The Nonpartisan Leader Newspaper, November 30, 1916, Page 6

St Paul Manufacturer Ob]ect' "vo D -Facts Fall to Sustain th .welghed 415 pounds per bushel before-z some of the facts: gathered by Dr. E. F. Ladd in his wheat and flour investigations, was contained in a letter received a few. weeks ago ‘from J. C. Enright, a miller of St. Paul, Minn., who disapproved of the publication; and . AUSTIC CRITICISM of the Non- ‘ partisan Leader. for publishing: of Dr. Ladd for having dug out the facts." Mr. Enright did not. deny that flour-could be made from the light welght wheat, cleaning, " and " after’ éleaning, onW 50 pounds. Yet it produced:a loaf of: ‘bread _far lighter than any of the N Northern, and ranking 94,5 per en _color of ‘the loaf, and' 96.5 .The . best_‘sample of No. 1. Norther milled and “baked only tested 95 per Ladd ‘recommended, " that “exclusxvely, lsu‘gelyL or: ey T0] cent in color and 95.5 in texture. ’the Nonpartlsan Leay Thus' for' comparison, if Dr’ Ladd orr' had : just as ‘Dr.-Ladd said’ it could, but he - had this;to say about it : } “Mind, ‘T am’ not; saymg that rusty,. ; 1¢ T : ; blighted wheat, won't make: flour fit : : B : En fi?hcxsed, the chemists and newspaper- m{n Who O s — : - A Samrights adnce, such articles.' Notat, all it y thing is good1 erough for t L (: : { h 1d h uf ; ¥ 2 2 B ;',‘,;,,“"fv,,:“ft‘:g,’,pt bl do sy latest ‘bullétin of ‘the Agrxcultural college dxs_ cent of flor, bran and the 8¢ flour mill- exclusively, -largdly ‘or ‘éven. ' clos“lg the stea].” lll' ‘S0 calle althotgh: with less than the :which considerably on wheat : stmg 52° b unds' 2 truth -2 much betber case; °°“1d hay and “less i3 going hroke.t - The letter was two pages long; closely typewntten, and ‘contained many: other : = interesting statements.” One of them fi th d e (altfeelgpt%d‘flfo rung -thus: . : . - “Up. to this time I have not purchased deny SpECl o ally e e“ ence pm uc a € a bushel of the chicken feed' which, = ; according : to your article, -yielded a- miller $1.50 per barrel velvet or unearned profit.” The reason 1 °:am behaving: in . 6. » this foolish' manner 'is because of having have sho“fed e Heed | wheat actually " had a sample of 52 pound wheat nulled ;n?&l:rfla;:rge fer flour and Bread tan Moy : and the flour- haked. ) ~_on the other hand lt, m easily bé : ,BESULTS NOT BASED “ON ONLY ONE SAMPLE . ¢ Now Dr.Ladd never came t'o': nny concL ~ “clusions ahout this light weight whea by “having a sample mllled and:the flour’, Hi APPTF T Liw: mhed 40.6 pounds‘ e 46 afterward, yielding flour has' been establish combination of Tw ‘sample m.\lled and the flour could - have . selegcted. Sor 2 Northern af ms\tance, one samplé ~ the Agncultural college.w"‘ : 2 The average or the 40 samples of.