The New York Herald Newspaper, December 13, 1871, Page 10

COUNTERFEITING. Continuation of the Trial of Minor, the Alleged Counterfelter. EXTRAORDINARY DEVELOPMENTS. Colonel Whitley, Chief of the Secret Ser- vice Department, Going Bail for a Convicted Seller of Bogus Money. Whe trial of Joshua D. Miner, charged with having eounterfelt money and counterfeit plates for print Ing the same in bis possession, was resumed yes- teraay in the United States Circuit Court, before Budge Bendict. The court room was very much srowded throughout the day. Mr. Pierrepont, Mr. Purdy and Mr. De Kay con- @uctea the prosecution on behalf of the govern- ment, and Miner was defended by Mr. Fullerton and Mr, Benjamin K, Phelps. OONTINUATION OF Tam , BETDUNON OF HENRY 0. Henry C. Cole was recalled and further examined for the prosecution by Mr. Pierrepont. In reply to questions by that gentleman he said:—I have gold counterfeit money; I aid not pase it; always wold it to wholesale dealers; I went to Miner's Btable some time in June last; he told me that fis wife died at eleven o’clock that day; I bought of him that evening $24,000 in counterfeit money, and paid him $1,900 for It in good money ‘he following day; 1 believe his wife was lying dead im the house when he paid me the money; I went to Montgomery county, Pennsylvania, to reside two years ago last July; 1 have a farm there now; Miner @1d not come there; I think I made Miner's ac quaintance «p at his house a little over eight years ago; 1 have net him a great many times, Cross-examined by Mr. Fullerton—I resided at 4 %bany when I was convicted and sentenced to the State Prison; before that I residedin Orleans county, New York, several years, seven or eight I ‘think; my age is forty-seven; I have resided in Gen- mesee county, New York; 1 was born there; 1 think A lived one winter, in 1851, in Burfalo; 1 think ZT have now stated all the places [ have resided in before 1 was convicted at Albany; 1d0 mot wink I was charged with crime before I was convicted at Albany; I decitne to answer if I had been charged with counterleiting before the counter- feiting for which I was convicted at Albany; I re- med at Thirty-seventb street, New York, three or fovr months; then I went to Filty-ninth street; lived there eight or nine months; after that I ved ix or seven mouths at Sixty-seventh street; 1 think I went next to Fifty-seventh street; then I ‘went to Eighty-ninth street; that was in 1863, and a lived there until 1863; im 1863, I think, I Went to Pennsylvania, and resided there until April, wuen I came to New York, and lived in Hignty-fourth street; 1 object to answer 98 to how long I had been out of prison before I again commenced counterfeiting; I think I got ac- quaiuted with Miner about eight years ago, but I bave no distinct recoliection of it; Ido not know a of the name of Thomas Ballard; saw a manat 2 Bleecker street, who Was pointed out to me as ard, On the night of Miner's arrest; I was not Qrrested that night; on the luvin of October I was ecco in my house at 310 Kighty-fourtn sweet, by lone! Whiley and two of lis men, for passing Syntype money; | was arresied in the night ume; 2 Bieecker street is Colonei Wiitley’s ofice; I re- ammainud three nights in Colonel Waltley’s ofice; I ave bali belore JOHN L, DAVENPORT im Colonel Whitiey’s office; for me in the sum of $40,000; 1° did not 8 },000; it Moncey, but gave him ~ ea ee SECURITY OF 4 HOUSE AND LOT Situated in Eigity-iourth sireet; my wife dtd not mega the deed; she was living with me at the 3 ONE OF COLONEL WHITLEY’S MEN DREW THE DEED, ‘Which is recorded; the house and lot are valued at id, ov0; Davenport drew the bail boud; Colonel ‘hitley promised me to have my liberty if I exe- Sured the deed; he said 1 would now be préseouted; ego there were some persons present then, but I not sure, Q Do you believe that, in case Miner js convicted, es will be discharged? A. I did not promise to hace cannot answer = question; Ido Cialm anything avout protecu Miner 1s convicted; tims =i on ARRANGEMENT WAS MADE WITH WHITLEY petween the 10th and 15th of October, and the frst Uaing 1 toid him, to pursuance of that arrangement, was trom whom J got the counterfett money; on thi ening Oi the 10th of October I received from Davi me, atiny house, $700 of good money, that wi marked, Q Were you not convicted and sent to the State Prison in Pennsylvania? A. No, sir; 1 was never coniined in Pitisburg Penitentiary ior any crime; 1 mover was in Sing Sing Prison, Q What time in the evening of the 25th October @id you go to Miner’s house? A. At about ten minutes before seven; arrived at whe stabie at tet Tee beiore seven, the umel agreed to meet ; being ahead of tume, andit raining hard, I Went dow: to Miner’s house; the arrangement td meet him at the stable was made at his house on Sunday, the 22d of October; Mr. Miner was not there ‘when j got to the house; | saw his wile and Charles er, and J think Mr. Silvey and bis wife; Mr, wer came home about tweive o'clock that day; i Femained in the house some three or four hours, and as I was going away made tue arrangement to een — atthe stable on the following Weduesday wen! 9 Q Dia you tell Miner that you had put up $10,000 with Whiteley, and that you could not get it back Bnless you returned some plates’ A. No; no con- toon occurred in Miner's house that day be- jweel Mr. Miner and myself and a Mr, Fox to the sect that I bad got into a scrape with regard to Whiteley, and that J wanted Miuer w get me out or Bi on tMatday Miver said he could get the plates IF $1,600, aud that he would meet me at the staple; be did not say he would give me the piates; had Qeked bim before that, while he was waking a wer in Ninth avenue, what he would give me the 10 and $2 plates for; he said he could not say, but ‘ould see bis man an} find out; again, before sun- y, the 22d, I saw nim and he told me the jates could not be got under $2,000; #aid that was too much, and would give tum $1,600 them; when I went to the house, on the 25th of October, Mr. Elliott did not open the door toc me, I think; some one came w the door and let me in; ‘When | entered the bouse 1 had not that ten doliar late iD my possession; 1 never had it in my posses- ; a8 1 Went into the front basement i saw a liceman speaking to Miner about @ cart standin in the street; Miper and I iett the kitchen, aud walked out and down the street towards Sixty- nd street, near Broadway; Miner asked me to yp beliind; We met one of Whiteley’s oficers, Ken- Boch, on the slaewalk we were on, To the Court—I went firsi into the basement from e street, and turned into the urst room; Charles er was there; I tnen went into the kitchen; Mr. Miner was there, sitting at the stove; he put on his coat and came out with me into the street; dia not eet & Man at the gate of Miner’s house as we assed oul; 1 do not remember meeting persous jamed Van Houghton and Wessel, or them walking With myself aud Miner, when we were walking down the Boulevard Miner asked me to fall behind im; I did pot get benind Miner at the time; I fell K Without his requesting me to do so. He Walked on fast and got twenty-five or thurty feet lead of me; be went in the ueighborhood oi Sixty- second sieet; I was walking then towards Filty- ninth sirect towards the Boulevard. @ What did you first see when you fell behind? isaw @ man Alandiig on the south side of Six- -first gtreet Wit) @ package tn his Laud; he was the ufifinished side of the street; [ saw the man Stauding toere; 1 did not see bim come upto we piace; the package Was done up in a oul cover. q When you first saw the man with the buff gackass 1p his hand, how far was he from you? A. wout sixty feet; tne night was dark and rainy; I gould see Very distinctly; Miner approached this man and held his umorelia over him; I did not see this man hand @ package to Miner; they remained together about a minute, when Miner caine towards me aud Landed me the but package; I do not know Who We other man was; a8 Mmer came toward me | went to the jamp at the east aice of the street; he wanted to give we the package, but I toid im to keep it until J got Lim the money; as he was avout to hand me the mouey the ouicer seizeu him; Minor got (he Money, out I did not get the plates; tue green coveriug on the package vow is pot the covering that | saw on the package that night; Ido not re- Collect swearing yesterday that the green cloth is the same that I saw that night; I had retired avout Ove hubured feet from we oficer and Miner wien they Were struggling: think Minor threw the officer Ou the start; did bot hear Mr. Miner say, “Do you Want to rob ine?” the ollicer, Kennock, had over- powered Miner before the other officer, Applegate, came up; 1 never bad that package in my pos- pession ana never threw it down at the feet of Miner while the struggie wag gomg op; J wever saw Bailard until I was arrested op the 2th of Uctuber; never was ac uated with baliardy Miner has been a contractor, my knowleage, lor about two years; I never meade overtures 10 & Man Damed Salinon. an inspec- tor on the works, that he could do better by going into the counterfeiting business; never made a over him that he could do better by patting a ackage in Miners house, and Salmon hever made e reply, “Do you think { am @ damued fool 7” Q Was your Wile ever arrested for passing coun- verielt money! A. I object to answer that question. Q Was your son ever arresied for that offence? A. I bave no son, Q@ Your stepson? A. Ae tA have been, 1do not OW; Mi 186° J] went over to Taylor's Hotel, Jersey City, and hada conversation with Colonel a8 about mus wile sud som Who Were senveesniien was in December, counter- to witness, and he said not identify it as ‘the one he got ‘rom Miner on the 17th of October.) He had neither counted nor markea the money; ‘the understanding jai erat mgt) ve witness kage f $10 coun’ bills, ner titere were any $2 or Eo pes pes ing dey he & pac! them! ihe twos, were mn 5 iddie of the ‘kage: on the follow! Pala Miner $500 for the bills; 00d. not marked; I got that in that money from the bank on the 18ta of , between ten and two o'clock: lam sure that the money I got from the bank I paid to Miner; I think 1 drew $° on the 18th of Octover, and of that I gave to Minor; I did not intend to sell aay of this counter- at money, and I gave this $500 to Miner to be even nt with him; I oe from wr tate 000 counterfeit money on the 3d of Cctober; | paid him $1,000 for it in good money. Where did you get thatmoney? A. I decline to answer that question, The CourT—\ou must answer it. Witness—I got the money irom David Keene and also from aman named Paine; Keene was arrested on the 6th of October, and he was subsequently set at liberty, and after that he gave me the check. Witness made other statements on this point, Q. Your evidence is this:—That after his arrest for bmn counterfeit money he paid you $700 in con- oe of counterfeit money you had sold him? es, . And after yourarrest? A. Yes, . What are Pact Treading from? A, Memorandum. When did you make it? A. A few days ago; I can't say. Is it in your handwriting? A. I think not. . Whose is it? A. It is Shoner’s; Thad another memorandum, but I tore it up; 1t might be over two months, more or less, since I made this other mem- oranduin; 1 wanted to know how much conterfeit moncy I had bought of Miner; Icannot assign any reason for making such & memorandum; I know @& Man named James Calvert, and have spoken with him; first became acquainted with him in New York in 1863; I have no recollection of buying or selling him counterfeit money; Ido not know any- thing of his occupation at all; heard he was a coun- terfeiter; Ido not know Dutch Charlie; 1 do not know Charles Ulrich; he never engraved a plate or dle for me; I first learned at Miner’s house from Miner of the printing of those $10 counterfeit bills about two years and eight months ago; 1 never was in partnership with this James Calvert. Q. What has been your occupation since you left the State Prison, besides passing counterieit mo- oy? A. Boating in the summer season on ihe Erie ‘anal; have followed the water as @ boatman twenty years, off and on; Ihave owned @ boat, the Catharine Winters. Re-direct—When I was at the Boulevard, at the time Miner was arrested, there were lamps !ightea; when the package containing the plates was taken down to Colonel Whitley's office it had, I think, tho same buff cover on it; when I went up to Miner’s house, for the purpose of entrapping him, I did not see Mr. Fox, a lawyer, or Van Houghton or Wessel there; never saw such people. Counsel thon asked questions as to what had be- come of the original memorandum witness had made of the amounts of counterfeit money he had sold Miner, Witness replied the memorandum had got worn out in his pocket, and then Shoner made the memorandum produced from the old one—wit- ness calling off to him the amounts and figures; bad been to Miner’s Stables and saw these horses, which ne understood were ‘fast horses;” had heard that a man named Eliott, allas Hank Hall, had been indicted or. as. charged in tnis Court, for counter- felting; had seen him several times at Miner’s house, To Mr. Fullerton—I never disciosed to Shoner the fact that I was dealing tn counterfeit money; he did not know that the amounts in the memorandum were amouuts I nad received {rom Minor; I saw the package examined tn Colonel Whitley’s office, but I did not examine the plates. TESTIMONY OF SARAH A. WILLIS, Sarah A, Willis, a lady aressed in deep mourning, residing at 225 West Fifty-tnird street, deposed that Thomas Ballard resided in the same house, and tuat on some occasions a person with shoulders like those of Miner came there to see Ballard. On cross- examination she replicd that sne could not state Miner was the man. At the request of Mr. Fullerton Cole was here called into court. He was desired to stand up, and did go. Mrs. Willis was asked to look at him aud say if Cole was the man 6he saw at the house. she could not say, thougi her impression was that she had seen a person of avery singular appearance calling for Baliard. (Coie is @ singular-looking per- gon, with eyes deeply sunken, and of cadaverous ap- pearance.) She could not, however, identify Coie. TESTIMONY OF OFFICER KENNOCH. Officer Kennoch, of tne Secret Service -Depart- ment, was examined at some length respecting the facts of Miner’s arrest. The witness’ direct exam- ination having closed, The Court adjourned until eleven o'clock this morning. A FRIEND OF MINER IN TROUBLE. Taylor O. Walman, of 157 Orchard street, was ar- raigned before Justice Shandiey, at Jefferson Mar- ket, yesterday morning, upon complaint of William 'T. Gilsbery, of 26 Bleecker street, who charges that he passed a counterfeit $20 bill on him. He was Temanded to the United States Court for trial, THE DROWNING OF MR. HALL. to Have Been © Drowned. Coroner Keenan yesterday commenced an inves- tigation in the case of Mr. Wililam M. Hall, the gen- tleman whose dead body was found in the dock at Pier 86 North River, as heretofore published in the Tigratp. Mr. William ©. Dunham, of Brooklyn, testified that he was well acquainted witn deceased, who was & member of the firm of Messrs, Wider & Co., of Lawrence, Mass.; deceased arrivea in tho city on Friday last, and put up at the St. Nicholas Hotel; withess identifed the remains at the Morgud as those of Mr. Hall, In the opinion of Mr. Dun- ham and those of his friends, deceased must have been down on tne plier looking alter some freight which he was shippiag East, when he fell overvoard and was accidentally drowned. Mr. flall was a man of excellent havits and possessed superior business qualitications. His fatner was formeriy a member of the Massachusetts Legislature. At eight o'clock on the evening Mr. Hall met lisdeath he was to have taken the tram for home. The investigation is not yet concluded, Yesterday afternoon the remains of Mr. Hall were taken on husetts. Supposed Accilentally The News in Boston—Mr. Hall’s Business Connections. LAWRENCE, Mass., Dec. 12, 1871, ‘The intelligence of the death by drowning, in New York, on Saturday, of Mr. William M. Hall, of this city, has cast a gloom over our community, by whom he was higily esteemed. For several years he bas been connected with the firm ot William Rus- sell & Sons, extensive Paper manulacturers, He went to New York on Friday of last week, intending to return on Saturday night, He had completed his basiness during the forenoon of Saturday, ana, it is supposed that, while going on board the boat that eveuing, to return, he slipped, or was crowded from the plauk into the dock. Mr. Hall was a son of the late Mr. William Hail, of Bradford. He was about thirty-five years of age, and ieaves a wife and child, THE CENTRE STREET HOMIOIDE, Coroner Schirmer yesterday held an inquest at the Sixtn precinct station house on the body of Patrick Black, late of 87 Baxter street, who, it is alleged, was fatally beaten by Frank Eagan tn Centre Street on the afternoon of the 8d inst. The two had @ slight misunderstanding when Eagan struck de- ceased @ blow in the face with ls fist. Below will be found the facts in brief as developed before the Coroner:— Hugh McGuire, of 15 City Hall place, deposed that on Sunday, the ‘2d instant, deceased and himself eutered Frank Eagan's saloon, in Centre street; deceased had a bowl of soup and paid for it, after which he said to Eagan that the soup was not good; deceased, in ieaving, said something which sounded like “go to hell with the soup;” Bagan started out on the sidewalk after deceased, who stopped, and they exchanged blows; deceased bled trom tne nose, and, with the witness, went toa liquor store to slop the bleeding; deceased subsequenuy went home and compiained of pain in his head, Eagan in his testimony admitted that he “touched” deceased on the left side of the face, under the chin, with his hand. Other withesses were examined, but their evidence contained no facts of Importance. Deputy Coroner Cushman, M. D., and Dr, E. T. T. Marsh, made @ post-mortem examination on tie body and found that death was caused by compres. sion Oi the brain from extravasation of bloou, we,re- sult of external violence. ceased also had a fracture of the nose, The case was then submitted to the jury, who found that Patrick Black came to his deatu by com- pression of the brain from extravasation of biood cal by @ blow at the hands of Frank Eagan, in — of 88 Centre street, on Sunday, December 3, 871, On the above verdict Eagan was committed to the Tombs to await the action of the Grand Jury. He is thirty-elg bt years of age, and born in ireland. He bad now to say to the charge preierred eo a tony . eceased was forty years oj and also a nauve of Ireland. om Hugh McGuire, the principal witness, was sent to the House of Detention by Uoroner Schirmer. Both jan and MoGuire will be released from custody i" have iriends able and Willing © go bau for HERALD, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1871.—TRIPLE SHEET, THE COURTS. Alleged Smuggling—The Appleton Divorce Suit Again ; Important Ruling Therem—The Bow- ling Green Savings Bank—Business in the Court of Over and Terminer—Another Black Friday Suit—Decisions. UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS’ COURT. Charge of Smugaliag. Before Commissioner Shields, The United Sates vs. John Hartley and Frederick Tall,—The defendants were brougnt before the Commissioner on & charge of smuggling from Can- ada into Port Huron, Michigan, 10,000 yards ofe silk. About one-fourth of juantity, worth $5,000 or $6,000, was recovered. ie portion that ‘Was not recovered was estimated to be 01 the value fhe defendants were held to await an Of $12,000, order of removal irom the District Vourt. ‘SUPREME COURT—SPECIAL TEAM. The Appleton Divercs Suit—The Next Friend of a Lunatic May Cenduct a Suit in Hile Name—Important Ruling. Before Judge Cardozo. Samuel F. Appleton vs, Amelia Warner, Other- ‘wise Known as Amelia Appleton.—This well-known divorce suit, begun six years ago, came to the surface again in this Court yesterday. The defendant, it ‘wiil be remembered, was married in 1841 to Wiliam Warner. He left her, according to her story, went to Caltfornia, and there, as she supposed, died. In 1864 she instituted a divorce suit against him in Indiana, and on april 26 of the same year obiained a decree of divorce, Previous to this time, however, as the friends of the plainuff allege —that, is on March 19, 1869—she was married to"the latter, and shortly afterwards the first husband turned up alive. Mr. Appleton became insane and his brotners had him placed in an asylum and commonced a suit for divorce in his name, A memorable feature connected with the suit is the fact that the late James ‘I. Brady made nearly bis last argument tn | thecase, he matter came up on two mottous— oue by the delendants to strike out the complaint as not beilug authorized by the plaindd, and the other by Vaniei 5. Appleton, a brotner of tne plain- ult, to be appomted his next friend to conduct the suit, The following contains all the material botuts of TRE JUDGE'S OPINION. of Kapaa the plaintiff were sane, the motion to strike frown the files would necessarily fail, and the real quesuon presented to me 1s what should be done upon the substantially conceded fact that the piaintiil was, when the suit was instituted, and sul coutinues to be, insane, The quesiion has given me more trouble than almost ‘any that has ever been presented LO ime, principally because of the doubt that I entertained as to the propriety of allowing any one but the plaintiif himseit to elect on a matter which seems s0 personal to him and to concern his mdiviaual happiness, whether his mar- Tiage should pe declared vold or not. This objec- tion was strenuously urged by’ the defendant's counsel, and I ielt the point to be one of great delicacy and importance, and the researches of the jearned counsel on either side fail to supply me with any case bearing on that view. Within the last iew days, however,,I have ound a case in which the question was directiy presented and decided by Sir Wm. Scott in Parnell vs. Par- nell (2 Haggerty’s Condensed Reports), which was & sult brought to obtain a divorce on the ground of the adultery of the wife. The bill was filed on the Part of the husband, who was alunatic, by his com- mitee. It was, among other things, argued that the Court “would not entertain a complaint of this nature which depends so much on the acts and dis+ positions of the husband iu a sulc instituted by any other person;” but Sir Wm. Scott allowed it to be prosecuied in the namy of the committee and cited the Case of Fust vs. Bowman, a suit to cancel a marriage. Asa precedent, he said, ii any other rule applied the wiie of a lunatic would have free license to com- mit adultery, and that no injury could ensue from allowing the suit to proceed because the tunattc, if he recover, may either condone the offence or stand on what has been done lor him. Reference to cer- tain case, Porismouta vs. Portsmouth, in which a sinvar course was taken, is made in Bowden vs. Bowdea, 2 Seval & Frist, 417. 1t foliows from these cases thatthe Court will permit the action to be prosecuted on behalf of the lunatic by some ono Tepreseniing him, although it is acase in which it seems Uhathe uasto make an election, and that being so the modon so appoint next friend should be granted, the cause to proceed in the name of the lunatic by is next iriend, and upon tnat being done the motion to strike irom the files shouid be denied, Ordered accordingly. COURT OF CVER AND TERMINE?, Before Judge Ingraham. ‘This Court met at eleven A. M, yesterday, the court room, as usual, being crowded. William Palmer, a colored man, was orst placed on trial, the charge against him being burglary and stealing clothing from 124 West Thirty-first street. The evidence, which was somewhat curious and conflicting, created a strong doubt as to his guilt, and he was Consequently acquitted. William H. Poole pleaded guilty to stealing a box of tea. He was employed as porter, and sald he Was intoxicated when he committed the welt. His employer interposed in his behaif and his sentence ‘was made light in consequence—one year and six montus in the Penitentiary. George Edwards Apes guilty to larceny from the person, He said he was only seventeen; that he caine trom Philadelphia to this city to get em- ployment and could get none; that he was com- elled to sieal im Consequence, and that this was his rat offence. He was sent to the Penitentiary for one year. Charies Uliman was tried on a charge of stealing $20 from Georgé Biack on the 2d of November last, the money being taken irom his coat pocket. He was acquitted. James Norton, for stealing a box of tea, was sentenced two years to State Prison, SUPREME COURT—SHAMBERS, The Bowiing Green Savings Bank. Before Judge Cardozo. In the Matter of the Bowltng Green Savings Bank.—Application was made by the Receiver for leave to commence suits and proceedings to collect the assets of the bank. ‘The application was granted. Decisions, By Judge Cardozo, In the Matter of John G. Lamberson.—the ex- ceptions are overruled. Mary Bronson vs, John Toronsend et al.—The mo- tion is too tate. Denied, without costs, In the Matter of the Application of Levt Gray et al.—Motion granted to extent of $500; no costs, Topping et a/, v8, Ferguson et al.—Motion granted, In the Maller of Ellen M, B. Connolly.—Applica: tion granted for confirmation of sale, Merwin vs, Merwin el al,—Contirmed by default. Amclia A, Dietz vs, John Dietz.—Motion granted for payment Of counsel fee and alimony, Pomeroy vs, Mortimer.—Motion granted. Same vs, Same,—Motion to amend granted on payment of $10 costs, Mary & White va William £, White,—Motion denied, with leave to renew on further proofs, Same vs, Saine,—Tho father should be permitted to visit the children, Time aud place will be desig- nated in the order. Pendergast e al. vs, Boist,—Findings and decree eon poor Juke v8, Harrington et al,—Motion te arresting injunction, ee Luy ct al, vs, Thompson.—Piaintif! may enter judgment; levy to stand as security. Defauit to be opened, and cause set down for next Friday. De+ fendant to pay $7, Cost of mozion. In the Mater Of (he Petition of Fanny M. Orms- by.—Memoranda tor counsel, ranam vs. Meyer vt a/.—Same, ovstti v8, Heath,—Motion grauted on payment of $y costs... ngrsoll vs, Roe.—Memoranda for counsel, Chase vs, Winant,—Motion granted without costs, In the Matter of tne Petiiion of Pawick Tracy 0 Vacate Assessmen!.—Memoranda for counsel. Andreas vs, Church et al.—Motion denied, to abide event. In the Matter of he Petition of Robert Mccarter et at. to Vacate Assessment.—Memoranda ior coun- Bel. Winch vs, The Mayor et a’,—Taxation correct. Hawky vs, Dorman.—Motion deuied, Costs to abide event, . ‘i abet Receiver, vs, Thistie et al.—Referred ack. Snow et al, vs. Rice—Motion granted unless paid within five days, Fetirttch vs, McKay.— Motion granted, Brown vs, Hilts,—Costs of mouon to abide event. Ma'coim vs Allen.—Mouon denied; costs to abide event. Butler vs, Torbet et al.—Order granted. Lowden ¢ al, vs. Lowden et al.—Findings settled, vs. Quackendush.—Order granted, Goodriage.—See memoranda of decision, Inve Wimerding et al. vs. M, H. Fowkr,—Same, By Judge Brady. Smith vs. Davis,—see memoranda of decision. SUPERIOR COURT—SPCCIAL TEAM. The Tamperiag with the Jury in the Biack Friday Case. Before Judge Freedman, Isaac 0. Davis etal. vs. Henry L. Smith et al— In this case—the tamous Black Friday suit-in which James Fisk, Jr., and Jay Gould are the lead- ing defendants, preliminary steps were taken yes- terday to set aside the veruict of the jury. Mr, David Dadiey Field submitted an aMmdavit of one of his clerks, setting forth that James O’Brien, tne ror charged by bis assoctate TTA peda “bribed.” but which "aamneation ke Costs Judge Following tn the wake of the late suit brought by 1.0, Davis, agent of Fisk and Gould, are sixteen otner suits of similar character against the same parties Uv.—Same. Joseph 4. Logan va, Louis L, Tood et al.—Same. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—SPECIAL TEM. Decisions, By Judge Larremore, Fowler vs. The Pittsburg, Cincinnatt and St, Louis Railroad Company.—It does not appear that the me a brought by @ citizen of this Siate, Motion mn e Weir vs, Sherlock.—Motion to amend payers anted, Kiliot v8. Eliot.—Reterence ordere. O'Farrell vs, Marshall,—Mouon deaied, Lomis va, C.ausen,—Movion denied. Synth vs, The Soidiers' business ind Messengers’ Despaich See for plainud, with leave to amen COURT CALENDARS—THIS DAY SuPReME CovrtT—CiacuiT—Part 1—Deia by Ju‘ Van Brunt.—Nos, 191, 82%, 639, a 1, 21a, 609, 1023, 211, 217, 281, 805, 65%, 601, 687, 4 635, 657. Part 2—Held by Judge Brady, ~ Nos, 1474, G42, 142, 646, 704, 378, 418, 420, 424, 420, 402, 4825, 4i4 30, 438, 440, 442, », SurREMB CoURT—CHAMbERS— Held by Judge Car- 4020.—Nos. 183, 204, COMMON PLEAS—GENERAL TenM—Leld wy Judges Daly, Robinson and Loew.—Nos. 105, 110, 78, 14 6 12, 19, 21, 80, 37, 88, 89, 40, 41, 44, 79, 60, 104, 111, 946, a, 18, 50, CoMMON PLEAS—TRIAL TeRM—Part 1—Held Judge J. F, Daly.—Nos. 345, 393, 10 327, 1136, 1801, 876, 1028, 1829, 192, 614, 332, 405, 40734, 1130, 772, 751, 122, 993, 1048, 1086, 241, 982, 847, 1134, 606, 527, 1034," 106454, 100534, 127. SUPERION COURT—(RIAL TEkM—Part 1—Held by Judge Monell.—Nos. 585, 1045, 805, 1007, 157, 6 1221, 1225, 1081, 1637, 1235, 869, 1151. Part 2—Hek by Judge Spencer.—Noa. 882, 816, 1050, 10388, 1040, MARINE COURT—TRIAL TeRM—Part 1—Weid by Judge Alker.—Nos, 7043, 7054, 7219, 7415, 7117, 7419, = 7464, 8144, 8275, 81 7607, 7608, 9 Part eld by Judge Shea.—Nos. 7354, 7331, 6680, 7044, 6134, 7391, 7460, 7040, 7330, 7522, 7506, 7510, 6485, 7514. Part 3—Held by Judge Joachimsen,— Nos. 8233, 8265, 7627, 8248, 6260, 5137, J. v8. P., Ly vs. W., A. V8. Be BROOBLYN COURTS, UNITED STATES COWMISSIONEI3’ COURT. Counterfeit Money. Before Commissioner Winslow. Thomas Martin was arrested on the charge of having passed or attempted to pass a counterfeit $2 note of the Westchester County National Havk at L, H. Hawkin's store, at the corner of Court and Union streets. He was held to answer. SUPREME COURT—GENERAL TES™. The Buckhout Case. Before Judges Barnard, Gilbert and Tappen. This case was up again yesterday on the appeal for a new trial, when the Court decided that it must be heard during the present term. It was agreed by counsel to sabmit the case without argu- ment, the points to be submitted before the 23d inst, SUPREME COURT—SPECIAL TERI Decisions, Before Judge Pratt. Aaron A, Degraw vs, James H. Eimore.—Motion toamend granted on condition that the defendant stipulate to tax no costs in Court of Appeals in case of reversed judgment, Chartes Meissner vs. Mary 0. Mefssner.—Motion on plaintif’s stipulation to refer and take short no- tice Jor alimony dented, Fifty dollars counsel's fee allow Wiliam A, Cott vs. Edwin Wilcox et al.—Motion denied, with $10 costs. Charles E. Moon vs. The Wilder Salamander Safe Company.—Motion in order to show cause for in- junction. Motion denied, plainuif not appearing; $10 costs. CITY COURT—CRIMINAL BRANCH. A Young Desperndo Sent to the State Prison for Ten Years—Attempting to Marder a Man in His Own Bedroom. Before Judge Neilson. On the night of the 13th of October last James Curry, a young desperado and a member of the notorious Tillary street gang, broke into the rest- dence of Mr. Jerome Canfield, an old gentleman, at 152 Henry street, and in his search for plunder entered the apartment in which Mr. Canfield was sl@eping. Curry had removed his shoes on enter- ing the room, but his movements awakened Mr. Canfield, who arose in bis bed. Ourry thereupon drew a pistol and discharged it at the old gentlemen, but the ball missed him ana lodged in the wall at the head of the bed. The burglar then escaped from the room and thence into the street. In bis flight he dropped one oi his shoes, which was taken charge of by Captain Joel Smith, of the Washington police station, wuo de- tanled Detective Curson to work up the case, ‘The arrest of Curry was brought avout in a some- what singular maoner, A day or two after nis visit to Mr. Canfleid’s house a woman, who gave the hame of Curry, called upon Captain Smith and complained of her son, Who, she was in the habit of remaming out ail night, and acting in a very suspicious man- ner. He always carried a pistol, and, as the woman stated, frequently threatened her with vio- lence if she did not furnish him with money. vo the Friday night previous he was absent from home, she said, and dld not return until morning, when he had but one shoe on. Upon hearing this state- ment Captain Smith was convinced that he had found his man. Tne aeiective was immediately sent down to Mrs, Ourry’s house, in Tillary street, where he Supee vent, arrested Curry aud found the odd shoe and the pistol. The bullet removed from the wall in Mr. Caniield’s room fitted precisely in the muzzle of the p stol, and the saoe leit by the burglar corresponded with the one found at the house in Tiijary street, Z Young Curry, who 18 only about nineteen or twenly years of age, Was tried and convicted tn the City Court yesterday. Judge Netison senteaced him to the State Prison for ten years and six moutns, Highway Robbery by Mayligin. Owsar Hicks and Edward T. Moore (colored) were Placed on trial for assaulting and robping one Wile Nams, also colored, Ou the 13th of September Jast Williams was passing the corner of Bridge and Johnson streets, when he was accosted by Moore and Hicks, the former of whom knocked him down, after ‘Which the latter stole fis pockeibook. ‘Tne prisoners swore that thelr characters were good, but ou the cross-examination Moore admitted that he had been in the Penitentiary avout twenty mes, The jury convicted both, and the Court sentenced each to the State Prison for two years and six moutas, A Darky Burglar, Richard Treadwell, a darky, broke Into and rob- bed the tallor shop of Samuel J. Howard, at No. 119 High street, on the night o1 the 5th of November. He was afterwards arrested, with several coats, which he had stoien, in his possession. He was cum victed yesterday and remanded for sentence. Joho King’s Trouble—Married While Drank. John King, a little red-haired individual of Ceitio birth, was placed on trial on @ charge of bigamy. Mary King swore that ehe was married to the prisoner by Father Quinn, at St. Peter's church, over three years ago, but that her husband lived with her only a short tume, ‘Then Kate King appeared, with a healthy babe in her arms, and sWore that she been war. ried to the prisoner for the past two years, In the Jace of this evidence King mounted the stand and declared that on ihe occasion of his introduction to Mary—some four Pity ago—tley ail got gioriously drunk, and he had the privilege of toting the festive damsel vo her ilttie bed. During one of their sub. he got so drunk juent orgies the prisoner sai that be did bot know what be was abuus and Wille they had him married to Mary. He denied that he er jived with the woman as Bis idged his marrage 20 Rave y ved King, for they acquit- jarged, f Miscellaneous. oseph Bose, an old man, waa sentenced to the J State Prison for ten years and six months for com- muting an indecent assault on a lite girl four years charged with assauiting J micholar Dition ites Tazor at the corner of Alarcy and Gates avenues on November 5, was acquitted, THE ALLEGED BROOKLYN CONSPIRACY The Abduction of Michael Reynolds and His Second Will. The Accused Before Justice Buckley, in Brook- lya-Officer Lyons Held on a Charge of Perjury. The examinétion in the case of ex-patrolman ‘Thomas Lyons, Justice John Lynch, Louis Gold- smith, John McArdle, Edward Hare and John Dimon, took place yesterday afvernoon in Brooklyn, before Justice Buckley. The accused are charged with conspiracy im causing the arrest and imprison- ment of Mrs. Elizabeth Keynolds and her daughter Rosanah, for the purpose of abducting Michael Reynolds, husband of Mrs. Reynolds, from his house in Bergen street, Brooklyn. Mr. GoupsmiTs, who {8 a counsellor-at-law, moved that the charge against him be dismissed on the ground that the only way in which he could be implicated in the case was for the DRAWING UP OF THE WILL of Mr, Reynolds, which he contended he had a right to do in the exercise of his profession. Justice BUCKLEY denied the motion. ‘Mrs. Elizabeth Reynolds was then called and tes- | tifed as follows:—I live at 1,329 Bergen street; lived there on the 27th of November; I had a husband, Michael Reynolds; on that day Mr. Lyons, the pris+ over, aud another gentleman came to my house; I ‘think the other gentieman who came with him was ‘this gentleman sitting next to me; on the day after they came again and talked with Father Creighton ana my husband; I don’t know what they talked about, but they went out and brought in Judge Lynch, aa 1 understood it to make a second will; Justice Lyncn asked me if he coald talk with my husband tm private; Isaid yes, and left him alone with him; my daughter went tn and, at tho re- quest of her father, gave Judge Lynch the ‘will which her father had made about a year be fore; he looked over the wiil, but did not say anything; he left the room, and I returned back and tola Judge Lynch there would be no new will made there that day; Mr. Lyons asked my hasband to make a will, and gald ne had a lawyer tere to do it; “to-morrow,” my Lusband said, and the poor man was hardly able to speak; he was hardly able to speak, having got @ peraiytic stroke the night before; he had been sick and suiering for wwo years before this, but worked of and on; they all weut tnto the front room and asked Lyons what was between him aud my hasbant, and said i you are an honest man you wili tell ne; he did not te'l me; on the Monday foliowing Mr. Lyous and wo sirange men came to my house and asked to see Mr. Reynolds; | said he was down stairs; they ‘went down stairs aud me and ny daughter followed whem; Lyous said MIKE, WE HAVE A CARKIAGB for you now; my daughter asked what the carriage was for; Lyons said it was to take him to the hos nye my daughter said he should be attended to in 18 OWN house; they tried to get him into We car- riage, and me and my dwagt er go. him back again; my husband watked to the carriage, and then we got hoid of him; when my husband went to the cur. riage he walked ail alone; when | took ny Nushand in ali the men with Lyous went away, and soon after they came back With a Warrant lo arrest ine and my daughter for assault on my husband; the officer read warvant to we aud my daughier aud arrested us and took us to Judge Lyneh’s Court; Mr. Goldsinith asked Justice Lyuch to keep us nuder arrest until those partiés got away, and we were kept there; Justice Lynch adjourned the heartog of the case tili the 11th of tals month; I could not tell bow lovg I was tu Coart before I was let out; | went home and found that in my abseuce my husband had been taxen away, andi never saw him again Until bis body was BROUGHT HOME TO ME A CORTS?; Ihave seen Lyons before, tut never kuew that he ‘Was @ relation of my husband; iy husvand never told me that he was. Father Creightoa testified as follows:—[ knew Michael fey pm deceased, and was ireguently in his house; I was there on ihe lta of Novemer, aud pepeeres Di for deata; ue was sick, and J gave hia e THE LasT PRAYER OF THR CHURCH; I Dad been iooking for his deata for the last year past; never saw Mr. Lyons at tne house; tne frat Place I saw him was in tie station gouse in Spring street, New York; he was @ policeman; had a few words with him, and le acknowledged before the captain that he i Reynolds to his own piace, 429 East ouston street, New York; the Captain asked why be brought him there, aud he acknowledged that he had executed @ will in his (Lyous*) favor at 429 Kast Houston street; the will, to the vest of my knowiedye, was drawn up by Counsellor Molt; the Captain asked him if he Nad ever heard teil of a mortgage on the property, and he sai! no. By the JupGg—Who iirst said anything about tho mortgage? WirvEss—The property was said to be worth about three thousand doilars; the mortgage was not drawn until the pexc day; I heara nothias aboat ine mortgage until Lyons was on trial, and then he said he had taken a mortgage on tie proper should not think the property Was worth over $1,200; went to get a copy of the affidavit and warrant and was then told that @ secona will bad been drawn up; ious wanted Justice Lynch to draw up the will, and he WAS TO GET TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR It, but he only got twenty-five cents for the warrant, Cross-examined by Mr. u'brien—Prepared Mr, Reynolds for death on the Lith of November; did not think he Was sane at ine ti) for he could not speak; read the prayers to the ag. Mra. Elizapeth Reynolds recalled—Did not hear the conversation between wer Lusvand and Mr, ons, but the boy heard Lyons say that he wa: him to sigan A wil. Ky the JuDGE—Did you see Mr. Lyons that day betore you went to Court? A. Les, sit; 1 was prea. ent all the ume, Q. vid you strike your husband on that day? a. Eh) sir; 1 never struck my husvand to my kuow- jedue. Rosanan Reynolds testified as foliows:—I was present (he day my jather was taken away: way there at the time Lyons was tn the how was out of the house about filteen minutes while Lyous was there, and don’t Know wnat fie said to father darin that time; the boy McMannus came out and told e that Lyons hada will in is pocket; asked yons whatit Washe had im bis pocket; never struck my jather, James McMannus testified that he was in the house when Lyons was tuere, and told Rosanal about the will; Mr, Reynolds did not tell Lyons tuat he had been ASSAULTED AND DRAGGED ABOUT THR ROOM, Cross-examined—Remained ip tne house anti Mr. Lyons came back with tie warrant; beard Reynolds teli Mr. Lyons that he had not had auy- po outa cup of tea; did not make the tea tor umn. At this pomt Jonn McArdle, Edward Hare ana John Dimon were discharged, as the evidence did not Impiicate them. Edward Hare was then called as a witness and tested to gomg to Keynoids’ house, in Bergen street, On the 27tn of November, with Oilicer Lyow Lyons came to his place Of business and ask him to go over and Witness the tion of a will of @& cousin of bis; ne did not give any pane at the time; heard it said that tie will had been drawn up by lawyer Mott; wien Mr, Reynolds saw Mr, Lyons he ran out to meet fim and said be was execa- willing to sign the will but his wife and daugh er | would not let nim do #0; Lyons did not say what ‘Was iu We Will; heard him sey that Be had been SADLY ADUSRD BY HIS FAMILY; it was only two days vefore they nad pushed him over the stove, and is daouuter sald, “Weil, you Were not purned;” he told Lrons that all he had lor Dis breakiast Was & Cup Of Water, le appeared to be Well and talked vary eens) Went w the court room and saw Lyons swear to ihe bed eta) ex and warrant; Mv. porng hy Wish to go with Mr. Lyons never gO back Lo his home again; be would pot Speak io lis Wie; Justice ‘Lyoch gave him his choice as to Whether be Would go with his family or with Mr, Lyous, be preferred te go with mr, Lyons; on going out he thanked Goa that he was away from his own home; came down the toilowing moruing and heard the Wil read to Mr, Keyuolde; be ovjected to Whe clause giving Mis Wile $000, but said since it Was in Wuey mignt le: it remat Several other wituesses were exammed, when the case was closed. Mr. Goldsmith was discharge! and ihe charge Ol conspliacy Was dismissed. Juage Lynch was aiso acquitted, and ex-patroiman Lyoas Was held on @ charge of p ary, ¥ rocuring the arrest ol Mra, Keynolds ana her daughter, Assistant District’ Attorney Jee: appeared for the prosecution. IRON SHIPBUILDING IN THE WEST. St. Louis, Mo., Dec, 12, 1871. The lower house of the Legislature to-day adopted concurrent resolutions calling upon Congress to ald in establishing an iron shipbuilding yard at some point on a Western river, in conformity with \he suggestion of the Secretary of the Treasury. The House aiso adopted a joint resolution to do- hate the reports of the Supréwe Court and @ copy Of the acts of the session to tne Chicago Library Asaociation. The Senate referred the same reso u- tion to the Cammittea on Wave and Means THE GREAT SOCIiL EVIL, Another Vindication of the Law for the Punishment of the Crime of Abortion. s Conviction of Mrs. Byrnes, the Female Rosenzweig. a, Sentenced to the State Prison for Seven Years. The sleepless Nemesis which pursues crime always, : whether through the officers of the law and the sen4 tence of offended justice, or by the more terrible agency of a remorseiul conscience, nas just overm taken another of the fearful peate of our social sys« tem—a professional abortionist, Yesterday, ir General Sessions, Recorder Hackett, before wi tribunal Dr. Wolff, Lookup Evans and Rosenzweig, were tried, convicted and sentenced to the State Prison, Anne E. Byrnes, one of that horrible fra-\ ternity of abortionists, was also tried, convicted! and sentenced. The testimony in the case was confined to the circumstances attending the death’ of the young, erring and unfortunate Mary Russell, whose death was laid to the charge ef the prisoner,’ but extended to other cases, bearing, however, om the principal charge, showimg the wide range ta which the accused carried on ner horrible and mury derous practice, } The prosecution was most ably conducted by; Assistant District Attorney Fellows, whose address‘ to the jury insumming up was really @ most im- pressive forensic display—scathing, solemn ‘and: affecting in his review of the testimony and in his | denunctation of the crime and its attending circum! stances, with which the accused stood charged. ' ‘The court room was crowded from the opening! of the doors, but through the censurable non-’ attendance of one of the jurors at the proper hour; some delay occurred in resuming the trial, Re-; corder Hackett read a lesson to the temporarily’ absent juror, which, it is hoped, will be not only lesson to nim, but to all jurors sworn on the trial case, to bo obedient to the instructions of the Court requiring an early attendance on their part. CONTINUATION OF THE TESTIMONY, Dr. Bliven was recalled by Assistant District Attorney Fetlows, and testified that the prisoner nad the reputation of being a professional abortionist, TESTIMONY OF A VICTIM. Mary Richardson said that abont eighteen mont ago she went to the house of the defendant, in Ol ton street, for the purpose of having an abortio! produced, and that Mrs, Byrnesgperformed tt by instrument tor $10. 4 Mr. Howe objected to this testimony, but th Recorder admitted 1 t, simply for the purpose ol _1m- peaching the credibility of Mrs. byrnes, who sword ‘Unat sae never performed an abortion upon any per son, Officer Parrish and Dr. koberts testified that the accused was reputed to be @ professional abor| uoMist, ‘The case being closed on both sides Mr. Williany F. Howe then renewed tne legal objections to the panel of jurors and other technical points; and pro- ceeded to address the jury upon the facts. In eloquent and forcible argument he maintained that the medical and other testimony adduced failed establish tne guilt of his client. ‘ SUMMING UP FOR THE PROSECUTION. ) Assistant District Attorney Fellows made & powerful appeal in behall of the people, claiming» that the evidence clearly showed that Mrs, Byrnes’ Was @ notorious abortionist and that she perlorme an operation upon Mary Russvil, whose dying state-’ ment corrovorated the testimony for the proseca-’ tion, When Colonel Fellows portrayed %n° Jervid! and eloquent language the awiul crime which pro-: fessional aboruonists in New York commitied, the, audience coula scarcely retram from giving exprea- > sign to their approvation in demonstrations of ap- jause. ‘ihe conviction of Dra. Wolll, Evans an Rosenzweig bad tended greatly to suppress t crime ia our midst, and the prosecuting office! urged the jury to convict Mrs. Byrnes, Wuo rep: sented tne female abortionists. THE CHARGE. ? Recorder HACKETr procecded to deliver his charge, and after defining tne law under which the prise Oner was indicted, instructed them that in order to justily @ conviction the evidence must have estad-| ished the fact that on or abouc the 234 of Augusé the prisoner employed some instrument or other; means to produce the miscarriage of Mary Russell; | that the use of such Instrument or other means was hot necessary to preserve ner life, and that the ems; ployment of an instrument or other means by. the: prisoner directly superinduced Mary’s death, which, occurred on the sd of September last, His Honor read copious extracts from his minutes oF the evic dence taken on the trial, and in conclusion said that to his appreheusipu the case presented no features of dimiculty, the law defining the offence being sims ple and comprehensive, 1c was for tue jury to say Whether the evidence had sauisiied then of th@ guilt of the prisoner beyond any reasonabie doubt, and if 80 their duiy under their catus demanded a verdict of gutity. THE VERDICT. The fury were only absent about eight minutes, when they returned with a verdict of “Guilty.” Colonel FELLOWS moved lor judgment, Mr. Howg moyed an arrest of judgment apon the ground that the record showed in the case that thd Court had no jurisdiction. ‘TNE SENTENCE, Recorder HackErt denied the motion, and seniencing the prisoner sard:—‘Thero is a strange coincidence in your case, On the 23d of August lust @ professional abortionist, by the name of Dr! Rosenzweig, periormed an oOperauon upon the per- son of a young girl, Alice Bowisby, and caused her, death, aud on that’ very same day and about tle sane hour you periormed a similar operation upor this young woman, Mary Russell, which super induced her death. Your induference to the result, ol your brutal crimes is shown by the fact tnat bovlw you ana your confidential friend, Mra. Conch, in Whose house you were # tenant Witcu Dre Lookup Evans, another professional aoortionist, bad been tried and convicted in tols Vourt, aud-you were warued of the danger; you paid no regard ta it, but rigut in the face of that warning you perpes trated this crime upon this poor young girl, Mary Russell, It would be a waste of time, in my Opinion, to €xpauate upon the brutal crimes and murders whicit your conscience must have charged you With committing at this and other umes, The only duty remaiomg with the Court 1s to send you ro the State Prison for seven years, that being tha highest penalty toat can ov lutityted, " TUR PRISONER manifested considerable mental excitement at tha Speedy determination of the case by the jury, and the prompt sencence of the Recorder, wuich sends her to the State Prison for seven yeara—as the ite~. corder said, the heaviest pouulty the law allowed. ANOTHER PRISONER “NBWKIRKED" AT JEF« PERSON MARKsT, On Monday might OMiver Patrick Fay, of the | Bighth precinct, arrested an unfortunate named Nellie Richardson, aged eighteen, of 164 wooster street, for disorderly conduct, After being confined in tie station house all night the woman was ar- raigned before Justice Shandiey, at Jefferson Mar- ket, yesterday morning. While arraigned before the Justice her language towards the latter and tae officer was mot of a very refined nature, im consequence of which Justice Sbandley com- mitied her, As the oilicer was taking her across the bridge to her new home in the prison she made some remark which so enraged him that he took her by the back of the neck and threw her neadiong down tne long and steep fight of stairs, Provideotialy the unfortunate woman, waen near the bottom of the stairs, scized tue trom raliag, Aud prevented herseif from jalitog on tue stone pavement in the court yard. One day last week thls same ONlcer arrested @ female for steal- ing $15 19 Monev from a man. Upon conveying the parties w the above Court ne ed the complain ant up tn the court ice box and allowed the prisouer to sit among the aw oe. before the arrival of the Justice (he prisouer quictiy sipped trom tae court Tout Ald bas since failed Lo come BACK, COUaT OF APPEALS. ALBANY, Deo, 12, 1871. ‘The following decisions were rendered in the Court of Appeais to-day :— Jndgments aitirmed with costs—Delap vs. Wood- bur; The National Bank of salem va fhouus; ;Maliory v8 The Traveller's tn. surance Company; Fox vs. Dunekel; Taompson va, The American Tontine Life aad Savings lasurance Company; Slitenrica va Hemines, Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs eveuts—Gibson Va Tovey; dimuons va, in; Kruider va. Eilison. dadgmeut reversed and img dismissed WItG Costs agalust tne plaintid—Clark Vs Wise, Special Judgiments—Studdard va, Whiuing; dad A ated Comstock vs. Jolson; Youn, ent, Order granting new trial reversed ana judgment on report of reieree aditimed with cosie—Kichard- son ve. Uarpenter. Orders afirmed with costs—Pike va, Johnson; Marland va, Listenthal, eT a dismissed with cosw—Suenburg vs. Jouse, Motion denied with $10 costs—Brookman vs. Hamu, . CALENDAR. The following 1s the Court of dar tor Decemver 14:—Nox 422, 431, 600. 47& calen- a, 6,