The San Francisco Call. Newspaper, October 12, 1901, Page 2

3 FRANCISCO CALL SA;TDRDAY OCTOBER 12, 1901 ; HOUSE OF DEPUTIES SITS ALL DAY AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLL - i S o 5 5 — BOARD OF MISSIONS WILL NOT CHANGE CANON UNTIL NEXT GENERAL CONVENTION s H%22 - Bishop of Dakota Tells of Sioux Indians. THE = T Board of Missions, in ses- last evening at Trinity Church, decided after several ours’ discussion to refer the 1 ort of the committee in- trusted with the resolutivns ending the form of canon 7 on to the General Conven- | | ee years hence. It was also de- | place printed copies of the pro- | | | sendment in the hands of mem- on three months be- ate of its meeting. of last nignt was to have to the bject of domestic REV. J W. A3HTen, DD or [ | 72 Q > Y (g'b FIZ_AHcls » - REY MAYo CaseLlL MARTIN, (& | of EL PAS0 TExAs A h } | Tk 17 Packarp, OF HAkyLAmp | | MISSIONARY ~ BISHOPS APPOINTED Continued from Page One. CRSWDED ) : Sl . e i ' . NiTH 8 3 i : e e LADIES o= of the missionary district of Shanghal, to be missionary Bishop of Hankow; Ray | | Charles H. Brent, a presbyter of the dio- cesec of Massachusetts, to be missionars Bishop of the Philippine Islands: Rev Frederick Willlam Cator, presbyter of the | | diocese of Towa, to be missionary Bishop of the district of Porto Rico; Rav. Wil | lam Cabel Brown, D. D., presbyter of the | church in Brazil, to be missionary Bishop N ; of the District’ of Olympia, and Rev 3 R 2 3 o, Charles Campbell Pierce, D. D., presbyter Bishope of Alacka, Mis- \ \ g < | of Washington, to_be missionary Bishop ent v a ;r{.“ Heuth l";{f‘&ydm:“ e ~| | of the District of North Dakota. ken up with the | | A message was also sent to the House t | | of Deputies that the Bishops had co 7 and when :he | | curred in and adopted proposed article cleared tie Bishops of | | | of the constitution and that it had dis- y had Tetired The | | | agreed to the ratification of the proposed s to j.,,q’ en | 2 3 . 7 i % X - % | article V and_the second part'of the pro- &n of ths ‘work s 2 posed article X CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND PARTICIPANTS IN THE DEBATE ON DIVORCE. \ fek ette e 35 TS oS lates discussed canon 37, relating to di- voree, and concluded by adopting the fol- lowing substitute: | Title~"Of Persons Marrying After Di- ‘| ORATORICAL EFFORTS OF SPEAKERS ENJOYED BY FAIR VISITORS. | X ler was a member of the committee | Christ laid down such princinles of Al e | | State of Kansas as a missionary district entertaip the ideas entertained by & great | this country than in all the countries of Eu- FAVORS THE AMENDMENT. |4 vote was taken and it was decided that many action upon the matter should be defer- person_divo A st iy WL b N e L Ll S5 LM ‘ lifetime of the other party n ahont to find safe 2 5 : 5 B any peréon marrying a person so divorced A . st el | Continued From Page One. | to his disciples on this question? 1t was thatin particular cases, but because individual | it, not merely, or not chiefly, as a theologian | these you give durability. . __ | ahall be admitted to baptism or confirmation he stone hand | | « woman guilty of adultery should die. That, | hardships may resuit from the application of | or an ecclesiastic, but as a priest of 1h¢‘ ‘But the other one replied: ‘“You have | permitted to receive the holy communion unt what the carving | - —— e | of course, would end the marriage. Isn’t that | a general rule, no argument furnished | church, and as a lover of my kind and as a | nothing to complain of but your own nature. | the written apuroval of the Bishop shall be op. . S 3 502 And if he said nothing about the adultery | against the propriety of that law, If it be | lover of my country. | For me, I am fire everywhere and alway given; provid that this prohibitio not ss seeks refuge in > mu of this amendment, s | of men it was because he was not laying [ caiculated to do good to the greatest number. “What Is the present social situation in this | ‘‘Social righteousness is illustrated and | apply to the case of innocent party to a e case to-day wi and not contained in the form subc | down laws inconsistent with those of the Jews | It it promote the general welfare we rest con- | country? It has been