The San Francisco Call. Newspaper, October 23, 1900, Page 6

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

THE SAN FRANCISCO CALL, TUESDAY, LEAKE, Wanazer ..Telephone m 204 Third. 5. ¥ MANAGER'S OFFICE PUBLICATION OFFICE. . . Market an Telepbone Press 201. EDITORIAL ROOMS. ... 217 to 221 Stevemson St. Telephone Press 202. postmasiers are asthorized to receive subscriptions. —hen requested y. October 24, at 11 o'clock, WILLIAM P. LAWLOR r walks in life, exp By the very duties of the of- grow into 2 judicial habit of not, they the dispensers of es, and 2 source of corruption in Men of broad minds, deep learning in Jaw and of 2 f corporations, a man. He has i by the votes of xll good citi- THE FIGHT IN THE THIRD DISTRICT. ROM all [ rts that come to us it appears he Republicans will control the Representatives, but the majority serefore important that the fight 1 district be made with untiring That is true of districts ac- as of those where the results are ger of owerconfidence threatens lican party at almost every point along the se, but nowhere is that danger greater than in those Congressional districrs where every one feels sure of wiInning. In the Third Congressional District Mr. Metcalf walkover. The district is Re- Metcalf's personal popularity and y certain next House It has something like a publican, and Mr his record as to give the assurance that be will have in addition to fhe full Republican vote the cordial support of many independent voters. Every prospect for his re- election is therefore bright. The only cloud that rests is the probability that many voters may be s0 sure of his election they will not put themselves to the trouble of exerting themselves to accomplish it. California ought to send a solid Republican dele- gation to Congress 2t this election. The administra- tion and the House are to be Republican, and it will be of advantage to each constituency to have its rep- resentative at the capital in harmony with the govern- ing powers. Why should any California district send tc Congress a2 man whose whole energies will be de- voted to the barren work of opposition to everything rtaken for the advancement of national prospe:- upon it ity? Why not send u man who will be a helper and | 2 leader in the advance mgvement, and who, by aid- ing ether: to promote the welfare of their constitu- ents, will have sapport in turn upon all measures de- signed to promote the progress of California? Mr. Metcalf has been tried in office. He has made his mark there. His personal influence with the pres- ent House is strong, and it will be stronger in the next. He has won the commendation of Speaker Henderson and is sure of assignment to important committees. By retaining him in office the peoplé of the Third District will materially benefit themselves and help to augment the prestige of California at the mationa! capital. all are needed upon | the test of arduous service. | e House of Representatives are such | JOHN SHERMAN. 1 ULL of years and honors, with all his work perurmed and his illustrious rounded out to periect close, John Sherm: ead. A figure icuous in public affairs since the stormy days of hes passed wiil long be cherished 2 record of deeds that will stand f the republic. some respects unique, a time to hold leader- than in any other ible exceptions of It was 2 comparatively to hold long terms in few fluctuations. Sherman, ckle constituency, where 1d where victory goes to the other, and where old office in such 2 State it is necessary that a an adroit politician, a resourceiul manager ses as well as a statesman, and such Sher- ndoubtedly was. Many a time in his career his sails to meet adverse public senti- must be ascribed a great part of his seem- tency of policy, and particularly the fre- which he boxed the compass on finan- que:‘.:v - Ohio has been a p'ouic mother of great Many of them have deserved a2 long career in official ! y few attai it, 2nd none other to such a erman. The ziries and ambitions have most stormy in the zreat parties have been gain by contests within e every eminent been confronted by rivals in his s by the antagonism of the leaders Oi the great men of Ohio olitics of the ests between over =z reason of hn Sherman onfy would not e for other whom he had counted his lieutenant The people had confidence in his honesty, his ability patriotism, but he lacked magne and all anagement never en: r the Presiden have been ‘ad H|= re- m to ce. His resig- ¢ then he has he nation, and he great states- e reconstruction periods of the ost of fore: —— rn Pacific lawyers are not! in their logic. Because a public pledge has been giv to remove the death rzi the company in the Mis- n the attorneys argue that the city has pledged it- self to inactivity. The same argument would give rder bacause bad been made. 8 license to m 2 protest against murder CONTRASTED ELECTION MANNERS. IDNEY BROOKS, a correspondent of the S London Chronicle, has contributed to that journal an elaborate article upon American | election manners as contrasted with those that pre- | excellence gives rise to certain campaigning tactics much below the level of anything possible in the old country. The article is fair in spirit and sufficiently | pertinent to the present canvass to be generally inter- esting. Mr. Brooks first notes that the British pretension to the honor of being the people who give the largest amount of fair play and free speech in elections is | false. Speaking of contests in England he says: “Every election sees a goodly percentage of heads broken, platforms stormed, speakers ‘mectinzs turned into riots. The { has been no exception. At Oldham, Battersea and Northampton the spirit that was behind the cab- bages and rotten eggs and dead cats that used to come | | fiying like bewildering meteors round the candidate’s | head in the good old hustings days is still alive and | | operative. It has changed its form of expression somewhat, but its essence is still the same.” No such tumults and assaults attend American Jections. The incident of the outbreak in a Colo- rzdo mining town against Roosevelt was a thing so rare in our politics that it aroused universal condem- nation. - Similar affairs occir in England in every | botly contested district. So frequent are they that they are regarded as the normal incidents of a cam- paign, and unless serious injuries result from them hardly any condemnation is heard. } | 1 { | our political crowds. says: “The excitement of it was greater than at the agers in the world fsed every conceivable artifice to | | keep it up to boiling point. Not a stimulus to passion | and even violence was wanting. In point of invective | the country was a magnified Ulster; the smallest vil- and torchlight processions, its mass meetings and its rival wirepullers to ‘boom things right along.’ Yet whenever I traveled along the Atlantic coastline or 2000 miles inland d found that speakers were listened to as courteously and meetings conducted as free from irterruption as though nothing of greater moment were at hand than a gathering in aid of some local | charity.” After describing how quietly American political audiences listen to the speaker and how promptly any one who interrupts is silenced, or put out of the hall, Mr. Brooks goes on to offer an explanation of the marked difference in- that respect between the two peoples. He says: “Partly, no doubt, it comes from the American love of doing things atcording to rule and regulation, of always observing the letter, even when they neglect the spirit, of the game they are playing. That, indeed, is the only thing that saves their complex electoral machinery from hopeless en- tanglement. Americans, too, are said to be an irreve- rential people, but they dearly worship a majority. In a company of six you have only to show an Ameri. 1 the fortunes of po- | men. | in Great Britain, and, while giving judgment in | our favor in most respects, concludes that our very | }ywkd down and | pfesent camipaign | Mr. Brooks has much to say of the orderliness of | He was in the United States | during the campaign of 1806, and in speaking of it he | bitterest moments of the fight for home rule, and for | feur solid months the most ingenious campaign man- | | lage had its Bryan and McKinley clubs, its parades | wrong. That is just when an Englishman becomes finally convinced he is the only sane person in the | OCTOBER 23, | can that five are against him to convince him he is | OWW%W LEADING SANTA ROSA DEMOCRAT | rcom. Probably there is no country where minori- | ties have fewer rights or more modest expectations. | They are taught their place in most departments of | public life in the States, but at political meetings their mere presence is only tolerated onm conditions of monastic silence. In America the majority is every- numbered straightway and instinctively holds his or its peace—knowing quite well that freedom of speegh is only allowed when the thing spoken does not run counter to the opinions of the majority.” The effect of the,good order of Amefican political sequently that the American people do not learn as much from a political campaign as the British do..| He gives his conclusion thus: “The American pub- lic speaker can usually feel pretty certzin that the men in front of him are of his way of thinking. This, it is true, relieves him of any restraint in the presentation | thing, and 2 man or body of men that feels itself out- | | meetings he believes to be not wholly good He | Calhoun, Webster, | says it has 2 tendency to keep the men of one party A T | away from the mass-meetings of the other, and con- are of the kind where poli- ! of his case. I believe that much of the exaggeration | and flamboyancy to be noted in American orators comes frormh the knowledge that whatever they say will be applauded, and the more strongly it is put the louder will be the applause. It is not good for ora- torical style or for a reasoned discussion of affairs that | orators should go unchallenged. At the same time it prevents the possibility of any meeting endmg in | a “disturbance of the peare.’ 1900. 5 DECLARES OPPOSITION T0 BRYAN % Lawyer'om.es Tears to Tatters the Doctrines of Democracy’s Standard-Bearer. | AMES W. OATES, the well known (- | Santa Rosa lawyer, who has been a | Iifelong - Democrat, hds declared | against Bryan for President. Mr. | Oates is a brother of Colonel W. C. | Oztes, one of the leading Democrats of | the South. In the following vigorous statement he gives his reasons for believ-) ing that the Democratic standard bearer | should be defeated: | Editor San Franciseo Call—Though I am | 2 Democrat it Is my conviction that the | best interests of this nation demand the defeat of Mr. Bryan, and this while I en- | tertain for him the highest respect and be- | lieve him to be a man of integrity of pur- | pose. | There are many reasons, each of greater | or less force, that <onduce 1o this ml.lzl, ! that he should be defeated. That there is some ground for such strictures is not | to be denied. The license given at our meetings to an orator does tempt the demagogue to utter 2 good many things thaf would promptly be proven false if opponents were permitted to question him. Still Mr. Brooks is wrong in supposing our campaigns are not ecucational. meetings gives serious orators ample opportunity for reasoned addresses, and such meetings, as every American knows, are attended by men of all parties and have marked effects upon the minds of the waver- ing. T e e — The legislator who accepts 2 bribe for his influence and his vote ought to find it difficult to bribe electors for the votes which will give him a chance to repeat the offense. The voters of the Forty-first Assembly District have a duty *o perform. €N OLD-FASHIONED DEMOCRAT. NE of the notable features of the campaign has been the complete failure of the Bryanites fo induce the people to accept imperialism as the chief issue of the contest. A few men of many vaga- ries and of uncertain political equilibrum like Schurz and Bourke Cockran have helped to swell the cl against the Philippine policy oi the a tration, but the great mass of those who are sincerely op- o:ed to that policy agree with Senator Hoar that th reign as well as the domestic policy of the country will be safer in the hands of McKinley than of Bryan—that upon is wiser to trust the Republican than the Democratic party. that as upon other questions it | cratic administration, a silver Republican He s insisting upon the free coinage of | silver at the ratio of 15 to 1, when the| only reasons that ever existed for it have | passed away, and every reason against “ has become more potent. He opposes expansion, which Is Demo- cratic doctrine as old as the party, and | which at this time offers to this nation | and our people their highest destiny in every proper sense. He opposes holding the Philippines, thus \ advocating the shirking of a high duty | | under circumstances that would be cow- The good order that prevails at our | + avold entanglements. ardly; would be cruel to millions of de- fenseless and peaceful people; a poiicy that would fustly disgrace us in the eyes of a civilized world. He would have us extend a protectorate over those islands, inconsistent alike with their independence and our responsibility, impractical of operation, a burden with- out a benefit, a duty without the power to He advocated the ratification of the ’ treaty of Paris and is now trying to at- tain power and place by an unwise oppo- ! sition to the logical and necessary resun:[ of that treaty. His position as to those islands gives aid and encouragement to the fellows engusd in shooting American soldfers. If I had no other objection to him, for this I would not support him. Judging from the tone of his speeches he has not a proper regard for the busi- | ness interests of this nation. He is an academic doectrinalre and not a | statesman. He advocates a crusade against what he, is pleased to term “government by injunc- | tion,” which in its’essence is an assault upon any government -that seeks to pro- tect life, liberty and property; it seeks to | | strike down the necessary power of courts | and is a contention unworthy of Mr. { Bryan's high ideals. He has accepted the nomination of three distinct parties that have only two | ! things in common—free silver and oypoux-; Among the men who have been stanchest in re- | fusing tp follow Bryan on his new career have been many of the conservative Democrats who repudiated his nomination four years ago. For example, Rear Admiral Belknap has stated in a recent letter: “In my judgment the questions that confront the country | most distinctively and most menacingly to-day are those affecting the stability of the currency and the integrity of the courts. questions have now been relegated to the contentions cf the past, in view of the fact that the ‘16 to 1’ and It is idle to say that such | ‘government by injunction’ heresies, adopted by the | | Chicago convention of 1896, were insisted upon by Mr. Bryan with imperial strenuousness and reaffirmed in submission to his imperious demand by the Kansas | City convention of the current year. | ous beatings of the tom-toms of alleged imperialism haye but a hollow sound; simulated distress of no more resounding force than | the confined clangings of the alarm bells of the scenic stage. To suppose, indeed, that Congress, changed in its membership every two years, and holding the | purse and therefore the sword of the nation, would | ever permit a policy of real imperialism to be pursued in any direction by the executive, is to discredit the | common intelligence, good sense, strong fiber and | resolute will of this people. Wherefore, in view of such considerations as they appear to me, and others {1 might name and more at length, I propose, as ar old-fashioned Democrat, to vote next month for the four years ago. Whatever other Democrats of the ]old faith may think or dg, such seems to me the best course to pursue at this juncture.” Letters of a similar purport come from men of all parties, of all shades of opinion in all parts of the country. There remain in the Bryan column ‘one but free traders, free silverites, socialists, the discon- ! tented and such old Democrats as are too subject to | partisan feelings to follow even their own reason when it leads them away from the Democratic name. energy for the Bryanites to continue the ‘campaign, | except in the case of those who are working now to | make a reputation for party service that will give them a claim upon the i)an_v‘for reward hereafter. Men who expect to get nominations for Congress or seats in the United States Senate, or some other office in the future, may go on with the fight, but those who have ! no other thought than that of advancing the cause of Bhyan or of iree silver or of free trade might as | well go heme and stay there. l John H. Holt, the Democratic nominee for Gov- ernor of West Vlrglma, who sings ragtime, dances | cakewalks, fiddles jigs and bakes dumiplings in his | campaign, must think that he has bebn chosen chief | buffoon in an itinerant circus. Prince David of Hawaii is running for Congress on the Democratic ticket. A sense of propriety mighe suggest to the Prince that, if only for campaign pur- poses, he ought to change his name. The tramp who chose a vdult in one of our grave- yards for a sieeping abode very probably has not that respect for the dead which takes ino consideration their inability to protest. ! The “original” Republicans of Oakland, who hap- ability to tell the truth. day morning and weat to the theater in the evening has adopted a routine of daily Infe;omewlm too spec- | tacdlar to be popular. .= 7 m“rloulpoh«wnmfn;mmfi“‘ o(opumm'iorptckpockua. It is perhaps natural |’ mehmwmkiwm ‘mhere. Under such circumstances it is a waste of time and | pen to be Populists, must think that their “original- |’ ity” as Republicans consists in their too ev‘ldeln in- mmwmwhoimpedimthehyh— The tumulty- | they but strike notes of ! Republican Electors, as I did vote for such Electors | { { | key could start a religious war with 3,000,- | it will give the tion to expansion—and which as to all[ other issues and in their fundamental principles are sharply at war with each | other. If he should be elected he cculd’ not at the same time give us a Demo- administration and a Populistic uimlnlz-‘ tration. He could give us one that would | be Democratic, or Populistic gr silver Re- ‘ “militarism” ERYAN'S DEFEAT URGED BY | THIS LIFELONG FOLLOWER | | | + ! | OF DEMOCRACY. + would it be? Iam induced to b his thods and utterances tha | ministration would most likely be Popu- | listte. But no one can fell now what It would be. The “paramount issue” and its twin are to my mind the veriest of humbugs, absol: unjustified by any rational apprehens: His foreign policy, if logical w! what he now says, would sacrifice what we | have gained In the last two years and would relegate us to the nerveless policy | of the past—a policy justly contemptible | in the eyes of the world. An American is as good as any man and has as much right as anty to all the opportunities of | earth. This natlon is a part of a world that does not live by the Golden Rule; a | world in which one has to be prepared | and dispased to assert his rights and de- | fend them; a world in which if one cheek | is siapped and we turn the other, it, too, | will be slapped and a kick thrown in for $004 measure. This nation should Bave |an administration that looks with a prac- | tical eye to the best interests of America, { d.\xnuy of i3 argumer patriotism abhors it | practice of ioott | Bave the cotton UP-TO-DATE EDITORIAL UT'I'ERANCE Vxews of the Press on Topics of the Times. may be proud of the “fact that the only stand taken by the & forces in China agains: looting was American officers and soldiers. m and necessariiy 1o M«,n of est grade; for reason condemrs it asd PHILADELPHIA fled than any ATLANTA (‘O\m"nf)\—:l’re ws flelds at our doors w ing our own mill superintenderts and experts. mt more do we need save capital? NEW YORK PRESS—The coast ar lery should be an absolutely independ corps, maintained at all times in its efficiency and drawn upom in mo less than the impending - revub\!c.d PERSONAL MENTION. Dr. J. W. Farrington of Bisbes is at the Grand. Dr. W. N. Tenney of Lincoln, Cal, is at the Lick. Hon. E. C. Hart of Sacramento !s at the Grand. . J. F. Clapp, s Chicage mining man at the Grand. George Dana, a Cincinnat! merchant at the Palace Former Jad is at the Ocell E. L. Sanford, a Corning hotel man, stopping at the Lick Charles H. Ingham of Manchester, land, is at the California. M. Biggs Jr. of Oroville, an extensive S. F. Gell of Salinas Clty Eng- | and one that will have the common sense |, owner, is at the Grand. | to deal with men and nations as they | B F. Brooks a Bakersfield oil man. practically be dealt with. is registered at the Palace. It is the duty of every American to vote | fa accordance with his best convictions, independently of what has been his past . party affliation, for otherwise we become | W. A Thurston of the Unt slaves to a mere organization, and I can | States ¥ is at the Palace. | conceive of no danger to our institutions| H. A. Hurlbut, eater than that. When a citizen loses | York, and wif s sense of personal political duty he makes the boss possible and destroys that D. C. Demon a mining maan from Angels Camp, is at the Eiek a auor dt&ll’r, is stopping at the Lick which alone can keep alive free institu- | 3 w Sbes 500 publican; or he could give us one that|tjons. JAMES W. OATES. g et would be a blend of all three. Which' Santa Rosa, Cal, October 20, 190, e Falac Barbara, propriztor . is stopping at ¢ @ Tttt e et @ | Grana. i ANOTHER VIEW OF THE ARMY CANTEEN. DITOR Call: I was very glad to tion on the Road,” in your issue words, as, leading Republican paper of the State, fair play and which enters so many something additional should be said. It tion up any defense of the army canteen. President Schurman in his report of them. John G. Woolley is not an ate by ecercion.” Franeisco is it advocating making men ture of Prohibition doctrine. that there is as much liquor-drinking The Call is simply mistaken. We still American beer in the canteen. We are id_their Quty the soldier boys would or “slough water." pure water. teen. It is a very recent position for for soldier boys In the tropics. army h | I | | “Prohibitionists deserve respect.” remarkable and startling campaign, stations and enthusiasm is by no means absent.” in supporting an administration to claim that every act of that administra- as been the wisest and best possible. than strengthens such support. The most grievous mistake of the presemt admainistration is its toleration of liquor selling In the tropical Philippines to soldier boys away from all home restraints. We are sorry to see The Call put saloon) bas “hurt the Americans more than.any thing else.” canteen is simply an ordinary beer saloon, and whisky can be bought by the bottle in most of them by either soldiers or citizens. dantly proved by men who have bought whisky with no difficulty in many any other Intemgent Prohibitionist believes that “men can be made temper- Because The Call opposes licensing prostitution in San This charge of attempting to make people “temperate by law™ is a earica- If the Call means when it says the Maine are “as far from being total abstainers as the dry citizens of Arizona™ years of age is prevented from drinking Filipino whisky by first virtues of Filipino and American liquors, but we do know that the American soldier boy had better get along without either. If the officers of the army This is too often the case, notwithstanding the ‘water- distilling apparatus which might supply every boy on the firing line with ‘We are very sorry to see The Call come out in defense of the army ean- tion papers to take that the beer saloon is a temperance agency, especiall: I sincerely hope I have misunderstood "'bz Call’s position and that it will yet take its stand in favor of abolishing the EADS. grogshop. Oakland High School, Oakland, Ottober 22, 1900, | J. H. Henry of San Jose, a Democ aspirant for political recognition, is a Caiffornia. E. Smith and F. T. Sutheriand, nent Denver mining men, are stoppin the Palace. | A W. Simpson and wife of Stockten are at the Occidental. Mr. Simpson L large lumber man. W. M. Breck | ficial at Tucson, notice in your editorial on “Prohibi- of October 3, some very pleasant and again of Woollev's “His crowds equal Bryan's at the However. in the one that stands for cleanliness and temperance and prohibition homes, is not necessary for a great journal is in the city for a few | days and.