The New York Herald Newspaper, May 25, 1875, Page 4

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

4 NEW YORK HERALD, TUESDAY, MAY 25, 1875.—TRIPLE SHERT. ALN AGONY. “THE DRO ‘Opening of the Twenty-first Week of the Great Scandal Trial. KING TO THE JURY. PORTER STILL St ———_+—__— ‘What Tilton Thinks of the Coun- sel’s Menacing Gestures. “THEY ARE SIMPLY GROTESQUE.” An extraordinary scene was presented yester- day in tue court room of the Brooklyn Court House in the Beecher triai wien the pleader, ex- Jutge Porter, tarsed upon the plaintuf in the case In scurillous abuse and turned thea to the defendant in language of extravagant eulogy. ‘The court room was about as full as ever, The heat was rather oppressive, but neither Mr, nor Mra. Beecher appeared aifecte: in the least. Mrs, Beecher kept her eyes steadily Mxed on the earnest Porter, who spoke ta the same zealous strain as he adopted at (he beginning. Porter was far clearer and more earnest than ever he was before, yet bis arguments were curious. He per- sisted in the line of eloquent tik aimed at the destruction of Tilton’s reputation, as i that ac- complishment could justiity Beecher. On one oceasion he turned round upon (he piatntid in o most menacing aod insolent manner, and while abusing bim right soundiy and cabling Tilton a scoundrel in @ high pitctiea tone of voice, he suddenly dashed his clenched, nervous fist almost into the face of the man he was Viluperating. AS’ he (Porter) did so lilton lowered his head and handed Mr. Beacn a note on some previous point made by the speaker. Tais movement, though not intended to avoid Mr. Porter, aisconcerted im for a moment, and ois hind went sawing in whe air like a irightenea bird seeking a place of rest. So constant were the gesticulations by Mr. Porter when alluding to the pluint™, thas they were commented on by many, and when one of Mr. Tilton’s counsel was asked what his principal thougnt of the gestures, the lawyer replied :—Ob, be looks npon them as simply grotesque.” At any rate Tlitem takes the matter very calmly and coolly. ‘The lawyer may be entitled to many privileges. He is certaimy entitled to mine @ Witness to the fullest extent of his ability and elicit the trath atany cost; but the methoa adopted by Mr. Por- ter in speaking of and to the piaintif in this case has no parallel im American jurispradence. He acknovledged thts ‘act himself during the day. Still, he is effective and ieaves a clear eld for the more po.isued Bvarts, who wil speak ia courtly language. Mrs, Beecher wore her cust) mary look of placid feeling and Mr. Beecher was as strong and seli-re- lant in nis bearing ag if no charge under heaven had ever been presented against bim. The pastor of Plymouth church evidently enjoys the invec- tives of bis counsel, and, when a hard was made, | 4° as — joyonsly aboy. At ze Porter alluded to iilton’s statement that Mr. Beecher did not love his wife, As he did so both smiied and looked into eacn otber’s eyes, exchinging @ Look of conn- dence fiat was touchiog. The day was an impor- tant one for (ne defence, but the plaintif’s ceun- gel took voluminous notes for future use, Ever since Judge Porter vegan his address Mr, Beach bas taken copious nores of Porter's argument, and Will combas all bis points wita his character- istic foree and energy. Frank Mouiton came in the first time since the evidence was closed, and he listened with a> parent interest to the adaress, taking Nis share of the vituperation coolly aud good bumoredly. in fact, be seemed to enjoy the sensation, Mr. Porter will probably conclude his address at id will be at once followed by Mr. jefence will thus hold the attention court yesterday for noon to-day Byarts. Thi of the jery, as both specches will be united, there being ho jong break between the speakers. ‘fais was evidently the aim of the counsel on the Beecher side when they procured an adjournment on Friday. Porter » a8 enablea yestercay to take up his discogrse and carry it ou to # fitting end, end as hw sits Gown Evarts will take up tue argu- went. JUDGE PORTER RESUMES. Jadge Porter took up the letter of contrition and called the jury’s attention to the circum- stances uncer Which Moulton alieged Mr. beecuer it, apd which jetter the defendant der Wrote, and continued;—l bave trasiea this to Pr: ys that Mr. Beecher bad dictated this letter, every word, irom begin- ping to end, from Alpuato Omega. Thatis the only letter be ever dictated that contal guch utterances; the only letter sings to man's estate that sy Ae eyen wood giammatical Engi How cowl poed that this man, a mis. ery inteliectaai department of knowledge, v @ preacher, an orator, Who |i ae WasiD a maduouse would still be eloquent, now could he come into the presence of a dear iriend like Moulton and be- coe all at once a puny scuooigiri Who could not write bis mother tongue? Aud, again, not ® word in this letter in connection with the evidence of ‘iiton. Moa)ton says he wrote it under the directim o: Henry Ward Beecher; that he dictated every wora of it; that be beard hun (Moul:on) read every word oj Wt; that he (Beecher) approved every word of tt; that ne afterward read every Word Of it nimseif, and thea when Moulton asked him to sign it that be refused point bia to siga it. Some explana- tion is needed for this. It is periectiy obvious, Why, @ man Knowing (he contents of the paper, who'was tne author of it and who intended io write {t when he dictated it, Beard ic read and approved of it, it ls inccmprenensible why he should reruse 0 sign It afier having dictated it, Toen come tne words, “i have trusted this to Frank Moulton in confaence.”” Way, you all Know the wbject. Noultou bevter sign tis”? = He “Certainly not; it i not my Mouiton . 2 had beter sign it and trust It to me to apytning \o get Mr. ber’s Bame to it. Mouitom Bnew he tre though be Was Dis enemy; he koew waat ne had written there, bt er did b ery pever sunk jower. In (his connection Mr. Beeciier permitted tim to use ine letter. frank Mouitoa bas been a sham from toe b 7 adore Tilton has given hii the repatation ol a literary man, ne has giveu hima toe ation of @ manct large and beundiess w wired a cheap repuiation for gea he would go iu the ete time and tide | eivquent Man, a rhetorician, r, a genius; as such AlMoss the foremost 2 On this Cont ent. Frank Moulton struts io borrowed piumage, to wake the Most o it, This giowitig tribute to the piaintims genius led some people to imagine that Mr. Porter had ex- bausted Ins Vituperative magazine and was on enother tack, Tiltoa took his Gvmpiiments in the ome spirit he bad sustained nis invectives—impas- sionately and without visibie emotion; ang it was well he Gid so, (oF the counsel soon reopened his torrent of abase, haying ooly complimented Til- on i order the better to cut up Moulioa. TUE CHAMPION WITNESS. In the course of this comtroversy he (Moniton) has acquired a reputation utterly anmerited, aud he jitie undersioud, Waen General Tracy was ex- amininy bim, the aBswers (hat were drawn from ’ ‘The man who went from the stand, adver- he country as the mpion wit . ve jittie thoagBt woen on tae gland, in reply to the questions pat to mm, that he was scutuing his own swip torough the frug- teen or fourteen days be Was the staod under cross-examination. And ‘his same part; of such vrilient hteraty ability—bear in mtn that Moulton confesses that these ietiers which he Wrote jo Mr, Beecher, and which were after- ward 7 hed in graputo romance in every wud