statistically summarized | taught in that great divine development and | divorce for the cause of adultery, and pro- ted by the committee—so much of my | then in existence. The laws of the Roman |tent with i for us time and again by different persons, but | altering of society as illustrated and taught | vided also, that the sacra t shall in no Missouri spoke entertain- | amendment as is new is not my own, but | empire were n in the ascendant. The very | Undoubtedly the universality of the pro- | by none perhaps more succinctly and clearly | as i think by the sovereign lord of the world. | case he refused to a peniter erson in immi- expressed the h that the work of a former member of this which thcse peopte ailude who asked | hibition is contained in the section as r than by Dr. Peabody of Cambridge In his ad- | Social righteousness m burn and destroy here | nent danger of death. £ church vet become the | house, Mr. Miller of Georgi o is not | guestions admitted polygamy. A |po-ted from the House of Deputies will in | mirable book on Jesus Christ ang the social | and there and work social hardship, but it is The Hou of Bishops also considered - ted States in atfendance here because of duties in | man was allowed to have a plurality of wives. | my judgment, in certain cases, work a hard- | question, where he tells us that during the | social righteousness aiways and everywhere. | the proposition to accept a portion of th Supreme Court at Washington. Mr. | *‘The teachings of our Lwrd and Savior E ), for 1 do not, I have already stated, | recent year more divorces were granted in i of the delezates here present. But shall | rope, Australia and Canada; that while during | < T jual hardship practically defeat in large | the past twenty vears. as he saye, the popu- | . The Rev. Dr. McKim of Washington, ind! b R e e ot D Hambatan | vod. was recommended, however, that e T e e odi o b Ty e | iized countrics tothe point at which we stand | measure the beneficlal Tesults Which Will | Jation of this country has Incrensed at a ratio | favored the wmendment ot Dr. Huntinston, | red. it was recommended. however. that i 5o /o s ¢hich I have | to-9ay. Women of his day were but little bet- | enure from the universality of the rule? I | of 60 per cent, the divorces during that period | S4/Qt des entlemen of the commit- | niza r fac - e D e e e ter than servants, Men were thejr masters, | claim not. have increased at a ratio of 156 per cent, and Mr. President and sentiemen of the commit_ | nizance o the fact that the Bishop of the — o er than servants. 1} o sters. Y ] " allS [ tee: 1 rise to speak upon this subject under | digcese was laboring under extraordinary s 4 o 3 .. | Why say that a woman guilty of adultery further he adds that if this accelerating ratio ] ielagig e . Continued From Page One. With respect to the legal merits of it that her husband should be divorced when the | MANISTERS LACK AUTHORITY. | i’ continue there will be more marital (& Vry solemn sense of responsibility. It Das | hurdens. : | 1 shall "have nothing to say. for there are | law was that the should dle, to cnd the mar- | New it is proposed in substance to amend | séparations by the end of the century by di- | Beeh ‘truly said tha \ come before us, | oA committes of five..composed of the —_ - § . ; 3 prop ome before us, or that can come b - a8 of ny on this floor far more competent to | riage n that way: the section by excepting the case of an Inno- | vorce than by death. L Pt | Bl=hops of Albeny, ¥oud du Lac. Texes ST e e k upon that point. but I should like | -What dil our Savior say when they asked | cent party to a divorce on the ground of adul- | “That is the social situation which con- | 'O tWORENE o0 | Vermont and Los Angeles. was appointed ot oo 8 briefly to state my argument on the | him the question, ‘What shall be done with | tery. Who Is to ascertain the fact of the fnno- | fronts us, or rather in the midst of whien | I desire at the outset to express Wy G=Ireel | to prepare a canon on provinces and s o ot g e iples involved and which I be- this Woman who was taken in the act? He | cerica? Will it appear by the record? Certalnly | we are, and as far as each of us has In- | SYMDALRY wWith the motive that flet bERRd Io% | mit it to the mext convention. He cautioned al to be unanswerable. replied, ‘Let he who is without sin 2 | the ministers of this church have no authority | fluence 'before this body we are responsible | (2000 that has been propesed to ue GG B4 | A" committee composed of three presby- . itianed il xamitted by Al that our Lord | throw the first stone at her: W at dhelr own instafe to. Institute an inauiry | for the social situation of the body. b there- | as come down from, the House of Bishops, 1| o it three Tayimen was abpoinicd 10 would enforce the | Jesus Christ in his utterances on the sub- | the man done? Why, the sin | Which might lead to a satistactory determina- | fore, In my limited way, a student of soctal | {F IR 029 Fouata S ity of the family, | take up the consideration of the transla- deputies con- | ject of marriage and divorce spoke of ope | Shareed her with being gullty o Lo oy the fact. hey are without power to | progress, as a student of the course of ¢lvilizd. | yyich’lq ‘intended to) check the vast and grow- | tion of Bishops and report at the next i xception to the rigid law which he laid | dqubted that or can doubt it who reads it|rummon and examine witnesses, so 1t goes | tion, of the method “of social development | hich i Inended tejchock the SRSt &gy BECR | LOR O e committes appointed b et BB T -0 aibf Hing IhbTootnt siE e h underetanding. He didn't pardon her sin. | without saving that it the innocence of the | whith teaches me and teaches, it seems to me, | € € differ in toto from the committee | the House of Bishops con of t h ation ot The Taseptima nt 85 10| He aian't condemn her to death. This s | rarties is fo be eatablished at all, it must be | every student in clearsst and most emphatic | Eresident. T differ ks Dihals conuity of the Tk < on of exceptions, but e ea to the woman: Has no man con- the single point that our Lord Jesus : 2 £ : ; 3% c | in ‘regard to the measure which they propose. | oo% o’ New York, Maryland and coadjutor he faid to the woman: ‘Hes o man jcol by evidence, s the, lawyers cay, | langusge the inviolability and indissolubility | 8% T'6o not belleve It will accomplish the ends | SP%0F Jew York, Y adj Christ in his own legislation admitted the | and sin no more.’ S ES e farlly Ghity T A0a uyaslt. Sompellon 3 0] e. I believe so strongly that | . xceptio xeepti what shall that consist? Shall it con- | the family unity, 1 find myself compelled to | {2t they propose. ey ot | The House of Bishops after a long de- | ©XCeption of one exceptional case. *1 know that it is natural for this church, | sist of a certified copy of the decree? Why, | vote against the amendment which has been | IL IS @ measure (raught with ecll 10 this | g.cr rre bate in on adopted a canon How can that be met by the friends of | refined and educated, to desire to stand upon tated by the deputy who last spoke (the | offered by my estcemed friend from New York | CHureh. no vs-v‘xvir oy B r Ais orced persons who re- | this measure? Only by discrediting the | a higher plane than any other Christian boG: | Kev. Mr. Battle), in many cases decrees do not | and to favor the canon as it has been passed D ther volee in this comvention to rise and | debate that took place in the upper house the Tlerie ates also nominated five | Tecord. Ouly by ralsing the question of a | <t Stand but 1ot us not take an impracticable | Glsclose the Drecise &round an which thy di|in the House of Bishops and sent ‘down .10 | Gonose it, mine should be that Voice. Bishop of Lincoln—you gentlemen who are leg er A rtrinic | higher criticism, and if that question-be | Step. Let us take a step In which wo will b | vorce has heen granted. A libel for divorce | (ne House of Deputies. pone it mine ahonia e that voice, U | Blshop, of Eincaln, you, sentiemen tvhg are lox th America, whom the raised there will be scholars enough to | fecompenied by'the best people of this country | may set forth various grounds and the decree And, sir, I believe further that this is the | 1, toe fact that this proposed legisiation i | the Bishop of Lincoln. who was tried for his Hous s ‘will be requested to | Meet it. I may remark in passing that it | I a1l churches of any and all dencminations.” | in some of the Stat This is what he said stated that | a vinculo matrimon 1 al is simply that a divorce | teaching of our divine Lord upon the subject. | Jo pnary. ‘'or 100 years it has been the | ritualisn 15 a liille singular that the oppogition of | , The Rev. Elder of South Virginia. e be granted. Of course, | frvery one. of course. is responeibl revolutionary, For 3 e 1o his own | Fevolutionary, For 100 yeare X e to offic | “The argument from Scripture seems to bs < iy OUT sy e Prresty his subiect | B& Wwas in sympathy with the amendment but | all these discussions I am referring to are of | iy ence Tis own conselence in the | Priviles: Lo . ty | such that I cannot regard marriage as abso- ssiosis held a short ses- | ouT existing fegislators on thls subject | deemed the language not sufficiently compre. | absolute divorces and not merely divorce from e e o T s e e T clate at the marrlage O amitery The brac. | lutely indissoluble. The excepting clause to and disposed of important | SUOR TORIE IO B ae higher critieisa| hensive and that the evidence of adultery { bed and board believe that the purport of his teaching is to | Hee. the grinciples the usage of the church, | these statements in the Gospel must, it seems sions were held yesterday Ly | SBPOFLURILY 10 disbarage hig gritlcism, | should be sought In the records of the court | Who is to determine the {nnocence of the | jay. the stress not only upon the indissolubility |.bocr Sne Principles, the ve - the Wenan's Auxiliary, the Brotherhood | Whereas when it comes to the issue the | rather than upon the face of the dectee. ete. | party? i “for 100 vears, is L P et 1 frequently h s b ¥ e ertioot | only way in which the legislation which | "My on t not’ unfrequently happens that both | of the family ow proposed to be over- | to me, limit the general statement to St but upon the spirituality of t | ] > | ¢ that statement | Mark and St. Luke. Such would be the ques- object is to enlarge the means or | parties are guilty and that there is collusion - ation 1s| fuined.” and. in fustification s % | tion to my mind, and when I consider the il ey 7 propose can be adopted is by meth- | the way by which the ground or cause of di- | between the partios. How are you goins £o | 1o disiniesmace. that it It seeme to me | L NAve only to polnt to vou the language used | WLy ofina authority of our greatest Bibe T of higher criticism. vorce is to be ascertained,” he said. | meet that case by a certified ‘copy of any | impliejtly recognized that it i g P By & eepiten etiag lical scholars I dare not put it aside. Sueh HOLD SPECIAL SERVICES. “Our Lord Jesus Christ admitted one | mplicitly recognized that it is a physical r \f mean the Rev. Dr. Fulton, who sald that - ception to his . | record? How s it possible to meet that case i t . | rigid law of marriage, | WANTS AMENDMENTS BEATEN. |by the production of the record of a civil | maion °d rot @ Spiritual relation. It is @ court? You can't do it. If there be collusion ri therefore any legislation by this church i o Oman | of the Western church: that is ta say, ¢ Potueen the St do It T e S Lusion | enter. A spiritual relation in the midst of a Visiting Churchmen at St. Stephen’s | which does not admit one exception to the | piaoge Bradford of Delaware, United States S eipline | W28 the question put by Bishop Wadsworth, this legislation is along the lines of discipline | THO SO0 UPRe O FHCW, Bo0e e o | The speaker guoted other noted churchmen | { church of Rome. I object again to this be- | v District Court Judge of Delaware, then ad- 1 ¥ physical environment like the soul In the midst | o e th this. chuteh the dootrine | Of, England. and continued and Church of the Advent. rigid law of marriage is not and cannot | Areswed the commitiee as follawe: | ot course, It the divoree be granted, but oniy | of the body or like the divine and personal | STU=® 1 UTITES MUP narage which belonged | ‘Al thesé men agree in saying that in caso The Brotherhood of . St. Andrew. von- | Lo T o Iance ‘With the Mind of Jesus 3 Mr. Chateman, gentiomen of the tomunittet | Wicreas, In chs of collusion they are equally | [ the Dresence and in the midst of a phy- | giifinetively to the church of Rome. We had | OF BQUHery the marriage may be dissolved and £ Lo PP e g Chris eimcerely trust that these amendments will calit b thab IF % o | sieal universe. festerday the ‘Bishcp of Rome' upon our ; : leas o marry dueted “A Quiet Hour” at St, Stephen’s g be defeated. 1 hope from the bottom of my |, Sullt. I claim therefore that it wou intro- yesterday the Bishop of ROme ek at be. | again. The responsibility of opposing their Church last « rvice was a| VAIEWS OF REV. MR. BATTLE. |neart that section ¢ au reported from the | fiie’ you Tacears distins tho mersosss to bs | DELIEVES IN SEPARATION, . | 5200, "2 uitdke, but todsy: in this propo- | judSmoent is very great Gemtiemen, T ehinie preparation fc snion and was Rev, Mr. Battle of North Carolina said: | House of Deputies will pacs. I am not one of |z 6 dd B0 (et ion, | I belleve in separation. I belfeve that for | sition, we have the spirit and the teachings | .., ’:m;n x«-mvzr:p:z:im:'"v»pfi‘:s&r;”:;e:r e She . Givects of Rev iy . Chairman and gentlemen of the con- | thosc who believe that Holy Scripture forbids | "y ojagm that it is better and safer to let | many causes other than infidelity; physical in- | and the discipline of the Church of Rome in Tadntict i The EeNih-speeking id s 5 it 3 2 vention: 1 have Grawn an amendment (o this | the marriage of an innocent party to & divorce | the cection stand as it is. It may be we will | fidelity, there may and ought to he separation. | very deed and truth. iie Sleiaioenth contugy. 1 very NGt icel Al secretary of the Domestic | ciause under consideration in almost the exact | 01 the ground of infidelity during the lifetime | wory individual Lardship In some cases, but in | Cruelty drunkenness and other things, neces- | ‘“The Church of Rome teaches that marriage | "1 GOUPRERT, SRR, 8 VATV SECRE Jneed. Missior Society | terms of those offered by the deputy from New | of his or her wife or husband. I do not enter- | {1 jong run it will conduce o the weifare of | sary perhaps and expedient beyond those neces- | Is absolutely indissoluble. This church has | o NOW. sentlemen, there IS Sour, comon in was alsc secial service last | York. I will ask to add to his amendment | tain that belief, but equally, I do not believe | (ha community, it will be for the protection | sary, that the husband and wife who are hus- | never taught it. Now this is a proposition that | LTy St G5 U GERCETE COF o FHEes HOF e in the « h of the Advent. The | the words ‘nor to the remarriage of parties |‘that Holy Writ contains & command or ar In- | of the clergy and It will advance the -inter- | band and wife in this world, that they shoull | we shall change our position upon that point | SHanrt e o (VR TAC L CES 2, (HE SR shop of Milwaukee conducted the ser- | once divorced, seeking to be united again.’ * |Jjunction that under all clreumstances and re- | estg of religion on all sidet. Unaer the pres- | be separated, but not that they should,be ab- | so that marriage is absolute and under no Cir- | conyicotion with such & ceremony, and it tha and the ¢ utor of Fopd du Lac Deputy Lewis in reply said: “In reply to | 3aTdless of the con l“-?“s)t‘.c‘.snng at the time, | (¢ condition of things they no doubt for the | solutely divorced so that either party should | cumstances indissoluble. - preached the sermor the gentleman from North Carolina 1 would |2 divorced person, though innocent, must be | canon is passed, then we will be in thfs posi- a e Tarried and must receive what he is emtjtled | MOment had in view the laxity mn relafion to | have the privilege of remarriage. May I quote 1 would like at once then to come to the ask whether he does ot think the committee ed and mus ¥ authority of our Lord and Saviour Jes o'clock to-morrow u s Christ vs, as this same gt The proceeds | husband or wifc of &ny other person then 1e: | men who differ on this subject, We cannot | favor of prohibiting remarriage of divorced per- | o¢ the SAvth; LAE Sliey K1 atk 3 ceeds | husband or Wi person then liv- | the | $ion—you will refuse your own children® the = o & ; = Vi = e ching of our divine % > el e | e, e i merriage and divorce. What is called holy | in this connection again what Dr. Peabody | question. What is the tea: | Hight 4o, metsimony in such cases, DOt soo baae < has covered his objection in the canon they | 10 have, the ceremony performed and solemn- | matrimony s now only too often a contract | says in his admirable chapter upon the fam- | Lord? The reason why I object to this legis- | wii aecept them In your communion, Willing Workers to Give Concert. | yat,“Droposéd and in the portion of which it B e i he eitaatine church. g us is | Of convenience between the parties, more or | ily in that book: lation, the reason why T feel so profoundly | A concert and soclal under the auspices | is left intact by the amendment of the rev- | D eier arands of i, sontronting. u2 18 | lees teminorary in its nature. ‘Brother and sister may be separated: par- | upon it llwhr:n:::v)v\;mcnl ould mot dare to | RESPONSIBILITY OF CLERGY. of the Willing Workers of Bush-stree- | erend deputy from New York. The word 4 . : ent and child may be separated: they may be | vote for such a propos s this, is b A h f the Willing Workers of the Bu et | er In"the third line before ‘persons’ was | 56oms to me that tlils question cannot be de- DR. GREER'S ARGUMENT. alienated for what scems to be &ood and suifi- | in my opinion. this is in direct contravention | “Mr. Chairman, allusion has been made hers Synagogue will be given at the Hall of | nicrieg there for that purpose. They are for. | clded by ‘merely theologionl arguments. We| 70 J05C00 S OlE0 Lm0 | Clent cause, IlVIng far apart on' opposite sidcs | of the teachings wf holy Scripture and the | - - the Cercle Francais, Hotel Savoy, at $:30 | bidden to marry any one who has been the | A1l know (hat there arc very mamy learne oty e H | : 5 £ enticity of the records of the e Th DD O T O eraongthen V- | expect them to agree. Now what 8 our cuty? | sons, then addressed the committee as follgws: | Eentleman remarke, always and = everywhere L T T it 16 woult b e Continued to Page Three. will be devoted to the building of class-; 1€, 1 00 0n" there 15 mo objectioR and it | LoOk at the condition of soclety. 1 clatm that Chairman and members of the com. | Drotber and sister p: d child, can- rooms for the Sabbath school conmected | was poy there for that purpose. . . |"| considerations of religion, of Christian moral- e s o SoUBt o Iy MM DAt S o insereatad that this church | witr congregation : t : o i o Sibi ity, and 1 may further say, common decency, | there is no subject of sreatér importance that | I am interested. therefore. in the passage | comld pos . ° o ; 8 ) i : ove my k “Let me first, briefly and hastily as possible The Rev. Mr. Battle—T believe in leaving | require tho passage of the ' resolution us re- | s to come or that can’ come before thiy Gen- ['of this proposed cancn Pecause © love my kind, |, S0% (o0 aiiention to what the real g euma lsm pothing to construction that can be avoided | ported from the Housc of Deputies. eral Convention. I find myself interested in | DeCabse & OV ¥ O 1o DUt come stop | dence of holy- Scripture is upon this subject. Contest Over an Estate. B e s, Hind | S cw, quring the past few years, te siint: 3nd cheek fo tha amarchistic poison that. s | Our Lord spoke about this upon three occasions, e R R i E | the legislation ie desired and therefore 1 see|ing of divorces has attained such alarming | @ sd=imieimiiri-ioimirimiriclefrbduinieinlnt @ | JR0, ChEH 10 I8 S0 g, PO ARt 19| TWo of them are mentioned in Mattnew and | What is the use of telling the rheumatic _ Irene Mary Harrigan, who applied for | no objection 10 adding the Words that are in | proportions as to be a growing menace to the B Dlushing n our soclety today. I want lo|leO ot Luke. St Mark mentions one which e e . etters of adm ation upon the estate | the sresent canon on the subject of marriage | morals of the family and to the community. Piles Cured Without the Knife. ne amily Is an indissoluble unity and that | is one of those menfioned by St. Matthew.” | that he feels as if his joints were being dis- of her father, John Harrigan.: yesterday, | “Uontinuing the Rev. Mr. Battle sald: I 3,;.llfjel”?