The San Francisco Call. Newspaper, June 6, 1895, Page 14

14 THE SAN FRANCISCO CALL, THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 1§95. LEGAL BATTLE FOR THE STANFORD MILLIONS The Government’s Big Claim Comes Up on a Demurrer. LEARNED COUNSEL ON BOTH SIDES. Judge Erskine M. Ross of Los Angeles Listens to the Arguments. ATTORNEY JOHN GARBER TALKS FOR HOURS. He Holds That Individual Stock- holders Are Not Liable for Pay- . ment of Bonds. The battle for the Stanford millions has commenced in earnest. Great legal guns are arrayed against each other, and their thunderings were centered in the United States Circuit Court room yesterday, Judge Erskine M. Ross of Los Angeles on the bench. All through the day, during both ses- sions of the court, Attorney John Garber, the heaviest piece in the ordnance of the opposition to the Government claim for fifteen millions against the estate of the late Senator Stanford, centered his fire against the Attorney-General’s complaint, and when the sun had gone down he had not exhausted his ammunition. He will re- sume at the opening of court this morning, and the battle will wage fiercer and hotter as the hours progress. Every Californian is generally familiar with the history of the transactions out of which has grown this colossal litigation. It was started when Richard Olney, the Attorney-General of the United States, in- stituted a suit against Mrs. Jane L. Stan- ford, the widow and executrix of the late | | | or circumstance which is generally sup- posed to follow in the train of millions, the struggle began. The thunderings were slight to start and it would not be possible to tell from the calm dcmeanor of the opposing forces thata battle royal was in progress. As time wore on and the plans of the respondent were developed, it was ea?v to be seen that extensive preparation bad been made and that nota step had been or would be taken which had not been carefully measured and considered. | Mr. Garber, in support of the demurrer, opened the argument. He reviewed the act of Congress of July 1, 1862, to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the Missouri River to the Pacific Coast, and the acts amendatory thereof, upon which the Government based all its | claims against the estate of ex-Senator Stanford. He then specifically attacked the allegation in the complaint that the stockholders were liable for the payment of the bonds issued by the Goyernment in aid of the building of "the road. Later in | the day he attacked the other allegation that ex-Senator Stanford, or his estate, or any stockholder of the roads was indi- vidually liable for the debts of the roads. Section 6 of the act of July 1, 1862, in which the conditions subsequent to the building of the road were set forth, as were the benefits accrued and accruing to the Government fre the carrying out of these provisions, was cited. Mr. Garber then read several. authori- ties to show that it would be preposterous to hold that, under the language embody- ing these conditions, and the conditions themselves, the stockholders of the road would be forever hable to respond for the faults of their successors in interest. “I say,” he continued, “that under the authorities and these conditions if it had been intended to ereate by these acts a personal oblization, or agreement, or cove- nant, it should have been expressed in unambiguous language; and a court can- not imply it from the language here used. On the contrary, not only what the Gov- ernment did not state—as it did not state in these acts—tends to the irresistible con- clusion that there was no contemplation, or thought, or intention of creating any personal agreement or liability to pay these bonds. When the Government came to express its intention it clothed it in technical language. They use the word ‘condition’—‘it is upon condition’ that | this thing shall be. Is it conceivable that | if it was the intention that the parties | were to be personally bound, that the deed | or agreement would have been couched in | any such language as that? “There is no reason,” continued Mr. Garber, “which would induce any reason- | able man, carrying himself bacx to the | year 1862 and casting his eyes around in izing their incorporation under the laws of the State of California, for the corpora- tors to build lines outside of the State. Under these laws the stockholders were only liable for debts and liabilities which might fairly be presumed to have been in contemplation of the laws of California when those laws were enacted. “In this case,” continued Mr. Garber, “upon these elementary principles, no in- dividual liability rests here upon any stockholder of any of these California cor- porations. It is nota debt. If it beone, this debt, which it is stated here was created by the constitution of the United States, it is not a debt which can, by any stretch of reason, be supposed to be within the contemplation of the framers of the constitution of California, or of the en- actors of the statutes of 1861. They were legislating with respect to California and California corporations. They were not legislating in regard to the building of transcontinental highways, or to the mak- ing of international roads to carry on oper- ations in China, or Peru, or Africa. “Now, in this case there can be no pre- tense that there was any power in the Cen- tral Pacific Railroad of California, or the ‘Western Pacitic Railroad of California, or the Central Pacific Railroad Company, to build one mile of road outside the limits of the State of California. Ifeverathingcould be said to be ultra vires, in the absolute sense of that phrase, the attempt of a Cali- fornia rflilrosg corporation to build a road from east of the SBacramento to Utah or to the Missouri River would be ultra vires. The men who took stock in such a corpo- ration could not be said to be liable—the law of California, I say again, cannot be stretched to include such liability as that. “Taking into consideration these mat- ters, it must certainly be held that what- ever liability vested upon the stockholders of any of these corporations must arise under the legislation of Congress and not of that of the Legislature of California.” Turning again to a consideration of the act of July 1, 1862, Mr. Garber pointed out that it had been decided by the Supreme Court that the stockholders of the Union Pacific Railroad were not individually lia- ble for one dollar of the debts of the road, while here was a suit of the Government to recover from the widows and orphans of the stockholders of the Central Pacific the money it had contributed in bonds for the building of a road which it needed. It was making fish of one and fowl of the other and was an entirely inexplicable pro- ceeding from his point of view. “In this legislation,” he went on, re- ferring to the acts of Congress, “‘there is not one word creating any_liability upon any stockholder of the road. It never was the intention on the part of the United States to exact or impose any individual responsibility or liability upon any of these stockholders in any of these companies. The very legislation of Congress makes this so plain that it is impossible to hesi- tate or doubt. “In eyery line and every feature of this legislation” stands out bold and apparent above everything else the clear intention, JUDGE ERSEINE M. ROSS. Leland Stanford, for the recovery of $15,~ 000,000, alleged to be due the Government by reason of the non-payment of bonds of the Central Paci Railroad of California and the Western Pacific Railroad of Cali- fornia. When the bill was filed in this circuit under the direction of Attorney- General Oiney it created a great deal of interest. No particular move was made for several months, the attorneys for Mrs. Stanford being, apparently, little worried by the big suit. They paid enough atten- tion to the suit, however, to file a demurrer, denying the liability of the estate of ex- Benator Stanford, and setting forth the want of ground in the complaint for equi- table relief against the respondent. Upon this demurrer the matter came up in the Circuit Court yesterday morning. The Government was represented by United States District Attorney H. . Foote and Special Assistant L. D. Mec- Kisick. For tne respondent was a particu- larly strong array of legal talentin the ersons of Russeil J. and Mountford 8. Wilson, John Garber of the firm of Garber, Boalt & Bishop, and F. E. Spenser, the latter bearing a most striking resemblance to Justice Field, taking a side view of it. ‘Without a ripple, with none of the pomp GENTLEMEN--- THERE ARE NO BETTER CIGARS THAN “CAPTAIN MARRYAT” CIGARS. s, s e “FINEST BEYOND QUESTION.* A~ A~~~ AAA~ HARBURGER, HOMAN & CO., New York, M akers. M. LEVI & CO., 117-119 Market St., Distributing Agents. the light of history—there is no reason which can be adduced that would induce any such man to suppose for a moment that it wasin the contemplation of any- body that there should be anything more contemplated than just what these acts call for—the security of the thing which was to be called into existence. Wh; should the Government of the TUnite States exact anything more?” Mr. Garber then referred to the Union Pacific decision in 91 United States and the sinking fund case in 99 United States, and contended that although it might be said that these menaced the tenability of his position, he was prepared to argue to the contrary. He went into an exiaustive review of the cases and then reverted to the conditions under section 6 of the act, and showed that there was a specific clause for forfeiture of the road in tEe face of a failure to comply with these conditions. Several authorities bearing upon the nature of the agreement, show- ing that tbe one in the act was an ac- knowledgment of money received, not a promise to pay, were also read and com- mented upon. At the reconvening of court after the noon recess Mr. Garber summed up the points in his morning’s argument, ho! ding that the Government had never intende to Jfeal with the men who_had stood for- ward to help it in a great National enter- rise in the hour of need as the money- lender would deal with his debtor. It had taken these men in as partners in a certain sense. Concluding this portion of his argument, he took up that part of the case dealing with the individual liability of the stockholder. . ““As to the matter of individuality liabil- ity,” he said, “I shail have but little to say. The matter of individual liability of stockholders is simply a creature of the statute, unknown to the common law, re- pugnant to the ideals of equity. The very 1dea of a corporation excludes the idea of individuality, In fact, the main purpose of a corporation—when the State sees tit to call in an nigre ation of means and con- tributions in the shape of a corporation— is to get rid of the law of partnership, which by reason of its onerous restric- tions of individual responsibility, tends to obstruct the advancement and progress which it is the idea and object of legisla- tion through these corporations to pro- mote. If it were not to get rid of this re- striction of individual liability there would, pe_rhugshbe little use for corporations. It 1s in the interest of development and prog- ress and advancement and production that this wiping out of individual liability is such a potent factor. “Whether wisely or foolishly, it has been conceived in many States that there should not be this unlimited responsi- bility on the part of stockholders of a cor- poration. In California it has been en- acted that the stockholders, in corpora- tions organized under the laws of the State of California, should be responsible for a proportionate amount of the debts and liabilities of the corporation, being, so far as this case is concerned, that pro- portion which the stock held by the cor- porator bears to the whole stock of the curp.okx;ltxotn." . ‘Taking fhe cases of the Central Pacific Buuronf Colpézlny.of California and the ‘Western Pacific d Company of Cali- fornia, Mr. Garber went on to gzo' that there was no power, under the law author- John Garber. F. E. Spencer. H. 8. Foote. SCENE AT THE TRIAL OF THE GOVERNMENT’S SUIT AGAINST THE STANFORD ESTATE. NEW TO-DAY—DRY GOODS. N Se— ONLY THREE DAYS MORE. "Cloaks 25c Each. Monday morning we had 290 old fashioned garments on our tables. We have no Cloak De- partment, no piace to keep them, and besides they had been kept long enough by Kennedy before we bought them—far too long, in fact—so we marked them from 50c to $5.00 each. There are 93 left this morning. They are warm woolen garments. Don’t want one leit Saturday night, so have marked them 25c to $1.00 each. 25¢ Each. 10 BLACK DIAGONAL CLOTH ULSTERS, size 34 only. 'S PLAID CIRCULARS, ages 4 CHILDH 6:to 8 years. 17 LADIES' JACKETS, in navy, tan and black cloths, assortment of styles; sizes 82 and 34 only. 50c Each. 7 FANCY CLOTH ULSTERS, sizes 34 and 36 onlv. 8 CHILUREN’S ULSTERS, in black, green and sapphire, ages 8, 10 and 12 years. 8 CASHMERE DOLMANS, beaded gimp trimming, size 84 only. 4 OTTOMAN SILK BRATDED MANTLES, size 34. 12 JACKETS, black cloth, assortment of styles, sizes 34 and 36. $1.00 Each. 12 FUR BACK BEAVER ULSTERS, suita- ble to make over, sizes 34, 36 and 38; golor black; Kennedy's price used to be ‘WRAPS, fancy cloth, color black, size 34: former price $25. 5 PRINCE ALBEKT JACKETS, In navy beaver, sizes 32 and 34; Kennedy’s price 15. 8BLACK CHEVIOT JACKETS, large moire sleeves, size 84 only. ) . . Men’s Furnishings. Here are a few specials in this department in addition to those published in our advertisements at first of the week. Don’t over= look these : MEN’S OVERALLS, Boss-of-the- Road make. heavy blue denim; only a few dozen left; Kennedy’s price 75¢; ours.... falele [INCORPORATED] 937, 939, 94 Market Street, SAN FRANCISCO. IKE BUBBIES OF §9AR- THIS WEEK'S SPECIALS LAST BUT A MSMENT, AND ARE GONE., EING THE LAST WEEK OF THE SALE OF THE KEN- NEDY BANKRUPT STOCK, we determined, if low prices would do it, to close out every article of that stock still When we advertised the hundred odd specials in last Sunday’s papers we supposed there was enough of each Before noon Monday, however, several of the lines were exhausted, and on Tuesday when country orders came pouring in we had to disappoint many The prices are wonderfully low for the qualities offered. We can only advertise a limited number of prices in the newspaper space at our command. dozens of other bargains just as good as these, but these will go first because they are mentioned in the papers. come early if you want to get your size or color in these. unsold. to last at least three days. customers. TN g J There are dozens and Therefore MEN’S WHITE MUSLIN GOWNS, 200d heavy muslin, s cred front, colla; 50° . Each S LAUNDERED SHIRTS, re-enforced and front, all-linen bosom with band, sizes 113, 12, 14, 17, 1746, 18 ind 1814 ‘oniy: wers QRO 0c,7bc and $1; if we have your B) a bargain at. Each MEN'S CARDIGAN JACKET made of heavy worsted, fancy $1.nn yarn fronts, dark colors; Kenne- — dy’s price $2 to $3 50 each; ours ~ Each MEN'S DRAWERS, all wool, and some wool mixed, color wi 28, 30, 38, Kennedy's #1 50 to $2 50 pair: our sale price Hosiery Specials. CHILDREN’S BLACK _COTTON 15° seemea prices rahged. tom 1! Palr HOSE, narrow rib, Hermsdort dve, double knees, héels and tocs, sizes b to 81, Kennedy's price 25c, our sale price. RN CHILDREN’S BLACK COTTON HOSE, extra fine quality, narrow rib, high-spliced heels and double 950 toes, Kennedy’s price 35¢ to 50c per DAIr, 5izes 6 10 814, ..veeeuuns Pair LADIES' BLACE COTTON HOSE, fine quality, seamless, hieavy, |50 Kennedy's price 2bc, our sale price... 3 Pair LADIES' LISLE THREAD HOSE, fast black, fine quality, military rib, white tops, spliced heels, double toes, Kennedy's price 50c, sale price.... 335° Pair Linen Department. Two hints at the last week of the sale values to be found here. This sale is an opportunity for hotel-keepers that shouldn’t be overlookad 3 CRASH TOWELING, 18 inches wide, bleached there are 3 differ- ent lots, some all linen, and abot 20 pieces part cotton; value 12 sale pri ALI-LINEN CHECK CRASH, two lots, 18 and 22145 inches wide, 191 Kennedy’s price 16%/c, and sale 2 price only.. Yard Domestic Departm’t We are the price=-makers for California on all kinds of Domes= 8y Yard tics. We allow no one to under= sell us, CHECK NAINSOOK. Here's s chance to get the children’s slips, dresses and aprons at about one- half, a good quality attern, Yard |ic 3 ..t Yard SCOTCH WOOL TENNIS FLA NELS, 60 pieces, in pretty pat- tems and seasonable colors for OEO ladies’ outing suits, outing shirts, 0 etc., the 40c quality at. Yard 44 BLEACHED MUSLIN, & heavy auality, equal to the Farwell, 20 with little or no dressing, & 106 quality this week at............... Yard ONLY DAYS CAMBRIC, full yard wide, fine thread, nice finish, the regu’ iar 10c kind, at.. 3 9-4 UNBLEACHED SHEETINGS, the Lockwood brand, good heavy quaiity, regular at 18¢ yard, this MORE. THREE week special at.. Yard Underwear Specials. LADIES COTTON heavy quality, high neck, long sleeves, lé;' Jersey ribbed, Kennedy's price COTTON ‘ht, fine quality, Kennedy's p9) for. Each LA Qrec Bh) Each L) A light or heavy welg neck and front, mTRC white or scarlet, Kennedy’: o goods for... Each Three Veiling Specials. BORDER VEILING, single width, navy and red only; worth 20c a noveity just received, fancy heavily dot- attered black, ted border and fine met sc dots; a regular 25c vell; white and colors; only. COMPOSITION DOT V white and colors: no biack; 2 inches wide; regular at 30¢ yard now.. z Dress Stuifs. Wonderfully low prices on this season’s beautiful Crepons. gains in Silk. OUR_f9uc, $1 and $1 25 BLACK CREPONS, they are 38 and 44 inches, in many beautiful patterns and will please the most exacting, your choice of these three lines... OUR 1 50 AND 81 75 TWO-TONED CREPONS, 45 inches wide, some all wool, some silk and wool, the the season, beauties of now marked...... L BILLOWY SILK CHE- Bar- 50° Yard 7EC 5 Yard PONS, 45 inches wide, olhen$1 00 asked $17 to $21 the sult at East- er time. we say now... S 850 YARDS FANCY SIL Wo- toned effects, 18 inches wide, new small designs, black and 21 bright colors, nice material fo waists, and only. = 420 YARDS BLACK BROCADED INDIA SILK, 21 inches wide, small, neat designs. and ever; thread silk, worth 65c. Yard Yard 44° Yard L. D. McKisick. the equitable intention and tiuSt purpose that all of these citizens of the United States, whether corporate or individual, who were called upon or lent their aid in response to this call for aid in the con- struction of this great National work, should stand upon the same footing and equality—that every and all the rights and privileges which had been conferred upon one should be conferred upon all. “The Government of the United States, in the plenitude of its powers, in the furtherance of a great National work, had called forth into existence these corporate ies. They were corporations, not sim- ply in the State of California, clothed only with the confined and limited statutory Fowers set forth in the constitution and aws of California, but the Government of the United States infused into them the breath of the higher life. It gave to them eater and more extended powers. t empowered them to do that which the State of California, if it had wished, was powerless to empower them to do. They were, to all intents and urposes, pro tanto, the creatures of the egislation of the United States of America and, hf the reserve power contained in that legislation, subject to alteration, amendment or repeal by the Congress of the United States.” Mr. Garber amplified on the question of individual liberty at great length and quoted a number of authorities. At the end of two hours’ constant talking in the arternoon his voice became husky, and at 40’clock he asked the indulgence of the court, as he was feeling ill. An adjourn- ment was taken until 11 o’clock this morn- ing, when he will conclude. It will prob- ably take the remainder of the week to finish the arguments. MATTIE MATHEWS' GUARDIAN. The Murdered Woman’s Husband Ap- pointed by Judge Coffey. Judge Coffey has appointed Edwin S. Mathews guardian of the estate of Martha (or ‘‘Mattie”’) Mathews, daughter of the uardian and Mrs. Jennie Mathews, who ied under iar circumstances recently after visiting one of the city cemeteries. The child is a beneficiary of an insur- ance policy of the Order of Chosen Friends in the amount of $2000, and Secretary Win- throp of the ofder is named in the policy as her trustee. The Order of Chosen Friends will now have to decide whether they will pay the amount of the policy to Winthrop or to the child’s father, yesterday appointed guardian her estate, which consists chiefly of the policy referred to. — ———— The amount of capital invested in tin rlnte works in this country amounts to ully $8,500,000. THERE is an article on th market seldom equaled and never exceiled—Jesse Moore Whis- ky. Moore, Hunt & Co. guarantee its purity, * ERAND JURORS AT WORK, Dr. Titus Undertakes to Ex- plain aFew Things to the Inquisitors. The School Directors and City Offi- clals In General WIll Be Censured. The Grand Jury met at 2 o’clock yester- day afternoon, every member present ex- cept two. The session was devoted almost entirely to the reading of reports. Outside of the reports, only one matter came up for the consideration of the jury. It was the case of a downtown saloon- keeper, charged with stealing a watch. Attorney Barnes was on hand with several witnesses, but after examining one or two of those present further consideration of the matter was postponed until Friday. It is quite probable, however, that an indict~ ment will be found against the accused. The forecast of the final report of the Grand Jury, as published exclusively in the CALL of yesterday, has created some- what of a stir in the various public offices of the City. Dr, Titus was so much dis- turbed over the publication that he asked the Grand Jury to allow him a few mo- ments in which to explain certain matters. The jury finally agreed to hear the doctor, though, if reports be true, he underwent a laivl\;ganing process that was not at all to his ing. Dr. Titus told the jury that it was a mis- take to suppose that the City and County Hospital did_not receive all the coal re- ceipted for. While he never saw the coal, he had no reason to believe that the men employed to do this particular work would do anything that was not strictly honor- able. "The same was true of all the goods received at the hospital. The men in charge of each icular department were selected for their known honesty and up- rightness. everal jurors asked him what might be called leading questions, to all of which the gentleman in charge of the City and County Hospital had & ready reply. He admitied that it was possible for those in flhhl'lia of the receiving department toact in collusion with the contractors and he know nothing about it. He did not think it probable, iowever, that such was the case. Dr. Titus was in_the Grand Jury room nearly an hour and a half, yet in spite of all this the institution over which he pre- sides will receive its share of the jury’s at- tention, and that, too, in no pleasant way. N eufy every department in the City gov- ernment will be handled severely in the forthcoming report. The School Directors will come in for their share of the censure. The report will point out several mistakes that have been made during the past year, and also make such recommendations as they think are alsolutely necessary. The School Directors have been very careless in some of their work, the jury will say, and it is their purpose to make them a little more careful. The City Attorney’s office will be one of the very few departments to receive words of praise from the jury. The work in this office has been systematically and con- scientiously done, the report will say, and then will follow a few suggestions as to possible improvement in certain direc- tions. These suggestions, however, are not 10 be considered as unpleasant reminders, but simply as a pleasant way of doing an unpleasant duty. he report promises to be a lengthy and valuable document, and probably one of the most interesting ever given to the pub- lic. The grand jurors are of the opinion 1 f that there is a leak in nearly every City de- partment, and they do not hesitate to say s0. Those high in power will feel the wrath of this august body, while the lesser lights will be looked after without fear or fayor. % The Grand Jury will go out of existence as a legal body next Thursday. It has done a vast amount of work since Decem- ber 9, 1894, The gambling houses are all ciosed, while other places of shady repute have been forced to comply with the law. The jurors have worked for the good of the people. They have not been biased in their decisions, and they have not allowed gel;sontl interests to stand in the way of uty. HUNT-STUMP WEDDING. A Daughterof the Manager of the Hearst Estate Married to a Wealthy Rancher. Miss Alice Stump, daughter of Irwin C. Stump, manager of the Hearst estate, and Alvis G. Hunt, were united in marriage yesterday. The ceremony took place at noon at St. John’s Presbyterian Church, Rev. D. Hanson officiating. The bride wore a white brocaded satin en train and a white veil caught by a beautiful diamond sunburst. She carried a bouquet of white carnations. Her maid of honor was Miss Bovhie Boggs of Woodland, and her brides- maids Miss Maud Atkinson and Miss Ag- nes Sadler of this City. R. L. Ulch was the groom’s best man and Elmer de Pue and Harry Malone were the ushers. The bride was given away by her father. There were present only the relatives and a few intimate friends. "After the ceremony the bridal gnny drove to the ralace Hotel, where the Stumps have been staying since their arrival from New York last week and where a wedding breakfast was served. The groom isa son of William Gaston Hunt, a wealthy resident of Woodland and a pioneer of the State. The groom has been for several years the manager of his father’s ranches in Yolo County. ————— Hamilton School Graduates. In the list of graduates of the Hamilton School which was published in yesterday’s CALL, the name of Miss May Ballinger was in- advertently omitted owing to a typographical error. Miss Ballinger was accorded much credit for her standing in all that goes to make up good scholarship. Ll Lol A New Mercantile Agency. The Mutual Mercantile Agency has been in- corporated with the following directors: Wil- liam L. Merry, Columbus Bartlett, Atbert Ger- berding, Charles Sanders, A. G. Mitchler. The a pital stock is $100,000. of which $2500 is up. MMENSE REDUCTION SALE CAPES, SUITS, SILK WAISTS, JACKETS, Etc. ARMAND CAILLEAU, 46-48 GEARY STREET, Corner Grant Avenue. this is to vemind you that our Special Sav- g Sale continues the entiye week this year; also that the special prices made ave on regular goods and that the regular pri- ces will prevail next week, S8PECIALS No. 1—Pineapple Syrup, 60 ofs. No. 2—Lazeran Boneless Sardines, 22} cts No. 8—Underwood’s Deviled Ham, 20 cts. No. 4—S8ingapore Fineapple, 15 cts. No. 6—Imported Swiss Cheese, 22} cts, No. 6—Finest French Candies, 35 cts. Goldberg, » Bowen & o Lebenbaum MinEx's Cocoa \ SERVED AT im NEw SToRE ) L | 428432 PINE 8T, 218-217 SUTTER 8T, 2805 CALIFORNIA § 219 ONTGOMERY 8T, BORAXAID 50 TIMES A YEAR comes the inevitable weekly clothes washing. 1000 TIMES A YEAR comes the perpetual tri-daily dish washe ing. No help for the weary washer, until—The Pacific Coast Borax Co. lends its 20-Mule Death Valley Borax Team, to make this heavy work light and easy. BORAXAID, their New Washing Powder, is just the right com~ bination of Soap and Borax to soften water, loosen dirt, heal the hands and save the clothing. For sale everywhere. Tos Best Osrames Br DEWEY & CO., 220 MARKET ST., 8. F., Cit 10 the Sexual Organs. ‘Weak Men andWomen D USE DAMIANA BITTERS, T b Mexican Remedy; gives Heals nd wad