The Nonpartisan Leader Newspaper, February 17, 1916, Page 7

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

THE NONPARTISAN LEADER SEVEN’ Distinct Victory for Cooperative Elevators (By. Staff, Correspondent): Bismarck, Fé fasresne ) tory for the chvommtio, Gstinet vie- Stwte Railroad Commission. Complies with. Equity Men’s Plea and. Refuses Demand of Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce That Mandatory Charges for Grain Stor- age be Ordered by Farmers’ Elevators. terests in: North Dakota as opposed to. the: old line elevators. and the 1!&‘Sllnxt?apqhs tbfihamber of Commerce . won in opinion and handed. downs b.y.pthe, railroad com- mission. todag, refusing to make mandatory eharges. for storing of grain. inr-elevators at primary mar- kets in the state. The ruling follows a hearing at Fargo last week at which the ele- vator rinterests of the state were representéd and heard, on the ques- tion. ~'Representatives of the Equity Coopsrative exchange: and Equity elevators: at primary throughout North: Dakota: practically. single handed took up the fight against. the propesition: ~to compel storage charges on grain, which old. line- elevators: and t%f& Grain Bulle- tin; organ of the: Minneapolis Cham- ber: of Commerce; advocated making. mandatory. Favorable- to Cooperators In taking the view of the case ad- vocated by the Equity the railroad commission. recognizes the strength and standing of the cooperative movement: among the farmers. Inh its opinion. the commission remarks that elevators operated. on a.cooper- ative: basis “more: nearly represent: the grain growers themselves than. any other class of warehousemen® and hence concluded’ that the farm- ers’ themselves. were opposed to mak- ing storage charges: mandatory, de- spite the fact that nearly all eleva- torr men present, except the Equity managers, were: for mandatory charg- es’ and outnumbered’ their opponents at the Fargo: hearing: The: statute at present provides that' no elevators: shall: charge- more: for storage of’ grain.than the follow- ing: schedule: 20 days free, .1 cent per. bushel per month for the first thiree: months' thereafter, = one-half’ cent per- month- thereafter. The statute does naot make any: charge mandatory: but the Commerce and' - old: wanted it made mandatory. Their contention: was it was’ discrimination: for- some- elevators: to make charges: and’ others not to: The Equitincontentibn- was- that to make the ch ri%- mandatory would discourage- the- holding: of” wheat' at primary markets and! tend. to result im: the’ dumping of* all grain on' the: market at once; glutting: the: market' and making favorable conditions: at Mineapolis for the. grain gamblers. Chamber of To Run Own Business “It is one of the:objects-of the co- operative movement to encourage farmers to hold’ their grain, either on their farms or in storage in' ele: vators “at” primary markets,” said J. G. Crites, manager of' the Equity: Co- order - markets: line: elevators: opegative: elevator at Lisbon. Dump- ing: of the. grain on the market. all ationce.is.a. big evil. If.is true some Equity. elevators make: a storage change, mostly at: a less: rate than provided. as a maximum. in the stat- ute, while other Equity ‘elevators. do not make such charges. We do not want anything in the law which will prevent the boards of directors of our various: elevators . making. such charges as they seé:fity 6r no charge at all, according ito *what they think best for their lodal “conditions: In other words we want to be left to. run our own business?’ Mr. Crites added no little zest to the meeting by:“insisting that. each * elevator man who took the floor in favor of mandatory charges state whether or not: he- was connected, in any way with: the: Minneapolis Cham- ber of Commierce;” Several elevator men repredented ‘themselves: as: man- agers of “farmers” elevators but: under questionilg admitted they were conmected’ with commission firms with: sedts: -on the chamber. One of these. was A. A. Lee, who heralded’ himself ‘as- manager of the: Farmers®* HElevator: company. at Sharon: “Are- you: not comnected with: the firm. of Randall, Lee and Mitchell, which: has: a: seat’ in: the: Minnneapolis chamber?” asked. Mr. Crites: “Of course- I’ am,” said: Lee;. “but: what! has: that: to' do:with it?" Iiguess: that: doesn’t” take: my: rights: away to explain: my. position on this charge tottlié: railioad: commission: as: am: ele: vator manager.’” “Not: at. allj’”” said. Crites.. “All’ we: want! is: that: each: person: favoring; these: charges:- state: his connection, if any; with: the. chamber. We: are connected: with: the: Equity and’ prougd: of it. Why should you. object to stating your: conneetions?”" Subsermentt speakers: were: careful: to mention: their connection. with: the chamber when: they: got: up to. boost the: proposition: of! mandatory. charges. | Eguity: representatives: were loaded! up: on: facts: as: to: the: connections of: those: opposing: the: Equity stand" and! saw that: each: speaker played’ fair: : The Equity Cooperative: exchange: was represented st the hearing: by Mr. Crites, A. E. Frie; of Berlin: and: W. H. Bell of Sheyenne;. and the: co:: eperative movement was" represented. by several other managers: and: directors of Equity elevators. Mest! of the old line elevators and several CHamber of Commerce firms had; rep- resentatives. present. The Equity delegation made no secret of the-fact it is believed' the move for mandatory: charges on' storage came- directly from the. Minneagolis chamber. 2 ty: Position* Equity representatives- presented: the following formal statement in writing to the commission: “We are: opposed: to this board making any change in the present ruling on the storage law for the- reason that we believe the source from: which. the prorosition eman- ates is: not for the business imterest of the farmer, but for ‘Big Busi- ness’ in its most vicious form. We believe: it. is- only another scheme fathered by the line companies to extract. a Yittle more: tribute from the farmers of North Dakota...... The present campaign that is being instigated bi; members of grain ex- changes: with the old argument to sell your grain in the fall and buy an option against it is most vicious and. if the elevators are: compelled to charge the maximum rate of storage it. w’yill give support to this propogan- a Equity- men pointed out that. old line: companies: at: the present time are in many instances paying four to. five cents more for grain than Equity elevators: in the same' town, in an attempt to put the Equity out of: business: They ask. what a little charge-for storage on grain amount- ed to when' this: kind: of cut-throat competition was going. on. pposes: Chamber Gambling. “Whydgn't: you take your grain you have: In. your: elevators over to these competitors and; sell it to them at: this advance in. price th‘v are: offering?” asked Chairman V H: Stutsman of’ the: railroad’ commis- sion. . “That’s- just: what' the old. line companies: want;”” was: the reply of Mz, Crites; “and: that!s- the last thing: we: will. do. We: don't: propose they: shall: get: our graim and’dump it on the: Minneapolis: market: so they can: lower: the: price-and; gamble in it. Purthermore; in. refusing: to sell to them: we: are: oné!.')‘:;adoptiqgf the same kind: of® a- rule: the: Chamber of Com- merce: has:adoptedi. A-member of the Chamber’ of® Commerce recently was expelled: for: buying: grain from the -Bquity: Cooperative exchange. The charge: against: him was that he was c}iea%fnggt.iiv farmers of North Dako- ta: by: ing rom 2 to 10 cent less for grain mght from the Equity than he could buy it from other eleva- tors. They won’t deal with us; we won’'t deal with:them. What is more,;. the cooperative priciple is so thorugh=- ly. believed in and followed' that' they: can’t keep grain away from us by this cut-throat competition. We get: all. the grain we can handle. The: Equity movement is beyond beating. They can’t beat us by raising the: price: to the farmer, so they try to get after us on this mandatory: charge matter.” . : P. M. Casey of Lisbon, represent-- ing, the state union of" the American Society of Equity, also made an ef= féective talk .against’ the proposed:: ruling. Among others: present, most--: ly’ boosting for mandatory charges;. were W. E. Tatlin of the’ Northwest. Elevator: company, Minneapolis; F.R. Durant of the Grain- Bulletin, Minne- apolis;’ E. ‘E. Mitchell, Great Western: rain company, Minnearolis; L. Du Marskall, National: Elevator company;.: Minneapolis; -A:+B. Dickinson; Car~ gill" Elevator' company, Minneapolis:. Commission: Ruling: In its ruling the railroad commis- sion. says: ... “While the commission is- impress- ed’ with' each: of: the contentions:: first, that a uniform rule is desirable: in' order to prevent any chance: of.: diserimination; and second, that. oo, the other hand- the: farmer. should: be: encouraged to hold his grain: from: the: market if’ he so desires; until. sach time as the market would right, yet a careful reading: of the: statute - convinces: us- that it: pro~- hibits the commission from: making: any such rule in the absence of a.. showing' that the granting. of free:: storage results in abuses: which: amount to- a violation of’ the: anti= diserimination” act: “While- the “cdmmission would in- sist"upon its" jurisdiction to. make a: rule: which“would, prevent any abuses. growing out: of’‘this -practice the. anti-discrimination. act, before- we. would; be justified in taking such a_step we: would have: to: bz thorough- ly. convinced: that’ evils of this: sort existed, and'in:view'of the fact that, although warehousemen of the- state were quite generally’ represented at. the conference;. no specific com- laint was: made; and; the- commissior Eaving received no- complaint from: the grain producers which would: béx traceable to.-any: suchcevil, we are constrained to hold that it is neither- pessible or' feasible at~ this- time: to. that would’ violate. the spirit or letter’ of” - make any- ruling’ or’ regulation: re= " garding: any. fixed charge for~ the storing .and”handling; of’ grain on the: part of’ the: wareliougemen.”” { "The" opinion" was" written' by: Com=-" missioner: man and: coneurred: in’ by Commissioners: 0. P N. Anderson:! and W. H: Mann. £ { efiééfls; We:are: in: possession: of the.names:of the school. board atr that time. ; © 'And here is a fellow who: could not successfully- teach one: term: of school, to the satisfaction: of the: patrons; andi now he: says that: farmers: who try to orgamize tlemselyes: are playing: the: “fish: act” and: bucking: “get-richsguick” games.. He: alse: in= forms: us: that banks, railroads: and® elevators: ha¥e-'no- part or lot in robbing the: people. We: are: glad: to: know: that. the: news- paper fraternity does:not contain many such-men as:Ji U:. Pavlik:. And’ you. farmers: who subscribe: for and: read: the: Express;. how: do you like to:be called: “bellyaching: fish?”” : [T is: interesting to notice hew: eongress: discriminates: against the farmer in: the matter of taxation: and' ap- propriations. The farmer, as the records show, pays the big end of the taxes and gets: the. little. end of the:appropriations.: Two items of the 1915 appropriations. are of especial inter- est ip: this: conneetion.. Here they are: , g _Total for militarism, $421,633,528. : Total: for agriculture; $19;865,832. In: other words the. government: appropriates. an average: of $1.90 per family t0 aid: its:farmers; and taxes them more: than: $20 per family to. pay the cost of past and possible. future: wars.. For a number of years the government has: been appropriating 60 per cent of its total income for militarism and: the scheme now: before congress: propeses to: increase it to 70 per cent, leaving but 80 per cent for alli other purposes. : : SRR To carry out this scheme plans are being worked out in: Washington that will inerease the burden of taxation, which. will, in the main, fall on the farm and the home. = It. is safe: fo"say that if the farmers: of ' this: nation had their proportional share of representatives: in: congress there: would: be a.different. story to. tell. ' For: the: sake’ of the republic-and’ for: their own. sakes, the: farmers. must. have a share in the making of laws: and: receive: their full: share: of: prosperity. If: there is:mnot:some. such: bal-- ance of power the government. will: grow: top: eavy and. crumble: to ruin; because the present arrangements carries all’ wealth: to: the top- of the: structure: and: taxes- the: foundationr until’ it can-. not: bear the strain:. | Glothir advertising: they ‘can do. members; and: geb big: results; MY, BUT. HOW. m'ADVEmglsmG, INCREASES. ".Our readers will notice that the Leader has a wonderful increase of new: advertising in this issue—more than a whole page of new ads; and: these. are of' great. variety—some local, some: from maxy points in the:state:and some from firms outside the.state. : There. are. firms- telling. you about seeds,. buggies. and engines,. . cigars, tobacco, confectionery, ‘general’ merhcandi paper, legal blanks, hardware and furniture, harness, trunks, auction- eer, .bakery, bank, ice cream, farm implements,.and: a: hoxde: of. things: for farmers are. offered. for sale: through th This array. of new advertising speaks.louder than:the Leaderitself . can about the value of: the Le:Ee ¢ chants-of every character are beginning to: know. that: if: they wish:to i reach, them effectively through.the i reach them effectively: through. the Leaderr:. This-is: added: to. from the fact that the members are showing: by. their patronage- that they appreciate this ackmowledgement that the Leader: is supreme adver-- » tising‘mediumiin all paxrts-of the state. l And how: the members: of the League: are taking: hold of the: + Leader’s half-price.offer to print:their proposals:for sale, their wants, + ete., im: the: small! ad: or: classified column; they know that it brings: ¥ r and it is therefore the’cheapest: dvertis € our: classified ads grow: to: greater: numbers, and if’ you:have;not: placeds yours: with; us, asking: for' what: you: want which: somne: other farmer- may have, or. offering him: for. sale that which he needs; you better:do:se:at: once: at: our cut rate to - er as.an advertising. medium. Mer- results: far- above any other: pi y NEWS- Crg e o s the. classified. columns. Leader.. ‘This. is added: to: from:

Other pages from this issue: