The New York Herald Newspaper, October 26, 1872, Page 8

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

THE COURTS. Third Day of the Second Trial of Mayer Hall. Davidson, Keyser and Garvey, the Plas- terer, on the Witness Stand. Forgeries on Keyser’s Name to the Tune of $900,000. The Swindlers Kept the Whole of the Money, Every Cent of It.” @arvey’s, Conversations with the Mayor. pale Grier Secret History of the Ring and How the Bose Bossed the Legislature at Albany. THE CASE ADJOURNED TILL MONDAY. Fhe Grand Jury in the United States Court-- Charge of Judge Shipman. Business in the Other Courts—More Mandamuses Against the Board of Audit—The Alleged Forger Denis Noonan in Court—Con- vietions and Sentences in the General Sessions. MAYOR HALL’S TRIAL. ‘The trial of Mayor Hallin the Court of Oyer and Werminer, before Judge Brady, was resumed yes- ferday morning. Public interest in the develop- ments of the case increases as the evidence of the ‘witnesses proceeds. There was a crowded attend- fmce in- the court room throughout the day, weveral legal and political city celebrities being Present. The evidence was mainly that of the ‘well-known trio, Keyser, Davidson and Garvey, who related, witha simplicity and candor that were positively refreshing, how their bills were first en- Janged by themselves and: how they became pas- @ive instruments in a further enlargement by ‘Watson and Woodward. Keyser in his evidence stated that warrants amounting to $900,000 had attached to them his Torged signature, and tnat of this large amount he had not received a cent. “HE SWINDLERS KEPT IT ALL,’? waid Mr. Keyser, in a complaining tone; “every cent. of it.” Garvey, the plasterer, was on the stand for a eonsiderable time. The main point of his testi- mony was before reported, except the fact of his @dmission that he assured Mayor Hall that all his accounts against the city were just and proper, ‘and that he believed the Mayor was ignorant of the frauds that were being perpetrated through his Bignature to the Ring warrants. The testimony throughout will be found well worthy of perusal, as revealing a state of affairs in the management of the city government and its finances that may ‘be a useful lesson for the citizens to take to heart ‘on the eve of an election that is to place the reins of the government in new hands. EVIDENCE OF , WILLIAM F. COPELAND. William F. Copeland said :—I was in the employ of the Deapsonet in the year 1870; I lett in March, 18/1; I as- in the County Bureau; Mr. Lynes was bookkeep: at the time ; I heard-his evidence yesterday ; I had occ: mon to look at the vouchers that passed into that bureau; all the vouchers that related to county expenditures through my hands; I saw vouchers of Davidson, ior, Garvey, Keyser and Ingersoll. The witness was examined at length here as to the genuineness of the sig- matures on the warrants. The signature on 3,789 was en- tirely different to the others; if the others are genuine that is not; the signature on Exhibit No. 9 is doubtful ; my attention was called to the face of these claims as being ie. ross-examine1 by the Mayor—I was in the Comp- troller’s office in May, June and July, 1870; the examina- tions I speak of were made during that time; there was ® partition that separated Mr. Watson's office from mine; I could not, therefore, see what was going on; that parti- tion was taken away when Mr. Lynes came. Q. When were your suspicions, if I may use the word, attracted to these vouchers? A.’ My suspicions were at: tracted in the Summer of 1870. May Task you why you dia not mention these sus. Picions to the “Mayorf A. I had no acquaintance with 1 my only friend in that matter was Mr. O'Brien, and i rent to him and tord him. @. Ifyou had known the Mayor as you know him now would you have told him? A. Yes, I would, @ Then you told Mr. O’Brien because he was the only friend in publlc life that you hadt A, Yes. . Was the stamp of the County Auditor attached to these warrants! A. Yes, sir. EVIDENCE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR. Abraham L, Earle, sworn, said :—I am now an official in the Comptroller's office; 'I am County Auditor; my is that the atures of the Mayor are all senine onthe exhibits handed to me, except that on This witness was not cross-examined. A document, handed in by Mr. Lynesasa.memorandum of the total amounts entered on ‘the record of vouchers ay to 1871, was then presented to the Court. ‘The total amount was $25,371,855 97. EVIDENCE OF JOHN M’BRIDE DAVIDSON. John McBride Davidson said :—I am a safe, maker, and reside at 116 West Twenty-thi eet; I made claims @gainst the sana 2 i for cme cy received some warrants for the payment; I received the warrant —- Exhibit 23; the endorsement is the endersement my firm. 2. Wit you state how the bill was made up from which that warrant was paid—how much of it was true, how aauch of it was talse, and how it was made out ? Before this question was answered Mr. Stoughton in- aired whether the prosecution intended to show that fraud was brought to the knowledge of the Mayor. Af not, the evidence was ene aa issible, After a short argument and the declaration of Mr. Tre- main that the prosecution would submit circumstantial evidence, at east, to connect the defendant remotely or pence with the fraud, the Court allowed the ques- yn. Witness—The bill was made up at $16,040;, that, was the amount of the original bill; it then went to Mr. Wood- Ward. and the Dill was left with him at $16,940; Twas then ‘ent to to come and get my pay, and he had en- larged the warrant to $48,000; he retail mae lf, iy Stoughton—How do you connect Mayor Hall with Mr. Peckham—We connect Mr. Woodward with this; he was the man who did all this business and is connected ‘with all these bills. The Court—He must prove that these bills were false, ons he must show that this was done knowing it to be od the warrant A CURIOUS SUM IN ARITHMETIC. By Mr. Peckham—Q. After you had presented this bill for some $16,000 when did 14 next do anything and ‘what was it you did next? A. Icame and received the check for $16,940, and he retained the $48,000, a Who was the “he?” A. Mr. Woodward or Mr. Wat- nm. Q@ Where did you go for that purpose? A. To the Board of Supervisors, fh this building. e What was the amount of the warrant? A. $49,170 42, |. Whose check did you receive? A. I cannot remem: ber whose check it was. Q. What did you do with this warrant? A. He turned dtover and reed it “J. MeB. Davidse he utter. wards added "'Co.” to it; he retained the warrant; 1 did Bot @ Do you know anything about that bill being audited which this warrant Was issued? ourt—W hat bill Mr. Peckham —The $16,040, your Honor. The Court—He has said he has no knowledge of the guditing of these bills. . Was this bill sworn to verified at all? A. No, sir. ross-examined by Mr. Buckle; You say this bill of your's was not verified? A. sir. How long previous to’ the presentation of this (000 bill had you been in the habit of having bills that ‘were not verified? A. I should think three or four years. Mr, Tremaine said that the Board of Audit was only in existence three or four months before the presentation of ie bill. ‘The Court ruled that this evidence was not admissible. ‘WANTING TO KNOW ABOUT A COURT HOUSE INDICT- MENT. The Grand Jury at this point entered with a batch of Madictments, After they had answered to their names Mr. Dukes applied for the indictment which he understood had been found against a gentleman Who, it was alleged, was conn with the Court House frauds, and he wished to give bail for that defendant and to ask for a speedy trial, They did Bot want any trouble with the Sherif. District Attorney Garvin said that it was very ‘Unusual for a defendant to be oad before the in- dictment was entered. He thought Mr. Duke was under some delusion. When an indictment was found his friend would not be long before he heard of it in the regular way, Me. Keyan DENCE OF JONN 1. KEYSER. ir. Keyser said—I am a plumber; 1 fAitecn years; I have worked forthe county abaut thir teen years; I remember the passage of the act in 1870, commonly known asthe “Ad-Interim Board of Audit;> Prien torrets sees saree and presented them to that 1S) smd lame iy ‘you state whether these bundles of papers h Ay, hand ie ee August 7 to 16 inclusive, ‘were mai Or to Mr. Yeckham—Those are the ten vouch- The A sir. fuses petemnd--A. Yes, thony are ihe biti itt you state how you made out these bills and all the ciscuingtances that transpired prior to these bills ? work ‘that done ‘upon, a cent; 1 wag ened upon at first by Mr. seorwerse Uy, loodward. where did you io make, them out? A. Pent into the okt vat of the: Se ‘ho ? A. Mr, ‘Watson, Woodwara ard a clerk who f buppose is since dend. q Bad they in these bills? A. Yes. wi el t_ A, Idon't know his name, he el clerk, I think, to the Supervisor. ‘Were made up in shape they now ex- ott A. Yes, sir. leh FIGURED. NOW WR. EEYSER Q. How ba snd Bp seginens mete! A. While Thad the oF , im the items. ton—That is they were increased each time ir cent, Q you verify any of these accounts, whether these rat A. Ni or 3 of these bills were 7 “A Daou know ‘whether any of these auditea ‘The wit in answer to Mr. Peckham, said that there were afew of bills to which the 333g per cent was not OROSS-RXAMINED BY THE MAYOR. hey te ots ahetedded 33 pee cents were not ; Tonty wi four, five or six years, and I chi 3 cent. ‘Then these bills have a bona Ade foundation? A. Yes, Your creditor was the gévernment? A. Yes, sir. Lemar Setee ior"my Roney and hed 0 pay 10 walt for yei A twenty er cent for money to'keep along with the work of lic Wo! be ao % fof capital had you in 160 t A From $i 100 4p $200; i before a Board of Andit. ‘A. expected they would go AEYSER'S NAME FORGED. aving yor eooderg aceon which there | was a ~ vour name? A. Yes; $900,000 ef these Bills "bere " "REDIRECT BY MR, PRCKHAM. nowy a" Wotupen ail inere. are ures thet are . r cent an- ward, Smounts; when the bills were’ paid they Kept back the Ki whose mn was the thirty-three and a third ver cent added? A. Mr. Watson’s. ). Did you get any of the money upon the warrants that were fc ? A, Notacent. EXAMINATION BY THE MAYOR. 9. Wert ‘any of these small bills, which were the foun- ¥ A. @. Have Helis FF om Pills, éver before the Board of Supervisors? A. es, sir. ry ‘You did not get any of the money of these forged warrants? A. Nota cent, sir. ‘The Court adjourned at one o’clock and took a recess of minutes. After Recess, Mr. Peckham read an extract from the Message of the Mayor, A it 16, 1871, requesting the ap- pointmen of the Committee of Investigation. ‘The yument was handed into the Court. Witness continued—Remembers the act of audit being passed; atter that made claims against the city; these claims were paid, $2,659, exhibits 26 to 50 inclusive (warrants) were paid upon my claim; the endorsements upon them (the witness very carefully examined the doc- uments in guestion) are in my handwriting, with the exception, of one signed by my authorization. Q. Btate hor make out these bills. A. ‘oodward, the Deputy Clerk ot much money was Kasco Ss LY ’ progress, and much would cover outside work; I told him ay near as T could; he then told me to make outmy bills; he told meT should have thirty-five per centof the bills; before I did so I saw Mr. Watson, the County Auditor, and asked him ‘what I should do; he told me to do as Woodward instructed me, and I made out the bills accordingly and handed them in from time to time. Q, How much was comin, to you ont of these bills ? a of this was for work done to the armories, and $75,000 for work done for Mr. Tweed. Mr. Hall objected that the testimony as to Tweed inadmissible; testimony as to any work that was done for Tweed. It was not pertinent as against the defence; but still it could not legally hurt the defence, and yet the defence do not wish to stand in the position of requiring any advantage at the expense of anybody else. e tes- ‘Gmony. he submitted, was entirely inadmissible. ants Mgnt argued in support o: the admissibility of ie teatimony. The ‘Court-Tall evidence going to show that additions ‘were made to valid bills was admissible. But the objec- tion is to the particular statement showing how these ad- made. As to that the Court does not see how the testimony is material. Mr. Tremain—We propose to show that of this Poe. used by him in the Legisla- portion’ of it was to go to Tweed was at e time a member of the Board of Audit Then we propose show the arrangement by which axty-Ave ‘per cent of the whole sum was to retained, with a connected arrangement dating back some two or three years. We then propose to connect the defendant by this testimony so far as to show that on @ prior occasion, while the arrangement was in force relating to the retention of a certain amount of the 1, the defendant asked the witness, when he pre- sented the bill, whether or not this was’ one of the bills in which Tweed was interested, and that witness told him it was, and that he then signed the warrant. ‘The Court—If you design to connect the defendant by dh a knowledge of this arrangement, the testimony mast be admitted. Mr. cparantinasre have no objection to that. We with- jee draw t witness e 000 ot that amount was due me by Wood- ion ditions were. embellishing th ward for work done to his, premises and grounds in Con- necticut; $50,000 of it was to be paid to Mr. Tweed, to be used by him at Alban; 000 of it was for ‘work at $60, done by me at Tweed’s premises ‘and grounds at Green- ich, Conn. ; $3,000 was for work done to the premises of Roche, $5,000 for some little expenses incurred by myself; that comprises the whole amount, +Witness then proceeded to enumerate the various de- osits made by him trom time to time in the Broadway ok. Q. You have stated you were called upon to a check for the amount retained. Is that one of the checks A. Yes; it is endorsed by the teller; it is also endorsed A. W, (Woodward, the Deputy Clerk of the Board of Su. pervisora). Mr. Stoughton submitted there was no relevancy in the testimony with the case against the detendant. Théy toconnect Mr. Hall with the arrangement re- Tred to. The witness has gone on giving testimony with reference to his deposits, and now they come to the checks. It is not pretended that Mr. Hall received one dollar of this money. No one has yet had the hardihood to suggest that, and I suggest to Your Honor whether this testimony comes within your ruling as to the admis- sibility of the feccimony. Mr. Tremain—What do you object to? These checks are put in evidence as part of the Repttrere sole Paes, ing the sums that he was to deliver over from the $300,000 ‘to the amount of sixty-five per cent. ‘The Court—The question ts whether the witness paid back, in pursuance of that arrangement, this money in checks, Ifthe defence require the particulars they can have them. It appears to me that would be the proper course. If the prosecution intends to connect the defend- ant with these payments I admit it. Mr. Stoughton—They say they intend to connect the de- fendant with the transaction in some way. I didn't sup- pose Your Honor would admit testimony im that indefinite ‘way. nike Court—t will admit no testimony on any indefinite ment % Mr. Stoughton—We have no objection, then. 3 Had you any conversation with Hall any time in 1871—a short time after the fraud: made pub- lict A. T remember meeting Mr. Hall in the vestibule of the Court House one day.and I told him I was very ry anxious about being sued ana having an injunction serv ainst me, and I asked him it there was any danger of ese fellows PROCEEDING AGAINST US BOTS, and taking our property from us; Mr. Hall said, “Who is Boing to do it?” that was the answer he made me. Q. How long did you know Mr. Tweed? A, Probably ir. Hall in 1869 with reference to aid over to Tweed? A. Some time in ‘or’s Office, at the request of Wood- and the rest of them; Mr. Hall was not in his office at the time, and I waited till after three o'clock ; I subse- quently saw Mr. Hall and he erase the warrants for me, andl e them to Mr. Ingersoll the next morning. any reference made to Tweed at that time? A. Yes, M looked at the bill and asked me if those were Tweed’s matters; I think I said yes; 1 made out all the bills according to instructions from Woodward; ny bank account shows thatI paid all the sums they de- manded ; I had to do precisely as they told me, Q. Did you make any payments directly to Tweed? A. Yes, iti 1367 ; that was the way it pegens ‘Q. What was the percentage then? A. Fifteen per cent; that lasted for some time; I made but a few payments at that rate; it then rose fo twenty, thirty and sixty-five ir cent. PO. Did you do any, work for anybody else's house by di- rection of Mayor Hall? A. Some orders for work were given to me by Woodward, but I don’t know that Mr. Hall had anything to do with tem. Q. Was any “auntie” paid to vou by anybody in connec- tion with this work, and by whom, ii such was paid? Mr. Buckley—Who is auntie. Is not that a slang phrase? Mr, Peckham—We will see what it means. Witness—I had a conversation one day with Woodward in the Winter of 1870, and he told me: that certain bills were to be made out, and that upon them forty per cent would be deducted; Tobjected to this, and he said that it had to be done, and I did it. . Did you present any warrants in 1870 to Mayor Hall? A. There were some warrants before him for several wecks; the amount was for $42,000, for work done to the reservoir in Filth avenue. ‘Mr. Hall—Opposite to my house t Witness—Yes, Mr. Hall. Q. Had you any conversation with M: gara to that claim or warrant? A. Ves: I went to sco about it; upon one occasion Mr. Connolly asked me why DOESN'T MR. HALL SIGN THE CHECK for you; he told me to se and spoke to him about it; Mr. to take that check to Albany ‘and make some inquiries about it; he said, “I think that will be all right, but I must do as Tam told.” = Mr. Hal) (to Garvey)—Who said this? A. You did, sir. A juror (to witness)—Repeat that statement. Witness repeated the alleged conversation and added that warrant must have been overdrawn; it never was him; I went, and saw Mr. Hall Hall said that he wanted you ever make any presents to the Mayor in did not myself, but a friend did a little thin in that way, to which I contributed at his suggestion ; did not emanate from me; he bought ‘TWO LITTLE PIECES OF SILVER, and, I believe, sent them in my name and in his own name, @ Did youget an acknowledgment from the Mayor of the receipt of that prevent?” A. T did. . Where is it? A. T haven't it with me, . Is it inexistence? A. I don't know. |. Did you look for it? A, Yes, State the contents of it? ir. Stoughton—Wait a moment. ‘The Court—Witness has not Fa established the fact of its being searched for and its loss, . State what you did to find it? A, Tlooked in some of my bureau drawers and failed to find it; I have not been able to find jt yet; bat I may be able to find it. Q Will you endeavor to ind it when you go home? A. if Do you think you may be able to find it? A, I didn’t look sor it thoroughly ; I will look for it again, Q. That warrant you presented to Mayor Hall for his signature after the presentation of the silver to him bt your friend and yourself—~was it an enlarged bill? es. 9. What was the percentage on that bill? A. Ido not think that for that bill I got more than twenty-five per cent of the amount; I have got Ingersoll’s check for te amount I got from it. tbe} a Eig 0 v8 aon, of the jurors (No. 5)on the front row expressed a wih'ts put a question. “ Counsel on either side having no objection, and the Court permitting, juror No, 5 asked him tw repeat his story of the presentation of the little piece of silver. It fared that Ingersoll originated the idea. Do you recollect havi ng any private consultation with any! sides Woodward in these transactions? A, Yes, wi ‘atson and another party, who was aware of all those trangactions; that was Ingersoll; I never spoke to the Mayor at allexcept about this particular warrant Q7Who bought that silver? A. My idea is that it emanated from Jnqpreohy gotit without my knowl edge 1 mubsequen ly paid my portion of the cost, as he asked me ior it alterwards, Mr, Stoughton—Find that note of acknowledgment e Of @ suit by: against the city? A. Yes. Dj take aectine cette, ec, am a eer err ee Went (othe Mayor's house OF that occasion? re ittn dl went ere ne ne nom he say to yout A. He sald; “Garvey, don't HG there axe bill ou 8 very lures 1 pay seventy: per nt of ‘thee bills to certain 'y9 fe, VER KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT)” Taaid, “1 "t bell did, Mr. Mayor; I said, “The doen't belong te mer” that T hed to money seventy- Peder eay aenmtsly what Teeald, but. the, Mayor. reapone, aid StTnever Knew that; I wish 1 had known ; ri repked BELIEVE YOU DID, MR. MAYOR.” vE What did he use in speaking of the coe. mencement of the suit by yout A. He ed me, “How mt you sue for?” and 1 said, “There ie more Ant than te coming to me,” it amounted to one AND SIXTY-NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS, coup dest upon these fellowes and ist tem nee, we don't fc! a ‘tout ir clamor 3)’ Tnccording! ‘commenced the it day, and iny lawyer served necessary pa- or om the same day; way lowrer at least two or three days to prepare the but I told him it was a case pest, im and to hasten it on; on the same of ap ane street, that I had commenced the Sitetwarde] went fone: Magar houies ta Forty-second 6 I wen! e qi street, and I said to hin that 1 was sorry that 1 had com need hes don’t wish this to go Into te Courts ana. he replied Sho hoe hada very papers, fect; the complaint was published in the ee iy, but no answer was put im, and the suit | Mr. Hall thing about money having to be’ paid for political purposes A. ie tai opis Bute litde {02 political "purosea: he Sppeared tobe very for what had happened 't donttrecaliect hie words, but they were to the effect, “1 WISH I BAD ENC 4 and answered, Mr. Hall asked permission of the Court to ask the wit- ness ion, the time for adjournment having ar- are tall Gi set whi r conversations the ir. larve: In jatever conve iol Mayer may have toa with you prior to August, 1871, did ‘ou not always assert, down to this time, that all ‘your ils against the city ‘and county had been legal and roper ‘o you, sir. Pir Hall—Yew cryin whatever conversations you ma have had with’ the’Mayor about that time, atid at all times, did you not asgert to him that your claims against the county—your set of claims—were proper claims ? rvey—I don’t recollect many conversations, because I didn’t often come in contact with you. Mr. Hall (repeating the question)—In whatever conver- satlons, few or many, you may have had with the Mayor PrIOr {6 August, 1871; did you not lead ther Mayor to be- eve that all your claims against the county were just? Mr. Peckham—I object. This would be a matter not of fact, but of inferenes. | Guestion admitted. Mf. Hall—Do you recol ° corner of Third avenue and Seventh street, I think, near the Stuyvesant Bank and the avenue, a short time after these troubles began? A. I do. Mr, Hall—And did you not then state in the presence, I think. of Mr. Tyler, a secretary of one of the companies at that corner, YOUR BILLS WERE Just? Mr. Garyey—I don’t remember the Dyecise words, but Sans axel. that I was going to tell you that they were unju This answer elicited great excitement in the court room, which would have broken out into a noisy demon- stration but forthe prompt action of the Bench, who Fomptly suppressed what appeared to be a popular feel- ig im behalt Of the accused. Mr, Hall at once resumed his seat and the pro- ceedings for th aay closed, the Court adjourning till Monday nex! eleven o’clock A. M. BUSINESS IN THE OTHER COURTS. UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT. Swearing In the Grand Jury. Yesterday the Grand Jury of the United States Circuit Court was sworn in before Judge Shipman. The foreman 1s Mr. John T, B, Maxwell. THE CHARGE, Judge Shipman said they were aware that they had been summoned for the purpose of making an inquiry into any alleged offences against the laws of the United States, As he had not been informed what classes of offences would be supmitted to their inquiry he had no special instructions to give them. Ir any question of law arose upon which they desired instructions as to the construction of @ statute or other things of that character they could come into Court and he woula offer such instructions as they might desire. No man could be tried by a petty jury in the United States until he had been first presented by a grand jur: of the district in which he had committed an of- fence. It would be the duty of the District attor- ney tofurnish them with evidence, so that they might be able to find such indictments as they thought they ought to find. The District Attorney would also refer them to the statutes on indictments should be founded. see an examination an offence had been committed. The rule of evidence was that they were to be satisfied, on the proofs brought before them, whether they would warrant a petty jury to find a verdict of guilty in the absence of explana- tion on the part of an accused person. The defend- ant did not come before them, neither did he sum- mon Witnesses before them; and it was their duty to pass on the evidence presented to them, and say if, in the absence of explanation on the part of a defendant, it would justify them in nding true bill. If the evidence did not come up to that standard they were not to find @ true bill. No bill could be found against an accused person unless tweive of the grand jury ed to it and sixteem of their number must resent to form a quorum. They were to receive their infor- mation under oath; their foreman was authorized to administer an oath. They were not to listen to any one on the business they had to do; they were to eee their oaths. Public rumor was not a sub- ject of consideration for the Grand Jury. Under their oaths they were to say whether a man was guilty or not. The Judge concluded with these words :—‘‘If any Offence has been committed to the knowledge of any of you individually, you are bound to disclose it ¥. the Aut. ee resis bt . nosses até simmoned and thake inulrG Aé t0 a offence that may thus come within the personal knowledge of any of you.” ‘The Grand Jury then retired to their room. Action for Not Stamping Receipts. The United States ve. the Hudson River Railroad Company.—This was an action brought by the government against the defendants to recover from the latter the sum of $650 for not stamping receipts. The suit is instituted under section 158 of the Act of June 30, 1864, as amended by the Act of July 13, 1866. The attorneys desired to try the case before the Court and not by a jury. There ‘Was @ verdict tor the ——- Judge Shipman, in discharging the petit jurors until Monday, said:—‘‘As the lawyers are so fond of making the Court do the work while the: ket the fees, the petit jurors are discharged till Monday.”” UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS’ COURT. Charge of Obstructing a Deputy Marshal. he Before Commissioner Betts. The United States vs. Jeremiah Kiely.—The de- fendant, who resides ‘at 369 Pearl street, was charged with obstructing an election Deputy Marshal in the disciiarge of his duty. It appears that the Marshal, whose name is Henry (. Bowers, went to the defendant's house and began question- ing him about his age, name, &c. Kiely told the Marshal that he must clear out and that he would answer him no questions, Bowers then obtained a warrant for the arrest of Kiely, who was taken be- fore the Commissioner and admitted to bail in $1,000. The examination was set down for Monday next. SUPREME COURT—CHAMBERS. Mandamuses Against the Board of Audit— Opposing Counsel Getting His Blood Up. Before Judge Ingfanam, The cases of Robert M. Grant, Charles S, Thatch- er, Francis A. Connolly and John T. Baker, for- mer clerks in the Finance Department, for ar- Tearages of salary claimed to be due them, came up for a hearing yesterday morning on the returns to the mandamuses previously applied for against the Board of Audit and Apportionment, the facts of which have already been published. The re- turns, verified by the Deputy Comptroller, set forth that the relators were not employed during the time ior which pay is asked, and performed no services. In answer to this Mr. Frederick H. Kellogg, their counsel, insisted that these returns were false, and produced affida- vits and written discharges of the men, showing their employment at the time in question. He said that the Deputy Comptroller knew that the revurns were false, and that the counsel knew them to be false. He threatened that he would take the cases before the Grand Jury and seek their indictment for making such faise returns. “You can try it if you choose,” said the Jadge very quietly. “Weil, I will try it,” replied by Kellogg, with em- phatic earnestness. After some further remarks the Judge took the paners in Baker's case, but that an issueshould framed in the other cases, He added that this would make new costs, “NO matter what the costs are,’? answered Mr. Kellogg; ‘they will contest them any way, and claim that the city should lay no costs in these cases When 80 much unnecessary time and delay have been caused in their peculiar mode of de- fending.” Here the matter dropped. The Alleged Irish Forger, Dennis Noonan. On Mon Jast Captain Irving, of the detective squad, boarded the steamer City of Brooklyn in consequence of having received a cable despatch from the Uhief of Police of Queenstown requesting the arrest of Dennis Noonan on @ charge of forgery, and among 400 passengers singled ont the fugitive. Noonan was at once lodged in Police Headquarters, where he has since been detained, His friends, however, secured for him the services ot Mr. William F, Howe, ag counsel, Who, yesterday morning, applied to and received from Judge Ingrauam a wit of habeas insist upon hie client's immediate discharge. Decisions. Bae 37, a aoeoet, Re. ot t200 grantee. rene’ W motion On-some proof of the truth of charges. Mahoney vs. Gilmore.—Reference granted. COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS. An Old Offonder Convicted of Robbery and Seut to the State Prison for Twenty Years. Before Recorder Hackett. _ “The first case which Assistant District Attorney Sullivan presented for the consideration of the Jury yesterday was an tdictment for the serious offence of robbery in the first degree preferred against John Warren, who had not a very pleasing | John Stravoss, a Greek (not ‘Johnny the Greek”’), ‘was the complainant. He said that on the night of the 13th of September, between half-past nine and ten o’clock, while passing through Elizabeth street, néar the corner of Canal; three men attacked him, one taking hold of each arm, and while so held the Prisoner stole his pocketbook, which happened to only contain $2 05. As soon as he screamed “police” the men let go their hold and ran away. The complainant pursued Warren, who was ar- Tested by a jan a fow uinutes. after ‘tho oc- currence. unsel for the 5 me as and asked the it strange, complainant. if he membered gett drink a¢ w saloon in Elizabeth street that iene Let , and he said he 06, ae denied draw: a knife on the Officer Beam stated thaton the night of the 13th September he heard the cry of ‘Police,’ and saw r the prisoner ‘wl . from the corner of Elizabeth street, pursued by the com- Plainant, who cried, “This man has robbed me;” Warren ran into the officer's a who, after taking him to the station house, insti- tuted a@ search for the pocketbook, which was missing, he having rid himself of it previous to being captured. ‘the only witness for the defence was Thomas Lestrange, who said he kept a saloon at No. 38 Elizabeth street; that on this night Stra- voss gota drink there and said he did not have any money to pay for it; that he followed him out and saw an altercation between Warren and Stra- voss. The witness saw the complainant kick the prisoner and attempt to draw something out of his pocket; they had a scuffle, and in a little while the complainant hallooed “Murder, watch!” after which the oilicer ran trom towards the Bowery and caught Warren; he (Lestrange) remarked to the officer that the complainant was the man who ought to have been arrested. The witness said he known Warren only a month, OmMcer Beam, who has been on the force twelve years, and who appeared to be very intelligent and sell-posseased, was recalled, and positively contra- dicted Lestrange, saying that he never saw him before; that he made no such remark to him as he swore to; that the prisoner deliberately ran into his arms, and, in addition, saia that the place Lestrange claimed to keep was a resort for thieves and prostitutes. The prisoner’s counsel very prudently refrained from putting him on the stand, fearing that the usly fact would be brought out that had served two terms in the State Prison. The Recorder delivered, as usual, a fair and im- partial charge, leaning rather towards a verdict of larceny trom the person than the higher crime of robbery; but when the jury rendered a verdict of guilty of robbery in the first degree His Honor, with characteristic promptness, sentenced War- ren to the State Prison tor twenty years at hard labor. Matricide—The Prisoner Sent to the State Prison for Two Years. Joseph Dykes was puton trial, charged with manslaughter, in causing the death of Margaret Dykes, his mother, on the 15th of August. Mr. Kintzing, who defended the prisoner, consented that the testimony taken at the Coroner’s inquest. might be read to the jury as evidence, most of the witnesses having failed to answer tu their names when called, It would appear from their deposi- tions that Mrs, Dykes lived at the tenement house 442 West Twenty-eighth street; that the prisoner oiten got drunk and beat his mother; that on the 14th of August a man prevented him from striking her, and that on the following day, when the . Warren oificer was called in, he itound the woman black and blue and marks of violence upon different parts of her vody. She had him arrested for assault and battery. ‘The deceased was admitted into the Bellevue Hospital on the 20th of August suffering from extensive contusions, and she died tour days atterwards, Drs. Cushman and Mitchell were oi the opinion that death was caused by external injuries combined with Bright’s disease of the kidneys, Before the case was given to the jury Mr. Kint- zing preferied not to run the risk of the possibility of a conviction of manslaughter in the second de- gree by offering to plead guilty to manslaughter in the fourth degree. Mr. Sullivan and the Recorder consented to take that plea, and Dykes was sent to the State Prison for two years. Assistant District Attorney Sullivan has had a homicide case placed on the calendar almost each day during the term, and thus far a number of them have been disposed of, after a careful examination of the facts, in an intelligent and satisiactory man- ner by the prosecuting officer and Recorder Hackett. A Trio of Innocent Alleged “Cracksmen.” John O’Brien (a boy) was tried upon a charge of burglariously entering the liquor store of John W. Dowling, 71 Eighth avenue, on the 19th of May, and stealing $30 worth of cigars. The ofMicer swore that when he arrested O’Brien he said he would ‘put a head” on his accomplice for Saqueslingl: on him. . Kintzing raised the point that the prosecu- tion failed to produce the owner of the property or any competent witness to prove the burglary. The Recorder held that the objection was good, and directed the jury to render a verdict of not guilty. In discarging O’Brien His Honor said, “You ‘will be here in a very short time lu.}- - John 1D, sad Beary lorrill wéfe also tried and acquitted, the indictment alleging that on the Sth of September they committed a burglary upon the residence of Henry D. Rolph, 716 Fitth avenue, stealing two fancy clocks, the only evidence pointing to the connection of the prisoners with the crime was that the clocks were found at a dis- reputable house in West Houston street which they were in the habit of Peanmsing, Mr. Price, who defended the accused, did not hurt his case by attempting to prove the innocence of his clients, who were acquitted by the jury. JEFFERSON MARKET POLICE COUAT. Dead in the Prisoners’ Box. . On Thursday afternoon a German named Augustus Billinger, apparently about fifty years of age, was Picked up on the street by an officer in a state of intoxication and carried to the Sixteenth precinct station house. Upon being questioned he gave his residence at No. 354 West Thirty-second street. Yesterday morning, in company with the usual batch of prisoners, he was brought to the Second district station house and placed in the risoners’ box. About the time the watch was eing discharged he was taken with a fit, and, fail- ing on the floor, immediately expired. The body was carried to the Morgue, and, subsequently, to his late residence, where Coroner Herrman will hold an inquest. BROOKLYN COURTS. COURT OF OVER AND TERMINER. The Fitzpatrick “ase Postponed, Before Judge Gilbert. ‘The case of Thomas Fitzpatrick, who was indicted on the charge of kicking and beating his wife to death at 286 Van Brunt street, was to have been tried yesterday. The Judge, however, was hearin; an unfinished case in Circuit, and as that had priority Fi trick’s trial could not take place, and it was rwards aa until next term. The defendant is out on bail. CITY COURT—SPECIAL TERM. District Attorney Britton’s Libel Suits, Before Judge Neilson, District Attorney Britton brought suit against Henry Richard, the proprietor of a local sheet, ior alleged libel and claimed $20,000 dam: Richard arrested on an order issued by Ju Neilson was and admitted to bail in the sum of $10, Subse- it he applied to have the amount of bail re- luced to $600. Yesterday Judge Neilson rendered @ decision denying the application. The Mardered Policeman, Two of the detained witnesses in the case of Rogers, the convicted murderer of Policeman Donahue, were admitted to bail in $500 each yester. ° day. The witnesses are McLaughlin and Gardiner, Mrs. Rogers, the mother of the condemned man, who has not spoken to her son for five years, Jearned of her son’s conviction for the first time yesterday. She was ‘eatly affected, and will make the most strenuous efforts to rescue him from the gallows, BROOKLYN COURT CALENDAR, Supreme CourT—CIRcouit.—Nos, 178, 147 to 163 inclusive, &, 161, 212, 217, 6, 7, 100, 221, 222, 223, 224 to 232 inclusive. “TOO MANY COOKS,” To THe Error oF THE HERALD :— In your issue of to-day you have inserted under the head of “Jefferson Market Police Vourt” an » item headed “How to Keep a Boarding House,” MARRIAGES AND DEATHS. Married. ATTERBURY—Lawnence.—In St. George’s church, Sabine, Law, Smee Oke me J. : ANNIR TOWNSEND, danghter of the late Richard Little Falls, N. Y.. on ‘teriap church, by Hook, Hunry M Y P. Mymrs, daughter of Wm. H. rs, Esq. BROWN—WELLINGTON.—In this city, on Thursda: Qotoer 24, 82, by Rev. 8. D, na ‘OUARLES A. of New'York. No cards. . BULKLEY—THOMPSON.—On Thursday, October 24, ty Rev. Jultua L, Danner, Epgak 0. an [ATTIE MIXON, of James B. Thompson, Gaughter October real- g, by the Rev. Charis ELLINGTON, Sa dence of the bride's paren’ of CHARLES J. CavE, of Brook- At gl Husnnwn daughter of the bg a4 eee % " all of this elty, No cards, Neacrnenpy 9 October 23, 1872, by the Rev. Father Rotchford, P., ORLANDO K. Lives to Fannie M., pongo ted aoe of the late Abraham D. Myer, aii ot this city. No cards. MuEKs—Bragaw.—On Thursday, October 17, at the residence of the bride’s father, Long Island City, by Rev. B. F. Stead, FREDERICK L. of vow tas to Mancaner G., only daughter of Rich- ard Bragaw. PARROTT—GALE.—At Cohoes, N. Y.. on Wednes- day, October 23, 1872, by the Rev. Mr. Grant, Dr. MALcom E. Parrorr, of Poughkeepsie, to Miss MINNIE F, GALE, of Cohoes, ROBERSON—TERPENY.—On Thursday, October 10, at the residence of the bride’s parents, by the Rev. W. W. Bowdish, EpMUND ROBERSON to KaTE E., canenver of Nathaniel B, Terpeny, Esq., all of Har- jem. RUSSELL—GILSON.—On Wednesday, October 23, at the residence of Judge M. R. Wallace, Chi- cago, lll., by the Rev. Dr. Ryder, WILLIAM INGRA- HAM RUSSELL, of Brooklyn, N. Y., to ELLA OLIVE, ponneces daughter of Mrs. G. W. Gilson, of Chicago. lo cards, SHERWwOoP—RvcK.—On Thursday, October 24, at St. Luke’s church, by the Rev. Dr. ‘rattle, RHODER W. SHERWOOD to Augusta E. Ruck, daughter of Peter Ruck, all of this city. STILLMAN—TRacY.—On Wednesday evening, Octo- ber 23, at the Clinton Avenue Congregational church, Brooklyn, by the Rev. Dr. Buddington, Mr. FRANKLIN W. STILLMAN, Of this city, to OLLIE TRACY, Of Brooklyn. Died. ATWELL.—At Williamsburg, on merely, October 24, WILLIAM ATWELL, in the 26th year of ts ys ‘The frienas of the family are invited to attend the funeral, at two P. M. on Sunday, the 27th, from his late residence, corner of Seventh street and Broadway. Brapy.—On Thursday, October 24, after a short illness, PETER BRADY, @ native of parish Columbkill, county Longford, Ireland, ed 32 years. The relatives and friends of the family are respect- fully invited to attend the funeral, on Sunday aiter- noon, at one o’clock, from his late residence, 87 Third street. Brown.—On Friday, October 25, THOMAS BROWN, in the 17th year of his age. ‘The relatives and iriends of the family are respect- fully invited to attend the funeral, from the resi- dence of his parents, 26 West Houston street, on Sunday afternoon, at half-past one o’clock. BIpWELL.—Suddenly, on Thursday, October 24, MARSHALL 8. BIDWELL. Notice of funeral hereafter. Boscu,—On Thursday, October 24, HERMANN BoscH, aged 43 years. Relatives and friends of the family, aiso the members of United Brothers’ Lodge, 356, F, and A. M., are respectfully invited to attend the funeral, from bis late residence, 17 Broome street, on Sun- day, the 27th inst., at half-past one o’ck . M. UCKLEY.—On Friday, October 25, at her resi- dence, No. 17 Forsyth street, aftera long and se- vere illness, Mrs. MARY STEVENS BUCKLEY, of Kings county, Ireland, in the 70th year of her age. CarreR.—At Fimira, N. Y., on Wednesi lay, Octo- ber 23, EDWARD CARTER, aged 66 yeara. The funeral will take place from the Church of the Heavenly Rest, Fifth avenue, between Forty- fitth and Forty-sixth streets, this (Saturday) morn- ing, at eleven o'clock. Cass.—On Wednesday, October 23, 1872, ELiza, ba beloved wile of John Cass, in the 26th year of er age. Relatives and friends of the family are respect- fully invited to attend the funeral, on Saturday, at one o'clock P. M., from her late residence, 240 West. Twentieth street. Corpova.—On Thursday night, October 24, GEoRGE, son of Rafael J. and Fanny De Cordova. The funeral will take place from the Sturtevant House, Twenty-eighth and Twenty-ninth streets, Broadway, on Monday, October 28 (his twentieth birthday), at ten o'clock A. M. De Vok.—At High Bridge, Westchester county, N. Y., on Friday, October 25, 1872, JENNIE B., eldest Woy of David McLeod and wife of Smith A. De ‘oe. The relatives and friends of the family are af- fectionately iuvited to attend the tuneral, from the residence of her father, at oy Bridgé, on Sun- day, 27th inst., attwo P.M. ‘Train leaves Central depot at eleven A. M. for High Bridge. ju Bors.—In Williamsburg, on Thursday, October (872, BENJAMIN S. Du Bois, in the 62d year of his *feineral service on Sunday afternoon, at hal four o'clock at his late residence, 359 Sout! street, Brooklyn, E. D. lat and friends are invited to attend. His remains will be taken to Tarrytown for interment on Monday, at eleven 0" oo es $ aK Ling eat on Wednesday, October 23, ears. JoRaneral from St, Jon's College, this (Saturday) < Funeral morning, October 26, at ten o’clock. FLEMMING.—On Thursday, October 24, LAWRENCE FLEMMING, aged 73 years. The relatives and friends of the family are respect- fou invited to attend the iuneral, from his late residence, No. 60 Pike street, on Sunday afternoon, at one o'clock. California papers please copy; also New Orleans. GILLIG.—On Friday, October 25, MATTHIAS GILLIG, d 38 years, 2 months, 25 days. relatives and friends of the family are in- vited to attend his funeral on Sunday afternoon, at two o’clock, from the residence of his mother, 110 Ewen street, Aan ital N.Y. ‘Troy papers please copy. GREEN.—At Saratoga Beings on Wednesday, October 9, CATHARIN! ife of Arthur Green, late of New Jersey, in the 87th year of her age. HEMswortH.—On Thursday, October 5 RICHARDA L. HEMsworTH, widow of Denton E. Hemsworth, Sr., aged 68 years and 8 months, Relatives ‘and friends of the family are respect- fully invited to attend the funeral, this (Saturday) afternoon, at two o'clock, from the residence of her son, 15 Lewis street. apers please copy. ILLIAM THOMAS, Kings See ted Inwin.—On Friday, October 26, Matilda Irwin, aged 13 infant son of John and months and 4 days. Funeral at two P. M., on Sunday, 27th inst., at his arents’ residence, 613 Fulton street, Brooklyn. ‘tends of the family are invited to attend. KELLY.—On Friday, October 25, WILLIAM KELLY, in the 32d year of his age. The relatives and friends are respectfully invited to attend the funeral, from his late resideyce, 128th street and Tenth avenue, Manhattanville. LEg.—At the residence of her parents, 372 Seven- teenth street, South Hage ee Mary ANN LEE, aged 3 years, 4 months, and 15 days, eldest daugh: ter of William and Ellen Lee. The relatives and friends are respectfully invited to attend the funeral, on Sunday, October 27, at two o'clock P. M, MARSH.—On Thursday night, October 24, after a short illness, JAMES ia, of this city, in the 724 year of his age. ‘The relatives and friends of the fami qed to attend the funeral, from his late resi- lence, 31 Fifth avenue, om Monday, October 28, at half-past ten o'clock A. M. MATTHEWS.—On Thursday, October 24, of Bright's disease of the kidneys, JosEPH MATTHEWS, in the 45th year of his age. The relatives and friends of the are re- respectfully invited to attend the funeral, from his late residence, 265 West Twenty-eighth street, on rm afternoon, ease 27, at one o'clock. . Thomas rs please copy. Monaay.—On Thuraday, October %, at his re- sidence, 13 East Thirty-sixth street, CHARLES Mor- GAN, Son of the late Matthew Morgan, in the 36th year of his age. The relatives and friends of the family are're- spectfully invited to attend the funeral, on Satur- day, October 26, at ten o’clock A. M., from Ascen- sion church, corner of Fifth avenue and Tenth street, MCBARRON.—On Friday, October 25, 1872, CaTa- ERINE MOBaRRON, a native of county Fermanagh, Ireland, in the 72d year of her age. The relatives and friends of the deceased are re- spectfully invited to attend the funeral, from her late residen: 414 Fast Tenth street, on Sunday, Octaber 27, 1872, at two o’clock P. M. McCormicg.—On Thi aor October 24, at ney ea seven o'clock, [ARLES J. MCCORMICK, son of Patrick and the late Elizabeth McCormick, aged 31 years, 8 months and 22 days. A solemn requiem mass for the repose of his soul will be celebrated thie day (Saturday), at half-past nine o’clock A. M., at St, Bernard’s churc! est Thirteenth street, between Ninth and Tenth ave- nues. His, Bee | will be taken fromthe above charch at half-past one o’clock P. M. and interred in Calvary Cemetery. The relatives and friends of the family are ig Invited to attend, McGuire.—On Friday, October 25, Rev. Tuvan McGuing, pastor of St. John’s church, Brooklyn, are re- October %, Mrs. Mary Powers, in tlie 74th on Bunday, ae halpast one at one her son, Rk. Thoraing, m Severe iliness, James S- but ear of his ds of the family, also those of his son-in-law, Ed. C. invited to attend the funeral, on Sunday, October 27, at one o'clock P. M. PEL.—Suddenly, on Wednesday, October 23, GgoncE V., youngest son of Henry and Ann Queri- |, aged 27 years and Potne relatives and frien spect invited to attend the his late residence, 47 King street, this turday), at one o'clock, without further invitation. REYNOLD.—At Jersey City (formerly Bergen), om Thursday, October 24, Fanny, widow of Dr. Charles of the above. relatives and friends of the family are most. respectfully invited to attend the funeral, from her late residence, No. 4 Wiley place, on Sunday after- at two o'clock, eetHEALL JOHN RHALL, of county Longford, Newr town Forbes, Ireland. Relatives and friends are ested to attend the fanera), on Sunday, October 27, at two P. M., fromm No, 28 Firman street, Ruacu.—On Frid Oct 2%, CHRISTIAN Ee DALE, wife of the late James Riacb, of London, |, in the 74th year of her age. are invited to attend the funeral ser- vice, at her late residence, 226 Henry street, om meeees afternoon, 28th inst., at -past two o'clock. Sackerr.—In Brooklyn, on Wedneaey October 28, 1872, WILLIAM A. Sackert, aged 73 years, for 7 rears associated with the Mercantile w York. Relatives and friends of the family are invited attend the funeral, at his late residence, 42 Greene place, Brooklyn, on 81 tober 27, at half-past two o'clock, SCHROEDER. Friday, October &: at the tist Home for the |, Miss CATHARINE SCHROEDER, aged 85 years and 7 months. Her friends and the members of the Baptist church are invited to attend the services at tne Home, No. 41 Grove street, Saturday afternoon, at one o’clock. SHERIDAN.—On Thursday, October 24, SHERIDAN, son of Bernard and the late Sheridan, aged 17 years. . The relatives and friends of the family are in to attend his funeral, from his late residence, Madison street, on Saturday, 26th inst., at half- one o'clock P. M. Srmons.—On Thursday, October 24, Jerrs 8! wife of Henry Simons. ‘rhe relatives and friends of the family are vited to attend the funeral, on Sunday, October Latin pies a ta nig 958 nr os avenue, and Hartfo1 rs please copy. Fee eae Rnaagh October 24, HENRY W. THURSTON, only son of the’ late Jasper A. Thurston. The relatives and friends are. respect invited to attend the funeral, from the chapel of the First Baptist Church, corner of Thirty-ninth street and Park avenue, New York city, this (Saturday) morn- October 26, at half-past nine o’clock. ‘AN TASSELI.—EXCELSIOR QOUNCIL, No. M4. 0. U, A. M. BroTHERS.—You are hereby notified to meet at the Council Chamber No. 189 Bowery, on Sunday, October 27, at ten o’clock A, M. si to attend the funeral of our late brother, Jacos VAN TASSELL. All sisters councils are respectfally in- vited to attend without further notice. By order, CHARLES H. BEADLE, R. S:. GEORGE W. Bates, 0. VREELAND.—On Wednesday, October 23, EL1za B.. VREELAND, widow of Hartmann Vreeland, in the: 88th year ofher age. - The relatives and friends are invited to attend: her funeral, on Saturday, the 26th inst., at two. o'clock P. M., from her late residence, in the city of Bayonne, Hudson county, N, J. Triages wi at the Pamrapo station to meet the 12:45 P. train from New York. WatsH.—On Friday, October 25, Mary, wife of John Walsh, native of Lismore, county Waterford, Treland, in the 56th year of her age. The friends of the family, and those of ker brother Patrick, are respectfully invited to attend. the funeral, on Sunday, at two o’clock, from her late residence, 239 avenue B. WuHITE.—On Friday, October 25, after a lit illness, JoHN WHITE, late of Philadelphia. The relatives and friends of the family are mn- vited to attend the funeral, from his late residence,. 254 Fifth street, Jersey City, on Sunday afternoon, at one o'clock. WILLIAMS.—At Rahway, N.J., on Friday morn- ing, October 25, HENRIETTA, eldest daughter .of Charles P. and Elizabeth Williams. The funeral services will be held at the residence of her father, in Grand street, opposite Irvin street, Rahway, on Monday morning, October 28, ai eleven o’clock. Trains leave the foot of Cortlandt street at 8:10 and 9:30 A. M. offic A RARE OPPORTUNITY.—WANTED, AN ENER- getic, honest and sober man as a partner in the reab estate, auction and commission business, already estab- lished : iy fom wil be required. Cail Remgonally, on R. W. EDMONDS, opposite the depot, Mount Vernon, Westchester county. : A GENTLEMAN OF HIGH BUSINESS ATTAINMENTS,. several years head bookkeeper and financial mana- ger ina large city house, having $1,000 cash and $7, other assets, which he is unwilling to sell at, Peeled. would pledge the amount for an interest in a established business where increased assistance ia Address, with full particulars, 0. F. R., Herald office. WELL PAYING AND OLD ESTABLISHED MANUe- facturing business; article staple; sells for. cash oreorde rs than factory can turn out; satisfactory rea- Tons for selling. 2 LLOYD, 29 Broadway. ARTNER WANTED IN A BREWERY, NOW IN full operation, with capital to extend the trade. Ad- Gress ve BARLEYCORN, Post office, Brooklyn, lew York, S79ck COMPANY FORMING.—CAPITAL PAID IN $60,000; trade established and increasing; factory large. Address for interview B., _BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES. none pie hee bot! ae ae le of safe’ e der im every fami H jat- For particulars address J, G., box 0 Hofald z Ate e now working; profits box 122 Herald office. ps UNDERSIGNED, WISHING TO DISSOLVE PART- nership and retire from business, offers for sale their busi achinery fo® manufacturing mosquito Posner, APE. emi’ ue disposed of ty Roane e ‘will be sold at auction. apoio i A. & G. McLEAN, 286 West Twenty-second street: ‘ANTED—A SPECIAL PARTNER IN THE WHOLE sale wine and liquor business, with a capital of $6,000, to join an active man, who has been in the busi- ness 20 years and has a good trade established; can f best city reterence for honesty, hard worker, & willdo the travelling, selling, & thout agents; interview with a business man. him it is a sate IRGE,, c., withot will satisiy nd profitable investment. Address ST. GEO! office. ‘ANTED-IN THE STATIONERY BUSINESS, A. party who can bring city trade. Address, with ref ces, D, M., Herald office. WANTED—A PARTNER, WITH $4000 TO $5.00), TO buy an interest ina valuable invention that only awaits capital and energy to introduce and sell it largely 5 Profits amply satisfactory, as will be shown at interview. Address (to November 1) MERCER, Herald office. 2.500 20, S00gWANTED, A. PARTNER, TO- Bi join advertiser in an established mannfac- turing business; one wh. take chai matters required ; princ'! oniy dealt with. For par~ ticulars address D. F., Herald ofice, $15, 00 —GENTLEMAN OR LADY WITH THIS we * amount wanted immediately to join a. ell known hotel man with no cash, but trade at com- in taking a first class hotel on Broadway, now fall) ‘ing. Address box 4,429 Post office. HOUSES, ROOMS, &C., WANTE! In this City and Brooklyn. FRENCH FLAT WANTED—WITH SEVEN ROOMS, any time to November 18, In good location. SPS ___L.J. HOWE, 10 Pine street. LAT WANTED—FOR A. BN ALL FAMILY: MUSE ave siX OF soven rooms; uptown preierred ; not over $60. Address 30 Broa treet, room 36. "eS 'URNISHED HOUSE WANTED IMMEDIATELY. Wanted until May 1, 1873, a three or four story House between Twenty-third and Forty-second streets and Lex ington and Sixth avenues, Any person havingisuch te let, at a fair rent, will hear of a good and careful ‘a private family) by addressing a note toJ. H., box jerald office. ANTED—A ISHED HOUSE, FOR A FAMIL of adults, with lease of five years or less; session immedinvely j location between Twentieth Forticth streets and Fourth and Seventh ayenues: rer at,” Address WASTE, box 10 Hargis Chen 8 ress » box ert gO ‘ptown Bran rivate family of three a ; must be in g neighborhood ; rent of house about 00, B. PUAN AGANS OF ‘ourth avenue. ANTED TO LEASE—A SMALL STORE, BELOW Ann street and east of Broadway, Nassau street, Fulton street or Malden lane preterred. Address F, 8. P, WANTED TO PURCHASE—A SECOND HAND HOIS® ‘Wheel, hand power. Address, Hoboken (N. J.) Post office, em emeating price, box ae dkcrehief. Eau Lustr: Eaude Cologne Oren ran, HE a ON EN'S HOTEL, NEAR THE ORYSTAR Palace, Upper Norwood, — families; its elevated) plemsant aad ea ai tion, combined with the comtort ‘uforded and, Management, have made the Queen's Hotel a fa sort of the upper ranks of English society.” ME COSMOPOLITAN, AMERICAN AND Exguisis Drinking Bar, No. 4’Rue Scribe, Paris.—A' a visiting Paris are informed that the ty ta famed tor the best Ameri inka ve vrletors. G. VALENTINE & CU ina @2 ¢ of the financial. |

Other pages from this issue: