The Bismarck Tribune Newspaper, March 28, 1933, Page 4

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

it} ys £ \ THE STATE'S OLDEST ; NEWSPAPER, (Betablished 1873) Bismarck, N. D., and A . Da en-/ Examination Gg cept eel 8! ecutive actions in signing or vetoing bills, shows that those state depart- ments in which the elective officers have resented his domineering tactics, suffered most heavily from exercise of Daily by carrier, per year........97.20/ the veto power. Those which bow to the governor or are operated by his appointees were barely touched. In the case of the dairy department veto, Governor Langer was not above 6.00 striking a serious blow to thousands of farm incomes in order to pay off ® political grudge against a man who contributed largely to his election. It is safe to say at this distance that, had not Husby and others who have since incurred Governor Langer’s en- mity, supported him, the governor never would have been elected to of- GEORGE D, MANN President and Publisher. Daily by mail per year (in Bis- t ‘Weekly by mail outaide of North Dakota, per year .............. 2 Weekly by mail in Canada, per Member of Audit Bureas of Circulation Member of The Associated Press The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this newspaper and also the local news of spontaneous origin published herein. All rights of republication of all other matter herein are also reserved. Foreign Representatives SMALL, SPENCER, “yigetttees (incorporated CHICAGO NEW YORK BOSTON Langer Must Answer ‘The statement of John Husby, com- missioner of agriculture and labgr, in ‘which he asserted that Governor Langer's veto of the appropriation for the state dairy department will cost North Dakota farmers thousands of dollars, calls for an answer by the governor if he has one. Although Husby's assertions were made with the avowed purpose of clarifying the situation, they consti- tute an accusation of the governor in the one particular which he has avow- ed is closest to his heart; the wel- fare of the farmer. In effect, the Husby charge is that the governor renders the farmer lip service and crashes the headlines in his alleged behalf but ignores their welfare in those official acts which really mean something. It has long been the habit of the governor, when he meets opposition, to charge those who disagree with him with bad faith and to claim their as- sertions are falsehoods. He has done this on occasion when competent tes- timony could have been adduced to Prove that the governor was either in- dulging in misrepresentation or else Possessed a conveniently faulty mem- ory. This case is not open to that sort of defense. He did veto practically the entire appropriation for the dairy department, leaving only enough to pay the salary of the dairy commis- sioner and giving him absolutely noth- ing to work with. He did fall to ex- plain the reason for this unprecedent- ed action. Mr. Husby makes the point that the dairy department is one of the few Activities of the state government di- rectly concerned with the welfare of the farmer and with nothing else. The governor should have known that. {f he did not he could have learned. eex One of the most surprising phases of Husby’s statement was the asser- tion that the veto came as a surprise to him and that he had not been ask- td for information on the subject. In view of the fact that Husby and Langer were elected by the same Political faction, it was to be assumed that the governor would have given the commissioner of agriculture and lakor the courtesy of asking for infor- mation on so vital a subject. The fact that he did not proves one of several things and none of them speak well for Governor Langer. Either he had & reason for the veto outside of any which he would care to give the pub- lic; he was interested in punishing Husby for some real or fancied politi- cal disaffection, or it was a manifes- tation of personal arrogance and dis- regard for the welfare of the farmer. The governor's prating about sup- Porting the farmers interests will not overshadow this important executive Qct and its consequences. Husby asserts he has no informa- tion as to the reason why the gover- nor vetoed this appropriation but he, “ #5 well as others, ‘could make a pret- look at recent political happenings to find a reasonable answer. the industrial commission, opposed jgome things the governor wanted. He contested, openly and vigorously, the Proposal to broaden the powers of the The Bismarck Tribune ‘An Independent Newspaper a of the governor's ex- Husby is an open and avowed sup- Porter of the cooperative creameries which have sprung up in this state. His major political history is one of strife against the so-called centraliz- ers or big creamery operators. governor knew this, even though he may have lacked knowledge of the duties and importance of the dairy Because of this fact it is clear that his veto constitues a declaration in opposition to the co- operatives and in behalf of the cen- This newspaper takes no sides in any question of business competition, but it does believe that competition should be fair and, above all, that the farmer is entitled to an honest price for his produce. asserts, the farmer is being cheated, the practice should not only be con- demned but effective means should be taken to stop it. take sides to declare for honesty and On the basis of Husby’s declara- tion, the governor is depriving many @ farm wife of a new dress, many @ farm child of a new pair of shoes or stockings, many a farm girl of a bright new hair-ribbon by emascu- lating a state department concerned directly with the farmers’ interest. Can the governor answer these charges? Can he afford not to an- swer? Those are questions which the people are asking now. Signed letters pertaining diagnosis, or treatment, self-addressed envelope is in ink. No tions. Prey, be seated. I am not an- nouncing discovery of a new disease, tho I might consider an offer trial court rights—say fifty-fifty with the lawyer if he gets his client off. No, it is contrary to my egregious princi- ples to trump up new maladies for People who are tired of the old com- plaints. Rather I do what I can to relieve them of the more baneful fic- titious ailments. siete I ee ter enemies everywhere by proc! - ing at all times and at peril of being |" branded unsympatheic, low-life and hard-boiled, that there is no such states as “neurasthenia,” “nervous breakdown” or “nervous exhaustion”? Has the loss of many good customers made me abate one jit or tottle .... well, readers know what I teach about rheumatism, hydro-phobia, autointox- ication, the common cold, and what I used to teach about marking babies in the days before B. C. All of these worries vary inversely with the intelligence of the people, for example alleged “colds” and ba- bies . . . . I mean the “marking” of babies. Quite seriously I believe the I. Q. of People who have babies is considerably higher than that of people who don’t. And I am allowing something for the fact that people who seek B. C. advice are younger and have had less educa- tion than people who have had child Much depends upon how the states handle the sale of beer. gain control of the traffic with all the attendant evils, repeal of the 18th amendment is going to be a most dif- ficult task. The drys are prepared for a stiff fight. ees Fans will be interested to know just how the $23,000 salary cut suffered by “Babe” Ruth will affect his batting average. But he has to be good to earn the $52,000. —____. Where is that $1.00 wheat we were going to have in North Dakota after Editorial Comment Editorials printed below show the trend of thought by other editors, They are published without regard to whether they agree or disagree with The Tribune's policies. More Than Mr. Mitchell (N. ¥, World-Telegram) Ever since Charles E. Mitchell ad- mitted to the Senate investigating committee that he turned @ 1929 net income of almost $3,000,000 into a pa- me Rasa a tem| si to his wife, the public has asked when he would be prosecuted for in-|it or not, I have too much sympathy for the wrong guy, the under dog,|~° President Roosevelt apparently got|the snake, the culprit, the fugitive, tired of wating for an answer to that|the sucker, the dupe, the victim of question and personally ordered Mr.|Chicanery or injustice. Often I'm Mitchell's arrest and trial. The pub-| ashamed of myself and the attitude lic effect has been good. There is less|0r the conduct this wretched trait talk on the street about “one law for |leads me into. Many a time I have suffered great embarrassment trying to congens e, borg or peep back the fair trial. A man of his wealth, with | tears at the cruel plight of some un- high-powered lawyers looking for lek, on or maybe a ee eee holes in the lay - hom I rendered casual 4 eg renner means Of de-| Tet it true that the dog that does 80 much barking is generally a gentle, good-natured fellow when you come come tax evasion. the poor and another for the rich.” Mr. Mitchell of course, deserves a lay, usually has little difficulty in get- ting all the legal breaks coming to The irony of this case is that Mr, |% know him? Mitchell is to be tried for the relative- ly unimportant offense of tax evasion finanee facketeering aa head of th Tat ig as head of the National City Bank. I¢ is reminiscent |*hAt there is something ch of the legal action against Alphonse ty accurate guess. One needs only to| © 3 3 atte hi I ; ANHEDONIA AMERICANA courses in the University of This anhedonia Americana is not @ new disorder of the mind. It is hy | Just a handful of horsefeathers I tossed up to get your attention. At aracteristi- about anhedonia, don’t vidual in any gathering in the coun- try, taken unawares, that he or she anhedonia hf ep2tk il rH THE BISMARCK TRIBUNE, TUESDAY, 1933 Well, We Asked for Leadership | ati il ‘Told convention what needs is a good non-skid another little matter for administration to PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICE By William Brady, M. D. to personal health and hygiene, not to disease will be answered by Dr. Brady if a stamped, enclosed. Letters should be brief and written reply can be made to queries not conf Address Dr. William Brady, in care of this Panhandler stopped us Asked Greece had three dicta! “ri pad other day. ‘You hear with your jawbone instead of your ear, says Dr. W. N. St. Peter of Pittsburgh. Well, many fighter has heard birdies after a stiff Jeft to the chin. ‘West coast woman horsewhipped editor for printing an normal do no harm to skin for |sether by grasping with the hand support requires renewal once a If carefully applied and constantly for @ few months this home will cure many umbilical hernias Spectacles Is it possible for a very near-sight- Person to throw away his glasses if he does the eye exercises referred to in the clipping inclosed? (P, W., Answer—As possible as a mouse’s nest in the cat’s ear. Young persons The possibility of Lou being part of the aeceeccenl never occurred to her. They were New York, March 28.—People who want to dance their nights away are all drinking tails, out of cocktail glasses, right on the front porch. The girls, too! And somebody saw two of the girls’ playing tennis with shorts certainly looked terrible! Lots of banks were ready the other day, but the Secretary of ithe Treasury bil eg them, raining Real Life. Remember, all I know is| Chicago school superintendent what I read in the letters (a) from|slipped in bath; skinned his knee, FF z E a 3 F ions, Chrysler, however, is not a musi- 4 A HH 17 f ance for waste. [4 5 RE FE F i 28 Sins. 29: Hawaiian food. E Bl EF 81 Perpendicular. <] 33 Corded cloth. E a E i | Ff i oS cy [ ad £F kk 7E er ii J : é i gb: Fas F i i a FE i ist F i i i F ; F i By f E e yf HY i SEL FERE ge # Fig a ef i § es ry fi 3 ; HL i i fin F f i eg it : 4 i : i E F i fe g& rf Fe & : ry u ¥ it A i ui H i F EF 38 ge F A i gt ? i nL ? fe | F i i Hj : a3 : a i ll t ig He FT cf i & Bg i i EE 8 & B 2 H Gi i 8 i F Hh ze) J] itt ie iE i E E fe Hl i L i j F i if { Fe ? E t ETE E ied & J Ee F if i F J F wz i ” [ i if H j F rE BEF é I i ef iF ij F HF 5 iG i F r 3 i EH : fe i te F i ul f F $ rei i i “s a a

Other pages from this issue: