The New York Herald Newspaper, June 12, 1875, Page 4

be reme! wi m4 yourn, around | witn maeity to nature, ‘emembe: the wire or yourn, ‘elt oy Ward be formed by Mr, beecher at that period with ble ip bis en; nts toward us, They had petty by Eee eetenon to that ‘witness, 4 u come ft Sam Wiikeson, and there is 00 intima- | act biog un sais MME WONDERFUL. TRIAL, Pe | ereraes ‘on the part of Mr. Mout | reference to any of the compiteations which sur: | t | whom the fresh tendrtts of his heart had gathered a8 that the dovy of burmingtke rounded Mr. Beecher, and were many involy- | stamp pow Theodore Tilton the disgrace | th @ clasp that ae subsequent act lad broken; joubLed! A yn who reads Du will not . 3 OF the re Vo burn the papers was {ag him in piece He coutd not even Feceive 9 | falsehood and perjury, They dared met, and they | of the ‘of that bouseold | neglect Walter Sooti, And very many, a8 is Lhe connected WER OF arose lh any degree Oulof tue let rom V Woodhuay wit! sending to | did not accept the challenge. And it ¢ to be taken © a Wi he loved, although | case with all of us, very many of the brightest arbitration and award, Mr, Srorrs does not neré | Mr. Moulton to know ther id answer | as true because they did not em at when | Weged that he bastardized one of | and highest conceptions Oo! our minds are derived, pretend tha convorsation had any connection ue and in all the porplexities it, and at eve: they bad the means of eoutra them ; when he thought of ali the consequences, of co that would of information, because there 4s very little originality tn the world, These are ,| with the arbitration and award, bul says thaiié | Mr. Moulton w man to whom he resorted | the gentleman under these cir ‘the ignominy, the sorrow, the ing \ nt i 1 Ki th De » f | arose ous Of the tripartite agreement, with | and in whom he trusted. But, gentlemen, why | keen railiery and his rapid witand iis follow to that housenoid, ana uplilted by the pre- origina! forms of eXpreasion, but it would be ue undre¢ an ult ay 0 which, ag You remeber, Mr. Sam Wilka3on was gil this uproar about the non-destruction of struction of this age aud these seniiments— | cepts of hia Master, he at0od up in the attitude of | diMoult to ladicate ® thought, a senuument, a . intimately’ connected, he having no connection | papers, When Over wnatis Gestroyod there ts @ | is be under th circumstances to throw out tbe | Christian manliness and said, “1 will not make | principle of morality, of nature or science that has : whatever With She arsitratien and award, and aif, | clamoreus outcry, and when they dre kept thera sword evidence of an umimpeacied witness, Unworthy as Henry Ward Beecher ye been long bi oe C3 and Goveloped. | 18 8 not very surprising, it be true, that enry the Scandal Suit. | Wilkeson, after the tripartite agreement had beep are fevecious complain for these papers veal no wrong if they are consistent with tle | BVARTS’ WONDERFUL BIBTORIC, He is sktlied i ali the devices of oratory; he | mnay be, deadly 43 Bas heen the stab be has th. | | this aseault, | ficted upon my honer and peace, nevertheless 1 id Living close to te heart and | Ward Beecuer was, in ils intercourse with {his executed, and that act of composure and friend- \iness ha@ been cop pleted as between parties, | honesty and integriiy of Mr. Beecuer. If the | Knows how to touch all the springs Of the human | will forgive himand stay the hand of my yen- | lady, be addressed this leiver to Mr, Moulion, which theory and the construction of iy learned friend | beart. But will the law periait swornevidence | geance."’ In the light of Christianity, actuated by GOVERNED BY Lust, Sy een srAT OPER wil vead you: ~ | ®re correct and sound, what ts the cause of this from @ Wituoss Whom they have Not dared te as- the example of the Master, clinging hard and close | or ir unuer the flerceness of semptation he yielded MR. BEACH'S GREAT SPEECHL | “Me pass tergo—now for tin cloains act of junign | disturbance? Why do my iriends complain that sail vy the ordinary and proper, modes of law, | to His teachings and Ms ‘promises and His com | to tuo atiractions aud the opportunities of she and duty. Let fheodere pass iuto your vandstue wrt. | We kept their papers, their own writings, and = impeachment of lis character—is i to be | Mands, is kt not one Of the grandest sights, the | giuation, it is not surprisin Mr. Beecher, ten apology which he boids fur tue lapro . | produced them? Whem they wanted tiem for | eraved trom the reoord py the mere breath of | highest exaltations of moral grandeur to se@ | should have used arguments of this character and’ And do you pass it Juto the Hames of the siendty dre ih | Yge the papers did not disturb them. If tneir | counsel? And ts that the mode which, in a great | human imdrmity elevating itself above its tendeus | addressed to this woman this sort of seutiment, | | your room otzeconctliauon. Then tet theodore talk to | contents are 80 frivolous, so casily recovered with case, before a learned Cuurt, justice 1s to be cles and passion: erin ‘i ‘& Vigorous and Powerful Effort | diver Soh cafcuegribagne and Carpoular, te art | tho integrity and te iunocence of Henry Ward | ministered between cltizeus ih your Stale? Now, | iaith of te Redeemer, a6 groat as Beecher, a4 lofty in all the paths of * . a ‘Btace: Beecher, what is ‘he trouble, gentlemen? Tako | Mr. Evarts was delighted with 1%, All the time H i for the Plaintitt. Ugn inthe clubs, Stncercly TONES KL WILKESOW. | your paper, be judged Ourselves. Consirue | his cinteh om Tilton was geviimg stronger and Along here Mr. Beach rose toa high flight of | kuowledge, as consecrated in the hearts of the "| your own wrislugy aa they acquit your | closer with every word he uttered. Sut Mr, | S0quence, amid the profound silence of the aud- Snes ee Beecher, puts iato oneef, QSSVE BETWEEN PORTER AND BEACH, TRE RESULTS, ‘Now, two things resuit from that letter :—First, that it did not originate from the arbitration an the award ; and*second, that there was bo request mand, or intimation, that it was the duty of client—why biess God, and thank us that they | Were preserved. The diMeuity is that these | Bapers ure of a deep significance which disturbed the conseience aud excited the fears of their author afd hus advocates. not be swits- | atood, Of course, as Objecting distinctly to eve: Evarts says:—‘Now, if Your Honor please, this indicates the nature of the communication con- cerning which my Objection appnes. | am under- y branco of this.’ “Of course,’ says the Judge, ienee. Mr. Beecher vowed his head and closed lus eyes, Mr ‘Tilton’s eyes mt Md with aqmira- tion of his advocate, who wus freely gesttoulating, luting a trembling arm above his head ang name tie sentiments of arguments of like kind. When Mr. Kvarw says that no human tatellect ever dreamed of arguments of this character ad. resved under such cireumstances to the seduc- flop of virtue I ieerild the example as delineated y Mr. Moulton to barn alithe papers. It was con- | fed that they are kept. They speak loud- | turning to Mr. Evarts ironically, ‘you were de- — ined to the letterof apology, the so called “‘letier mouthed, with clear and unerring force of truth, lighted with this narrative.”’ Ob, have — scnightoning Niopelt-ny're the Tull mogeure:of Penenieor tee pan eecament ¢ gree hd Tha Jury Bearded and Real- | Censor. wreil.. areny handed that letter to | upon the subject of this scandal, | gentleman now, I cal him with my rhetoric, | his stature. forsifled by authorities, Dave veen submitted i 4 Mr. Stores, when te vepested, the COOYSEMSHED | “Treving exhausted argument in defence of the | FINAN? Slee totes ct ae ae ete | irstnereds eer eane a nner Ate ie alla’ | ZOUE HONOE. T have no ccossien to contend wi ize Their Duty. tng the papers of Mr. Wilkesou, arising out of the | action of Mouiton.in retaining the Beecher letters, | hand.t’ Well, the ‘wlinem. ‘proceeds: Me, | meshed acne don, Pi ctfot nee toon | sem, t admit ¢ every proposition of my learned. = ee rena. = seein ase oe counsel concluded by saying, “If tbey acquit you, | poacher: een. ihm oe ae a oes hk. jon eoaruies ith ‘nothing; if the whole world has | doctrine.’ But do not pitirtrg seo that, when f a % = | ee 1 ” a i owed | n diaturbed and mo you please, with tae v men. that Mr. Storrs, inthe retation of this con. | Mt Beecher, 1 thank God they are preserved,” | nit Mrs, Tiiton’a conieasion, oF a copy made in | feeling of the gullt of Hovey Ward. Hesseee wise, | nie cae nttens nan tara afr ‘A REGULAR FIELD DAY.) | Aa farag numbers and distinguished company | ‘went yesterday was tne feld day in tne great jseandal case; People trom all parts of the coun- Bry were present. Senator Morton, Governor Par- | mistaken in the allusion which was made by Moultua to the papers. You wiii remember sons Which our learned irienas a to us in regard to the fallivie nature of evyitence as to conversations and conies- sions, My friend, Mr. Vorter, renders # very uble, instructing and truthful essay apon that suoject, in every word of which | agree—tt ts one o! the most diMcut efforts of human memory to recall “versation, was whol applause was checked at this moment, thelic audience evidently surrounded and gave a | whitog and friendly ear to the speaker, BOWEN'S TESTIMONY UONSIDBRED. Tdo nov think [am celled upon in this case to enter upon any deieace of Henry U. Bowen, [ know, if the testimony of Mr. Tilton is true—and I | looking Beecher straight im the face, A burst of | A sympa- | the saat. part of the evening before, the ortginal of wht was in Mr. Moulton’s Aur Well, here @ long argument ensues of a ful and abie character on the part o! my learned friend, all for the clesiug of the mouths and the | shutting out of evidenve and obstructing the re- ception of the facts.’ Mr. Beach was happy in his allusions to Mr. Evaris’ rhetoric, the tmmense weight the aavocate out apy evidence, without any fact of any reality in 4, let us learm it—iearn it by the bold, frank deciaration upon the part of the jury, that there is noting in the trubh of what four witnesses swore to. Now, you will remember that we were not permitted to prove what this statement made on tie 29th of Decem- ber was. We olfered i!, we could have proved it | by two wituessea. They ovjected to il, The court with force und- efficiency in favor of their adversary? It is said that the confession of Mrs. Tliton ts no evidence against this defendant; Granted, aua Your Honor has over and over again ruled, And new again and again acceded to ane proposition, 1t1s only when that confession ta! detailed to the party whom it implicates, when with precision aud with the motives under all the possibility of the communication, in the! y y | apd repeat @ conversation; and ttis, Tadmtt, @ yaimk'l wilt satisfy you by and by that it Is ve- ruied tb out. We struggied as best we could for | ¢; and i ker, of New Jersey, and Chief Justice Church, | hazardous species of evidence, to be scrutinized | facious i know that Mr. Bowen acteu an un: | for the defendant attached to is own werds aud | the admission of The evidence sre. dOsired | ee eee ae cent the amance aud Bal Pongressmen De Witt, Cortland Parker, of the PO Oe a Disadiy “pert, 30. aay thn leash, toward Mr. Tilton. | the jittle accouns {acts and evidence were beside | that | you Doni SRAARrotRRS —-SROR wD | aie jug irom the presence of Ms ASCUser,, i? y 3 now that wile refused to sides, boin | witnesses, Y 5 hola | exci Now Jersey Bar; Judge Van Syokel, of the Cours | OWN ONC ta he applied to. the evidence On tho | SATetrset piunds aad Gurseives, all imiormation | the classic language of tne counsel, “Never mind | say‘npon the suuject—ani give men anatase ene pe a of Appeals, New Jersey; Dr. Darrin, of Rochester; | General Tibbets, of Troy; ©. H, Windeld, of New York, andJoun Wilson, of Aberdeen, Scotland, had Beats on the beuch. The iadies penetrated into every corner of the court room. Exactly twelve of ‘them sat iu the jury box to tae lett of the bench, actng the masculine and bond de jury on the other side of the room. It wasa thick and swelter- | purt of the platnti@, and I insist that the same application snould be made of ws to the evidence ou the part of the defence, When counsel saul it was one of the most diffi. cuit things for the human memory to reeali and give a precise recital of a conversation long past | the Beecher peo smiled at the admission and remembered fora momeat Mrs. Mouiton’s cele- | tm regard to the facts within bis knowledge, all revelation as to the testimony he would give upon | | the stand, that we called him as a witoces, and | that relation usually imposes upon a lawyer an | | honorable duty of protection, so iw as protection | | is justice. Heé was called, gentlemen, as you well | Know, in auswer to ademand, You telt the pro- riety and the necessity of hearing from Henry C. | Bowen what he had to gay upon the sitbject. The- | odore Tilton had sworn that on the 26th day of | what Moulton or Mrs, Moulton, or Tilton or any- body clse testifies to, only let me talk aad L'il ges you out of the scrape." PRAYER AND BENEDICTION. + Well, I have said to you two or three times, gen- tlemen, that in construing the acts of these parties, and the neceasity of tt will become apparent to you hereaiter, we must consider the peculiar char- acteristics, situations and consttions of these ity to say whether they were to be rejected. if you disbelteved them, why the plaintif’s case jailed, and (helt statement of what tois wri of Mrs. Tiiton contained of course would be - Credited and disvelleved. My triends would not | have st, Dae witnesses would have told you accord. ing to their best recollection, I assume, and upon their consciences and oaths. What was juse in that writing and. why tt was destroyed I wiil talk of by aud by. Bat I repeat it, our friends would not have it, and who is to be blamed? When Mr, TL- tt 13 only then that the coniession of Biteabatt: Ra Tilton becomes significautand important. ‘Well, says my irieng, “of course it was a coniessions| Ab! there 18 the mustake of my iriend’s argument; there is the greaterror of their position. They! assumed that the document of Decemover 29 was: the confession, and that was expected from Titon, | The Goniestion which was related to Henry Ward Beecher, and which in the momeat he dared not @taud up and deny like @ man, was ‘ z brated titerview with Beecher, which she ap- | December H Cc. Be “ eal | utside 400 or 600 a | Decem! jeary owen ha reyeaied to | various parties. One thing you know, that | mg throng. 1n the corridor outside i rive | eared to give word fur word two years after iis Mm disgraceful’ charges” against Mr. Leecher. | Flizaboth f. ‘Tilton -worsiipped Henry’ Ward | fon read it to ME Keecher, i there isany truth in fhe comession manila six menshs ago, WOes a4, \people stood all day long walting tor the | Cccurrence. tise noticeable feature of she case | 1c 18 Not mecessary 0 repeat the de- | Boscher. This is coniossed on all Rands. Her | Mr. Tilton, Mr. Beecher snust have wodorsteod pe nacealine subinisiad £9-ALD COR talnIRS eee: cChamce of getting inside the court room. Mr. | te tals,of those charges. hey were of such | character as a Caristian devotec; her tempera- | whut it was. de says that the charge was im. | CusAlon er Cl erica ta Beach was received with cheers by the outside crow4, but the presence of the Judge, stern and | "uubending, suppressed an unmistakable tmpuise | that on the side of the defence any trifling straw is. grasped auto save from drowning. MOULTON AND THK BAECHER LETTERS. Another thing is obvieusfrom this lecter, that agrave and serious character, according to Mr. | Pulton, as to lead flenry v. Bowen to say that he | Was unit to hold bis exalted postition as a pastor and instructor iu truth. They were sufficient to authorize Henry ©. Bowen, in his judgment, to say _ ment as a delicate, excitaple, spiritual, ay, as Mr, Beecner says, an inspirational woman, has been given toyou. I shall pereafver show to you, I think, the circumstances and mental conditions under which this Woman was ied to submit to tho proper aolicitatien, Mr, Tilion says it was #eXual intercourse. r. Shearman—Mr. Beecher never said £0. Mr. Beach (continuing)—Tnat tne charge he | made upen that occasion against Mr. Beecher was And it was the manner in which be received, that. Tae silence and submission and broken heartedness with which he listened to that, gives, to thut confession and to its statement the Soe of convincing aud denouncing she proof. Now I ‘to applaudon the part of the inside multitude. | there was nu» assertion on the part of Mr. Wil . ° that the promulgation of those charges would | wishes ef Mr. Beecher. But she was a peculiar | Not sexual intimacy. I said that Mr. Beecher de- ‘The whole strength of counsel on boin sides was | son. There never has been a pretence Memana | arive Mr. Heecnor irom his pulpit and from Brook- | lady, of deep emotional character, of fomewhac clares that that charge upon Enat occaston gate nat OF Lie DaSAesey of ale Cate goer oe lyn in twelve hours. Mr. Bowen is on the stand, | strange and eccentric thougits and feelings. Mr. | wae improper solicitation. Mr. ‘Lilton swears ‘on the 20th of December was won from her ee A yepresented, including even General Pryor, who has been absent from the trial for some time. THE OPENING by Mr. Beach was tame. The audience had come | together to ve stimulated by a treat of fery decia- or suggestion to Mr, Tliten or Mr. Moultoa that the papers or any papers connected with this transaction were to be brrned, 1ounded upon any tdea either of an expressed agreement to ao it or any obitgation arising out of any proceedings be- fore the arbitrators or otherwise. Mr. Wilkeson had just compieted that act of ampesty and con- | My irtends ao not ask him whether Taeodore Til- ton’s relation of the proceedings between bun and Bowen on the 26tn of December were trath- | fully told by Mr. Tilton. My friends Mr, Bowen wheiticr, on the 26) f December, he did teil Theodore Tilton to present this demand did Dot ask | Beecher was a great preacter, her pastor, loved still, for at that tue the conviction of her sin had not falien upon her cousctence. The delnsion by which she had been betrayed had not then beon dissipated. She then recognized no wrong in the act Itself and eulpability only in the aystem of deceit, in the life of auplicity which she was lead- that it was sexual intimacy. Well, if Mr. Tilton and Mr. Moulton could have sworn ag to the con- tents of the statement that mrs. Tilton made and communicated to mr, Beecher at the time what tt was, we should have bad some adaitional light upon the subject, and it would have depended then whether it enlightened us; it would have de- portunities and solicitations. Tne situation of things, the conditions im waich the pastor wag. Placed, the perposes for Walch this writing was, to be used, 1 submit to you, contraaicts any such ‘puppossuion. Theodore ‘Tilton did not want t@ use it for the purpose of making an sccusesions mation, im this they were disappoimted. Tne and be woola back bim upinit. My friends did % part! Then he ap- “ he did not use i for the purpose frst two hours were dull! save for tye or ten min- | Cll/ation. the tripartite covenant, not ask him to tell how and why, ihe did this, if | ing. Now if this be the character of the woman, | pended upon the reliance we placed upou tie 3 Deals to Moulton or Tiiton through Moulton, ag an | iy’tue nuine of truth and morality, upon the eVi- | this the relation of the parttes, there ts nothing | credibility of Mr. Moulton and dr. Luton, making an accusation; for in the vi utes, when counse! struck a vein of eloquence act of clemency and of duty under the eircum- dence be held in bis own hands, he bad under. srrenae or inconsistent in the idea that Mrs, Titton Here the Court took the ususi recess, iustaat when be preneonet and read ; to Henry Ward Beec: er he professed to fully equal to any effort of the previous two days, | Stamoes, to burn the apology and nothing else, ‘a to pronounce Henry Ward Heeeher an unilt | should desire to make the frst communteation to ihe Ufbexneon, however, was oxtrezely-entiven- What it’ there nad been, gentiemen, suct a prom | oo@fmant of the sacred pulpit. They dido’t ask | Mr. Beecher that she bad revealed to ber husband AFTER THE RECBSS, 1g silence. He withdrew the demand which four y id y ase upon the part of Mr. Moulton? Suppose in the | o The court room was @ scene of great bustleand | days belere he bad made upon Mr. Beecher to va- 1 Mr. Be despite his hoarseness, mad se of fi ‘aly’ feeli which controlled him to tell how le came to change bis views and the charagter and extent of her intercourse, er fe Bg. sabenanear cnn longipeeaaaed Sent annie eee wate Oe eee tren ana | purposes ‘pans io vetiay, tne aly, be, on that | Why, as belmeen ordinary minds ad men and | coutuston in the afternoon. The coming back of ROnIpLs Sng pando Broce Vaas ely mime | . . wth of December, nai en to his contideuce beasts, in the practice of the Vulgar and obscene - Moulton haa said that they would burn al! the pa- aduiteries of the time, why it 1s possible that the | OS? who had gone to lunch and the pushing and gation or sscunaiion cr Bowater ras concerned? @long under a full head of steam and dwelling pers connected with this scandal, and taat after and trast. (farning to Mr, Kvarts.) smiles iroutcaliy, and I will give him an oppor- My fiiend | criticism of my learned friend woul be true that struggling for seats made up a scene of sively he Was throwing Of bis armor! He was with- nape the charge of “improper olicita- | reflection, considering the possibilities of the fu- w! ‘an’ i} “ ng ot that A aions,? as the ome the other side in-| ture, there being no linperative obligation as- questions of Mr. bowen, nid Han't Ask thoes | ent, ol that elevation ot isciing un ‘emotion, | sredsec iw seen ola than Wore within the | 2fawing the a¥sautt Ne had made upon Mr. ais 2 rae ade 4 t f sumed, there beg no duty by aby authority iai- rs ee is w _ | tere would be nothing of that spiritualized iden | sreater number of people than were within the | Beecher; ne was telling fim that tor his witela vod op made, and not one of posed upon these parties to burn the papers, there ‘Mr. Evarts was sitting beside Mr. Beach with a | Siete Tver Aoi Or by these parties, as I wiil | Waus of the court room, which Was already {ull to wake, not 10r tus (Beeclier's sake, or hus (Th : "adultery, up jampea Judge Porter inanexcited never having come from Mr. Beecher a single re- | curious smile on his face, balf ironical, haif in- | | the Sensuousness and vulgarity of a lustful inter- manner and in effect aceused Mr. Beach of false~ hood. Quite a scene took place. Mr. Beach per- sisted in his original siatement, while frequent | apprause,; checked before it had time to expend | bonor init, Well, iny friends say it reflects upon “I 5 Atself, broke forta from tae audience. | the tutegrity of Mr. Moulton, It destroys his cred- | wore au jronical smiiein the face of the jury, | Mr. Beecher raised bis newspaper above tls | Mrs. Fiela, the great friend of Mrs. Tilton, | #iX Months had been heid and ‘nospaad ds ee) THE ADDRESS OUTLINED. i inpay see ee Lad ree ~ Shearman and ‘racy worked their facial muscies | ace, The audience keenly relished the sentence | Mr, Beach dabored under an tnoreasing Bente ot panto Se meine, by dad Re ks Sas / . we | 2 statemen what importance 18 1t \Mr. Beach continued bis address by referring to | ering into no ebligation to destro: these papers to the expression of a sneer at the ‘lame aud im-— Just given. The ladies were all in a fatter, a few | Roarseness, but he showed no lack of | cares whut becomes of te it 8 not the founda. the waste of time ou the other side in denouncing | ajthongu requested to do so by Mr. Wilkeson; | potent’’ conclusions of the speaker, of them biushed, and the resc laughed at the ab- | yieor and bowled along to the eud of the day's | HOn Of this Case; It Was not che cuatession of Mra, 1 ae , Tilton; it bore the character, origimated in Prank Moulton forretaining the Beecher corre- spondence, and for balfan hour continued to argue in justification of the conauct of Mr. Moulton. Be next passed to the sunject of the Bowen arbi- Sration, and contended that when the award was made Theodore Tilton was cbarging Mr. Beecher with an offence, aud Frank Moulton’s offices at quest or intimation that he desired apy paper to be burned, what if they bad changed their pur- pose and determined to preserve these documents to meet any possible exigency that might arise in the ruture? I do not see any particular dis- Without any promise to that enect and although believing that ar. beecher supposed the papers | were to be burned or were burned, this gentleman yet preserved them, aud what obligation or duty bas he violated’ What pledge has ne assumed or broken’ Why is he villiied’ Because with a view tothe whoie reiations of these parties, all the possible conditions of tuls scandal then prutted about the coumtry and a matter of gossip in this city and ad, Whatil be did determine credulous. Mr. Beach caught the expression and tarned toward him to the amusement of the audience and exciaimed, “Ah! my friend smiles ironically.” Buvttwas not Mr, Evarta alone tha, BOWEN NO FRI@ND OF TILTON’S, We could not ao if, and he knew it, We could | not ask as toa conversation between Mr. Tilton | and Mr. Bowen. But they didn’t pursue the whole | range of the mqutry. And if he could have con- tradicted the retation of Theodore Tilton, oh, how | ‘that Latin maxim would have rolled from his mouth, Falsus iv uno, falsus in omnlbus. ter.) (Laugh. There wowd wave been a contradiction of | friendship was close and confiding. snow you, to modity their case, to relieve tt from course and to elevate it to that ideal which my learned friend expresses when he conceives it to be introduced by prayer and ended by a benedic- tion. (Laughter). | surd degree of ceremony observed in the peculiar retations existing between Mr. Beecher and Mrs, Tilton. Mr, Beach went on to say how unjust the criticism was to represent as the statement of Mrs, Tilton's in her owp words, that ste was in- timate with Mx. Beecher Jor years, and that their Does any- some material point, someting that would bave “yogy suppose that Mrs, Tilton used the precise the doors, stood watting for admission. Mr. Beecher has eviaently made up his mind not to attend the afternoon sessions. He was again av- ‘sent yesterday, but he took the considerate pre- caution of sending back nis wife, with"whom sat proceedings with his characteristic spirit. He came to deal with Evarts’ “argument” that Beecher was entitied to great consideration he- cause of the services he rendered the Union tn Kngland when he spoke before howlmg audiences of Englishmen in sustatning the position of the carried the audience away with him when he | meaty aud sick, feariul and trembling and anxious, spare you! | withdraw tbs demand. Cousider it bipttved out forever, And then tells hun that a coniession Was made to him oy his wife—tor the: first time lets him know that thyt secret between, Henry Ward Beecuer and Eliza! the. motive and produced the effect which | have dew #crived to you. DOES ANYBODY SUPPOSE ' that Mr. Moulton means to believe that Mts | Beecher was sensible o! his guilt, and do you sup- any that Moulton suggested the charge of crim. nul intercourse to some ns and coutradicts that to otuer persons’ The Court wil, Mr. Beach’ hoped, iustruce the jury to draw common sense that time were those of @ man sent | ty preserve them! Ifepeat this question, Itis United ' b a i. touched the heart ana merits of this controversy, b ‘aited States, couclusions of the whole evidence, weighing each! = — weheraie ta! prmaeased ost he Fnac Bosse tat nit aeen tae eooenaire aioe fn not to Ay about the ontakirte and AKIrmIc | brim jeg contained in her communication to | qn speaker thought that Evarts had spent too deren and otreumstance in the estimation of the pel a. as i c ~ an - CWnat will Ti rolg of this 5 1 Ww! Vo are seeking, not to troy the induiged in the exclamation, ‘What wit! Theo- then have been on the citadel of this case. He dare | | long a time at Genova to remember what was due | Mole. Wo re seeking not eae un this trials @gaipss this Man that he conspired to injure dore do in case Of trouble?’ or “What will Theo- not, be hasnot advancea toit. (Applause.) tis | unsel then continued:—I have pursued ts toshow you the generat character of to the selfrespect and Independence of an Ameri- but we are doing the best we ean to reacn the Beecher. Ifthe papers were harmtess, wny afl dore do with his trouble "’ Whichof these ex 4 somewnat significant omission, and 1 wul show | P J ° 4 oo “5 Z i 5 the n: etmade at tiat time by Mrs. Tilnon, | Gan jury. sruth. My only purpose ts to present to you what this commotion, ‘If these papers acquit you, | pressions is accurate; The prelcrence Of my | yon by and by, when we come to tac i-purlite | anal jinve done it for the purpose of illustrating | M*, Beach, in resuming, criticised the relation | Lconcelve tobe a professional and logical argue Mr. ‘Beecher, thanx God shey have been pre- | trouvie is tuere, then? The aflais with Bowen | goveuant, how it is and why it is thal Spon Of | tue r°~ position I made that thts was not the rev- | givea by Mr. Tilton of the confession of mis wate, ment of this case, Lagree that huinan memory werved.” Counsel turned and looked toward the | nad just at that instant been conciuded. The ar- | jocumentary evidence of this case | jorel.- | lat of a wrong done by Mr. Beecher to Mr. Til- | gs made by her, on account pf its particularity; | 2 Imperfect, and] do believe that there ts mor t ° bitration and the award had been heid and made, toa stands #o exalied and trathfuly sapported | top om tue pressure of which upon hisheart and | that 1t was too precise and formal; that one | voluntary perjury Committed in @ conrt of jus- | + that my itiend dare not assail him ja any essenual | goui ineodore Tilton was then burning and rag- | speaking under the circumstances in which awie | tice than you or 1 can conceive, but we Gefendant as he uttered the words, willie an at- tempt at applause was made by the audience. Counsel next referred to Bowen, Of whom he said Certain questions had not been asked by his side Decause they Could not ask them. Bowemwas not their witness. He Was called on the principle of and the dificuities with Bowen were composed, Mr. Beach thus gave the first baif hour of the morning to a defence of Moulton for retaining the papers committed to his charge by Beecher. Moulton palied his mustache and watched the speaker closely as be proceeded to cxeulpate him ts of his evidence, except by Henry W cher and Bessie Turner, But when we get an apparently truthful and Indepepdent map. a man who from position is adverse to Mr, Tilton, be- cause not even in the speeches of my learned Iriend is so severe @ philippie, #0 unsparing and crusming @ denunciation as stauds in that evi- Gence uttered In writing by Theodore Tilton upon ‘ug. It wasn narrative of a preceding transace tion of six months before, It was a narrutive made necessary by certain immediate circum- stances in watch Theodore Tuton had committed, according to his wile, au error of judgment with reference to their domestic condition and their relations to Mr. Beecher. He was calied upon to Was supposed to be situatea—making @ reve.ation of this character to her husband—could not by any possibility bave #0 controlled her emotions and therr effect upon her mental operation as to descend to the minuti# of detail; that on speak- i jy hed the commission Of this offence, to say that it Was committed at No, 174 Livingston -strées, to rely upon mere surmises aud con- M can give the detatis of facta, fa few years ago. But when per- sons retain disconnected and separate recollec- ue fa occurrence whlch agree on t, it is an evide: of trate, Ia such ap lnslance there is nothing to suggest that compact understanding. Mr. Moulton came here Opening every avenue of truth. Bir. Evaris : en 7 have this interview With a man toward whom he Well, I su v Teas x @miied, and as Mi. Beacn detected it he turned to Soe Pep cheng Ot toe Soteneen pects acted | Renry Bowen. He is no friend o! ours; be was | fel( in his hearta sentiment of resentment and tnat Iimolgy would be. ve ef telling conversations of three years ago. Theodore a treacherous part, IN keeping a correspondence | not calied as a friend of our: was calied Upon | jostility wuich Was only covered and controlled by pn at two places om Livingston street—at | Tilton, you, likewise. Mr, Beecher, you are in the Bis learned friend and said, ‘My friend epmiles parcastically ; bat if he had asked Bowen as to fne foverview between Lim and Tilton and if he could bave contradicted Tilton tuere and then, how whe Waxim ‘Fails in uno falsus ty omnibus' would Dave rolied from his mouth.” TUR NEXT POINT to show the relations between Mre. Iéton and 1s Was agreed upon to destroy. TDS DESTRUCTION OF THE PAPERS, Tilton bad received is $7,000, puttmz him in comparatively easy circumstances and rebeving him of his pecusiaty distress and @ifculties, and was (hen able to prosecute tne enterprise o! the Golden Age. What was the troabie he nad whieh Wr. aboulion aunded to, abd in reverence to which these papers may pernaps be useful? The gentic- the same principle and with the same mottve bave induced the mauagement of the cause Of tuis and tocallevery person who, trom their knowledge Of the parties or connection with Plymouta charch, could supposed to hus own Christian resolution and by the restraint | of nis wife and herjove. You may not belicve it, asserted before, to openevery | gir (addressing the foreman), it may excite in- credulity m your mind, it may excite a smile of tronioal disbelief, but you are bound to judge irom this evidence; you are not to adopt the prejudices throw any light upon this extraoraimary aud 1 counsel; you have sworn to decide tuis case World wide controversy. THE IRISUMAN’S STORY. But Mr. Evarts proceeded to com: ent upon the | Upon the evidence, and according to law; andl | am entitied to a respec | and cack and all of you, i hearing trom this jury, Andi may ask tile in- Nos. 48 and 174, and in giving an account to her | husband of the circumstances connected with her dishonor she says they occurred at the place where they resided. She undoubtedly did not use the words No. 174 Livington street. Mr, Tilton, ia communicating the information which be re- ceived from his wile, clothed {t with those epecit. cations, with that language. 1, . Bveris contends that this ts Incredivie, that Mra. Tilton should have used the language “My pastor, Mr. game ‘position. Bessie Turner, you are somethi ‘worse of. (Langhter.) I don't believe there tsa wit ness recounting occurrences Of three years ago, or even one r ago, Who has given a precise and whole narrative of that occurrence, Lt ‘would be contrary to the experience of the world, Bat suppose five years ago, on & certain occasion, Ibroke suadealy on your attention, and I said, “pir, 1 nave just kilied a maai” and | relate the cireumstances aud the motive, and 1 urge you riicised was Evaris’ statement that this @ddl- | man has not told us that. Is there anything In = 4 AA Foe , relation by Mr. Tilton to Mr. Beecher ta tneir Brat ence of this jur; this house, in its ” ‘against to atlence, and you -believe that there are pal- tary sould Rave heen Only MIACEIEGS, GES SOER- | Se oe eee, ere ramnle Tegan waren | eETeem; Che Senet Decummar, af he Mease saeec, ead with. Gea racer impartial and Jost | suetge shouls he ade, las hoe able to | Uattnn Circumsianocs about my guilt, At length Sei told the okt story of the Irismman who was |W, appretinded” by” Mr, Moulton, except conlession of bis wife, and | Judgment, to consider the arguments which m | wppreciate the force of that criticism, and | Justice crics out for me and 1 plead, and the law wiven an lusiration of what a miracle wasbys [hat growing out of ihis very’ seandal {uized in a most extraordinary y f answer to thirteen days) appeallam attempting i wm referted to @ memuraple exauple wich I ee ee ee tee cat tet teexcnaen . ot re ~ 7 ’ oO un! an e@ ol pied oug! ick om the slim by the priest. He went tnvo au | WUICh we aro Low lovestigating? And Nr. Moulton diiron, anid you never Will rcet the Uuctlon IER | this jury.” Welk Tus leatned {fiend spoke of the | Anu whicl would. equally oballenge the criviowm | SMer as wiinessee under the cross-examinaiion sof Mrs, Tilton’s ‘clings as expressed tm | PAMiIS Oh Oe Oe and which is conceded to him in | wich Re gave that declaration, as if be heid the comments made by Mr. Tilton’s representation of of my learned friends, ‘nen Jacob asked Labi ofskliful counse! for the delenge. Moulton, Til- ' lers to her “love-skilied pastor, whose | Siicination Notwithstan ling the arbitration | Cesuuies Of this case and of the wuole earth in | this Interview upon theearlier moral condition of | for hie daughter he says, “will serve thee seven | tol and lire, Moulton and ail the rest may err in } re voor ee ret withstaadiag the * tite | Bis hand. I aid not mterrupt hit. { did not try | Mr. Tilton and mocked at it. He could not do years for Rachel the younger.” Well, the Scrip- | the circumstances and the details of their infer- CHASES SENET AADAA, WER DONT 608 CIEE |) Ree Ee a Ge paeaie ee to change a word ke satd, it wasso strange and #0 | ornerwise: having exalted the character of Mr. tures are thougnt to be tolerable rhetoric—pretty | ences, but ween Henry Ward Leecher with bowed with a veuediction.”- Here aloud, rippling laugh Cor enaat, Knowing Bt the near others pos. | Cxtraordinary ga illustration; and, by the way. | Beecher to a standard of infallible purity, having | reliable standard tor the wee of Ia Now, | head and moistened eye coniessed his reduction ran through the eufience. Mr. Beecher kept tum- | Sauces Ana the knowledge suiton under these Su irisu friend of mine insisted that Mr. Rvarts | clothed it with tne white robe of wusoiled si0 | when Jacob thus spectiie younger, ra, Tilton, there Is no mind that could fo: If busy with a pew: Mr. ch circumstances, aa ese papers ougot motto | Sui Punch are plagiarisis vpon irish humor aud | through all this career, he could not, of course, | it seems to be admivalble for Mrs. Tilton, speak: virgummanse 05 00st. Ho witness can egphasene tel pain yg aoe ran aoa | be aud shal jestroyed unless both parties nd long before he ever thought of there | qaqmit that in any portion of it, there Wasevet img of Mr. Beecher, to speak of him as “Mr, | ¢t that Mr. Beecker, so grand, 80 poweriul, 6 v This 18 a better definition «fa miracie, | never couid | Beecher and my pastor.” it implied something elevated, when confronted with the accusation of pernicious ‘a story; 18 any doupt of lls exalted moraitty and purity of uduct. uid probably break down im tell | ¢o; ‘of intensity And possivility of repuke, The mag having seduced Mra, Tilton, m profound sorrow L Beecher, quoting from severai iettors of the former i secret; it ing it; but’l have faith im my mformaut, wh 360 and making comments by the way. ' ll be at rest. ‘Th ee eer uo | The foreman of the Jury had turned aside his | Was not only Mr. Becoper, but “my pastor,” | fel, Hemores acer phon te mouths ; it tea w y wi | and that is a | wonderfa implication in | from tesumony paseag SPIRITUAL DELUSION. interests; It 18 @ #&cret Of too grav | was giving: bes pote dS t = Sam petest | head with asmile of incredulity, “Youmay mot | tha: ‘form, as we shall see. In answer | the subject, and gontinued +— yell, Z “ s — : the ” : | : Continuing his addres: ter recess Mr, Beach 4 character to be trusted to the ject of miracles, and giving @ definition of th believe it, sir,” thundered forth the counsel; “you =. Re which seems oi a = pam vad A Ry 4 bes trae eee Felerrea to the argument of Mr. Evarts taat Mra. Pilton could not have fallen except through some Wolrltua! delusion. He called atsention to @ char- @cter in Sir Walter Scott's “Woodstock,” Master Tompkins, ho fought with the Bibie on Ris lips, @bd who la spite of bis rigid Puritauiem was not sitegether impreguavie to the influence of beauty. imations hereafter exeept upon the trutafal rec- grus and tu@ evidences in these documents which jig rustic hearers Was a little uncercain about it, | the evideuce I present you with alter listening for | I possess and hoid as the representative of these parvies, aad | Will build hem.” Now, it has, tomy mina, considerable significunce, gentiemen. It bas been suid all along by our jearned friends that Mr. Tilton waa “worried and excited aud spurred oy bis necessities and difficulties with Bowen ; be had fallen from a bigh position, his resources been reduced, he was in perplexity and Want; the subject entirely satisiactory to Nimseif, but one of , Tue definition was too learned; \t #as not prac- tical enough and he did not understand it. ‘The man, at the end of the services, addressed t, “Your Reverence, 1 did not quite i Your explanation of a miracle; cal not you make it a littie more plain’ “Yes, Pal tara round,” sald the priest, and there was denend spasmodic extension of the fexor mi e may smile sarcastically, but you cannot disregard thirteen days to counsel on the other side. J am entitled to attention from the jury, and from each anc every one of you,” This remarkable break in | une address created a decided sensation. Chester Carpenter, the foreman, kept bis head turned away from the speaker during this scorcning re- tral pt se UI that this womau, #0 exaited | indulgence of love 1s innocent, that we cannot never reach the x original charge ig 1 Dot unfortunate, gentie~ men, that Mr. Tilton, even by the forzetfaincss, the ‘mdwweretion, tue recklessness of coun: Should be subjecte these dishonoring refieo- tions upon his character? My friend Porter be- ee He read Tompkins’ plea for seduction to Phebe, | goiden A " ge Was embarrassed and @ failure, and 1 he forester’s conghter, the subject of whicn was | Sewes citable and ‘Tertiees.” WHY, gentiomen, | Gi ivecuersimh Of tue Priest, whica semewnes | puke, All the defendant’s counsel and thede- | control the passions end conditions ar | sine with the Gusset Pateondivion of eis Cie fear in the thought and not in the corporal act | ail these things had heen yacified and silenced; | when be got hiwael! turned round tn a at | fendant himself appeared uneasy, Br. Beach | SUF mature; we cannot shut our eyes | Tr Vttas Out Shas tie oustge is cnicanded. dass Ge aa ef wetoowve consates, Coenen | Sere was’ "no chord retention 70m, Snstneed | RC eee eer Ns ah Oe eee deen coin | Wat tented. Gnd there ares no telling what he bearts to the approaches of tenderness | Evarts follows it by charging mutilation of this drow on analogy between Br. Beecher difficulties; there were none of those perplexities would have been a miracle.” so tacmton® ir | Might say. A scene was anticipated by every- tions of those who ate lovable, there- | letier. We reler to the proof Wo find that whem fad «Master Tompkins m toeir modes Siting from straitened Yncome pi ape ns my [riead has any uncertainty on that subject, if | body. Counsel fairiy bearded the jury, and belare peal tad seatnay sore SS which | it was refuted en otalco “oharee, tnd ME wares Of reduction, Tompkins held tm his discourse to | fot lan Tar lw reds sre thous smuarracament | hove sumalt co 8 Jartber sllustration, tt Wik 08'S | ke stopped the fereman’s face turned to RIN | jove ts manticsted ang tuiensiied,” Nobody could | Very properly acknowivaged the refuiing proof, Peeve that to the saints, one of which ke was, | or car, What was the trouble which thus ais- week ago, (Laugater and applause.) This ulus- | SalD. | ve such language. Waiter Scott ts supposed to nd yet, in submittiag Mis case to the Jury, ha many privileges were given that tue uagoaiy {¥*bed ihe miud of Moulton, wna tu view of wh ‘on ef Mr. Tiiton now you see, you must re- | BEECHER’S DELUSION. | have veen @ tolerably good scholar in bumau na- | makes a onsen . ” he determined to preserve these evidences bear- member, comes trom mr. Kvarts, who seated in | But, according to Henry Ward Beecher Mrs. | and yet he pever penned anything like that. | FIERCE ATTACK UPON THEODORE TILTON Gare not claim. Counsel admrttea that it was | ing significantly upoa it, whatever it was? It Was is arguafent that Tilton is a suited rnetorician, a | Tiltoo 18 @ truthful woman. Ag in and agaia | of | for the very act wich he first charged and then ) Man p 08a i: + witnesses to be exact as to the de- this dithcalty with Mr, Heecher, it was this secret vaingiorious, lofty and famous utterer of big | asked upon the stand if certain \hings were true withdrew. I kon't know, I dou’s velieve, wo ig ever your couclusion may be, aithougt you suould falls of an eveut that Occurred some time previous to their testifying; but they could never forget tn regard to Beecher, and it was in view of that Wat he came to this devermination to act in the Manner he did; and yet the gentleman would have words, he gives iu everything the idea of sermon- izing, @nd that every word must be Tolied out with the utmost dignity, Thatis the mau who ts | @s ConLected with the assertion Of Mra Tilion, his but if Fitazebeth KR. answer was, ‘1 don’t reco! What did she say CN ‘Piiton said #o 1t ts true.’ Beecher?’ Writing on the 26h of Januury, ters there was # Master Yo! nd his redoubtable lronsides, = of give the fullest testimonial in favor of tne im. ‘rity and the truth and the honor o! Theodore ‘Tilton—I doa’t believe im the long years to coma the great centrai fact of am edwission made to ts believe by the testimony of these arbitrators | taixi: aod we must know to woom. That is er that ali this trouble between @eccher ana Mr. | what Mr. Evaris says about him. Well, Mr. “Pour letters from you reacved me ti , ine | fought with the Bibieon his lipsand | he will ever recover from the damage of these wc- them of such a great crime as edutery D7 69 fii ad Leen composed by sUbUsSION LO THOSE | pays this relation was made by Te ee yarte | cluding one to Sirs. Desmond and Oil Toute | Who was as independent @ preacher.as Plymouth | cusations, They have been made (oo long: thoy 1 did not go to Mrs, D.’s wedding, | C#¥TCh—o law unto itself, judging for itsel!, ae- | come irom sources too high and powerful, and prominent a man as Menry Ward Beecher. Coun- wel referred to the services of Mr. Beecher in Hngiend as an argument made by the other side fo free the Geiendant trom the charge of adal- tery. geatiemen anu by their award. Mr. Beach begins to grow hoar: dealing with a very Gry element in the scandal, the Bowen arbitration, the most abstruse and un- interesting part of the whole case to the gencral Te has been | | the discovery of bis Wife’s gulit, irom whom he had just learned of this adultery, and was raging witn jeniousy, for the Scriptures say, ‘Jealousy is the rage of @ man.”’ The old, Old story, good to tefl at a th spread a cheerful fecling throughont the audt- to you. as it was celebrated at Mrs, Merriem’s, in Spring- field. Mother went on, and has not yet returned, I wil forward your letter, though not the kiss. J think in reference to Oliver's (that is Oliver Joha- son) Opinion of Mr. B. (that is Mr. Beecher), as nis rewaras (remarks, probably) were made to Mr. knowledging no allegiance to presbyteries aad council aud synods, W THESE 1RONSIDES, ho preached at every tterval between the battles, and who fought with the courage of re- hgious zeal, were very remarkable characters. grand as | think bim to be tn many of the at. tributes of manhood, learned and cultivated, and industrious aud truthfal and honorably as you may believe him to be, yet he hae upon him @ ‘weight of calumny and suspicion which evea the ad sirength of his character must be MP, DEAOH'S ADDRESS, Shortly after eleven ck Mr. Beach resamea | PUPIC. But remy sl ronson ned phewge on ence. Mr. Beecher smiled aii over his tace and, Bowen. and they are ae? Fan ae This Master Tompkins was qiamous exkerver of | br i "eae Lae Mi J aoe) Sonne Geproe euelase tame enpeemed ap Hy prone ae ean Pia Pye dedi pinnae cube S| the Judge was moved to languter. Mr. Beach Is seouan ‘vecy dimarent through tuo coloring thas | Opening of this case? How, low will the bue theory tm ween guilty of | 500) ane Aveathesmacsogd prtaystnd not equal to ar. Evarts at this kind of work, bat | Mr. Bowen iay give it. Oh! how my soul yeari | defeuce which 18 made on behalf of Mr. Tuton in Gisuomoradio aitbiess conduct io fis failure Of AOC Ore paiatavie feaure of the Scaudal, =| 46 gory ne bad to toll Was Very suort audsimple, OVeT you two dear men! You, my beio Hee correctious of the errors aud its replulve of te pte BE pg mer g — bbe, ays Mr. Tiiton. Through all thie difficalty, wad heen | Aid needed Little skill In narration. | oes aot, Rote mein send than hon ereaiate aim | fon, ever 1 ch with ine antidote the wide citou. Of the eward made by the fnsisting that Mr. Seosner hai been guilty of an MURS. TILTON’S CONFRASION, | as he ts keeping us? On! jet us pray for him. You into contact lation and the poweriul Impression which such Mr. Tilton end offeuce toward him; air, Beecter himself Bad Then he repeated tae statemeas of the Woman | are not Willing to leave bim top! vil influences bold forester, | Wee wot prpen es 2 yp Ad Fad = ee? You & ir the in. founds tion of tue ‘Ol course, | have confessed tt; 1 mean not In the general nature— yet reeking With the stains of adultery, apd Bis Which sarround him. usion with He ia in & a misteken 10 bis jory, geutiemen, You can do something toward ible, on the pa in, the to Whicn | *hal: allude hereasierto prove the truth §lnanner, as said, would have been astonisning, | regard to himself and pitifully | tostimony of Mr. » ug tv @ COUVEerBali of thia accusation—but m his statement belore | even giving to Mr. Tiltun the character he 18 sald | opinion of yor Jean never rest satisfied th her by odering to carry the pitcher. | justice. Bome ten days subseque )$h@ arbitration aod | wis own picked comuitice he admitted an offence. | to possess, ot being & wordy, | and pompous | You voth age eye $0 eye und jove one another a4 Sle resented this, und be says:—“Stand up, |. But another singular argument was usen by the tue award. It 8 mm gentlemen, to draw ‘Theodors Tilton had been denounced through the | taiger. When was it? On the 20th of becomber. | you once did. This will not come to passas ish maiden, ond know that sin for which man ts | learned counsel, Mr, Evarts, He alluded with be- Your atiention to this wpe. Myr. Storrs saya vet | Whole jengti and breedth of this land as 4 cal. | Tue confession of his wile bad been made in Jilly | quickly by estri ments, But, with ail tue | punished with tie vengeance of heaven Mos pot | coming pride to the efforts of Henry Ward Beecher Bir. Mouivon conversation of which umamiator of Menry Word Beecher. Everywhere Vevious, ANG it Was Chit coniession he was rei@t- | ng, 1 comant you both to | im the act, but in the thought of the siuner. Be- | amoug the populations of England, it was ata peaks, said m Wi.kesoa, as he called Bim, he had been denounced as the assailantof the | mg. For #ix months he bad stayed his hand, and iy biessed you both, aud | lieve, lovely Phebe, tat to the pure all acti | great crisis in our history. A great struvgle ve- had eitiv or Writes to bim, proudest pastor of the greatest pulps ofthe land, he came to that interview wito sir. Beecher ander why [ was brougat pure, and that sin ts In our thougat not ween the different sections of this Common- quested him arly to burn Mr. B Conia Theodore Tliton kave submitted to tuls ar- a restraimt warranted and bound with the ipl know not, yet actions, even as the radiance of the day is a ‘Wealth was Waging. The question of liberty or Apology and Moulton said, Wliration, this question affecting his honor and in- | rage of a strong mau baruiny within him, but he fe has made my soul to the bilnd man, but is seen and enjoyed by him | ery, the question of union or «ivision, was “On yes, | have bu or Mr. ner tegrity ond dame, Without claiming a Single Word | Was Under & promise And @ pledge to talk vo this @che so Verily as the apparent jack of Ch: who has eyes to receive it, To him who is but a | jaucing fearfully in the scale of eveuts, ‘There *hmke i have.’ Then be remarked, ‘ir Sam Wilke- of justification in-the award f- without, at least, man MD terms Of iriendsbip. He was sent by bis | manliness m vis beloved man. Mattie f bevice in the things of the spirit muchisen- | were Lae brave and true-hearted patriots who, gon thinks lbave burned ali tuese papers be ts Gertrand that the offence which Henry War wile for that purpose. She had learned of this do. 1 saw her to-day.” Mr. Tilton bad learned | joined, much is prubibited and he is fed with milk | Gisvelieved in the power of tne North wnd in the. qnistaken, What Would Llucodore do im ease of Beecher. confessed, however limitod it may be combination wiica had been formed by Mr. Bowen | from Mr. Bowen, to say nothing Of bis oWn ex- | fit for babes. For himare ordinances and prohi- | strength of the Union to maintatn it indivisible > Troubie?’ He says again on cross-exam om, and whatever ite Character, suould have been de- | for tae persecution of Mr. Beecher—ii you call % perience, that this maw, so noble And proud and | ditions and commands; but the saint ls B00) and it was in that exigency that the aniiavstty “Well, this was the om jon as leaid: i cared by those arvitrators, that he might hold it | persecuvion—and she was alarmed, and pressed exaitec, Who was nothing bat *@ White sepul- these ordinances and restraints, To lim, as the | Ol England in its aid to the South and in its cold commenced about the tri te nettement; as far up as tis fustifiestion aga these foul and de- upon ber husband the terms made at the time the ve,” Who was occupying the grandest pulpit on chosen child of the house, Is given the pass key | codutevunce to the North Was sustaining the as | how rememver, | ko Lad auy taik With structive ass@ults apon iia honor aud fame ? Why, | Coufession was given In Joly. Well, now, geutle- | earth, that he was an unworthy mun; that he was | to open all locks which withhold him irom th | audacious rebellion, as Henry Ward teecher be« him before, ang } was teil that Mr. Bowen gentiemen, it seems to me one o! the most pre- men, J agaia recall your attention to tals Aj prompted by @ reward for general mo joyment of bis heart's desire. Into such p' | lieved, as many great men in this country be- Jelt that we b ht iu two large a sum; his | posieroos propomtions that could be advanced, | statement on the part of Eheodore Tilton, Mir, truih and honesty, and he says, “This man shi patus willl guide thee, lovely Phebe, an meres with faise ideas witn regard to the issue Bons leit agurieve 4 then, Guring tis eonver- and it is only done for the purpose of reviling ana | Bowen oa Monday, the 26¢h, bad told to Tilton the no longer defile the Church of rk he ino Unite in joy and in Innocent freedom the pleasures | of tha! pens conflict, in regard to the cardinal gation, Mr. Moulton Swid tha: Sem Wilkeson had catumuiaung toe gentiemag who at that day | adulterjes of Beecher. If toat statement Waa longer preach in tue robes of bis hypocrisy to | which to the privileged are not prohivited.” Well, | principle which lald at the root of the hostility elthet seen Bim Of written bim—I would not be etvod unchalianged @ud wnrebuked by Mr, | false, 1 no such comuuntcation and charge hed | trusting souls; he shal) r miniously eke 18 THR VERY SENTIMENT ATTRIBUTED TO | @nd the fight. They knew and bolleved that tha which—thet he wanted bim to ourn, tobe Beecher, or any of the iriends of Mr. Beecker, | been made by Henry ©, owen to Tilton, and ifme | resign.” And it was @ gi ‘and thing, it was TBNRY WARD BEECHER reat question Was one of servitude or irecdom ta , Mr. Beecher’s “pology and ail the as the most bonorabie and truest frieod seut | had ‘not undertaken to Tilvon, ag Tilton swears he | pretty brave, it was protty insolent—toe man who by the mouths of two or three witnesses, It 14 | avo, and Henry Ward Beecher under bad, why did not they ask Mr. H Bowen as to | could assume the hardihood to say that to Heury | tie mode tn whioh he is Cg higt Dy acdressed | aud performed, nobly and gloriously the task o| a Mr, Moulvon says, vy the providence of God, as Mr. Beecher saye, ‘They had the means Ward Beeoner in the position which he occupied, this lady, and united ul other indu- | « t disavusing tue mind of England, reaching ri all the papers; Mr. Beeoner thinks lnave,’ tor his protection and defence, Then there | the truth of that marrative? earns s he eth seem Wiikeson thinks | bay wae no steptoton of Mr. ‘Meshons then tnere wi of then overturning ts by our own witne: with the proud qualities which he possessed—aye ences which clustered around him hearts of hor middie class a of ber yeomanry, burned af! those papers be | pees. co NO degrading accusations agaist Mr. Moulton; | called and coreere by the fact that we calle ed—aud surround cap itn uplitted beads ber ge MN ips ge — agit e Re ll rae oe (oI " able’ Then fr the stand, above any Im; mtrol the dest! o would Theodore 40 in case 0! Yhen there were no revilings wud musterings from | bim to 9 ae Meine man woo aa | man versed in all toe iaereaciee of buzsan khowl- | country. Ana he wae met with, derision nd nded to Mr. Storrs the letter of Sam Witkeson,"' be. as roe iv ting that Moulton nia taps mr. Beesuer, Mr. Muulton was then the stall upon which Mr. beecher lewned, end leaned with ao ceive, represen fs requests 0 UFR Mak Memerd Ua | CATO CYUAYCROG WHA ful Lhce wad ayy ik | WOU RO wail wad polradg part, a witness whom they saw on on to Tilton was aa adversary Ww 2 Bs, Ad Doow Ukehom: | basamie ai . It ia bravery, but he came tha family doadlation, whan | rience, trac out the omeretion of human no 23 & Fumancar. DUS 164 scorn. fie was asgalied at hiv meetings, whera | Gddseaaca warn ko be delivered unui Hs RUlOke