The Seattle Star Newspaper, December 5, 1910, Page 1

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

iThe Seattle Star << 245 PLE STAND BY STAR per Is Endorsed Mass Meeting je peopel are wi th The Star. fe sooner had copies of this paper reached the Duwamish y night telling of the contempt proceedings Star than the residents began to get busy. A rous- meeting was held at which resolutions were passed and commending The Star for its attitude and for onship of the people's cause. Wea further evidence of their sympathy and their feeling Sas low fare fight the residents of the valley are planning to mei the court house in a body next Friday when the con- : gs against the editors of The Star come up. the same day and before the same court the hearing of the company’s application for a permanent injunction will as the valley people will be there to see what is done. TARVED WITH GOLD COIN IN HIS POCKET dere | quarters. he Man after man was searched, Se but not a penny was found op any of them until Patrolman Humphrey dug ¥ V's upper right hand vest pock 2 Humphrey produced the ra of eyes bulged n explained that he had olled,” and thinking he had John Bell, hu ‘i a $10 gold pi the past two days without Tesembling a square meal Band 25 other idlers were ad out of the Lifeboat mission, ay. &, bear King st., early cedar wstny stood; others | been fe chairs, window sills, on/ been “stripped,” fatled to remem t Those Who had 10 cents ber the coin in his vest pocket is beds. Two days he wandered about town, gute leads of the “discon-| hungry and almost sleepless, but peme taken te police head with a $10 » ce In his pocket o Third Degree Cun Be Used On Girl By Caited Prem) PMBRIDGE, Mase, Dec. 5 defense of Hattie Le Blanc, ance with the murder of ( ing Glover, scored a point in to gession of the girl's trial dodge Bond ruled the uld not be perm t any rate, t Miss Le she was sub jected to the | police “third degree” by the Little teatimony of import. Was brought out at the morn session GILL CAN'T MUZZLE ‘Beart brok s now ¢ % SE bérporation e the papers " ’ ft all of | t the time one ©. D. Hillman it Gili and Wappy n ing to muz defense f will give THE WEATHER Rityone ye Ba AL FORECAST Tues M Uncle Tom Is Sure Behind the Toms fometh Max, it 3) more » Bear cans it night w y but he’s a Bor ol4 Unc MMately (a PB iphed in Hime, to +} ever, 1, ake {t LIETLE EVA Gors Ta MEAVEY 5 Wj SMOwING Papr //, THAT THE Niort Ck ieietr Nights, no in Dieture irniture, n¢ Vir Y he hasn't SUPPOSED MNVeniences 7o S#E. tbe same SEATTLE, WASH, MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1910, » a bright $10 gold plece from | of, municipal | ONE CENT, &X, TRAINS AND NEWS STANDS be IS EVERYBODY HAPPY? TIME TOMORROW in the American system of government. when the Duwamish ale re. fon tomorrow other) ‘There are five candle cast their ballots for the waterway commis that the taking an Candids say of the district are For the first time in the history ts ste Interest in th their first ele pate in an ¢ in the! The polle will remain open than the choice of school officials with three to be ced }1 to 8 p.m GILL’S SECRETARY SAYS women will partic! from | jand Constitution of the United States. ae Where The Star Stands and Where It Sticks The ing ot f The Injunctions to show cause The Star ha ling with the grante been cited to appear contempt of court against that dangerous it possible for courts which often makes it sult of traction articles printed de Furth monopoly, hav they should not be puni for years been fighting and prote condition of affair that SYSTEM—which not onl to decide in favor of DOLLARS as a t MEN, but tically impc for More especially vigorou Star, a the editors a re why hed for ting make prace to decide any otl va sible court during £ star been both aggressive and elfare this ad- month believing it te cited numerot recent tal importance to the w tending to show in this movement, of the people. The Star ha vantage which DOLLARS Phe latest instance the INJUNCTION L ve over MI happened to be in ving to AW the Furth Traction ecure a re against the Duwamish vall idents i low fare fight judge jhonest "i courts, I bec protest of The Star h dat thi STEM, and a reflection particul dual ctically, I , simply, vs than have been aime therefore indis Honest ler the DOLI MEN But this, in The Star’ from exercising the constitution The Star contends that the courts are that they are not infallible institutions AND MOREOVER, THE STAR WILL CONTINUE THEORY. And along this line learned jurist will not be tolerated by a free usurpation. I usurpation proper courts to set aside The Star has 1895, Wm. H Bar ass it is not upon any judges are nece rily victims of t tem vorof DOLI : as ag ARS have h n to do wi bound unc law to decide 1use¢ king of our la judgment, not p l rig a free pre open to critici doc irom prote sting behalf. Star contends TO PROCEED ON THIS court and other that judicial usurpation will kingly or executive calling attention to this seeking to confine them to their MUST END, or the power of Ives of the One 1s than elt and others who are The Star asks the juc in this cit ce supe rior nsider a fe Any people more x-President Roosey are in reality upholding the courts by functions. Flagrant usurpation of power utes will be taken.away pend catnarity, it believes, for criticism of courts. In then U. S. circuit judge, in an address before the American riticism of the Federal Judiciary,” said: “The opportunity freely and publicly to criticise judicial action is of vastly more importance to the body politic than the immunity of courts and judges from unjust aspersions and attack. * * * Non- professional criticism also is by no means without its uses, even if accompanied, as it often is, by a direct attack upon the judicial fairness and motives of the occupants of the bench; for, if the law is but the essence of common sense, the protest of many average men may evidence a defect in a judicial conclusion, though based on the nicest legal reasoning and profoundest learning.” ad what U.S. Circuit Judge Pritchard said (In re & N.C. R. 131 Federal Reporter, page 95 some aft ociation on “Recent ¢ Then, too; re ler v. Atlantic and 99): “If Judges charged with the administration of the law are not to be-criticised on account of their official conduct, the liberty of the press is abridged and the rights of individuals imperiled. While all citizens should entertain due respect for the courts of the land, it does not follow that editors and public speakers are to refrain from legitimate criticism of the acts of any tribunal. Such criticiem should be invited by public officials, in order that the people may fully unserstand what is bei done by those who are acting as th agents in the administration of the jaw. Public questions are usually settled in the right way, and the fact that such Is the case is due in a large measure to their Tree and untrammeied discussion by the press of the country. The courts are constituted for the pur- pore of protecting the rights and liberties of the individual, and the enactment of any law which gives a judge the power to prevent the free and unrestrained discussion of questions which may come before the court for adjudication would in many instances defeat the very object for which the courts were established.” Daniels, Cuys and { 9a res & opment years is the s of the radical awakening and pro< gnition of the importance of courts rece Phe “interests’ nterests” long ago recognized this fact, and have acted accordingly. organized a SYSTEM, whereby they couldn't lose out in the AW. In years gone by they have seen to it that The people were lax in such matters and let them interests” y have the LAW and the best LEGAL BRAINS The result is that the COURTS accordingly. have plenty of ASONS for deciding in favor of DOLLARS and against MEN. a SYSTI been evolved. It is against this SYSTEM that against any individual judge or any particular court. rhe They began with the I made for their benefi gene Tha “THERE WAS GRAFT” tion but what he was a damned Testimony Given by Robert Boyce to Graft thief, Should Prove Interesting to Mayor. Here Is some of the testimony given before the council probers by Robert W. Boyce, Mayor Gill's secretary: certain chief of police was getting Q—Did elther Mr. or Mrs. Lowry @ liberal rakeoff from Chinese , that they had paid any Games, and he got the money any So you: Some Coy e ved through his own Chinese cook, protection sng that is hard evidence to get violating | think, under certain conditions, he is a good chief, for it “takes a intimated that thief to catch a thief.” Interesting Q—Did anybody ever tell you do feel, Mr. that they had paid money to any graft one else with the understanding that it was to reach Wappenstein? ' Investigators fay Il can find this testimony I think, for anybody to ever know, the er 1 y filed by and he understands that those t nvestigating committee. It w things can be worked very smooth ly. | believe | told Max how a Boyce, his own Boyce's opinion ot fit to be et money to anybody for or for the privilege of the law? A—Well, it they could give evidence. 1 felt, and Biaine, that there has been money paid to someone Q.—Were you ever offered a per A centage from the gambling houses? word for the time being and | A—No; it was more in the crib want to keep my word good house line. { think the gambling, testimony, frame-up was too strong for any private influence Q—Do you know whether penstein is interested, either in his own name, or under the name of Wappenstein being a bold grafter others as trustees, in any of the A.—Well, | have heard so much crib houses in the present district about It | suppose | could truthful or in any of those in the prospec ly say yes. Ed Chilberg tive district? ployer in past years, came to me|to get A.—Wappenstein once and said there was no ques. Times—No Electric _ Even in His Little Cabin | pickaninnies around the door Not Even an Auto. Unele 1 hasn't was very As to that, | have given my ther down In the the following occurs Wap Q.—Did any business man express his opinion to you ever about my em Is too smooth, granted ee “ow OnRE THAT You Asn igh GIAL'S A1 Fo? auto. 1 think Gerrine Too AIERCY YO after ¢ urs on the far Fer ovR ~The And 2On why hire foal \ on Awe ? jomebody put hin n and good? Here 8 be bea Unele of the onl pe to e him bolle in ol © ee sa wick Lit wher butter last I hinting or r, she did rea Hike an ang wonder Tom tho AS one BH \ ust night ir Unel« painted on th Continued on Page Three. | | | The > thing. Star be It seems will not do this, therefore must talk out loud about the newspapers Someone ishes to say this It hs as come to be that ha only man who is expected to observe the law is the |man who is too poor to fight it through the courts. And it has come to be that the only man who can obtain justice is the man wealthy enough to go into court and battle against DOLLARS. This is a stateme f fa the system respone sible f er as the honest mouthpiece of the people, necessarily must and will cons tinue to protest and fight, — OF (oxrew snow 17]; That John Van Ho NING That Gardner Kellogg. That in 20 years of That reservations a 2 MORE SHOPPING| DAYS BEFORE| CHRISTMAS| ; J JIM IS A STEADY BOARDER UP THERE RRR RRR RRR KR HH * * * py on The * Sta r of De * W 1 make * real * * AAAARARE ee 3 The mar on seo precesteaesasrnensnoanaeas jemmeimeuneay

Other pages from this issue: