The New York Herald Newspaper, October 20, 1871, Page 8

8 Mattes he ines Sot nwnieN aaey hrs THE LAWLESS LOWREYS. ee ek banted with bloodhounds, ine JDr*te | Indictments in the United States Circuit Court— THE COURTS. Pxpleits of the Most Extraordinary Gang of Outlaws Known to Crime. Robeson County, North Caro- lina, in Anarchy. @umpaiga of State and National Troops Against the Lowreys—Its Utter Failure—The Troops ‘Withdrawn—The Gang Propose a “Treaty of Peace’ —Description of the Outlaws. RauEtaw, N. O., Oct. 13, 1871. ‘The vigorous measures which were instituted early three months since on the part of both tne State and national gevernments against Henry Berry Lowrey, the notorious outiaw, and his law- tess gang, in Robeson county, have just been Brought to @ most Inglorious and unsuccessful eioze. The readers of the Hgnatp are already familiar ‘with the history of these desperadoes, who have so dong outraged the taws of tne State, and upon each of whose heads a price had been set by the State gov- ernment. They were outlawed by Governor Holden end large rewards offered both by the State and eounty for their arrest, but even this did not deter ‘Wem from committing the most daring, bloody and INHUMAN DEEDS on record. For @ period of over elght years, com. mencing in 1883, the Lowreys and their associates, the Oxendines and others, who are ® mixture of Indian, negro and Caacasian, held a high carnival ef crime im Robeson and the adjacent counties. They became a terror to all law-abiding and peace- ful citizens, and every effort to capture them proved @nsuccessful. In the inmost recesses of an almost impenetravie swamp their headquarters are estab- Mened, and from this they emerged only when their mecessities required, or when they desired to wreak vengeance on some person or persons who had meeeetelatets Nar Admiralty Cases—Important Cases in Bauk- raptey—Charge of Desertion from a Ship— Suit Against a Mining Company— Business in the General Sessions Before Recorder Hackett. of ided, and it 18 une ae od of Bs CHITED STATES SUPREME CCUAT. Validity of Appointments by Military Com- manders in Louisiann—Operation ef a Waiver of Protest—Oue of Frement’s St. Leuls Army Coutracts, WASHINGTON, D. C., Oct 19, 1871. speech. pee No. 06, The State af Loutsiana, ex rel. Haudin, ‘Steohen Lowrey 1 thirty-one of seven | vs, Wicklife—Error to the Supreme Court of Lovisi- po prem pee moses Bao ana.—The question in this case is whether Haudlin, nd 18 qe STOO ee oe pec veny black, bul | WHO Was appointed Judge of the Third District i hes Court of New Orieans by Military Governor, Shepley PR gpae Boone tn Mi hn endlrray Reap A Bi and, removed, by Provisional Governor Haha, is en- CY eee Cn TE seen ae tutied to his salary up to the date of the organization nether oviehes rm pte Tolee, “He has | Of the State government under the new constitution, Been wonndedl by sanshot in his leht'urm and back, fe 18’ | ‘phe Court below held that the appolatment by the ee pe pty Military Governor aid not entitie the relator to the bright TDulalto Somplesiog, ‘binck eyes and dark Tiraleht omice as'claimed, ana that the acflon of Governor Ralf and le quick epskes. He wears a0 whiekers, end has | B@hn in removing him without notice, trial, £c., but fittle beard. He 1s about twenty-six years of the federal constitution, o ‘was not rep it to Pobre men apes fost oven inde et thick ot From that Judgment this writ of error Is taken. He is only twenty yeare of age, an ‘has 00 beard ouly & No, 150, Kearney vs. Charles Case, Receiver, éc.— thiek dows Error to the Circuit Court for the District of be talkative. disposition % curl; | Louistana.—This was an action commenced by Vase eager thas black eyes’ end beary evedrowss | ay Receiver of the First National Bank of New Ai ® black, powerfully built negro, | Orleans, appointed under the National Currency opm, froin Goldahora and. mated act, against one Nixon and the plaintiff in error as gang. the maker and endorser of two promissory notes One of tne Oxendines hasfoeen executed, and an- | owned by the bank. The judgment below was for other is now confined tn the jail at Wilmington | the Receiver, and the cause is bronght here by waiting trial for murder, with a certainty of meet- | Kearney, presenting the question whether waiver the terrivie fate of hts relative. ot and notice of non-payment by the en- inere are rewards offered by the State and county | dorser ts a waiver of demand onthe maker. The plaintiff in error contends that the ment of the endorser 18 to be strictly cons! and that “an agreement to waive notice of the dishonor of @ note will not be deemed to be a waiver of due pre- sentment of it to the maker for payment. Demand on the maker is essential to 1x the obligation of the endorser. ‘No. 161. Walker v3, Drevitle,—This was an action on a promissory note, brought by Dreville against Walker, which was tried beiow in the absence of the plaintiff in error, by the Conrt, without a jury, for the arrest of these men amounting in tne ‘@- gate to $8,500. Parties in South Carolina and tie pews gaet in Syne should be on the lookout for dl toem, a8 itis more than probable they may attempt to escape in disguise during the temporary suspen- ston of active demonstrations against them. LYN H LAW IN TENNZSSEE Five Hundred Mcn Hapg Two Negroes tor Made themselves prominent im endeavoring to effect their capture, The catalogue of the murdom and assassinations they committed 1s a most start- Ung and fearful exhibit. Since the close of the war they lave murdered some twenty-iive citizens in ‘Whelr houses and on the highway, ant ALL IN COLD BLOOD, @xcept recently, when two citizeas were killed bo- Jonging to a party organized to capture them. Lowrey and his gang ambushed the party, and a Volley killed two, wounded several. and put tne re- mainder to fight. Such expeditions against them $0 their swamp-bound quarters have been numer- ous, and have invariably rosulted in similar disas- frous escapades. When tueir supplies of provisions required pedir y fi oS §nd bis gang, srmed to the teeth, made on some country store or farm nousé, quitted it, and retired back to the swamp triumphant, On these occasions if resist- ‘doe Wad offered they bound the owners of the prop- arty they were taking to trees or fenced @id cui om their ears, and if they were too unruly shot thom “gown on the spot, Added to these heinous érimes ‘Was that of rape, which during tne past five years has freqnentiy been committed by this lawless and @esperate gang. In shoit, THEY DEFIED ALL AUTHORITY, espised the efforts of the local olicials to effect ‘shelr arrest, and inspired such a terror among the eitizens that few would be foolharmty enough to at- ‘tempt to make one of a party to capture them, and they roamed the country lving monuments of a feeble and miserably conducted government, and ® menace to alt peaceably disposed citizens. Lf a better evidence of the utter contempt in which they held te local authorities were wauting than the Tollowing 1t 1s hard to say how it would be found:— One of the gang, for whom a reward of $400 had een offered, one day presented himself to a citizen, and supalated that the latter might arrest him aud godge him in the county jail at Lumberton on condi- fon that he would share the reward equally with ‘Bim in two week from the date of arrest. The citr- wen agreed, and the outlaw was delivered to the Sbderif, who bad hin MANACLED AND SHACKLED * tp the most veg 4 and approved manner and ‘shen chained to the floor. In addition to those pre- utions bolts, bars and the most ponderous sort of KS Were placed upon no! only the doors of the cell in which the outlaw was secured, but also upon the outer doors of the juil, 60 that there was no po-wibdtiity of escape. He remained quietiy incar- cerated until wwe expiration of the siipu- lated two weeks, and a few days alter; but the share of the reward ($200) not being ming, he disappeared oue brignt moon- Dgbtnight Into tue very midst of tue town of Lamrerton the gang came from the swamp, broke open a blacksmith’s shop, and, r supplylag themselves with tools, went to the jall, made short ‘work of the locks and bars and bolts and liberated their fellow outlaw. Soon afterwards the ciuzen who made the arrest left the county. kvery one of the numerous expeditions by the citizens against ihe Lowreys, usually gotien up uring the exctiement attendant upon one of their marders or out Signally failed, and generally resuiled fatally to some, and always ansuccess(ully to the would-be captors. At length the county was becoming depopulated owing ‘0 the fear and ip- security Which the citizens felt, ana at the same ime the Lowreys were becoming more daring, and, posalbie, MORE ATROCIOCS AND OPEN 4p the commission of their outrages. Under these UMstauces Umiind States troops were sent to troops Te '®, during which ume the Lowreys were a3 active as ever, aud, to show bow litle they cared for troops, they shot avd xived in broad daylignt @ inan within 20) yards of the soldiers’ cainp. “Soon | alter these troops were withdrawn tae community were again startied by the anvouncement of an- evher horribie murder by the Lowreys, and again an expedition, for the twentieth time, was started against the Outlaws, It was on this Occasion that the two citizens referred to above were killed by Sve Lowreys in ambush. In jace of such open de @ance of the county authorities apd such wholesale Sacrifice of life and rae by the Outlaws, Gover- Bor Caldwell ordered out the militia of the county supplied tem With arias and amuranition, aad them ON A WAR FOOTING, of the state forces. Large numbers of United States troops beng then in the state tor the arrest Sud suppressiva vi Lhe Ku Klux Klan, tue Governor eppile jor two companies Ww agaist in eapturing Lowrey and ims yang. furuished, ordered to Robeson, and, with the millita, were placed in lie eld some (three months ago, With Lue jul devernunation of either capturing or Bnuinilatiog the oulaws. Slace then the exploits Of the Lowreys Lave been characterized by greaver VELEY, LF NOT DAMON 78 bave veen dof, but tho | ives iu the | on a traip | pie places, and once they fred Hujugton. Chariove and Ru ord Kail Poad. ayein, Lowrey himecif invaded the miliua | camp in the night Ume, cut Mis nome on Ue BLOCK of | @ MUFket And fel) a Complimentary note for Gorman, siating that is Inspection of tn was st isfactory and the , At another time he was quad} 1 States soldiers vosd. They were unarmed, but ftowres des 4,douvle-barreied shot gun, ti Joaded revolvers in Ns belt. He passed t ‘Who siared at bim in amazement. and h appeared in the woods, His next appearance was i's batteau in Lumber river, witnessed by ade- | Sachment of United states troups, wo Sred at him. | The ouUsw iaid down in the boat, careened it so hat ihe bottom protected bis bouy until out of @anger, and then he paddied away without even so much a6 returning tue fire. These were the only glimpses ovtained o1 Lowrey by me military fore: Bent to capture him during their campalgn of three months. and, like the Seminole Indians in Florida, the outlaws suil remain unconquered and masters of the situation. Finding the operations of the miil- Rary—s glorious inactivity—were rather too ex pen- Sive, while they but afforded amusement for the oullaws, tuey were Withdrawn; bus prior to their re oval Lowrey, \brough a messeng. A FLAG OF TRU end 4 personal meeting with General Gorman, the commander in-chies This proposition was auiy Considered; bus as there Was nuthing to be feared from a meeting with Lowrey it was agreed to, on the terms and conditions mentioned by Lowrey, Accordingly, at the stated time, General Gorman fepaired to the appointed rendezvous, where, punctual to the moment, he met the notet cnief of tie # of negro outlaws, murderers and incendiaries. the present there has been no detailed report or Stavement of the interview made by the Adjutant General, but itis known on oficial authority that Aowres Proposed TREATY OF PRACR \with the state of North Carolina on the condition that he d his gang ve wed peaceably 1 leave the United states forever, is Was the result of the Interview under the 0 o! truce, near ScuMetown, where the wives ies of the outlaws reside; but, 80 far, no action jaa oeen taken upon it. [tis @ sad commentary Sonn tbe administration of the government of openly met by nd the United Carolina—a gang of negro desperadoes defy: ite authority, not for months ora year, but now for over a period of eight yeara It is eureely pormibié that the oauaws will be sufered | Lestimony was so conflicung that the trial resulled ler the command of Adjatunt General Gorman, | | tration of the crime above detailed, about seveo These were | Perpetrating Diabolical Crimes, and the judgment was for the plaintiff there, (From the Nashville Banner, Oct. 17.) Two of the most diabolical outrages ever perpe- Mo. 188; Fhe Unites Sates vs ORUG o¢ als.—Appeal trated In @ olvilized community occurred last week | from the Court of laims,—tne appeliees obtained 8 near Shespyatite mt atins re mas . whe Poe Judgment for $163,111 for a balance due them on eC ic WI i Bed! and gunty arties two notorious m deaperadoes, | #ccount of army stores furnished to the United named Henry Williams and Samuel Gilliland. States army in the West during the months of Au- gust, September aud October, 1861, The Court ‘Miss Susan Patterson had gone a short distance from her dwelling, scarcely out of sight of it, 10 | tonng that the purchases. were lawful and valld, and m compliance with the act of March fact, wien she inet Henry Williams, woo addressed her in language of the most insulung nature. e- fore she could utter a cry for ald the villain seized 1861, and constitute valid contracts, by which her by the throat and threw her 8 the erquad. fi Inited States became lable to the defendants. She now shricked at the to; er iaogs | It is here insisted bf tlié goverment that Congress for ae In. the jt tr ba ew tig clase of cases from the jurisdiction of wh ad followed hef, pounced upon ‘ourt of Claims by the joint resolution of March and in his efforts to bite him tore a piece of clotl | 11, 1862, and that werefore the judgment below is from the right leg of his pantaloous, e ravisher, | error. But assuming that the Court pelow had juris- not being able to maanage both, as his intended vic- | diction, it 1s contended that the adjustment or this Gm was resisting with all the desperation of despair, | claim by the commission sent to St. Louis to settle Rbie the dog was harassing him with flerce and | the Fremont contracts, the satisfaction of the acts juent attacks, he jum up and attempted to | of that commission i the resolution of Congress make his escane, Tt hout having accomplished hig | and the acceptance by the claimants of the money bratal pul 4 this instant Miss Patterson’s | voted by Congress to the sam allowed consil, gave | tute an accord and faction of the claim, a Brother came SpoR the scene, immedia' abe At ran Dim into Sheidyvilie, where he was cal Fim ye while niding under the house of Mi; sone ‘alter, hams was Committed to jail, and was not only ‘tifled by Miss Patterson, bus the piece of cloth which the fait dog bad torn from his pantaloons was found to match e: UNITED STATES CiRcUIT cOU3T. Bills of Indictment, Judge Benedict sat yesterday in the United States eee eae: cae ont ea AES Cifeatt Coart, at the usual hour. The Grand Jury Gtitiand went to the house of as. Rogers and ra] Modu ener Ceres; Hee yrentated Gills “of indigs, her if any one was at home beside herself. Fright- | Ment against the following persons:— ened at iis menacing manner, she replied that she Henry v. Justice, Frond 8, Esmond and Augus- thought there were others around the house, where- { tus (, Radciife, for smuggling diamonds and con- upon he toid her that she lied; that he had been | spiring to defraud the United States. It is under- ‘watching around the house for some tine and that | stood that Radciiffe will not be prosecuted, but pro- Rot @ soul was there besiae herself, He further in- | duced as a witness azainst Justice am Esmond, tormed her that he had driven the hearse in which George Wendell, for having in his possessivn and her husband had been conveyed to his grave, and | uttering counterfeit money. that be had had his eye upon her ever since. Sus- ‘Wilttam E, Bray, for infiicting cruel and unusual Decting now what was his joul intention, Mra, Rogera | punisliment. commenced to scream, woen the fiend clutched her John ©. Berthoif, for secreting and embezzling | by the toroat, threw her to the floor, pullea out | letters trom the Post Office. a dirk and gave her to understand that Isaac S. Lanigan, the like charge. if she made any noise tt would be her death, Not- Kate Gross, uttering counterieit money. Witnstanding this murderors threat she resisted him William J. Brown, tite like charge. with ail her Qnequal strength, and, in ver strugg! Kate Gross and William J. Brown pleaded not scratched bi on the nose with her finger nails. tity. Aiter having satisfied his brutal desires Gilluand The Court assigned them counsel, and named a went to the door to see whether any one was ap- Gay for their trial. There betng no case ready for proachiug, returned, aud, with bis dirk ready to | trial, tne Court adjourned till this morning, ateleven murder his vicum Uf she made further resiatance, o'clock. jain Outraged her person and rashed out of the * Dense. Her’ brotier, John Jonnson, a constable, Amportant, Case In Baukraptcy. happen ng to come up at the time, chased the negro Before Judge Wooarut, Corn and peonent ns Rane AS, Rept cemeds In_the Matter of Borden @ Geary, Bankrupts,— aly recom peculiarly repulsive face, by the scratch upon his nose and by the shoes | TBS 1s ao important case, arising under section 33 wach he wore, they having belonged to her de- | Of the Bankrupt act, whton provides ‘that uo dts- charge shall be granted to a debtor whore assets | ceused husband. Gilliland was committed to jail at Shelbyville, and | stan not be equal to fifty per centum of the claims proved agains: hia estate.” Tne petitioners ‘Was, With Wiliiains, taken out last Savurday, to the filed thetr petition in the District Court to be | district where the outra had been perpetrated, Ip mp pe pest yh =. Caer. eS of the Peace. The magistrate not at home, f the prisoners were dewined there by EW. Raney, | declared bankrapt, and had an appraise. ment made of their property at more than fiity per centum of their Indebtedness, The assignee scid the property and it realized Icss than fifty per centum the Deputy Sherif, iu whose charge they were, uatil | dark, when the eificer started back with them to of the debts proved before him, The petitioners then appied for their discharge, contending that the Shelbyville. true value of their assets was the amount at which Not long after dark, and about three and a halt mules from Shelbyville, en ihe Tallahoma road, they they were appraised; that the difference between the appraisal and the amount realized by the were met by about five bundred iwen, none of whom, it 1s important to state here, were in disguise. The nee Was occasioned by a de‘erioration of th goods arising from their exposure after the filin Tisoners were seized by the indignant cluzeus and medistely hung toa limo of a tree. Upon their Dodies were placed placards warning no one to re- | move them until the next evening, unless by lezal authority, on pain of suaring the same fate. ‘The | ofthe petition and before the eale, and that such | Deputy Sheri, who had been directed by | toca should be borne by the creditora and not by the | the Sherif, F. F. Fonville, to take @ guard titioners, The District Court found, as matter of along, and not allow the prisoners to be harmed or | taken away from him, protested against the course of the law being interfered with, but ve and his ard had to yield to superior nambers. The nignt 80 dark and the execulion so summary that Ot ope of the avengers was rev ized, though, as before stated, none of them were disgutaed. it is sald that oue of tne negroes had been con- nected with some circas and was exceedinviy sup re and active. When his executioners had hung im up he turned a complete somersauit, caiching hold of the rope above with his feet. Some ot the citizens, however, pulled his fect down, aud finished him by aitaching to tifem several large stones, tie never kicked again. The Coroner of the county had the bodies cnt down on Sunday evening. An inquest was held, but no evidence was elicited as to the identity of the persong by whom such swift vengeance Shad been visited upon the ravishers. fact, that the assets of the bankrupts were not equal | to fifty per cent of the claims proved against (heir | estate, and held that the only erivcrion as to the value of the assets was the amount realized by | the assignee, and denied the application for a | discharge, The bankrupts brought @ petition of re- | view in the Cirentt Court, which held, Orst, that | upon & question of fact the decision of the Court | below was entitled to great weight; second. tuat the decision now sought to be reviewed was not er- Toneous; third, that upon a petition of review no collatera! questions could be raised; that every inct- | dental question arising tn the District Court must bo | | decided by that Court before the Cirenit Court contd pass thereon on a petition of review, and the decree refusing a discharge to the baukrapts was tucre- fore affirmed. Messra. Cheney and Dtxon for bankrupts; Messrs. | Seward and Fogarty for creditors. H Henry Williams was arraigned be‘ore the jury of | Interesting Question of Praciice In Bank. | the Circuit Court (fe hee some time ago, raptey. at the instance of several other negroes, on Wa ic worre 7 rd Row extgnee: charge of being ® Ku Klux, and although sone very | Richard Warren ana Baward Rowe, Asstynees posilive evidence was produced agatast him, oS E. P. Sanger & C0., 8 /The Tenth National ; Bank.—This was an action brought to set as certiin executions obtamed by the defend: against the bankrupts’ property, ‘Ihe District Court sent the case before Commissioner Osborn | to taxe the testimony, whtle the defendants de- manded a jury trial, which motion had been denied by Judge Blatchiord, Tue defendants thereupon ia his acquittal. Guilland was for some time driver of the She Ville omuibus, but resiied, at the time of the perpe- iniles from that town. It is said that on the very day he outraged Mrs. Rogers he had gone to the house of another lady with the same tutent, but that she Was fortunate euoagh to escape his clutches, Thia lady haying told of hia conduct to some of the | whites | guilty and was to-day sentenced 10 three years’ im- fied Soom of review to the Circuit Court to re- verse the order of the District Court refusing a jury trial. Judge Woodrad dismissed the petition on the ground that, even if the Circuit Court can re- view an interlocutory order before inal decree in | an equity case, itcan only be done ty appeal, aud | not by petition of review, | H. &, Tremain for defendant(s; A. Biumenstiel for | plaintim. | Notice to the Bar. } Judge Woodrum expects to be able to take up the equity calendar on Monday next, UNITED STATES DISTRICT Court. Acmiratty Cases. Wefore Judge #latchiord. J. 1. Austin vs, Schooner Enterprise.— Decree for A wagon load of Union torpedoes exploded this | libellant morning. The driver was instantly killed, and one Robert Smith va. Whitam Sparks,—This case has | of his legs blown &# distance of several hundred fect. | been om trial two days, After argument the Judge Several persons were slightly injured. The con- | decided that the jibellant was entitied to recover tents of @ saloon in the Masa were shattered. ‘the | $75 anu cosia. | torpedoes were manufactu! by Messrs, Kiuber & rar} | Goldschmidt, of New York. They were being dis- UNITED STATES COMMISSIONES'S COURT. i heignbors, one of tuem kept a Watcu over ter house Jor ‘ear he would return, Boik Wilttaws and Gilliland were a terror to the and biacks of Bedford, aud sl! reoiwe at having beea rid of their preseuce. 5 NEW ORLEANS INTELLIGENCE. Exteusive Robbery—Eity Thousand Dolines Stel n-Teryedoe Explosion—Two Itundred Causes of ‘Vorprdoes Ou Board a New Vork Bh -NEW ORLEANS, La., Oct, 19, 1871. Valle 4 Oammack’s bank box, containing about Hity thousand dollars’ worth of securities, has been stolen, charged from tue sbip George Hurlbert. Two hun- dred vases are atill on board, and the vessel will | probatly be ordered off. SENTENCE OF GOVERNMENT DEPAULTERS. Charge of Desertion from a Ship, Before Commissioner Osborn. The United States va, Thor Knudsen and anton Evensen.—The defendants, who had been seamen Bavrimone, Oct. 19, 1871. on board the Norwegian bark Brage, were brought General Richard N. Bowerman, ex-Deputy Col- bt = 7) jana deg. tad Liab fete on lector, convictea on the 7th inst., in the United | Consul, o1 iJ Oi, thas Silip Bt tBis States District Court, of embezzlement, was to- port. the ate anu the wtp wae gaan tesa, sentenced to four years’ Imprizonment in the Balti- | when they would ve put on board and taken back no city jail and to pay a fine of $2,545 72 and | to Norway. Colonel Thomas J. Wileon, ex. ity Collec! i pa PAR aio churged with embezzlement, ties bees fond Sere MAN TE Te PY Sult Agninst an Exploded Mining Company. Before Judge Freedman, Henry R. Morgan os. Franvis 8 Skiddy et al.— This is one of about forty prospective suits grow- ing out of speculations in Colorado mining stock. In January, 1*64, was organized, under the laws of | this State, the “Central Mining Company of Colo- | rado.”” In about four months the company burst up. ‘This suit is brought to recover $5,000, money patd by the plameif for stock. Itis claimed that the ieee trarie bi oh a a ae and that the my cas |, 400 feet en, Irom duty as | Love was untrue. ‘ihe derence is that ithe compeng othing at Portsmouth | was organized 1m good faith; that it was believed tue property Was aw valuable as represented. anu Prisonment in tie Baltimore city jail and to pay a De Of 45,140 and cones, NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. Pay Director Charles W. Abbot has Veen ordered duty as inspector of clothing and provisions at the Portameuth (N, H.) Navy Yard, Captain R, W. Shafeidt is detached from the com- mand of tue Wabash and placed on waiting orders; Lieutenant Commander ©. M. Bunce, from # Guty wa ordnance oMiver at Pittsbarg and placed on sick Jeave; Paymaster Georg tuapector of provisions ana BNO placed on waibng Orders | York, thatthe Doughs the stock on speciation. ‘The case is on. SUPREME COURT—CHAMBERS Dectetens. By Judge Barnard. John Green vs, Hlisha King.—Motion granted. James Donnelly vs J, Oochlistein,—Same. I the Matter of the Habeas Corpus of Mary Sultl- van.—The papers snow that the child is dead, which stops the auit. 4 In the Matter of the Application by Habeas Corpus Sor the Custody of int Thomas Grant Hatha- ‘way.—The mother is not entitled to the custody of the cbild in case. SUPERIOR COURT—SPECIAL TERM. Decisions. By Judge Jones, Charles ©, Howard vs. Henry ¥. Smith, —Order granted. Washington M. Thurman vs. Angeline @, Wielir.— Same, % James 8. Taylor vs. Francis 8, Luqueer, Jr. et al.— Same. BR. Davis Hillinger vs. Henry Degener.—Reference ordered. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—SPECHL TERM. Decisions. By Judge Robinson. Susan Winter vs. William Winter.—Judgment of Givorce granted In favor of plaintiq. In the Matter of William A, Martin.—Order 1b be referred to Nathaniel Jarvis, Jr., to take and state the account of Thomas Rome, committee, GOURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS. Charge of Wie Murder. Before Recorder Hackett, In the General Sessions yesterday afternoon the trial of Wiliam Rudd, charged with the murder of his wife, was commenced. There was no dtMcalty in obtaining a jury, for the case did not excive general public attention at the time. Assistant Dis- trict Attorney Sullivan opened the case, stating that tho accused was Indicted for kiiliug his wife, Mar- garet Rudd, on the 16th of May, by throwing her out of the window of atenement house at No. 133 Reade street. ‘The only witnesses examined for the prosecution were George Hume and William McCarty. Hume occupied the second story of a house which was separated from the rooms of the accused by an alley- way. He testified that by 1ouxing diagonally across he could see the window of the accused's apart ments. Upon the night In question; about ten o'clock, he was in bed and heard screams, folluwed by cries of “Murder” and “‘Help;’’ he burst open the shutters of Ins window aud saw the prisoner and his wife Struggling; Rudd had one arm around her neck and the other ander her lezs; Hume Tillooed to him in a loud voice to stop that, bat he paid no attention ? to the reyuest; when the witness Apgt looked the Winuow was up, but it fell down; the prisoner then put it up witht one head and held her with the otner and forced her through the window; he saw ‘him push ber and she fell; the transaction occupied turee minutes; Hume went down stairs Immediately into the area WD which the woman tell, and saw MoCarty and Officer Jol bes fren spice fet spite fie alley crying, saying, ‘‘Oh! my poor wile fell out o! the anion ” he put ms hand in his pocket and drew out a small pocket knife, but did not use it; the woman Was taken to the Chaiaoef street sta- tion house, and sbe Was groaiumJ ali the (ime; Ruqd Was arrested, M Hiute was cross-examined at great lengt>, ‘by Mr. Townsend, who sought to show, by @ cerefully pro- pared di: m of the premises, that it was impos- sible for Hume to have seen what ie swore to have witnesseed from his own window, Wiliam McCarty, a young man who lived on the ground foor of No, 135 Reade street, vestified that about ten o'clock at night he heard screaming aud cries of “Murder; Went out into the alleyway, looked up aud saw as! le between @ Man and a ‘woman in the window; she wus trying to resist, and almost immediately when ue weut out she fell from the window; sie lay upon the ground gna her feet were up.on & couple of steps; she could not speak and appeared be unconscious, McCarty hel to take her to the station house, ‘he cross-examination of this witness was not fin- ished when the Court adjourned. The Kecorder permitted the jary to go to the scene of the occur- rence in company Witn an officer, in order that they might make a personal inspection of the premises, GRAND LARCENY, Stephen A. Ogden was tried and convicted of graud larceny in stealing on the ist of July a case containing Dineteen pieces of satin, valued at $1,350, me property of Jay & Co. A porilon of tho goods Was traced to the prisoner, against whom were two other charges of larceny. Recorder Hackett im- Dosed tne full penaity, which was tive years in the State Prison, COUST CALENDARS—TO-DAY. NITED STATES DisTRioT COCRT—ADMIRALTY.— o8, 229, Willis vs. Woodbury; 72, Dunham vs. 1,265 Vitrified Pipes; 218, Brown vs, Loug; 196, Chase va, The Bark Alice Taimtor; 223, Smith vs. Bonan et al.; 140, Luce et al. vs, Steamship City of Baltimore; 217, Kiernan vs, Austin et ai; 174, New York Harbor Pro- tection Company vs. Schooner Clara; 176, Cox vs, Steam Tug Clara Clarita. SurRuME CouRt—Cuampgrs—Held py Rage In- granam.—Nos. 72, 84, 121, 143; call Special Term—Held by Judge Cardoz0.—Nos, 127, 204. Cir cult— Part 2—Heid by Juage Brady.—Nos. 1044, 1215, 2152, 2158, 2222, 227834, 2204, 2280, 2473, 2478 4g, 2522, 26264, 2546, 765, 1100, 1302, 1e34, 2454, Scepexior CoURT—TRIAL Tsku—Part 1—Held by Judge Barbour.—Nos. 649, 665, 885, 1011, 1165, 1215, 1239, 869, 797, 726, att, 1075, 671, 1193, 1208, Part 2— Heid by Judge Freedman.—Nos. 1008, 1012, 1154, 720, br! 180}4, 1212, 1z16, 1080, 116), 1234, 1244, 1246, 1250, ComMON PLEAS—TRIAL TERM—Part 1—Held by Judge Van Brunt.—Of term causes—Noa, 1400, 1161, 1184, 1071, 1078 Set Down Causes—Nos, 1636, 1723, Png 1608, 1576, 1577, 1298, 1665, 1663, 1509, 1541, 1665, 695, BROOKLYN COURTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUAT. ‘The Recent Whiskey Raid. Retore Judge Benedict. In the United States Court yesterday District At- torney Tracy commenced twenty suits for the con- demuation of the property seized by the revenue oMcers during the recent raid in “Irishtown,” ‘The property in question consists of twelve sulls, 171 barrels of rum, twenty-nine barrels of spirits and a wagon. The total value is Ostimated at about ten thousand dollars, UNITED STATES COMMISSIDIEIS’ COUIT aor Dealers Held. Commissioner Winslow. Three liquor dealers—Peter Taylor and Patrick Kernan, of Columbia street, and Michael McCor- mack, of Court and Warren streets—were before the Commissioners yesterday on the charge of violating | the revenue laws, They were hetd to awalt tie ac- | ton of the Grand Jury. SUPAEIIE Ci T—c1ncuiT. A Kaitrond’s Respousibility. Before Judge Gilbert. Envy A. Newton vs, The Utica and Black River Raiivoad Company.—The plaintiff, as assignee, brings suit to recover $743, the value of personal property alleged to have been lost or destroyed throngh the negligence of defendants. She claims that a trank containing the property was given into the charge of the company on the 4th of November, 1870, by Nataan and Barre Newton, to be taken from Alden station, N. Y., to New York city, The pie pot ‘was never delivered. Hence vhis action, he company hold that they only contracted to taxe the property as far as Utica, where it was turned over to another ratiroad to be theace taken to New Case still on, Another Action Against n Railrond Company. Daniel M. Frawiey The Fiushing and Long Jsiand Railroad Company.—The plainttff sues the company to recover damages in the sum of $20,000 for myuries recetved in December, 1870, at Winfleld. He was watking from his home across the track hen he was struck by a train, first on the hip and thén on the nead, and had one of his hips disivcated and one of his tom, He claims that in con- sequence Of these filjui,e$ he was laid up for seven months. mig . The defence 1s that the accident Was caused by the plaincif’s own negligence, Case on, CITY COUAT--CIVIL BRANCH. About a Yachs, Belore Judge McCue. Daniel J. Quigtey vs. Charles A. Cheasevororgh, ~ Plaintiff, as assignee of R. BE. Campbell, sues to re- cover $1,000, alleging that mm March, 1869, the de- fendant made an agreement with the sala Campbell to superintend the constriction of a yacht, the jatter to receive five per cent on the total cost of the yess for his services. The vessel cost $22,000, and Mr, Campbell’s bill was $1,100, He was paid $100 only, and assigned the balance of the claim to the plaintif in this case. ‘The defence is meral denial, Case still on. * CITY COURT—CPIMINAL BRANCH. Burglars sentenced, Hefore Judge McCue, Phuip Boyland, who was Indicted for breaking into the house of Mr. Robert Malcolm, i Nassau street, yesterday pleaded guilly and was sentenced 10 the State Prison for five years. Charles Ferguson, alias Spencer, stole @ quantity of dry goods from the store of Francs Ourran, 1m NEW YURXK HERALD, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1871.—TRIPLE SHEET. Myre avenne, “4 the morning of the Te inst. ‘” Tessie @ith the in is possession. a 4 Isaac Davis’ Trouble. ‘aac Davis, of No. 629 Atisatlo avenue, was in- @icied on the charge of having circulating cardg setting forth that he made # specialty of attending to cases of ladies in trouble, Yesterday eyed his Me. moved to quash the fletment on the na no offence against the statute had really been charged. The statute was Tead by [cCue. who remarked that / me and If t that he had certain Fredicints foranie as crcnoe ras commiteed.. Judge MoCue denied the motion, and the trial of the case ‘was set down for to-d: TOMBS PYL‘CE COURT. A Cashier In Dificulty Steals $300 from His Employers—45,000 Nee‘les stolen by an Employe—Robberies in the Gold Room and on Brondway in Open Day. ‘Walter F, Magee, a dashing young man twenty-six years of agé, @ resident of Rhode Island and cashier to the firm of Adriance, Robbins & Co., of 355 Broad- way, Was yesterday morning charged before Judge Dowling, by Joseph B. Lockwoou, a copartner in the concern, with defrauding them of $300 in @ very in- genious manner, The circumstances are these:— Magee has been entrusted with a certain sum cf money each day for the purpose of defraying the current expenses and making disbursements ofsmall amounts for which it would otherwise be necessary to draw checks, Mrs, FE, W. Robbins, who is the wite of William M. Robbins, one of the partners, has, it appears, an account with the frm, from Which it seems that orders for money made by her were pald. On the 81st of July iast the defendant made an entry Jn his cash book. to the effect that he had paid the avove amount of $300 to Mr. Robbins, her husband, and this was charged to her account. Tne amount was posted in the regular manner, and was not noticed until Weanesday, when the books were being regularly audited by the proprietors, When this amount was called over Mr. Robbing stated that he had never Teceived any such amount, put he would see Mrs, Robbins. This lady was consulted about it, and she unhesitatingly denied having received this sum from the hands of Magee. or that she ever author- ized such an entry. Magee was trotted to the “tapis” and an explanation was Instantly de- manded, but he could give no satisfactory account of the money, 224 subsequently averred that the money was paid. The old, old tale comes looming up in this case, Magee has been living too fast, spending a great deal but earning very litle in comparison, and, finding vankruptcy and an un- Pleasant exposé threatentng him, he employed the property of his emp ployers to extricate himself from his diMicniues, He isa young man of good educa- tion and has been brought up in a good family. He Med ‘held to answer at the General Sessions tn a PXCRRDINGLY SHARP PRACTICE. Hehry Moss, a resident in the City of Churches, has been I of what lawyers might truly term “sharphy lenry has for @ long time been in the $™\oy of W. OC. Spelman & Co,, 969 Broadway, On ‘Wednesday be was observed taking a parcel trom the ground store in the building, but at the time no one seemed to think there was aaylling wrong about that circumstance, but snortly aiter ward it was discovered that a parcel, answerins the de- seription ofthe one seen in lis possession, contain- ing 45,000 needies, had been taken away and no record left as to its destination, As the question ‘Was under agitation it was suzgested that tile trank of the man Moss should be searched, and, sure enough, the needles were discovered stowed away atone side of it. The value of the needles ts $70, Moss, at first, denied ever having seen them, but as be had the key of the trank on his person, and it being tolerably certain the ds had not been Grawn through the keyhole, however powerful a loadstone be might have had erein, 16 ‘was reasonably assumed that he had put them there with the intention of disposing of them at some future time for nis own special benefit. Juize Dow- ling told him that however smart he might be he cou!d not draw 45,000 needles by magnetic intimence from a.store to another place and force them through a Keyhole im a@ package, If such was the Case it was @ Very remarkable phenomenon, and he would refer the case to the investigation of the Grand Jury in defauli of $2,000, ROBBERY IN THE GOLD ROOM, Patrick HH. MoCarton, a tall, bunery-loocing young man, encased in portions of what was once a gray soit, was brought into court, heralded by au excited mob. Samuel J. Beebe, of No. 7 New street, stepped up to_the bench and stated that he had ba- siness inthe New York Gold Room, ani that on ‘Wednesday morning he went in there and hung up Nis overcoat worth $30 on @ hook prior to commenc- ing business and then wen: behind a railing, appa- Tentiy out of sight. At this time another gentleman named Willtam H. Olstead, of 30 Wall street, was pre- sent. McCarton was aitting there and suddealy went towards the coat, took it down off the hook, and walked away with it. The owner of the coat saw hima, a8 weil as the other gentleman, although he was under the impression he was altogether unobserved. In 8 short time he returned to his piace, he being a “runner! employed there, and then Beebe ask bimto return his coat. He became higuly indi, nant, and denied ever seeing the coat. He was co! fronted with Mr, Olatead, but still inaintained they had made a “‘great mistake.” He was asked to re- turn the article, or he would be prosecuted, but still he declined to do so, There was no doubt about his taking it, and officer Smith, of the First precinct, ‘took him into custody. The Judge asked him if he would return the coat, and he satd “No.?’ The two entlemen made aMdavits as to tne occurrence, ut When calied upon to sign Beebe said he did not ‘want ‘he trouble of @ prosecution for $30, and de- sired to withdraw the charge, but he was informed that be could not do 80; sor once having given the Prisoner into custody ‘he was in the nands of the authorivies of the State of New York. McOarton Was sent down stairs until Saturday, when he will be tried in the Court of Special Sessions. ROBBING AN EXPRESS WAGON. Henry W. Smith, of 96 Wortn strect, was driving An express wagon along Broadway Wednesday mora- ing when Chariea Heslin, of 75 Mott street, acroitly stepped up behind him and removed a case con- taming jewelry, neckties, bralis, &c., of the value of $48. He had observed that Heslin was watching his vehicle, but was not aware for what purpose his vigtlance had been exerted until he missed the pro- perty entrusted to his care, He at once went back and found Heslin in the act of opening the caso, whien he said had fallen off the truck, Of course, had he been as honest as he pretended to be he would have catiert the ariver’s attention to nis los, which would have been much easier than carrying it on to a side strect and rifling it, under the pre- tence of seeking the address of the owner, The lat- ter story was considered too thin to hold water, and he was comm:tied for trial before Judge Bed- ford in default of 00 bail. THE TREXTOY BANGER, SWAY. ACQUITTED OF A CHARGE OF FORGERY. This tria), in which Alpheas Swayze, a leading ‘Trenton stock broker, estate agent ana banker, was charged with forgery, continued until noon yester- day, When it was stopped by Chief Justice Beasley. fn a manner that has won for him the thanks of the community. It was evident daring Friday morning that there had been a conspiracy to ruin Mr. Swayze. The Chief Justice said:—In the opinion of the Court tt was little use to go any further, He would Not call on the counsel for the defence to aay any- thing, for ao sensible man would took at that case and not be satisfied. The Court was of opinion that the defendant did not commit the alleged forgery. No man in his senses could, after the evidence that nad been adduced, have any doubt on the matter, THE ALLEGATION is that Mr. Swayze, a leading business man tn Tren- ton, did take @ $1,090 nove and change ihat ito a $2,000 note. YOR WHAT PURPOSE? I have heard 0: nen forging to obtain money aad iving forged notes to raise money on, but never Before have f heard of a man forging a note and making DO use of 1t until the day it was due and jor presentation. Mr. Swayze hoops Shin note uotil the very (lay and then he puts it Into the Irenton Bank, and the interested parties were notified when the note would become due, Wa; that the action Of @ man Who had done wrong’ No man ever heard of such @ charge of forgery. WHAT 7! waa that by putting one the note Was made into a $2,000 n That, gentlemen, makes it une.” @0d did ever a man aitempt such @ Jorgery as that é THR Panties To Nol received notice, did not go 3 Vie gpk to look at the note, nor Git hey aay at that Ume That. was not a note for thal amoant, Jacob 8, arr did not go to Mr, Swayze to say earthing. about its being a forgery, but he went to iake up the $2,090, Witt four other notes, A month or so alter, when the parties were in Mr. Swayze's orfice, D. W. Titus, the endorser, said, “Swayze, that was 4 $1,000 note I en- dorsed for Jacob 8. Carr,” and yet that very nignt he gave Mr. Swayze a check for $1,009 for new siock transacifons. If Mr. Tivus knew that Mr. Swayze was @ forger Would he have done thait THE DESIGN. I may say that from the moment I saw that note ail doubt was at an end, ‘That note stated $2,000, aad it has cen fampered wiih, Can man doubt what it means after hearing what the bank officers and experts in writing have said? It means w de. sign to convict an honest ian; and perhaps the party who has done it will find ont that there is a way fo punish villany of (his kind. ‘the jury mstantly revarned a verdict of not guilty, and the Chief Jusiice orderod the prosecuvor to take charge of tue note. Mr. Swayze wept aa soon an the Verdict wan returoed aud was sur. Foundel by @ host of the best citizens, Who con- Gretulated lnm on the resuit TUE TRIAL OF BRIGHAM YOUNG, Federal Authority vs. Polyga- mic Theocracy. Pencicten Fe ul Judge McKean Overrules the Mo- tion to Quash the Indictment. On the 11th inst. Justice McKean delivered the following decision at Salt Lake City on the motion toquash the indictment against Brigham -Young, who is oberged with cohabiting with sixteem women:— The defendant is indicted for lewd an association and cohabitation with ee Under the following statute:— pals It 2 otber, lewdly and lnsciviously assoninte wad natch te ose Nagamment net exceeding tan feat end ma ae tans Be poogiony hee ‘toll ha aoe i a an one bun: Gand ofthe ‘Laws of Utah, page Bi section We The Indictment contains sixteen conn! charges as many offences, extending from ite yor 1854 to the present time, there being mo. atarnte of, imitations, The defendant moves dictment on the following grounis:— First—That in said indi it, a9 appears ‘th ri = upon the face tue ‘wish clzteen’ distinct different felonieny all a rulited at sixtens different times and pl faces, with siateen diferent th f y e fame not being diferent pura of one offence, nor, diferent statements of the same offence, or such, alleged felopies Uelog in any wise connected with each other, ‘Becomt—That each and every count of satd indictment, as. bh per upon the face thereof, js vague, secs, and In- definite in the allegation as to time when sald offences or any of them were cumult MoKkas, ©, J.—Alchough the question of selecting, summoning and impanelling the Grand Jury whi presented the indictment is not involved im the motion betore the Court, one of the counsel for the defendant saw fit in bis remarks to denounce the Jury as having been selected and impanelled in @ manner unprecedented either in Hurope or America. Had the counsel first investigate? this question he would have found that when Brigham Yo wag Governor of this Territury, and nis selected friend, Judge Snow, now one of his: counsel, sat upon the District and the Supreme Bench of the Territory, Gratd were for years selected, summoped and impanelied precisely as they ROW are. And the connsel woulu also have found that im reported cases United states Judges, even within: the have sometimes found ine State statutes inapplicable, and have ordered rocared Substantially as they are prova in this pith ta But all this “has nothing todo mitn the motion be- fore the Court, ‘The motion to quash assdils the in- dictment—not the urand Jury that found it, Let yo wrOne of te counsel for tue. defendant has rightiy, ni e counsel for fendant has said thal the Court should render such a dcouslog upo Motion as shall subserve the interests o} the public and the ments le defend: Wha are those interests ? Wet WE toes eh? Ttia id by counsel on both sides that at common law the Court might ether grant or refuse this motion, in. the exercise of a sound discretion. Many au- thorities were cited on the argament sustaining thie proposition. One of the counsel the defendante- fought to account tor the fact thas there seems ta be a preponderance of authority against the grant- ing of such motion to quash, by conjecturing thar when such motion: granted they are not often reported. He also w that this Court is not bound to respect any decisions rendered outside of this Territory, unless they be reudered by the Suprem Court of the United States. ae) Without pausing now ‘a Consider these arguments Jet us proceed to inquire what are the interests of the public and the rights of tue defendant, as in- volved in thia motion. It is unquestionably to the- Interest of tng pyniio that @ man indicted for crime, if guilty should he couvicied: if innocent, acquitted; and that too with as little delay as may be consis ‘With the rights of the accused, and with those safe- guards which experience has approved, But will it romote the interests and rights either of the pub- ic or of @n accused citizen to have many indict- ments and many trials for offences of the same class, rather than one inalctment and one trial covering the whule? The Court is bound to presume that the evidence before tae Grand Jary authorized, nay, qvired the alxteen charges contaimed im tis dictment. If, now, the Court should grant the motion of the defendant, and quash the indictment. Decause it contains these sixteen counts, the Grant Jury, which is not yet Gichseeety would be in duty bound to find sixteen new indictments. Or, if the Court should compel the prosecution to elect to go to trial on some one count only, striking out the others, then the Grand Jury would be in duty bound. to flad firteen new indictments, Thus, in either event, the defendant would be subjected to sixteen indictments aud sixteen triais, How this could pro- mote the interests and rignis either of the public or of the defendant, it is not easy to perceive, nay, it is diMeult to imagine anything more harassing and vexatious to tle deiendant. Indeed, the learned counsel forthe defendant failed to show wherein this would be auy favor to their client, Had sixtecn indictinents been found in tue first instance instead of one, could not the defendant's counsel urge, with. sresiatahle arguments, that they should be eonsoli- rn But ta there not some lezislation Nearing upon this question? By act of Congress, approved Feb- ruary 26, A. D. 1393, 16 is provided that—“When- ever there are or shall be several charges against any person or persons for the same act or transac- tion, or for two or more acts or transactions con- nected together, or for two or more acts or transac- tions of the same class of crimes or offences which. may be property joined, tastead of having several indictments, the whole may be jolned in one indict- Te- in “ment 1m separate couats; and if two or more indict. mienta shall be found in order them consolidated, What is the just construction of this statute? Notwithstanding the ingenious eiforts of one of the counsel to induce the Court to disregard the views, reasonings and opinions of other courts, stili in may prudent first to listen tw those courts and seo if their gecision he reason- abie. In the Unite? States va. Blokford, the indictment contained one hundred counts, eacn one being for a distinct felony, but of tho same class. On motion to quash, the Court refased, holding that the joinder of the distinct felonies wae warranted by the statute cited above. in the United States vs. O'Callahan the same doctrine 1s heid. These decisions are entitied to great respect, having beeu rendered by ominent J the Supreme Court of the United States and their Asso- ciate District Judges. Indeed, so obviously reasona- ble and just are they that, were the question a new one, (do not see how | could reach a diferent con- clusion. In considering the second ground of motion to ‘quash, the meaning ot two words, “associate” anc “cohabit” must be carefully kept im mind, Webster defines “associate” thas:—To join 10 company, ax a friend, companion, partisan or confederate.” * ~ * “it conveys the idea of intimate unton.’”’ He thus de@nes “cohanit:'—“To dwell or live to- gcther as husband gud wife; usually or often ap- piled to persons not legally married.” ‘The offence charged in each count could not be poe ree of any one moment or instant of time. commit such an offence? a continuous and some- what procracted pertod of time is necessary. 18 nothing in this obligation. The learned counsel for the defendant need not be assured that any motion which they may make 1m benaif o1 their client shall be patiently heard and carefuily considered Nor does the Court intend to” restric! them in their arguments, except upon ques. hions already adjudicated, wut let the counsel on both sides, and the Court also, keep constantiy in mind the ‘uocommon character of this case. The Sapreme Court of Callfornia has well sald, “Couris are bound to take notice of the political and social condition of the country whien they politically rale,”” It is thereiore proper to say that whue the case at bar {ts called “The Peopie va, Krigham Young,” its other and real tue ts “Federal Anthority yersus Polygamtc Theocracy.”” The gov- erninent of the United States, founded upon a writ- ten constitution, finds within its jurisdicuon another government—claimiug to come from God—imnperi:in tn imperio—whose policy and practice, in gr. ve ‘tienlars, are at variance with its own, The one government arrests the other In the person of itw chief, and arraigus iv at this bar. Asystem is on trial in the person of Brignain Young. Let ail con- cerned keep this lact steadily in view, aud lot that government rule without a rival which shail prove to be in the right. If the learned counsel for the defendant will adduce authorities or principles from the whole range ot jurisprudence, or from Sach crses the Court may There mental, moral or social science, proving that the polygamic practices charged in she indictment are not crimes this Vourt will at once quash this indict- ment and charge the Grand Jury to find no more of the kind, ‘The pending motion to quash ts overruled. BOARD.OF HEALTH, Important Decision—The Trade Prebibition of Forolgea Porin, At @ meeting of the Board of Health of the Health Department heid yesterday the Sanitary Committee presented tho followity report, which ee New YORK, Oot, 18, 1971 The Sesltery Commaition, to whieh won reterreu the oon. Jeet of th Wderation ot aud; e contained of we Lg 4 "e Polley, from Cron iin) sug. tee Yorks Wasbingion’ and. A. Kobii, from Ham y\, now detatued at enareeure, Tespecttuily they have heard the statements of the owners, of ve-namedl verecle, juced at sal ing your contained in the fectanin— introduction ef Rags from LIPPINGS OF COTTON AND LINEN and “cast-of” materiats of clothing collected fn the Interior towne a of Germs usin during the winier prevaliing jm an eps were w pressure and the month of Jas the oploion Of your commmiliee rays #0 gathered and baled, after slmply Trashing In water, are exiremely isable to be or become im fected with infections or CONTAGIOUS Un tly in the higheat degree dangerour u nde fn the judgment of your committre, pe “ito be janded without @ mom thor ough Eero ot sia ipotlon Under the direotion of sume competent authority. Your commit lave eg rr peed Mt ro 9 ren) ‘ally bey cargoes of ra: OF counteine where cho ralltng at ected In A 18 prevailing at the time of aucts collection, or has prevailed during the present should not be allowed to be disohanged o (78d op WF board without sim! ier disiafeuies. " a