The San Francisco Call. Newspaper, January 8, 1899, Page 2

2 THE SAN FRANCISCO CALL, SUNDAY, JANUARY 8, 1899. "CONDEMNATION OF MAN AND METHODS. 1 '—H. M. RIER. be a blot on the fair name of our proud | Western country, even to_the candidacy | ests. We need able and honest m do not want Dan | commonweaith and a step backward in|of Dan Burns for United States Senator. represent us in the halls of '—WILLIAM VAN | our civilization. I believe U. 8. Grant to | T should ever after he ashamed that I am JAMES A. JOHNSON be the only man who can beat him | a citizen of this State if he could be suc- | ney: “In my opinion D. M. tes Senator. 1 ~, GEORGE W. | from this county who votes for him could | RATLIFF, member State Central Com- | California in Congres: | ever be re-elected. mittec. “I, as a Republica ALBERT | _J. M. HUNTER, secretary of Board of | “The most desirable and most avail- [ Burns for Senator. Trade—Burns is the epitome of corrup-|able man for United States Senator .is | SANT. not my man. “1 ‘would prefer some good Republican | tion in politics, representing an element [ U, S. Grant."—T. H. THOMPSON. “Dan Burns should not represent Call- | to-day."—JOHN R. NEWBERRY. cessful. That would be the apotheosis of | & proper selection for United S oth x‘ 1;..11“r]zuyrn.\"n l‘f{n T. \,“-RE - | which e?’e‘r\' ;D“.de.—;:mz:" s‘i}ould oppose “I do not believe the best interests of | fornia in the United States Senate.”— “‘I prefer General W. H. L. Barnes first | machine politics. T cannot believe it pos- Son:nnr The ;y;\Al}}lP. v!nl “‘l“l vf‘",', x:flt“r:: FIELD regardless of party. If gullty of half the | the State or the Republican party would | ARTHUR BELEW. and U. S. Grant second. I do mot care | sible. ~JULIUS JANSEN. aspi of Mr. Burns and his election or United States Sen- | charges against him he Is unworthy of | e subserved by the clection of Burns | “T do not think that Dan Burns is the | to spedl of Burns. T consider Barnes one | ~ “I am not in favor of Burns for Senator. | by the present Legislature to the United Bard of Ventura the position. My first choice s Bulla, but [ Were I a member of the Legisiature 1| right man for Senator.”—D. OGLE. | of the most brilliant men in the State. I| Tt surely would be a great misfortune for Senate would imperil the future the woods are full of other good Republi- | would support W. H. L. Barnes.—J. 'W. | "I don’t think Dan Burns shouid be |know he would do what is right.’—H. H. | this State if he i elested. In fact, it | Suc of the Republican party some one else than | cans. DAVIS. Senator.”—GEORGE STEINMILLER. | APPEL. would ‘be a_calamity. The Republican|Stgies = S e Kniglit~C. W. SOLOMON JEWETT, president Kern| “Harnes is my choice.”—J. B. BECK- i “As Between Grant, Burns and Bulla 1| party s diskusted with Burns ever eince | fL, & ALDRICH, attomey: (The rep: | Valley Bank—My objection to Burns is | WITH. “ ” am in favor of Bulla, He has e e e ety tour Years ago."—J. . | reséntative from lamed y advocated of associations. | We don't want him. 1| “T am for Barnes. Have no use for | SEND DAN BURNS TO JAIL | ity than elther of the other two, Grant|HENDERSON, President Humboldt for Burns should be treated to 3 coat 2. Bard of Ventur " | prefer Barnes. Burns."—D. F. J. REED. g would be my second choice.'— M| County Bank. f tar and fes i S AMIN BROOKS. ". H. SCRIBNER, capitalist and mer- am for Barnes.”—A. YOUNG. . COMES FROM COLTON | 5°yiy /g “Ny cloction of Dan Burns to the | CRAIGIE SH ary Board o degrading to Cal resentative in gy ) ‘D nt—If Burns is good enough to be in- an out- ted to do work for the party. as has 0 not favor D. Burns. Am for e “I am for U. 8. Grant as against Burns. | United States Senate would b 'ER. COLTON, Jan. 7.—*1 do not want to see | The election of Burns would create a Da- | rage, the like of which never w Favor Grant.”” | Dan Burns elected for our next Sena- | tional scandal’—W. R. BACON. trated on this State before. The onsdy NOT A MAN FAVORS BURNS | {I it Senate, not a machine been the case in_the past, he should be nate, not a 4 3 ¥ ticia complimented. My choice is General i o 2 A “I have just returned Trom Pomona. | who would vote for him Ought to be woli y i IN PLACER COUNTY | gompimented. 3y < fs my cholce.’—E. C. BEALS, | tof-W. W. WILCOX. Dan | With every one with whom I have spoken | only politically but soclally os LIALIE e = . N. REED, secretary Republican posed to Burns. Favor Grant.” e have had all we want of Dan | the past two weeks, and they number | forover atterward,”'—C. G. S b s Oaks County Central Committee—California is HOENEMAN. Burns and his records, and hope never | hundreds, the expression of opinion is “As to the election of Burr e a great big State and she needs a great R to hear of him as a possible candidate {,‘fiatmn\’:%ofle‘cr“m" B, Buras W;’ul& be a|terly opposed to it and 1 belleve big man for Senator. In my opinion w.at for Senator.”—G. E. SLAUGHTER. e party. Grant is the sec- | glection would be a disgrace to man is General Barnes. WATSONVILLE WANTS BURNS s bl s A ond cholte of all that have come under | pia His vo louid defeat S At the natlon: DR. § F. SMITH, physiclan—Don't ‘UNDEE NO CIRCUMSTANCES YOUNG. my notice.”—H. G. TINSLEY. Ik HOSI dent Gage Republl- | 15 mot o oroper ; want Burns under any consideration. y | "I am unqualifiedly in favor of U. 8. | -Iamin favor of a Southern California | can Club. , Senator. Either Judge Scott wouid | on’t know the mapn, but don’t think he S | Grant for United States Senator.”—G. L. | man. ' —GENERAL E. P. JOHNSON, ke election of Burns would demor- | or Horace Davis would st ) B E is the right man. I want General Barnes.| WATSONVILLE, Jan. 1 do not| HUTCHINSON. |, “1 favor Bulla for United States Sena- | g)ize the Republican party. With so m {. McCLEAN, D.D. nt Pacifie CHARLEY MAUL, old G.A.R.man—We | want him under any circumstences.”—W. | "“T would not favor Burns for Senator | tor. while U. 8. Grant is my second choice. | other good men in the field Burns she : Lol Placer county | don't want that blankety blank Bumns | ANBORN, Prominent Frult Grower. |under any circumstances.”—CHARLES |#% (0 the effect of the electlon of Burns | 515t pg’chosen.”—W. 5. CQOPER. . hiih of” , ne id a scalawag like him aspiring | SANBORN, SDHURY : 35401 gD or 5 T g0t e Semate. " 1ike. GBtera]| Tt Is a aisgrace to the State and a men- | MEDHURST, | the son of a prophet."— WALTER LIND- ; ot —A. N.| -1 do mot belleve the Legislature will | {f JUDD, Prominent Fruit Grower. St bo g tte By cpglag Bl “ANY PREFERRED TO BURN»" Barnes, but Grant is my cho ace to the Republican party E"?'h = 24 : e ; Jean. ints 1‘[‘!’ Saorsed My il Yor Senator and| IS THOUGHT IN MARYSVILLE g a X\:gh(lnk\.i C. H. FAIRCHILD, commercial agent of 5 0K . nce is | the Southern Pacific—General Barnes - «Burns' record is such that he 1s & | I would send Dan Bur nstead | Das Indorsed Mr. Bulla for Senator. an b 6 nomi- o taver | OSERRJ CINEE It Hhe Bald stench In the nostrils of the public.’—E. | of the Benater it B HAMILAON. Instrdated ourdieglslators ito; vote for g — nated by Mayor of ENDER of Bender & Hewitt, ab- candidate from the south. Nothing should | 4 pvevir1E, Jan. 7—T. J. SHER- from F. WYCKOFF, President of the City| “The election of Dan Burns to the Qaxlan would be a | lican part; of thi. "' ON Al Y s State. WIL SANTA ROSA, Jan. 6—JAY WILLIAM has taken the form of one Senator tryin ody but | stractors—Am not for Daniel Burns. His a % 1€ | prejudice his v. 1 do not think | _2 0 s e e "Had he said D00y U I T Ph st AT A Entiie the o }?g?‘a&ek}«jul\;ldsgiITflHvuth conditions have arisen to_change this | WOOD: ‘“‘As the contest :)r Se n;luv?cr"nh;t g e e S Pparty and would be the cause of losing 't want him; prefer Grant I ‘favor. sending Burng to Mexico. " | Situation.” BRADNER W. LEE. stands, which scems to be a choice he- cs. but any- | the State for McKinley two years hence, | R( SEITZ, Proprietor of the Man- | mpyo @ SSaGing Burn A 3 o —- tween Burns and (,rnnl.ll un? ?ocrx rl\)fl) MERC \ (r;‘;lupal; ¥ " | General Barnes is my choice. plinLiouse: | e T the Y « | in favor of the former. In point of abil- 10t regard Burns ope Don't want Buras|| T BiSTHOUATE (president Clty Trus-| ~*Burmstérecord ought to best him. oy | okt ENEIEE g slection of Dan Buma| SHISHERUTATION SEHO0IBAD I o RIo8 oF (15 SOmew (40 En fe by et for'the office, T think Mr. do ces. Think Scott a | disgrace and an outrage to the State of SAY SANTA ROSA VOTERS | nait of his party Colonel Burns should ould do more for, the State tha | California and a fatal blow to the Repub- succeed as against Grant. The contest CCOODORTL Atte 00 closely e J. = ] to dictate to the people of the State as politics and corporation ir Fo0dER epublisan HUDSON—“Until the record of Colonel . gl e _politics and corporation influen fen! aotut andl « Burns has been thoroughly Investigat- | to who shall be his colleague to suc uoet, the requirements ¢ office. re Iin 3.‘}3 SHAME IF BURNS GETS IT” | T can say nothing concerning him as a OIR{tS,El_f ll';fil\fif'—:“» e would _disastrou upon the BURNS’ OPPONENTS WILL POMONA, Jan. «—EX-ST«1E SEN- ATOR 8. N. ANDROUS—*I favor Bulla for United States Senator and never Burns.” man, but with California’s brilllant sons avallable with no stigma of scandal, with no reproach of political chicanery to sully reputation, I remonstrate with all my being against his representing me as Scott has been my choice all the way through. In my opinion he can do morg for California_than any other candidate. KT 7. ‘A. MABEN, City Marshal: I prefer | and any of them to Dan Burns. I think M. H. de” Young would do more for California O intellect 1 M President of Oakland rd Burn morally incompetent. General tee or W. R. Davis my cho 5 : b2 e n o, = H. HOBART cannot_af- = I T. BRADY, President Pomona Na-|@ citizen in the United States Senate. fhan any one. mentioned for Senator, but | R 1 ! ‘We cannot MAKE A ROLL OF HONOR | AR tlonal Bank—"T am in favor first, last and| C: A. ‘WRIGHT, Statloner—“I don't|at the same time he would be looking out | ford to sink to the low level of Newak o | all the time of tho electlon of Bulla. The | think a man of Burns' reputation should | for De Young =, o ©0 409 SERRSHSIE ARG SO, 2, DGR 00T Republican party will be disrupted in | P€ elected to fill such an important office = A 2 & i repres. i Wi [} ~, ( “"‘V‘!‘ i California by the election of Burns.” N e A6 WALTER M. AVIS—*We shall all han 4Gy g Z N our heads in shame at the election of I cannot believe our State legi: lators will dellberately disgrace the State by electing Burns. Bulla is my man,* JOHN W. STRINGFIELD—"Oh, hor- rors at the possible election of Burns! 1 shall never dare talk Republicanism agatn in California if " Defaulter Burns is elected.” CITY ATTORNEY EDWARD FLEM- MADERA, Jan. 7.—‘“There is certainly the Legislature of Dan B s to te to represent the | —R. R. PRECIADO, | tion us in t important office of twe | Senator.’” AMES S. NAISMITH, Real Estate— S e . My ice is Irv-| “Burns is too closely allied to that ele- {JOHN C. WHITE: “My cholce Is Irv-| (" tnat believes in running politics SLLEN COOLEY: “Put me down in | Without regard to the welfare of the favor of Irving M. Scott.” | State, but solely for revenue only—for Suisy Burns, but I think through his ele the State will be lost to McKin years hence.” | what they (']LH\ lml.'\k. - : | J. B. RICHARDSON, Attorne “I cons “BURNS’ ELECTION WOULD BE | siler Burns the most uhilt of any of thosa named for office. My preference is M. M, DISGRACE TOITHE PARTW LS 08 9508 0 DEEsonce & i - JOH clection by == s as a Sen- it were left le he would s T. REDFIELD, at- T. BEL Director Oakland Ex- 1 blush at the very thought of the possibility of the election C . i e osition—"If half of what has been pub- i ING—"T want any one_ of the United PASO ROBLES, Cal.,, Jan. T.—*I favor | position— ; i s Henator: States Senatorial candidates but Horge Robert N. Bulla, for United States Sena- | {5 acd about Burns Is true, iy 2 Trotter Burn e “WILLI ¥ tor. i) H GLASS LAIR HILL, Attorney “For United States Senator Major Me- | helicve ‘the elec Laughlin would be an ideal repres satisty the peop . and i tive of California’s interes! would be unf s r";r.x\:‘r‘t[.\(‘;l: I gainst Burns.”—VAN R. ELLIOTT. who is not above gainst Burns; in favor of Bulla.’ irns would not of Dan Burns. if ja, and it MAYOR C. P. PATTERSON—"We all want Bulla and we shall be utterly ruined in our party if Defaulter, Horseracer, Mexican Dan Burns is ever chosen Sena- obligation to the to: o - COrpo « ction.”” 1t Legislature is com- ATTORNEY WILLIAM A. BELL—‘“T M. DODSON. i eatpdtation lection posed of will fight all ol vant Bulla, and I don't believe there is a “ghoua prefer any one now mentioned | | ELBERT R. DILLE, D.D.—Of all the ba 3 ingle Republican in all Pomona but will iniis prefévencas | to \\EBumstH VG e Who, have bealn mentloned; for Sens gt | be “chagrined and discouraged if Dan WRIGHT. California wants to show that she has | Burns is made Senator. “I am not in favor of Dan Burns for ssed the cond £ a frontle | STATE COMMITTE N BROUGH- stion Soaid ben alg T | passed out of the conditions of a fr © Senator. His el ea iblican party of California.”— RY. camp into those of a settled ci and to repel the accusation of akb and low moral standard, let her not send ch | a low ‘and corrupt politician like Burns o D EROST. otce for | 10 the chief council of the natior _E. L. ADNER. e g ; ‘Put me down for Bulla. Think of sted Republicanism in California would be if Dan Burns should be sent to sit where Webster, Clay, Seward and Sumner have sat.” / 7 / to the Re / T. W. HE s my choice for United ational A. M. DOLE—“I can Senator. ; koL :ly conceive of a greater calamity General Barnes_would be my choice | Bauke—T ar y opposed to our ‘grand old party than the putting for United States Senator. Do mot think | g Ui o v pnpy MerchanterT = of a Senatorial toga on 3urns of race Bu a fit representative.’—E. B. HAR- | 457 0t so0 how v he Leg track, defaulting and Me n mine re- LA islat cords, The legislators from Los Angeles ' Barnes is my cholce for Senator.”—F. DL County will ne lni{forgl\'(‘n If they give B. LADD. : 1 2 Z ] 5 ulla {s my man.’ = S o JUDGE E. W. BARNES—"Anybody b o | that man Burns. ~ We will nyves dnos “BURNS COULD NOT Oppase Senator; neither do I pr inent candidates. ace Davis or Irving M. rns for honor a part of . G. WIL- | { look honest Democrats in the face if our representatives at Sacramento give their votes for Dan Bu Bulla is my ideal for United States Senator.” DR. E. W. HE ‘Why, the ey | Scott. NEVADA, Jan. 7.—WILLIAM G. RICH- | " BEN F. LAMBORN, City Clerk, Ala- “We . want a representative at HEN RSON hus far mentioned for idea of Burns for United Stat s Se ARDS, merchant—"I believe that a man | m 3 i By diggracesully Srepobicronss wouldns Whose record Is such as Dan Burns' has | Washington, not professional politician Fer Sbapicans Heel RSNAried torukve been would not be a creditable represer E 3 | United ‘States Senate Tor our reas sng e of the decent people of California.” | — 4 United States Senate ur tative of the decent pe lifornia.” | | glorious Btater - Dan - Brrns Shas, and Ji M WALLING 1. am unalterably Continued on Third Page Dagane thought is sickening. _I¢ Assem- opposed to his candidacy g ntins s | blyman Huber and Senator Currier vote E. B. POWER, District Attorney—' The‘ g B sarns they will be long cussed here in election of Burns would indicate that our | ADVERTISEMENTS. . z ADVERTISEMENTS. State government is one of politicians, by | politicans and_for politiclans. {20} w2t C. J. BRAND, jeweler— Like every | Setls “PEOPLE ARE UNIVERSALLY JUDGE q ther Republican in Nevada City, I am Wavyrire AGAINST DAN M. BURNS P\ IFaLEY | ohpesed 1o Burn sy “NOT BURNS AT ANY PRICI” CHICH T e e . ¥ ENGELBRIGE OF THE | 1 Yommittee— 'Burns dictated all the other am not In favor of the election of a man CHEERFUL COUNTENANCE. | (ot e B e Banatership.” He | S Area o o A as w ave the Senatorship. o aburns’ character, and think it a dis-| or any other office for that matter. It A el Y OTULLOY, merchant— | g e party to forward a man of | Grant is the man for the place. el the right man for the place if | his type. If he had his just deserts he| J. C. MAILOR, President Atheneum | He is not < | SENATORIAL ASPIRANT IS THE VOICE OF LOS GATOS Barnes, RiAse - s e interests of the | 1SAAC | would be now in the State's Prison in- | Company—*Do not want Dan Burns for | ¥ 8tOD (;0()f(‘“(r;:s}"i‘w‘x?lk\mxn"un(parl . To | nd thi stead of trying for office.” Senator. His record is against him, and | S&%¢ G0F 001 injure our party. | e GEORGE MILLER—"The Legislature | 1¢I5 ROt the kind of man for the place. I| Iffg M (U CHAPMAN 11 all 1 have | does not dare elect a man like Burns. The | EX-SHERIFF SAM ALLEN—-T | read about Colonel Burn: 3513 members would not dare to return to | think Mr. BUMs o manperfeatiy eapabia | OUgNt Lo be in Bt B ey | their respective homes if they voted for | of representing the people in the position | he is the most maligned man ] s my choice/'=J.: W, chant— | R him. The people are universally against “ni ates Senator, bi 1| YGEORGE_ E. JOHNSTON, me ice, Judgs his election, and I think the members wi.. flg‘}em}::dlssnigqm:r:mtfie]'pe‘:xtmgo“l‘-‘:xstbfo “His ‘record is against him. I should A e look to their constituents for advice be- | represent them. I belleve this is on ac- | blush to see the Republican party send | id n ¢ ing ¢! to the United States Senate.” | Tl ore voting.” count of the fact that they lack confi- [ such a man to NE rveyor—* T} 5. Ge DR. N. WATTS—“It would be a dis- | dencs in him," W W W AGH O B O YO e grace for any party for its members to| T. W. KEEGAN, Merchant—“I English language it is p 5 support Dan Burns, with the record ho | acquainted with 'Mr, Butns, all the | Republican paper like The Call does not | The Giant Despair. favor of Dan Burns for | I ne Call does not JAMES J, STANFIELD. carries. 1le might be a smart man and | knowledge of the man haying been gained | adequately express the intensity of my One of the most hor. D B all that, but he s not honest, and none | through newspapers, Judging him by | antagonism ta Burns and all of his kinc o o 5 ings about the but honest men should be supported. v o . LONG, ex-Assemblyman—*"It is le things al = There are many honorable men in' the | thinkk hins the prose woon tor hoUld Mot | . onton the ‘election of Colonel Burns nervous diseases to which arty who are worthy of the place who | E. D. SWEETSER, Editor Sonoma | would be a disgrace to the Republican | women are peculiarly have lived honmest and straight lives, and | County Farmer—*T think we should elect | party.” | subject 1s Gue: scone of I think as a Republican no man of Burns' | a man for United States Senator who is P Top S - overwhelming despair record should recelve the best office at the | entirely above suspicion, and for that «BURNS' ELECTION WOULD BE f which they bring upon the mind. hands of a party which he has dis- | vesson are as ad ition i ] S gainst Dan Burns. If the | coman’s mental condition is reference is Grant above all others.”—I, | STaced. 2 oman ATKINS. is a man of unques- JOHN C. MILES. SR “BURNS IS NOT A FIT MAN” SAY GILROY REPUBLICANS | tees—Don’t know anything a matter were to be settled by popular vote RAGE ON THE STATE” | @ 4. - " e e ;\x'm\ (lnn'll care to. Would like to see De | H. ’{I'T’FL‘E.1Pru;n|n:~m ]rlugg(}rowcn i R ;vould Yote m}(}nlnsn him, T favor % man| AN QUDSEGH [/ gl,r§°§‘fmfflf’ r.‘?m?ééf‘i}i’i;cfi“‘ffec?a’i GILROY oung elected. “Am not 'in favor of Burns: want |« rom the south to replace White.”” S A oE T ch a Qif A i Barnés or Grantoob. B MAHSR, | “WILL QUIT REPUBLICAN SUPERVISOR T. . PUTNAM.-Of all| SAN JOSE, Jan. T—"I think the election organs of her sex. Such a dificulty % BURNS BITTERLY OPPOSED Atforney: . PARTY IF BURNS IS SENATOR” | the candidates so far mentloned, T con- | of guch a man as Dan Burns would be | not only racks her body with pain and suf. “U. 8. Grant was in Washington during Tk sider Burns least suitable. The position | 2, outrage on the State and a disgrace | fering but burdens her with mental anguish do not | BY PEOPLE OF TULARE glls;ht_ ‘\ rs ‘x‘r_m his father was Presi- i3 i g should be filled by an entirely different to the Republican party, and an outrage | Which words can hardly describe. City Treas- | ent; he needs no introduction to public| RED BLUFF, Jan. T will quit the | kind of a man. "Of those out I favor | ' n Thousands of women have had a similag men. His election as Senator would | Republican party when it will put in| Barnes, but Scott is my favorite. on the public morals of the State. A | v SRURY. 2 - h 3 3 a > s W rience that of Mrs. Eurath A, regard the| TULARE, Jan. 6.—A. J. PILLSBURY, | place California in a tion where her : ¢ 3 % H. G. HAHMAN, Bookseller—*T am not | with such a reputation as he has is whol- | experience to_t : of the Register: “I am a Republican, and | Wants could be s ity and imonlgcmlyif\“"h e i;Surns for. Nenator.’— | ;ersonally ' ncqualntedl with Burag ool Iy unworthy to occupy any place within| Williams, of Westport, Oldham Co., Ky., | . ; i) | provided for."—H. LETCHER, Cash- | MAJOR E. H. WARD. Grant, but from general knowled. 1 le. I have no prefer- ich the use of Dr. Pierce’s wonderful hall stand by the Republican party what- { fI700 "ottt & FLSTOHER, “It will be an eternal disgrace to the | former does not seem o me the Kiad g | the Bift of the people. have no prefer- | R o e ever the iss v of the esti-| ““Any name that has been mentioned in | fair fame of California to elect Bur : h MmO thedeind, of | ence for any candldates named, but would \to b 3 ' to [ man for the high position of Se = ¢ : : preference fo Burns”—OWEN TUTTLE. | United States Senate’—D. G. WEST. | Judging from what the papers have eui, | be glad to see any man of good, reputable | In my judgment no man should vote | LAKE. I do not think he would be acceptable to | character named. T am satisfied no one Burns as.a politiclan and party boss, I re. | for Mr. Burns. I should look upon his : Bumns elected ¢ health and strength to the feminine organ- i not only restored complete vigor 1y powers but has { mate which the people deservedly or un- deservedly have come to place upon Dan . I SR Al . ever. | the people of the State.” in this county want ICLY POy i e O i cassuredly iigard his candidacy s @ misfortuns and | SIESHSN, ToH{Ne United Btatos Centiais R TR e s ORGE A LUPPER—“Burns is no | cept a few of the vilest gang politiclans. gir'ft“w‘d Plgotaces s oiruy a irant first on a nt of | & g oo SLA00 5 S 3 anator’ TPERVISO b e place, and I am agai ] SWIS. 2 il SR i T second | Should regard his eler-u?‘n as a calamity | the doom of the Republican party in this \;EHTI‘?["SS Senator’—SUPERVISOR A. O. first, last and all 'the time. ch “*;5;0‘11"11 JUDGE J. R. LEWITS, iae « I suffered for overa year,” says Mrs. Williams, Shtices | to the Republican party. State for the next tewnty-five years.—A, | WalLB-o At for | Sultable man under any circumstances. ;| My cholce for United States Senator |, 1SHCGi Shon o0 nervous prostration. I g, S [y oRolo s penacor: b D [)']"l hva'"'“x a f Sehaton adoiit wonld b r‘xmllligrfl\;:'rl for| J- F- SMITH—“I don’t belleve Dan | Of the candidates for that office now at| e (0 eat or sleep. 1 tried several phys- “BURNS THE EPITOME Burns."—R. M. GILLESPIE. Burne toe e ‘é{".ti’: g{’};;igi} }3 133;‘ the Legislature to clect him to the Sen- | BUrns should be given the honor. The | Sacramento is certainly W. H. L. Barne Iped me for a short time, | “Opposed to Dan Burns, I favor Grant.” OF CORRUPTION” | M. C. ZUMWALT. | “Favor W. H. L. Barnes for .nited | LD. Jan. 6—H. F. CON- | States Senator. Have no use for Dan N i Bur; J. WOLFROM. Mr. Burns' past hecord, | "ujm ot in favor of Dan Burn -A. W. WHF otake Dr. Pierce's Favorite . Dr. Pierce's Golden Medical Dis- 1 “Pellets,” I commenced taking the ate of the [United States'--ERSKIN | Position of Senator is one of high honor | If 1 were a member of the Legislature, IS S e andimeclghtio hhve man of high honor however, T would vote st for B. I, Pres- “Burns for United States Senator?— ho 0 £ £ Menlo Park, as Nrecognize in hi Never, especially when such men as|, PR. C. H. THOMPSON—“If the Legls- zlamr‘n;n of power, honesty and mental c: negias 2 t 'h"“( b(]:tlle., o the al Barnes or Grant ask for the|lature of this State elects Dan Burns | pacity as is needed to make the kind of | ‘Favorite Prescripti PSS SntHen e G. II. CHASE, Secretary Repub- | United States Senator I say the quicker | Senator California ought to have.’—J. R.| Medical Discovery, and thres vials of the ' Pel- SRl e R n 1 lehts Conniy. Gontrai DA it i the Senator is elected by the direct yoes | Tonaigr | lets,"and am now fecling better than I have for 2 | 18, myichioi 4 ‘ e oo > | _“When the Republican party puts up | f the people the better. They will then, | ‘*My first_preferende would be General | two years. Have a good appetite, sleep well, I am bitterly opposed to Burns | $ronsoms. S \9man, Burns for va- | guch a man as Dan Burns for Senator, I |at least, be able to protect themselves | w 1Y I, Barnos of San Francisco and do ot suffer from indigestion or nervouss x tary of Repub- | surprised and disappointed at the candi- | Fious reasons. Liibink that he is not a|think ii has outlived its usefulness'— | from being simillarly disgraced in. £y y ‘second choice would be Irving vess. T have gained scven and a half pounds t ever Burns | dacy of Burns for Senator. I thought he | Febresentative citlzen of California, and | ATTORNEY W. HENRY JONES. ture:” : £ O B either of whom would make & sioce taking these medicinen’ (X Nave efouts : had too much good political sense, and | therefore would not represent any party, | “opye Doy h R . B. M. SPENCER—*“Cali Scott, eitl 2 e mended Dr. Pierce's medicine to several lgdies, right kind 8 | in my opinio; h Mr. Burns-represents the corrupt boss 2 ‘alifornia_has sev- | ting representative of the State in the x : Stnte i the | gl believe the Legislautre of Callfornia | I3 my gpinion, o the reputable citizens | cremeni - politicss his candiduey. 1 o eral times fn its history occupied the po- | United States Senate.'—JOSEPH R. PAT- | one of whom is uow takiag it and is being v State 1€ | has the welfare o at heart suf- | OC the State, T fc .. Grant. ameful reflection on the integrity and | Sition where the honoring of a man win | Lo At ey : : greaty hensiied o representative | ficlent to refuse to_elect him."—W. P. | WILLIAM BIXBY, M. D! intelligence of” the Republican ‘party’ of | had forced himselt into public Prominesse | MY preference for United States Sena-[——————— other pc m 3; the gift of the peopl Barnes R. 1 am of man to TUnited epresent Senate. it e | California.”—D. D. DODSON, Editor Daily | Would be a public calamity. 3 S ATTORNEY (. D. 000600000000 0D00000000000000000C 0000 | “BURNS MUST BE BEATEN” | Serima ¥ | worst tning dat coula happen or coug | RiGHT - Do —ATTORNE o S éver have happened to the State politi- | *I think General W. H. L. Barnes would oarsene and diffi- SAYS SNOW-CLAD TRUCKEE culty in speaking. I also to a great extent lost hearing. By the I 10 v or otherwise right now would be to | 2 ct more attention in the United TOO SMART AND NOT HONEST the Legislature indorse Dan Buyrng | Staies Sonate than any other in the Sen- ENOUGH FOR SENATOR?” |0F any other man with a reputation like | atorial race and would be able to (0 mo LOMPOC HEARD FROM. TRUCKEE, Jan. 7.—My choice for his.” e ¥ 3 3 o = 1 d Sta s ’ California.”—8. E. SMITH, Merchan! use of Ely's i zl]“?‘\] s};«"‘)‘(‘:’ifienalor is decidedly Grant.” (T e m'x:(‘m;oral W. H. L. Barnes is my choice 1';;nn dropping \Sr::m for United States Senator. Dan Burns must be defeated, as he would not be a| PEOPLE OPPOSE BURNS” f')' rapr;n\}lififll\éafox this great State.’” LOMPOC, Cal., Jan. 7, 1899. For the honor of the State, and particularly the Republican party, we, the undersigned Re- publican voters, citizens of Lompoc, Santa Bar- bara County, are most decidedly opposed to the selection of Dan Burns to represent our Statein the United States Senate; and we hope that the members of the Republican party in the State Legislature will refrain from an act so suicidal to the best interests of the State. H. A. AVERILL, W. A. SAUNDERS, THOMAS D. BLACK, J.W.MEALS, LOS ANGELES, Jan. 7.—*“I am for |« i “My choice for United States Senator | Bulla for United States Senator first, last | NN E-TENTHS OF THE is Grant.”—G. W. BRYANT, M.D. and all the time. I do not conslder any “My preference for United States Sen- | one else is in the fight. I have no second ator is U. S. Grant. one to “beat | choice.”—F. P. FLINT, United States Burns.’—D. J. WILLIAMS, District Attorney. "My choice for United States Senator | I am for a Southern California man, is Grant.”—W. M. BURCK. ) Ny o A Ca“,,,,.,mlc’,}g{,“;?;],;‘fr‘ any | and have paid very little attention to the anxiety about Burns being elected Sena- | Subject at best.”—JOHN DRAIN, Super- . M. RUTHERFORD. intendent of Streets. tor. “Anything to beat Burns. Preference| “I am not stuck on Dan Burns for Sen- | (; ornia.” ' —W. ANDREWS, Manage: O R, SPALDING. 5 L A Bdor. S ounty are opposed to the election of | foriia, 8 L cus has ceased. voice and hearing are greatly improved.—J. W. Dav- ‘Either General W. H. L. Barnes or U. idson, Att'y at Law, EUREKA, Cal., Jan. 7.—"I believe that | S. Grant would suit me for United | Monmouth, Til. es Senator; it is anything to beat inged he ‘mostrils the f'ecm’" of Dan Burns to the Senate | Bi1eS RENRLON (518 AUYNEE 17 S ¢ sorbed. . Retlor 1y would result in the loss of the State to | WIGHT. Bresidont Union & Bank Raiee the Republicans for at least two of the| *Such a man as Horace Davis of San | ing following elections. I belleve that fully | Francisco would make a good United | Trial Size, 10c: « nine-tenths of the people of Humboldt | States Senator and be an honor to Cali- BH : 0n RS, Barnes.”'— {hi & .,_|ator. 1 think there are a whole lot of v 1, SKINN Farmers' Union. | FOR DAR) 7 JoKnighe, or Barnes will”'sult me.— ‘BHA‘;"S . 1. SKINNER. “I do not believe that a man like Dan BRUSHE gl i e A ik good men in California suitable for the m positive that the election of Burns | Burns would be a representative Senator | houses, billlard tabies, = place.’—FRED EATON, Mayor. would surely defeat the Republican party | for a great State like California. I have | prewers, bookbinders. candy- makers, .aners, “BURNS NEVER THE “If Dan Burns were as honest as he is | i 1900. We could never remove the stain | 10, preference of other candidates.”—CAP- | dyers, flourmlls, foundries. Ilu;lxdrtu!. paper-. RIGHT MAN»|Smart he would make an ideal Senator, | Of Such a choice from Callfornia's fair | T4 1 M. BENSON, e s G Vi 2d | etabl . tar-roofera, tanners. tallors. ete. Should he be elected to the Senate it |name. Knight, Barnes or Gillett would be | gor L‘fii(?drms:ufi: ggf\lzif‘:-‘,flh:‘fnf’o.iofiagé Hablem®. BUCHANAN. BROS., it would be a grave mistake. 1 prefer |an honor to the party and to the State.”— | think Burns woald grace the chair’'—Q. | Brush Manufacturers, 609 Sacramento Sk v L to see a Southern California man -elect- | W. B. COOK. By R e it bbacdiiialtots g DIXON, Jan. T.—'T am opposed to Dan | o "y ¢’ PATTERSON, President Los | 1 4m against Dan Burns first, last and | O- DLANEY, Real Extate Agent. Burns for Senator.”"—G. §. CONNOR. Angeles National Bank. all the time. If a member of the Legisla- S e W. L. CALVERT B. A. THOMA “I am not in favor of Dan Burns for | “U. S. Grant is all right, I prefer to | ture I would bolt the caucus if it deeldod | “D- M. BURNS NOT A PROPER Use Use . L. g LA, S, Senator.”—DAN McKINNON. have o Southern California man every | in favor of him. His electlon would ot MAN” SAYS OAKLAND| Woodbury's mhm= Woodbury's J. B. DEAN W. C. BALL D an Tt Is ot the wan T want for | Hmer - K. RULE, Chairmn Republt. | Only disrace the Siate.put would defoes : ) : . B. s .C. ’ s ety S Committee, * " otes. T don't think | Lo JiTLY LOF ne next six ot clent vears, e Facial Soap. €& 7 Facial Cream. B. S. BAILEY, W. H. SUDDEN, . Grant is my choice. I do; n ought to. AVER. OAKLAND, Jan. 7—JOHN E. FAR- ““Personally no objection to Dan Burns, | we can afford to elect Burns. His election | ‘“‘Am unalterably opposed Th i 2 P , alte v opposed to Dan Burns. | N1 Y e e complexion speedily and permanently but for Senator all the objections in the | would be a detriment to the future of tne | His election would be a alsgrace o the | 1\ tegacy Somee Sommissloner: “1 do f‘eieared “of "tiotches, fiver spots, 'moth, tany world."—A. KIRBY. Republican party of this State.’—F. R. | State and would undoubtedly defeat the b rgm' . M. = DEOpa mal o ilex qnay l?g];lglnflra{\gi::red sott. smooth Dan Burns is not my choice for Sena- | WILLIS, Deputy District Attorney. Republican party in this State in 1900."— | for United States Senator. California | 8ol White by JOHN H. WOODBURY. 26 W. —B, McBRIDE. “I consider the election of Dan Burns|A. W. HILL, ex-Assemblyman. has a great destiny and it Is the duty jo ow York, and 168 State st., Chicago. to BXA > “I don’t want Dan Burns to represent | to the United States Senatorship would “Nothing 1s impossible In this glorious | of every citizen to be loyal to her inter- S:;lniléue::fll k;f ’é’éap"i“n‘&"cr?:&'f'n‘e'é‘.’ TSty DR.V.W. SAUNDERS, D. T. TRUITT. 0000000000 000000000000000000000000 0000000000000 000000O0000000O0 0000000000000 0000000000000C0 Iy . ‘ Y rl