: can such an outrage be tolerated any longer? Point 12 of the 21 conditions stipu- lates that the Party must be “or- ganized in the most centralized fashion,” that “iron discipline bor- dering on military discipline must any other, except their own factional discipline. The question is: can such |an outrage be tolerated any longer? 4, The Rights in the C. P. G. and in the C. P. S. U. I learned. today. from several speeches delivered here that some German conciliators refer to the speech I delivered at the November Plenum of the C, C. of the C. P. S. U. on the question of the methods | of combating the Right elements as a justification of their position. As you know I said in my speech (it has been published) that in the pres- ent phase of development of the Right danger in the C. P. S. U., the principal method to be applied is that of an ideological struggle, which however does not preclude the application of organizational measures in individual cases. 1 sub- \stantiated my thesis by saying that the Rights in the C. P. S. U. have not yet become crystallized, that they do not constitute a group or a faction and have not yet violated, or failed to carry out, any of the decisions of the C. P. S. U. I said | they do not intend to do so? I think that anything sillier than this would | be difficult to find. Only those who have abandoned dialectical thinking can fail to understand the full depth of the difference that exists between the position of the Rights in the Cc. P. S. U. and the position ef the Rights in the C. P. G, After all, the Rights in the C. P. S. U. are not a faction and it is an incontrovertible fact that they loy- ally carry out the decisions of the C. C, of the C. P. S. U. The Ger- man Rights, on the contrary, al- ready have a faction, with a fac- tional center at its head, and sys- tematically trample under foot the decisions of the C. C. of the C. P. G. Is it not clear that the metheds of combating the Rights at the present moment cannot be the same in these two Parties? Furthermore, kere in the U. Ss. The statement Comrade Ser made is particularly interesting. He swears by his faith that he is against the Rights, against the con- ciliators, ete. But what conclusions does he draw from that? To fight the Rights and the conciliators? Not Cow These then are the conditions in iermany and the conditions in the S.S. R. The conditions are dif+ nt in each case and necessitate different methods of C. P. G. and against the Party Try and think this out: the Politburea of the C. C. of the C, P. G. is wag- ing a determined struggle against |the Right danger and the vacill tions of the conciliators; Comrade | Serra is in favor of combating the} moved to extend the application of Rights and the conciliators; there: | the fundamental points of the reso- fore, Comrade Serra prop that | lution to the other sections of the the Rights and the conciliators be| Comintern, including the German not interfered with, that the strug-| section. We rejected that motion, gle against the Rights and con-| and declared that the conditions of ciliators be slackened and that the} the struggle against the Right dan- composition of the Politbureau,, of| ger in the C. P. G. were cardinally the C. C. of the C. P. G. be changed | different from the conditions of the to suit the wishes of the concilia-| struggle in the C. P. S. U. 5. The Drafft of the Open Letter. draft|cause we want to explain to the com-, workers the nature of the Right ten- dency, to expose to them the real features of Brandler and Thalheim- er, what they were in the past and what they are now, to show to the rkers how long the Comintern nd the C. P. S. U. had spared them in the hope that they would mend ean fail to understand this simple fact. In the Commission of the Novem- ber Plenum of the C, C. of the C. P. S. U. charged with the drafting of the resolution, a group of comrades Two words concerning the resolutions submitted by the missions of the E. C. C. I. Comrade Serra thinks that these draft reso- lutions are provincial in character Why? the draft of the Open Letter does not contain an analysis of the political Beea use, it appears, w situation that gave rise to the Right ition is a precarious and decaying | the foundations of world capitalism. Ithat if the Rights will resort to fac-|R. we have not a social democ danger. This is ridiculous, com-| their ways, to show how long they abilization, who says that the pres-| How can Marxians, Leninists, Com-| , the Communist Party of Ger- own press and which day in and day| tional fighting and will commence |as an organized and serious force "Ades. We have such an analysis in have been tolerated in the ranks of it struggle of the working class|munists maintain, after this, that’ many to be or not to be an organized cut violates Party discipline. See-/ to violate the decisions of the C. C. tc foster and stimulate the Right | the resolutions of the VI. Con the Communists and why such peo- \dermines and disintegrates capital-| capitalist stabilization is not a pre-|anq consolidated organization with ondly, there is the conciliatory of the C. P. S. U., they will be |danger in the C. P. S. U. In Ger-|Is it necessary to repeat it? 1 ple can no longer be tolerated in t stabilization. Who is Comrade umbert-Droz sneering at? Obvi- isly he is sneering at the decisions * the VI. Congress. It follows therefore, that Comrade umbert-Droz, while ostensibly de- nding the decisions of the VI. Con- ress of the Comintern, is actually svising them, and is thus sliding 2. The Problem of the Proletarian Class Struggles. Comrade Humbert-Droz also goes rong on the question of the char- ster and significance of the class stuggles of the proletariat in capi- Tiotskyites Forge Signatures to counter-Revolution Resolution 3 (Wireless By “Inprecorr”) | October, is expected to be the next) BROOKLYN, N. Y. WE HELP CHILDREN IN THEIR |) nection with the publication last That Minneapolis Trotskyites do|- With the repudiation from Com- ‘OW (By Mail).—In Harbin, | Fi | SCHOOL HOME WORK or laratgh LPM ot stop at forgery in their desire|rades Axel and Helen Hedlund, who | MOSCOW (By Mai eedbaengibker ne san SE Se Ra | crmemrerone reso naar a |] 301 LIVINGSTON Sr, B'KLYN week of “Hell’s Bells,” flippant ) show a big front to the rest of je country is shown by a letter re- rived today by Comrade Devine, istrict organizer of District No. 9. Writing from the country where rey went some months ago to take p farming, Comrades Axel and jearious and decaying stabilization, that it is not, year after year and day after day being shattered by| the very process of development? | Do Comrade Humbert-Droz and iron discipline—that is the question, comrades? It is not merely a ques- tion of Rights or conciliators that is at stake, but the very existence of the Communist Party of Germany. Serra realize he Bakes they have got | The Communist Party of Germany into? The principal mistakes ne exists. But inside the Communist | rades Humbert-Droz and Serra make party of Germany there are two| arise from this one mistake. forces which are disintegrating the| Party from within and are endanger- | ‘ |ing its very existence. First, there talist countries. The conclusion to/|is the Right faction, which is or- be drawn from Comrade Humbert- | ganizing a new anti-Leninist “Party Droz’ speech delivered at the meet-| within the Communist Party, with ing of the Politsecretariat is that|its own Central Committee and its Manchurian Police | Suppress Soviet — Paper in Harbin in Manchuria, the Soviet newspaper | “Molva” has been suppressed for | publishing a feuilleton dealing with | the condition of King George V of England. The reaction in Harbin has inten- | sified recently. The police have is- charge forgery. against the Trotsky- | ites, it is expected the other signa- tories who were not present will) show up at the district office with the same complaints. It is confidently expected that the DEC will immediately reinstate the group, which, by its vacillations, | strengthens the Right faction. | There is no need for me to prove here that the Right faction is break- ing with Leninism and is waging) a desperate struggle against the Co- mintern. That has been proved long ago. Nor is there any need for me to prove that the conciliatory group | violates the known decision of the | VI. Congress concerning the syste- | matie struggle against the concili- ators. That has also been proved al- ready. | The situation in the German Party GRAIN DEALER TAKES STAND.} NASHVILLE, Tenn., Jan. 29 (U.P). —Walter L. Liggett, wealthy grain | dealer, who is on trial for the mur-| ler of Turney M. Cunningham last | details of his alleged illicit affec- | tion for Cunningham’s wife. | Earl Kiger, a private detective | who said he had been hired by Cun-| ningham to trail Liggett and Mrs. | Cunningham, occupied the stand to- treated in the same way as the Trotskyists were treated in 1927. This, I think, is clear. Is it not silly after this to refer to my speech as an argument in fa- many, on the contrary, there is side {by side with the Communist Party {a more powerful and a fairly well organized social democratic party which fosters the Right danger in |vor of the Rights in Germany, |the Communist Party of Germany where they have already commenced | and which utilizes that danger as to employ factional methods of an objective channel through which struggle and where they system-|to permeate our Party. Only the atically violate the decisions of the |hlind can fail to see the difference C, C. of the C. P. G., or as an argu- | befween the situation in the U. S. ment in favor of the conciliators in |S, R. and that in Germany. A issociated themselves from the jand became consolidated in des- Right faction and where, it seems, |perate struggles against the Men- wermany, where they have not yet | One more point. Our Party grew | think there is no need for repeti-| the oie es ie eis That hitone os eeo men as so eonia | is Why the draft resolution is longer tion. Properly speaking, we could/ than might have been at first ex- eee |limit ourselves to a short resolution | pected, Comrade }on the Rights who systematically | violate the decisions of the VI. Con- | gress, and who, therefore, are liable to expulsion, and on the conciliators | who refrain from combating the | Rights and therefore deserve a ser- | ious warning. Molotov has already stated that the delegation of the Cc. P. S. U. is fully and whole- heartedly in favor of these draft resolutions. I can but repeat Com- rade Molotov’s statement. I would like to make only a few minor amendments, | The reason we did not limit our- wants aid Mrs ete [selves to a short resolution is be-| sidium.) tas? Phone: DICkens 1096. Blue Bird Studio “Photos of the better kind.” 1598 PITKIN AVE., Cor. Amboy St. English, Spelling Grammar, Litera- ture, History, Arithmetic, Algebra taught to beginners and advanced pupils at your home or institute. | TRIANGLE 0509, Automobile INSTRUCTION TAUGHT. Complete Course $10, until license granted; also private and special Instruction to Ladies Elementary — Intermediate Advanced—Private or Group BENIKOFF SCHOOL 337 GRAND STREET, N. Y. AUTO 845 ‘Educational Institute TO REINSTATE STUDENTS. LOS ANGELES, Jan. 29 (U.P). Reinstatement of four of the 13 men suspended from the University of California at Los Angeles in con- school publication, will be asked by |the student governing body today. |“Hell’s Bells” ridiculed faculty rul-| jings, the athletic administration, | |an dleading individuals and organ-} \izations of the campus, | struggle § sued an order providing for a-sharP- | day telling of his witnessing the ened police control at concerts and | shooting of his employer by Liggett | other meetings attended by Soviet |in an alley at the rear of the Cun- tnd det deter ten Empire SCHOOL jeted INTervale 10019 (Cor. Prospect Sta.) {elen Hedlund say: comrades mentioned. _ “We learn from you that we were) 6 The modern laborer, on the con- | xpelled from the Party because we jad our signatures on a resolution ‘oncerning Trotskyism. We claim his to be untrue; we have always een true to the Party, and have jothing to do with the Trotsky troup or have any intention of be- ‘ag with them so kindly give us our undivided attention if we can reinstated.” The resolution referred to was “resented to the Minneapolis mem- ership meeting on Nov. 18th over eeting) and called for the reinstate- Imany of whom were not at the eetin) and called for the reinstate- j Ind all other expelled members and a fight against the bureaucratic e of the Comintern and the '‘Lovestone to Write, ‘Series of Articles on}! ConventionDiscussion | In « few days the Daily Worker will publish on this page the first ‘of a series of articles by Jay! | iLovestone, executive secretary of the Workers (Communist) |Party, on the issues before \the Party in the pre-convention ‘discussion, entitled, “The Devel- jepment and Growth of Our Party and the Problems and Tasks Be- fore Us.” » Christian soctalinm tx but the holy water with which the priest con- citizens. Meetings of all kinds, in. cluding meetings to deal with sapi- | tary questions, are practically pro- | hibited. Even theatrical perform- ances which deal with present-day life have beer suppressed. All per- | formances in Yiddish have been pro- hibited by the police, irrespective of the pieces intended to be performed. JERSEY MAIL ROBBERY. | ELIZABETH, N. J., Jan. 29 (U.P). | —Assistant Prosecutor | Walsh in the trial here of the four /men charged with murder in con- ‘nection with the Elizabeth mail rob- ‘bery killings asked for and was granted severance of indictment as te Canice Neary and William Fan- necrates the heartburnings of the eee teere tat Marx (Communist ning, and to try Benjamin Haas and Frank Kiekart later. a John D.| | ningham home. Eron School JOSEPH E. ERON, Principal THE LARGEST AND BEST, AS WELL AS OLDEST SCHOOL to learn the English Language; to prepare oneself for admission to college, BRON SCHOOL ts registered by the REGENTS of the State of New York. It has all the rights of a Government High School. Call, Phone or Write for trary, instead of rising with the progress of industry, sinks deeper The proletariat of ench country munist, of course, first of all settle matters with its own bourgeoisie— Karl Marx (Comunist Manifesto) YA OPEN DAILY from 9 a. m9 p.m <li His: be of existence of his own class—Karl Marx (Communist Manifesto) | iti ‘atl, a lh Bl mechanics WA : myer iM) NE Catalogue! NEW COURSES BEGIN JAN. 28th REGISTER NOW! Our 25,000 alumni are our best witnesses, TELEPHONE: ORCHARD 4473. Our glasses are fitted by expert (Formerly Polen Miller Optical OPTOMETR: 1690 LEXINGTON AVENUE., Corner 106th St. to ingure comfortable neat appearance—— yes |. Sree al Co. — OPTICIANS ISTS Spend Your Winter Vacation at the Cooperative Workers’ Camp Nitgedaiget PHYSICAL AND MENTAL RECREATION BEACON, N. Y. — Phone, Beacon 862 RATES: $17.00 PER WEEK OPEN ALL YEAR ‘CITY PHONE:—ESTABROOK 1400.