‘y‘,if,‘&gfif".;’t""fn'e "12;3:”({“;:1!;”\)"‘-—631"('1: iR pino, Bleeding or Protruding Piler. | if you permit, from any cause, any disintegra- DOL" oo of the Sove "’,{‘f’,':u"t““';g . | Tocated ? is placed in a peculiar position, i1,“2<lh‘| size that thls church eholld set an example | of this fand. It menaces the purity and huppl; No,Cpre, [No Pay.. All druggists are author: tion on oo I s et e g i | selubliity of marrlage. Now it s said that| He knows that his suffrings are very ties adn ra c be! ser- ¥ s of the Uniteq & ness -of v, Wi v s = Fberi ~ g P P: as spoken In the severith chapte: " med by Dennis Harrigan, who opposes | churches of all denominations. 1 believe that | once the unity and basis of our ChrISUSD | case of phen ng mares of by Jors trcafnly | whole social body and the whole natlonal | Bt PR 189 SOVCT " pabier of Firet Covin | much like the tortures of the rack. the young woman's petition on the ground | we should try to constitute ourkelves leaders | civilization. Cures ordinary cases In six days; the wors | (Famework. thians and says nothing about an exseption, | WAat he wants {o know is what will per~ that she is not the daughter of the late | on this question. And if we do not adopt this | T believe, gentlemen, that it is the duty of | cases in fourteen days. One application gives | ' Sir. and gentlemen, I recognize the fact and | pyt it did come to pass that a John Harrigan, having been born after | canon as sent down from the House of Bishops | the church to take action in this matter. The % y statement | manently cure his disease. | ease and rest. Relieves itching instantly. This | Do one more clearly or beiter than I, that in | | he had secured a divorce from his wife, | We would make a very great if mot a fatal 5 of our Lord was to be subjected to the exten- h C = gmml question fs. what action? Shall it apply s a new discovery and s the only pile remedy | Some instances jt will work hardship. Of | uation of an exception. Our Lord in St. Mat- | 4 ‘“‘ ’»g‘l“’f""g o vty of The hearing of the petiticn was continued | ™istake. I believe that If we adopt this canon | general Tue? Or shall it apply a rule subfect | gold on a bositive guarantes, no cure no pay. | course, in some cases It Will work hardship. | (hew in those two places states the law and the | tEStimonials, is until next Friday we will take a step that wil' enable us in|to exceptions, which will partially neutralize E A free sample will be sent by mail to any one | That Is always the case with the great prin- | exception. St. Paul states the —— the end to bring about uniformity of the laws | and defeat the rule itself? T am in favor of Ple. % - F o y P 3 law without to | tending their name and address. Price, Zc. 1If | ciple of soclal righteousnes: mentioning the exception. of the United States in regard to marriage | the universality of the prohibition IP all cases Hood’s Sarsaparilia 3 1 beli thet this legisi: prok o your druggzist don’t Xeep it in stock send us s0c {1 rflezd onlly §|hn ’a[yhor 12:'.[ in a book som “Now, Mr. President. my opinion, of course. | o " nd divorce believe that this legislation is | of divorce, no matter what may be/the cause, | in stamps and we will forward a full size box | such ‘figure of allegory as this: will not weigh much upon this subject, but 1| It promptly neutrali i Stops the Cough such ag is suited to the people of the United | for the simple reason that in my judzment no | by mail. Manufactured by Parls Medicine Co., | ‘* ‘Some beautiful companion vases placed | venture to direct attention to the opinion blmp onpwhi bl:hr:légss S And works off the cold Laxative Bromo | States and as is consistent with the Chris- | other view, no other law, Is practicable and | St. Louis, Mo., who also manufacture the cele- | beside a fire were talking and ecomplaining | of one whose authority will, I think, be recog- | Oy bt disease depends, com- Quinine Tablets cure & cold in one day. No | tianity of the United States, can work satisfactorily. We all know that | brated cold cure, Laxative Bromo-Quinine Tab- | against the elements and said: ‘‘See how bit- | nized. [ hold in my hand the clerieal confirm- | Pletely eliminates it, and strengthens the Cure, No Pay. Price % cents. ® | “What was the law when our Savior spoke | most general laws work individual hardships | lets. | terly you treat me. Me you d troved. All | ations for July, 1308. In the course of the | System against its return. Try Hood's.