The Daily Worker Newspaper, July 16, 1924, Page 4

Page Four Radek Replies to Zinoviev at World Communist Congress (Continued from page 1.) was active, and for this very reason, of course, mistakes occurred. The criticism of Hulla’s article, the policy in the elections in the Carpa- thian section of Russia, the policy in the agrarian question, are attributable in part to misunderstandings, and in part to incorrect information. The correct interpretation of the United Front policy and advantageous maneuvering in the agrarian question led to the disintegration of the ag- rarian party and the clerical party and shattered the Social-Democrats the united front, and secondly, sought for the watchwords for this united front. Aiter the Halle Party Confer- ence, every German Communist felt that we had already drawn to our- selves the workers who were for the dictatorships that meanwhile the great masses would not be won by the propaganda of the watchword of dictatorship; and that we must win them over by the putting forward gen- eral slogans in their daily struggles. The situation was not, in general, im- mediately understood by the com- rades. It is a historical fact that a number of comrades considered the and the National Socialists. Thirty-|“open letter” of January 8, as oppor- five to forty per cent of the soldiers|tunistic back sliding. Only as a re, vote the Communist ticket. The de-/sult of the intervention of comrade cisions of the Prague convention are|Lenin were directions for the united based upon the resolutions of the|front and the “open letter” included Fourth Congress. It would be aston-/in the resolutions of the Third Con- ishing, if the sum total of the resolu-|gress. These obstacles which were tions of the Congress were to amount not overcome, found expression in the to a complaint against opportunism. | differences which we had on the Ex- United Front policy from below will] ecutive, with regard to the require- be applied frequently by the party;| ments of the transition period with the United Front policy from above|the confiscated capital, and the taxa- will be used sparingly. tion program. And they found expres- , Radek Speaks. sion in the question of the workers’ "The next speaker was Comrade Ra-|and peasants’ government. At Fourth Congress. What, comrades, was the position of the workers’ and peasants’ govern- ment questidn at the Fourth Con- gress? Comrade Zinoviev has ex, plained here how much he felt that dek. He said: “Comrade Zinoviev’s speech, which, in my opinion, represents the annul- ment of the resolution of the Fourth Congress on the united front (inter- ruption: Oh, Oh) has induced me to put my point of view, which, because of the unanimous decision of the Rus- sian Communist Party against my views, I should otherwise have hesi- tated to do. “Four questions are presented here. the watchword of a workers’ govern- ment as a coalition with other work- ers’ parties, might be opportunistic. But he gave way; (I do not know if it was because of my incitement) but so it came about that, im the meeting of the Commission at the Fourth Con- gress, Gretchen, under the flattery. of 1, How did our united front tactics arise, what were they, and what are they? 2. What experiences have we| Faust, sinned for a moment. Com- gained in the last year with regard rades, however flattering the role of to the united front, particularly in|Mephistophies or even of Faust may .Germany? 3. What is the present sit-}be to me I must uproot this legend. uation, and what is to be done? 4.|Here is the first draft of Comrade What is the situation in the Commun-|Zinoviev’s resolution. This draft con- ist International, and how must Com-| tains, unfortunately, not only the first munist tactics be defined within our| transgression of Comrade Zinoviev, parties? which he has already read out, but a “] shall begin with the origin of}Second. In this draft comrade Zino- the united front policy. Comrade] Viev wrote: Zinoviev makes two assertions in ex-| “ ‘When we are defending the unit- planation of the history of the united |¢d front, Communists must not hesi- front. The first is that in the year|tate under certain circumstances, to 1919—20, the Communist Internation-|form a government in conjunction al, in the West, outside Russia, con-}With non-Communist parties. The sisted of small propaganda parties|%¢cond passage is much better. It and groups, and that we first became |84YS: ‘Communists do not hesitate to mass parties in the year 1921. This|™ake agreements with other parties, statement is incorrect. In 1919 our|€Ven if the leaders of these parties small Communist Party in Germany| Te social democrats or even Chris- stood at the height of greater revolu-| tian socialists. (Brandler: Very sen- tionary mass struggles than since the | sible). year 1920. In Bavaria we conquered| “Up to this day I think it is sensible, power and defended it. We had our|This mention of Christian socialism smali Hungarian Party which|©@me from a preference for certain achieved power and defended it by |!©8ders of the German center, who had arms for four and a half months. Latin and Russian. What is the united front and what is the watchword of workers’ and Peasants’ governments. For Zinoviev this is quite simple. The Russian Peasant understands no Latin, he does not know what the dictatorship of the proletariat is, and this watch- word has therefore been translated, first into Russian, then into Germ: and into English, ete. On the basis of our Latin we have, in the years 1918, 1919, and 1920 torn away great masses of the social demo- erats, and after the Halle Conference we became a mass party. Since then however, in the year 1921, we trans- lated the Latin words ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ into German, we sit at each Congress and attempt to ex- Plain to ourselves what this transla- tion means. (Interruption: Opportun- istic translation). With the year 1920, with our defeat in Poland, our defeat in Italy, with the world economic cri- sis, which made plain the way for the capitalist offensive, began the so- called new stage, which we announc- ed at the Tnird World Congress. We said to ourselves, now call together again the masses which are in retreat, and out of sentimenta! socialists we must make Communists and hard fighters. To this end we first adopted Our EYES Night and Morning to keep tama Clean, Clonr and Healthy Write 2 isd Free “Bye Care” or “Eye Beauty” Book Marine Co., Dept. H. ‘.,9E. OhioSt.,Chieago A. TEGTMEIER 1718 S. Halsted St., Chicago, Ill. Phone Roosevelt 8748 10 PER CENT LESS WITH THIS AD JAY STETLER’S RESTAURANT Eotablishod 1001 1053 W. Madison St. Tel. Monroe 2241 Chicago | Res. 1632 S. Trumbull Ave. Phone Rockwell 5050 ECAI SHULMAN ORNEY-AT-LAW 701 Association Bullding 19 S. La Salle Street Dearborn MOR A CHICAGO said that it was possible that even the Christian socialists might take part in a workers’ government. “In this resolution comrade Zino- viev'’s two transgressions, as I have calculated, multiplied into seven trans- sressions. All were, as usual, the re sults of the first sin. The form of the resolution makes it clear to us also that the Leipsic and Prague resolution ag is nothing more than a repetition of this resolution, and that the object of now the ending of this resolution. United Front, “In the resolution it is stated, among other things: “The Commounists, in opposition to an open or disguised bourgeois-democratic coalition, pres- ent a united front of all workers, and the coalition of all workers’ parties on the economic and political field, to fight against the bourgeois power and to lead to its final overthrow. “.... Even a workers’ government, which arises from a parliamentary sit- uation, is thus of purely parliamentary origin, and can create the opportunity for the astablishment of revolution- ary workers’ movements, “.. .. Communists, under certain circumtsances, declare their readiness to form a workers’ government in co- operation with non-communist work- ers’ parties and workers’ organiza’ tions.” This resolution unites a warning NEW YORK CITY Party Activities OPEN AIR MEETINGS Thursday, July 17 Section 3—Interv xf al 5 Speaker, Margaret Undjus oe Friday, July 18 Section 1—7th St. a a hts sony Meare and 2nd Ave. Speak. " iy. Section 2—ii0th St. and 5th Ave. sky. So. 2nd st. § ors, Geor Pri \ a Section 1—Hast Broadway and Jeffer- son St. Speaker, Lena Chernenko. Saturday, July 1 Section 2—110th ‘st. Meee PASIAN. and Brook jection 3— t. a } ection ra le a er, Simon Felshin. evennten., Bae ection 6—Stone and Pitkin Aves. Speaker to be announced. one tion 6—a5th St. = Mermaid Aves. er to be Garounesd. inion Thursday, July 17—14th St. and Ber- wenline Ave, Saturday, July 19—Columbia and Be: genline Aves. Speaker, Rebecca Grecht and others, NEW YORK, July 15.—Wm. Z. Fos- ter, recently returned from a trip to Russia, will speak on RUSSIA IN 1924 at a m meeting to be held on Monday, July 21st, 8 P. M., at Web- ster Hall, 11th Street between 3rd Central 4945-4947 |and 4th Aves, against the dangers of the \united front with the clear perception that we may perhaps be forced, by a num- ber of transition stages, to a struggle for the dictatorship. Bukharin, in his report to the Rus- sian Party Congress last year, repres- ented the failure of the left wing com- rades to perceive that one must pro- ceed to the dictatorship by sages, as a left digression. (Freimuth: On the contrary.) We shall see. Freimuth says that he will proceed thru dictatorship to the Saxon workers’ government. (Freimuth: You say that.) It is said: It is not a matter of ab- stract formulae. The workers do not make these divisions. Of what do the masses of the workers, not only the Communists, think, when they speak of a workers’ government? In England they think of the Labo Party. In Ger- many, in the countries where capital- ism is in collapse, the workers say: the united front means that Commun- ists and social democrats do not fight aginst each other during strikes, but co-operate. The idea of the workers’ government has the same mefning for the working masses. They think of a government of all workers’ parties. Enter Coalltions. At the [Vth Congress of the Com- munist International we declared that in the interests of the revolution it '|might be necessary: 1. To propose to the mass of the workers to enter into a coalition even with the Social-Demo- crats. 2, To be ready in certain cire- umstances actually to carry out in practice and not merely to agitate for it. And how was that understood? It is not onl; mrade Smeral who does not find hitgself in a very cheerful Position at @, moment, who had reason to ex@iise himself on the ground that he. Was seduced. Quite a number of. the~comrades have been seduced by the influence of our com= rade Zinoviev. I have in my hand an article published by comrade Kleine on the first of February 1923. In this article, which is a polemic against the “Left,” written before the party con- gress and before Brandler’s thesis had been published, he says: “The readiness which recently we have so often shown to take the final decisive step by joining the common fight for the interests of the proletariat in compayy with the re- formist parties, is not a trick, it is not a tactical maneuver, but a sheer fact. And in the same way the pos- sibility which we have faced of a workers’ government is not a trick or an artifice. “Simply because the workers’ gov- ernment is not as yet a proletarian dictatorship but only the govern- ment of a labor party which has to rely on the extra-parliamentary fight- ing organization of the United Front, deviations in its policy are inevi- table.” Saxon Experience. Theat is what comrade Kleine said before the Party congress.\ Since that time we have been thru \pur exper- iences in Saxony end our \chairman, comrade Treint, has written an article on the results of the elections in France. This article ends with the words: “The Workers’ Government is a step towards the dictatorship.” He has also written an article for the spe- cial congress umber of the “Com- munist International” in which he again says that it is not a dictatorship but merely a stage forward. Yesterday he got up here and said he was “in per- fect agreement with Zinoviev, that his form of workers’ government is ad- mirable, that, in short, the Workers’ Government is the dictatorship of the roletariat in evolution.” (Exclamation from the German dele- gation: “A good road to improve ment.”) But it is not a question of who is in the wrong and who is in the right. Comrade Zinoviev is quite right when he says that at the IVth Congress we took a step which was opoprtunisti¢ whether we knew it or not; we can still learn something from tHat. Bulgarian Situation. I will pass to the second part of the Massachusetts Is To Hear Ruthenberg And Foster July 19 BOSTON, Mass. July 15.—The most important membership meeting that our Party ever held will take place at the Dudley St. Opera House, 113 Dudley St., Roxburry, July 19, at 7.30 p. m. Both Comrades Wm, Z. Foster, National Chairman of the Workers Party, and C, B. Ruthenberg, Execut- ive Secretary will be present and will |discuss with the membership our IM- MEDIATE PROGRAM of Party work. The discussion will cover the Labor Party Campaign, Industrial Work, .| Shop Nuclei Organization, Membershjp Campaign, Daily Worker Campaign, Unemployment Campaign, and Bduca- tional Work of the Party. It is desirable that a delegation trom out-of-town locals be present at this meeting and take part in the discus- sion so as to be able to report back to their membership the important problems which will be presented there. Admission to this meeting will be by membership card only, It is the duty of every member of the Party to attend this meeting. Branch secretaries are instructed to immediately notify their entire membership and CCC's out: of Boston are invited to send a de! tion, It is very important that the ~ a it THE DAILY WORKER report—to our experiences. Bulgarian Communist Party proposed to the Bulgairian Social-Democratic Party, which had at one time sup- ported Zankow, to form a bloc. ‘hat is the first point. Next we decided here that the German Party was to take part in the Saxon government. After the defeat in Saxony our French comrades, with our consent, offered to form an election alliance with the Social Democratic Party in France, whe.e this is only possible by putting forward common tickets. Comrades, let us first examine the two steps which were taken without any catas- trophe resulting, where a bloc was not formed, because the opposition did not wish it. People talked in this sort of way: “Comrades, the labor government is the dictatorship of the proletariat. It is a synonym; it is a pseudonym,” I always understood that one used a pseudonym when one wanted to conceal something. But if I say, my name is Hasse, but I am Radek, then surely, comrades, this has no sense. Now for the third point to be ex- plained: how are the social democrats to be unmasked? We know that the social democrats. can and will never fight. But we propose to them that they should fight with us in order that Wednesday, July 16, 1924 — Comrades, I come now to the exam-|our progress. But he was careful in] millions of hearts of the Germans, After the incidents in Bulgaria, the|ination of the Saxon experiences. |his report not to draw the conclusions | And you have not done that. What did they consist of? Comrade Zinoviev does not criticise the Com- munist Party tor not deciding to en- ter upon the struggle for power in October. He says in his thesis that it was right to avoid this, because we had no arms. He says, too: “Since up- risings and civil war are not under- taken in order to provide opportun- ities for an heroic death, but in order to win victory, it was wise to attempt them.” How does he criticise the at- titude of the party? He says that when we went into the Saxon govern- ment and it became evident that we could not grasp power, we should at least have demanded the arming of the proletarists and the socialization of industry, and that if the social democrats would not join with us in fighting for this, we should have broken with them and left them. He criticised Fritz Heckert for making a speech,in which he said that he stood by the onstitution. »Comrade Heckert should not have said that. It was non- sense to say that because his ad- versaries did not believe him. All over the country the party had spread ma- nifestos—“Workers Arm Yourselves,” A Tragi-Comedy. Comrades, the Saxon affair is no comedy, It is a tragic-comedy and not which logically follow from this. Now I want to say a few words about the organization of the Revolution. The organization of the revolution may mean that correct Communist tactics are adopted from the first moment when even a group of Com- munists are occupied in rallying the workers for the revolution, in organ- izing them for the fight, and in or- ganizing preparations for the fight un- til they become so wise that they grow into the party of the revolution. Or it may mean that we have reached a situation when we can calculate that within a given time, that is to say, at @ moment not far off, in the next months, or in the next weeks; we shall enter upon the decisive battle. To say this means that one must force the pace of the struggle to an extra- ordinary degree, it demands the most. extensive concentration upon military preparations—for if anybody says that one be a just get hold of arms, he is very much undervaluing the exper- iences of revolutions, and also the ex- periences of the Russian revolution. (Turning to the German comrades.) Comrades, you are simply talking in the air when you say we are ready to lead. the masses in their struggle ev- ery day! In that case, why don’t you we may then unmask them. Comrade |a parliamentary tragic-comedy but the | lead the masses every day into the Trient knew perfectly well that the|tragic-comedy of a Cammunist Party |struggle for power? Why do you social democrats would never join|which has not learned to prepare for| wait, if you can lead the mass of the I pass to a wider question, our work in the ‘rade unions, The central question here is: shall’we capture the trade unions, shall we draw the masses together, or not? That will be decided by whether we are a rad- ical party protesting in parliament, or whether we are a mass party prepar- ing the revolution. I beg Comrade Losovsky. who perhaps knows the sub- ject better, and is officially obliged to know about German trade union af- fairs, to come up here and say what he thinks about the direction our work is taking in the trade unions, There is, in the German party, a terrible passivity. This is very strong- ly emphasized in an article by a Ber- lin comrade in the Funke (The Spark). It is the one serious phenom- enon which must be examined. Comrades, you will say that the cap- italists throw our comrades out of work, they become unemployed, and cannot pay tlieir contributions; they leave the trade unions. You will say that Amsterdam: is kicking us out, That is true. The question only is: if we shall avoid everything which would make that easier for them or shall we do everything to make it im- possible for them. Comrades, the resolution of your party conference on the trade union question clears the way for leaving the trade unions, with us in forming a bloc, and so we] battle. were able to permit ourselves the} What is the lesson of the experiences luxury of offering them this union.j/in Saxony? The lesson which we They have refused it, therefore, they|must learn if we are to avoid further now stand unmasked. But we rather|defeats? The lesson is, first, that one workers in their struggle every day?] And now, comrades, the factory (Freimuth: We do lead the masses|councils. Comrade Zinoviev has re- in their struggle every day, in what-|ferred to a report by Comrade Varga. ever struggle is the order of the day.) |1I do not know what is the date of this Comrade Freimuth says we lead the|report, and if it reviews the recent spoil the effect of this unmasking|canot take a jump unless one has a|struggle for power every day, just as|period. The result of the elections when we anonunce beforehand: “Our object is not a common struggle, what we are out for is to unmask you.” The whole point in our being genuinely and honestly ready to go a bit of the way with every working-class party which is ready for a fight. Unity of the Workers. (Exclamation: “But the social demo- crats will never fight.”) We should be trampling the interests of the working class under foot if we did not honestly and without reserva- tion aim at the unity of the proletariat at every stage of its battle. Comrades, if the Executive allowed the Bulgarians and the French to do this, it cannot turn around now and say: “This was a proposal made with good intentions; but ke knew all along that it would not be accepted.” In September we decided that the German comrades should enter the Saxon government. They did enter it and the whole Executive was con- vinced that they had maanged the af- fair very badly. We had suffered a crushing defeat. And what did Com- rade Zinoviev write: about our entry into the Saxon government after his defeat? In his pamphlet on “The written after the defeat: Useful Experience. “The comrades who look only at the their perspective right. jumping-off ground. One cannot,-all at once, simply because the party has de- cided that one is to undertake the fight for power, enter upon actions which require a considerable time for their development, and which involve the masses of the people. The second lesson is still more im- portant. I am in absolute agreement with comrade Zinoviev that one can- not have a united front from above unless one has it from below. And it was the United Front from below which we had not organized; our fac- tory councils were divided into bits, they were nothing but separate atoms. The Central Committee governing the factory councils was no better than a shadow and we had not bound them to our party. If the Saxon government had sup- ported itself upon the congress of fac- tory councils .... “ (Severing: “Why was it not called together?”) That is just the mistake which I ad- mit. it comes along. That means every|in recent weeks shows that in a num- one of our struggles for power. Quite} ber of towns we have suffered great true! But what is being said gener-jlosses. The Congress had to examine ally is that the German Communist|the direction of development of the Party is ready at any moment to lead|party. The direction of its develop- the proletariat in the struggle for|ment which you accept on the basis of complete power. (Severing: Quite|your theoretical attitude, on the basis true!)* of your judgment with regard to the I say, if you are ready for it every|ripeness of the situation with regard day, and do not do it, you are traitors|to the relations of force, is such that to the German proletariat. Comrades,| you might cut the party away from behind this dispute is a serious mat-|its basis. There is a danger of the de- ter. Comrade Zinoviev has said in his| termination of the party's circle of in- report that in the important centers| fluence in the near future. And that in France and Germany we are ad-|is the greatest danger that can threat- vancing toward winning the majority|}en us. The Communist International of the proletariat. That is the kernel|has carried thru great struggles at al- of the question. If Comrade Zinoviev| most all its Congresses. The novel asserts that he is mistaken. And this|point now is, unfortunately, that dis- error, together with the idea of our/agreements have crept into the ranks left comrades, who declare that they}of the comrades who have hitherto are ready every day to take up the} been common representatives of the struggle -for complete power... .|Russian Party. At the end of his (Interruption: Ready, ready!) One is|speech, Comrade Zinoviev raised the not ready to do that which one cannot] question of official or correct Com- do. ‘ munist discipline. If we, in the Com- Comrades, in that does the error in| munist International, rely only on offi- (Severing: “We asked for it six,judging the situation lie? Comrades| cial discipline, we would be-an official times!”) That points the moral: have said, “We have suffered a tre-| framework, but not a living interna- without ajmendous defeat in Germany,” and,|tional. This minority, whatever it is, mass organization, a workers’ govern-|having said that, they are still of the| whatever direction it adheres to, must © Problem of the German Revolution” | ment is doomed to death. It must|/opinion that nothifig has changed that|not only submit to the regolution of he says in the introduction, which Was;end either with a fight or with a de-|tomorrow we shall again be ready. the Communist International, but has That is the greatest illusion that can/also the duty, between Congresses, of feat. Refused to Consider Question. What light have these experiences be entertained. carrying out the international revo- If the French comrades were so/| lutions in organizing and agitation. situation in Germany from the point|to throw upon the questions whether |strong, why was there only one dem- of view of Saxony are making the mis-lin certain circurmstances we should|oustration in Paris when the Ruhr/|often, like all of us, may make mis- take of provincials, they, have not got | enter into a coalition government with|workers were shot by the French|takes, are practical exponents of the The Russian comrades, who very The Saxon|the S. D. in order to further our revo-|troops?, Comrade Trient writes very| Working class movement. And if experiences were not accidental, and |lutionary ends? Comrade Zinoviev has|pertinently in an article in the Com-| Comrade Zinoviev declares a thousand they were not useless to the party./not told us clearly here, whether he|munist International: “The great ma-|times that he will never more make (Hear! Hear!) The most important|excludes the possibility of our enter- jority of the French proletariat is still|@ coalition with the social-democrats, task in Germany is to capture the}ing a coalition government with the | filled with pacifist and democratic il-| he will come to the day when it will workers who support the Left wing of |S. D. in the future if we are stronger |lusions.” And in Germany? I believe,|be necessary; he will only declare the social democracy—the present|than we were in Saxony. The German | comrades, that the Congress will have|that the situation has changed, and Left wing of the social democracy is|Left refused to consider th playing the same part as the inde-| What is the view of the Executive? pendent socialists played in 1920. The salvation without the bloodshed of a/tation among the social d is question. |the opportunity of considering in com-| that it is only a maneuver, while the mission one ‘fact after another, not/ other, the wicked one, has opportunis- I do not think that comrade Zinoviev|only the present transient situation|tic designs. The result of the discus- masses of the workers are clinging to|will refuse to consider this problem, |in the German Party, but that which/sion of differences should still allow the left social-democrats as they might |for to do so would mean that we re-|is developing. cling to a life buoy, still hoping to get | linquish all hopes of fruitful mass agi-| A fraction numering 62 people rep-|or that decision, to remain in the par- every one, who may disagree with this ocratic|resent four millions of workers who/ty, subject to its discipline. We must civil war. All these sections of the|workers and can show them no way of have been thru all the tribulations of|not hesitate at criticism, otherwise working class would have held us|escape. fused to try in company with the left |reform or revolution is nothing but a] We illegality. They enter the Reichstag}we would be an organization of Communists responsible if we had re-| To say that the question is one of|for the first time, and what do we see?| cliques which carries on its business hear a social democrats to bring the country |rhetorical phrase which nobody who|speeches I will not describe here. When the experts’ report, which is|opportunity to work positively, wher- out of its crisis by peaceful means.” Even after the Saxon ‘experiences |take seriously. cOmrade_ Zinoviev entry into the government to have/up in the phrase: has any grasp of the situation could been a mistake, but even tho it|for the future. brought defeat to our party he regards it as a great victory. ARMED PEASANTS ARE SEIZING MEXICAN LAND; WON'T GIVE UP GUNS MEXICO CITY, July 15,—Because many peasants who had been armed during the last revolution are using their arms for the appropriation of land, the Mexican war department intends to Wisarm all peasants at once. From the rich landowners hundreds of complaints are urging more rapid disarmament. From all the peagant organiza- tions protests are this order to disarm. ‘These com- plain t ifter the arms have been taken away they will be unable to defend the land which belonge to them, Hostility to disarmament has assumed concrete shape in Hidalgo. There the peasants have organized to defend their arms even at the cost of their lives, —— whole membership be familiarized with the program of work which the Central Executive Committee has laid out for the Party, and the success of this meeting will materially assist the district office in its work in the coming campaigns. Remember the place: Dudley St. Varga in his thesis says that since spout general speeches, but to give| other. fjan answer which will be echoed in! Congr 1920 we have been in a new sta’ Fascist Ku Kluxers Mutiliate Georgia Man’s Daily Worker ATLANTA, Georgia, July 15.—One hundred per cent Kluxers have been active in this city of lynch-law trying to keep the DAILY WORKER from getting the truth to the workers of the few parliamentary} behind the recess. But after we have fought here, we have the duty and the What we are con-|to enslave the German proletariat,|ever the executive of eur party places did not hold our|cerned with is what Zinoviey summed jcomes before the Reichstag, it is the|us, and to leave it to time and their Finding out a way|duty of the Communist Party, enter-| experience to show whether we have ing parliament as agitators, not to|erred in one respect and they in an. Party Activities Of Local Chicago town. John Rolley, 75 McCatee St., re- |19%" at Ogden Auditorium. ports that practically every copy of the Saturday, Ji DAILY WORKER mailed him arrives |" Halsted Been ooperist Hall, 2409 /at Main and’ Genosse St. in such a mutilated condition it is| South impossible ot read it. The postmaster of Chicago has iva. lida 4 ieee Wc rd » Ty G vision 7 the DAILY WORKER de. Tith Ward ttaiian, 2439 S. Oakley Blvd.}to co-operate with 8ist Ward Italian, 511 N. Sangamon St. ware this picnic a written ming against |claring: “This office is in receipt of 4 communication from the postmaster of Atlanta, Georgia that copies of your publication addressed to Mr. John Rollery, 75. McCafe Street, ceived by him almost daily in a torn condition as will be seen by the en- closed copy. I would be pleased to be advised as to how and in what condi- tion the copy is forwarded to that address.” were re-| Polis! (Applause in a part of the BUFFALO PARTY ACTIVITIES ~ Friday, July 18—The general member. \ G hip mee’ will be held at the vi CHICAGO BRANCH MEETINGS — /ShiP esting wilt De neld at the engin Wednesday, July 16 a ey Fades are urged zg pe peonene Sr 5 3 ) m where Comra WM. Z. FOSTER on “RUS: Ee A wi Feport on the re ony e Party, Thursday, July 17 eeetuntie, Jur 16--Onen, cic mea Speakers, Sim Scandinavian Karl Friday, July 18 Ukranian No .2, Ukrainian Educational | out of town mem ranial Society, we Stephenson Ave. h th Side, 1902 W. Milda Hall, $142 8. Halsted Greek Branch, 722 Blue Island Ave. . CHICAGO STREET MEETINGS This Week. WEDNESDAY—Fullerton and Halsted, North Side Eng., W. P. The Atlanta postal authorities claim THURSDAY—62nd and Halsted, Engle- to be unable to prevent the mutilation | wood of the DAILY WORKER, Poor. Eyesight Bad Burden: year in school and the taxpayers are Opera House, 113 Dudley St., Roxbury. | charged $10,000,000 annually for the The Time: July 19, 1924, 7.30 p,m, ! burden, PRIDAY Division and Washtenaw, N, ti 8 » N. '. W. P, North and Rockwell Maslawtod YW. ts Roosevelt bod Coos 112th and Mi ub-C, C, C. 8 SUNDAY—Marshficld and Roosevelt Road, Marshfield, Y. W. L. ed St. in Side English, 3201 8. Wabash Picnic Marx, 2733 Hirsch|Finnish Grounds. A good ran i meeting as we ha Division St. | transact, in Buffalo and vicinity are in req ey ee will be held on th are urgently requ PITTSBURGH, PA, DR. DENTIST derin —$—$$ $e WHY PAY MORE? kov, Y. W. L. ‘ . \ About 2,000,000 children of the} sine TUR aian int chipa, Boh It & | United States are retarded about a] Pullman Absolutely the best there is made 12 SETS FOR m4 SAMPLE SET 85¢ on euode f Send in that Gubsoription Today, “ We ship-anywhera ie " %