«is staying at Grand. * The Rev. T. F. Dermody of Sacramento | and the Rev. F. H. Dermody of Grass Valley are registered at the Lick. Such a claim weakens rather | Frank Greatzer has returned from | Nome, where he has some large mining interests. He is stopping at the Grand condemns it and says that it (the C. S. Browne, city ticket agent for the The army Denver and Rio Grande at Colorado it B et S gz:nn. is spending a few days in this —_——— Cmflm‘B IN NEW YORZE. NEW YORK, -Oct. 2—From San Fra cisco—N. Kohn and Dr. Bosford are at th Sinclatr: H. H. Ellis is at the St. George: W. E. Hall is at the Morton: H. Haniin, H. Janss, E. Janss 20d P. J. Janss are at the Gerald; H. R. Lipman is at the Her- | ald Square; T. McGhee Is at the Hoffman; L. R. Mead s at the Holland: R. E. Miller dnd wife are at the Gerald; C. Promis is at the Everett; F. T. Shea is at the Im- perial; A. S. Sherabacher is at the Plaza: | H. @. Smith s at the Gerald: S. Sol s at the Wessminster: J. Steinberger is at the Impertal; L. 8. Vassauit is at the Sturte- i ¥ vant; D. C. Weil and wife are at the L “‘evangelist of woe.” Neither he nor and women chaste “by coercion™? people of in Malne as there is in Arizona, why, fail to see how a boy from 17 to 2¢ drinking Dot prepared to discuss the relative not be shut up to the choice of beer : Gerl'ld: E. G. Wheeler is at the Navarre; the administration and administra- Brown is at the Herald Square | H. Evans and wife are at the St. Denis ! E. Dreyfus Is at the Cadillac; J. Mells i3 | at the Criterion. | From Los Angeles—W. C. McQuilten is | at the Manhattan; Miss E. J. Shiveley is the St. Denis; E. Singleton is at the Savoy. P. M ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. FIVE-DOLLAR PIECE—A Sub!cflbef.l Truckee, Cal, If the five-doilar piece of ! uired about has on the reverse the | }&l‘:‘&q Plaribus Unum.” it commands a premlmn of rom $1 to $2: if it has not such legend jt does not ‘command any pre- mium. RELIGIOUS WAR—N. N.. City. The story to the effect that the Suitan of Tur- 000 Mohammedans in the Phiippine Islands ! against the United States is without 1 dation. In the first place the Mo- h:‘l’l‘:mned:: population of the islands does not exceed 30, THE CENSUS-S. V. 8. City. The Census Department for 1990 has not’ yet given out the figures as to the cities named in the letter of inquiry. It had been announcad that within a week or two pu!a! n of all cities having over 10 habitants and when tcl:t list is f\lrnlshed it will appeag in The BETTING ON ELECTION—A. O. S, City. The Penal Code of California on the subject of betting on election says: “Every person who makes, offers or ac- cepts any bet or wager ‘npon the mult cut !or Any o Specific “’n‘flx’iy 2 ‘}m‘ l'Li'éo.“ a ‘:flm or ment not exceul":g six l‘anl{l or both. SOLDIER'S VOTE—N., City. A sol- dier does not gain or lose a residence by reason by being in the service of the United States. But a soldier who enlisted in the State of New York, was sent to this city and remained at the post for a time sufficient to s:lfl a rem!lenn in Calf- al hflf‘y 0 eh‘.‘n 3 h be registered so Anln. lt llol {season by using DR. SIEGERT" Prom Oakland—W. Gillette is at tio x-nhnuu A. Brown is at the Hoffman. . H. Taft of Petaluma is at the Broad- ny Central. G. P. Reynolds of Alameda is at the Imperial. F. M. Shideier of Eu- reka is at the Grand Union. Andrew Clunie. California’s Insurance Commissioner, left for San Francisco Sat- urday, intending to stop a day or two in Chicago. ———— CALIFORNIANS IN wmmn No grippe, no pneumonia in \no-nym = nter, WASKIVGTO“ Oct. 2 —-Mrs. M. Shus- those who build up their systems after the hot | ter. Miss Amy Shuster and F. Shus: Angosturs | San_Francisco are at the Shoreha: J. Faust and William - Grant Francisco are at the Raleigh. 1. E | Hickok of Los Angeles is at the St James. J. R/ Maxwell and wife of Dak- land is at the National McKINlEY ani RUOSEVELT' . SAMUEL M. SHORTRIDGE ' SPBAKS AT METROPOLITAN TEMPLE THIS .TUESDAY EVENING. Ht the Good Tidings te Brings From the fat:rior of the State. - HON. REUBEN H. LLOYD WILL PRESIDE. Cal. flm(mtflcmb-t'l’ow:' —_——— Special information supplied dai; business houses -nd public men ‘4 Press Clippi: ‘zfelepm“' (Allen’ s 510 gomery st. —_——— The ants in on i i e nest are not all "{..f;'.} the [ ont- | Bitters. ———————— Dr. Sanford’s Liver T E The best liver medicine. nvuuuu_um Eranted :g:floui to ém “::fl CAMPAIGN SONGS BY THE ROUGH RIDERS QUINTET. was Secretary. FROWE. GEORGE

Other pages from this issue: