Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, April 15, 1879, Page 9

THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: TUESDAY. APRIL 15, {879—-TWELVE PAGES. if Intms Mr. Mills, “on the | macte the remark that yout didw’t know that this ground af aimee : Indy that you were with was Ils wife, ‘You “How do you know it {8 {mmaterial?’ in- | know betters you saw her with me ata party, Strike tt out," says the Court to the sten- ** Was te compiled to quit if ographier. m ‘Not exactly to quit, but ha didn’t do one+ “How did he nppear rhea he cama tn?” third lite ueual staount of work. = sneak through others—to prove lier own alin OF to convict or ncauit her surviving husbandt This orecise ease wan deciled even in the TEVENS. not proper in addressing the Court” | > uy x 7 “1 should think he wis quite mad.” “ Didn't he ect up and walk to and fro?! ict Wey 5 ‘Melt, ways Mr. Trude, paying | quires Mr. Storrs. ‘ and you knew she was my wife 71” al i * Di Rickirs aiegs sr ‘often seforreat dntevad aiteen cae na ies hey ee samantiony au “Tt fs material or Immaterial.” bnew er’ tlie 1 Np, pits not to my Fesalecttou.t abe’ i How did he appear when he lett? & esha sti Ares ft ‘ h ‘ t Z i f Us z pa rhile i a be ts i i FaMatOn of ches nes ana Elbe eons | wematediog ti Mdina Mtavei. lhe Anas gos Ore oe prota eae h 70 Fatt Marnie Stevetis, was not Stevens "Where did you go after you left the “7 object,” cries Mr. MIUs, * b Judge fesate ft a d given to her | week the hamickte took place, nddresaine her | Stevens or not." where you saw Mal q if TEN abjaclioe ie eeeaknea esa. Gk Points - Decided y eagion of the wite, made and ~ | with this witness’ name, and I want to ask lim |” © That ts the auestion,” outs In Mr. Weber, | present" Tivol? ie objec rules the Ree ences MO | etksile treatm cae | Rr tartgatent tae aoe | CHC ym ee ah | PETA oma tg | Electr omeent, [emer dirk . ‘The letter was introduced in evidence, rays Mr. Trade, “wits e ae Mr ¥ H ; Defense. Sud ea on noe, AxeuNG, HOF aR agar ege rs “ ‘The fetter is not In evidence,” remarks the tothe Kenowiedges shat Anmitisg tha Courb Be vs instal is, wife Were present at the party, ary er aa es but L didn't see then,” Peres ; ba haat ators fina of evidence tending to show the inaanity of the | Court, Before the homicide?" Inquires the Court. und met De Lacy. sbalda-iheGoudd np et sepa Renfree rattae ch ft might “Do you Elfelt awore to those tacts?” Yea,” answers Mr. Trudi, At ts not competent," hold 2 win orks ime He wna retuacd by tao Sudizor nud | aales sin Si Aa fall Tirant 10 ktow,” obrerves the | ite oir to ruprorey aye Mit “Crude, “alter tat tlre ald yon tee Stevenet® wf what head." comes from the Hench, Lots in Much of tho Tes- | was tot ndmitted ns ovidence for any purpose, “He wrote letters to the wife of the prisoner Court. “Gu on. . that t tes wore at-thic onrty proper place,” | ciayyettls Amerer eam tm tending | witnese Nerying Teantie i head coneiauet ho An " . “Uf adultery can be shown, and the fact was | at the ber, und addressed eras Engert,"? re- Did you go anywhere with her that after ‘ou th vga to A y is competent otle | mative che eee ee era thane tut paltirns Bln fois topcase eee timony on the Insanity Brought to the knowledas of eee ae taeeiG ate ete: evidence on that point,” re- at ey 7 g ane ie dedse, : 7 “told him fhwas wronky—-thutd nover had.” | [ wore excita 3 re he walked up and down f nd thin Ye i . ‘ 1 in J i ‘ a Question. Sree ama enn she ein some tendeney | mocks the Court. “You muat be mistaken. I] © Who comprised the party?” “Wo propose to make tho offer,” states Mr. | | The State's-Attorney ts dattstied, but Mr, | the floor, fle would start on a poetal card to show un insane state of mind at the tine of | have no recollection of it." “Mre, Edwarde, Mra, Stevens, another gentle- | Trude. Trude jins some more qqueations, probabtyeget the dute on, and then he would Whe 1 J— | lout ut it five or ten minutes, £ bad charye of *. itings ¢ front t tated it,” explains Mr, Trude. man, and inyaclf, ‘Ask the question,” rejoins the Court, and “When he came in, you say he was excited. { eee oe ‘etetion aut fad may The Can AeainA ‘wana ai rake. “What u Whats The other entieman's name?? iene au are phere: trey lett evens a appeared mad ” \ i Herren grote ay Peery i ia uy f others to the | fs the question you are talling about y? dohn Carruthers, t what party « re Mattn tr, 6lre " Statoments Me bua oe pave artes jee re eee ailalteraus In The ats MDIGE Fens the Interrogatory,, ii te When yon fa Mra, Btovens, st0, you mean ae lord acines (rat SI Nan ? iit What evidence of maduess was thera upon ae aan cu need phd ane Sats my fs i 8 Lears ani tercouree or {leit Intrigites between the dead “Ht Is not competent,” says the Court, “un- | the wife a} he prisoner at the bar: sustain the . Daly: ti ‘ by dagt g garding £ , e — (they came to the | Jess it can be brought lome tu Stevens’ knowl- “Eda. observes his Jlonor. nly his Iooks,—seeing ma with his wife, 5 Troubles, Peer ae am nueeeaelen a Te palegnee before | edge before the homlcide,* “What day of the month was {t!"? “Did you see Mamie Stevens st more than | Ie asked ice Fet tip, : Liold bint Alia wasn’t dey Hi yott see btin ery more than once that the killing—are competent evidence aera be ae We expect to prove that,’ observes Mr. ae 20 katara . fron one We 4," interposes Mr. Weber. neccesary.—that I would teil hin what happen- admitted upon the same principle, The ques- rade, 9 you know where she came from 2 object, Mr ‘. pil, and if that didn’t satisfy him he could use |‘ F saw him cry two or three times? Alow of Insunity—the degree required to destroy “Ain youl asks the doubting Mr. Weber, “Tea not. ie ubjection ts sustained,” repeats the ay i ‘ “Did he state what the occastun of his weep i ii i i rely team c Ve will,” ‘ “Didnt "7 tre. “Didn't he anv, + Now here, De Lacy, you bave | {ng was His Inability to Deal with ae Sim- Ereenta) tibet ihn etree ete se Meet at aye Mr eave the Da aeons Traile the sent she come from the matineo? Cay We offer to ahow, exclaims Mr. Trude, | been running with a married Indy, nud' have bru- “Yes: the trouble fn regard to hls wife.” ple a Thing as a Postal- Card. the Court, the Jury will live to pass upon the Court, “‘Haooly's—from appearances they came | ‘that he never saw her at ful one party, an “ facts, und deteriuitie the guilt or innocence of from that way! that Stevens was there syith her.’ il Mam{e Stevens over bear your name,— ken up one home, and Ehave caught fou, here ; reat id Ie say in reférenco tu hfs alfection H thrusts | for hart" with iny wife, and If you wet up 1 wil ‘ b e spt “Well? exclaims Mr. Weber, in astonish- a pa shinny. Sil, te donee CHAE ST Ms oot Fae: | ang Aine Maree eraeengeae ane Cam SOL ments , WIERE'S DAVIS? A Donte sou know she did?” edge."? whether rary competent? Basha Which wid iis say anything to that effect"? dr Nunh M net narrative. pute in Mr. ee ‘The conntunanves of Mr. Storrs nud Mr. Trude “T do not” "Strike tt out," fa the ruling, of the Court, set ut at mare than gre ri a Ne f lene of the kind?” asks Mr. stilts, loadin ett iB " FO edad ae tne OF | Rrgatg ap eten thy emt he Court tas | Tay aren eras ‘Ade Eoget' | Comin sng he unui ctarer “ae | Sl idan wa prac Bie thin goon," aya Me. Weber, “Steven ~ | ttt part yfetded to thetr wishes, a1 “Wid you address her as ‘Ada Engert, my the Period on the y i : “Did you see them," on Mr. Trude, “What purty was theta? ‘The witness leaves the rack, ani some delay | must inves toved his wifs or he would never last word of the decision 1s uttered, one of them | dartine wife]? ee "7 object,” sings out Mr. Webor, occurs. ‘The Court twiste around in ble have shot. hor,"? Stand. ye to Batllt Runnion “T did not? cre eerai Me eats ‘phe cbetion ts sustalned,” says the Court. | nnd finally gives vent to his tinpaticuce,. ‘i ciep alears told me,'t procstds the witness i reat Wiliam C. Davia!” “Did you address her as “Ada,? Mr, Engert!” © Wilera did you see theta first?" “We offer to show '—begins Mr. Trude | avuther witness.” pile ie, foved his wife, lie toid me thas - . D8 Hot answer, “Tdid not “Ab the corner.” agatn. : ; ~ x 1 : - i 3 Hire Trude ‘observes thae® the police Aenart. | f Did you call her ‘Ada Eugert1 «Were you there by apgbintmentt # wi he ration” interrupts the Court, CoeRE YANG LAST EMPLOTER. | sath ieublec Unt abetted to be upper ms es ; did not. tles F, is sworn, uud 1s examin v AN - A Full Account of the , interesting Tanbieh a pitioen, SA SAE aan pet to “Way. dd you may you don't kuow whether Wats your meeting accRtental?!? urges Mr. Trude, Mr. Trude. . ij A se eat blurs ue Ae en Trude. Scene at the Tivoli. ter. tle Ualtdlme’ Decaues they Haver ac sabe | Sle Gomse ee ea “Yea, sir? “Not without the question being asked and . ye Mrs \. pt ae “The withers tnust anawer, ‘was or was nob’ ruled on," rejoite the Judge. Wero you standing thdret Yes, air.!? “I reside on the North Side,’ he testifies, “Whut subject seemed te be uppermost in gundam in the comumtssfon puemess at No, 87 | his miud 1? Mm ae South Water street, Peter Stevens was in my Ve oblect,”* shouts Mr. Weber. . "| ” & employ in June, 1878, He did the correspond | scp, Anat t# 8 matter of judgment,” observes enco. J d{d not notice anything so very peculiar “What was the subject matter of his tall Bait Runnion rushes out into the ball and | remarks the Court, sella for Dayle. Still le responds not, and the “Was it or not done, to your knowledge?” Ollicer retires and tells the Court “he {snot (rit was not done to my knowledge,?? there.” ( * i Preven did you suy ale may have borne your Mr, Trude remarks that ‘men represent me? rieecaives as witnesses in order to get in here, “That Is vot competent, says the watchful “ Waa Stavens present at the party where you 8aw Mamic Stevensi" “Not to my knowledge."* ASimple Lunch of One Beer and Ono Cigar for ‘Iwo. in the rain??? 3 i Where wero you atanding? VUE SCENE AT THE TIVOLI + about him during the last week he was fo my | that day!" aske the Court. “ Did sho icave the Tivolt with bim1? " + 4 rh to | uniithe officers aro very cautious,” Judge. ‘ly one of tie duors of lie Sherman House. “No, sit” a eer After he bad been See Miele “Altogether about his wife,” replies the wit Gets a Chance to "The atate: that not a single wit- . ‘na the crowd passing out of the theatre at ¢ told me, one noon, when uobudy else was in Mr. Boyd ot Last : ary fete tanesant but Mr. Storrs A LITTLE OF EVERYTHING, ners for the looks over the crowd and singles outa man, aud "That fs all at present,’ ubserves Mr. Trude, then turns to his Itonor with, There isons | “hut we want the witness to stay in the court- here, but we will be obliged to break our line.” room." Md that tines" : Vindicate Himself, wi tuey Were going right atong,”? Rea sho wap one of the crowd??? US, SF, : “ Did he leave you all sitting there!” 4 Yeg,t9 5. . ” the ofllee, that he was having a guod deal of | 94, /4°.2eted altogether out of sorts,” Inquires “What did he say, if anything, to his wife?” Mr. Trude trouble. Lasked him what it was about, and he “We object," exctaime Mr. Weber, pulled out a Jot of Ietters, and hunded me one, ‘That tsn't proper,” remarks the Court, Stevens Will: Probably Go on A je made some remark to her,’* “ ” —- We have no questione," states Mr. Mulla, | gaqnfitth Yu and your fhiend joloed the two | seul tha eer ere are to BEE feat ers ia Jub ot lovers: L found. wyegere vet ame De steeken out," inate af, yf d S PILOTOGRAPH, Hi Hees adies. a“ etl Elie In toy wife's trunk, oh 4 the Stand To-Day. mE AND DIE Reena “Doutt leave the room,” escapes the lips of Yaa? turned around,—he was directing bia con- u Age it i : around with other men, und 1 have gut- | gyoatt 1 fnslst that it stay in," says Mr, ‘orrs, ten their letters here tht are not “Strike it out," from the Court ends the dis fit tor you to see.’ 2did not care about getting | pute. “Whure did yout got" ‘ We want to the Tivolf?? ‘* What part of the Tivol} Versation to me; no one else spoke,—and I says to, and proves to be Frank Engert—a fairly | the Court, to the ladies, {Why don't you explain this to good-looking fellow, rather stout, well-dressed, ‘The witness leaves the chair, but stands in TNE FOURTH DAY. Mr, Stovens; tell him how this transaction hap- “flow dtd he act?” front uf-the jury foro moment, und then lifts ey ” i y ; Hs mixed up In the muss, and when Ite handed me d -polng manner—one who evi- p-stairs,’ I pened! She hesitated about speaking, and * “He acted ins strange aud excited manner ‘The crowd {n the Crimiuat Courtroom yester- | und with on easy-pol = Ia | Up his votce, * tn ons of the private tooms?? Hinally she sald, *He koows bimeelf that I'pever | one I merely glanced over ft. I advised bin, if the trial ie not quite up e = “* What was the character of the room? How was ft fixed up?” : ,' "There was a tabio and chalrs and a castor— all set out for duners and a mirror: L didn't “What is your business?” asks Mr. Trude, | made by Mr. Trude a few days ngo—— “Tuat ia not evidence,” exclaims the Cour! “Buokkeeoer for J. T. Rawleleh & Cu. and ee eaee erates, 4 “Do you know Peter Stevens?” Mr. ‘Frude, howevei “7 have seen nim.” tells him to take th when he came there,’ trunk aud Jeave his wife, His remark wae that uw What did he do evidencing that?” it was too bad; he loved his wife, and he “He was unfit for work," couldn'tdo tt. I toid lim {t was better todo ue ‘object. to that anewer,”” says Mr. Weber, last week, but It docs very well for the first day in the week, and considering the probabllity that the last part of the morning’s busiuess “ Who knows!" “The husband. “What siext took place? And then he told her to shut up.’ te comes to his ald, and q exactly tule notice,” “What else took place!” Paint a eee oe ee “Teg nut responsive," 1 again. “1 ok cely take notice,’ pat else took place pat was his manner “Whut do you beln a will include the delivers of a decision from the | havo you evar spoken to him? *| | Sau save quuetinne saya Kee ve | ce Wus a colored man assigned to watt on | Taine e come Dia: stald aminute or two | tHe felt very bad, aint should Judge from | sfecouita ae eke eget un for Toe neh astothe law poluts ralsed Friday and | tr taye,” “Were you out riding with Mamie Stevens | yout and went out’? his feelings anc actions——? “What did he do to provent hlmeclt Be re y P49 on ne, “¢ Drove imself from Eaturday. Stevens looks fresh and brieht, as if “Did you know hts Inte wife ¢'* and Aunic Coou at any timus? (Not to my knowledge,” “What did ho say to her, if anything, wheo “Not your judement,!* Interposes the Court. working! Sunday rest bad done him good, and his “ey did? “tNo, sir! y ‘a W ho wus with Mrs, Stevenst'* . he Jefur” é Btate facts. “ He tras very much exclted, and would leave founech, Storrs ond ‘Trude, return’ to the | “When did you become acquainted with | Were you in company with Mamie Stevens | {1 was, “1 don't remember." és vie felt very bad, and he tatked as if ho | tue desk aud walk up ardteon the floor and de- counsel, “ iJ ‘i Thes her?” and Annie Coon aud another party—a gentle it How tong were you fn the room!" “Did he ask her to wo home? thought a great deal of his wife. He used no Jay bts work; and for that reason he conldn’tdo attack fa apparently cheerful spirits, ‘Thegame | "tty tne fall of 70." man? k {About ten minutes)? “T think not.” hard names acainst her asa person naturally | ig fa trnc of Mills and Weber, who are apparently “When did you learn sho was a married “That.is not” competent,’ says tho Court, ‘Dia Ly aonter anything? “ Did the colored man come in?” would that had letters In hls pocket thut he was “Was he out and in that day—Saturday 1”? ad that thetime for nrgument has passed and | fady?? “unless the circumstance comes in under my “Ty atd? “Te dia.’ ashamed to show, ‘Tio or three days, it mliclit “Yea; he would go into the loft, and then tvtime for adeviston fs at hand. Mrs, Young, “Shortly after she went to Cincinnati.” ruting,” Whatp “ What did he say??? have been a week. before the homicide, he caine ek.2? 7 io her weeds, afte in hier uruat scat in front af | {Did vou learn beforot? come baci Mr. Trude evidently knows it does not, and he “ Awlass of beer nando elgar.? [Thora are “1 did not. Ididn't inquire whether sho was | roleuses tlie witness with “That is alt,’ sins “Heeameinand wanted to know of the smiles, | to the casiier’s desk about, 10 o'eluck in the | “Then Me Nile be; " ins his questioning. other gentivinan I was with {f he shouldn't put } morning and suvs, ‘Mr. ‘Toda, L have concluded | 2 ould premunee rr theralling. “Lille, her youngest daughter, oc- | 4,"l But the Coure prolohge the exatutestion by |" Wilut ald you hayet™ Mr, Stevens out, und he told him no, ft was'all | to quits’ Tasked ‘him whit fry aind i aol the | aie gute presume, "aye aria © hobna been cuptes a chair next to her; and Anna Coons— |" «pid you write her any letters?” sayluy, “dio asked to makean explanation re- | A clyar.”” This excites slight laughter. right, und wanted to uxplain matters.?? Mas not capable of doit: the work. +L van't | his troubles with bie wife, Ho was working for changed somewhat as to her personctle hy the |“ wrote her some.” gardiuy statements made by you, Mr. Trode, | ,, Te merriment annoya the Court, who says: Wiss the colored inan told by any of you Keep my inind pt the: wank, and Be Nil us continuously up to Saturday night, Juae 29, substitution of a more extensive plecu of head~ | {low did you address her lettors? Suppose, in your opening; that Teannot take | (‘The Ballifts wilt suppreas the slightest laugh | that Peter Stevens wae the husbund.of the lady | quit.’ Irather liked the "mat aud { advised gear for the little English walling-hat of last | We object,” says Mr. Weber; “they will | time to hear.’ Py or anythiyy of the kind tn the audience. If I Mcense smiles they will increase in volume, und the court become a Bedlam if I do not atop that was with yout? © No, slr, I believe not. “The colored mun didn’t know who Stevens a Auother clerk working there Wasa Sr. Grose: lim to keep an. Lsaya, You liad better keep | thupe 's ‘ 5 on, leave her und act ilke a man.’ He thought | Mau. Stevens tried to work, but 1 don't now show for themselves. Turning to thewitness,-Mr. Trude inquires: the matter o¥er, and suya, *Lwill take soursde how many postal-cards ho wrote. I did Dot sea week—makes up the trio. “Sey are not in existence,” observes Mr. “Have you any letters of Mamio Stevens?” Everybody is on time, aud the proceedingsare him shed tears thut day. He went out quite a Trudes “they were destroyed by the whtness, | «7 hayo nots? {t. Till send the Bailiffs out among the eraw d, | wasi” vice. T'lt go to work and trs toda the best I | number of times, but Ldou't kaow whore he opened, os it was expected they would be, by | and we expect toahiOw, Gas daifoa,? ed “Did you have any?! nae aiey watels any oa Pl send the persons “ nae I eit har ieee ii . an ave deci Sts leyens By ale-stare ta went” ; : OY, lon,” re “ y . om, or fing them, here was ea disturbance the or cs 'e e ui fbb Tru r ie Sudgo Kogers delivering his decision on the law | ,,° Yuu lave wot Iatd the foundation,” remar erat makes no difference,” chimes in afr Jal, according to the exegeey oF gent A ea etween out dad Srey ee eet teat Altornos, whe fuqulres? r. Trude asks, on the ro-direct, * Was ho questions. “The contents aro not. adusstble,!? fotns in “It could not under my ruling,’ says the’ Uons. Imake this announcement uow that all the Court, “until you haye proved that'the let- Court, ‘unless £ permit them to be introduced “There was a little," lying with his head on the tables? “Did be shed tears ony time about his “ " i troubles fu your presence!" ‘Ask him what the condition of the postal: THE DECISION. \ may hear aud have no excuse.” ‘Will you tell the Jury what the facts were?!” Tost. T to inquire ab H sav.” continues Mr. Trude tothe wit- | “have stated to the jury whee 1 | *!Not that I remomber of. wae couuments the Court. essed ters are lort. videuce. It is not necessary inquire about . Air. Trude to the wi jt ee what occurrer H ‘ bs = “Well, I couldn't read them myself, and wa “The discussion upon questions of oridence | ‘3 Wo will prove that they were weltten,? re- ievile ze yiotag ness, “you sent for a cigar and a gloss of beer. | there.” : “Didn't he the morolug be wanted to quit | contdn't send then: to the country, They were on Saturday,” says he, “took a wider acope than | marka alr. Trude—" thelr existence, and then ‘The witness goes to his sent, and is followed Teuppows each lady had a glass of beer?” “Now, as a matter of truth, wasn't ita work! t hav feed tt. £ Very bad for soveral days,” ropties the witness, wan at frat intended, You it was not thine spoat | their dostrie hil” To the witnoss: “ How did | by Mr. Storrs. drosently: the latter commas back a aa ‘ig: att RA iaita Kt sculls aig oracles the Hero r" ie age might aad 2 fot have, policed Ane aves : Y e de! ree oF mass, a No, slr’ ko Tam now,' E: * . i. Mig: > Beene ee aren tee a ee cen Manes ate MIL: id When he tues the stand aicties i pre eaed | Weber H Guerre i aclttagegollaa YoURtone rE He hind boen fi my employ about o month GARY S RECOLLECTIONS. of the defense of insanity in criminal prosecu- “The address fh hot the contents," observes | to him, unt he Is asked, 1 )¥¢ don't want particulars,” saya the Court. | Not quite a3 cool,” tlons—ariges, nud is ono to be met ant deter: Mr. George B, Gary is recalled and testifics: then.” : ‘They wer ere, Mr. Mills comes to the | ‘*When I saw Pete on Madison street, a few Mr. Storrs. 1g that fn your hantwriting?” “They were there, und ordered sumethiage!? “Was it the loud talking that attracted the Mr. Trude retires, and i mined in the cnse atbar, ‘That insanity, whether “\ part,” saya Mr. Mila. “ET inalst,!” says Mr. Weber, “that the ex- “We want the detatls,”” comes from Mr, | colored man? front for the cross. days before the homleldey—perhaps a weok,—I Rencral or partial, ut the tine of committing the | | How can we show thelr loss)? asks Mr. | amination be conducted by one counsel. | That | Trude. “T think not? “Wheo dia ie Ast conversation occur fo | shook hands with uim, und aa he looked pretty en ies ogres tliat’ c Trude, * unless wo show thelr existence? is the rule, and tt ought to be fnvarlub! Tl not permit 11,” rjotns the Court, “un- | © What was it that attracted him?” Feferanes to his wife Uttle | bad Lasked what the maztor was. Ho sald it act allewed to bo criminal, ton degree thut cons | TAides unless wa sl her," romarks tho Court, | This is an entirely new copie,” pleads Mr, | less they tend in a curtalh dinecrca.ss “We found out afterwards, when Stevens After be had been in my emplor eat Lele cae the aninw old trouble cine wile. Soya L trolled thy will of itg subject aud took from him | w quit tiie presumption 18 that hu wrote fea Storrs, by way of extenuation, left the rou, thithe inquired at the door, — Hime.ie the nelzuborhoul of tivo weeks, SURY dees foe Ra ee eee eave the criminal Intent, {1 a defense tn the prosecu- | pame,’ “The rulo 4s o proper one,” remarks the STEVENS DROPS IN. said thero Were some frleuds of his in there, q When did fadeare your empl ath heat? hy don’t you leave herd! Bays hie I love Hon for that act, Is too well settled to be ques- | Mr. Trude abandons the question, and pute Court, nnd will be onlorced,?" ‘ Did you see Stevens there?” and they lee hin a? i dhe Sat arday Va fore the homicide,’ her too well, George; 1 can't feuve her.’ When tamed « omits It la dang: detest; seats, this gnes “How many letters did you write fea arnce rolleyes Mr. Storrs, and repeate | wy aid? ppid the colored man accompany stevens | Generally close nt 6, but that Saturday were | Ne #tld It was the sume old trouble he .odded, Ble er ata nas Fenderting Ht Inempae | ee Qontt remember.” “No, str, answers the witness er Bir . “Was only one glass of beer drunk by the lodies?? “None drunk by the Jadtes.?” “What died Steyens say t “What oveurred?'* iuquires the Court, im- patiently. -“Let him go on and teil, Ifyou ble of entertaining the criminal intent, which constitutes one of the elements in every crime,’ as well stated by Chilef-vustice Gibson in a Pennsylvania case. At present Ido not pro- pose further to discuss that question. It Is not the time. fu the progress of this trinl, to be “T think he opened the door and let him in, and then came fo again. Didn't he come in the second time, attract- ed by the noise tht wag boing made there!” ‘here was no nolse when talking," Wasn't the talising loud and excited}? “Not particularly so,” 3 “Sho ts driving me nearly crazy," open jeter It might have been probably 7 | “yp, Weber ‘Cross-exaniines vd witness teatl- o'clock. fles: ave not spoken to any one at uny thine “Had he been in your employ continuously b EXce) Mr 1 0, S fav fren thie begianhng Of the month" or place, except to Mr. ‘Trude, as to the facts Hee 5 about which t have testified.’ J saw Pete later LC Xeh that day. Saturday? with his wife on State street. I made up iny i «To the best-of my recollection, tind from the way he was looking thut he had “So many that you can't remember?” “Do you know in whose handwriting St {51 “Qulte—several” "1 do not.” Ma, Trude says the letters were deatroyed,?? “ifave you any of your handwriting with interrupted Mr. Wober, “und J sugvest, before yout? \ they would be udniltted as evidence under any © T havo nat.” eircuntances, that lt must be ahown that the “Do you know where you can get some of it?” defendaut saw them.’ 7 object,” puts In Mr. Weber, ne ae tala dad # Sues with hls Wite.’ i tu the , fl tral ta fen a aaa, sae aha ae ir ee i ask questions we'll never get through,” ; Sina Hovens, tn just Interview, ask youto | | seat eae weal u & Pa was thutt interjected Mr. Weber,» ore epecltic, orto make anplicatlon of facts, “We expect to show," rejoins Mr. Trade, xtndweriting caunot ba proved by comparl- lc came up tu me," states the witnes: eave, ‘ i : eaetit ditt it Wu this ase, praven ur to be proven, | ss that the contents of theso letters were brouht son,” sayy the Judge, “and looked at me. Tdldu't kuow bim froma lotto a ioral ; " mee APRA TIA tr " si ng, Hsiorva More than you do about such equestion fs now ane of ovidence, the | to the knowledga of Stayens the Friday before | “°'Ycus Honcr ce geo the aifleutty, urees | stranger, Ite wanted to kuow whet boca doing | *(, Ask you to go avray, and Jet her alonet ‘Dl you ace ht at worse” things,” puts in Storrs, character uf facts, and their relevancy, aut com- | the homicide.” Fs Mr, Trude, * Ut comes to us atep by atop?! with his wife, Lasked lim, ‘Whos your wifes) | {s2, 8ire id ys . Petencr of certain facts proposed to’ be intro- That iscompetent,” states the Court, “when “He is vot an unwilling wituces,” observes you have proved that there were auch letters,” the Cunrt. “f understand your Honor to decide,” says “1 didn’t know whether the handwriting was Mr. Mills, “that they must prove Wledge on | his or not,” remurks Mr. Storrs. “He devlincd’ ihe part of the defendant of the existence ot a | to auswer me off the tind.” fact. beture they prove the fact.’* F “They must prove positiyel: * explains the ISSING WITNESSES. Court, thut theses letters caine to his knowt- Me aoa ni eens “Perhaps not aa much as you,’ replies Weber, more sharply, “04 know ho was there,’* ‘* How long did the first conversation last?” You! eo ” “ Probably ten or fitteen minutes,” You've uessed wrong there," geta bacle Was he standing or sitting?” tors, “egigutng.” 7 reiragt ablized to you rotorts Weber; « Was he cool, deliberate, and coherent in his | muleot (2 “st concession Lye beard you speech, or otherwise i” duced by the defense. Iv is. a eeneral principle, ag well exeressed i 13 Ala, 627, that the per- son's nets, declarationa, unt condttes incou- Alstent with bis previous ‘character and habits, and leading to the conclusion of an aberration of mld, ara admissible a8 oyldence upon the question of ineanity, * From whieh the “Didn't he accuso you of writing letters through the Post-Olltce, und making aeslgnas tlone ut that place??? ‘ fle dido’t say anything about assignations.!? “Or making appointments ?? “Ito salt something about. writing letters, and farnlsbing her tnatinee tickete.’? t and he said, * This woman here,’ pointing across the table,» I says, ‘Lain not aware of the fact.’ He says, ‘She ismy wife. What business bava you to take her here!” LT told hin Emet her on the corver of Randolph and Clark Btreet, anid asked them Where they were olny yy and they auld to Mandel Eros, and we atarted over, anit “Ilo looked bad sround the eyes and the * Didn't hu say you bad written ber a letter, “ He Was perteetly cool and rational.'? mouth,” continued Garry, as Llook when I am " ks ca hie, 3 Mr. Trude directs the Bailiff! to call for | when we got to the cornor of Washington . hd “Was thatthe cuso on the occas) . waht rig wine sia ig neue Sir aay Moe mentee Pee oT eEe Charles Turner, and he docs so, but Mr. ‘Turner | stteet Jolin Carruthers suggested to the adios | Ord et terry agcrosed matinee tlekete, and if Bacon OF the ie in any sort of trouble, last futerview ‘ walking together, in Welle loi ie ae peor aa Sau ras | ort Hat's cuough, eald Mr, Weber, ollee! 1 ecuuse he was Lr 6 a” T i} uot capable, and he would havequit itt bud | "alt suotwer” directs the Court, jet hin. THY YOUNGER corrr “Was there anything marked of peculfar Orrtiaad Deput TENs about bls appearance that made an impression Wiliam Coffeen, Deputy Clerk in the Superior on your mind?” Court, brother of the Coffeon on the stand last Pr didn't notice anything peculiar, except that | week, is then valled, and testiflua: ‘Then, they wero not It is aleo well-settled that the usual expressions of amentul state aro original and competent evidence, It these nre the natural langwuco of Tuental alienation, they turnish satisfactory und sometiines the only prouf of its existence. Lt all case the jury are to determinu whether tuch expresstoris aro feigned or real. It must e observed, however, that mere narration or Statements by the accused, or thut he ur hits said they should go to the matinee, und you would mevt them ut the corner of ‘Clark ‘and Randolph streets, and go with them to the Tivol" © He gaid that? “Now, then, a8 a matter of fact, they did go to the mutincei” “Yes, atts’? * And you did goto the corner—— that they bud better go into the Tivall out of the rnin, He said, “By the way, let's Bo inand fet sonie refreshment.’ I made the remark that Thadn’t thine, a3 1 was on bntatness, ** 1s that what yuu toll Stevens t? “ Peetty nearly’ what £ totd blin,?! “Go on,’ interrupts the Court, + Only tell what took place when ho was tu the room,” * Ltold iw,” continues the witnoas, that Jectlon iy premature. If Stevens swore lie got | falls te anawer. sertitn fetta how would we know they were Cail William Wrenn," says Mr. Trude. eLtern Be ‘The official obeys, and Wrenn, tov, Is absent. “There are no many of them," remarks Mr. - ‘Trude; und by addes 11 withdraw the ques: | Ball Whecter ts put on the atund. don, [ have gotten this man mixed with an- Wero you given ® aubparua to serve on Gil- other,” And tien Mr ‘Trude pieks up fram the | bert?” aske Mr. ‘Trude, table two or three photographer, and reads from #f object,” says Mr. Mills. the back of one, “Compliments of Frank.* ‘The objection ta sustained,” remarks the as time. in the language of a Ivarn- dm, u #1 object," erles Mr. Weber, he looked ba . “Tsaw the defendant the Friday before the Wife, or othér person, auld, or wrote, or did | |S] ubject,!? exelufins Mr. Weorr, Court. Homa tty camueemone ou ty tut, ie eal thab ‘The objection Iysustalned,”? rules the Court, a pave you teen ober men look body homicide on Clark street, near Mouroc, Ho was Toe MELO Noe fall ‘within the rube, wud are | ed ona identifying the photograph,” urges Mr. | wtie State niay’ ask,” observes Mr. Trude, | supposed there were mutiuce-tickets iu then’ | {tHe chutged youwith atating that in a letter, “rhe nbleciion da auntainea Lae Judge, { Walking with his head down, I stopped ttm Mi deerme g8 aeatetents of facts, “AN acta, | arude. “why we didn’t et these witnesses," * | und accused me of furnlshityy mutince-tickers: | ali be not! ” ‘vines fa Jall bas he buen aoe ‘ney. wesc | qmssed the compllinenee oo tho day, and asked, all deciarations, exclumations, actions, mit? exe “ You are not,” says the Court. “It ts prapar, “says the Couct, to call uy; told btm [did not. tHe made several threats,’ “J believe be did. P it an en dolng any work 4 lay, und aske pieaton ae Heually and naturally: aecompaty | Que of fhe leires ts Inward the witness, | the Hallitt und ask it he cot the witnesses” Ce | 24? Whiat did he say?" o 3 Aud Ubst, uso matter of fact, did take or yoni Hat Paar was sioine, and hs, said ho was Mito. Brook of, or tend in thent: | and he ts asied, “18 that yours “We wish to show,” says Mr. ‘Trude, that | Ho sald that lw would punch me, and place “Whe 1 | clerking in a ‘house on Water street, felves to “prose, "an existing mens | Wf hulove thn photograph will spoale for tt- a iecihowaiors bee that : pu y Ane’ one } "Wott! wall! waltl” exclaims Mr. Weber in- When did be begin workIng far you in jattt | ut adn't beon able to do much, a nats tet affection of the miud self,” says he, somewhat out of humor. he had 9 subpana tor thu writer of thu Nelile thing and another like that.’ “Lobe interposes Mr, Storra, That {a sunlty ouclt, cl “Give us the language,” exclaims Mr. Mills. he was tn trouble about bls wife; sald he had not cross-exaraivatiou,"”! Answer Heateation? comes sharply from lutters, and searched for him and couldn't tiad, ed Judge, to be tafrly und tuily admitted,—that here asa witness, aud f lms that hls mother was summoned for the ¢ ” the question,” says Mr, Trude, received lettors addressed by youn men to h y e © flo vaid hu hada coud mind to punch me, cwithoeny A BRE OLE es show the ‘relation be - A pee omnes fa gidee, to be lately \ 3 the Court, "You te purpose of uaving her come Lito court to tes | f tol lun thut tt would be nonsense toto ang: | atKl a ad te ailiad jose len Milles frien den are jail iad found same Inorg fn bee trunk, | die eforey—atnl after, ade een guet’s time | must nasser the questions.” Hity ag te ber gon, und slo stated she wes siek. | thing of ue kinds What 1 would explaiw meee |. "MY Nrosmexumninatfone ee Sila, in open- | fess" ti mit Bald 1a, Wad ola oo eon the subject, Uy cofnectea with e ceetiecay Ge, reasena | That ie my photaeanl." saan he State ay ty Ws dre we call those | ters, and it woanle eutletactory he could uso | ng te erasecean Halve abget Provi. | Slow whather he tad any feellng on the | ft there alse Ceo rakge ses og oe, tue, men, the ting of the RUN te toda ala i] ou fA iit Sour bandits tule on the back? Dersons here ta testity und prove certain facts? | hig own judgment.” No. 720 We street now. Previ- a i rales et Culd him to keop Mh, 855, Judyy Brovee” recognized the rule that “Dd you send this to hert!* Our answer is tut they have teft towu—run vaya “Wail! interrupts Mr, Weber. “We ara | 2*3Y; ” now entitled to see the photograph,* tho subpeuas prove that’ observes tho sien” ‘sno trouble about Ut” saya Mr, mists should be permitted to do it,’ remarks Mr, ‘Wohor takes the pleture, und, after took | Mt, Trude. subject?" inquires the Court. cool, Traw hin again, ether that day or tie some ia the Huo 1 was adoptivg,” explains day eatore nd he tbpeared vory and and dejecte Mr 5 ie tulked goberly at first of his troubles, cae he jfeations don’t tend to show that,” ob- | but became more excited and more vehement a3. ra G T iY “Have you secn Stovens since June S04" asks hy went on, Tasked him why he dido’t leave ous to June 30, 1878, Lfived at the corner of Monroe and Peoria streets. fam an cugraver." “Holdont” breaks in Mr. ‘Trude, who has been tulking with Stevens, “I waut to ask hin a question or two more? . ‘The State's Attorney bows, and waves his ‘Did he put bis hand on your shoulder!” No, air? “What else took place, if angthing? “That was all tintamounted to. auything, and he went out,"” “Did nothing else take place? * the acts und “statement of the accused were ad- sible to show his monumania, Lb Is utterly tmpossiuls tor a Court to lay down an fntlex.bie a or standard by which We arg to precisely toring what ucts and declarations of a pris- ; ere horney |B : ; Me. Mills, taking a new tavis bls stiles ld ce salt be daa lett her thes or eS ’ ” Ne a ” hand, a8 hrowing the witness into Mr, | Ar. if i$ four tines, but he Joved her so much that he dens ine, a tli with Ingunity which ett “You siinply identify It and the liand writing, things. If you have subjenas Ll give you “There might have been game more words ult ded Sibvond eae 13 edbabt “Tn ate jail,” agit aut pratt Bes shi tneas repttes: otherwise bo cine fara act that would | and do not offer Aenated Inquires Mr. Milts. Attehments, aud walt until to-morrow: to get | anid, but I can't way what they were, Ho de Dd ke Sirs Tendo the oy e: Mga Inter~ ) tow often?” tween Leona iri and Bloatoe was be Or tte ect i al nde etl anid ia Intent. ry No, nnawors Mr. Trude, ‘i the witnesses If it fs possitte.® rected all Iifs conversation to me,” view,’ "asks 3 Ae Pate ae you. a rola “Lay have seen him half-a-ozen times," ue pat: ae ee ae ails roti nig Hd and state, ae f inky stready admitte acl “ Waeu did you send this to hort “Tdlstike very much,” siya Mr, Mills, to bo “You were the one with bla wife? up one bolls a me al alas lia va dieing 4 Op what business {"™ D courte PtH pe ee ny Ing Baca ar In his fore the honitelde,-sieh ua his conten | gece eka says Mr. Webce, “unless thoy in- | carl sti Nery mull,” sive Str Mi object to | Yes, [escorted her tu the tivoll” Meee EE aan cere ASE he dicate | Oa wae taaing carrying Mu Meckped, al Spoke to las he duce by the'singets Attoruey, md hig detarupe | wayediatnend” toloins Mr. ‘Trude, hot proved, Iie cald that Glibert wus ule writer A MYSTERIOUS Panty, “Mrs, Edwards, as @ matter of fact, was livt That was ull”. inay have talked ‘with others before now abeus Pesrunce, ete, us detailed te Cane ea actss ae | erhen the ae eit Te neon continues | Ge the Neilic letters, ‘There 1s oo proof of | «tad you ever scon Mra, Stevens bef fs Mrs. Hawatls,#s a matter of fact, wasliving | 7! State's Altorney has no mora questo ay R fore now abou! thers, Whee 8 detalted by Capt. Mealy und | ate, Weber, “whether it ts Proper or not. Tt | that x fore away from her husbaue y q ns. Others, What effect this funy hove or what | must be xhown first that it cune to’ the |! 8 i er in Me. MIL the ctreumstance. [asked hin where he was 7 “7 att “Yes, I hac.’ TL abject,” pute in Mr, Mills, Welcht ts to be given to. them as hercatter | knowledye and tute the possession of thy de. malig bicetign Isa proper one, states the e ; ; sts a i Tee Een Res tie Ae forage Feailiesta vine, ant He aad: ronmaetiing about renting a FB Nags Hee, oy fess “Where?” “The ubjection Is sustained, remarks the | Mr. Todd ai vil , Siuce be may be | house. ‘Then asked him why he didu't leave fee pbewe, Lt has been stsested tut the de- fondant, aul was one of the excitatory elements pout Fehnee Un eae ART Nn . Court. needed tu rebuttal, her, and he answered a4 1 have testitled. He rove a. ch bis Learned “counsel will offer to | foward bringing avout, the mental ata thoy | a wituess, auyeif ho were herg ho would anecs | 4c Ab @ parts + Did Stevens charge you with it there” tuliged slowly and distinetly when ‘he begua,?" Freke.ss beatin, upon the question of insunity | LwAEY, SE aa AE ere ere 8 ae eae What party? ; “No, str” DAVIS TURNS Ur, ee o statements inade by the deceased wile,—her ‘The Court makes an observation, but in so | fe certain thing ‘ t “Thut is not material" ejaculates Mr, | «With nothluy to that effect?" W. C, Davis ts called, and testitle EDWARDs, protestations, promises, ete., as well as conduct Jow a tona that all that can bo canghtat itis | 2b ropes Wober, ‘No, ott.” ou her part showing, or strongly tendiug to show, tht ate had been untaithful to her mar He Vows, and had In tact been guilty of adul- “ticable.” : 4 “Then foffer to show by this. witness,” re- Si When did vou gqud her this photographin — j Souldn't tind hin. fald that," says the Comet, “Lobject,” intorrupts Mr. Weber, “I cante To the Bath: “What ts the return on the fy see (ts relevancy"; but be Is too late, ‘Ihe a id:t answer ist “Tho Saturday before the homicide, Peter | _I.d. Edwards, a heavy-uet Gentleman, with o was very much exclted—scemed to be ao great | plentiful luck of alr ou the ton of his head, is deal worried. We were very busy that day, und | called, und teatites of follows: © L keep a Ne didn't do his full comotenent of work, and | saloon at the corger of Lake und Ann streets, Wo were very much behind. Tasked him if be | 2 merely euw prisoner, to know hia, while his would come down the next day, and he said ha’ | wife was ving In my house, next dogr. 1 saw would, but he didn’t, Ho satd a erent deul, but | Ulin last afew days before tho homicide, und all L remensber 1s that bo was very worried, and | shortly before they moved, He came in unt fot very bad.” “Tt fg not,” says the Court. "Stop it.” “TI propose tu ask this witucss,” observes Mr. Trude, “if Stevens asked hit where he had seen his wile before!” “What occurred there Ie admissible,” rojoins the Court, “but not anywhere elge,'? “Was Stevens at the party you refer tot’ + “That ta not competent,” futerrupte the The counsel of the prisoner takes his seat Once more, und Mer. Mills fs allowed co resume lis questioning, “1 worked tor John B, Wiggins in June of 1878," says the witness, cd had worked for hin eleren ¥ Tam stl! employed by hit, ldo not live with my parents. 1 ain a married aan." ‘i “It (8 conceded that adultery, if proved, was. © such provocation as would reduce the Killing 2 mauslaughtur, aml was in no sense an excuse Justitication ‘for Killing her. It has tong eu cetablished, and Is well recognized Jag, at to take away the life of a wollan—a wife Muse Fou suspect that she hus been entaged “T never knew you todo tt intentionally,” “ How long had you kaown her? * VAGUE THREATS ABOUT PUNCH asked for acigar, tHe scemed perplexed and 40 tome Mie ‘i A “That fe atl" remarks the Court. Courc, “unlegs It was talked over there,!? ne ING. no youu aeg him ery that or any other day? | excited, und ua if sometuiuy was the matter Fould be “ ct : elicto, ‘ ” ue Trude, his wite/"" In what tone of voice, and what was his mans] «4 i Thad along talk Friday,—the d: tiara soln past, and tolny i ant is Erde Daless SaughE in Hetkihen nes hus settled it, “1 object," Interrupts Mr. Mills V1 couldn't aay."” " wer Me ati te along tal riday,—the day wid ‘out gl stg Kote where ils ute live t ea tu the tmimediate transpurt a - The { Tek Festi ce . ner ore he tel saw hity another time,—a little betore this— pat crested by the discovery of thy act, her ADA ENGERT. Coust'’ Oulection ts sustuined,” comes from the | |, 1,08 you sivon us all that you recollect of | “When she turned around to address him, he «Wha wag sald duriag hat congersutiont” | When lis eau to the dor of tly lnsuss: raped, Of tact conduct brought tae iy ete eMIMEME® | Aaa Engertt™ ‘The olliver who had the subpcena for Wrenn ts} «That ix pretty nearly all.” hell. itu | guilt ls $00 late to object” chimes fu ate, | ub her Welty ha yt tale | Xegs 1 jut woagsban, before the killing. 18 u fact which | ‘L object, shouts Mr. Mitts. called tor, but tis {8 over on Ue South Side, and, ie Pi baE Dave su See ing excent a fow | {Did he cay anything clso to or against bis'| stores, : the tout here” ‘then he “etenned to the wi they ree “ite: 3 ed, jou . 4 "7 i one Ink 4 ifs & 1» Mr. ee s RE . er: I. ence.’ ‘ it th gol : i an ow Thusnity at te ences eae eee tenn to uicated to the dofendant.!" Willian De Lacy ts then sworn, Hotsoneof | ‘the accused gets up and whispers to bls at- “At the time ho told you something about Tt sbeoanaat ti consis pare a h rales Pi Hy wee and Heat he Bot, Si an went cate tala tne there duclined to te opinfon that proofot | We iutend to show everything,” says Mr, | the" young men,” but has uot the appearance | toritoy, ut then Mr, ‘ride inquires: bunching, what were the words?" 7 : they poth went riding MT seemed to wonder, the fact (Wf tt tea fact) and ite cominuiiieation True, ’ "| of alady-killer. "Me tsa Very ordinury-tookin, ‘pldatt you say to Pete Stovens there that “Ho sald ho had a cnod notion to punch me, |" £riday,} goos on the witness, “Peter came spy ol ity rust iliere.™ 4 tothe accuse fs Ue counacl Heer i Tew | 1 don't ike that statement—' everything,’ | chap, atout 2 witha amocer fone aisd had toa Fee ee SATE SRE INR a rr ec oiiug ta ehak elt" *} gown tu the tiorning, awit Lrememberdistineuly | S¢.tE8 you vey telegrapleboys coming to the to prove other facta of hice. fe tos ey expect remarks his Honor, “1 have torcly on Mr. | ures, aud hus on ready-made clouhes. Its Or ala “Did ne punch soul he was very canchy axelbety ee rge sea tioute house frequently (” Prater “They wilt ue elements, showing au insane mind before | Storrs und Mr. Trude, aud if you make a mis- | charm must be his tonuue. wdlada't you before seen her and Stovens at | \t A Ae inake an olferto pineb you, of offer | wo iu ud before in regard to hery—E dome | know hetter than the witueas to whom the mes. State he? thine of the homicide, Bealdes, the | take I'll begin to be very particular,” “ Did you know Mamie Stevens?” begins Mr, | a party, aut iia % you know they wero any violence! Know ay Ucan ave tne language —auout certain | fom Wetter than ts wit ruse aaldy Yn eubstaneg Hie i eR tio | Your Honor has auld,” saya Me, Trude, | Trude. ba at ia ly eee er ‘tte asked me toget up trom where I wae | letters hy tnd ia ils possesion, ‘und te was | "Xe" Mutetsyiieuely tilukes it lan’t worth while Tilted adultery, oe wae viva Lape * that you never knew me to violate my word.” | 4 aia.” “Wasn't Dete stevens present at the party to je." very much distressed In wind; and he walked | to crose-uguuine, Ro ive UW ta of a Tho tacts! ry of a prostituts. Ing, aed he would bit m wD ie at yout yout e ci i y tate which you refert? ground the ofllce, Ina very agitated inanner £ ould think,—in fact I Kuow be did," MENTAL CONDITION, 7 should be admitted to explal ualifes the Court; “but you might make a “ q revious to the homicide, “T object,” Interpoaes Mr. Weber, ‘No, air. L - a MORE '. og azaton, Eu therefore admis teutmouy | qastane, “Eyecrtihg oe soe se i Do you Kuow Sia, Mary Edward ‘hal is’ substanuivey" Fears’ the Court. “Did he attempt tot? 1 Het ad He Lag cad.f Janos Stowart ts called, aud testifies, in ree adnntyguettion, But Lao hot feel justilled in | ‘here was a Jottor written by Elfelt,"" zocs |. you " Meare naw on. reble matters fa este ie hel ioug was he thera?! How did hie eyes look f"" sponse to Mr. Storrs’ questions: “1 am Depus 4 } e1 2 . US 8G: rors , 1 ‘ t 1 p = . anand ste gon ed | iy Mi Saad inate | Dut you age Mame Serene on Batunday| qed ee tags porn angen te, | lo Wig wash tira? t [poke red, Bocture ho bad bean crying. | ty Clerk of thls Cour, and have beeu Recorder, tral oritets for or agallst her husband, Io u "| stioutd be permitted to vo outslde and lead’ te Any her alleged “What was his manner when be went off"? “He wens out the door, 1 thuught, perfectly satisfied after what L had explained to hiin,!” “ask that thut be stricken out,’ requests Mr, Trude. : paramour. she would. a Sprapetent arttiieaa, Aue would by sup- ‘sub poteatate ovri. Can she bu Whtoces~for, though dead, they want her 1 1. object to the characterization of witueasea,!? | Jane 29, 18731"" jnterrupts lr, uu i i i aye ne dta you see bert” jen you cumea p argument! remarks . ere the Court may not te ab le to nod thereins, “On the corner of Clark and Randolph,'? but now J would rather you would speak of the | Did you Zo anywhere with bert \ How do you now he had been erying?!” T have koown Steveus since 1875; he was in my “7 saw him crying." 5 loy In 18750, FE eaw him a short tlne be ane you ace bin erylog when writing postal fore “the homicide, the. last occasion belug Yes, afr! about the middle ef June, on Clark witness, Iam informed that this took place.” Ask bin about it," prompta the Court; ‘it it was sald there,” “Didn't Peto Stevens say to you, when you