The Nonpartisan Leader Newspaper, June 22, 1916, Page 19

N Political Advertisement. Bt . FOR COUNTY TREASURER 4 Richland County : M..O. Standy is a candidate in the Republican - Primaries = for County Treasurer of Richland county. He has been a resident of and farming in the county for 30 years; he is capable and honest and will make one of the best public officers the county has ever had. He is a member of the Farmers’ Nonpartisan League and is in full sympathy with the organized farmers’ movement. The support and vote of all citizens will be appreciated by him. Political Advertisement A. G. WILSON Ellendale, N. D. Republican Candidate FOR REGISTER OF DEEDS of Dickey County ‘Your support will be appreciated I am not being backed by any group of Political Bosses but am making my campaign on’ my record as a man and my thoro knowledge of the office ' to which I aspire. " i Political .Advertisement FOR SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS As a candidate for the. office of Superintendent of Schools of McKenzie county I wish to mention : that I am 33 years a resident of this state and nine years of ‘this county 'and still-own ‘my home- stead. I have had over 10 years experience. That my former campaign and travels since, give me knowledge of the conditions and acquaintance with many people throughout the county. That L ‘Womern*ara_daily proving themselves as efficient officers as men and I know I can fulfill the duties of the office. I therefore, ask the vote and influence of every ' terested elector in in a just and high standard of instruction. I am of no party, but of the people and for the people. ; 3 Yours truly, MRS. RUTH A. SCRIVNER. (Formerly Wilbur.) Political Advertisement = - TO THE VOTERS OF MORTON . COUNTY ‘I ' hereby- - announce myself as Republican candidate for the office of Clerk of Court of Morton county, North Dakota, subject to the will of the voters at the June primaries. I am a farmer and a member of the Farmers’ - Nonpartisan League. I pledge myself, if nominated and elected, to perform the duties of the office to the very best of my ability. L. M. STOLBERG, Flasher, N. D. “Political Advertisement : M. E. WATKINS For Superintendent of Schools Bottineau County To the- Voters of Bottineau County: I am a candidate for the office of county sup- erintendent of schools and will appreciate your vote. on June 28th. I° have had five years experience in Bottineau county, three of which I have been superintendent of the ‘Antler schools, During these three’ years the high school has grown. from’ a‘two-year' course with -eleven stud- ents " to ‘a four-year course with 27 students. During - ‘'my first" year in this . school I saved the' district’ $600.'in teachers’ salaries by doing extra ~work yself. - If elected I will visit every school at least once each 'term and will stay long enough to learn what is being done. Ay 1 believe in uniform texts for. the county so that the taxpayers will not be asked ‘to buy new texts every time they get'a new.teacher. I shall t1y to have trees planted in every school yard in the county, Since the schéol of forestry supplies .trees. free, vthis should be easy to accomplish, 2 3 Yours for an economical and efficient school @ M. E. WATKINS, * Use Leader Want Ads Political Advertisement to administer the " efficient manner.. To the Voters of Kidder : - County ‘ Iama cétndidate for .the office of County Treas- ~urer on the Republican ticket at the June Primaries, ‘Being“a- farmer-anid a’ member of the Nonpartisan —Le:ague.l will appreciate your vote. and support. 'HENRY B. HANSON 'FOR REGISTER OF DEEDS = . : I hereby announce that I am a candidate for ‘t_h,e’ .Repub- lican nomination for the office of ‘Register of Deeds of McHenry county. If nominated and elected I pledge myself affairs of the office in an economical and- Your support is solicited_ : 2 . Respectfully, and will be appreciated, e Fortunately - the voters of the Fifth Barnes, Foster, Stutsman, most important position in the person of A. P. A district judge is elected but once in four district to take particular care that a man is court matters that justice is dome to all, and taxpayers caused by frequent appeals and There are two candidates the voters to choose wisely, we herewith humiliating Mr. Coffey, but the voters are public official, and it is published solely for follows: AFFIRMED 7 State ex rel v. Ferguson, 23 N. D., 153. State v. Dodson, 23 N.-D., 305. Nichols Shepard Co. v. Delaire, 23 N. D., 532, 26 N. D. 50. Ackerman v, Maddux et, al., Crane v. Bank, 26 N. D., 268 Morris v. Bradley, 26 N. D., 862, La Moure v. Lasalle, 26.N. D., 638. Ag@nlone v. County of La Moure, 27 N. D., Kain v. Garnass, 27 N. D., 292. Doolittle v. Nurnburg, 27 N. D., Gast v. N. P. Ry. Co., 28'N. D., 118, Christopherson v, Ry. Co., 28 N. D;, 128, Reeves & Co., v. Ri 1 ussell, 28 "N.” D, "255. Malmstad v. Telephone Co., 29 -N. D McKenzie v. Hopkins, 29 N. 4 Past v. Rennier,-80.N. D., 1.~ : Ellison v. City of La Moure, 151 N. W., 988. "Lloyd v. City of La Moure, 151 N. W., 991, " Smith v. Barnes County, 152 N, W., 674. Felton v. Midland ‘Ry. ‘Co., 1656 'N. W., 28, Wilson v. N. P. Ry. Co.,~30 N. D., 466. Morris v. Soo Ry., 155 N. W., ‘861. -Harvison v. Griffin; 1656 N. W., 685. Messener v.' Bruening, ‘156. N. W., 241. Buchanan v. Elevator. Co., ‘157 N. W;, 122, Bank v. Collard, 157 N: 'W., ‘488.’ } N. W., 693, . 5 - Allenv. ‘Krugen,: not -reported.” Ry R Helman v, Strong, not reported " - REVERSED . . = Morrissey v. Baskey, 22 N. D., 480, " = Nivon. et.-al. v, Pedples et. al., 23.N..D,; flg. nu‘é‘f;‘t’ v. Harvey Mercantile Co., 24 N. ‘Putman v. Prowdy, 24 N. D,, 517, Hintz v. Wagner, 26 N. D., 110. Morris v. R. Co., £ 26 N. D., 186. D., 298, : Bruening, 25 State v. Winbauer, 26 N. D., 43. N. D., 699. .~ knowledge of the law prejudice to influence ! dealt with in district in appealing, iy jet it a dge by bias. or- ignorance:of remedied. " If a judge is wrong. t s i Poht{cal Adverhsement A. P. Paulson for Judge Judicial District, comprising the countles of Wells, La Moure and Griggs, - have thi judge & man apnd lawyer eminently qualified by education, nd. Paulson of Valley City. years and so’ it behooves the citizéns of that elected to that position who will so dispense and likewise one who will make sound decisions, that will prevent the necessity of numerous appeals with the for this position, one of whom the voters must select. . To enable submit for their consideration Judge Coffey’s record in the supreme court up to June 1st, 1916.~ This record is not published for the purpose of entitled to know of the quality of work done by a the information of the people. The record is as = Powers_Elevator Co., 'v. Stolts_ef. al, 167 : district judge has a record which you may study, and tcplly 3 mdlf.eoruet and whether, if hs?”pom_‘ ; e 1 ngs.” Owing: to the expense incident® to Court, only a fewlitigants can afford to appeal, il e R B T 4 sound’;- of <much ce e, A it b\;: for'many a poor man the district court yRese is year- for. their choice as district training and temperament for that consequent ‘heavy expense ‘to litigants 17?-mgnhr v. Village of Dickey, 26 N. D., x 222, Eliza Willoughby v. Smith, 26 N. D., . Wilson Willoughby v. Smith, 26 'N. D., 222. Dan Willoughby v. Smith, 26 N. D., 222, Dan and Wilson Willoughby v, Smith, 26 N. D, 222, ' Persons v. Valley City, 26 N. D., 342. B Waterman v. Railway Co., 26 N. D., 540, Atwood v. Tucker, 26 N. D., 622. Ertelt v, Lillethum, 27 N. D., 326. Gruman v. Lillethum, 27 N. Di, 227. - Kunde . v. Lillethum, 27 N. D., 229, ~ Henderson v. Gray, 27 N. D., 417. er v. Svends; 28 N. D., 366, - Severtson v. Peoples, 28 N. D., 872. - © Shockman v. Ruthroff, 28 N. D.,-597. e Foster County v. Morris, 29 N!'S D, 1. 0, Hoo, 152 N. W., 656. Wells Dickey, 154 N. W,, 198; Kennedy v. Dennestedt, 154 N. W., 271. Cook v. N. P. Ry., 165 N. W., 867. 2 State v. Mackie, 153 N. W., 982. - 5 . Grandgaard v. Bitzina, 156 N. W., 1035, Henderson v. Henderson, 166 N. W., 245. "gu:knon ¥, . City of Jamestown, 167.N. W., Coleen ‘v, Twn., 157 N. W., 672. Morris v. Elevator, 167 N. W., 486. .Kurtz v. Paulson, 1687 N. W., 805. ‘Kretchmer v. Board, not yet- ndahl v. Bank, 163 N. W., 794, « ‘baffie - Bros., v. Elevator ‘Co., 157 N. W Leu v. Montgomery, 31 N. ‘Dole ! : s _MODIFIED . - - ¥ Hawkins v. Sinclair, 24 N. D,, 623.. Burgar v. Sinclair, 24 N. D., “624. eckerson v. Sinclair, ZGN.}).;'GZS.‘ Smith-v. Bradley, 27 N. D., 618, Co., 28 N:'D., 519, even if they. helleve they b therefore, that a th