The New York Herald Newspaper, May 26, 1877, Page 11

“THE COURTS. The Unrequited Love of the Daughter of Moses. THE “RING” PRINTING GOLCONDA. Evil Consequences of a Lawyer’s Vacation. \NTERESTING INSURANCE CASE. Youterdsy Judge Brarett vacated the order of arrest Sranted by Judge Donohue in the case of Ernestina Moses against {ynatgz steindler, tor breach of promise vo marry. This ig one of a series of suits brought sgainat Steindler by is intended, Miss Moses, already sotieed im tho Henao. In the Court of Common Pleas, also, Mr. Ira Leo Bamberger, of counsel for de- fendant, moved to discharye an attachment issued against Steindler’s property on the grouad that he was disposing of his property and concealing himsolf with intent to defraud bis creditors, Mr, Bambergor urged that the judgments by confession having been given by Steindler for debts actually due, could not ha ‘been made In fraud of his creditors. The aflvavits of various parties were also read, showing that Steindier Wag at his place of business during the greater part of she time that plant alleged be was concealing bim- tell. In the course of his argument Sir, Bumberger tovk occagion to remurk that a great deal bad appeared in ‘ee mapers about Mr, Steiuulor, criticis his conduct, an Same rested entirely with, the deiendant, And that be was borne out in nis opinion by the dvs cision of Judge Barrett. ecuuse the plaintiff is @ woman,’? said Mr. Bamberger, ‘‘she ought .vot to bo considered as incapable of Vins 3 Crime is of every color, sex and olime. 11 De Foe wrote a ‘Colonel Jack’ he aso wrote a *Moily Flanders,’ and my ex- Perience bas breught me face to face with more Becky Sharps than lagos,’? Juage Daly took the voluminous papers and re- served his decision. As regards the motion to con- huge the injunction reswainiug defendant Irom collect- in sum of money ae; Ing a ct ed to the credit of Spiracy on the part of plainwill, her father and relatives $0 drive defendant into marriage und then prevent him from obtaining possession of tue money. Ex-Judge Hart and ira Leo Bamberger appeared for dotendant; R, 1. Newcombe for plain A PONDEROUS COMPLAINT, In Supreme Court, Chambers, yesterday, Corpora. tion Counsel Whitney appeared before Judgo Barrett and moved to dismiss two suits brought by William C. Rogers. Une of these suits is to recover $323,000 and the other $96,000 for printing and stationery turuished the city prior to and during the ‘*Ring” administra. tion, and are two out of six sults brought in 1872 on Similar claims. They were commenced by the service Ot summons only, and the complaints therein have never since been served, In explanation of this deluy, and iu opposition to the motion of the Corporation Counsel, Mr. West, on the part of plaintiff, stated that the drawing of the Complaints was u task “of such magnitude that he shrank fromit, - During the term of office of Mr. O’Gormyn, aud bis saccessor, Mr. Smith, 4s counsel to the Corporation, be hu nding with both that be would not be.burr Prepsration of his complaint; that, im fact, when they ssuould deem it Recessary to have it served tney would notily bim to that effect, In order that the Court might the lubor whici ation of the complaint in- volved counsel si (hat there were two or tnree Cubic feet of vouchers, wuich had to be three times copied. Tne claim tor $323,000 was made up of small bitle containing 15,000 items, to which were attached 800 or 790 schedules, When the complaint 1s com- plote and printed, which he expects to be in about twenty or bhirty days, it will muke (bree volumes euch of about six inches in thickoexa, Upon this 5! or facts he asked that the time to serve the complaint be ext by the Court, 1n reply, Mr, Whitney said when he came into office he found these suits ou its record, abd nothing bud been do: ein beyond the service of summons, His predec ir, Mr. Souitp, pad informed bim that he Knew Of no arrangement as to delay in serving the complaints, Butil, ander the circumstances stated by counsel for the plaintiff, tbe Court snould think proper Lo grant an eXtension of time, he thought 1 Should be on the condition that ho stipulate that the siatute of limitations shall uot run against the city’s rounter claim, ‘To this counsel tor ihe plaintiff ase sented in open Court, and Judge Barrett extended the time twenty days, within which be may compiete and terve his uousually ponderous complain, lt was Stated thatthe amount involved in all the six suits would reach $1,26u,000, [IMPORTANT INSURANCE DECISION. The suit of Mary Denison against the National Capi- sal Life Insurance Company was tried and disposed of vefore Judge Curtis and @ juryin Part Lof the Su. perior Court yesterday. The suit is an important one, and involves a principle which wili doubtless govern a umber of claims similar to that involved, The suit was brought on a time policy which had been originally taken out ine New York company which became in- suivent. Tho policies were then relusured in another company which also went by the board, and were toully reinsured by the preseut company.’ The com- pany defended on the ground that the rr. jurance was the result of fraud a misrepresentati made tolt former company, und that on that ground it udiated the policy. It appeared in testimony, tbat the present compuny fad recetved three oily from the plaintiff, and thia, tne Jourt neld, made the contract under the policy bind- Dg between them. A verdict was rendered in iavor of the plaiutiff tor the full amount, $3,714 42. A DISASTROUS VACATION, About a year ugo the Mechanics’ Bank, of Chicago, through their counsel, Mr, Juus J, Lyons, commenced @ suit in the Supreme Court in this city to recover against Jane Carman on a note for $000, During the summer of 1876, no answer having been put in, a judgment was entered by default in favor of plaintiff tor the amount of the note, with in itand cosis, amounting in all toover $1,000, Subsequently 1 attorney Jor the defendant applied to the court to nave the Judgment vacated, alleging that it bad been entered while he wus absent on vacation, aud be bud overs looked (he matter. {his appiicnuon was denied, was twice repeacod and a often dened. he lust denial was by Judge Donobae, aod trom bis order to that ellect un appeal was taken to tue General Term, whe it was argued yusterday by BI ¥. MoCrary, on bebalt of defendant, and opposed by Mr. Julius J. Lyons, on beball of the bank Aiter 4 lengthy urgu- meut oa boip sides the Court took tn pers, reser ing ite decision, ‘The deiendant ecluims she has o delence, which she wants to plead, while piuiotits depy that she has guy, and say that she had ampie opportunity to plead belore judgment, * THE DANCER WILL CASE, ‘The examination of witnesses in the contested will butt of the late Miss Mary M. Dancer was resumed yus- verday before Surrogute Ouivin, Mr. William A, Bute er, (he second subscribing Wituess to tbe will, was put apon the stand for cross-exumination, A lew minutes suflced to wbow that nothing important to the tssue on either side could be elicited, and the witness wae with. drawn, and the cage, so lar us lurtber testituony was soncerned, restod ou either sidv, Counsel for the ex- sxeutor to the will, Mr. Dyett, addressing the Court, sontended that the will was proved prima lagie, Coun- wl for the contesiants admitted that there Was no doubt of the lormal execution of the paver writiag purport. | ing 0 be the deceased sligs Duncer’s will, vor did he good tuith of the execator, | the matter, With regard the religious of Mies Dane mind, he thought idence of suunduet of intellect rather that otherwise, ber cipposition of her property; buteven granting tuis, aud supposing | sho bad testamentary capacity, the otber side was noe relieved from many iegai obstacies. Counsel argued, | supposing (he decvased wag competent io make # will, | you that will must be tnade oaly according to the laws Of this State, and these jaw tuterpose au vvsiructiou to | the validity of (he bequegis iu tbe Will Lo the jnstitucoDs Lenented thereby and also to the residuary clause of (ue wil With regard to (bose societies uaned im the will that have beeo incorporsied vy special ucts, counsel heid that the will, us (ar as reimied tu them, was Invalid as @ iegal insirument, and ov thx point | bo asked the Court to pit a .juarera) con | struction on the tnsirument, Counsel ior tne executor, in reply, comleuded that tue Surrogate tad wy jurisuice Won conlerred on bin by law iv cousirue the will, oF ihe legality Of apy of the bequescs Contained therein, | in the present Mage OF Lue proceedings. foe point io | jurisdiction 181! aby provision ip the will is contesied | the Surrogute hus ihe same power vested 1 hun | by right 4 exercised Ly Him, as tual posseesed vy Supreme Vourl, Tho exceuor makes no application Surrogate to bave it contested, uur doe. avy iu barmony with Wim. Lt 16 (Mu Leite atluw | m hostility to tie Will that now ase to have it cone sirued, Ov this point Mr. Dyett, counser tor die ox ecULOF, CoNTeLded, (hal according 1H (Le suaiute aw it was vuly the eXecutors or leguices tu harmony with the will thet can properiy or leguily ask tu bave a wil | construed, Which rigiut or privilege ts by law vewied to all as bosuility to a wil; that tue wily ren heirs wt law 1h contest is vo await the fun! ace e Surrogate, Counsel at this point of b Myed wimself that ho would, tun a WUIDILed LO Prolie, begin a suit 1H tue Sa- preme Cert iv bebe of Me, Juiemiul, tne execuior, 10 have ali the questions raised ].2y contestant’s counsel tested. The Surrogate jesald his i t conviction was that the statute of $70, beamed the beirs at lawand next of kim, although hey might be in hosulity to a Will, as competent to ask for the construction of @ will by tne Surrogate as the executor of such will and the legatoes under it. Is was Guaily agreed u further argum he point raised—the jurisdiction of the Court—sl ye bad the 9th day of June next, to which time the caso was adjourned, SUMMARY OF LAW .CASES. Judge Sanford, of the Superior Court, yesterday sranted @ stay of proceedings on judgments in two suits brought by Ann L, Neil! againstthe American Life Insurance Company. The stay was granted en petition of the Attorney Gederal, In the suit of Susannah McPartland Fox against 1 B. Hawking, srieq im Supreme Coart, Circuit, before Judge Donohue ands jary, yesterday, the defendant Presented himself as « witness on dhis own bebalt After he had got through the Court called bis atten- tion to some apparently irreconcilable contradictuous in his testimony, pod sept him to the office of the Dis- trict Attorney with directions to explain it there. \n relation to the custody of Charles Rivera, the little acrobat, whose story Bas already appeared in tb Huxayo, Judge Donohus, in the Supreme Court, ren- decision yesterday reusing to give the child ustody of Richard Rivers, wh id to father, The Judge thinks thi luck of evidence to show that the clai: tb Deurs ti ‘elation of parent to the boy, te remitted to the custody of the Society tor the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Ubarles H, Neill and Henry C. Netil huve brought suivtn the Superior Court to recover some bec 8 commission a8 ute of tho Americun line of wail Stewmabips. Judge Sentord, of \he Superior Court, esterday denied # motion for « reteren Charles Neill to an affidavit opposing the motion says that his accounts ieated, aud (be action 1s one that should be tried by a Jur: He staies that they obtained # valuable ‘commission from tho Venezuelan government, wh:ch was worth not less than « quarter of a million doliars. He turther states that the igno- miny of the failure of the company rests cntirely npou the defendants, who were the proprictora, and not upon his tirm, who wore agents, DECISIONS, SCPBEME COURT—CHAMBERS, By Judge Barrett, Matter of McCracken.—Motion granted and sale va- cuted, Matter of Speis.—Motion granted und galo vacated, ‘the Mayor, &c.—Complaint dismissed with costs, und $10 costs of this motio Tobey vs. Hogun.—The disposition 1s suflicient, the undertaking approved and judgment ordered for tho aim . Thomas vs. Thomas.—I have gone over the testi- mony and the papers and am prepared to coufirm the report avd to grant the judgment of divorce. Belore doing 80, however, the planutill must comply with the new law as to his own innocence, &,, bo be found in the Daily Register of May 10. Jones ys. The Mayor, &c.—Complaint dismissed with costs, und $10 coats of motion. Stone vs, Gordon, pleadings are vacated, and {fon inspection tt appears a proper cage, the order should be umended by striking out the costs and the recital of Mr, McAdam’s opposition, Faber va, Snaw.~ Motion to piace cause on Special Court Culondar tor June 1, 1877. Moses va, Stamdlor.—The motion to vacate the order of urrest is granted, with $10 costs apon defendant filing @ stipulation not to bring any action im conse- quence of such arrest, Matter of Van Alstyne.—Motion granted and sale vacated, ° Wood vs, Carieton.—Tke order of reference 1s cated aud the complaint dismissed with costs, and §: costs of this motion. Matter of tue Security Life lusuran Bernadino Busso ts permitied to inv made u party to the record. Gavel vs, Gabel.—Reterred back to take proot as to the service of the process herein upon the delendant under the new rule, and to report with the opinion of the refereo, Brenuan vs, Fitggerald, &c.—Keport confirmed and The question as to allowance ts re- bas been fixod or a sale of any, thd’ be vi the property, in ihe matter of Durteo, &c.—Uppn the additional testimony now turoisbed und upon the suggestion of tue committee that he has veen requested by the next of kin to pay the bill, the report is confirmed and the order lor payment granted. Matter of Mahoney.—Report confirmed and order grunted. The attorneys lor she petitioner are entitled to she thanks of the Court for the labor which 14 bus been saved by the manuer in which the papers bave boen prepared und the case presented. Haro vs. Batos, je proot of the personal service the summons and complaint upou the dant sumicient, Further, 1¢ dt by law, of without the state is entirely is hot aubbeaticated as requ Furtuer, the undertaking docs not comply rules, It should recite rule 34 a3 well as ihe statute und should contain the additional words or in case the allachment uud judgment shail be vacated and set asiue lor irregularity, Myers vs. Maloney —Tho order is not im acrordanco with the tacts, uor ure the papers sufficient, The orcer lor the examivation of the bank was served upon thesecrotary, and the examingiion iw that o a clerk. Further, the order jor deieudant’s examination was obtaiued belore tue Foturn of ay execuiion unsatisfied and without prool that he uvjustly rejusea to appiv his property, &c. (wis may bave been waved, &c., but the other objection must be cured by tbe examination of the officers o1 the bank of the plaintiff will not ve entitled to a direct order. On the papers, however, ho may bave an order jor a receiver if go udvised, ‘Thomas ve, Beard aud unotber.—| do not think this upou Mr, Tuayer’s affidavit and suggestion in court and Mr. Cowdrey’s consent appended to bis brief it is case lor a rejerence, and ag both parties #0 agree aud Tequeat 4 separate motion need not be order may be entered referring to Obarle: end Another.—The plaintiff, in won iately readered by this Uourt to the eflect thut his summons, and ali subscquent pro- Cvedings in these actions must be sot uside, obtained an order trou Mr. Justice Pratt, sitting ut a Special Term of Kings Connty, for a writ of inquiry, ypoo which # Sheriil’s jury seems to have assessed his vam- ages at $5,000 iu each of ghese suits, The Cierk upon Voing applied to hesitatéd to enter jud; such extraordimary mstances, and wi as laras ican judge trom the aimost iliegible 's presented, is lor an order directing the ( lerk to bis daty im the premises [bis ougut not to be dene for several reasons, In the first piace, the papers which the Clerk wus asked jo tiJe are net ft to go upon the Hlesof the Court; tuey are iilegibio and in ever; Tespect disgracelul productions. then the plaintil’s actions have been adjuuged alter full nearing to be boo-existent, such being Wwe legal effect of the setting asive of the summons und all subsequent proceodings. Further, shore 8 uo aughority to enter such judgwent, 4s the pluintil has not vbtaiued an order tor tuo reliel demanded in bis complaint im tho Court whore the veuue tw laid. Lt ts qi ir that order of Special Term of Kings bank § im an action triable ip New York is void, und furnished no authority for the action of the Sherif’s jury. By Judge Donohue, Bearup vs, Carrab Granted, ‘The New York Society tor the Preventiun of Crueliy to Children va. Rivers.—There seems to be an utter failure of proot tv show that the infant ia the respondent, and the custody muss bi the relator, SUPERIOR COURT—SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Saniord, 1 ve, Schalte,—By sc¢tion 6s4 of the remedial cou® I am required (o assume the truth of each aliega- tion of the cumpiaint, uotwitstanding a coutlict of evi- deuce. | must, therefore, build that the defondunt wroogluliy cunverted tbe property of tue piuintiff, although he denies (his aud swears tuat he bougue the tobacco of the plaintiff aod paid tor it by his promi notes, wid althougu no counter afiidavit is presen the part of the piaintif, uncer section 65 [ am, Low. ever, ab liberty wud am required ty determine every other allegation of iact arising upon the application &® question of fact, wud | am DOL salisded upon all th evidence that the defendant bas dssigned or dispos of his property with intent to defrwud bis creditor: Tho evidence i conflicting, aud the burden of proof ix upon the plaintifl. Lf tere ja 4 preponderance it Is in favor of the detenyant, (‘he mowion ts, therelore, | granted, with $10 costs. Lord ot al, vs, Harl—Motion granted, with $10 Motion grauted, with $10 , aud (0 be taxed tn lavor of the prevailing parry us costs in tue cause, Struppmaa va, Muller et al.—Motion denied, without costs. Durando et ul, vs. Vuucan et al,—Reierred to Mau- rice Leyne to tuke proof, &&, und to report thercou, Mitier vs. Foe New York Coment Company et al — Diouon grantud and injunction coutinued peudente ste, | $10 cost of motion to wbide event, uud bo be tured as Coste 1u the cause in favor of provailing party if costs be awarded him, Thomus et al. va Scribner, —ihe affidavit of defeud- anv’s physician, in my vpluion, Justities the applicu- ton for un adjournment of 18 eXamiuacion aauli Sep- tb mbur, and | am accordingly Wuwiling to require uis Allendunce at an curly dute Suow Va, Scoul,--Lnjunevion granted. O' Koliy va Bower —Motiun denied, without coste, Noi Gt al vs. Wagner, =Mouun deniea, with $10 Costs LO pimiutiit 10 abide Lhe even, Green Vs --Motiow granted, without coms to eltuer party. SOW Va& Soott et wi. —Codortaking approved. Wanuell va Gregory eC al —K frond eieree's repre sud Juuxment uf fureciosu dvr, Keasiet.—Keemitiitur J sale vr detuN. Judgmens ai vs. Vinton Ordered Jadsmeut for plainun, Frevee vs Lhe Boston Marige Losucance Company. Usderiaking mm ata hivent approved woh Va, Phe boston Marine Lusurauee Compuny.— disehargibg abachinunt granted Cai Ver Surchaw.--Order appovoting Henry Brown receiver Uivs The Ameriean Popular Life Lasurance Col pany, Order staying proceedings Butler vs. Ph, American Popular Live Losurance Cow- puny. Order stayrig proceedings George (oe Cogut Joauues Vs, Jarret et al —Order to le original answer, & Koon wile et al, vs. Ginnelly et al; Rockwile et aj, vs. vicGovern et «)-—Reomiutiturs filed. Judgments atfira@ed. Cohen 7% Viale ot al ~Motion granted, Ludi ¥¢ Masers —rivred ow May calendar. Seully va sand tuat judgment ve marked "Secured ¢ Ordered Laat the er vi defendant revs. Our be struck out irivolous, eBid chat plaimtil have Judgment witb cota ig @ proper case tor the Special Circuit calendar, but | @ | Was thought that this Farrell answered the doscrip- | | ingt. broke into the lager beer suloon of Jacob Maus out defendant's Unienbant ye, Ohrt, —Order strikin: io have jodgment answer as tetvolous, and that plainti with costs. Koehier v% Mattlago ot al.—Undertakings approved on justification, Cornwall va, Miles et al—Ordered om day calendar for tirst Monday of Juno. Hanion va, Gilbert et resettle order, dated by Chi Spader, &e. Justice Curtis, ve. Ti New York Elevated Railroad Company. —Findings settied and signed COMMON PLEAS—SPECIAL TERM. By Judge J. F. Daly. Bemas va. Oliphant.—-Motion granted and warrant of attachment discharged, Schett va Wright et al.; Engel va, Victory; Sted- mun va Gschwend, —Motions grante: Stedman vs. Gsohwend.—-Motion denied, with $10 costs, Auld ve | Same va | Appleton va The Mayor; Austin Same; Same vs. Same; Agnew y: Same; ati Brown vs. Sam Busch ve Sumo; Bockman v4 Sume; Barkley va Same; Bannan vs, Same; Bausch vs. same v8. Same, Breil va Same; Buvta vs Samo Same; Bush va Samo; Burk va Same Sume; Same ve. Same; Bergh vs. Sum! Same; Billiags vs Same; Buck -¥é& Same; -Biumeglasser vs. ve Same; Cully vs Sam Costello vs, Same; Diden vs, Suine; Dev. eling jane; Sume vs, Sune; Venunitie va, Sum a Dennesoin vs.’ Sume; Downes'vs Same; Dodin vs. Same, Same Ve. Same; Davenport ve. Same; Doschor vs, Same; Dowers vs. Same; Dickerson ve, Sam Daniels vs, Sume; Ely ve Same; Ebvo vs, Sune: Ewen vs Same, Euttrich ve. Same; iden ve, Samo; Eselgrath va same; by vs, Sume, The Erie Railrou Company vs Same; Frendentual va Same; Pulver vs sume; Therm vs. Same; Fraser vs, oume; Hayes ve. Same; Hirsch vs, Same; Moextervs. Sam man vs. Same; Hackensat vs same; Hert, Same; Huribup'vs. same; Hepburn v: sou Vs. Same; Joves vs. Same; Juc Kessner vy Same; Keunor va*same; Howentels va. Sane; King vs. same; Kraft vs, Same; Knapp ve Same; Koflenberz ve. ‘Same; Lewis vs. Same; Koop- man V3, Same; Levi ve, Same} Logan vs, Same; Low .| va. Same; Leed ve. san Lemmon vs. Same; Lewis Landt vs. Sam Levy ¥a, Same; Newton vs, Same; Ochs vs Same; O'Grady va Same; Oliver vs, Same; Osterms yx. Suime, O'Douohue ve Same; Post vs. Same; Phillipe ve Sam Viquelot vs, Samo; Purr ve. Same; Purr vi Sumo; Pruder vs, Same; Putnam ‘va, same, Preiss ys. Sam Same vs. Same; Sume vs. Same; Parker vs, Same; Pursell ys, Same; Pastor vs. Sami Purpam ys, same; Pellisser vs. Same; Quenger vi Same; Roaner vs, Same; Rogan vu, Same; Ranken ve, Samo} Reidenberger va same; Repper vs. Sum Repper vs. Same; Kyer vs. Sumo; Remmy vs, Sam Rosenmilior va, Samb; Bogert vs, Same, Banton vs, Same; Burke va Same; Brull vs. Same; Barkley vs, Same} Bannan vs. Same; Baruek vs. Same; Boehm vs, Same; Brinkerbotf vs. Same; Basen vs. Same; Barry vs, Same; Broch vs, Same; Bush vs. Same; Bell vs Same; Beil vs. Samo; Buckioan vs. Sam: Benedict vs. Samo; Burineister va. >uinv; Bush v: Same; Brown vs. Same; Bang vs Sumo; Brinkerboff rothurs vs, Sune; Clymer vs, Same; Same; Cole vs. ‘Samo; Carpenter va. Cromwell vs. Sumo; Cleary ve. Samo; Fravk vs. Same; Force vs. Sume; Fry vs. Same; Same; Franke vs, Same; Fitzgerald vs. Saw Bame; Feitner vs, Same; Fitzgerald ve, Sam Flogg v. Greenbut va Sune; Geissenberm: vs, Same; Gilsey vs, Same; Green va Same; Gunther vs, Same; Gorman vs. same; Glenngn vs Same; Gurbel ve, Same; Gaudeubeimer va Same; Green vs. Samo; Gilles vs, Sume, Gould vs, 3ame; Gregory vs. 8amo; Gelhardt vs, Same; Hodgeman ve. Same; Hollings va Same; Hardy vs. Sume; Hope va. Same; Hageiton vs, Same; Landheun vs Same; Moses vs. Same; Morri- son va Same; Moller va. Same; Manoiug vs. Same; McDonaid Same; MoGoy va, Same; Mclotyre vi Same; Martin vs. Same; Martin vs. Same; Mitt Stuedt vs, Sumo; Mclutyre vs, Same; Meyer vs. Same; 8, I McKiniey va Same; Maeder v. Same; Matfeld va, Same; McUary va. Sume; Mavery va. Same; Marsh vs. Same; McLean ve, Same; Minnio vs, Same; Matthews vs. Sau. Moescher ya, Same; Nicott vs, Same; Nuyler vs, Same; Nayler va, » Nyles 91 Stew va, Same; Steinburger vs. me; 3 ¢; Spicer vs. Same; Soan vs. Same; schwartz vs, Same; Simeun vs. Same; Sudaf va, Same; Struss va. Same, Spatta- poff vs. Same; Sickel vs. Same; snedicken vs. Sune; Spicer vs. Same, >polford vs, Same; 6 vs. Sume; d vs. ume; Schultz ve. Same; Scxnion v; Same; Stenser vs. 3 Schmidt vs. Same; Shai Sume; Thompson vs Same; Van Buren vs. Sami Van Wagener vs. Same; Van Idosiein vs. Same: Valiean vs. Sami Whitebead vs, Sawe; Wray vs. Same; Williamgon ya. Same; Weithesmer vy, same; Warwick | va, Same; Walker vs, Same; Williamson vs, Same; Whilplis ve. Same; White va. Samo; Whinnesy vs. Same —Mowons granted on stipulations, witnou. wow, By Chief Justice C. P, Daly, Aspinwall vs. Balch. —Order signed. Simpson va. Ferguson et al—Order »i MARINE COUBT—CHAMBLL». By Judge MoAdam. Haywood va. Wells; Gould va. Curtis —Opinions. Loughran va Suyles; Schlessinger v4 Caricton.— Detault‘opened ou terms indorsed ov papers, MeoCabe vs. Morgan, —Seo inuorsemont on papers. Bigelow vs, Suiotmon, —Motior denied, without costs, Averi!\ ve. Phaaix Iron Company.—Commission ordered, Hall vs, Rohe,—Judgment for plain, $215 3% Giluogicy vs, Garve, Lis pendend cancelled, Lewis vs, Walker; Waddell vs. Mooney; Conner va, Smsth; Woston vs, Shook; Myers vs. Lainvert; Dorell K vs, Duphin.—Motions granted, Duden ve Wiiluins; Kerr va. Wyatt,—Detauits. Salomoa vs. Phillips,—Mr. Eli M. Cohen appointed Teceivee. parrerety va, Davenport.—Stay granted pending appea Barras vs, Ornament vs. Port GENERAL SESSLONS—PART Bofore Recorder Hackett ROBBING AN ARTIST, A seemingly respectable young man, named Janes M. Farrell, of No. 272 West Thirty-third street, was arraigned at the bar yesterday by Assistant District Attorney Bell, charged with burglary. 1: appeared | that on the night of the 14th inst, as Mrs. Anna Jane | Guibert was fulfilling ber pro‘essional engagement at | the Fifth Avenue Theatre, hor apartments at No, 66 | West Thirty-cighth street wero broken into and prop- | erty, inclading silk dresses and joweiry, valued at $600 | was carried off. Information was given to the police, and not long afterward Detective Reilly arrested Far- rell, charged with having stolen the sum of $40 trom | Ligaie Devine, No 605 West Sixty-tourth street. It | L tion of the man who had broken into Mrs, Gilberv’s premises, The servant girl, Mary Nolan, on being contronted with Farrei promptly ideunied him as tbe man who had come to the nuuse and asked tor Mra, Gilbert, saying he wapted a lewer lor Kugeve Poilisps, @ former janitor in the buliding. Farrell wag also identified by & geatioman vamed Mazanet, a resi- dent of the house, who saw lim on the nigut in ques- tion leaving the place with a bundle, At (ue trial y | terday Kugeno Phillips tosiitied that Farreli tad ‘fre. quenily vixtted nis olfive when be acted ax janitor of | the boust ‘Ihe detence set up an ulibi, the defeudaot | claiming that he had uever deca at No, 66 West Thirty- | eighit street, that on the eveuing 1D question he was | atapicnic with oue Jobn Sues, Mr, Beil cross-ox- mined the accused and asvertained that be bad prev- tously been arrested on a charge of attempting to com- | mit highway rovbery, and thut the otber witness who | swore to the alibi bad also been previously imdicteu with the accused ‘The jury found the accased guilty ot burglary. was remanued or semtence. | PLEAS AND SENTENCKS. | Jobn Flaberty, aged ciguteen, No, 480 Seventh ave. | nue, said to belong toa gang of thieves, on the Ob map, No, 253 Tenth avenue, and, in company with others | Attomptod 10 steal a key of beer, The invaders, on seo | ine Mr, Maus: (hrew stones at him and flea, but Flaherty was apprebended, The prisouer piewied gurity, and the Recorder sent im to the State Privon lor threw yeurs, Auuiew Dulty, uged sixwon, of No. 460 West Fiity- | tevoud street, plagued yailty (0 bursinry in tne tuird degree On the Z Inst. he broke into the aovceuyied dwelling houne No. $84 Tenth avenue and attempted to ts steal some lead pipe. He was seut to tho Penitentiary | jor the term of two yours, ' GENEKAL SESSIONS—PART 2 Belore Judge Sutheriand, THE ALLEGED WIth MURDE The triat of Thomas Cosick, WLO was charged with having on the 4tn of Mareh last killed Gis wite Bridget, | at No, 30 Kose street, was resumed yesterday, The ails wave dy been fully set forth, the main cies meut belog that the prisoner in a fit of tutoxicaion bout aud kicked his wife, from tho eects of which suo died, Mr W. PF, Howe, on the part of the defone umined & umber Of Witnesses us LO the prisoner's character, the majority of tuem lesutying that be had veon « hurd working and indusirious man, but that he Was inelined Ww be intemperate, fue prisoner Was 4iso i eXuinined aud described (ue transaction, He said he came howe trom tts Work On Saturday night; be dua his wile imtibed ireoly. When be tell” asleep’ hits wie bad gone, Having tkou $L1 out uf bis pocket returned’ iu @ quesionable CouLitiON ut Uhree but be warned ler to leave, She again came back morning, When he tuk her by tho shouluer aud p ber out luso the ball, Where she lell, In eross-exaime- imation by Assistant Distrivt Attoruey Bell Ue pi ise ouer suid he could wot recollect whether le bad kicked und beaten Lia Wile and Knocked ber head against the | our, as Weatilied 10 by another Wilbess, Who swore to baving seen ita maltreat bis wile, He towily sitied bis Wile Up lb & KeNHT-UnconseIOUs state and laid Ler | vu the bed, where sue rewuined alt sunday, sbe was rewoved the tullowiug day to the Cuambvers Sereet | Hospital, where she ded. Tho prisover suid be vad | veeu drinking heavily und could not remember (be amount of injury We bud inflicted on the deceased, Aller some larther evideuce’ the caso was submited, aud Judge Sutueriand delivered « cloar aud succinct | charg Ji the poinis of law bow 38 Were UMbOd.Cd Jn A COMproneMsiVe Wanner. Aller | Uriel auseuce the jury found the prisoner guilty of | | conspired to oring about this failure, chief among | enable them to meet obligations they bave no wish to | wis to make auy proposition to th tui | change yesterday, NEW YORK HERALD, SATURDAY, MAY 26, 1877.-TRIPLE SHEET. mausiaugbter tn the second a . Mr, Howe made an urggut appeal on behalf of the prisoner, and tho Court Hentenced him to tue State Prison lor the term of seven years at hard labor, COURT OF APPEALS. Aupaxy, N. ¥., May 25, 1677. Ip the Court of Appesis to-day the following bust Doss was transacted :— No. 19% Smith vs. Fros,—Argued by William F. Shephard for appellant, and Heury uw Burnets for respobd 0. 14. Cushmun vs, United States Life Insurance =Argued by F, jandier for eppellamt, |. Thomas tor respondeut. No. 12 Canuell vs, The N. C, and C, R, R.— Y, Argued by Samuel Hand tor appellant, and J, H. Clute r respondent, CALRNDAR, The foilowing ts the calendar for Monday, May 23, 1867 ;—Noa 20, 205, 22, 24, 14, 31, 2 and 1h A JUDGE IN “BANCO,” { George Watson, alias George Marston, and James | Lowery, of the Sherman House, © arrested yesier: day afterpoon at No, 108 East Fourteenth streot, and we sagen botore Judge Waudell, ut Jefferson Mar- kes Court, who remandod them to the Central Orifice at | the request of Sergeant Kealey, The Sergeant, with Detectives Wood, MeVonnell and Thompson, wade » raid on the premises above mentioned yesterday after. noon and found the prisoners there, all the sppurte- nanees of 4 “vauco” game and $860 im money, whieh the; wized. A very respectable looking old yentieman, who 18 suid to a United States aisirict judge, trom California, made a cotuplatut before Superintendent Wulliog yesterday, that he bad been swiudied out of $100 at the place, and hence the raid, At Headquarters ihe name of the complainant was relused (he reporters, and Judge Wandell, though sunntting trovly that he knew 4! nome, refused also, sayiig that be did mot twink c4ae Was yot in proper shape, amd that he was quested to withhold i trom publication, — 1! howover, suid that ho was getting tired of romanding canes for the benedt of either «special officers or Headquarters men, for he tuvartably found that yheu @ cuse was remanded these astute deteouves had evidence to produce on the succe 7 day than ays they bad the day before. As ur us yesterd cuse wus concerned, there Wag no real reusop for remanding iat all, for the complainant was in eusy cali of the pohoe, The prisoners themselyes looked upon the Whole thing 4s 4 tarco, and wero laughing and joking with the actoctives ag if they rather enjoyed it asa | good Joke on the old Juuge, FALLEN FROM GRACE, Frederick Stewart, alias “Rod-Nosed Baruo; was arrested on Thursday on complaint of Mr. Frauk Tay- | lor, of No. 534 Hudson street, who obarged Lim with | stealing from (be house in Hudson street $22 worth of clothing and & pocketbook containing $10 Mr jor formed “Barney’s’’ acquuintance in Peter Dwyer's mission, Whore he came frequently to pray and to ask for the prayers of those converted. Touched by bis apparent piety Mr, aylor took im to bis boarding house and iviroduced wim A few duys ugo the cused berrowed the landiady’s watch and chain, woich bo jorgos toreturn, On Wedues he broke tuto Mr, Taylor's room und stole he clothing and mouey. Stowart wr rraigned before Judge Waudell yesterday, almitied guilt and was comm/tted in $1,000 bail to answer, CHEAP CABS, THE PROPOSED SERVIOK BY THE MANHATTAN CAB COMPANY, ‘The proposed organization gf a mew cab eompany, sustained and operated by Knglish and Atmerican capl- tul, @M account of which appeared in yesteras: Hexawo, bas met with enthustastic approval at the bands of capitalists who arg anxious to subscribe for the stock. Tho meeting on Thursday was merely pre- minary to opening subscription books, under tho now limited Hability law of this State, passed June 21, 1975, involving no lubility beyohd the amount of sub- scriptions. Alter the mecting for permanent organ- ization next Tuesday the books will be open, when those who desire stock wili ave an opportunity to bsoribe, Careful estimates made on the basis of wimilag service in London apd Paris justifies | the promoivrs of this enterprise in prowiwing | dividenas of irom twenty to twenty-seven per cent on the nominal capital of $250,000. ‘The compuny propose to iuaugurate the work with 100 cabs aud increase the umuor {rom time to time us tue necessi- d Viow of the service may require, The will be Oxe a pant of the vehicle orders « slower rate of speed. Tue for service by these cabs wall be as iollows:— For fiiteen minutes or less, twenty-five cents; over filteen minutes but not exceeding thirty minutes, dity conta; over half ab hour and not excceding ove hour, seventy-live cents, And at the same rates fur any time exceeding an bour for one or two pussvpgers, No cbargo wil! be tnade for childron under ight years of accompanied by adults, or for | Daxgage cal The drivers will ve liveried | aod = permi to become sharehold with a view of obtaining & grecter umount of civility and attention to the patrons of the com- pacy. Atlached tw eacu vebicle will be wo paont apuilanee tha, will indicate to the occupant of the cab the timo be bas employed it, us wel; a8 register the number of trips ‘nd sue distance travelled during the day, #0 that th drivers will have au opportuuity of uppropriating 'o their own age w portion of the pro- ceeds of Lhe day’é ovilections. The prospectus of the cumpuny—whieb iy to be known as the *Manhatiun Cab Company, limited” will not be issued woul alter the meeting on Tuesday next, but tha ubove deuils ure understood to cover (he main features of the enter. prise, SAVANNAH'’S DEBT. OBLIGATIONS THAT CANNOT POSSIBLE BE MET— THE CITY BONDHOLDERS IN SESSION, A meoting of the bondholders of the City of Suvan- nab was held at the office of Mr, Manning, in Wall street, near Broad, yesterday, Judge Scbley presiding, ‘The chairman explained that the object of the meet- ing was to have a free conference with a view to make some kind of compromise with the eity, which has failed to meet its tuterest, Many causes, he said, have which he meniioned the yellow fever epidemic and the general prostration of trade, In consequence the citizens asked that some Goncosmons be made t@ as Lo repudiaie, The chairman, baving fuisbed, culled Mayor Wheatman, of Savannah, to etate circumstanwially tue condition of aflairs, Mayor Wheatman said be did pot mveting. He could only assure thom the city government wus de- | pirous of meeting all its Obligatious Un jaking office Just January he aod the other city officials were over- woeimed by the condition of afairs. They found the | city’s debt $4,000,000 om property the assensed vulua on of which was $14,000,000, and on which not more than $9,000,000 could ve realized, Under this state of things 1 would be impossible to impore a tax on the people bigh enough to pay interest on ub the expenst carrying ou the governm largest amount the government could 'y was $300,000, Changes of trade, he said, hud impoverished | Savauned, aud Balumore, Philadelpbia sud Now York are (be gainers by ber lose er railroads, too, aro all bankrupt, and stock which # few years agu sold at 140 isuow down to 34. Tho city owns securities of one Toad ty the amount of $1,300,000, which are whouy vuiuoless, besides 1,306 shares Of anowber, also worih- less, Her debt is four-tenths of ber entire property, and it will take ber twenty years to recover irom ber present prosuretion, — | “A Hideous, Blasphemous, Wicked Impos- | ; government are not satisfied with what they bave | going on among the tribes of polygamy, ‘TMB CITY'S Asses Her assets, some of which ure uot convertible yield but « sinail iueumne, umount to $1 275,080, committee Of the city government appoimied to im | quire (blo (bis state of xilairs Koine tie ayo #ay they cun do Hotbing WikboUL HecomiodativA. ‘The total ex | pense ol tue cily government 18 angually $182,960, | Mayor Wheatmanh said tbe cumwittes thougut by | sealing down the bouds to pay privcipal and interest | iu the course Of ime Alter some discussion ot the | manner |0 Which this should ve douse it was voted to | aceupt a seuling of the bonds down to eighty vents, | nbvut their Original coxt ty most of the woluers, and io accept 6X per cout interest, Mayor Wuewunan age 1 WOUld Le Im poEMIbIe Lor Lhe ery to ugreD Lo this, Aud Said thot the resident bondhoders in Bavu nah would meet June 6, wien they would provabiy take some further action Muking mare liberal couced- | sions (o the devt-burdened ey, The woeting then | adjournea tHE GKAIN TRADE, | the grain trade adoptea waditional rules yesterday governilg Geiiverivs aud (he recently vetabusued calls on cori, Tho calls oy corn are subject to the follow. tog regulatious:— 1. Low of $,000 bushels; but if a larger quanuty than 5,000 Duguels is oflerud, tue Layer shall luve the rigut (© bwke any puruien iu 8,000 buBuel lola 2° Quainy; So 2eorw ana steamer corn, 3 Pr por busuvl, nod Ja fractious of wot less than oF quarterpfacent 4, Deliveries on sues of cash corn, ve (be avertoon call, shall be made betore eleveu o'e bs rules gover re uoliVeries (ex provided iw the p regulation), Margiie and payments alreauy existing shall govern wii (ransactious wader ihe calls, Noiniuag in this rule shall be construed as interfering with Irapswetions tm towing 1dts, wuien shall ve considered to mean wot less than 4,000 nor more than 5.000 | bushes. PRODUCE EXCHANGE AFFAIKS. | Twenty-Ave now memvers were elected at the meut- | ingef the Board of Managers of the Produce Ka. | A provont was received there againat the Harvor Master allowlny canal boat quar tury bo be vceupied vy wenguing Veswers, These quar- are piers 2 to 9, inclusive, aud their occupasion interferus With insurance rales aud other matiors of | ucores: to tue grain trade, THE UTAH ULCER, —---—— The Saints Begging Off from the asserts that he bas “three wives living and one heaven,"’ Possibly the law against porygaury may not beable to reach this man, but the experiment may be worth trying. It would bea good thing to got sionary in jai! before be misleads any of our peoples THY PAROWAN OUTRAGES. Discussion, {From the Salt Lake Tribune. The Junction editor vainly simulates incredulity ef the story tod to the New York journalist, He knows {§ 18 too bkely te be true, because such ferocity and Such Insensibility to all human sentiment are the Bal ural outgrowth of the Mormon religion, as taught is. this heavenly Kindom and in these later days, INDIGNANT PUBLIC SENTIMENT. THE PEDERAL AUTHORITIES TO BLAME (From the Deseret News, May 16.) “Why should uot she federal officers investigate the — Mountain Meadows massacre?—Nkw York Hamann Yos, why, indeed? Why did they not do it nearly twenty years ago? They were invited todo it thea. {From the Cincinnati Times.) The “Mormons’? have been watting ever since jor The call of Governor Eimory for troops te evidence | them to do It, President Young offered all the agsist- that be ¢ avprohengive of some trouble, and to (hat | ance in his power years and years ago to have the extent confirms the letter published im the Salt Lake | whole affair properly, thorongbly and judicially inves Tribune and telegraphed to tho New Yor Hurarn, set- | tigated. Why was it not done? Who is to biamet Ling forth that the Nauvoo Legion was arming and ge | Certainly uot President Young. He had no oficial eretly drilling, We And alse im the Deseret News, | power, Judicial or otherwise, alter the advent of Ba Brigham Young's official organ, the “oficial report’? | chanan’s army, nor for some time before. When the Grand Jury is about to meet, why should ermon delivered & Week ago Sunday in the » y pdr A Bans by th vay shen righam Young threaten bioodshed trom bis pulpit ??— Its closing paragraph bas beon printed | Rrignan Young thres but it 13 well enough to reprint itfrom what is o r Wel r i acknowledged to be the “official repr.” Hesuid:— | Did bedothatr We live ies 8. bet va “{ suid hero last Sabbath, that 11 the people of thig | AM the HxnaLD people do, We heard him speak on the identical occasion imdicated, aud we know bt | threatened nothing of the kind. “We take the liberty to suggest to the Presideny that he shouid keep bis eye oa Utab.”’—New Yore Heratp, That would be a good thing, especially for him to keep lis eye on the slander mill set, They are @ bad lot, and there is no telling what niscbief they may’ be up to if they are not watched. They are deceitful above all things and desperately wicked, They need watching, ture and Usurpation.” BLoop! srLoop! already passed through this side of twenty years pi ‘Wait a little longer and they will be perfectly satiated with blood.’ They shed the blood of the tnnocen if they are not satisfied with the blood they have shed of each other, wait alittle while and they will shed each other's vlvod to their full satistaction. The Lord bas spoken it, and we have vothing todo with iu If we could we would bide ourselves away from the scenes that will take piace; batthia we cannot do, But waita little looger, and the peopie of this nation, as well others, will have blood wll they are satisfied with | shedding the blood of each other. This is the predic- tion of the ancient prophets, and has beon conirmed unto ue Grougi fis servant Joseph. ‘The people are in the hands of God; Ho will rulo all things and deal justly with all mankind; but He will not suffer thie wicked. ness to dwell on th be cleansed, All that we need to concern ourselves about 18 to serve the Lord, to trust 1n Him, so that we may be ready to | receive His dealings upon the just and the unjust in all bis chastisements, Lot us live up to the principles of the just, and God will continue to bless us und de- liver us with the jus"? Now, nobody knows better than Brigham Young himself, that be vever was in leas danger, on account of bis atrocious religious or irreligious doctrines than now. There is no disposition to interfere with Mormonism, But there 1s a desire to get atthe bottom facts of tho Mountain Meadows Massacre, If there ta any evidence in existence im. | plicating Brigham Young, the public wants it to be broughs to the attemtion of tho Grand Jury. This Brigham Young Knows unquestionably, And this ex- | plains the arming of the Nauvoo Legion, if it is arm- | ing. | JUSTICE FOR BRIGHAM, (From the Omaba Herald.) ‘The fact that the government is ordering reintorce ments and fresh distribution of troops to the various military garrisous im Utab will give color of truth te the reports concerning contemplated resistance by force of arms to the federal autnorities in that Terri. | tory. But wo denounce and discredit the whole story. We do not believe there is the slightest ground for ine story that the cool-headed aud far-soeing religious ruler of the Mormou people is in any way cou. nected with amy such foolbardy scheme, But there i this about 1, If the federal power in Utah undertakes, as the wan McKean unceriook, to outlaw the Mermon | people by overriuing the laws under which they are entitled to protection of life, liberty and property | equally with otber citizens of the Union, there will be a terrible time in the Sult Lake Valley. Lf Brigham Young or any man other bus heen guilty of murder or other crime in Utab, let bin be pum ished jor it according to law, As Grant said of the whiskey rascals we auy of the Mormons, ‘*Let no ape.” But po men, veither Brigham Young nor apy other wan, must be either indicted, convicted or punished lor capital or other crime ta Utah, unless it can be done in obedience to laws under which other men besides Mormons ure held account ablo for criminal offences, Courts must not ee organ- tzed, juries must not be packed to either imprison oF bang meu, whether innocent or guilty, any such programme as was broached by General Kimball at a late meeting 'iu Salt Lake City, if ‘t is attempted to be carried out, will se@ not one stone standing apom ane other jn Utah. f VOLUNTEERS FOR UTAH. (From the Wilkesbarre Leader, } Tho New Youk Hexard, through ite special corre- spondence from Utan, Is creating much alarm concern- ing the military preparations which the Mormons are making lor the purpose of resisting any attempts of the United States yovernment from the (urther prose- cution of the Mountain Meudows murderers, Whilothe War Department is silent , the Henaty prociaims almost dady, iy that the Mormons are busily drilliug in the school of the soldier, and that Gentile residents of Utah are making preparations for an early departure to places of safety, Brigham Young or the Mormons are preparing or The reiteration of the Hxxaun’s statemonts would | intending to resist process of law? When did he or. lead one to suspect that something very serious is | they refuse to answer any lawiul summons of any It ts mani- | court in the country? © Mormon leaders bave festly certain that Brigham Young and his leaders | submitted, time and time again, to the orders and ro- would preter meeting deato on the battle fold than in | quirements of the courts, even when they had nothing the way it camo to Jobn D. Lee, and there is no tolling | buts more coloring of legality. There 1s vot a com- to whas extremes Young and his bosts might nos be led | munity on this continent whe have as great respect if they saw no hope of getting out of a rigid prosecu- | for logitimate acthority as these same terrible Mor- tion, mons. Of course the danger of such an outbroak will bo | The fact is they have been too submissive, too pa- greatly magoited, especially by republican organs, | tisnt and too upresisting under the falsehoods, avus who will bave something to say in regard to the cut- | and devilish maligaity of their unscrupulous asaailanty. ting down of the standing urmy, and of the unfortu- | Aud it is this that gives the cowardiy scoundrels whe hate condition it 18 im concerning Its maintenance, | live by slander the bardibood to work for the destruc. Yot for all this there need be no great alarm tell, Lf | tion of the community from whom they get their daily our regular force should full to meet the demand in | bread, Tuey have lied so long without punishment or numbers, in case they are necded, there are a plenty | reply that they consider themselves secure, and now of volunteers out West who would hurry to Utah ut» | revel in ribaldry, blackguardisin and libel, uaprose moment’s notice, and eflectivoly squelch in no time | cuted, unthreatened and unhung. any effort looking toward a civil trite, We hi ‘ways had to depend upon the Volunteers for safety iv tine of vital emergencies, and there is no reason to doubt their valor im the future, HIDEOUS, BLASPHEMOUS, WICKED IMPOSTURE | AND TREASONABLE USUBPATION. (From the Philadelphia Press.) It i said that inquiries will soon be made by Gen- eral Crook into the necessity or propriety of com- piiance with Gcveroor Emory'’s request for a cou- siderable incroase of the number of United States troops in Utah, aud that reinforcements will pe for- warded to the Mormon stronghold if an outbreak is seriously threatened. The only probable or possible pretext for riotous or revolutionary proceedings would | be the institution of vigorous prosecutions against the | 5 Mormon leaders, and especially a; at Brigham | Young or prominent participants in the Mountain | Meadows massacro and similar crimes, doubt that many offences have been perpetrated by | {ain sc, aid ft. w. of Av. Brigham Young and his principal associates which | plainti™ rieuly deserve condign punishment, The entire sye | supreme Court f tem Brigham Young has upheld, and especially his detiance of tho United States authorities In 1857, wire he proclaimed martial law throughout the ‘Territory of Utab, and made many preparations for military | resistance to the government, woult have long since ied | 4 to bis execution for treason anu for treasunable asaump- tions of powor if our laws aod modes of administeriug Frouwann tok, K thom were not exceptionally merciful. Pructicully, | Ox Brigham Young has acted as an usurper, wielding | personally for @ jong period much of the authority | c that belougs to the national goverament or iis au- Uhorized representatives, and with this usurpation he bas combined the most hideous, blasphemous and wieked imposture that ever disgraced our country. But the inherent difficulty of convicting the Mormon loader betore @ jury composed tainly of bis dupes and confederates has bitherto prevented Brighain Young's arraignment on charges tuas would have | proved fatal under circumstances and surroundings more layoravle to the enforcement of jaws aguinst treason and the abuse or usurpation of official powers. Even suck dificuities, however, uiay vot create insur. mountuole obstacles to the trial and conviction of some of the Mormons who are charged with cruel murders, and the prospect that such prosecutions will follow Lee's execution has probably induved some of the most desperate of the Mormon leaders to pro- yare for determined resistance to the decrogs of tue Utah courte, Butit military aid i needed to ineare the enforcement of the laws it will, duabtiess, be ture nishod, aud the country will await with oo small de. reo of iMterest and anxiety tho result of the preseat | 12 eflorts to bring these oid offendors to justice, THE MORMONS ‘TOO PATIENT.” (From the Ogden Junction.} On what grounds can any person or paper allege that REAL ESTATE, ‘The following sales were made on tho Real Estate Exchange yesterday :— &, 145 ft. ©, of 4th av, bo Andrew Court loreclosure site ~ BB. Chetwood, » With jut 20x60, 00 I¥b Ave, we Of Gist ot, to Mony KB, Dowaney, pial u with lot 25 of se °. MYKKS, aiel aM w, arshy can pany, pluintit upreme Court fo rel ol ® plot of lena, 30xG8, on ws, 20.5 th. & of 120cb wt, $0 Julia Hunt, um... “+ 8,100 ai wikis ceanaLE There is no | Supreme Court forecivsure ref of a house, with lot ‘Total salow for the day... Tha xavERs. ay., 2 Lb wb, He wey ton Both at, a. s. rettaon (rele >} F fi N. ot w. ol to A 116th at, a samme to R. Beno: Lath wt, 0 wth. we of to M. I 16h st 0 Fito. ot Alicia and wile to Jew, corner Warton oury O' Keiliy to bllen U'iteilly €. 8, 125 16 0: Houston #t., 2x 100; st 8, 2S Mh, woof bith me, 100K Tt ‘et. sk, LOU It, w. of 7th awe, Koo wnd wite to Sullle M. Cory. uh 1 ino LAS: 100.10 ~ foo , 8x Pe 100.11; 12th THOROUGH KEMEDIES NEEDED, (Prom the Newark Journal. | wot tet wy, 4. Parra ‘The trial, conviction wud execatiog of Lee ts a good ots MeGape vod vite to Mis Puten 2600 begimeing, but ouly 4 beginoing. There should be no | — oh My m Biuorton (re Gourge 8 MeKionin ‘i pause of Stay unui every Mormon, elder or biniop oF | ities ©, lHe dl th 6 of loth ay, ed in 4 tdec ol 4 | Wuegles (eleree) wo 5. Cardwell, execut , 8,000 layman, coucerned In the bideous butchery bas beom | ,,,\ucrles (Veler & Conte e eer brought to tris d, W convicted, brought to execu " slo Norwood. 6,009 | 45ei wt y8.08100.5) 6. tion, ‘The proceedings cau hardly stop short of the | *%! Sper ¢ arraigoment of Brighuin Young binself, who certainly | 7th as., w could not have bees iguorant of the crime, nor ig | Berd (Fe horant of the fact that the criminals, ao far trom suffering punishment, were advanced im the Church. | The wholo establishment should be pus down by the strong hund of the law, unless (he deplorable immo- | ra.iiles and prolanitien of the piace are reforwed aito- | > gether, | o AUDACIOUS PROSELYTISM. (From the Philadelpoia Sun.) | Ih is announces that there are two Surmon elders in Philadelphia who buve come here for ibe purpose of | oF Urb av., pron s\., Heins, anne M. dav. avd #6. aud Mouro | Van Dolson, Abram, t & Colley Vaal trying wo make cooverts to their faith, Thus iar they whe, @ OF @ have hud Uo Suevess; Bot because there are here uo | PTA*k!ld Lumanue wus wile, be 12,000 weak-minded poopie who are foolish engugh to swallow | Kelly, Joseph 1. to rranets J Preadergasi, No ait Joe Smith's absurd Inventions, but Because the mise | gute e's bets naries havo been woadle to nd w ball iw whieh they | toy Lite Losuran Cav preach weir burlesque gospeh One oi those elders MRO) Lyeaticce Qa