hich were so mecn sion Of sharp, trencuaat, e bimseil Confesses that Tiftof's writings, if they Were dictated These are statements whion have h to the world which have given him, I might say, not ony an Americas but & Kuropean reputation for maignity, for Ditterness, jor imvective, for adroitness, bat also for @ fair order of literary = inveleet—compelied — to econiess that each of taem irom = the frst word to the vast; was from the pen Of the celebrated American statesman, end Were ine result of two week's labor but all writtea by General Benjamin F. Buvier— the very 8 be wrote to Mr. Beecher, =peax- ang o1 Thi aD advent man to woom he was Duder every Obiigation, Who would Het permit him to return to Mr. Beecher o14 own property oF eb perm: Him to lovk ut it. Une of tnewe let $ Was Written by General Buvier, the otner by neodore Tii'ot. And we very sentence where ne tells, On the Sth of AUST, “i WH Ree Tiron and endeavor to procure his consent, tnat ne (Beecher) may read DIS OWN cocaments—even that came irom the hands of Tucon; it was Ti. ton’, pen that Wrote It. Ana yet Moulion at- ty convince you that he Was the master ton .tee = menial. Not *O—not #0, tH Triton was the master from a is wae in fis = diabolical eo (fl all these crafty, maigoant weriee Wi Wrougat out wito oe, of an artisan, ored at Volcan's forge, and wntcn gave direction to everything that Moulton talked about of “grinding Tilton to powder,” and dectai lng himself as belug ready to “smite him to the | earto” it he “attempted io erueify Henry Ward Beecher.” Braggart and liar as he is, | bave sald | there are other circumstances in the case to | which I ought to advert tor the purpose of en- avlng you to appreciate these poiats, wick, in themselves, may de of small moment—that 1s, whether or not Henry Ward Beecher is guilty of adultery, and which will show that Moulton, i- stead ol the fine senolar he would feign, is sim- ply am ignoramus, Lt is significant, however, in another aspect, Great misciief bas been done to Beecher by the pubdlication of letters im which language 18 imputed to him of am extravagant, sensational character, which he never could have employed and never did employ, Every one appeared to accept these expressions, knowing the strong, vehement ex- Prevsions Mr, Beecher uses. Do you suppose if a scoundrel wants to lorge your hame that he would C muke bis forgery as like your signature as pos- sible? A Wun With te brains and craft and WICKEDNESS OF TLLTOS when preparing to destroy his enemy, would see to it that tuere would be a similitude or » lLkeness to the atyie of writing, uted to Mr. Beecner by Tilton, by Moulton, and, I am sorry to say, by Mrs, Moulton, all bear the stamp of Tilton’s matice. You remember that greais word, “paroxysmal,’? which to this day furnishes occasion to ali those un- favorapiy disposed to Mr. Beecher, imputing from the eharge that he used the word, that he was guilty of the base crime of adultery. and yee tne words ‘paroxysmal kiss,” who ever heard Trom the Ups of Mr. beecter, save by the two men, the conspirators here, Theodore Tilton and Frank Mouttoa’ In the first place the expression ts one which Mr. Beecher ts utterly incapable of utter- ing. And there 1s @ difference between & man With brains and without # heart, anda man with brains and with a heart as well, When Beecher speaks ne speaks Jorcible, living, burning words. Bul the sham woo kvows notniug but the sounds of words may yet be cap nivting terms of expressions to give them the sig- nificance he desires, On that pight—tuat snowy night--Mr. Beecher Is said to have taken occasion to deliver himself in this wise—to aman who to that day never crossed his threshho.d, and whose toresanold be (Beecher) for the lirst time crossed that nighi—not an abswer to a question puk to him, bata yolantary thing oa his part. «4 stand on the brink o( a mora! Niagara.’ ’? That is, Tilton, not Beecher. Do you think that Henry Ward Beecher would speak of a moral Niagara? He would as scon talk of a mora! haystack or & moral swamp. There is no meauinsin suck words.’? As the speaker uttered these short, sharp, incis- ive sentences, his voice rose and mis Nand, tight.y clenched, went up 1m tne air like a catapult, and he glared hercely at Mr. Tiltop, who returned nis | gaze serenely. Mr. Porter is too harsh in his treatment of the principal in the case, and few of the spectators outside the Beecher circle seem tolike it, Ashe taiks of moral swamps a smile ripples over Mr. Beecher’s face, and all those around him seem to euloy the epithets huried at Mr. Tilton, The plaimtitr bases himseif in taking notes, and when he ceases he looks long and cari- estly at the defendant. COINING WORDE. With Beecher worus have meaning; there is life and spivit in his words; significance and © hereucy in them. But with Tutop, a “mor: Niagara,” and the incongruous ideas which tt con- veys, Would have @ rhetorical charm ior him, @ud Ge puts tuem in tne lips of Beecher a8 lis language. | might multiply examples of this run- | Ding Lorough the testimony of Tiiton, Moulton | and Mrs. Moalvon, where they impute language to him oe never used and never was capaoie of using. That paroxysmal kiss has been taken up by all the country newspapers hostile to us, and they will taik of Heary Ward Beecher’s parox- | ysmal kiss of tue woman he attempted to ravish. Allow me to read tis paper and to ask you whether you believe that aman like Henry Ward Beecuer qeliberately dictated @ word or wrote @ Word of such Sentences 3 are Contained in the letter of contrition, Judge Porter read the letier, parsing and criticising what he pointed out a8 grammatical blunders, suck, aé he claimed, Mr. Beecuer could never have made. From that lester Tilton argues that Beecher intended to admit tae commission of adultery (quoting trom tue letier); ‘she is gulltiess, sinued against, bear- ing the transgession of another.” Tiitoa denies the divine principle, He rejects that absolutely, that Divine influence created ali human beings, even the injerior apimais—male and female— created He tuem, Bat here 1s @ case of male adul- tery only. Way, What @ foolish thing tt wus to create Kve, Adam alone coula have been the Progeaitor of all the posterity that sprung irom Doth, according to Tilton’s theory. You eee that tne very language cf vne letier utterly excludes the idea that Beecker was coniessin, adultery, even if that were ms own writing in- stead of Frank Moulton’s. Tilton, Whe once Wor- suipped in Beecher’s charcn and koew bim, thoughts that “his extravagance of expression was the thing to make the letter appear as rer's—folaed hands seemed eloquent; amoral Niagara eloquent; “‘simned agains’ was elo- quent—aill these purases seemed to Dim just the ¢ Beecher should write and speak and give ulterance to, “She is gail'less;” he is ap adulterer witlle there 18 no adulteress. I have de- tuined you too long up this point, but she question bus to be discussed, pears to me @ pal- #Wears to that 18 NOt to be beueved waen he sw to any fact which Ie opposed tu the Oath Oo: an bonest man. Mr. Porter then read the letter of Mrs, Tilton to Beecher of May 5, 1871, in whieh she asks bim for bis forgiveuess forever having made any charge | @iainst bim, dnd continued :—Gentlemen, what ‘Was the occasion of that letter? Isit a letter of | T gs these men would have you bettever leligr ot an agulteress—ot ope « uiting in past jasciviousn NO; js the letter of an fal Praken, and con- trite woman to the mi had wrong But it wes tne dishonest device of Tilton to coo Vert tne language of purity into the Ian, of confession of guilt, Much iujury has beeo done to Mr. Beecher in the estimation of those who will not watt for the defence by the publication of bis Jetter of the 2uth of Jacuary, 1872. Cousse! then contended that there was some- thing crue! ia the platnia’s endeavor to preja- dice the community against an ignocent man, He urged that it was desirable the jury should peep +2 View that the sult Was not Drought by Mr. Moul- won. It was a suit brougnt by Tweodore Titon— he who was allegea to have been wronged. Here the speaker becomes very impressive; for he apparently feels the importance of the occa- sion, and is eloquent as be proceeds, His manner improves, aad ne devotes himself entirely to the jury and jess vo Tilton, wao, pertaps, imagmes be is in the dock. As Mr. Porter argues the audience follow hit closely, and bis Words Rave an evident emect. if he TILTON A LIAR. (connsel) cou satisiy the consciences of the jury teat Theodore Tutva, ade the accusavion Wasa lar— na! that he did not belleve, and never dia believe, the @ccusation Which be put furth—whatever otuer people migat thmk they would quire what ot witnesses m! ulierly unimportant what cunning devices had been resorted to im the preparation of the case by iaintif, Counsel commented severely on tne piaiutid as A so-called Chfisuaa leader, and went on to say that such Was the man who demanded from the jury @ verdict to strike down the vet Whose head was whitened in the service of ret jon. Nothing but a stern sense of duty com- pelled him lO speak so barsuly of the ptainuf. rhe cases were, inueed, very rare where such language woula be agmissivie. But tnis was no case jor @ compromise. if Theodore Tliton's ae- cusation Was alse, u be had saborned hia wife as he proiessed to have done, if be had made use of @ vilain to do the work of destraotion, then there was no pity for him. And while he knew that h that be Lad said would cause pain to bis towara toe was conspiracy tO S$p-ak ol #uck mea as Was tho ofthem. He askea tne jury were they goin admis the statements of two ilars againat the oath Of ao honest man. Those men said they lied cecause they wanted to lie, and they now said they told the trusm because they had no motive to He. Moulton said he lied out of consideration for Henry Ward Beecher’s position; Tilton said he hed out of tender aad deucecy toward hia wile. Under tne circumstances their Oaths ought be rejected. Counsei v com- mented OF the evidence of Mra. Moulton. He sub- Mitted that sue Was swearing in the interest of @ Villald and & tralto§ Whom she aamitied she for- merly denounced, DIPPING INTO THR RVIDENCE. Let as, continued the counsel, take tne decia tion, for instance, of Mr. Tilton, woich is proved by Mr. Storrs in July, 1874, at Mr. Ovington’s Doose, aNd after his Wile bac left him, storrs says the conversation turned on the subject of his Wie’s leaving him, @nd he said that he had not id anything about it, bu that he must now 1380 Elizsbeto and Mr. Beecher. These women Smashers come into cuurt and ask you tweive men to help Wem smash the woman. Take the occation of the interview with We find what bis troupie was, Nov that Mr, Beecher had commitied sduitery, “He #uid Mr, Beecher had not come to nis help.” This 18 a8 early a8 1872 “That be Was @ man of such power that he could, with bis little finger, bave lifted oom up out of his troubles; bat toat he had jaid on the sidewalk in Brookiyn, crashed and ruined by Bow: treatment of him, im conae- quence of hfs loss of employment on those two papers.’ There was bis trouble. ‘and the injury Gone to his reputation was suc Who With bis litie Onger had the power to lift him Op and rematate him, had passed bim by indifferent ana ha helped Him, Rad left Dim lying there. Moving Gcrous the room, Deck and forth. im great ement, lie said ne would pursue Henry Ward soher to the grave. Tha: ne may do, but he calls Upon you to help him to hound MF, Beecher to the grave. This is the kind of piainti? who presents His cause vefore this eminent juriet and velore you And Who has Ocoupted 4 bail a year of your time in order that be may be reinstated ia re- spect to the pecuniary josses he haa sustained by Mibking Use OF (he Fepulution Of Bis Wue sud Mr. Wilkeson. ‘The declarations attrios | ole of ingeniously using | the legitimacy of his cniidren and the character of a Christian clergyman a3 the means of rein- statement. Agaia, in speaking in reference to | the clause im the tripartite ment, The pre- | cise words he used were:—“i will never sign any | Agreement which wil prohibit me from pursu | Beecher, frem pursuing Henry Ward Beecher.” ad no scrupulous about it. You agreements, He Was Would have been broken just as readily. business Of bis lie has been audoing what be and violating pledges of honor, tn breaking all obligations, and promoting his own imterests at the expense Of all mankind, of his own ‘amily. Now take the testimon: Now observe, I have given you so tar the testi- mouy of Mrs. Moulton, Ii you believe ber descrip- tion of Theodore Tilton, What 1s bis character ? What is lis oatn worth? 1 have given you the testimony of Samue! Wiikeson. If you bedeve that, what is Tiltou’s oath worth? RLACKMAIL, Counsel then reviewed tne testimony of Jackson S. Schultz, and submitted that the plaintid had been doing nothing but blackmailing for years; that he bad lived on blackmail, nad indulged his own lust on biackmall, bad taken blackmail in the form of benefaction, taking it 1m any form on which it coald be got. He was ready to adopt any con- trivauce, even the same manner of fraud and spollation described when he put on Bowen's check the memorandum, ‘Spotis from new friends for the good of the old.” Mere, pul ras he wasol this reverend defendant, pursuer as he was ot thi Plymouth crew, determined as he was to biow the roof off from /’lymouth church, he was only satiated when they came to bis terms and settled with him on bis terms, And this 18 the Man Who telis you he didn’t Want mouey, and that when Frank Moulton took $5,000 apa put it aside, five parcels of $1,000 each, $5,000, when Frank Moulton gave him that | money be always closed his éyes, threw his nead backward and putitin his poeket—didn’t know where the woney came fro He had no record Of boat transaction, 1dou’t wonder that you truly said on one occasion when Franklin Wooarull talked with him on that occasion, “We won't dis- cuss the question whether Theodore Tilton knew where that money came trom,”’ Why, one of the jeading merchants of this Continent, a man of as ciear integrity a8 any man Who ever sat upon the bench, swears that Theodore Tiiton toid bim that ne would biow the root irom Piymouth church un- jess Plymouts chureh came to his terms, and on those terms appease mus wrath, 1 think Mr. Beecher was right when he told Mr. Redpath of this. He is notoften aman Who speaks against _ anybody, Mr. Redpath knew that Theodore iilton Was a myn, that money could assuage his grief, and when money would not do other meaus must be adopted, TILTON’S MALICR. Having referred at lengtn (o the evidence of Mr. Ovington, counsel Continued as foliows:—You may take Theodore Tilton among decent Christian people, and you find malice showing itself there, Take him with respectable jadies and be forces tt upon them. Go even to those resorts in which he found greater pieasure, and even there you find bim saying it, Wherever he went he carriea with him denunciations of Henry Ward Beecher, the same stories m rr wile, of bis own peridy, Again, ina conversation with Mrs. Ovingion after the puvlivation of the Bacon letter be said 1f was now his time for action | and he proposed to fight it out from twat moment. | Various expressions of the kind, figures of batue axes ana swords, and that be wouid not sheatu the “ais d that bi idk it th | sword anil Beecher was dowao. You may tirow away your shield; you will bever have use for it, in another conversation with Mr. and Mrs. Oving. ton he said:—‘I sali be tae samsou who will de- stroy the temple. will pull down the pillar of the temple on Mr. Beecuer, and, althouga my family are crushed, be sail be cruanea wits them.” Again in the testimeny of Mrs. Ovington, when the committee Was in session:—“Wuen be greeted us in tie plazza he spoke of Mrs. Tiiton, and Said ‘Sue isa trump, isn’t she? 1 e spoke Weill beiore the committee, and that she made @ favorable impression upon them; but it is alla fiction—all a fcuon,’ hen he spoke of & ficuon I think 1t was he satd:—‘Huzabeth will lie jor me; she will tell any number of es tor me. Eyea i] were on trial for tae Nathan murder and she saw me cominit the deed and she were called upon to Lestily, she would never testily against | me.’ pal ‘1 can hardly imagine such a case, Mr, Tilton. Yours is not a parailel Case. if an Innocent man was on trial for his 110 nd was about to ve cunvicted, and | was called on to testily, 1 believe that I should tell tbe traca, even alchough it convicted my husband, rather than the innocent should suffer,’ He satd, ‘No, you would not.’ y What did ne say to ‘that? A. He said, ‘No, you would not,’ "’ Mrs, oun. ton—“Yes, | would,’ He said Mra, Tilton had oniy done the duty of awife in going before them to he, and thacif he had committed the Nathan mur- éer,” &c. You observe that 18 one of the uses this man would put a womau to—to Le for her hus- band. That 18 @ part of the teaching of that school of which Theodore Tuton claims to be the head. 1 hope he will never bave such another disciple ag Moulton in that schooL Moulton says Mr. cher is 4 liar and @ Mbertme, Toat is the spirit with which this man comes to cast a slur upon the Feputation of a pure woman aud uprigut man. MOULTON A COWARD. Tie is the man who made two calls, one on a woman and the other on @ clergyman, and carried @ pistol for his provecuon, 1am Wroug as to the Gute; it was the day belore, Saturd: A man WhO was suck a coward that he needs a pistol in { ineodoro to The did + is coward when he goes to Mr. Beecher's and wants to impress nim wito a sense of his valor, that be shows the pistol, althongl there is bo eccasion to use it—thatis not the kind of man to talk apout shootng. He had betier not talk about the man 18 going 10 shoot down, But there is this to be embered, that Frank Moulton, uf he told the ul rem ‘truth, nad in nis Deart this toing—for this was after the breach—had in ark at that time a spirit which woul % derous, Ouly his peck The man whois only restrainet the fear of the gauiows is not s m by tweive sworn jurors. Observe, | do not believe that it was any Tore than idie bravado, but the Maa Who jokes about assassination is 4 man ofa | ‘ low order of moral instinct. Let no man, let mo j jet ho child, trust bim. Don’t trust nis till more do womat oath, day and explained wiy he sens or me, Upstairs and be said he wanted me t brother that he must not siga Church Committee report. e 4 Beecher confessed his adultery to him.” An honest Mau would have sped there, wouldn't be? He knew himself, be koew he was noi an bonest man, and therelore he add: Ana | can prove it.” Mr. Moulton had been brongat to the poist. He said he was going to drive Mr. Beecner out of }lymouta church and out of Brookiyn, At thls stage the Court took the usuai recess. APTER RECESS Jadge Porter said:—in auotner of these inter- views Mr. Mouitob ufconsciously daguerreotyped himselrt by the language be appued to s venerated clergyman in Gescriving him tv a member of Bis own church as @ liar and asneak. “liouor thy favs a thy mother that thy days may be long in the land which the Lord thy God givetu thee.” | The only commandwent, as the Kedeemer Wuich was coupied with a promise. The spirit of reverence for age extenas not merely to the parental relation, but to every other, and men like Theodore Tilton and Francis LD. Moulton im speaking of Ww °o ONE WHO IS HONORED, bat abroad, whom all the world not only at home, Teveres, andertaxe to (alk O/ im as they would of & str guard—a ilar and intermingling tuese men joinea er; y migat iniuse the blood of Moulton into Tito @ it would baraly aistarb a throb of tue pulse. Tal the current Wiich throbs in Tiiton’s veins and pub it in the bosom of Moulton, and it williind as Diack in Dis heart as it Would in Tiiton’s things Which little, base, Come temptidle men deligh\ in. If ileury Ward Beecuer had jallen, Wf it were true that the mao nad isgraced his calling ani family, if it Were true that a man #0 proudiy gitted of and so much ponored | of men, had. inatempted moment, yielded and fal Jeb,’ acknowledged and known of all me! the: o Classes of men of the baser sort wou! Fei and you and I and cacu of these his coum. sel here would have {cit a sadness they co scarcely Overcome. These men think that a lie ‘Wei, stuck to is a8 go0d as the trutti—tnat, in fact they can doudie and trebie the le and upom the jury; but you will meet them one by ol and form your oWn jadgment upon the charac of the men, Tem when @ Woman, & mother, who telis 0S that sue isa lady, reared in @ house of gentle dlood, taugut to revere God, to love God; she tells us that she, girl as she was, bravely, calmly looks the gfay-Daired man in e and tells him:—“Yoa have lied for sod = this, ss ims ober = own = house, her own roof, to an American gentieman, wi aside from tis being a Clergyman—'sir, you have added to your origipal crime ye or lying perjury. Have you the impudenee to expect to go to Plymouth church aud commane with 723) a liar and a perjurer? 1 cannot do it. Iw you what to do. Go down to Piymont and stand there and say, ‘vvllutea lcome to you, covered allover with leprosy. 1 come with Git hovor to myseifand my amily. | am aliarand &@ perjurer. Emima Moulton said to me this after- poon—'Sir, you are a beast, Wilh whom I caumot commune.’ She told me that in ber own house, t if i would come bere and say wo you that I, the pastor of Plymouth church, am an adu- terer, and that thougn she canuot forgive me, Plymouth charch will.” Frank Moaiton, taut memorable ist of June, 187%, pret he koew (his man Was & hypocrite, har and & \iberune, wrote to him, chureh and tell ue people of Pi and (hey and ali mankind can stand before the wo these are earmarks, and EARMARKS OF A PROGABILITY that you cannot reject. If I were to come before you, and, lilting my right hand in the presence of | Almighty God, say that | had left this court room and had gone to & household in the & iyo anid so conversed Wit a iriend, Mr. Beach, you would not pelleve it; you would know it was a We; even although | should volve mys in the accusation would Enow it not true. Now, wen a lad: American jady of education and of culty who would scorn tu be rude even to ® sori when she Was led by her husband to slory that she looked on this good man ar With bim of adultery as if (t were per aally pastime Salked of perjury (0 @ man Woo bad gever (akon ee, of Jackson 8, Schults. | pect to his own © 'b trust bis 0 nes his hpi agai tie emacs SP Stag its | “ne | i y of Brook. | oath before, who had Vibe a neh Sanat sate prove te ae iy e) re @ e m er ied in int matter. bus had been con/essing ail the time bis guilt, you gone need to Know any more about her than @he tells yeu. Lf yon feel as T do, that story would bever have iailen from her lips if God not visited upon her the calamity of binding her— 4 hope not beyond this liie~ to a man like Frank Moulton. Take this man Moulton, who wants | | you tweive men to believe Bis oath, who has the | em @ and say, “1 ask y 1 have sworn in the | Presence of A! language of Moulton to Armour on third volume, ‘This is the Man who appe: Court and to the adminis'rator of justice. You will see how he — talke witnesses, You can imagine how he would talk to jurors. He gentieman who is | stating @ fact within his u KkoOWledge, and | Frank Moulton endeavors to intimid, him | entering & court o! justice to swear to the because it is convenient for Moulton to swear to @ hie, He said be would make it ae then heil for anybody that testified against in. “HOTTER THAN HELL! | shonts Porter, and he pounds tho unfortunate | table once more, Then he repeats the phrase and | glarea at Tilton, The venemence of bis manner | | rouses the jury, who are evidently getting ured | of so much rhetoric, Carpenter, the foreman, | laughs, and the Beecherites lose momentary fulth | in him, while tne other jurors oil in thetr seats. Une looks ag though he might go to sleep, and there is an alr of inattention among them, Bat it 1s now @ trial of wits, for while Porter speaks to — the jury Beacn takes rapid notes and prepares to meet his arguments, Thus the true story of the trial wiil go to the jury. “Hotter than heil!? Were those relati grees | of heat the subject of discussionin Remsen street? | Is there @ housebola inhabited by respectabie fe- | males where thé women taik of s¢xuul intercourse | With clergymen? where tue charge of perjury is | made by the lips of women? where the men talk _ avout “making it hotter than heli’ for any man who fwlfils his duty and observes bis oath? Are you to expect Irom such quarters honesty, fairness and aregard lor trath? fo return once more to | Mr. Moulton, to show that he ig @ uo unworthy consort and miniou of Theodvre Tutom, who said | be was going to drive Beecher out of Piymouth | churen and out of Brooklyn, Who is this | man who undertakes to gay that | shall no longer live in Brooklyn ? it by bis | mercy that you hold your places here? Is there a man who bas arisen to thay power and postition in | Brooklyn, that because pens to be em- ployé Of Theodore Tilton, and can always com- — | mand his unscrupulous crait, tous Cam order men, | not merely out of Plymouth church but out of | Brooklyn? Nay You know where he learned | | that lesson, because you heard this m@irvolun- — | teering to say, as he sat opon that stand, in Answer to no question—at least so far as the con- | cluding cisuse Is cuncern un | Say:—"'l threatened to drive Heary Beecher out of Bovoklyn, and 1 wil” He thought (that with the assistunce of one of the | ablest — advocate: ~ this country ever | produced, aud wi the aid of Benja- min ¥, buuler and ws wie, kmma Moulton, 8 a witness, It depended op bis mercy who shoula be driven irom Brovklyo. He forgot that he | meeded every one of 72 twelve men before he | could drive bim out of Brooklyn, Here is one of | the things which characterizes Mr. tflron:—‘‘Mr, | Tilton sald Mr. Beecher said he tumblea himself before him as be did before God, and he shall.” | And yet Frankim Woodrud would have you be- | lieve that he unuerscvod tue charge to be adultery. | All the statements of those men go to prove that Heary Ward Beecher was not charged with adul- | tery. We have another insight tate his character in nis description of the Church Missionary meet- ing tm 186% | THE TRUE STORY, | | as it was called, he says is a ile, He forgets the faat that in the early part of the examination he | culled it @ trae story. He admits the fact that | during the summer and fai: of 1870 he had spoken ofthe Case to @ lew {rienus, expressing himee.f more in anger than tn caa towi Mr. Beecher. | You, Triton, called to the nda whom you | roved to bea friend of, There came from Wash- ington that year @ story that “Mr. Beecher preached to a dozen of his mistresses every 5un- | Gay.” That was before the breach of 1870. I ask Mr. Moulton whether he ever heard it, and he says be did not. It srows that while this man was revending to shield Mr. Beecner from Mr. Bowen | be was circulating lies so base and paipabie against Henry Ward Beecher that even krank Moulton bimself confesses shat he believed to be lies. Again, you men, that the occasion of Mi o- ened resignation was that Theodore Tilton tn. | tended to pablisha card to request Henry Ward | Beecher to resign fits pastorate of Plymouti | ehorcd. Tilton seid there wili be three par’ that church and it wili be destroyed. Mr. Bee said Piymouth cagrca sh nob be destroyed, bus I will resign my ebarge. “You know it wasn't a Pleasant ting for me to go to my home and say | lo my family, ‘there is no trust to be pat in eo | core Tilton.’ No. I will save my cnuren and will Stand tivne.” Tilton Was toreatening ve publish @ card to biast Mr. Beecher, and he has sow tue impudence to id before this tribuoal in the resence of twelve nopest and sworn jurors and say that if Mr. Beecher had signed that paper he would not have staobed bim. 0 back to the early part of this diMcuity. On the afternoon of December 26, 1870, after (he pretended pledge he had given bis wife Dever wo injure Mr. Beecher, he wrote to Mr. Beecher:—‘“For reasons whieh y xXplicitiy un- stand,” and requests pim to “ieave riymouto chureh ad Brookiyn.” Of course he did not mean that Mr. Beecuer should comply with his re- quest, bul there was @ fiendish malice tn the let- ter, Which 18 apparent (hreaghout bis relations, Jn bis interview of December 30, 1870, he says, “1 a itherto spared your life, whom I haa the | destroy. I Spare it now.” This wall laise to oe sure. Kat it is in Mis heartuow. he | an tt then as be Nas in Enews He swore o the heart. If to stab bim we ai im, he meant to deliverarely murder an uvarmed ciergyman at suat interview of December, 1870. 1) you want to see WHAT A PERFROT SHAM | this man Tilton is you néed only look at that let- ter to this man ol straw, “the friend in the West,” G ule ted arrogant style, ke cass * jo not tl That lourn to avenge my wile aud childrea you do not kaow me.” This man 0| Magnanimity teds us what ve Would have avenged bis wie’s dishonor but for the sake of (ne sudering it Would cause to obvers, yet this letter is taken (which he himselt ned) and stowed away in Frauk Moulton’s tin box unti (he for it to be Used, Frank Moulton knew | tuat be couldn’s trust mim. Novody | | he proke | gave pledges to Mr, Beecver again and again end he broke them al. He bas gone on plecving and piedzing himseif all through the con.foversy. Nobody could trust him whether he was down 10 WwriliDg ornot. He was treacherous and (alse. He signed tripartite agreemeat and broke it, and #0 on ough aii you dud the mixture of arrogant bom- Dast and base § eachery. He Was principaily en- wed in mak and king covenants, He ‘gays be jied, and | hav bat i tiach the greatest importance to those doca- ments Which he wrote and laiu away for publica- | tion. The “True Story,’ ior exampie, which was not beretof ire jor publica Here 1s a jong lee ter, dated Decemober 31, Ist Speaking of himself Tilton says “My Dear Fri 1 y lever.” Who was this i | Frank Mouiton says, “i don’t know.” a had he not? Whoever it was | doa't He did not give it for pubstcation. He sham. Tois Man is 80 accustomed to lying | and aeception that he iles even when he 1s alone. That letcer is brimiul o/ wit. Who wrote itt | “TUS OATH OF AN ASSASSIN," exclaims tne speaker, and again his trembling and goes up in the air. It is now three o'ciock, nd Frank Moulton appears for the first time since Mr. Porter began. He is greeted warmly by Tilton and Judge Morris. The latter leane over and whispers to Moulton, who nods and jaagha. Jost then Mr. Vorter mentions his name snd that of his wife, whicn causes Frank to tura and cari. | ously watch the speaker. He hears himself branded aa ths vile counsellor of the viler Tilton, and smiles. Mr, Claflin enters the court room at ‘ this moment and qnietiy takes @ seat by Air. | Shearman. | ] | | Judge Porter then continued to read the letter | to ond in the Wear,” which has been pub- | lished. ie said:—In that leiter, which was no’ written as @ lie jor the public, be Genounce: Bowen and Woodhull and Ciaflin. It is there by | seys, “the tongue if a Wild beast that No mau can | | tame.” tHe remembered wheo wrote this let | fer that Mrs. Woougull put um ane Frank Modal | r spring Of 1971 nto Mae ear almost the sane ne afterward published. iat Tuten said ‘i was polling to keep this scandai story down.” Yes, ve tolied im that room, that bedrvom where wrs. | Gules saw the youthful Hercues at Mra, Wood | bull's, where be took off a because tae Weather Was cules, Theodore jiiton accompliane | naue time the paviication of ta | made. Ajter tne publication, Which wai graphed all over the country, aud though Tilton Was oniy at Concord, distant twelve hours irom this city by raiiroud, by telegraph only ten min- dim suolime HANCE O! 1L8 AD you betieve 1 Woodnuls ivetier eered tO bis wile updertake ness, To his utter consu the “Tit for fav’ articie, which he didn’t w | topnbdliah, Hut wise ingocent, aud yet ne sa: “What to do in tis emergency [ hive not decided.” What had this man Tilton to do with | counsetiors and advisers? He aud only one coun- | selior—Francis D. Moulton, 1 don’t know at what stage o| the matter Mr. Benjamin F. Butler came 1D Up to tits period. Now we fina that Theodore Tilton wants tue legitimacy of his chitaren ques- toned and the purvy of His wife questioned, out of tenderness to Henry C. Bowen. Here we have his wile, loyal, anstaived wi Gishonor, ber Vindication complete, sitving Within taree feet of ) the coir where be ts Writine. tory against © | of Tiiton’s proposed her is untrue; tt needs only him to make that fact Public, ‘and yet with bis wife publicly accused lett her undefended, nos because he loved ber Jess, bat because HE LOVED HENRY C, BOWEN MORE. own handwriting we nt, which be read to his charge of Mrs, Woodhull 1d he says he does not pad- his own account, and second, be- enable him to ruin Bowen. ‘Then after Mr. Beecher’s return from Peekskill, in July, 1874, afser the impudent message seat DY Xedpath, the charge against Mr. Beecher was changed to aduitery; ana now this self- conessed cuckold, who flourishes a pair ol antiers not belonging to him, comes into court, asking you to tip them with goid, and says that the charge was adultery from the veginu ng, Despite this fact born he and Moulton bad for years, in ail their imtercourse either among themseives or others, maintained that the charge was one of ‘improper selicita- tious” only, Alter the character of the charge was changed they prepared report for the In- Vestigatiug Committee to make. his report has been introduced iu,evid.nce by him and was sub- muted by him to Henry Ward Beecher on the Sunday ioilowing the tme when the charge was read from Moulton’s evidence as te the circumstances surrounding the preparation tement for Mr. Be Beecher, hw coufience in Moulton agreed to make @ statement to the committee, taking all the diame upon himself, and that state- ment he prepared and delivered to tae committee, ‘They intended to entrap Mr, Beecher into use of language corresponding with tia report, that ne had committed an offence against Pheedore Tilton, so that they could construe tt into the commission of an undefined offence. Mr, Mouiton, in the i+ terview with Mr. Beecher, showed him Mr, Til. ton’s prepared report for the acceptance of the Plymouth church examining comm ttee, the | paper which Tilton haa expressed bis willingness to abide by. Tilton admits this he would have been satisted wh its adoption. Their desire was “to exonerate Beecuer irom all censure, That statement Tilton read to Moul- ton and to the committee, false to taat tement, and he exchanged It for tae one which he made on the 20th of July, They wanted to commit Mr, Beecher to tue admission of an undefined offence, That was wnat Tiiton and Moulton counted upon doing. But Tilton for- got when he was writing that report that he was aper, and says | actually making a record against himself and ADMITTING THE FALSEHOOD of the charge of adultery, Tilton did not then know that in the judgment of the law what a man | writes for another to sign is a record against him- selfof the truth of what he writes. His counsel understood tnat better than he diu himsell, Here, then, 8 the verdict rendered by Ineodore Tilton before he cal.ed you to the bar. If bis language be true it was an “offence,” and it ts not true that any solicitations wi ever made by Mr, This report shows that that was what ad charged him with—only an offence. ‘That was all he imputed, Judge Por-er tlen read from the report tn ques- tion, commencing, “We, the undersigned, consti tuiing the committee of Piymoutn church to whom were referred certain publications of Dr. Leonard Bacon aud Theodore Tiitou, mereby present these Unanimous reporis.” Tuis letter of Dr. Bacon contains the so-called letter of contrition—that ts, it embraces what purports to be the crime of Mr. Becener, Not in 80 many words, but the facts | garbied. He called atiention to tne letter of apology which Tilton and Moulton said means auuitery, That was plainly absurd and at once @pparent. “Che commitiee (he read irom the report aga! witnesses with letters an e accusation and impltc: They have all been misrepre- appertaining to ries, * * and indig- the auther of the ressed them with the trath paid @ingh tribute to racter, * * * Tneodol husvang’s chivairou: Tuton clined to state the nature of it necause to ex- plain it woula inciude the name of otner persons, Bnd that no posstole food could come by exposing those particulars, * * The committee fur- ther find that Henry Ward Beecher’s statement corr borates the statemeot which Mr. and Mrs. Tilton make. * * © Tne pubitc impression that Theodore Tilton had been in the habit of sperking against Mr. Beecher jis unjust. * © The con mittee, after bearing these three witnesses, report tuat they should rise in respect to Plymouth chorch.” Here there 1s a written retraction tn the hand- Writing of Theodore Tilton vbree days after his wife had left his household and six days after he went vefore tne Piymouth churca committee. Now this paper, submitted to Mr. Beecher on th 14th of July, stamps Tilton as a liar, If thatletier Of apology ever meant aduitery it was then. ‘Tilton certifies heré that {t did not mean adultery. The apology, Re says, Was designed ‘to cover a complicated transaction.” Adultery of his wile with Mr, Beecher could not certainly mean to imply a “complicated transaction."”” If Henry Ward Beecher nad debauched the wife of Tiiton, and if Mr. Beecher had confessed adultery with Mrs, Tilton, what does Tilton mean by writing that Mr. Beecher had suffered misrepre#entation. It in impating improper soltc.tations to Tl- ton’s wile? Tilton had said farther that witnin ten days {rom thence he would puviisi his sworn statement. Did he mean to make that sworn tement a * Which ts more to be belleved, the written statement o! July 14, prepared for the committee, declaring that Mr. Beecher is inno- cent, or the written statement of July 20, deciar- jug that he was guilty of adultery? The Court acjourned at this point till eleven o’cluck this forenovn. page ar aa ee MARRIA GES AND DEATHS. ENGAGED. SmarrwaN—Bemax.—Mr. HyMan SHaTTMAN to PAULINE BEMaK, On Sand ie dence No. 436 Third avenue, ag ae W. ta Miss Dona Giuck, of New York, on Sunday, May B, 187% AO Rag MARRIED. HaYs—Van Getpiten.—On Sanday, May 1875, > by the Rev. J.J Lyons, Bexsamin FE, Hays, M. D., $0 ABBIg VAN GELDREN, both of this city. Hure—MERWIN. —OD Suuday evening, May 23, at the residence of the bride's pareuts, Milford, Conn, by the Rev. George Griflu, Cuaunoy F, ovr to Miss Minnis bk. MERWIN, Atvorn.—At Orange, N. J., Monday, May 24, 1875, ALWYN A. ALVORD, in the d6¢0 year of Lis age. Notice of funeral her-aster. Bigca, the Soto year of bis age. Friends of ‘he jamily are respectfully invited to attend the /uneral ou Weanesday, May 26, at 2 olclvek P. M., ‘rom vis late residence, No, 243 West Tenth su Buxenex.—On Sunday, May 23, Jane Breyey, the beloved wite of Edward Breuen, in the Sad year of her age. The friends of tne famity and those of her brother, William Su 'e respectfully invited to aitend the funeral, tu ¥, at one o'clock P. My from her la, » 119 West Twentieti ser Brips.—Patrick HENR bie Bride, aged 23 years s Tue friends of tue (amily are respect quested to attend the funeral, from the Of his parents, 397 God street, Brooklyn, on 1ues Gay, 26th Insi., at two o'clock P, M. CAHALL.—On Monday, May 24, ANNIE CAMALI, daughter of the jate Daniel and Catharine Canall, of (he pariah of Teeworeher, county Cavan, ire- land, aged 3) years. The relatives and (riends are respectfully in- Vited to attend the funeral, at one o'clock P. My u 22, 1875, ANNIE wie of Byron George Viark, in tue Sist year uf her age. interment at Waterford, Erte county, Pa. OLARKE.—Ob Monday, May 24, JaMbS STEPHEN CLaR&e, beloved husband of Sophie Clarke, aged 21 years anu 12 days. Funeral services this (Wednesday) afternoon, at One o’ciock, at his jate resiaence, No. 342 Sixta street, corner Of Monmouth street, Jersey Olry. ConpON.—O Suaday, May 23. KicHanD Oonpow, ative Ol Fergoy, county Vork, ireland, in the a | 46un year of hig age. Relatives and iriends are respectfully invited to Attend the (unerai, irom his late residence, 145 Hudson street, ou Tuesday, May 26, ball-past one o'clock. CORNKLISON,—At Jersey City Heights, on Mon. 24, JOWN M. CORNBLISON, M. D., in the 3 age. Relatives anc (riends of the i to attend te funeral, from St Paul's Protestant Episeopal church, Luocan avenue, on Thursday, th mst, at four o'clock P, M. Conni@as.—Iin St. Francis Bospital, Fifth street, between «venues 4 and U, ou May 25, MaRY Corrie r was exouerated, it would | But Tilton proved | }) appointed an interview with Mr, | | and Mrs. fulton with respect to these haope! and | they appeared * * * The committee frss intervicwed | YLOR, of Brooklyn. to | | tenville, 8, I., on Tuesday, May 25. | child o| Samuel B. and Emma A. funeral, from her Iate residence, 221 Ninth avenue, on Wednesday, 2oth inst., at one o'clock P, M. Paistey (Scotland ers please Copy. GUILLMORE.—On Sunday, ‘che 230 108t.. THOMAS ELDRIDGE, mfant son of Davi and Minole L, Gilmore, aged 1 year, 3 mont ad 18 days, Funeral on Tuesday, May 25, at three o’clock P.M., from the residence of his parents, No, 82 Fair ‘street, Paterson, N. J. Trains leave fot of Chambers street at 1:45 o'clock. HoBBIE.—Suddemy, on Senoer taAM F, Hopste, only son of E. Hobbie, aged 3 years, 8 mont! Funera! from toe residen: morning, Wade hed and M. A. f nis par: ent! P.M. Boat trom foot of Whitehall Island Railroad), at eleven A. M. HunveR.—On Sunday, May 23, Martaa Gur- TRUDE, youngest daughter of Wiliam and fanuie Hunter, aged 4 years and 18 days. A bud on earth, to bloom in heaven, ; The relatives and iriends of the family are im vited to attend the {nneral, from the residence of her parents, No. 10 Marcy avenue, on Tuesday, May 25, at three o’cloek. Inwin.—On Monday morning, May 24, at the res- idence of bis son, Samuel Irwin, 683 Third avenue, Brooklyn, WILLIAM InWLn, in the 72d year of his age. Relatives and friends of the family are respact- fully invited to attend Lue funeral, on Wednesday, May 26, at three o'clock, irom the Free Methodist church, Third avenue and Twenty-first street, Brooklyn. Kauks,—On Monday, May 24, Metra Ka aged 20 rs 2 months and 7 days, niece ae aod Magaretha Lehnert, No. 60 Pik¢ street. Relatives and friends ot the family are respect fully invited to attena the funeral, irom St. Maré cus? Church, Sixth street, between First and Second avenues, this (Tuesday) aitermoon, May 25, at two o’cluck. KenNgeDY.—On Sunday, May 23, Lizzim, wife ob Charies 8, Kennedy, in the 37th year of her age. ‘fhe relatives and friends of the family are re- Spectiully invited to attend the funeral, Irom net lace residence, No, 18 Bast 125tn street, this (Tues day) morning, at eleven o'clock. Interment at Greenwood LANG.—JOHN, youngost child of the late Jom Lang and his wife CaMoltaa, on May 24, aged 7 months and 21 days. Relatives and friends of the family are respect- fully invited to attend the funeral, from the mother’s residence, 849 fhird avenue, on Wednes day, May 26, at half-past one o'clock P. M. Le Parp.—In this city, on Monday evening, Nurrre B. Le Pard, in the 10tu year of her age. Notice of tue funeral hereafter, LirvrLe.—in Jersey -Vity, on Monday, May 24, CATHARINE, Wife of Andrew M. Little and daughter of thomas and Ann Catharine Gross, aged 20 years, 6 months and 14 days, Relatives and friends are invited to atcend her funerai on Weduesday, May 25, at two o'clock, Pies St. Mattuew's chureh, Sussex street, Jersey ity. MARKLER.—On Sunday, May 23, MARTHA MARK LER, a native oj Eegiand, aged 31 years. ‘Tue relatives and friends are respectfully tn- vited to atvend the funeral, from her late reste dence, 610 Taird avenue, at one o’ciock this P, M. Massa. —In Brooklyn, on Monday, May 24, pes of membranous croup, GRack JosEPHINE, youn, Massa, aged 2 ‘8, 6 mouths and 7 days. Funeral services at residence of her ts, 99% Fuivon street, on Wednesday, 26th Ma} haif- past three P. M. May 22, LYDIA Mary, MINTURN.—At Astoria, widow of John Minturn. of New Orleans. ‘The relatives and friends of the family are in- vited to attend ber funeral from the Church of the Redeemer, Astoria, on Tuesday, at two P. M, Carriages will meet the 1:15 boat irom Fulton sip. lnterment at Greenwood. jOON.—At New Brighton, 8, L, on Monday, May 24, JouN MOON, In the 55th year of his age. Relatives and friends are respectially invited to attend the funeral, from his late residence, New Brighton, on Wednesday, May 26, at 11s. M, Boat leaves Walteuall street at 10:45 A. M, MoRe.—On Saturday, May 22, Joun O. Mors, tn has had just cause of offence, but he de- | | vited to attend the funeral, on Wednes Yer | the 66tn year of lis age, Yee reiatives and friends of the family are re- spectiully invited to attend the funeral, from nis late residence, 134 Hast Forty-iourth stteet, on Yuesday, the 25th inst., at one P. M. MUKDOCK.—On Friday, May 21, 1875, of pnews muula, BETSY A. MURDOCK, 10 the 73d year of her age. Kelatives and friends of tne family, and mem- bers of the Olive Branch Lodge, No. 31, 1. O. O, ¥. are respectfuily invited to attend the funeral, a the residence of her son-in-law, Oscar F, Shaw, N 466 St street, Brooklyn, on Tuesday, May 25, at two P.M. MuRPAY.—On Monday, May 24, Joszpo M. MuagPuy, youngest of Micnael id fannad A. Murphy, aged 4 ye: abd 9 month The frieuds of the jamily are Respect tally Sar afler- noon, at half-past one o'clock, from the residence 0: his parents, No, 403 Fourth avenue. McConMICK.—On Sunday, May 23, WILLIAM Mc- CoxmIck, In the 87th year of his age. The relatives and iriends o! the {amily are re- spectiily anvited to atiend the funeral, from his lute residence, No. 92 Kightu street, Bruoklya, ye om Tue: » the 25tu tnst., at two o'clock MOCULLOGH.—May 22, Wiliam McCULLogn, aged 42 years. Relatives and friends are respectilly invited to attend the funeral, irom bis late residence, No. 2b Weoster piace, Brookiyu, on Puesday morning 4 | eleven o'clock. Monday, May 24, Epwarp Bincn, in | 8 | Gxo aN, & Mative of Parieu of Kuimore, Gounty Armagh, | wm toe 74th year of her ag Mis (loe=day) afternoon at two o'clock, FP foneral from the aveve hosp.tal, (rom thence to Caivary Cemetery. Bellas! (Ireland) papers please cop: Dokay.—Ov Monday, May 24, 1875, T a short fliness, iHoMAs Donan, the beloved son of Jonn and Kizabe\o Loran, ® bative of county Meath, Ire lauds The rejatives and friends of the family are re- spectiully invited to attend the fuveral, from his late residence, No. a4 Little Tweilth street, on Wednesday, May 2, at one I’. M. ENNIs.—Un_ Monday, May 24 at her residence, corner of Uiifle street and Concord avenue, Mor- risauia, CATHARINE, Wue of Daniel bunts, In the 600 year of her age. The /uneral will ‘ake place from her residence 10 A. M. on Wednesday at st. Augustine's Chareh, Morrigania, where # solemn requ tiass will be offered; thence to St. Peter's Cen tery, Bergen, N. J. Friends and relatives are re- spectiuily invited to attend, Fee.—On sunday, May 24, 1675, Peaxcrs Fee, to the zud year of his age. Novice of sunerai nereafter, On the 24th fost., of consomption, WAY, Wile of Join Galloway, and (ate Joun Gibsup, years, friends are invived sd the Of the famiiy are invited to attend tne | | Margery and McPARLAND.—On the 24th tnst., HAMILTON, som Of the late Hamtiton McFarland, aged 36 years. The relatives and Iriends of the family are re+ specifully invited to attend the funeral from tae Church of St. Chrysostom, corner of Thirty-nint street and Seventh avenue, on Thursday at ui past one o’c.ock. McGre.—At Philadelphia, ob Monday, May 24, at her mother’s residence. 1,520 Catharine stree! NELUR, Wife o: Denuis McGee and daughter the late Dominick O'Donnell, formerly of New York. The faneral wil take piace on Wednesday morn' ing, at oine o'clock, from St. There: churen, Pailadeiphta. Friends of the family, and those ol ner brother James ¥. O'Donnell, are respectfully invited, AUGHLIN.—At Springtown, ., On Sunuay, ay #3, 10 S, MCLAUGHLIN, of Now York city, io é dist year of his age. Rabap gh 92. Nad Interment at Greenwood Cemetery Wednesday efernoon, ~_— 24, at Santa Barbara, Cal, OxrRoaax, formerly of Wile OLrRoces.—On May ana RE bY fe Bs yea jad 10 moatna PoLHEMUS.—On Monaaj morning, May 24, A. D. Po.mteMvs, in the 56th year of his age. Re .atives and friends of the family are respect. fully invited to attead the funeral, from his late residence, 86 Pierrepont street, Brook'yn Heignts, on foursday aiternoon, 2768 Inst., at turee o'clock, QUINN,—On Sanday, May 23, 1875, MakY AGNed QUINN, beloved wife of James Qumn and youngest daughier of James and Catharice McDonalu, im the J3d year o/ ner age. The reiatives and friends of the famtly are re- spectfully invited to attend the {uneral, from late residence, 615 West Ninetecnin street, (Tuesday) afternoon, at Vall-pasi one o'clock, terinent in Calvary Cemeter, Ryan.—On Sunday, May 75th year of Lis age, Fuieral irom als late residence, 161st street and Teuth avenue, on Tuesday, May 25, at twelve o'clock noon; thence to Calvary Cemetery. Tne Itlends of the iamily are respectrally invited to attend. fy In- “A 23, JOuN RYAN, tn the aet.—On Sunday, May 23, of pneumonia, SCHLEGEL, aged 27 yedra. Fuserai irom Christ (Lutheran) church, 648 Sixth street, pear avenue ©, Tuesday, May 25, at one o'clock. Friends @ud relatives are in SENIOR.—On 5 PRAN SENIOR, in The rejatives and friends of the famiiy, also the Members and cougre: square Meihodist Episcopal church; lard Lodge, 20, F. aod A. M.; Hope Chapter, No. 244, KA. M.; Morton Commandery, No. 4, K. T.; Free Masons’ Club; Press Lodge, No. 91, K, of P.,'Joun Hancock Council, No. 45, 0. U. A. AL, and Exempt Firemen’s Association, are respectiaily Invited <o atiend the funeral, from the Washing tom square Methodist Episcopal church, Fourtl street, near Sixth avenue, on Wed. jay, 260m Inst, at haif-past one o'clock, Association OF EXEMPT FingMeN.—The mem- bers of the avove Associatinn are hereoy notified to meet at the Wushingtom square « Episcopal church, Foarth et, ner enue, on Weduesday, 26th, at half-pass ciock P. M., for tue purpose of paying the rae lust tribate of respect to our late assoctate cis C. Senior. FRANOIS HAGADO La SMiTH.—On Sunday, May 24, 1875, at Greesiawn, LL, WiLttas SafirH. services on Wednesday, 20th Inst, af at the Episcopal charch, Huntingtos. Sonday, May 23, Ewity AvGusta, hter of Bernard Hl. and Mary A. Smita, in the 8th year o1 her age. Friends and reiatives are respectfully invited to attend the funeral, from 40. West Fifty -fith atreet, this ((uesday) afternoon, wo orciock. SMITH.—CNRISTIAN SMITH, im Greenpoint, om 234 May, io (he 2660 year of Mis age. Relatives aud friends of the family are respect- fully invited (o attend the funeral. on Toesday, Ecktord Mra, 2th just. at two o'clock Py M., at 207 street, Greenpoint, L. L Mane bene —iu Brookiyn, on the 234 fnst., | MARY SULLIVAN. The relatives and friends of the family are re ully myited to attend the iuneral, og eaday, at nall-past two o'clock P. M., from | Rer late residence, No. 902 Pactilc street. sworns.—On Saturday, Muy #2, Kearny (., only son of Margaret ana the late Caristopher Swords, aged 2 Ts and 1 month. The revat and iriends of the family are re epectiully invited co attend the (uneral, (rom the residence of his mother, on Tuesday, May 25, from | 413 West Twenty-fiitn street, at two o’ciock P. Me VAIL.—At hia residence, “Speedwell,” Morris town, N. J., om Sanday, the 23d lush, ilu, Geonem VAIL, aged 66 years. Relatives and friends are invited to attend the foneral, on ToUrsday, che 27th Inet, at. two o'ojoek P, M., tom tae First Presbyterian churcdy Morristown. Trains teave New York, via Railroad, a0 11:20 4, M. ang 12 M. 7 Jn Friaa May 21, BLossom, only e Vuu Dyke, in the 9tu year of li Wean ee and Essex VAN DYK child of Jmogeu Faneral services at the residence of her mother, 402 West Filty-fith street, tam (Tuesday) afte Nyon, at two o'clock. Wet —In Brookiyn, May 22, Fayre W., only danghver of B.S. ana Abigail Welch, aged 32 years. Funeral at 462 State street, Lrovkiyn, om Tues GAY. at (wo O'viock,

Other pages from this issue: