Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, August 22, 1874, Page 7

MOULTON. (Continued from tho Second Pago.) o aud awn mow wutferlug {u ousoquates maro than & sblo lo Lear, Tam yours very truly, (8lucd) ExtzankTn R, TirToN, As bearing wpon this tople of her husband's tfidelity and Lor desire fur wo paration, a lottor from My, Lilton, dated Jan, ifl, 1871, Is pub- Ushed, ‘Uho lotter is an follows: MIS, TILTON TO meem e, 174 LaviNastox Stiiext, Broox-) % LN, Jan, 18,1671, Mr Dran FRrenn Awp Ststen: 1 was mado vory Rlad by your lotter, for your love (o me in most grate Tul, and for which'I nctually hunger, You, llke me, hyvo loved and boen loved, and un Asy wiih Mrs. Brownlog, “Wol ecnough, I_tink, wo've faved ; heart and I3 but I fiml in 3 my you aun elomoint to which I rosnoyd, why or how I an not phifosoptier anough of the humiat it ta wider- stand, I catingt reasor, ouly feel, Iwrc by toyon a roply ©on tho morning of niy slekuess, aml tinged with fears of approaching disuster, so that when monfl-day srrived 1 was kafely over my sulleringw, with & fulr }roapect of Toturnfug hoatth, - T destroyod 1€ leat 1ty morbld tone might shadow your mpirit, 1 mm now around m houso again, (loing very poorly what I want to do well, Allthicso ambitionn aud faflures you know darling; and ‘when §n your last letter to Theodors—tlode good, true Iettors—you tetl hul!rocllfl' of your ltfo with ~your pr~ Tonla, T eaught and folt the acif-saoritice, sduiivod and #lucorely approcinted yonr raro l‘llnlllh'l of leart nnd mind, T wm n moro domonatratlvo aml enthuslastic Jover of God manifestod in his childron, than you will ‘beljove, and my memorios of you till me with admira- ton and delight, 1 bave caught up your card-pieture, which wo lave, In such moments, and kissed it agalu and ngain, praylng with tears for God's Dlessing to follow you, nnd {0 perfect in us Abireo tho beautiful promiec of onr naturo, But my wweot and dear —— I Feallzo In fheso monthin of olir ueqialn co how ntinost nn{xwm“ it in to bring onl thens blossoms of our licarts growth—God's gifts 0 u—to humn oyes, Our pearls and flowers aro caught ap literally Dy vulgar uiid buso myuds thu aur- Tonud us on overy side, und g0 dostroyed or ubised ot wo know them no louger ws our ownf sud thun God s mndo our ouly hope, My dear, dear ufster, do not fet us dlsspoiut ek’ ofher, I oxpect much from you, You o of me—nat in tha senso of drafnfug or wearinoss 10 Lody ov epirt, but trust and fajth fn kumun hearts, Doca it not oxtst'belweon ue? I beliova ity My huas ‘Dand biss sufferod mcl with me iu a cruol conspiracy, uado by tay poor wuilaring mother with & onerey worluy of & holter cawsc, (o divorco us, by sayini thiut I was nceking It becausa of Theodore’s infidoilty— anaking her fecling mine, Theeo slnndors Luve beon sown Uroudenst, sn quoted overywliera 28 {ho author of them. Coming 15 this form and way to Bowen, they caured s immediate dininisston from both tho /ndependent snd Umon. Buorlug thus, boll of s, utfustiy, T Jauow nothing of thess plany. Anxlety night und doy Drougiit on nyy mistarruge—a_ dissppolutinuut 1 havo Dover lieforo known—n love-babe 1t promised to be, You know I bave kad_sorrow almiost boyoud human <capacity. Dour —, 1t o my mother, That will ox- pliin volumes to your il Loatt, Theodory kas many Bocrot enemics, 1 fnd, beatdo miy mollier, but with o fulthfulness renowed and stregriiened by expericuco, o will, by sllonce, tmo, and Jatence, be view torlous ‘over them all, * My faith and hope aro very beight, how that 1om off thio sick-bed, aud dear Frauk Monilton Is o friend fndoed, 1y fn mous aging tho caso with Mr, Bowen, Wo have weathered Aho utorm, and, I boileve, without barm to ws, Lot 20t your heart bo_troubiled, dear kwest, 1love yon s bo uwsnred of it, I wish I could come toyou, I would Lol you fu tha cara of your loved vnes, for that T can do. My heart bounds towards ull, Tlion your spirit would bo freo (o writo snd (hink, " But hereunto I um ncteulled, My sprit ts willing My dear ehlidren asoull well, Floy, on her return at tlic halfuay vacutlor, found 1m0 wick, and we ¢an- eluded 1o keop her with us ; und the Lis onterod tho Packer Tuptitute, Our houschold hus indeed been aad= 1y toseed nbout, und the chiidren wuiler with tho pareuts, but the ond hias come, and I writo that you 2nuy Lavo oy und not_grief, for that is past. Tam glad you jove Alice, 1 luve kinsed her for yoi many s, T will teucls’ all my darlings to love you, aud welcomo _your liomo-coming, ph 13w e, Leautiful boy, aud 1o Lo our ouly baby—very preclous therefore, Carrol {8 visiling Thoodore's parents uc Eoysport, Thore your mother la now belter, aud that Jou liwve reuehod tho suushino, - Our spirils caumot Rurivo Iu nuture's gloam, Give much love to your purents, I am yours faithfully aud fondly, BstEn ELuzanera, ‘This lettor requires a word of explanation, It will be observed that in tho course of tha corre- spoudonco botwaon Bowen und Lsochor there hnd been claimod infidolities on the part of Tilton with o certnin ludy, whoso nnme fs mot disclosed, although well kuown to all tho partics, and mueh of (ho accusntions against “Tilton connected bim with that lady ; und it wag avorred that they camo from his wifo. ‘Tho abovo letter was written to that lady loug atior 4ho nccusations bad beon made apainst Tilton, aud aftor they bad been communicated to Lis wife, und 1 bring it iu here as_bearivg on tho question whothor Mrs, Tilton destted & sopura- tun from hor husband os had been alleged on account of lug infidelities with this lady. 1hud ug o necessury precuution to tho penco of tho family and parties interceted, interdictod all partics from Lisving communication with each othor exeept husbund and wife, uuless that com- munication was -ktiown to me, aud the loters sent through mo or shown to me, Mr. Tilton and Mr. Boechior both faithfully complied with their promine in that regard so far as I know, I Wi nway sick iu the spriog of 1871, as beforo gtuced, and wont to Torida. Soou afior my ro- tun, Bocchier pluced in my hand sz unsign- od lottor from Mrs, Tiltom, . in or hundwriting, undated, but warked, in his Lundwriting, * Recoived Muroh 8" 1 horo pro- duco it, murited FF: s, T1tTON TO TETORER, s IDXESDAY, My Dran Fraxno s Does your beart bonnd towards all o iLiieod 7 Bo daes mino, Iam myself again, I i not duro to tll you bl T was wire, but tho bird L sung in my heart theso four weeks, and he bas covenanted with e never uguiu to loave, Bpring Las come. . . . Docanse I thought ft would ghwddon o t0 ¥now fuls, and not to trouble nor eribarrass you in any way, i now write, Of courso I should lika 10 shore wath you my Joy, but can wait for the buyoud, when, desr Fank says, 1 may ouce go to old Plymouth, T wlit thauk the dear Father, Buch o communieation from Mra, Tifton to ber pastor, under the cireumstaucos, scemed to ma 10 Lo & breach of good faith; but, desirous to hava tho peace kept, and hoping, if unanswered, it mighe not bo repeated, I did not show it to Til- ton, or inform hiiin of itw existenco. * Ou Friday, Aprit 21, 1871, Deacker roceived unotber lottor of that Uato, Unsigned, rom Alrs, Pilton, which he guve to mo. It is as follows: MD8, TILTON TO VEEOHER, Fupay, April 1, 1671, Mn, BegonEr: As Mr, Moniton Nas returzed, will you use your fnfluenco to ave tho paperh fu i pos- Bevslon destroyed 7 My eart bleeds night and day st the fnjustics of their existencs, T could nov comply with this roquest. I did not show this lotter to Tiltoy, nor did [ call Mrs, Tilton's attention to it. On the 3d of May Beccher bandod mo still another lattor unsigned; but iu Mia. Tilton's Laudwriting, of that dute, MRS, TILTON TO BEECKER, Brooxuyy, N. Y., May3, 1871, Mn, Bepongn: My future, ‘either for lifo or doufl, would Lo buppier could T Lut feel that you forgave, wiilo you forget me Iu all tho sad complications of tho st year, My ondeavor wa to entircly koep from ou il wuffering, {0 bear mysolf wlone, leaviug you orcver limorant Of it, Ay woapons werg love, o litgo untiring generosity, sod nest-biding, Thut I folled nfterly we both know, but now I ok forgivencsn, Thio contonts of this lotter wore 5o remarkable that I queried withun my own mind whother I ought not to show it to Tilton, but as I was as- suced by Doeclier, and verily belioyed, and now bolieve, that thoy woro unauewered by him, I thought 1t beat to ratain it in my own “possos- glon, o8 1 baye dono until now; but from the hour of its reception what rewained of faith in s, Tilton's character for truth or propriety of conduct wus wholly lost, and from that time forth § bad no thought or eare for Lor roputa- tion, ouly 80 faras it afeotod that of her clile rou. Aflorthis Tdo not know that angthing oc- ourved botweon mysolf and Mra, Tilton of perte- nanco o this inquiry, or wore thay the ordinary courtesion_und civilitics, when I callod st hor onse, ond I rocivad uo other communication from lier until shortly bofora the question of tho urbitration of the business botweon Bowen and Tilton was detormmed upon, I had loarned that Mrs, Tilton bhad boon muking declarutious which wore sullying tho roputation of her huse band, and givivg it to bo understood thut hor ‘howme was not 8 happy ouo, because of tho want of refigious symputhy botweou horsolt and hus- buud, uud becuuyo he did not accompany her to chwrch os regularly and aw often a8 sho thought ho onght to, and sho thought it wanld bo woll for theohitldren to do, and sonie- timos upeaking of hor unuappiuoss without de- fining specislly the causo, thus leaving for tho l\uuy‘éu&lnu and intormeddlera to infer cuusos of unhappiness which sho dut uot state, I thonght At my duty to tho parties to caution hor in that Togurd, and 1 sald to her that I thought sho ought not iu tho prosonco of others to' upbraid ier husband with their difforouces in rnllfimuu Fooling or opiulous, and thut it was not well for *hor to maka any swtomont which would show hior homo unhappy, or that sho was unkiappy in it, bocause it m’uhz lend to such inquiries sy might broak it up, as woll 84 the sottlement which 8ho was go denlrouy to maiutam for the #alio of both families—)r. Booohor's uud her own, This conversstion drow from Mrs, Tilton o lottor to Monlton, dated Sunday morning, Fob, 11, 1872, in whioh she snys : It wus given to you to reveal tome last Sabbath evaning two tuings, for which Gud blows yoit sband. sautly with Hls beaco? feat, the teuth thiat until then T Jiad novur seen nor Tolt, nmoly, Whonevor 1 romoime- mywell, i conversing withh Others, fo the shadows 1ug of Thvodoro, 1 hecamu hiy enony, und tho sucond truth] was that 1 hifdored the rocomutenction more than any ono olss, 1Luve not been equal 10 the grout work of the aat your, llhm nlmf el fo coue tho n; it BHe, My tot obiiarens 7 R0(hek, lige Adber tho signiug of the * Tripaztite Qovens TIE CHICAGO DAILY TRIBUNE: SATURDAY, AUGUST 22, 1874, nant” Tilton dealred I should raturn him tho' papor containing his wifo's canfession, as Lo #ald, to reliove lor auxiaty as to Its' possible falling into wrong hands, and sho was vory de- sirous that this papor showd bo destroyed., As 1 Iield {¢ wololy for lor Ymu\aflon and undor & pledgo to him, Igave it to Lim, and lo told o aftorwards that sho dostroyed it. Sho also contirmed this ntatomont, Bomo timo aftor thiat Ylonrned from Hocclior that Mrs. Tilton had told iim that when shie made hor confession ta nor husband of hor infldloty with him Sflm‘uhur) hor husband had made & liko confosaion to her of his own fnfidelitios with sovernl othor womon, This belng an antiroly uow slatement of fnct mo, and nevor baving heard Mrs, Tilton in all my con- versationu with Ler, although sho had admitted froely her own soxual fntorconrso with Boechor, make any clatms that hier husband had confossed s Infidality, or that he had boon unfaithful to hor. I brought it to the attantiou of Tilton in tho form of & vory stroug criticlsm of his courso towards mo, which might havo mado n great diffotonco ns to tho courso that ought to o takon, TiHton promptly, and with much feoling, doniad that o had ever wudo auy such confos- slon, or that his wifo over olaimed that ho had, and dosired mo to soo Mra, ‘Tilton and satisfy mysulf upon that poiut, and he wont immediate- Iy with me to his houso, On armiving ot tho hause, Tasked dre, Tilteu to step Inio the front patlor, whore wo two woroalone. I thon put tho queation to her: ** Elizabeth, did you toli Mr. cechor that, when you made ~your con- fosmion to your husband of your lo~ fidelity with DBeechor, your husband at the samo timo mado confossion to you of Li own {nfldelity with other womoa? " Lead: L want to knoy {f this is truo for my own sutisfac- tion?" 8ho anewored *Yes”” I thon siopped with her futo the back parlor, whero her husband wag waiting and snid to bim: * Your wifo says sho did tell Boocher that you confessod your in- fidolity with othor womon at the time she mado hor confesslon to you.” Elizaboth immediately enjd: * Why no; I didn’t to!l vou so. I could not hiave understood your question, booauso 1t isn't truo that Thoodore ever mado such coufos~ glon, and I didn’t stato it to Doecher, beonuso it s not tiue.” I was very muck shucked aud sur- prited at. tho donial, but of coursa could say notbing moro, and did pay nothing more npoi that subject, aud lofe aud went home. The next mormng I rocoived thoe following latter grom Mrs. Tilton, without dato, but it was aftor tho tripurtite covennut: AN, TILTON TO MOULTON,. DeAr Pranow: 1 did tell you twa falsehoods at your Lust visit, At first Tentirely miaundoratood your guestion, hinilg youjliud refarcuica to tho interiow ot your Liouso tha day Lufore; but when I futolligently replicd to you, I roplied falsoly. I will now put my~ z0if on rocurd truthitnlly, ‘I told Alr, Beochcr (hat, ot {hio timo of miy confussion, T, had mado silar con- fessious (o himgelf, bitt uo_developments as to pereous, When you then nsked for your own xotisfac- tion, Was it wo " T told my second le, Affer you had’ left, Tsald to T., *You know Iwas obliged to Mo to Frank, aud Inow say, rather than make vthers aufleras I riow do, Imuatlie, for it fu u physical - posslility for me to tall thia trutl 3 yol I o think, ‘rancis, bind not T, 's angry, troublad faco beon beforo 1o, T would Liave fold you the truth. Iam o perfect coward fn his _preseuco, mnot from any faull of his, perhups, bLut from louf yesry of timidity, imyplore you, 28 this dn « alde-fyaus” to s careful to lead ine futo further temptation, You may show this to T, or Mr, B, or auy one us in elfort xindo for truth, Wrolchediy, (8lguud) Evtzanertis, Tho letter was_ wholly unsstistactory to mo, becauso nothing had ocourred the day provious to which #hie could possibly have roforrod. Aiter the publication on the 2d’ of Novowmbar, '72, i Woodhuil & Claflin’s Weekly of tho story of ‘L'il- ton's and Boechor's conduct in relntion to Mra. { Tulton, nud, a8 my name was mentionod in tho urticlo as one in porsossl edgo upon tho wholo sub asked by my scquaintauces, and even by stravgors, upon their sscortaining who I was, o Waethor that publication was trus,” snd 1 found grest dilculty in msling’ on on- swer. Iu some cases I doubt wbot that Inquirers pupposed that I, in _fact, doniod their truth, but n}mn that point I wns very studious, not dircotly to commit myaelf. Tiuding that my vory silence was workiug in- jury 10 the causo of tho Bupprossion of . the scaindal, I told Lilton that 1 wished to bo an- tuorized by his wifo to dony it. Soou after [ re- caived » paper without data from s, Tilton, 10 which sho #aid: For wy husband’s sake and my childrens’, I hereby toutify with ull my womn’s noul, thut I win innocetit of the exime of Jinpure conduct allod ugainat mo. 1 hava beon to my hisband a trus wifo fu_bis love, I wish to ive aud die, My early atfoction for him still Dburns with ts maiden thune, ull tho more for what ho hina borno for my mako, both privale sud public wrougs, Having L tho power 10 strike otbers, lio Liau forborne to uwy it, and al'owed himself ta Lo ln— Jured fustoad. 1 bless him svery day for Lis falth jn Tuc, whick swerves not, aud for standing my champlon uguinst all my aceuse Upon the strongth of that T thereaftorwards #aid that Mrs, Tilton dewied the story. About the 16th of Decombor, 1872, Mr. Carponter and Dr. Btorrs undertook to look up the reports,with the intoution, as I understood, of advisine some public statement, orus being concerned insoma iuvestigation of the matter, sud Mrs. Lilton wroto for them the papor bearing that dato, Mus. TILTON'S BTATEMXNT, In July, 1870, 1ed by my duty, T Hatovmed n July, 1870, prowpted by my duty, I informed my hasbund fhat ME. I WV, Becdhior, my friend and pase tor, ind volielted m ta'be n Wifo to lifm, together with all that thia fmplied, Slx mouthy aftervards my hus- Lond folt linpeiled by the cireumatancos of o couspl- Tucy ugainst bim, fu which M, Brecher had taken Imrl, to bave sn iuferview with Mr, Heec) in order that Ar. B, might know exocliy whal I had sald to my wusband; I wroto u brief statoinent, I bavo forgotten in whot words, which my busband abiowed to Mr. Buechor, Late tho kamo uyonie g, Al canio to e, Iying very sick at the time, and (116d me with distrdss, saying I had ruined Lin aud wanting to kuow 3t T uant toappear agutust Lim, Tbis I certaly did not mean to do, sud tho thought w3 agonizing to we, I ihen wignod a paper which ho wroty {o clear Lim {n cuso of a trial. In thla fnstauce, ay iu mont others, when nbsorbud by ona great futere eat ur fcelfug, the hurmony of wy miud I outircly dis- turbed, und T found ou yetioctivn that this papor waa so drawu as to place mo most unjustly ogainat my hwsband, apd on the #ido of Mr, Boceber, #o4 In order fo ropalr mo cruel blow “'to My longesuflering lusboud, I ‘wroto an explanation of the frst paper any my elgna- ture, Mr. Moulton procured from Br, Beccher the statemonts which I giva to bim iu wy agitation aud excitoatent, aud naw Lolds 1, This ends iy connec~ ton with the case, of peoulinr knowl- y I was continually (Hluunfl E11zADETH R, TILTON, P, 8.~y statement {s mado ut the reqiest of Mr. Carpenter, that it nay be shown coutidentislly to Dr, Buorns and otlor drieids with whow my husbund aud T ure cousultivg, This paper was deliverod to me, and the :huury of tho confession then wag that Alr, and Mun, Tilton shonld admit uo more thau the so- licitation, but that endeavar to maka au explane- tion of the business fell through, aud, after it was shown to those intorested, as I was fold, the poper remained with me. I received o furcher communication from Mis, Tilton wtil tha 25th of Juuo, of this year 1874, and that commuuication came to” ma in this wise: Wheu Tiiton showed mo his Dy, Bacon lotter, I mout strongly and esruestly ad- vised agaiugt its publicanon, and paid to him substance, that while 1 adimitted the wrong and injustico of Dr. Bucon's charge, that be (Mr, I,) bad lived by the msgnanimity of Beechor, and that ho was @ dog uud & kuuvs, whou [ be lieved bo hud neted a proper and manly part in ondeavoriug to shiold bis famuly, yot ihatits publication would ko wtir tho public’ mind that gn investigution would bo forced upon him aud Jleochor fn some manner, which I conld not thon foruroe, and thut tho truth would in all proba- bility havo to come out, or so smueh of it that Mrw, Lilton und Boechor would bo dishonored oud destroyed, sud ho himself be sabjected o tho severest criticlm, Notwithatanding 10y sdvico, o was 80 wrought up with the con tiued assnulty u{mu it by friends of Boeoher, Lo dotormined the publication of this letter, "Lla auly modifleation that [ was able to got of tho Bacon lottor was thi, that it ortginstly roud that Deochor hiad committod ngafnst bun aid nis family o revolung erime, I inslatod that that #hould be changed into “an offenso committod agaiuat we," whioh was dous, aud the lotter was lmbfluhud in that form. 'T'ho reasous whica se- uatod mo to roquire this change Ly Tilton in Ly Jotter wero in tho hope that racouciliation und ponge might atlll bo possiblo, us the lottar us_amended would atalo uwn 'offanse only, and also thot an apology, sutile clent in tho mind of Titon, K{ml boon made for that offense. If Bogohor in roply to the Dacon lettor should come out and ntuto that it wan truo; he bad committed an offenseagninat Lilton for winch be hud mndo tha moat ample prplogy, which had boon acospted by Tilton as satisfactory, sud e the mutler way nobady's busineus bub that of the partios intor— osted ho would nover becoma & purty to any in- vantigation of tho subjeet, and that ‘Lllton had tuludu not unjustly or unfairly towaid him m whas ho bud dope; that, in sudh casa the uftmre might possibly havo boen quicted, and peace mulntainod ; but if the word revalting ciime re- maiued in tho Intter, all hopo of reconlliation or esonpiug the fullost invostigation would Lo - possible aftor the publicatiun of that lottor. Iso adyised Mr. Docclior, lis frionds, und counsol, but that advice wans unheoded, and 1 also pave M. Bocohor the wamoe advico at a congultution with him, for which ko asked In a lottor whioh will horoafter in its propor lnge Do praduced, dags subsequont 10 hin advico of 1me to ilton, I recoived the fols lowing lotter of dato June 25, 1874, from Mrs, "Pilton, which 1y tho lags communication I huve = haud with or Zroni hor upon tho nubjoat s M4, TILTON TO MOULTON June 25, 1874, Ma, Mourzon i It s Oiting X should naks quick ondcavor to undo my fulustico townrda you, T loaruod from Theodorw Jart night that you greatly opposed tho publication of hia_ stutomont to Dr. Nacon, 1 lind coupled you with Mr, Carpentor na advisiug it, Fore glyo mo‘and accept my gratitude, (Htgned) Enizangrn B, Tiron, Having now pldoed boforo tho Committes my statomont of facts coucarning Mra, ‘Wilton, and documontary avidonce that 1 have to suppoit thou, a8 thoy nro dimmotrically opnosod to noarly all that Mra, Tilton appears to declars in hor published stutomont, I doom it my duty to wyeall and my position 1 this terriblo buginess Lo sny that durlug thia affaic 3re, Tiltou kas moro than once admittod to me and to anothor person. whom I do ot care fo bring into tlis controversay, tho tact of TER SEXUAL BELATIONS WITH DEECHER, and aho nover hias donled thom other than in writlon papery pl‘el)nrud for s purrouo whioh I hove ahioady oxhibitod, but, on tho contrary, tha fact of wuch crimiual jtercourso boing well undoratood by Bacotier, Tilton, and Mra. Tilton, to lavo tukad pinco, my wholo action in tho mnttor was basod upon the oxistouce of that Tact, and wng an ondeavor, falthiully eniod out by mio in overy wuy possiblo, to profect tho faw- illey of hotl partios from tho consequencos of }mbllu disclosura of M. Lilton's iutidelitios to hor husband, I now retucn to TUE DOOUNENTART EVIDENOR and necessary oxplunatious thoieof, which I havo of tho conditlon of tho affair as regards Doochor bimeelf aftorthe fall of 1871, nu dis- connected with the uffurrn of Boweu. At about this time I recelvod n lettor, sont by Mra, Wooud- huil to Boochor. ~ Sho says to bim 1 Tor roasons In which you aro deoply Inforested, as woll as inygolf, tha canne of truth, I desiro to hove s futerviow with yon without fall at somo hour to- morrow, Two of your siaters_Liave goue ont of thelr way 1o a8wall my clioractor and purposes, aud by tho means of tho publfe and by uumerous privato lettors writton to vatious persous with whom they segk to i Juro mp, and thus defeatthe political ouds at twitich T aim, You doubticas know that it fs in my power to pirike buck, and In o way moro dlsustrous thun any~ thing that éan como to me, T ropeat thot T munt bavo an {uterviow to-morrow, sluco I am toapeak to-niorrow ovouing at Bteinway Hafl, and what T shul or shiatl not sty wil doend largoly lipou the result of tho tufer= view, Tho lottor occnsioned Tilton much anxiety, lost Mns. Woudbull, in prococding nguinst Doocher and bis sisters, would thereby volve Mrs, Tilton. Accordingly, knowing that Beecher and Mrs. Woodhull wore'to Lave an terview at iy Bouse the noxt day, ho cnmo to it uninvited aud urged Boechor to presido on that ovening at Bteluway all, Aftér Mis, W. leit, Tilton re- ponted this urgency to Boccher. Ou that eveu- ing I went to Steinway Hall with Tiiton, and failing 1o ono there to proside, Tilton volun- toored to preside himeolf, which'I beliovo bad tho olfect to provont Mrs, Woodhull's attack on the Bocchor family at that time, : On the YUtk of Decombor, 1871, Mra. Woodhull sont a lotter to Boecher desiring that ho would speak ot » Women's Suffraze Convention i Washington, to be hold on the 10th, 11ih, and 12¢h of Jauvary following. That loiter Beecher forwarded to me with the following noto of date of 2d January, 1872, BELOLER TO MOULTON, Bnookryx, Tuesduy eveniug, Jan, 3, 1672, ¥ DEAR MourTol : Tneud you Wy's letier to mey oud a roply which 1aubmit to your judgment. ‘Toll mo what you think, 8 it too Joug? "Whi vho une it for publisbing? I'do not wish to have it su used. I o uot tean 10 ypenk on the platform of o:thier of tho twa sufituge woclotfes, What inftuouce I exort I profer to do on my own book, and Ido not ineau to train wilh ofthor parts, and 1t will not bo fulr to prems o in whera I do not Wikl to go, But I leave It for you fo Judgo for me. 1 huvo leaned on you hitherto, sud ver been sorry for it Twas misiakon ovout' tho Uirion coming but o catly that Lo could tiot get & no- tlco of the Golden Age in it It was Just tha other way ta bo delsyod, und fo soid you's rougls proof of the first page and the Star articla, Tn tio payer fo-morrow o line or so will ba fwertd'to soften a liitlo tha touch about tho Cliristiun, Do you think T ought to ave o capy of any lettarto V, W, 7 Do you thfuk it would bo wellto write ughin and’ ot koy ko muck? Will you keep tho- lefter 10 mo, and send the othor if you Judgs {twise? Will yon tend u lino to any liouse fu the worning what you conelude? 1am fuil of company. - Yours truly nid aectiostely, Thero is a paragraph in_this note which needs & word of explauation, Ihad advised Deecher, mw ordor thut ho might show that thors was wo unkiodly feoling botweon him aud Titan, to publish i the Christian Union s roference to the Golden Age. Ho agrocd to do 8o, but, instead of that, Liohnd a nutico which, 1 thought, was worse thau if ho had said nothing, and "the allusion In the second pura- graph of this lettor. fs to & lotter which | had written to Beocher upon tho two topics—this sud Mrs. Woadbull. On tbo 5th of February, 1872, I received from Mr. Boechor & lottor of that dato, which is in- claded In tho statemont, but already published in Mr, Becelior’s statement, This was to let mo know that Elizabeth bad written him, contrary 1o her pramine, without my perunssion, aud nlso toivform me of his fears a8 to the ohnnge in ‘Pilton's mi-Z, and its clear statomont of the cano Ay it thon stood caunot bo furthor eluci- dated by mo. On tho 26uhs of Mareh I recolved a portrait of Titian a8 o present from Mr. Becclior, with s 1ote 88 s token of his confidenco aud rospoct. BRECUEN TO MOULTON, My Desn Fun:yp : 1sont on Fridoy or Saturday o porteait of ‘Titluu to the eiare for you, I hopu it wy it you. T havo beeu duiug ton mun's work thls wit ter, purtis 1o moko up Josy, and partly becauso I livo under a cloud, feeling overy mont that T may bo do- 1 my Jast worlk, sud suxious o wake the most of 48, Wien Tsuu wold Lis birtlright, Lo fouud 1o placo for ‘repeutance, thouglt ba wought it eargtully with teaes bur I have oue ublding comfort, T hove kuows you, s found {1 you o0 who has glven a now mean- ing to fricndsbip, "AS soon us warm daye come, I Want you {0 go 16 Peekakill withme, Tamoff iuin hour for Mugsuchuselts, 1o be gone all tho week, I am urgingt forward my second volume of the Lifoof Clrist,* or @ tho night comatli, when no mad tan worlk. With smuch atfoction aud admiration, yours truly, L W2 B, Matoh 95, 1873, Alter Tilton had written a campaign docu- ment against Grant's Administrativn, and in fuvorof Mr. Greoley's eloction, Beochor dis- cuned with mo tho position taken by Tilton. Beacher also gave mo & copy of his (Boochor') spooch at the openiug of Grant’s campaign I Brooklyn, After the speoch was dolivored e Hont mo tho following noto of May 17, 1873, which I here prodace, marked * R1t": M1, DEFCUKE TO MOULTON, ¢ May 17, 1872, 3y Dean Fianic: T eend you thoonly copy I have of 1y spouch ut tho Academy of Music, on Graut, and buvo murked tho passuge fhat wa spoke about lust ight, ond you-will soo just what I suid, and that [ argued then just us I donow, - Pray send it back, or T abiall bo left withiout a apeceli, 1 road Theodord's o Graut. T do ot Uink it fugt, It sbly writton.” 1t {80 cano of grapeeshat, yet I ihink It will overact, 1t ia 0o strong. - Will by likely to produco s fosling wmong thoso not slready lutenss that 1s excessive, Yours siucerely and vver, . ¥, §,—Dow't forget (o vend Lack my speech, About the time of tiis occurioncs, Beechor and Tiltou met at mv houso on friendly 1erms. In fact, I vannot exhibit bettor the tono of Til- ton's mind iv the winter aud full of 1871-"72 thau to produce hero a lutter writton to wma at that time without date, but I cau fix tho dota o8 carly as tha, It fa hore producod : TILTON TO MOULTON, Hupson Naven B, R., Monday Morning, My Dzan Fuans: Lam writlhg whils tho teain ls in motion, which acconnt for tho apparent drunkou- ness of this shakey chlragraphy, Ara, Beochor ity iu the noxt seat, Wo aro afmc: elbaw Lo elbow in the palace-cor, Bha 8 white-alred snd looks o dozen yours oldor thun whon I last bad & near view of lior, My heart has been full of pity for lior, nobwithatund. ing the cruol way In whieh iho Lus treated my good uuwme, or faco fn written over with many volumes of humaan wafforing, T do not think who lua beou owaro of my piessuce, for sho hus Deon wbzorbed in thought, Her eyed rolled to one ppot. A auguestion bas occurred to me, wiich I bue ten to conumunicate, Blo in going to Florkiv, and oy nover roturn alive, If Tum cvor to bo vindiinted £rom tho slunder which sho hus oiveulaled, or which x. Bowen prefends 10 luve derived from hor and i, Morsg, why would it not bo woll to gut from her and Mes, Morao o statement, under vath, by such a procens ka Inat ove,—documents mado enuy aud Hieinfens—of tho oxuct narmitions which they made o i wick 10 othera? It would bo well to hva them sy wht tioy aald Lufore, Lo gobn s elianco to say whit thoy said to Lim. Bpeak o Ar, Ward about It, Of conirso 1 foayo tho matter wholly fo you and him, I am unustally heavy-learted thls morulng, M sullen nellibor kovpstho durkand lurld past vivialy Lefave miy mind. Tf who nctunlly kuow tho conduct which her prieaty Lusband Moy’ ean guilty of, T bo- love ahe wonld alied by Llood s o, pechaps, aparing hfm, 6o would wrouk hor wratll on i victint, ‘Lhero funlook of dosporation dn lier ose to-duy, g if sho wer compalent 10 syl bLtor or rovengofal ; but portiaps, T nlejudgo hor miud, T hopo I do, % uhall hot bo homo il hursiay” afterucon, instend of worniug, us I 8aid, lenving for Wasbington at D v'clock that oveniug, Ever yours, ‘Turopong, (igued) On_tho third of Juiie, 1473, Deocker rucelvod from e, Woodbull the followiug fetter of that datos 285, WOUDItULL, TO BEKOUES, 48 Do Brugrr, June 3, 187, T the Mev, Henry Ward Beecher: 4 g Y Dz STt Lo saolul Oght agaivst mo belng yaged fn UMd city fa boowing rather botter {lisi T ean wall bear Jaugor, standing nunpportod aud wlono as 1 hisvo uttt 0w, | Within tho past two weels T have been shut ouv uf hotol uftor Lotel, aud s now, afior luving oblafned 8 vlace fu ono, hunted down by @ wet of maia und tomules who aro dotormined that £ shutt not ho permitiod 10 Vo aveg, if thoy enn pros ventit, Now,1Wiue Our usalstatco, I want to ho wnstolied i 1y posson i the Gilsey House, from * which 1 do not. Wikl 10 go, and all tuls ehnply hocuuso Twm Vietorls 0, Woodhull, the advoeato of suoiul freee dout. 1 lave submitted 10 this persooutipn Just wo long us T cats enduro (0, Ay buslucss, my projects, in g.;(' everytbing for which 1 live, sufery from It, and it uut cuasu, WAL You lond me your ald fu tufed Yours very trul 3 Hlnund)’ % Vioronth 0, WoonkuLL, Thae above Jottesr was sout to mo cuclosed In a noto from Deochoy, of the ssmo date, whlch i Liera produced ¢ DEXORIER TO MOULTON, MoNna Evexi, Juno 3, 1872, Mr Diean M, Moutzox : Will you auwwor this ? or will you sea that sho s to understand thot 1 can do noililug? I cortatnly slisll uu, at any and nil hnrards, tnko n sluglo step i thet dircotion, aud if &t brings traubl it tust come, Pleaso drop o a line o say that sl in right, if 1o your judgment all Sa rigbt. Truly yours, oW B, Tue Jottor of Mrs, Woodhull, together with those bofore produced ssking Boechor to wpoak at the Buffrago Covyoutlon, ara sll tho lotters I I havo from hor to Boochor, To this lotter no raply wag mada. Aiter tho publication of thio tripartite covenant. was made, Tilton deemed, from' the comments from tho press, that tho statomont roflocted upon bim, and’ he doesired that in some way Beocher should roliove him from the imputation of having ciroulnted slanderous stories about him without justification, for which he had apol- ogizod, and, by advice of [rlends, he preparod a card for mo to submit to Beochor to hnve him eign, and publiah in bis vindication. Tho origi~ nal card I horowith produce ¢ A CABD FROX IKRNIY WATD REROWEN, Alettor written by Thoodora Tilton to Henry O, Towan, dated Brookiy, Jun, 1, 1871, narrating charges i by M, Bowen “against my character, ias beon mndo publle u & community in " whioh T am a citizen und clergymay, and thrusts upon nio by no agoncy of my owa Wiint X cowd not it propristy shvite for miyaolf, nmely, an opportunity tomuko tite following statoment s Dy tho courtesy of Me, Tilton, tht leltor was shown at” the timo it was wriiton, and_befora Ib wna conveyed to dr, Bowen, two-and-a-half years By legal and oibior savixers Mr, Tiiton was ured fo publish 14 then without delay, o a shuflar statement, explaining Ll sudden tolllslon with Mr, Bowen, and hla unoxpeeled rolitement s editor of the Urion aud_coutributor 10 tho [rdepend= ent ; but, although Mr. Tiltow's publle standing neod- ed sch an explanation to bo mad, and sithough he i my freo consont to make it, yeb ho maguaninious- Iy refraiued from doing ko, throngl an unwilliugneas 10 tho publication of My, Bowen's sasortions convern- ing myrelf, Mr, Tilton's considomtion for my feel- inga nud roputation thus ovinced at the boginning hne contintiod to tho eud, and 1 Luve never consed 0 bo grateful to him for’an uncominon manliueed In ao- copting woulds to hfs omn repitatian for the sako of proveuting aspersious on mino. The surreptitious and unantliorized publteation, luat Sunday, of Mr, Til- 10u’s leltor, @ publication mado withont tho kuowiedga wither of Mr, Tilion or myself, glvea mo o rght to siy thut Mr, Bowen long ngo retractod bis mistaken chinrges tn tho following words, under hia own hand and eeal, duted namely, . o . . . In additionto Mr. Howen's voluntsry ‘stitomont ' sbove given, I solomuly pronouico {ie cineges to be fmisc, one dud al, und to bo without nny color of reason of fonndas tion. In fact, all my différences witlt Mr, Bowen, nud nil tomporary misunderatandings between Mr, Tilton and mynclf, yrowing out of theat, wero longago wettled, Justly, amteaply, sud {n the spivit of mutual good-wills (@lgned) Iexur WAnD BExonEn, Mr. Beochior folt much aggrieved at this claim on bim by Tilton, feoling that the msttor had beon all suttlod and adjustod, and he answered Tilton's application iu this’ rogard by lotier, under dato of Juue 1, 1874, published {n full in Mr. Buecher's statement, aud boginuing * 3y Doar Frank: Tho whole oarth is tranquil, and tho hoavon is soreno,” Moanwhile oharges wero proferrod agaiust Lilton for tho purposs of having him diswiseed from Plymouth Church. ‘I'his action, which scomod to threaten the dis~ covery of the facts In rogard to the troubles bo- tween Booclior and Tilton, sunoyed both vory much, and I myself feared that serious dif- feulty would sriro therotrom, Upon con- sultation with Beecher and Tilton, I suggested n ma by which that, investigntion would bo rondored tunceassury which wa in 8ubstance that o resolution shoul Do paséed by the church amending its rof, allog- ing tbat, Tilton baving voluntarily withdrawn from the church Bomo four years before, there- fore, the roll should be awended by striking off hiy nemo. This courso hnd been Bupgested to ‘ma by 2z, Tilton about a your aud a bialf boforo, }laxnnuuwor toa lottor by Booohor, dated Dac. 3, DEECHER TO MOULTON, My Dear Friexo: Thereare two ot three who feel anxious tu pruss uctlon fn tho care. It will ouly serva {0 1nla0 a profitiess excltement whera thers ia nced to have quict, There nro ulresdy complexitles enough, Wo do not want ta run tho sk of tho complexious which {n such s body 10 mou can foresee, aud no one control, Uuce frev from a enke of rosponsibllity for him, und thero wonld be a strong tendency for kindly fecling to set 1w, which is now cliockod by the mom. borship — without attondanco, sympathy, or doctrinal agrcoment, Sluce the conncctlon ls formal, sud mot vital or sympa- inetle, 1t 'showld not contiuve, with ll tho 7lsk of provoking or circulating rifors, A very fow duys’ reflection watlsfics wmo that this fs tho courso of wikdom, and thut T, will be the stronger and B, tho weaker for it, You siid that you meant to glvo it offect, Canuot'it be douo pramiptly? Ifs Ietter fo written It bad bettor bo vory short, simply sxnouncing the withitrawa), nnd, porhaps, whih au oz resulon of kind wishics, ete, You will know, I shall o fn tows Monday nud part of Tuesdsy, Suall Thear from you? Dec, 31, 1871, But when the meeting of the church was held for that purpose, it wascharged thore that Tillon had slandored tho paator. Tilton took the staud, and sad, in eubstanco, thut if lie bad uttored any slandors against Beechor he was rondy to auswer thew, ss God waa his witnoss, Beochor thoreupow stuted that he Liad no churges to make, apd tho mutter was dropped. Dut when thoe resolution was passed, iustend of bo~ ing put g0 s to oxoneinto Tillon, it was de- olwred, in_substunco that, wheroas ‘certain ohmigos had been mmnde against him, aud a8 he Flnadnd to those charges non-memborghip,” bis name be dropped from tho roll. This action of the church very tauch exasperated Lilton, who thought Boecher shoutd unvauprovonled such s result, and that ho might have douoe go it ho had stood by him fully aud fairly as agroed, In that, howaver, I bolinve Tilton was mistakon, becsuso Mr, William F. West, who proferred tho cliatges againat Tilton, did it againkt tho wish of Boccher and without any cousultation withehim. Moauwbile, througly the intorvention of Dr, Storrs and otuers, s understond, an Ecclesinstical Council had been® called, Ths offorts of this Council in uttompt- ing to disrellowship Plymouth Church were very dinplonsiug to Leecher, and eausod him much trouble, cspeelally tha actiou of Dr. Storrs, which o expresscd to me in the following letter, dated Mavobs 25, 1874 ; BEECHER TO MOULTON, [Conndential.] 3r Dean Fraw: I am fudignant beyond oxpres- slon. Btores’ courea hna been an unnpeakubily outrage, After bl pretendod symputhy sud (eieudubip iof Theodore, bu bos turned wgainst bim in the most venomous mantier, sud it is not slncere, Iile profes- slons of faith and atfection for me ara Lollow sud falthless, Thoy are meroly lactical, s object s ain, 1o s determined to' forco o contllct, aud _use ouo of us tu_destroy tho. othor, if pessitio. That 1n s game, By stinging Theodore be believes bo will bo driven foto a course which he hopea will ruin me, If ever & man letroyod anothir, o bas, I am in hopes tlint Theodare, who Lns horne 40 much, will b uuwill- ing 10 bo a faflin Storca’ band to strike sta friend, “Lhero ar ouo or two reasoas, emphatic, for walting uutil the euq of tho Councl) before takiug any action, Fleat, that thouttack on Viymouth Church aud the throats ogainat Cengrogationslisin wero mo violent that the public wind 1 bo absorbed in the coleajustical and lementa not In¢the personal. econd, if Plymouth Chuircl i alsfellowshipred, 1t will constitute o blow at mo and tha Chureli fur severcr than ut Lfm. Third, thut if thu Council duea nat disfellowsliip Piymouth 'Cliurch, theu undaubtadly Storrs will go off futo Dresbyterian. fau, o ho, slnost without dlsguise, thyoatenod in biu wpedel, aud i that case tho enplinsbs wil be there, Yourll, st any rale, while the fury reges n tho Councll, it s not wise to mako sny nmove that would by Ono amiong so muany ou to loso effect in a degreo, Aftor tho uattle Ju oyer ono can more _oxactly so what ouglit to be done, - Meantimo, I am a4 pitlout aw T Luow Low to bo, but pratty nearly used up with inward oxcitement, aud mukt run away for a duy or two sud ifdo and sleop, or thero will b a funeral, Cordially und truating yours, I, W. B, Manou 25, 1874, No ono can toll undor firat _impressions what the offcot of such a spooch will bo, It ought to damu Btorrs, Wilo those procoedings wero ponding, tho Rov, Mr. lialliday, tho assistant of ecabier, called upon him aod upon mo to en- deavor to Inarn tho fucts ahout tho difficnitics Dbatweon Boechor and Lilton, I stated to Halli- duy that I did not think that eithor ho or the church wero justifled in endoavoring (o rcopen & troubls which had been nd{nu(ud and gottled by tho parties to it, and that it was better, 1n my Judgmont, for everyvody, that tho whole matter should bonllowed to ropogo in quiot, Tho re- sult of thio,iutorviow botween Halllday and Bocoher was communicated to me in tho follow- ing lotter, undated nud unsigned, ko that L can- not fix tho date, but it is E’ Boechor's hand- writing ¢ UEKONER TO MOULTON, UNDAY 4, 31 | called Juvt night, My Dean Fuenp: Halllday ilton's Tutorviow with b did not uatlagy but dise turbad ; but it was the wume with oll, “who was preseut, Ittondod directly fo unsettliug, Your iu- torviuw last night wus vary benoticial and’ guve cou- fidence, Thin must bo looked uftor. Id s valn to Duitd If tho fonndution sjuks under every offort, I aliail ueo you at 10:40 to-niorrow, f you selurn by way of &0 Kemvon siruct, N Tho auxioty which Beecher folt sbout th so aloiies and thio steps Lo took to quict nmmli to- gother with tho trust he reposed in me and my evidence to aid him iu _that behalf, may be scen from a lottur boaded 26—73, which I belivve to bo June 26, 1878, and diveoted, * My Desr Yon Moltko," " 1t fu bioro prodused | i PRECHER TO MOULTON, 25, M9, ¥ DEan VoN MoLrke : I Lnvencen Howard again, o suys thut ft wos not from Thoodore that Giliisou ot tlio statement, but {rom Qutpenter. It ko re- porfiug that view? T bave told Olaflin that you would corm witl Garpenter 1t La could ta found sud st auy vato by U t-night, ta weo Stoyrw, but I dld not any wuylliug about Slorta, Yyent Qlovelaud Witl tny borao und buggy over to huut Curpoutor, Will you put Carpeuter ou bis yuard about muking such atito gnmm m:uu'-au!:uuru;nu &au-- of comifug from uarioss, Xa and over, 3 » Wo Baxostes, Meanwhilo Halllday hnd bad an intorviow with Tilton, the rosult of which, as unsotthng the matter belwoon 'lilton and Boecchor, was vory anxiously awawod by Hoechor, who communi- cated to mo, aud who was ais0 quito 88 anxious 1bat Thiton should take no stops by which the mattor botwoen thom should got iuto tho nows- papore, or bo made in Any mauner a mattor of controvorsy. Withi this view he statad the situ- atiou, on tho same night of tho interview of IIal- liday nndTilton, in the following lotter, which {8 without date, and was written in poncil {n groat laatos DREONER YO MOULTON, SunpAY Nramr, My Deas Frienp: 1, The Kagle ought o havo notling to-night, 14 1n that meddling which stirs up our folks, Nelthier you nor Theodore ought to ba troubled by the sldo which you sorvod mo faithfully in ublic, 9. The Deacons' mesting, I {link, 8 ad- Joirned. s sawr Doil, Tt was a fklondly movemont, B, The only near nozt dunger is the women, Morrill, Tiradshaw, and the poor duar cbfld, If tlie papora will hold off a mouth wo can’ rido out the galo and mako aafe snchiorage, and then when onco we ire in deop aud trunquil waters, wo witl all Jofn hands {n 8 profound and gonulno sanx deo ; for tirongh suctt o wildornesa only s Divine Providence could have Jed n8 undovoured by the open-moutlied beshta that fay fu walt for our lives, Igo on tho 12 o'clock train, after a sleoploss night, 1 am anxious about Theodore’s Suterviow with Holliday, Will yon send mo n line Mondsy night or Tueklsy morulng, care of M, £, gz‘l‘zlunrd, ‘Boatou, Muss,? 1 shull get mails thero til slday, 1 have now produced to the Committeo all tho Jottors aud documonts \Jenrlu§ upon the subject matter of this inquiry which I Linve in my poa- souston, either from™ Beecher, Tilton, or Mra, “Tilton, previous to the Bacon letter, and thore s but ono collateral mattor of which I dostro to Bponk, Beochor novor intimated to mo that he thought thote was any dosire on ‘Tllton’s part to bluckmall him, and as 1had the solo maunge- ment ot the money controversy botwesn Tilion aud Bowen I know therowas mo attompt on Tidton'a part to blackmall or gobt anything more than what I bolieved his just duo from Vowen. ‘The queation whottior Wilkckon knew or bolisved that any offonso Lind beou committed will dopend upon the faot whother he knew of auything tlntqml been done by Boecher or Til- tou's wifa which callod for apology, a¢ tbe time ho wrote the Tripartite Covenant, That the Tripartite Covenunt was mado Rololy in rofer- once to the disclosures which Bowen bad mado to Tilton, and Tilton had mode to Bowon, and ‘L'ilton’s latter oty forth that the only disclosuro ho mado to Bowen of Beeoher's acts_towarda himsel? were of improper advancos mado £0 Lis wife, nnd that bo go limited bis charga in ordor to Bavethe honor of biswife. Theso questions will bo suswered by the production of & letter of April 2, 1872, writton by Samuet Wilkeson : WILEESUN TO MOULTON, New Youk, April 2, 1872, 31y Dear MourroN: Now for ihe clowlng act of Jutice and duty, Lef Theodore pase into your Lands hio writtan ayology whlcli Lo huld foF (e dmproner ndvances, and do you pars it inlo tho flumos of the friondly firo in your room of reconcillstion, Thon let Theodore talk 0 Oliver Johnson, Thear fhat ho aud Curpouter, thoartlst, hava wade this wholo affuir tho subjoct of ‘couversstion i the clubk, Hincorely yours, Barves WiLknsoN, Thie lotter, it will be obscryed, containg no protest against blackmailing, eithor on Tilton's uurt or my own, upou Baocher or Bowan, and is of tho duto of tho tripartite covenant, Wilkin- 800, wlso hearing of Tilton's traublos, kindly of- fored to procure bim vory lucrative employment i a largo euterpriso with which he was con- nected, ug appears from letter dutod Jan. 11: WILKERON TO TILTON, NonTuxzmy Pacirio RAILROAD Coxrawy, } Jon, 11, 1871, Deas TiLTox : You aro in trouble, with w Jotter Just matled to Juy Cooke, advising him fo wecure your sorvices ke a plaiform Apoalter to turn Now, Englund, Old England, or tho Great Weat, up- sido’ down sbout our Northoru Paciie, Pluck up heart. You shan't bo trampled down. Keep quict s don’t talk ; dow't “publish, ~Abido your time, and it will bo & vory good time, Take Mr. Wood for it, (Bignedy BANUEL WILKESON, Ty lottor waa dated after the lotter of apol- ogy, and aftor the fettor of Lilton to Bowen, nnd Wilkesou could bardly bave desired to employ in 80 gravo an cnterprise one whom he thon kuow, or boheved, to boattempting to blackmail his em- ployer; and, besidoes, his kindly sxpiossions nnd advice to Tilton seem to wmo wholly inconsistent witli such an allegation. On tho 3d of May, 1873, I know that Tilton was in want of mone and I took leavo, without consultiug him, to sond him my check for $1,000 and o due-bill for that amount, to be signed by bhim, inclosed in & Jottor, snd which he returnod to mo with this iu- dorsement thercon : Dean Frank: 1 cannot borraw any monoy, for sce B0 way of returning it. Hastlly, T, T, Aftor the nbovo paper was roturned to me, on the same day, 1 sent him the $1,000, leaviag it to bo o mattor as botween oursclves, o far as Beacher iu concerned, Tiltou never made a de- mand on him for monay, or pecuniary aid in auy way or form. He asked only that Beechor should intorpose his influence and power to protect him fro the slandors of thodo who olsimed to bo Bocechor's friouds, winlo Beccher bimsolf, wilh that goueroity aud kinduess towards Tilton winch had alwnys characterizod his scts during tho whole of thits unhappy controversy, of his own motion, ingisted, turough me, in aiding ‘filton _in uumhliuhin% his _enterprise of tho Golden Age, for which ho gavo me the sum of §5,000, which I was to oxpond in such mannor as I deomed best to keep tho enterprise along, and if Tilton was any time in nced perdounlly to aid bim, Iv was anderstood ~ Lotween mywolf and Beechor tual this monoy should go to Tilton ad il it cumo from my own voluntary contributions for his beuofit, and that he should not kuow aud ho does not kuow until ho reads this statement (for I do not bolicve ho has do- riued it from any other soutce), that this monoy came from Boecher, or thinks that bo isio aoy way indebted to him for it. nnoxed |8 an acoount of the recoipt and ex- pondifuro o that sum 8o far as it had beon ox~ ponded ¢ BTATEMENT OF ACCOUNT, 1873, Moy May July Aug. Bept., 12 Daid Bept, 30, Paid, Dge., 10 Fald 1674, Fob. ‘M4, Paid... March 80, Pald, My 2. Pald, Msy 26, Paid Tota Ialso o tlio publishers of the Golden Age, which wi to vouch for the expeuditure of & part of tho abovo amount: RULAND TO NOULTON, [Vrivato,] Trx GoruEx Aat, New Yok, March 30, 1674, Dean M, Mouwron © Wearo du o $iyht wpdt, 3r, —— ls away, and we bave no monoy and Lo paper, Cun't got the latter without the former. Wo owo ubout $400 for paper, aud tho Hrm we bave been ordering from refuso to let us bave sny more without mouey, Haven't any papor for this week's fusuo, 'Fruly yours, 0, W, Ruianp, I you can do anything for us I trustyou will, to ‘help us got over tho chusm, FIOM BANT 70 BAME, Tus: GoLEN Auk, New Yoxx, March 30, 1874, Dean M, MourToN’s I am wore gratefal tnan I can tell you for tho noblo and generous Key you camo to the rescuo of the Gulden A gé this ofteruoon, Truly your friond, 0. W, Ruranp, Ithiok proper to add further, that, Tilton 'mora than ouca said to ma hecould and would recvive nothing from Bocchier in the way of pocuniary sssistanco, I romombor ouve special 1natauce in which tho subject was discussed be- tweonus, Boeccher Lad told mo that ho was willing to furmsb monoy to pay tho expenses of Tilton and lus family in traveling sbrond, in order that Tilton might bo saved frow tho coustant stato of krritation which urodo trom tho rumors ho was dully heuring, I rathor hintod at than informed L'ilton of this fact, and Lo re- pelled ovon the iutimation of such a thing with the utmost indignation andangor. ‘Theorofore I only undortook tho digbursemont of this sum st the most enrnost and voluntary roquest of Beocher, [Mr. Moulton hoie incorporales in s utate- ment loug lottors trowm ‘Liton to a friend 1u the Wost, aud which cawo into his possossion at tho timo it was wirton, explainivg bis (Liiton’s) jlosmnu iy regard to Mrs. Woodhull and the fn- uricus publication mado agalust Lim and hLis Tamily and Mr. Boecner, ‘Tho fivat intlmation of tho wennity of ‘Lilton aroso i this wise: Prlor to Bunday, March 29, 1874, a publication was medo of & utastvmont by & reporter of tho Brooklyn Union, purporting tobo the result of nu interyiow with homas G. Bhearman, Olorl of Piymouth Church, 1o tho offect (I quoto from womory) tbat ‘Lilton was jusano, and that he statod that Mre. Tilton bed medmmstio fits (whatover that disoaso msy bo), in whioh she had stated mattora affooting tho charactor of Toccher, aud to the statomoent of nelther of thom, for that reuson, wuy any oredit to bo given, 'This publication, es it touded not ouly to excite Tilton to & dofenso of his sunity,but, 88 also comtug from the Olork of Plymouth C‘hnmu, might be supposed to bo an nuthoritative ex- prossiou of its pastor, sonoyed Doccher vory uch, and ho wrate tho followipg lattar: UTEQUER TO MOULTON, HIJN’:IAY Niaur, March 9, 1874, MY Dew Faai ¢ Tu thers to be no end of trouble ? Ta wave to fullow wave in cndloss succession 2 T wus out o the Jwart whou O, showod mw that whameful pavagraph frons tho Union, It cxtelly 18 bayond des scriptlon, I folt ke lyiug down aud waying, “I um tired, tited, tired of Wving ur of frying'to yealut tho dovil of mischiof,” T would rathur have Lud u Juvelfuu launchod ugafiwt 1uo 6 bundred timos thun ‘aguluat thoso thut Luve sutforod 4o 1much, The shomo- ful fudoleacy of bringing the most sucred rolations into such publicity Alis mo Wit Lorror, But here are Dfl.llll‘hpl ilvludloat, The paragraphs cams when purpoeo | the publie mind wes nllglulml with tho Counefl mml * with Theodorow — Ietters, 1 hopo ¢ will pasa witliout furthor notica, If 1t a not taken up by otlior papers, 1t will sink out of aighit and bo for- qottan ; wherons, 1 1bbo aanailed, 1t sy ive 4t o conapionity that it nover would huvo ind, But 1 shail ‘wrile Bliearinan a lottor aud glve lhn iny Tul feeliugs, about it~ I must egais be, o I kisvo licretoforn boci, indohtod o you for judlcioun counsel in thia now #lagrant olomont, Ay’ fumnost soul longa for peace, and, It catinot Lo, Tor ‘death, Thot will bring peace, My forvent hopo in that thin depth of gall may sink through outright, and not prove mortnl poteon, Youra' evor, I, W, LkRORER, 1 hinve written strongly to Bhoarman, and hope Liat e will sond & letter 10 T, wnsoliclted, I am_mlck hend, Leart, and body ; bit smust move on, I f thls ‘morning liko leiting tilugs go by fho run, Tho lettor of retraction Em osod by ‘Lilton, not bolug lorlllcnmln’m l’(‘llt it ‘my duty in this conteat to tuko uuch moasuros as should resull in an apology fiom Shoar- man to Titon, 1 accordingly carricd to bim a €opy of tho panes having tho srtlolo, and lojd it upon his desk 1n his obico, and snid to him that it tho statoments in this articlo woro not neturlly mado by him ke ought to retractthem, Althougis it Iy on bis dosk, ho said mo that he Liad not soon the articlo, snd did not mosn to sea it, I told him that ho must #00 it, and if it wan not truo be must say so, lio #ald ho Al not want to road {t, and would not road it. 1 thon loft him. Aftorwnrds I saw Til- tou, and tola him what £ hnd dono, snd_ knid, “Wo will_go up togathor,” which we did, and mot Mr, Shearnian.” Mr. Tiiton eulled his ation. tion to the statoment in the Brooklyn Union as havmg come from him [Shoarman] concornlog himsolf and his wifo, that ono was orazy and tho othor mubject modinmlstic fits, Said ho, ** Mr. Sheavinun, this i8 untrue, and if you aro not correctly reported, your simplo duty {8 to say so; aud it you have mado such & atatomont, I domand that you ro- tract and npologizo. If you to not, I shall hold | you responsible i any way L can for such an in- Jurious sintemont,” ~ his conforonco brought about an oxplauation from Bheatwmay, which Tilton rofusad _to nccops, and Shearman two days aftorwards sent bim anothor Tettor of explanation, in which ho snys, 1 am now sutiuflod that what I did sny was arronoous,” Moanwhile, it had eama to bo aprond about that Iecchor hind mado similar accusation as to tho Binity of Mr. and slrs, L'ilton to thut of Sheor- ma, to which roport Mr, Buochur gave u ompliatio donial in & noto to Mi. Cleave- land, of tho gmunnt Investigating Committeo, o enid, *' I have been as dumb ss tho doad. They that dare to say I have wnpoken of it are liars, and thoy ara the boarors of lies if thoy re- ceived 1t from others,” Having rotnined tho friendehip of the princi- pal parties to this controversy down to to-day, 1 have not thought it proper to produce herewith any letters that I have recoived from cither of them, oxcopt the single ono oxonerating mo from blame aud showing slrs. Tilton’s confl- dence in mo, which I thought was due to mvself to do, because of tho peculiar stntement nttrib- uted to her. Nor huve T Jroduced wuy papers or proporals for 8 sottlement of this con- troversy since it has broken out afresh, and “sinco the ublication of T, Tilton's lotter to Dr. Bacon, and the call of Beochor for » committeo; nor have I since then furnished to eithor party, although called npon by both, anydocnments in my possassiou that one might uso tho samo against tho otber. I havo endeavored to hold myself strictly as & mediator botween them, and my endeavor hias been, oven down to the very lIatest Lour to bLave all tho scandnl arising out of tho publication of tho fucts of thoir controversios and wrongs buriod out of sight, doom g it best that it ehould bo ko done, not only for" the good of the partics con- cornod aud their fumihes, but that of the com- munity st large, If auy evidence wa necded that 1 was endeavoring “to tho latost hour to provent tho publicatiou of all theso dncuments and this testimouy, and that I retained tho confidcuco of ai least ome of iy purties in that emdeavor, I produce & lottor of July 13, 1874, befug n note arranging n meeting beuweon myself and Beacher in regard to this controvors BEECHER TO MOULTON, Souy 19, 1874, My Dran Frane : I will bo with you ut 7, 'or a lit- flobefore, £ am oshamed 10 i u draw u bre wpon you, aud have but a slugla_ cousolation—thut the mat or canuot diatreas you fung, us it wuat saan ud, That in, there will Lo 1o more_auxlety about the future, whatover regrets thera may be fu the past, Truly yours, and over, H. W. Beionxg, It thero isany paper or fact suppused by oither of the parties, or by the Committee, to be in'my pousenslon which will throw any furthor Light upon the subject of your iuquiry, Txhull b most willing to produce it if I havo 1k, although I do not beheve thore is auy such, and I am ready to suswer any propor question which shall be put to me in tho wiy of cross-exsmination by any of tho parties concoruad, or thor counsel, aa fully a8 my memory or any datn I bave will werye, 50 thut all the factd may be knownj for, it ooy part of thom bo known, I 'deem it but just to trath and right thatall showld bo koown, As, how- evor, controvorsy hus nlready arison as to the correctuom of tho roports of the ovidence taken before the Committee, I must ask leave, if any crosw-oxamination is to ba lad, to bo accompenied by my own stenograplor, who shall tako down the evidence 1 may give, a8 & necespary measuro for my owua protection. Leaving to your Commitice witiiout comment the facts and documenis herewith prosented, 1 bave the Lionor to remain, yourstruly, (sigued) Fuavcis D, MovrToy. —_— EFFECT OF THE STATEMENT. spectal Disvateh to The Chicagn Tribune, New Yonk, Aug, 21,—The publication of no naws aince the stirrlug events of the Rebellion Las been awaited with such eager attention by this city and Brooklyn (and tho interest felt In tho subject Is quite aa deep in all other parts of the country) s Francia D, Moulton's statemont of what tso knows about the Begcehor-Tilton af- foir, It burst unexpectodly upon tho pub- lie this afterncon, Doing published ox- clusively by the New York Daily Graph- io in o fivepage extra iwued in conjunction with tho third edition. It was un- expectod, bocause Moulton positively declared yestorday aftarnoon, noar the time wheu Mr. Tilton told a friond that it was in typo in the Graphic, that it wus privatoly sot at his oxpony and would be given simultaneously to the morn- ing ppors thid ovoning for publication ta-mor- vour T addition to its exten, the. Graphta fils ity flvat, fourth, and fiftu pagos and one column of its eighth—spncoe urus ly given to pictorinl illustrations—with fae sumilicn of tho letters Moulton produces in biu statemont, aud slo bas & two-column loader on sho subjoct, besida throe editorful uotes. Theso latter aro chiotly dovot~ ed to 1 VINDIOATING MOULTON'S cONDUCT in the affair. Boecher, however, is referred to in rather hoatod words, In the course of which hhe is ealled a liar, & Libortine, and a sncak; but, on the whole, the subject is tronted with fale- news, "I'ho statemont i8 o telling strokoifor Tilton. The demand for the ungm‘uonmnmmu Moulton's story 1 astounding, —The extra was put on tho streot about 8 o'clock, and by 6 o'clack 1,000 cupics bud bicou aold at & newd-staud fu frout ¢f the Astor Houso, and 100 ware sold in _another bour. BSoveral other standa in the vielpity sold front 60D to 80U befare 6 o'clock. At Brontano's pows-agenoy, in Union Bquaro, sevon clorks woro kopt coustantly employed until well on in tho evening selling tho Moulton oxtra slone, and the proprietor said he could uot get them faat ouough 1o supply tho domand, NEWBIIOYS RAISED TUE PRICK of tho @raphio to 10 conts, but whou purchasers demurred to this they sccopted tho usunl prico of 5 conts; but gonorally buyors wero tu such hasto to got a pogput the story thas thoy dld not dickor ubout the extru pounics. Pooplo in the hurse-cars rosd tho narrative, aud podestriang porusod It ag they walked. Ono ald gentloman was so anxfous to got turough it that ho dared to attompt crossing DBroadyay at the Astor Houus reading, and wa knocked down Dy & passing stago for bis tomority. Mombors of tho Investigating Commitiee sy that they foared Moulton would 80 arraugo tho papors in Liiis possession as to BADLY COSPROMISE BEEORER, and that they oxpected to koo Lim produce al- loged loteors from Boschor to Mra, Tilton, aud vice veren, malking assiguations ; bue they urg rolioved to tlud that thore {s nat a singlo point in tho statoment of sufliciont importance to doe mond their investigation. 'They, with others of Doechor's frionds, becomo Lonbastic iu their efforis to give currency to the ides that Moul- ton's story is lurmlers, I'or effect, ono of them tolegraphod to Boochor this evenlng: “Bloulton' atatomont uttorly harmloss: we ute erfootly eatistied with tho caso,” Alr, Cloyo- &md. cf tho Investigating Committes, said to~ by 3 % MOULTON MAKES NO DEPENSE agalust the ohurges of blackmail bie rests under. Wall, what could ho do? We could orush him with proof of tho charges. What differonce docs |t make whother Tilton kuaw whero the umtnw came from, s Moulton snys thas ho did not 7" TIE PLYNOUTH OIURCH COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY mot the Examining Cominitteo of tho oburch at the residonce of My, Bhoavman, in Hlcks stroot, Brooklyn. The former Committes vuported to tho latter slmply progress, It waa delormined to defer tho presontation to the ohuioh of tho QComumittoo's roport uutll wexs Fridey, Bhonr- man, howoves, suggeats tuat It 14 nok impoasible 7 . thnt & apocial mooting of the oburoh to rocolve tho report Lo calfod for noxt Monday evong. Yosterday noaly alt thomambors of tho Commiz too wore anxions for n apoedy prosontation of the m{mrz. Thosn who sdvocatod farthior do- lay aro Mosura. Whito nud Storrs, Thosa doclare that thay hava not bind time to examine tho tos- timony and form au acowrata_couclusion, Of eourso the report will perfoctly oxonarate Mr, B Sirocldyn avont 'ho Brooklyn evenlng papors of to-day pub- lish tho sumuony and n:nmr;m‘\’mt In 8 TILTON'S BUIT AGAINAT DECUHER which woro sorved on Mr, Shearman, Baechior'y sttoiney, this mornfug, Damages ave set at $100,000. Tho complaint chargos Dnocher with dovauching Mrs, ‘Cilcon on Oct. 10, 1803, and on_divord othor days nnd times nfter that day. Mr, Shonrman snya ho shall put inmn nn. swer next wook, and oxplicitly deny overy point ralsed, Ex-Judge Morrls, Tilton's counsol, says that ho (8 propartug complaints in TIOPOED AULSS FOR LIDEL agatnat tho Now York Tribune, Now Yorh World, sl Brooklyn Hagle, in alt of which Tilton §s plaintift. Tt fu undonstood that in ench cuso tho dnimages will bo placed at nenrly, if not quite, a8 lugh a figure as in the suit againat Booelior, —p s MR. BEECEER'S STATEMENT, To the Iditor of T'he Clifcago Tyibune: Sm: In_ghaing gontly ndown the purling sireatn of Mr. Boocher's latost oxplanations, wo find ourselves " suagged " onco moro in' tho niost distressing manner spon nnother fmmoya. blo obutacle, which wo enconntor full fn mid- chanmel. Who reuder will ramombor that, be- foro this unhappy quostion had arison, Mr, Duocher had ovor'elained to bs the warm pore songl friond ot both Mr, tnd Mes. Tilion, Ine devd, until this dinienlty hnd ‘prosontod, Tilton and Bocohor bad baen, Ko some ono well puts it, tho Jonatban aud Davld of modoru timos. Not the Damon and Pythizs of antiquity were more insoparably united than wore thoxo twin-uonls iu the bonds of fratornal love. Indeed, o deay unto Moury Ward was tha love of Theodora, 8o won- dorful," 8o * passing tho love of woien,”—so tendotly did Mr, Boecher's howals of compassion yearn over iy noble and gifted friend, that, oven ‘when prosiding at publio snoctings, the hand of Dovid would unconsciously seok that of Jona- than, sud thore, like brothers hund fu hund, would they sit by the Liour togother,—David for~ vidly pressing, olnsping, and earossing the mau- Iy digits of "hig Jonathnn, This, indoed, was lovely, but, n8 ovenls proved, altogethor voly ‘aud gushing to last. 1t did not “pan out™ as woll as tho public had boon lod to expect, It was too doaidodly * hofty,” ng Artemus Ward would hinocontly romark. - This kindliess of foeling had, hawever, for yoars oxisted botwoen them, although, vad to rolate, it wos daomed Lo au untimoly end. How? Innswer: Upoir tha oceasfon whon, in Decembor, 1870, Mrw, Tilton wout for Mr, Beecher to her mothor'sLiouso, and thoro poured * into the sympathizing our of her fricud and postor tho story of hor husband's unkiuduens, sbuse, snd brutalty. Sho wished a separation from for Lusband, aud asked Mr. Beochiors ade vico ns to ber conrse, 'Yhiv is tho account Mr. Boechor gives of what oceurred ; aud iio aganen ug thot, up to this time, he never dresmod of auy tronblo, dowostic or othorwise, having arisen inthis family. Lot it not be forgolten that, dear ns we lhave desoribed Mr. Tilton to have been to Ar. Ieechor, Mra, Tilton was, if possmblo, still donvor, Tor Mr, Boocher himecif {uforms us chiat he had watclied hor from childhood, and had over chor- fshed for hernpure and fathorly nifoction und admitation, which sho had roturned ntmost with the touder foeling of deughter. Bearing nlb this in mind, wo bere witness him, upon this oc- casion, thundorstruck by thia tale of undrenmod- of wrotcheduess, uaw pourad into s horrited ears by the wifo of his doarcst friond, By her hand is the curtain drawn usido, and his sight i blastea by the spectaclo of this grinning akelo- ton, #o long and w carfully concenlod, ovorn from his oyes, m thoir domestic closot. 1le is told by the unbappy wife thut shae desires to separals from her husband, Now, what docs Mr. Beechor do,? Does he, fillod with n lllfih and holy sense of duty towards big friend, ueek him withoutdelay to renson with and oxpostulute with him? Does ho bog and nn- plore of bim, for the unke of their old love snd frieudship, to pausoote hodrive out his ouco dear, and sull loving, wife into the cold and cruel world, to bo over thereafter the targat for the flippaut scorn of brulal men aud the con~ tompt of frivolously-soltish women? Doos ho conjure um, by the momory of his onco foud affcetion for this now uuboppy womun, to make one wmore effort to yocall the bane ished spirit of Peaco to their wreeked homo and kearth, to seel, by Clrist-like pationce, by GudHliko cliarity, by beariug aud forboaring, ond with another, to win back that tender love, that fond aifectio, Which ouce mads that then happy home fudcod “idenl # Or, failing by sch nrxu- ments to wove tho stony hieart of thin romorse- loss busband, do we porceive him rising in bis righteous wrarl, and, by virtue of lus sacrod priosthood, commanding this oruel tyrant, in the name of tho living God, to bold his unrighteons bund, nor dere to touch profanely tho suered srk of Liw own domestic happiness ? Does Lo do mil this? Doos he do uny wit of this? Docs ho over seck fheodoss lltou st all in the matter? Nay, doos he evor once laok apou the fuce of thiy husbaud, or sk Lum if bo hus fudood heurd avight.—it thoro insy; porchance, bo wnother sido Lo this foncfwl tala ot wos aud cmfllk{'{ Ho daes nat. On ths contrary, he sodulously avoids Mr. Tilton, and never, I suy mauuer whataver, refars to lifw in tho watter. ~ Determuncd upon advising n wepas ration, bo pretondsuot totrust bisown judgmont, but drags Mrs. Becchor uto tha affair, and now apporently would make her tho scapogosb by which the sin of this must strange, one-sited, aud hurmed advico is to bo borue ‘awsy mto the wilderness,—tuat thus o may seck to go froo of his donorved ponalty of mau's contempt. De- spising the palpublo’ nud fliusy deception of such & most improbablo story, we ten thousand times more hourtily dospive this effort to slzre the burdoen of his sinmo with one who is in nd way responeible for bis misdeeds, 11 Mr. Boochor was Innocent, why this hurried haste? Wiy this foverish impationco? Why this seemiugly-guilty avoidance of the acouseil bugband? ~ Why this polut-blank advico to separate forthwith, without any sigle, wolitary offort boiug made by bim to offect & roconcilio— tion botwoen estranged frieuds, who, by his own showing, wore 8o dear to him that, for their sakes, Lo should Tinve beon witling to imperil oven his own hfe 1t- self, could he theroby have served thum? Wag this the action of o “wige mun? Way this the duty of u trua friend? Wy this the righteous sotion of & minister of God, whoso boundon duty it was to hive warned thnt husbaud to for- givo his brother, much moro his wifo, if eithor Dad sinnod_sguinst bim, even * sovouty times wevan"? Did he over remonstrate utall with Theodore Tiiton? o did vot! Did ho plead witls tho wito to try once moro to redcomn the ornug busband 7 Ho faited to do cither. Byhis own showing bo traitorously sbendoned both to tholr fate. But, bupty, this wad nud wickod nd- vice of this delinquent fricud and pustor wus (See 'T'wellth Paged) SPECILAL NOLICES, FRNSURUINE. o siutsiin bivbatbrune PP RPe Many who arve suifering from the offoots of tho warm woathor and are debliitated, are ad visoa by physielans totake mederate amounts of whisky two or throo thwos during the day, In a littlo whlle thosa who adopt this advioe froquontly fnorease tho pumbor of **drinke," and iu timo bocomo contlrmed fn- obriatos, A bovorage which will not croatoa thirst for tntaxioatiug Uquars, and which (s futended capacially for tho bonofib of debtiitated porsons, whethor at homo or abroad, is Dr, Bobenok's Sea:Woed Tonlo, Contalning tho julces of many modloinal Lerbs, this preparation doos not oroate an appotita for the Intoxicating oup. The ‘wourlshlng snd thel ifo-supporting propertics of many yalu= ablo natural productions contafaed In it and woll known tomedical mon havos most strongllioniog Influonce. A singlo hot(lo of tho Toalo will domonstrato ita valusblo qualition, For dobility arising frow aioknoss, oyer ezar- tlon, or from any causo whatavor, & wino-glassful of Soa- Weod Tonlo taken attor moals will strongthon and oreats an appotitofor wholosomo food, Toall who sre. sbout loaving thoir honios, wo dosiro {0 say that tho sxoollent wffaots of Dr, Sohienck’s sosvonsble romodios, Soa-Waod "Tonlo, and Mandrako Plll4, aro partioularly ovidont when takon by thiose wha are injurlously affucted by & change of watorand dlot, No porson should leave Lomeswithout takfug o supply of thoso asfoguarde along, Formloby all drugy GENTS' FURNISHING GOODS, SHIRTS! WILSON BROS, 07 Washington-st,, Chicago, And Fourth-st., Pike's Opora Mouse, Cincinnatl,